Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
21 May, 2012
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
- Wake Up World … We’re Already Slaves to the Nazi Fourth Reich!
- Is this a Model of the Third Temple in Jerusalem?
- "Government" is Kept in Place by Gullibility
- How to Reclaim Your Brain: Part 2
- Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in One Page
- The Real Reason for the Military
- The Science Cartel vs. Immanuel Velikovsky
- Women Don't Need Men
- I Wish I Had A Woman as Nice as My Dog
- Why I am Proud to be Homophobic
- Diana Was Murdered for Seeking Love
- Rense and Icke--Birds of a Feather?
- Media Ignores Women Cheaters
- Mormonism is Luciferian and Masonic
- How Canada Was Sold Out--the Book
- Eight Signs the Illuminati Orchestrated World War II
- Resist by Boycotting Your Bank!
- Understand that the Banking System is One
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as
a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in
today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are
addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When
was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because
of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit
in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your
'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur.
In so doing, you are serving our purpose."
(Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists
who are not "TC"
"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in
selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the
official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For
propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home...
In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of
countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on
us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the
voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. Wake Up World … We’re
Already Slaves to the Nazi Fourth Reich!
“The people of the world are being tricked, duped, played like a deck of cards by a hidden (and
Satanic) communist oligarchy of ‘illuminati’ international banking magnates. In other words, the whole planet is being run under a World Government
*already*, they are just using terrorism and lies right now to establish more control as
tyrants have done and still do. Astonishingly, it has been recently discovered, in the year 2005, that the
biggest events of the world in the last 100 years have been conducted by the Illuminati on occult numbered
dates especially the World Wars. This book proves the fact that humanity itself has been
continuously and massively deceived and manipulated by elite personages who ritually worship the ‘angel of
the abyss,’ the father of all lies, and secretly rule the whole world through their privatized corporate
banking complex. And the good news (and there is good news despite the bad news) is that Jesus will certainly
soon come to chain the beast back into the abyss through the power granted to Him by the Father and bestow
his blessing of forgiveness and eternal life ontoHIS FOLLOWERS; those who have believed
and trusted in Him. This book contains over 1000 historical facts and proves to those who might be on the
fence that God Our Father’s word is true and just; for the faithful and righteous Jewish; Christians;
Muslims, etc. Israelhas been tricked,
America has been tricked, the whole world has been duped by the devil. This is a rare and valuable
book with a unique set of messages that you will want to show all your skeptical friends, so get your copy of
this amazing book today! The idea of this ebook is to show all those you know before the evil power seizes
their liberties, wealth, and possibly their souls with the Mark! Ephesians 5:11: ‘And have nothing to do with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose
them.’” (Source: http://www.lulu.com/content/104841
2. Is this a Model of the Third Temple in
Model, Third HebrewTemple. Note
foundational floor on which the model rests … it is
the black and white tiling of the floor of a Masonic Lodge!
Brother Alan Lamont has produced another informative video with much on the Knights of the Equestrian Order of
the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem. The Order’s “Church” in Jerusalem is given much attention and may well be
destroyed with the Temple Mount
Mosques during the coming war in Israel—the Pope’s Revived Latin
Kingdom of Jerusalem.
2. "Government" is Kept in Place by Gullibility
Extract from Frederick Mann’s essay, “The Nature of Government.”
“‘Government’ is a granfalloon, a scam, a hoax, a fraud, a swindle, a theatrical tragicomedy,
and a form of parasitism or cannibalism kept in place by certain fraud-words, by superstition, by idolatry,
by gullibility, by lack of thinking skills, by brainwashing, by mass hallucination, by terror, and by
violence.” (Frederick Mann)
Download the full essay, “The Nature of Government,” from here:
To think of Slick Willy as "President of the U.S.A.," is pure gullibility. The same applies to
Washington, Jefferson, and all the others. They were all liars and impostors - idols. The entire "U.S." political system has been a fraud and a hoax since the outset. The same
applies to all the other political systems I know of.
Why are people so gullible as to believe politicians, bureaucrats, and lawyers? The first reason
is that human consciousness is in its infancy. In
evolutionary terms, consciousness is a very recent development - as Nietzsche indicated. Erving Goffman
started his book Frame Analysis with:
"There is a venerable tradition in philosophy that argues that what the reader assumes to be
real is but a shadow, and that by attending to what the writer says about perception, thought, the brain,
language, culture, a new methodology, or novel social forces, the veil can be lifted. That sort of line, of
course, gives as much a role to the writer and his writings as is possible to imagine and for that reason is
Later in the same book - implying that it's impossible for people to become more conscious? -
"I can only suggest that he who would combat false consciousness and awaken people to their true
interests has much to do, because the sleep is very deep. And I do not intend here to provide a lullaby but merely to sneak in and watch the way people
snore." [emphasis added]
The second reason is that many beliefs are
culturally passed on from generation to generation. In general, people who question cultural beliefs tend to be
ridiculed, punished, cast out, or killed. Furthermore, the politicians, bureaucrats, and lawyers have created
concentration camps for brainwashing (euphemistically called "schools" by the gullible) where the youth are
coercively inculcated with cultural beliefs designed to perpetuate and strengthen the political
The third reason why many people are so gullible is that few have developed the thinking skills
to question what they are taught and what they see, hear, and read in the media.
"Government" is Kept in Place by a Lack of Thinking Skills
To see through political hoaxes requires thinking skills. The most important one is probably
the ability to question everything. Robert Anton Wilson wrote as follows in his book Right Where You Are Sitting
"On a night in September 1927 when he contemplated suicide at the age of 32, Buckminster Fuller
decided to live the rest of his life as an experiment. He wouldn't believe anything anybody told him -
"golden rule," "dog-eat-dog," or any of it - and would try to find out by experience only, what could be
physically demonstrated to work.
In the year following that decision, Bucky stopped talking entirely, like many mystics in the
east. He insists that he had nothing "mystical" in mind. "I was simply trying to free myself of conditioned
reflexes," he said. He had met pioneer semanticist Alfred Korzybski shortly before and was convinced that
Korzybski was correct in his claim that language structures caused conditioned associations - mechanical
reactions that keep us locked into certain perceptual grids. Fuller tried to break these grids, to find out
what a person "of average intelligence" could accomplish if guided only by personal observation and
The language we use influences the thoughts we think much more than the thoughts we think
influence the language we use. We are encased in fossil metaphors; verbal chains guide us through our daily
Physicists, for example, spent nearly three centuries looking for a substance, heat, to
correspond to the substantive noun, "heat"; it took a revolution in chemistry and thermodynamics before we
realized that heat should not be thought of as a noun (a thing) but a verb (a process) - a relationship
between the motions of molecules.
Around the turn of this century - this is all old news, even though most literary
"intellectuals" still haven't heard about it - several mathematicians and philosophers who were well versed
in the physical sciences began to realize consciously that there is not necessarily a "thing" (a static and
block-like entity) corresponding to every noun in our vocabulary."
Fuller's many inventions and discoveries stem largely from his ability to question everything.
It's through the application of this and other thinking skills that we discover that the most fundamental
issue concerning "government" is the underlying thought patterns, consisting of statist fraud-concepts like
"government," "state," "nation," "king," "president," "law," etc. According to Robert Pirsig in Zen and
the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance:
"But to tear down a factory or to revolt against a government... is to attack effects rather
than causes; and as long as the attack is upon effects only, no change is possible. The true system, the real
system, is our present construction of systematic thought itself, rationality itself. And if a factory is torn down but the rationalitywhich produced it is left standing, then that rationality will simply produce another
factory.If a revolution destroys a systematic government, but the systematic patterns of thought that
produced that government are left intact, then those patterns will
repeat themselves in the succeeding government..."[emphasis added]
Frank Herbert illustrates the same principle in his book The White Plague:
"There's a lust for power in the Irish as there is in every people, a lusting after the
ascendancy where you can tell others how to behave. It has a peculiar shape with the Irish, though. It comes
of having lost our ancient ways - the simpler laws, the rath and the family at the core of society. Romanized
governments dismay us. They always resolve themselves into widely separated ascendants and subjects, the
latter being more numerous than the former, of course. Sometimes it's done with great subtlety as it was in
America, the slow accumulations of power, law upon law and all of it manipulated by an elite whose monopoly
it is to understand the private language of injustice. Do not blame the ascendants. Such separation requires
docile subjects as well. This may be the lot of any government, Marxist Russians included. There's a peculiar
human susceptibility you see when you look at the Soviets, them building an almost exact copy of the Czarist
regimes, the same paranoia, the same secret police, the same untouchable military, and the murder squads, the
Siberian death camps, the lid of terror on creative imagination, deportation of the ones who cannot be killed
off or bought off. It's like some terrible plastic
memory sitting there in the dark of our minds, ready on the instant to reshape itself into primitive patterns the
moment the heat touches it." [emphasis added]
Let me suggest to you that the "terrible plastic memory" consists of concepts like "government,"
"state," "nation," "king," "president," "law," etc. The tragedy of organizing human affairs into structures
called "government" will be resolved when the underlying structures of words, and the thoughts that stem from
the words, are changed. In The Virtue of Selfishness Ayn Rand wrote:
"If some men do not choose to think, but survive by imitating and repeating, like trained
animals, the routine sounds and motions they learned from others, never making an effort to
understand ... they are the men who march into the abyss, trailing after any destroyer who promises
them to assume the responsibility they evade: the responsibility of being conscious."
"Government" is Kept in Place by Brainwashing
My book Wake Up America! The Dynamics of Human Power (available from Terra Libra)
includes a chapter titled "Are our Schools Concentration Campuses for Mind Destruction?" in which I describe
"education" in some detail.
Ayn Rand's The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution, contains a chapter, "The
Comprachicos." Comprachico is a Spanish word meaning
"child-buyer." The comprachicos were a nomadic association, notorious in the seventeenth century. They bought
and sold children - special children, children turned into deformed freaks, used in freak shows to amuse the
public. At an early age they placed a young child in a porcelain pot with a grotesque form. As the child's
body grew, it had to assume the shape of the pot. The result was a deformed freak for people to laugh
Rand uses the practice of the comprachicos as an analogy
to describe American "education." She refers to our "educators" as "the comprachicos of the mind." Children's
minds are forced to assume the shape of a grotesque "intellectual pot." Rand describes the result:
"The students' development is arrested, their minds are set to respond to slogans, as animals
respond to a trainer's whistle, their brains are embalmed in the syrup of altruism as an
automatic substitute for self-esteem... They would obey anyone, they need a
master, they need to be told what to do. They are ready now to be used as cannon fodder - to attack, to bomb, to burn, to murder, to
fight in the streets and die in the gutters. They are a trained pack of
miserably impotent freaks, ready to be
unleashed against anyone." [emphasis added]
In every part of the world, the monsters who masquerade as "government," do their utmost to
achieve monopoly control of the so-called "education system" - they try to make it compulsory so all children
will be subjected to government brainwashing. The result is that practically every victim is degraded into an
unthinking follower... or unthinking rebel.
"Government" is Kept in Place by Mass Hallucination
My Webster's definition of hallucination includes the following:
· Perception of objects with no reality;
· A completely unfounded or mistaken impression or notion.
We could also describe hallucination as "seeing" or "perceiving" what's not there - or "seeing"
or "perceiving" more than exists in reality.
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) could be described as the science of representational
systems. In our brains we have "neural patterns" or "models" that attempt to represent reality. For example,
in my brain I have a "picture" of a table. If someone asks me to draw a picture of a table, I access the
"picture" or "model" in my head, from which I then draw a table. These "pictures," "models," or "neural
patterns" are called representational systems. They include intellectual, emotional, visual, auditory, and
other sensory data.
Our representational systems are more or less "useful." To
the extent that we use them to predict accurately and produce desirable results, we regard them as useful. NLP
people have identified three major ways in which our representational systems differ from reality:
Generalization - e.g., the representational system called "furniture" - or the "intellectual" neural pattern:
"all women are the same."
Distortion - e.g., "the color of my car is blue" - the physicist tells us this is a distortion; it's more
accurate to say that my car's outer surface reflects light with the wavelength we call "blue," while
absorbing light with other wavelengths.
Deletion - e.g., "Tom is a wonderful, generous, happy, healthy individual" - Tom has many other
attributes, some of which have been ignored or "deleted" from my representational system.
· I've identified a very important fourth way in which our representational systems differ from
Addition - e.g., "John-the-stranger is a King, therefore he has special powers; and the words that come
out of his mouth are special and therefore are the law which must be obeyed." John is really an ordinary man.
By representing him as a "King" in our representational systems, we have added something to what
exists in reality. Similarly, John's words are ordinary like those of the rest of us, and when we represent
some of his words as "the law" in our representational systems, we have added something to what occurs
The essence of hallucination is "seeing" or "perceiving" what doesn't really exist or occur. The
phenomenon of addition, as described above, is simply hallucination. To have a neural patterns or mental
models that say "the government runs the country," "government makes law," "Slick Willy is President of the
U.S.A.," all constitute hallucination.
It's these forms of hallucination that keep "government" in place. Because practically all
humans suffer from similar political hallucinations, they tend to all agree with each other about certain
fundamental political concepts and notions - such as "government," "state," "country," "nation,"
"constitution," "king," "president," "law," etc. If anybody questions or challenges these concepts or
nations, they tend to think he's crazy. The phenomenon is mass hallucination.
Here is one of my favorite sentences: "The notion of "law" (so-called) is an hallawcinotion" -
it sounds even better in French: "La notion de la "loi" (soi-disant) est une halloicinotion." How's that for
"Government" is Kept in Place by Terror and by Violence
Ultimately, political power comes from the barrel of the gun - as Mao said. The last resort of
the monsters who masquerade as "government" is terror and violence. That's why they need the IRS, the ATF,
the FBI, the CIA, etc. They have to threaten, terrorize, punish, and kill to retain their coercive power.
Make examples out of those who question, threaten, or challenge their so-called "authority."
That's why it's appropriate to call them "territorial gangsters" or "territorial criminals" or
"terrocrats" - monsters who use fraud, coercion, and violence to claim "jurisdiction" over a certain area,
and the people who happen to be in that area. The monsters do so in order to control and dominate, and to
live like parasites or cannibals off the values created by their victims. The foregoing is another very
useful definition of "government!"
Download the full essay, “The Nature of Government,” from here:
2. How to Reclaim Your Brain: Part
By Walter Allen Thompson
In the first instalment I covered my general experiences about being a brain-washed drone to being able to utilize more common
sense. The problem most of us have is either a government weenie tells us to do this or
to do that, or some wack-job religious teacher scares us with various teachings of the Bible which may or may
not be true. The religious teachers are the most dangerous people on the planet because a man's
religious fervor is stronger than his political proclivities. Once he is thoroughly ensconced in his
religion, it becomes very difficult for him to believe in any other religion or in any other idea. He
can then be manipulated into giving up his own life for a belief that may or may not be true. I've been
through most types of Christian beliefs, and I can confidently say that everything today that is passed off
as Christian is not. So how do we separate ourselves from those things that are questionable. How
do we reclaim our brains and start thinking for ourselves?
We have to understand that there are two
major areas of operation in the physical and the spiritual realm: God the creator
and His goodness; Satan, Lucifer, and his evil. Since man has a freewill, he has the choice between
good and evil. Here is where you reclaim your brain. I'm going to assume that most of the readers
know the commandments and have a good idea what is natural law.
With all the religions in the world, how we know God? That's easy. He would be the
one who created everything we see and don't see. That is the God we are responsible to and of course
His commandments are important. How do we know what commandments we are supposed to
Most of them are obvious and can be rationally thought out through the use of reason.
Because the commandments are always present within the natural law and they can be confirmed without the use
of a book.
Let's look at the commandment of not having
any false gods before Him and not to
make any graven images. It's obvious that mankind is to worship God the creator
only, and it would be stupid to worship something that is created. Remember, the created cannot be
worshiped. So then any false religious doctrine should be ignored because it will draw us over to the
darkside. We don't want to worship a satanic delusion. In my experience in "Christian" churches,
I have seen so many false doctrines that I couldn't keep track of them all and I saw it in every
church. In fact, I can safely say that I have never seen a Christian church. If it wasn't for
some of the earlier Christian writings, I would have given up on it long ago. If there is false
doctrine, then there is idolatry. In order for me to preserve my own well-being and not offend God, I
no longer go to any church. If a doctrine is false then the whole organization is on the
darkside. If you go into various churches you will see statues. Are they not graven images?
If they were true to their own Bible they wouldn't have them in the churches. So when you see them, you
know that you are in a church that is evil.
Of course this is hypocritical to say one thing and do another, but it is useful for us to
recognize them for what they are and then just stay away from them. And that is our immediate
solution. It is better to simply separate oneself from the spiritual nonsense. We will always be
tempted to offend God and this is the spiritual battle with which we are all involved.
Your best evidence is in the natural law. Anyone can write a book, but a book has too many
opportunities for someone to lie or to make gross errors. The Bible isn't any different. The
Bible has many conflicts in "moral character." While I believe that there is a lot of truth in the
Bible, even that has to be double-checked to make sure what I am reading is true. In these two
examples, it is easy to understand that we are not to worship that which is created. Why worship a
statue that was made with a man's hands. Why worship a god who is a lie? Just because some
preacher holds the Bible and says that it is the word of God, doesn't mean that it is true. Every
writing has to be checked with reason and common sense. God didn't put in a bunch of secret codes that
only the chosen few would understand. I believe that God put the commandments in nature and in us, and
he made them simple to obey. If we go outside of them, then we waste our lives.
When we choose good then our lives become
enjoyable. When we worship God we need to do it in truth, then we will benefit
from the life that He gave us.
Now, the Bible claims that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. How do I know that is
true? Well, it may be, but it doesn't make any difference because Christ told people to keep the
commandments and the gospel said he is God. So if I worship the God who created me, and Jesus Christ
was a true historical figure and was indeed the Messiah, then I am essentially worshiping the same
person. But if Jesus Christ is false, and some jerk made up the stories, then that could draw me into idolatry. I'm not willing to take that
chance. I do believe there is a hell, because all of the evil people have to go somewhere. I
believe the soul of a man is immortal and it makes sense to do things the right way so as not to offend my
[Nazarene Remnant comment:
Unfortunately our author here, Walter Allen Thompson, is a sincere man, but on the subject of believing that
Jesus Christ and the Creator God, who we call God the Father, are one and the same Being, he is seriously in
error. For the truth of the matter see our free book The
God Messiah Worhships.]
What this does for me is to stop all the religious arguments. I don't have to go from one
chapter and verse to another to make a point. And I am or was very accomplished at that, but then I realized
that if it wasn't true, I would be spreading some liar's nonsense to innocent hearers. All I am
expected to do is to fear God and keep His commandments because I was created that way. All men and
women are subject to the same God because in nature we all live on the same planet. If we flushed all
of the religious groups down the toilet (symbolically speaking), then most of the commandments would be kept
and mankind's troubles would be greatly diminished. That would be a very advanced society. I know
this works because I can see the benefit from it when I behave myself.
Walter Allen Thompson is the author of Grace of Repentance: Keeping God's Commandments, available here: http://www.graceofrepentance.com
Also by Walter Allen
How to Reclaim Your Brain: Part 2 in Issue
58 of Last Days Watch
How to Reclaim Your Brain: Part 3 in Issue 60 of Last
All Bad Things Flow from the Oath of a
Any Man Who Takes An Oath Is A Liar
Swear an Oath; Tell a Lie
3. Protocols of the Learned Elders of
Zion in One Page
Goyim are mentally inferior to Jews and can’t run their nations properly. For their sake and ours,
we need to abolish their governments and replace them with a single
government. This will take a long time and involve much bloodshed, but it’s for a good
cause. Here’s what we’ll need to do:
• Place our agents and helpers everywhere
• Take control of the media and use it in propaganda for our plans
• Start fights between different races, classes and religions
• Use bribery, threats and blackmail to get our way
• Use Freemasonic Lodges to attract potential public officials
• Appeal to successful people’s egos
• Appoint puppet leaders who can be controlled by blackmail
• Replace royal rule with socialist rule, then communism, then despotism
• Abolish all rights and freedoms, except the right of force by us
• Sacrifice people (including Jews sometimes) when necessary
• Eliminate religion; replace it with science and materialism
• Control the education system to spread deception and destroy intellect
• Rewrite history to our benefit
• Create entertaining distractions
• Corrupt minds with filth and perversion
• Encourage people to spy on one another
• Keep the masses in poverty and perpetual labor
• Take possession of all wealth, property and (especially) gold
• Use gold to manipulate the markets, cause depressions etc.
• Introduce a progressive tax on wealth
• Replace sound investment with speculation
• Make long-term interest-bearing loans to governments
• Give bad advice to governments and everyone else
Eventually the Goyim will be so angry with their governments (because we’ll blame them for the resulting mess)
that they’ll gladly have us take over. We will then appoint a descendant of David
to be king of the world, and the remaining Goyim will bow down and sing his praises. Everyone will live
in peace and obedient order under his glorious rule.
Of course the descendant of David they are referring to is Prince Charles of Wales! For more information
see our free book ...
The Sinister Garden at Highgrove
4. The Real
Reason for the Military
[Narazene Remnant comment: The real reason for the military, as well as the police force, is to serve as the private army
of the London-controlled Corporation, known as the Crown (which is not to be confused with the British
Monarchy, or the House of Windsor). It is this sinister hidden hand all around the world which insists that
its people always swear oaths to serve them (the Crown) first and foremost, rather than God and His
By Fred Reed
November 2, 2011
I read frequently among the lesser neuronal of the supposed honor of soldiers, of the military
virtues of courage, loyalty, and uprightness—that in an age of moral decomposition only the military adhere
to principles, and that our troops in places like Afghanistan nobly make sacrifices to preserve our freedoms and
democracy. Is not all of this nonsense?
Honour? A soldier is just a nationally certified hit-man,
perfectly amoral.When he joins the military he agrees to kill anyone he is told to kill, regardless of whether he
has previously heard of the country in which he will kill them or whether the residents pose any threat to
him or his. How is this honourable? It is cause for lifelong shame.
It is curious that so many soldiers think that they are Christians. Christianity
is incompatible with military service, if any Christianity is meant that Christ would have
regarded with other than repugnance.
The explanation of course lies in the soldier’s moral compartmentation. Within his own tribe or
pack, these usually being denominated “countries,” he is the soul of moral propriety—doesn’t knock over
convenience stores, kick his dog, or beat his children; speaks courteously, observes personal hygiene, and
works tirelessly for the public good in the event of natural disasters. A steely gaze with little behind it
and a firm handshake amplify the appearance of probity.
In conflict with foreigners, he will burn, bomb, rape and torture indiscriminately. His is the
behaviour of feral dogs, which humans closely resemble.
Sacrifice? GIs do not make sacrifices. They are
sacrificed, sacrificed for big egos, big contracts, for the shareholders of military industries, for pasty
patriots in salons who never wore boots. They fight not for love of country but to stay alive, and from the
fear of the punishments meted out to deserters. If you doubt this, tell the men in Afghanistan that they may
come home on the next plane without penalty, and see how many stay. Troops are as manipulated as roosters in
a cock fight, forced to choose between combat and the pot.
Who Takes an Oath is
an Agent of the Enemy
"Why are the oaths
used? The intent of the oath, as all things that are
against God, is to destroy mankind. There is no other purpose for it. The oath has
a man violate God's law just by taking it. The oath is an act of idolatry, and it is so
commonplace, that its presence is hardly
noticed. Yet, it is present in almost all
political and religious systems. The only religious system that forbids it is true
The oath is the primary tool of antichrist to destroy mankind and ruin his life in
so many ways. It sets mankind upon the path of evil; disabling him from doing any
good for himself because the oath is the oath of bondage. it binds the soul to a
bond; it is the worst thing a man can do to himself. Those people in the United
States, in the political system, who are on the "right" or on the "left" always
speak about their oaths to the system. What they do not realize is that the oath is the major
component of death and hell. The U.S. Constitution could
have been written without the oath, but it was put in because those "founding
fathers" were subject to antichrist and not the Jesus Christ (the Messiah) of the
true scriptures. Thus, the whole political and legal systems are bad religion
rather than a type of politically system. In this case, religion and politics are
intimately intertwined by the oath; it is the common denominator when reduced to
its lowest form of evil." (Walter Allen Thompson, "Swear and Oath; Tell a
Lie," from here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/swear-and-oath-tell-a-lie.html )
Also see Walter Allen Thompson's "All Bad Things Flow from the Oath of a
Man," here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/all-bad-things-flow-from-the-oath-of-a-man.html
Always, to understand the bloody absurdity of the
military, bear in mind the primitive, overriding instinct of mankind to form packs and fight
other packs. It is the only drive that can at times take precedence over sex. Thus we have tribes, football
teams, Crips and Bloods, religious wars, rabid political parties, and patriotism, this latter being far the
worst. Men in particular live primed to form martial herds and rush mindlessly upon other herds, waving
slogans, arguments, forty-yard passes from scrimmage, swords, naval artillery, or white phosphorous. Dogs.
Ants. Soldiers. Humanity.
Nowadays a high moral pretext for war will be contrived, embodying saccharine goodness and nauseous piety. We kill them to make them free, butcher their families because
they must be democratic. The race has accumulated just enough fragile decency to want a noble
pretext before burning children. Yet the pack’s hostility to outsiders remains the primary drive behind wars,
with reasons hung on later like Christmas ornaments.
Read the Full Article:
The Real Reason for the Military
5. The Science Cartel vs. Immanuel
16 September 2009
In 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky (left) culminated decades of research with a
book titled Worlds in Collision that
"proposes that many myths and traditions of ancient peoples and cultures are based on actual events." His
approach was interdisciplinary, a rarity in the 20th century, taking into account astronomy, physics, chemistry,
psychology, ancient history, and comparative mythology.
He noted, for example, that Venus,[Nazarene Remnant comment: Venus is the star-emblem of the Messiah, as
recorded in Revelations 22: 16: "I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I
am the root and the offspring of David, [and] the bright and morning
star."] the second brightest object in the night sky, was not mentioned by the earliest
astronomers. He proposed that the planet was a newcomer to our solar system, a comet, appearing in historical times
with an irregular orbit that caused catastrophic events on our own planet.
Coming in close contact with the Earth, the latter's rotation
altered, making it appear that The Sun had stood still, a
phenomenon reported on in the Book of Josue. What has come to be
known as Joshua's Long Day is corroborated by the texts of
the ancient Chinese, Japanese, Egyptians, Babylonians, and Mayans; the East Asians reporting a extremely long
sunset, the Mexicans reporting an extremely long sunrise.
Immanuel Velikovsky was too eminent a scholar to be dismissed
outright as a kook, and he counted some respected people among his friends. (See The Einstein-Velikovsky Correspondence). Nevertheless, his
Catastrophism was rejected outright by a scientific establishment that
couldn't stomach an interdisciplinary challenge to its dogmatic Uniformitarianism, even after Velikovsky's predictions about the
temperature of Venus and radio activity from Jupiter were proven true.
Stephen Jay Gould summed up mainstream scientific
opinion, saying, "Velikovsky is neither crank nor charlatan - although to state my opinion and to quote one of my
colleagues, he is at least gloriously wrong ... Velikovsky would rebuild the science of celestial mechanics to save
the literal accuracy of ancient legends." Velikovsky would counter that "the ancient traditions are our best guide
to the appearance and arrangement of the earliest remembered solar system, not some fancy computer's
retrocalculations based upon current understanding of astronomical principles."
While recognized as "neither crank nor charlatan," Velikovsky and his ideas were denied a hearing in what same to
be known as the "Velikovsky Affair."
Read the Full Article:
Cartel vs. Immanuel Velikovsky
6. Women Don't
March 26, 2012
"It's going to take some
time to work things out. Meantime, women such as Magdalena Hinojosa (above) still find it hard to
get a date."
The "empowerment" of women was social engineering not social change. It was designed to make them
seek career instead of family. They were told they could "have it all" but for most, that was a lie.
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
Feminism has been convincing women they "don't need men" since the 1960's. Now women have one problem. They can't find
Successful women often make men feel demoralized and inadequate.
a recent article by Margaret Wente, What if Women Don't Need Guys Any More:
"Magdalena Hinojosa, (above) a striking-looking single woman, is a senior associate vice-president at the
University of Texas. She's learned
that her job makes men uneasy. So when they ask her what she does, she simply tells them she works ... in
the admissions office.
"You have to hide who you are, at the beginning, until that person is comfortable with you," she says.
In the past fifty years, feminism has swept through society like an Oklahoma tornado leaving a trail of
1. "Women in America now earn almost half the family income, and more than half in lower-income families. Forty per
cent of wives now out-earn their husbands. And the gender gap is closing fast. The median income of
young, unmarried urban women in their 20s is now higher than the men's."
2. "More than half of births to American women under 30 now occur outside marriage. One mother, Amber
Strader, 27, said she was in an on-and-off relationship when she got pregnant. Marrying her boyfriend, a clerk at
Sears, never entered her mind. "It was like living with
3. Men have been deprived of their identity. "What happens when they aren't needed as providers any more?
What happens when their sense of purpose is
lost? The answer is, they become unmoored."
4. The US
birthrate is down from 23 births per 1000 in 1960 to 13.8 in 2011, the lowest point in history!
In 1960, 72% of all American adults were married; in 2010
just 51% were. The number dropped sharply by 5% in the most recent year, 2009-10.
We don't need to debate that a stable loving marriage between a man and
a woman is the best foundation for raising children, and for giving people
identity, purpose and love.
With statistics like those cited above, you'd think the government and media would be sounding the alarm.
What do we hear instead? The news is full of homosexual marriage. Gays don't have children. Those who want to
marry represent roughly one person in every
thousand. Schools and media actively promote homosexuality which is a debilitating developmental disorder.
"Gay Rights" is a mask for a vile attack on
something is fundamentally wrong. Our society has been subverted by a satanic cult, the Illuminati (
i.e. Freemasonry.) Our government, corporations and media are owned or controlled by the Illuminati central banking
Everybody who achieves public success -- educators, politicians, journalists,
feminists in general -- is either a dupe or a traitor. They have
sold their soul to this devil-worshiping cult unwittingly or not.
Read the Whole Article:
Women Don't Need
7. I Wish I Had A Woman as Nice as My
By Walter Allen Thompson
I was getting out of my car this morning, and my little Yorkie stuck out her paw and scrapped it on
my hand wanting me to pet her. She's so nice. She does this a
lot--though it's a bit annoying when I'm driving--because all she wants is some love and a little attention. I
pet her on the head and she's happy, and will lay down and sleep on a longer trip.
A dog will give a man unconditional love; whereas, a woman may or may not keep you around
depending upon the prevailing winds. I don't have to buy my dog a food dish lined with
My dog doesn't get crabby and vicious for no reason because she loves me unconditionally.
My dog doesn't run up a charge account at Macy's, and she doesn't spend $50.00 to do her nails. My dog
doesn't take drugs, drink alcohol, or crash my brand new car. My dog doesn't stand there and "bitch me
out" for not being sensitive to her needs. All my dog needs is a little love, attention, and her
food. Overall, the quality of life with my dog has far exceeded any relationship I have had with any
woman. If you want to know where you stand with a woman, just run out of money. If you
have a woman that stays with you when you're broke or in a setback, then
you have a good one. The value of any relationship depends upon
unconditional love, and that's more evident with my dog.
My guess is that animals are not subject to evil
as people are. Even wild animals seem to be more behaved than mankind. Animals don't strap explosives on
themselves and then go blow up other animals. You don't see eagles or vultures flying over the
elephants dropping bombs on them. When was the last time you saw a socialist animal? Animals
don't shave their faces, armpits, or legs, put on makeup, they don't get pierced or get tattoos, take drugs,
engage in homosexual activities, nor do they cross-dress. You will never see a male lion shave
his mane nor his beard in order to look like a female lion. You don't see them working on
their "six pack" (I have a one pack). You'll never see animals joining the freemasons or other
satanic cults. Animals have more freedom than people.
So when some of you call a woman a "bitch" think about what you are saying. The word
"bitch" means a female dog. So if you are going to use the word with its true meaning, you would
actually be insulting female dogs, because the dogs have better behaviour than many women. You can
blame a lot that on the feminist movement, but also, because men and women refuse to stay within their
natural order of life, which are God's commandments. I would never insult my dog by calling Gloria
Allred a "bitch". I'm trying to maintain a higher standard; I would call her a feminist but not a
bitch. The feminist movement has made many of our women unseemly wenches. Raise the moral
standards, and the problems will subside. It's not like there's no solution.
I love my bitch and I don't want to say anything to offend her. My bitch is sweet, my
bitch is lovable, my bitch is kind, my bitch is considerate, and she hardly causes me any trouble. She
doesn't mess with my mind; doesn't say yes today and no tomorrow. She doesn't tell me she loves me
today, but tomorrow she wants a divorce. My dog doesn't pole dance at drunken parties. My dog doesn't pick up
"stud muffins" at bars. My dog doesn't make porno films. My dog doesn't take me to court (you lawyers …
don't get any ideas) and she doesn't make any unreasonable demands. It is a perfect relationship as I
don't have to entertain any of her relatives. My dog is my friend and not my
If I was ever to consider getting married again, the woman would have to (at the very
least) rise to the level of the behaviour of my beautiful little dog. Dogs and animals stay within the natural order in which God created; many people do not.
The Manipulated Man
8. Why I am Proud to be
March 25, 2012
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
(from Nov 11, 2002)
I'm "coming out"
as a homophobe and I urge more people to join me. I am defining "homophobe" as someone who is afraid
of homosexual activists, hence the suffix "phobia." Gay activists use this term to bludgeon opponents. Let's
embrace it instead.
I had always accepted the mass media's portrayal of gays as
a colorful minority like the Croatians, who have a special "sexual orientation." They meet each other at their bars
and do their thing. As long as they kept it within their own community, what did I care?
But they don't. To my surprise I recently learned that most
gays prefer heterosexual males. My source is a book, The Caricature of Love, (1957), by Dr. Hervey Checkley, a
clinical professor of psychiatry at the Medical College of Georgia. A gay friend also confirmed this fact to me.
That would explain the amount of gay porn on the Internet found by searching the term "straight men."
I also learned that many gays prefer youths, and these
experiences often turn victimized children into homosexuals and/or distort their lives. A survey of readers of the
gay magazine The Advocate indicated that 21% of respondents were sexually abused by an adult by age 15. This seems
to be one way that homosexuals "propagate." My source is an extraordinary research paper by psychologist Dr. Judith
Reisman entitled Crafting "Gay" Children: An Inquiry, p. 9.
According to Reisman, the 1991 US Population Statistical
Abstracts indicate that between 1-2 million gay males (2% of the adult male population of 90 million) abuse 6-8
million boys. The ratio is 3-5 boy victims to one gay male compared to one girl victim per eleven straight males.
This is based on data on 33 million boys and 32 million girls under the age of 18. Reisman says that since 100% of
the gay males do not sexually assault boys, the 2% homosexual population harbors a vast pederast subculture
committing multiple repeated child sex offences. (8)
Before I continue, I want to say that I have known the gay
friend I mentioned since I was 11-years-old, and not once in 40 years did he make an improper gesture. No doubt,
there are hundreds of thousands of gays like him who behave with dignity and have no predatory agenda, personal or
Nevertheless lesbian feminist and gay activists, by their
own admission, are dedicated to recasting society in their own image. (See my columns: "The Other Attack on Our
Manhood" and "American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation.") The mainstream media is assisting by
suppressing all negative information about gay life. In her monograph, Reisman refers to the suppression of data on
gay violence against children, child pornography, sex rings, serial murders, and inter-gay domestic battery.
Another example of media complicity is the Boy Scouts' ban
on gay scoutmasters. There was no mention that about 100 cases of sexual molestation by Boy Scout leaders occurred
every year. According to the Washington Times, (June 15,1993) between 1973 and 1993, 1,416 scout leaders were
expelled for sexually abusing boys.
The Boys Scouts' action belatedly recognized their
obligation to protect their wards. Is there any question they are liable? Yet amazingly the Scouts have come under
scathing attack for "discriminating" against gays. The pederast magazine "Palaver" advises pedophiles to take
positions like Boy Scout leader: "If you want to spend your time with children you must have a legitimate reason
for doing so; as a teacher helping children learn... as a play or youth leader helping children to enjoy their
leisure time" (Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.19). In 1992, the North American Man/Boy Love Association
specifically targeted the Boy Scouts. They passed a resolution calling on the Boy Scouts "to cease in its
discrimination against openly gay or lesbian persons in its appointment of scoutmasters" in order to "permit scouts
to be exposed to a variety of lifestyles." (See "The Nazis in America" in "The Pink Swastika" by Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams). In their literature, gays portray
adult advisors as playing a hands-on role in initiating the young to homosexuality.
According to "The Pink Swastika", the moral courage
exhibited by the Boys Scouts of America is not shared by all youth organizations. The Girl Scouts allows lesbian
leaders in its organizations and has expelled at least one heterosexual leader who refused to keep this policy a
secret from parents. "Big Brothers" and "Big Sisters" actively recruit homosexuals in many cities and lobbied the
Boys Scouts to do the same saying "non traditional volunteers can serve the best interest of children." And of
course, all of this mirrors the push into public schools where youth are prematurely introduced to sex education
and introduced to homosexuality as a lifestyle option.
"Gay rights" activists have targeted the Boy Scouts. An
ostensibly "spontaneous" outcry against the Boy Scouts has arisen across the country, led by the United Way Agency,
which pulled its funding of BSA in many cities. Homosexuals at the highest rank of the US government attempted to
intimidate the organization. Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders used her post to castigate Scout officials (USA Today
June 2, 1994) and Interior secretary Bruce Babbitt signed an order prohibiting Boy Scouts from volunteering in
national parks (Washington Times, May 28,1993). As of June 2001, at least 359 school districts in 10 states have
forbade the Boys Scouts from using their facilities, according to a gay organization quoted in the Washington
Times, Nov. 1, 2001. Congress has just tabled legislation to deny funding to these school districts.
Homosexuals, both feminists and gays, have gained incredible
power by successfully disguising their true character and their true agenda. This is how subversive movements such
as Nazis and Communists function. Under the guise of being a persecuted minority seeking human rights, homosexuals
are actually using the state to persecute heterosexuals. They are waging successful war against all the
institutions of masculinity, femininity and the nuclear family. (As someone pointed out, the Boy Scouts train boys
to become men.)
Their goal is to supplant Judeo-Christ heterosexual values
with their own. Society is in a state of denial about this vicious subversion, which takes practical form in the
actual seduction of heterosexual youth.
As the father of a 14-year-old son, I am afraid of the power
of gay activists. I guess that makes me homophobic. But I am not afraid to say so.
9. Diana Was Murdered for Seeking
April 30, 2012
Ultimately Diana may have
been murdered because she wanted a loving marriage. She found no real men within the British
By David Sinclair
On 10th April 2012, Queen Elizabeth II bestowed on Camilla, wife of Prince Charles, the highest honour:
Dame of the Highest Order of the Victorian Cross - for
Services to the British Monarchy. In normal circumstances this award is reserved for acts of heroism in the
In this case, it means that Camilla, unlike Diana, has fully passed the Monarchy test - and is free - like Prince
Charles - to do as she pleases.
She is now equal to Charles and the
Queen in their personal lives. Diana was never prepared to accept that situation - because she was
horrified by what she saw from the inside.
She was a Natural Woman who sought her equal in a Real Man.
For as long as Monarchy has existed - sex has been a key to the upper layer of royals. Ruling monarchs can do as they please in
sexual terms and bisexual behavior has been prevalent for
Centuries ago, brides could be as young as two-years-old! The catalog of European facts is shocking. Anyone
who 'pleases' a major royal sexually will be honored. Many members of the Pop Industry have enjoyed honors
for that reason only.
(Charles, left, was
recorded saying he envied Camilla's tampons.)
Diana hoped to break the mold. That proved to be fatal. She found no Real Men within British
The first Real Man she did find was
the first to be suspiciously killed off - in another motoring accident - as a warning - to Diana. She
was convinced of that and those who know the bigger picture are also convinced of it.
Barry Mannakee (see picture, below, right)
who was once her personal Bodyguard. He also saw what went on first-hand and sympathized with Diana's
That was not approved. Barry was taken off duty to Diana and put with MI-6 Security. While on a motorbike
mission, a very odd accident was set up.
That also involved a Fiat Uno. From all accounts - the
motorbike on which Barry was riding - suddenly became erratic - as did the Fiat Uno - as if electrical
interference was disturbing his vehicle's electrics and a skid and crash took place in which he was
It all happened like clockwork - and
got the desired message to Diana - of fear and terror.
Some time later - a copycat accident was set up for Diana herself on the Cromwell Road, London again with a Fiat
Uno involved. That was 22nd March 1996 - the year before her third and final fatal experience.
Diana was under extreme pressures to keep silent about insider
royals. She was prepared to do that - to help her retain rights as Mother to her sons.
She had Paul Burrell the Butler to share her secrets with - which acted as a buffer for her. However, Burrell
wasn't always absolutely confidential.
Certain menace merchants wanted to get rid of her altogether including top Church of England officials. They
made no secret of it either.
They began a very nasty smear campaign questioning her sanity. However, it didn't convince the British public
who knew the real monarchy and insiders only too well.
This was a source of outrage to the Monarchy - so the assassination strategy evolved. Diana was scared.
Centuries ago, they could just have executed her - so whatever happened would have to be subtle - as per the two
crash warnings she had received.
Diana knew Camilla was the reason.Camilla was a senior female to
Prince Charles - she had first rights - over Diana.
Even her husband , Andrew
Parker-Bowles had to defer to her and Charles. He had no say in whether - or when - they could
disappear for sex sessions - even though he was her husband and had children by her.
Andrew had been a senior security guard for Charles. Monarchs have these privileges - they can take who they want.
It is barbaric in modern terms such as Diana understood.
MARRIAGE TO CHARLES
On the eve of Diana's marriage to Charles, Camilla left a note on Diana's bed telling her what days she would be
allowed access to Charles.
Diana spent that night alone - whilst he went to Camilla - as Camilla requested. This scene from a horror
movie was reality for Diana.
In 2-12, UK press reported that
Camilla and Charles spend most of their time
apart. She said she prefers her old life in her old house. She complained about Charles'
very bad moods and verbal sniping. He has male friends
One of those is
Tony Blair. With Camilla as his new wife, he felt
less free to be - free. However, now that she has proved herself - she has royal seal of approval to move out and do as she pleases
whilst keeping up the 'united' front for press - with no threat to Charles.
Blair are open supporters of Islam. In fact, they are very clear about that. They both
want one religion - and hope to define that for the Earth. This is despite Blair having converted to
Catholicism. He reads his copy of Q'uran every single day. Their patronage of Islam has raised very
major concerns amongst UK people and press. Followers of Islam in UK have realized outrageous powers and that
is creating unrest.
Consequently, Diana had wanted to prove that the two different religions could live well together - as real people
- and sealed her allegiance with Al Fayeds on that. Dodi Al-Fayed was a real
The Establishment wanted their own way - with no success for Diana and no future access
to her own children. They could not risk her being active anywhere-especially America, where she planned to
Diana became a Martyr for the Real Man. She is remembered for that. When Paul Burrell looked likely to
spill the beans on insider reality and facts he also knew about the sex-ploits of bisexual persons - he came under
a life threatening situation.
(Dodi and Diana,
Diana had left him some memorabilia in her Will. The Queen accused him of stealing them and he landed
in High Court where he could have been imprisoned for many long years. Once they had sealed his silence and
made their point - at the eleventh hour - literally- as he stood in the Dock awaiting judgements - the Queen
changed her story - to acknowledge that he had agreed to be lip stitched. It was a tense moment. His family
were threatened too.
The royals have been extremely angry that Diana is still so
missed. Her name is forbidden to be mentioned within their private circles.
Camilla is and was duly rewarded. She can do whatever she wants now and anyone who dares expose her will be
dealt with like Diana. It is very prehistoric.
Now UK boys are being groomed and pressured into believing that all men are gay really - but just don't understand
that and won't admit that. You can't succeed in government, business or entertainment
unless you sign on to this
agenda. Diana separated on all of that. She hoped to protect her Sons from it
She will always be remembered as a real warrior for the Right to be NATURAL in your chosen inclinations - by
She will always be missed.
Prince Harry not Charles' Son
QEII Born of Artificial
6. Rense and Icke--Birds of a
April 28, 2012
David Icke couldn't defend
JR's suppression of the Fukushima conspiracy theory. He posted it himself. Instead he stooped to ad
hominem attacks. L.C. Vincent reports on a topic Icke won't touch.
"The DI specialist intertwines approximately 15% bogus information
with 85% true and verifiable information. Since the
preponderance of information on the site is true, the false information is then absorbed and perceived as
true." - L.C. Vincent
By L.C. Vincent
I knew your dispute with Jeff Rense involved the tragedy of Fukushima but I did not know the details. Even leaving out his nine
ex-wives and his psychopathic personality, just assessing the bare bones of his edict (not only can't you post
Jim Stone's Fukushima story link on his
site, but you will not post it on YOUR site!) is simply absurd!
This is nothing more than a blatant, dictatorial attempt at censorship of a theory Rense doesn't like, and of
course his stooges, underlings and lapdogs (David Icke in particular) trot along behind him and carry his doggy bag
of turds because he allows them to continue to post their drivel on his disinformation site.
There is only one possible explanation for Jeff Rense's dictatorial
edict: this story cuts to the bone and far too close to the truth for Zionist interests to allow it
to see the light of day. So not only must it be suppressed on the Rense site; it must also be suppressed on
YOUR site! Utterly incredible!
For someone who claims to wear the mantle of a Champion of Truth, Rense's duplicity and agenda are clearly revealed for all
who have eyes to see.
Highly instructional and amusing, too, to find the vaunted David Icke siding with this closet psychopath.
Birds of a feather, no doubt. Even more amusing is Icke's defense of the indefensible....
he therefore attacks you, as a man, while totally ignoring the crux of the argument to which he instinctively
knows there is no genuine rebuttal.
His "logic" is jejune and laughable. Icke, despite his valuable work on the linkages of institutions, royalty
and the spiritual/economic conspiracy, is revealed to be nothing more than a tool of the
forces he pretends to oppose.
In the final analysis, his fervid attempt at insulting you becomes nothing more than a parody of his vapid
arguments in favor of Rense's censorship, and the stifling of your freedom of speech, thought and inquiry because
Rense supposedly has more valid bona fides as a revealer of the conspiracy against Mankind.
IS RICKE DOING MORE TO DISCREDIT CONSPIRACY?
As for David Icke, I had tried to keep on open mind about his Royal reptilian fantasies for a very long time, but
began to question his sanity when he produced a three-part video of his interview of an African witch doctor who
solemnly informed him of how he had witnessed the transformation of lizards to human beings and back again.
Icke's reverence for this Black con artist left me with only one of two alternatives: either Icke was a fool
or a charlatan. His defense of Rense actually proves he is both.
Beyond that, you will notice that rather than address the actual issues of the rift, David Icke's "arguments"
are nothing more than personal vitriol against Henry Makow. Not once does he address the ethical implications
of Rense demanding that Makow delete the story from Makow's own website. He does not make this argument
because it cannot be made. There is no ethical justification for it, other than the control of information,
something in which the 'image' (but not the reality) of Rense is supposed to be in diametric opposition!
As for David Icke and his reptilian fantasy agenda, I've always cut him slack in this department because I know
from personal experience that there is far more to our reality than the perception of three dimensions.
Nevertheless, think of the ammunition David Icke provides the Powers That Be! On the one hand, he deftly
reveals complex linkages between authoritarian control mechanisms like the Tavistock Institute, the Royal Family of
England, and the international banking cabal. On the other hand, he accuses Bush and The House of Windsor of
being shape-shifting reptilians.
Now ask yourself this question: if you presented the average intellectual investigator with the first aspect
of David Icke's reportage, would not those revelatory linkages raise eyebrows and curiosity?
However, after presenting those linkages, (all of which are provable and verifiable) and you now mix into this stew
the concept that the people on the thrones of power as well as the powers behind these thrones are shape-shifting
reptilians, do you not negate the entire first part of your argument intellectually, and consign both to the loony
Of course you do, because that is what most honest intellectual inquirers into alternative explanations of
socio-political reality would do; throw the baby
out with the bath water, and relegate Icke's ground-breaking revelations as spurious due to their
contamination by association with Icke's so-called "Reptilian Agenda."
RICKE: INFORMATION GATEKEEPER
My own encounter with David Icke's criticism was revelatory in and of itself. I had posted a story to the
"Before It's News" website entitled "Hitler Survived!" This was
actually written in reference to a book review which had appeared earlier on the "Before It's News" site by
an author who claimed that Adolf Hitler not only survived the war and escaped Germany, but that he and Eva Braun
lived comfortably in South America until his death in the early 1960's. I must point out that this author was
not the first to posit an escape plan for Hitler, nor the first to provide evidence of his survival.
As a board member of the internationally reknown submarine research group, Sharkhunters (http://www.sharkhunters.com ), our organization, which has over 6000 members in
73 countries, many of them high ranking admirals and military men from all branches of every military service,
(including moles planted in the secret military archives of Russia, England, the United States and Germany) has
access to original documents that no other research organization can dream of. Over the past 28 years,
Sharkhunters has become the "go to" organization and final authority on
any question of submarine warfare and history.
The President of Sharkhunters, Mr. Harry Cooper, also authored a book
entitled "Escape from the Bunker" which details the drugging of both Hitler and Eva Braun, and their removal from
Berlin under the orders of Martin Bormann. From there the couple were transported to Spain at the port of
Vigo, and thence via German submarine to Argentina. We have documentation from
multiple sources for this story.
When I posted my story of Hitler's survival on "Before Its News", David Icke deigned to offer a one word
I thought that his response was highly indicative of his thought process and his own personal "integrity."
For here is a man who asks us to accept, without verification, that the Bush family and The House of Windsor are
comprised of shape-shifting reptilians. Yet when a story appears on Hitler's survival, which can be traced
and documented thru four different books and authors, as well as the secret intelligence services of the four major
participants in WWII, Mr. Icke's only intellectual response is to project the contents of his own mind onto the
"Bullshit" -- and perhaps Bullshit Artist -- succinctly sums up the relevancy of David Icke as yet another agent of
disinformation. Jeff Ricke sums it up!
Related - Grey Wolf - The Escape of Adolf Hitler
Farganne - What Really Happened at
Makow - David Icke Forgot Who He is
Comments for "Rense and Icke - Birds of a
Debra said (April 30, 2012):
Finally, an article on Makow's website exposing Icke's
nonsense regarding reptiles/shape-shifters.
The author shows how Icke's lies works to trash truths he
mixes with such utter nonsense (lying).
As far as Rense, he's a mainstream news guy, bringing
money-making skills to a truth-movement. Though with a bushel of "personal" errors, he has not caused massive
public damage like D. Icke.
Exposing Rense's private relationship issues has a tabloid
effect. Makow should think twice about.
Expose David Icke for diversion and delusion; but give Rense
a break for now. Enough is enough.
You weren't "married" to Jeff, but I was for 11 years, in a
So were nine wives and more fiancees who he abused and often
And so are an estimated 100,000 people who are being duped
by his act.
I love Tabloids. Jeff Rense is a fascinating character --
huckster, cheat, liar wrapped in a coat of truth and freedom -- and I intend to tell his story.
Jerry said (April 30, 2012):
Dr. John Coleman:
"David Icke of course copied all
my work letter for letter"
Icke "one of the
worst plagiarists of our era."
Hana said (April 30, 2012):
The globe is undergoing a controlled demolition and these
"intellectuals" are having a pissing contest like a bunch of narcissistic primadonnas! Who is an "agent", who is a
"perp" ... shapeshifters, despite being included in all lores/cultures around the world for thousands of years -
well, they don't exist, but Hitler lived happily in Argentina up till the 1960s!
Henry - you should be ashamed of yourself!
You deserve to be led by charlatans; you are a
Ron-2 said (April 30, 2012):
L C Vincent downplays the significance of the so called
"African witch doctor" as the fellow he is referring to is a one Credo Mutwa the main historian of the Zulu Nation.
He is a descendent of Dingaan - the Zulu King who massacred Piet Retief and his 70 member delegation and later over
500 Boer civilians in Natal when they were double crossed after an official ceremony in February 1838 which was
aimed at ceding the vacant land south of the Tugela River. The actual African witch doctors do not like Mutwa very
much as he remains true to their original teachings and reveals secrets that they do not want him to reveal. He has
had numerous death threats from them for revealing the information that he does. If all of the information about
the Reptilian elite were disinformation - then they would not be trying so hard to suppress it. Furthermore: no one
talks about "shape-shifting" reptilians as that is not possible. What "shape-shifts" is the viewer's conscious
awareness [ similar to learning to see auras ] - not the actual "shape-shifting" of the given individual. Dr. Bill
Deagle among others have pointed this out. Vincent is incorrect in his understanding as Rense was not trying to
stop you from posting the Jim Stone story on your own web site: he was simply opposed to posting it on his own web
site which is what the furor was all about to begin with.
Ron said (April 30, 2012):
The whole reptilian elite topic is quite complex because it
is not just David Icke who occasionally talks about it [ despite his initial reluctance as he too taught it might
have been a disinformation campaign ] but many others like John Rhodes [ who was talking about it years before Icke
popularized the notion ] / Michael Tsarion and of course the aforementioned Credo Mutwa among others. The peculiar
thing about this topic is that it was discerned from the numerous people around the world coming forward giving
their accounts so if this topic is indeed disinformation - then there area lot of disinformation artists out there
spreading a similar tale for no clear reason.
I myself did not know what to make of this issue [ that I
first heard about on a radio program over twenty years ago and dismissed it out of hand back then ] until I too
started meeting people who have told me that they can see reptilians and other assorted aliens - among which they
claim even benevolent or neutral humanoid aliens they often call Paleidians. All these witnesses from around the
world certainly cannot all be mad or disinformation artists. There is also the MASSIVE indigenous records spanning
the globe which mention the reptilian traits of the "gods" [ construed as aliens by ancient astronaut theorists ]
which significantly lend credence to the notion of an alleged reptilian elite ruling mankind.
David said (April 30, 2012):
The Illuminati probably manufactured Icke's reptilian BS.
It's counter intelligence, a way to render harmless the good research people like you do.
In this video, a NWO activist confronts Lionel De Rothschild
in his Hampshire garden. He turns his video recorder on him and accuses of various crimes.
Rothschild's response? 'O yes... I remember one man accused
me and my family of being aliens.' Then he giggles.
Don said (April 30, 2012):
I read the latest article posted on your website about Rense
and Icke. A couple of years ago a story was on the internet about Icke’s resemblance to John D. Rockefeller Jr. I have
read a couple of Icke’s books and listened to his talks and actually saw him live (a present from my wife). He
has some interesting information, but the reptilian shape shifters stuff is too far out there for me. He seems
to be more of a feel good cheerleader.
Have wondered how he (really) got his start, and how he has
time to write and research everything. However after reading about his possible Rockefeller connections, I have a
lot of doubts about him now and wonder if he really gets paid to spread disinformation such as reptilians so people
will dismiss any information about the elite as being garbage. If he indeed is a Rockefeller that would explain
much, and would make him Bill Clinton’s cousin - if Clinton
is the illegitimate son of Arkansas Governor Winthrop Rockefeller.
In both cases they came from supposedly humble beginnings
and against the odds have all the right doors opened for them. I have little problem believing either as history
has many examples of rich and powerful men fathering many children out of wedlock. Their money and status allows
them many opportunities for affairs and they have the means and position to help their bastard children as they grow up. In
case you missed the story about Icke when it came out, I’ve attached a link to a short video that pretty much sums
it up. There is more detailed information still on the web. Whatever the truth is, the resemblance is remarkable
and makes you wonder.
7. Media Ignores Women Cheaters
April 24, 2012
"After researching women's
infidelity for more than ten years, I can honestly say that most of our societal beliefs about females are
grossly distorted and many are completely erroneous." -- Michelle Langely
The mass media ignores a book that blames women for marital breakups. To destabilize heterosexuals, women must
always be superior, i.e. the victim.
"Woman's Virtue is Man's Greatest
Invention" -- Honore de Balzac
Michelle Langely's "Women's Infidelity: Living in Limbo" (2005) should be required reading for
every male and female. It explains the behavioral patterns and sociological dynamics of female infidelity based on
Both male and female readers will recognize these behavioral patterns. Michelle is not some Ivy League professor,
not an echo of pc beliefs, not a media spokesperson. This makes her book more credible, and explains why it
has largely went under the radar.
It is also the very reason some of her findings will resonate so well with ordinary people who have an innate sense
of truth, but because of all the disinformation and programming, they cannot quite put the finger on.
Michelle states: "After researching women's infidelity for more than ten years, I can honestly say that most of our
societal beliefs about females are grossly distorted and many are completely erroneous."
Michelle gives a predictable
pattern many women's relationships follow today:
||They push for
||They get what they
||They lose interest in
||They become attracted to
||They become angry and
||They begin telling their
partners they need time apart,
They blame their partners for their behavior ... and eventually,
after making themselves, and everyone else around them miserable for an indefinite, but usually,
long period of time, they end their relationships or marriages."
Michelle states that 75% of all divorces are initiated by the female, but that the real figure could be much
higher. Husbands often are unaware of the real causes of their
It takes place when the lady has finally trampled the man enough in marriage, and decides to totally mow him over
in divorce. It's just like she's cashing out her chips at the casino.
I divorced my ex-wife because she was cheating with one her mother's friends. Although I filed for divorce, her
infidelity was the cause.
I had lots of other reasons to divorce her, and should have long before I did. Men, especially young guys, are
The women never (or hardly ever) admit to their affairs, even when there is concrete evidence of multiple
The guys do not want to believe they were so stupid. It's a form of cognitive dissonance. Michelle covers all that
in the book. It really is a good book without biases.
More info on Michelle's book can be found at http://womensinfidelity.com/
Readers on Amazon.com wrote:
Women cheat partially for biological reasons, but that's really only a small piece of the puzzle. The author
talks about the EMOTIONAL reasons women cheat. They are lied to by society before they get married. They have to lie to get married. (It's not just men!!) Then
the marriage isn't perfect like they were promised. Then they have kids and feel like a beached whale. The husband
is NOT supportive emotionally, withdraws from the marriage. The women feels alone and abandoned. Then one day, she
notices another guy. And he notices her.
And our red pill roller-coaster ride down the rabbit hole begins.
This is the common story the author has in cases of infidelity.
-- All of women's marital infidelity is explained away as: it's hormonal and natural as women enter their
sexual prime. They turn 30, more testosterone pumps into their system, they get horny, and need sex with multiple
If that's what you want to hear, then read the book and you can ignore the other aspects of marriage, including
communication and commitment.
The book is written as a dialog with her friend "Kevin," in which she teaches him the ways of women. The book is
based on a) her personal past of infidelity and b) her interviews with cheating men and women. She's not a doctor
and does not have training; she's a "professional public speaker specializing in career development."
--As I read the "stages of infidelity" described by the author mild nausea reinforced the realization that I was
reading an exact description of what happened to my marriage. After a while my wife announced that she needed to
move out to "find herself" (just another stage guys). Actually it was a result of my demands that she end it with
the other man or else....
As a person of faith I do not agree with all the premises that Ms. Langley proposes but I can tell you that her
description of what happens, and why, was such an accurate description of my experience that it was disturbing. If
really want to know what a woman means when she says "I'm not happy" you better read this.
---A complete waste of time and money. This book offers no real insight into what most people think and feel and
certainly offers no real guidance or help to any persons who have been affected by an extramarital affair.
Half-truths, suppositions and illogical conclusions. At times the author completely contradicts herself from one
chapter to the next. I got the impression that the author was no fan of the male members of our species and in the
end, offers no real solutions.
Comments for "Media Ignores Women Cheaters "
Len said (April 25, 2012):
The elite luciferian social-engineers have virtually
destroyed the capacities for love and commitment among BOTH men and women. It is, in fact, an enormous family and
social catastrophe. Only a return to godly
Christian values can reverse the effects of these satanic social-engineers and their
Letter from Finland
said (April 25, 2012):
I just readed that Infidelity text, Cheating wives.... It is actually sad to see how similat it
is here in Finland too. I have gone that through that too. Divorcion was name of that thing. And now I am 35
years old male. In august I am 36. I am not saying I was innocent. There is always both of sides something to
Feminism is like communism. Not real target. Not only one way to see it. Depends on leader how
it is been done. Here because of Russia so near we have long history to see how Communism works. I have
studied it myself very well. It is so similar than feminism. You know what I mean.
But why womans act so strange way? That picture is easy to see if you want to see it. Here they
about 19-22 year old girls/womans seem to be thinking because I am divorced and older I want to go bed and
have all of them. No I do not. Sex is not all. But because they hear it now again and again that you should
be value-nautral and then you change man all the time and don't even think that maybe it is wrong way to
behave because it is just searching. Searching for what? Nothing. Some big emotion what do not exists.
Impulses there and there. It is really sad to see how it is going to be in future if this does not change.
Much we need here is values. Value-neutral society is not good.
David said (April 25, 2012):
This is another great article you published. All one has to
do is look at TV shows such as Hot in Cleveland and Happily Divorced where men are targeted for being men. Viacom
owns these shows and the writers refused to portray men in a positive light. Men are made into these wimpy males
who can not think for themselves and need the woman to make every decision for them. Entertainment companies such
as VIacom refuse to acknowledge how men and women are biologically programmed.
If a man even dares showcases any of his natural alpha male
persona he is immediately made a fool for being a man. Bottom line is that the media and people who control
Hollywood want to turn men into feminist men and portray women as superior over men who are here to serve them and
please them which is wrong.
Even Happily Divorced wants society to embraced the
homosexual life style which is wrong. Being a man of God, I know this wrong. Keep up the great
Mike said (April 25, 2012):
This is a GREAT article.
At last...THE TRUTH.
Of the very few Women I have dated and called girlfriends....a THIRD of them admitted
openly to have had intercourse with NO FEWER than "50 guys" [how many football teams is that?] "2"
admitted having over "100".One admitted over "150" !!!!!!!!!! And theres me nearly 40...and struggling into DOUBLE
FIGURES....BECAUSE I AM A "GROWN UP" MAN THAT SIMPLY WANTED A WIFE.
Any retard that tells me on here to "Grow Up"...truly is RETARDED. I am a Mature Man that simply wanted a Wife to
Love. Boy meets Girls kinda thing. But this sick twisted World that seduces Women with Worldly Shite....is NOTHING
BUT an enemy to Mankind.
Its extremely EASY to spot a guy "in love", so for women to be FEMINISTS and give all they got without ever wanting
MARRIAGE any more...they get used by the IDIOT guys out there and blame ALL Men for it.They DON'T put their foot
down anymore about Marriage and get used BUT enjoy the DRAMA of it....and society is a MESS as a
8. Mormonism is Luciferian and Masonic
Presidential candidate is a practicing Mormon who gives 10% of his income to the "church.")
Americans can choose between two Illuminati (Cabalist Jewish) sects, Communism and
The author, James, is a 29 year-old independent researcher of religio-spiritual and occultic subjects. He
is a former Christian fundamentalist, currently Christian of a Friends (Quaker) flavor, and novice mythologist. He
has no relation to Mormonism. His interest is in exposing that which would seek to be hidden, i.e. Ephesians 5:11.
He encourages others to research independently and test the information presented.
Mormonism is in the spotlight in recent months due to Romney et al. and I think fellow readers would benefit from knowing just what Mormonism really
Firstly, Mormon theology is largely copied from older occult notions. The notion that man can evolve into a god is
taught in everything from Theosophy and Scientology to New Age thought and trans-humanism, to name a few.
Both evolution and the notion of aliens are crucial to their theological model. Their endowment ceremony is Freemasonic. Secret names
are issued to the participants (as also occurs in wiccan covens, etc.) There are secret handshakes with certain
levels of priesthood, and wearing of aprons, as also seen in freemasonry.
Their "three heavens" concept is largely based on the three lowest degrees in Freemasonry (telestial/entered apprentice, terrestrial/fellowcraft, and celestial/master mason.)
(Masonic eye among many Masonic symbols adorning
Temple Square HQ in Salt Lake City.)
Only Mormons "in good standing" (a phrase copied from Freemasonry) will becomes gods of their own planets, with
their goddess wife or wives, depending on how many wives they are sealed to.
Secondly, Joseph Smith was known, previous to his "revelation" as
one who scryed to find treasure (that is, psychic looking
at/into a stone or rock for divination purposes.)
It was by "scrying" that he allegedly "translated" the Book of Mormon etc. Compare this with automatic writing,
channeling or other similar occultic practices, which each also spawned pseudo-bibles, with followings of their
As an aside, Joseph Smith (jr. and sr.), Hyrum Smith, Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, and others were practicing
Freemasons, in spite of the fact that Mormons were banned from becoming Freemasons from 1866 to 1984.
Thirdly, Mormonism is polytheistic, having a pantheon of gods and goddesses (a "council of gods"), who go
They teach that God the Father (whom they refer to as Elohim, whereas Christ is considered to be Jehovah) was once
a mortal man on another planet. However this leads to a problem. What god do they think created the universe, and who was their first
God? This is never addressed.
Further, they teach that this god has a body of flesh and bone, and the Mormon goddess(es) as well (Doctrine and
How then, do they copulate and produce babies that are spirits and thus lack tangible bodies? What of the teaching
that demons have no bodies, (something one who knows Scientology would be familiar with this, except that Ron
Hubbard called them Thetans.)
This is curious, given the fact that in their theology, Lucifer, their chief of demons, not only has a body, but is
light skinned and tangible.
The so-called "prophets" of Mormonism seem to be mislabeled, as they fail the test for legitimate prophets, that
is, making false prophecies.
these cases ...
Read the Full Article:
Mormonism is Luciferian and Masonic
9. How Canada Was Sold Out--the
Rather than "governed", Canada is being trafficked like a kidnapped child. The
details of this tale are chilling.
Insider says a secret version of the US-Canada Free Trade Deal was signed.
Shelley Ann Clark reveals how Canada was sold to the USA in her new book, "The Sale of a Country"
By Dee Nicholson
Shelley Ann Clark, multilingual 30-year veteran of Canada's Dept. of Foreign Affairs found herself in
the midst of a scandal that has yet to be openly discussed in Canada.
As a high-level staffer with security clearance during the negotiations for the 1988 Canada-USA Free Trade
Agreement*, she watched as our country was sold to the USA, without anyone
Now she has written an explosive book that proves Canada was placed on a rapid path to full integration with the
United States. Those skids were greased by the Free Trade Agreement, which essentially was a gift of Canadian
resources to the USA with not a lot in return.
The Americans got the keys to
Canada's wealth in much the same way as they bought Manhattan Island from the indigenous natives, for a bunch of
beads and blankets worth only a couple of bucks.
Clark recounts how, as the Executive Assistant to Germain Denis, Number Three man on the Canadian FTA negotiating
was required to type out two different versions of the agreement's terms, one for the provincial
premiers to review, and another with the real terms, that has never since been seen by any Canadian outside of the
team that wrote it.
So the premiers never saw the real agreement: they were
handed bogus documents with figures altered to make things look hunky-dory to them, while behind the scenes, the
Americans were busy approving terms and conditions the premiers would never have agreed to support.
In fact, the original, real document is hidden in a bunker 50 miles north of Ottawa, and all the bogus documents
were shredded on command. The premiers never caught on that they had been had, nor did the Canadian people.
And the signed agreement has since been declared an object of "National
Shredded documents, midnight meetings, secret whisperings, computer spying, ransacked homes, threats, covert
contacts with the PMO... and a deal that gave away Canada's right to determine what we do with our water resources,
that allowed foreign takeover of Canadian companies, that harmonized with the US health care system (Obama-care,
anyone?), that altered our banking system, our communication system, and ultimately geared us up for absorption
into the USA....
WHISTLE BLOWING FALLS ON DEAF EARS
In a perfect world, arrests would be going on as we speak, heads would roll, and enraged Canadians would scream for
justice. But, oddly, no matter where Clark went to try to speak truth to power, her words fell on deaf ears.
In fact, the more she spoke out, the more trouble Shelley Ann endured, all for the sole purpose of trying to make
Canadians wake up and take back their beloved country.
Even the estimable Maude Barlow and the Council of Canadians, for all their influence, could not make a dent in the
wall of silence that covered this agreement.
Nor could lawyers, honest reporters, or a speaking tour of the country and countless interviews by Clark and her
gaggle of supporters.
Sick and tired of watching this nation being eroded by its own elected representatives, while Canadians snore in
front of their I-stuff , Clark is now moving in a full court press to get the word out: there are two more books to
come in this saga, which is worthy of a big-budget Hollywood production, complete with sexual predation, death
threats, manipulation and full-on intrigue.
With them will come even more detail, and more evidence, of the scandalous
theft of our national sovereignty via "trade" agreements, and how Canada has succumbed to these
entanglements, along with far too many other countries.
These guys trade countries like kids
"The Sale of a Country" is a solid education on how things really run behind closed doors, one that should cause
patriot hearts to sink. But what continues to shock me, is that damnable wall
of silence: the media's complacency and widespread refusal to publish the story, the RCMP's failure
to investigate, and most of all the deliberate
blindness of Canadians who are currently watching their nation swirl in the bowl along with many
other national sovereignties, without regard for the fact that their children, and their children's children, will
never enjoy the Canada we once had, for the simple reason that evil is abounding, and good men
are doing nothing.
Harper is rapidly leading us down the same path to the total destruction of this country. Indeed, he
has been quoted as saying that when he gets done with this country, we won't recognize it. And he's well
known for the kind of secrecy that is endemic in the story of the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement. And he will
continue, as long as he thinks he can get away with it.
"Those who fail to learn from the past are doomed to repeat it," said a wise man, once. If Canadians fail
again to listen to Shelley Ann Clark, and do not stand up to take back this nation from the criminals and traitors
who have unlawfully sold it out from under us, well, you do the math...
"The Sale of a Country" by Shelley Ann Clark, Xlibris 2011, ISBN 978-1-4653-4140-2
* This was the Free Trade Agreement with the USA, not to be confused with NAFTA, which includes Mexico.
In her capacity as Executive Director of the National Health Federation of Canada (www.thenhf.com ), Dee
Nicholson was one of the first in the health freedom movement to point to Canada's expanding loss of
Dee can be heard on Zero Point Radio along with Dr. Christopher Holmes, every second Saturday on www.bbsradio.com/
Station ONE. Listen to Shelley Ann Clark in person, on May 26th from 4-6 pm EDT.
All physical land in Canada is the property of the Crown, Queen Elisabeth II. (And she owns 1/6 of the entire land
surface on Earth = 3 times the size of the USA.)
There is no provision in the Canada Act, or in the Constitution Act 1982 which amends it, for any Canadian to own
any physical land in Canada.
All that Canadians may hold, in conformity with medieval and feudal law, is "an interest in an estate in land in
Land defined as 'Crown land' in Canada, and administered by the Federal Government and the Provinces, is merely
land not 'dedicated' or assigned in freehold tenure.
Freehold is tenure, not ownership. Freehold land is 'held' not 'owned'.
Who Owns the World: The Surprising Truth About Every Piece of Land on the Planet
of the land of Canada is privately held. The majority of the land, 90.3%, is Crown Land, otherwise
known as Public Land. Of this, 50% is Crown land administered by the Provincial governments and 40.3% is Crown land
administered by the federal government.
Comments for "Book Details How Canada Was Sold Out"
Frank said (April 25, 2012):
The article, HOW CANADA WAS SOLD OUT, needs to be supported
by some of us hardcore members of the I TOLD YOU SO crowd. No matter how lousy it sounds we were legion, and the
news blackouts were not very effective.
I was still steelworking then, in Ohio, and we were joined
at the Detroit AND Windsor demonstrations by counterparts from various Canadian outfits, especially aluminum
workers from Sudbury. Canadian and US autoworkers were also involved, and about five years later there were enough
from our old gang that when the Mexican side agreement came, we printed up teeshirts thats said NAFTA - NOT ANOTHER
F__KING TRADE AGREEMENT!
Canadian and American workers both realized AT THE TIME that
the CAN-US part of the treaty was only an intro, both were industrial nations. The real ploy here was bringing
Mexico in it. After four years of nothing much happening to workers above the Rio Grande, the REAL issue was snuck
The Mexican Deal was the money shot because it destroyed all
three countries. Check if you like. The bankers celebrated the NAFTA trinity by devaluing the peso and sending
millions of Mexicans into poverty, and often also into the USA and Cananda.
But we must keep repeating: This was ALL known before it
happened. It was a banker-government co-op, designed precisely to cut the bottom out of what had been a fairly
stable North American industrial middle class. Also let's remember that Mexico, on its own hook, was doing far
better than it has been since. The idea that ANY of this outsourcing ever benefitted Mexico then, or any lesser
developed country since, is bunk.
Keep hitting them Henry. The Bilderburgers are going to be
deciding our futures again come Mayday.
V said (April 25, 2012):
Let's get a few things straight.
was never a sovereign
country. It has always been controlled by Great Britain, first overtly then covertly. A giant and wealthy
plantation state to the "Empire of the City".
Canada's official name (rarely mentioned) is "her majesty's government" as in
queen Liz's government. She owns all the land, minerals, water in Canada. We are mere users
(serfs) paying rent for the privilege of using her land and resources.
The high level politicians in Ottawa (of all political parties) are members
of the Privy Council of Canada.
Privy means private, secret,
confidential. The Privy Council are the
monarch's henchmen. Even the late NDP leader Jack Layton was a member. So much for right wing / left wing
was not so much sold out as
was merged with the USA.
Like Tony said "If Canada was sold
it wasn't to "the United States." It was to the owners of the United States."
The owners of the United States would be the same owners of
Still would like to read the book "The Sale of a Country".
Tony said (April 25, 2012):
If Canada was sold it wasn't to "the United States." It was to the owners of the United States. The normal American
citizen is already pauperized by his owners and can't buy anything like that.
Randy said (April 25, 2012):
Shelly made the claim of the two versions of the agreement
with Glen Keeley. I immediately faxed the info to ex-premier Mike Harcourt with the info. I never got a
10. Eight Signs the Illuminati Orchestrated World War II.
Go'fers and traitors at Yalta. Brother Hitler occupied elsewhere.)
Operating behind their
agents, Churchill, Hitler, Stalin, and FDR - the Illuminati waged a merciless war on humanity, destroying
nations and murdering 60 million people.
This article is indebted to
in History - World War 2' by Robert Pye, a list of various discrepancies in the war that reveal the
Illuminati controlled both sides.
Street Funded the Nazis
Without the capital
provided by Wall Street, there would have been no Hitler and no WW2.
In his book 'Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler' Professor Anthony G Sutton writes that "General Motors,
Ford, General Electric, DuPont," and other "U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany
were ... controlled by the Wall Street banks," such as "the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a
lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank."
Standard Oil provided a
steady supply of oil throughout the war. The oil was shipped to Spain then piped through Nazi-controlled France
General Motors and Ford
provided 90 % of Nazi armored trucks. IBM produced the Hollerith machines that helped SS Officers manage the
round up of dissidents for concentration camps.
did Hitler pause at Dunkirk, letting the British escape?
The German Army had the
massive British expeditionary force at their mercy at Dunkirk in May 1940 but, on Hitler's orders, held back for
three days, thereby allowing 338,000 British and French troops to escape. The German generals, waiting approval
to launch a full-scale assault, were left scratching their heads.
This military blunder is
inexplicable by conventional standards.
Why did Hitler hold back?
The Illuminati wanted WW2 to be a long and bloody conflict - but one Germany would lose. The destruction of the
British Army would have given the Nazis an almost unassailable advantage in the war, so Hitler had to let them
didn't Hitler commandeer the French fleet?
The Nazis were never
serious about exploiting France.
France signed an armistice with the
Germans on 22nd June 1940, stipulating that the French fleet would be largely disarmed and confined to
harbor, under French control. What insanity! If Hitler had commandeered the French fleet, he would have had
overwhelming naval superiority in European waters!
This fleet could have been
used to seal the Straits of Gibraltar, the only route the Allies had into the Mediterranean Sea.
Hitler was a Trojan horse
designed to destroy Germany's national, cultural and racial pretensions, therefore integrating the country into
a world government. This is why, instead of executing a sensible strategy to defeat the Allies, he launched a
suicidal invasion of the USSR.
did Stalin take no steps whatsoever to repel the planned German invasion of 22 June 1941?
The goal of the Nazi-Soviet
war was to burn out the German war machine. Stalin's refusal to preempt the Nazi invasion is evidence that
the war was staged.
For months preceding the
war, there was a huge build up of Nazi forces on the Soviet border. Soviet spies had infiltrated Nazi ranks and
could tell Stalin all their moves,
but 'Uncle Joe' refused to attack first. Even when the Nazis had four and a half million soldiers and 650,000
vehicles amassed on the Soviet border, Stalin refused to mobilize his defenses!
This gave the Nazis a
chance to gain a foothold in Russia and launch a full-scale attack, ensuring a long and bloody
Read the Full Article:
Eight Signs the Illuminati Orchestrated World
11. Resist by Boycotting Your
May 4, 2012
Take Your Money Out of the Bank Now!
People don't understand how they are fleeced through interest on fictional debt.
By Anthony Migchels
The current austerity program is an assault by the Money Power.
What is worse: even without the credit crunch, we are paying trillions per year in interest for absolutely
The solution is simple: quit their banks.
The Money Power's goals are obvious. It is not just the massive multi trillion wealth transfer that is under way.
It is about bringing the West down a few notches. The US seems strong with a nominal $30,000 per capita GDP, but
when the dollar devalues against the Brazilian Real and the Chinese Yuan, things will quickly look different. It
will also be the end of cheap raw materials.
The reason this crisis exists is because the banks, politicians, the media and economists are colluding in fooling
the many into believing we need banks for our money supply.
Most of them probably even believe this is true themselves.
They say we need the banks,
because otherwise the real economy would have no money to trade with.
All this is complete and utter rubbish, of course. If banks can
create credit, then anybody can. That's just common sense.
Just imagine: we are led to believe that we need to cough up trillions just to have a
means of exchange that is completely paper/computer based. I.e., almost free of cost.
Banking is part of the
Babylon Mystery and bankers believe we are still enthralled with their 'fractional reserve banking' sleight of
And they are right.
Although people are waking up, they still don't get it.
A good example of this is
the 'take your money out of Bank of America' of last October. Bank of America decides to rake in an extra $60
per year with a silly fee. This upsets people.
While they are paying $300k
interest over 30 years on their $200k mortgage. Which the bank created out of
nothing the moment they borrowed it.
Meanwhile, 45% of our disposable income is lost to pay for capital included in the prices we pay for
our daily needs.
In other words: Penny wise,
People still don't understand how they are fleeced through interest on fictional debt.
Of course, it was good to see people finally showing some teeth.
Boycotting the banks is the
blindingly obvious approach. If somebody is enslaving you with interest and fractional reserve banking while
destroying the economy by not lending why would you patronize his business?
To say this is
irresponsible as it will worsen the crunch is ridiculous: propping up a system that only exists to enslave us is
irresponsible, not disconnecting from it.
But only few even within
the Free Media are willing to accept this simple conclusion.
The fact of the matter is:
many are still enthralled with the 'magnificent edifice of international finance', as Rothschild mouthpiece the
Economist once called it.
It is unfortunate that
there is still widespread misunderstanding about both money and our real problem with it.
People do not yet understand how pervasive the enslavement
through interest really is.
That's why they fall for the notion that Gold will solve our problems. But what does it matter whether we pay all
this interest for Gold or for paper based credit? The Money Power owns both and all the interest will end up in the
The mind control of the
rich, the social conditioning to accept the current order and its despicable 'morality', to defend it at the
cost of oneself and one's loved ones is very profound and pervasive in our beliefs. They are not easily
uprooted, not even by the 'Internet Reformation'.
In the mean time we are ignoring the real solution:
interest free money.
Either debt free, in the form of Social Credit, which would work out like a 'Citizens Dividend'.
Or interest free credit, through Mutual Credit.
These solutions are real
and we can implement them today.
We would no longer pay
interest on a mortgage, which would also mean much lower rent.
We would pay 45% less for
what we need, because there would be no capital cost included in prices. World Government would be
dead and Big Business would face the competition of well funded small business.
Brussels are owned by the Money Power in the City of London. But the main reason we are not doing
this is the people don't understand the problem and therefore the solution.
We don't need to wait for reform on a national level. We can create our own currencies. High powered currencies, not just the simple barter units
that are now starting to float everywhere in the world. We can create extremely effective,
interest free credit based units, convertible to dollar or euro providing us with a printing press with which we
can buy back the world interest free.
But these will take time to
build up. Meanwhile, the obvious thing to do is pull our money out of the banks.
We should not have one dime in that system. Every dollar we put
in the banking system gives them a dollar income per year. Remember that. The system, through fractional reserve
banking, multiplies your dollar by ten and takes interest over each of them.
Real interest rates
(including credit cards) are probably close to 10% and that means they make a dollar per year over every dollar
you have in your account.
And you can maintain an
account for monthly payments, just keep its balance at almost zero. Pay your bills and take out the
Force the FED and ECB to
print ever more for bailouts.
Pay cash only. Don't support their cashless society. Liquidate all your
paper assets, both to blow up the system and to minimize your own exposure to the
Let them squirm and lie
ever more transparently with every new bailout that they need to force upon us. Let them show their hand. We're
not going to 'repay' odious debt.
We're not afraid. We don't
Let them eat cake.
The Swiss WIR, or: How to Defeat the Money Power
Mutual Credit, the Astonishingly Simple Truth about Money Creation
Understand that the Banking System is One
This article on Anthony's website
comment: If the government
represented us, it would take over the national bank and spend the money into existence or loan it
12. Understand that the Banking System
March 7, 2012
controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce … And when you realise
that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will
not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.”(
James Garfield 1881, a few weeks before he was shot)
Far too much energy is wasted on analyzing the
banking system to death. The key to understanding its machinations is seeing that it is one
global system, controlled and directed from the top down. Shifting blame from Government to Central
Banks to Wall Street is just a distraction.
Endless analyses of exactly who is to blame for what is
filling the columns of both the mainstream- and alternative media. Is it Wall Street, the Central Banks,
derivatives, politicians, economists, greed?
This article by the Daily Bell is a typical example. In the article
the Daily Bell correctly analyzes that the Central Banks are trying to generate a world wide
depression. However, they present the Central
Banks as a statist operation, messing up the operations of free market players, which would be the
The problem with this is, that
the Central Banks and the commercial banks are owned by the same people.
The banking system must be seen as a whole. It includes all
the Central Banks, all major commercial banks, BIS, the academic world ‘studying’ economics and finance and the
The Daily Bell is
right to say that they are engineering a depression. They are wrong to suggest that the CB’s are responsible for
this while the banks are not. Yes the banks are on the receiving end of the CB’s, but they’re all just mere links
in the chain of command and control.
Central Banks were created by the banking community as
lenders of last resort because they went bust so often. They needed the CB’s to maintain a certain stability within
the system, otherwise they would not have been able to maintain their monopoly on currency.
Nowadays CB’s are all powerful financial juggernauts allowing the Money
Power full control always. They don’t care about
some of their banks going bust occasionally, because they are just the vehicles dividing the market among them.
Their market control remains 100%.
When the CB’s do things to hurt creditors (the big banks)
they do so to damage their balances and their ability to lend. In this way the illusion of real forces creating a
depression is created. It’s the same thing with the BIS raising capital reserve requirements. They know this means
depression, but their sell is ‘stability’. The instability they created by purposefully allowing the banks to
leverage ever more only a decade ago is conveniently forgotten by well paid academics and journalists who most
people think are on the lookout for these kind of things.
Stagflation is easily created by combining the deflationary
bust with rising prices for commodities through speculation. These price rises then eventually attack the whole
economy already strapped for cash.
In earlier times bankers just published an advertizement in
their Banker Magazine telling their members at what date to start calling in loans. In this way contracting the money supply and
creating a deflationary depression allowing them to buy everything up for pennies on the dollar. Nowadays
things are a little more convoluted.
But for the few men controlling the system it is not. They just
order: ‘create depression now’. Their executives push the
buttons and voila.
And yes, it’s a gigantic control grid and very complicated
and it is very difficult for them to maintain control. But it still is a system, being worked. And those that work
it are the most powerful men in the world.
A ‘Free Gold
When we realize how the system is controlled in this way, it is also easy to understand that a ‘free currency
market’ is also easily controlled top down.
Massive funding for Gold based currency, support from the
media, the academics, political pressure. A real onslaught that will quickly conquer the maiden ‘free market’. Then
the easy contraction of the money supply at will by controlling world Gold reserves.
System is One. It is controlled top down. Those that control it are the Money Power. It’s global and
it rules finance. It dominates every Government on the planet through it.
Its basic operations are simple: maintain monopolistic
control of the money supply. Provide credit at interest. Create a boom/bust cycle by inflation and deflation.
Finance those under control or to be brought under control and starve
the rest. Translate this financial omnipotence to Global Despotism.
The implementation of these basic policies have become more
complex during the last century. But for the controllers little has changed.
This is basically
all we need to know about the problem. There is
no need to endlessly analyze what the CB’s are up to now or what Goldman Sachs is doing next.They’re busy doing what they’ve always
We should be busy deserting the
system and building new, really free and independent currencies instead.
Financial Warfare 2012: Boycott All Banks
For Self Determination we need Free Currencies
List of the Rothschild-Owned Central
Banks of the World
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?"(Quote from satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke,
The Fozdyke Letters.)
The 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media: 2011 Version
wary! Probably "Controlled
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details: