NazareneRemnant header graphic

The Tax-Exempt Foundations

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page

The URL of this page is:  

From the Introduction to Alan B Jones' How the World Really Works  


If it takes you more than a few days to read this book, I have defeated my own purpose. That purpose is to provide a shortcut for politically astute readers to acquire the essential knowledge needed to be effective in the ongoing fight to save for our posterity the great experiment in freedom that was launched 200 years ago by our country's founders. 


I have selected and reviewed in this volume a mere handful of the many books which have been written outlining our various problems. Taken together, however, they will correctly spell out who we are really fighting, what their goals are, and what strategies they are utilizing to attain those goals. Once these matters are understood, effective counter-strategies are easy to define. Without this understanding, our efforts will continue to be aimed at symptoms rather than causes, and will continue to be insufficient, misdirected, and ineffective. 


These reviews cannot possibly cover all the detail contained in the original books themselves. They can, however, convince you that our problems are interconnected in a way that you probably never guessed, and that very few of even the most politically active people understand. I urge you to acquire these several books yourselves to help you fill in more pieces of the puzzle for yourselves. Many of the actions most needed by our society will then become obvious to you, to the benefit of us all. 




Summary of The  Tax-Exempt  Foundations  


(By William H. McIlhany, II. Pub. 1980 by Arlington House, Westport, CT.) 

(Subsidiary reference: "The Dodd Report to the Reece Committee on Foundations," by Norman Dodd. Pub. 1954 by Long House, New Canaan, CT.)

We take up this book next to flesh out the brief exposition concerning the tax-exempt foundations that appeared in The Naked Capitalist. McIlhany's book, appearing ten years later, and devoted to its one single topic, gives startling illumination to the scope of "un-American" activities undertaken by the major American tax-exempt foundations and the satellite organizations which they financially support.


McIlhany's incentive for writing this book stemmed from the abortive 1954 hearings of the House of Representatives' Special Committee to Investigate Tax Exempt Foundations, chaired by Rep. Carroll Reece. Both Carroll Quigley and Cleon Skousen have discussed the Reece hearings in their respective books, as we have reviewed above. McIlhany's approach was to obtain an extensive interview with Norman Dodd, the Research Director of the Reece Committee, to get his account of the history of that investigation, and follow it up with his own investigations and interviews with officials in the primary foundations and "accessory agencies" (as Dodd labels them) that were under investigation. We will go immediately to the major new revelations transmitted to McIlhany by Mr. Dodd.  


Following his appointment and prior to the hearings, Dodd prepared a list of questions and sent them to the major foundations. One reply he received was a call from the Carnegie Endowment for Interna­tional Peace, which resulted in an appointment with Dr. Joseph Johnson, its recently appointed president (replacing the former president, Alger Hiss). Johnson said he couldn't take the time to research and answer Dodd's questions about the organization, but would make the minute books of the foundation available to one of Dodd's staffers in their library. Dodd swiftly agreed, believing that Johnson probably did not know what might be in those records.  


He sent Kathryn Casey, the legal analyst for the Reece Committee, to examine those records, asking her to concentrate on the first years of the Endowment after 1910, and the years from 1917 to 1920. She came back shocked and upset, but having transcribed enough material for Dodd to reconstruct what she had found. In his words (pp. 60-61):  


"[In the minutes, about 1911] the trustees raised a question. And they discussed the question and the question was specific, 'Is there any means known to man more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?' And they discussed this and at the end of a year they came to the conclusion that there was no more effective means to that end known to man. So, they raised question number two, and the question was, 'How do we involve the United States in a war?'  


"And then they raised the question, 'How do we control the diplomatic machinery of the United States?' And the answer came out, 'We' must control the State Department. At this point we catch up with what we had already found out, and that was that through an agency set up by the Carnegie Endowment every high appointment in the State Department was cleared.  


"Finally, we were in a war. These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated that it would alter life and can alter life in this country. This was the date of our entry in the war; we were involved. They even had the brashness to dispatch a telegram to [President] Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly.  


"The war was over. Then the concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education. And then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, 'Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that are domestic in significance?  

We'll take it on the basis of subjects that have an international significance.' And it was agreed.  


"Then, together, they decided the key to it is the teaching of American history and they must change that. So, they then approached the most prominent of what we might call American historians at that time with the idea of getting them to alter the manner in which they presented the subject."  


The minutes further showed, says Dodd (pp. 61­62), that the Carnegie trustees, upon encountering resistance from established historians, set about "to build their own stable of kept historians, and they even got a working agreement with the Guggenheim Foun­dation to grant scholarships to their selected candidates who were seeking graduate degrees…. The extent to which the Carnegie trustees were able to build their stable of submissive historians is significant…. Though encountering resistance at first, this group succeeded gradually in capturing more influence in the American Historical Association and affiliated circles."  


McIlhany continues (p. 62), "It is important to remember that the [Carnegie] endowment supported U.S. entry into the war, not for any patriotic purpose, but so that the war would provide an excuse for, if not necessitate, Andrew Carnegie's goal of British-American regional government." He supports this allegation by quoting much earlier words from Andrew Carnegie himself, dating back to 1893 (p. 21): "Time may dispel many pleasing illusions and destroy many noble dreams, but it shall never shake my belief that the wound caused by the wholly unlooked-for and undesired separation of the mother from her child is not to bleed forever. Let men say what the will, therefore, I say that as surely as the sun in the heavens once shown upon Britain and America united, so surely is it one morning to rise, shine upon, and greet again the reunited state, the British-American union." It is thus easy to see how close Carnegie's intellectual outlook was to that of the Rhodes-Milner group, whose secret society had already been established, according to Carroll Quigley, by March, 1891.  


The foundation minutes of around 1911 ex­pressing the need to control the State Department, as noted above, were apparently written during the tenure of the first president of the endowment, Elihu Root.  Mr. Root had himself just finished a term as Teddy Roosevelt's Secretary of State from 1905 to 1908, so he was in a position to know what control of the State Department could accomplish. Later, says McIlhany (p. 61), "as a U.S. Senator and Nobel Peace Prize recipient, Root was probably the most influential trustee at this time." On August 16, 1918, he wrote to Colonel Edward Mandell House, President Wilson's advisor and alter ego, discussing the need for "an international community system" to enforce World War 1 settlement terms which were soon to be negotiated. In response, "Colonel House wrote back on August 23, telling Root that he had discussed his letter with Wilson, and that he did 'not believe there would be much difficulty in bringing our minds in harmony upon some plan' for a 'Community of Nations.'" 


This interest in the control of international relations is especially interesting in light of the second major revelation which Dodd related to McIlhany. Dodd said that in response to his request for information prior to the Reece hearings, he sought and was extended an invitation to visit Rowan Gaither, the president of the Ford Foundation. The visit took place in December 1953. Dodd said that Gaither opened the conversation with an unforgettable admission (p. 63):  


"'Of course, [Mr. Dodd,] you know that we at the executive level here were, at one time or another, active in either the OSS, the State Department, or the European Economic Administration. During those times, and without exception, we operated under directives issued by the White House. We are continuing to be guided by just such directives. Would you like to know the substance of these directives?'  


"And I said, 'Yes, Mr. Gaither, I'd like to know.'  


"'The substance was to the effect that we should make every effort to so alter life in the United States as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union.'"  


Shocked by this confession, Dodd recalls responding that, in the light of those directives, he was no longer surprised at the record of left-wing grants made by the Ford Foundation. He suggested that Mr. Gaither make those directives public, a suggestion which Gaither brushed aside, indicating that, for public consumption, his foundation was guided by the Ten Commandments, The Sermon on the Mount, the Declaration of Independence, and the U.S. Constitution.  


Thus, the thrust of the major foundations to alter life in the United States toward internationalism, expressed first in 1911 in the minutes of the Carnegie Foundation, is found substantially unchanged 42 years later as a guiding principle of the relatively new (but much wealthier) Ford Foundation.  


Dodd also related to McIlhany that about a month earlier, in November 1953, after having given a speech at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, he had been approached by Mr. Herman Edelsberg, who identified himself as an Anti-Defamation League lobbyist.  Over a drink in the hotel bar, Dodd says he got the man to open up, whereupon "he spoke of a very powerful group of men whom he represented," but implying that the ADL was only an agency for those men. McIlhany continues Dodd's story (p. 64):  


"Edelsberg said the men had some very serious problems. They had amassed so much power that it would destroy them. They should dissolve their associations, but he was sure they would not be willing to do so. Dodd well recollects what [Edelsberg] said, continuing: 'We will exercise our power and it will destroy us, but it will destroy everything else in the process…. As we exercise our power from here on out, we're going to get closer and closer to the surface, and somebody's going to get very curious and pick up the end of the string and follow the string and he's going to find himself at our door.'  


"It was obvious that Edelsberg was claiming to represent an elite far more powerful than anyone active in the ADL. He told Dodd that the strength of the group was their secrecy and their understanding of the nature of a free society. And their Achilles heel was the possibility that their efforts to cloud public under­standing in these areas might fail."  


Dodd related that, following the first day of the hearings, he was again contacted by Mr. Edelsberg, who said that he had been ordered to deliver a threat against Dodd's life. No such attempt was apparently made, however, though Dodd says that his phone was subsequently tapped, he was crudely followed, and he was subjected to a verbal attack in the October 1954 A.D.L. Bulletin.  


Before going to a discussion of the hearings themselves, let us detour to pick up a valuable suppo­sition spotted by Mr. McIlhany regarding the motiva­tions of the Rhodes-Milner group. McIlhany notes (p. 19) that Cecil Rhodes attached to his will a "Confession of Faith" which contained the following:  


"The idea gliding and dancing before our eyes like a willow – a wish at last frames itself into a plan. Why should we not join [or 'form' as other writers have interpreted Rhodes' handwriting] a secret society with but one object: the furtherance of the British Empire, for the bringing of the whole uncivilized world under British rule, for the recovery of the United States, for the making the Anglo-Saxon race but one Empire."  


Though sounding remarkably like the sentiments voiced by Andrew Carnegie, it seems a contradiction that Rhodes would attach to a public document, i.e., his will, the purposes of a secret society. The contradiction is further explored by McIlhany (p. 18):  


"This goal [of merging Great Britain and the United States] was put forth by their public organiza­tion, the Round Table Groups, organized and led by Milner after Rhodes' death in 1902. In spite of Milner's public declarations of fidelity to the interests of the British Empire, much controversy has arisen from the fact that Milner's agents were instrumental both in provoking hostilities with Germany in 1904 through the Jameson Raid in South Africa, and in assisting with the financing of the 1917 Bolshevik takeover of Russia. [E.g., see Skousen, pp. 40-41.] That the Round Table leadership in the British government and press after 1919 spearheaded the drive not only for socialism at home but also for the dismantling of the Empire around the globe has caused researchers to question what the goals of the Rhodes-Milner group really were."  


McIlhany supplies copious references to the works of these other researchers. He is clearly sug­gesting that the Pan-British oratory is little more than a cover for the real (and really secret) objective, which is to reorganize the world by socializing its governments and then merging them into one, by, for example, "altering life in the United States such as to make possible a comfortable merger with the Soviet Union," as revealed above by Rowan Gaither. This secret objective is exactly that described by Mr. Skousen in our previous review, which he summarized as follows: "[The] world hierarchy of the dynastic super-rich is out to take over the entire planet, doing it with socialistic legislation where possible, but having no reluctance to use Communist revolution where necessary."  


McIlhany then proceeds to describe the two attempts of Congress to investigate the foundations – first by the special committee of the House run by Democrat Congressman Eugene Cox of Georgia, and second by a similar committee chaired by Republican Congressman Carroll Reece of Tennessee.  


The Cox committee was formed April 4, 1952, and was required to complete its work by January 1, 1953, i.e., at the start of the next congressional session. It's motivation centered on the concern raised by the immediately preceding work of the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee which found, as McIlhany puts it (p. 35) "that much of the Roosevelt-Truman foreign policy that led to the fall of mainland China to the Communists was deliberately calculated to produce that result. The private organization which influenced or supplied so many of the State Department personnel responsible for shaping Far East policy was the American Council of the Institute of Pacific Relations. The IPR, founded in 1925, was by far the most influential source for all information about China in this country. It has already been mentioned that the Rhodes-Milner Round Table Groups supported and used the IPR as an extension of their strategy for global power. But the Senate subcommittee concluded, 'The IPR has been considered by the American Communist Party and by Soviet officials as an instrument of Communist policy, … [and] was a vehicle used by the Communists to orientate American far eastern policies toward Communist objectives.'"  


The Senate report then identified the main sources of IPR funding, the American IPR receiving, in the 26 years from 1925 through 1950, 50 percent of its total income from foundations (chiefly Rockefeller and Carnegie groups), and the International IPR receiving in the same period 77 percent of its total income from the Rockefeller and Carnegie groups and the American IPR. These funds included grants as late as 1950 of $50,000 and $60,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation to the American and the International IPR, respectively. Further, the temporary chairman of the Carnegie Foundation, John Foster Dulles, recommended in 1946 that the foundation's presidency be given to the upcoming State Department figure Alger Hiss. The board so acted in December 1946. Though evidence concerning Hiss's role as a Soviet spy was made available to Dulles a few weeks later, and though Hiss was publicly identified as a spy by Whittaker Chambers in December 1948, Hiss was not removed as the foundation president until 1950.  


These several revelations provided the momen­tum for forming the Cox committee to investigate the foundations and their apparent promotion of Communist objectives. McIlhany quotes from the House Resolution authorizing the committee study (p. 37): "The committee is authorized and directed to conduct a full and complete investigation and study of educational and philanthropic foundations and other comparable organizations which are exempt from federal income taxation … to determine which such foundations and organizations are using their resources for un-American and subversive activities or for purposes not in the interest or tradition of the United States."  


The hearings then proceeded apace, with selected testimony described by McIlhany in some detail. The time was short, however, and compilation of a report was interrupted by the unexpected death of Chairman Cox. The job was given to another, and the final report which emerged consisted of just 15 pages, lacking any significant, supported conclusions or generalizations concerning the thrust of foundation activities and grants. As McIlhany puts it (p. 49):  


"The issues discussed in the hearings were summarized for the report in the form of twelve questions. Several of these focused generally on the grants made to subversive organizations and individuals with Communist affiliations, but the report, perhaps due to the impossibility of in-depth analysis, concluded that the foundations had overwhelmingly lived up to their respective reputations as public trusts." However, he continues, "there was one angry member of the Cox committee who was disappointed by the outcome of the hearings and the very limited nature of the report. Representative B. Carroll Reece of Tennessee knew that another investigation would be necessary to tell the whole story. And, if he could help it, he was determined that the foundations were not going to get away with a whitewash."  


Carroll Reece got the continuing investigation he wanted by a House resolution passed in July 1953. The best single thing that he did in furtherance of his goal was to hire Norman Dodd as research director. Dodd's background and mentality matched the task at hand, as McIlhany makes clear in his thumb-nail biography of Dodd. McIlhany relates the following exchange in January 1954, shortly after Dodd's hiring:  


"'Norm, would you accept the premise that this country is the victim of a conspiracy?' Dodd remembers thinking for a moment and saying, 'Yes, Carroll, I'll accept that.' Then [Reece] said, 'Can you conduct this investigation in a manner which will expose it with proof?' …. Dodd agreed to conduct the research on the suggested basis of proving what they both knew was true – what had been demonstrated in the Cox Commit­tee hearings but not stated in its report – that some of the foundations were part of a totalitarian conspiracy."  


The roadblocks that were erected to first prevent, and then sidetrack, and finally to stop the Reece Committee hearings make as good a story as ever came out of Hollywood. As related by Dodd to McIlhany, Dodd received a call in February 1954, from Bob Humphreys, an officer of the Republican National Committee, who as much as ordered him to stop what he was doing. At about the same time, Rep. Wayne Hays, a Democrat minority member of the Reece Committee, told Dodd he had been contacted by President Eisenhower's congressional liaison, General Jerry Persons, who asked Hays to "throw as much of a monkey wrench into the investigation as possible." Hays said that he refused, though he had told Dodd several months earlier that he thought the investigation was nothing more than a publicity stunt on the part of Carroll Reece.  


Then when Reece called the committee members and staff to his office to discuss when the hearings should start, Rene Wormser, the committee counsel, proposed (p. 57), "Gentlemen, I recommend that the committee hold no hearings, but that you permit me to write a report and we'll let the foundations do anything they want." Reece said no, but Wormser's suggestion was consistent with the prior expressed concern felt by both Dodd and Reece that Wormser did not share their premise of a foundation conspiracy. Dodd then offered to write, and did write, a report to the committee setting out the basis upon which the committee would proceed with its work. We'll discuss that report more fully in a moment.  


On May 10, just after the first public hearing, Dodd received a death threat via Mr. Edelsberg, as previously related. Then, during the one month or so of actual hearings, Dodd and his witnesses were continuously interrupted for harangues by Wayne Hays, delaying the hearings and preventing adequate time for development of coherent causal relationships. Hays exploded on June 17 into a tirade of obscenities directed at Reece and the committee staff, immediately following which the hearings were postponed and then finally called off entirely.  


Hays subsequently apologized to Reece, but Reece did not reinstate the hearings. Dodd related to McIlhany that he was later informed that Reece did not do so because of blackmail pressure brought against Reece relating to a prior recorded charge by Washington police of his homosexual behavior in a public washroom. Dodd believed the charges to be a frame-up, but whether true or false, the hearings were dis­continued, and Dodd was prevented from bringing up the content of the Carnegie Foundation minutes which Kathryn Casey had transcribed, or the conversation he had had with Rowan Gaither of the Ford Foundation, both of which would have gotten damning evidence on the record in support of his thesis.  


McIlhany devotes about two pages (pp. 66-68) to a discussion of the Dodd Report to the Reece Committee, which we referred to above, and which we also identified as a "subsidiary reference" at the be­ginning of this chapter. For our purposes, the Dodd Report provides us with a highly important insight into the scope and power of the forces seeking to socialize our society. As the report points out, the implementa­tion of socialization actions by government, and the aggrandizement of Executive branch power, went through a revolutionary increase during FDR's first term, but with the wide acceptance of the electorate. This led to additional studies by the Reece Committee staff which indicated that such a revolution could not have been publicly accepted "unless education in the United States had been prepared in advance to endorse it." It was therefore reasonable to hypothesize that educational grants by the foundations would reflect such preparation. On this basis, the staff was directed (Dodd Report, p. 7) "to explore Foundation practices, educational procedures, and the operations of the Executive branch of the federal government since 1903 for reasonable evidence of a purposeful relationship between them." The Dodd Report continues:  


"Its ensuing studies disclosed such a relationship, and that it had existed continuously since the beginning of this 50-year period. In addition, these studies seem to give evidence of a response to our involvement in international affairs. Likewise, they seemed to reveal that grants had been made by Foundations (chiefly by Carnegie and Rockefeller) which were used to further this purpose by:  


"Directing education in the United States toward an international viewpoint and discrediting the traditions to which it [formerly] had been dedicated.  

"Training individuals and servicing agencies to render advice to the Executive branch of the federal government.  

"Decreasing the dependency of education upon the resources of the local community and freeing it from many of the natural safeguards inherent in this American tradition.  

"Changing both school and college curricula to the point where they sometimes denied the principles underlying the American way of life.  

"Financing experiments designed to determine the most effective means by which education could be pressed into service of a political nature.  


"At this point the staff became concerned with … identifying all the elements comprising the operational relationship between Foundations, education, and government, and determining the objective to which this relationship had been dedicated and the functions performed by each of its parts…. To insure these determinations being made on the basis of impersonal facts, I directed the staff to make a study of the development of American education since the turn of the century and of the trends in techniques of teaching and of development of curricula since that time. As a result, it became quite evident that this study would have to be enlarged to include the accessory agencies to which these developments and trends had been traced.  


"The work of the staff was then expanded to include an investigation of such agencies as:  


"The American Council of Learned Societies, the National Research Council, the Social Science Research Council, the American Council on Education, the National Education Association, the League for Industrial Democracy, the Progressive Education Association, the American Historical Association, the John Dewey Society, and the Anti-Defamation League."  


Dodd then proceeds to provide a sketch of each of these organizations (excepting only the ADL). The scope of their activities is awesome. Here, somewhat abbreviated, is how he describes them:  


"The American Council of Learned Societies was founded in 1919 to encourage humanistic studies, including some which today are regarded as social sciences. It is comprised of 24 constituent member associations. In its entirety, it appears to dominate this division of scholarship in the United States.  


"The National Research Council was established in 1916, originally as a preparedness measure in connection with World War 1…. [Since 1919,] on behalf of its 8 member associations, it has been devoted to the promotion of research within the most essential areas ordinarily referred to as the exact and applied sciences.  

"The Social Science Research Council was es­tablished in 1923 to advance research in the so­cial sciences. It acts as spokesman for 7 con­stituent member associations representing all of the subdivisions of this new field of knowledge, i.e., history, economics, sociology, psychology, political science, statistics, and anthropology.  

"The American Council on Education was founded in 1918 'to coordinate the services which educational institutions and organizations could contribute to the Government in the national crisis brought about by World War 1.' Starting with 14 constituent or founding organizations, this formidable and influential agency has steadily expanded until today its membership is reported to consist of:  


79 constituent members (national and regional educational associations),  

64 associate members (national organi­zations in fields related to education), and  

954 institutional members (universities, colleges, selected private school systems, educational departments of industrial concerns, voluntary associations of col­leges and universities within the states, large public libraries, etc.)  


"The National Education Association was es­tablished in 1857 to elevate character, advance the interests of the teaching profession, and to promote the cause of popular education in the United States. Broadly speaking, this powerful entity concentrates on primary and secondary schools. Its membership is reported to consist of 520,000 individuals who include in addition to teachers – superintendents, school administrators and school secretaries. It boasts that it is 'the only organization that represents or has the possibility of representing the great body of teachers in the United States,' thus inferring a monopolistic aim.  


"The League for Industrial Democracy came into being in 1905, when it was known as the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, for the purpose of awakening the intellectuals of this country to the ideas and benefits of socialism. This or­ganization might be compared to the Fabian Society of England, which was established in 1884 to spread socialism by peaceful means.  


"The Progressive Education Association was established around 1880. Since then it has been active in introducing radical ideas to education which are now being questioned by many. They include the idea that the individual must be adjusted to the group as a result of his or her educational experience, and that democracy is little more than a system for cooperative living.  


"The American Historical Association was es­tablished in 1889 to promote historical studies.  It is interesting to note that after giving careful consideration, in 1926, to the social sciences, a report was published under its auspices in 1934 which concluded that the day of the individual in the United States had come to an end and that the future would be characterized, inevitably, by some form of collectivism and an increase in the authority of the State.  


"The John Dewey Society was formed in February 1936, apparently for the two-fold pur­pose of conducting research in the field of edu­cation and promoting the educational philosophy of John Dewey…. He held that ideas were instruments, and that their truth or falsity de­pended upon whether or not they worked suc­cessfully."  


Dodd concludes: "The broad study which called our attention to the activities of these [accessory] organizations has revealed not only their support by Foundations, but has disclosed a degree of cooperation between them which they have referred to as 'an interlock,' thus indicating a concentration of influence and power. By this phrase they indicate they are bound by a common interest rather than a dependency upon a single source for capital funds. It is difficult to study their relationship without confirming this. Likewise, it is difficult to avoid the feeling that their common interest … lies in the planning and control of certain aspects of American life through a combination of the federal government and education…. In summary, our study of these entities and their relationship to each other seems to warrant the inference that they constitute a highly efficient, functioning whole. Its product is apparently an educational curriculum designed to indoctrinate the American student from matriculation to the consummation of his education. It contrasts sharply with the freedom of the individual as the cornerstone of our social structure. For this freedom, it seems to substitute the group, the will of the majority, and a centralized power to enforce this will – presumably in the interest of all."  


Dodd finishes off his report with observations, first, about the potentially pernicious effects of new government-sponsored foundations, such as the National Science Foundation, moneys to which "are so large that they dwarf Foundation contributions," and second, about the unprecedented funding and activities of the relatively new Ford Foundation, in the light of which he suggests "that the Committee give special consideration to the Ford Foundation."  


Given the insights that Dodd displayed in his report, and his intention to make them public and dig for documentary evidence backing them up, is it any wonder that those directing this targeted monolith of educational brainwashing would find ways, fair or foul, to subvert and quash the Reece Committee hearings?  


The remaining portion of McIlhany's book, comprising about two-thirds of the total book, is devoted to updating information on the activities of, primarily, the three major foundations that the Cox and Reece Committees had sought to investigate, namely those of Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford. He starts off his chapter on Carnegie by referring back to Dodd's most critical finding:  


"The reader will recall the minutes of the trustees of the endowment during its first decade and the reason they so shocked an unsuspecting staff member of the Reece Committee. Here were very powerful men, the likes of Secretary of State Elihu Root and Professor James T. Shotwell, planning in secret to push the United States into a European war so they would have the excuse of heralding the 'solution' to such conflicts in the form of a postwar League of Nations. They also began trying to influence American history teachers to push public opinion eventually in the direction of what Nicholas Murray Butler [long-time president of the endowment] called 'the international mind.'"  


McIlhany then updates the Carnegie Foundation's history and major involvements through the early 70's. He finishes the Carnegie chapter with an interview he recorded in June of 1976 with David Robinson, "the Carnegie Corporation's congenial vice-president." The conversation is fascinating, replete with key-words such as Look-Say, New Math, Day Care Council, OSHA, Teacher Tenure, Chelation, Laetrile, FDA, NAACP, Howard Roark, Gunnar Myrdal, Corp. for Public Broadcasting, Education Vouchers, Bussing, Ralph Nader, National Lawyers Guild, ACLU, CFR, and more. It's like a questioning expedition through the multitudinous shoals and tribulations which ever more tightly surround and press upon our body politic as the months and years roll by.  


Next is the Rockefeller group. A large part of McIlhany's treatment consists of a 1976 interview with John M. Knowles, MD, the then current president of the Rockefeller Foundation. Subjects covered included medicine, nutrition, child welfare, public health services, public education, planned parenthood, Austrian economics, and many other matters. His responses were rather more evasive than Mr. Robinson's, and McIlhany noted: "The overriding impression Knowles left with me was a tremendous lack of credibility." He backs this up by analyzing at some length the panegyric entitled China Diary which Knowles authored and had printed in 1976 as a Rockefeller Foundation Working Paper, following his 1975 visit to Red China in the company of a huge phalanx of CFR members and other insider elites (whom McIlhany lists), led by Cyrus Vance, at that time a Rockefeller Foundation trustee and vice chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, and soon to be Secretary of State.  


McIlhany's last major target is the Ford Foun­dation. His interviewee there turned out to be Mr. Richard Magat, the director of the Office of Reports, and a 20-year employee of the foundation. Magat started off by effectively implicating a couple of the high ranking "accessory agencies" identified by Norman Dodd:  


"One of [our ways of supporting researchers] is the general support of a discipline or field…. For example … we have, as you probably know, given a very, very large amount of money to the Woodrow Wilson Fellowship Foundation…. We do not select the individuals. So that immediately eliminates any skewing in one direction or another. Now that's true of a lot of the research we support. In fact, in terms of the numbers of individuals, that probably accounts for the great majority. So that, for example, we give funds to the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies, who support a very large amount of research in the social sciences. They make the selection and they are, you know, beyond question, reputable, even-handed…."  


The interview goes on at length, the basic matter under discussion being the paucity of grants to study free enterprise-based solutions to social problems. The fields of psychology, economics, public broadcasting, education, political advocacy, property rights, and law enforcement are among those which came under the microscope. Mr. Magat weaseled his way expertly through the bulk of these matters, admitting little that would cast a significant shadow on his employer.  


McIlhany finishes his examination of the Ford Foundation by listing and describing the immense range of causes and studies it has supported up through the mid-70's (pp. 175-187). If there is one common thread running through this massive outpouring of money and energy, it is that the federal government is therewith encouraged or enabled to expand its involvement with every problem that is brought up about which something should be done. This guiding principle is demonstrated in each of McIlhany's many listed examples, including lastly the emphasis on governmental control over environmental and energy use issues. McIlhany's concluding summation (p. 217) is:  


"That portion of the record which we have reviewed is only a small fraction of the total evidence that could be presented. Further study will surely establish not only the degree of consistency with which the foundations we have examined have promoted the growth of big government and the objective of world government, but also the fact that there are no founda­tions successfully promoting to any similar degree an individualist goal of limited government."


Though written in 1980, that statement un­doubtedly remains true today (1996). Though a few such Constitutionalist foundations do now indeed exist, it can hardly be said that their influence yet is anywhere near comparable to those which have been in existence for the last 80 years or so. Truth, however, is on our side. The question is, do we have enough time to get enough of it out to enable a return to a Constitutionalist society without the major train wreck which, as Mr. Edelsberg told Norman Dodd, "will destroy everything else in the process."  

The URL of this page is:


Share This Page
Delicious Digg Facebook Google Bookmarks Reddit Stumbleupon Yahoo My Web Blogmarks Diigo Livejournal Ma.gnolia Netvouz Newsvine Technorati Wists



• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map

The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture

The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days

The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial

The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)


So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]


Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”


[1] Dr. Greg Evenson


Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.

Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.

UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...

"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?


As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.


Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 

How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download

Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)

We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)

False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations

John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto

Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Democracy Is An Illusion

Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?

Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.

What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)

We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.


So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.


Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.


This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”


Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.

Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.

The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes

"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King,

Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.

The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.

The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book

How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)

"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."

“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)