NazareneRemnant header graphic

The New World Order Would Have
Been Impossible Without the
Institution of Democracy

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this PageNazarene-Remnant-Article-Feeds


The URL of this page is:

Download this article as PDF File in US Letter or A4 International size: (Right-Click and select "Save Target As")

  The New World Order Would Have Been Impossible Without the Institution of Democracy
US Letter Version. Download time on 56kb modem: 19 seconds

  The New World Order Would Have Been Impossible Without the Institution of Democracy
A4 Version. Download time on 56kb modem: 19 seconds

I tell you, the man and the dog are working togetherm



Article #1: The Real Nature of the Statute of Westminster of 1931
Article #2: A Closer Look at Government
Article #3: Deep Corruption in the Australian Government, Judiciary and Federal Police
Article #4: The Colour of Law in Australia
Article #5: Theodor Ludwig Adorno Wrote the Beatles' Music
Article #6: From The Nameless War by Captain Ramsey
Article #7: The Business Of America Is War
Article #8: How To Control People
Article #9: Democracy Is An illusion
Article #10: Treason in Australia
Article #11: The Real Agenda of "Democracy:" The Enslavement of Humanity
Article #12: Book Review: The West Possessed
Article #13: OPINION: Where is Australia Going and Why?
Article #14: The Deepest Secrets
Article #15: Western Democracy: A Farce And A Sham
Article #16: Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika Deception)
Article #17: Who Controls Our Elections?
Article #18: Our Parliament is Rotten to the Core
Article #19: The Holding of “Extremist Views” in Our Democracy Will Not Be Tolerated.
Article #20: The Occult Technology of Power
Article #21: The Truth about Democracy, by JAH
Article #22: The 33rd Degree Freemason.
Article #23: Humanity is Satanically Possessed
Article #24: How Did We Come To Be Such Idiots?
Article #25: Information from Peter Wright, author of Spycatcher: The Candid      Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer.
Article #26: The Party Game Is Over. Stand And Fight


“Conquered states ... can be held by the conqueror in three different ways. The first is to ruin them, the second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person, and the third is to allow them to continue to live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of the few [i.e. traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror.” (Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince)

The simple fact is that it is Machiavelli's third way that has been tranformed into the sham that is modern democracy, which has become the favoured mechanism of the money-power eilite to enslave humanity.


"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these thingsbut will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same policies." (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)


"Democracy in the West today is the forerunner of Marxism, which would be inconceivable without Democracy." (Captain Ramsay, The Nameless War. Get a free copy of The Nameless War.)

“Regarding the political clout which they [1] developed, Abraham [2] quotes from Professor Arthur S Miller's The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change: 'In other words, those who formally rule take their signals and commands not from the electorate as a body but from a small group of men (plus a few women). This group will be called the establishment. It exists even though that existence is stoutly denied. It is one of the secrets of the American social order [and the social order in all countries]. A second secret is the fact that the existence of the establishment, the ruling class, is not supposed to be discussed. A third secret is implicit in what has been said? That there is really only one political party of any consequence in the United States [and anywhere else for that matter], one that has been called the 'Property Party.' The Republicans and the Democrats are in fact two branches of the same (secret) party.' Abraham notes support of this view from Alvin Toffler's new book, Power Shift, which 'identifies this consortium as the 'Invisible Party' [3] and agrees with Miller that partisan politics has little or no bearing on the wielding of this all-encompassing power.’” [4]


[1] "They" are the wealthy ruling elite of the world, and their henchmen, and henchwomen, our degenerate politicians, including our lying media, and its willing employees (having the hide to call themselves editors, journalists, radio announcers and the like), and corporate leaders who have sold out our peoples and our countries. They probably think that they will be spared when the full evil of the system that is being setup is revealed for all its tawdry ugliness and evil. However, if history is any indicator, they too will die with the people they have back-stabbed.

[2] Abraham is Larry Abraham, author of The Greening: The Environmentalist's Drive For Global Power.

[3] You can get a comprehensive summary of this book in Alan B Jones book, How The World Really Works.

[4] See chapter 21, “The Invisible Party,” of Alvin Toffler’s 1990 work, Power Shift.


And also know well that the purpose of having two political parties to run a country is a device of the Illuminati, who have seen this system of “democracy” installed in so many countries since 1931 (the Statute of Westminster). Both parties are actually controlled not by the people, but by the money-power elite, to whom our politicians actually answer. Our elections, under this demonstrable lie, are a sham in that it doesn’t really matter who gets in, since both parties are in the pocket of the demonic host. In fact, the truth is that it would have been impossible for the demonic host to gain control of so many nations by stealth without the institution of democracy, and that is why the actions in Iraq, Egypt, Libya and elsewhere, seek to remove those leaders (such as Gadaffi) who oppose the Illuminati agenda for a New World Order, and replace them with “democracy.”

A 33rd degree Freemason takes a blood oath to serve the Order of the Gartner, and none other. The current leader of the Order of the Garter is Queen Semiramis II, better known to the world as Queen Elizabeth II. John Winston Howard, arch traitor to the Australian people, is a 33rd degree Freemason. His first overseas trip after becoming Australian Prime Minister was to receive his reward of the order of the 33rd degree, and to take a blood aoth to serve only Queen Semiramis II.

These murderers and athiests and satanists have always identified themselves by their membership in the Fabian Societies around the world. The logo of the Fabian Society shows a "wolf in sheep's clothing," and that is exactly what they are. Their logo is also very telling: "The inevitability of gradualness."


Politicians are clever, deceitful and totally ruthless and evil in following their leader, Queen Semiramis II. For example, despite that fact that the temperature of the Earth is exactly the same as it was 30 years ago, there is a movement to force the people of the world to believe in the lie of Global Warming. John Winston Howard was ceratinly aware that it was a lie, because he decalred himself to be an agnostic on global warming, but at the same time he carefully and systematically crafted the global warming bureaucracy for this lie, the one that we have today, before he left office!

As David Archibald of City Beach, Western Australia, has pointed out:

"When [Howard] had control of the Senate, he did not roll back the Australian Greenhouse Office or the Renewable Energy Target Scheme.

The last dark deed of the Howard Government was the passage of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act in October 2007. This is the auditing basis of the carbon tax. His plan was to get the audutung system bedded down, then start taxing.

Labor's carbon tax would be a couple of years behind schedule if Mr Howard had not laid the bureaucratic foundation for it.

As we rationalists at the time found, Mr Howard had no interest in the science of climate. To his mind, climate was serving a higher purpose, which was to bring forward the day that Australia adopted nuclear power. As such, he was a second-rate Machiavelli. He did not trust the Australian people to make that decision for themselves, and he did not trust his cabinet colleagues enough to tell them either.

The evil that men do lives after them, and in Mr Howard's case that is a future in which Australia does not have a cement industry, a steel industry, oil refining, a multitude of industries and, most importantly, a synthetic liquid fuels industry [all our vital industries were virtually spirited away to China in the dark of night, without the Australian people knowing what was going on, and all this happened under John Winston Howard's watch!]

That is the Howard legacy that many of us are toiling mightily to avoid." (in the Letters from readers section of New Weekly magazine, May 28, 2011, p. 11, available here: )

John Howard was also behind the unconstitutional water grab, called the Water Act 2007, which was nothing less than an all out attempt to steal water from Australian farmers and communities in the Murray-Darling Basin. Since the Australian Constitution grants responsibility to the States for water, Howard tried to override this by inserting a number of new international treaties into the Water Act 2007. These "international treaties" were no doubt intended to serve the interests of the international Illuminati gangsters, and they are the real monopoly that John Howard has always served, not the Australian people.

Howard claimed that the new Act was sound in that it retained the balance between the interests of the farmers, local communities, and the environment. But the fact emerged quite clearly that it was the environment that was god in this supposedly balanced legislation. Australians need to wake up and study the reason why the environment has been such a powerful player in politics over the last 20 to 30 years. The fact is that the environment has alway been used as a wedge to drive in Draconian legislation against the best interests of the people. (This goes back to the days of The Report From Iron Mountain, and much has been reported about this to the global community, e.g. see The Greening.) For example, witness the new slug of the Carbon Tax of Julia Gillard, which is based on a total lie. Yet it is being forced through by the playing out of the so-called charade between Abbott looking to be the good guy, and Gillard playing the monster (which she is in reality), yet both sides serve the same master. (As an aside here, if you've never read the book Antichrist and the Green Prince, then now is the time to do so!)

The simple fact remains to this day that the Water Act 2007 puts the interests of a hidden group of internationa stakeholders above those of the people and communities who live and work in the Murray-Darling Basin. It is quite telling that the latest government inquiry headed by the indepedent member for New England, Tony Windsor, makes no mention of removing these international treaties from the Water Act, in his report which has just been released to the public. Until the Water Act 2007 is re-written to totally exclude non-Australian interests, anything coming from our corrupt politcians will be totally rejected again by the farmers and communities of the Basin.


John Howard was also in the Australian PM's chair when the Port Arthur Massacre occurred. He was in New York on the day of 911, and in London at the time of the London Bombings! Being a 33rd Freemason, he had no trouble lying to the Australian Parliament about Weapons of Mass destruction in Iraq, which saw Australian troops being used as part of the private army of the Illuminati in both Iraq and Afghanistan, where they remain to this day under the satanic Gillard government.


We must always keep in mind that the agenda of the enemy is to enslave the world without the people actually being aware of it happening. But at some critical point, which they have planned to happen, the enslavement becomes so apparent, that there is no longer any need for deceit. At that point the real nature of these evil people will be put on the table by the most ruthless and murderous acts the world will ever know (known anciently as "Jacob's Trouble").


While the British television series Yes Minister! was supposed to be a comedy, it was in fact a light-hearted swipe at what actually goes on in politics. You will remember that it wasn't the PM who was in control, but the permanent bureaucracy which actually ran the whole show. This was obvious to anyone.

 The real financial situation in Australia.

Article #1 

The Real Nature of the Statute of Westminster of 1931

This is an excerpt from Chapter 1, "The Foundations of COUNTRIES that Never Were," of The Extortion SYSTEM of the Ruling Elite, by Rob Hay,

"Canada was Founded on the Supremacy of God and Rule of Law. (Yes the Supremacy of the Emperor of Rome and his Rule of Law )

There are some defacto COUNTRIES, which means that there is no lawful authority between the PERSONS and the Government. Again I am going to focus on Canada as a model as I am most familiar with the structure. However you can simply look at what I do and you will find similarities with other COUNTRIES. Australia for example has no statements within it's Constitution connecting it to the Queen's Heirs and Successors. Everything is very subtle and hidden out in the open for the purpose of giving the Illusion that a Democracy that represents the wishes of the people is Governing them. 

In truth these Democracies are nothing more than Corporations and a Feudal System of Serfdom has been set up for which the people have no rights or freedoms, only privileges. They do selective enforcement of laws to give the Illusion that the law applies to all when in fact they are robbing the people blind. The objective here is to expose the system and fraudulent controls within that system so you can more easily see it taking place in other COUNTRIES and situations. ...

The Statute [of Westminster] Confirms that Canada is under Admiralty Law and not Common Law based on the King James Bible.

... Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this Act, section seven hundred and thirty-five and seven hundred and thirty-six of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, shall be construed as though reference therein to the Legislature of a British possession did not include reference to the Parliament of a Dominion.

... Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing provisions of this Act, section four of the Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890 (which requires certain laws to be reserved for the signification of His Majesty's pleasure or to contain a suspending clause), and so much of section seven of that Act as requires the approval of His Majesty in Council to any rules of Court for regulating the practice and procedure of a Colonial Court of Admiralty, shall cease to have effect in any Dominion as from the commencement of this Act.

There you have it complete disclosure that Canada was founded under Admiralty Law. Why is this so important? Well Admiralty Law has but one principle, the Captain may break any laws he/she wishes for the safety and security of the ship. However there is one problem, nobody is at sea here and nobody is on a ship. Thus you are granted privileges not rights and freedoms. This is common throughout the world not just CANADA or the Commonwealth.

However they don't tell you this. Why, well you're a Slave, remember.

Although the U.K. Parliament gave up all controlling power over Canada, Schedule 17 of the Constitutional Act reinstated section 4 of the Statute of Westminster in 1982, giving the U.K. Parliament complete and direct control over Government of Canada. Thus those elected to Canadian Parliament must do as they are told by the U.K. Parliament. Thus CANADA is controlled by the U.K. Parliament under Admiralty Law.

... No Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom passed after the commencement of this Act shall extend or be deemed to extend, to a Dominion as part of the law of that Dominion, unless it is expressly declared in that Act that that Dominion has requested, and consented to, the enactment thereof.

[Note: As far as Canada is concerned, section 4 was repealed by the Constitution Act, 1982] Note they never removed the repealing of Section 2 of 1893. The QUEEN has no power. So what is going on? Who is running the Asylum? Well no one is actually running it for then there would be someone to be held accountable, such is the nature of a defacto Government. They Acts are merely policy manuals for the CORPORATION.

The Statute of Westminster was put forward to show that the U.K. Parliament had no say over Canadian affairs at all. Done just prior to the BANKRUPTCY of CANADA and over 100 other COUNTRIES in 1933. This was done so they could apply Talmudic Law against the FICTION PEOPLE called PERSONS and use the unsuspecting living real people as sureties. Of course some caught onto the scam, but the courts being Admiralty in nature gave nobody any avenue for an impartial and fair trial to plead their case. In the United States all rulings prior to 1933 were abolished, hence rulings which agreed that people were not PERSONS, were thrown out in one fell swoop. That's fair right? Common Law courts all over the United States were closed down and Commercial Admiralty Merchant Courts took their place, of course the people were not told this. Treason? Yes, beyond Treason as the Bankers seized control over the Judicial processes, thus ensuring that they could force their will against the people. Canada never had anything but Admiralty Merchant Courts. Thus all laws from the inceptions of Canada are invalid and unlawful.

In essence what the Statute of Westminster was all about, was to simply decommission the ship called Canada, listed on the British Board of Trade. Thus preparing it for the Bankruptcy that happened in 1933 to most of the countries of the world. This was done so they could bring forward the Babylonian Talmud as the rule of law for the planet. Creating a world of debtors with no rights or freedoms, for which real people are tricked into becoming the sureties for. Also enabling the Bankers to create massive wealth for themselves at the expense of the world. Why? Because the Agenda [Nazarene Remnant comment: this is the Grand Plan, now commonly referred to as the New World Order, but better called the New Babylon or the AshkenaziFourth Reich] must progress and be in place prior to 2012, which is the end of the Mayan Callander and possibly the end of the world as we know it. However I'll leave that open to speculation for now. Much thought by many has been put into it, however whatever is going to happen in 2012 [to find out what is going to happen in 2012, see our freely available The Real Crisis is About to Unfold and It's Not Financial], these Ruling Elite are working hard to see to it we don't get there as free people.

So what was 1982 all about anyways? Well it is the Jubilee of course. Jubilees go back to the time of Ancient Egypt where after 49 years the Slaves would get 1 year of freedom and then be re-enslaved. 1982 is 49 years after 1933. These people are seriously into Slavery and see us all as their property to use and dispose of as they wish. As you read through this book you will discover more about this. They built those Pyramids in Jubilees the Great Pyramid taking 3 Jubilees to build [Nazarene Remnant comment: the Great Pyramid in Egypt was not built by the forerunners of the modern Illuminati at all! It was built by the Eternal God!]. So what are the building now? Well they are getting you to help them build a New World Order as announced by George Bush Senior. The New World Order is a One World Government based on enslavement of the people for the benefit of the Ruling Elite. Thus unless you are one of them, you might want to sit up and start taking notice of what is going on." (From The Extortion SYSTEM of the Ruling Elite, pp. 13-14., or here:

Article #2 

A Closer Look at Government  


"The vision we're usually given of how political power is manifest in our society typically runs something like this: government at the top, banking, industry, media and military, beneath, and the people beneath this. However, an independent examination of the development of modern political power is more likely to reveal the following arrangement: extended family banking groups at the top, government beneath, facilitating the wishes of this hierarchy, and the media [which is owned by the 'extended family banking groups'] beneath portraying the work of the government to the people as "democracy in action." 


It can thus be seen that, in truth, most governments are little more than front organizations for the elite banking cartels. They interface with the public via the media, acting to facilitate social change in a manner that maintains relative social stability, while ensuring that our culture stays in line with any course the elite wish it to pursue.  


Western governments do not usually allow the public to actually pick who becomes their political representative, merely to choose between individuals selected by the party hierarchy. Neither do the public get to pick the policies the representative will pursue, this is also under the control of the party. To say that this system is open to abuse is a considerable understatement." (Blueprint for a Prison Planet, by Nick Sandberg   


"Conquered states ... can be held by the conqueror in three different ways. The first is to ruin them, the second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person and the third is to allow them to continue to live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of the few [i.e. traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror." (Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince

Article #3

Deep Corruption in the Australian Government, Judiciary and Federal Police

Love Letters From the Bar Table




A true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System. Who by? By the Australian Federal Government, Australian federal Police and various Judges and Magistrates. 


Justice Ipp of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (now Supreme Court of New South Wales) said in a speech on Judicial Bias in 2004 that: 


“The most obvious example of a judge with a direct interest in the case is the judge who accepts a bribe to decide in favour of one of the parties. There can be nothing more inimical to the idea of justice.” 


In relation to allegations that the respondents bribed a Judicial Officer their lawyers said in their written submissions: 


“The Respondents submit that it is for the Appellant to prove his serious allegations of bribery. Unless the Appellant can make out a prima facie case, the Respondents (through their legal representatives) are not required to refute baseless allegations”. 



Notice how they will only talk through their legal representatives and they want to see all the evidence first. In my mind that is hardly the words of an innocent party. Just for the record the prima facie case had well and truly been made out and the respondents knew it. 




A non-fiction book about corruption in the Australian Government, Judiciary and Federal Police. The book includes documented evidence and names names.  


The Commonwealth Ombudsman, Professor John McMillan, has openly stated in an ABC Four Corners interview (October 2008) that the Australian Federal Police do not want to know about corruption in their own department. He said he was told this directly by senior Australian Federal Police. This in itself says there needs to be a Royal Commission. It is worth noting that the Federal Police and the Federal Courts are all part of the Attorney General's Department. So it is no surprise that the Federal Police do not want to know about the criminal conduct of Judges.  


Just for the record on the front cover above there is a picture of the author holding a sign saying "Justice Moore Federal Court of Australia takes bribes". The photo and others like it were tendered as part of an affidavit in court before Justice Moore. The book has further information on the history of the photos.   


Extract Book Review by:

Phillip Taylor MBE LL.B PGCE Barrister-at-Law 

Richmond Green Chambers 

Book Review Editor, 'The Barrister'

Surrey, United Kingdom  



"This book is described as 'a true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System'. In 18 chapters and just over 300 pages, a case is being made out that certain people are, by definition, 'corrupt' and 'taking bribes'. But it is one-sided with silence and inaction on the other."   


"I came away from this book with very perplexed feelings. Mr Rudd will do nothing; the Australian judiciary would never acknowledge any form of corruption as I see it."  


"But I would like to think that the ironically named 'Love Letters' is a marker setting a future agenda for international human rights and upholding the rules of natural justice."   

It would be greatly appreciated if you would spend 5 minutes of your time and 1. Email as many people as you can letting them know about the book and this website.2. Put a link to this site on your social networking page, e.g. Facebook and MySpace or other news sites or blogs or use twitter 3. Buy the book (see links to bookshops on the left side of this page) or if you can not afford to, go to your local library and ask them to buy a copy. Links to some of the libraries that already have the book are below. 5 minutes of your time can make a big difference. Thank you for your support.     

Some of the highlights in the book are: 

1.     The Prime Minister Julia Gillard being party to concealing the corruption that the book exposes.  

2.     The former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd turning a blind eye to the corruption and his own criminal history. 

3.     Prima facie cases against a number of judicial officers for breaching section 34 of the 1914 Crimes Act.   

4.     The Attorney General, Robert McClelland, trying to cover up the corruption and caught out lying about referring the corruption to the Federal Police.  

5.     The current directors of Fairfax Media being in contempt of court.   

6.     A current judge having a sexual relationship with one of the respondents while the judge was hearing the matter.   

7.     Transcript evidence of a judicial officer lying in court in relation to having a personal interest in the matters. When I started asking to many questions he quickly transferred the matters to the Federal Court.   

8.     The fraudulent costs bill sent to the author by Freehills Lawyers on behalf of Fairfax Media which showed criminal conduct and fraud etc. So much so that they could never enforce the costs.   

9.     The criminal history of a judicial officer which includes price fixing and bribing a witness.  Plus much more.  




Love Letters from the Bar Table by Shane Dowling 


By Shane Dowling


ISBN: 978-0-646-51736-0 


Self Published 




An appreciation by Phillip Taylor MBE of Richmond Green Chambers 


I’m always interested in the cross section of law books depicting the working of the common law across its jurisdictions. When I came across this curious self published work, ‘Love Letters from the Bar Table’, from Shane Dowling, who has a certain number of ‘issues’ with the legal establishment in Australia, I thought it was worth looking at further. 


A doctrine which is gaining international popularity at present is called ‘judicial recusal’ where a judge stands aside (or is made to stand aside) in certain circumstances based on the two main rules of natural justice: namely, a judge may not act in his own cause; and both sides must be heard. New Zealand academic Grant Hammond has written a definitive work on the current state of the law. 


I think it’s a fair comment to say that we do not have any recognised corruption within the judiciary in the United Kingdom. I, for one, have grave reservations about the strength of any argument suggesting forms of corruption elsewhere amongst judges because of the catastrophic constitutional implications involved. 


So, what I am saying here is that I have no idea of the rights and wrongs of Shane Dowling’s detailed case. I don’t offer an opinion although I have read his documents and his views in the book in some detail. What I do say, however, is that I feel the worth of this book merits some consideration in relation to the basic concepts we hold true in the common law tradition, namely upholding rules of natural justice. 


This book is described as ‘a true story about the systematic scandalisation of the Australian Federal Judicial System’. In 18 chapters and just over 300 pages, a case is being made out that certain people are, by definition, ‘corrupt’ and ‘taking bribes’. But it is one-sided with silence and inaction on the other 


The problem remains that when judicial decisions are made where one party becomes aggrieved by the outcome, the phrase ‘sour grapes’ springs to mind. I feel Dowling doesn’t suffer from sour grapes but has that other perennial, ‘being ignored’. 


It’s only relatively recently in UK that judges now give interviews or sometimes reply to correspondence (through their clerks) so I am not surprised by the tactics employed in the ‘stop (or rather ignore) Dowling’ campaign. Frankly, I doubt whether he will ever get closure on his matter, but he raises a most important principle – that is: ‘when should a judge retire from a hearing’, or, in other words: ‘when can we question a judge?’ 


I came away from this book with very perplexed feelings. Mr Rudd will do nothing; the Australian judiciary would never acknowledge any form of corruption as I see it; and the case for a Royal Commission (or whatever name you want to call it in the future) is many years away, if ever it is convened, and gives any form of realistic appraisal to be acted upon. So, what to do? 


Well, Dowling has raised the consciousness of the issue in parallel with increases in judicial recusal applications as the wider public become more aware of the failings of judges. Frankly, it’s a can of worms with no winners on the horizon here. 


But I would like to think that the ironically named ‘Love Letters’ is a marker setting a future agenda for international human rights and upholding the rules of natural justice in the tradition of a discussion on a new ‘Table Talk’ theme- it’s a valuable contribution to the debate about how we face the future in the global discussion age of the internet … and where judges (and politicians) will have to face up to a new agenda of jurisprudential responsibility by answering their critics if our accepted concept of natural justice is ignored. 


The book is available here:

National Library of Australia
National Museum of Australia Library

State Library of NSW
University of Newcastle

University of South Australia
University of Western Sydney

University of Sydney   

Article #4

The Colour of Law in Australia   


By Sue Maynes 




Every Common Law country has been battling the ever increasing surge of Government regulations, which have been removing our ownership rights, personal and civil liberties, rights of free speech and free will choice, that has been a key feature of our common law rights as men and women.



After the great wars,
 most countries were made bankrupt. Australia in 1932. Our country was already in massive debt to the international bankers, based in the City of London (a 1 mile square in the centre of London dominated by banking, insurance companies, trading companies and the like) – as they had funded much of the original early colonisation growth.

The deal was that Australia could continue to borrow—without having to ever repay the principal—as long as the government met the interest repayments.

To do that they needed assets and the labour of the Australian people was the only asset that could produce money.

Yet, we were free will people with the right to choose whether we would pay off a debt that was not of our making.

So, we were manipulated subtly but surely to agree to contract ourselves to that debt.


By our voluntary agreement to register ourselves as assets, firstly of the government of Australia, then more securely under the corporate government of Australia. [Nazarene Remnant comment: I'm disappointed to see that Sue Maynes has not clearly identified the moral problem inherent in these arrangements. That is, how can I be held accountable for arrangements that I have no knowledge of, and have been made responsible for. The answer is I cannot, because this is a fraud perpetrated against all people. In other words, I am not bound by these frauds morally, but in their fraudulent courts, true common or moral law does not stand a chance.]

Registering What?

The Birth Certificate: Our children at birth – for which we are paid a fee (family allowance) to recognize our role as guardians.
Starting a bank account.
Driver’s licence.
Tax file number.
Electoral role.
Marriage certificate.
ACN, ABN, and Trade licences.
Torrens Title, land registration, etc, etc.


At birth, each child is worth $1 million to the government – the Birth Certificateis printed on bond paper.

At all stages of registration, your value increases allowing more borrowings.

In many US state documents, the state is not only listed as a third party to every marriage but as the primary party.

This voluntary and ongoing registration enters each of us in a situation where we became contracted to the government and are “forced” to obey laws that would not apply under Common Law.

Therefore we become subject to speeding fines, parking fines, rates, dog registration, child innoculations, etc and when we protest, we enter the courts as guilty people having to prove their innocence.

Where is our Common Law?

Oh, it is still there, but as we are no longer Common Law people, having voluntarily given ourselves to the corporation as a chattel, we cannot access it.

And because we still appear to have a Constitution, we can still get a jury trial for murder, we can still appear to have a Monarch guarding us, we THINK we still have access to our long history of rights,
 when in fact we do not.

We have what is called the Colour of Law. Looks right, but is overlaid with something completely different.

And because the only legitimate money in the world is gold and silver, which government took away from us during the wars, we can only buy and sell with pretend money / fiat money, which ultimately means
 we have not really paid for anything properly.

Are we the true parents of our children any more?
 No, we simply mind them for the government,which is why they can step in and take them off us.

Do we truly own our cars? No, the manufacturer’s deed of production is held by government, we simply get to “rent” them yearly.

Do we truly own our land? No, we hold the paper title, but the government holds the primary title through our registering our land under Torrens title.

And Mr Kerry Shine, Minister for Justice and Member for Toowoomba in QLD stated that in a reply to a letter from a constituent, published in the Toowoomba Chronicle August 11, when he said: 


“Finally, in relation to Mr Patch's third enquiry (TC 25/07), Common Law land rights have not applied to Queensland freehold land since the introduction of the Torrens Land Title system in 1861 or the leasehold lands which are governed by the Lands Act 1994. The ‘Brigalow Corporation’ simply administers land pursuant to this Act. This system functions effectively to protect the interest of private landholders in Queensland.”

This explains why we cannot get Common Law relief in a court of law, why we are constantly told the Bill of Rights does not apply, why we have our home taken from us, when this is against common law, why government authorities think they can trespass freely on our land and in our homes.

We have voluntarily registered our rights away. 


[Nazarene Remnant comment:   i.e. we have registered our children at birth through the Birth Certificate, and all the other systems of registration mentioned previously in this article. But the truth is that everything in this article has befallen on us because we have forgotten God and His Great Law, which would have protected us all from the great evils under which we have all been subjected. But the bad news is that things are about to get a lot worst.] 

Article #5

Theodor Ludwig Adorno Wrote the Beatles' Music

“It turns out that little to our knowledge the Beatles, Rolling Stones and others didn't write those songs. A German of the Frankfurt School born September 11th 1903 named Theodor Ludwig Adorno did. Americans never knew this and still don't. Adorno said in a German interview (w/subtitles) years ago that the combining of political protest against the Viet Nam war with pop rock music trivialized the protest because that context makes war and atrocities just another consumer item. War, serial killers, economic crashes become processed in the minds of the media consumer with cartoons, sitcoms, beer and McDonalds. This is shown in a montage at the close of the '76 movie Network too.”(Dan, a reader of Henry Makow's blog article, “Lou Dobbs Quits Cabala News Network,” November 19, 2009. Source: )

Article #6

From The Nameless War by Captain Ramsey

1694 — The Bank of "England" set up and the National Debt instituted, securing for the Jew moneylenders a first charge on the taxes of England for interest on their loans. The right to print money transferred from the Crown to this "Bank of England". (p. 83) (Also see The Imperialism of Jewish Capital)

For the significance of this act, see below.

1707 — Economic and political union forced upon Scotland against the vote of every country and borough; the national debt foisted upon Scotland, and the royal mint in Edinburgh suppressed. (p. 84)

From Chapter 1, The British Revolution

Chapter 1: The British Revolution

"It was fated that England should be the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet finished." (Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin Earl of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I published in 1851.)

The scene opens with distant glimpses of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions; these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in one solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous rumblings of Calvinism.

"The English Revolution under Charles I was unlike any preceding one ... From that time and event we contemplate in our history the phases of revolution." Isaac Disraeli


In 1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we read this remarkable sentence:

"Remember the French Revolution, the secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work of our hands."[Protocol No.3]

The Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written, "Remember the British and French revolutions, the secrets of which are well known to us for they were entirely the work of our hands."


In 1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so, dividing once more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of Christ's Church, the next attack would develop.

The next attack would aim at placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews, who were now firmly ensconced within.


The real objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694, when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and the institution of the National Debt.

This charter handed over to an anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could previously obtain.

From that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the birthright of the British peoples. [Note: Germany's most successful economic system was NOT backed by gold. He eluded the blood-sucking grip of the Zionist Jew Money Masters, therefore "Germany must be destroyed!" and Adolf Hitler vilified down through ages so the uninformed will DEMAND their government return to the gold standard. -- jackie]

The political and economic union of England and Scotland was shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale corruption, and in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough. The main objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and to force upon her, too, responsibility for the "National Debt."

The grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was that the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of their ancestors, challenge this state of affairs. To provide against this, therefore, the party system was now brought into being, frustrating true national reaction and enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their newly-established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from their newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.

Gold was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000 pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger entries.

The owner of 100 pounds of land, however, still must work every hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The end of the process must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become millionaires; those who own and work the land, the Englishman and the Scotsman, must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably till now, when it is nearly completed.

It has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in the main the deliberate ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the Gentiles, and their supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on. The French

From Chapter 2, The French Revolution

The main discovery that such an examination [of the nature of the French Revolution] will reveal is this fact:

The revolution was not the work of Frenchmen to improve France. It was the work of aliens, whose object was to destroy everything, which had been France.

This conclusion is borne out by the references to "foreigners" in high places in the 13 Revolutionary Councils, not only by Sir Walter Scott, but by Robes Pierre himself.

We have the names of several of them, and it is clear that they were not British, or Germans, or Italians, or any other nationals; they were, of course, Jews.

Let us see what the Jews themselves have to say about it :

"Remember the French Revolution to which it was we who gave the name of 'Great.' The secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was wholly the work of our hands." Protocols of Zion No. 7.

"We were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words 'Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.' The stupid Gentile poll parrots flew down from all sides on to these baits, and with them carried away the well-being of the world.

The would-be-wise men of the Gentiles were so stupid that they could not see that in nature there is no equality, and there cannot be freedom (meaning, of course, freedom as understood by Socialists and Communists, freedom to wreck your own country)." Protocols of Zion-No. 1.

With this knowledge in our possession we shall find we possess a master key to the intricate happenings of the French Revolution. The somewhat confused picture of characters and events moving across the screen, which our history books have shown us, will suddenly become a concerted and connected human drama.

When we begin to draw parallels between France of 1789, Britain of 1640, Russia of 1917, Germany and Hungary of 1918-19, and Spain of 1936, we shall feel that drama grip us with a new and personal sense of reality.


By 1780 financial paralysis was making its appearance in France. The world's big financiers were firmly established.

"They possessed so large a share of the world's gold and silver stocks, that they had most of Europe in their debt, certainly France."

So writes Mr McNair Wilson in his Life of Napoleon, and continues on page 38: "A change of a fundamental kind had taken place in the economic structure of Europe whereby the old basis had ceased to be wealth and had become debt. In the old Europe wealth had been measured in lands, crops, herds and minerals; but a new standard had now been introduced, namely, a form of money to which the title 'credit' had been given."

The debts of the French Kingdom though substantial were by no means insurmountable, except in terms of gold: and had the King's advisers decided to issue money on the security of the lands and real wealth of France, the position could have been fairly easily righted. As it was the situation was firmly gripped by one financier after another, who either could not or would not break with the system imposed by the international usurers.

Under such weakness, or villainy, the bonds of usury could only grow heavier and more terrible, for debts were in terms of gold or silver, neither of which France produced.

And who were the potentates of the new debt machine; these manipulators of gold and silver, who had succeeded in turning upside down the finances of Europe, and replacing real wealth by millions upon millions of usurious loans?

... recall the Protocols of Zion, and turning up Number 20 we read:

"The gold standard has been the ruin of States which adopted it, for it has not been able to satisfy the demands for money, the more so as we have removed gold from circulation as far as possible."

And Again:

"Loans hang like a Sword of Damocles over the heads of rulers who . . . come begging with outstretched palm."

No words could describe more aptly what was overtaking France.


By 1730 Freemasonry had been introduced into France from England. By 1771 the movement had attained such proportions that Phillipe Duc de Chartres afterwards d'Orleans became Grand Master. This type of freemasonry was largely innocent, both in policy and personnel in its early days; but as events proved, the real moving spirits were ruthless and unscrupulous men of blood.


To my mind, that is the same as saying that "Judaism is a political program (for World Dominion) wrapped in a cloak of religion". - jackie]


By 1789 there were more than two thousand Lodges in France affiliated to the Grand Orient, the direct tool of international revolution; and their adepts numbered over 100,000.


In this smug sentence Mr Renier unwittingly dots the i's and crosses the t's, which Robes Pierre had left uncompleted. Robes Pierre's allusion to the "corrupting and secret foreigners" was getting altogether too near the mark; a little more and the full truth would be out.

At 2 a.m. that night Robes Pierre was shot in the jaw and early on the following day dragged to the guillotine.

Again let us recall Protocol 15:

"In this way we shall proceed with goy masons who know too much."

Note: In a somewhat similar manner Abraham Lincoln was shot and killed by the Jew Booth on the evening of his pronouncement to his cabinet that he intended in future to finance U.S. loans on a debt free basis similar to the debt free money known as "Greenbacks," with which he had financed the Civil War.

Article #7

The Business Of America Is War

By Stephen Lendman
27 June 2011
Noted trends analyst Gerald Celente said it, and it's true. In fact, America's business is war, more war, multiple wars, permanent wars, pillaging one nation after another for wealth, power, and dominance, while homeland needs go begging.
America never was and isn't now the "land of the free and home of the brave." In fact, it's become a "Let 'em eat cake" society.
Whether or not Marie Antoinette actually said it, France's 1789-99 revolution was very real, delivering guillotine justice, not promised "Liberte, Egalite, and Fraternite," a status now destroying what's left of American freedom, heading for the trash bin of history if not already there.
Earlier articles discussed Washington's wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Yemen, as well as numerous proxy ones in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and at home against Muslims, Latino immigrants, and working households.
Combined, they represent a shocking contempt for rule of law justice, democratic values and humanity, notions now mere artifacts long ago abandoned to advance America's imperium.
As previous articles explained, out-of-control imperialism is heading America for tyranny and ruin. In her 1951 book, "The Origins of Totalitarianism," Hannah Arendt said it's "never content to rule by external means, namely, through the state and a machinery of violence; thanks to its peculiar ideology and the role assigned to it in this apparatus of coercion, totalitarianism has discovered a means of dominating and terrorizing human beings from within."
She called it dictatorship based on:
"(1) an elaborate ideology;
(2) a single mass party;
(3) terror;
(4) a technologically conditioned monopoly of communication;
(5) a monopoly of weapons; (and)
(6) a centrally controlled economy."
Duplicitously called a democracy, today's America nearly qualifies:
(1) Its ideology is concentrated wealth and power.
(2) It's governed by a two-party duopoly - the money or property party, excluding alternative choices.
(3) It's the world's leading purveyor of state terrorism, waging global wars against nations, groups or individuals, including targeted assassinations of its own citizens.
(4) Major media managed news gives it dominant (not monopoly) communication control, but efforts to subvert Internet discourse and debate may undermine its free and open content.
(5) Corporate-run society makes it centrally controlled for bottom line priorities, excluding other choices.
In her book, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil," Arendt said crimes of state aren't committed by fanatics or sociopaths, just "terrifyingly normal" (people)....neither perverted or sadistic....who accepted the premises of their superiors and their state" to continue current and/or longstanding policies.
In his book, "On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," Ward Churchill agreed, explaining what he called the "technocrats of empire," functioning as "little Eichmanns," banally serving imperial interests, no matter how lawless or evil. They could say "no," of course, but go along to get along, including at the highest levels. For them, it's to share spoils, no matter the harm or human misery globally.
Churchill's many books and writings discussed 500 genocidal years against America's indigenous peoples, as well as its global imperial apparatus. Touching the right nerves persuasively, the University of Colorado disgracefully fired him in summer 2007, a pattern repeated elsewhere against other activist professors, notably targeting Israeli critics like Norman Finkelstein, Joel Kovel, Denis Rancourt, and Sami Al-Arian among others.
Al-Arian was also lawlessly arrested, tried, acquitted, imprisoned, brutalized, then freed, but remains under house arrest awaiting dismissal of spurious charges against him.
Imperial America's War Machine
The empire never sleeps or tolerates anti-war activism, threatening its quest for unchallengeable "full spectrum dominance" over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space, electromagnetic spectrum and information systems with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary, including with nuclear weapons preemptively.
September 11, 2001 served as pretext to consolidate power, destroy civil liberties and human rights, and wage permanent wars against invented enemies for global dominance over world markets, resources, and cheap labor - notably at home and throughout
Eurasia, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Asia at the expense of democratic freedoms and social justice.
In its 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), the Pentagon called it the "long war." Dick Cheney said wars won't end in our lifetime, and former CIA Director James Woolsey said America "is engaged in World War IV, and it could continue for years....This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us."
In his 1990 address to a joint session of Congress, GHW Bush called it a "New World Order," preparing the public for Operation Desert Storm and years of war and occupation of Iraq, perhaps knowing Serbia/Kosovo, Afghanistan, and other targeted states would follow.
Obama is America's latest warrior president, succeeding numerous past ones, including Washington, Madison, Jackson, Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, Wilson, F. Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush preceding him.
Today's stakes, however are far greater and riskier because of Pentagon grand plans, including militarizing space as a platform for future wars. A previous article explained, accessed through the following link:
It discussed plans to position nuclear, other state-of-the-art weapons, and delivery systems to wage multiple wars from space anywhere on short notice. Under Obama, the policy remains in place. His May 2010 National Security Strategy:
"reserve(s) the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend our nation and our interests." In other words, to wage preemptive wars, using first-strike nuclear and other destructive weapons "to keep the American people safe (and advance the nation's) values and ideals," pursuing unchallengeable global/space dominance, ruling by intimidation and war, making the world safe for capital.
During the Cold War, MAD (mutually assured destruction) held both sides at bay. Today's strategy includes "more flexible options (for) a wider range of contingencies (with weapons) to optimize performance." It means destroy an adversary's capabilities preemptively, then target others to eliminate all challenges to US dominance.
With America on a nuclear hair-trigger, it reinvented MAD in new form, threatening potential global nuclear winter, defined as "a long period of darkness and extreme cold that scientists predict would follow a full-scale nuclear war, a layer of dust and smoke in the atmosphere cover(ing) the earth and block(ing) the rays of the sun, (causing) most living organisms (to) perish."
Anti-nuclear expert Helen Caldicott says "one single failure of nuclear deterrence could end human history (quickly). Once initiated, it would take one hour to trigger a swift, sudden end to life on this planet." Only nuclear disarmament and abolition of nuclear weapons can stop it, what's never discussed or considered.
On January 17, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower coined the phrase "military industrial complex" in his farewell address, saying:
"....we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
As he prepared to leave office, he could hardly imagine the difference 50 years would make, transforming fortress America into a colossus, waging permanent global wars, spending unconscionable amounts on militarism and threatening planetary survival in the process.
On April 17, 2010, Independent Institute analyst Robert Higgs said annual "defense-related spending greatly exceeds the amounts budgeted by the Department of Defense," presenting FY 2009 data, the most recent figures available.
The official $636.5 billion spent way understated a growing annual total even Higgs can't fully identify, given enormous black budgets and hidden add-ons, likely totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. What's known for FY 2009, however, in billions of dollars includes the following:
-- Department of Defense: $636.5
-- Department of Energy (nuclear weapons and environmental cleanup): $16.7
-- Department of State: $36.3
-- Department of Veterans Affairs: $95.5
-- Department of Homeland Security: $51.7
-- Department of the Treasury (for Military Retirement Fund): $54.9
-- Half of NASA's budget: $9.6
-- Net interest attributable to past-debt-financed defense outlays: $126.3
Total: $1,027.5 trillion
Moreover, the National Priorities Project's analysis of FY 2010 discretionary spending showed 62% spent for military-related purposes, including 4% for veterans' benefits.
For FY 2012, the House approved $690.1 billion, an 8.4% increase (though below the $725 FY 2011 budget, a temporary drop, likely compensated for with add-ons). The Senate will approve a similar amount. If the entire $1,027.5 trillion increases by the same amount, it raises known FY 2012 defense-related spending to $1,113.8 trillion.
In fact, with supplemental and hidden add-ons, as well as Pentagon, intelligence, and other unknown amounts, the grand total likely exceeds $1.5 trillion, a figure rising most years while popular needs go begging.
Higgs also cites the unreliability of official numbers. He believes it's more accurate to take the Pentagon's basic budget and double it because as much as 40% of it is black or hidden. Moreover, as Pentagon power grows, more spending accrues to congressional districts. As a result, Congress willingly goes along as jobs are allegedly created. In addition, generous campaign contributions follow - bribes to keep funding the war machine.
Congressional Affirmation of Permanent War
The current House bill, HR 1540 includes a worrisome/duplicitous Sec. 1034: Affirmation of Armed Conflict with Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Associated Forces, affirming:
"(1) the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces and that those entities continue to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and abroad;
(2) the President has the authority to use all necessary and appropriate force during the current armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40);
(3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization(s), and persons, who --
(A) are part of, or are substantially supporting al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or
(B) have engaged in hostilities or have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported hostilities in aid of a nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph (A); and
(4) the President's authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force....includes the authority to detain belligerents, including persons described in paragraph (3), until the termination of hostilities."
In September 2001, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) for "the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States." Still in force today, it began the "war on terror," giving George Bush carte blanche authority to wage global wars in violation of international and constitutional laws. A 2002 AUMF against Iraq followed.
The House (and likely the Senate) FY 2012 Defense Authorization bill affirms that authority, letting Obama as commander and chief, wage wars anywhere at his discretion. He's taking full advantage, duplicitous congressional posturing notwithstanding.
On June 24, in fact, House Republicans and 70 Democrats rejected support for Obama's Libya war, but defeated a measure to defund it. In other words, they authorized war at the same time symbolically rejecting it, exposing their gross hypocrisy.
America's Permanent War Agenda
In inflation adjusted dollars, annual defense spending more than doubled under George Bush and keeps rising under Obama despite growing budget cutting pressures, given a much greater national debt burden than reported.
Officially it's nearly $14.3 trillion (headed for an estimated $15.5 trillion by September 30), exceeding 100% of GDP at that time. Omitted, however, is another $7.6 trillion owed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other government agencies, besides future trillion dollar or more amounts added annually.
It hardly matters, given the military/industrial complex's power to demand what it wants and get it. Today, in fact, it comprises:
-- defense, technology, energy, financial, private military contractor (PMCs), and other corporate interests;
-- Congress;
-- America's media;
-- prominent think tanks and other pressure groups;
-- various others benefitting from militarism; and
-- the Pentagon colossus, a frightening power unto itself, threatening humanity's survival.
The Defense Department's FY 2010 Base Structure Report shows how large it's become, even with important information omitted:
DOD is the world's largest landlord with over 539,000 facilities (buildings, structures, and linear structures) located on nearly 5,000 sites, covering more than 28 million acres and over two billion square feet of space in America, its territories and overseas. In fact, these numbers way understate much higher totals as many Pentagon facilities are secret and/or unreported.
They include over 1,000 overseas bases in 150 or more countries, as well as additional secret ones shared with or leased from host countries. As of April 2009, Congressional Research Service data includes 1,402,000 total active duty US military personnel worldwide, 73,000 National Guard, and 208,000 Selected Reserves, for a 1,683,000 total.
Add to them America's private military contractor (PMC) army, corporate mercenaries profiting from US imperialism. They perform a wide range of functions from combat to consulting to logistics, virtually anything once done by the Pentagon. Moreover, America's intelligence agencies, State Department, Homeland Security, and other branches also use PMCs.
Overall, they're unregulated, unaccountable, and often out-of-control, involved in some of the most controversial aspects of war from over-billing to ritual slaughter of unarmed civilians. Yet they're not prosecuted, convicted or imprisoned, just rewarded with fat contracts costing far more for services military personnel once performed. Moreover, the more they're used, the greater they influence war making, sustaining their bottom line priorities at the expense of a free society and vital homeland needs.
America's New Military Industrial Complex
On March 1, 2003 Business 2.0 magazine writers Ian Mount, Matthew Maier and David Freedman headlined, "The New Military Industrial Complex" for digital age war, describing the Pentagon's "revolution in military affairs (RMA)," comprised of "faster, lighter, smarter" cutting-edge technology warfare. Readying for it, they're building an unchallengeable high-tech arsenal, more advanced now than then.
The old one remains and gets huge contracts for new and more traditional weapons. The result is an influential "iron triangle" of Congress, the Pentagon and defense industry. Besides major media support, conservative think tanks also like:
-- the Project for a New American Century (PNAC); its "Rebuilding America's Defenses" scheme promotes US global hegemony;
-- the Center for Security Policy (CSP) headed by super-hawk Frank Gaffney endorses a policy of "Peace through Strength" and perpetual wars for perpetual peace;
-- the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) composed of hard right leaders and members, "fighting terrorism and the ideologies that drive it;"
-- the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP), focusing on defense issues, tied to the nuclear weapons industry; and
-- the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), emphasizing national security and "advancing (US) global interests;" specializing in crisis management, it's connected to the highest levels in government and the Pentagon.
The nation's 16 intelligence agencies, including CIA, NSA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), FBI, Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence, DHS (Department of Homeland Security), and Department of State comprise another component destroying a free society. They comprise a multi-billion dollar funded, largely off-the-books, clandestine anti-democratic network. Interconnected with thousands of private contractors, they're tied to world governments and their intelligence services.
Moreover, they comprise a government/military/industrial/intelligence service/media/think tank colossus, waging global wars, bankrupting the nation, wrecking the remnants of a free society. Plagued by the same dynamic that doomed past empires unwilling to change, they also pursue the misguided notion that militarism sustains growth.
In fact, it erodes it by sacrificing industrial America, shifting production and other high-paying service operations abroad to focus on war making. As a result, essential homeland needs go begging, including healthcare, education, job creation, and the nation's infrastructure, crumbling from years of neglect.
In his farewell address, Eisenhower said:
"Every gun that is made, every war ship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and not clothed."
In his November 2003 Harper's article titled, "The War Business," Chalmers Johnson said:
"(M)unitions and war profiteering have (become) the most efficient means for well-connected capitalists to engorge themselves at the public trough." Even Wall Street profits hugely. "To call these companies 'private,' though, is mere ideology. (Weapons and) munitions making in the United States today (and related industries profiting from them are) not really private enterprise. It is state socialism."
They also destroy constitutional freedoms, what George Washington in 1796 warned about, saying "overgrown military establishments (are) inauspicious to liberty." Johnson called it America's future, now more the present, saying, "When war becomes the most profitable course of action, we can certainly expect more of it," sacrificing a free society for private interests reaping short-term gains.
In his book titled, "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War," Andrew Bacevich discussed America's "trinity," its global military presence, power projection, and intervention, creating a "permanent national security crisis....propell(ing) the United States into a condition approximating perpetual war." However, "(no) evidence exists - none - to suggest that US efforts advance the cause of global peace," just the opposite. As a result, "(o)ver the horizon, a shipwreck of epic proportions awaits."
It's coming perhaps when least expected. Nations that live by the sword, die by it. America is no exception, nor any other.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
Also visit his blog site at and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

Article #8

How To Control People

Monday, 8 January 2001

Source: writes:

How To Control People by Charley Reese

The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred. Here are a few tips on how smart people can control other people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!

The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.

It is easier than you think to control people indirectly,to manipulate them into thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.

One basic technique is to keep them ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans. The indirect approach is to control the education they receive.

It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.

The most obvious symptom is their absence of original thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or thought the answer was. What do they think? Well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite sources.

That greatly simplifies things for the controller because with lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.

Another technique is to keep them entertained. Roman emperors did not stage circuses and gladiator contests because they didn't have television. We have television because we don't have circuses and gladiator events. Either way, the purpose is to keep the people's minds focused on entertainment, sports, and peripheral political issues. This way you won't have to worry that they will ever figure out the real issues that allow you to control them.

Just as a truly educated person is difficult to control, so too is an economically independent person. Therefore, you want to create conditions that will produce people who work for wages, since wage earners have little control over their economic destiny. You'll also want to control the monetary, credit, and banking systems. This will allow you to inflate the currency and make it next to impossible for wage earners to accumulate capital. You can also cause periodic deflation to collapse the family businesses, family farms, and entrepreneurs, including independent community banks.

To keep trade unions under control, you just promote a scheme that allows you to shift production jobs out of the country and bring back the products as imports (it is called free trade). This way you will end up with no unions or docile unions.

Another technique is to buy both political parties so that after a while people will feel that no matter whether they vote for Candidate A or Candidate B, they will get the same policies. This will create great apathy and a belief that the political process is useless for effecting real change.

Pretty soon you will have a population that feels completely helpless, and thinks the bad things happening to them are nobody in particular's fault, just a result of global forces or evolution or some other disembodied abstract concept. If necessary, you can offer scapegoats.

Then you can bleed them dry without having to worry overly much that one of them will sneak into your house one night and cut your throat. If you do it right, they won't even know whose throat they are cutting.

Charley Reese E-mail:

What you do with this article now that you have read it ... Is up to you.

Sales Tax School Tax Liquor Tax Luxury Tax Excise Taxes Property Tax Cigarette Tax Medicare Tax Inventory Tax Real Estate Tax Well Permit Tax Fuel Permit Tax Inheritance Tax Road Usage Tax CDL license Tax Dog License Tax State Income Tax Food License Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Gross Receipts Tax Social Security Tax Service Charge Tax Fishing License Tax Federal Income Tax Building Permit Tax IRS Interest Charges Hunting License Tax Marriage License Tax Corporate Income Tax Personal Property Tax Accounts Receivable Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax Workers Compensation Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone State and Local Tax IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon) Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax

Don’t forget Income Tax Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians? ' I hope this goes around THE WORLD at least 1000 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!! GO AHEAD - - - BE FREE!!!

Article #9

Democracy Is An illusion

By Henry Makow, Ph.D
August 20, 2005

A "Far Side" cartoon describes our innocence about democracy.

A slave rowing a Viking ship puts up his hand and calls to the whip master: "Yoo-hoo! Oh, yoo-hoo... I think I'm getting a blister."

Democracy Is An Illusion

Like this man, most people cling to the belief that our leaders represent our interests.

"Yoo, hoo, Mr. Bush, you lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction."

At an elite gathering, Bush peered under his lectern and quipped: "Where are those weapons of mass destruction?"
A tiny cabal of international bankers chooses our "leaders". This clique, which subtly controls every significant facet of our society is gradually establishing an Orwellian global police state. Much of the ruling class has been duped to think they are building a better world.

Prove it, you say?

"The Naked Capitalist" by W.C. Skousen (available at and is yet another smoking gun. It is based on the revelations contained in Professor Carroll Quiqley's "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time." (1966)

Quiqley, a Professor of History at the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University was a trusted insider who had access to their private archives. He felt the plot, which he supported, was too important to be kept hidden. However, shortly after publication, his book was taken off the market.

Cleon Skoussen was an FBI agent for 16 years and the Police Chief of Salt Lake City for four years. His "The Naked Capitalist" distills the most shocking evidence from Quigley's daunting 1300-page book.

At just 122 pages, "The Naked Capitalist" (1970) is a concise, lucid and absolutely convincing account of the international banker conspiracy. Historians have betrayed the public trust by largely ignoring this material.


Quigley confirms that a network of banking dynasties has, in Skousen's words, "acquired a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race." According to Quigley, they include "Baring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Selingman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Malet, and above all Rothschild and Morgan." (Citations are from Tragedy and Hope, 51-52)

Quigley confirms that, starting with the Bank of England in 1694, these dynasties organized themselves in a system of central banks that charge their respective nations billions of dollars in interest for the privilege of using currency backed by the nations' own credit. In other words, they have carried off a swindle of monstrous proportions.

Quigley quotes William Gladstone who as Chancellor of the Exchequer said in 1852: "The government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." (325)

This power of the Bank of England. . . was admitted by most qualified observers. In January, 1924, Reginald McKenna. . . as chairman of the board of the Midland Bank, told its stockholders: 'I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can, and do, create money. . . . And they who control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hands the destiny of the people.'" [25]

Able to create money out of nothing [dubbed the "Mandrake Mechanism" by G Edward Griffin], they naturally grabbed as much of the world's real wealth as they could. Quigley writes about the formation of their American cartels: "The period 1884-1933 was the period of financial capitalism in which investment bankers moving into commercial banking and insurance on the one side, and into railroading and heavy industry on the other were able to mobilize enormous wealth and wield enormous economic, political and social power." (71)

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Indeed their representatives, the "Eastern Establishment" i.e. the Morgans and now the Rockefellers run the United States. (72) The principle mechanism is the Council on Foreign Relations.

According to Quigley, the ultimate goal is "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled the central banks...acting in concert." (324)
Quigley confirms that the bankers have usurped mankind's collective instincts by financing the Socialist and Communist movements. Bankers love big government because the ultimate monopoly is the State. Through it, they take over their competition and control debt, resources, market demand and labor.

Speaking of the Communist takeover of the US government in the 1930's and 1940's, Quigley writes, "it must be understood that the power that these energetic left-wingers exercised was never their own power of Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie." (954)

In other words, millions of idealists committed to human brotherhood and equality were (and are) duped into advancing a totalitarian scheme to concentrate the world's wealth and power into the hands of the superrich. More opportunistic Leftists, Communists, Feminists and Globalists prosper while piously pretending to serve humanity.

The Money Power controls the debate and encourages gridlock by backing all shades of the political spectrum and marginalizing anyone who shines the spotlight on them. (Ever wonder why the word "Rothschild" has never crossed Noam Chomsky's lips? Or why the John Birch Society debunks the obvious fact that 9-11 was an "inside job?") The media is controlled through direct ownership and advertising.

Quigley writes: "To Morgan all political parties were simply organizations to be used, and the firm always was careful to keep a foot in all camps. Morgan himself, Dwight Morrow and other partners were allied with the Republicans; Russell C. Lewffingwell was allied with the Democrats; Grayson Murphy was allied with the extreme Right; and Thomas W. Lamont was allied with the Left." (945)

The Lamont family was "sponsors and financial angels to almost a score of extreme Left organizations including the Communist Party itself." (945)


A small cabal of people who are not even citizens hold the financial purse strings of every nation.

This goes a long way to explaining "globalization" and the push to one-world government. It explains the assault on race, religion, nation and family. The bankers want a homogenous deracinated neutered world that offers no basis of resistance.

It explains why in a time of supposed security danger, the southern border of the US is practically porous. The bankers want to undermine America's European character, which it perceives as a threat.

It explains the carte blanche Israel receives, the war on Iraq, and the fact that there is no opposition to the war in the mainstream parties or press. This war desecrates a cradle of civilization and assails Islam. It is also an opportunity to create more debt and enrich the bankers and their corporate allies.
It explains 9-11, the Patriot Repression Act and the phony "War on Terror."

It explains the depraved mass media and stupefying education system. I could go on but you get the picture. We are krill at the mercy of a gigantic whale. At the very least, let's not waste energy thinking we live in a free and open society.

Our democracy is a ruse. Ostensibly it expresses the aspirations of the people. In reality, it masks the insidious anti-human agenda of the central bankers.

"The less people know about what is really going on, the easier it is to wield power and authority."

(Charles, Prince of Wales)

Comments for "Democracy is an Illusion" 

John from Dublin said (August 24, 2005):

firstly would like to congratulate you on your piece entitled ?Democracy is an Illusion? Your work is an eye opener for humanity and for those who will listen to you it is even more important its a breathe of fresh air.

I am sick of trying to convince people what is going on but they are so locked into their own matrix they will never listen.

I want to bring something to your attention have you watched a DVD called The Money Masters?

If not then I suggest you go to and order it as you will love it.

It is a presentation by an American Professor very detailed factual information.


Nancy from Iowa said (August 24, 2005):

So what do you propose that we do about this?? I am a 57-year-old grandmother with a bad knee who can barely get through the day. I also have a severe loss of cartilage in my neck. I am an honest and decent citizen who tries to live by the golden rule. I have five precious grandchildren who deserve a chance at a decent life. My mother is a recent widow who is crippled and needs my assistance as often as possible. What on earth can someone in my position do to make this world safer and better for the next generation? Is there any hope...or should I just take some extra sleeping pills and forget it. I try to pass on articles like yours, but people just get mad at me and tell me that I need to "get off the internet" and get a hobby. ~Nancy from Iowa

I would ignore these problems and concentrate on nurturing those around you and projecting a positive happy energy. We all can serve in different ways.



Gail said (August 24, 2005):

Right on! Thank you for the courage to share what needs to be shared. I wish that I did not have to agree with you. Alas, reality is what it is.

If you see Svali,

tell her I owe her a debt of gratitude. I affirm everything she has written. Please tell her that SHE IS A GIFT TO HUMANITY. She is also a gift to me personally. No one could have affirmed my reality except one who has been there.

Bless you both forever. To God be the Glory.


Pete said (August 23, 2005):

Have just sent your article about lack of democracy to my wife to photocopy it so I can give it to my friends.

You write some good stuff which has lost me a friend, but that?s no problem to me?.. there are bigger things at stake.

Please keep writing and opening eyes to true spiritual realities behind the scenes.


Michael (Houston) said (August 23, 2005):

We en masse seem to suffer the paradoxical "...infirmity of will"
....Ralph Waldo Emerson, Compensation and Self quoted in text

here.... "Discontent is the want of self reliance. It is infirmity of will."....


Robert said (August 22, 2005):

"The Whale & The Krill" sounds like the title for one of Aesop's fables. Alas, not.

I believe you have revealed the Elite's grand design, the complete submersion of the caucasian "masses", which to my disappointment would include fine intellectuals like you and Norm Finkelstein, charming Ashkenazis though you may well be, but surely thorns in the Zionist bottom.

The Elites have caused the "visible" managements of Western nations and the US to roll out their red carpets, though there will be some self-serving deceitful high-level handwringing about "invaders". By grand design, Great Britain and The Netherlands will soon be Muslim countries.

While, here in the US we already have Hispanics as over 50% of the populations in 4 states, with more to come swiftly thanks to unlimited border crossing and rampant reproduction, which is bound to ensue if you put twelve hot-blooded mixed illegals in one motel room in the dark with no working television.

A nearly brain-dead, anxious and distracted population has made little reaction to the expressed intention of the Hispanics to dominate the entire Country.

"Depraved mass media" and "stupefying education". You're right. You could go on and on. Oppressive fascist oligarchy covers most of it all for me.

More complete understanding arrives when you consider the dismal character and low intelligence of the President who the Elites managed to illegally install twice in a row. Talk about utter contempt for the public.

Well, it could be worse. The poor Britains will soon be at risk of losing cherished body parts under strict Moslem fundamentalist law, while hopefully I'll be condemned to something more Napoleonic, with the possibility of wanton women bringing themselves and wine to my comfortable cell now and then in order to improve my Spanish.

And, to think several years ago I was about to enroll in a Cantonese language class. Tough to keep up those bad boys.


Alan (Newcastle, UK) said (August 22, 2005):

Dear Henry

You have noticed the madness.

Debt emasculates the borrower and empowers the lender ? it?s a simple equation.

The credit free-for-all of the last 7 years is so exceptional in its
magnitude and so globally pervasive in its reach, that suspicion about the banking industry?s real motives must be expounded.
Debt levels are not just high, they are preposterously so, and the
socio-economic profiles of many borrowers are historically unparalleled and simply don?t make sense without reverting to ?conspiracy? as an explanation.

Student debt for example is anomalous. Suddenly, under-achieving kids who can barely string a sentence together are getting outstanding A-grades in Advanced level papers and getting places in some of the UK?s top universities. It just doesn?t make sense without proposing that debt is driving it.
What?s more, irresponsible lending has reached levels of absurdity that are making newspaper column inches internationally. When infirm and economically inactive pensioners are being offered loans they could never dream of paying off, alarm bells should start ringing.

I can only conclude the scam is precursor to a terrifying calamity being prepared for humanity with debt as the means by which social control can continue to be wielded.

These past few years of seemingly unending prosperity (built on debt) have been enough to get the people hooked on pleasure, so much so that they will do anything to continue getting their fix, even if it means selling their souls.

A short period of banker-inspired austerity either through war, economic collapse or probably both, will get the people clamouring to have their luxury appetites slaked once again. They will scream out for a ?saviour? who will wipe their slate clean with the only condition being they are signed up to an innovative new cashless banking system requiring the insertion of a micro-chip for their own protection and security. For more details see Revelation 13.


John said (August 22, 2005):

Dear Henry,

I'm a longtime fan, and simply must congratulate you on your latest article, so short, so sweet, so true!

I'm also a longtime reader of Lew Rockwell's daily postings, and subscribe to the libertarian viewpoint. But your article made me wonder. You mention that the banking cartel make sure they have influence in all camps but marginalise anyone who points the searchlight at the cartel itself. You point out, for instance, that Chomsky makes sure never to commit this cardinal error. Well, this is true of LRC, too. I've been waiting for articles pointing the finger at Zionism, or at the international bankers, but all you ever get is a celebration of 'the free market'. Fair enough, in that 'freedom' is the primary issue where libertarianism is concerned. But what about the 'freedom' to conspire, to monopolise, to dominate, etc? Lew Rockwell simply never lets this question arise.

Libertarians rightly point out that the traditional left-right split in politics is a sham, and that all parties along this axis promote centralised state power as against the freedom of the individual. They posit a vertical alternative to the conventional horizontal axis. This altenative is based on the issue of individual freedom versus the power of the state. On this axis, all tradition politicians, and politics in general, rank extremely low, while libertarianism and anarchism rank extremely high. At this level of thought, there is tremendous debate about how far you can reduce the size of intrusive government. There are 'minarchists' who propose a minimal state, and 'anarchists' who propose the complete absence of state power.

Anarchists say that any minarchist state will inevitably attract
power-hungry politicians and end up as a monster. Take the USA, founded as a minimal state and ending up as it is now, a maximal one (despite the supposed protections of the constitution and Bill of Rights).

Lew Rockwell's libertarianism is primarily concerned with money and property. Capitalism is defended, since it is an intrinsic feature of a free market. But what if a cartel of capitalists pretty much own all the major world governments? Then, state coercion can be used to promote the interests of monopoly capitalists and bankers, and individual freedom is inevitable diminished. News media can be owned or suborned and used as propaganda tools on behalf of the ruling elite. University and research funding can be used to suppress any knowledge dangerous to the controllers.

So now I ask: are Chomsky and Rockwell dupes or, even worse, red-herring merchants?

I could go on, but I'll leave it there and thank you again for an inspiring article.

Dear John,

Chomsky knows that he would not be working at MIT if he mentioned the Rothschilds. Whether he is an active agent I don't know. As for Lew R, if he isn't making $, he probably just has a limited view.



Carlos said (August 22, 2005):

"When is America going to wake up?"

I think America will not wake up because so many
people are on medication. When people have a personal crisis in this country they allow "health care professionals" to convince them they need pharmaceutical, synthetic, chemical drugs to help them cope. In reality, they need the nutrients no longer in the soil, hence, no longer in the food. They need the toxins removed from the air and water.

Everyone is suffering from a biochemical imbalance. I believe all of this is not the doing of governmental bumbling idiots, morons, misguided and misled public servants, it's intentional. That's the only way it makes sense.

People become agitated by the complete lack of common sense in what they see happening. They must play political games to keep their jobs. They must sell out their fellow man to retain the lifestyle to which they have become accustomed.



Martin said (August 22, 2005):

Mr. Makow, Thank you for your brilliant observations. Our supposedly enlighten society has no clue. We have never been a nation of free people. The power/money mongers play with us as if we were a board game. They have all the power and money they want. Playing the game gives them the ultimate satisfaction. When they tire of toying with us, they will let us implode.


Brian said (August 21, 2005):

Sir a great article,I only wish that the majority of Americans would understand this,I know this,and have lost most of my friends and family for even talking about the Illuminat and new world order and how our country is more communist than free,Bush needs another 911 attack and we will have martial law,there goes the consititution out the window.

Its now Bush this dumb ass is only a stooge for the intl bankers,zionists,and secret satantic masons.I as a 62 yr old vietnam vet,know the lies of all wars,which are caused by bankers and war profiteers and etc,since the begining of time.

Thanks again and God Bless you for your work,they will one day come for us,who talk like this,I got plenty of ammo and still a good shot,as asshole bush says bring em on.


Mario said (August 20, 2005):

Frank Zappa once said that when the illusion of democracy and freedom stop being profitable in Amereeka, all the props will be thrown aside, the curtain will rise and you will see a huge brick wall. You seem to echo those very same thoughts and thats why Im starting to respect you Dr. Makow. Most people seem to forget that The US is a republic with democratic principles. I dont hate America, but I do despise the corrupt
scum that run the government. Good day


Dian said (August 20, 2005):

Smoking gun, you say, Henry?

The challenge of pointing to "the smoking gun" these days is best answered with a question: "Which one would you like to see first?"


Pavlov (Australia) said (August 20, 2005):

How succinctly you put it, Henry. You're selling wake-up pills to the masses. I wonder if they will be able to afford to pay for them. I know that you might say that they can't afford to be without them. I think the truth is that their spiritual poverty certainly threatens to consume them. Still, having legs to do so, one must stand up in the face of the devil. Carry on!


 Henry Makow is the author of A Long Way To Go For a Date. He received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto. He welcomes your feedback and ideas at

Henry Makow © 2007

Article #10

Treason in Australia

"Treason: the simple definition of treason is betrayal of one's own country to an alient authority.

Chambers Dictionary: 'betraying of the government or an attempt to overthrow it: treachery: disloyalty.'

There seems to be clear evidence of conspiracy on the part of the main Australian political parties to overthrow constitutional government and place our nation under the control of an alien power, namely international socialism as administered through the United Nations Organisation." [1]

"Our OWN government" is making us subordinate to socialist world government as directed through the United Nations and we should not forget that German National-Socialism is only cosmetically different to Russian Communism. We see them as opposites because we are conditioned to do so. At base all socialism is: dictatorial government; world government; mind control of the general population[2] ; extermination of unwanted population. All modern socialism will have the same essential morals and ambitions because they rest on the same belief structure."[3]

"The unmentionable truth about the United Nations Organization: A surreptitious influence leading national governments to betray their people into dictatorial World Government."[4]

"The unmentionable truth about communism: A device of enslavement created and supported by capitalism."[5]

"To all intents and purposes Australia is today not governed by parliamentarians representing the full will of their own constituents but by politicians, diplomats and advisors who give allegiance to, and enforce, the dictates of UN covenants."[6]

"According to Dr Mark Korowicz, United Nations delegate from Poland who defected to the United States some years ago: '… the organisation of the UN is considered as one of the most important platforms for Soviet propaganda in the world.'"[7]


[1] Gourley, Alan, How To Avoid The Looming Catastrophe: Everyone's Introduction To The Secret Society (I Mean The One In Which We Live), Veritas Publishing Company, Sydney, 1988, p. 70. And this was written nearly 20 years ago!
[2] You should be aware of the work of the NWO's Tavistock Institute of the City of London in this regard. A good place to start is here: 
[3] Gourley, p. 25, Ibid.
[4] Gourley, Ibid., p. 63.
[5] Gourley, Ibid., p. 63.
[6] Gourley, p. 107., Ibid.
[7] Gourley, p. 107., Ibid.

Article #11

The Real Agenda of "Democracy:" The Enslavement of Humanity in the New Feudal World System

By Batr Satre 

Original Title: The New World Order Feudal Enslavement System

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." (A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933)

Sartre's Pyramid of Power--


From times immemorial, the top down authority imposition has been the rule. This system of control is the reason why excrement discharge flows downhill. The feudal model works well for the lords who sit atop the pyramid. Essentially the New World Order is the supreme evolution of the subjugation of the serf class. In spite of this fact, what keeps this inequitable delineation between the dominant and the spineless? Pure power and malicious behavior achieves the perfection of perdition, in this hierarchal slave gulag. Because it can be done and no force can stop the captivity is the cause of the suffering.

The manipulating influence behind the Anglo-American hegemony and hyper-power governance is the "Crown." The Crown as defined by NESARA INTERNATIONAL may seem bizarre to the casual spectator. However,the secrets of the international banksters, wholly exposed after the global financial meltdown, are undeniable. If this is not the ultimate extortion by the global gangsters, what could top this rush into thralldom?

"The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attorneys. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery - the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane - a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorneys from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent "legal" - but totally unlawful - contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorneys carry out their Orders by controlling their victim's judiciary".

This technical description helps to focus on the undeniable; that the entire legal, political and economic template is driven by a sinister desire to regiment the population. Substitute or interchange the term "Crown" for the Illuminati or the New Work Order and you have the same playbook used on different teams. The Khazars inspired banking system is the means by which the top echelon of the obelisk pulls the strings of all the puppets. In the Youtube, Monopoly Men Rothschild Banksters Rule, the feudal enslavement system in revealed.

[Nazarene Remnant comment: Ever wonder why so many solicitors become politicians? See Your Lawyer’s Secret Oath for the answer!]

Article #12 

BOOK REVIEW: The West Possessed

News Weekly, August 20, 2011

DEMONIC: How the Liberal Mob
Is Endangering America

By Ann Coulter

(New York: Crown Forum)
Hardcover: 368 pages
ISBN: 9780307353481
RRP: AUD$57.95

Reviewed by Bill Muehlenberg

American columnist Ann Coulter knows all about the culture wars. She has been involved with them for decades now. She is a seasoned warrior in these battles, and she knows very well the nature and tactics of the adversary. She has written a number of bestsellers on these themes, and her newest volume offers more of the same.

Coulter is both a Christian and a conservative. Thus she is not afraid to draw upon biblical truths as she dissects the liberal mind and its radical agendas. She ties in the violent mob reactions against Jesus, based as they were on the demonic, with the way all radical leftist regimes and movements also utilise the mob for their purposes.

She draws heavily upon an 1896 volume by French social psychologist Gustave Le Bon. His book, The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind, was the first study of the mass mind, and the way in which mob violence operates. It provides a nice backdrop for analysing contemporary leftist coercive utopians.

Of course, the grand example of leftist agitation and utilisation of the mob is the French Revolution. Coulter spends several chapters discussing it in some detail. As she correctly notes, “To understand liberals, one must understand the French Revolution.”

Liberals — or leftists — of today can trace their lineage straight back to the radicalism of the late 18th century. All the tricks of the trade we find so characteristic of today’s radical left were present in this bloody revolution. The bloodshed, violence and demonic mob activity have been chronicled plenty of times before, but Coulter offers a nice summary.

Anything associated with the old order was targeted by the mobs, but anything having to do with the Church was especially focused on. Priests, nuns and lay-people were massacred in large numbers, while churches were destroyed and one sacrilege after another was carried out.

Some of the gruesome descriptions of what the mobs did to ordinary men, women and children are almost too hard to stomach. Rape, torture, mutilation and hideous forms of killing were the norm. If one had to illustrate the actions of the demonic, surely this was it. It seemed there were not enough guillotines to keep up with all the carnage and slaughter.

And all the while the crowds were cheering this on. The Jacobin program of “de-Christianisation” was especially ferocious and repellent. Indeed, “the word ‘vandalisme’ had to be invented to describe” their actions as they desecrated churches, looted Christian properties and destroyed sacred art. The revolutionaries sought to “completely destroy Christianity and replace it with a religion of the state”.

Anything associated with Christianity was open to attack. Citizens were even forced to drop their Christian names. A new Revolutionary Calendar was established, with the months renamed, and even clocks were redesigned in decimal time.

If all this sounds somewhat familiar, it should. We see the same sort of thing happening today all over the Western world, and much of Coulter’s book is about documenting these moves by the left-wing secularists to wipe out the Christian faith and Christian morality.

She also rightly contrasts the 1789 French Revolution with the 1776 American Revolution. American history “is the exact opposite of the French Revolution and their wretched masses guillotining the aristocracy and clergy. … The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas, painstakingly argued by serious men in the process of creating what would become the freest, most prosperous nation in world history. The French Revolution was a revolt of the mob.”

She characterises it as “the progenitor of the horrors of the Bolshevik Revolution, Hitler’s Nazi Party, Mao’s Cultural Revolution, Pol Pot’s slaughter, and America’s periodic mob uprisings”.

She notes many obvious points of difference: “Americans celebrate the Fourth of July, the date our written demand for independence from Britain based on ‘Nature’s God’ was released to the world. The French celebrate Bastille Day”, a day of violence, mayhem and mob action.

The American revolutionary symbol is the Liberty Bell, while the French symbol is the “national razor” — the guillotine. The closest thing to mob action the Americans experienced was the Boston Tea Party. As Coulter reminds us, there were “no beheadings, disembowelings, or defilement of corpses — or any corpses at all”.

Her book offers case after case of leftist mob mayhem in modern-day America. She looks at many keys issues in today’s culture wars, such as race relations, the economy, national security, and so on. She contrasts the conservative penchant for conserving and preserving, and the leftist addiction to radical change and destruction.

She correctly observes: “The history of liberalism consists of replacing things that work with things that sounded good on paper.” She adds: “Liberals never bother to ask whether there might have been a reason for a thousand-years-old convention such as marriage. They don’t care. Their approach is to rip out society’s foundations without considering whether they serve any purpose.”

As with all of Coulter’s writings, her latest book is a grab-bag of memorable quotes. One is reluctant merely to summarise what she says. It is tempting instead to offer plentiful quotes. Here are a few more examples.

She says: “Liberals are constantly pushing for the Rousseauian approach to governance in defiance of our history and Constitution. They not only believe there is a ‘general will’; they are sure their policies express it. Instead of allowing ordinary people to have more control over their lives, Democrats produce inflexible, universal plans, sublimely confident of their ability to build a perfect system.”

Free speech is certainly under attack from the lefties. She observes: “Liberals supported free speech until they realised, years later, how bad speech is for them and began demanding hate crimes legislation, speech codes, and sexual harassment laws restricting speech.”

She adds: “Following their totalitarian forebears, liberals went from punishing acts to punishing thoughts and motives in the blink of an eye. In lieu of class crimes and counterrevolutionaries, American liberals have given us ‘hate crimes’, ‘disparate impact’ rules, ‘sexists’ and ‘bigots’. Acts are irrelevant; your motives are on trial. You are presumed guilty and acquittals are rare.”

Much more can be said about — and quoted from — this invaluable new book. Once again, Coulter takes no prisoners as she dissects the foolishness — indeed, dangerousness — of the radical left. With razor-sharp insight and humour she does an admirable job of showing us why the radical left agenda should be avoided like the plague.

Along with Canadian columnist Mark Steyn, America’s Ann Coulter is probably the best conservative writer on the scene today. Anything she writes is gold, and is well worth getting, digesting and passing on. Three cheers for Ann Coulter.

Bill Muehlenberg is a commentator on contemporary issues, and lectures on ethics and philosophy. His new book Strained Relations: The Challenge of Homosexuality will be reviewed in the next edition of News Weekly. His website CultureWatch is at:

Article #13 

OPINION: Where is Australia Going and Why?

By Major-General W.B. "Digger" James

News Weekly, August 20, 2011

We are facing a time of world financial crisis, and what are we doing? We have chosen to be influenced by extraordinary views, many by elected leaders, who seem unable to spend our taxes wisely and administer well-controlled programs.

Let us look and view the policies, advocated by some of our leaders, which are loathsome and evil in contrast to those beliefs we have grown to develop and live by in a Christian society. We even have a female Prime Minister who calls herself an atheist. She nominally leads a non-governing government.

There are those who wish to introduce euthanasia, presumably to cut costs and commitment on health care. Family responsibilities are among the oldest commitments we have known in the development of man on this earth — the care of our family, our parents and our children.

Feminism has introduced many changes in our society and some deserve review, such as the shortage of male teachers in public schools. This is wrong, for the influence of good men on the development of young children is an essential element of life.

Then there are those who promote methadone to enable addicts to be “weaned” off hard drugs. But it doesn’t work.

There are those who promote abortion as a willy-nilly means of relieving women and girls of taking responsibility for avoiding pregnancy. Does anyone tell our youth to practise chastity?

Then there is the push by homosexuals to bring in a law to allow same-sex marriage. Marriage is clearly defined in our current laws: marriage is between a man and a woman, and is not for same-sex couples. The basis of all mankind and of all forms of life is proven in biology. It is part of the pattern of propagation, to raise a family to continue the race and to fulfil the needs of our society.

But perhaps, the greatest curse we now seem to live with today is for people to tell lies. This is often practised with pride in politics. The truth is forsaken for gain.

I do not intend to discuss the particular people who make our laws, and who seem so often responsible for the social horrors we face today.

Instead I want to point out the way we were, the way we faced the many problems of developing our great country in the short period of 222 years since Captain Arthur Phillip led a fleet to Australia in 1788 to set up a colony. He was on a mission for his government to give a future to convicts from Britain, and with great wisdom, leadership and fairness he sowed the seeds for our nation, a nation we now seem determined to ruin.

Later, our outstanding leaders carefully developed our own constitution, arguably the best in the world. It was written and approved by the people of Australia who wished to enhance our capacity to plan and assist the development of our land, and to encourage new arrivals to honour their origins but become true Australians.

Australia has developed an outstanding military capability to assist our friends in times of world wars and in other wars in defence of our way of life in a fair and responsible way. Those who served, fought and died in the many campaigns were truly fighting for our country. We should aim to emulate their attitude.

As a child at a primary school in country Victoria, we had a flag-raising ceremony every Monday morning. All students participated in a ceremony of raising the Australian flag on the school flagpole. Here we were called to attention, place our right hand over our heart and recited an ode to our nation. The words were “We love our country, we honour our flag, our parents, teachers and the laws.”

Surely, this is still needed for our children in our schools today.

In the case of our youth, what do we promote? “Schoolies week” — a week of careless waste, of alcohol and health abuse and more, and it seems some parents support this frivolity. Why?

In 1950, Prime Minister Robert Menzies, seeing the problems of communist subversion, acted with many other free nations to introduce national service for our young males. At 18 years of age they were required to undertake 90 days’ full-time training in the Australian army, or in similar schemes in the RAN and RAAF. Today, our volunteer servicemen are engaged in a war against terrorism, a major world problem.

I believe national service should be introduced again, for such an action would both strengthen our defence capacity and give our young men a meaningful period of education.

I have spoken to many hundreds of men who served in the 1950s and the later program in the 1970s. They say that their service in the program was excellent and that they are proud of their participation. It was here that they grew up, for they worked and lived with other young men from all walks of life, grew to understand the truth of discipline, honesty and what leadership means.

Let us all commit to sense and not nonsense.

God save Australia, the country that Captain Arthur Phillip foresaw.

Major-General W.B. “Digger” James, AC, MBE, MC (Ret’d), is a decorated war hero, seriously wounded in the Korean War, who rose to become director of the General Army Health Services. He was elected national president of the Returned and Services League of Australia in 1993.

Article #14 

The Deepest Secrets

By Jim Kirwan
2 September 2011

As promised to the listeners of Jeff Rense on 31 August 2011.
The deepest secrets of life and freedom have always been with us in plain sight and while these most intimate secrets are perhaps one of the smallest of truths; they continue to affect us, for both good and bad, throughout our lives. What are these secrets? Where can they be found?
They are associated with the invisible parts of our DNA, and that would be our personal bloodlines: Because these are the original 'ties that bind us' first to the families that gave us life and eventually to all the other things that allow us each to survive, in a world that for all too many is often a very hostile place.
Each of us is born into a world that literally consists of "a country of one." Then most of us spend the rest of our lives trying to regain the freedom that the not-so-simple-act of 'birth' gives to each and every one of us.
While this quiet knowledge would seem to be obvious to many, this is another of those 'secrets' which the illuminati detected early on and immediately began to cultivate: To enslave the individual, rather than to allow freedom to any person, not of their bloodline. The Illuminate used this "secret' to enhance their lifelong project to become as successful as possible by enslaving the individual; from long-before your birth or mine even happened. This smallest of secrets has also been used and abused throughout history, to control people on many different levels simultaneously, so that almost every possibility to escape this trap; is by design prevented, by tradition, by religions, by politicians and by the darkest of forces that have roamed this world almost from the beginning.
Most of us rarely become aware of these phenomena, until we are well along into early adulthood--if at all. And by then most of the real dependencies have already been so strongly established that these simple almost invisible ties, that had by that time, become the heaviest of anchor-chains that are resistant to almost every opportunity to escape the draconian demands; which these secrets are there to insure.
These unconscious-predetrminations are very subtle at first but over time they become very demanding and tend to force compliance upon the individual throughout the lifespan of most of those they have ensnared.
This secret and its problems are characterized in this card that was part of the ancient knowledge, some say 'secret-wisdom.' This card is 'the hanged man' and it tells the story of an individual that at first tends to see himself or herself as a HOSTAGE to others or to a set of circumstances; and in this position 'that self' is upside down (Hence the hanged man).
However once any individual is able to decode the problem that caused the situation; the individual is then able to right him or herself and is able not only to RELEASE the 'self' from bondage; but they find that they can finally go in search of his or her true nature, after having first freed the self, to be able to have the freedom that each of us was born with. (RELEASE)!
In this 'task' there is something almost invisible; called 'our invisible means of support.' This moral-assistance is symbolized here by the line of fire just below the knees. It's available to everyone but only on the unconscious level of our thoughts, which is why when we allow the unconscious levels of our beings to be bulldozed into non-existence we lose a lot of our real strength to combat the nearly invisible chains that seek to bind us to something we rarely can acknowledge; because it has been with most of us since birth.
How does this 'secret' actually work?
Families are the smallest unit of the humanrace and are part of the bedrock beneath the bloodlines that hold families together. The loyalties and obligations of 'family' are determined differently from one family to another, but they are usually organized around the need to ensure the survival of the family, over the personal preferences of the individual-for the continued survival of the family unit. When the survival of the 'family' is assured; then the interests of the family will expand outward to include a village or a community of which the family is 'a part.' The process continues to advance to the extent that the "needs of the original family unit are fulfilled. And as this happens the family becomes part of a community, maybe a larger city, a county or state or even a nation: But only after the survival of that original family unit has been assured.
Throughout this process the individual sublimates themselves to the good of the family first and therein lies the hidden-obligation that can haunt the life of those not strong enough to challenge the authority of either family or community. This beginning process is generally the beginning point that goes almost entirely unnoticed by far too many; and it's what accounts for so much conflict throughout life; as individuals continue to grow while trying to keep those early direct associations alive.
As we begin to mature some will drift away from those original ties; others will become completely immersed in the family traditions and still others will simply cut all ties and begin new lives. Most however will not recognize how much of their own lives were actually formulated by those early direct ties to the survival of the family; regardless of the success or failure of those you or I might feel indebted to, for all that time when we were very young.
Whether it is a career choice, a love-interest or an education; family has an abiding interest in all that each family tie represents; which is part of why severing these family-links becomes so very important; even when the conflicts-of-interest might not have anything to do with any choice which the family member might be trying to discuss. Later on, or if real distances are involved some turn to shrinks or advisors for advice as they find that they are very lonely without the direct and immediate support that they expect they should have from "family." The one common denominator that most seem to share is that to be alone with yourself is a very scary proposition; which is why so many people are only comfortable in groups or crowds. But this artificial-busyness (games, TV, gossip and all the crap related to any mind-numbing job) ultimately cannot stave off the personal choices that each person must eventually make for themselves. But remember we were each subjected to an entire litany of beliefs from the very beginning of our lives. To go against that system is to require courage and self-determination to strike out on your own. Because if this is not done then "to be alive" would only consist of repeating everything that went before, unless of course what was instilled in the children had to do with creating people that will think and decide for themselves; because part of what they were taught was how to question and how to think critically about the lives they would be living. I was one of those lucky ones.
If you can picture the universal-newborn infant, much like the Universal Soldier of the Vietnam era you might tend to see the universal-infant like a tiny version of Gulliver being set upon by the Lilliputians of dogmatic-belief systems: Systems that have wrapped the child into a vice-like web of beliefs and practices even before they learn to speak. These initiating principles can be as different as are the billions of people in the world from each other; and yet: We still have far more in common with-each-other; than we have in opposition to one another. Here's the Universal Soldier whose impossible-situation describes this 'deepest-little-secret' as well [1]
If we have never been truly free to make up our own minds about most things; then we feel disconnected about our lives and therefore we tend to seek out others with whom to share the now absent or hostile family members. Some turn to lovers, others to shrinks and still others immerse themselves in idiot-games like business where the RULES (the rights and wrongs) are crystal clear and the goal is only money, money and even more money; which in the mind of the confused amounts to having an occupation (translation: something that has clear answers for everything regardless of how right or wrong our observations of others might be); while beginning to move through that outside world as if we were partially blinded by all that dangerous "uncertainty' which the real world with all of its conflicting-dimensions always brings.
Here's an image of our universal-INNOCENCE that is born from the opening of the flower produced by the Devils' Claw; which is contrasted by the life-long shadows of EVIL itself that is never very far away.
"The Deepest Secret" is that this innocence has been carefully undermined by the New World Order for a thousand years to enslave the universe through the perversion of each new generation. This has frustrated, in all too many cases, the genuine reaction that most people would instinctively embrace if their lives were not so burdened with so many false-choices in our controlled lives. Lives that were manipulating of our loyalties even before we were born. And this will continue in far too many cases until we (as their cattle) are of no use to them anymore.
Remember how US policy refused to help with birth-control when black-Africa was drowning in over-population, hunger, thirst and disease? That happened not because our-owners were enforcing a religious belief (regarding birth prevention through condoms) but because they wanted to flood the world with potential human cattle, to increase their options while choking Africa and the world with population problems that drove up prices, for their food and their water as well as everything else. Their full plan is in this video entitled The Handbook of Human Ownership [2]
This is one topic that has been at the very core of everything for so long that everyone has forgotten that this 'most basic of all facts' has been pivotal in creating these massive herds of docile sheep since long before the officially sanctioned invasions by big-pharma, big-government and the global-criminal empire even came from the shadows around the world to kill us all in broad daylight! 
[1] Buffy Saint Marie ­ Universal Soldier ­ video
[2] The Handbook of Human Ownership 

Article #15 

Western Democracy: A Farce And A Sham

By Paul Craig Roberts
3 November 2011-11-04  




Every day that passes adds to the fraudulent image of what is called Western democracy.  


Consider that the entire Western world is outraged that the Greek Prime Minister announced that he is going to permit the Greek people to decide their own fate instead of having it decided for them by a handful of banksters, politicians, and bureaucrats living it up at taxpayer expense at "talks" in the French resort of Cannes on the Mediterranean.  


The Greek economy is facing its fourth year of decline and lacks the revenues to service its national debt held by private European banks. The banks don't want to lose any money, so a handful of power brokers reached an agreement with representatives of the Greek government to write off some of the debt in exchange for EU capital subsidies to be financed by inflicting severe austerity on the Greek population. Wages, salaries, pensions and medical care are being cut while the rate of unemployment rises to depression levels. Government employees are laid off. Valuable public properties are to be sold to private parties for pennies on the dollar. In short, Greece is to be looted.


Large numbers of Greeks have been in the streets protesting the austerity policy and have reached the point of anger of throwing Molotov cocktails at the police. Greece is disintegrating politically. The Greek people sense that the EU "bailout" is not bailing out Greece. It is bailing out the French, Dutch, and German banks at the expense of the Greek people.


The Greek Prime Minister, watching his party's support and power crumble, announced that he would let the people decide in a referendum. After all, allegedly that's what democracies do. But it turns out that "we have freedom and democracy" is not supposed to be taken literally. It is merely a propagandistic slogan behind which people are ruled through back-room deals decided by powerful private interests.  


The Greek Prime Minister’s announcement that he would put the back-room bailout deal to a referendum shocked the EU hierarchy, Washington, and investors. Who does this Greek guy think he is permitting the people, who bear the cost of the deal, to have a say in it? Who let this Greek guy out of his cage? This is not the way democracies are ruled.  


The EU power brokers are outraged over the Greek Prime Minister’s departure from normal procedure. But the Greek PM is relying on the Greek people to approve the deal, and not without reason.


The Greek people have been brainwashed for decades as to the importance of "being part of Europe."That means being a member of the European Union. When the Greeks realize that voting down the bailout of the banksters means being thrown out of the European Union, which is what they will learn between now and the referendum, they will vote for the back room deal.  


Polls already indicate this. A poll for a Greek newspaper indicates that whereas 46% oppose the bailout, 70% favor staying in the EU, which the Greeks see as a life or death issue.  


If this poll is a reliable indicator, the Greek PM has made a brilliant political decision. The Greek people will vote in favor of what they have been protesting violently in the streets. As the Greek people will do themselves in, the politicians are off the hook. This is the bet that the Greek PM has placed.  


Whatever the outcome, keep in mind that the entire Western political and investor world was shocked that a politician, instead of simply imposing a back room deal, said he would let the people decide. Letting the people decide is a no-no in Western democracies. 


If you need more evidence of this mythical creature called "Western democracy," consider that Western governments are no longer accountable to law. Contrast, for example, the sexual harassment charges that are plaguing US presidential candidate Herman Cain's campaign with the pass given to high government officials who clearly violated statutory law.  


What follows is not a defense of Cain. I take no position on the charges. The real point is different. In America the only thing that can ruin a politician is his interest in sex. A politician, for example, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, B. Obama, cannot be ruined by violating United States and international law or by treating the US Constitution as a "mere scrap of paper."  


Bush and Cheney can take America to wars based entirely on lies and orchestrated deceptions. They can commit war crimes, murdering large numbers of civilians in the cause of "the war on terror," itself a hoax. They can violate US and international laws against torture simply "because the president said so." They can throw away habeas corpus, the constitutional requirement that a person cannot be imprisoned without evidence presented to a court. They can deny the right to an attorney. They can violate the law and spy on Americans without obtaining warrants. They can send due process to hell. In fact, they can do whatever they want just like Hitler's Gestapo and Stalin's secret police. But if they show undue interest in a woman or proposition a woman, they are dead meat.  


Very few commentators have said a word about this. The House of Representatives did not impeach President Bill Clinton for his war crimes against Serbia. They impeached him for lying about a sexual affair with a White House intern. The US Senate, which had too many sexual affairs of its own to defend, didn't bother to try to convict.  


This is Amerika today.A president without any authority whatsoever, not in law and certainly not in the Constitution, can assassinate US citizens based on nothing except an assertion that they are a "threat." No evidence is required. No conviction. No presentation of evidence in any court. Just a murder. That is now permissible to the Amerikan president. But let him try to get a woman who is not his wife into bed, and he is a cooked goose.  


In Amerika there is no such thing any longer as torture; there is only "enhanced interrogation." A mere word change has eliminated the crime. So torture is permissible.


In Amerika today, or in the UK and the EU, anyone who tells the truth is a "threat."Julian Assange of Wikileaks, who made public information leaked to him by US government sources horrified by the criminal actions of the United States government, is now, as a result of Amerikan pressure on UK courts, being turned over to Sweden, which, for favors from the "world's only superpower," will turn him over to the US regardless of law to be prosecuted on trumped-up charges.  


Western "civilization" is totally corrupted by American money. There is no integrity anywhere. For a decade Washington has been murdering women, children, village elders, and journalists in the name of the hoax "war on terror."  


What terror does the world actually see? The world sees the terror that Israel, protected by Washington, inflicts on the Palestinians. The world sees the terror that the US inflicts on Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya, Latin America and now Africa, with Syria, Lebanon, and Iran waiting in the wings. The "war on terror" is nothing but an orchestrated invented excuse for Amerika-Israel to achieve hegemony while enriching their armaments industries. 


In Greece, at least the PM committed to giving the people a say in their fate. In America [as in the UK, the EU, Australia, and Canada] the people have no voice whatsoever. The sheeple are content to be protected by "security," porno-scanners, warrantless wiretapping, indefinite detention, and sexual groping. To carry on the hoax "war on terror," the US government has elevated itself above the law.


The American effort to achieve accountability to law, the Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement, if not shut down by cold weather, ice, and snow, is likely to be shut down by police violence. One riot begun by provocateurs is all it takes to transform protesters into "domestic extremists," the number one concern of Homeland Security. The presstitute media will make the case against the rioters, and the sheeple will buy it.  


The police have been militarized by Washington. Community police forces no longer represent the local public that pays their salaries. Local police represent Washington's war against America [which is the case in all countries].  


American citizens are all suspects. Anyone who goes through airport security knows this. The only law that the US government obeys is not even a law. It is a bureaucratic regulation that prevents, even in dire wartime, any profiling of suspects by ethnicity or country of origin.  


Consequently, all native born, flag-waving, American super-patriots are suspects when they board commercial airliners. Americans who have a life time of security clearances are subject to being porno-scanned or sexually groped. Airport Security cannot tell a "terrorist" from a CIA analyst, a Marine general or a US Senator.  


Well-connected members of the ruling elite, such as Michael Chertoff, can become rich from selling the porto-scanners to taxpayers in order "to protect the public from terrorists."  


The only terrorists Americans will ever experience are those funded by their own tax dollars within their "own" government. A people incapable of perceiving its real peril has no chance of surviving. America might be a military superpower, but it no longer exists as a free country with accountable government and a rule of law. 

Article #16  

Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika Deception)

February 21, 2009

By Jon Baker -


Without going into background on Trotsky
 in this article and the overthrow of the Tzar of Russia by the International Bankers - just know this: The Soviet Union was established by the same people who own the Federal Reserve and virtually every other central bank in the World. The Soviet Union was created to be an antithesis to capitalism (thesis). Besides making tons of money over the eventual conflict these two opposing dialectics would have on each other, they are the pro-genitive elements that would eventually lead to the preconceived "New Order" for the world. A synthesis of Capitalism and Communism, the China model if you will.

If the singular source of funding is not enough of a factor to sway your cognitive reasoning, then you perhaps should look at the fact that the New World Order is set to be a global socialist totalitarian form of government. That organizations like the SI (Socialist Internationale) and the United Nations embody such principles and promote them on a global scale. Never-mind that most of the U.S. delegation who signed the U.N. Charter in San Fransisco on October 24, 1945 were later found to be communist spies or have communist ties (i.e. Alger Hiss, FDR's personal attorney present at the Yalta Conference. - Never-mind that FDR took over the entire presidential platform of a gentleman and union icon named Norman Thomas who unsuccessfully ran for President on the Socialist Party ticket 6 times.) Never-mind that the U.N. Charter is virtually identical section by section of the old Soviet constitution. Never-mind that the Constitution for the United States of America, Art. 4, Sec. 4 guarantees a republican form of government, not a democracy.  Never mind that mainstream media constantly reinforces that we live in a "Democracy" when that is not true.

Yes, we're being played as pawns (and fools) in a global chess game, and it's ugly and nobody wants to face it. Excuses and rationalizations run the gamut; "It's too hard to understand, " or "That's just the way it is," or the infamous "There's nothing you can do about it." These are all cop-outs and evasive maneuvers. Yes, socialism sucks.

The reason the use of the word "Democracy" is used ad nauseam is because in the Socialist community it is well understood to be a "code-word" for "Socialism" and is therefore more palatable for the "masses."

In Mikhail Gorbachev's book Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country AND THE WORLD on page 32 he lays it out in the open:

"We will now firmly stick to the line that only through the consistent development of the democratic forms inherent in socialism and the expansion of self-government can we make progress... It is exactly because we place emphasis on the development of socialist democracy that we pay so much attention to the intellectual sphere, public consciousness and an active social party... In the West, Lenin is often portrayed as an advocate of authoritarian methods of administration. This is a sign of total ignorance of Lenin's ideas and, not infrequently, of their deliberate distortion. In effect, according to Lenin, socialism and democracy are indivisible."

And on page 34, ibid:

"Perestroika means mass initiative. It is the comprehensive development of democracy, socialist self-government...But in principle I can say that the end result of perestroika is clear to us. It is a thorough renewal of every aspect of Soviet life; it is giving socialism to the most progressive forms of social organization; it is the fullest exposure of the HUMANIST nature of our social system in its crucial aspects - economic, social, political and moral... The essence of perestroika lies in the fact that IT UNITES SOCIALISM WITH DEMOCRACY and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice."

We Are All Socialists Now

(Newsweek, Feb. 16, 2009)


And on page 36, ibid:

"...we are conducting all our reforms in accordance with the socialist choice. We are looking within socialism, rather than outside of it, for the answers to all the questions that arise. We assess our successes and errors alike by socialist standards. THOSE WHO HOPE THAT WE SHALL MOVE AWAY FROM THE SOCIALIST PATH WILL BE GREATLY DISAPPOINTED. EVERY PART OF OUR PROGRAM OF PERESTROIKA- AND THE PROGRAM AS A WHOLE, FOR THAT MATTER -- IS FULLY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF MORE SOCIALISM AND MORE DEMOCRACY...More Socialism means more democracy... We will proceed toward better socialism rather than away from it. We are saying this honestly, without trying to fool our own people or the world. ANY HOPES THAT WE WILL BEGIN TO BUILD A DIFFERENT, NON-SOCIALIST SOCIETY AND GO OVER TO THE OTHER CAMP ARE UNREALISTIC AND FUTILE."

V.I. Lenin set the definition of peace to mean the elimination of all forms of opposition to socialism. PEACE=SOCIALISM. This is a form of Orwellian newspeak, but you have to understand their language they use to communicate to each other.

Also on page 147, ibid, one interesting statement:

"A third world war, if unleashed by imperialism [Bush Doctrine], would lead to new social upheavals [global economic collapse, terrorism] which would finish off the capitalist system for good, and this would spell global peace [socialism]."

Now, as to clarify the United States position on this policy, let's refer to Presidential Documents (AE2.109:25/47) "Administration of George Bush, " November 22, 1989, page 1822:

"Off the island nation of Malta [Knights of Malta], Mikhail Gorbachev and I [President George Herbert Walker Bush]will begin the work of years... I will assure him that THERE IS NO GREATER ADVOCATE OF PERESTROIKA THAN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES."

As if that weren't enough, in the Los Angeles Times, April 1993, in an article entitled "The Peace Dividend: Gorbachev Pro-Democracy [a.k.a. socialism]Foundation Opens Office at Bay Area's Presidio," subtitled " THE FORMER HEAD OF THE RUSSIAN KGB TAKES OVER A U.S. MILITARY POST IN S.F.," it details how the keys to one of the most hallowed military posts was turned over to Gorbachev to set up a pro-socialism office on the oldest continually operating military base in the United States. Gorbachev was the first applicant granted permission to move onto the post. The article went on to say "Gorbachev gave this assessment of the moment to the crowd of dignitaries shivering in the San Francisco fog: 'This is the symbol of our IRREVERSIBLE TRANSITION from an era of confrontation an militaristic insanity to a NEW WORLD ORDER, one that promises dividends for all.' At the close of the ceremony, Gorbachev was joined via satellite by singer Billy Joel, who announced a June bebefit concert to raise money to IMMUNIZE children in the United States and Russia."

Thanks Billy Joel, the Founding Fathers would be proud. But seriously, if you haven't gotten a glimpse of the bigger picture, that this is not about Capitalism vs. Communism or East vs. West; this is about INTERNATIONAL STRATEGY by INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS with NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY NATION. These people don't have a homeland yet. They are transforming the WORLD to make one. These events are being implemented by agents of International Socialism, which is being pushed through think-tanks, academia, non-governmental organizations, and ALL international organizations. Socialism fools people with idealism that never transpires into individual freedom - it's always going to make all the promises that it will save the children from cancer, clean the environment, give every worker a fat check, etc., etc. The truth is this is always a mirage. It is smoke and mirrors - and the idealism is what attracts people. You have no individual unalienable rights in socialism - only collective civil rights that can be repealed by the whim of a politicians. Why would anyone fall for that trap? (Stupidity?)

Gorbachev Foundation North America

International Socialist Organization

Socialist Internationale

Communist Party U.S.A.

World Socialist Website

United Nations Organization

Socialism is the vehicle to integrate the world, but it is not the driving philosophy, for that is the shiny pinnacle of the pyramid known as Mystery Babylon -- but that's an entirely different article. If you're asking how or why, then you obviously don't know about that. That's your answer above all answers.

So to The Perestroika Deception By Anatoliy Golitsyn.

Diehard fans of the theory that Communism is dead will not like this book, whose stated goal is to help such people recover from their blindness. The Perestroika Deception describes with unmerciful clarity the confusion and errors that have been engendered in the world and in the Church by the deceitful Communist strategy of perestroika, under whose reformist guise rebellions and wars have been promoted, and the Church persecuted, in order that the Communist goal of world domination is finally achieved. In other words, what it unintentionally depicts are the very events prophesied by Our Lady of Fatima if the Collegial Consecration of Russia is not done.

Anatoliy Golitsyn's 1984 book, New Lies for Old, forecast, with 94% accuracy, all the recent changes in the Communist Bloc, including the economic and political reforms, the rise of Solidarity, the removal of the Berlin Wall, the reunification of Germany and the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Perestroika Deception, with extensive documentation, reinforces his contention in New Lies for Old that all the changes were meticulously planned years in advance. It explains how they fit into the devious Leninist strategy for achieving with Western cooperation a one-world Communist government or New World Social Order, run by the Russians and Chinese, by 2000 A.D. It also analyzes current events up to the Chechnya struggle and forecasts and developments.

Golitsyn was a high-ranking KGB official involved in espionage and counter-espionage who defected to the United States in 196. Convinced that Western interpretations of developments in the Communist Bloc were seriously flawed, he combined his study of Soviet long-range strategy with his inside knowledge of KGB and Leninist thinking in New Lies for Old. For over thirty years he has submitted memoranda to the CIA, in which he has provided very accurate analyses and forecasts of Bloc developments. "The Perestroika Deception" is a collection of dated memoranda covering the years 1984 to 1995.



Comments for "Democracy = Socialism, i.e. Communism (The Perestroika Deception)"

Lindsay said (February 22, 2009):

I have a few more quotes for you: "Democracy is the road to socialism." Karl Marx

"Modern Socialism is inseperable from political democracy." Elements of Socialism, pg 337.

"The view that democracy and Socialism are inwardly related spread far and wide in the decades which preceded the Bolshevist revolution. Many came to believe that democracy and Socialism meant the same thing, and that democracy without Socialism or Socialism without democracy would not be possible." Socialism, Ludwig von Mises, pg 67.



Dan said (February 21, 2009):


That's a good find - the article.

I'd never heard of Anatoliy Golitsyn’s 1984 book, New Lies for Old. Wish I had, in 1985-88. I could have saved myself 20 years of ignorance.


"The reason the use of the word “Democracy” is used ad nauseam is because in the Socialist community it is well understood to be a “code-word” for “Socialism” and is therefore more palatable for the “masses.”

"Socialism is the vehicle to integrate the world, but it is not the driving philosophy, for that is the shiny pinnacle of the piramid known as Mystery Babylon — but that’s an entirely different article. If you’re asking how or why, then you obviously don’t know about that. That’s your answer above all answers."



The smartest grad student I knew while back a college in 1986 remarked one day, that the head of CIA and head of KGB were then in political charge of the USA and USSR. He said this meant in fact that covert intelligence was controlling all world events, and that they appeared to be on the same page. What was missing in the hypothesis then, was what connected global covert intelligence? Money? Power? Certainly we realized it had nothing to do with the ideological rhetoric for public consumption.

It never occurred to us it might be religion. ie, Luciferianism.

Once one set's aside ideology and rhetoric, the common denominator between Corporate fascism and Soviet communism comes in to focus as simply full spectrum centralization of power. The common enemy and first casualy of Corporate fascism and Communism is local community free enterprise, disposable wealth and property in public ('profane') hands.


The CFR's Foreign Affairs website says Golitsyn's book is disinformation, but I'd expect them to say that if it's not.



Graham said (February 21, 2009):


I have the same problem everytime trying to convince people Communism is not dead & the Fall of the Berlin Wall was show trial at best.


The Communist always wanted US Arm Forces out of West Berlin & have achieved that through Flase Peace,so later they can invade West Berlin without having to blow down the Wall or waste Armmunition or wake up the West to their tanks rolling in at night.

People just cant see it-that the success of Perastoka Deception,process of Fabian Socialism,by gradual withdrawal of the West Defence,until the Soviet bring down the hard fist on the West by reverting back to open Communist State again but well built up.

They can't see America Nuclear Blackmail via the Communist United Nation, that put America into Vietnam, to Disarm the Superpower America, by Disarmament at Home, while every one distracted with the War in Vietnam.


The same United Nation bringing in Foreign Troops under disguise United Nation uniform,most from Former Soviet Union.


If you remove Former Soviet Union & see this as 1962 Cuban Crises-it would be seen as a US Surrender to Soviets or Blackmail.


They cant see that Gorbachev resigned His position,in Moscow, to be the Real President of the United States of America,shutting down US Bases on His Orders,(which would wake up America,If He order them closed from the Kremlin) & not the President Orders in Washington.


We have Freemasonry to thank for this mess,as Pope Leo XIII rightly stated-Freemasonry helps the Communist Cause,even though Communism was Condemned in 1846 by His Predessor-Pope Pius IX.

We have to go back to History itself,to find,that President Kennedy was anything but a Liberal President,when it came to the Test Ban Treaty,which was against Atmosphere Fall out ,on Limited Testing Radiation, not Disarmament.

His Pax Americana Address in June,1963,was for advoiding War even Limited like Vietnam & aimed at a Different Russia,with no Federal Reserve Bank Tax Dollars building up the Russian War machine let alone China or Cuba.


It would fall short of US IMF Currency to build their Arms Industry as Kennedy had at the same time in June,1963,taken away their power through new American notes backed by silver Executive Order-11100-taking away the power of the Elite Families to build the Russian War machine that would collapse in 1964.


It Kennedy way of over riding the CIA to overthrow Castro by Monatary means,internal Civil War against their oppressors & in Russia by sending in the Peace Corp to restore Order out of chaos not by Weapons of War from America-Pax Americana.


If Kennedy had read His speech in Dallas-everyone would be amazed by it-Upgrade Polaris Submarines,increase in Defense Budget not Disarm America & no mention of Vietnam involvement.

His speech is available on web site but the question is this-why wasnt it released the next day or put forward in the Media?


In fact after 40 Years WE are allowed to see His speech when it is too late to save America Defence.


That why He was removed,to Disarm America by President Johnson,while MaNamara wanted a freeze on US Missiles so that Russians can catch up,Senator Robert Kennedy did not want the freeze but no matter,after Johnson statement to Robert face in January,1967-You & all your peace doves will be destroyed in 6 Months-One Year later-not June,1967 but June 1968,6 Months from January 1968?


I believe John Kennedy told Pope Paul VI in 1963 visit His intention to end the Cold War by starving Ecomonic Military aid to the Communist States, keep the Space Programme open, not get involve in Vietnam which is to waste American Defense in that Region long War, by a Communist on CIA pay roll, Kennedy knew His name-Ho Chi Minh of North Vietnam & knew His troops had training from Green Beret-Dear Team?


Article #17


Who Controls Our Elections?

Computer Crimes: Understanding the Deception Behind 9-11 and Election Fraud

By Christopher Bollyn 

“The stealing of American elections is primarily a computer crime, as was the false flag terror attack of 9-11. These crimes are carried out by criminals who produce malicious computer code and enterprise software.  

I know Americans who watch television every night. I actually know people who spend virtually every non-working minute of the day in front of a television, bathing in the absolutely fake and utterly non-intellectual "reality" of TV. Millions of Americans, in fact, receive the bulk of their news and information about the world from the television. That means that a very large segment of the American population has a worldviewthat has been shaped primarily by what they have seen on TV. For many people, the artificial and contrived "reality" of the two-dimensional television screen largely defines and informs their view of the real world.  

This is why so many Americans know so little about the Middle East. The most obvious symptom of this television-induced ignorance is that most Americans know nothing about the real history of Zionism and the State of Israel. They are completely unaware, for example, of the long history of Zionist terrorism against Palestinians, Americans, Jews, and even Israelis. Raised on Hollywood television and movies, many Americans don't have the slightest clue about the real nature of the Zionist beast.  

Think about this for a minute: When was the last time you saw a movie in which the bad guys were Israelis speaking a guttural Slavic-based language called Yiddish or "Ivreet"? Can you recall even one television program in which the criminals or terrorists were Israelis? Apart from The Little Drummer Girl by John Le Carre, I have never seen a film in which Israelis were anything but heroes or victims, usually both. The Little Drummer Girl, which is a film worth watching, shows how false flag terror attacks are frequently committed by Israeli intelligence agents to be blamed on their enemies. Such false flag Zionist terror attacks were carried out against synagogues in Europe in the movie, and in Baghdad in real life during the late 1940s.  

In the usual Hollywood films about terrorists, such as the Die Hard films and others produced by Zionist media moguls, the bad guys are always Arabs, Germans, or corrupt members of the U.S. military. For many decades the Zionists who control Hollywood have defined who the "bad guys" are for most Americans. Israelis and their fellow Zionists are, therefore, never the "bad guys" in Hollywood films, although Israelis and Zionists play a very major role, if not the leading role, in the real world of organized crime. 

Kobi Alexander, one of the high-level Israeli criminals involved in Comverse, Odigo, and 9-11. After stealing hundreds of millions of dollars, Alexander fled to Israel and Namibia seeking refuge from U.S. justice. Israeli criminals like Alexander are seldom portrayed in Hollywood films. 

Like millions of American television viewers, reality is largely defined for the people in the U.S. military, whose job it is to protect and defend the United States, by the artificial reality they see on their screens. These people spend most of their workdays sitting in front of monitors that provide them with the information to which they react, often in life-or-death situations.  

But who really controls the information that the average American and the specialists in the U.S. military receive on their screens? You may be surprised to discover that the man behind the curtain is an Israeli with a thick guttural accent and a foreign and extremely racist view of the world.” (From Chapter VI, “Who Controls Our Elections?” of the book Solving 9-11: The Deception that Changed the World, Online Book by Christopher Bollyn, freely available here:

Article #18

Our Parliament is Rotten to the Core  


By Peter Oborne

12 November, 2010 



Before starting in journalism, I worked at the banking house of NM Rothschild. Though fundamentally ill-suited to and, indeed, useless at my job, I did learn the importance of absolute devotion to fact. 

All statements of profits, assets or any other material consideration in an offer-for-sale document were rigorously checked, then checked again. It was drilled into us that failure to tell the truth, even inadvertently, was a criminal offence, punishable in the last resort by jail. 

This training was one reason why I was so puzzled when, a number of years later, I began work as a reporter in the parliamentary press gallery. Of course, I relished the hyperbole, exaggeration and vulgar abuse which has done so much to enliven political discourse since time immemorial. What struck me hard, however, was the realisation that ministers and government spokesmen were systematically and deliberately making false statements – lying – on the record in Parliament and to the press. 

This culture of deception became a perfectly normal instrument of government under New Labour, and, in due course, I documented hundreds of examples in my book, The Rise of Political Lying. One of the worst cases was Tony Blair’s notorious dossier of September 2002 which made the case for the Iraq War. Had this document been an offer-for-sale prospectus, Blair’s fatal tendency to convert speculation into incontrovertible fact would have invited the attention of the fraud squad. 

The toleration of deceit carried on for years after the Iraq invasion, reaching its culmination with last year’s expenses scandal, when this newspaper disclosed the appalling truth that the House of Commons itself was engaged in a gigantic conspiracy to steal from the British taxpayer. The scale of the fraud was so audacious that our leading politicians had no choice but to acknowledge that something had gone horribly wrong. 

To his credit, David Cameron responded with a promise to restore trust in British politics. Six months have now passed – enough time to make a preliminary judgment on how the Prime Minister is carrying out this task. Sadly, the conclusion must be that little has changed. 

Let us examine first the case of the Tory MP Nadine Dorries, who was cleared last month by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner of wrongly claiming some £60,000 in second-home allowances. Central to Dorries’s defence was her assertion that she spent the bulk of her time in her old house in the Cotswolds (billed as her primary home) rather than her Bedfordshire constituency, which she stated was her secondary residence (and, therefore, allowable for expenses). Here, though, Dorries ran into an apparently insuperable problem: she had incriminated herself in her blog by giving the strong impression that she spent the majority of her time in Bedfordshire. Miss Dorries got around this difficulty by informing the parliamentary standards commissioner that “my blog is 70 per cent fiction and 30 per cent fact. It is written as a tool to enable my constituents to know me better and to reassure them of my commitment to Mid Bedfordshire. I rely heavily on poetic licence and frequently replace one place name/event/fact with another.” 

In other words, her blog was, for the most part, a lie, designed to give constituents the impression that she was doing her duty as a diligent MP in Bedfordshire when actually she was in another part of the country altogether. This is a wretched state of affairs and if David Cameron were a Tory leader who valued integrity and honesty, he would surely have ordered Miss Dorries to apologise personally to her constituents, and stripped her of the party whip there and then. Instead, he has done nothing. 

Another troubling example concerns Bill Wiggin, an old schoolfriend of the Prime Minister, who claimed interest payments for a property in his Leominster constituency which turned out not to have a mortgage. When the Telegraph exposed this pertinent omission, Mr Cameron was swift to accept Wiggin’s defence that it was all a dreadful misunderstanding. This is what the PM told breakfast television on May 21 last year: “It looks like it’s an honest mistake and he was not claiming money that he wasn’t entitled to. Now if he was, that would be totally different and he would be out of the door.” David Cameron felt so confident in Bill Wiggin’s integrity that he went to the lengths of making him a Government whip when the Coalition was formed in May. 

Sadly for Mr Wiggin, the Prime Minister’s confidence turned out not to be justified. Three weeks ago, the Commons Standards and Privileges Committee determined that he had wrongly claimed for his expenses and ordered him to apologise to the House. David Cameron has since failed to take the action he promised. Wiggin retains the backing of the Tory party, and his Government job. 

The most troubling of the three recent examples of parliamentary deception, however, concerns last week’s devastating court judgment against Phil Woolas, the MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth. The full gravity of the finding against Woolas can only be properly grasped by reading the judgment in its entirety. But it can be summed up as follows: Woolas used his election literature to assert that his Liberal Democrat opponent was in league with violent Muslim “extremists”, even though he knew this was not true. His lie was especially loathsome because, as private email evidence suggested, it was intended to “get the white vote angry”. In short, Woolas was pandering to anti-Muslim emotions in a constituency disfigured by race riots only nine years ago. 

The most extraordinary thing about the Woolas debacle has been the reaction to it. One national newspaper published a leader condemning the judges’ decision. There has been a wave of sympathy from fellow MPs of all parties. Charles Falconer, the former Lord Chancellor, is reportedly advising Woolas; Cherie Blair sent a friendly note and Gordon Brown is said to be supportive, as is David Miliband, the former foreign secretary. 

Inside the rarefied atmosphere of the House of Commons, the persecuted party has been Harriet Harman, Labour’s deputy leader. With Ed Miliband on paternity leave, she sacked Woolas as soon as the court judgment was made. But poor Harman, who appears to have behaved impeccably, was practically lynched for her pains at a meeting of the parliamentary party. 

There is a common thread to these stories. All three cases show that lying and cheating are still regarded as acceptable conduct by the British Political Class. Our MPs continue to regard themselves as somehow beyond the basic morality that applies to their fellow citizens. I used to believe that this arrogant and dishonest approach to politics was peculiar to New Labour. Now it looks like common practice for all parties. 

It is true that the job of prime minister is incredibly demanding, and David Cameron has little or no time to attend to what may seem to him like obscure matters of party management. But he should be careful. While he travels the globe making grand bargains with world leaders, the stench of deceit and corruption is once again beginning to fill the Tory benches. 

Article #19

The Holding of “Extremist Views” in Our
Democracy Will Not Be Tolerated, They Say.


This man is not only someone who has extremist views but also someone who has lied about those views,” Anna Blight, Premier of Queensland, said. [1] 


Today in so-called democratic Australia we are led by a very large group of Labour Fabian Socialist, [2] posing as democratically elected politicians, such as Julia Gillard, Anna Blight, and Wayne Swan, who insist that they lead by “consensus,” and that the holding of “extremist views” is not to be tolerated in their New World Order (which is already upon us). These “extremist views” are now defined as what every Christian on earth once clearly understood to be known as “goodness” and “righteousness.” These things could be called living by the Holy Spirit, as shown in the right-hand side of the images below. The left-hand image, below, labelled “Sin-controlled living,” is now totally acceptable in these last days, and those who live by them will be totally destroyed.

 Extremist views.


These things of pure beauty have now, through the long operation of the deliberate tactic of the inevitability of gradualness, the Fabian motto,[3] been turned into “extremist views.” Such is the state of the moral rottenness that prevails everywhere.



Here’s what the scriptures reveal about such moral sickness:


Holding the Truth in Obedience to Unrighteousness:


“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness.” (Romans 1: 18)


“But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, indignation and wrath.” (Romans 2: 8) 


“That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” (2 Thessalonians 2: 12) 


On Respect of Persons:


“Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.” (Leviticus 19: 15) 


On Volunteering:


“Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, and his chambers by wrong; [that] useth his neighbour's service without wages, and giveth him not for his work.” (Jeremiah 22: 13) 


On Lovers of Lies Instead of the Truth:


“And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.” (2 Thessalonians 2: 10)


On Deception and Duplicity:


“And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, [as] they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots [they are] and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you.” (2 Peter 2: 13)


Fools Rise to the Top and Lead Us to Destruction:


“For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed [it] unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified [him] not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves: Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen. For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication [which includes all form of sexual sin, such as homsexuality, pornography, and other perversions], wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.” (Romans 1: 18-32)




Quote #1:


“We have swallowed all manner of poisonous certainties fed us by our parents, our Sunday and day school teachers, our politicians, our priests, our newspapers, and others with a vested interest in controlling us. ‘Thou shalt become as gods, knowing good and evil,’ good and evil with which to keep children under control, with which to impose local and familial and national loyalties and with which to blind children to their glorious intellectual heritage. … The results, the inevitable results, are frustration, inferiority, neurosis and inability to enjoy living, to reason clearly or to make a world fit to live in.” Dr. G. Brock Chisholm, President, World Federation of Mental Health.


Quote #2:


“Today, most of the good people are afraid to be good. They strive to be broadminded and tolerant! It is fashionable to be tolerant - but mostly tolerant of evil - and this new code has reached the proportions of demanding intolerance of good. The wall of resistance to evil has thus been broken down and no longer affords protection to those who, persecuted by evil doers, stand in need of it.” (Lady Edith Queenborough, Occult Theocrasy, published in 1933, p. 4)


Quote #3:


“Civil disobedience is not our problem.Our problem is civil obedience [to evil]. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders and millions have been killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves and the grand thieves are running the country. That’s our problem.” (Howard Zinn)


Quote #4:


“But the average Homo normalis is beyond caring. Provided their bellies are full, their minds empty and their time consumed with frivolous entertainment, Satanists are free to triumph. It took less than sixty years to turn the Western world from war heroes to poofters; from bold, adventurers to cry-babies; from devoted couples to divorcees and although never afraid of work in the past, now everyone has a Doctor’s Certificate. Chronic apathy bolstered by cynicism litters the economic cul-de-sacs of our society. Literacy is almost gone, television is almost irrelevant, public infrastructure is heritage protected and most are crushed by the foreboding knowledge that tomorrow is another day.” (Australian satanist Sir David Griffin, ex-Lord Mayor of Sydney, From The Foydyke Letters, available here:   )


[1]Reported in The Australian, 23 February, 2012. 

[2]The logo of the Fabian Society, a wolf in sheep's clothing.

[3] 2 Peter 1: 16 classes this motto as “cunningly devised fables.”

Article #20

The Occult Technology of Power 



A Project of the Society for Illuminating the Sources of Power 

Copyright 1974 by Alpine Enterprises, PO Box 766, Dearborn, Michigan 48121. All Rights Reserved for Printed Editions. E-text editions may be distributed without limit as long as the address of the Copyright Holder or publisher is included. Printouts from e-text are not allowed.  

ISBN 0-55950-009-3
Library of Congress Card Catalog Number 88-083670  

To My Son: 

"The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." --- Benjamin Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield)  

In this thin volume you will find the transcripts of your initiation into the secrets of my empire Read them again not for the arcane knowledge which is now second nature you, hut in order to re-experience the shock and awe you felt twenty years ago when at age thirty the fabulous scope of my power was revealed to you by my trusted, and now mostly departed advisors. Remember the surprise, to the point of disbelief, with which you beheld the invisibly delicate, but invincible chains of deceit, confusion, or coercion with which we finance capitalists enslave this chaotic world. Remember the feats of will and strategy that have been required to retain our position. Then, inspect your retinue carefully. Your heir must be equal to and eager for the task much as you were. Choose him carefully. As I lie here waiting for the end I can afford to relish the thought our empire lasting forever as I never dared while in charge. Rational power calculations, so easily disrupted by the thrill of power, are now entirely in your hands.  

"Know, Will, Dare, and be Silent!" --- Aleister Crowley  

The Transcripts

1. My Introduction to Your Initiation 

2. Professor A. on the Role of Fraud in Nature 

3. Professor Q. on Occult Knowledge as the Key to Power 

4. Professor M. on the Economics of Central Banking 

5. Professor B. on the Functions of the Central Bank in the Mature Finance Capitalist System 

6. Professor G. on Social and Business Legislation and Policy 

7. Professor D. on the Role of Public Education 

8. Professor X. on Prestigious Associations and Secret Societies 

9. Professor Y. on Covert Operations and Intelligence 

10. My Closing Remarks 

11. Afterwords by the Transcriber [Author?] 

12. Bibliography 


1. My Introduction To Your Initiation ~

"Man is a rope stretched between the animal and the Superman a rope over an abyss."  

"I teach you the Superman. Man is something to be surpassed." --- Friedrich Nietzsche  

"Self reverence, self-knowledge, self-control these three alone lead to sovereign power." --- Alfred Lord Tennyson  

"And nothing, not God, is greater to one than one's self is." --- Walt Whitman  

"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law." --- Aleister Crowley: The Book of the Law  

My Son, the time has arrived to make formal what you have confidently awaited for some years. Of all your brothers, sisters, and cousins, as well as the offspring of my close allies, I have chosen you to be heir to my empire. All the trust funds, foundations, and accounts through which my empire is controlled shall pass into your hands upon my retirement. All my alliances, understandings, and enmities with my handful of peers around the globe shall gradually become yours. Over the next twenty years we shall collaborate closer and closer, you and I, until, we finally act as one.  

For ten years you have toured my empire in a succession of managerial assignments and are now familiar with the outward operations of my crucial banking, foundation, governmental, and think tank organizations. Until now, my advisors and I have deflected your questions as to how and if my diverse operations and holdings, which seem autonomous and even contradictory, are integrated into an organic whole to serve the dynasty's interests. The fact that you asked these questions, rejecting my carefully nurtured public image as an idle, coupon clipping philanthropist, was a major factor in the high esteem in which I hold you. Most of your competitors found puppet leadership in any one of my organizations so awesome and gratifying that they immediately eliminated themselves from the contest for the top position which you have won. Such men of limited vision are necessary for my success. They bend unconsciously to the subtle pressures to which I expose them. They can be led in any direction I choose by simple-minded rationalizations aimed at their vanity without being privy to my motives which would be short lived secrets in their undisciplined and envious minds.  

Most important in your selection as my successor, however was your psychological nature which has been faithfully reported to me over the years by my associates many of whom have advanced psychological training. A man in my position must have total mastery over his emotions. All actions affecting the power of the dynasty must be taken on the basis of coldly reasoned power calculations if the dynasty is to survive and prosper at the expense of its subjects and rivals. All power is impossible to those whose pursuit is ruled by sentimentality, love, envy power-lust revenge, prejudice, hatred, justice, alcohol, drugs, or sexual desire. Sustained power is impossible to those who repress all their irrational longings into their subconscious only to have them return in compulsive, out of control behavior that inevitably leads to their ruin. Although often clothed in the rationalizations of power calculation, compulsive behavior is at root, the emotionalism of a frightened child, desperately projecting his inner agony into a reality he is afraid to under stand, much less master.  

Although you now must begin to pursue it consciously you have already displayed the alienation from your emotional nature that is so essential to achieving real worldly power. You must recognize your emotional nature as a primitive survival mechanism that was appropriate for the jungle and perhaps useful to common men, but useless for the tasks that confront us finance capitalists. Attachment to what you do, just because you do it, is the primary psychological characteristic of ordinary mortals. Such cognitive dissonance spells disaster for us. Our emotional mechanism makes our lives worth living, but is no guide to the occult arts of intrigue. So, continue to gratify your senses and emotions fully at your leisure. As long as the empire prospers you will have the resources to indulge in systematic gratification which will leave your irrational urges sated and, therefore, powerless. You will never be in the unenviable position of the middle class strivers who must, from lack of resources, repress their emotional natures if they are to attain any power whatever during their lives. Typically, they end up taking their pleasure from the victories and cruelties of their struggle. Thus, their end ceases to be power and they eventually defeat themselves with reckless behavior in pursuit of dominant thrills.  

I have brought you into seclusion with my most trusted advisors in order to inaugurate a new phase of your instruction. Your formal training in the "official" political-economic world is now complete. This weekend will mark the beginning of your training in the occult technology of power that lurks behind outer appearances. As your tutors will explain, "occult" or secret knowledge is the basis of all power in human society, so I use the word "occult" advisedly, in its pristine usage. As I am sure you are aware by now, productivity in itself does not secure power and therefore does not secure the gratifications of life. After all, slaves can be productive. None of my organizations in which you served so well are concerned with advancing the techniques of satisfying human needs and desires. Rather, all are dedicated to the surreptitious centralization of productive, but especially coercive, efforts in my hands or in creating the intellectual climate in which such veiled control would be tolerated in the future. I destroy or paralyze productive efforts that cannot be ensnarled in my web  

After a break Professor A. will take the floor in order to put finance capitalism into full biological perspective. His short talk will be followed by similar abbreviated summaries by his six associates, all of whom you know well. The rest of the weekend will be devoted to forthright fielding of your questions.  

2. Professor A. On The Role Of Fraud In Nature ~

"Are we not all predatory animals by instinct? If humans ceased wholly from preying upon each other, could they continue to exist?" --- Anton S. LaVey  

"Nature, to be commanded must be obeyed " --- Francis Bacon  

Organisms typically base their success primarily on deception and rely on actual force or mutually advantageous trade (symbiosis) as little as possible. This should be nearly self-evident, but is generally overlooked due to the moral codes we elitists foist on our subjects. Let me give a few examples in case the moral culture has to some extent impaired your powers of objective observation. Camouflage is universal among predators and victims alike. Blossoms imitate fragrances and colors which are sexually attractive to certain insects in order to effect pollination. Dogs bark ferociously and feign attack on enemies of whom they are, in fact, terrified. The Venus Fly Trap plant lures flies to their deaths. Men proclaim their altruism to others and even themselves while they selfishly scramble for personal advantage. If you doubt that fraud is normal in nature you should read section 3 of the first chapter of Robert Ardrey's "The Social Contract" for a wealth of fascinating examples. (Of course Ardrey fails to grasp the full application to contemporary human society of his brilliant insights into man's animal nature.)  

Human mental prowess and communicative powers have merely provided superb elaboration on nature's old theme of fraud and added its own distinctive feature: self delusion. Primitive animal hierarchies are based on bluff and bluster, and each member is well aware of and accepts, at least temporarily, its position in the hierarchy. The same wild enthusiasm and fascination for dominance and submission rages in human hearts. However, fraud is taken one step further. Not only is fraudulent bluff and bluster used to achieve dominance but fraudulent altruism and collective institutions are used to conceal dominance once achieved. Human hierarchies, in contrast to the animal variety, are best sustained when the members are deluded regarding the oppressive nature, or better, even the very existence of the hierarchy!  

Visible rulers are highly vulnerable. Thus we see visible rulers claiming to be representatives of God, the common good, the material forces of history, the general will (either through vote or intuition), tradition, or other intellectual "spooks" that serve to lessen the envy of the ruled for the rulers. Encouraging such self-delusions among the masses of the ruled is universal for visible governments. However, such spooks are little protection for the leaders of such systems against their sophisticated elite rivals and no protection against men like your father. The Roman Empire was unquestioned by the mass of its subjects for centuries, but the Emperors lived in constant fear of coup and assassination.  

By embracing deception wholeheartedly at every level, finance capitalism, or rule through money, has fashioned the ultimate system yet devised for the secure exercise of power. Men like your father, the hidden masters of finance capitalism, govern those who govern, produce, and think through invisible financial tentacles, the operations of which will be elucidated later by my colleagues. Dominance in all aspects of society is surreptitiously accomplished while the great majority of the ruled, and even most of the visible leaders, believe themselves to be fairly autonomous, if harried, members of a pluralistic society. Nearly everyone believes major decisions to be the vector sum of autonomous pressures exerted by business, labor, government, consumers, social classes, and other special interests. In fact, the vectors of societal power are carefully balanced by us so that any net movement is in a direction chosen by us. The only fly in the ointment is the occasional, but extremely messy, interferences by competing financial dynasties. This disconcerting problem will not be a major topic for this weekend.  

I now yield to Professor Q. who will elucidate the central secrets of your father's immense money power.  

3. Professor Q. On Occult Knowledge As The Key To Power ~

"The theory of aggregate production which is the point of the following book, nevertheless can be much easier adapted to the conditions of a totalitarian state than the theory of production and distribution of a given production put forth under conditions of free competition…" --- John Maynard Keynes ~ Forward to the German Edition of the General Theory (September 7, 1936)  

Throughout history, secure ruling elites arise through secret, or occult knowledge which they carefully guard and withhold from outsiders The power of such elites or cults diminishes as their occult knowledge is transformed into "scientific" knowledge and vanishes as soon as it becomes "common sense." Before analyzing the secrets of the finance capitalist money cult let us glance for historical perspective at occult astronomy, the oldest source of stable rule known to man of which astrology is hut the pathetic remnant.  

As soon as men abandoned the life of wandering, tribal hunters to till the soil they needed to predict the seasons. Such knowledge was required in order to know when to plant, when to expect floods in fertile valleys, when to expect rainy seasons, and so on. Months of backbreaking work were wasted by the unavailability of the calendar, a convenience we take for granted. The men who first studied and grasped the regularities of sun, moon, and stars that presage the seasons had a valuable commodity to sell and they milked it to the fullest at the expense of their credulous fellowmen. The occult priesthoods of early astronomers and mathematicians such as the designers of Stonehenge, convinced their subjects that they alone had contact with the gods, and thus, they alone could assure the return of planting seasons and weather favorable to bountiful harvests. The staging (predicting) of solar and lunar eclipses was particularly effective in awing the community. The general success resulting from following the priesthood's tilling, planting, nurturing, and harvesting timetables insured the priesthood's power. Today's Christmas holiday season continues the tradition set by ancient priesthoods, who conducted rituals on the winter solstice to reverse the retreat of the sun from the sky.  Their invariable success was followed by wild celebrations.  Popular knowledge of seasonal regularities was discouraged by every manner of mysticism and outlandish ritual imaginable.  Failures in prediction were blamed on sins of the people and used to justify intensified oppression. For centuries people who had literally no idea of the number of days between seasons and couldn't count anyway, cheerfully gave up a portion of their harvests, as well as their most beautiful daughters, to their "faithful servants" in the priesthoods.  

The power of our finance capitalist money cult rests on a similar secret knowledge, primarily in the field of economics. Our power is weakened by real advances in economic science (Fortunately, the public at large and most revolutionaries remain totally ignorant of economics). However, we established money lords have been able to prolong and even reverse our decline by systematically corrupting economic science with fallacious and spurious doctrines. Through our power in the universities, publishing, and mass media we have been able to reward the sincere, professorial cranks whose spurious doctrines happen to rationalize in terms of "common good" the government supported institutions, laws, and economic measures upon which our money powers depend. Keynesianism is the highest form of phony economics yet developed to our benefit. The highly centralized, mixed economy resulting from the policies advocated by Lord Keynes for promoting "prosperity" has all the characteristics required to make our rule invulnerable to our twin nemeses: real private competition in the economic arena and real democratic process in the political arena. Laissez-faire or free market, classical economics was our original attempt to corrupt economic science. Its beautiful internal consistency blinded economists for many years to the fact that it had virtually nothing to do with current reality. However, we are so powerful today that it is no longer possible to conceal our imposing institutions with the appearances of free competition Keynesianism rationalizes this omnipotent state which we require, while retaining the privileges of private property on which our power ultimately rests. Although the interim reforms advocated by Marx in his Communist Manifesto such as central banking, income tax, and other centralizing measures can be corrupted to coincide exactly with our requirements, we no longer allow Marxist movements major power in developed countries. Our coercive institutions are already in place. Any real steps toward communism would mean our downfall. Of course, phony Marxism is an excellent ideological veil in which to cloak our puppet dictators in underdeveloped areas.  

Secondarily, the power of the lords of money rests on an occult knowledge in the area of politics and history. We have quite successfully corrupted these sciences. Although many people are familiar with our secrets through such books as 1984 by the disillusioned George Orwell, few take them seriously and usually dismiss such ideas as paranoia. Since real politics is motivated by individual self-interest, history is viewed most accurately as a struggle for power and wealth We do our best to obscure this self-evident truth by popularizing the theory that history is made by the impersonal struggles between ideas, political systems, ideologies, races, and classes.  Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.  

The so-called Left-Right political spectrum is our creation. In fact, it accurately reflects our careful, artificial polarization of the population on phony issues that prevents the issue of our power from arising in their minds. The Left supports civil liberties and opposes economic or entrepreneurial liberty. The Right supports economic liberty and opposes civil liberty. Of course neither can exist fully (which is our goal) without the other. We control the Right-Left conflict such that both forms of liberty are suppressed to the degree we require Our own liberty rests not on legal or moral "rights," but on our control of the government bureaucracy and courts which apply the complex, subjective regulations we dupe the public into supporting for our benefit.  

Innumerable meaningless conflicts to divert the attention of the public from our operations find fertile ground in the bitter hatreds of the Right/Left imbroglio. Right and Left are irreconcilable on racial policy, treatment of criminals, law enforcement, pornography, foreign policy, women's lib, and censorship to name just a few issues. Although censorship in the name of "fairness" has been useful in broadcasting and may yet be required in journalism, we generally do not take sides in these issues. Instead we attempt to prolong the conflicts by supporting both sides as required. War, of course, is the ultimate diversionary conflict and the health of our system. War provides the perfect cover of emergency and crisis behind which we consolidate our power. Since nuclear war presents dangers even to us, more and more we have resorted to economic crisis, energy shortages, ecological hysteria, and managed political drama to fill the gap. Meaningless, brushfire wars, though, remain useful.  

We promote phony free enterprise on the Right and phony democratic socialism on the Left. Thus, we obtain a "free enterprise" whose "competition" is carefully regulated by the bureaucracy we control and whose nationalized enterprises are controlled directly through our government. In this way we maintain a society in which the basis of our power, legal titles to property and money, remain secure, but in which the peril of free, unregulated competition is avoided and popular sovereignty is nullified. The democratic process is a sitting duck for our money power. Invariably we determine the candidates of the major parties and then proceed to pick the winners. Any attempts at campaign reforms simply put the rules of the game more firmly under our government's control.  

Totalitarianism of the fascist of communist varieties is no danger to us as long as bastions of private property remain to serve as our bases of operation. Totalitarian governments of both Right and Left, because of the vulnerability of their highly visible leaders to party rivals, can be manipulated easily from abroad. Primarily, totalitarian dictatorships efficiently prevent new money lords that could challenge our power from arising in whole continents, civilizations, and races.  

Perhaps a few words on ideology proper are in order before I conclude. The only valid ideology, of course is rational egoism, that is, the maximization of the individual's gratification by whatever means prove practical. This requires power over nature, especially, when possible, power over other humans who are the most versatile and valuable tools of all. Fortunately, we do not have a society of egoists. Money lords would be impossible in such a society as the mental spooks and rationalizations by which we characteristically manipulate and deceive would be a laughing stock Under such circumstances a policy of live and let live or true "laissez-faire" anarchy might be the only alternative. Certainly a hierarchical order would be difficult to maintain by force alone. However, in the current era, while minds are yet in the thrall of altruistic collectivistic, and divine moralistic spooks, the egoist's rational course is to utilize such spooks to control others.  

The next speaker, Professor M., will detail the key institution of our power: Central Banking.  

4.  Professor M. On The Economics Of Central Banking ~ 

"It (a bank) can take the depositors' goods, the goods that it holds for safekeeping, and lend them out to people on the market. It can earn interest on these loans, and as long as only a small percentage of depositors ask to redeem their certificates at any one time, no one is the wiser.  Or, alternatively, it can issue pseudo warehouse receipts for goods that are not there and lend these on the market. This is the more subtle practice. The pseudo receipts will be exchanged on the same basis as the true receipts, since there is no indication on their face whether they are legitimate or not. It should be clear that this practice is outright fraud." --- Murray Rothbard: Man, Economy, and State  

"The bold effort the present bank has made to control the Government, the distress it has wantonly produced,. . ., are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American People should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution (The Bank of the United States), or the establishment of another like it." --- Andrew Jackson (December 2, 1834)  

As you have a doctorate degree in economics from a great university I will touch as lightly as my verbosity allows on facts accepted by economic "science" and proceed to occult aspects of Central Banking.  

Since the division of labor is the key to all human achievement and satisfaction, a system of exchange is crucial. Barter is hopelessly complicated. A command economy, in which each does and receives what be is told, is also hopelessly cumbersome and fails to take advantage of individual initiative, ability, and concrete knowledge. A medium of exchange, money, is the obvious solution. (Even our highly centralized economies on the socialist model now enthusiastically embrace money as an indispensable simplifying tool in their economic planning.)  

When left to themselves people of a given geographical area settled upon a durable luxury commodity, usually gold or silver, to use as money. Because money is a store of value as well as a medium of exchange, people saved part of their gold income rather than spending it all. This gold was often stored in the vaults of a local goldsmith, the precursor of the modern banker, for safekeeping. The depositor received a receipt that entitled him to an equal quantity and quality of gold on demand from the goldsmith. At some point the goldsmith realized that there was no reason he could not loan out some of the gold for interest as long as he kept gold on hand sufficient to meet the fairly predictable withdrawal rate. After all, be simply promised to pay on demand, not bold the gold as such. Better yet, be could simply issue more receipts for gold than be bad gold and the receipts, renamed notes, could circulate freely among the populace as money.  

However, he soon found that there was a definite limit set on this process by reality. Not all the extra notes issued circulated forever among the public. The rate of note redemption began to increase rapidly as the receipts passed into the hands of people unfamiliar with his reputation and especially when competitive goldsmiths, always eager for more gold reserves, came into possession of his notes. To prevent a disastrous run on his gold reserves, note issuance had to be kept within bounds. But the spending power of over-issuance was a grave temptation. Especially relished was the power over governments, industry, and merchants that the miraculous loan power of the goldsmith could obtain. Many succumbed to temptation, overextended themselves and brought ruin to their depositors while others slowly became wealthy bankers by pursuing conservative loan policies.  

At this point, according to economic "science," Central Banks are instituted to protect the public from periodic financial catastrophe at the hands of unscrupulous fractional reserve bankers. Nothing could be further from the truth. Central Banks are established to remove the limitation on over-issuance that reality places on competitive banking systems. As early as ancient Babylon and India, Central Banking, the art of monopolizing the issuance of money, had been developed into a perfect method for looting the general public. Even today many bankers copy the traditions of the earlier exploitive priesthoods and design their banks to resemble temples! Defenses of Central Banking are simply part of the deception that lies at the heart of all power elites.  

Let us look at the way a new Central Bank is created where none has existed previously. We bankers approach the Prince or ruling assembly (both of whom always want more money to fight wars or to curry favor with the people and, typically, are ignorant of economics) with a compelling proposal: "Grant our bank a national Charter to regulate private banking and to issue legal tender notes, that is, force our notes to be accepted as payment for all debts, pubic and private. In exchange we will provide the government all the notes it prudently requires at interest rates easily payable with existing taxes. The increased government purchasing power thus created will simultaneously assure the power an prestige of the currently precarious nation and stimulate the sluggish, credit starved economy to new heights of prosperity. Most important the violent banking panics and credit collapses caused by unscrupulous private bankers will be replaced by our even handed, beneficent and scientific management of money and banking. Our public-spirited expertise will be at the disposal of the state while we remain independent enough of momentary political pressures to assure sound management."  

For a while this system seems to work remarkably well with full employment for everyone. The government an public does not notice that we issuers of the new notes are using the notes we create out of thin air to surreptitiously build economic empires at the expense of established interests. Because of the legal tender laws, few of the new notes issued by the Central Bank are returned for redemption in gold. In fact, private banks and even a few foreign banks may begin to use the Central Bank's notes as reserves for further issuance of credit. Soon enough, though, prices begin to rise as the added notes increase demand relative to the quantity of goods and services. As the value of their savings decline more and more foreigners in particular begin to question the value of the Central Bank's notes and start to demand redemption in gold. We, of course do not take responsibility for the rampant inflation when it comes.  We blame inflation on evil speculators who drive up prices for personal gain, as well as the greed of organized labor and business who are promptly made subject to wage and price controls. Even the consumer can be made to feel guilty for agreeing to pay the high prices! Mistaking symptoms for causes the government accepts the banker's analysis of the problem and continues to give the Bank free reign in monetary policy.  

By slowing the rate of note issuance periodically, the ultimate crisis stage is postponed until many decades after the original Central Bank Charter was granted. Before the rapidly dwindling gold reserves on which faith in our Bank depends is exhausted we abruptly contract our loan volume to private industry and government as well. With the contraction of the money supply a great deflationary crash begins in earnest with all its attendant unemployment, bankruptcies, and civil strife. We do not take responsibility for the depression. We blame it on evil hoarders who are refusing to spend their money and the prophets of doom who are spoiling business confidence. The government accepts this analysis and leaves monetary policy in our hands. If things go well we bankers channel the fury and unrest into puppet movements and pressure groups that carry our agents into full control of the government. Once in charge we devalue our outstanding bank notes in terms of gold and make them inconvertible for all but possibly foreign Central Banks and begin plans to restore a "prosperity" that will be totally ours.  

When lucky, we are able to confiscate the gold of private citizens as punishment for hoarding during the climax of the depression.  

Once the old order is subdued during the chaos of the crash and desperation of the depression, the field is open for our full finance capitalist system to be realized. If the money lords behind the Central Bank can avoid lapsing into political and economic competition among themselves a new and lasting order can be established. A war timed for this period of consolidation provides the perfect excuse for the regimentation required to crush all opposition.  

Professor B., a former Chairman of a Central Bank, will explain the functioning of the Central Plank in the typical, fully developed finance capitalist system.  

5. Professor B. On The Function Of The Central Bank In The Mature Finance Capitalist System ~  

"We are undone, my dear sir, if legislation is still permitted which makes our money, much or little, real or imaginary, as the moneyed interests shall choose to make it." --- Thomas Jefferson  

"From now on depressions will be scientifically created." ---  Congressman Charles A. Lindberg, Sr.-1923  

In its pristine form a Central Bank is a private monopoly of a nation's money and credit issuance supported by the coercive power of the state. That the Central Bank be directly in our hands is vital until our new order is firmly established throughout the governmental, business, intellectual and political spheres of society. After our order is consolidated, formal nationalization of the Central Bank with great fanfare is usually advisable in order to dispel any lingering suspicion that it is operated for private gain. Of course only loyal agents of the dynasty are allowed to obtain high offices in the Bank and our power remains intact. Obvious private monopolies are always the targets of sharp reformist agitators. Only the most paranoid, however, can see through the public facade to the private monopoly of the nationalized or quasi-nationalized Central Bank.  

The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends. The occult power of the Central Bank to create money out of nothing is the fountainhead that fuels our far-flung financial and political empire. I will make a quick survey of a few of the ways this secret money power is brought to bear.  

Basically, the power of our Central Bank flows from its control over the points of entry into the economy of new, inflationary money which it creates out of thin air. Ordinarily, bills of exchange, acceptances, private bonds, government bonds and other credit instruments are purchased by the Central Bank through specially privileged dealers in order to put the new money, often only checking accounting entries, into circulation. The dealers are allowed a large profit since they are fronts operated by our agents. Our purchase of government securities pleases the government, as our purchase of private debt pleases private debtors. As a quid pro quo to assure "good management" our agents are given directorships, managerial posts, and offices in the corporations and government's so benefited. As the addiction to the narcotic of inflationary easy credit grows and grows we demand more and more control of our dependent entourage of governments and corporations. When we finally end the easy credit to "combat inflation" the enterprises and governments either fall directly into our hands, bankrupt, or are rescued at the price of total control.  

Also, we ruling bankers control the flow of money in the economy through the wide authority of the Central Bank to license, audit, and regulate private banks. Banks that loan to interests outside the loyal entourage are "audited" by the Central Bank and found to be dangerously overextended. Just a hint of insolvency from the respected Central Bank authorities is enough to cause a run on the disobedient bank or at least dry up its vital lines of credit. Soon the banking establishment learns to follow the hints and nods of your father's agents at the Central Bank automatically.  

Further, the periodic cycles of easy money and tight money that we initiate through our control of the Central Bank cause corresponding fluctuations in all markets. Our inner circle knows in advance the timing of these cycles and, therefore reaps windfall profits by speculating in commodity, stock, currency, gold, and bond markets. Monopolistic stock and commodity Exchanges are a vital adjunct to our power made possible by our Central Bank power. We do not allow a fair auction market to exist, but make a great show of "tough" government regulation to create a false sense of confidence among small investors. With the aid of our regulatory charade and financial power we are able to maintain Exchanges tailored to our entourage's need to manipulate stock prices at the expense of independent investors. Our privileged specialists on the floors of our Exchanges, aided by the propaganda of our financial press and brokerage houses, continually play on naivete and greed to drain the savings of the unwary into our coffers. The stock, commodities, and securities held in trading accounts by the Exchange and brokerage houses provides us with a clout far beyond our own actual holdings with which we can manipulate prices and win proxy fights for corporate takeovers.  

Little danger to our lucrative racket exists from public-spirited regulation. Our manipulations are so complex that only the most brilliant experts could comprehend them. To most economists our Exchange operations appear to be helpful efforts to "stabilize" the market. We ruling bankers, if able to keep peace among ourselves, become richer and richer as time passes without the annoyance of exerting productive effort of benefit to others.  

The next speaker, Professor G. will discuss the secrets of social legislation and policy that do so much to cement our power.  

6. Professor G. On Social And Business Legislation And Policy  

"There is no proletarian, not even a Communist, movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in the direction indicated by money, and for the time being permitted by money--and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact." --- Oswald Spengler: "Decline of the West"  

"Also at the (SDS) convention, men from Business International Roundtables… tried to buy up some radicals. These are the world's leading industrialists and they convene to decide how our lives
are going to go… We were also offered Esso (Rockefeller) money. They want us to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move to the left." --- James Kunen: "The Strawberry Statement: Notes of a College Revolutionary"  

The danger to our system clearly is not that the "people" will spontaneously rise up and dispossess us. The "people" never initiate anything. All successful movements are led from the top, usually without the knowledge of the movement, by men like your father with vast resources and brilliant plans. The real danger arises in the upper-middle classes. Occasionally, these people make vast fortunes through some brilliant technological innovation in their business or through the favor of local politicians that escape our influence. Because of their ignorance of the reality of our power, however, the new rich usually fall easily into our hands. For instance, they seldom realize until too late that the dozens of loans they may owe to apparently independent banks can be called simultaneously with a mere nod from your father. Graver danger is presented by those whose enterprises are so successful as to be self-financing. Since the advent of the corporate income tax truly self-financing corporations are extremely rare. Most disquieting is when these upstarts acquire the covert or open support and advice of your father's major international antagonists. This is particularly dangerous in countries with long democratic traditions where it is difficult to make our arbitrary rulings stick.  

The best solution is to enact comprehensive taxes and business regulations in the name of the common good. Such measures reduce the incidence of significant upstart competition to manageable levels. This policy, of course, strangles innovation and productivity. Reduction of the GNPs in countries under your father's control would be acceptable in the interests of secure power under the pretext of conservation, ecology, or no-growth stability except that if carried too far your father's clout vis-a-vis his international rivals would be impaired. The most difficult problem for the money lord is determining the level of social and economic freedom he dares allow for the sake of his international power. Only method is to maintain a home base of carefully monitored, relative freedom on which to base the economic and military strength required to maintain an empire of totalitarian dictatorships abroad. The following measures, however, are found necessary by nearly all money lords:  

1. Steeply Graduated Income Tax ~ Income tax does not affect us because our money was accumulated before the tax was imposed and most of it is now safely protected in our network of tax exempt foundations. Foundation income and capital can legally be used to finance the bulk of our social, economic, literary, and even political propaganda. In a pinch it is easily diverted to illegal uses. Expensive "studies" required by our profitable economic operations can be legitimately financed through foundations.  

To the middle classes, however, income tax makes life into an endless treadmill. Even the most productive find themselves unable to accumulate significant capital. They are forced into the clutches of our Central Bank entourage for injections of the inflationary credit which we are privileged to create out of nothing. The self-financing wealth of the legendary 19th Century robber barons and early Twentieth Century tycoons is no longer possible. Although your grandfather owed his start to just those wide-open conditions, he was among the first of the super-rich to advocate the erection of the tax wall that is now in place. Please note that in democratic countries eternal vigilance is required to prevent our tax shield from being riddled with loop holes by conniving legislators, who are usually of the tax oppressed, upper-middle class origins themselves.  

2. Business Regulation ~ When upstarts slip through our financial tentacles and tax shields, perhaps with the aid of outsiders, a second line of defense becomes vital licensing in the crucial area of broadcasting has proven particularly necessary. This makes serious upstart-led mass political challenge impossible. Harassment by bureaucrats armed with arbitrary and voluminous industrial safety regulations is a new and increasingly effective technique. Security registration requirements, "to protect the small investor," can cause fatal delays in an upstart's ability to raise capital on the stock market. Ecological considerations are easily perverted to stymie the plans of those who would upset the stability of our carefully planned system.  

Anti-trust law, however, is our ultimate weapon. The handy doctrine of "pure and perfect" competition which we have fostered in our universities is ideally suited to convict any successful competitor, at our discretion. If the competitor charges a lower price than ours he is accused of "unfair competition" aimed at driving us from the field to impair future competition. If he asks the same price as we, he is open to the charge of collusion. If he charges more than us, he is obviously exploiting his "monopoly power" at the expense of the consumer. Fortunately, the rulings of our bureaucrats are so complicated that even when successfully appealed in court many years elapse before the ruling is rendered. By then our goals are often achieved through harassment.  

Product quality, safety, and testing regulations are excellent methods by which we insulate our established industries from potential competition. Beside raising the costs of entry into the auto business, for instance, the cost of "safety" can be passed to the consumer along with a healthy profit mark-up.  

3. Subsidies, Tariffs, and Foreign Aid ~ Although direct subsidies can occasionally be procured for our entourage of corporations by appealing to the masses' desire to preserve jobs, this exploitive technique is usually too obvious. Tariffs are easily passed, but lead to retaliation against our foreign holdings. Foreign aid and soft (sure to be defaulted) government guaranteed loans, however, fill the bill perfectly under modern conditions. Foreign aid maintains our empire of foreign dictators abroad while providing guaranteed, highly profitable sales to our corporations at home base. Foreign aid should always be contingent on the purchase of goods, usually military hardware, that only our entourage of firms can provide. Few have the courage to oppose such altruistic aid to the "starving masses" of the "third world."  

4. Centralization of Power ~ Real division of power between national, state, and local government is dangerous to our system. When local politicians have real autonomy, even in limited spheres, they can do much to enable upstarts to challenge our power. Our program is to bring all levels of government under our sway through such innovations as federal aid, revenue sharing, high federal taxation, and regional government.  

5. Alliance with the Lower Classes ~ In order to keep our valuable regulatory machinery in place and under our control we must have the mass support of the numerous lower classes against our vigorous, but scarce middle-class rivals. The best method is to provide the lower classes with subsidies at the expense of the middle class. This creates a mutual hatred that prevents the middle class from appealing effectively to the lower classes for support. Social security, free health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, while doing nothing for us directly, create a dependent class whose support for our critical measures can easily be made part of a package deal. Please note also that the major labor unions began with our financing and are led to this day by leaders of our choosing. No one can rise to or remain at the top of a rough and tumble union without our financial backing. In spite of their rebellious rhetoric, bought union leaders are the source of our power over the management of firms with widely held stock. Unions are the ultimate weapon for destroying otherwise invulnerable, self-financing rivals. Further, downward flexibility of wages and prices which obtains without widespread unionization would increase the ability of the economy to survive without our aid during the economic crises we create.  

Bread and circuses are as useful today as in Roman times for mobilizing the mob against our staid adversaries. Next, Professor D. will describe our education policies.  

7. Professor D. On The Role Of Public Education ~  

"In our dreams we have limitless resources and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hands. The present educational conventions fade from our minds, and unhampered by tradition, we work our good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk . . . The task we set before ourselves is a beautiful one, to train these people as we find them to a perfectly ideal life just as they are. So we will organize our children into a little community and teach them to do in a perfect way the things their fathers and mothers are doing in an imperfect way in the home, in shop, and on the farm."  --- The objective of Rockefeller "philanthropies" stated by him and Gates in Occasional Letter No. 1 of Rockefeller's General Education Board.  

"A general state education is a mere contrivance for molding people to be exactly like one another; and as the mold in which it casts them is that which pleases the predominant power in the government --- whether this be a monarch, a priesthood, an aristocracy, or the majority of the existing generation --- in proportion as it is efficient and successful, it establishes a despotism over the mind, leading by natural tendency to one over the body." --- John Stuart Mill  

In order to maintain our system of power, the institution of universal public education is indispensable. The anarchy of private education in which any manner of dangerous ideas could be spread cannot be tolerated. Thus we make private education financially impossible to all but the few mostly the elite offspring of our financial entourage, by means of burdensome taxation and regulation. The primary purpose of public education is to inculcate the idea that our crucial institutions of coercion and monopoly were created for the public good by popular national heroes to blunt the past power of the malefactors of great wealth. Crucial is to create the impression that, although the people have been exploited in the past, today the wealthy are at the mercy of an all-powerful government which is firmly in the hands of the people or do-gooding liberals.  

For those of more sophistication who reject this Pollyanna view of reality, we promote the "liberal reformer mentality" which holds that a new era of reform is on the verge of crushing forever the last vestiges of money lordism. Of course, the reforms, after taking shape as a bewildering myriad of regulatory agencies and taxes, are found to be ineffective in subordinating our power to the popular will, whereupon we stir up another era of progressive reform.  

Our contrived Left-Right spectrum which our compulsory education helps to make universal is valuable in assuring that this charade does not get out of hand. The Pollyannas in the middle are neither dangerous nor useful in this endeavor. What is needed is a feeble, but persistent right-conservatism to moderate and emasculate the liberal reforms. Conservatives tend to resist all the advances in centralized, government power that we lead the liberals to see as necessary in order to totally end the "undemocratic" power of money in society. Conservatism would rather promote a "pluralism" of competing interests in which money is the medium of competition than risk the excesses of "big government," When "liberal" reforms show signs of exceeding our intentions and actually threaten to place our key institutions in the hands of the people, we can always count on the conservatives to defend our power under the illusion that they are defending the legitimate rights of "free-enterprise capitalists." On the rare occasions when conservatives call for subjecting our enterprises to laissez-faire competition, we can count on the dominant liberal reformers to insist on more government interference, unaware of our desire for such, in effect, self-administered regulation.  

The Right has such a fear of the Left's dream of democratic collectivism and the Left such a hatred for what it sees as the Right's elitist, rugged individualism that there is little danger that they will ever join forces to overturn our government-backed monopolies even though we violate the ideals of both left and right.  

Centralization of control at the state, or preferably national level, assists in building the climate of opinion we require in public education. Failing to obliterate local control, other methods nearly as effective are available. Our overwhelming financial clout in the publishing industry can induce relatively uniform textbook selection. Further leverage can be created by promoting teacher colleges and teaching machines. National teacher's associations and unions are also an excellent power base from which to foster our programs of indoctrination.  

With our great influence in publishing and publicity we are able to, selectively popularize educational theorists whose views are incidentally beneficial, compatible, or at least not in conflict with our own goals. This way we obtain sincere, energetic activists to propagate our desires without having to reveal our motives or even existence. We do not want an educational system that produces hard-driving individuals bent on amassing great wealth and power. Therefore, we discourage education that would develop the potential powers of students to their fullest. "Liberal" education that stresses knowledge for its own sake or even sophistry and sterile mental gymnastics is of no danger to us. "Relevant," vocational, or career-oriented education also poses no danger to our power. Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal. Progressive education with its stress on "social adjustment" also produces the conformity we require of our subjects. Emphasis on competitive sports may produce a certain amount of disruptive competitiveness among the participants, but primarily has the effect of creating life-long voyeuristic spectators who will enthusiastically sublimate their competitiveness into endless hours of following college and professional sports on the boob tube. Space spectaculars and dramatic political infighting are also marvelous diversions with which to occupy the masses.  

Anyone seeking social change will gravitate to the field of education. Our strategy is simple: Let only those succeed whose influence would be compatible with our power. Encourage all who would develop the passive or receptive mode of existence. Discourage all who promote the aggressive or active capacities. Build a great cult of salvation through endless education, touting it as the "democratic" path to success Deride the frontal approach to success of the "outmoded' rugged individualist.  

Before yielding the floor to Professor X., who will discuss the role of secret societies and prestigious clubs, I would like to comment on the demise of religious education as a vehicle for social control. Religion, in its time, was a remarkable weapon for inculcating subservience, altruism, and self-abnegation among our subjects. We did not give up this weapon voluntarily. Your grandfather, for one, supported the Baptist faith well after most finance capitalists had turned wholly to secular ideologies. However, a trend toward rationality in human affairs plods along inexorably quite outside the reach of our power. Only in our totalitarian dictatorships can this trend be quashed entirely. In the semi-open societies in which our money power is based, the forces of reason can only be impeded and diverted. Some have theorized that, eventually, widespread rational egoism will overturn our order. I am confident that secular faiths and just plain confusion will suffice to sustain our power for many centuries to come.  

8. Professor X. On Prestigious Associations And Secret Societies ~  

"Every compulsion is put upon writers to become safe, polite, obedient, and sterile. In protest, I declined election to the National Institute of Arts and Letters some years ago, and now I must decline the Pulitzer Prize." --- Upton Sinclair  

"It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal, that a great part of Europe--the whole of Italy and France and a great portion of Germany, to say nothing of other countries--is covered with a network of these secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered with railroads." --- Benjamin Disraeli (Earl of Beaconsfield), July 14, 1856  

In preserving and protecting our grasp on nations we must exert veiled control of all major opinion molding associations and especially prestigious clubs which attract the leaders in various fields and do so much to influence the dispensing of commanding positions in government and business. Associations of the leading scholars, businessmen, writers, religionists, artists, bureaucrats, newsmen, ideologists, publishers, broadcasters, and professional men as well as special interest groups representing laborers, farmers, consumers, racial minorities, and so on must be subtly kept under the broad limits of our sway. Since membership dues and fees are never sufficient to support their ambitious activities, voluntary, non-profit organizations are easy prey for the nearly unlimited financial resources of our entourage. However, our real motive, to further our political and economic power, must not be revealed in the process. Our policies must be laboriously rationalized in terms compatible with prevalent ideologies and moralities or the material advantage of the groups involved. Leaders of such groups are remarkably quick to accept our rationalizations when financial support is extended. We engage in outright bribery only as a last resort, and then, only in extreme cases. Our long-range interests are better served by temporarily postponing a policy victory than by risking exposure of our power by attempting outright bribery. In fact, clumsy bribery and intimidation attempts are characteristic of our foolish nouveau-riche opponents.  

As an example, if we decide that federal rather than state chartering or licensing of corporations would further our control over the economy, we would not simply order politicians and opinion leaders to support our desires. Corporations not relishing central control would be suspicious that something was afoot and might expose our plot. Our strategy would be as follows:  

1. Sacrifice one of our less competent management teams in a well-publicized corporate scandal in order to focus attention on the "widespread problem of corporate corruption under current, lax regulations."  

2. Through well-funded agents, thrust into the publicity spotlight intellectuals or groups who already support federal licensing as a piecemeal step toward socialism. (One can find pre-existing supporters for nearly any measure with sufficient effort.)  

3. After the issue is before the public, offer to support through foundations the "objective" study of the federal licensing proposals being discussed with an eye toward proposing legislation. Often, simultaneous support for studies by disreputable, irrational groups who will oppose the proposal is useful as well. Provide no platform for
well-reasoned opposition.  

4. When a ground swell of support appears to be building provide the interested lobbying organizations with plenty of funds to grease the palms of politicians. The enactment of the federal licensing law thus appears as the will of society. Last-ditch opposition automatically appears mean spirited, obstructionist, reactionary, and paranoid, serving only to discredit our opposition.  

In our fully developed system of finance capitalist thought control and promotion control, our hierarchy of prestigious associations is capped by a single prestige society: The Council of World Affairs. This organization is a front for the secret society of which your father is head. This secret society is made up of the people who have spoken, plus six others not present. You are replacing Professor Q. who is to retire shortly. Eventually you will replace your father. We thirteen are your father's advisors and only confidants. All other agents are misled as to the bulk of our objectives and motives. Their knowledge is restricted to the details required by their assignments. The penalty for disloyalty is death.  

The Council is invaluable for propagating our policy decisions to our entourage without revealing our motives and strategy. In many instances, policy can he successfully sold to our entourage and thus transmitted to the multitudes by merely airing it along with appropriate rationalizations in a single awe-inspiring session of the Council. The informal power of the Council is such that our policy manipulations are usually attainable without the clumsy exercises in brute power that invariably snag the independent power seekers. The Council is at the heart of what is called the Establishment and we are at the heart of the Council.  

At the Council's inception, we worked hard to attract the successful of all fields with all the prestige that our money power could buy. We had to work hard convincing the independent, self-made Council members to move in harmony with our policy objectives. We had many failures. Now everything is changed. Membership is no longer a reward for success as much as it is a prerequisite for major success. Without Council membership only the most outstanding can achieve national prominence. With membership, glaring mediocrities, with the "right" attitudes, achieve prominence. In fact, mediocrities are much more adapted to propagating our policy rationalizations and less likely to detect and oppose our ulterior motives. A power lusting mediocrity is not likely to judge his benefactors too harshly or inquire diligently into the nature of the power structure that brought him what he fears was undeserved success. The vanity of even idealistic, committed humanitarians militates against such a course.  

The Council is now a giant employment agency of loyalists ready to parrot our public line from the commanding posts of government, foundations, broadcasting, industry, banking, and publishing. Although Council members are encouraged to take sides and bicker over the diversionary issues we create to entertain and enfeeble the populace, their solidarity in defending our power structure, root and branch, when pressed is a sight to behold! And to think that most see themselves as righteous defenders of the public good while they dismiss whispered rumors of our power structure as "kooky paranoia."  

Classical secret societies with elaborate circles within circles no longer play a major role in finance capitalist power structures. Most wide membership secret societies have degenerated into middle class excuses for escaping the wife and kids once a month for the company of men. But secret societies were a major weapon of our bourgeoisie forebearers in their struggle with the old feudal order of kings and princes. Under authoritarian despotism of the old style, the secret society was the only place a free-thinking man could express himself. Through threats of exposure, loyalty oaths, patronage, deception, and rewards we bound such malcontents into a fierce force for our revolution. The multitude of degrees, occult mumbo-jumbo, and vague humanitarianism concealed the real goals of our secret societies from the bulk of the membership. The roles of the "Illuminated" Masonic Lodges in European revolutions were decisive in our final victory over the old order.  

I now yield the floor to Professor Y. who will discourse on the real "secret societies" the Modern Finance Capitalist State:  the National Security Institutions and Intelligence Agencies.  

9. Professor Y. On Covert Operations And Intelligence ~  

In our fully developed state-capitalist systems we have found absolute control of governmental intelligence gathering and covert operations to be vital.  

Besides providing a valuable tool in our struggle with rival dynasties, such control is now an integral and necessary part of our day-to-day operations. Large intelligence communities are inevitable, given the system of all encompassing governments which we have imposed upon the world during our ascent to power. Our power would be short-lived indeed if the pervasive influence and power of these iron-disciplined intelligence agencies fell into the hands of mere politicians, especially those beyond our control.  

We do not allow intelligence agencies to pursue the "national interest," the way the public conceives "spies" to operate. Politicians cannot be permitted to divert the power and influence of our intelligence community from the esoteric requirements of our Money Power to petty political struggles.  

Neither nationalistic aspirations of races and peoples nor ideological visions of intellectuals for humanity can be allowed to pervert intelligence and covert operations. Our rationalizations, both within the intelligence community and to the public at large, must be diverse and flexible, but the intelligence community must further without exception the inexorable goals we have set for humanity.  

No crisis is more serious for our Money Power than an attempt by a head of government to assume personal control of intelligence and operations or to by-pass existing agencies by setting up parallel ones. Such intrusions must be met decisively. Although a contrived scandal to remove the offending politician from office is the first line of defense, we dare not shrink from assassination when necessary.  

Perhaps the most accurate overview of our intelligence community can be achieved by visualizing it as a "nationalized secret society." Our predecessors, in their struggle against the old order of kings and princes, had to finance secret societies such as the Illuminati, Masons, German Union, etc. out of their own pockets.  

At great expense and risk such secret societies were able to infiltrate the major governmental and private institutions of the nations that our noble predecessors targeted for take over by the Money Power. Such bureaucratic takeovers are expensive and time consuming. They can be considered complete only when promotions, raises, and advancements are no longer based on objective service to the stated organizational objectives, but are in the hands of the infiltrating group and its secret goals.  

How much easier it is for us, the inheritors of a fully developed state-capitalist system! By appealing to "national security" we are able to finance and erect secret societies of a colossal scope, far beyond the wildest dreams of our path breaking predecessors. Besides the benefits of public financing reaped by these "nationalized secret societies," we obtain a decisive advantage from the fact that these our "spook" operations are sanctioned by law!  

Maintaining discipline, loyalty, and secrecy is no longer solely a matter of propaganda, blackmail, patronage, and intimidation. Although these remain important tools, especially in emergency cases, ordinary discipline among initiates (now called agents) can be encouraged by appealing to patriotism and can be enforced in courts of law by prosecuting "national security violations."  

As massive as our intelligence community has become in itself, we still operate strictly on the finance capitalist principle of leverage. Just as a rational finance capitalist never owns more stock in a corporation than the bare minimum required for control, intelligence operatives are placed only in as many key positions as are required to control the target organizations. Our goal, after all, is agent control of all significant organizations, not intelligence community member ship for the entire population.  

The organizational pattern of baffling "circles within circles," characteristic of classical secret societies, is retained and refined by our intelligence community. That "one hand not know what the other is doing" is essential to the success of our operations. In most cases, we do not allow the operatives themselves to know the ultimate, and when possible, even the short-range objectives of their assignments.  

They operate under "covers" that disguise our goals not only from the public and target groups, but from the agents themselves. For instance, many agents operating under "left cover" are led to believe that the agency, or at least their department, is secretly, but sincerely motivated by socialistic ideology. Thus, they assume that the intelligence agency's ultimate goal is to guide left-wing groups in "productive" directions, even though they cannot always see how their own assignment fits into those assumed goals.  

Other "left-cover" agents, those with right-wing predilections, are encouraged to believe the agency is simply "monitoring" violence prone, subversive groups in order to protect the public. When such agents are asked to participate in or even lead radical activity they assume that the ultimate objective is to fully infiltrate and destroy the organization for the good of the country. This is very seldom the case. We waste little or no money protecting the "public" or defending the "nation."  

Agents operating under "right-cover" are handled in symmetrical fashion. Agents with right-wing prejudices are encouraged to believe the agency is right-wing. Left-prejudiced agents are asked to operate under "right-cover" in order to "monitor" dangerous rightist organizations. Most intelligence agents remain blithely ignorant of the big picture which is so clear to us from our spectacular vantage point. Very few have enough information or intelligence to reason out how their specific and sometimes baffling assignments promote the legislative, judicial, operational and propaganda needs of our Money Power. Most would never try. They are paid too much to think about such things.  

Agents with a "gangster-cover" are of two types. First, there is the sincere gangster that draws his salary from an intelligence agency. He is led to believe that the gangland "Godfathers" control the government agency for their own purposes. Actually, the situation is the opposite. The agency controls the gangster for other purposes. Second, is the sincere crime fighter who is led to believe that the agency is at tempting to infiltrate and monitor the gangsters as a preliminary step to destroying organized crime. Such "upstanding" agents commit many crimes in their zeal to rid the country of organized crime!  

To envision how we operate in this lucrative field, let's briefly look at the mechanics of dope smuggling. Police and customs officials are told to leave certain gangsters alone, even when transporting suspicious cargoes. This is made to seem perfectly proper since it is well known that secret police infiltrators of organized crime must participate in crimes in order to gain the confidence of gangsters.  

What customs agent would want to upset a carefully laid plan to "set-up" the underworld kingpins of dope pushing! But the agent, as well as the police who cooperate, are mistaken in believing that the purpose of the assignment to help smuggle dope is ultimately to smash organized crime. If he could see the big picture, as we can, the agent would see that practically all our dope is smuggled by federal intelligence agents and secret police! How ever could such a volume be transported safely? Real harassment and prosecution is reserved for those who enter the field without our approval.  

Here is our organized crime strategy: On the one hand we pass laws to ensure that mankind's favorite pastimes (vices) are illegal. On the other hand, we cater to these "vices" at a huge monopoly profit with complete immunity from prosecution.  

A new and growing methodology of our intelligence community is psychologically and drug-controlled agents. Properly, these are referred to as "behavior modified" agents, or, in the vernacular, "zombies." With the use of hypnotic drugs, brain washing, sensory deprivation, small group "sensitivity" training, and other behavior modification techniques, the scope of which was hinted in the movie "Clockwork Orange," complete personalities can be manufactured from scratch, to the specifications of value structure profiles we design by computer to suit our purposes. Such personalities are quite neurotic and unstable due to defects in our still developing technology, but still useful for many purposes.  

The primary virtue of "zombies," of course, is loyalty. Agents that are subconsciously programmed for the assignment at hand cannot be conscious traitors. All a "zombie" can do is reveal how compulsive and psychotic he is with regard to his "cause." Even to trained psychologists he simply appears to be the proverbial "lone nut." Although the "zombie" may have memories of psychotherapy at a government agency when questioned under hypnosis, this is unlikely to raise suspicion in the mind of court-appointed psychologists. After all, "lone nuts" should be kept in insane asylums and subjected to psychotherapy! At most, the government hospital will be reprimanded for letting a loony loose before he was cured.  

Until our techniques can be perfected the use of "zombies" must be restricted to "national dramas" designed to justify the growing power of our centralized governments over the lives of our people. Most suicidal radicals and "crazies" who so mysteriously avoid arrest for years at a time are "zombies" conditioned to terrorize the public in the name of some irrational ideology. After repeated doses of such terror, the public is conditioned to accept the necessity of our intrusive police state with very little objection.  

The way is clear for an accelerated program of behavior modification research to be conducted mostly at public expense in the name of mental health and rehabilitation. Such research can be conducted with little complaint in prisons, refugee camps, drug rehabilitation centers, government hospitals, veterans hospitals, and even public schools and day care centers. Mental institutions, methadone maintenance centers, and prisons are fertile fields for recruiting the deranged or drug-addicted persons most suitable for "zombie" conversions. Of course, only a few of our most trusted agents actually participate in the creation of "zombies." The brilliant researchers and experimenters who make most of the breakthroughs earnestly believe that their techniques are destined strictly for the betterment of mankind.  

Inevitably, a fraction of the population objects to behavior modification as an infringement of man's "sacred" free will even if they are convinced that our intentions are benign. We carefully leak a few scandals to satisfy such persons that our experiments are being kept within bounds and that excesses are being stopped. Our artificial scandals exposing the "excesses" of coercive psychology are carefully designed to make the researchers seem incompetent and clumsy to the point of maiming and killing their "patients." This effectively conceals the fantastic strides we have made toward total behavioral control. Great things are going to be possible in the future.  

I now return the floor to your father for his concluding remarks.  

10. My Closing Remarks ~  

My son, you surely have many questions about my strategy in the seemingly momentous economic and political crises that are shaking national and international affairs. You and I will begin handling them in detail shortly. For tonight, let me be brief. Most of the current national upheavals are stage-managed to consolidate our monopoly position in government and business against the continual nuisance of economically competent, but politically naive competitors. Likewise, most international crises are managed to exert pressure on our obstreperous, reluctant puppet dictators in underdeveloped areas. These events are fairly easy to manage. I expect to place such management in your hands as soon as possible.  

The real challenge lies in dealing with my international peers. These are the real crises since they are crises of my power structure, not just of my subject populations and puppets. In the vast chess game with my peers there are no rules and no proven tactics. Mutual vulnerability, alone, limits the conflict. My peers and I have labored for decades to erect a world government and banking system under which we could all share finance capitalism's millennium without the nightmare of internecine warfare. With the advent of nuclear war a new world order seemed particularly desirable. I say ostensibly we have labored for world government because none of us are sure the others will ever voluntarily surrender sovereignty to the group. The schedule set after the last World War has not been met. So far, the world government idea has served mainly to enthuse collectivist intellectuals, and secondarily to veil each finance capitalist's maneuvers for supremacy from the rest.  

The future course of finance capitalism is difficult to predict. Our empires are too fragile to risk all-out battles for supremacy among ourselves. Our power would dissipate to second echelon wealthy during the struggle. Yet we continue to chip away at rival empires on the premise that offense is the best defense. On the other hand, purely political leaders are helpless before our money power. When Caesars arise, they are of our making.  

Perhaps our system will simply remain much as it is, secure on the national level and disturbingly pluralistic at the international level, until reason and egoism have developed among our populations to such an extent that our occult technology of money power becomes obvious to all who think and must yield to either anarchy or a more advanced form of deception.  

11. Afterword By The Transcriber ~  

"The names of some of these banking families are familiar to all of us and should be more so. They include Baring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Seligman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Mallet, Fould, and above all Rothschild and Morgan." --- Dr. Carroll Quigley: "Tragedy and Hope"  

Any resemblance of these characters to persons living or dead is purely coincidental. Any resemblance of their methodology to that of real ruling elites is purely intentional. The extent to which I represent or exaggerate the self-conscious, intentional power technology of real politico-economic rulers and their unity is for the reader to decide after studying available empirical evidence.  

I am providing a bibliography of relevant historical works to aid the curious reader. I have included no works written from spurious pluralistic suppositions no one seems to consider pluralism as a proposition requiring evidence since they are flooding the market. Unfortunately, many works listed affirm that ideas rather than individual struggles for wealth and power propel history; that is, they view the elites they observe ruling the world as ideologically motivated. Thus we have the spectacle of the Right claiming that major finance capitalists such as the Rockefellers or Rothschilds are "communist" conspirators or "socialists." On the other hand, we see the Left claiming that the same people are bent on imposing laissez -faire capitalism, or in a slightly more realistic vein, are fanatical proponents of fascism. Virulent white racism is another ideology foolishly ascribed to the ruling class by the Left. This opinion is nicely balanced by the charge from the Right that the elite wants to "mongrelize" and thus submerge the white race. As usual the elite, completely free of prejudice, supports both sides of this battle for its own ends.  

As should be clear by now, I believe that finance capitalists (Ferdinand Lundberg has dubbed them finpols, or financial politicians) are understandably attempting to make their power as extensive as possible without incurring the severe risks which plague pubpols (public politicians). (It seems that only the most daring finpols are willing to take on the additional risks of pubpoldom, perhaps only because they are denied the reins to the family's fortune by more privileged relatives.) Pubpols lose their privacy and thus their right to sexual impropriety in addition to incurring vulnerability to electioneering and worse in "democratic" countries. In most areas of the world the lot of the pubpols is even worse. Purge, assassination, and armed coup are regular events. While totalitarianism of Right or Left at home eliminates the shield of secure private property desired by finpols, laissez--faire is likewise rejected out-of-hand as hell-on-earth by enlightened power-seekers.  

Egoism, mitigated only by the reality of circumstance, is the motive to realistically attribute to healthy elites. An elite under the spell of mental spooks could not hold sway for long. Although finpol statism is increasingly a crisis for its victims, there is as yet no evidence that the elite itself is in serious crisis. Even inflation, the current crisis for the powerless, is simply another crisis to be managed toward the end of consolidating, extending, and refreshing elite power. No doubt the depression which must inevitably follow will be managed to even better effect at the expense of the masses.  

I have classified the bibliography into the categories Right and Left. In each list I begin with the most objective works and proceed to the works most infected with mental spooks and emotional hysteria. These books should be read for empirical data, not theoretical insight. A list of less ideologically biased works is provided as well. I quote and recommend authors, not to imply support for my scenario where there is none, but to credit a few of those who have provided grist for my thoughts.  


"We are much beholden to Machiavelli and others, that write what men do, and not what they ought to do." --- Francis Bacon  

Indispensable Thoughts on History, Economics, Politics, Philosophy, and Human Nature: 

Murray  N. Rothbard: Economic Determinism and the Conspiracy Theory of History Revisited; Audio-Forum.  

Nash: America's Great Depression;1972.  

Carroll Quigley: Tragedy and Hope; Macmillan, 1966  

Gabriel Kolko: The Triumph of Conservatism; Quadrangle  

Carroll Quigley: The Evolution of Civilizations.  

Anton S. LaVey: The Satanic Bible; Avon Books, 1969.  

Arkon Daraul: Secret Societies; Citadel Press, 1962.  

Count Egon Caesar Corti: The Rise of the House of Rothschild; ibid.,  The Reign of the House of Rothschild; Cosmopolitan Book Corp., 1928.  

Max Stirner: The Ego and His Own; Libertarian Book Club, 1963.  

Robert Ardrey: The Social Contract; Dell Publishing; 1970.  

Friedrich Nietzsche: Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future; Random House, 1966.  

George Orwell: Animal Farm; New American Library  

Niccolo Machiavelli: The Prince.  

Ludwig von Mises: Theory and History; Arlington House, 1969.  

Henry Regnery: Human Action; 1966.  

James J. Martin: Revisionist Viewpoints; Ralph Myles Publisher, 1971.  

Committee on Government Operations, U.S. Senate: Disclosure of Corporate Ownership; U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974.  

Antony  C. Sutton: Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution; ibid., Wall Street and FDR; Arlington House, 1975.  

The Left on the Ruling Class: 

Gabriel Kolko: The Triumph of Conservatism; Quadrangle Books, 1967.  

Richard Ney: The Wall Street Gang; Praeger Publishers, 1974.  

Ferdinand Lundberg: The Rich and the Super-Rich; Lyle Stuart, 1968.  

Ferdinand Lundberg: America's 60 Families; Vanguard, 1938.  

William G. Domhoff: Who Rules America?; Prentice Hall, 1967.  

W.G. Domhoff: The Higher Circles; Random House, 1970.  

Matthew Josephson: Money Lords; New American Library, 1973.  

M. Josephson: The Robber Barons; Harcourt Brace & Co., 1934.  

George H. Shibley: The Money Question; Stable Money Publishing Co., 1896.  

Jules Archer: The Plot to Seize the White House; Hawthorn Books, 1973.  

William Hoffman: David: Report on a Rockefeller; Dell Publishing, 1972.  

Joel Andreas: The Incredible Rocky; North American Congress on Latin America, 1973.  

Gustavus Myers: The History of the Great American Fortunes; 1907  

The Right on the Conspiracy Theory of History: 

Antony  C. Sutton: National Suicide; Arlington House, 1973.  

Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr.: The Economic Pinch; Dorrance & Company, Inc., 1923, Reprinted by Omni Publications.  

Louis T. McFadden: Collective Speeches of Congressman McFadden; Omni Publications, 1970.  

H.S. Kenan: The Federal Reserve Bank; The Noontide Press, 1968.  

Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy; Concord Press, 1973.  

G. Allen: Richard Nixon: The Man Behind the Mask; Western Islands, 1971.  

G. Allen: The Rockefeller File; '76 Press, 1976.  

Dan Smoot: The Invisible Government; The Dan Smoot Report, Inc., 1962.  

W. Cleon Skousen: The Naked Capitalist; The Author, 1970.  

Taylor Caldwell: Captains and Kings; Fawcett Publications, 1973.  

John Robison: Proofs of Conspiracy; 1798, Reprinted by Western Islands.  

Nesta Webster: Secret Societies and Subversive Movements; Christian Book Club, 1967.  

A. N. Field: The Truth About the Slump; 1931, Reprinted by Omni Publications, 1962.  

William Robert Plumme: The Untold History; The Committee for the Restoration of the Republic, 1964.  

June Grem: Karl Marx: Capitalist; Enterprise Publications, 1972.  

Emanuel Josephson: Rockefeller Internationalist: Man Who Misrules the World; Chedney Press, 1962.  

Article #21

The TRUTH about Democracy.


By Jah




Winston Churchill said many years ago, that democracy is the least bad of all of the systems of government produced out of human experience. 

Winston Churchill is also quoted as having once said: "Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." Just as a bell that has been rung cannot be "unrung," the annoying problem with the Truth is that, once you learn it, you can not "unlearn" it.


Democracy, which has become the Cure-all Mantra, quoted incessantly by all western politicians, is a LIE and a confidence-trick, that they and their puppet-masters are now trying to deceive the rest of the world with, and are using their economic and/or military-muscle and means to force other nations to adopt, so that their puppet-masters can use the politicians to help them to rip-off all the other nations too, just as they have done already to the vast majority of their own citizens.

It is very simple to see that democracy is a lie and a confidence-trick. All you have to do is analyse what it is supposed to be and then compare that definition to the reality.

Democracy is supposed to be the rule of the majority. Government of the majority of the people, for the majority of the people, by the majority of the people.

Let us now compare the smooth deceptive definition, to stark reality.

In the western world approximately 95% of the wealth is possessed by approximately 5% of the people. That means, using these same figures, that 95% of the people, the overwhelming majority, possess only 5% of the wealth.

The politicians would have us all believe that this is the will of the majority. That is the politician's idea of what they call democracy.

When did the 95% of people, the overwhelming majority, ever vote for the right for themselves to be poor and vote for the tiny 5% minority to possess their own (the poor people's) share of the nation's wealth, that the poor majority's ancestors have fought and died to protect?

The Ruler of the Universe has prohibited democracy because He knew that the rich would use it and other means to deceive and rip everyone else off; keep the majority down and poor; just as He wrote, via His Prophets in The Bible.

He gave the world, via Moses, the perfectsystem of government, under which there is no poverty; no poor people and consequently no need to resort to crime to survive.

He prohibited the writing of laws and economic policies by humans, in order to protect the majority from abuse, and oppression created under the home-made laws of the rich and powerful. 


Deuteronomy 17:14 When thou art come unto the land which the "I AM" thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that [are] about me;
17:15 Thou shalt in any wise set [him] king over thee, whom the "I AM" thy God shall choose: [one] from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger (a Gentile) over thee, which [is] not thy brother.
17:16 But he shall not multiply horses to himself, nor cause the people to return to Egypt (slavery - employment under man-made laws), to the end that he should multiply horses: forasmuch as the "I AM" hath said unto you, Ye shall henceforth return no more that way.
17:17 Neither shall he multiply wives to himself, that his heart turn not away: neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold.
17:18 And it shall be, when he sitteth upon the throne of his kingdom, that he shall write him a copy of this Law in a book out of [that which is] before the priests the Levites (The Torah):
17:19 And it shall be with him, and he shall read therein all the days of his life: that he may learn to fear the "I AM" his God, to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes, to DO them:
17:20 That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren, and that he turn NOT aside from the Commandment (The Covenant), [to] the right hand (right-wing politics), or [to] the left (left-wing politics): to the end that he may prolong [his] days in his kingdom, he, and his children, in the midst of Israel. 


Many people can see the Democracy (demon-crazy) Deception and refuse to vote, so the wily politicians made-up special rules to allow themselves to rule using only a majority of the votes, even when the number of people who vote is only a minority of the population. How can that possibly be conceived to be the rule of the majority? Of course it is not the rule of the majority; it is a confidence-trick.

Those who can see the deception, unfortunately do not know what to do about the confidence trick; because they do not study; understand and apply the teachings of The Bible, having been deceived yet again by the misinterpretations of the churches, who work with, and are part of, the political-system; and so just watch the puppets* dancing on their strings, not knowing how to cut those strings forever.

The Ruler of the Universe pre-warned you about all of this in The Bible and that you are not "a law unto yourselves" and that if you will not live by His Law, in prosperity and peace, then you will die by His Law, either, during Armageddon, or, shortly after, during "The Reaping".

Unfortunately the lunatics have taken-over and are running this asylum, but The Law is still The Law, even if you decide to break it and the penalty, in this case, as you have all been told repeatedly, is death. It is not quite too late yet, to return to The Covenant; prosperity and freedom from oppression in The Torah; the five Books given to Moses:- Genesis; Exodus; Leviticus; Numbers and Deuteronomy, which are the first five Books in The Bible. 


* Losing Your Illusions.

A young child viewing a puppet show will sit happily entranced and fascinated by the animated, talking marionettes, believing that they are very much alive and real. One day, when the child is older, and sees the strings attached to the puppets for the very first time, the illusion is forever shattered. The child will always know that hidden hands control the lifeless puppets.

Most people living today have advanced into adulthood without ever having known of, or seen, the hidden hands controlling their systems of money, taxation, public education and social reform. The nearly invisible strings attached to the marionettes are well concealed, and the marionettes themselves - politicians; religious leaders; heads of colleges, scientists, foundations and think-tanks; media moguls and other officials held in general-esteem by the people - act so lifelike as to blend perfectly with their audience.

For the young child, the puppet-theatre is a small box with curtains, and the strings - usually transparent nylon fishing-line - rise up to the hands of loving parents and friendly neighbours.

For the adult, the "Virtual Puppet-theatre" is the controlled space between their ears. The space within which their belief-system can be manipulated - held entranced and fascinated - by puppet-masters directing cleverly crafted plays, dramas and crises, the plots to which the audience is told will unfold to their general benefit and to the endings which have already been written.

Invisible strings called beliefs rise up to hidden hands holding global-wealth and power. As long as the illusion can be maintained, the audience can be held spellbound. For them, the show is their reality.

Until, one day - they see the strings. 


Discovering The Truth. 


In speaking of the Truth, Henry David Thoreau once said: "Any Truth is better than make-believe ... rather than love, than money, than fame, give me Truth."

Yet Italian Renaissance statesman and political writer, Niccolo Machiavelli, wrote in The Prince, one of the most influential political works of all time, that governments are created to lie to the greatest number of people the greatest amount of the time.

And why do governments lie? Why, to cover up their previous lies in order to protect the perpetrators, of course.

But the Truth is a funny thing. You can distort it, you can even suppress it for a while. Sometimes you discover that it's been hiding in plain view all along. Eventually the Truth always comes out as unsealed records, and death-bed confessions reveal decades later what really happened.

But once in a while the lie, the fraud or hoax is exposed while the perpetrators are still alive, as is the case today, with this article.

What will you do now? What did Winston Churchill say? "Most people, sometime in their lives, stumble across truth. Most jump up, brush themselves off, and hurry on about their business as if nothing had happened." Until it is too late to do anything about it - JAH.

What do you think the rest of the world, who have been forced to adopt democracy, instead of The Covenant, are going to do when they find-out it doesn't work and that the West knew that, before it forced them to adopt it? And who are they going to quite rightly blame for all of their suffering? YOU. Then what will they do? Armageddon. 


Clinton’s Impeachment 




President Clinton's so-called impeachment trial was sure-proof that the lawyers and politicians of today have set up separate laws for themselves and for everyone else. If any person not in government was proven to have lied under oath in court as president Clinton has, they would be instantly locked up in prison for perjury, so how did Clinton get away with it? Obviously modern politics and law has one set of laws for the rich (lawyers and politicians) and another for everyone else. By not only letting this injustice happen but by also encouraging it, the American people have proven to the whole world that they think that it's alright for their leader to commit adultery and lie to them and the rest of the world, which makes all American people look, to the rest of the world, to be nothing but liars and adulterers and as long as they are making money they don't care.

How can anyone trust or believe anything Bill Clinton or any American says now, after he has been proven beyond any doubt to be guilty of lying to the whole world under oath, and the so-called highest court of 'law' in America found him not guilty. It is supposed to be a court of law but in a court the jury has to vote on the evidence, not for their own political party or position. This makes the trial a farce and every peace-treaty and agreement that Clinton and the Americans have signed with other nations to be of no effect because he, through his own actions, and the people through theirs have proven their word to be of absolutely no value. A man is only as good as his word and a country is only as good as its leader (or more accurately, a country gets the leader it deserves). . . . 

Please "Click Here" to view complete article.  


Christ’s Opinion of Lawyers, Politicians and Priests...  


23:1 Then spoke Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples (the Apostles),
23:2 Saying, The lawyers and the politicians sit in Moses' [Law] seat:
23:3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe [of God's Law], [that] observe and do; but do not ye after their example: for they say, and do not (and make up their own laws against God's Orders - Deut. 4:2).
23:4 For they bind heavy burdens (the Talmud) and grievous to be borne, and lay [them] on men's shoulders; but they [themselves] will not lift one of their fingers to remove them.
23:5 But all their works they do for to be seen by men: they make broad their phylacteries (small leather box containing Old Covenant- Testament texts, worn to remind them to keep The Law [God's Law]), and enlarge the borders of their garments,
23:6 And love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the churches,
23:7 And greetings in the markets, and to be called by men, Priest, Rabbi, Imam, etc. (the church and the state were one at that time)
23:8 But be not YE (which included the Twelve Apostles who were also there) called priest (etc.): for One is your Teacher, [even] Christ; and all ye are brethren.
23:9 And call NO [man] your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.
23:10 Neither be ye called masters: for one is your Master, [even] Christ.
23:11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant.
23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
23:13 But woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye shut up the Kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither allow ye them that are entering to go in (see Enoch 93:4 - 101:6 in the "King of kings' Bible" - by JAH, which also includes God's Holy Koran).
23:14 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
23:15 Woe unto you, lawyers and politicians, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one convert, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell-fire than yourselves. 


2000 Years and absolutely NOTHING has changed! 

Article #22

The 33rd Degree Freemason.


“I saw that superior orders were distributed from chiefs unknown to their executors. Those chiefs, in turn, obey a supreme and completely unknown authority whose orders must be carried out blindly by them.”


"It is unknown to the Australian people that John Winston Howard's first overseas trip after becoming Prime Minister of Australia was to receive his honours of becoming a 33rd degre Freemason."

Freemasonry is the most sinister and evil false-front for satanism
 that exists on the planet, and always has been. Those who founded Freemasonry knew that they would never convince a man or woman of common sense and decency to join their ranks if they knew the true facts about the satanic purpose of the organisation. So instead, they created two organisations in one (just as the Catholic Church if organised along the same lines). Thus it was based on a multi-tiered structure, much as the Great Pyramid of Giza is a multi-course structure composed of 203 courses of masonry (which of course is where they get their name). The lower levels would have to be attracted to the organisation for its perceived "goodness," a community-based organisation that strives for the betterment of the human race. Now this then is the first level of Masonry, and at this level it does perform these functions. I have worked with these low-level Mason (they're actually called "Porch Masons" because they never actually are admitted beyond the front door, the porch so to speak.), and they have always been a bunch of good men. Some of them actually service in their local churches in the higher levels of the laity there, and are outsnading pillars of their community.  


Unfortunately it is nearly impossible to convince a "Porch Mason" that they are being shamelessly used to give the organisation this shining white facade that the public only gets to see. Incidentally, these "Porch Masons" are the first three degrees in the Masonic hierarchy. So this is the first level of Freemasonry, and they are involved in all sorts of so-called community relations from Rotary, Apex, running whole retirement villages (one of their specialties), as well as the regular Lodge meetings held in all towns and villages all over the planet. 


But it is at the higher levels, above the 3rd degree, that the real evil of the organisation manifests itself. Gradually, as members are tested in various secret ways, it becomes clear who will be susceptible to enter into the higher, satanic, degrees. Bribery and blackmail form the essential weapons that are used to lure and entrap those men who neter into dark and sinister places "where angels fear to tread." Of course only the higher active Masons will know the important decrees above the third.  


The Frightful Oath


As those who are more susceptible to evil are recognised in the organisation, they are advanced up the ladder. But they have to take “the frightful oath,” as the following material from Dissipation of the Darkness: History of the Origin of Masonry, reveals: 


“My Brothers: I have no doubt of your sincerity and affection. We know that your respective functions are in direct relationship with the Jewish religion and nation, with the country and the king; for that reason we must bind ourselves by on oath that each one of us must take in the presence of the others. 


I have composed its text and I have called it the FRIGHTFUL OATH. I will be the first to take it. I will read its formula to you before taking it officially, so you may approve it if it seems complete to you. 


And the King began the reading of the text of the Oath. … 


The King continued. Brothers: you have seen that this Oath is horrifying, frightful. Each one of us must mediate on it before taking it, for oath binds the Founder with chains of steel. It chains him to the brotherhood, it chains him to the fundamental principles whether they be innocent or corrupt. It chains him with obedience to the orders and decrees of the commission and with the fulfilment of everything decreed, good as well as bad. It obliges him to attack the Impostor's men and to kill them in any way possible. It obliges him to be a perfect guardian of the decrees of the Association, even in front of his own sons, except the one who will be the trustee as heir to the secret. Just as he is obliged to carry out orders to kill, so also he is obliged with respect to the divulgence of something prohibited, that the Association judges expedient for the preservation of the Jewish religion. He is even obliged to sacrifice everything dear to him to serve its principles. … 


Dear Brothers: Each association must have a private see where its active members meet. This hall, where we have realized our fundamental meetings, will not serve for our secret meetings. We must install a see that will be called the Lodge of Jerusalem. This Lodge must be located in a hidden corridor where no one will see us nor hear our decrees. I take this opportunity to call your attention to an affair of utmost importance. We have said that we must increase our Association until thousands of people join, thus increasing our strength. But if it should come to be known that this Association has been founded at this time, it will cause fear and reaction, and consequently, the alienation of a part of the people, especially in these critical times in which the revolution of that Impostor continues increasing its strength. We nine are the cornerstone of this splendid edifice which is "The Mysterious Force." Let us consider, then, the instruments for the construction of this edifice. Let us saturate ourselves with the grandeur of our mission in this political and religious work that would not exist if it were not for us, for without masons and instruments there is no edifice. Obviously, we are the reason for the existence of this edifice. I desire, and I ask that you accept with me, the making of this edifice the most magnificent of palaces. And how? With Occultism. And what does this Occultism mean? 


Listen: The best means of making our association, besides grand and important, exciting, is to hide the date of its foundation, the names of its founders, our names, from every affiliate, whoever he may be. These secrets will be guarded by the nine of us and each one of us will pass it on as an inheritance to one of our sons, the most serious, the most secretive, when he reaches 21 years of age. His own brothers must know nothing. 


With this legend we will hide the date of the foundation and the goal of the Association. This will be our principal weapon. Occultism will be a disguised even for our brothers although they reach the highest of degrees; in regard to these degrees, I must let you know beforehand that with brothers Moab and Hiram we will make different degrees for the associates and, once in order, we will make them known so you may give us your opinion. 


What's more, we will hide all the decrees issued by us nine. Besides, it will not escape your profound discernment that the absolute concealment will provoke the desire to enter our Association, to know the occult.


There will be other secrets, secondary ones, that the brother will only be able to know after taking the General Oath, the text of which we will study in the next session. The Oath will oblige him to keep the secret. … 


Dear Brothers: Each association must have a private see where its active members meet. This hall, where we have realized our fundamental meetings, will not serve for our secret meetings. We must install a see that will be called the Lodge of Jerusalem. This Lodge must be located in a hidden corridor where no one will see us nor hear our decrees. I take this opportunity to call your attention to an affair of utmost importance. We have said that we must increase our Association until thousands of people join, thus increasing our strength. But if it should come to be known that this Association has been founded at this time, it will cause fear and reaction, and consequently, the alienation of a part of the people, especially in these critical times in which the revolution of that Impostor continues increasing its strength. We nine are the cornerstone of this splendid edifice which is "The Mysterious Force." Let us consider, then, the instruments for the construction of this edifice. Let us saturate ourselves with the grandeur of our mission in this political and religious work that would not exist if it were not for us, for without masons and instruments there is no edifice. Obviously, we are the reason for the existence of this edifice. I desire, and I ask that you accept with me, the making of this edifice the most magnificent of palaces. And how? With Occultism. And what does this Occultism mean? 


Listen: The best means of making our association, besides grand and important, exciting, is to hide the date of its foundation, the names of its founders, our names, from every affiliate, whoever he may be. These secrets will be guarded by the nine of us and each one of us will pass it on as an inheritance to one of our sons, the most serious, the most secretive, when he reaches 21 years of age. His own brothers must know nothing. 


With this legend we will hide the date of the foundation and the goal of the Association. This will be our principal weapon. Occultism will be a disguised even for our brothers although they reach the highest of degrees; in regard to these degrees, I must let you know beforehand that with brothers Moab and Hiram we will make different degrees for the associates and, once in order, we will make them known so you may give us your opinion. 


What's more, we will hide all the decrees issued by us nine. Besides, it will not escape your profound discernment that the absolute concealment will provoke the desire to enter our Association, to know the occult.


There will be other secrets, secondary ones, that the brother will only be able to know after taking the General Oath, the text of which we will study in the next session. The Oath will oblige him to keep the secret.” [1] 


The Mysterious Force


In the early days of the Movement, which was then called The Mysterious Force, they called their meeting places “Temples,” after the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem. Later this name was changed to “Lodges,” but they continued to have the twin pillars of Jachin and Boaz in the front of each Lodge, as it was in the Temple of Solomon: 


“The King said: You already know that we must make everyone believe that our Association is very ancient. And so there may be no doubt about the legend of the "found papers," we will place in our temple Symbols from ancient times, such as those Solomon used in his Temple. 


We will erect two Pillars as Solomon did in the Temple. We will call the first BOOZ and the second JACHIN. One will be to the right; the other to the left. We will say also that our brother, Hiram Abiud, is Hiram Abiff, the Great Syria1 Architect called by Solomon for the construction of the Temple. These two subterfuges must be noted in the general principles of the .Association. 


We will reinforce this deceit with the use of the instruments of construction that the architect Hiram utilized in the construction, such as the Square, the Compass, the Trowel, the Scales, the Hammer, etc., all of wood as Hiram Abiff had them. 


It is fundamental that the front of the Temple must face the East, a point that I will explain to you later. I believe also that we must adopt symbols inspired by the firmament, such as the stars, the sun and the moon, symbols that remind us more of antiquity. We will also utilize other symbols to recall the impostor Jesus, the images of which we will select so they may be adopted by our sons and grandsons who inherit this History together with the administration of our new Association. ...


“Let us erect the two pillars, one at the right and the other at the left. Let us bless them. We bless these instrument and we also bless these various symbols of Jesus (12) that represent, ironically, some episode of those that the Impostor spoke of during his preaching in his instructions and blasphemies, such as the cock, the sword, the light, the darkness, the hammer, because of its being the instrument that was used to nail his hands and his feet, and with it we will open all the sessions, emphasizing this irony. Every session will be opened by striking three times consecutively with this hammer; thus we will remember eternally, through the centuries, that we have crucified him and that with this hammer we have fixed the nails in his hands and feet, killing him. These three stars you see symbolize the three nails. We would be able to change them for three points that VI have the same significance. Among our symbols will be the three steps, ridiculing with them this blasphemy: God is Father, Son and Holy Ghost, with his claiming to be the Son. 


Prince Charles with the hammer.


 Prince Charles with his hammer, performing for his
Ashkenazi groomers. The hammer is a decidedly
anti-Christian symbol as used by world Freemasonry,
 and in every court and parliament on the planet.



“Within our Association, we will make degrees, as we have mentioned previously. These will be thirty-three, symbolizing the age of the impostor. We will give a name to each degree and we will create other similar symbols. All these things were my idea and those of brothers Moab and Hiram. The meaning of these ironic symbols must not be perceived; it must remain among the nine of us. For the other brothers or affiliates it is enough to make them see the utilities and instruments so they may believe that the Association was founded in the times of Solomon or earlier than this. Any brother can propose a new symbol.” [2] 


Here are some of the higher degrees in Freemasonry: 


·                     Degree 7       The Guide 

·                     Degree 9        The Elder  

·                     Degree 12      The Triumphant One 

·                     Degree 15     The Scientist 

·                     Degree 18     The Talented One 

·                     Degree 21     The Preacher 

·                     Degree 24      The Little Master 

·                     Degree 27     The Little Philosopher 

·                     Degree 30     The Kadosch 

·                     Degree 31     The Cross 

·                     Degree 32     The Great Architect 

·                     Degree 33      The Living Dead (41) [3] 


The 33rd degree is thus very special, not for the reasons given above (that it was the age of Jesus when He was crucified. He wasn’t!). It denotes the one-third of the angels who rebelled against our Father God, and joined satan in the rebellion. 


"To all the dear brother members of the affiliate temples: Degree 33 being the symbol of the end of the life of the impostor Jesus, we have decreed that the aspirant to the Degree mentioned must wear a shirt of a purple color with a cross of white fabric sewn over the breast, over the cross must be drawn the four letters INRI.(42) These letters will then be a sacred word of recognition for the degree mentioned, like the word BOOZ. And, as the secret word must be changed every six months, we authorize the presidents of the temples to select the word they desire. Continue the battle to serve religion and the prestige of the Association. May union and occultism be our emblem." [4] 


When a Mason reaches the 33rd degree level, they are expected to serve only the Order of the Garter, the head of which is Queen Semiramis II (aka Queen Elizabeth II). It is also to be understood that a 33rd degreed Freemason is also expected to engage in the Black Mass, and in human sacrifice. For more information in this grisly sector of such a Mason’s life, see:


The Black Mass You Don't Want To Know About't-want-to-know-about.html 



Most Western Nations Have Long  

Been Masonic Tyrannies


“In his book "The Brotherhood," Stephen Knight showed how Masons secretly control every aspect of British society. There are 500,000 Masons in England. Lodges are associated with every local government, police, bank, military unit, hospital, university, church, court and of course Westminster. What passes for politics is basically members of the same Lodge contending for office to decide how to enact the Masonic agenda. [Nazarene Remnant comment: This naturally extends to the definition of democracy: “two wolves and a chicken deciding what’s for dinner.”] Knight documents how Masons give each other preferment in hiring, promotion and business. Non-Masons are continually hassled. It is no understatement to say that the UK is a Masonic tyranny.

Former Scotland Yard Chief Sir Paul Stephenson.

Former Scotland Yard Chief Sir Paul Stephenson

Look at the picture of former Scotland Yard Chief Sir Paul Stephenson (above.) He resigned because he was implicated in the scandal. Look at the checkerboard symbol on his hat, worn by every British constable. It is  Masonic.” (Source: Henry Makow: “Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal?” available here:   ) 

Battling for Temporal Authority


It is a fact that many politicians, beside coming the ranks of the legal profession (see The Lawyer’s Secret Oath), come from the ranks of Freemasonry.[5] In fact it would be a worthwhile exercise to determine who in Local, State and Federal politics is actually a member of the Masons, and what degree they have attained. Of course that would be a difficult project bearing on mind the oaths of secrecy that they take. 


“I told her how, through my permanent contact with the grand Masons, I discovered that there are three groups of them in the lodges:  


  1. Some of them attack Catholicism.   
  1. Others attack all religions.   
  1. The third, composed of men from the first two groups, [Nazarene Remnant comment: like John Winston Howard] battle in politics for the purpose of coming to dominate temporal authority.” [6]  

The Clear Signature of Evil


One of the clearest expressions of evil on this planet is the system known as obedience to hierarchical authority. It prevails just about everywhere, from your local pre-school, right up to the highest echelons in all industries the world over. Politicians bow to it, while pretending to serve the people. The military, the army, navy and air force, are all built upon this principle. It is the stock-in-trade of the religious hireling , and one of the prime reasons that no truth in now preached in the churches right around the world. 


“My ascent to the other degrees, from the 19th to the 33rd 


Jonas said: I have known throughout my studies that the ascent to the high degrees requires, above all, the payment of the price of the inscription, a price that varies according to the degree, but it also requires activity, zeal and services on behalf of the principles of the Association and the realization of its purposes. I discharged the duties within my reach to make a false show of my activities and I saved, at the same time, what was necessary to pay the respective inscriptions. 


I solicited the ascent, paying the dues for the 11 degrees, from the 19th to the 29th inclusive. My petition was accepted with pleasure. Being one of the holders of the 29th degree, I knew the secrets, vestments, terms, movements and signs corresponding to all those degrees. All the rituals are of no interest, for they are similar to those of the earlier degrees in their falsity and ridiculousness. 


I saved the amount necessary to attain the 30th degree. I solicited it and attained it. 


I did not delay much in attaining Degrees 31, 32 and 33 in the same way. Here my age become infinite; I remembered then what was recorded by the ancestors of my mother, Esther, who tried by that definition 'to mock the Resurrection of Jesus, His Ascension and His eternal life. 


Thus I completed my ascent to the maximum degree of "elevation," reaching the "gates of Heaven." Thus I come to be considered among the ranks of the chiefs of "liberty!" Despite the superiority of my high degree, I did not know from whence come the superior orders. The president himself of our lodge did not know their origin. I saw that all the presidents of the lodges were subject to those orders that came mysteriously. 


For example: "Carry out the exalted order as we have carried out ours, executing the following.... " 


Another example: "By a superior order we must make every effort to do such-and-such a thing; comply with it and begin... " 


Another example: "By orders, the knowledge of whose origin is prohibited by Law, you must initiate a subscription to collect (such-and-such a sum of) money that will be destined to expand the capacity of the Association and its interests.... " 


All the orders were of this nature. 


Then 1 remembered the cunning of our ancestor founders and their successors and noted that the nine successors improved considerably in the art of fallacy and cunning. 


I deplored the word "free," which should be omitted from the dictionaries of languages with that meaning, to use rather the meaning, "those who claim to be free and are nothing but slaves ordered by their masters to do good or evil." Nevertheless, the slave knows his master, but we, on the other hand, do not know who orders us, and we obey blindly.” [7] 


How many people do the dirty work of satan under these same circumstances, never refusing an assignment or a task, because they will be fired, demoted, or moved to a new place? This is how evil rules all over the planet, because people will not have the integrity to do the right thing. Instead they do the evil deeds, not realising that they have become dead people, such will be their judgment on that fateful day, called the White Throne Judgment.  


A Good Example was Adolf Eichmann


After psychiatrists interviewed Eichmann prior to his trial, they found him "normal" and that he had a desirable attitude towards his family, relatives and friends. A minister of religion who visited him regularly found that he was a man with positive ideas.  


It seems that Eichmann was not, in person, the evil madman people made him out to be. It was discovered soon after that no one, not a relative, a friend or another officer, ever confronted him on the morality of his actions. Not one person stood up to him. He is quoted as saying: "Not a single person came to me and reproached me for anything in the performance of my duties." 


Both Eichmann and Hitler would not have had their power without the cooperation of the German people and, in many instances, Jews who conspired against their own to save their own necks. Many of the German people who were against Hitler from the start committed the crime of silence and then went along out of fear of personal harm. But within the crime of silence lies a number of seemingly normal atrocities. 


In businesses, the Eichmann of the organisation, the axe-person for the boss or CEO, or minister or priest, readily finds some eager company or organisation ladder-climber - usually called an elder or deacon - to commence the execution of the weakest in the organisation. "Fred," the axe-man says, "profits are down and we need to let 20% of our workers go. If you do a good job, I'll make sure your division gets extra funds for the next quarter. That will really make you shine in the organisation. You'll be at the top of the ladder sooner than you think. Just make sure the blood-letting is quick and quiet. We don't want any adverse publicity." Fred (or Robert or Don or Bill), the organisation's gopher, with visions of "Vice-President" dancing in his head, slaughters friends and fellow workers, leaving them for dead. 


Why didn't Fred stop and say, "Wait. Isn't there another way?" Probably because then Fred wouldn't have gotten his chance at the top of the ladder. His thoughts probably were, "Why make waves when I can be promoted. Someone has to be fired anyway." 

Harvey goes on to point out that the Danes of Denmark were exemplary role models of courage during the times of Hitler. Hitler and Eichmann did not start out immediately murdering the Jews. They started with "little atrocities" such as requiring all Jews to carry ID cards. Once they got the Jews to do so however, and the rest of the Germans to collude, they asked the Jews to wear arm bands for external identification. After that was accepted, then came the murders. The King of Denmark, on the other hand, refused to go along with the Nazi's demands. Instead, he ordered that if Jews had to carry ID cards, then all Danes, regardless of race, had to carry them. The Danes continued to stand up to the tyranny and the Jews of Denmark were spared. I would say that it is time for the people of the Church to look to the Danes as models of humanity, in the very least. 


You cannot have autocratic bosses and ministers unless there are subordinates willing to colludewith his or her power. There cannot be a victimiser without a victim. I have found the Sabbath-keeping churches of God too filled with people terrified of making waves, of truly engaging their own God-given potential thinking capacity, of proving the truth for themselves, of stating their beliefs and of not conforming to the ministerial dictatorship they collude with. They will even do this and still continue to think they are moral and ethical people, perhaps because they think that tithe and offering-paying, attendance at Sabbath services, Feasts and Holy Days (which needs pointing out are all false systems anyway) and other social functions, is all that is required of them! This method of operation is what we are conditioned to by the world system, especially its education system. We send our kids to school each day blissfully unaware that little-by-little they will be surely slaughtered by little atrocities each day over the next twelve years of their school life. 


Robert Anton Wilson enters our discussion at this point with a most important observation about the SNAFU principle and the ultimate and inevitable death of authoritarian institutions - such as the Worldwide Church of God and its apostate daughters - coming from the fact that they have been laid on the wrong foundations right from their inception: 


“Every authoritarian structure can be visualized as a pyramid with an eye at the top. This is the typical flow-chart of any government, any corporation, any Army, any bureaucracy, any mammalian pack. On each rung, participants bear a burden of nescience in relation to those above them. That is, they must be very, very careful that the natural sensory activities of being conscious organisms-the acts of seeing, hearing, smelling, drawing inferences from perceptions, etc-are in accord with the reality-tunnel of those above them. This is absolutely vital; pack status (and 'job security') depends on it. It is much less important-a luxury that can easily be discarded-that these perceptions be in accord with objective fact. 

For instance, in the FBI under J Edgar Hoover, the agent had to develop a capacity to see godless communists everywhere. Any agent whose perceptions indicated that there were actually very few godless communists in this country at that time would experience cognitive dissonance - his or her reality-tunnel was at variance with the 'official' reality-tunnel of the pyramid. To talk about such perceptions at all would be to invite suspicions of eccentricity, intellectual wiseacreing or of being oneself a godless communist. 


The same would apply to a Dominican inquisitor in the middle ages who lacked the capacity to 'see' witches everywhere. In such authoritarian situations, it is important to see what the Top Dogs (alpha males) see; it is inconvenient, and possibly dangerous to see what is objectively happening. 


But this leads to the equal and opposite burden of omniscience upon those at the top, in the eyes of the pyramid. All that is forbidden to those at the bottom-the conscious activities of perception and evaluation-is demanded of the Power Elite, the master class. They must attempt to do the seeing, hearing, smelling, etc., and all the thinking and evaluating for the whole pyramid. 


But a man with a gun (the power to punish) is told only what the target thinks will not cause him to pull the trigger (write the pink slip, order the court-martial). The elite, with their burden of omniscience, face the underlings, with their burden of nescience, and receive only the feedback consistent with their own preconceived notions and reality-tunnels. The burden of omniscience become, over time, another and more complex burden of nescience. Nobody really knows anything anymore, or if they do, they are careful to hide the fact. The burden of nescience becomes omnipresent. More and more of sensory experience becomes unspeakable. 


As Paul Watzlawick notes, that which is objectively repressed (unspeakable) soon becomes subjectively repressed (unthinkable). Nobody likes to feel like a coward and a liar constantly. It is easier to cease to notice where the official tunnel-reality differs from existential fact. Thus SNAFU [8] accelerates and rigiditus bureauctaticus sets in-the last stage before all brain activity ceases and the pyramid is clinically dead as an intellectual entity.” [9] 


In other words, an authoritarian institution is dead right from the start. It is only a matter of time before it self-destructs into a brain-dead ho-hum church, of which there are thousands on planet earth, or finds its expression as just another social clubthat people blindly devote their lives to. It is the House of SNAFU! Jesus called it "the synagogue of Satan." And well might he, because Satan’s system, as the Master Liar, is a self-perpetuating loop, aka a vicious circle. These nasty little things are a series of problems that ends where it starts. The last problem in the series stimulates the first problem so that the whole sad sequence can start out all over again. And no one is any the wiser! This gives that dead-awful "treadmill feeling" where there is no joy or spontaneity or excitement, just laboured deadness, which is the exact definition of spiritual death. All that needs to be done to break the vicious circle is to find the solution to any one of the problems! When one of the problems is solved, all the others will dissolve. 


Perry Marshall, in his brilliant little eCourse, The 7 Lies of Organized Religion, put this very well: 


They always have something to do with a free spirit that starts out being very inspired.


Then somebody makes like a plaster cast of it and then says,‘Okay, that's what everybody is supposed to do here. That's what everybody is supposed to look like.’ It turns into a whole bunch of rules and it gets encrusted with barnacles and after a while it's totally unrecognizable. 


A lot of people confuse that with spirituality. They see that and they see how ugly it is and how confining it is and they get so disgusted they turn and run the other way. 


It's like people put themselves up on a pedestal and they look nice and they've got the right kind of suit and they say the right kind of things.”[10] 


Many scholar have studied Eichmann. Many have claimed that he was an inhuman monster. Others support his own claim that he was a simple bureaucrat doing his duty, and therefore not responsible for what he did. This explanation seeks to absolve all those who participate in evil, provided only that the organisation of that evil be organised as a bureaucracy from "the top down." In other words, this is the government organisation branded by Christ as "being under authority." In these totalitarian organisations the governmental system resembles an onion with the leader, or bully, in the centre surrounded by front organisations (performed by the local clones of the system, the elders and deacons who have been "bought off" in various non-monetary ways). Each layer of the onion represents a different degree of ideological militancy, so that those in each layer can accept that the movement fits the real world. 


Other scholars see a third possibility in the Eichmann story. It is that the Eichmann of this world represent a certain personality type - the authoritarian personality of the cultural model of the obedient German. This too is probably a bit too simplistic to accept as the truth of the matter - because the truth is that Eichmannism was and is a general phenomenon of fallen human nature. It is not limited to monsters, to bureaucrats, to authoritarians, or to Germans. To these scholars, Eichmannism is the refusal to make moral judgements, not because bureaucratic duty makes one amoral and not because a monster is immoral, but because an Eichmann is unable to think and so unable to judge. This is Hannah Arendt's explanation. Hannah Arendt (1906-1975) was a Jewish woman who became one of the foremost thinkers and political commentators of last century. She addressed some of the most difficult and contentious issues of modern times: she insisted always that freedom and autonomy, indispensable for human existence itself, are only attainable within an framework authentic personal responsibility. She had much to say about the failure of human responsibility in the presence of political evil. Some of her more famous works include: The Jew as Pariah: Jewish Identity and Politics in the Modern Age; The Origins of Totalitarianism; The Human Condition; Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil; Men in Dark Times; Personal Responsibility Under Dictatorship; On Revolution and The Life of the Mind.


Arendt attributed the undoubted evil of Nazism to ordinary men and women; not to monstrous individuals, although they certainly played a sizeable part, nor to a dehumanising system called bureaucracy, although it too was a contributing factor of great importance. Without the collusion and compliance of so many ordinary people neither the monsters (ministers) nor the bureaucracy (the "bought off" elite of the system) would have been so effective. If one studies the most common assumptions in political science in general and political theory in particular, one of the first truths we come across is this very point: that political power can only be exercised with the voluntary support of at least some of the governed, even if only a praetorian guard. 

David Hume called this a first principle of government, as did A V Dicey (Dicey, Law and Public Opinion in England, 1905). Thus, much research in political science today examines the support that rulers enjoy, be it through elections, class interests, conspiracies, or alliances. 


Arendt's analysis of Eichmann's ordinariness (she called it the banality of evil) implies something different and that is that a regime does not need the voluntary support of anyone, not even a praetorian guard. Though coercion, fear, and what she calls double-think have their uses, the inertia of ordinary men and women when they do not think or judgesuffices to sustain even the most barbaric regime. The results of this inertia, or should we call it spiritual laziness (which it really is), is a compliance with the system but not a voluntary support for the regime. In the end nearly all citizens could truthfully say they did not support the regime but, nonetheless, the regime persisted. It is not double-think, fear, and coercion that oil the wheels of totalitarianism, but no-think.”[11] 


The British Royal Family and
the Order of the Garter


"We have been so brainwashed that we believe the British royal family is just a nice, harmless and colorful institution, and fail to realize just how corrupt and therefore highly dangerous is this institution called the British Monarchy. The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the INNERMOST circle of the most corrupt public servants who have utterly betrayed the trust placed in them by their nation, their people.


The Knights of the Order of the Garter are the leaders of the Committee of 300, Queen
Elizabeth II’s most trusted “privy council.” When I did my research on the Order of St.
John of Jerusalem some years ago, I went to Oxford to talk with one of the Masters who is
a specialist on ancient and modern British traditions. He told me that the Knights of the
Garter are the inner sanctum, the elite of the elite of Her Majesty’s Most Venerable Order
of St. John of Jerusalem. Let me say this is not the original order founded by the true
Christian warrior, Peter Gerard, but is typical of many fine institutions that are taken overand destroyed from the inside, while yet appearing to the uninitiated to be the original.


From Oxford I went to the Victoria and Albert Museum and gained access to the papers of Lord Palmerston, one of the founders of the Opium Dynasty in China. Palmerston, like somany of his kind, was not only a Freemason, but a dedicated servant of Gnosticism....
Like the present ‘royal family,’ Palmerston made a pretense of being a Christian but was
in fact a servant of Satan. Many satanists became leaders of British aristocracy and made
immense fortunes out of the China opium trade.


I learned from the papers in the museum named after Victoria that she changed the name
of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem in 1885 in order to break away from the Catholic
connection of the Order’s founder, Peter Gerard, and renamed it the “Protestant Most
Venerable Order of Jerusalem.” Membership was open to every oligarchical family that
had made its fortune in the China opium trade and every thoroughly decadent family
received place in the ‘new order.’" (Dr John Coleman, The Committee of 300, p. 92.)


List of Famous 33rd Degree Freemasons

The reason why I am focusing on Freemasonry, and in particular the treacherous 33rd degree Freemason, is explained by Henry Makow, in his article “Humanity is Satanically Possessed,” which is found below, just after the list.



John Winston Howard

Umberto Agnelli

Bernard Baruch

John Wilkes Booth

John C Breckinridge

George Herbert Walker Bush

Senator Byrd

Henry A Clausen

Aleister Crowley

Bob Dole

Gerald Rudolph Ford

Giuseppe Garabaldi

JJJ Gourgas

Manly P Hall

Christian A Herter

J Edgar Hoover

Col. Edward Mandell House

Colin Powell

Jack Kemp

Bill Clinton

Jesse Helms

Barry Goldwater

Strom Thurmond

Newt Ginrich

Joseph Mazzini

Francois Mitterand

Henry Morgenthau

Henry Palmerston

Albert Pike

Roscoe Pound

Franklin D Roosevelt

James Rothschild

Jacob Schiff

James D Shaw

Rev. Robert Schuller

Senator Simpson

Rudolph Steiner

Harry Truman

Felix M Warburg

Earl Warren

H G Wells

William Wynn Westcott

John Yarker

Walt Disney

Robert Schuller

Oral Roberts

Buzz Aldrin

Yasser Arafat

Gene Autry

Foster Bailey

Hugo Black

Dr. Norman Vincent Peale

Shimon Peres

Prince Phillip

Yitzak Rabin

Ronald Reagan

Joseph Rettinger

Michael Rey

Cecil Rhodes

Bill Schnoebelen

Gerhard Schroeder

R W Thompson

Leon Trotsky

Earl Wheeler

Brigham Young

Admiral W Baird

Achille Ballori

Jonathan Blanchard

Tony Blair

Plutarco Elias Calles

James Cameron

Jimmy Carter

Winston Churchill

Howell Cobb

James B Conant


Adolphe Crémieux

Francesco Crispi

Richard DeVos

James Doolittle

Gerard (Papus) Encausse

Frederick Engels

Senator Sam J Ervin

King Frederick II

John Glenn

Mikhail Gorbachev

Al Gore

Rev. Billy Graham

James Graham

Col. James “Bo” Gritz

Mark Hatfield

Richard Holbrook

King Hussein

Saddam Hussein

Burl Icle Ives

Lyndon Baines Johnson

Rev. Jesse Jackson

Jesse James

Duke Michael of Kent

Alexander Kerensky

Spencer Kimball

Henry Kissinger

C Fred Kleinknecht

Kenneth S Kleinknecht

Hekmut Kohl

Arnold Krumm-Heller

Adriano Lemmi

Vladimir Lenin

Douglas MacArthur

Sir Henry McMahon

Robert McNamara

Vasili Maklakov

Domenico Margiotta

Thurgood Marshall

James C Martin

Karl Marx

Lord Alfred Milner

Benjamin Netanyahu

G Bromley Oxnam

Olof Palme

M H Barroso

Harry L Baum

John H Cowles

Delmar Darrah

Morris B de Pass

Mcllyar H Lichliter

Yves Marsaudon

Harman Gansevoort Reynolds

Marshall S Reynolds

Michel Reyt

Pierre G Vassal

George Warvelle

Leo Wheeler


Article #23

Humanity is Satanically Possessed


By Henry Makow Ph.D.  

February 28, 2012  




A Satanic cult has colonized the earth. This is the key to understanding  history and avoiding the pitfalls of moder n "cult--ure."

If you wishto escape the ravages of modern life, understand that mankind is satanically possessed. We are being inducted into the lowest ranks of a satanic cult, the Illuminati.

I am not speaking from a Christian or Biblical perspective. I am from a secular background. The difference is thatI recognize, in secular terms, that God is the magnificent moral and natural order governing the universe. 


The prevalent Illuminist denial of God is a satanic rebellion that ultimately cannot be won.


Our satanic possession is the product of a highly organized long-term conspiracy to establish a "New World Order." Today, the cancer has spread to all social institutions, public and private, including charities and the church. As a result, humanity has fallen into a coma, hardly able to recognize the sickness, let alone resist.

As I have said, the mainspring of this diabolical conspiracy is the Cabalist (Illuminati) dynastic families who own the world's central banks. Their control of most large corporations, especially media, and consequently politicians ensures that their cancer is all pervasive.

Here are just some logos with Illuminati motifs. Politicians and entertainers adore making the sign of Baphomet and the Masonic handshake. 

The instrument of this secret control is Freemasonry, a Cabalist secret Society. (The Illuminati is a secret society within Freemasonry.) Essentially you will rise in Freemasonry and society according to your willingness to serve Lucifer, and betray your community to the new Luciferian dispensation.

The Illuminati is a secret society within Freemasonry.

The Illuminati is a secret society within Freemasonry. Source of image:



Democracy is a charade. Sure, we can decide where the sewers will go, but the big issues have been taken out of our hands. All the politicians are  Freemasons: Ron Paul, Obama, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum. [Nazarene Remnant comment: That includes all our politicians here in Australian, going right back to the days of the Great Depression, when they allowed Australia to be taken over through the Westminster system of government, in 1931, which is satanically inspired.]

They divide into a House League, with certain Masons taking the Right, and other Masons taking the Left. The people are polarized, distracted and deceived. No one sees the puppet master. Nothing fundamental ever changes.

Left Vs. Right: Two apparently opposing forces advancing the same goal, a thinly veiled world police state ruled by satanist billionaires. 


The same applies to the international stage: Islamists Vs. Zionists: Both Masons.

Nothing illustrates our peril better than September 9-11. Essentially the Illuminati bankers through their Masonic proxies murdered over 3000 Americans [including many Australians] in broad daylight and got away with it.

This mass trauma brainwashing was designed to justify foreign wars and a domestic police state. It could not have succeeded without the collaboration of the mass media and virtually the whole political elite, who are an occupying power, a colonial administration.

The essence of Satanism is to turn the natural and moral order upside down a.k.a "revolution."  

God is Reality. Satanism turns reality on its head.

Thus, the good is made to appear evil and vice-versa. Lies have the authority of truth. The Truth can never be known. It is a matter of perception. It is whatever the Illuminati say it is.

Beautiful is ugly and ugly is considered beautiful. What is healthy and natural (e.g. marriage, family, heterosexuality) is painted as unhealthy while what is sick (e.g. homosexuality) is presented as natural and healthy.

These examples of our satanic possession should be seen in this light:

1. The divorce of sex from love, marriage and procreation. The promotion of anonymous sex in place of courtship degrades all human contact to the level of sex appeal. Anonymous sex is hyped as the best experience in life.

Pornography, the sex addicts' cocaine, is made widely available. 70-80% of teenage boys watch online porn regularly. Girls need to behave like porn stars to be loved. The sexualization of children takes place and eventually, acceptance of pedophilia. In Japan, porn is killing heterosexual relations. 

2. Gender bending- the relentless media promotion of feminism, lesbianism and homosexuality is designed to destroy heterosexual identity and values, including marriage and family.

3. Incessant wars have no purpose other than to increase the wealth and power of the Illuminati and undermine nation states. All wars are contrived by the Illuminati to kill off natural leaders and demoralize, degrade and destroy humanity. Ironically, they are an excuse for Illuminati "world government." 

4. Entertainers are members of the Illuminati and part of the Satanic initiation. Madonna's Superbowl half-time and Nicki Minaj's performance at the Grammy's were both Satanic rituals.

5. The dumbing down of the public through sports, entertainment and a defective education system.  

My whole website is devoted to this topic. The point is  --  mankind is satanically possessed.  


The masses are in denial. Corruption and sexual abuse (e.g. Gerry Sandusky) abound but none mentions Freemasonry. The legal system and police are compromised. 

Society is a full accomplice in its own subversion. The masses have Stockholm syndrome. They hope that the psychopaths won't harm them if they keep their heads down and play along.

Fully invested in their enslavement, people are too venal, craven or dumb to face reality. They prove Aldous Huxley's prophesy that the slaves  "will love their slavery."

Eventually the Illuminati will degrade us until humanity's promise is lost, and the Illuminati's depraved vision of mankind vindicated. Then our culling under some pretext will seem like Divine Justice. 


Our best hope is the Internet. It's very hard to institute a police state in an age of instant communication.

As long as the Internet is free, we will remain free. Let's defend it with our lives!

Related Articles:

Scientists Who Recognize Intelligent Design are Rejected

Rejection of the Feminine is Rooted in the Occult

Will Newman: Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?

Richard Evans: The Kabbalah is a Hoax

Henry Makow: The God of the Kabbalah

Henry Makow: Kabbalah Explains Current Events 




Comments for "Humanity is Satanically Possessed "


Troy said (February 29, 2012): 


Just this morning I was thinking of how to respond to "but it's your duty as an American to vote in order for the system to work."  


My reply would be that "the system is broken and much like a Stockholm Syndrome victim, we Americans have looked to our leaders as our saviours.  


We are actually mislead though, and would you blame the victim for believing their kidnappers are innocent and helping them, or would you blame the kidnappers for manipulating them into believing a lie?" 


Thanks Troy 

Both I think 




EJ said (February 29, 2012): 


To be "satanically possessed" is simply a categorizing or labeling of the behavior modification and not some sort of true "evil possession" like in some dark movie or TV show.  


Your effort at pointing out the modification is exemplary in its focus and examples. IMHO, people don't need to be "saved" they just need appropriate re-modification to a normalcy of heart-felt actions. 




The people behind this "behavior modification" are believing Satanists. 




L said (February 29, 2012): 


Bravo Henry.

Superb article on the Satanic Possession of Humanity.  

Most have no clue. Why? Because I find most people to be under some type of mass illusion or are sleepwalking. I agree wholeheartedly with your views.

Thank you for putting it out there that humanity has fallen under Satanic control. As a mother of a young teen,I am in constant anguish by what my precious child comes home with! I see it so clearly for what it is ... Satanic indoctrination.

But, try to tell that to a teenager who thinks what he is learning is cool! My only hope is that our bond is strong enough to counteract the rubbish he is learning is NORMAL.

Keep up the good fight Henry. We are definitely under extreme attack. 




Kevin said (February 28, 2012): 


In your latest article, you state: "As long as the internet is free, we will remain free." Yet there are people who claim to be against the Illuminati, against the NWO, against this fascist/communistic one-world evil who actually make the claim that certain people should be BANNED from using the internet.  


Should anyone think I jest, consider this article written recently by a Jeff Rense apologist and endorsed by Jeff Rense himself:  


For anyone interested in a detailed breakdown of the psychopathic 'Super Bowl' halftime show, Robert Phoenix put together a terrific article relating the ritual to astrology : 




M said (February 28, 2012): 


Your latest article was simply excellent. This is the core issue - a war for our souls, whether it's about economy, politics, sexuality, art and culture, or even science in certain cases. Most people don't see that or seem to lose track of that. 


It's interesting that you mentioned intelligent design - the topic of Darwinism came up in an email exchange with Anthony yesterday, and I mentioned that one is not allowed to even begin to doubt Darwinism in scientific circles. The level of brainwashing is scary in academia. Scientists and professors act as gatekeepers - and most are probably not even aware of it, only those at the top realize it. If others do realize it, they keep silent because they know they would lose their job or funding if they said anything. 




The Secret of the 33rd Degree of Freemasonry and Illuminati Bloodlines


33rd Degree Mason List



[1] From Appendix A3, “Dissipation of the Darkness: History of the Origin of Masonry,” in What The Study Of History Should Have Been, freely available here:  

[2] Ibid. 



[5] Also see Woe Unto You Lawyers, here: 



[8] Robert Anton Wilson invented the SNAFU Principle (or Celine's Law), which holds, on the simple level, that communication is only possible between equals. More rigorously "this proposed 'law' would read: "Adequate communication flows freely between equals. Communication between non-equals is warped and distorted by second-circuit Domination and Submission rituals perpetuating communication jam and a Game With End." (Prometheus Rising, p. 241) The word SNAFU has quite a vulgar meaning. Nevertheless, it is very true and very apt. I will let you add the missing letters: "Situation Normal All F--ked Up."

[9] Robert Anton, Prometheus Rising, New Falcon Publications, Tempe, Arizona, 1983, pp. 241-242.

[10] Perry Marshall, The 7 Lies of Organized Religion, freely available here:

[11] Little Atrocities: Eichmannism in the Church, available here: 




Democracy is the Sacred Satanic Cow of Modern Life because the Illuminati have refined and tweaked he so-called "democratic" process to ensure that they completely own and control it...


“You’d better be nice to America, or they’ll
bring democracy to your country.” 


“The government schools, the media, and the government itself remind us daily that democracy is sacred. The word ‘democracy’ is derived from the name of the Greek god, Demos. Remember when we said that the Greeks believed Demos ruled the earth, and Zeus ruled the heavens? What has changed today? Absolutely nothing because we still believe that democracy should rule the earth, and that another god should rule the heavens. Admittedly, we are just a little more enlightened because we believe that our God rules the heavens, but it does illustrate that there is nothing new under the sun. 


In order to understand democracy a little better, Webster’s 1828 Dictionary defines it as … 


A form of government in which the supreme power is lodged in the hands of the people collectively, or in which the people exercise the power of legislation.’ 


The supreme power is in the people, and they exercise legislation or the making of law. Since we, the people (demos), established the legislation which enabled us to create law, by default we accepted the axiom that the source of the law is the god of that society. 


We may now ask, are Communism and democracy related? Our government Baal [[1]] has told us that Communism is dead. However, Bruce McCarthy wrote a tract entitled Communism is Dead—A Media Myth. It shows a tombstone with ‘Communism’ written on it. Under this title it says:  


Here lies a name which history soon will see concealed itself behind the mask now called ‘Democracy.’ 


‘Communism didn’t lie. The cold war is over, but no one has asked himself who won it. Somebody definitely won that war. We are told that Communism lost, but the truth of the matter is that the reason they were able to lower the Iron Curtain is because we have finally become Communist ourselves. Now the final plan of the one-worlders is to raise the standard of living in the former Communist countries while they lower ours so that we can more easily be merged together. [[2]


If Communism died in the USSR, then there ought to be established criteria by which to identify this political corpse. Where are they, and where are they to be found? Let’s turn to the Communist Manifesto’s ten planks, their political agenda, and see whether Communism received a decent burial,or simply adopted an alias, democracy, to beguile the unsuspecting victims of a growing tyranny. 


Was it gleefully announced by the anti-Communist media that the USSR abolished its property tax, thus restoring absolute custodial ownership of the land to the peasants? If not, then the first plank is alive and well. What is the first plank of the Communist Manifesto? Abolition of private property and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. We don’t call it rent, we call it property tax. It is for public purposes. 


The second plank was a heavy progressive, or graduated, income tax. Did they abolish that? No.’ [[3]


As you go down through the ten planks of the Communist Manifesto that Bruce has examined in his tract, you will see that they are all alive and well in the USSR. Moreover, they are also alive and well here in the United States [as they are also flourishing in Australia, Canada, South Africa, Ireland, the UK, the EU, and just about everywhere else in the world] under the guise of democracy. 


I have a facsimile from a book that the US War Department compiled and issued on November 30, 1928. The following is how that book defined the word ‘democracy’ at that time in our history: 


‘A government of the masses. Authority derived through mass meeting, or any other form of direct expression. Results in mobocracy. Attitude towards property is communistic, negating property rights. Attitude towards law is that the will of the majority shall regulate [this has now been redefined as consensus], whether it be based upon deliberation or governed by passion, prejudice, and impulse without restraint or regard to consequences. Results in demagogism, license, agitation, discontent, and anarchy.’ 


We can summarise this chapter with the knowledge that America [and most countries of the world] now has a democratic state, where we can shout, ‘Power to the people just as they did in the Russian Revolution. We dethroned the only true King [[4]], and replaced Him with ‘demos.’ We think we have become our own sovereigns, that we are ‘autonomous.’ We have become our own gods. When we say, ‘We will plot our own destiny,’ or ‘I can do all things,’ we are denying our God. 


We often hear, ‘I think the Bible is wrong because I think a man has a right to choose his own sexual preference.’ Today we Christians think that viewpoint is abhorrent. However, it is no worse than forty years ago when parents of today’s homosexuals were saying, ‘I don’t agree with the Bible on child discipline. I think Dr. Spock as it together.’ There is no difference. We begin to be our own gods [and thereby break the First Commandment] when we say, ‘I feel in my heart’ or ‘I think’ in contract to what God has proclaimed. When we replace the Law of God with out own ideas of right and wrong, we are denying, ‘Thus says the LORD.’ We the people want what seems reasonable and convenient, not what is Scriptural and godly


Yet a church Baal today says, ‘Fixed moral rules based on Bible Law are not sufficient.’ For example, let us take the subject of homosexuality. You will hear, ‘Well, what if he was born a homosexual?’ Since the Baals today refuse the perfect Law of God, they have decided that the unchanging moral rules of God’s Law are not sufficient in today’s culture, they find it necessary to address side issues. This allows man to avoid the ‘unpleasant’ judgments and remedies for sin that God has established. 


Another example is the statement, ‘Well, what if he was crazy at the time he murdered and cannibalised his victim?’ The Bible does not address whether or not the lawbreaker is crazy when he commits a crime. If he is crazy, he will not mind being put to death. According to the moral law of Scripture, the murderer dies. The issue is not whether the lawbreaker is crazy, the only issue that the Bible addresses is whether that person is guilty of the charge against him. If he is guilty of first degree murder, he must forfeit his life. That position is in complete opposition to the god Demos because the laws found in the Bible do not represent the pervasive attitude of the masses. 


How would we best describe the religion of the masses? Accurately defined, it is the religion of the people, for the people, and by the people. We the people have become small ‘g’ gods in the religion called ‘democracy.’ We have mentally placed all power in ourselves. We have set ourselves up before the first and only God in violation of the First Commandment, and we must repent if the Kingdom of our Lord and King is to be perfected here on earth.”[5] 




[1] “The word ‘Baal’ as found in Zondervan’s Pictorial Encyclopedia is defined as: ‘Owner, master, lord, or husband. Generally it designates the Canaanite deity.’ It should be understood that the Canaanites have a great propensity for serving Baal. [i.e. obedience to hierarchical authority, or respecter of persons]. By way of reason, if there are Israelites in existence today, there are also Canaanites in existence today. It also stands to reason that if there are Canaanites among the Israelites they will promote their Canaanite deities.” This is exactly what satanists such as Prince Charles have been doing all their lives. For more information on the subject of the religion of the Canaanites, see The Two Seeds of Genesis 3: 15, here,, Antichrist and the Green Prince, here:, and The Black Mass You Don't Want To Know About, here:'t-want-to-know-about.html

[2] For more information on this theme, see the section head “On The Supposed Downfall of the Soviet Union,” in Reading #51: “The Fearful Master Is The Beast,” in our free book, The Warning of the Last Days, available here:

[3] From Bruce McCarthy’s Communism is Dead—A Media Myth.

[4] For details of how we did this, see the Introduction to What The Study Of History Should Have Been here:  

[5] Peter J Peters, Baal Worship, published by Scriptures for America, PO Box 766, LaPorte, Colorado, USA, 1995, pp. 133-137. 

Related Articles:

What Really Is Happening in Australia
Your Lawyer’s Secret Oath
Veil Lifting On Parasitic Elite Illusion Of 'Democracy' 

Article #24

How Did We Come To Be Such Idiots?


The following essay has an interesting story. The author, a federal prisoner, wrote a very intelligent and insightful letter to us late last February. In it he used the term "idiot" in a very interesting way. In my response, I challenged him to develop the term into something interesting, descriptive and inclusive in such a way as to be informative and useful. What he came up with is not exactly what I had in mind. It’s better. (DWH)

[This article was published in the Idaho-Observer in May of 2009 while I was still in prison.  And while Don Harkins edited the piece, he gave me full credit for it.  What was interesting about this article is that he published it even though there were some things he initially disagreed with, but published them according to the way I had written the piece.  Unfortunately, Don passed away suddenly in September, 2009 after sustaining a very strange leukemia illness. Don was a good man and an outstanding reporter who will be missed by his family, friends, and his readers.  I highly recommend the
Idaho Observer. (WAT)]

By Walter Allen Thompson  




“Why does he act like such an idiot?” 

How many times do we ask that question about other people—even about ourselves? There is no shortage of idiots and they are the primary reason it is so difficult (if not impossible) to live on Earth in peace and truth.

Idiot: 1. A person afflicted with idiocy (extreme deficiency of intelligence, commonly due to incomplete or abnormal development of the brain). Idiots are incapable of learning connected speech or of avoiding common dangers in life. 2. A fool; simpleton—a term of reproach (Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary [1947]).Today the term "idiot" is most commonly used as a "term of reproach" while historic idiots are now described as "retarded" or "mentally handicapped." We will be using "idiot" and "idiocy" in the reproachful contexts in common usage today.

Foolishness, stupidity and ignoranceare the product of influences that relentlessly attack our sensibilities, faith and equanimity every day of our lives. They attack the well-being of all men. Idiocy induces war and an enormous amount of suffering upon mankind.

The First Idiot …

Who was the first idiot?As a Christian, I will say that it was Satan. Here is a being who was in heaven, but swore oaths with other angels and sinned against his Creator—eternally damning himself because he wanted to usurp the authority of God (Read Book of Enoch). And when God created man in His own image, Satan was intent on destroying the lives of every man, woman and child.

The choice between good and evil—free will—has always been a part of God’s creation. God did not create evil, but the tendency for Satan and mankind to choose evil has always been present. 

Satan became an idiot when he disobeyed God,incurring His wrath. Since misery loves company, Satan spreads the misery by influencing mankind to disobey God’s natural order of life. The "New World Order" was started with the first sin and it has continued to this present day. 


The March of the Idiots


The New World Order is the plan of the idiots who are responsible for the death and destruction of the millions (if not billions) of lives memorialized in written history. The reason is because the New World Order exists completely outside of God’s natural order. Think of it as God’s natural order completely inverted or reversed: Good became evil and evil became good; darkness is light and light is darkness. In God’s order the strong and the wise came before weak idiots. In the New World Order we can plainly see that idiots come before the wise because idiots love death while the wise man loves life.

The worship of images, or "idols," is called "idolatry." The purpose of idolatry, the worship of powerless objects, is to destroy mankind by influencing man to disobey God’s natural order of life, thereby acting like an idiot.

Recently, the monetary and banking systems have been involved in numerous crises and bailouts. When money was made of gold and silver it was strong. But paper debt notes are weak, producing the boom and bust cycles that we have today. Any monetary system that trades debt notes in exchange for goods and services is doomed to eventual failure. Why? The people who designed and are currently running the money system are idiots. In addition, the financial institutions are patronized and regulated by idiots.

Idiot Worship


Most people know the histories of Hitler, Stalin, Mao-Tse- Tung and Pol Pot who destroyed the lives of millions. These leaders were idiots. Worse yet is how other idiots look upon the works of these men with favor. This kind of idiocy—murderous leaders and the people who support them—is apparent in our own political system. The same kind of idiots are in control of the United States [and every other country in the world]. Through idiots in the mass media, the idiots in leadership animate the rank-and-file idiots to do their bidding. The idiots-in-charge derive their relative strength in proportion to the numbers of rank-and-file idiots willing to support—even fight and die—for their idiotic causes. 

The idiots’ strength is the force of arms under war powers; it is easier to kill or imprison anyone who questions the motives of the idiots-in-charge. And the idiot’s message is this: "Let our strength be the law of justice."

Idiots Have No License

From where do the idiots-in-charge derive their authority? They are not ordained by God because God is not an idiot. They are not ordained of God (as in Romans, Chapter 13) because they break God’s commandments. The idiots have no license to sin or do evil; no one has the authority to usurp God’s law; any claim that idiots proceed with lawful authority is an utter farce: "For God made not death: neither hath he pleasure in the destruction of the living. For he created all things, that they may have their being: and the generations of the world were healthful and there is no poison of destruction in them, nor the kingdom of death upon the earth." 

God did not make us in His image to be idiots.I used to think that all men were born evil; they are not. The evil we do is chosen. If we were born evil, then God’s commandments would serve no purpose because it would be impossible to keep them. It is not only possible for a man to keep God’s commandments, but also He expects us to keep them. And this is exactly how we can abide in His natural order. 

The idiot will say just the opposite. "But ungodly men with their works and words called it to them..." 

The idiot brings evil upon himself because he has contracted with evil to do evil; he acts like an idiot because he is an idiot. 


How Do We Stop Being Idiots?


While sitting in a prison for the last four years, I realized that I have to stop doing what all the other idiots do. I discovered that my isolation from the outside world was becoming an asset to me because I have had more time to think things through. But all of my actions are my responsibility and there is no excuse for me before God if I do wrong.

I can’t just stop being an idiot without knowing how to guard myself from acting like one. My mind is something that I consciously set out to guard so that I do not lapse back into idiocy. My first line of defense is the eyes. I do not use them to offend God in any way. I don’t look at or read things that will cause my mind to become unsettled. I avoid all forms of material that is offensive to God’s natural order.

I use the same principle with my ears. I try not to hear anything offensive as it will disturb the strength of my inner peace. By consciously guarding my eyes and ears, I can effectively guard my mind and soul. As a result, I’m finding that I can enjoy long periods of time in silence without getting bored.

The key to overcoming idiocy is goodness and virtue.We should be mindful about how we speak about and treat others. By exercising self-control, we can break the idiotic habits of saying and doing things that harm our fellow man. I actually feel good when I get the urge to say something idiotic and then hold my tongue. I’ll admit sometimes it is difficult but I feel good when I can suppress my evil inclination.

What are our obligations to God? Solomon says it in one sentence: "Let us hear the end of all: fear God and keep His commandments: for this is the whole duty of man” (Eccl. 12: 13-14, Geneva Bible). 

The fear of God puts a man’s soul at rest because the man knows his duties to God and he practices them. There is no fear of hell because his obedience to God’s commandments is the source of his confidence, hope, faith and the love for his Creator. On its surface, the fear of God putting a man’s soul at rest seems to be a paradox. I think of it this way: The fear of God is as healthy as not putting my hand into a flame. God will punish evil doers, so why be one?

I don’t fear Satan; I fear God. God makes the judgment; I want to have His favor all of the time. I exercise my own self-control so as to not act like an idiot. 


Idiocy’s Opposite

The opposite of idiocy is wisdomand with wisdom comes understanding.

"The beginning of wisdom is the fear of the Lord: all they that observe them, have good understanding: His praise endureth forever" (Psalms 111:10).

Here are some of the aspects of wisdom that I am paraphrasing from the wisdom of Solomon: 


Wisdom is glorious, does not fade, and seen of those who love her.
Wisdom is a treasure found by those who seek her.
Wisdom is the breath of the power of God; the worker of all things.
Wisdom moves more than motion; it is the pure influence flowing from the glory of the Almighty.
Wisdom is the unspotted mirror of God; the image of His goodness.
Wisdom is the brightness of his everlasting light; the knowledge of God, the fear of God and the understanding of God.
Wisdom is privy to the mysteries of the knowledge of God; is patient, and conversant with God. 


The Choice Is Ours.


In light of the aformentioned, we can see that an idiot has no value to God if he dies an idiot. To be an idiot greatly offends God. Man was created in the image of God so when he acts like an idiot he, in a sense, defiles the "copy" of God and is, therefore, a degraded version of the original. The only true happiness in life is having the favor of God; nothing else is better. But there are those choices God allows us to make between life and death, good and evil and heaven and hell; between idiocy and wisdom. 

Most governments have failed because they were run by idiots with no regard for God’s commandments. 

Religions of the world with doctrines other than that which God has promulgated are not valid and will suffer the same fate as failed governments and for the same reasons.
Our problems today arise from people calling upon idols or false gods for answers.We turn to our enemies as if they are our friends. We look to idiots as if they are wise. We treat idiots with honor and treat the wise with contempt. We turn to darkness and live as if it were light. We call upon ruthless idiots to do good when we should know they are incapable of it. The idiots have the authority on earth because we, the idiots, gave it to them. 


Are There Any Good People In Government?

I take the position that, if they take an oath of office (forbidden in the scriptures), then no, they cannot do good even if they wanted to; the structure of government is idiocy with evil as its foundation. 

Oh sure, there are some seemingly good things about government but they are always twisted and perverted to do the work of evil because it was designed that way and is working perfectly. The real purpose of most governments is to promote and grow idiocy by enlisting legions of idiot evildoers to steal from the people.


Only One Way Out Of Idiocy

The only remedy for idiocyis to mend our ways and do good by being good and by providing others with the example of our goodness through the plain testimony of our actions. We are witnessing the last death-throws of this global idiocracy. We should step aside and stand aloof from it all, keeping ourselves within God’s natural order while adding virtues to our lives and exercising more self-control. If we guide our hearts and minds to maintain God’s natural order in our spheres of influence, then we will realize true peace. And pray for God to give the idiots a place for repentance. This is the true power of God. 


If It Weren’t For Idiots...


I will now close with an example of how things work when they are under the authority of God. The following was written about 100 AD by Bishop Clement of Rome in his Epistle to the Corinthians: 

"The heavens, revolving under His government, are subject to Him in peace. Day and night run the course appointed by Him, in no way hindering each other. The sun and moon, with the companies of stars, roll on in harmony according to His command, within their prescribed limits, without any deviation. The fruitful earth, according to His will, brings forth food in abundance. At the proper seasons, for man and beast and all the living beings upon it. Never hesitating, nor changing any of the ordinances which He has fixed. 

"The unsearchable places of the abysses, the indescribable arrangements of the lower world, are restrained by the same laws. The vast unmeasurable sea, gathered together by His working into various basins, never passes beyond the bounds placed upon it, but does as He has commanded. For He said, ‘Thus far shall you come, and your waves shall be broken within you.’ The ocean, impassable to man, and the worlds-beyond, are regulated by the same enactments of the Lord. The seasons of spring, summer, autumn, and winter, peacefully give place to one another. The winds in their several quarters fulfill, at the proper time, their service without hindrance. The ever-flowing fountains, formed both for enjoyment and health, furnish without fail their breasts for the life of men. The very smallest of living beings meet together in peace and accord. All these the Great Creator and Lord of all has appointed to the smallest of living beings to exist in peace and harmony; while He does good to all, but most abundantly to us who have fled for refuge to His compassions through Jesus Christ our Lord, to whom be glory and majesty for ever and ever. Amen." 


Compare the words of Clement to the idiocy of evil men.What is our problem? Again, it rests on man’s desire to usurp the authority of God and to establish a "New World Order" of idiocy and utter nonsense. God did not create evil; man does that for himself. We all must place ourselves under the authority of God and live in harmony and peace under His natural order. To do anything else is idiotic.

Walter Allen Thompsonis the author of The Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments, which is available here:  

Article #25

Information from Peter Wright, author of Spycatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer.

The short snippet of information that follows shows how the British always integrated spying and deceit into their so-called diplomacy, which is always treacherous. You should make sure you read Australia, the Concealed Colony! [1] and The United States is Still a British Colony. [2] Also see “Canada, Australia and NZ Are Still Colonies.” [3]

Conquered states ... can be held by the conqueror in three different ways. The first is to ruin them, the second for the conqueror to go and reside there in person, and the third is to allow them to continue to live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of the few [i.e. traitors] who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror.” (Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince)


“The entire Cyprus episode left a lasting impression on British colonial policy. Britain colonised most successfully when we defeated the military insurgency first, using intelligence rather than force of arms, before negotiating a a political solution based on the political leadership of the defeated insurgency movement, and with British force of arms to maintain the installed government. This is basically what happened in Malaya and Kenya, and both these countries have survived intact.

The fundamental problem was how to remove the colonial power while ensuring that the local military forces did not fill the vacuum. How, in other words, can you create a stable local political class? The Colonial Office were still well versed in complicated, academic, democratic models—a constitution here, a parliament there—very few of which stood the remotest chance of success. After the Cyprus experience I wrote a paper and submitted it to Hollis, [4] giving my views.I said that we ought to adopt the Bolshevik model, since it was the only one to have worked successfully. Lenin understood better than anyone how to gain control of a country and, just as important, how to keep it. Lenin believed that the political class had to control the men with the guns, and the intelligence service, and by these means could ensure that neither the Army nor another political class could challenge for power.

Feliks Dzerzhinsky, the founder of the modern Russian Intelligence Service, specifically set up the CHEKA (forerunner of the KGB) with these aims in mind. He established three main directories—the First Chief Directorate to work against those people abroad who might conspire against the government; the Second Chief Directorate to work against those inside the Soviet Union who might conspire; and the Third Chief Directorate, which penetrated the armed forces, to ensure that no military coup could be plotted.

My paper was greeted with horror by Hollis and the rest of the MI5 Directors. They told me it was ‘cynical,’ and it was never even passed to the Colonial Office, but looking back over the past quarter of a century, it is only where a version of Lenin’s principles has been applied in newly created countries that a military dictatorship has been avoided.

These ideas were also hotly contested by the CIA when I lectured to them in 1959.  Helms  [5] told me flatly I was advocating Communism for the Third World. He felt that we had a decisive intelligence advantage which they lacked. We were the resident colonial power, whereas in the insurgencies which they faced in the Far East and Cuba, they were not, and therefore they felt the only policy they could pursue was a military solution. It was this thinking which ultimately led the USA into the Vietnam War.

More immediately, it led them into the Bay of Pigs, and when, two years later, Harvey listened to my Cyprus experiences, he was struck by the parallel between the two problems: both small islands with a guerrilla force led by a charismatic leader.” [6]


[1] Available on the DvD or here:
[2] Available on the DvD or here:
[3] Available on the DvD or here:
[4] Sir Roger Hollis, the then Director of MI5. Peter Wright persistently maintains in his book Spycatcher that Hollis was always the “fifth man” in the infamous British spy ring (the other four were Kim Philby, Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess and Sir Anthony Blunt) However, Hollis was never detained and retired from his high position in MI5 with all charges against him unproven. Later research has shown that the “fifth man” was none other than Victor Rothschild. If Wright is correct about Hollis then there was a “sixth man” in this spy ring! As the dusk-cover of this book proclaims, “The story of how he [Peter Wright] and many of his MI5 colleagues came to this conclusion [about Hollis] makes for some of the best reading found anywhere in the vast literature on espionage.”
[5] Richard Helms, the then CIA Director of Plans.
[6] Peter Wright, with Paul Greengrass, Spycatcher: The Candid Autobiography of a Senior Intelligence Officer, Viking Penguin, New York, 1987, pp. 158-159.

Article #26

The Party Game Is Over. Stand And Fight

By John Pilger
4 November 2010


"Rise like lions after slumber
In unvanquishable number!
Shake your chains to earth, like dew
Which in sleep had fall'n on you:
Ye are many - they are few."

These days, the stirring lines of Percy Shelley's "Mask of Anarchy" may seem unattainable. I don't think so. Shelley was both a Romantic and political truth-teller. His words resonate now because only one political course is left to those who are disenfranchised and whose ruin is announced on a government spreadsheet.

Born of the "never again" spirit of 1945, social democracy has surrendered toan extreme political cult of money worship. This reached its apogee when £1trn of public money was handed unconditionally to corrupt banks by a Labour government whose leader, Gordon Brown, had previously described "financiers" as the nation's "great example" and his personal "inspiration".

This is not to say parliamentary politics is meaningless. It has one meaning now: the replacement of democracy with a business plan for every human activity, every dream, every decency, every hope, every child born.

The old myths of British rectitude, imperial in origin, provided false comfort while the Blair gang built the foundation of the present "coalition". This is led by a former PR man for an asset stripper and by a bagman who will inherit his knighthood and the tax-shielded fortune of his father, the 17th Baronet of Ballintaylor. David Cameron and George Osborne are essentially fossilised spivs who, in colonial times, would have been sent by their daddies to claim foreign terrain and plunder.

Today, they are claiming 21st-century Britain and imposing their vicious, antique ideology, albeit served as economic snake oil. Their designs have nothing to do with a "deficit crisis". A deficit of 10 per cent is not remotely a crisis. When Britain was officially bankrupt at the end of the Second World War, the government built its greatest public institutions, such as the National Health Service and the arts edifices of London's South Bank.

There is no economic rationale for the assault described cravenly by the BBC as a "public spending review". The debt is exclusively the responsibility of those who incurred it, the super-rich and the gamblers. However, that's beside the point. What is happening in Britain is the seizure of an opportunity to destroy the tenuous humanity of the modern state. It is a coup, a "shock doctrine" as applied to Pinochet's Chile and Yeltsin's Russia.

In Britain, there is no need for tanks in the streets. In its managerial indifference to the freedoms it is said to hold dear, bourgeois Britain has allowed parliament to create a surveillance state with 3,000 new criminal offences and laws: more than for the whole of the previous century. Powers of arrest and detention have never been greater. The police have the impunity to kill; and asylum-seekers can be "restrained" to death on commercial flights.

Athol Fugard is right. With Harold Pinter gone, no acclaimed writer or artist dare depart from their well-remunerated vanity. With so much in need of saying, they have nothing to say. Liberalism, the vainest ideology, has hauled up its ladder. The chief opportunist, Nick Clegg, gave no electoral hint of his odious faction's compliance with the dismantling of much of British postwar society.The theft of £83bn in jobs and services matches almost exactly the amount of tax legally avoided by piratical corporations. Without fanfare, the super-rich have been assured they can dodge up to £40bn in tax payments in the secrecy of Swiss banks. The day this was sewn up, Osborne attacked those who "cheat" the welfare system. He omitted the real amount lost, a minuscule £0.5bn, and that £10.5bn in benefit payments was not claimed at all. Labour is his silent partner.

The propaganda arm in the press and broadcasting dutifully presents this as unfortunate but necessary. Mark how the firefighters' action is "covered". On Channel 4 News, following an item that portrayed modest, courageous people as basically reckless, Jon Snow demanded that the leaders of the London Fire Authority and the Fire Brigades Union go straight from the studio and "mediate" now, this minute. "I'll get the taxis!" he declared. Forget the thousands of jobs that are to be eliminated from the fire service and the public danger beyond Bonfire Night; knock their jolly heads together. "Good stuff!" said the presenter.

Ken Loach's 1983 documentary series Questions of Leadership opens with a sequence of earnest young trade unionists on platforms, exhorting the masses. They are then shown older, florid, self-satisfied and finally adorned in the ermine of the House of Lords. Once, at a Durham Miners' Gala, I asked Tony Woodley, now joint general secretary of Unite, "Isn't the problem the clockwork collaboration of the union leadership?" He almost agreed, implying that the rise of bloods like himself would change that. The British Airways cabin crew strike, over which Woodley presides, is said to have made gains. Has it? And why haven't the unions risen against totalitarian laws that place free trade unionism in a vice?

The BA workers, the firefighters, the council workers, the post office workers, the NHS workers, the London Underground staff, the teachers, the lecturers, the students can more than match the French if they are resolute and imaginative, forging, with the wider social justice movement, potentially the greatest popular resistance ever. Look at the web; listen to the public's support at fire stations. There is no other way now. Direct action. Civil disobedience. Unerring. Read Shelley and do it.


Download this article as PDF File in US Letter or A4 International size: (Right-Click and select "Save Target As")

  The New World Order Would Have Been Impossible Without the Institution of Democracy
US Letter Version. Download time on 56kb modem: 19 seconds

  The New World Order Would Have Been Impossible Without the Institution of Democracy
A4 Version. Download time on 56kb modem: 19 seconds


The URL of this page is:


Share This Page
Delicious Digg Facebook Google Bookmarks Reddit Stumbleupon Yahoo My Web Blogmarks Diigo Livejournal Ma.gnolia Netvouz Newsvine Technorati Wists



• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map

The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture

The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days

The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial

The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)


So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]


Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”


[1] Dr. Greg Evenson


Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.

Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.

UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...

"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?


As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.


Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 

How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download

Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)

We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)

False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations

John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto

Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Democracy Is An Illusion

Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?

Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.

What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)

We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.


So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.


Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.


This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”


Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.

Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.

The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes

"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King,

Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.

The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.

The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book

How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)

"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."

“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)