NazareneRemnant header graphic

Report From Iron Mountain

A Summary by Alan B Jones

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page  NR Home Page

The URL of this page is:

This summary is from chapter 7 of Alan B Jones' How the World Really Works.

From the Introduction to Alan B Jones' How the World Really Works  


If it takes you more than a few days to read this book, I have defeated my own purpose. That purpose is to provide a shortcut for politically astute readers to acquire the essential knowledge needed to be effective in the ongoing fight to save for our posterity the great experiment in freedom that was launched 200 years ago by our country's founders. 


I have selected and reviewed in this volume a mere handful of the many books which have been written outlining our various problems. Taken together, however, they will correctly spell out who we are really fighting, what their goals are, and what strategies they are utilizing to attain those goals. Once these matters are understood, effective counter-strategies are easy to define. Without this understanding, our efforts will continue to be aimed at symptoms rather than causes, and will continue to be insufficient, misdirected, and ineffective. 


These reviews cannot possibly cover all the detail contained in the original books themselves. They can, however, convince you that our problems are interconnected in a way that you probably never guessed, and that very few of even the most politically active people understand. I urge you to acquire these several books yourselves to help you fill in more pieces of the puzzle for yourselves. Many of the actions most needed by our society will then become obvious to you, to the benefit of us all.



"Report From Iron Mountain On The Possibility And Desirability Of Peace"

(Foreword by Leonard Lewin. Pub. 1967, Dial Press, NY. Call American Opinion Books, 414-749-3783.)

This remarkable book appeared eighteen years after Orwell's 1984, and suffers from many of the same speculations as to its origins. It is not a novel, but rather a report written by the members of a 15-man "Special Study Group" commissioned, they believe, by some governmental entity which wished to remain unknown. The report is addressed to that unknown requestor, the work of the group having been completed after about two and a half years of labor. The members of the group knew that they had been carefully screened and selected for the task, that they represented the highest levels of scholarship, experience, and expertise in a wide range of the physical and social sciences, that they possessed years of service in business, government, and academe, and that among them they had access to a vast proportion of the country's resources in the social and physical science fields. The Special Study Group was clearly possessed of outstanding establishmentarian credentials.

The book comes to us because one of the members of the group, identified only as John Doe, approached Mr. Lewin several months after the completed report had been submitted, and sought his help in getting the report commercially published, since he (Doe) felt that the public had a right to be apprised of its existence, even though the group had previously agreed to keep it secret. Mr. Lewin, having agreed to serve in that capacity, wrote a foreword spelling out these circumstances and passing on what little he learned from Doe concerning the study's origin and its participants. He further revealed his personal reaction to the conclusions of the report, conclusions which he said he does not share, but which appear to explain aspects of recent American policies which have otherwise been incomprehensible from a "common sense" viewpoint.

As with 1984, we shall not indulge in speculation as to the possible motives of persons involved in commissioning, performing, or publicizing the Study's activities, except to suggest the possibility that both 1984 and The Report From Iron Mountain may have been created to serve as guides for middle-level workers in the fields of the elites. This would require, of course, a certain skill in reading between the lines,since calling a spade a spade would obviously raise too much public reaction. But let's move right along, starting with a little background on the nature of the Study Group and its operations.

The name Iron Mountain was derived from the name of the location, near Hudson, N.Y., where the first and last meeting of the Study Group took place. The meeting place served to impress and convince the participants of the authenticity of their endeavor. It was a well-equipped underground facility built to survive a nuclear holocaust, and was being used by hundreds of American corporations for the safekeeping of their critical documents. It also even housed substitute corporate headquarters for a number of them, including such major establishment firms as Standard Oil of New Jersey, Shell, and Manufacturers Hanover Trust.

Meetings other than the first and last were held, approximately monthly, at universities, hotels, summer camps, private estates, or business establishments in various parts of the country, but never in the same place twice. Participants were paid travel and per diem expenses by a member identified as the "government contact" who also instructed them not to report those payments on their income tax returns, and to otherwise do whatever was necessary to keep their deliberations secret.

The first meeting was held in August of 1963, though the idea for the study, according to Doe, originated as far back as 1961 with the incoming staff of John Kennedy's administration, mostly, says Doe, "with McNamara, Bundy, and Rusk." Doe further revealed that three of the fifteen Study Group members had been in on the planning which produced the group, but the identities of none of the members (except for Doe) were revealed to Lewin. The last meeting was held in March of 1966, and the report was completed and submitted shortly thereafter. Lewin was approached by Doe during the following winter to arrange for commercial publication. (For reference, recall that John Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.)

Lewin warned in his foreword that the Report contained presumptions and recommendations which were, on the face of it, outrageous and offensive to ordinary common sense, including such notions that poverty is both necessary and desirable, that the return of slavery as an institution may be desirable, and that budgeting the optimum number of deaths to occur annually in warfare was a proper function of government. With this warning in mind, one cannot help but be mentally probing, as he proceeds through the Report, for the real purposes being served, including the foundation premises upon which the study was based. Doe told Lewin that the purpose stated by the anonymous caller who recruited him was "to determine, accurately and realistically, the nature of the problems that would confront the United States if and when a condition of 'permanent peace' should arrive, and to draft a program for dealing with this contingency." The Report's transmittal letter rephrased these purposes as:

"1) to consider the problems involved in the contingency of a transition to a general condition of peace, and

2) to recommend procedures for dealing with this contingency." As the Report's Introduction again rephrased it, the following two questions were to be addressed: "What can be expected if peace comes?

What should we be prepared to do about it?" We are soon led to observe that there is something askew in the logic of the first stated purpose. A society's "problems" are not nearly as uniquely determined by the presence or absence of "peace" as they are by other societal characteristics, most particularly the presence or absence of "individual liberty." The question to the Study Group should therefore spell out as a postulate the status of this elemental characteristic, since the society's "problems" will be grossly different depending upon whether its citizenry is or is not "free."

We, as Americans, would naturally assume that the Study Group would automatically acknowledge, respect, and seek to preserve the philosophical foundation of our country (the existence of our individual inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) along with the mechanics which our forefathers put in place (the U.S. Constitution) to try to preserve those rights for their posterity, rights which they had just wrested from Old World monarchs representative of the entire prior world history of ongoing despotic rule by whoever managed to acquire a preponderance of arms. It soon became clear, however, that such an assumption was ill-founded, and that the implicit presumption of the Study Group was that the condition of individual freedom was to be that which had historically existed in the Old World, namely the subservience of the citizenry to an aristocratic elite.

The main question that was to absorb the group's labor was posed early in the Report's Introduction. Presuming a world with no war, war preparations, or armaments, were there not certain societal functions fulfilled in the past by warfare for which substitute activities would have to be found in a world of peace? Thus, what functions did war fulfill? If no viable substitutes could be found to fulfill them, was "peace" even desirable, in terms of "social stability?"

The study member who was the government contact was code-named Able by Doe, who revealed to Lewin that it was Able who challenged the classical definition of war, and suggested that war served other purposes beyond being an extension of diplomacy, or ultimate physical actions in support of a foreign policy, etc. All the other members ultimately came around to his view. It was also Able who, with one other member, drafted the Report, circulated it for review, and then produced the final version. It therefore seems likely that those who conceived the study had pretty well in mind what the study would produce from the beginning.

Of course all of us ordinary folk have a pretty good idea of why peace is desirable. In a few words, war involves lots of us getting killed, usually for the benefit of kings or other elites with whom we have little truck, and even if we physically survive, our savings, i.e., the fruits of our lifelong labors, are expropriated (by inflation or otherwise) and spent on killing others, reducing our ability to lead the good life, and ruining life in its entirety for those who are killed, displaced, enslaved, tortured, etc. All that being so, what is this "social stability" that the Report refers to which may bring into question the desirability of peace?

It took a long time for the Report to get around to defining what it meant by "social stability." But here are a few of the significant steps that we detected on the way. First, in describing the scope of the study, the Report claims that one of the operative criteria was to avoid utilizing any preconceived value assumptions (such as one's right to life or liberty, we assume). But then it proclaims one, since any serious investigation "must be informed by some normative standard... The stability of society is the one bedrock value that cannot be avoided." The words still remain undefined, however.

The Report next goes directly into the economic effects of disarmament, alleging that such effects would be the same whether disarmament preceded or followed the attainment of peace. The study therefore entirely bypasses the issue of how nations, centered about our own Constitutional Republic, might work to create the desired peace with freedom, for example by jointly defining the conditions, including self-sufficiency and security, which must be satisfied to make nations willing to disarm, and then working jointly to realize those conditions. With a regime of "peace with freedom" established, the institutions then existing could be examined to seek out problems then remaining and recommend programs for dealing with them. The Study, however, avoids looking at what institutional structures might evolve in the production of peace with freedom, though such structures would undoubtedly be very different from those presently existing.

The Report fleetingly describes and then dismisses prior studies leading to mechanistic disarmament procedures. This brief discourse acknowledges that before such scheduled disarmament procedures could begin, genuine agreement of intent would have to be reached among the major powers. We described that above as seeking to define and then realize the conditions which would permit nations to feel secure about disarming. The Report, however, does not mention the attainment of common intent, but rather proclaims that disarmament efforts have been unsuccessful because nations do not want peace to reign, and desire instead that the use of war as an institution continue, because war serves certain essential purposes that peace cannot. In point of fact, says the Report, war is not "subordinate to the social systems it is believed to serve." Rather, society's war readiness "supersedes its political and economic structure. War is itself the basic social system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. It is the system which has governed most human societies of record, as it is today."

We find fault with the above, not respecting its accurate description of how the Old World powers behaved in order to expand their powers at the expense of others (that is, to indulge the fatal flaw of their rulers of being corruptible by power), but most particularly with respect to the purposes and intent of the United States of America, in whose name and for whose benefit the Special Study Group was presumably laboring. George Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned Americans to stay out of Europe's intrigues and wars, which had no legitimate place in our newly constructed country, a country which, for the first time in human history, was put together to be run by the people for the benefit of the people, and not for the benefit of those momentarily powerful persons in governmental office, who would in fact be frequently replaced. The power to make war was carefully put in the hands of the Congress, representing the wide-ranging electorate. The carnage of the Civil War renewed our abhorrence of war, and conspiratorial efforts were required (see Chapter 5 of How the World Really Works) to drag us against our will into World War 1. That produced further revulsion, and further conspiratorial efforts were required to get us into World War 2. That ghastly war fed mass efforts to get us out of the Vietnam War, mass efforts that arose from our increasing conviction that we, the public, were being manipulated, a conviction made possible by our improved historical awareness and our much improved access to current events due to the growth of modern communication media.

We the people do not want war, we know we do not want it, and we are more than willing to support efforts to obtain and maintain peace in the world. To this end we supported the formation of the UN, but were again conned into doing something against our real interests, because the UN is clearly recognized now not as an institution seeking peace with freedom, but rather as the institution charged with acquiring political and military control over the world's peoples for the benefit of today's power elites.

Let's go on with the Report. It next sets about to define what it says are the real functions served by war, and in so doing cannot avoid tipping its hand concerning its previously implicit postulates. It first takes up the economic functions of war. Though war involves waste, it says, such waste has social utility, in that the waste is outside the control of market forces, and is subject instead to "arbitrary central control." That control can be used to "stabilize the advance" of the world's industrial economies, which have "developed the capacity to produce more than is required for their economic survival..." It can also be used as a sort of economic flywheel to balance the economy, and is better for this purpose than wasteful social welfare programs, because the latter, once initiated, become imbedded in the general economy where they are "no longer subject to arbitrary control." In fact, compared to war, "no combination of techniques for controlling employment, production, and consumption has yet been tested that can remotely compare to it in effectiveness.."

One perhaps begins to detect that a major goal, perhaps the major implicit postulate, is control, and more particularly, arbitrary central control. But, we ask, why do we want to "stabilize the advance" of the industrial economies? Isn't it proper to try to avoid war in order to permit the continuing increase in our own standard of living, as well as the rest of the world's? And isn't war a ludicrous price to pay as a mechanism for smoothing out the ripples in the economy? Aren't better and much less costly mechanisms available? The answers are right around the corner.

The Report has now arrived at its core issue: the hidden political functions of war. And here we run once again into that undefined phrase that we started with: "social stability." War, we are told, is even more critically needed for maintaining social stability than it is for providing economic stability. It is fully capable of doing so because a state's war powers constitute "the basic authority of a modern state over its people." In our modern industrial societies, war has served "as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary social classes." Our productive economies make it more difficult to "maintain distribution patterns insuring the existence of 'hewers of wood and drawers of water.'" But fortunately, the arbitrary nature of war expenditures and related military activities "make them ideally suited to control these essential class relationships." Unless a substitute can be found, the institution of war must be continued "to preserve whatever quality and degree of poverty a society requires as an incentive as well as to maintain the stability of its internal organization of power." (Our emphasis added.)

The prime political function of warfare, as understood by the Study Group, is thus seen to be to preserve poverty in the society as an aid to maintaining the elite class in control. The congruence of the Report with Orwell's 1984 is now clear. What social stability really means is "keeping the Low's in poverty and the High's in power, forever."

The last essential step to completing the Study Group's thesis is to understand why war is so readily accepted by the public, whose members are always the prime losers in any war. The reason, says the Report, is that individual citizens will willingly rise to the defense of their society when they see it being threatened by an external enemy. The enemy, of course, must be formidable and the threat real, or at least perceived to be real. Such a major threat to one's society justifies to the individual the loss of life associated with meeting that threat, including even the loss of one's own life. It may be very difficult, says the Report, to find a substitute for war that produces the desired waste of resources and is at the same time so readily acceptable to the populace. The Report makes no mention of the ease or difficulty of producing wars on demand, perhaps because the means were so obvious that no discussion was felt to be needed.

The final nonmilitary function of war, not necessarily incapable of adequate fulfillment by a substitute, is the loss of life which it produces. This comes under the euphemism of ecological control, aimed at maintaining the world's population at that reduced level at which it may successfully sustain itself within the constraints of the world's agricultural capacity. The Report briefly acknowledges that this Malthusian notion of population control may be approaching obsolescence due to the increasing efficiency with which food and other essentials are being produced, but then quickly dismisses the thought. The chief difficulty with using war for population control, says the Report, is that war regressively kills off a higher proportion of the fittest (our young warriors), instead of our old, weak, and infirm, thereby acting against eugenic improvement. Modern warfare has the promise of improvement in this regard, however, since nuclear warfare will enable millions to be rapidly killed off, and indiscriminately with respect to the weak or the strong. (It really says that!)

The Report further notes, as an incidental matter, that medical science has also exacerbated the problem by removing pestilence as a method of population control, but even worse, it has done so by perpetuating the lives of those who would otherwise have been eliminated by their genetic susceptibilities, thereby eugenically weakening the race. The coming "transition to peace" should probably take these matters into account as well.

The Report then seeks to define substitutes for the essential nonmilitary functions of war which it has allegedly found in the economic, political, sociological, and ecological arenas. In the economic field, there are two important criteria for substitutes:

They must be wasteful (involving the destruction of at least 10 percent of the gross national product) and they must be outside the consumer supply and demand system.

The first candidates considered are massive social welfare systems, such as cradle-to-grave health care, college education for all, housing for all at the level of the current top 15 percent, environmental purity with respect to air, water, forests, parks, etc., and the elimination of poverty via a guaranteed annual income or other appropriate redistribution scheme. While these schemes may prove useful during the transition to peace, says the Report, they all suffer from the disadvantage that they are too cheap (not as wasteful as war), and would work themselves into a permanent level of expenditure embedded within the general economy, and therefore not subject to arbitrary control.

A second possibility for an economic surrogate is a massive, open-ended space research program having substantially unattainable goals, such as the colonization of Mars, etc. This one might produce sufficient economic waste, and could be extended indefinitely, but lacks the urgency associated with an imminent, credible threat.

In fact, this lack of a credible threat turned out to be the main difficulty with finding any viable substitute for the political and sociological functions of war. Any such substitute requires the existence of an "alternate enemy" posing a massive and credible threat, sufficient for one to be willing to give up his life to fight. Of the social welfare programs mentioned above, environmental pollution is perhaps the only one which might be blown up into a big enough threat to convince people that lots of money urgently had to be thrown at the problem. But even this appears to have doubtful viability, even if efforts were made to deliberately poison the environment in various ways in order to enhance the threat. The Report's way around this apparent brick wall was to conclude that, if a viable natural substitute could not be found, a fake one would have to be invented. The Study Group didn't wish to pursue that matter any further, at least in print, in order not "to compromise, by premature discussion, any possible option that may eventually lie open to our government."

The Study Group did manage to find an alternate to war for proper population control (an "ecological" function). The Report declares:

"A universal requirement that procreation be limited to the products of artificial insemination would provide a fully adequate substitute for population levels. Such a reproductive system would have the added advantage of being susceptible of direct eugenic management.. The indicated intermediate step - total control of conception with a variant of the ubiquitous 'pill,' via water supplies or certain essential foodstuffs - is already under development." (Emphasis added.)

The only question the Report raised about this matter was whether the imposition of procreation control should or should not await the arrival of peace. The participants seemed to reluctantly agree that it should, since significant excess manpower would probably be needed in the warfare that was likely to ensue prior to the arrival of the "peace system," and because procreation control would naturally also require the existence of a centrally enforced "peace."

The Report reprises the motivation for the study, now clearly stated, in its summary:

"The permanent possibility of war is the foundation for stable government; it supplies the basis for general acceptance of political authority. It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has ensured the subordination of the citizen to the state, by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood.. The war system has provided the machinery through which the motivational forces governing human behavior have been translated into binding social allegiance... The foregoing [political and sociological] functions of war are essential to the survival of the social systems we know today."

Except, perhaps, the one created in the late 1700's by Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Hamilton, and their revolutionary compatriots.

After all of this cerebral effort, the Report concludes, "No program or combination of programs yet proposed for a transition to peace has remotely approached meeting the comprehensive functional requirements of a world without war... The war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until

1) we know exactly what it is we plan to put in its place, and

2) we are certain, beyond reasonable doubt, that these substitute institutions will serve their purposes in terms of the survival and stability of society.. It is uncertain, at this time, whether peace will ever be possible. It is far more questionable . that it would be desirable, even if it were demonstrably attainable."

But given the above, the Report goes on to complain how even the "war system" is getting difficult and risky to manage. For example, it is becoming more possible "that one or more sovereign nations may arrive, through ambiguous leadership, at a position in which a ruling administrative class may lose control of basic public opinion or of its ability to rationalize a desired war." Horrors! What if significant leaks were to develop in the media's paper and electronic curtains? The final recommendation of the study is that a War/Peace Research Agency be created, with unlimited secret funding, and accountable only to the President, to continue research on both how to get to the sought-for permanent peace, and how best to shore up the present war system so that it can continue to be efficiently used until such time as a stable peace is secured. The war studies should include, for example, the "determination of minimum and optimum levels of destruction of life, property, and natural resources prerequisite to the credibility of external threat essential to the political and motivational functions."

One wonders if such a War/Peace Research Agency presently exists. In our review (Chapter 5) of Griffin's The Creature From Jekyll Island we noted that Griffin also had made reference to The Report From Iron Mountain. We encourage you to read and absorb his interpretation, which has an emphasis somewhat different from ours. Griffin supplies evidence of the authenticity of the Report by quoting the written assertion to that effect by Harvard's establishmentarian professor John Kenneth Galbraith, who admitted to participating in the study in at least a consultative capacity. We would also like to borrow from Griffin's conclusions concerning the study's importance. He asks why this study differs from any other think tank effort, and then writes (p. 525):

"The answer is that this one was commissioned and executed, not by ivory tower dreamers and theoreticians, but by people who are in charge. It is the brainchild of the CFR. Furthermore, it should be obvious that the stratagems outlined in the report are already being implemented. All one has to do is hold the report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is conforming to the recommendations of the report. So many things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become perfectly clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria. The Report From Iron Mountain has already created our present. It is now shaping our future."

We will have more to say about a major element of that shaping process in our next review."

Source of this summary: 

This summary is chapter 7 of Alan B Jones' excellent book, How the World Really Works. You can get a free copy of the entire book at the following link:

How the World Really Works

Related Resources:

The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion

1984 by George Orwell

The URL of this page is:


Share This Page
Delicious Digg Facebook Google Bookmarks Reddit Stumbleupon Yahoo My Web Blogmarks Diigo Livejournal Ma.gnolia Netvouz Newsvine Technorati Wists



• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map

The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture

The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days

The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial

The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)


So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]


Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”


[1] Dr. Greg Evenson


Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.

Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.

UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...

"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?


As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.


Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 

How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download

Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)

We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)

False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations

John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto

Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Democracy Is An Illusion

Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?

Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.

What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)

We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.


So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.


Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.


This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”


Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.

Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.

The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes

"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King,

Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.

The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.

The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book

How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)

"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."

“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)