Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
21 December, 2011
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
- How The Murdoch Press Keeps Australia's Dirty Secret
- "Smart Meters" ... The New Silent Killer, Part 2
- Man-Made Weather Modification the Media is Forbidden to Report On
- List of the Rothschild-Owned Central Banks of the World
- Menacing UFO Fleets Circumnavigating Globe, We Are Led to Believe
- Joseph McCarthy Worked to Hide from the Public the Fact that Soviet Communism was Illuminati Jewish.
- Six Kabbalah Must-Read Books
- Behind The Arab Revolt Is A Word We Dare Not Speak
- How The So-Called Guardians Of Free Speech Are Silencing The Messenger
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as
a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in
today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are
addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When
was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because
of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit
in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your
'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur.
In so doing, you are serving our purpose."
(Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists
who are not "TC"
"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in
selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the
official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For
propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home...
In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of
countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on
us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the
voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. How The Murdoch Press Keeps Australia's Dirty
By John Pilger
12 May 2011
The illegal eavesdropping on famous people by the News of the World is said to be Rupert Murdoch’s
Watergate. But is it the crime by which Murdoch ought to be known? In his native land, Australia, Murdoch controls
70 per cent of the capital city press. Australia is the world’s first murdochracy, in which smear by
media is power.
The most enduring and insidious Murdoch
campaign has been against the Aboriginal people, who were dispossessed by the arrival of the British in the
late 18th century and have never been allowed to recover. “Nigger hunts” continued into the 1960s and
beyond. The officially-inspired theft of children from Aboriginal families, justified by the racist theories of the
eugenics movement, produced those known as the Stolen Generation andin 1997 was
identified as genocide. Today, the first Australians have the shortest life expectancy of any
of the world’s 90 indigenous peoples. Australia imprisons Aborigines at five times the rate South Africa during the
apartheid years.In the state of Western Australia, the figure is eight times the apartheid
Political power in Australia often rests in the control of resource-rich land. Most of the uranium,
iron ore, gold, oil and natural gas is in Western Australia and Northern Territory – on Aboriginal land.
Indeed, Aboriginal “progress” is all but defined by the mining industry and its political guardians in both Labor
and coalition (conservative) governments. Their faithful, strident voice is the
Murdoch press. The exceptional, reformist Labor government of Gough Whitlam in the 1970s set
up a royal commission that made clear that social justice for Australia’s first people would only be achieved with
universal land rights and a share the national wealth with dignity. In 1975, Whitlam was sacked by the
governor-general in a “constitutional coup”. The Murdoch press had turned on Whitlam with such venom that
rebellious journalists on The Australian burned their newspaper in the street.
In 1984, the Labor Party “solemnly pledged” to finish what Whitlam had begun and legislate
Aboriginal land rights. This was opposed by the then Labor
prime minister, Bob Hawke, a “mate” of Rupert Murdoch. Hawke blamed
the public for being “less compassionate”; but a secret 64-page report to the party revealed that most Australians
supported land rights. This was leaked to The Australian, whose front page declared, “Few support
Aboriginal land rights”, the opposite of the truth, thus feeding an atmosphere of self-fulfilling
distrust, “backlash” and rejection of rights that would distinguish Australia from South Africa. In 1988, an
editorial in Murdoch’s London tabloid, the Sun, described “the Abos” as “treacherous and brutal”.
This was condemned by the UK Press Council as “unacceptably racist”.
The Australian publishes long articles that present Aboriginal people not
unsympathetically but as perennial victims of each other, “an entire culture committing suicide”, or as noble
primitives requiring firm direction: the eugenicist’s view. It promotes Aboriginal “leaders” who, by blaming their
own people for their poverty, tell the white elite what it wants to hear. The writer Michael Brull parodied this:
“Oh White man, please save us. Take away our rights because we are so backward.”
This is also the government’s view. In railing
against what it called the “black armband view” of Australia’s past, the conservative government of
John Howard encouraged and absorbed the views of white supremacists -- that there was no
genocide, no Stolen Generation, no racism; indeed, whites are the victims of “liberal racism”. A collection of
far-right journalists, minor academics and hangers-on became the antipodean equivalent of David Irving Holocaust
deniers. Their platform has been the Murdoch
Andrew Bolt, columnist on Murdoch’s
Melbourne Herald-Sun tabloid, is currently the defendant in a racial vilification case brought by nine
prominent Aborigines, including Larissa Behrendt, a professor of law and indigenous
studies in Sydney. Behrendt has been an authoritative and outspoken opponent of Howard’s 2007 “emergency
intervention” in the Northern Territory, which the Labor government of Julia Gillard has reinforced. The rationale
to “intervene” was that child abuse among Aborigines was in “unthinkable numbers”. This was a fraud. Out of 7,433 Aboriginal children examined by doctors, four
possible cases were identified – about the rate of child abuse in white Australia.
What this covered was an old-fashioned colonial grab of
mineral-rich land in the Northern Territory where Aboriginal land rights were granted in
The Murdoch press has been the most lurid and vociferous in its promotion of the “intervention”,
which a United Nations special rapporteur has condemned for its racial
discrimination. Once again, Australian politicians are dispossessing the first
inhabitants, demanding leasehold of land in return for health and education rights that whites take for granted and
driving them into “economically viable hubs” where they will be effectively detained -- a form of apartheid.
The outrage and despair of most Aboriginal
people is not heard. For using her institutional voice and exposing the government’s black
supporters, Larissa Behrendt has been subjected to a vicious campaign of innuendo in the Murdoch press, including
the implication that she is not a “real” Aborigine. Using the language of its soulmate the London Sun, the
Australian derides the “abstract debate” of “land rights, apologies, treaties” as a “moralizing mumbo-jumbo
spreading like a virus”. The aim is to silence those who dare tell Australia’s dirty secret.
2."Smart Meters" ... The New
"The electromagnetic field is the
perfect secret agent: you cannot see it, you cannot smell it, you
cannot hear it, and its effects are slow but relentless." -By Volter Hertenstein, MP
2 (Part 1 is in the
last issue of Last Days Watch newsletter)
2 September 2011
At the end of Part I , I posed these questions:
1. Can you opt out of having a
'smart meter' in your state?
2. What if I already have one
installed? Should I file a lawsuit?
3. Is there a state or federal
law requiring a 'smart meter' be installed on your home or business?
This mess is a complicated
issue with states around the country doing one thing while another is doing nothing.
Regarding lawsuits: One
thing I have learned over the past two decades from brilliant constitutional attorneys who have become dear
friends - never, ever go into court poorly prepared because the end result is bad case law on the books.
We when feel threatened or
harmed, the first inclination is to file a lawsuit. But, due to millions of laws on the books at both the
federal and state level, one becomes frustrated and driven to insanity by tracing one statute to the next from
one bureaucracy to another. Here in Texas, a lawsuit over the 'smart meter' failed because of jurisdiction. On
Aug. 13, 2010, Texas Civil District Court judge Lorraine Raggio dismissed a class action lawsuit against ONCOR.
That case was about new smart meters overcharging customers by ONCOR. Judge Raggio ruled that the Public Utility
Commission of Texas (PUCT) was the entity that had to be approached for looking into and ruling on the accuracy
of the meters.
There was another
unsuccessful lawsuit filed earlier this year, Cynthia Johnson v ONCOR, which had a lot of good arguments, but,
again, wrong jurisdiction. There is a central theme regarding the 'smart meter' onslaught which appears in the
filings in the Johnson case. The first I read about it was in the letter from ONCOR to me:
In ONCOR's response to Ms.
Johnson, they, of course, make the claim there are no health risks involved, but also bring forward the pesky
little jurisdictional issue - page 18. ONCOR falls under the jurisdiction of the Texas PUC. On page 20, the
discussion begins regarding something known as PURA. As you can see on page one of the letter to me from ONCOR,
they talk about PURPA. All of this revolves around whether or not there is a federal or state law which requires
anyone to have the specific 'smart meter'. Now, I spent a considerable amount of time researching this,
including the law cited by ONCOR in their letter to me, H.B. 2129, which uses the word "encourages" not
I also was sent this very
valuable piece of comprehensive research on this important question:
Smart Meters: No Federal
How about here in Texas? In
ONCOR's letter, they site the previously mentioned bill, H.B. 2129
Please note this part of
SECTION 6. Chapter 31,
Utilities Code, is amended by adding Section 31.005 to read as follows:
CUSTOMER-OPTION PROGRAMS. (a) This section applies to:
(1) a municipally owned
(2) an electric
(3) an electric utility;
(4) a power marketer;
(5) a retail electric
(6) a transmission and
(5) a program that
encourages the deployment of advanced electricity meters;
Encourages does not mean
On August 29, 2011, my
state representative, Jim Landtroop, forwarded me email from Gabriel Cardenas, Legislative Assistant,
Governmental Relations Division, Public Utility Commission of Texas, who opened his email with this statement:
As you may know, in 2005,
the federal government passed legislation that required states to consider the adoption of advanced metering
infrastructure (Energy Policy Act of 2005). That same year, the Texas Legislature adopted law that encouraged
the deployment of new advanced metering technology.
The Public Utility
Commission of Texas (PUC) then established standards for the features and deployment of the smart meters (PUC
Substantive Rules 25.130.
Consider and encouraged
does not mean mandatory.
Going to the URL provided
by Mr. Cardenas, here, one sees this on page one for 25.130:
(d) Deployment and use of
(1) Deployment and use of
AMS by an electric utility is voluntary unless otherwise ordered by the commission.
So far, I cannot find any
such order by the Texas PUC.
There is one other source I
need to cite and wish to thank Debra Medina (who ran for Governor here last year against Rick Perry; I voted for
her) for bringing it to my attention: Texas Utilities Code - Section 39.107.
Metering And Billing
Debra was told by JP Urban
at the PUC that Sec. 39.107 of the Utilities Code provides the authority for installation of the meters and in
fact, "he said, was the directive to install the meters." Debra disagrees with his statement and after reading
it, so do I.
Now, let's go back to page
two of ONCOR's letter to me (image above). They provide fine print stating they have the right to enter a retail
customer's premises to do this that and the other. I am not a retail premise nor is my personal residence.
So, where do we stand
legally? Citizens in dozens of states are fighting with their utility companies. They are sending letters
telling the utility company to stay off their property. They are putting locks on their old analog meters so a
utility company's installer can't removetheir old meter. They are spending money to purchase kits ($299.00) in
an effort to keep the 'smart meter' from functioning the way it is supposed to when installed. However, in my
opinion, the utility companies are going to find out and come after the homeowner for tampering with their
equipment and then the homeowner will have even more legal problems.
First thing you must do is
research the rules and laws set by your state's PUC (Public Utility Commission).
The aforementioned lawsuits
were thrown out because the plaintiffs did not take their case to the PUC first. I can't tell anyone what to do,
but based on those couple of court decisions already on the books, I would not recommend filing a lawsuit until
you exhaust your right to petition your state PUC and see what they rule. You can retain legal counsel and ask
others in your state to become petitioners (see below). There are a lot of lawyer jokes out there, but when
you're dealing with state bureaucracies where billions of dollars (and political cloud is purchased by
lobbyists), you absolutely need qualified legal counsel to represent you.
Many folks are printing out
some of the expert opinions listed at the bottom of my first column and presenting them at city council meetings
to let folks know how dangerous those meters are. However, as has been the case over and over in California with
almost two dozencounties banning the meters, I'm afraid it's largely symbolic as it all goes back to the PUC.
Out there, PG & E continues to install those meters regardless of what city councils have voted because they
know the California PUC has jurisdiction. It's good to attend a city council meeting and hand out a nice flyer
with facts, but the real fight has to be with your state PUC first while you petition your state representative.
I recommend you write a
snail mail letter to your state representative (regardless if they're out of session or not) if you have or are
experiencing new health issues that did not exist before the 'smart meter' was attached to your home. List your
new health problems. Tell your state representative that your legislature must step up now and pass a simple law
that says no citizen, owner of an apartment building or retail or commercial building can be forced to have one
of those 'smart meters' forcibly installed. You can print out (or simply dump all onto a CD) the expert opinions
provided at the bottom of my first column and include it with your letter. Putting it onto a CD is more cost
effective and your state rep can just pop it into his/her computer. Politely remind your state rep next year is
an election year and do they want one of those dangerous things on their home?
You can notify your utility
carrier that you refuse to have them install the meter, but, they can and will shut off your power.
As I said in my first
column, the only reason there isn't a 'smart meter' now attached to my home is I have locks on my six foot
fences and ONCOR can't get into the back yard unless I unlock the gates. At this point in time, they have lied
about access to our home, but that will be addressed at our hearing. Here in Texas, the PUC has a law on the
books that utility companies cannot shut off the power to a home that has a disabled person residing there. That
is the only thing that has kept ONCOR from flipping the switch and turning off my power because my husband has a
long list of serious health problems. ONCOR was notified of this prior to their July 20, 2011, letter via
Of course, that didn't stop
ONCOR in their letter; image two at the bottom of the page where they threaten to 'suspend' delivery of power to
my home knowing full well they would be in violation of PUC law. My case can be the second landmark case in the
country. Texas is a huge state compared to Maine as far as getting a favorable decision for the rest of the
country. PUC's watch what other ones are doing throughout the country.
If you read my first column, you know I have retained legal counsel to present our arguments to the
Texas PUC. My husband and I are petitioners. Hiring legal counsel costs a great deal of money and like many,
John and I live on a fixed income. A few people have comeforward who are able to contribute financially to my
case and are now petitioners. They have sent their checks in various amounts. We are pooling those funds so the
financial burden gets shared, just as the folks did in Maine. Tommy Cryer is our attorney representing us as
petitioners. He will be filing for a hearing in front of the Texas PUC. I am still gathering some documentation
for him and checking a few more things with the Texas PUC, so this isn't going to happen tomorrow. We only have
one shot at this so we need to be fully prepared.
If you would like to become
a petitioner in my case as a few others have done, please contact me by email: firstname.lastname@example.org and I will give you the specifics as well as what we can
expect as far as the financial burden. In the end, John and I will be responsible if not enough funds are
available at the end of the case. But, the more petitioners we have who can contribute financially to the legal
defense fund, well, the easier it will be for all of us. I have been doing all the research so far regarding
health issues and the information provided above regarding laws here in Texas to cut down on billable hours, but
Tommy will have to do the legal part.
To date, the utility
companies here in Texas (and elsewhere) are simply picking people off one by one. The more numbers we have as
petitioners in front of the PUC, the more clout we will have and not just financially.
If you decide to join my
case here in Texas and become a petitioner, you will not have to appear at the hearing as Tommy will be
representing all of us. No hearing date is set yet, but all petitioners in my case will be kept up to date as we
If you live in the State of
Texas, this case is very important and can have a tremendous impact in other states. We will have two issues
before the PUC:
1. Can any utility company
in Texas force you to allow them to install a 'smart meter' on your home against your wishes even though there
is no federal or state law requiring installation?
With the amount of expert
opinions warning 'smart meters' are a "ticking time bomb against human beings," I believe we can win this
argument because as far as I can find from all my research, there is no mandatory requirement for the specific
'smart meter'. This is all about massive amounts of money for the utility companies and that 'smart grid'.
2. Your utility company
installed a 'smart meter' on your property without your knowledge and without informing you of the very real
risks involved. Can the Texas PUC legally force the utility company to remove the 'smart meter' and reinstall
the analog meters (which I have on my house? Can the PUC force the cost of such replacement onto the utility
company or will the people in Texas get reamed like they did in Maine as discussed above?
If you are unable, and I do
understand, to become a petitioner in my case, perhaps you can make a donation that's comfortable for your
situation. As long time readers of my columns and old newsletter dating back to the mid-1990s know, I am always
up front in projects I undertake and for the rare occasion when I ask for donations, every penny goes only for
that project. If you would like to make a donation, which will be greatly appreciated, please send your check or
Tommy Cryer - Attorney at
7330 Fern Ave., Suite
In the memo section, please
write: smart meter defense fund
http://www.devvy.com. You may also
sign up for her free email alerts.
3. Man-Made Weather Modification the Media is Forbidden to Report On
Weather modification has been ongoing for decades in the
United States. It was perfected during the Vietnam War leading to the ENMOD Treaty
signed by the United States. However, this has not stopped a whole host of weather modification programs and
experiments being initiated or are now ongoing in the U.S.
These exponentially growing programs have no government or public oversight, limited oversight in a very few
states which allow them, and no government or public oversight or consent for the rest of them. These programs
change the climate, the micro-climates needed for watersheds, trees, and agriculture crop production. NOAA lists
some of these programs but most are not listed due to their experimental nature, military classification,
university experiments, and failures to notify NOAA by various states, counties, cities, weather modification
companies, and private individuals and corporations who may all modifying your weather.
Your local weather forecasters either don't know or don't report ongoing
experimental weather modification program letting the public believe that the weather that they are experiencing is
unusual but normal. Climate change and global warming are blamed for some
weather events by meterologists. The Weather Channel and local newscasters, don't report current and ongoing
weather modification programs, even when they are taking place, according to NOAA documents detailing these
U.S. Senate Bill S601 (introduced by Senator Kay Bail Hutchison-Texas), was not passed by the U.S. Senate in
2010. Senator Hutchison has introduced a version of this bill each year since 2005, and the public has lobbied
successfully to stop passage. It is highly likely that Senator Hutchison will again introduce this bill in the
Senate in 2011. This bill allows anyone to mitigate or modify your weather without public notification, consent,
oversight or debate. This bill could also be added as an amendment to other legislation and passed.
The implication for agriculture, watersheds, water supplies, and who will receive
the benefits or the negative consequences are hidden from public view.
It is time for all of us to examine these experimental weather modification programs and who is benefitting from
them financially...who is suffering the consequences of these uncontrolled programs...and how much is crop
production in the United States is being reduced due to these programs which may leave many ranchers and farmers
without enough rainfall, water supplies or with too much snow.
There are many questions and few answers due to the fact that few people in the United States know
about these programs and how extensive they are now. The information on these programs is from
the NOAA office in Colorado and we have listed them for the last several years below.
Read the Full Article Here:
4. List of the Rothschild-Owned Central
Banks of the World
Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Cameroon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada
Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States
The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan
Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philippines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: The Dirty Nasty Stinky Fed, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia
Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
5. Menacing UFO
Fleets Circumnavigating Globe, We Are Led to Believe
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
Original Title: Menacing UFO Fleets Circumnavigating Globe
Frightened UFO investigators: Is the world is being
Thousands of awestruck people around the world are
seeing—and sometimes recording—literal fleets of UFOs. The unwordly
craft dominate the skies over major cities with complete
Terror over Taiwan
In the video [
See here] they arrive without warning and dart across the skies like they own it...and maybe
The UFO armada appeared over Taiwan to the amazement and consternation of pedestrians on the streets far below.
Silent, manueverable, and definitely under the control of some unknown intelligence, the UFOs dipped and looped
while the authorities on the ground stood helplessly gaping up at the sky along with thousands of stunned
Massive UFO fleet invades Seoul, South Korea
More than 20 UFOs converged on Seoul, South Korea's largest city. [Video here]
According to news reports the UFOs dominated the skies over other parts of South Korea as well, yet the South
Korean officials kept their aircraft grounded on the advice of an American military officer that was in satellite
contact with Vandenburg Space Command in California during the incident.
His reported advice to frightened South Korean officials was direct and blunt: Don't chase after them; it's too damn dangerous.
UFO Armada Commands Lebanese
Amazed eyewitnesses swore that huge UFOs buzzed
the expressway at Antelias Jounieh in the city of Lebanon. They made their claims on a national TV show hosted by
Il Maestro Nichan Derharoutiounian a respected journalist. The highly rated show was broadcast across the nation on
the LBCI network.
Witnesses testified that hundreds of cars pulled off the roadway and stopped when more than 50 UFOs converged
overhead. Some of the alien craft descended almost to ground level before rising again and rejoining the fleet.
The reports were carried acdross the Middle East and Europe, but as is normally the case the American news media
completely ignored the furor.
Fleets of UFOs now
appearing all over the world...
UFO fleets picked up on Chinese
The Chinese are picking up hundreds on radar. Meanwhile
they're forced to close commercial airports as some gigantic craft appear over runways. Reports from China describe
some of the alien craft as being half a mile long.
In Saudi Arabia UFOs appeared near Riyadh and spelled out Allah's name in the sky. Thousands fell to their knees in
prayer struck with awe and fear.
Residents of Guadalajara, Mexico spied hundreds of darting, dashing UFOs zoom over their heads. The Mexican
military remained helpless.
Guadalajara, Mexico terrorized by UFO
Residents of Guadalajara have seen UFOs for
Across the Atlantic in the United Kingdom, expressways like the M25 are being buzzed by UFOnauts...some Brits
snapped photos of the UFO sky hordes as the craft soar overhead.
Incredible! Photo by photographer Gene
New Yorkers gawk as the sky above Manhattan filled with
mystery ships. The normally staid city folk yelled and pointed at the sky—their frank amazement tinged with
UFO fleet stunned thousands in
From Brazil to Australia...from Russia to Canada...the skies are bursting with UFOs.
What are they really? Where do they come from? Why are they here? What do they want?
Are they harbingers of doom? Monitors of an approaching worldwide cataclysm?
No one knows...
Other Mass Sightings of UFO
UFO fleet spotted at Pennsylvania/Delaware State
line...Dozens fly over Colorado...Mystery fleet sails over west Texas, chased by military fighter
UFO Fleet spotted above Kazakhstan On March 27,2011
mass UFO sightings in Santiago, Chile
6. Joseph McCarthy Was Used to
Hide from the Public the Fact that Soviet Communism was Illuminati Jewish.
Original Title: Illuminati
Bankers Controlled Joseph McCarthy
(Left, McCarthy -- March 8, 1954 Edition of TIME)
"We were the ones that wrote the
speeches for McCarthy back in West Virginia that started his build-up into the famous
anti-Communist that he is today. Our pressure on the press resulted in his getting as much attention as he
has. In return for this build-up he
agreed not to call up or expose Jews in the Communist movement by the investigations through his
By Michael Collins Piper
(from his 2006 book, "The Judas
(First posted here Nov. 24, 2010)
DeWest Hooker (1918-1999) was an American patriot and successful businessman. During the 1950s, he
uncovered a Zionist effort to control the "anti-communist" movement, an
eye-opening and sobering revelation for Americans who are unaware of how Illuminati bankers manipulate public
What follows is the text (slightly annotated for purposes of clarity) of a sworn statement that Hooker executed on
September 30, 1954 outlining his findings about the role of the self-styled "American Jewish League Against
Communism" and how it was manipulating then Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy's efforts to investigate communism in high
places in the American system. The affidavit reads:
"I had an astounding interview for two hours some time ago with Norman L. Marks of the American
Jewish League Against Communism, Inc. As a matter of fact, I was brought along by another party, and Mr.
Marks did not know anything about me (hence he really opened up because the person who took me was "trusted" by
him). The AJLAC has offices at 220 West 42nd Street, New York City. Its national chairman is Alfred
Kohlberg. Its executive director is Rabbi Benjamin Schultz, and its treasurer is Harry Pasternak. Listed on
its national board are the following: Bern Dibner, Lawrence Fertig, Theodore Fine, Benjamin Gitlow,
Hon. Walter R. Hart, Herman Kashins, Eugene Lyons, Norman L. Marks, Morris Ryskind, Rabbi David S. Savitz,
Nathan D. Shapiro, George E. Sokolsky, Maurice Tishman, Rabbi Ascher M. Yager.
I swear under oath to you that the following is as accurate as it is possible to put down from memory an hour or so
later. Also, the information can be verified by the other unnamed party.
Mr. Marks, listed above and on the letterhead of the AJLAC as a member of the national board, said: "Far and
away the principal financial contributor to the AJLAC is Mr.
Bernard Baruch." When questioned on this point as to what percentage he would say Mr. Baruch contributed, he
answered: "About 85% or 90% of the funds."
I said that I had thought Mr. Kohlberg was the main contributor to the AJLAC and Mr. Marks answered:
"Well, he contributes some but nothing like what Baruch contributes." I asked Mr. Marks why Baruch's name did
not appear on the letterhead. He stated that Baruch was very emphatic about NOT having his name appear
on the letterhead, and that it was to be unknown that he contributed funds to it.
Mr. Marks said that the organization was entirely Jewish but that a funny thing was that many of the
founders of it seemed to have "Christian" wives. He said that they used to meet every Thursday at the
Ambassador Hotel for lunch and talk about the world situation. Marks said that the organization would not
accept either a "Christian in it" or a "Christian dime of support" and that no Christian money had ever
been accepted in the past--that it was completely a Jewish organization and financed by them.
He said there were only two purposes for its founding: That the Number One purpose was to take the heat
off the Jewishness of Communism, and a secondary aim was to get the Jews out of Communism and to support
Zionism. He said that: "for a while there, almost all the spies of the Communists that were turned up
were Jews and that they had become concerned, and thought that something should be done to take the sting
off the Jews. They wanted to show the Christian world that ALL Jews were not Communists."
When asked just how they went about this whole project, Mr. Marks said: "It's impossible for a
Christian to get away with criticizing the Jews. Only a Jew can do that."
He went on: "And so we got together a strong group of Jews that "were known to be anti-Communists" and
started our campaign of pressure from our point of view."
[According to Hooker's original affidavit, Marks' reference to those who were said to be
"anti-Communists" actually meant that the Jewish leaders in question were, as Hooker put it, "meaning
Marks stated: "We were the ones that wrote the speeches for McCarthy back in West Virginia that started his
build-up into the famous anti-Communist that he is today. Our pressure on the press resulted in his
getting as much attention as he has. In return for this build-up he agreed not to call up or expose Jews in
the Communist movement by the investigations through his sub-committee."
Mr. Marks stated that a lot of Jews called McCarthy an anti-Semite but little did they know that "he is
the best friend the Jews ever had."
[Hooker noted of McCarthy that "Eventually they destroyed him anyway when he started calling up Jewish
Communists later on."--Ed.]
Marks went on to say that "other investigations might have turned up Jews and McCarthy had been given
credit for them, but that if we traced the record back, we would find that McCarthy actually did not
call up a single Jew in that period when the heat was on the Jews." He later qualified these remarks by
saying that "while McCarthy was operating as a temporary subcommittee under the Truman administration,
he did not call up any Jews; that when he once got himself elected as the chairman of the permanent
investigating committee, in the new administration, he then began to call witnesses "as they came."
[That is, whether the witnesses were "Jewish or not," according to Hooker--Ed.]
Mr Marks continued: "But that doesn't make much difference now
because he accepted our own men to work right with him. For example, he accepted as his top man next to him
our man Roy Cohn, left, which was arranged through another of our men, George Sokolsky."
If memory serves me correctly, Marks stated that Julius Kahn was also their man on the McCarthy committee, but who
was now on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He definitely stated that David Schine was NOT with the AJLAC but that he was put there
by "another group which I don't know about."
Mr. Marks went on to say that "not only is McCarthy under our control but so are Jenner and Velde, who also
took our men to work right with them. Benny Mandel and Robert Morris represent us on the Jenner Committee." He
mentioned Robert Kunzig as "their man" for Velde. Marks also stated definitely that Professor Louis Budenz was under "their control" and one of
"their men," and that he was working to take the "heat" off the Jews.
[Budenz was a well-known "ex-communist" who became a leading figure in the so-called anti-communist movement,
key elements of which had come under the control of the Zionist and Trotskyite elements. Hooker's revelations
He stated that [Alfred] Kohlberg, their national
chairman, was the one who "found" Budenz when he was testifying in Washington and Kohlberg "picked him up and
practically supported him for a while in order to get him started and built up to the man he is today in the
Marks also stated that they got "their man Robert Morris" elected recently as a judge in New York City, and
that Victor Lasky was another one of their men who did a lot of "press work" for them, and "made speeches favoring
their people, for example, Robert Morris." He said, "All these people agreed to take the 'heat' off the Jews."
I recall now another statement by Mr. Marks that "there is a vast pooling of information in the New York City
area and throughout the country which is connected with our organization."
I asked if J. B. Matthews and his files were
in on "the deal" and he said: "Yes, we have access to all of his files."
[J. B. Matthews was a prominent "anti-communist crusader" in the period, but, clearly, under the control of
He said that they have at least "thirty Communists on our payroll who report information to us," and that "we know
everything that goes on in this field."
Mr, Marks told all the above information as if there was nothing "wrong" with what he was saying. He even
invited me and this other unnamed fellow to go to a meeting the following Tuesday night at the University Club,
sponsored by Norman Lombard.
When they finally found out who I was, however, I was told by Norman Lombard and Norman Marks not to come to
the meeting. I sure hope that the true patriotic American nationalists will be able to straighten out a few of
these "pseudo-patriots" who are trying to lead the so-called "anti-communist" movement.
Don't misunderstand me: I'm just as anti-Communist as any of you, but I don't want our country to be led
head-long into traps which enable these pseudo-patriots to "use" the fine instincts of the American people and the
anti-Communist movement for their own diabolical ends. In other words, some of these pseudo-patriots are
"anti-Communist," meaning "anti-Stalin communism," but are pro- as hell another form of Communism (American brand)
leading to dictatorship by them in our own country and the rest of the world under Bernard Baruch and the crowd he
[The "American brand" of communism to which Hooker referred, although he didn't say it directly, was
precisely the Trotskyite brand, then in its evolution, that has come today to be known as
(Signed) DeWest Hooker
---Makow comment: Reading this, it's hard to imagine that the same forces didn't put Hitler into power.
Or that The John Birch Society and some unnamed anti-NWO websites are truly independent.
After World War Two ended, the Illuminati needed to create the bogus
Cold War to justify the arms race and the national security state (just as the "war on
terror" replaces the Cold War today.) The problem was that Communism could be traced back to the
Illuminati Jewish bankers. Most Communist spies were Jewish and Soviet Communism was
Illuminati Jewish. They used McCarthy to fuel Cold War hysteria while de-emphasizing the role
Jews play as agent/dupes for the Illuminati bankers. Apparently
McCarthy outlived his usefulness and they murdered him at Bethesda Naval Medical Center after disgracing him
This article impugns most Jews but I can assure my readers that I am still waiting for my offer. (You'll know I've
accepted it when I get mainstream media coverage. That's the tell.) It's pathetic that anti-Communist/ anti-NWO
forces need to be organized and subsidized by the enemy. It proves my contention that grass roots or populist
resistance is negligible and nothing gets done politically unless someone pays for it. And you know who can afford
to Tony Blizzard for sending me this excerpt.
Comments for "Illuminati Bankers Controlled Joseph
Mark said (November 25, 2010):
Eustace Mullins said that McCarthy was fine so long as he
stuck with his anti-communist agenda
Mullins says in 'a writ for martyrs' that he (Mullins) wrote a speech for McCarthy detailing the Jewish bankers who
were financing the communist.
McCarthy delivered the speech in Washington, this is when
Bernard Baruch called McCarthy into his
office and laid down the law. No more talking about who was
financing the communists. This was the end of McCarthy. Mullins was working on a bio that would
restore Joe m's image as hero/patriot before he died.
The following is an extract of an interview with Mullins: On
the John Birch Society...
"JBS was set up by Nelson
Rockefeller. I knew two people at the
original meeting. They needed a right-wing, anti-communist organization. NR decided that Robert Welch was the man
to run JBS, so he arranged for the sale of Welch's Candy Co. (where Robert Welch had been working for his brother
John) to Nabisco (which was a Rockefeller controlled company) at a highly inflated price and Welch was given an
income to run the John Birch Society.
Revilo Oliver was a good friend of mine and he was one of
the founders of the JBS. He and I were sitting in his living room once and he told me that he knew Nelson
Rockefeller ran the Birch Society because he had a revolving fund at Chase Manhattan Bank, and whenever Welch
needed a quarter million dollars to meet the payroll, he'd go to CMB and withdraw the money.
Oliver told you that?
Himself. One of the founders, can't ask for better authority
I traveled around for years and I was trusted because it was
pretty well established that I was working for no one but myself, so people would be frank with me. I'm writing my
autobiography now, which will break all these things out. It'll be out this spring. I'll go into JBS, McCarthy,
Ezra Pound and e.e. Cummings..."
Ty said (November 25, 2010):
I think it fair to remember that McCarthy's list of Soviet
agents came from the Venona files handed to him from Hoover. At this time all the "gentiles" in power became aware
of the Jewish threat and feared the media's anti Semite slander if they did their duty exposing their subversive
Nixon and Kennedy were very aware of all of this which is
why Nixon is on record admitting it while speak to Graham, and Kennedy died trying to break the Jewish grip on
America by informing the Media (his famous speech a "monolithic" power) about their duty not to succumb to their
We all know about his desire to break the Federal Reserve
yet few know that he was going to have the UN investigate Dimona in Israel in an attempt to stop the Israeli's from
When one adds up that McCarthy and Kennedy were very close
friends, it is easy to conclude that McCarthy was more of a well meaning partial dupe who did his duty as best he
could only to be murdered like Kennedy was.
Another point worthy of mention are the reports that Kennedy also wanted anti gravity and free energy technology released to
the public and everyone knows he was against the Vietnam war which Kissinger
admitted was a Zionist plot against America from start to finish.
In summary, I view McCarthy as a true blue patriot who did not understand the
full game. I also view Kennedy as carrying on the fight and that if any of his battles against
the Jews would have seen success, it would have spelled in the very least a great disaster in the Jews attempt
to control the world through America by proxy.
Lastly, I think Nixon also tried to take up where Kennedy
left off but was destroyed by Jewish power once they realized his attempts to buck the growing Jewish system of
control in America.
Henry, if anyone has any shred of allegiance to truth, honestly decency and America, they must take up the torch,
perform their sacred duty andtake
up the fight against Jewish power where these great men left off. I for one am not too
worried because I know the promises of Jesus Christ and his prophesies concerning Jewish power.
Anderson said (November 25,
"It proves my contention that grass roots or
populist resistance is negligible and nothing gets done politically unless someone pays for it. And you know who
can afford that."
As you indicate, the bottom line is the financial muscle. Therefore the banking power, the power to create money
privately and soak the world in usury, is the key. Nearly all our efforts must focus there, since that manipulation
spawns our other political and cultural problems. That is why they like us chirping about a smörgåsbord of issues
and why the tea party movement started decentralized with End the Fed as a fairly common theme and ended up a
neutered monolith that largely supports the GOP and neo-con wars while forgetting about a Fed probe.
They don't care what we know; only what we do with what we
know. They speak of false unity but actually fragment the freedom movement so not enough people
focus on the right thing at any given time, while making sure we're too broke to make enough lasting progress.
Mark Anderson AFP editor
7. Six Kabbalah Must-Read Books
Kaballah--Book 1: Sabbatai Sevi, by John S. Torell (US$4 plus shipping) from here:
Sabbatai Sevi proclaimed to be the messiah in the year 1666, but unlike Jesus, he lived an immoral
life, and the Kabbalah teaches that through his sinful life and death through sickness, he opened the door for
salvation for them that believe on him. Striving to live a sinful life is not the nature of God, but of the Devil,
and the complete opposite of what the Bible teaches of Jesus, who was born of a virgin, lived a sinless life and
died on the cross for our sins.
The messiah concept found in the Kabbalah is
actually “Satan’s gospel” and the core belief of the people in charge of the coming
World Government. If you don’t understand this concept, you will be deceived by the
Antichrist system and might even be assured to take the Mark of the Beast by apostate church leaders and the
2. The Kaballah - Book 2: Jacob
Frank, by John S. Torell (US$4 plus shipping) from here:
For thousands of years people believed the earth was flat and the center of the universe, and
anyone who challenged these assumptions was arrested, tried and put to death by the Roman Catholic Church. So what
happens today when someone makes an assertion that is considered anti-Semitic but can be proven otherwise?
Few Gentiles know about a Jew named Jacob Frank in
the 18th century who was deeply educated in the Kabbalah and believed he
was the reincarnation of Sabbatai Sevi. He believed in nihilism
and advocated overthrowing every national government, executing every king and eradicating every trace of
Christianity. He strove to destroy God’s laws and lived in total sin.
While Frank was never able to put his revolutionary ideas into practice, his writings
did become the foundation for the scourges of Communism, Nazism and Fascism and someday they will also be used by
the Antichrist. The millions that were killed during the Second World War and the communist
takeovers of Russia, China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Cuba are a direct result of Frank's writings. Their blood
cries out for truth concerning this demonized man so that so that future generations can be warned about this
3. The Kaballah - Book 3: The Rothschild
Family, by John S. Torell (US$4 plus shipping) from here:
How the Kabbalistic leadership was able to get
control of the world banking system.
A successful revolution requires a lot of money, but when the goal is to subdue the world and put
it under a dictatorship, entire financial systems must be taken over. The Kabbalistic
leadership wants to take dominion of the earth and rule it with their messiah and they need to control the banking
system to achieve this objective. The Fugger family was promoted in the 14th century but
they did not protect their wealth. Jewish traders became very wealthy during the next two centuries as they
operated in all nations and supplied warring armies but there was no centralized control that could be projected
over the banking systems of different nations.
Amschel was selected to be the founding father of a global banking family. He was sly and
deceitful and intensely loyal to the Jewish cause that is spelled out in the Talmud and the Kabbalah. The
Kabbalistic leadership invested funds and coins which Amschel used to build a fairly strong banking house in
Frankfurt and his five sons proved to be more shrewd than their father. In less than 50 years the Rothschild family
had penetrated the financial markets in Austria, Germany, France, England, Italy and Spain. This is the story of
the Rothschild’s, who through the Kabbalistic leadership was able to set the policies in these nations and achieve
a monopoly that is unrivaled today.(Nazarene Remnant
comment: Make two tiny letter-changes to Lord Meyer Amschel Rothschild’s name and we get
Lord Mayor Amschel!)
Read the Full Article:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8. Behind The Arab Revolt Is A Word We Dare Not
By John Pilger
24 February 2011
Shortly after the invasion of Iraq in 2003, I interviewed Ray McGovern, one of an elite group of CIA
officers who prepared the President’s daily intelligence brief. McGovern was at the apex of the “national security”
monolith that is American power and had retired with presidential plaudits. On the eve of the invasion,
he and 45 other senior officers of the CIA and other intelligence agencies wrote to President George W.
Bush that the “drumbeat for war” was based not on intelligence, but
“It was 95 per cent charade,” McGovern told me.
“How did they get away with it?”
“The press allowed
the crazies to get away with it.”
“Who are the crazies?”
“The people running the [Bush] administration have a set of beliefs a lot like those expressed in
Mein Kampf ... these are the same people
who were referred to in the circles in which I moved, at the top, as ‘the crazies’.”
I said, “Norman Mailer has written that that he believes America has entered a pre-fascist state. What’s
your view of that?”
“Well... I hope he’s right, because there are others saying we are
already in a fascist mode.”
On 22 January, Ray McGovern emailed me to express his disgust at the Obama administration’s barbaric
treatment of the alleged whistleblower Bradley Manning and its pursuit of WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange. “Way
back when George and Tony decided it might be fun to attack Iraq,” he wrote, “I said something to the effect that
fascism had already begun here. I have to admit I did not think
it would get this bad this quickly.”
On 16 February, Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton gave a speech at George Washington University in which she condemned governments that
arrested protestors and crushed free expression. She lauded the liberating power of the internet while
failing to mention that her government was planning to close down
those parts of the internet that encouraged dissent and truth-telling. It was a speech of
spectacular hypocrisy, and Ray McGovern was in the audience. Outraged, he rose from his chair and silently turned
his back on Clinton. He was immediately seized by police and a security goon and
beaten to the floor, dragged out and thrown into jail, bleeding. He has sent me photographs of
his injuries. He is 71. During the assault, which was clearly visible to Clinton, she did not pause in her
Fascism is a difficult word, because it comes with an iconography that touches the Nazi nerve and is
abused as propaganda against America’s official enemies and to promote the West’s foreign adventures with a moral
vocabulary written in the struggle against Hitler. And yet
fascism and imperialism are twins. In the aftermath of world war two, those in the imperial
states who had made respectable the racial and cultural superiority of “western civilisation”, found that Hitler
and fascism had claimed the same, employing strikingly similar methods. Thereafter, the very notion of American
imperialism was swept from the textbooks and popular culture of an imperial nation forged on the genocidal conquest
of its native people. And a war on social justice and democracy became “US foreign policy”.
As the Washington historian William Blum has documented, since 1945, the US has destroyed or subverted more than 50
governments, many of them democracies, and used mass
murderers like Suharto, Mobutu and Pinochet to dominate by proxy. In the Middle East,
every dictatorship and pseudo-monarchy has been sustained by America. In “Operation Cyclone”, the CIA and MI6
secretly fostered and bank-rolled Islamic extremism. The object was to
smash or deter nationalism and democracy. The victims of this western state terrorism have been
mostly Muslims. The courageous people gunned down last week in Bahrain and Libya, the latter a
“priority UK market”, according to Britain’s official arms “procurers”, join those children blown to bits in
Gaza by the latest American F-16 aircraft.
The revolt in the Arab world is not merely against a resident dictator but a worldwide economic tyranny
designed by the US Treasury and imposed by the US Agency for International Development, the IMF and World Bank,
which have ensured that rich countries like Egypt are reduced to vast sweatshops, with half the population earning
less than $2 a day. The people’s triumph in Cairo was the first blow against what Benito Mussolini called
corporatism, a word that appears
in his definition of fascism.
How did such extremism take hold in the liberal West? “It is necessary to destroy hope, idealism,
solidarity, and concern for the poor and oppressed,” observed Noam Chomsky a generation ago, “[and] to replace
these dangerous feelings with self-centred egoism, a pervasive cynicism that holds that [an order of]
inequities and oppression is the best that can be achieved. In fact, a great international propaganda campaign is under way to convince people –
particularly young people – that this not only is what they should feel but that
it’s what they do feel.”
Like the European revolutions of 1848 and the uprising against Stalinism in 1989, the Arab revolt has
rejected fear. An insurrection of suppressed ideas, hope and solidarity has begun. In the United States, where 45
per cent of young African-Americans have no jobs and the top hedge fund managers are paid, on average, a billion
dollars a year, mass protests against cuts in services and jobs have spread to heartland states like Wisconsin. In
Britain, the fastest-growing modern protest movement, UK Uncut, is about to take direct action against tax avoiders
and rapacious banks. Something has changed that cannot be unchanged. The enemy has a name now.
8. How The So-Called Guardians Of Free Speech Are
Silencing The Messenger
By John Pilger
10 March 2011
As the United States and Britain look for an excuse to invade another oil-rich Arab country,
the hypocrisy is familiar. Colonel Gaddafi is “delusional” and
“blood-drenched” while the authors of an invasion that killed a million Iraqis, who have kidnapped and
tortured in our name, are entirely sane, never blood-drenched and once
again the arbiters of “stability”.
But something has changed. Reality is no longer what the
powerful say it is. Of all the spectacular revolts across the world, the most exciting is the
insurrection of knowledge sparked by WikiLeaks. This is not a new idea. In 1792, the revolutionary Tom
Paine warned his readers in England that their government believed that “people must be hoodwinked
and held in superstitious ignorance by some bugbear or other”. Paine’s The Rights of Man was considered
such a threat to elite control that a secret grand jury was ordered to charge him with “a dangerous and treasonable
conspiracy”. Wisely, he sought refuge in France.
The ordeal and courage of Tom Paine is cited by the Sydney Peace Foundation in its award of
Australia’s human rights Gold Medal to Julian
Assange. Like Paine, Assange is a maverick who serves no system and is threatened by a secret
grand jury, a malicious device long abandoned in England but not in the United States. If extradited to the US, he
is likely to disappear into the Kafkaesque world that produced the Guantanamo Bay nightmare and now accuses Bradley
Manning, WikiLeaks’ alleged whistleblower, of a capital crime.
Should Assange’s current British appeal fail against his extradition to Sweden, he will
probably, once charged, be denied bail and held incommunicado until his trial in secret. The case against him has
already been dismissed by a senior prosecutor in Stockholm and given new life only when a right-wing politician,
Claes Borgstrom, intervened and made public statements about Assange’s “guilt”. Borgstrom, a lawyer, now represents
the two women involved. His law partner is Thomas Bodstrom, who as Sweden’s minister for justice in 2001, was
implicated in the handover of two innocent Egyptian refugees to a CIA kidnap squad at Stockholm airport. Sweden
later awarded them damages for their torture.
These facts were documented in an Australian parliamentary briefing in Canberra on 2 March.
Outlining an epic miscarriage of justice threatening Assange, the enquiry heard expert evidence that, under
international standards of justice, the behavior of certain officials in Sweden would be considered “highly
improper and reprehensible [and] preclude a fair trial”. A former senior Australian diplomat, Tony Kevin,
described the close ties between the Swedish prime minister Frederic Reinheldt, and the Republican right in the US.
“Reinfeldt and [George W] Bush are friends,” he said. Reinhaldt has attacked Assange publicly and hired Karl
Rove, the former Bush crony, to advise him. The implications for Assange’s extraidition to the US from Sweden are
The Australian enquiry was ignored in the UK, where black farce is currently preferred. On 3
March, the Guardian announced that Stephen Spielberg’s Dream Works was to make “an investigative
thriller in the mould of All the President’s Men” out of its book WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange’s War
on Secrecy. I asked David Leigh, who wrote the book with Luke Harding, how much Spielberg had paid the
Guardian for the screen rights and what he expected to make personally. “No idea,” was the puzzling reply
of the Guardian’s “investigations editor”. The Guardian paid WikiLeaks nothing for its treasure
trove of leaks. Assange and WikiLeaks -- not Leigh or Harding -- are responsible for what the Guardian’s
editor, Alan Rusbridger, calls “one of the greatest journalistic scoops of the last 30 years”.
The Guardian has made clear it has no further use for Assange. He is a loose cannon
who did not fit Guardianworld, who proved a tough, unclubbable negotiator. And brave. In the Guardian’s
self-regarding book, Assange’s extraordinary bravery is excised. He becomes a figure of petty bemusement, an
“unusual Australian” with a “frizzy-haired” mother, gratuitously abused as “callous” and a “damaged personality”
that was “on the autistic spectrum”. How will Speilberg deal with this childish character assassination?
On the BBC’s Panorama, Leigh indulged hearsay about Assange not caring about the
lives of those named in the leaks. As for the claim that Assange had complained of a “Jewish conspiracy”,
which follows a torrent of internet nonsense that he is an evil
agent of Mossad, Assange rejected this as “completely false, in spirit and
It is difficult to describe, let alone imagine, the sense of isolation and state of siege of
Julian Assange, who in one form or another is paying for tearing aside the façade of rapacious power. The canker
here is not the far right but the paper-thin liberalism of those who guard the limits of free speech. The New
York Times has distinguished itself by spinning and censoring the WikiLeaks material. “We are taking all [the]
cables to the administration,” said Bill Keller, the editor, “They’ve convinced us that redacting certain
information would be wise.” In an article by Keller, Assange is personally abused. At the Columbia School of
Journalism on 3 February, Keller said, in effect, that the public could not be trusted with the release of further
cables. This might cause a “cacophony”. The gatekeeper has spoken.
The heroic Bradley Manning is kept naked under lights and cameras 24 hours a
day. Greg Barns, director of the Australian Lawyers Alliance, says the fears that Julian Assange will
“end up being tortured in a high security American prison” are justified. Who will share responsibility for such a crime?
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?" (Quote from
satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke
The 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media: 2011 Version
wary! Probably "Controlled
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details: