The New World
Order Would Have
Been Impossible Without the
Institution of Democracy
Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
The URL of this page is:
Download this article as PDF File in US
Letter or A4 International size: (Right-Click and select "Save
Article #1: The Real Nature of the Statute of Westminster of 1931
Article #2: A Closer Look at Government
Article #3: Deep Corruption in the Australian Government, Judiciary and Federal Police
Article #4: The Colour of Law in Australia
Article #5: Theodor Ludwig Adorno Wrote the Beatles' Music
Article #6: From The Nameless War by Captain Ramsey
Article #7: The Business Of America Is War
Article #8: How To Control People
Article #9: Democracy Is An illusion
Article #10: Treason in Australia
Article #11: The Real Agenda of "Democracy:" The Enslavement of Humanity
Article #12: Book Review: The West Possessed
Article #13: OPINION: Where is Australia Going and Why?
Article #14: The Deepest Secrets
Article #15: Western Democracy: A Farce And A Sham
Article #16: Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika Deception)
Article #17: Who Controls Our Elections?
Article #18: Our Parliament is Rotten to the Core
Article #19: The Holding of “Extremist Views” in Our Democracy Will Not Be Tolerated.
Article #20: The Occult Technology of Power
Article #21: The Truth about Democracy, by JAH
Article #22: The 33rd Degree Freemason.
Article #23: Humanity is Satanically Possessed
Article #24: How Did We Come To Be Such Idiots?
Article #25: Information from Peter Wright, author of Spycatcher: The Candid
Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer.
Article #26: The Party Game Is Over. Stand And Fight
“Conquered states ... can be held by the
conqueror in three different ways. The first is to ruin them,
the second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person, and the third is to allow them to continue to
live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of the few [i.e.
traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror.” (Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince)
The simple fact is that it is Machiavelli's third way that has been tranformed into the sham that
is modern democracy, which has become the favoured mechanism of the money-power eilite to enslave humanity.
"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the
Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers.
Instead, the two parties should be almost
identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election
without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time
corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if
necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these thingsbut will still
pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same
policies." (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)
"Democracy in the West today is the forerunner
of Marxism, which would be inconceivable without
Democracy." (Captain Ramsay, The Nameless War. Get a free copy of The Nameless
“Regarding the political clout which they  developed, Abraham  quotes from Professor Arthur S Miller's The Secret Constitution and
the Need for Constitutional Change: 'In other words, those who formally rule take their signals and commands not
from the electorate as a body but from a small group of men (plus a few women). This group will be called the
establishment. It exists even though that existence is stoutly denied. It is one of the secrets of the American
social order [and the social order in all countries]. A second secret is the fact that the existence of the
establishment, the ruling class, is not supposed to be discussed. A third secret is implicit in what has been
said? That there is really only one political party of any consequence in the United States [and anywhere else
for that matter], one that has been called the 'Property Party.' The Republicans and the Democrats are in fact
two branches of the same (secret) party.' Abraham notes support of this view from Alvin Toffler's new book,
Power Shift, which 'identifies this consortium as the 'Invisible Party'  and agrees with Miller that partisan politics has little or no
bearing on the wielding of this all-encompassing power.’” 
 "They" are the wealthy ruling elite of the
world, and their henchmen, and henchwomen, our degenerate politicians, including our lying media, and its
willing employees (having the hide to call themselves editors, journalists, radio announcers and the like), and
corporate leaders who have sold out our peoples and our countries. They probably think that they will be spared
when the full evil of the system that is being setup is revealed for all its tawdry ugliness and evil. However,
if history is any indicator, they too will die with the people they have back-stabbed.
 Abraham is Larry Abraham, author of The
Greening: The Environmentalist's Drive For Global Power.
 You can get a comprehensive summary of this
book in Alan B Jones book, How The World Really Works.
 See chapter 21, “The Invisible Party,” of
Alvin Toffler’s 1990 work, Power Shift.
And also know well that the purpose of having two political parties to run a country is a device of
the Illuminati, who have seen this system of “democracy” installed in so many countries since 1931 (the Statute of
Westminster). Both parties are actually controlled not by the people, but by the money-power elite, to whom our
politicians actually answer. Our elections, under this demonstrable lie, are a sham in that it doesn’t really
matter who gets in, since both parties are in the pocket of the demonic host. In fact, the truth is that it would
have been impossible for the demonic host to gain control of so many nations by stealth without the institution of
democracy, and that is why the actions in Iraq, Egypt, Libya and elsewhere, seek to remove those leaders (such as
Gadaffi) who oppose the Illuminati agenda for a New World Order, and replace them with “democracy.”
A 33rd degree Freemason takes a blood oath to
serve the Order of the Gartner, and none other. The current leader of the Order of
the Garter is Queen Semiramis II, better known to the world as Queen Elizabeth II. John Winston Howard, arch
traitor to the Australian people, is a 33rd degree Freemason. His first overseas trip after becoming Australian
Prime Minister was to receive his reward of the order of the 33rd degree, and to take a blood aoth to serve only
Queen Semiramis II.
These murderers and athiests and satanists have always identified themselves by their membership in
the Fabian Societies around the world. The logo of the Fabian Society
shows a "wolf in sheep's clothing," and that is exactly what they are. Their logo is also very telling: "The
inevitability of gradualness."
Politicians are clever, deceitful and totally ruthless and evil in following their leader, Queen
Semiramis II. For example, despite that fact that the temperature of the Earth is exactly the same as it was 30
years ago, there is a movement to force the people of the world to believe in the lie of Global Warming.
John Winston Howard was ceratinly aware that it was a
lie, because he decalred himself to be an agnostic on global warming, but at the same time he carefully and systematically crafted the global
warming bureaucracy for this lie, the one that we have today, before he left office!
As David Archibald of City Beach, Western Australia, has pointed out:
"When [Howard] had control of the Senate, he did not roll back the Australian Greenhouse Office or the
Renewable Energy Target Scheme.
The last dark deed of the Howard Government was the passage of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting
Act in October 2007. This is the auditing basis of the carbon tax. His plan was to get the audutung system
bedded down, then start taxing.
Labor's carbon tax would be a couple of years behind schedule if Mr Howard had not laid the bureaucratic
foundation for it.
As we rationalists at the time found, Mr Howard had no interest in the science of climate. To his mind,
climate was serving a higher purpose, which was to bring forward the day that Australia adopted nuclear power.
As such, he was a second-rate Machiavelli. He did not trust the Australian people to make that decision for
themselves, and he did not trust his cabinet colleagues enough to tell them either.
The evil that men do lives after them, and in Mr Howard's case that is a future in which Australia does not
have a cement industry, a steel industry, oil refining, a multitude of industries and, most importantly, a
synthetic liquid fuels industry [all our vital industries were virtually spirited away to China in the dark of
night, without the Australian people knowing what was going on, and all this happened under John Winston
That is the Howard legacy that many of us are toiling mightily to avoid." (in the Letters from readers
section of New Weekly magazine, May 28, 2011, p. 11, available here: http://www.newsweekly.com.au )
John Howard was also behind the unconstitutional water grab, called the
Water Act 2007, which was nothing less than an all out
attempt to steal water from Australian farmers and communities in the Murray-Darling Basin. Since the
Australian Constitution grants responsibility to the States for water, Howard tried to override this by
inserting a number of new international treaties into the Water Act 2007. These "international treaties" were
no doubt intended to serve the interests of the international Illuminati gangsters, and they are the real
monopoly that John Howard has always served, not the Australian people.
Howard claimed that the new Act was sound in that it retained the balance between the interests of
the farmers, local communities, and the environment. But the fact emerged quite clearly that it was the environment
that was god in this supposedly balanced legislation. Australians need to wake up and study the reason why the
environment has been such a powerful player in politics over the last 20 to 30 years. The fact is that the
environment has alway been used as a wedge to drive in Draconian legislation against the best interests of the
people. (This goes back to the days of The Report From Iron Mountain,
and much has been reported about this to the global community, e.g. see The Greening.) For example, witness the new
slug of the Carbon Tax of Julia Gillard, which is based on a total lie. Yet it is being forced through by the
playing out of the so-called charade between Abbott looking to be the good guy, and Gillard playing the monster
(which she is in reality), yet both sides serve the same master. (As an aside here, if you've never read the book
Antichrist and the Green Prince, then now is the time to do
The simple fact remains to this day that the Water Act 2007 puts the interests of a
hidden group of internationa stakeholders above those of the people and communities who live and work in the
Murray-Darling Basin. It is quite telling that the latest government inquiry headed by the indepedent member for
New England, Tony Windsor, makes no
mention of removing these international treaties from the Water Act, in his
report which has just been released to the public. Until the Water Act 2007 is re-written to totally exclude
non-Australian interests, anything coming from our corrupt politcians will be totally rejected again by the farmers
and communities of the Basin.
John Howard was also in the Australian PM's
chair when the Port Arthur Massacre occurred. He was in New York
on the day of 911, and in London at the time of the
London Bombings! Being a 33rd Freemason, he
had no trouble lying to the Australian Parliament about Weapons of Mass destruction in Iraq, which saw
Australian troops being used as part of the private army of the Illuminati in both Iraq and Afghanistan, where they
remain to this day under the satanic Gillard government.
We must always keep in mind that the agenda of the enemy is to
enslave the world without the people actually being aware of it happening. But at some
critical point, which they have planned to happen, the enslavement becomes so apparent, that there is no longer any
need for deceit. At that point the real nature of these evil people will be put on the table by the most ruthless
and murderous acts the world will ever know (known anciently as "Jacob's Trouble").
While the British television series Yes Minister! was supposed to be a comedy, it was
in fact a light-hearted swipe at what actually goes on in politics. You will remember that it wasn't the PM who was
in control, but the permanent bureaucracy which actually ran the whole show. This was obvious to
The Real Nature of the Statute of Westminster of 1931
This is an excerpt from Chapter 1, "The Foundations of COUNTRIES that Never Were," of The Extortion SYSTEM of
the Ruling Elite, by Rob Hay, http://www.freedomfiles.org/extortion.pdf
"Canada was Founded on the Supremacy of God and Rule of
Law. (Yes the Supremacy of the Emperor of Rome and his Rule of Law )
There are some defacto COUNTRIES, which means that there is no lawful authority between the PERSONS and the
Government. Again I am going to focus on Canada as a model as I am most familiar with the structure. However you
can simply look at what I do and you will find similarities with other COUNTRIES. Australia for example has no
statements within it's Constitution connecting it to the Queen's Heirs and Successors.
Everything is very subtle and hidden
out in the open for the purpose of giving the Illusion that a Democracy that represents the
wishes of the people is Governing them.
In truth these Democracies are nothing more than Corporations and a Feudal System of Serfdom has been set up for
which the people have no rights or freedoms, only
privileges. They do selective enforcement of laws to give
the Illusion that the law applies to all when in fact they are robbing the people blind. The objective here
is to expose the system and fraudulent controls within that system so you can more easily see it taking place
in other COUNTRIES and situations. ...
The Statute [of Westminster] Confirms
that Canada is under Admiralty Law and not Common Law
based on the King James Bible.
... Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this Act, section seven hundred and
thirty-five and seven hundred and thirty-six of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, shall be construed as though
reference therein to the Legislature of a British possession did not include reference to the Parliament of a
... Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this Act, section four of the Colonial
Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 (which requires certain laws to be reserved for the signification of His Majesty's
pleasure or to contain a suspending clause), and so much of section seven of that Act as requires the approval of
His Majesty in Council to any rules of Court for regulating the practice and procedure of a Colonial
Court of Admiralty, shall cease to
have effect in any Dominion as from the commencement of this Act.
There you have it complete disclosure that Canada was
founded under Admiralty Law. Why is this so important? Well
Admiralty Law has but one principle, the Captain may break any
laws he/she wishes for the safety and security of the ship. However there is one problem, nobody
is at sea here and nobody is on a ship. Thus you are granted privileges not rights and freedoms.
This is common throughout the world not just CANADA or the
However they don't tell you this. Why, well you're a Slave, remember.
Although the U.K. Parliament gave up all controlling power over Canada, Schedule 17 of the Constitutional Act
reinstated section 4 of the Statute of Westminster in 1982, giving the U.K. Parliament complete and direct
control over Government of Canada. Thus those elected to Canadian Parliament
must do as they are told by the U.K. Parliament. Thus CANADA is controlled by the U.K. Parliament under Admiralty
... No Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend or be
deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act
that that Dominion has requested, and consented to, the enactment thereof.
[Note: As far as Canada is concerned, section 4 was repealed by the Constitution Act,
1982] Note they never removed the repealing of Section 2 of 1893. The QUEEN has no power. So what is going on? Who
is running the Asylum? Well no one is actually running it for then there would be someone to be held accountable,
such is the nature of a defacto Government. They Acts are merely policy manuals for the
The Statute of Westminster was put forward to show that the U.K. Parliament had no say over Canadian affairs at
all. Done just prior to the BANKRUPTCY of
CANADA and over 100 other COUNTRIES in 1933. This was done so they could
apply Talmudic Law against the FICTION PEOPLE called PERSONS and use the unsuspecting living real people
as sureties. Of course some caught
onto the scam, but the courts being Admiralty in nature gave nobody any avenue for an impartial and fair trial to
plead their case. In the United States all rulings prior to 1933 were abolished, hence rulings which agreed that
people were not PERSONS, were thrown out in one fell swoop. That's fair right? Common Law courts all over the United States were closed down and Commercial Admiralty
Merchant Courts took their place, of course the people were not told
this. Treason? Yes, beyond Treason as the Bankers seized control over the Judicial
processes, thus ensuring that they could force their will against the people. Canada never had anything but
Admiralty Merchant Courts. Thus all
laws from the inceptions of Canada are invalid and unlawful.
In essence what the Statute of Westminster was all about, was to simply decommission the ship called Canada,
listed on the British Board of Trade. Thus preparing it for the Bankruptcy that happened in 1933 to most of the
countries of the world. This was done so they could bring
forward the Babylonian Talmud as the rule of law for the
planet. Creating a world of debtors with no rights or freedoms, for which real people are
tricked into becoming the sureties for. Also enabling the Bankers to create massive wealth for themselves at the
expense of the world. Why? Because the Agenda [Nazarene Remnant
comment: this is the Grand Plan, now commonly referred to as the New
World Order, but better called the New Babylon or the
AshkenaziFourth Reich] must progress and be in place prior to 2012, which is the
end of the Mayan Callander and possibly the end of the world as we know it. However I'll leave that open to
speculation for now. Much thought by many has been put into it, however whatever is going to happen in 2012
[to find out what is going to happen in 2012, see our freely available The Real Crisis is About to Unfold and It's
Not Financial], these Ruling Elite are working hard to see to it we don't get there as free
So what was 1982 all about anyways? Well it is the Jubilee of course. Jubilees go back to the time of Ancient
Egypt where after 49 years the Slaves would get 1 year of freedom and then be re-enslaved. 1982 is 49 years after
1933. These people are seriously into Slavery and see us all as their property to use and dispose of as they wish.
As you read through this book you will discover more about this. They built those Pyramids in Jubilees the Great
Pyramid taking 3 Jubilees to build [Nazarene Remnant
comment: the Great Pyramid in Egypt was not built by the forerunners of the modern Illuminati
at all! It was built by the Eternal God!]. So what are the building now? Well they are getting you to help them
build a New World Order as announced by George Bush Senior. The New World Order is a One World Government based on
enslavement of the people for the benefit of the Ruling Elite. Thus unless you are one of them, you might want to
sit up and start taking notice of what is going on." (From The Extortion SYSTEM of the Ruling Elite, pp. 13-14.
http://www.freedomfiles.org/extortion.pdf, or here:
A Closer Look at Government
"The vision we're usually given of how political power is manifest in our society typically runs
something like this: government at the top, banking, industry, media and military, beneath, and the people
beneath this. However, an independent examination of the development of modern political power is more likely
to reveal the following arrangement: extended family banking groups at the top, government beneath,
facilitating the wishes of this hierarchy, and the media [which is owned by the 'extended family banking groups']
beneath portraying the work of the government to the people as
"democracy in action."
It can thus be seen that, in truth, most governments are little more than front organizations for the elite banking cartels. They interface with the public via the media, acting to facilitate social change in a manner
that maintains relative social stability, while ensuring that our culture stays in line with any course the
elite wish it to pursue.
Western governments do not usually allow the public to actually pick who becomes their political
representative, merely to choose between individuals selected by the party hierarchy. Neither do the public
get to pick the policies the representative will pursue, this is also under the control of the party. To say
that this system is open to abuse is a considerable understatement." (Blueprint for a Prison Planet,
by Nick Sandberg
"Conquered states ... can be held by the conqueror in three different
ways. The first is to ruin them, the second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person and the
third is to allow them to continue to live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create
in them a government of the few [i.e.
traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror." (Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince)
Deep Corruption in the Australian
Government, Judiciary and Federal Police
A true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System. Who
by? By the Australian Federal Government, Australian federal Police and various Judges and
Justice Ipp of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (now Supreme Court of New South Wales)
said in a speech on Judicial Bias in 2004 that:
“The most obvious example of a judge with a direct interest in the case is the judge who accepts
a bribe to decide in favour of one of the parties. There can be nothing more inimical to the idea of
In relation to allegations that the respondents bribed a Judicial Officer their lawyers said in
their written submissions:
“The Respondents submit that it is for the Appellant to prove his serious allegations of
bribery. Unless the Appellant can make out a prima facie case, the Respondents (through their legal
representatives) are not required to refute baseless allegations”.
Notice how they will only talk through their legal representatives and they want to see all the
evidence first. In my mind that is hardly the words of an innocent party. Just for the record the prima facie
case had well and truly been made out and the respondents knew it.
A non-fiction book about corruption in the Australian Government, Judiciary and Federal Police.
The book includes documented evidence and names names.
The Commonwealth Ombudsman, Professor John McMillan, has openly stated in an ABC Four Corners interview (October 2008) that the Australian Federal Police do
not want to know about corruption in their own department. He said he was told this directly by senior
Australian Federal Police. This in itself says there needs to be a Royal Commission. It is worth noting that
the Federal Police and the Federal Courts are all part of the Attorney General's Department. So it is no
surprise that the Federal Police do not want to know about the criminal conduct of Judges.
Just for the record on the front cover above there is a picture of the author
holding a sign saying "Justice Moore Federal Court of Australia takes bribes". The photo and others like it
were tendered as part of an affidavit in court before Justice Moore. The book has further information on the
history of the photos.
Extract Book Review by:
Taylor MBE LL.B PGCE
Book Review Editor, 'The
Surrey, United Kingdom
"This book is described as
'a true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System'. In 18 chapters
and just over 300 pages, a case is being made out that certain people are, by definition, 'corrupt' and
'taking bribes'. But it is one-sided with silence and inaction on the
"I came away from this book
with very perplexed feelings. Mr Rudd will do nothing; the Australian judiciary would never acknowledge any
form of corruption as I see it."
"But I would like to think
that the ironically named 'Love Letters' is a marker setting a future agenda for international human rights
and upholding the rules of natural justice."
It would be greatly appreciated if you would spend 5 minutes of your time and 1. Email
as many people as you can letting them know about the book and this website.2. Put a link to this site on your social networking page, e.g. Facebook and MySpace or other
news sites or blogs or use twitter 3. Buy the book (see links to bookshops on the left side of this
page) or if you can not afford to, go to your local library and ask them to buy a copy. Links to some of
the libraries that already have the book are below. 5 minutes of your time can make a big difference.
Thank you for your support.
Some of the highlights in the book are:
1. The Prime Minister Julia Gillard being party to concealing the
corruption that the book exposes.
2. The former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd turning a blind eye to the
corruption and his own criminal history.
3. Prima facie cases against a number of judicial officers for breaching
section 34 of the 1914 Crimes Act.
4. The Attorney General, Robert McClelland, trying to cover up the
corruption and caught out lying about referring the corruption to the Federal
5. The current directors of Fairfax Media being in contempt of court.
6. A current judge having a sexual relationship with one of the
respondents while the judge was hearing the matter.
7. Transcript evidence of a judicial officer lying in court in
relation to having a personal interest in the matters. When I started asking to many questions he quickly
transferred the matters to the Federal Court.
8. The fraudulent costs bill sent to the author by Freehills Lawyers on
behalf of Fairfax Media which showed criminal conduct and fraud etc. So much so that they could never enforce
9. The criminal history of a judicial officer which includes price
fixing and bribing a witness. Plus much
from the Bar Table by
NATURAL JUSTICE AND
THE NEW ‘TABLE TALK’
An appreciation by
Phillip Taylor MBE of Richmond Green Chambers
I’m always interested
in the cross section of law books depicting the working of the common law across its jurisdictions. When I came
across this curious self published work, ‘Love Letters from the Bar Table’, from Shane Dowling, who has a
certain number of ‘issues’ with the legal establishment in Australia, I thought it was worth looking at
A doctrine which is
gaining international popularity at present is called ‘judicial recusal’ where a judge stands aside (or is made
to stand aside) in certain circumstances based on the two main rules of natural justice: namely, a judge may not
act in his own cause; and both sides must be heard. New Zealand academic Grant Hammond has written a definitive
work on the current state of the law.
I think it’s a fair
comment to say that we do not have any recognised corruption within the judiciary in the United Kingdom. I, for
one, have grave reservations about the strength of any argument suggesting forms of corruption elsewhere amongst
judges because of the catastrophic constitutional implications involved.
So, what I am saying
here is that I have no idea of the rights and wrongs of Shane Dowling’s detailed case. I don’t offer an opinion
although I have read his documents and his views in the book in some detail. What I do say, however, is that I
feel the worth of this book merits some consideration in relation to the basic concepts we hold true in the
common law tradition, namely upholding rules
of natural justice.
This book is
described as ‘a true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System’. In 18
chapters and just over 300 pages, a case is being made out that certain people are, by definition, ‘corrupt’ and
‘taking bribes’. But it is one-sided with silence and inaction on the other
The problem remains
that when judicial decisions are made where one party becomes aggrieved by the outcome, the phrase ‘sour grapes’
springs to mind. I feel Dowling doesn’t suffer from sour grapes but has that other perennial, ‘being
It’s only relatively
recently in UK that judges now give interviews or sometimes reply to correspondence (through their clerks) so I
am not surprised by the tactics employed in the ‘stop (or rather ignore) Dowling’ campaign. Frankly, I doubt
whether he will ever get closure on his matter, but he raises a most important principle – that is: ‘when should a judge retire from a hearing’, or, in
other words: ‘when can we question a judge?’
I came away from this
book with very perplexed feelings. Mr Rudd will do nothing; the Australian judiciary would
never acknowledge any form of corruption as I see it; and the case for a Royal Commission (or whatever name you
want to call it in the future) is many years away, if ever it is convened, and gives any form of realistic
appraisal to be acted upon. So, what to do?
Well, Dowling has
raised the consciousness of the issue in parallel with increases in judicial recusal applications as the wider
public become more aware of the failings of judges. Frankly, it’s a can of worms with no winners on the horizon
But I would like to
think that the ironically named ‘Love Letters’ is a marker setting a future agenda for international human
rights and upholding the rules of natural justice in the tradition of a discussion on a new ‘Table Talk’ theme-
it’s a valuable contribution to the debate about how we face the future in the global discussion age of the
internet … and where judges (and politicians) will have to face up to a new agenda of jurisprudential
responsibility by answering their critics if our accepted concept of
natural justice is
The book is available here:
Library of Australia
National Museum of Australia Library
State Library of
of South Australia
University of Western Sydney
The Colour of
Law in Australia
By Sue Maynes
Every Common Law country has been battling the ever increasing surge of Government regulations,
which have been removing our ownership rights, personal and civil liberties, rights of free speech and free
will choice, that has been a key feature of our common law rights as men and women.
After the great
wars, most countries were made bankrupt. Australia in 1932. Our country was already in massive debt to the international bankers, based
in the City of London
(a 1 mile square in the centre of London dominated by banking, insurance companies, trading companies and the
like) – as they had funded much of the original early colonisation growth.
The deal was that Australia could continue
to borrow—without having to ever repay the principal—as long as the government met the interest
To do that they needed assets and the labour of the Australian
people was the only asset that could produce money.
Yet, we were free will people with the right to choose whether we would pay off a debt that was not of our
So, we were manipulated subtly but surely to agree to contract ourselves to that debt.
By our voluntary agreement to register
ourselves as assets, firstly of the government of Australia, then more securely under the corporate
government of Australia. [Nazarene Remnant comment: I'm disappointed to see that Sue Maynes has not clearly
identified the moral problem inherent in these arrangements. That is, how can I be held accountable for
arrangements that I have no knowledge of, and have been made responsible for. The answer is I cannot, because
this is a fraud perpetrated against all people. In other words, I am not bound by
these frauds morally, but in their fraudulent courts, true common or
moral law does not stand a chance.]
||The Birth Certificate: Our children
at birth – for which we are paid a fee (family allowance) to recognize our role as guardians.
||Starting a bank account.
||Tax file number.
||ACN, ABN, and Trade licences.
||Torrens Title, land registration,
At birth, each child is worth $1 million to the government –
the Birth Certificateis printed on bond paper.
At all stages of registration, your value increases allowing more borrowings.
In many US state documents, the state is not only listed as a third party to every marriage but as the primary
This voluntary and ongoing registration enters each of us in a situation where
we became contracted to the government and are “forced” to obey laws that would not apply under Common
Therefore we become subject to speeding fines, parking fines, rates, dog registration, child innoculations, etc and
when we protest, we enter the courts
as guilty people having to prove their innocence.
Where is our Common
Oh, it is still there, but as we are no longer Common Law people, having voluntarily given ourselves to the corporation
as a chattel, we cannot access it.
And because we still appear to have a Constitution, we can still get a jury trial for murder, we can still appear
to have a Monarch guarding us, we THINK we still have access to our long history of
rights, when in fact we do not.
We have what is called the Colour of Law. Looks right, but is overlaid with something completely different.
And because the only legitimate money in the world is gold and silver, which government took away from us during
the wars, we can only buy and sell with pretend money / fiat money, which
ultimately means we have not really paid for anything properly.
Are we the true parents of our children any
more? No, we simply mind them for the government,which is why they can step in and take them off us.
Do we truly own our cars? No, the manufacturer’s deed of
production is held by government, we simply get to “rent” them yearly.
Do we truly own our land? No, we hold the paper title,
but the government holds the primary title through our registering our land under Torrens title.
And Mr Kerry Shine, Minister for Justice and Member for Toowoomba in QLD stated that in a reply to a letter from a
constituent, published in the Toowoomba Chronicle August 11, when he
“Finally, in relation to Mr Patch's third enquiry (TC 25/07), Common Law land rights have not
applied to Queensland freehold land since the introduction of the Torrens Land Title system in 1861 or the
leasehold lands which are governed by the Lands Act 1994. The ‘Brigalow Corporation’ simply administers land
pursuant to this Act. This system functions effectively to protect the interest of private landholders in
This explains why we cannot get Common Law relief in a court of law, why we are constantly told the Bill of Rights
does not apply, why we have our home taken from us, when this is against common law, why government authorities
think they can trespass freely on our land and in our homes.
We have voluntarily registered our rights
[Nazarene Remnant comment: i.e. we have registered our children at birth through the Birth Certificate, and all the
other systems of registration mentioned previously in this article. But the truth is that everything in this
article has befallen on us because we have forgotten God and His Great Law, which would have protected us all
from the great evils under which we have all been subjected. But the bad news is that things are about to get
a lot worst.]
Theodor Ludwig Adorno Wrote the Beatles' Music
“It turns out that little to our knowledge the Beatles, Rolling
Stones and others didn't write those songs. A German of the Frankfurt School born September 11th 1903
named Theodor Ludwig Adorno did. Americans
never knew this and still don't. Adorno said in a German interview (w/subtitles) years ago that the combining of
political protest against the Viet Nam war with pop rock music trivialized the protest because that context makes
war and atrocities just another consumer item. War, serial killers, economic crashes become processed in the minds
of the media consumer with cartoons, sitcoms, beer and McDonalds. This is shown in a montage at the close of the
'76 movie Network too.”(Dan, a reader of Henry Makow's blog article, “Lou Dobbs Quits Cabala News Network,”
November 19, 2009. Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/lou_dobbs_leaves_cabala_news_n.html
From The Nameless
1694 — The Bank of "England" set up and the National
Debt instituted, securing for the Jew moneylenders a first charge on the taxes of England for interest on their
loans. The right to print money transferred from the Crown to this "Bank of England". (p. 83) (Also see The Imperialism of Jewish Capital)
For the significance of this act, see below.
1707 — Economic and political union forced upon
Scotland against the vote of every country and borough; the national debt foisted upon Scotland, and the royal mint
in Edinburgh suppressed. (p. 84)
From Chapter 1, The British Revolution
Chapter 1: The British Revolution
"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet
finished." (Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I
published in 1851.)
The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity, and its own
ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in one solemn bond on
the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous rumblings of Calvinism.
"The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one ... From that time and event
we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution." Isaac Disraeli
In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the
shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read this remarkable sentence:
"Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was
entirely the work of our hands."[Protocol No.3]
The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written, "Remember the British and French
revolutions, the secrets of which are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."
In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the Kingdom he had fled
from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom
now, and as soon as the stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once
more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church, the next attack would develop.
The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in the hands of
the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within.
The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the
Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the National Debt.
This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money;
converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on the
taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security
they could previously obtain.
From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the
fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which
was the birthright of the British peoples. [Note: Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by gold.
He eluded the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money Masters, therefore "Germany must be destroyed!" and Adolf
Hitler vilified down through ages so the uninformed will DEMAND their government return to the gold standard. --
The political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards forced upon
Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main
objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for
the "National Debt."
The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was that the members of
the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this state of affairs.
To provide against this, therefore, the party system was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction
and enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-established financial power to ensure that
their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from their newspapers,
pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.
Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount deposited. In other
words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold
could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger
The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight in order to make
perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become millionaires; those
who own and work the land, the Englishman and the Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably
till now, when it is nearly completed.
It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by mulcting the
rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the landed
classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on. The
From Chapter 2, The French Revolution
The main discovery that such an examination [of the nature of the French Revolution] will reveal is
The revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was the work of aliens, whose
object was to destroy everything, which had been France.
This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in high places in the 13
Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.
We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or Germans, or
Italians, or any other nationals; they were, of course, Jews.
Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :
"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of 'Great.' The secrets of its
preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.
"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.'
The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the
well-being of the world.
The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there
is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and
Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No. 1.
With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate
happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the
screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.
When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany
and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of
By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world's big financiers were
"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver stocks, that they had most of
Europe in their debt, certainly France."
So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page 38: "A change of a
fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth
and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new
standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had been given."
The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means insurmountable, except in terms
of gold: and had the King's advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France,
the position could have been fairly easily righted. As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier
after another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the international usurers.
Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and more terrible, for
debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France produced.
And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these manipulators of gold and silver, who had
succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of
... recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:
"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not been able to
satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."
"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . come begging with
No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France.
By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the movement had attained
such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of freemasonry
was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits
were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.
To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political program (for World Dominion)
wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]
By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the
direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.
In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre
had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was getting altogether too
near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be out.
At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following day dragged to the
Again let us recall Protocol 15:
"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons
who know too much."
Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew Booth on the
evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis
similar to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he had financed the Civil War.
The Business Of America Is War
By Stephen Lendman
27 June 2011
Noted trends analyst Gerald Celente said it, and it's true. In fact, America's business is war, more war, multiple
wars, permanent wars, pillaging one nation after another for wealth, power, and dominance, while homeland needs go
America never was and isn't now the "land of the free and home of the brave." In fact, it's become a "Let 'em eat
Whether or not Marie Antoinette actually said it, France's 1789-99 revolution was very real, delivering guillotine
justice, not promised "Liberte, Egalite, and Fraternite," a status now destroying what's left of American freedom,
heading for the trash bin of history if not already there.
Earlier articles discussed Washington's wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Yemen, as well as
numerous proxy ones in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and at home against Muslims, Latino immigrants, and
Combined, they represent a shocking contempt for rule of law justice, democratic values and humanity, notions now
mere artifacts long ago abandoned to advance America's imperium.
As previous articles explained, out-of-control imperialism is heading America for tyranny and ruin. In her 1951
book, "The Origins of Totalitarianism," Hannah Arendt said it's "never content to rule by
external means, namely, through the state and a machinery of violence; thanks to its peculiar ideology and the role
assigned to it in this apparatus of coercion, totalitarianism has discovered a means of dominating and terrorizing
human beings from within."
She called it dictatorship based
"(1) an elaborate ideology;
(2) a single mass party;
(4) a technologically conditioned monopoly of communication;
(5) a monopoly of weapons; (and)
(6) a centrally controlled economy."
Duplicitously called a democracy, today's America nearly qualifies:
(1) Its ideology is concentrated wealth and power.
(2) It's governed by a two-party duopoly - the money or property party, excluding alternative choices.
(3) It's the world's leading purveyor of state terrorism, waging global wars against nations, groups or
individuals, including targeted assassinations of its own citizens.
(4) Major media managed news gives it dominant (not monopoly) communication control, but efforts to subvert
Internet discourse and debate may undermine its free and open content.
(5) Corporate-run society makes it centrally controlled for bottom line priorities, excluding other choices.
In her book, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil," Arendt said crimes of state aren't
committed by fanatics or sociopaths, just "terrifyingly normal" (people)....neither perverted or sadistic....who
accepted the premises of their superiors and their state" to continue current and/or longstanding policies.
In his book, "On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," Ward Churchill agreed, explaining what he called the
"technocrats of empire," functioning as "little Eichmanns," banally serving imperial interests, no matter how
lawless or evil. They could say "no," of course, but go along to get along, including at the highest levels. For
them, it's to share spoils, no matter the harm or human misery globally.
Churchill's many books and writings discussed 500 genocidal years against America's indigenous peoples, as well as
its global imperial apparatus. Touching the right nerves persuasively, the University of Colorado disgracefully
fired him in summer 2007, a pattern repeated elsewhere against other activist professors, notably targeting Israeli
critics like Norman Finkelstein, Joel Kovel, Denis Rancourt, and Sami Al-Arian among others.
Al-Arian was also lawlessly arrested, tried, acquitted, imprisoned, brutalized, then freed, but remains under house
arrest awaiting dismissal of spurious charges against him.
Imperial America's War Machine
The empire never sleeps or tolerates anti-war activism, threatening its quest for unchallengeable "full spectrum
dominance" over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space, electromagnetic spectrum and information systems
with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary, including with nuclear weapons
September 11, 2001 served as pretext to consolidate power, destroy civil liberties and human rights, and wage
permanent wars against invented enemies for global dominance over world markets, resources, and cheap labor -
notably at home and throughout
Eurasia, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Asia at the expense of democratic freedoms and social
In its 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), the Pentagon called it the "long war." Dick Cheney said wars won't
end in our lifetime, and former CIA Director James Woolsey said America "is engaged in World War IV, and it could
continue for years....This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II
did for us."
In his 1990 address to a joint session of Congress, GHW Bush called it a "New World Order," preparing the public
for Operation Desert Storm and years of war and occupation of Iraq, perhaps knowing Serbia/Kosovo, Afghanistan, and
other targeted states would follow.
Obama is America's latest warrior president, succeeding numerous past ones, including Washington, Madison, Jackson,
Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, Wilson, F. Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush
Today's stakes, however are far greater and riskier because of Pentagon grand plans, including militarizing space
as a platform for future wars. A previous article explained, accessed through the following link:
It discussed plans to position nuclear, other state-of-the-art weapons, and delivery systems to wage multiple wars
from space anywhere on short notice. Under Obama, the policy remains in place. His May 2010 National Security
"reserve(s) the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend our nation and our interests." In other words, to
wage preemptive wars, using first-strike nuclear and other destructive weapons "to keep the American people safe
(and advance the nation's) values and ideals," pursuing unchallengeable global/space dominance, ruling by
intimidation and war, making the world safe for capital.
During the Cold War, MAD (mutually assured destruction) held both sides at bay. Today's strategy includes "more
flexible options (for) a wider range of contingencies (with weapons) to optimize performance." It means destroy an
adversary's capabilities preemptively, then target others to eliminate all challenges to US dominance.
With America on a nuclear hair-trigger, it reinvented MAD in new form, threatening potential global nuclear winter,
defined as "a long period of darkness and extreme cold that scientists predict would follow a full-scale nuclear
war, a layer of dust and smoke in the atmosphere cover(ing) the earth and block(ing) the rays of the sun, (causing)
most living organisms (to) perish."
Anti-nuclear expert Helen Caldicott says "one single failure of nuclear deterrence could end human history
(quickly). Once initiated, it would take one hour to trigger a swift, sudden end to life on this planet." Only
nuclear disarmament and abolition of nuclear weapons can stop it, what's never discussed or considered.
On January 17, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower coined the phrase "military industrial complex" in his farewell address,
"....we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military
industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
As he prepared to leave office, he could hardly imagine the difference 50 years would make, transforming fortress
America into a colossus, waging permanent global wars, spending unconscionable amounts on militarism and
threatening planetary survival in the process.
On April 17, 2010, Independent Institute analyst Robert Higgs said annual "defense-related spending greatly exceeds
the amounts budgeted by the Department of Defense," presenting FY 2009 data, the most recent figures available.
The official $636.5 billion spent way understated a growing annual total even Higgs can't fully identify, given
enormous black budgets and hidden add-ons, likely totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. What's known for FY
2009, however, in billions of dollars includes the following:
-- Department of Defense: $636.5
-- Department of Energy (nuclear weapons and environmental cleanup): $16.7
-- Department of State: $36.3
-- Department of Veterans Affairs: $95.5
-- Department of Homeland Security: $51.7
-- Department of the Treasury (for Military Retirement Fund): $54.9
-- Half of NASA's budget: $9.6
-- Net interest attributable to past-debt-financed defense outlays: $126.3
Total: $1,027.5 trillion
Moreover, the National Priorities Project's analysis of FY 2010 discretionary spending showed 62% spent for
military-related purposes, including 4% for veterans' benefits.
For FY 2012, the House approved $690.1 billion, an 8.4% increase (though below the $725 FY 2011 budget, a temporary
drop, likely compensated for with add-ons). The Senate will approve a similar amount. If the entire $1,027.5
trillion increases by the same amount, it raises known FY 2012 defense-related spending to $1,113.8 trillion.
In fact, with supplemental and hidden add-ons, as well as Pentagon, intelligence, and other unknown amounts, the
grand total likely exceeds $1.5 trillion, a figure rising most years while popular needs go begging.
Higgs also cites the unreliability of official numbers. He believes it's more accurate to take the Pentagon's basic
budget and double it because as much as 40% of it is black or hidden. Moreover, as Pentagon power grows, more
spending accrues to congressional districts. As a result, Congress willingly goes along as jobs are allegedly
created. In addition, generous campaign contributions follow - bribes to keep funding the war machine.
Congressional Affirmation of Permanent War
The current House bill, HR 1540 includes a worrisome/duplicitous Sec. 1034: Affirmation of Armed Conflict with
Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Associated Forces, affirming:
"(1) the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces and that
those entities continue to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and abroad;
(2) the President has the authority to use all necessary and appropriate force during the current armed conflict
with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public
(3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization(s), and persons, who --
(A) are part of, or are substantially supporting al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in
hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or
(B) have engaged in hostilities or have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported hostilities in aid of a
nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph (A); and
(4) the President's authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force....includes the authority to
detain belligerents, including persons described in paragraph (3), until the termination of hostilities."
In September 2001, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) for "the use of United
States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States." Still in
force today, it began the "war on terror," giving George Bush carte blanche authority to wage global wars in
violation of international and constitutional laws. A 2002 AUMF against Iraq followed.
The House (and likely the Senate) FY 2012 Defense Authorization bill affirms that authority, letting Obama as
commander and chief, wage wars anywhere at his discretion. He's taking full advantage, duplicitous congressional
On June 24, in fact, House Republicans and 70 Democrats rejected support for Obama's Libya war, but defeated a
measure to defund it. In other words, they authorized war at the same time symbolically rejecting it, exposing
their gross hypocrisy.
America's Permanent War Agenda
In inflation adjusted dollars, annual defense spending more than doubled under George Bush and keeps rising under
Obama despite growing budget cutting pressures, given a much greater national debt burden than reported.
Officially it's nearly $14.3 trillion (headed for an estimated $15.5 trillion by September 30), exceeding 100% of
GDP at that time. Omitted, however, is another $7.6 trillion owed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other government
agencies, besides future trillion dollar or more amounts added annually.
It hardly matters, given the military/industrial complex's power to demand what it wants and get it. Today, in
fact, it comprises:
-- defense, technology, energy, financial, private military contractor (PMCs), and other corporate interests;
-- America's media;
-- prominent think tanks and other pressure groups;
-- various others benefitting from militarism; and
-- the Pentagon colossus, a frightening power unto itself, threatening humanity's survival.
The Defense Department's FY 2010 Base Structure Report shows how large it's become, even with important information
DOD is the world's largest landlord with over 539,000 facilities (buildings, structures, and linear structures)
located on nearly 5,000 sites, covering more than 28 million acres and over two billion square feet of space in
America, its territories and overseas. In fact, these numbers way understate much higher totals as many Pentagon
facilities are secret and/or unreported.
They include over 1,000 overseas bases in 150 or more countries, as well as additional secret ones shared with or
leased from host countries. As of April 2009, Congressional Research Service data includes 1,402,000 total active
duty US military personnel worldwide, 73,000 National Guard, and 208,000 Selected Reserves, for a 1,683,000
Add to them America's private military contractor (PMC) army, corporate mercenaries profiting from US imperialism.
They perform a wide range of functions from combat to consulting to logistics, virtually anything once done by the
Pentagon. Moreover, America's intelligence agencies, State Department, Homeland Security, and other branches also
Overall, they're unregulated, unaccountable, and often out-of-control, involved in some of the most controversial
aspects of war from over-billing to ritual slaughter of unarmed civilians. Yet they're not prosecuted, convicted or
imprisoned, just rewarded with fat contracts costing far more for services military personnel once performed.
Moreover, the more they're used, the greater they influence war making, sustaining their bottom line priorities at
the expense of a free society and vital homeland needs.
America's New Military Industrial Complex
On March 1, 2003 Business 2.0 magazine writers Ian Mount, Matthew Maier and David Freedman headlined, "The New
Military Industrial Complex" for digital age war, describing the Pentagon's "revolution in military affairs (RMA),"
comprised of "faster, lighter, smarter" cutting-edge technology warfare. Readying for it, they're building an
unchallengeable high-tech arsenal, more advanced now than then.
The old one remains and gets huge contracts for new and more traditional weapons. The result is an influential
"iron triangle" of Congress, the Pentagon and defense industry. Besides major media support, conservative think
tanks also like:
-- the Project for a New American Century (PNAC); its "Rebuilding America's Defenses" scheme promotes US global
-- the Center for Security Policy (CSP) headed by super-hawk Frank Gaffney endorses a policy of "Peace through
Strength" and perpetual wars for perpetual peace;
-- the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) composed of hard right leaders and members, "fighting terrorism and
the ideologies that drive it;"
-- the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP), focusing on defense issues, tied to the nuclear weapons
-- the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), emphasizing national security and "advancing (US)
global interests;" specializing in crisis management, it's connected to the highest levels in government and the
The nation's 16 intelligence agencies, including CIA, NSA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), FBI, Army, Navy and
Air Force Intelligence, DHS (Department of Homeland Security), and Department of State comprise another component
destroying a free society. They comprise a multi-billion dollar funded, largely off-the-books, clandestine
anti-democratic network. Interconnected with thousands of private contractors, they're tied to world governments
and their intelligence services.
Moreover, they comprise a government/military/industrial/intelligence service/media/think tank colossus, waging
global wars, bankrupting the nation, wrecking the remnants of a free society. Plagued by the same dynamic that
doomed past empires unwilling to change, they also pursue the misguided notion that militarism sustains growth.
In fact, it erodes it by sacrificing industrial America, shifting production and other high-paying service
operations abroad to focus on war making. As a result, essential homeland needs go begging, including healthcare,
education, job creation, and the nation's infrastructure, crumbling from years of neglect.
In his farewell address, Eisenhower said:
"Every gun that is made, every war ship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from
those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and not clothed."
In his November 2003 Harper's article titled, "The War Business," Chalmers Johnson said:
"(M)unitions and war profiteering have (become) the most efficient means for well-connected capitalists to engorge
themselves at the public trough." Even Wall Street profits hugely. "To call these companies 'private,' though, is
mere ideology. (Weapons and) munitions making in the United States today (and related industries profiting from
them are) not really private enterprise. It is state socialism."
They also destroy constitutional freedoms, what George Washington in 1796 warned about, saying "overgrown military
establishments (are) inauspicious to liberty." Johnson called it America's future, now more the present, saying,
"When war becomes the most profitable course of action, we can certainly expect more of it," sacrificing a free
society for private interests reaping short-term gains.
In his book titled, "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War," Andrew Bacevich discussed America's
"trinity," its global military presence, power projection, and intervention, creating a "permanent national
security crisis....propell(ing) the United States into a condition approximating perpetual war." However, "(no)
evidence exists - none - to suggest that US efforts advance the cause of global peace," just the opposite. As a
result, "(o)ver the horizon, a shipwreck of epic proportions awaits."
It's coming perhaps when least expected. Nations that live by the sword, die by it. America is no exception, nor
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at email@example.com.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests
on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays
and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
How To Control People
Monday, 8 January 2001
How To Control People by Charley Reese http://disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/149495.html
The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred.
Here are a few tips on how smart people can control other
people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!
The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling
them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would
then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.
It is easier than you think to control people indirectly,to manipulate them into
thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.
One basic technique is to keep them
ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or
restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans. The indirect approach is
to control the education they receive.
It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer,
businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time
be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational
training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while
at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.
The most obvious symptom is their absence of original
thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or
thought the answer was. What do they think? Well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite
That greatly simplifies things for the controller because with lots of money, university
endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as
authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.
Another technique is to keep them
entertained. Roman emperors did not stage circuses and gladiator contests because they
didn't have television. We have television because we don't have circuses and gladiator events. Either way, the
purpose is to keep the people's minds focused on entertainment, sports, and peripheral political issues. This way
you won't have to worry that they will ever figure out the real issues that allow you to control them.
Just as a truly educated person is difficult to
control, so too is an economically independent person. Therefore, you want to create
conditions that will produce people who work for wages, since wage earners have little control over their economic
destiny. You'll also want to control the monetary, credit, and banking systems. This will allow you to inflate the
currency and make it next to impossible for wage earners to accumulate capital. You can also cause periodic
deflation to collapse the family businesses, family farms, and entrepreneurs, including independent community
To keep trade unions under control, you just promote a scheme that allows you to
shift production jobs out of the country and bring back the
products as imports (it is called free trade). This way you will end up with no unions or docile
Another technique is to buy both political
parties so that after a while people will feel that no matter whether they vote for
Candidate A or Candidate B, they will get the same policies. This will create
great apathy and a belief that the political process is useless for effecting real change.
Pretty soon you will have a population that feels completely helpless, and thinks the bad things happening to them are
nobody in particular's fault, just a result of global forces or evolution or some other
disembodied abstract concept. If necessary, you can offer scapegoats.
Then you can bleed them dry without having to worry overly much that one of them will sneak into
your house one night and cut your throat. If you do it right, they won't even know whose throat they are
Charley Reese E-mail: OSOreese@aol.com
What you do with this article now that you have read it ... Is up to you.
Sales Tax School Tax Liquor Tax Luxury Tax Excise Taxes Property Tax Cigarette Tax Medicare Tax
Inventory Tax Real Estate Tax Well Permit Tax Fuel Permit Tax Inheritance Tax Road Usage Tax CDL license Tax
Dog License Tax State Income Tax Food License Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Gross Receipts Tax Social Security Tax
Service Charge Tax Fishing License Tax Federal Income Tax Building Permit Tax IRS Interest Charges Hunting
License Tax Marriage License Tax Corporate Income Tax Personal Property Tax Accounts Receivable Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax Workers Compensation Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone State and Local Tax IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) State Unemployment
Tax (SUTA) Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Federal Universal
Service Fee Tax Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon) Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Don’t forget Income Tax Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most
prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom
stayed home to raise the kids.
What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians? ' I hope this goes around THE WORLD at least
1000 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!! GO AHEAD - - - BE FREE!!!
Democracy Is An
By Henry Makow, Ph.D
August 20, 2005
A "Far Side" cartoon describes our innocence about democracy.
A slave rowing a Viking ship puts up his hand and calls to the whip master: "Yoo-hoo! Oh, yoo-hoo... I think
I'm getting a blister."
Like this man, most people cling to the belief that our leaders represent our interests.
"Yoo, hoo, Mr. Bush, you lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction."
At an elite gathering, Bush peered under his lectern and quipped: "Where are those weapons of mass
A tiny cabal of international bankers chooses our "leaders". This clique, which subtly controls every significant
facet of our society is gradually establishing an Orwellian global police state. Much of the ruling class has been
duped to think they are building a better world.
Prove it, you say?
"The Naked Capitalist" by W.C. Skousen (available at www.abe.com and www.bookfinder.com) is yet
another smoking gun. It is based on the revelations contained in Professor Carroll Quiqley's "Tragedy and Hope: A
History of the World in Our Time." (1966)
Quiqley, a Professor of History at the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University was
a trusted insider who had access to their private archives. He felt the plot, which he supported, was too important
to be kept hidden. However, shortly after publication, his book was taken off the market.
Cleon Skoussen was an FBI agent for 16 years and the Police Chief of Salt Lake City for four
years. His "The Naked Capitalist" distills the most shocking evidence from Quigley's daunting 1300-page book.
At just 122 pages, "The Naked Capitalist" (1970) is a concise, lucid and absolutely convincing account of the
international banker conspiracy. Historians have betrayed the
public trust by largely ignoring this material.
Quigley confirms that a network of banking dynasties has, in Skousen's words, "acquired a choke-hold on the
affairs of practically the entire human race." According to Quigley, they include "Baring, Lazard, Erlanger,
Warburg, Schroder, Selingman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Malet, and above all Rothschild and Morgan." (Citations are
from Tragedy and Hope, 51-52)
Quigley confirms that, starting with the Bank of England in 1694, these dynasties organized themselves in a system
of central banks that charge their respective nations billions of dollars in interest for the privilege of using
currency backed by the nations' own credit. In other words, they have carried off a swindle of monstrous
Quigley quotes William Gladstone who as Chancellor of the Exchequer said in 1852: "The government itself was not to
be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." (325)
This power of the Bank of England. . . was admitted by most qualified observers. In January, 1924, Reginald
McKenna. . . as chairman of the board of the Midland Bank, told its stockholders: 'I am afraid the ordinary citizen
will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money. . . . And they who control the credit of the
nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.'" 
Able to create money out of nothing [dubbed the "Mandrake
Mechanism" by G Edward Griffin], they naturally grabbed as much of the world's real
wealth as they could. Quigley writes about the formation of their American cartels: "The period 1884-1933 was the
period of financial capitalism in which investment bankers moving into commercial banking and insurance on the one
side, and into railroading and heavy industry on the other were able to mobilize enormous wealth and wield enormous
economic, political and social power." (71)
"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one
perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic
thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost
identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election
without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in
office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be
possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will
be none of these things but will
still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same
policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and
Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)
Indeed their representatives, the "Eastern
Establishment" i.e. the Morgans and now the Rockefellers run the United States. (72) The
principle mechanism is the Council on Foreign Relations.
According to Quigley, the ultimate goal is "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in
private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled ...by the central banks...acting in concert." (324)
Quigley confirms that the bankers have usurped mankind's collective instincts by financing the Socialist and
Communist movements. Bankers love big government because the ultimate monopoly is the State. Through it, they take
over their competition and control debt, resources, market demand and labor.
Speaking of the Communist takeover of the US government in the 1930's and 1940's, Quigley writes, "it must be
understood that the power that these energetic left-wingers exercised was never their own power of Communist power
but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie." (954)
In other words, millions of idealists committed to human
brotherhood and equality were (and are) duped into advancing a totalitarian scheme to concentrate the world's
wealth and power into the hands of the superrich. More opportunistic Leftists, Communists, Feminists and Globalists
prosper while piously pretending to serve humanity.
The Money Power controls the debate and encourages gridlock by backing all shades of the political spectrum and
marginalizing anyone who shines the spotlight on them. (Ever wonder why the word "Rothschild" has never crossed
Noam Chomsky's lips? Or why the John Birch Society debunks the obvious fact that 9-11 was an "inside job?") The
media is controlled through direct ownership and advertising.
Quigley writes: "To Morgan all political parties were simply organizations to be used, and the firm always was
careful to keep a foot in all camps. Morgan himself, Dwight Morrow and other partners were allied with the
Republicans; Russell C. Lewffingwell was allied with the Democrats; Grayson Murphy was allied with the extreme
Right; and Thomas W. Lamont was allied with the Left." (945)
The Lamont family was "sponsors and financial angels to almost a score of extreme Left organizations including the
Communist Party itself." (945)
A small cabal of people who are not even citizens hold the
financial purse strings of every nation.
This goes a long way to explaining "globalization" and the push to one-world government. It explains the assault on
race, religion, nation and family. The bankers want a homogenous deracinated neutered world that offers no basis of
It explains why in a time of supposed security danger, the southern border of the US is practically porous. The
bankers want to undermine America's European character, which it perceives as a threat.
It explains the carte blanche Israel receives, the war on Iraq, and the fact that there is no opposition to the war
in the mainstream parties or press. This war desecrates a cradle of civilization and assails Islam. It is also an
opportunity to create more debt and enrich the bankers and their corporate allies.
It explains 9-11, the Patriot Repression Act and the phony "War on Terror."
It explains the depraved mass media and stupefying education system. I could go on but you get the picture. We are
krill at the mercy of a gigantic whale. At the very least, let's not waste energy thinking we live in a free and
Our democracy is a ruse. Ostensibly
it expresses the aspirations of the people. In reality, it masks the insidious anti-human agenda of the central
"The less people know about
what is really going on, the easier it is to wield power
(Charles, Prince of Wales)
Comments for "Democracy is an
John from Dublin said (August 24, 2005):
firstly would like to congratulate you on your piece entitled ?Democracy is an Illusion? Your work is an eye opener
for humanity and for those who will listen to you it is even more important its a breathe of fresh air.
I am sick of trying to convince people what is going on but they are so locked into their own matrix they will
I want to bring something to your attention have you watched a DVD called The Money Masters?
If not then I suggest you go to http://www.themoneymasters.com/ and order it as you will love it.
It is a presentation by an American Professor very detailed factual information.
Nancy from Iowa said (August 24, 2005):
So what do you propose that we do about this?? I am a 57-year-old grandmother with a bad knee who can barely get
through the day. I also have a severe loss of cartilage in my neck. I am an honest and decent citizen who tries to
live by the golden rule. I have five precious grandchildren who deserve a chance at a decent life. My mother is a
recent widow who is crippled and needs my assistance as often as possible. What on earth can someone in my position
do to make this world safer and better for the next generation? Is there any hope...or should I just take some
extra sleeping pills and forget it. I try to pass on articles like yours, but people just get mad at me and tell me
that I need to "get off the internet" and get a hobby. ~Nancy from Iowa
I would ignore these problems and concentrate on nurturing those around you and projecting a positive happy energy.
We all can serve in different ways.
Gail said (August 24, 2005):
Right on! Thank you for the courage to share what needs to be shared. I wish that I did not have to agree with you.
Alas, reality is what it is.
If you see Svali,
tell her I owe her a debt of gratitude. I affirm everything she has written. Please tell her that SHE IS A GIFT TO
HUMANITY. She is also a gift to me personally. No one could have affirmed my reality except one who has been
Bless you both forever. To God be the Glory.
Pete said (August 23, 2005):
Have just sent your article about lack of democracy to my wife to photocopy it so I can give it to my friends.
You write some good stuff which has lost me a friend, but that?s no problem to me?.. there are bigger things at
Please keep writing and opening eyes to true spiritual realities behind the scenes.
Michael (Houston) said (August 23, 2005):
We en masse seem to suffer the paradoxical "...infirmity of will"
....Ralph Waldo Emerson, Compensation and Self Reliance...as quoted in text
here.... "Discontent is the want of self reliance. It is infirmity of will."....
Robert said (August 22, 2005):
"The Whale & The Krill" sounds like the title for one of Aesop's fables. Alas, not.
I believe you have revealed the Elite's grand design, the complete submersion of the caucasian
"masses", which to my disappointment would include fine intellectuals like you and Norm Finkelstein, charming
Ashkenazis though you may well be, but surely thorns in the Zionist bottom.
The Elites have caused the "visible" managements of Western nations and the US to roll out their
red carpets, though there will be some self-serving deceitful high-level handwringing about "invaders". By grand
design, Great Britain and The Netherlands will soon be Muslim countries.
While, here in the US we already have Hispanics as over 50% of the populations in 4 states, with
more to come swiftly thanks to unlimited border crossing and rampant reproduction, which is bound to ensue if you
put twelve hot-blooded mixed illegals in one motel room in the dark with no working television.
A nearly brain-dead, anxious and distracted population has made little reaction to the expressed
intention of the Hispanics to dominate the entire Country.
"Depraved mass media" and "stupefying education". You're right. You could go on and on. Oppressive
fascist oligarchy covers most of it all for me.
More complete understanding arrives when you consider the dismal character and low intelligence of
the President who the Elites managed to illegally install twice in a row. Talk about utter contempt for the
Well, it could be worse. The poor Britains will soon be at risk of losing cherished body parts
under strict Moslem fundamentalist law, while hopefully I'll be condemned to something more Napoleonic, with the
possibility of wanton women bringing themselves and wine to my comfortable cell now and then in order to improve my
And, to think several years ago I was about to enroll in a Cantonese language class. Tough to keep
up those bad boys.
Alan (Newcastle, UK) said (August 22, 2005):
You have noticed the madness.
Debt emasculates the borrower and empowers the lender ? it?s a simple equation.
The credit free-for-all of the last 7 years is so exceptional in its
magnitude and so globally pervasive in its reach, that suspicion about the banking industry?s real motives must be
Debt levels are not just high, they are preposterously so, and the
socio-economic profiles of many borrowers are historically unparalleled and simply don?t make sense without
reverting to ?conspiracy? as an explanation.
Student debt for example is anomalous. Suddenly, under-achieving kids who can barely string a sentence together are
getting outstanding A-grades in Advanced level papers and getting places in some of the UK?s top universities. It
just doesn?t make sense without proposing that debt is driving it.
What?s more, irresponsible lending has reached levels of absurdity that are making newspaper column inches
internationally. When infirm and economically inactive pensioners are being offered loans they could never dream of
paying off, alarm bells should start ringing.
I can only conclude the scam is precursor to a terrifying calamity being prepared for humanity with debt as the
means by which social control can continue to be wielded.
These past few years of seemingly unending prosperity (built on debt) have been enough to get the people hooked on
pleasure, so much so that they will do anything to continue getting their fix, even if it means selling their
A short period of banker-inspired austerity either through war, economic collapse or probably both, will get the
people clamouring to have their luxury appetites slaked once again. They will scream out for a ?saviour? who will
wipe their slate clean with the only condition being they are signed up to an innovative new cashless banking
system requiring the insertion of a micro-chip for their own protection and security. For more details see
John said (August 22, 2005):
I'm a longtime fan, and simply must congratulate you on your latest article, so short, so sweet, so true!
I'm also a longtime reader of Lew Rockwell's daily postings, and subscribe to the libertarian
viewpoint. But your article made me wonder. You mention that the banking cartel make sure they have influence in
all camps but marginalise anyone who points the searchlight at the cartel itself. You point out, for instance, that
Chomsky makes sure never to commit this cardinal error. Well, this is true of LRC, too. I've been waiting for
articles pointing the finger at Zionism, or at the international bankers, but all you ever get is a celebration of
'the free market'. Fair enough, in that 'freedom' is the primary issue where libertarianism is concerned. But what
about the 'freedom' to conspire, to monopolise, to dominate, etc? Lew Rockwell simply never lets this question
Libertarians rightly point out that the traditional left-right split in politics is a sham, and
that all parties along this axis promote centralised state power as against the freedom of the individual. They
posit a vertical alternative to the conventional horizontal axis. This altenative is based on the issue of
individual freedom versus the power of the state. On this axis, all tradition politicians, and politics in general,
rank extremely low, while libertarianism and anarchism rank extremely high. At this level of thought, there is
tremendous debate about how far you can reduce the size of intrusive government. There are 'minarchists' who
propose a minimal state, and 'anarchists' who propose the complete absence of state power.
Anarchists say that any minarchist state will inevitably attract
power-hungry politicians and end up as a monster. Take the USA, founded as a minimal state and ending up as it is
now, a maximal one (despite the supposed protections of the constitution and Bill of Rights).
Lew Rockwell's libertarianism is primarily concerned with money and property. Capitalism is
defended, since it is an intrinsic feature of a free market. But what if a cartel of capitalists pretty much own
all the major world governments? Then, state coercion can be used to promote the interests of monopoly capitalists
and bankers, and individual freedom is inevitable diminished. News media can be owned or suborned and used as
propaganda tools on behalf of the ruling elite. University and research funding can be used to suppress any
knowledge dangerous to the controllers.
So now I ask: are Chomsky and Rockwell dupes or, even worse, red-herring merchants?
I could go on, but I'll leave it there and thank you again for an inspiring article.
Chomsky knows that he would not be working at MIT if he mentioned the Rothschilds. Whether he is an active agent I
don't know. As for Lew R, if he isn't making $, he probably just has a limited view.
Carlos said (August 22, 2005):
"When is America going to wake up?"
I think America will not wake up because so many
people are on medication. When people have a personal crisis in this country they allow "health care professionals"
to convince them they need pharmaceutical, synthetic, chemical drugs to help them cope. In reality, they need the
nutrients no longer in the soil, hence, no longer in the food. They need the toxins removed from the air and
Everyone is suffering from a biochemical imbalance. I believe all of this is not the doing of governmental bumbling
idiots, morons, misguided and misled public servants, it's intentional. That's the only way it makes sense.
People become agitated by the complete lack of common sense in what they see happening. They must play political
games to keep their jobs. They must sell out their fellow man to retain the lifestyle to which they have become
Martin said (August 22, 2005):
Mr. Makow, Thank you for your brilliant observations. Our supposedly enlighten society has no clue. We have never
been a nation of free people. The power/money mongers play with us as if we were a board game. They have all the
power and money they want. Playing the game gives them the ultimate satisfaction. When they tire of toying with us,
they will let us implode.
Brian said (August 21, 2005):
Sir a great article,I only wish that the majority of Americans would understand this,I know this,and have lost most
of my friends and family for even talking about the Illuminat and new world order and how our country is more
communist than free,Bush needs another 911 attack and we will have martial law,there goes the consititution out the
Its now Bush this dumb ass is only a stooge for the intl bankers,zionists,and secret satantic masons.I as a 62 yr
old vietnam vet,know the lies of all wars,which are caused by bankers and war profiteers and etc,since the begining
Thanks again and God Bless you for your work,they will one day come for us,who talk like this,I got plenty of ammo
and still a good shot,as asshole bush says bring em on.
Mario said (August 20, 2005):
Frank Zappa once said that when the illusion of democracy and freedom stop being profitable in Amereeka, all
the props will be thrown aside, the curtain will rise and you will see a huge brick wall. You seem to echo
those very same thoughts and thats why Im starting to respect you Dr. Makow. Most people seem to forget that
The US is a republic with democratic principles. I dont hate America, but I do despise the corrupt
scum that run the government. Good day
Dian said (August 20, 2005):
Smoking gun, you say, Henry?
The challenge of pointing to "the smoking gun" these days is best answered with a question: "Which one would
you like to see first?"
Pavlov (Australia) said (August 20, 2005):
How succinctly you put it, Henry. You're selling wake-up pills to the masses. I wonder if they will be able to
afford to pay for them. I know that you might say that they can't afford to be without them. I think the truth is
that their spiritual poverty certainly threatens to consume them. Still, having legs to do so, one must stand up in
the face of the devil. Carry on!
Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way To Go For a
Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of
Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Henry Makow © 2007
Treason in Australia
"Treason: the simple definition of treason is betrayal of one's own country to an alient
Chambers Dictionary: 'betraying of the government or an attempt to overthrow it: treachery:
There seems to be clear evidence of conspiracy on the part of the main Australian political parties
to overthrow constitutional government and place our nation under the control of an alien power, namely
international socialism as administered through the United Nations Organisation." 
"Our OWN government" is making us subordinate to socialist world government as directed through the
United Nations and we should not forget that German National-Socialism is only cosmetically different to Russian
Communism. We see them as opposites because we are conditioned to do so. At base all socialism is: dictatorial
government; world government; mind control of the general population ; extermination of unwanted population. All
modern socialism will have the same essential morals and ambitions because they rest on the same belief
"The unmentionable truth about the United Nations Organization: A surreptitious influence leading
national governments to betray their people into dictatorial World Government."
"The unmentionable truth about communism: A device of enslavement created and supported by
"To all intents and purposes Australia is today not governed by parliamentarians representing the
full will of their own constituents but by politicians, diplomats and advisors who give allegiance to, and enforce,
the dictates of UN covenants."
"According to Dr Mark Korowicz, United Nations delegate from Poland who defected to the United
States some years ago: 'â€¦ the organisation of the UN is considered as one of the most important platforms for
Soviet propaganda in the world.'"
 Gourley, Alan, How To Avoid The Looming Catastrophe: Everyone's Introduction To The Secret
Society (I Mean The One In Which We Live), Veritas Publishing Company, Sydney, 1988, p. 70. And this was
written nearly 20 years ago!
 You should be aware of the work of the NWO's Tavistock Institute of the City of London in this regard. A good
place to start is here: http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/nwotavistockbestkeptsecret.shtml
 Gourley, p. 25, Ibid.
 Gourley, Ibid., p. 63.
 Gourley, Ibid., p. 63.
 Gourley, p. 107., Ibid.
 Gourley, p. 107., Ibid.
Real Agenda of "Democracy:" The Enslavement of Humanity in the New Feudal
By Batr Satre
Original Title: The New World Order Feudal Enslavement System
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger
centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." (A letter written by FDR to Colonel
House, November 21st, 1933)
From times immemorial, the top down authority imposition has been the rule. This system of
control is the reason why excrement discharge flows downhill. The feudal model works well for the lords who sit
atop the pyramid. Essentially the New World Order is the supreme evolution of the subjugation of the serf class. In
spite of this fact, what keeps this inequitable delineation between the dominant and the spineless? Pure power and
malicious behavior achieves the perfection of perdition, in this hierarchal slave gulag. Because it can be done and
no force can stop the captivity is the cause of the suffering.
The manipulating influence behind the Anglo-American hegemony and hyper-power governance is the
"Crown." The Crown as defined by NESARA INTERNATIONAL may seem
bizarre to the casual spectator. However,the secrets of the international
banksters, wholly exposed after the global financial meltdown, are undeniable. If this
is not the ultimate extortion by the global gangsters, what could top this rush into thralldom?
"The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If
this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attorneys.
The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful
Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in
the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and
its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorneys from the
independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally
unlawful - contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the
Attorneys carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary".
This technical description helps to focus on the undeniable; that the entire legal, political and
economic template is driven by a sinister desire to regiment the population. Substitute or interchange the term
"Crown" for the Illuminati or the New Work Order and you have the same playbook used on different teams.
The Khazars inspired banking system is the means by which the top echelon of the
obelisk pulls the strings of all the puppets. In the Youtube, Monopoly Men Rothschild Banksters Rule, the feudal enslavement system in revealed.
comment: Ever wonder why so many solicitors become
politicians? See Your Lawyer’s Secret Oath for the answer!]
BOOK REVIEW: The West Possessed
News Weekly, August 20, 2011
DEMONIC: How the Liberal Mob
Is Endangering America
By Ann Coulter
(New York: Crown Forum)
Hardcover: 368 pages
Reviewed by Bill Muehlenberg
American columnist Ann Coulter knows all about the culture wars. She has been involved with them for decades now.
She is a seasoned warrior in these battles, and she knows very well the nature and tactics of the adversary. She
has written a number of bestsellers on these themes, and her newest volume offers more of the same.
Coulter is both a Christian and a conservative. Thus she is not afraid to draw upon biblical truths
as she dissects the liberal mind and its radical agendas. She ties in the violent mob reactions against Jesus,
based as they were on the demonic, with the way all radical leftist regimes and movements also utilise the mob for
She draws heavily upon an 1896 volume by French social psychologist Gustave Le Bon. His book, The
Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, was the first study of the mass mind, and the way in which mob violence
operates. It provides a nice backdrop for analysing contemporary leftist coercive utopians.
Of course, the grand example of leftist agitation and utilisation of the mob is the French
Revolution. Coulter spends several chapters discussing it in some detail. As she correctly notes, “To understand
liberals, one must understand the French Revolution.”
Liberals — or leftists — of today can trace their lineage straight back to the radicalism of the
late 18th century. All the tricks of the trade we find so characteristic of today’s radical left were present in
this bloody revolution. The bloodshed, violence and demonic mob activity have been chronicled plenty of times
before, but Coulter offers a nice summary.
Anything associated with the old order was targeted by the mobs, but anything having to do with the
Church was especially focused on. Priests, nuns and lay-people were massacred in large numbers, while churches were
destroyed and one sacrilege after another was carried out.
Some of the gruesome descriptions of what the mobs did to ordinary men, women and children are
almost too hard to stomach. Rape, torture, mutilation and hideous forms of killing were the norm. If one had to
illustrate the actions of the demonic, surely this was it. It seemed there were not enough guillotines to keep up
with all the carnage and slaughter.
And all the while the crowds were cheering this on. The Jacobin program of “de-Christianisation”
was especially ferocious and repellent. Indeed, “the word ‘vandalisme’ had to be invented to describe” their
actions as they desecrated churches, looted Christian properties and destroyed sacred art. The revolutionaries
sought to “completely destroy Christianity and replace it with a religion of the state”.
Anything associated with Christianity was open to attack. Citizens were even forced to drop their
Christian names. A new Revolutionary Calendar was established, with the months renamed, and even clocks were
redesigned in decimal time.
If all this sounds somewhat familiar, it should. We see the same sort of thing happening today all
over the Western world, and much of Coulter’s book is about documenting these moves by the left-wing secularists to
wipe out the Christian faith and Christian morality.
She also rightly contrasts the 1789 French Revolution with the 1776 American Revolution. American
history “is the exact opposite of the French Revolution and their wretched masses guillotining the aristocracy and
clergy. … The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas, painstakingly argued by serious men in the process
of creating what would become the freest, most prosperous nation in world history. The French Revolution was a
revolt of the mob.”
She characterises it as “the progenitor of the horrors of the Bolshevik Revolution, Hitler’s Nazi
Party, Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot’s slaughter, and America’s periodic mob uprisings”.
She notes many obvious points of difference: “Americans celebrate the Fourth of July, the date our
written demand for independence from Britain based on ‘Nature’s God’ was released to the world. The French
celebrate Bastille Day”, a day of violence, mayhem and mob action.
The American revolutionary symbol is the Liberty Bell, while the French symbol is the “national
razor” — the guillotine. The closest thing to mob action the Americans experienced was the Boston Tea Party. As
Coulter reminds us, there were “no beheadings, disembowelings, or defilement of corpses — or any corpses at
Her book offers case after case of leftist mob mayhem in modern-day America. She looks at many keys
issues in today’s culture wars, such as race relations, the economy, national security, and so on. She contrasts
the conservative penchant for conserving and preserving, and the leftist addiction to radical change and
She correctly observes: “The history of liberalism consists of replacing things that work with
things that sounded good on paper.” She adds: “Liberals never bother to ask whether there might have been a reason
for a thousand-years-old convention such as marriage. They don’t care. Their approach is to rip out society’s
foundations without considering whether they serve any purpose.”
As with all of Coulter’s writings, her latest book is a grab-bag of memorable quotes. One is
reluctant merely to summarise what she says. It is tempting instead to offer plentiful quotes. Here are a few more
She says: “Liberals are constantly pushing for the Rousseauian approach to governance in defiance
of our history and Constitution. They not only believe there is a ‘general will’; they are sure their policies
express it. Instead of allowing ordinary people to have more control over their lives, Democrats produce
inflexible, universal plans, sublimely confident of their ability to build a perfect system.”
Free speech is certainly under attack from the lefties. She observes: “Liberals supported free
speech until they realised, years later, how bad speech is for them and began demanding hate crimes legislation,
speech codes, and sexual harassment laws restricting speech.”
She adds: “Following their totalitarian forebears, liberals went from punishing acts to punishing
thoughts and motives in the blink of an eye. In lieu of class crimes and counterrevolutionaries, American liberals
have given us ‘hate crimes’, ‘disparate impact’ rules, ‘sexists’ and ‘bigots’. Acts are irrelevant; your motives
are on trial. You are presumed guilty and acquittals are rare.”
Much more can be said about — and quoted from — this invaluable new book. Once again, Coulter takes
no prisoners as she dissects the foolishness — indeed, dangerousness — of the radical left. With razor-sharp
insight and humour she does an admirable job of showing us why the radical left agenda should be avoided like the
Along with Canadian columnist Mark Steyn, America’s Ann Coulter is probably the best conservative
writer on the scene today. Anything she writes is gold, and is well worth getting, digesting and passing on. Three
cheers for Ann Coulter.
Bill Muehlenberg is a commentator on contemporary issues, and lectures on ethics and philosophy.
His new book Strained Relations: The Challenge of Homosexuality will be reviewed in the next edition of News
Weekly. His website CultureWatch is at: http://www.billmuehlenberg.com
OPINION: Where is Australia Going and
By Major-General W.B. "Digger" James
News Weekly, August 20, 2011
We are facing a time of world financial crisis, and what are we doing? We have chosen to be
influenced by extraordinary views, many by elected leaders, who seem unable to spend our taxes wisely and
administer well-controlled programs.
Let us look and view the policies, advocated by some of our leaders, which are loathsome and evil
in contrast to those beliefs we have grown to develop and live by in a Christian society. We even have a female
Prime Minister who calls herself an atheist. She nominally leads a non-governing government.
There are those who wish to introduce euthanasia, presumably to cut costs and commitment on health
care. Family responsibilities are among the oldest commitments we have known in the development of man on this
earth — the care of our family, our parents and our children.
Feminism has introduced many changes in our society and some deserve review, such as the shortage
of male teachers in public schools. This is wrong, for the influence of good men on the development of young
children is an essential element of life.
Then there are those who promote methadone to enable addicts to be “weaned” off hard drugs. But it
There are those who promote abortion as a willy-nilly means of relieving women and girls of taking
responsibility for avoiding pregnancy. Does anyone tell our youth to practise chastity?
Then there is the push by homosexuals to bring in a law to allow same-sex marriage. Marriage is
clearly defined in our current laws: marriage is between a man and a woman, and is not for same-sex couples. The
basis of all mankind and of all forms of life is proven in biology. It is part of the pattern of propagation, to
raise a family to continue the race and to fulfil the needs of our society.
But perhaps, the greatest curse we now seem to live with today is for people to tell lies. This is
often practised with pride in politics. The truth is forsaken for gain.
I do not intend to discuss the particular people who make our laws, and who seem so often
responsible for the social horrors we face today.
Instead I want to point out the way we were, the way we faced the many problems of developing our
great country in the short period of 222 years since Captain Arthur Phillip led a fleet to Australia in 1788 to set
up a colony. He was on a mission for his government to give a future to convicts from Britain, and with great
wisdom, leadership and fairness he sowed the seeds for our nation, a nation we now seem determined to ruin.
Later, our outstanding leaders carefully developed our own constitution, arguably the best in the
world. It was written and approved by the people of Australia who wished to enhance our capacity to plan and assist
the development of our land, and to encourage new arrivals to honour their origins but become true Australians.
Australia has developed an outstanding military capability to assist our friends in times of world
wars and in other wars in defence of our way of life in a fair and responsible way. Those who served, fought and
died in the many campaigns were truly fighting for our country. We should aim to emulate their attitude.
As a child at a primary school in country Victoria, we had a flag-raising ceremony every Monday
morning. All students participated in a ceremony of raising the Australian flag on the school flagpole. Here we
were called to attention, place our right hand over our heart and recited an ode to our nation. The words were “We
love our country, we honour our flag, our parents, teachers and the laws.”
Surely, this is still needed for our children in our schools today.
In the case of our youth, what do we promote? “Schoolies week” — a week of careless waste, of
alcohol and health abuse and more, and it seems some parents support this frivolity. Why?
In 1950, Prime Minister Robert Menzies, seeing the problems of communist subversion, acted with
many other free nations to introduce national service for our young males. At 18 years of age they were required to
undertake 90 days’ full-time training in the Australian army, or in similar schemes in the RAN and RAAF. Today, our
volunteer servicemen are engaged in a war against terrorism, a major world problem.
I believe national service should be introduced again, for such an action would both strengthen our
defence capacity and give our young men a meaningful period of education.
I have spoken to many hundreds of men who served in the 1950s and the later program in the 1970s.
They say that their service in the program was excellent and that they are proud of their participation. It was
here that they grew up, for they worked and lived with other young men from all walks of life, grew to understand
the truth of discipline, honesty and what leadership means.
Let us all commit to sense and not nonsense.
God save Australia, the country that Captain Arthur Phillip foresaw.
Major-General W.B. “Digger” James, AC, MBE, MC (Ret’d), is a decorated war hero, seriously wounded
in the Korean War, who rose to become director of the General Army Health Services. He was elected national
president of the Returned and Services League of Australia in 1993.
By Jim Kirwan
2 September 2011
As promised to the listeners of Jeff Rense on 31 August 2011.
The deepest secrets of life and freedom have always been with us in plain sight and while these most intimate
secrets are perhaps one of the smallest of truths; they continue to affect us, for both good and bad, throughout
our lives. What are these secrets? Where can they be found?
They are associated with the invisible parts of our DNA, and that would be our personal bloodlines: Because these
are the original 'ties that bind us' first to the families that gave us life and eventually to all the other things
that allow us each to survive, in a world that for all too many is often a very hostile place.
Each of us is born into a world that literally consists of "a country of one." Then most of us spend the rest of
our lives trying to regain the freedom that the not-so-simple-act of 'birth' gives to each and every one of us.
While this quiet knowledge would seem to be obvious to many, this is another of those 'secrets' which the
illuminati detected early on and immediately began to cultivate: To enslave the individual, rather than to allow freedom to any
person, not of their bloodline. The Illuminate used this "secret' to enhance their
lifelong project to become as successful as possible by enslaving the individual; from long-before your birth or
mine even happened. This smallest of secrets has also been used and abused throughout history, to control people on
many different levels simultaneously, so that almost every possibility to escape this trap; is by design prevented,
by tradition, by religions, by politicians and by the darkest of forces that have roamed this world almost from the
Most of us rarely become aware of these phenomena, until we are well along into early
adulthood--if at all. And by then most of the real dependencies
have already been so strongly established that these simple almost invisible ties, that had by that time,
become the heaviest of anchor-chains that are resistant to almost
every opportunity to escape the draconian demands; which these secrets are there to insure.
These unconscious-predetrminations are very subtle at first but over time they become very demanding and
tend to force compliance upon the individual throughout the lifespan of most of those they have
This secret and its problems are characterized in this card that was part of the ancient
knowledge, some say 'secret-wisdom.' This card is 'the hanged man' and it tells the story of
an individual that at first tends to see himself or herself as a HOSTAGE to others or to a set of
circumstances; and in this position 'that self' is upside down (Hence the hanged man).
However once any individual is able to decode the problem that caused the situation;
the individual is then able to right him or herself and is able not only to RELEASE the 'self' from bondage; but
they find that they can finally go in search of his or her true
nature, after having first freed the self, to be able to have the freedom that each of us was born
In this 'task' there is something almost invisible; called 'our invisible means of support.' This moral-assistance
is symbolized here by the line of fire just below the knees. It's available to everyone but only on the unconscious
level of our thoughts, which is why when we allow the unconscious levels of our beings to be bulldozed into
non-existence we lose a lot of our real strength to combat the nearly invisible chains that seek to bind us to
something we rarely can acknowledge; because it has been with most of us since birth.
How does this 'secret' actually work?
Families are the smallest unit of the humanrace and are part of the bedrock beneath the bloodlines that hold
families together. The loyalties and obligations of 'family' are determined differently from one family to another,
but they are usually organized around the need to ensure the survival of the family, over the personal preferences
of the individual-for the continued survival of the family unit. When the survival of the 'family' is assured; then
the interests of the family will expand outward to include a village or a community of which the family is 'a
part.' The process continues to advance to the extent that the "needs of the original family unit are fulfilled.
And as this happens the family becomes part of a community, maybe a larger city, a county or state or even a
nation: But only after the survival of that original family unit has been assured.
Throughout this process the individual sublimates themselves to the good of the family first
and therein lies the hidden-obligation that can haunt
the life of those not strong enough to challenge the authority of either family or community. This beginning
process is generally the beginning point that goes almost entirely unnoticed by far too many; and it's what
accounts for so much conflict throughout life; as individuals continue to grow while trying to keep those early
direct associations alive.
As we begin to mature some will drift away from those original ties; others will become completely immersed in the family
traditions and still others will simply cut all ties and begin new lives.
Most however will not recognize how much of their own lives
were actually formulated by those early direct ties to the survival of the family; regardless of the
success or failure of those you or I might feel indebted to, for all that time when we were very
Whether it is a career choice, a love-interest or an education; family has an abiding interest in all that each
family tie represents; which is part of why severing these family-links becomes so very
important; even when the conflicts-of-interest might not have anything to do with
any choice which the family member might be trying to discuss. Later on, or if real distances are involved
some turn to shrinks or advisors for advice as they find that they are very lonely without the direct and
immediate support that they expect they should have from "family." The one
common denominator that most seem to share is that to be alone with yourself is a very scary proposition;
which is why so many people are only comfortable in groups or
crowds. But this artificial-busyness (games, TV, gossip and all the crap
related to any mind-numbing job) ultimately cannot stave off the personal choices that each person must
eventually make for themselves. But remember we were each subjected to an
entire litany of beliefs from the very beginning of our lives. To go against
that system is to require courage and self-determination to strike out on your own. Because if this is not
done then "to be alive" would only consist of repeating everything that went before, unless of course what
was instilled in the children had to do with creating people that will think and decide for themselves;
because part of what they were taught was how to question
and how to think critically about the lives they would be living. I was one of those
If you can picture the universal-newborn infant, much like the Universal Soldier of the Vietnam era you might tend
to see the universal-infant like a tiny version of Gulliver being set upon by the Lilliputians of dogmatic-belief
systems: Systems that have wrapped the child into a vice-like web of beliefs and
practices even before they learn to speak. These initiating principles can be as
different as are the billions of people in the world from each other; and yet: We still have far more in common
with-each-other; than we have in opposition to one another. Here's the Universal Soldier whose impossible-situation
describes this 'deepest-little-secret' as well 
If we have never been truly free to make up our own minds about most things; then we feel disconnected about our
lives and therefore we tend to seek out others with whom to share the now absent or hostile family members. Some
turn to lovers, others to shrinks and still others immerse themselves in idiot-games like business where the RULES
(the rights and wrongs) are crystal clear and the goal is only money, money and even more money; which in the mind
of the confused amounts to having an occupation (translation: something that has clear answers for everything
regardless of how right or wrong our observations of others might be); while beginning to move through that outside
world as if we were partially blinded by all that dangerous "uncertainty' which the real world with all of its
conflicting-dimensions always brings.
Here's an image of our universal-INNOCENCE that is born from the opening of the flower produced by the Devils'
Claw; which is contrasted by the life-long shadows of EVIL itself that is never very far away.
"The Deepest Secret" is that this innocence has been carefully undermined by the New World Order for a thousand
years to enslave the universe through the perversion of each new generation. This has frustrated, in all too many
cases, the genuine reaction that most people would instinctively embrace if their lives were not so burdened with
so many false-choices in our controlled lives. Lives that were manipulating of our loyalties even before we were
born. And this will continue in far too many cases until we (as their cattle) are of no use to them anymore.
Remember how US policy refused to help with birth-control when black-Africa was drowning in over-population,
hunger, thirst and disease? That happened not because our-owners were enforcing a religious belief (regarding birth
prevention through condoms) but because they wanted to flood the world with potential human cattle, to increase
their options while choking Africa and the world with population problems that drove up prices, for their food and
their water as well as everything else. Their full plan is in this video entitled The Handbook of Human Ownership 
This is one topic that has been at the very core of everything for so long that everyone has forgotten that this
'most basic of all facts' has been pivotal in creating these massive herds of
docile sheep since long before the officially sanctioned invasions by big-pharma,
big-government and the global-criminal empire even came from the shadows around the world to kill us all in broad
 Buffy Saint Marie Universal Soldier video
 The Handbook of Human Ownership
Western Democracy: A Farce And A
By Paul Craig Roberts
3 November 2011-11-04
Every day that passes adds to the fraudulent image of what is called Western democracy.
Consider that the entire Western world is outraged that the Greek Prime Minister announced that
he is going to permit the Greek people to decide their own fate instead of having it decided for them by a
handful of banksters, politicians, and bureaucrats living it up at taxpayer expense at "talks" in the French
resort of Cannes on the Mediterranean.
The Greek economy is facing its fourth year of decline and lacks the revenues to service its
national debt held by private European banks. The banks don't want to lose any money, so a handful of power
brokers reached an agreement with representatives of the Greek government to write off some of the debt in
exchange for EU capital subsidies to be financed by inflicting severe austerity on the Greek population.
Wages, salaries, pensions and medical care are being cut while the rate of unemployment rises to depression
levels. Government employees are laid off. Valuable public
properties are to be sold to private parties for pennies on the dollar. In short,
Greece is to be looted.
Large numbers of Greeks have been in the streets protesting the austerity policy and have
reached the point of anger of throwing Molotov cocktails at the police. Greece is disintegrating politically.
Greek people sense that the EU "bailout" is not bailing out Greece. It is bailing out the French,
Dutch, and German banks at the expense of the Greek people.
The Greek Prime Minister, watching his party's support and power crumble, announced that he
would let the people decide in a referendum. After all, allegedly that's what democracies do. But it turns out that "we have freedom and democracy"
is not supposed to be taken literally.
It is merely a propagandistic slogan behind which people are ruled through back-room deals decided by
powerful private interests.
The Greek Prime Minister’s announcement that he would put the back-room bailout deal to a
referendum shocked the EU hierarchy, Washington, and investors. Who does this Greek guy think he is
permitting the people, who bear the cost of the deal, to have a say in it? Who let this Greek guy out of his
cage? This is not the way democracies are ruled.
The EU power brokers are outraged over the Greek Prime Minister’s departure from normal
procedure. But the Greek PM is
relying on the Greek people to approve the deal, and not without reason.
The Greek people have been brainwashed for decades as to the importance of "being part of
Europe."That means being a member of the European Union. When the Greeks realize that voting down the
bailout of the banksters means being thrown out of the European Union, which is what they will learn between
now and the referendum, they will vote for the back room deal.
Polls already indicate this. A poll for a Greek newspaper indicates that whereas 46% oppose the
bailout, 70% favor staying in the EU, which the Greeks see as a life or death issue.
If this poll is a reliable indicator, the Greek PM has made a brilliant political decision. The
Greek people will vote in favor of what they have been protesting violently in the streets. As the Greek
people will do themselves in, the politicians are off the hook. This is the bet that the Greek PM has
Whatever the outcome, keep in mind that the entire Western political and investor world was
shocked that a politician, instead of simply imposing a back room deal, said he would let the people decide.
Letting the people decide is a no-no in Western
If you need more evidence of this mythical creature called "Western democracy," consider that
Western governments are no longer accountable to law. Contrast, for example, the sexual harassment charges
that are plaguing US presidential candidate Herman Cain's campaign with the pass given to high government
officials who clearly violated statutory law.
What follows is not a defense of Cain. I take no position on the charges. The real point is
different. In America the only
thing that can ruin a politician is his interest in sex. A politician, for example, George W. Bush,
Dick Cheney, B. Obama, cannot be ruined by violating United States and international law or by treating the
US Constitution as a "mere scrap of paper."
Bush and Cheney can take America to wars based entirely on lies and orchestrated deceptions.
They can commit war crimes, murdering large numbers of civilians in the cause of "the war on terror,"
itself a hoax.
They can violate US and international laws against torture simply "because the president said so."
They can throw away habeas corpus, the constitutional requirement that a person cannot be imprisoned
without evidence presented to a court. They can deny the right to an attorney. They can violate the law and
spy on Americans without obtaining warrants. They can send due process to hell. In fact, they can do whatever
they want just like Hitler's Gestapo and Stalin's secret police. But if they show
undue interest in a woman or proposition a woman, they are dead meat.
Very few commentators have said a word about this. The House of Representatives did not impeach
President Bill Clinton for his war crimes
against Serbia. They impeached him for lying about a sexual affair with a White House intern. The US Senate,
which had too many sexual affairs of its own to defend, didn't bother to try to convict.
This is Amerika today.A president without any authority whatsoever, not in law and certainly not in the Constitution,
can assassinate US citizens based on nothing except an assertion that they are a "threat." No evidence is required. No conviction. No presentation of
evidence in any court. Just a murder. That is now permissible to the Amerikan president. But let him try to get a woman who is not his wife into bed, and he is a cooked goose.
In Amerika there is no such thing any longer as torture; there is only "enhanced interrogation."
A mere word change has eliminated the crime. So torture is permissible.
In Amerika today, or in the UK and the EU, anyone who tells the truth is a
"threat."Julian Assange of Wikileaks, who made public information leaked to him by US government sources
horrified by the criminal actions of the United States government, is now, as a result of Amerikan pressure
on UK courts, being turned over to Sweden, which, for favors from the "world's only superpower," will turn
him over to the US regardless of law to be prosecuted on trumped-up charges.
Western "civilization" is totally corrupted by American money. There is no integrity anywhere. For a decade Washington has been murdering women, children,
village elders, and journalists in the name of the hoax "war on terror."
What terror does the world actually see? The world sees the terror that Israel, protected by
Washington, inflicts on the Palestinians. The world sees the terror that the US inflicts on Serbia, Iraq,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Latin America and now Africa, with Syria, Lebanon, and Iran
waiting in the wings. The "war on
terror" is nothing but an orchestrated invented excuse for Amerika-Israel to achieve hegemony while enriching their
In Greece, at least the PM committed to giving the people a say in their fate. In America [as in
the UK, the EU, Australia, and Canada] the people have no voice whatsoever. The sheeple are content to be
protected by "security," porno-scanners, warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention, and sexual groping.
To carry on the hoax "war on
terror," the US government has elevated itself above the law.
The American effort to achieve accountability to law, the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, if
not shut down by cold weather, ice, and snow, is likely to be shut down by police violence. One riot begun by
provocateurs is all it takes to transform protesters into "domestic extremists," the number one concern of
Homeland Security. The
presstitute media will make the case against the rioters, and the
sheeple will buy it.
The police have been militarized by Washington. Community police forces no longer represent the
local public that pays their salaries. Local police represent Washington's war against America [which is the
case in all countries].
American citizens are all suspects. Anyone who goes through airport security knows this. The only law that the US government obeys
is not even a law. It is a bureaucratic regulation that prevents, even in dire wartime, any profiling of
suspects by ethnicity or country of origin.
Consequently, all native born, flag-waving, American super-patriots are suspects when they board
commercial airliners. Americans who have a life time of security clearances are subject to being
porno-scanned or sexually groped. Airport Security cannot tell a "terrorist" from a CIA analyst, a Marine
general or a US Senator.
Well-connected members of the ruling elite, such as Michael Chertoff, can become rich from selling
the porto-scanners to taxpayers in order "to protect the public from terrorists."
The only terrorists Americans will ever experience are those funded by their own tax dollars
within their "own" government. A people
incapable of perceiving its real peril has no chance of surviving. America might be a military
superpower, but it no longer exists as a free country with accountable government and a rule of
Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika Deception)
February 21, 2009
By Jon Baker - 1984usa.com
Without going into background on Trotsky in this article and the
overthrow of the Tzar of Russia by the International Bankers - just know this: The Soviet Union was established by the same people who own the Federal Reserve and
virtually every other central bank in the World. The Soviet Union was created to be an antithesis to
capitalism (thesis). Besides making tons of money over the eventual conflict these two opposing dialectics would
have on each other, they are the pro-genitive elements that would eventually lead to the preconceived "New Order"
for the world. A synthesis of Capitalism and Communism, the China model if you will.
If the singular source of funding is not enough of a factor to sway your cognitive reasoning, then you perhaps
should look at the fact that the New World Order is set to be a global socialist totalitarian form of government.
That organizations like the SI (Socialist Internationale) and the United Nations embody such principles and promote
them on a global scale. Never-mind that most of the U.S. delegation who signed the U.N. Charter in San Fransisco on
October 24, 1945 were later found to be communist spies or have communist ties (i.e. Alger Hiss, FDR's personal
attorney present at the Yalta Conference. - Never-mind that FDR took over the entire presidential platform of a
gentleman and union icon named Norman Thomas who unsuccessfully ran for President on the Socialist Party ticket 6
times.) Never-mind that the U.N. Charter is virtually identical section by section of the old Soviet constitution.
Never-mind that the Constitution for the United States of America, Art. 4, Sec. 4 guarantees a republican form of
government, not a democracy. Never mind that mainstream media constantly reinforces that we live in a
"Democracy" when that is not true.
Yes, we're being played as pawns (and fools) in a global chess game, and
it's ugly and nobody wants to face it. Excuses and rationalizations run the gamut; "It's too hard to
understand, " or "That's just the way it is," or the infamous "There's nothing you can do about it."
These are all cop-outs and evasive maneuvers. Yes, socialism
The reason the use of the word "Democracy" is used ad nauseam is because in the Socialist community it is well
understood to be a "code-word" for "Socialism" and is therefore more palatable for the "masses."
In Mikhail Gorbachev's book Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country AND THE WORLD on
page 32 he lays it out in the open:
"We will now firmly stick to the line that only through the consistent development of the democratic forms inherent
in socialism and the expansion of self-government can we make progress... It is exactly because we place emphasis
on the development of socialist democracy that we pay so much attention to the intellectual sphere, public
consciousness and an active social party... In the West, Lenin is often portrayed as an advocate of authoritarian
methods of administration. This is a sign of total ignorance of Lenin's ideas and, not infrequently, of their
deliberate distortion. In effect, according to Lenin, socialism and democracy are indivisible."
And on page 34, ibid:
"Perestroika means mass initiative. It is the comprehensive development of democracy, socialist
self-government...But in principle I can say that the end result of perestroika is clear to us. It is a thorough
renewal of every aspect of Soviet life; it is giving socialism to the most progressive forms of social
organization; it is the fullest exposure of the HUMANIST nature of our social system in its crucial aspects -
economic, social, political and moral... The essence of perestroika lies in
the fact that IT UNITES SOCIALISM WITH DEMOCRACY and revives the Leninist concept of socialist
construction both in theory and in practice."
(Newsweek, Feb. 16, 2009)
And on page 36, ibid:
"...we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism,
rather than outside of it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors
alike by socialist standards. THOSE WHO HOPE THAT WE SHALL MOVE AWAY FROM
THE SOCIALIST PATH WILL BE GREATLY DISAPPOINTED. EVERY PART OF OUR PROGRAM OF PERESTROIKA- AND THE PROGRAM AS A
WHOLE, FOR THAT MATTER -- IS FULLY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF MORE SOCIALISM AND MORE DEMOCRACY...More
Socialism means more democracy... We will proceed toward better socialism rather than away from it. We are saying
this honestly, without trying to fool our own people or the world. ANY HOPES THAT WE WILL BEGIN TO BUILD A DIFFERENT, NON-SOCIALIST SOCIETY AND GO OVER TO
THE OTHER CAMP ARE UNREALISTIC AND FUTILE."
V.I. Lenin set the definition of peace to mean the elimination of all forms of opposition to socialism.
PEACE=SOCIALISM. This is a form of Orwellian newspeak, but you have to understand their language they use to
communicate to each other.
Also on page 147, ibid, one interesting statement:
"A third world war, if unleashed by imperialism [Bush Doctrine], would lead to new social upheavals [global
economic collapse, terrorism] which would finish off the capitalist system for good, and this would spell global
Now, as to clarify the United States position on this policy, let's refer to Presidential Documents (AE2.109:25/47)
"Administration of George Bush, " November 22, 1989, page 1822:
"Off the island nation of Malta [Knights of Malta], Mikhail Gorbachev and I [President George Herbert Walker
Bush]will begin the work of years... I will assure him that THERE IS NO GREATER ADVOCATE OF PERESTROIKA THAN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
As if that weren't enough, in the Los Angeles Times, April 1993, in an article entitled "The Peace
Dividend: Gorbachev Pro-Democracy [a.k.a. socialism]Foundation Opens Office at Bay Area's Presidio," subtitled "
THE FORMER HEAD OF THE RUSSIAN KGB TAKES OVER A U.S. MILITARY POST IN S.F.," it details how
the keys to one of the most hallowed military posts was turned over to Gorbachev to set up a pro-socialism office
on the oldest continually operating military base in the United States. Gorbachev was the first applicant granted
permission to move onto the post. The article went on to say "Gorbachev gave this assessment of the moment to the
crowd of dignitaries shivering in the San Francisco fog: 'This is the symbol of our IRREVERSIBLE TRANSITION from an
era of confrontation an militaristic insanity to a NEW WORLD ORDER, one that promises dividends for all.' At the
close of the ceremony, Gorbachev was joined via satellite by singer Billy Joel, who announced a June bebefit
concert to raise money to IMMUNIZE children in the United States and Russia."
Thanks Billy Joel, the Founding Fathers would be proud. But seriously, if you haven't gotten a glimpse of the
bigger picture, that this is not about Capitalism vs. Communism or East vs. West; this is about
INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY by INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS with NO
ALLEGIANCE TO ANY NATION. These people don't have a homeland yet. They are transforming
the WORLD to make one. These events are being implemented by agents of International Socialism, which is
being pushed through think-tanks, academia, non-governmental organizations, and ALL international
organizations. Socialism fools people with idealism that never transpires into individual freedom - it's
always going to make all the promises that it will save the children from cancer, clean the environment, give
every worker a fat check, etc., etc. The truth is this is always a mirage. It is smoke and mirrors - and the idealism is what attracts
people. You have no individual unalienable rights in socialism - only collective civil rights
that can be repealed by the whim of a politicians. Why would anyone fall for that trap? (Stupidity?)
Gorbachev Foundation North America
International Socialist Organization
Communist Party U.S.A.
World Socialist Website
United Nations Organization
Socialism is the vehicle to integrate the world, but it is not the driving philosophy, for that is the shiny
pinnacle of the pyramid known as Mystery Babylon -- but that's an entirely different article. If
you're asking how or why, then you obviously don't know about that. That's your answer above all answers.
So to The Perestroika Deception By Anatoliy Golitsyn.
Diehard fans of the theory that Communism is dead will not like this book, whose stated goal is to help such people
recover from their blindness. The Perestroika Deception describes with unmerciful clarity the
confusion and errors that have been engendered in the world and in the Church by the deceitful Communist strategy
of perestroika, under whose reformist guise rebellions and wars have been promoted, and the Church persecuted, in
order that the Communist goal of world domination is finally achieved. In other words, what it unintentionally
depicts are the very events prophesied by Our Lady of Fatima if the Collegial Consecration of Russia is not
Anatoliy Golitsyn's 1984 book, New Lies for Old, forecast, with 94% accuracy, all the recent changes in
the Communist Bloc, including the economic and political reforms, the rise of Solidarity, the removal of the Berlin
Wall, the reunification of Germany and the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Perestroika Deception, with
extensive documentation, reinforces his contention in New Lies for Old that all the changes were
meticulously planned years in advance. It explains how they fit into the devious Leninist strategy for achieving
with Western cooperation a one-world Communist government or New World Social Order, run by the Russians and
Chinese, by 2000 A.D. It also analyzes current events up to the Chechnya struggle and forecasts and
Golitsyn was a high-ranking KGB official involved in espionage and counter-espionage who defected to the United
States in 196. Convinced that Western interpretations of developments in the Communist Bloc were seriously flawed,
he combined his study of Soviet long-range strategy with his inside knowledge of KGB and Leninist thinking in
New Lies for Old. For over thirty years he has submitted memoranda to the CIA, in which he has provided
very accurate analyses and forecasts of Bloc developments. "The Perestroika Deception" is a collection of dated
memoranda covering the years 1984 to 1995.
Comments for "Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika
Lindsay said (February 22, 2009):
I have a few more quotes for
you: "Democracy is the road to socialism." Karl Marx
"Modern Socialism is inseperable from political democracy." Elements of Socialism, pg 337.
"The view that democracy and Socialism are inwardly related spread far and wide in the decades which preceded the
Bolshevist revolution. Many came to believe that democracy and Socialism meant the same thing, and that democracy
without Socialism or Socialism without democracy would not be possible." Socialism, Ludwig von Mises, pg 67.
Dan said (February 21, 2009):
That's a good find - the article.
I'd never heard of Anatoliy Golitsyn’s 1984 book, New Lies for Old. Wish I had, in 1985-88. I could have saved
myself 20 years of ignorance.
"The reason the use of the word “Democracy” is used ad
nauseam is because in the Socialist community it is well understood to be a “code-word” for “Socialism” and is
therefore more palatable for the “masses.”
"Socialism is the vehicle to integrate the world, but it is not the driving philosophy, for that is the shiny
pinnacle of the piramid known as Mystery Babylon — but that’s an entirely different article. If you’re asking how
or why, then you obviously don’t know about that. That’s your answer above all answers."
The smartest grad student I knew while back a college
in 1986 remarked one day, that the head of CIA and head of KGB were then in political charge of the USA and USSR.
He said this meant in fact that covert intelligence was controlling all world events, and that they appeared to be
on the same page. What was missing in the hypothesis then, was what connected global covert intelligence? Money?
Power? Certainly we realized it had nothing to do with the ideological rhetoric for public consumption.
It never occurred to us it might be religion. ie, Luciferianism.
Once one set's aside ideology and rhetoric, the common
denominator between Corporate fascism and Soviet communism comes in to focus as simply full spectrum centralization
of power. The common enemy and first casualy of Corporate fascism and Communism is local community free enterprise,
disposable wealth and property in public ('profane') hands.
The CFR's Foreign Affairs website says Golitsyn's book
is disinformation, but I'd expect them to say that if it's not.
Graham said (February 21, 2009):
I have the same problem everytime trying to convince
people Communism is not dead & the Fall of the Berlin Wall was show trial at best.
The Communist always wanted US Arm Forces out of West
Berlin & have achieved that through Flase Peace,so later they can invade West Berlin without having to blow
down the Wall or waste Armmunition or wake up the West to their tanks rolling in at night.
People just cant see it-that the success of Perastoka
Deception,process of Fabian Socialism,by gradual withdrawal of the West Defence,until the Soviet bring down the
hard fist on the West by reverting back to open Communist State again but well built up.
They can't see America Nuclear Blackmail via the
Communist United Nation, that put America into Vietnam, to Disarm the Superpower America, by Disarmament at Home,
while every one distracted with the War in Vietnam.
The same United Nation bringing in Foreign Troops
under disguise United Nation uniform,most from Former Soviet Union.
If you remove Former Soviet Union & see this as
1962 Cuban Crises-it would be seen as a US Surrender to Soviets or Blackmail.
They cant see that Gorbachev resigned His position,in
Moscow, to be the Real President of the United States of America,shutting down US Bases on His Orders,(which would
wake up America,If He order them closed from the Kremlin) & not the President Orders in Washington.
We have Freemasonry to thank for this mess,as Pope Leo
XIII rightly stated-Freemasonry helps the Communist Cause,even though Communism was Condemned in 1846 by His
Predessor-Pope Pius IX.
We have to go back to History itself,to find,that President Kennedy was anything but a Liberal President,when it
came to the Test Ban Treaty,which was against Atmosphere Fall out ,on Limited Testing Radiation, not
His Pax Americana Address in June,1963,was for advoiding War even Limited like Vietnam & aimed at a Different
Russia,with no Federal Reserve Bank Tax Dollars building up the Russian War machine let alone China or Cuba.
It would fall short of US IMF Currency to build their
Arms Industry as Kennedy had at the same time in June,1963,taken away their power through new American notes backed
by silver Executive Order-11100-taking away the power of the Elite Families to build the Russian War machine that
would collapse in 1964.
It Kennedy way of over riding the CIA to overthrow
Castro by Monatary means,internal Civil War against their oppressors & in Russia by sending in the Peace Corp
to restore Order out of chaos not by Weapons of War from America-Pax Americana.
If Kennedy had read His speech in Dallas-everyone
would be amazed by it-Upgrade Polaris Submarines,increase in Defense Budget not Disarm America & no mention of
His speech is available on web site but the question is this-why wasnt it released the next day or put forward in
In fact after 40 Years WE are allowed to see His
speech when it is too late to save America Defence.
That why He was removed,to Disarm America by President
Johnson,while MaNamara wanted a freeze on US Missiles so that Russians can catch up,Senator Robert Kennedy did not
want the freeze but no matter,after Johnson statement to Robert face in January,1967-You & all your peace doves
will be destroyed in 6 Months-One Year later-not June,1967 but June 1968,6 Months from January 1968?
I believe John Kennedy told Pope Paul VI in 1963 visit
His intention to end the Cold War by starving Ecomonic Military aid to the Communist States, keep the Space
Programme open, not get involve in Vietnam which is to waste American Defense in that Region long War, by a
Communist on CIA pay roll, Kennedy knew His name-Ho Chi Minh of North Vietnam & knew His troops had training
from Green Beret-Dear Team?
Who Controls Our Elections?
Computer Crimes: Understanding the Deception Behind 9-11 and Election
By Christopher Bollyn
“The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as was the false flag terror
attack of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals who produce malicious computer code and enterprise
I know Americans who watch television every night. I actually know people
who spend virtually every non-working minute of the day in front of a television, bathing in the absolutely
fake and utterly non-intellectual "reality" of TV. Millions of Americans, in fact, receive the
bulk of their news and information about the world from the television. That means that a very large segment
of the American population has a worldviewthat has been shaped primarily by what they have seen on TV. For many people, the artificial and contrived "reality" of the two-dimensional television screen
largely defines and informs their view of the real world.
This is why so many Americans know so little about the Middle East. The most obvious symptom of this television-induced ignorance is that most Americans know nothing about the real history of Zionism and the State of Israel.
They are completely unaware, for example, of the long history of Zionist terrorism against Palestinians,
Americans, Jews, and even Israelis. Raised on Hollywood television and movies, many Americans don't have the
slightest clue about the real nature of the Zionist beast.
Think about this for a minute: When was the last time you saw a movie in which the bad guys were
Israelis speaking a guttural Slavic-based language called Yiddish or "Ivreet"? Can you recall even one
television program in which the criminals or terrorists were Israelis? Apart from The Little Drummer Girl by John Le Carre, I have never seen a film in which
Israelis were anything but heroes or victims, usually both. The Little
Drummer Girl, which is a film worth watching, shows how false flag terror attacks are frequently
committed by Israeli intelligence agents to be blamed on their enemies. Such false flag Zionist terror
attacks were carried out against synagogues in Europe in the movie, and in Baghdad in real life during the
In the usual Hollywood films about terrorists, such as the Die Hard films and others produced by Zionist media moguls, the bad guys
are always Arabs, Germans, or corrupt members of the U.S. military. For many decades the Zionists who control
Hollywood have defined who the "bad guys" are for most Americans. Israelis and their fellow Zionists are,
therefore, never the "bad guys" in Hollywood films, although Israelis and Zionists play a very major role, if
not the leading role, in the real world of organized crime.
Kobi Alexander, one of the high-level Israeli criminals involved in Comverse, Odigo, and 9-11.
After stealing hundreds of millions of dollars, Alexander fled to Israel and Namibia seeking refuge from U.S.
justice. Israeli criminals like Alexander are seldom portrayed in Hollywood films.
Like millions of American television viewers, reality is largely defined for the people in the
U.S. military, whose job it is to protect and defend the United States, by the artificial reality they see on
their screens. These people spend most of their workdays sitting in front of monitors that provide them with
the information to which they react, often in life-or-death situations.
But who really controls the information that the average American and the specialists in the
U.S. military receive on their screens? You may be surprised to discover that the man behind the curtain is
an Israeli with a thick guttural accent and a foreign and extremely racist view of the world.” (From Chapter
VI, “Who Controls Our Elections?” of the book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the
World, Online Book by Christopher Bollyn, freely available here:
Our Parliament is Rotten to the Core
By Peter Oborne
12 November, 2010
Before starting in journalism, I worked at the banking house
of N M Rothschild. Though fundamentally ill-suited to and, indeed, useless at my
job, I did learn the importance of absolute devotion to fact.
All statements of profits, assets or any other material
consideration in an offer-for-sale document were rigorously checked, then checked again. It was drilled into us that failure to tell the truth, even
inadvertently, was a criminal offence, punishable in the last resort by jail.
This training was one reason why I was so puzzled when, a
number of years later, I began work as a reporter in the parliamentary press gallery. Of course, I relished the
hyperbole, exaggeration and vulgar abuse which has done so much to enliven political discourse since time
immemorial. What struck me hard, however, was the realisation that
ministers and government spokesmen were systematically and deliberately making false
statements – lying – on the record in Parliament and to the press.
This culture of deception became a perfectly normal
instrument of government under New Labour, and, in due course, I documented hundreds of examples in my book,
The Rise of Political Lying. One of the worst cases was Tony Blair’s notorious dossier of September
2002 which made the case for the Iraq War. Had this document been an offer-for-sale prospectus,
Blair’s fatal tendency to convert speculation into incontrovertible fact would have invited the attention of the
The toleration of
deceit carried on for years after the Iraq
invasion, reaching its culmination with last year’s expenses scandal, when this newspaper disclosed the appalling
truth that the House of Commons itself was engaged in a gigantic conspiracy to steal from the British taxpayer. The
scale of the fraud was so audacious that our leading politicians had no choice but to acknowledge that something
had gone horribly wrong.
To his credit, David Cameron responded with a promise to
restore trust in British politics. Six months have now passed – enough time to make a preliminary judgment on how
the Prime Minister is carrying out this task. Sadly, the conclusion must be that little has changed.
Let us examine first the case of the Tory MP Nadine Dorries,
who was cleared last month by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner of wrongly claiming some £60,000 in
second-home allowances. Central to Dorries’s defence was her assertion that she spent the bulk of her time in her
old house in the Cotswolds (billed as her primary home) rather than her Bedfordshire constituency, which she stated
was her secondary residence (and, therefore, allowable for expenses). Here, though, Dorries ran into an apparently
insuperable problem: she had incriminated herself in her blog by giving the strong impression that she spent the
majority of her time in Bedfordshire. Miss Dorries got around this difficulty by informing the parliamentary
standards commissioner that “my blog is 70 per cent fiction and 30 per cent fact. It is written as a tool to enable
my constituents to know me better and to reassure them of my commitment to Mid Bedfordshire. I rely heavily on
poetic licence and frequently replace one place name/event/fact with another.”
In other words, her blog was, for the most part, a lie,
designed to give constituents the impression that she was doing her duty as a diligent MP in Bedfordshire when
actually she was in another part of the country altogether. This is a wretched state of affairs and if David
Cameron were a Tory leader who valued integrity and honesty, he would surely have ordered Miss Dorries to apologise
personally to her constituents, and stripped her of the party whip there and then. Instead, he has done
Another troubling example concerns Bill Wiggin, an old
schoolfriend of the Prime Minister, who claimed interest payments for a property in his Leominster constituency
which turned out not to have a mortgage. When the Telegraph exposed this pertinent omission, Mr Cameron was swift
to accept Wiggin’s defence that it was all a dreadful misunderstanding. This is what the PM told breakfast
television on May 21 last year: “It looks like it’s an honest mistake and he was not claiming money that he wasn’t
entitled to. Now if he was, that would be totally different and he would be out of the door.” David Cameron felt so
confident in Bill Wiggin’s integrity that he went to the lengths of making him a Government whip when the Coalition
was formed in May.
Sadly for Mr Wiggin, the Prime Minister’s confidence turned
out not to be justified. Three weeks ago, the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee determined that he had
wrongly claimed for his expenses and ordered him to apologise to the House. David Cameron has since failed to take
the action he promised. Wiggin retains the backing of the Tory party, and his Government job.
The most troubling of the three recent examples of
parliamentary deception, however, concerns last week’s devastating court judgment against Phil Woolas, the MP for
Oldham East and Saddleworth. The full gravity of the finding against Woolas can only be properly grasped by reading
the judgment in its entirety. But it can be summed up as follows: Woolas used his election literature to assert
that his Liberal Democrat opponent was in league with violent Muslim “extremists”, even though he knew this was not
true. His lie was especially loathsome because, as private email evidence suggested, it was intended to “get the
white vote angry”. In short, Woolas was pandering to anti-Muslim emotions in a constituency disfigured by race
riots only nine years ago.
The most extraordinary thing about the Woolas debacle has
been the reaction to it. One national newspaper published a leader condemning the judges’ decision. There has been
a wave of sympathy from fellow MPs of all parties. Charles Falconer, the former Lord Chancellor, is reportedly
advising Woolas; Cherie Blair sent a friendly note and Gordon Brown is said to be supportive, as is David Miliband,
the former foreign secretary.
Inside the rarefied atmosphere of the House of Commons, the
persecuted party has been Harriet Harman, Labour’s deputy leader. With Ed Miliband on paternity leave, she sacked
Woolas as soon as the court judgment was made. But poor Harman, who appears to have behaved impeccably, was
practically lynched for her pains at a meeting of the parliamentary party.
There is a common thread to these stories. All three cases
show that lying and cheating are still regarded as acceptable conduct by the British Political Class. Our MPs
continue to regard themselves as somehow beyond the basic morality that applies to their fellow citizens. I used to
believe that this arrogant and dishonest approach to politics was peculiar to New Labour. Now it looks like common
practice for all parties.
It is true that the job of prime minister is incredibly
demanding, and David Cameron has little or no time to attend to what may seem to him like obscure matters of party
management. But he should be careful. While he travels the globe making grand bargains with world leaders, the
stench of deceit and corruption is once again beginning to fill the Tory benches.
The Holding of “Extremist Views” in Our
Democracy Will Not Be Tolerated, They
“This man is
not only someone who has extremist views but also someone who has lied about those
views,” Anna Blight, Premier of Queensland, said.
Today in so-called democratic Australia we are led by a very large group of Labour Fabian Socialist, posing as
democratically elected politicians, such as Julia Gillard, Anna Blight, and Wayne Swan, who insist that they
lead by “consensus,” and that the holding of “extremist views” is not to be tolerated in their New World
Order (which is already upon us). These “extremist views” are now defined as what every Christian on earth
once clearly understood to be known as “goodness” and
“righteousness.” These things could be called living by the Holy Spirit, as shown in the right-hand side of
the images below. The left-hand image, below, labelled “Sin-controlled living,” is now totally acceptable in these last
days, and those who live by them will be totally
These things of pure beauty have now, through the
long operation of the deliberate tactic of the inevitability of gradualness, the Fabian
motto, been turned
into “extremist views.” Such is the state of the moral rottenness that prevails
Here’s what the scriptures reveal about such moral
Holding the Truth in Obedience to
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against
all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in
unrighteousness.” (Romans 1: 18)
“But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey
the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath.”
(Romans 2: 8)
“That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” (2
Thessalonians 2: 12)
On Respect of
“Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the
mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.” (Leviticus 19:
“Woe unto him that buildeth his house by
unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong; [that] useth his
neighbour's service without wages, and giveth him not for his work.” (Jeremiah 22:
On Lovers of Lies Instead of the
“And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in
them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth,
that they might be saved.” (2 Thessalonians 2: 10)
On Deception and
“And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness,
[as] they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots [they are] and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you.”
(2 Peter 2: 13)
Fools Rise to the Top and Lead Us to
“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against
all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be
known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them. For the invisible things of him from
the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the
things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because
that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was
darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the
uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and
creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness
through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed
the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for
ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile
affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And
likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men
with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was
meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are
not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication [which includes all form of sexual sin,
such as homsexuality, pornography, and other perversions], wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of
envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without
natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the
judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have
pleasure in them that do them.” (Romans 1: 18-32)
“We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our
politicians, our priests, our newspapers, and others with a vested interest in controlling us. ‘Thou shalt
become as gods, knowing good and evil,’ good and evil with which to keep children under control, with which
to impose local and familial and national loyalties and with which to blind children to their glorious
intellectual heritage. … The results, the inevitable results, are frustration, inferiority, neurosis and
inability to enjoy living, to reason clearly or to make a world fit to live in.” Dr. G. Brock Chisholm,
President, World Federation of Mental Health.
most of the good people are afraid to be good. They strive to be broadminded and tolerant! It is fashionable to
be tolerant - but mostly tolerant
of evil - and this
new code has reached the proportions of demanding intolerance of good. The wall of resistance to evil has thus been
broken down and no longer affords protection to those who, persecuted by evil doers, stand in need of it.” (Lady
Edith Queenborough, Occult
Theocrasy, published in 1933, p. 4)
“Civil disobedience is not our
problem.Our problem is civil obedience [to evil]. Our problem is
that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders and millions have been killed because of
this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty,
starvation, stupidity, war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of
petty thieves and the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.” (Howard
average Homo normalis is beyond
caring. Provided their bellies are full, their minds empty and their time
consumed with frivolous entertainment, Satanists are free to triumph. It took less than sixty years to turn
the Western world from war heroes to poofters; from bold, adventurers to cry-babies; from devoted couples to
divorcees and although never afraid of work in the past, now everyone has a Doctor’s Certificate. Chronic
apathy bolstered by cynicism litters the economic cul-de-sacs of our society. Literacy is almost gone,
television is almost irrelevant, public infrastructure is heritage protected and most are crushed by the
foreboding knowledge that tomorrow is another day.” (Australian satanist Sir David Griffin, ex-Lord Mayor of
Sydney, From The Foydyke Letters, available here:
2 Peter 1: 16 classes this motto as
“cunningly devised fables.”
Occult Technology of Power
A Project of the
Society for Illuminating the Sources of Power
Copyright 1974 by
Alpine Enterprises, PO Box 766, Dearborn, Michigan 48121. All Rights Reserved for Printed Editions.
E-text editions may be distributed without limit as long as the address of the Copyright Holder or publisher
is included. Printouts from e-text are not allowed.
Library of Congress Card Catalog Number 88-083670
"The world is governed
by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." --- Benjamin
Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield)
In this thin volume you
will find the transcripts of your initiation into the secrets of my empire Read them again not for the
arcane knowledge which is now second nature you, hut in order to re-experience the shock and awe you felt
twenty years ago when at age thirty the fabulous scope of my power was revealed to you by my trusted, and
now mostly departed advisors. Remember the surprise, to the point of disbelief, with which you beheld the
invisibly delicate, but invincible chains of deceit, confusion, or coercion with which we finance
capitalists enslave this chaotic world. Remember the feats of will and strategy that have been required to
retain our position. Then, inspect your retinue carefully. Your heir must be equal to and eager for the task
much as you were. Choose him carefully. As I lie here waiting for the end I can afford to relish the thought
our empire lasting forever as I never dared while in charge. Rational power calculations, so easily
disrupted by the thrill of power, are now entirely in your hands.
"Know, Will, Dare, and
be Silent!" --- Aleister Crowley
1. My Introduction to Your
2. Professor A. on the Role of Fraud in
3. Professor Q. on Occult Knowledge as the Key to
4. Professor M. on the Economics of Central
5. Professor B. on the Functions of the Central Bank
in the Mature Finance Capitalist System
6. Professor G. on Social and Business Legislation
7. Professor D. on the Role of Public
8. Professor X. on Prestigious Associations and
9. Professor Y. on Covert Operations and
10. My Closing Remarks
11. Afterwords by the Transcriber
Introduction To Your Initiation ~
"Man is a rope
stretched between the animal and the Superman a rope over an abyss."
"I teach you the
Superman. Man is something to be surpassed." --- Friedrich Nietzsche
self-knowledge, self-control these three alone lead to sovereign power." --- Alfred Lord Tennyson
"And nothing, not God,
is greater to one than one's self is." --- Walt Whitman
"Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the law." --- Aleister Crowley: The Book of the Law
My Son, the time has
arrived to make formal what you have confidently awaited for some years. Of all your brothers, sisters, and
cousins, as well as the offspring of my close allies, I have chosen you to be heir to my empire. All the
trust funds, foundations, and accounts through which my empire is controlled shall pass into your hands upon
my retirement. All my alliances, understandings, and enmities with my handful of peers around the globe
shall gradually become yours. Over the next twenty years we shall collaborate closer and closer, you and I,
until, we finally act as one.
For ten years you have
toured my empire in a succession of managerial assignments and are now familiar with the outward operations
of my crucial banking, foundation, governmental, and think tank organizations. Until now, my advisors and I
have deflected your questions as to how and if my diverse operations and holdings, which seem autonomous and
even contradictory, are integrated into an organic whole to serve the dynasty's interests. The fact that you
asked these questions, rejecting my carefully nurtured public image as an idle, coupon clipping
philanthropist, was a major factor in the high esteem in which I hold you. Most of your competitors found
puppet leadership in any one of my organizations so awesome and gratifying that they immediately eliminated
themselves from the contest for the top position which you have won. Such men of limited vision are
necessary for my success. They bend unconsciously to the subtle pressures to which I expose them. They can
be led in any direction I choose by simple-minded rationalizations aimed at their vanity without being privy
to my motives which would be short lived secrets in their undisciplined and envious minds.
Most important in your
selection as my successor, however was your psychological nature which has been faithfully reported to me
over the years by my associates many of whom have advanced psychological training. A man in my position must
have total mastery over his emotions. All actions affecting the power of the dynasty must be taken on the
basis of coldly reasoned power calculations if the dynasty is to survive and prosper at the expense of its
subjects and rivals. All power is impossible to those whose pursuit is ruled by sentimentality, love, envy
power-lust revenge, prejudice, hatred, justice, alcohol, drugs, or sexual desire. Sustained power is
impossible to those who repress all their irrational longings into their subconscious only to have them
return in compulsive, out of control behavior that inevitably leads to their ruin. Although often clothed in
the rationalizations of power calculation, compulsive behavior is at root, the emotionalism of a frightened
child, desperately projecting his inner agony into a reality he is afraid to under stand, much less master.
Although you now must
begin to pursue it consciously you have already displayed the alienation from your emotional nature that is
so essential to achieving real worldly power. You must recognize your emotional nature as a primitive
survival mechanism that was appropriate for the jungle and perhaps useful to common men, but useless for the
tasks that confront us finance capitalists. Attachment to what you do, just because you do it, is the
primary psychological characteristic of ordinary mortals. Such cognitive dissonance spells disaster for us.
Our emotional mechanism makes our lives worth living, but is no guide to the occult arts of intrigue. So,
continue to gratify your senses and emotions fully at your leisure. As long as the empire prospers you will
have the resources to indulge in systematic gratification which will leave your irrational urges sated and,
therefore, powerless. You will never be in the unenviable position of the middle class strivers who must,
from lack of resources, repress their emotional natures if they are to attain any power whatever during
their lives. Typically, they end up taking their pleasure from the victories and cruelties of their
struggle. Thus, their end ceases to be power and they eventually defeat themselves with reckless behavior in
pursuit of dominant thrills.
I have brought you into
seclusion with my most trusted advisors in order to inaugurate a new phase of your instruction. Your formal
training in the "official" political-economic world is now complete. This weekend will mark the beginning of
your training in the occult technology of power that lurks behind outer appearances. As your tutors will
explain, "occult" or secret knowledge is the basis of all power in human society, so I use the word "occult"
advisedly, in its pristine usage. As I am sure you are aware by now, productivity in itself does not secure
power and therefore does not secure the gratifications of life. After all, slaves can be productive. None of
my organizations in which you served so well are concerned with advancing the techniques of satisfying human
needs and desires. Rather, all are dedicated to the surreptitious centralization of productive, but
especially coercive, efforts in my hands or in creating the intellectual climate in which such veiled
control would be tolerated in the future. I destroy or paralyze productive efforts that cannot be ensnarled
in my web
After a break Professor
A. will take the floor in order to put finance capitalism into full biological perspective. His short talk
will be followed by similar abbreviated summaries by his six associates, all of whom you know well. The rest
of the weekend will be devoted to forthright fielding of your questions.
A. On The Role Of Fraud In Nature ~
"Are we not all
predatory animals by instinct? If humans ceased wholly from preying upon each other, could they continue to
exist?" --- Anton S. LaVey
"Nature, to be
commanded must be obeyed " --- Francis Bacon
base their success primarily on deception and rely on actual force or mutually advantageous trade
(symbiosis) as little as possible. This should be nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to
the moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects. Let me give a few examples in case the moral culture has
to some extent impaired your powers of objective observation. Camouflage is universal among predators and
victims alike. Blossoms imitate fragrances and colors which are sexually attractive to certain insects in
order to effect pollination. Dogs bark ferociously and feign attack on enemies of whom they are, in fact,
terrified. The Venus Fly Trap plant lures flies to their deaths. Men proclaim their altruism to others and
even themselves while they selfishly scramble for personal advantage. If you doubt that fraud is normal in
nature you should read section 3 of the first chapter of Robert Ardrey's "The Social Contract" for a wealth
of fascinating examples. (Of course Ardrey fails to grasp the full application to contemporary human society
of his brilliant insights into man's animal nature.)
Human mental prowess
and communicative powers have merely provided superb elaboration on nature's old theme of fraud and added
its own distinctive feature: self delusion. Primitive animal hierarchies are based on bluff and bluster, and
each member is well aware of and accepts, at least temporarily, its position in the hierarchy. The same wild
enthusiasm and fascination for dominance and submission rages in human hearts. However, fraud is taken one
step further. Not only is fraudulent bluff and bluster used to achieve dominance but fraudulent altruism and
collective institutions are used to conceal dominance once achieved. Human hierarchies, in contrast to the
animal variety, are best sustained when the members are deluded regarding the oppressive nature, or better,
even the very existence of the hierarchy!
Visible rulers are
highly vulnerable. Thus we see visible rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common good, the
material forces of history, the general will (either through vote or intuition), tradition, or other
intellectual "spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the rulers. Encouraging such
self-delusions among the masses of the ruled is universal for visible governments. However, such spooks are
little protection for the leaders of such systems against their sophisticated elite rivals and no protection
against men like your father. The Roman Empire was unquestioned by the mass of its subjects for centuries,
but the Emperors lived in constant fear of coup and assassination.
By embracing deception
wholeheartedly at every level, finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned the ultimate system
yet devised for the secure exercise of power. Men like your father, the hidden masters of finance
capitalism, govern those who govern, produce, and think through invisible financial tentacles, the
operations of which will be elucidated later by my colleagues. Dominance in all aspects of society is
surreptitiously accomplished while the great majority of the ruled, and even most of the visible leaders,
believe themselves to be fairly autonomous, if harried, members of a pluralistic society. Nearly everyone
believes major decisions to be the vector sum of autonomous pressures exerted by business, labor,
government, consumers, social classes, and other special interests. In fact, the vectors of societal power
are carefully balanced by us so that any net movement is in a direction chosen by us. The only fly in the
ointment is the occasional, but extremely messy, interferences by competing financial dynasties. This
disconcerting problem will not be a major topic for this weekend.
I now yield to
Professor Q. who will elucidate the central secrets of your father's immense money power.
Q. On Occult Knowledge As The Key To Power ~
"The theory of
aggregate production which is the point of the following book, nevertheless can be much easier adapted to
the conditions of a totalitarian state than the theory of production and distribution of a given production
put forth under conditions of free competition…" --- John Maynard Keynes ~ Forward to the German Edition of
the General Theory (September 7, 1936)
secure ruling elites arise through secret, or occult knowledge which they carefully guard and withhold from
outsiders The power of such elites or cults diminishes as their occult knowledge is transformed into
"scientific" knowledge and vanishes as soon as it becomes "common sense." Before analyzing the secrets of
the finance capitalist money cult let us glance for historical perspective at occult astronomy, the oldest
source of stable rule known to man of which astrology is hut the pathetic remnant.
As soon as men
abandoned the life of wandering, tribal hunters to till the soil they needed to predict the seasons. Such
knowledge was required in order to know when to plant, when to expect floods in fertile valleys, when to
expect rainy seasons, and so on. Months of backbreaking work were wasted by the unavailability of the
calendar, a convenience we take for granted. The men who first studied and grasped the regularities of sun,
moon, and stars that presage the seasons had a valuable commodity to sell and they milked it to the fullest
at the expense of their credulous fellowmen. The occult priesthoods of early astronomers and mathematicians
such as the designers of Stonehenge, convinced their subjects that they alone had contact with the gods, and
thus, they alone could assure the return of planting seasons and weather favorable to bountiful harvests.
The staging (predicting) of solar and lunar eclipses was particularly effective in awing the community. The
general success resulting from following the priesthood's tilling, planting, nurturing, and harvesting
timetables insured the priesthood's power. Today's Christmas holiday season continues the tradition set by
ancient priesthoods, who conducted rituals on the winter solstice to reverse the retreat of the sun from the
sky. Their invariable success was followed by wild celebrations. Popular knowledge of seasonal
regularities was discouraged by every manner of mysticism and outlandish ritual imaginable. Failures
in prediction were blamed on sins of the people and used to justify intensified oppression. For centuries
people who had literally no idea of the number of days between seasons and couldn't count anyway, cheerfully
gave up a portion of their harvests, as well as their most beautiful daughters, to their "faithful servants"
in the priesthoods.
The power of our
finance capitalist money cult rests on a similar secret knowledge, primarily in the field of economics. Our
power is weakened by real advances in economic science (Fortunately, the public at large and most
revolutionaries remain totally ignorant of economics). However, we established money lords have been able to
prolong and even reverse our decline by systematically corrupting economic science with fallacious and
spurious doctrines. Through our power in the universities, publishing, and mass media we have been able to
reward the sincere, professorial cranks whose spurious doctrines happen to rationalize in terms of "common
good" the government supported institutions, laws, and economic measures upon which our money powers depend.
Keynesianism is the highest form of phony economics yet developed to our benefit. The highly centralized,
mixed economy resulting from the policies advocated by Lord Keynes for promoting "prosperity" has all the
characteristics required to make our rule invulnerable to our twin nemeses: real private competition in the
economic arena and real democratic process in the political arena. Laissez-faire or free market, classical
economics was our original attempt to corrupt economic science. Its beautiful internal consistency blinded
economists for many years to the fact that it had virtually nothing to do with current reality. However, we
are so powerful today that it is no longer possible to conceal our imposing institutions with the
appearances of free competition Keynesianism rationalizes this omnipotent state which we require, while
retaining the privileges of private property on which our power ultimately rests. Although the interim
reforms advocated by Marx in his Communist Manifesto such as central banking, income tax, and other
centralizing measures can be corrupted to coincide exactly with our requirements, we no longer allow Marxist
movements major power in developed countries. Our coercive institutions are already in place. Any real steps
toward communism would mean our downfall. Of course, phony Marxism is an excellent ideological veil in which
to cloak our puppet dictators in underdeveloped areas.
Secondarily, the power
of the lords of money rests on an occult knowledge in the area of politics and history. We have quite
successfully corrupted these sciences. Although many people are familiar with our secrets through such books
as 1984 by the disillusioned George Orwell, few take them seriously and usually dismiss such ideas as
paranoia. Since real politics is motivated by individual self-interest, history is viewed most accurately as
a struggle for power and wealth We do our best to obscure this self-evident truth by popularizing the theory
that history is made by the impersonal struggles between ideas, political systems, ideologies, races, and
classes. Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological
organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the
limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.
Left-Right political spectrum is our creation. In fact, it accurately reflects our careful, artificial
polarization of the population on phony issues that prevents the issue of our power from arising in their
minds. The Left supports civil liberties and opposes economic or entrepreneurial liberty. The Right supports
economic liberty and opposes civil liberty. Of course neither can exist fully (which is our goal) without
the other. We control the Right-Left conflict such that both forms of liberty are suppressed to the degree
we require Our own liberty rests not on legal or moral "rights," but on our control of the government
bureaucracy and courts which apply the complex, subjective regulations we dupe the public into supporting
for our benefit.
conflicts to divert the attention of the public from our operations find fertile ground in the bitter
hatreds of the Right/Left imbroglio. Right and Left are irreconcilable on racial policy, treatment of
criminals, law enforcement, pornography, foreign policy, women's lib, and censorship to name just a few
issues. Although censorship in the name of "fairness" has been useful in broadcasting and may yet be
required in journalism, we generally do not take sides in these issues. Instead we attempt to prolong the
conflicts by supporting both sides as required. War, of course, is the ultimate diversionary conflict and
the health of our system. War provides the perfect cover of emergency and crisis behind which we consolidate
our power. Since nuclear war presents dangers even to us, more and more we have resorted to economic crisis,
energy shortages, ecological hysteria, and managed political drama to fill the gap. Meaningless, brushfire
wars, though, remain useful.
We promote phony free
enterprise on the Right and phony democratic socialism on the Left. Thus, we obtain a "free enterprise"
whose "competition" is carefully regulated by the bureaucracy we control and whose nationalized enterprises
are controlled directly through our government. In this way we maintain a society in which the basis of our
power, legal titles to property and money, remain secure, but in which the peril of free, unregulated
competition is avoided and popular sovereignty is nullified. The democratic process is a sitting duck for
our money power. Invariably we determine the candidates of the major parties and then proceed to pick the
winners. Any attempts at campaign reforms simply put the rules of the game more firmly under our
Totalitarianism of the
fascist of communist varieties is no danger to us as long as bastions of private property remain to serve as
our bases of operation. Totalitarian governments of both Right and Left, because of the vulnerability of
their highly visible leaders to party rivals, can be manipulated easily from abroad. Primarily, totalitarian
dictatorships efficiently prevent new money lords that could challenge our power from arising in whole
continents, civilizations, and races.
Perhaps a few words on
ideology proper are in order before I conclude. The only valid ideology, of course is rational egoism, that
is, the maximization of the individual's gratification by whatever means prove practical. This requires
power over nature, especially, when possible, power over other humans who are the most versatile and
valuable tools of all. Fortunately, we do not have a society of egoists. Money lords would be impossible in
such a society as the mental spooks and rationalizations by which we characteristically manipulate and
deceive would be a laughing stock Under such circumstances a policy of live and let live or true
"laissez-faire" anarchy might be the only alternative. Certainly a hierarchical order would be difficult to
maintain by force alone. However, in the current era, while minds are yet in the thrall of altruistic
collectivistic, and divine moralistic spooks, the egoist's rational course is to utilize such spooks to
The next speaker,
Professor M., will detail the key institution of our power: Central Banking.
Professor M. On The Economics Of Central Banking ~
"It (a bank) can take
the depositors' goods, the goods that it holds for safekeeping, and lend them out to people on the market.
It can earn interest on these loans, and as long as only a small percentage of depositors ask to redeem
their certificates at any one time, no one is the wiser. Or, alternatively, it can issue pseudo
warehouse receipts for goods that are not there and lend these on the market. This is the more subtle
practice. The pseudo receipts will be exchanged on the same basis as the true receipts, since there is no
indication on their face whether they are legitimate or not. It should be clear that this practice is
outright fraud." --- Murray Rothbard: Man, Economy, and State
"The bold effort the
present bank has made to control the Government, the distress it has wantonly produced,. . ., are but
premonitions of the fate that awaits the American People should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this
institution (The Bank of the United States), or the establishment of another like it." --- Andrew Jackson
(December 2, 1834)
As you have a doctorate
degree in economics from a great university I will touch as lightly as my verbosity allows on facts accepted
by economic "science" and proceed to occult aspects of Central Banking.
Since the division of
labor is the key to all human achievement and satisfaction, a system of exchange is crucial. Barter is
hopelessly complicated. A command economy, in which each does and receives what be is told, is also
hopelessly cumbersome and fails to take advantage of individual initiative, ability, and concrete knowledge.
A medium of exchange, money, is the obvious solution. (Even our highly centralized economies on the
socialist model now enthusiastically embrace money as an indispensable simplifying tool in their economic
When left to themselves
people of a given geographical area settled upon a durable luxury commodity, usually gold or silver, to use
as money. Because money is a store of value as well as a medium of exchange, people saved part of their gold
income rather than spending it all. This gold was often stored in the vaults of a local goldsmith, the
precursor of the modern banker, for safekeeping. The depositor received a receipt that entitled him to an
equal quantity and quality of gold on demand from the goldsmith. At some point the goldsmith realized that
there was no reason he could not loan out some of the gold for interest as long as he kept gold on hand
sufficient to meet the fairly predictable withdrawal rate. After all, be simply promised to pay on demand,
not bold the gold as such. Better yet, be could simply issue more receipts for gold than be bad gold and the
receipts, renamed notes, could circulate freely among the populace as money.
However, he soon found
that there was a definite limit set on this process by reality. Not all the extra notes issued circulated
forever among the public. The rate of note redemption began to increase rapidly as the receipts passed into
the hands of people unfamiliar with his reputation and especially when competitive goldsmiths, always eager
for more gold reserves, came into possession of his notes. To prevent a disastrous run on his gold reserves,
note issuance had to be kept within bounds. But the spending power of over-issuance was a grave temptation.
Especially relished was the power over governments, industry, and merchants that the miraculous loan power
of the goldsmith could obtain. Many succumbed to temptation, overextended themselves and brought ruin to
their depositors while others slowly became wealthy bankers by pursuing conservative loan policies.
At this point,
according to economic "science," Central Banks are instituted to protect the public from periodic financial
catastrophe at the hands of unscrupulous fractional reserve bankers. Nothing could be further from the
truth. Central Banks are established to remove the limitation on over-issuance that reality places on
competitive banking systems. As early as ancient Babylon and India, Central Banking, the art of monopolizing
the issuance of money, had been developed into a perfect method for looting the general public. Even today
many bankers copy the traditions of the earlier exploitive priesthoods and design their banks to resemble
temples! Defenses of Central Banking are simply part of the deception that lies at the heart of all power
Let us look at the way
a new Central Bank is created where none has existed previously. We bankers approach the Prince or ruling
assembly (both of whom always want more money to fight wars or to curry favor with the people and,
typically, are ignorant of economics) with a compelling proposal: "Grant our bank a national Charter to
regulate private banking and to issue legal tender notes, that is, force our notes to be accepted as payment
for all debts, pubic and private. In exchange we will provide the government all the notes it prudently
requires at interest rates easily payable with existing taxes. The increased government purchasing power
thus created will simultaneously assure the power an prestige of the currently precarious nation and
stimulate the sluggish, credit starved economy to new heights of prosperity. Most important the violent
banking panics and credit collapses caused by unscrupulous private bankers will be replaced by our even
handed, beneficent and scientific management of money and banking. Our public-spirited expertise will be at
the disposal of the state while we remain independent enough of momentary political pressures to assure
For a while this system
seems to work remarkably well with full employment for everyone. The government an public does not notice
that we issuers of the new notes are using the notes we create out of thin air to surreptitiously build
economic empires at the expense of established interests. Because of the legal tender laws, few of the new
notes issued by the Central Bank are returned for redemption in gold. In fact, private banks and even a few
foreign banks may begin to use the Central Bank's notes as reserves for further issuance of credit. Soon
enough, though, prices begin to rise as the added notes increase demand relative to the quantity of goods
and services. As the value of their savings decline more and more foreigners in particular begin to question
the value of the Central Bank's notes and start to demand redemption in gold. We, of course do not take
responsibility for the rampant inflation when it comes. We blame inflation on evil speculators who
drive up prices for personal gain, as well as the greed of organized labor and business who are promptly
made subject to wage and price controls. Even the consumer can be made to feel guilty for agreeing to pay
the high prices! Mistaking symptoms for causes the government accepts the banker's analysis of the problem
and continues to give the Bank free reign in monetary policy.
By slowing the rate of
note issuance periodically, the ultimate crisis stage is postponed until many decades after the original
Central Bank Charter was granted. Before the rapidly dwindling gold reserves on which faith in our Bank
depends is exhausted we abruptly contract our loan volume to private industry and government as well. With
the contraction of the money supply a great deflationary crash begins in earnest with all its attendant
unemployment, bankruptcies, and civil strife. We do not take responsibility for the depression. We blame it
on evil hoarders who are refusing to spend their money and the prophets of doom who are spoiling business
confidence. The government accepts this analysis and leaves monetary policy in our hands. If things go well
we bankers channel the fury and unrest into puppet movements and pressure groups that carry our agents into
full control of the government. Once in charge we devalue our outstanding bank notes in terms of gold and
make them inconvertible for all but possibly foreign Central Banks and begin plans to restore a "prosperity"
that will be totally ours.
When lucky, we are able
to confiscate the gold of private citizens as punishment for hoarding during the climax of the depression.
Once the old order is
subdued during the chaos of the crash and desperation of the depression, the field is open for our full
finance capitalist system to be realized. If the money lords behind the Central Bank can avoid lapsing into
political and economic competition among themselves a new and lasting order can be established. A war timed
for this period of consolidation provides the perfect excuse for the regimentation required to crush all
Professor B., a former
Chairman of a Central Bank, will explain the functioning of the Central Plank in the typical, fully
developed finance capitalist system.
B. On The Function Of The Central Bank In The Mature Finance Capitalist System ~
"We are undone, my dear
sir, if legislation is still permitted which makes our money, much or little, real or imaginary, as the
moneyed interests shall choose to make it." --- Thomas Jefferson
"From now on
depressions will be scientifically created." --- Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr.-1923
In its pristine form a
Central Bank is a private monopoly of a nation's money and credit issuance supported by the coercive power
of the state. That the Central Bank be directly in our hands is vital until our new order is firmly
established throughout the governmental, business, intellectual and political spheres of society. After our
order is consolidated, formal nationalization of the Central Bank with great fanfare is usually advisable in
order to dispel any lingering suspicion that it is operated for private gain. Of course only loyal agents of
the dynasty are allowed to obtain high offices in the Bank and our power remains intact. Obvious private
monopolies are always the targets of sharp reformist agitators. Only the most paranoid, however, can see
through the public facade to the private monopoly of the nationalized or quasi-nationalized Central Bank.
The Central Bank is the
primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends. The occult power of the Central Bank to create
money out of nothing is the fountainhead that fuels our far-flung financial and political empire. I will
make a quick survey of a few of the ways this secret money power is brought to bear.
Basically, the power of
our Central Bank flows from its control over the points of entry into the economy of new, inflationary money
which it creates out of thin air. Ordinarily, bills of exchange, acceptances, private bonds, government
bonds and other credit instruments are purchased by the Central Bank through specially privileged dealers in
order to put the new money, often only checking accounting entries, into circulation. The dealers are
allowed a large profit since they are fronts operated by our agents. Our purchase of government securities
pleases the government, as our purchase of private debt pleases private debtors. As a quid pro quo to assure
"good management" our agents are given directorships, managerial posts, and offices in the corporations and
government's so benefited. As the addiction to the narcotic of inflationary easy credit grows and grows we
demand more and more control of our dependent entourage of governments and corporations. When we finally end
the easy credit to "combat inflation" the enterprises and governments either fall directly into our hands,
bankrupt, or are rescued at the price of total control.
Also, we ruling bankers
control the flow of money in the economy through the wide authority of the Central Bank to license, audit,
and regulate private banks. Banks that loan to interests outside the loyal entourage are "audited" by the
Central Bank and found to be dangerously overextended. Just a hint of insolvency from the respected Central
Bank authorities is enough to cause a run on the disobedient bank or at least dry up its vital lines of
credit. Soon the banking establishment learns to follow the hints and nods of your father's agents at the
Central Bank automatically.
Further, the periodic
cycles of easy money and tight money that we initiate through our control of the Central Bank cause
corresponding fluctuations in all markets. Our inner circle knows in advance the timing of these cycles and,
therefore reaps windfall profits by speculating in commodity, stock, currency, gold, and bond markets.
Monopolistic stock and commodity Exchanges are a vital adjunct to our power made possible by our Central
Bank power. We do not allow a fair auction market to exist, but make a great show of "tough" government
regulation to create a false sense of confidence among small investors. With the aid of our regulatory
charade and financial power we are able to maintain Exchanges tailored to our entourage's need to manipulate
stock prices at the expense of independent investors. Our privileged specialists on the floors of our
Exchanges, aided by the propaganda of our financial press and brokerage houses, continually play on naivete
and greed to drain the savings of the unwary into our coffers. The stock, commodities, and securities held
in trading accounts by the Exchange and brokerage houses provides us with a clout far beyond our own actual
holdings with which we can manipulate prices and win proxy fights for corporate takeovers.
Little danger to our
lucrative racket exists from public-spirited regulation. Our manipulations are so complex that only the most
brilliant experts could comprehend them. To most economists our Exchange operations appear to be helpful
efforts to "stabilize" the market. We ruling bankers, if able to keep peace among ourselves, become richer
and richer as time passes without the annoyance of exerting productive effort of benefit to others.
The next speaker,
Professor G. will discuss the secrets of social legislation and policy that do so much to cement our power.
G. On Social And Business Legislation And Policy
"There is no
proletarian, not even a Communist, movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in the
direction indicated by money, and for the time being permitted by money--and that without the idealists
among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact." --- Oswald Spengler: "Decline of the West"
"Also at the (SDS)
convention, men from Business International Roundtables… tried to buy up some radicals. These are the
world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives
are going to go… We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion
so they can look more in the center as they move to the left." --- James Kunen: "The Strawberry Statement:
Notes of a College Revolutionary"
The danger to our
system clearly is not that the "people" will spontaneously rise up and dispossess us. The "people" never
initiate anything. All successful movements are led from the top, usually without the knowledge of the
movement, by men like your father with vast resources and brilliant plans. The real danger arises in the
upper-middle classes. Occasionally, these people make vast fortunes through some brilliant technological
innovation in their business or through the favor of local politicians that escape our influence. Because of
their ignorance of the reality of our power, however, the new rich usually fall easily into our hands. For
instance, they seldom realize until too late that the dozens of loans they may owe to apparently independent
banks can be called simultaneously with a mere nod from your father. Graver danger is presented by those
whose enterprises are so successful as to be self-financing. Since the advent of the corporate income tax
truly self-financing corporations are extremely rare. Most disquieting is when these upstarts acquire the
covert or open support and advice of your father's major international antagonists. This is particularly
dangerous in countries with long democratic traditions where it is difficult to make our arbitrary rulings
The best solution is to
enact comprehensive taxes and business regulations in the name of the common good. Such measures reduce the
incidence of significant upstart competition to manageable levels. This policy, of course, strangles
innovation and productivity. Reduction of the GNPs in countries under your father's control would be
acceptable in the interests of secure power under the pretext of conservation, ecology, or no-growth
stability except that if carried too far your father's clout vis-a-vis his international rivals would be
impaired. The most difficult problem for the money lord is determining the level of social and economic
freedom he dares allow for the sake of his international power. Only method is to maintain a home base of
carefully monitored, relative freedom on which to base the economic and military strength required to
maintain an empire of totalitarian dictatorships abroad. The following measures, however, are found
necessary by nearly all money lords:
1. Steeply Graduated
Income Tax ~ Income tax does not affect us because our money was accumulated before the tax was imposed
and most of it is now safely protected in our network of tax exempt foundations. Foundation income and
capital can legally be used to finance the bulk of our social, economic, literary, and even political
propaganda. In a pinch it is easily diverted to illegal uses. Expensive "studies" required by our profitable
economic operations can be legitimately financed through foundations.
To the middle classes,
however, income tax makes life into an endless treadmill. Even the most productive find themselves unable to
accumulate significant capital. They are forced into the clutches of our Central Bank entourage for
injections of the inflationary credit which we are privileged to create out of nothing. The self-financing
wealth of the legendary 19th Century robber barons and early Twentieth Century tycoons is no longer
possible. Although your grandfather owed his start to just those wide-open conditions, he was among the
first of the super-rich to advocate the erection of the tax wall that is now in place. Please note that in
democratic countries eternal vigilance is required to prevent our tax shield from being riddled with loop
holes by conniving legislators, who are usually of the tax oppressed, upper-middle class origins themselves.
Regulation ~ When upstarts slip through our financial tentacles and tax shields, perhaps with the aid of
outsiders, a second line of defense becomes vital licensing in the crucial area of broadcasting has proven
particularly necessary. This makes serious upstart-led mass political challenge impossible. Harassment by
bureaucrats armed with arbitrary and voluminous industrial safety regulations is a new and increasingly
effective technique. Security registration requirements, "to protect the small investor," can cause fatal
delays in an upstart's ability to raise capital on the stock market. Ecological considerations are easily
perverted to stymie the plans of those who would upset the stability of our carefully planned system.
however, is our ultimate weapon. The handy doctrine of "pure and perfect" competition which we have fostered
in our universities is ideally suited to convict any successful competitor, at our discretion. If the
competitor charges a lower price than ours he is accused of "unfair competition" aimed at driving us from
the field to impair future competition. If he asks the same price as we, he is open to the charge of
collusion. If he charges more than us, he is obviously exploiting his "monopoly power" at the expense of the
consumer. Fortunately, the rulings of our bureaucrats are so complicated that even when successfully
appealed in court many years elapse before the ruling is rendered. By then our goals are often achieved
safety, and testing regulations are excellent methods by which we insulate our established industries from
potential competition. Beside raising the costs of entry into the auto business, for instance, the cost of
"safety" can be passed to the consumer along with a healthy profit mark-up.
Tariffs, and Foreign Aid ~ Although direct subsidies can occasionally be procured for our entourage of
corporations by appealing to the masses' desire to preserve jobs, this exploitive technique is usually too
obvious. Tariffs are easily passed, but lead to retaliation against our foreign holdings. Foreign aid and
soft (sure to be defaulted) government guaranteed loans, however, fill the bill perfectly under modern
conditions. Foreign aid maintains our empire of foreign dictators abroad while providing guaranteed, highly
profitable sales to our corporations at home base. Foreign aid should always be contingent on the purchase
of goods, usually military hardware, that only our entourage of firms can provide. Few have the courage to
oppose such altruistic aid to the "starving masses" of the "third world."
4. Centralization of
Power ~ Real division of power between national, state, and local government is dangerous to our system.
When local politicians have real autonomy, even in limited spheres, they can do much to enable upstarts to
challenge our power. Our program is to bring all levels of government under our sway through such
innovations as federal aid, revenue sharing, high federal taxation, and regional government.
5. Alliance with the
Lower Classes ~ In order to keep our valuable regulatory machinery in place and under our control we
must have the mass support of the numerous lower classes against our vigorous, but scarce middle-class
rivals. The best method is to provide the lower classes with subsidies at the expense of the middle class.
This creates a mutual hatred that prevents the middle class from appealing effectively to the lower classes
for support. Social security, free health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, while
doing nothing for us directly, create a dependent class whose support for our critical measures can easily
be made part of a package deal. Please note also that the major labor unions began with our financing and
are led to this day by leaders of our choosing. No one can rise to or remain at the top of a rough and
tumble union without our financial backing. In spite of their rebellious rhetoric, bought union leaders are
the source of our power over the management of firms with widely held stock. Unions are the ultimate weapon
for destroying otherwise invulnerable, self-financing rivals. Further, downward flexibility of wages and
prices which obtains without widespread unionization would increase the ability of the economy to survive
without our aid during the economic crises we create.
Bread and circuses are
as useful today as in Roman times for mobilizing the mob against our staid adversaries. Next, Professor D.
will describe our education policies.
D. On The Role Of Public Education ~
"In our dreams we have
limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present
educational conventions fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our good will upon a
grateful and responsive rural folk . . . The task we set before ourselves is a beautiful one, to train these
people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just as they are. So we will organize our children into a
little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an
imperfect way in the home, in shop, and on the farm." --- The objective of Rockefeller
"philanthropies" stated by him and Gates in Occasional Letter No. 1 of Rockefeller's General Education
"A general state
education is a mere contrivance for molding people to be exactly like one another; and as the mold in which
it casts them is that which pleases the predominant power in the government --- whether this be a monarch, a
priesthood, an aristocracy, or the majority of the existing generation --- in proportion as it is efficient
and successful, it establishes a despotism over the mind, leading by natural tendency to one over the body."
--- John Stuart Mill
In order to maintain
our system of power, the institution of universal public education is indispensable. The anarchy of private
education in which any manner of dangerous ideas could be spread cannot be tolerated. Thus we make private
education financially impossible to all but the few mostly the elite offspring of our financial entourage,
by means of burdensome taxation and regulation. The primary purpose of public education is to inculcate the
idea that our crucial institutions of coercion and monopoly were created for the public good by popular
national heroes to blunt the past power of the malefactors of great wealth. Crucial is to create the
impression that, although the people have been exploited in the past, today the wealthy are at the mercy of
an all-powerful government which is firmly in the hands of the people or do-gooding liberals.
For those of more
sophistication who reject this Pollyanna view of reality, we promote the "liberal reformer mentality" which
holds that a new era of reform is on the verge of crushing forever the last vestiges of money lordism. Of
course, the reforms, after taking shape as a bewildering myriad of regulatory agencies and taxes, are found
to be ineffective in subordinating our power to the popular will, whereupon we stir up another era of
Left-Right spectrum which our compulsory education helps to make universal is valuable in assuring that this
charade does not get out of hand. The Pollyannas in the middle are neither dangerous nor useful in this
endeavor. What is needed is a feeble, but persistent right-conservatism to moderate and emasculate the
liberal reforms. Conservatives tend to resist all the advances in centralized, government power that we lead
the liberals to see as necessary in order to totally end the "undemocratic" power of money in society.
Conservatism would rather promote a "pluralism" of competing interests in which money is the medium of
competition than risk the excesses of "big government," When "liberal" reforms show signs of exceeding our
intentions and actually threaten to place our key institutions in the hands of the people, we can always
count on the conservatives to defend our power under the illusion that they are defending the legitimate
rights of "free-enterprise capitalists." On the rare occasions when conservatives call for subjecting our
enterprises to laissez-faire competition, we can count on the dominant liberal reformers to insist on more
government interference, unaware of our desire for such, in effect, self-administered regulation.
The Right has such a
fear of the Left's dream of democratic collectivism and the Left such a hatred for what it sees as the
Right's elitist, rugged individualism that there is little danger that they will ever join forces to
overturn our government-backed monopolies even though we violate the ideals of both left and right.
control at the state, or preferably national level, assists in building the climate of opinion we require in
public education. Failing to obliterate local control, other methods nearly as effective are available. Our
overwhelming financial clout in the publishing industry can induce relatively uniform textbook selection.
Further leverage can be created by promoting teacher colleges and teaching machines. National teacher's
associations and unions are also an excellent power base from which to foster our programs of
With our great
influence in publishing and publicity we are able to, selectively popularize educational theorists whose
views are incidentally beneficial, compatible, or at least not in conflict with our own goals. This way we
obtain sincere, energetic activists to propagate our desires without having to reveal our motives or even
existence. We do not want an educational system that produces hard-driving individuals bent on amassing
great wealth and power. Therefore, we discourage education that would develop the potential powers of
students to their fullest. "Liberal" education that stresses knowledge for its own sake or even sophistry
and sterile mental gymnastics is of no danger to us. "Relevant," vocational, or career-oriented education
also poses no danger to our power. Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our
military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal. Progressive education with its stress on
"social adjustment" also produces the conformity we require of our subjects. Emphasis on competitive sports
may produce a certain amount of disruptive competitiveness among the participants, but primarily has the
effect of creating life-long voyeuristic spectators who will enthusiastically sublimate their
competitiveness into endless hours of following college and professional sports on the boob tube. Space
spectaculars and dramatic political infighting are also marvelous diversions with which to occupy the
Anyone seeking social
change will gravitate to the field of education. Our strategy is simple: Let only those succeed whose
influence would be compatible with our power. Encourage all who would develop the passive or receptive mode
of existence. Discourage all who promote the aggressive or active capacities. Build a great cult of
salvation through endless education, touting it as the "democratic" path to success Deride the frontal
approach to success of the "outmoded' rugged individualist.
Before yielding the
floor to Professor X., who will discuss the role of secret societies and prestigious clubs, I would like to
comment on the demise of religious education as a vehicle for social control. Religion, in its time, was a
remarkable weapon for inculcating subservience, altruism, and self-abnegation among our subjects. We did not
give up this weapon voluntarily. Your grandfather, for one, supported the Baptist faith well after most
finance capitalists had turned wholly to secular ideologies. However, a trend toward rationality in human
affairs plods along inexorably quite outside the reach of our power. Only in our totalitarian dictatorships
can this trend be quashed entirely. In the semi-open societies in which our money power is based, the forces
of reason can only be impeded and diverted. Some have theorized that, eventually, widespread rational egoism
will overturn our order. I am confident that secular faiths and just plain confusion will suffice to sustain
our power for many centuries to come.
X. On Prestigious Associations And Secret Societies ~
"Every compulsion is
put upon writers to become safe, polite, obedient, and sterile. In protest, I declined election to the
National Institute of Arts and Letters some years ago, and now I must decline the Pulitzer Prize." --- Upton
"It is useless to deny,
because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe--the whole of Italy and France and a great
portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries--is covered with a network of these secret societies,
just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads." --- Benjamin Disraeli (Earl of
Beaconsfield), July 14, 1856
In preserving and
protecting our grasp on nations we must exert veiled control of all major opinion molding associations and
especially prestigious clubs which attract the leaders in various fields and do so much to influence the
dispensing of commanding positions in government and business. Associations of the leading scholars,
businessmen, writers, religionists, artists, bureaucrats, newsmen, ideologists, publishers, broadcasters,
and professional men as well as special interest groups representing laborers, farmers, consumers, racial
minorities, and so on must be subtly kept under the broad limits of our sway. Since membership dues and fees
are never sufficient to support their ambitious activities, voluntary, non-profit organizations are easy
prey for the nearly unlimited financial resources of our entourage. However, our real motive, to further our
political and economic power, must not be revealed in the process. Our policies must be laboriously
rationalized in terms compatible with prevalent ideologies and moralities or the material advantage of the
groups involved. Leaders of such groups are remarkably quick to accept our rationalizations when financial
support is extended. We engage in outright bribery only as a last resort, and then, only in extreme cases.
Our long-range interests are better served by temporarily postponing a policy victory than by risking
exposure of our power by attempting outright bribery. In fact, clumsy bribery and intimidation attempts are
characteristic of our foolish nouveau-riche opponents.
As an example, if we
decide that federal rather than state chartering or licensing of corporations would further our control over
the economy, we would not simply order politicians and opinion leaders to support our desires. Corporations
not relishing central control would be suspicious that something was afoot and might expose our plot. Our
strategy would be as follows:
1. Sacrifice one of our
less competent management teams in a well-publicized corporate scandal in order to focus attention on the
"widespread problem of corporate corruption under current, lax regulations."
2. Through well-funded
agents, thrust into the publicity spotlight intellectuals or groups who already support federal licensing as
a piecemeal step toward socialism. (One can find pre-existing supporters for nearly any measure with
3. After the issue is
before the public, offer to support through foundations the "objective" study of the federal licensing
proposals being discussed with an eye toward proposing legislation. Often, simultaneous support for studies
by disreputable, irrational groups who will oppose the proposal is useful as well. Provide no platform
4. When a ground swell
of support appears to be building provide the interested lobbying organizations with plenty of funds to
grease the palms of politicians. The enactment of the federal licensing law thus appears as the will of
society. Last-ditch opposition automatically appears mean spirited, obstructionist, reactionary, and
paranoid, serving only to discredit our opposition.
In our fully developed
system of finance capitalist thought control and promotion control, our hierarchy of prestigious
associations is capped by a single prestige society: The Council of World Affairs. This organization is a
front for the secret society of which your father is head. This secret society is made up of the people who
have spoken, plus six others not present. You are replacing Professor Q. who is to retire shortly.
Eventually you will replace your father. We thirteen are your father's advisors and only confidants. All
other agents are misled as to the bulk of our objectives and motives. Their knowledge is restricted to the
details required by their assignments. The penalty for disloyalty is death.
The Council is
invaluable for propagating our policy decisions to our entourage without revealing our motives and strategy.
In many instances, policy can he successfully sold to our entourage and thus transmitted to the multitudes
by merely airing it along with appropriate rationalizations in a single awe-inspiring session of the
Council. The informal power of the Council is such that our policy manipulations are usually attainable
without the clumsy exercises in brute power that invariably snag the independent power seekers. The Council
is at the heart of what is called the Establishment and we are at the heart of the Council.
At the Council's
inception, we worked hard to attract the successful of all fields with all the prestige that our money power
could buy. We had to work hard convincing the independent, self-made Council members to move in harmony with
our policy objectives. We had many failures. Now everything is changed. Membership is no longer a reward for
success as much as it is a prerequisite for major success. Without Council membership only the most
outstanding can achieve national prominence. With membership, glaring mediocrities, with the "right"
attitudes, achieve prominence. In fact, mediocrities are much more adapted to propagating our policy
rationalizations and less likely to detect and oppose our ulterior motives. A power lusting mediocrity is
not likely to judge his benefactors too harshly or inquire diligently into the nature of the power structure
that brought him what he fears was undeserved success. The vanity of even idealistic, committed
humanitarians militates against such a course.
The Council is now a
giant employment agency of loyalists ready to parrot our public line from the commanding posts of
government, foundations, broadcasting, industry, banking, and publishing. Although Council members are
encouraged to take sides and bicker over the diversionary issues we create to entertain and enfeeble the
populace, their solidarity in defending our power structure, root and branch, when pressed is a sight to
behold! And to think that most see themselves as righteous defenders of the public good while they dismiss
whispered rumors of our power structure as "kooky paranoia."
societies with elaborate circles within circles no longer play a major role in finance capitalist power
structures. Most wide membership secret societies have degenerated into middle class excuses for escaping
the wife and kids once a month for the company of men. But secret societies were a major weapon of our
bourgeoisie forebearers in their struggle with the old feudal order of kings and princes. Under
authoritarian despotism of the old style, the secret society was the only place a free-thinking man could
express himself. Through threats of exposure, loyalty oaths, patronage, deception, and rewards we bound such
malcontents into a fierce force for our revolution. The multitude of degrees, occult mumbo-jumbo, and vague
humanitarianism concealed the real goals of our secret societies from the bulk of the membership. The roles
of the "Illuminated" Masonic Lodges in European revolutions were decisive in our final victory over the old
I now yield the floor
to Professor Y. who will discourse on the real "secret societies" the
Modern Finance Capitalist State: the National Security Institutions and Intelligence
Y. On Covert Operations And Intelligence ~
In our fully developed
state-capitalist systems we have found absolute control of governmental intelligence gathering and covert
operations to be vital.
Besides providing a
valuable tool in our struggle with rival dynasties, such control is now an integral and necessary part of
our day-to-day operations. Large intelligence communities are inevitable, given the system of all
encompassing governments which we have imposed upon the world during our ascent to power. Our power would be
short-lived indeed if the pervasive influence and power of these iron-disciplined intelligence agencies fell
into the hands of mere politicians, especially those beyond our control.
We do not allow
intelligence agencies to pursue the "national interest," the way the public conceives "spies" to operate.
Politicians cannot be permitted to divert the power and influence of our intelligence community from the
esoteric requirements of our Money Power to petty political struggles.
aspirations of races and peoples nor ideological visions of intellectuals for humanity can be allowed to
pervert intelligence and covert operations. Our rationalizations, both within the intelligence community and
to the public at large, must be diverse and flexible, but the intelligence community must further without
exception the inexorable goals we have set for humanity.
No crisis is more
serious for our Money Power than an attempt by a head of government to assume personal control of
intelligence and operations or to by-pass existing agencies by setting up parallel ones. Such intrusions
must be met decisively. Although a contrived scandal to remove the offending politician from office is the
first line of defense, we dare not shrink from assassination when necessary.
Perhaps the most
accurate overview of our intelligence community can be achieved by visualizing it as a "nationalized secret
society." Our predecessors, in their struggle against the old order of kings and princes, had to finance
secret societies such as the Illuminati, Masons, German Union, etc. out of their own pockets.
At great expense and
risk such secret societies were able to infiltrate the major governmental and private institutions of the
nations that our noble predecessors targeted for take over by the Money Power. Such bureaucratic takeovers
are expensive and time consuming. They can be considered complete only when promotions, raises, and
advancements are no longer based on objective service to the stated organizational objectives, but are in
the hands of the infiltrating group and its secret goals.
How much easier it is
for us, the inheritors of a fully developed state-capitalist system! By appealing to "national security" we
are able to finance and erect secret societies of a colossal scope, far beyond the wildest dreams of our
path breaking predecessors. Besides the benefits of public financing reaped by these "nationalized secret
societies," we obtain a decisive advantage from the fact that these our "spook" operations are sanctioned by
loyalty, and secrecy is no longer solely a matter of propaganda, blackmail, patronage, and intimidation.
Although these remain important tools, especially in emergency cases, ordinary discipline among initiates
(now called agents) can be encouraged by appealing to patriotism and can be enforced in courts of law by
prosecuting "national security violations."
As massive as our
intelligence community has become in itself, we still operate strictly on the finance capitalist principle
of leverage. Just as a rational finance capitalist never owns more stock in a corporation than the bare
minimum required for control, intelligence operatives are placed only in as many key positions as are
required to control the target organizations. Our goal, after all, is agent control of all significant
organizations, not intelligence community member ship for the entire population.
pattern of baffling "circles within circles," characteristic of classical secret societies, is retained and
refined by our intelligence community. That "one hand not know what the other is doing" is essential to the
success of our operations. In most cases, we do not allow the operatives themselves to know the ultimate,
and when possible, even the short-range objectives of their assignments.
They operate under
"covers" that disguise our goals not only from the public and target groups, but from the agents themselves.
For instance, many agents operating under "left cover" are led to believe that the agency, or at least their
department, is secretly, but sincerely motivated by socialistic ideology. Thus, they assume that the
intelligence agency's ultimate goal is to guide left-wing groups in "productive" directions, even though
they cannot always see how their own assignment fits into those assumed goals.
agents, those with right-wing predilections, are encouraged to believe the agency is simply "monitoring"
violence prone, subversive groups in order to protect the public. When such agents are asked to participate
in or even lead radical activity they assume that the ultimate objective is to fully infiltrate and destroy
the organization for the good of the country. This is very seldom the case. We waste little or no money
protecting the "public" or defending the "nation."
Agents operating under
"right-cover" are handled in symmetrical fashion. Agents with right-wing prejudices are encouraged to
believe the agency is right-wing. Left-prejudiced agents are asked to operate under "right-cover" in order
to "monitor" dangerous rightist organizations. Most intelligence agents remain blithely ignorant of the big
picture which is so clear to us from our spectacular vantage point. Very few have enough information or
intelligence to reason out how their specific and sometimes baffling assignments promote the legislative,
judicial, operational and propaganda needs of our Money Power. Most would never try. They are paid too much
to think about such things.
Agents with a
"gangster-cover" are of two types. First, there is the sincere gangster that draws his salary from an
intelligence agency. He is led to believe that the gangland "Godfathers" control the government agency for
their own purposes. Actually, the situation is the opposite. The agency controls the gangster for other
purposes. Second, is the sincere crime fighter who is led to believe that the agency is at tempting to
infiltrate and monitor the gangsters as a preliminary step to destroying organized crime. Such "upstanding"
agents commit many crimes in their zeal to rid the country of organized crime!
To envision how we
operate in this lucrative field, let's briefly look at the mechanics of dope smuggling. Police and customs
officials are told to leave certain gangsters alone, even when transporting suspicious cargoes. This is made
to seem perfectly proper since it is well known that secret police infiltrators of organized crime must
participate in crimes in order to gain the confidence of gangsters.
What customs agent
would want to upset a carefully laid plan to "set-up" the underworld kingpins of dope pushing! But the
agent, as well as the police who cooperate, are mistaken in believing that the purpose of the assignment to
help smuggle dope is ultimately to smash organized crime. If he could see the big picture, as we can, the
agent would see that practically all our dope is smuggled by federal intelligence agents and secret police!
How ever could such a volume be transported safely? Real harassment and prosecution is reserved for those
who enter the field without our approval.
Here is our organized
crime strategy: On the one hand we pass laws to ensure that mankind's favorite pastimes (vices) are illegal.
On the other hand, we cater to these "vices" at a huge monopoly profit with complete immunity from
A new and growing
methodology of our intelligence community is psychologically and drug-controlled agents. Properly, these are
referred to as "behavior modified" agents, or, in the vernacular, "zombies." With the use of hypnotic drugs,
brain washing, sensory deprivation, small group "sensitivity" training, and other behavior modification
techniques, the scope of which was hinted in the movie "Clockwork Orange," complete personalities can be
manufactured from scratch, to the specifications of value structure profiles we design by computer to suit
our purposes. Such personalities are quite neurotic and unstable due to defects in our still developing
technology, but still useful for many purposes.
The primary virtue of
"zombies," of course, is loyalty. Agents that are subconsciously programmed for the assignment at hand
cannot be conscious traitors. All a "zombie" can do is reveal how compulsive and psychotic he is with regard
to his "cause." Even to trained psychologists he simply appears to be the proverbial "lone nut." Although
the "zombie" may have memories of psychotherapy at a government agency when questioned under hypnosis, this
is unlikely to raise suspicion in the mind of court-appointed psychologists. After all, "lone nuts" should
be kept in insane asylums and subjected to psychotherapy! At most, the government hospital will be
reprimanded for letting a loony loose before he was cured.
Until our techniques
can be perfected the use of "zombies" must be restricted to "national dramas" designed to justify the
growing power of our centralized governments over the lives of our people. Most suicidal radicals and
"crazies" who so mysteriously avoid arrest for years at a time are "zombies" conditioned to terrorize the
public in the name of some irrational ideology. After repeated doses of such terror, the public is
conditioned to accept the necessity of our intrusive police state with very little objection.
The way is clear for an
accelerated program of behavior modification research to be conducted mostly at public expense in the name
of mental health and rehabilitation. Such research can be conducted with little complaint in prisons,
refugee camps, drug rehabilitation centers, government hospitals, veterans hospitals, and even public
schools and day care centers. Mental institutions, methadone maintenance centers, and prisons are fertile
fields for recruiting the deranged or drug-addicted persons most suitable for "zombie" conversions. Of
course, only a few of our most trusted agents actually participate in the creation of "zombies." The
brilliant researchers and experimenters who make most of the breakthroughs earnestly believe that their
techniques are destined strictly for the betterment of mankind.
Inevitably, a fraction
of the population objects to behavior modification as an infringement of man's "sacred" free will even if
they are convinced that our intentions are benign. We carefully leak a few scandals to satisfy such persons
that our experiments are being kept within bounds and that excesses are being stopped. Our artificial
scandals exposing the "excesses" of coercive psychology are carefully designed to make the researchers seem
incompetent and clumsy to the point of maiming and killing their "patients." This effectively conceals the
fantastic strides we have made toward total behavioral control. Great things are going to be possible in the
I now return the floor
to your father for his concluding remarks.
Closing Remarks ~
My son, you surely have
many questions about my strategy in the seemingly momentous economic and political crises that are shaking
national and international affairs. You and I will begin handling them in detail shortly. For tonight, let
me be brief. Most of the current national upheavals are stage-managed to consolidate our monopoly position
in government and business against the continual nuisance of economically competent, but politically naive
competitors. Likewise, most international crises are managed to exert pressure on our obstreperous,
reluctant puppet dictators in underdeveloped areas. These events are fairly easy to manage. I expect to
place such management in your hands as soon as possible.
The real challenge lies
in dealing with my international peers. These are the real crises since they are crises of my power
structure, not just of my subject populations and puppets. In the vast chess game with my peers there are no
rules and no proven tactics. Mutual vulnerability, alone, limits the conflict. My peers and I have labored
for decades to erect a world government and banking system under which we could all share finance
capitalism's millennium without the nightmare of internecine warfare. With the advent of nuclear war a new
world order seemed particularly desirable. I say ostensibly we have labored for world government because
none of us are sure the others will ever voluntarily surrender sovereignty to the group. The schedule set
after the last World War has not been met. So far, the world government idea has served mainly to enthuse
collectivist intellectuals, and secondarily to veil each finance capitalist's maneuvers for supremacy from
The future course of
finance capitalism is difficult to predict. Our empires are too fragile to risk all-out battles for
supremacy among ourselves. Our power would dissipate to second echelon wealthy during the struggle. Yet we
continue to chip away at rival empires on the premise that offense is the best defense. On the other hand,
purely political leaders are helpless before our money power. When Caesars arise, they are of our making.
Perhaps our system will
simply remain much as it is, secure on the national level and disturbingly pluralistic at the international
level, until reason and egoism have developed among our populations to such an extent that our occult
technology of money power becomes obvious to all who think and must yield to either anarchy or a more
advanced form of deception.
By The Transcriber ~
"The names of some of
these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Baring, Lazard,
Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and
Morgan." --- Dr. Carroll Quigley: "Tragedy and Hope"
Any resemblance of
these characters to persons living or dead is purely coincidental. Any resemblance of their methodology to
that of real ruling elites is purely intentional. The extent to which I represent or exaggerate the
self-conscious, intentional power technology of real politico-economic rulers and their unity is for the
reader to decide after studying available empirical evidence.
I am providing a
bibliography of relevant historical works to aid the curious reader. I have included no works written from
spurious pluralistic suppositions no one seems to consider pluralism as a proposition requiring evidence
since they are flooding the market. Unfortunately, many works listed affirm that ideas rather than
individual struggles for wealth and power propel history; that is, they view the elites they observe ruling
the world as ideologically motivated. Thus we have the spectacle of the Right claiming that major finance
capitalists such as the Rockefellers or Rothschilds are "communist" conspirators or "socialists." On the
other hand, we see the Left claiming that the same people are bent on imposing laissez -faire capitalism, or
in a slightly more realistic vein, are fanatical proponents of fascism. Virulent white racism is another
ideology foolishly ascribed to the ruling class by the Left. This opinion is nicely balanced by the charge
from the Right that the elite wants to "mongrelize" and thus submerge the white race. As usual the elite,
completely free of prejudice, supports both sides of this battle for its own ends.
As should be clear by
now, I believe that finance capitalists (Ferdinand Lundberg has dubbed them finpols, or financial
politicians) are understandably attempting to make their power as extensive as possible without incurring
the severe risks which plague pubpols (public politicians). (It seems that only the most daring finpols are
willing to take on the additional risks of pubpoldom, perhaps only because they are denied the reins to the
family's fortune by more privileged relatives.) Pubpols lose their privacy and thus their right to sexual
impropriety in addition to incurring vulnerability to electioneering and worse in "democratic" countries. In
most areas of the world the lot of the pubpols is even worse. Purge, assassination, and armed coup are
regular events. While totalitarianism of Right or Left at home eliminates the shield of secure private
property desired by finpols, laissez--faire is likewise rejected out-of-hand as hell-on-earth by enlightened
Egoism, mitigated only
by the reality of circumstance, is the motive to realistically attribute to healthy elites. An elite under
the spell of mental spooks could not hold sway for long. Although finpol statism is increasingly a crisis
for its victims, there is as yet no evidence that the elite itself is in serious crisis. Even inflation, the
current crisis for the powerless, is simply another crisis to be managed toward the end of consolidating,
extending, and refreshing elite power. No doubt the depression which must inevitably follow will be managed
to even better effect at the expense of the masses.
I have classified the
bibliography into the categories Right and Left. In each list I begin with the most objective works and
proceed to the works most infected with mental spooks and emotional hysteria. These books should be read for
empirical data, not theoretical insight. A list of less ideologically biased works is provided as well. I
quote and recommend authors, not to imply support for my scenario where there is none, but to credit a few
of those who have provided grist for my thoughts.
"We are much beholden
to Machiavelli and others, that write what men do, and not what they ought to do." --- Francis Bacon
on History, Economics, Politics, Philosophy, and Human Nature:
Rothbard: Economic Determinism and the Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited; Audio-Forum.
America's Great Depression;1972.
Tragedy and Hope; Macmillan, 1966
Gabriel Kolko: The
Triumph of Conservatism; Quadrangle
Carroll Quigley: The
Evolution of Civilizations.
Anton S. LaVey: The
Satanic Bible; Avon Books, 1969.
Arkon Daraul: Secret
Societies; Citadel Press, 1962.
Count Egon Caesar
Corti: The Rise of the House of Rothschild; ibid., The Reign of the House of Rothschild;
Cosmopolitan Book Corp., 1928.
Max Stirner: The Ego
and His Own; Libertarian Book Club, 1963.
Robert Ardrey: The
Social Contract; Dell Publishing; 1970.
Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future; Random House, 1966.
Animal Farm; New American Library
Ludwig von Mises:
Theory and History; Arlington House, 1969.
Henry Regnery: Human
James J. Martin:
Revisionist Viewpoints; Ralph Myles Publisher, 1971.
Committee on Government
Operations, U.S. Senate: Disclosure of Corporate Ownership; U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution; ibid., Wall Street and FDR; Arlington House, 1975.
The Left on the Ruling
Gabriel Kolko: The
Triumph of Conservatism; Quadrangle Books, 1967.
Richard Ney: The
Wall Street Gang; Praeger Publishers, 1974.
The Rich and the Super-Rich; Lyle Stuart, 1968.
America's 60 Families; Vanguard, 1938.
William G. Domhoff:
Who Rules America?; Prentice Hall, 1967.
W.G. Domhoff: The
Higher Circles; Random House, 1970.
Money Lords; New American Library, 1973.
M. Josephson: The
Robber Barons; Harcourt Brace & Co., 1934.
George H. Shibley:
The Money Question; Stable Money Publishing Co., 1896.
Jules Archer: The
Plot to Seize the White House; Hawthorn Books, 1973.
David: Report on a Rockefeller; Dell Publishing, 1972.
Joel Andreas: The
Incredible Rocky; North American Congress on Latin America, 1973.
Gustavus Myers: The
History of the Great American Fortunes; 1907
The Right on the
Conspiracy Theory of History:
National Suicide; Arlington House, 1973.
Charles A. Lindbergh,
Sr.: The Economic Pinch; Dorrance & Company, Inc., 1923, Reprinted by Omni Publications.
Louis T. McFadden:
Collective Speeches of Congressman McFadden; Omni Publications, 1970.
H.S. Kenan: The
Federal Reserve Bank; The Noontide Press, 1968.
Gary Allen: None
Dare Call It Conspiracy; Concord Press, 1973.
G. Allen: Richard
Nixon: The Man Behind the Mask; Western Islands, 1971.
G. Allen: The
Rockefeller File; '76 Press, 1976.
Dan Smoot: The
Invisible Government; The Dan Smoot Report, Inc., 1962.
W. Cleon Skousen:
The Naked Capitalist; The Author, 1970.
Captains and Kings; Fawcett Publications, 1973.
John Robison: Proofs
of Conspiracy; 1798, Reprinted by Western Islands.
Secret Societies and Subversive Movements; Christian Book Club, 1967.
A. N. Field: The
Truth About the Slump; 1931, Reprinted by Omni Publications, 1962.
William Robert Plumme:
The Untold History; The Committee for the Restoration of the Republic, 1964.
June Grem: Karl
Marx: Capitalist; Enterprise Publications, 1972.
Rockefeller Internationalist: Man Who Misrules the World; Chedney Press, 1962.
The TRUTH about Democracy.
Winston Churchill said many
years ago, that democracy is the least bad of all of the systems of government produced out of
Winston Churchill is also quoted as having once said: "Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across
truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." Just
as a bell that has been rung cannot be "unrung," the annoying problem with the Truth is that, once you learn
it, you can not "unlearn" it.
Democracy, which has become
the Cure-all Mantra, quoted incessantly by all western
politicians, is a LIE and a
confidence-trick, that they
and their puppet-masters are now trying to deceive the rest of the world with, and are using their economic
and/or military-muscle and means to force other nations to adopt, so that their puppet-masters can use the politicians to help them to rip-off all
the other nations too, just as they have done already to the vast majority of their own citizens.
It is very simple to see that democracy is a lie and a confidence-trick. All you have to do is analyse what it
is supposed to be and then compare that definition to the reality.
Democracy is supposed to be the rule of the majority. Government of the majority of the people, for the
majority of the people, by the majority of the people.
Let us now compare the smooth deceptive definition,
to stark reality.
In the western world approximately 95% of the wealth is possessed by approximately 5% of the people. That
means, using these same figures, that 95% of the people, the overwhelming majority, possess only 5% of the
The politicians would have us all believe that this is the will of the majority. That is the politician's idea of what they
When did the 95% of people, the overwhelming majority, ever vote for the right for themselves to be poor and
vote for the tiny 5% minority to possess their own (the poor people's) share of the nation's wealth, that the
poor majority's ancestors have fought and died to protect?
The Ruler of the Universe has prohibited democracy because He knew that the rich would use it and other
means to deceive and rip everyone else off; keep the majority
down and poor; just as He wrote, via His Prophets in The Bible.
He gave the world, via Moses, the perfectsystem of government, under which there is no poverty; no poor people and
consequently no need to resort to crime to survive.
He prohibited the writing of laws and economic policies by humans, in order to protect the majority from abuse,
and oppression created under the home-made laws of the rich and powerful.
Deuteronomy 17:14 When
thou art come unto the land which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell
therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as
all the nations that [are] about me;
17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the "I AM" thy God shall choose: [one] from among
thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger (a Gentile) over thee, which [is]
not thy brother.
17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt
(slavery - employment under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the
"I AM" hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.
17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly
multiply to himself silver and gold.
17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of
this Law in a book out of [that which is] before the priests the Levites (The Torah):
17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may
learn to fear the "I AM" his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these
Statutes, to DO them:
17:20 That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn NOT aside from
the Commandment (The Covenant), [to] the right hand (right-wing politics), or [to] the left
(left-wing politics): to the end that he may prolong [his] days in his kingdom, he, and his children, in
the midst of Israel.
Many people can see the
Democracy (demon-crazy) Deception and refuse to vote, so the wily politicians made-up special rules to allow
themselves to rule using only a majority of the votes, even when the number of people who vote is only a
minority of the population. How can that possibly be conceived to be the rule of the majority? Of course
it is not the rule of the majority; it is a confidence-trick.
Those who can see the deception, unfortunately do not know what to
do about the confidence trick; because they do not study; understand and apply the
teachings of The Bible, having been deceived yet again by the misinterpretations of the churches, who
work with, and are part of, the political-system; and so just watch the puppets* dancing on their strings, not
knowing how to cut those strings forever.
The Ruler of the Universe pre-warned you about all of this in The Bible and that you are not "a law unto
yourselves" and that if you will not live by His Law, in prosperity and peace, then you will die by His Law,
either, during Armageddon, or, shortly after, during "The Reaping".
Unfortunately the lunatics have taken-over and are running this asylum, but The Law is still The Law, even if
you decide to break it and the penalty, in this case, as you have all been told repeatedly, is death. It
is not quite too late yet, to return to The Covenant; prosperity and freedom from oppression in The
Torah; the five Books given to Moses:- Genesis; Exodus; Leviticus; Numbers and Deuteronomy, which are the first
five Books in The Bible.
* Losing Your Illusions.
A young child viewing a puppet show will sit happily entranced and fascinated by the animated, talking
marionettes, believing that they are very much alive and real. One day, when the child is older, and sees the
strings attached to the puppets for the very first time, the illusion is forever shattered. The child will
always know that hidden hands control the lifeless puppets.
Most people living today have advanced into adulthood without ever having known of, or seen, the hidden hands controlling their systems of money, taxation,
public education and social reform. The nearly invisible strings attached to the marionettes are well
concealed, and the marionettes themselves - politicians; religious leaders; heads of colleges, scientists,
foundations and think-tanks; media moguls and other officials held in general-esteem by the people - act so
lifelike as to blend perfectly with their audience.
For the young child, the puppet-theatre is a small box with curtains, and the strings - usually transparent
nylon fishing-line - rise up to the hands of loving parents and friendly neighbours.
For the adult, the "Virtual Puppet-theatre" is the controlled space between their ears. The space within which
their belief-system can be manipulated - held entranced and fascinated - by puppet-masters directing cleverly
crafted plays, dramas and crises, the plots to which the audience is told will unfold to their general benefit
and to the endings which have already been written.
Invisible strings called beliefs rise up to hidden hands
holding global-wealth and power. As long as the illusion can be maintained, the audience can be held
spellbound. For them, the show is their reality.
Until, one day - they see the
In speaking of the Truth,
Henry David Thoreau once said: "Any Truth is better than make-believe ... rather than love, than money, than
fame, give me Truth."
Yet Italian Renaissance statesman and political writer, Niccolo Machiavelli, wrote in The Prince, one of the most influential political works of all time, that
created to lie to the greatest number of people the greatest amount of the time.
And why do governments lie? Why, to cover up their previous lies in order to protect the perpetrators, of
But the Truth is a funny thing. You can distort it, you can even suppress it for a while. Sometimes you
discover that it's been hiding in plain view all along. Eventually the Truth always comes out as unsealed
records, and death-bed confessions reveal decades later what really happened.
But once in a while the lie, the fraud or hoax is exposed while the perpetrators are still alive, as is the
case today, with this article.
What will you do now? What did Winston Churchill say? "Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble
across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had
happened." Until it is too late to do anything about it - JAH.
What do you think the rest of the world, who have been forced to adopt democracy, instead of The Covenant, are going to do when they find-out it doesn't work and
that the West knew that, before it forced them to adopt it? And who are they going to quite
rightly blame for all of their suffering? YOU. Then what will they do? Armageddon.
President Clinton's so-called
impeachment trial was sure-proof that the lawyers and politicians of today have set up
separate laws for themselves and for everyone else. If any person not in government was proven
to have lied under oath in court as president Clinton has, they would be instantly locked up
in prison for perjury, so how did Clinton get
away with it? Obviously modern politics and law has one set of laws for the rich
(lawyers and politicians) and another for everyone else. By not only letting this injustice happen but by
also encouraging it, the American people have proven to the whole world that they think that it's alright
for their leader to commit adultery and lie to them and the rest of the world, which makes
all American people look, to the rest of the world, to be nothing but liars and
adulterers and as long as they are making money they don't care.
How can anyone trust or believe anything Bill Clinton or any American says now, after he has been
proven beyond any doubt
to be guilty of lying to the
whole world under oath, and the so-called highest court of 'law' in America found him not
guilty. It is supposed to be a court of law but in a court the jury has to vote on the evidence,
not for their own political party or position. This makes the trial a farce and every peace-treaty and
agreement that Clinton and the Americans have signed with other nations to be of no effect because
he, through his own actions, and the people through theirs have proven their word to be of absolutely
no value. A man is only as good as his word and a country is only as good as its
leader (or more accurately, a country gets the leader it deserves). . . .
Please "Click Here" to view complete article.
Christ’s Opinion of Lawyers, Politicians and Priests...
23:1 Then spoke Jesus to the
multitude, and to his disciples (the Apostles),
23:2 Saying, The lawyers and the politicians sit in Moses' [Law] seat:
23:3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe [of God's Law], [that] observe and do; but do
not ye after their example: for they say, and do not (and make up their own laws
against God's Orders - Deut. 4:2).
23:4 For they bind heavy burdens (the Talmud) and grievous to be borne, and lay [them] on men's shoulders; but
they [themselves] will not lift one of their fingers to remove them.
23:5 But all their works they do for to be seen by men: they make broad their phylacteries (small
leather box containing Old Covenant- Testament texts, worn to remind them to keep The Law [God's Law]), and
enlarge the borders of their garments,
23:6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the churches,
23:7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called by men, Priest, Rabbi, Imam, etc. (the church and the
state were one at that time)
23:8 But be not YE (which included the Twelve Apostles who were also there) called
priest (etc.): for One is your Teacher, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.
23:9 And call NO [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in
23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, [even] Christ.
23:11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be
23:13 But woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye shut up the Kingdom of heaven against men:
for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither allow ye them that are entering to go in (see Enoch 93:4 - 101:6 in the "King of kings' Bible" - by JAH, which also includes
God's Holy Koran).
23:14 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make
long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
23:15 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians,
hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, ye make him
twofold more the child of hell-fire than yourselves.
2000 Years and absolutely
NOTHING has changed!
The 33rd Degree Freemason.
“I saw that superior orders were distributed from chiefs unknown to their executors. Those
chiefs, in turn, obey a supreme and completely
unknown authority whose orders must be carried out blindly by
"It is unknown to the
Australian people that John Winston Howard's first overseas trip after becoming
Prime Minister of Australia was to receive his honours of becoming
a 33rd degre Freemason."
Freemasonry is the most sinister and evil false-front for
satanism that exists on the planet, and always has been. Those who founded Freemasonry knew that they
would never convince a man or woman of common sense and decency to join their ranks if they knew the true
facts about the satanic purpose of the organisation. So instead, they created two organisations in one
(just as the Catholic Church if organised along the same lines). Thus it was based on a multi-tiered
structure, much as the Great Pyramid of Giza is a multi-course structure composed of 203 courses of
masonry (which of course is where they get their name). The lower levels would have to be attracted to
the organisation for its perceived "goodness," a community-based organisation that strives for the
betterment of the human race. Now this then is the first level of Masonry, and at this level it does
perform these functions. I have worked with these low-level Mason (they're actually called "Porch Masons"
because they never actually are admitted beyond the front door, the porch so to speak.), and they have
always been a bunch of good men. Some of them actually service in their local churches in the higher
levels of the laity there, and are outsnading pillars of their community.
Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to convince a "Porch Mason" that they are being
shamelessly used to give the organisation this shining white facade that the public only gets to see.
Incidentally, these "Porch Masons" are the first three degrees in the Masonic hierarchy. So this is the
first level of Freemasonry, and they are involved in all sorts of so-called community relations from
Rotary, Apex, running whole retirement villages (one of their specialties), as well as the regular Lodge
meetings held in all towns and villages all over the planet.
But it is at the higher levels, above the 3rd degree, that the real evil of the organisation
manifests itself. Gradually, as members are tested in various secret ways, it becomes clear who will be
susceptible to enter into the higher, satanic, degrees. Bribery and blackmail form the essential weapons
that are used to lure and entrap those men who neter into dark and sinister places "where angels fear to
tread." Of course only the higher active Masons will know the important decrees above the third.
The Frightful Oath
As those who are more susceptible to evil are recognised in the organisation, they are
advanced up the ladder. But they have to take “the frightful oath,” as the following
material from Dissipation
of the Darkness: History of the Origin of Masonry, reveals:
“My Brothers: I have no doubt of your sincerity and affection. We know that your respective
functions are in direct relationship with the Jewish religion and nation, with the country and the king;
for that reason we must bind ourselves by on oath that each one of us must take in the presence of the
I have composed its text and I have called it the FRIGHTFUL OATH. I will be the first to
take it. I will read its formula to you before taking it officially, so you may approve it if it seems
complete to you.
And the King began the reading of the text of the Oath. …
The King continued. Brothers: you have seen that this Oath is horrifying, frightful. Each
one of us must mediate on it before taking it, for oath binds the Founder with chains of steel. It chains him to the
brotherhood, it chains him to the
fundamental principles whether they be innocent or corrupt. It chains him with
obedience to the orders and decrees of the commission and with the fulfilment of everything decreed, good
as well as bad. It obliges
him to attack the Impostor's men and to kill them in any way possible. It obliges him to be a
perfect guardian of the decrees of the Association, even in front of his own sons, except the one who
will be the trustee as heir to the secret. Just as he is obliged to carry out orders to kill, so also he is obliged with respect
to the divulgence of something prohibited, that the Association judges expedient for the preservation of
the Jewish religion. He is even
obliged to sacrifice everything
dear to him to serve its principles. …
Dear Brothers: Each association
must have a private see where its active members meet.
This hall, where we have realized our fundamental meetings, will not
serve for our secret
meetings. We must install a see that will be called the Lodge of Jerusalem.
This Lodge must be located in a hidden corridor where no one will see us nor hear our decrees. I
take this opportunity to call your attention to an affair of utmost importance. We have said that we must increase
our Association until thousands of people join, thus increasing our strength. But if it should
come to be known that this Association has been founded at this time, it will cause fear and reaction,
and consequently, the alienation of a part of the people, especially in these critical times in which the
revolution of that Impostor continues increasing its strength. We nine are the cornerstone of this
splendid edifice which is "The Mysterious Force." Let us consider, then, the instruments for the
construction of this edifice. Let us saturate ourselves with the grandeur of our mission in this
political and religious work that would not exist if it were not for us, for without masons and
instruments there is no edifice. Obviously, we are the reason for the existence of this edifice. I
desire, and I ask that you accept with me, the making of this edifice the most magnificent of palaces.
And how? With Occultism. And what does this
Listen: The best means of
making our association, besides grand and important, exciting, is to hide
the date of its foundation, the names of its founders, our names, from every affiliate, whoever he may
be. These secrets will be guarded by the nine of us and each one of us will pass it on as
an inheritance to one of our sons, the most serious, the most secretive, when he reaches 21 years of age.
His own brothers must know
With this legend we will hide the date of the foundation and the goal of the Association.
This will be our principal weapon. Occultism will be a disguised even for our brothers although they reach the
highest of degrees; in regard to these degrees, I must let you know beforehand that with
brothers Moab and Hiram we will make different degrees for the associates and, once in order, we will
make them known so you may give us your opinion.
What's more, we will hide all the decrees issued by us
nine. Besides, it will not escape your profound discernment that the absolute concealment will
provoke the desire to enter our Association, to know the occult.
There will be other secrets, secondary ones, that the brother will only be able to know after taking the General Oath, the text of which
we will study in the next session. The Oath will oblige him to keep the secret. …
Dear Brothers: Each association
must have a private see where its active members meet.
This hall, where we have realized our fundamental meetings, will not
serve for our secret
meetings. We must install a see that will be called the Lodge of Jerusalem.
This Lodge must be located in a hidden corridor where no one will see us nor hear our decrees. I
take this opportunity to call your attention to an affair of utmost importance. We have said that we must increase
our Association until thousands of people join, thus increasing our strength. But if it should
come to be known that this Association has been founded at this time, it will cause fear and reaction,
and consequently, the alienation of a part of the people, especially in these critical times in which the
revolution of that Impostor continues increasing its strength. We nine are the cornerstone of this
splendid edifice which is "The Mysterious Force." Let us consider, then, the instruments for the
construction of this edifice. Let us saturate ourselves with the grandeur of our mission in this
political and religious work that would not exist if it were not for us, for without masons and
instruments there is no edifice. Obviously, we are the reason for the existence of this edifice. I
desire, and I ask that you accept with me, the making of this edifice the most magnificent of palaces.
And how? With Occultism. And what does this
Listen: The best means of
making our association, besides grand and important, exciting, is to hide
the date of its foundation, the names of its founders, our names, from every affiliate, whoever he may
be. These secrets will be guarded by the nine of us and each one of us will pass it on as
an inheritance to one of our sons, the most serious, the most secretive, when he reaches 21 years of age.
His own brothers must know
With this legend we will hide the date of the foundation and the goal of the Association.
This will be our principal weapon. Occultism will be a disguised even for our brothers although they reach the
highest of degrees; in regard to these degrees, I must let you know beforehand that with
brothers Moab and Hiram we will make different degrees for the associates and, once in order, we will
make them known so you may give us your opinion.
What's more, we will hide all the decrees issued by us
nine. Besides, it will not escape your profound discernment that the absolute concealment will
provoke the desire to enter our Association, to know the occult.
There will be other secrets, secondary ones, that the brother will only be able to know after taking the General Oath, the text of which
we will study in the next session. The Oath will oblige him to keep the secret.”
In the early days of the Movement, which was then called The
Mysterious Force, they called their meeting places “Temples,” after the Temple of
Solomon in Jerusalem. Later this name was changed to “Lodges,” but they continued to have the twin
pillars of Jachin and Boaz in the front of each Lodge, as it was in the Temple of
“The King said: You already know that we must make
everyone believe that our Association is very ancient. And so there may be no doubt about
the legend of the "found papers," we will place in our temple Symbols from ancient times, such as those
Solomon used in his Temple.
We will erect two Pillars as Solomon did in the Temple. We will call the first BOOZ and the second JACHIN. One will be to the right;
the other to the left. We will
say also that our brother, Hiram Abiud, is Hiram Abiff, the Great Syria1
Architect called by Solomon for the construction of the Temple. These two subterfuges must be noted in
the general principles of the .Association.
We will reinforce this deceit with the use of the instruments of construction that the architect Hiram utilized in the
construction, such as the Square, the Compass, the Trowel, the Scales, the Hammer, etc., all of wood as
Hiram Abiff had them.
It is fundamental that the front of the
Temple must face the East, a point that I will explain to you later. I believe also that
we must adopt symbols inspired by the firmament, such as the stars, the sun and the moon, symbols that
remind us more of antiquity. We will also utilize other symbols to recall the impostor Jesus, the images
of which we will select so they may be adopted by our sons and grandsons who inherit this History
together with the administration of our new Association. ...
“Let us erect the two pillars, one at the right and the other at the left. Let us bless
them. We bless these instrument and we also bless these various symbols of Jesus (12) that represent,
ironically, some episode of those that the Impostor spoke of during his preaching in his instructions and
blasphemies, such as the cock, the sword, the light, the darkness, the hammer, because of its being the instrument that was used to nail his
hands and his feet, and with it we will open all the sessions, emphasizing this irony. Every session will be opened by striking three times consecutively with this
hammer; thus we will remember eternally, through the centuries, that we have crucified him
and that with this hammer we have fixed the nails in his hands and feet, killing him. These three stars
you see symbolize the three nails. We would be able to change them for three points that VI have the same
significance. Among our symbols will be the three steps, ridiculing with them this blasphemy: God is
Father, Son and Holy Ghost, with his claiming to be the Son.
Prince Charles with his hammer, performing for his
Ashkenazi groomers. The hammer is a decidedly
anti-Christian symbol as used by world Freemasonry,
and in every court and parliament on the planet.
“Within our Association, we will make
degrees, as we have mentioned previously. These will be
thirty-three, symbolizing the age of the impostor. We will
give a name to each degree and we will create other similar symbols. All these things were my idea and
those of brothers Moab and Hiram. The meaning of
these ironic symbols must not be perceived; it must remain among the nine of us. For the
other brothers or affiliates it is enough to make them see the utilities and instruments so they may
believe that the Association was founded in the times of Solomon or earlier than this. Any brother can
propose a new symbol.”
Here are some of the higher degrees in Freemasonry:
· Degree 7 The
· Degree 9
· Degree 12 The
· Degree 15 The
· Degree 18 The Talented
· Degree 21 The
· Degree 24 The Little
· Degree 27 The Little
· Degree 30 The
· Degree 31 The
· Degree 32 The Great
· Degree 33
The Living Dead (41)
The 33rd degree is thus very special, not for the reasons given above (that it
was the age of Jesus when He was crucified. He wasn’t!). It denotes the one-third of the angels who
rebelled against our Father God, and joined satan in the rebellion.
"To all the dear brother members of the affiliate temples: Degree 33 being the symbol of the end of the life of the impostor
Jesus, we have decreed that the aspirant to the Degree mentioned must wear a shirt of a
purple color with a cross of white fabric sewn over the breast, over the cross must be drawn the four letters INRI.(42) These letters will then be a
sacred word of recognition for the degree mentioned, like the word BOOZ. And, as the secret word must be
changed every six months, we authorize the presidents of the temples to select the word they desire.
Continue the battle to serve religion and the prestige of the Association. May union and occultism be our
When a Mason reaches the 33rd degree level, they are expected to serve only the
Order of the Garter, the head of which is Queen Semiramis II (aka
Queen Elizabeth II). It is also to be understood that a 33rd degreed Freemason is also
expected to engage in the Black Mass, and in human sacrifice. For more information in this grisly sector
of such a Mason’s life, see:
The Black Mass You Don't Want To Know About
Most Western Nations Have Long
Been Masonic Tyrannies
“In his book "The Brotherhood,"
Stephen Knight showed how Masons secretly control every aspect of British
society. There are 500,000 Masons in
England. Lodges are associated with every local government, police, bank,
military unit, hospital, university, church, court and of course
Westminster. What passes for politics is basically members of the same
Lodge contending for office to decide how to enact the Masonic agenda.
comment: This naturally extends to
the definition of democracy: “two wolves and a chicken deciding
what’s for dinner.”] Knight documents how Masons give
each other preferment in hiring, promotion and business. Non-Masons are
continually hassled. It is no
understatement to say that the UK is a Masonic
Former Scotland Yard Chief Sir Paul
Look at the picture of former Scotland Yard Chief Sir Paul
Stephenson (above.) He resigned because he was implicated in the scandal.
Look at the checkerboard symbol on his hat, worn by every British constable.
Masonic.” (Source: Henry
Makow: “Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal?” available
Battling for Temporal
It is a fact that many politicians, beside coming the ranks of the legal profession (see
The Lawyer’s Secret Oath),
come from the ranks of Freemasonry. In fact it would be a worthwhile exercise to determine
who in Local, State and Federal politics is actually a member of the Masons, and what degree they have
attained. Of course that would be a difficult project bearing on mind the oaths of secrecy that they
“I told her how, through my permanent contact with the grand Masons, I discovered that there are three groups of them in the
- Some of them attack Catholicism.
- Others attack all religions.
- The third, composed of men from the first two groups, [Nazarene
Remnant comment: like John Winston Howard] battle in politics for the purpose of coming to
dominate temporal authority.”
The Clear Signature of
One of the clearest expressions of evil on this planet is the system known as obedience to
hierarchical authority. It prevails just about everywhere, from your local pre-school, right up to the
highest echelons in all industries the world over. Politicians bow to it, while pretending to serve the
people. The military, the army, navy and air force, are all built upon this principle. It is the
stock-in-trade of the religious hireling , and one of the prime reasons that no truth in now preached in
the churches right around the world.
“My ascent to the other degrees, from the 19th to the 33rd
Jonas said: I have known throughout my studies that the ascent to the high degrees requires,
above all, the payment of the price of the inscription, a price that varies according to the degree, but
it also requires activity, zeal and services on behalf of the principles of the Association and the
realization of its purposes. I discharged the duties within my reach to make a false show of my
activities and I saved, at the same time, what was necessary to pay the respective
I solicited the ascent, paying the dues for the 11 degrees,
from the 19th to the 29th inclusive. My petition was accepted with pleasure. Being one of the holders of
the 29th degree, I knew the secrets, vestments, terms, movements and signs corresponding to all those
degrees. All the rituals are of no interest, for they are similar to those of the earlier degrees in
their falsity and ridiculousness.
I saved the amount necessary to attain the 30th degree. I solicited it and attained
I did not delay much in attaining Degrees 31, 32 and 33 in the same way. Here my age become
infinite; I remembered then what was recorded by the ancestors of my mother, Esther, who tried by that
definition 'to mock the Resurrection of Jesus, His Ascension and His eternal life.
Thus I completed my ascent to the maximum degree of "elevation," reaching the "gates of
Heaven." Thus I come to be considered among the ranks of the chiefs of "liberty!" Despite the superiority of my high degree, I did not know from whence come the superior orders. The president himself of our
lodge did not know their origin. I saw that all the presidents of the lodges were subject to those orders
that came mysteriously.
For example: "Carry out the
exalted order as we have carried out ours, executing the following.... "
Another example: "By a superior
order we must make every effort to do such-and-such a thing; comply with it and begin...
Another example: "By orders, the
knowledge of whose origin is prohibited by Law, you must initiate a subscription to
collect (such-and-such a sum of) money that will be destined to expand the capacity of the Association
and its interests.... "
All the orders were of this nature.
Then 1 remembered the cunning of our ancestor founders and their successors and noted that
the nine successors improved
considerably in the art of fallacy and cunning.
I deplored the word "free," which should be omitted from the dictionaries of languages with
that meaning, to use rather the meaning, "those who claim to be free and are nothing but slaves ordered
by their masters to do good or evil." Nevertheless, the
slave knows his master, but we, on the other hand, do not know who orders us,
and we obey blindly.”
How many people do the dirty work of satan under these same circumstances, never refusing an
assignment or a task, because they will be fired, demoted, or moved to a new place? This is how evil
rules all over the planet, because people will not have the integrity to do the right thing. Instead they
do the evil deeds, not realising that they have become dead people, such will be their judgment on that
fateful day, called the White Throne Judgment.
A Good Example was Adolf
“After psychiatrists interviewed Eichmann prior to his trial, they found him "normal" and
that he had a desirable attitude towards his family, relatives and friends. A minister of religion who
visited him regularly found that he was a man with positive ideas.
It seems that Eichmann was not, in person, the evil madman people made him out to
be. It was discovered soon after that no one, not a relative, a friend or another officer, ever
confronted him on the morality of his actions. Not one person stood up to him. He is quoted as saying: "Not a single person came to
me and reproached me for anything in the performance of my duties."
Both Eichmann and Hitler would not have had their power without the cooperation of the
German people and, in many instances, Jews who conspired
against their own to save their own necks. Many of the German people who were against
Hitler from the start committed the crime of silence and then went along out of fear of personal harm.
But within the crime of silence lies a number of seemingly
In businesses, the Eichmann of the organisation, the axe-person for the boss or
CEO, or minister or priest, readily finds some eager company or organisation ladder-climber - usually
called an elder or deacon - to commence the execution of the weakest in the organisation. "Fred," the
axe-man says, "profits are down and we need to let 20% of our workers go. If you do a good job, I'll make
sure your division gets extra funds for the next quarter. That will really make you shine in the
organisation. You'll be at the top of the ladder sooner than you think. Just make sure the blood-letting
is quick and quiet. We don't want any adverse publicity." Fred (or Robert or Don or Bill), the
organisation's gopher, with visions of "Vice-President" dancing in his head, slaughters friends and
fellow workers, leaving them for dead.
Why didn't Fred stop and say, "Wait. Isn't there another way?" Probably because then Fred
wouldn't have gotten his chance at the top of the ladder. His thoughts probably were, "Why make waves
when I can be promoted. Someone has to be fired anyway."
Harvey goes on to point out that the Danes of Denmark were exemplary role models of courage during
the times of Hitler. Hitler and Eichmann did not start out immediately murdering the
Jews. They started with "little atrocities" such as requiring all Jews to carry ID cards. Once they got the Jews to do so however,
and the rest of the
Germans to collude, they asked the Jews to wear arm bands for external identification. After that was
accepted, then came the murders. The King of Denmark, on the other hand, refused to go along with the
Nazi's demands. Instead, he ordered that if Jews had to carry ID cards, then all Danes, regardless of
race, had to carry them. The Danes continued to stand up to the tyranny and the Jews of Denmark were
spared. I would say that it is time for the people of the Church to look to the Danes as models of
humanity, in the very least.
You cannot have autocratic bosses and ministers unless
there are subordinates willing to colludewith his or her power. There cannot be a victimiser without a victim. I have found the
Sabbath-keeping churches of God too filled with people terrified of making waves, of truly engaging their
own God-given potential thinking capacity, of proving the truth for
themselves, of stating their beliefs and of not conforming to the ministerial dictatorship they collude with. They will even do this and still continue to think they are moral and ethical people,
perhaps because they think that tithe and offering-paying, attendance at Sabbath services, Feasts and
Holy Days (which needs pointing out are all false systems anyway) and other social functions, is all
that is required of them! This method of operation is what we are conditioned to by the world system,
especially its education system. We send our kids to school each day blissfully unaware that
little-by-little they will be surely slaughtered by little atrocities each day over the next
twelve years of their school life.
Robert Anton Wilson enters our discussion at this point with a most important observation
about the SNAFU principle and
the ultimate and inevitable death of authoritarian institutions - such as the Worldwide Church of
God and its apostate daughters - coming from the fact that they have been laid on the wrong
foundations right from their inception:
“Every authoritarian structure can be visualized as a pyramid with an eye at the top. This is the typical flow-chart of any
government, any corporation, any Army, any bureaucracy, any mammalian pack. On each rung, participants
bear a burden of nescience in relation to those above them. That is, they must be very, very
careful that the natural sensory activities of being conscious organisms-the acts of seeing, hearing,
smelling, drawing inferences from perceptions, etc-are in accord with the reality-tunnel of those
above them. This is absolutely vital; pack status (and 'job security') depends on it. It is much less
important-a luxury that can easily be discarded-that these perceptions be in accord with objective
For instance, in the FBI under J Edgar Hoover, the agent had to develop a capacity to see
godless communists everywhere. Any agent whose perceptions indicated that there were actually very few
godless communists in this country at that time would experience cognitive dissonance - his or her
reality-tunnel was at variance with the 'official' reality-tunnel of the pyramid. To talk about such
perceptions at all would be to invite suspicions of eccentricity, intellectual wiseacreing or of being
oneself a godless communist.
The same would apply to a Dominican inquisitor in the middle ages who lacked the capacity to
'see' witches everywhere. In such authoritarian situations, it is important to see what the Top Dogs
(alpha males) see; it is inconvenient, and possibly dangerous to see what is objectively
But this leads to the equal and opposite burden of omniscience upon those at the top,
in the eyes of the pyramid. All that is forbidden to those at the bottom-the conscious activities of
perception and evaluation-is demanded of the Power Elite, the master class. They must attempt to do
the seeing, hearing, smelling, etc., and all the thinking and evaluating for the whole
But a man with a gun (the power to punish) is told only what the target thinks will not cause him to pull the
trigger (write the pink slip, order the court-martial). The elite, with their burden of
omniscience, face the underlings, with their burden of nescience, and receive only the
feedback consistent with their own preconceived notions and reality-tunnels. The burden of omniscience
become, over time, another and more complex burden of nescience. Nobody really knows anything anymore,
or if they do, they are careful to hide the fact. The burden of nescience becomes omnipresent.
More and more of sensory experience becomes unspeakable.
As Paul Watzlawick notes, that which is objectively repressed (unspeakable) soon becomes
subjectively repressed (unthinkable). Nobody likes to feel like a coward and a liar constantly. It is
easier to cease to notice where the official tunnel-reality differs from existential fact. Thus SNAFU
accelerates and rigiditus bureauctaticus
sets in-the last stage before all brain activity ceases and the pyramid is clinically dead as an intellectual entity.”
In other words, an authoritarian institution is dead right from the start. It is only a
matter of time before it self-destructs into a brain-dead ho-hum church, of which there are thousands on
planet earth, or finds its expression as just another social clubthat people blindly devote their lives to. It is the House of
SNAFU! Jesus called it "the synagogue of
Satan." And well might he, because Satan’s system, as the Master Liar, is a self-perpetuating loop,
aka a vicious circle. These nasty little things are a series of problems that ends where it starts. The
last problem in the series stimulates the first problem so that the whole sad sequence can start out all
over again. And no one is any the wiser! This gives
that dead-awful "treadmill feeling" where there is no joy or spontaneity or excitement, just laboured
deadness, which is the exact definition of spiritual death. All that needs to be done to break the
vicious circle is to find the solution to any one of the problems! When one of the problems is
solved, all the others will dissolve.
Perry Marshall, in his brilliant little eCourse, The
7 Lies of Organized Religion, put this very well:
“They always have something to do with a free spirit
that starts out being very inspired.
Then somebody makes like a plaster cast of it and then says,‘Okay, that's what everybody is supposed to do here. That's what everybody is supposed to
look like.’ It turns into a whole bunch of rules and it gets encrusted with barnacles and after a while
it's totally unrecognizable.
A lot of people confuse that with spirituality. They see that and they see how ugly it is
and how confining it is and they get so disgusted they turn and run the other
It's like people put themselves up on a pedestal and they look nice and they've got the
right kind of suit and they say the right kind of things.”
Many scholar have studied Eichmann. Many have claimed that he was an inhuman monster. Others
support his own claim that he was a simple bureaucrat doing his duty, and therefore not responsible for what he did. This explanation seeks to absolve all those
who participate in evil, provided only that the organisation of that evil be organised as a bureaucracy
from "the top down." In other words, this is the government organisation branded by Christ as "being
under authority." In these totalitarian organisations the governmental system resembles an onion with the
leader, or bully, in the centre surrounded by front organisations (performed by the local clones of the
system, the elders and deacons who have been "bought off" in various non-monetary ways). Each layer of
the onion represents a different degree of ideological militancy, so that those in each layer can accept
that the movement fits the real world.
Other scholars see a third possibility in the Eichmann story. It is that the Eichmann of
this world represent a certain personality type - the authoritarian personality of the cultural model of
the obedient German. This too is probably a bit too simplistic to accept as the truth of the matter -
because the truth is that Eichmannism was and is a general phenomenon of fallen human
nature. It is not limited to monsters, to bureaucrats, to authoritarians, or to Germans. To these
scholars, Eichmannism is the refusal to make moral judgements, not because bureaucratic duty makes one
amoral and not because a monster is immoral, but because an Eichmann is unable to think and so
unable to judge. This is Hannah Arendt's explanation. Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) was a Jewish woman who became
one of the foremost thinkers and political commentators of last century. She addressed some of the
most difficult and contentious issues of modern times: she insisted always that freedom and autonomy,
indispensable for human existence itself, are only attainable within an framework authentic personal
responsibility. She had much to say about the failure of human responsibility in the presence of
political evil. Some of her more famous works include: The Jew as Pariah: Jewish Identity and Politics
in the Modern Age; The Origins of Totalitarianism; The Human Condition; Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report
on the Banality of Evil; Men in Dark Times; Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship; On Revolution and
The Life of the Mind.)
Arendt attributed the undoubted evil of Nazism to ordinary men and women; not to
monstrous individuals, although they certainly played a sizeable part, nor to a dehumanising system
called bureaucracy, although it too was a contributing factor of great importance. Without the
collusion and compliance of so many ordinary people
neither the monsters (ministers) nor the bureaucracy (the "bought off" elite of the system) would have
been so effective. If one studies the most common assumptions in political science in general and
political theory in particular, one of the first truths we come across is this very point: that political
power can only be exercised with the voluntary support of at least some of the governed, even if
only a praetorian guard.
David Hume called this a first principle of government, as did A V Dicey (Dicey, Law and
Public Opinion in England, 1905). Thus, much research in political science today examines the support
that rulers enjoy, be it through elections, class interests, conspiracies, or alliances.
Arendt's analysis of Eichmann's ordinariness (she called it the banality of evil) implies something different and that is
that a regime does not need the voluntary support of anyone, not even a praetorian guard. Though
coercion, fear, and what she calls double-think have their uses, the inertia of ordinary men and
women when they do not think or judgesuffices to sustain even the most barbaric regime. The results of this inertia, or should we call it spiritual laziness (which it really is),
is a compliance with the system but not a voluntary support for the regime. In the end nearly all
citizens could truthfully say they did not support the regime but, nonetheless, the regime persisted. It
is not double-think, fear, and coercion that oil the wheels of totalitarianism, but
The British Royal Family and
the Order of the Garter
"We have been so brainwashed that we
believe the British royal family is just a nice, harmless and colorful
institution, and fail to realize just how corrupt and therefore highly dangerous is this institution
called the British Monarchy. The Knights of the Order of the Garter are
the INNERMOST circle of the most corrupt public
servants who have utterly betrayed the trust placed in them by their nation, their people.
The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300, Queen
Elizabeth II’s most trusted “privy council.” When I did my research on the Order of St.
John of Jerusalem some years ago, I went to Oxford to talk with one of the Masters who is
a specialist on ancient and modern British traditions. He told me that the Knights of the
Garter are the inner sanctum, the elite of the elite of Her Majesty’s Most Venerable Order
of St. John of Jerusalem. Let me say this is not the original order founded by the true
Christian warrior, Peter Gerard, but is typical of many fine institutions that are taken overand destroyed from
the inside, while yet appearing to the uninitiated to be the original.
From Oxford I went to the Victoria and Albert Museum and gained access to the papers of Lord
Palmerston, one of the founders of the Opium Dynasty in China. Palmerston, like somany of his kind, was
not only a Freemason, but a dedicated servant of Gnosticism....
Like the present ‘royal family,’ Palmerston made a pretense of being a Christian but was
in fact a servant of Satan. Many satanists became leaders of British aristocracy and made
immense fortunes out of the China opium trade.
I learned from the papers in the museum named after Victoria that she changed the name
of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in 1885 in order to break away from the Catholic
connection of the Order’s founder, Peter Gerard, and renamed it the “Protestant Most
Venerable Order of Jerusalem.” Membership was open to every oligarchical family that
had made its fortune in the China opium trade and every thoroughly decadent family
received place in the ‘new order.’" (Dr John Coleman, The Committee of 300, p. 92.)
List of Famous 33rd
The reason why I am focusing on Freemasonry, and in particular the treacherous 33rd degree Freemason, is
explained by Henry Makow, in his article “Humanity is
Satanically Possessed,” which is found below, just after the list.
George Herbert Walker
Col. Edward Mandell
Dr. Norman Vincent
Senator Sam J
Col. James “Bo” Gritz
Morris B de
Humanity is Satanically
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
A Satanic cult has
colonized the earth. This is the key to understanding history and avoiding the pitfalls of moder n
If you wishto escape the ravages of modern life, understand that mankind
is satanically possessed. We are being inducted into the lowest ranks of a satanic cult, the
I am not speaking from a Christian or Biblical perspective. I am from a secular background. The difference is
thatI recognize, in secular
terms, that God is the magnificent moral and natural
order governing the universe.
The prevalent Illuminist denial of God is a satanic rebellion that ultimately cannot be won.
Our satanic possession
is the product of a highly organized long-term conspiracy to establish a "New World Order." Today, the
cancer has spread to all social institutions, public and private, including
charities and the church. As a result, humanity has fallen into a coma, hardly able to recognize the
sickness, let alone resist.
As I have said, the mainspring of this diabolical conspiracy is the Cabalist (Illuminati) dynastic families who
own the world's central banks. Their control of most large corporations, especially media, and consequently
politicians ensures that their cancer is all pervasive.
Here are just some logos with
Illuminati motifs. Politicians and entertainers adore making the sign of Baphomet and the Masonic
The instrument of this secret control is Freemasonry, a Cabalist secret Society. (The Illuminati is a secret
society within Freemasonry.) Essentially you will rise in Freemasonry and society according to your willingness
to serve Lucifer, and betray your community to the new Luciferian dispensation.
The Illuminati is a secret society within Freemasonry. Source of image: http://s900.photobucket.com/albums/ac208/crackhead1488_photo
Democracy is a charade.
Sure, we can decide where the sewers will go, but the big issues have been taken out of our hands. All the politicians
are Freemasons: Ron Paul, Obama, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum. [Nazarene Remnant
comment: That includes all our politicians here in Australian,
going right back to the days of the Great Depression, when they allowed Australia to be taken over through the
Westminster system of government, in 1931, which is satanically inspired.]
They divide into a House League, with certain Masons taking the Right, and other Masons taking the Left. The people
are polarized, distracted and deceived. No one sees the puppet master. Nothing fundamental ever changes.
Vs. Right: Two apparently opposing forces advancing the same goal, a thinly veiled world police
state ruled by satanist billionaires.
The same applies to the
international stage: Islamists Vs.
Zionists: Both Masons.
Nothing illustrates our peril better than September 9-11. Essentially the Illuminati bankers through their Masonic
proxies murdered over 3000 Americans [including many Australians] in broad daylight and got away with it.
This mass trauma brainwashing was designed to justify foreign wars and
a domestic police state. It could not have succeeded without the collaboration of the mass media and
virtually the whole political elite, who are an occupying power, a colonial administration.
The essence of Satanism is to turn the natural and moral order upside down a.k.a
Reality. Satanism turns reality on its head.
Thus, the good is made to appear evil and vice-versa. Lies have the
authority of truth. The Truth can never be known. It is a matter of perception. It is whatever the
Illuminati say it is.
Beautiful is ugly and ugly is considered beautiful. What is
healthy and natural (e.g. marriage, family, heterosexuality) is painted as unhealthy while what is sick (e.g. homosexuality) is presented as natural and
These examples of our satanic possession should be seen in this light:
1. The divorce of sex from love, marriage and
procreation. The promotion of anonymous sex in place of courtship degrades all human contact to the
level of sex appeal. Anonymous sex is hyped as the best experience in life.
Pornography, the sex addicts' cocaine, is made widely available. 70-80% of teenage boys
watch online porn regularly. Girls need to behave like
porn stars to be loved. The sexualization of children takes place and
eventually, acceptance of pedophilia. In Japan, porn is killing heterosexual relations.
2. Gender bending- the relentless media
promotion of feminism, lesbianism and homosexuality is designed to destroy heterosexual identity and values,
including marriage and
3. Incessant wars have no purpose other than to increase the wealth and
power of the Illuminati and undermine nation states. All wars are contrived by the Illuminati to
kill off natural leaders and demoralize, degrade and destroy humanity. Ironically, they are an excuse for
Illuminati "world government."
4. Entertainers are members of the
Illuminati and part of the Satanic initiation. Madonna's Superbowl half-time and Nicki Minaj's performance at the Grammy's
were both Satanic rituals.
5. The dumbing down of the public
through sports, entertainment and a defective education system.
My whole website is devoted to this topic. The point is -- mankind is satanically
The masses are in denial. Corruption and sexual abuse (e.g. Gerry Sandusky) abound but
none mentions Freemasonry. The legal
system and police are compromised.
Society is a full accomplice in its own
subversion. The masses have Stockholm syndrome. They hope
that the psychopaths won't harm them if they keep their heads down and play along.
Fully invested in their
enslavement, people are too venal, craven or dumb to face reality. They prove Aldous Huxley's
prophesy that the slaves "will love their slavery."
Eventually the Illuminati will degrade us until humanity's promise is lost, and the Illuminati's depraved vision of
mankind vindicated. Then our culling under some pretext will seem like Divine Justice.
Our best hope is the
Internet. It's very hard to institute
a police state in an age of instant communication.
As long as the Internet is free, we will remain free. Let's defend it with our lives!
Scientists Who Recognize Intelligent Design are Rejected
Rejection of the Feminine is Rooted in the Occult
Will Newman: Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?
Richard Evans: The Kabbalah is a Hoax
Henry Makow: The God of the Kabbalah
Henry Makow: Kabbalah Explains Current
Comments for "Humanity is Satanically Possessed "
Troy said (February 29, 2012):
morning I was thinking of how to respond to "but it's your duty as an American to vote in order for the system to
would be that "the system is broken and much like a Stockholm Syndrome victim, we Americans have looked to our
leaders as our saviours.
actually mislead though, and would you blame the victim for believing their kidnappers are innocent and helping
them, or would you blame the kidnappers for manipulating them into believing a lie?"
EJ said (February 29, 2012):
"satanically possessed" is simply a categorizing or labeling of the behavior modification and not some sort of true
"evil possession" like in some dark movie or TV show.
effort at pointing out the modification is exemplary in its focus and examples. IMHO, people don't need to be
"saved" they just need appropriate re-modification to a normalcy of heart-felt actions.
people behind this "behavior modification" are believing Satanists.
L said (February 29, 2012):
Superb article on the Satanic Possession of Humanity.
Most have no clue. Why? Because I find most people to be
under some type of mass illusion or are sleepwalking. I agree wholeheartedly with your views.
Thank you for putting it out there that humanity has fallen under Satanic control. As a mother of a young
teen,I am in constant anguish by what my precious
child comes home with! I see it so clearly for what it is ... Satanic indoctrination.
But, try to tell that to a teenager who thinks what he is learning is cool! My only hope is that our bond is strong
enough to counteract the rubbish he is learning is NORMAL.
Keep up the good fight Henry. We are definitely under extreme attack.
Kevin said (February 28, 2012):
latest article, you state: "As long as the internet is free, we will remain free." Yet there are people who claim
to be against the Illuminati, against the NWO, against this fascist/communistic one-world evil who actually make
the claim that certain people should be BANNED from using the internet.
anyone think I jest, consider this article written recently by a Jeff Rense apologist and endorsed by Jeff Rense
anyone interested in a detailed breakdown of the psychopathic 'Super Bowl' halftime show, Robert Phoenix put
together a terrific article relating the ritual to astrology :
M said (February 28, 2012):
latest article was simply excellent. This is the core issue - a war for our souls, whether it's about economy,
politics, sexuality, art and culture, or even science in certain cases. Most people don't see that or seem to lose
track of that.
interesting that you mentioned intelligent design - the topic of Darwinism came up in an email exchange with
Anthony yesterday, and I mentioned that one is not allowed to even begin to doubt Darwinism in scientific circles.
The level of brainwashing is scary in
and professors act as gatekeepers - and most are probably not even aware of it, only those
at the top realize it. If others do realize it, they keep silent because they know they would lose
their job or funding if they said anything.
The Secret of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry and Illuminati Bloodlines
33rd Degree Mason List
Democracy is the Sacred Satanic Cow of Modern Life because the
Illuminati have refined and tweaked he so-called "democratic" process to ensure that they completely own and
“You’d better be nice to America, or
bring democracy to your country.”
“The government schools, the media, and the government itself remind us daily that democracy is
sacred. The word ‘democracy’ is derived from the name of the Greek god, Demos. Remember when we said that the Greeks
believed Demos ruled the earth, and Zeus ruled the heavens? What has changed today? Absolutely nothing
because we still believe that democracy should rule the earth, and that another god should rule the heavens.
Admittedly, we are just a little more enlightened because we believe that our God rules the heavens, but it
does illustrate that there is nothing new under the sun.
In order to understand democracy a little better, Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines it as …
‘A form of government in which the supreme power is
lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the power of
The supreme power is in the people, and they exercise legislation or the making of law. Since
we, the people (demos), established the legislation which enabled us to create law, by default we accepted the
axiom that the source of the law is the god of that
We may now ask, are Communism and democracy related? Our government Baal  has told us that Communism is dead. However, Bruce McCarthy
wrote a tract entitled Communism is Dead—A Media Myth. It shows a
tombstone with ‘Communism’ written on it. Under this title it says:
‘Here lies a name which history soon will see concealed itself
behind the mask now called ‘Democracy.’
‘Communism didn’t lie. The cold war is over, but no one has asked himself who won it. Somebody
definitely won that war. We are told that Communism lost, but the truth of the matter is that the reason they were able to lower the Iron Curtain is because
we have finally become Communist ourselves. Now the final plan
of the one-worlders is to raise the standard of living in the former Communist countries while they lower
ours so that we can more easily be merged together. 
If Communism died in the USSR, then there ought to be established criteria by which to identify
this political corpse. Where are they, and where are they to be found? Let’s turn to the Communist Manifesto’s ten planks, their political agenda, and see whether
Communism received a decent burial,or simply adopted an alias, democracy, to
beguile the unsuspecting victims of a growing tyranny.
Was it gleefully announced by the anti-Communist media that the USSR abolished its property tax,
thus restoring absolute custodial ownership of the land to the peasants? If not, then the first plank is
alive and well. What is the first plank of the Communist Manifesto? Abolition of private property
and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. We don’t call it rent, we call it property
tax. It is for public purposes.
The second plank was a heavy progressive, or graduated, income tax. Did they abolish that? No.’
As you go down through the ten planks of the Communist
Manifesto that Bruce has examined in his tract, you will see that they are all alive and well in the
USSR. Moreover, they are also alive and well here in the United States [as they are also flourishing in
Australia, Canada, South Africa, Ireland, the UK, the EU, and just about everywhere else in the world]
under the guise of democracy.
I have a facsimile from a book that the US War Department compiled and issued on November 30,
1928. The following is how that book defined the word ‘democracy’ at that time in our
‘A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting, or any other form of direct
expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards
property is communistic, negating property rights. Attitude towards law is that the will of the majority
shall regulate [this has now been redefined as consensus], whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by
passion, prejudice, and impulse without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license,
agitation, discontent, and anarchy.’
We can summarise this chapter with the knowledge that America [and most countries of the world]
now has a democratic state, where we can shout, ‘Power to the people just as they did in the Russian
Revolution. We dethroned the only true King , and replaced Him with
‘demos.’ We think we have become our own sovereigns, that we are ‘autonomous.’ We have
become our own gods. When we say, ‘We will plot our own destiny,’ or ‘I can do all things,’ we are denying
We often hear, ‘I think the Bible is wrong because I think a man has a right to choose his own
sexual preference.’ Today we Christians think that viewpoint is abhorrent. However, it is no worse than forty
years ago when parents
of today’s homosexuals were saying, ‘I don’t agree with the Bible on child discipline. I think Dr. Spock as it
together.’ There is no difference. We begin to be our own gods [and thereby break the First Commandment] when
we say, ‘I feel in my
heart’ or ‘I think’ in
contract to what God has proclaimed. When we replace the Law of God with out own ideas of right and wrong, we
are denying, ‘Thus says the LORD.’ We the people want what seems reasonable and convenient, not what is Scriptural and godly.
Yet a church Baal today says, ‘Fixed moral rules based on Bible Law are not sufficient.’ For
example, let us take the subject of homosexuality. You will hear, ‘Well, what if he was born a homosexual?’
Since the Baals today refuse the perfect Law of God, they have decided that the unchanging moral rules of
God’s Law are not sufficient in today’s culture, they find it necessary to address side issues. This allows
man to avoid the ‘unpleasant’ judgments and remedies for sin that God has established.
Another example is the statement, ‘Well, what if he was crazy at the time he murdered and
cannibalised his victim?’ The Bible does not address whether or not the lawbreaker is crazy when he commits a
crime. If he is crazy, he will not mind being put to death. According to the moral law of Scripture, the
murderer dies. The issue is not whether the lawbreaker is crazy, the only issue that the Bible addresses is whether
that person is guilty of the charge against him. If he is guilty of first degree murder, he must
forfeit his life. That position is in complete opposition to the god Demos because the laws found in the
Bible do not represent the pervasive attitude of the masses.
How would we best describe the religion of the masses? Accurately defined, it is the religion of the people, for the
people, and by the people. We the people have become small ‘g’ gods in the religion called
‘democracy.’ We have mentally placed all power in ourselves. We have set ourselves up before the first and
only God in violation of the First Commandment, and we must repent if the Kingdom of our Lord and King is to
be perfected here on earth.”
“The word ‘Baal’ as found in Zondervan’s
Pictorial Encyclopedia is defined as: ‘Owner, master, lord, or husband. Generally it designates
the Canaanite deity.’ It should be understood that the Canaanites have a great propensity for serving
Baal. [i.e. obedience to hierarchical authority, or respecter of persons]. By way of reason, if there
are Israelites in existence today, there are also Canaanites in existence today. It also stands to
reason that if there are Canaanites among the Israelites they will promote their Canaanite deities.”
This is exactly what satanists such as Prince Charles have been doing all their lives. For more
information on the subject of the religion of the Canaanites, see The Two Seeds of Genesis 3: 15, here, http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-two-seeds-of-genesis-3-15.html,
Antichrist and the Green Prince, here:
and The Black Mass You Don't Want To Know About,
What Really Is Happening in Australia
Your Lawyer’s Secret Oath
Lifting On Parasitic Elite Illusion Of 'Democracy'
How Did We Come To Be Such Idiots?
The following essay has an interesting story. The author, a federal prisoner, wrote a very
intelligent and insightful letter to us late last February. In it he used the term "idiot" in a very
interesting way. In my response, I challenged him to develop the term into something interesting, descriptive
and inclusive in such a way as to be informative and useful. What he came up with is not exactly what I had
in mind. It’s better. (DWH)
[This article was published in the Idaho-Observer in
May of 2009 while I was still in prison. And while Don Harkins edited the piece, he gave me full credit
for it. What was interesting about this article is that he published it even though there were some things he
initially disagreed with, but published them according to the way I had written the piece. Unfortunately, Don
passed away suddenly in September, 2009 after sustaining a very strange leukemia illness. Don was a good man and an
outstanding reporter who will be missed by his family, friends, and his readers. I highly recommend
By Walter Allen Thompson
“Why does he act like such an idiot?”
How many times do we ask that question about
other people—even about ourselves? There is no shortage of idiots and they are the primary reason it is so
difficult (if not impossible) to live on Earth in peace and truth.
Idiot: 1. A person afflicted with idiocy (extreme deficiency of intelligence, commonly due to
incomplete or abnormal development of the brain). Idiots are incapable of learning connected speech or of
avoiding common dangers in life. 2. A fool; simpleton—a term of reproach (Webster’s
Collegiate Dictionary ).Today the term "idiot" is most commonly used as a "term of reproach" while historic idiots are
now described as "retarded" or "mentally handicapped." We will be using "idiot" and "idiocy" in the
reproachful contexts in common usage today.
Foolishness, stupidity and ignoranceare the product of influences that relentlessly attack our
sensibilities, faith and equanimity every day of our lives. They attack the well-being of all men. Idiocy induces
war and an enormous amount of suffering upon mankind.
The First Idiot …
Who was the first idiot?As a Christian, I will say that it was Satan. Here is a being who was in heaven,
but swore oaths with other angels and sinned against his Creator—eternally damning himself because he wanted
to usurp the authority of God (Read Book of Enoch). And when God
created man in His own image, Satan was intent on destroying the lives of every man, woman and
The choice between good and evil—free will—has
always been a part of God’s creation. God did not create evil, but the tendency for Satan and mankind to choose
evil has always been present.
became an idiot when he disobeyed God,incurring His wrath. Since misery loves company, Satan spreads the misery by influencing
mankind to disobey God’s natural order of life. The "New World Order" was started with the first sin and it has
continued to this present day.
The March of the Idiots
The New World Order is the plan of the idiots who are responsible for the death and destruction
of the millions (if not billions) of lives memorialized in written history. The reason is because the New
World Order exists completely outside of God’s natural order. Think of it as God’s natural order completely
inverted or reversed: Good became evil and evil became good; darkness is light and light is darkness. In
God’s order the strong and the wise came before weak idiots. In the New World Order we can plainly see that idiots come before the wise
because idiots love death while the wise man loves life.
The worship of images, or "idols," is called "idolatry." The purpose of idolatry, the worship of
powerless objects, is to destroy mankind by influencing man to disobey God’s natural order of life, thereby acting like an
Recently, the monetary and banking systems have
been involved in numerous crises and bailouts. When money was made of gold and silver it was strong. But paper debt
notes are weak, producing the boom and bust cycles that we have today. Any monetary system that trades debt notes
in exchange for goods and services is doomed to eventual failure. Why? The people who designed and are currently
running the money system are
idiots. In addition, the financial institutions are patronized and regulated by idiots.
Most people know the histories of Hitler, Stalin, Mao-Tse- Tung and Pol Pot who destroyed the
lives of millions. These
leaders were idiots. Worse yet is how other idiots look upon the works of these men with favor. This
kind of idiocy—murderous leaders and the people who support them—is apparent in our own political system. The
same kind of idiots are in control of the United States [and every other country in the world]. Through
idiots in the mass media, the idiots in leadership animate the rank-and-file idiots to do their bidding. The
idiots-in-charge derive their relative strength in proportion to the numbers of rank-and-file idiots willing
to support—even fight and die—for their idiotic causes.
The idiots’ strength is the force of arms under
war powers; it is easier to kill or imprison anyone who questions the motives of the idiots-in-charge. And the
idiot’s message is this: "Let our strength be the law of justice."
Idiots Have No License
From where do the idiots-in-charge derive their
authority? They are not ordained
by God because God is not an idiot. They are not
ordained of God (as in Romans, Chapter 13) because they break God’s commandments. The idiots have
no license to sin or do evil; no one has the authority to usurp God’s law; any claim that idiots proceed with
lawful authority is an utter farce: "For God made not death: neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the
living. For he created all things, that they may have their being: and the generations of the world were healthful
and there is no poison of destruction in them, nor the kingdom of death upon the
God did not make us in His image to be
idiots.I used to think that
all men were born evil; they are not. The evil we do is chosen. If we were born
evil, then God’s commandments would serve no purpose because it would be impossible to keep them. It is not only
possible for a man to keep God’s commandments, but also He expects us to keep them. And this is exactly how we can
abide in His natural order.
The idiot will say just the opposite. "But
ungodly men with their works and words called it to them..."
The idiot brings evil upon himself because he has
contracted with evil to do evil; he
acts like an idiot because he is an idiot.
How Do We Stop Being Idiots?
While sitting in a prison for the last four years, I realized that I have to stop doing
what all the other idiots do. I discovered that my isolation from the outside world was becoming an
asset to me because I have had more time to think things through. But all of my actions are
my responsibility and there is no excuse for me before God if I do wrong.
I can’t just stop being an idiot without knowing
how to guard myself from acting like one. My mind is something that I consciously set out to guard so that I do not
lapse back into idiocy. My first line of defense is the eyes. I do not use them to offend God in any way. I don’t look at or read
things that will cause my mind to become unsettled. I avoid all forms of material that is offensive to God’s
I use the same principle with my ears. I try not to hear anything
offensive as it will disturb the strength of my inner peace. By consciously guarding my eyes and ears, I can
effectively guard my mind and
soul. As a result, I’m finding that I can enjoy long periods of time in silence without getting
The key to overcoming idiocy is goodness and
virtue.We should be mindful
about how we speak about and treat others. By exercising self-control, we can break the idiotic habits
of saying and doing things that harm our fellow man. I actually feel good when I get the urge to say something
idiotic and then hold my tongue. I’ll admit sometimes it is difficult but I feel good when I can suppress my evil
What are our obligations to God? Solomon says it
in one sentence: "Let us hear the
end of all: fear God and keep His commandments: for this is the whole duty of man” (Eccl. 12: 13-14, Geneva
The fear of God puts a man’s soul at rest because
the man knows his duties to God and he practices them. There is no fear of hell because his obedience to God’s
commandments is the source of his confidence, hope, faith and the love for his Creator. On its surface, the fear of
God putting a man’s soul at rest seems to be a paradox. I think of it this way: The fear of God is as healthy as
not putting my hand into a flame. God will punish evil doers, so why be
fear Satan; I fear God. God
makes the judgment; I want to have His favor all of the time. I exercise my own self-control so as to not act like
The opposite of idiocy is
wisdomand with wisdom comes
beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord: all they that observe them, have good understanding: His praise
endureth forever" (Psalms 111:10).
Here are some of the aspects of wisdom that I am
paraphrasing from the wisdom of Solomon:
Wisdom is glorious, does not fade, and seen of those who love
Wisdom is a treasure found by those who seek
Wisdom is the breath of the power of God; the
worker of all things.
Wisdom moves more than motion; it is the pure
influence flowing from the glory of the Almighty.
Wisdom is the unspotted mirror of God; the image
of His goodness.
Wisdom is the brightness of his everlasting
light; the knowledge of God, the fear of God and the understanding of God.
Wisdom is privy to the mysteries of the knowledge
of God; is patient, and conversant with God.
The Choice Is Ours.
In light of the aformentioned, we can see that an idiot has no value to God if he dies an idiot. To be an idiot greatly offends God. Man was created in the image of God so when
he acts like an idiot he, in a sense, defiles the "copy" of God and is, therefore, a degraded version of the
original. The only true
happiness in life is having the favor of God; nothing else is
better. But there are those choices God allows us to make between life and death, good and evil
and heaven and hell; between idiocy and wisdom.
Most governments have failed
because they were run by idiots with no regard for
Religions of the world with doctrines other than
that which God has promulgated are not valid and will suffer the same fate as failed governments and for the same
Our problems today arise from people calling upon
idols or false gods for answers.We turn to our enemies as if they are our friends. We look to idiots as if they are wise.
idiots with honor and treat the wise with contempt. We turn to darkness and live as if it were
light. We call upon ruthless idiots to do good when we should know they are incapable of it. The idiots have the authority on earth
because we, the idiots, gave it to them.
Are There Any Good People In Government?
I take the position that, if they take an oath of
office (forbidden in the scriptures), then no, they cannot do good even if they wanted to; the structure of
government is idiocy with evil as its foundation.
Oh sure, there are some seemingly good things
about government but they are always twisted and perverted to do the work of evil because it was designed that way and
is working perfectly. The real
purpose of most governments is to promote and grow idiocy by enlisting legions
of idiot evildoers to steal from the people.
Only One Way Out Of Idiocy
The only remedy for
idiocyis to mend our ways
and do good by being good and by providing others with the example of our goodness through the plain testimony of
our actions. We are witnessing the
last death-throws of this global idiocracy. We should step aside and stand aloof from it all, keeping
ourselves within God’s natural order while adding virtues to our lives and exercising more self-control. If we
guide our hearts and minds to maintain God’s natural order in our spheres of influence, then we will realize true
peace. And pray for God to give the
idiots a place for repentance. This is the true power of God.
If It Weren’t For Idiots...
I will now close with an example of how things work when they are under the authority of God.
The following was written about 100 AD by Bishop Clement of Rome in his Epistle to the
"The heavens, revolving under His government,
are subject to Him in peace. Day and night run the course appointed by Him, in no way hindering each other. The sun
and moon, with the companies of stars, roll on in harmony according to His
command, within their prescribed limits, without any deviation. The fruitful earth, according to His will,
brings forth food in abundance. At the proper seasons, for man and beast and all the living beings upon it. Never
hesitating, nor changing any of the ordinances which He has fixed.
"The unsearchable places of the abysses, the
indescribable arrangements of the lower world, are restrained by the same laws. The vast unmeasurable sea, gathered
together by His working into various basins, never passes beyond the bounds
placed upon it, but does as He has commanded. For He said, ‘Thus far shall you come, and your waves shall be
broken within you.’ The ocean, impassable to man, and the worlds-beyond, are regulated by the same enactments of
the Lord. The seasons of spring, summer, autumn, and winter, peacefully
give place to one another. The winds in their several quarters fulfill, at the proper time, their service
without hindrance. The ever-flowing fountains, formed both for enjoyment and health, furnish without fail their
breasts for the life of men. The very smallest of living beings meet together in peace and accord. All these the
Great Creator and Lord of all has appointed to the smallest of living beings to exist in peace and harmony;
while He does good to all, but most abundantly to us who have
fled for refuge to His compassions through Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom be glory and majesty for ever and ever.
Compare the words of Clement to the idiocy of evil men.What is our problem? Again, it rests on man’s desire to usurp the authority of God and to
establish a "New World Order" of idiocy and utter nonsense. God did not create evil; man does that for
himself. We all must place ourselves under the authority of God and live in harmony and peace under His
natural order. To do anything else is idiotic.
Allen Thompsonis the author of
The Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments, which is available
Peter Wright, author of Spycatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior
The short snippet of information that follows shows how the British always integrated spying
and deceit into their so-called diplomacy, which is always treacherous. You should make sure you read
Australia, the Concealed Colony!  and
The United States is Still a British
Colony.  Also see “Canada, Australia and NZ Are Still Colonies.” 
“Conquered states ... can be held by the conqueror in three different ways. The first is to ruin them, the
second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person, and the third is to allow them to continue to live
under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of the few [i.e.
traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror.” (Niccolo Machiavelli, The
“The entire Cyprus episode left a lasting impression on British colonial policy. Britain
colonised most successfully when we defeated the military insurgency first, using intelligence rather than
force of arms, before negotiating a a political solution based on the political leadership of the defeated
insurgency movement, and with British force of arms to maintain the installed government. This is basically
what happened in Malaya and Kenya, and both these countries have survived intact.
The fundamental problem was how to remove the colonial power while ensuring that the local
military forces did not fill the vacuum. How, in other words, can you create a stable local political class?
The Colonial Office were still well versed in complicated, academic, democratic models—a constitution here, a
parliament there—very few of which stood the remotest chance of success. After the Cyprus experience I wrote
a paper and submitted it to Hollis,  giving my views.I said that we ought to adopt the Bolshevik
model, since it was the only one to have worked successfully. Lenin
understood better than anyone how to gain control of a country and, just as important, how to keep it. Lenin
believed that the political class had to control the men with the guns, and the intelligence service, and by
these means could ensure that neither the Army nor another political class could challenge for power.
Feliks Dzerzhinsky, the founder of the modern Russian Intelligence Service, specifically set up
the CHEKA (forerunner of the KGB) with these aims in mind. He established three main directories—the First
Chief Directorate to work against those people abroad who might conspire against the government; the Second
Chief Directorate to work against those inside the Soviet Union who might conspire; and the Third Chief
Directorate, which penetrated the armed forces, to ensure that no military coup could be
My paper was greeted with horror by Hollis and the rest of the MI5 Directors. They told me it
was ‘cynical,’ and it was never even passed to the Colonial Office, but looking back over the past quarter of
a century, it is only where a version of Lenin’s principles has been applied in newly created countries that
a military dictatorship has been avoided.
These ideas were also hotly contested by the CIA when I lectured to them in 1959.
Helms  told me flatly I was advocating Communism for the Third World. He felt that we had a decisive
intelligence advantage which they lacked. We were the resident colonial power, whereas in the insurgencies
which they faced in the Far East and Cuba, they were not, and therefore they felt the only policy they could
pursue was a military solution. It was this thinking which ultimately led the USA into the Vietnam War.
More immediately, it led them into the Bay of Pigs, and when, two years later, Harvey listened to my Cyprus
experiences, he was struck by the parallel between the two problems: both small islands with a guerrilla force led
by a charismatic leader.” 
 Available on the DvD or here: http://www.basicfraud.com/main-0/index.php#
 Available on the DvD or here: http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/the-united-states-is-still-a-british-colony.html
 Available on the DvD or here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/canada-australia-and-nz-are-still-colonies.html
 Sir Roger Hollis, the then Director of MI5. Peter Wright persistently maintains in his book Spycatcher
that Hollis was always the “fifth man” in the infamous British spy ring (the other four were Kim Philby, Donald
Maclean, Guy Burgess and Sir Anthony Blunt) However, Hollis was never detained and retired from his high position
in MI5 with all charges against him unproven. Later research has shown that the “fifth man” was none other than
Victor Rothschild. If Wright is correct about Hollis then there was a “sixth man” in this spy ring! As the
dusk-cover of this book proclaims, “The story of how he [Peter Wright] and many of his MI5 colleagues came to this
conclusion [about Hollis] makes for some of the best reading found anywhere in the vast literature on
 Richard Helms, the then CIA Director of Plans.
 Peter Wright, with Paul Greengrass, Spycatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence
Officer, Viking Penguin, New York, 1987, pp. 158-159.
The Party Game Is
Over. Stand And Fight
By John Pilger
4 November 2010
"Rise like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number!
Shake your chains to earth, like dew
Which in sleep had fall'n on you:
Ye are many - they are few."
These days, the stirring lines of Percy Shelley's "Mask of Anarchy" may seem unattainable. I don't
think so. Shelley was both a Romantic and political truth-teller. His words resonate now
because only one political course is left to those who are disenfranchised
and whose ruin is announced on a government spreadsheet.
Born of the "never again" spirit of 1945, social democracy has surrendered
toan extreme political cult of money worship. This
reached its apogee when £1trn of public money was handed unconditionally to corrupt banks by a Labour government
whose leader, Gordon Brown, had previously described "financiers" as the nation's
"great example" and his personal "inspiration".
This is not to say parliamentary politics is meaningless. It has one meaning now: the replacement of
democracy with a business plan for every human activity, every dream, every decency, every
hope, every child born.
The old myths of British rectitude, imperial in origin, provided false comfort while
the Blair gang built the foundation of the present
"coalition". This is led by a former PR man for an asset stripper and by a bagman who will
inherit his knighthood and the tax-shielded fortune of his father, the 17th Baronet of Ballintaylor.
David Cameron and
George Osborne are essentially
fossilised spivs who, in colonial times, would have been sent by their daddies to claim foreign terrain and
Today, they are claiming 21st-century Britain and imposing their vicious, antique ideology, albeit
served as economic snake oil. Their designs have
nothing to do with a "deficit crisis". A deficit of 10 per cent is not remotely a crisis. When Britain was
officially bankrupt at the end of the Second World War, the government built its greatest public institutions, such
as the National Health Service and the arts edifices of London's South Bank.
There is no economic rationale for the assault described cravenly by the BBC as a "public spending
review". The debt is exclusively the responsibility of those who incurred it, the super-rich and the
gamblers. However, that's beside the point. What is happening in Britain is the
seizure of an opportunity to destroy the tenuous humanity of the modern state. It is a coup, a
"shock doctrine" as applied to Pinochet's Chile and Yeltsin's Russia.
In Britain, there is no need for tanks in the streets. In its managerial indifference
to the freedoms it is said to hold dear, bourgeois Britain has allowed parliament to create a surveillance state with
3,000 new criminal offences and laws: more than for the whole of the previous
century. Powers of arrest and detention have never been greater. The police have the
impunity to kill; and asylum-seekers can be "restrained" to death on commercial flights.
Athol Fugard is right. With Harold Pinter gone, no acclaimed writer or artist dare depart from
their well-remunerated vanity. With so much in need of saying, they have nothing to say. Liberalism, the vainest
ideology, has hauled up its ladder. The chief opportunist, Nick Clegg, gave no electoral hint of his odious
faction's compliance with the dismantling of much of British postwar society.The theft of £83bn in jobs
and services matches almost exactly the amount of tax legally avoided by piratical
corporations. Without fanfare, the super-rich have been assured they can dodge up to £40bn in
tax payments in the secrecy of Swiss banks. The day this was
sewn up, Osborne attacked those who "cheat" the welfare system. He omitted the real
amount lost, a minuscule £0.5bn, and that £10.5bn in benefit payments was not claimed at all.
Labour is his silent partner.
The propaganda arm in the press and broadcasting dutifully presents this as unfortunate but
necessary. Mark how the firefighters' action is "covered". On Channel 4 News, following an item that portrayed
modest, courageous people as basically reckless, Jon Snow demanded that the leaders of the London Fire Authority
and the Fire Brigades Union go straight from the studio and "mediate" now, this minute. "I'll get the taxis!" he
declared. Forget the thousands of jobs that are to be eliminated from the fire service and the public danger beyond
Bonfire Night; knock their jolly heads together. "Good stuff!" said the presenter.
Ken Loach's 1983 documentary series Questions of Leadership opens
with a sequence of earnest young trade unionists on platforms, exhorting the masses. They are then shown older,
florid, self-satisfied and finally adorned in the ermine of the House of Lords. Once, at a Durham Miners' Gala, I
asked Tony Woodley, now joint general secretary of Unite, "Isn't the problem the clockwork collaboration of the
union leadership?" He almost agreed, implying that the rise of bloods like himself would change that. The British
Airways cabin crew strike, over which Woodley presides, is said to have made gains. Has it?
And why haven't the unions risen against totalitarian
laws that place free trade unionism in a vice?
The BA workers, the firefighters, the council workers, the post office workers, the NHS workers,
the London Underground staff, the teachers, the lecturers, the students can more than match the French if they are
resolute and imaginative, forging, with the wider social justice movement, potentially the greatest popular
resistance ever. Look at the web; listen to the public's support at fire stations. There is no other way now. Direct action. Civil disobedience. Unerring. Read Shelley and do it.
Download this article as PDF File in US
Letter or A4 International size: (Right-Click and select "Save
The URL of this page is: