NazareneRemnant header graphic
 

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
 

Cover image for Last Days Watch

Issue #50
25 August, 2011

Learn to deal with reality or
reality will deal with you.
 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

   

URL of This Issue:
http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/issue-50-ldw.html

Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days Watch.

Contents of this Issue ...

  1. Palestine, The World's Newest State.
  2. Falsified Major Media Reports On Libya
  3. The Meaning of the British Riots: Corruption At The Top Leads To Lawlessness By The People
  4. 25 Ordinary Citizens Write Iceland's New Constitution With Help From Social Media
  5. Illuminati Inspect Every Hollywood Script (Part 1)
  6. Hollywood Peddles Specific Occult Themes (Part 2)
  7. Therapist Calls Homosexuality "Mental Illness"
  8. Zionists Admit Breivik is Fjordman! Breivik, Rightist Mass Murderer, 'Atlas Shrugged' Contributor.
  9. The Damning of Tony Blair: Former PM to Be Held to Account on Iraq in Chilcot Report on Iraq War.
  10. Satanist Insider Unveils Famous Personalities
  11. Why Narcissists Rise To The Top
  12. The Beware The Risen People: Global Banking-A Criminal Syndicate Of Tyrants And Thieves!
  13. List of National Debt by Country
  14. New NASA Data Blows Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism
  15. Lies, Damn Lies And 'Safe' Nuclear Power
  16. The CIA In Australia: America's Foreign Watergate
  17. The Business Of America Is War
  18. 10 Questions The MPs Will Not Ask Murdoch
  19. Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 5 of 6
  20. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About. (Part 13)
  21. Good Summaries of Climate Change Issues.
  22. Cold War Myth: An Exercise In The Use Of The Dialectic
  23. The Imperialism of Jewish Capital
  24. Is the Devil in the New World Order?
  25. Somalia: the Real Causes of Famine
  26. Hard Facts on China.
  27. ECHELON: The Global Eavesdropping Scheme
  28. Libya in Pictures: What the Mainstream Media Does Not Tell You
  29. NATO will be Defeated in Libya
  30. 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media-2011 Version
  31. The Federal Reserve ADMITS that Its 12 Banks Are PRIVATE - Not Government - Entities
  32. Modern Christianity is Designed to Create Extremely Dissociated People
  33. Naming Names: Your Real Government
  34. The Real Revolution
  35. Tea Party is Controlled Opposition
  36. The International Monetary Fund's "Kiss of Death"
  37. Illuminati Use Cancer to Hold Us Hostage
  38. 16 Quotes On Drugs
  39. Why did Japan Surrender?
  40. The Rise of the Archons
  41. The Invasion Of Australia - Official At Last
  42. News in Brief

Last Days Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us ... 

"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your 'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur. In so doing, you are serving our purpose."  (Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )

We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists who are not "TC" Proponents ...

"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home... In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)

Important Note ...

Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...

http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/get-emails.html

SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this newsletter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1. Palestine, the World's Newest State.

July 26, 2011

Source: http://www.avaaz.org

The nations of the world that endorse the creation of the new Palestinian state are shown in green ...

Countries recognising Palestine, July, 2011.

In 24 hours the UN Security Council will meet, and the world has an opportunity to embrace a new proposal that could turn the tide on decades of failed Israeli-Palestinian peace talks: UN recognition of the state of Palestine.

Over 120 nations from the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and Latin America have already endorsed this initiative, but Israel's right-wing government and the US are vehemently trying to block it. Australia is still undecided. Only a massive urgent public push now could tip the government to back this momentous opportunity to move towards Palestinian self determination and an end to this bloody conflict.

US-led peace initiatives have failed for decades. But now most of the world is coming behind this bold new initiative, that could be the best opportunity to jump start a resolution of the conflict. We've got one day to call on the Australian government to endorse this statehood bid now, and make clear that citizens across the country support this legitimate, non-violent, diplomatic proposal. Sign the urgent petition and send this to everyone: 

http://www.avaaz.org/en/independence_for_palestine_au/?vl

While the roots of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are complex, most people on all sides agree that the best path to peace now is the creation of two states. But repeated peace processes have been undermined by violence on both sides, extensive Israeli settlement-building in the West Bank, and the humanitarian blockade on Gaza. The Israeli occupation has shrunk and fragmented the territory for a Palestinian state and made daily life a crippling ordeal for the Palestinian people. The UN, World Bank and IMF have all recently announced that Palestinians are ready to run an independent state, but say the main constraint to success is the Israeli occupation. Even the US President has called for an end to settlement expansion and a return to the 1967 borders with mutually agreed land-swaps, but Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has furiously refused to cooperate. 

It’s time for a dramatic shift away from a futile peace process and on to a new path for progress. While the Israeli and US governments are calling the Palestinian initiative ‘unilateral’ and dangerous, in fact the world’s nations overwhelmingly support this diplomatic move away from violence. Global recognition of Palestine could crush extremists, and foster a growing non-violent Palestinian-Israeli movement in step with the democratic momentum across the region. Most importantly, it will rescue a path to a negotiated settlement, allow the Palestinians access to a variety of international institutions that can help advance Palestinian freedom, and send a clear signal to Israel’s pro-settler government that the world will no longer accept their impunity and intransigence.

For too long, Israel has undermined the hope for a Palestinian state. For too long, the US has appeased them, and for too long Europe has hidden behind the US. Right now Australia is on the fence about Palestinian statehood. We have just 24 hours to appeal to the government to stand on the right side of history and support a Palestinian declaration of freedom and independence, with overwhelming support, and financial aid. Sign the urgent petition now for long-term peace in Israel and Palestine:   

http://www.avaaz.org/en/independence_for_palestine_au/?vl

Palestinian statehood will not bring a resolution to this intractable conflict overnight, but UN recognition will change the dynamics and will begin to unlock the door towards freedom and peace. Across Palestine, people are preparing, with hope and expectation, to reclaim a freedom their generation has never known. Let's stand with them and push our leaders to do the same, as they have stood with the people of Egypt, Syria and Libya.   

With hope and determination,

Alice, Ricken, Stephanie, Morgan, Pascal, Rewan and the entire Avaaz team

More Information:

Abbas vows to continue UN statehood bid
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/07/201171302020819197.html

Arab League will call for Palestinian State at the UN
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/14/us-palestinians-israel-statehood-arabs-idUSTRE76D21020110714

Palestinians and Israelis march for Palestinian statehood:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/israelis-and-arabs-march-in-jerusalem-for-palestinian-statehood/2011/07/15/gIQAQPnSGI_story.html

Israel campaign against UN vote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jun/10/israel-plan-block-un-palestinian-state?INTCMP=SRCH

Palestinian call for statehood:
http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/47a391f6-b121-11e0-a43e-00144feab49a.html#axzz1SefO7Aor

Palestinian statehood and bypassing Israel:
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/06/20116168535227628.html

UN says Palestinians able to govern own state
http://unispal.un.org/pdfs/AHLC-Apr2011_UNSCOrpt.pdf

List of countries recognizing the state of Palestine (see map above)
http://www.avaaz.org/en/countries_recognizing_palestine/?info

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2. Falsified Major Media Reports On Libya

By Stephen Lendman
16 August 2011  

 

Source: http://www.rense.com/general94/falsi.htm 

 

Major media specialize in what they do best: truth inversion (aka bad fiction), not doing what journalists are supposed to do - their job, especially covering imperial wars for dominance and rich spoils.  

   

With Libya's National Transitional Council (NTC) falling apart and rebel forces in disarray, today's headlines belie the truth, reported by independent "un-in-bed-with" journalists and other sources.  

   

On August 16, Lizzie Phelan's Libya diary "clear(ed) up the latest media rubbish on Libya," saying:  

   

Gaddafi forces liberated the "hitherto rebel-held" town of Misrata. "Last night, the Libyan army moved into the center of the city, and now the rebels are trapped between Misrata and Tawergha."  

   

About three-fourths of the city, including its port, is secured, "which was a lifeline" for shipping rebels arms and other supplies.  

   

At a press conference attended by around 200 tribes (including the four largest comprising half the population), Libya's media spokesman, Dr. Moussa Ibrahim, confirmed it.  

   

Th major four, including Wafalla, Tarhouna, Zlitan and Washafana, all support Gaddafi.  

   

"The tribal leaders also confirmed that Zawiya and Sorman are secure, in contrast to (falsified) claims by (in bed with) foreign reporters in Tripoli and Djerba (Tunisia) that they have been taken by the rebels."  

   

In addition, claims that rebels control Ghuriyan are untrue. Ongoing clashes there continue.  

   

Major media reports lie, although pockets of rebel resistance remain. Nonetheless, they're "isolated and surrounded by the Libyan army and tribes."  

   

Falsified major media reports stand in stark contrast to "Libyan tribes who, of course, know their land with great intimacy."  

   

It's clear media bosses want Libyans demoralized to think all is lost so give up. In addition, NATO's "been desperately trying to secure some victory before August 17 (Ramadan's 17th day), a very important date in the Islamic calendar.  

   

On Ramadan's 17th day in 624 AD in the Islamic calendar, the Prophet Muhammad won an important Battle of Badr victory in present day Saudi Arabia. It was a key turning point against his opponents.  

   

Fast-forwarding to today, major media sources falsify reports "to create confusion and panic on the ground."  

   

In an August 15 telephone address to supporters massed in Green Square, Gaddafi "reasserted his calls for the Libyan people to remain steadfast in defeating NATO's allies on the ground and NATO itself."  

   

Phelan also said unconfirmed reports say rebel commander Khalifa Hefter was captured, the former army officer turned CIA asset, having formerly lived near its Langley, VA headquarters since the early 1990s.  

   

If true, it'll will create more disarray among TNC leaders, perhaps better described as the gang that can't shoot or get their stories straight.  

   

"So the media war goes on," said Phelan, on the ground in Tripoli, reporting important truths on her Lizzie's Liberation site, accessed through the following link:  

   

http://lizziesliberation.wordpress.com/  

   

Contrasting Falsified Major Media Reports  

   

The vulgarity of lying needs no comment. Doing it for a living is beyond reproach. It doesn't deter takers, however, like New York Times writers David Kirkpatrick and Kareem Fahim headlining, "A Top Libyan Official Appears to Defect, as Rebels Defend Recent Gains," saying:  

   

Interior Minister Nassr al-Mabrouk "landed in Cairo in a private plane with nine family members who were traveling on tourist visas....The defection would signal a new crack in the Qaddafi government...."  

   

Fact check:  

   

Al-Mabrouk didn't defect as widely reported. He left for an operation in Cairo, saying he stands firmly with Gaddafi. It's unsurprising he'd want family members with him for support.  

   

Kirkpatrick and Fahim continued saying, "(R)ebels, emboldened by their gains in recent days, are losing incentive to make concessions."  

   

Fact check:  

   

Falsified rebel gains are, in fact, unreported losses and disarray. Moreover, without NATO air support, they'd have been routed months ago. Air cover also gave NATO a chance to slaughter and injure thousands of Libyan civilians, as well as cause horrific mass destruction, related to imperial, not military, aims.  

   

Both Times writers also reported rebel claims of having Tripoli surrounded as well as key supply lines cut off. None of it is true, but fact-checking isn't part of Times writers' job description - just reporting accounts ordered by their bosses.  

   

From Tripoli, independent journalist/Middle East/Central Asian analyst Mahdi Nazemroaya explained in a morning email:  

   

"The insurgency was defeated in Misurata. NATO responded with massive bombing. One route is controlled. Zawiya and Sorman have not fallen. There have been attacks on the route. They are trying to cut the supply routes off" but haven't succeeded.  

   

On August 15, Washington Post writer Leila Fadel was no better than other accounts headlining, "Gaddafi isolated as rebels advance, aide flies to Cairo," falsifying the same agitprop as their Times counterparts, claiming rebels have "a stranglehold on the Libyan capital, Tripoli."  

   

London Guardian writers are also complicit, headlining the following August 15 and 16 stories, better described as media lies:  

   

August 15: "Libya's interior minister flies to Egypt in apparent defection"  

   

August 15: "Libyan rebels enter oil town where decisive battle may yet be fought"  

   

Fact check: Zawiya was referred to, securely controlled by Gaddafi's forces.  

   

August 15: "No stalemate in Libya - the writing is on the wall for Gaddafi"  

   

August 16: "Libya shows signs of slipping from Muammar Gaddafi's grasp"  

   

August 16: "Live Syria, Libya and Middle East unrest - live updates," many, in fact, falsified like others.  

   

Al Zajeera is also complicit in misreporting on Libya. On August 16, it headlined, "Libyan rebels push to isolate Tripoli," sounding more like CNN, Fox News, and The New York Times than legitimate journalists.  

   

The report repeated the same misinformation about isolating Tripoli, controlling most of Zawiya, and other distortions.  

   

An earlier August 12 report claimed "Fleeing Libyans say Gaddafi regime crumbling" as rebels advance toward the capital. Again untrue.  

   

Al Jazeera, of course, is based in, funded by, and controlled by Qatar, a coalition NATO partner against Libya, its armed forces supporting rebels on the ground.  

   

As a result, it reports lack credibility and should be avoided. Angry Arab editor As'ad AbuKhalil says they're "like watching MSNBC after being purchased by Murdoch."  

   

Of course, it's worthless under its current owner, Comcast, and previous one, General Electric, especially on issues of war and peace, as well as lawless US imperialism.  

   

A Final Comment  

   

The battle for Libya continues. Overwhelming numbers support Gaddafi and want their country free from imperial control. They're also prepared to fight for it, knowing the unacceptable alternative - colonization, pillaging, loss of freedom, and perhaps their lives.  

   

What better reasons to resist than those!  

   

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.  

   

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.  

    

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
3. The Meaning of the British Riots: Corruption At The Top Leads to Lawlessness by the People 
 

Global Research, August 13, 2011

By Washington's Blog

I've repeatedly noted that corruption and lawlessness by our "leaders" encourages lawlessness by everyone else. See this, for example.

Peter Oborne - the Daily Telegraph's chief political commentator - wrote yesterday:

 

The criminality in our streets cannot be dissociated from the moral disintegration in the highest ranks of modern British society. The last two decades have seen a terrifying decline in standards among the British governing elite. It has become acceptable for our politicians to lie and to cheat. An almost universal culture of selfishness and greed has grown up.

 

It is not just the feral youth of Tottenham who have forgotten they have duties as well as rights. So have the feral rich ....

 

***

 

The so-called feral youth seem oblivious to decency and morality. But so are the venal rich and powerful – too many of our bankers, footballers, wealthy businessmen and politicians.

 

***

 

The sad young men and women, without hope or aspiration ... have caused such mayhem and chaos over the past few days. But the rioters have this defence: they are just following the example set by senior and respected figures in society.Let’s bear in mind that many of the youths in our inner cities have never been trained in decent values. All they have ever known is barbarism. Our politicians and bankers, in sharp contrast, tend to have been to good schools and universities and to have been given every opportunity in life. 

 

Something has gone horribly wrong in Britain. If we are ever to confront the problems which have been exposed in the past week, it is essential to bear in mind that they do not only exist in inner-city housing estates.

 

The culture of greed and impunity we are witnessing on our TV screens stretches right up into corporate boardrooms and the Cabinet. It embraces the police and large parts of our media. It is not just its damaged youth, but Britain itself that needs a moral reformation.

 

Osborne also gives specific examples of corruption, such as the prime minister's involvement in the Murdoch scandal, and members of parliament abusing expense accounts.

Indeed, the rioters themselves agreed. As Reuters notes:

 

Speaking to Reuters late on Tuesday, looters and other local people in east London pointed to the wealth gap as the underlying cause, also blaming what they saw as police prejudice and a host of recent scandals.

 

Spending cuts were now hitting the poorest hardest, they said, and after tales of politicians claiming excessive expenses, alleged police corruption and bankers getting rich it was their turn to take what they wanted. 

 

"They set the example," said one youth after riots in the London district of Hackney. "It's time to loot."

 

(Indeed, looting by the bankers has been shown by a Nobel prize winning economist as being the root cause of the S&L crisis and today's economic crisis).

 

Austerity Leads To Rioting And Unrest


I've previously
argued that the British riots are due to bad economic policy which has created rampant inequality. (As I've noted for years, raging inequality and policies which help the big boys at the expense of the "little people" are causing unrest - not just in Egypt - but worldwide.)

 

As the above-quoted Reuters article notes:

"I don't think the implications of this have been fully thought through or accepted yet," said Pepe Egger, western Europe analyst for London-based consultancy Exclusive Analysis. 

 

"What we have here is the result of decades of growing divisions and marginalization, but austerity will almost certainly make it worse. Yes, the police can restore control with massive force but that is not sustainable either in the long term. You have to accept that this may happen again." 

 

***

 

Analyst Louise Taggart at security consultancy AKE said that in time urban unrest worries could make it harder to cut other programs as well, including sorely needed education and community services. It went well beyond Britain, she said.

 

"Across Europe, we've already seen some incidence of civil unrest," she said, saying it would almost inevitably impact policy. "There's definitely a likelihood that similar scenes might erupt when austerity cuts really start to be felt." 

 

Indeed, a study this month by economists Hans-Joachim Voth and Jacopo Ponticelli shows that - from 1919 to the present - austerity leads to violence and instability:

 

Does fiscal consolidation lead to social unrest? From the end of the Weimar Republic in Germany in the 1930s to anti-government demonstrations in Greece in 2010-11, austerity has tended to go hand in hand with politically motivated violence and social instability. In this paper, we assemble cross-country evidence for the period 1919 to the present, and examine the extent to which societies become unstable after budget cuts. The results show a clear positive correlation between fiscal retrenchment and instability. We test if the relationship simply reflects economic downturns, and conclude that this is not the key factor. We also analyse interactions with various economic and political variables. While autocracies and democracies show a broadly similar responses to budget cuts, countries with more constraints on the executive are less likely to see unrest as a result of austerity measures.

 

As CNN notes:

 

Studying instances of austerity and unrest in Europe between 1919 to 2009, Ponticelli and Voth conclude that there is a “clear link between the magnitude of expenditure cutbacks and increases in social unrest. With every additional percentage point of GDP in spending cuts, the risk of unrest increases.”

 

“Expenditure cuts carry a significant risk of increasing the frequency of riots, anti-government demonstrations, general strikes, political assassinations, and attempts at revolutionary overthrow of the established order. While these are low probability events in normal years, they become much more common as austerity measures are implemented.”

 

Corruption And Austerity = Global Unrest

Time Magazine's Global Spin blog sums up these two threads nicely:

 

Simply working hard and playing by the rules is no longer a path to prosperity or even a dignified future in much of the industrialized West, where neoliberal economic policies have funneled most of the wealth created in recent decades to a small, already wealthy elite, while shrinking the middle class finds its living standard steadily declining, and more than one in five young people is unemployed with no prospect of finding work in the foreseeable future.

 

The looters respond to their circumstances by simply breaking the rules and grabbing whatever they can, while the moment -- and their capacity to hurt anyone who gets in their way -- allows it. The protestors, who are far more numerous, despond by demanding that the rules be changed, and they're on the streets because they believe that even the democratic political system has failed them, producing governments in thrall to the interests of financial elites regardless of which party dominates. And the British anti-austerity programs are echoed on the streets of Madrid and Barcelona, Rome and Lisbon, Athens and Tel Aviv -- an Austerity Intifada is sweeping Europe.

 

The term "looting" commonly describes the actions of those who help themselves to the merchandize of stricken stores when social order breaks down. But many of those in the more orderly protests on the streets of Europe accuse the Western world's bankers of doing the same to the state, demanding bailouts to save them from the consequences of their catastrophic mistakes, leaving them sitting pretty while public debt balloons and the middle class and poor are expected to shoulder the burden of austerity.

 

Whether they respond with disciplined protest or nihilism and criminality, millions of young people in Europe today see playing by the rules of the socio-economic and political status quo as offering them no decent future. Politicians may comfort themselves with the notion that the social unrest on the streets is simply a problem of a "culture of irresponsibility" and deviance, but if mainstream society is unable to integrate whole swathes of its youth population and give them a stake in playing by the rules, it's going to face growing discontent.

 

***

 

The protests that have shaken Spain, Greece, Portugal, France, Israel and Britain this year (even before this week's rioting) suggest that the pattern continues. The orgy of looting and vandalism that Britain suffered this week may have been simply the ugly Halloween face of a far broader wave of social unrest that expresses not simply economic discontent, butthe declining legitimacy of the political system in the minds of millions of people who see it as serving the interests of a narrow elite at the expense of the majority.

More vigorous policing will drive the thugs off the streets and restore a tenuous calm. But keeping them off the streets, and integrating them -- and the hundreds of thousands who have poured onto the streets in peaceful protests -- into a socio-economic system that offers them a future and a stake in social stability is a challenge that may be nearing crisis proportions.

 

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=26015

 

Nazarene Remnant comment:

 

Recently Tony Blair (aka Tony Bliar), the ex-PM of Great Britain, declared that England isn't in the grip of a moral decline (as if he'd know anyway!): "I think we are in danger of the wrong analysis leading to the wrong diagnosis, leading to the wrong prescription," he said. He blamed “the group of young, alienated, disaffected youth who are outside the social mainstream,” for the riots. Then he quipped in with the blatant lie that above all else, “they’re not symptomatic of society at large.” There is no moral crisis in Great Britain (i.e. if you have the morals of Tony Blair). He blames the bad element, while of course exonerating himself from this classification. He says that the bad element in British society do not have an individual problem, they have a family problem: “Many of these people are from families that are profoundly dysfunctional, operating on completely different terms from the rest of society.” The gang culture, like the culture in the military and police, gives these people a twisted sense of belonging. “We have to be prepared to intervene family by family, and at an early age, before criminality has a chance to take root.”

 

Of course all this diatribe that slides so easily out of his lying mouth is just the pot calling the kettle black. The fact is that Blair and his satanic cronies worldwide have created the template and the conditions for the mayhem and chaos we are now beginning to witness on the largest scale the world will ever witness. This is because these politicians (appropriately the word comes from the Old English for prostitute!) are doing the dirty work of the money-power elite (commonly referred to as the Illuminati), whose agenda has always been to “make the West stink.” Of course we have allowed this to happen, by not fighting the downward spiral in our our personal moral lives. Sadly, we have gone along for the ride, with hardly a whimper of protest or recognition (See Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight, and Character Deficiency Syndrome).

 

Just recently Peter Hitchens, writing in the Daily Mail (UK), August 20, 2011, made the following important observations:

 

“It is now clear that we have learned nothing from seeing our cities in flames and our streets ruled by violent thieves.

 

The governing elite have decided to respond by pretending to be fierce for a few weeks.

But they will do nothing to change the policies which brought us to this state. These policies will continue, and so will the consequences. …

 

The Prime Minister David Cameron, who has a great talent for faking anger and concern over things he couldn’t care less about, gave a speech on Monday that could have been delivered by his idol Anthony Blair.

 

Mr. Cameron declared that ‘Government cannot legislate to change behaviour.’

 

This is both defeatist and untrue. The whole Fabian socialist project, which revolutionized our nation throughout the 20th century and which eventually took over the Tory Party itself, was intended to change behaviour, and did so.

 

So is the new program which has replaced it, the politically correct drive for ‘equality and diversity.’

 

The 1969 Divorce Reform Act completely changed the nature and standing of marriage. The Children Act of 1989 sharply reduced adult authority.

 

The consequences of the Human Rights Acts are limitless. The Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, decriminalized cannabis with huge results for behaviour. So did the abolition of the old alcohol licensing laws.

 

Numberless Criminal Justice Acts have robbed the courts of power. What does he mean, ‘government cannot legislate to change behaviour?’

 

It can, and it does—but always in the wrong direction.”

 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

4. 25 Ordinary Citizens Write Iceland's New Constitution With Help From Social Media

By Aaron Saenz
August 3rd, 2011 
 

Source: http://singularityhub.com/2011/08/03/25-ordinary-citizens-write-icelands-new-constitution-with-help-from-social-media/

 

The newest government in the world was designed with help from comments on the Internet. God help us all. After Iceland’s economic collapse in 2008, the island nation decided it was time to write a new constitution, this one not based on its parent country of Denmark but rather made from the original ideas of its citizens. Iceland’s small population of 320,000 elected 25 assembly members from 522 ordinary candidates (including lawyers, political science professors, journalists, and many other professions), who in turnopened their process up to the public in an unprecedented fashion. The Constitutional Council was highly active on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and Flickr, where they solicited comments and suggestions for the new government. On Friday July 29th, 2011, the Iceland parliament officially received the new constitution, comprised of 114 articles divided into 9 chapters. Set to be reviewed, and then put before vote for ratification by October 1st, the internet-assisted document marks a possible paradigm shift in governing. In the 21st Century, we’re writing our constitutions with social media. The future is a crazy place.

From the elections to the website, Iceland has gone to great length to make their citizens feel involved and enabled by the process of writing the new constitution. Candidates for the constitutional assembly gathered thousands of signatures to appear on the ballot, and discussed their views publicly on 50 radio show presentations. The candidates also wrote about themselves on public websites including Wikipedia and Facebook. After The Constitutional Council was formed, there was a constant upstream of their proceedings to Twitter, and Facebook, along with regular photo updates on Flickr. You can find videos of The Constitutional Council on YouTube, but they’re in Icelandic. Just to give you a taste, here’s the inaugural meeting…opening with a song!
 

In many ways then, the new Iceland constitution was the first to ever be born completely in the public eye. Sure, constitutional assemblies are often open to some sort of public scrutiny, but Iceland’s was broadcast on the internet. Council members regularly interacted with commenters, and every week the latest drafts of the various chapters (or the work related to their writing) were shared via a public website. Live broadcasts of the open council meetings were shown every Thursday via their site as well as Facebook. There was even a regular e-newsletter. Iceland used the web like never before to open up their process to the world and attract the attention of their public.   


The Constitutional Council handed the proposed draft to the Parliament last week, but it's too soon to know if social media was the right answer for this challenge.
 

Yet the enthusiasm from the public hasn’t exactly been stellar (maybe they didn’t like the singing?). Despite the historic nature of the constitutional elections, little more than a third of Iceland actually voted (83,531 or 35.95% of the ~230,000 eligible voters). That election, by the way, was deemed invalid by the Supreme Court of the nation due to problems with voter privacy, and the parliament had to eventually appoint the same elected candidates to the Constitutional Council in order to get things rolling. It’s unclear how that debacle tainted the opinion of the council in the eyes of the Icelandic public. While the social media presence has been active during the writing of the constitution, the main website only garnered about 1600 comments. That’s certainly a lot for the Council to wade through, but I’m not sure you can call it a mandate from Iceland’s people – especially when you consider many comments were made from interested parties from all over the world.
 

The lessons we are to learn from Iceland’s new constitution, then, are a mixed bag. It’s absolutely amazing that an entire structure of government was made with help from social media and in total view of the world. Anyone from Reykjavík to Rio de Janeiro could watch and even give input to how Iceland should be governed. But that didn’t guarantee widespread public support nor even success. The new constitution is 700+ pages of ideals that may or may not be ratified come October, and whose ultimate benefit to Iceland is uncertain. Crowd-sourcing a constitution was a remarkably ballsy move, but it will take years before we know if it was a smart one. 

1000 points to Iceland for being progressive, daring, and crazy enough to undergo this revolutionary approach to government formation.

1,000,000,000 points to whoever can find a way to learn from this example and successfully leverage the power of social media to truly make the world a better place to live.
 

Source: AFP, www.stjornlagarad.is

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

5. Illuminati Inspect Every Hollywood Script

Detecting And Understanding Illuminati Interference

By Aspen
(The author is a former professional movie critic.)

(For HenryMakow.com)   

 

Part 1 

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/aspen.html  

Left, a scene from "V is for Vendetta" -- "The most blatantly honest Illuminati project I have yet viewed."

The Illuminati exert
 influence in popular visual media to an extraordinary extent. Every major film script that is in pre-production mode is submitted to key Illuminati subordinates whose role is to assess the script for potential alterations or insertions. These changes may be major or minor, depending on the material of the script.
 
Additionally, these subordinates comprise a tightly managed think tank which surveys the progress of Illuminati propaganda in global societies. The members make decisions about which themes are ready for further amplification in popular media. Then, detailed descriptions of desired creative projects are handed down to a further subordinate (but not necessarily knowledgeable) group of highly skilled writers, who create the scripts for these projects.
 
Different projects are created to target different sectors of the global population. That may seem logically obvious, but it's worth stating. Grossly blatant Illuminati messages are more often couched in films of excessive violence, sexual content, outright weirdness, and so on, in order to distract viewers from the fact that external ideas are being inserted forcefully into their minds.

Actually, that's not quite right: excessive violence, and such, activates a psychological openness to the receiving of ideas. The explanation for this is that once a viewer makes the decision to ACCEPT the violence and the sex, and so on, his or her mind remains open to the ideas that the film is meant to insert into their minds.
 
SUBTLE INFLUENCES

Very often, the decision is made not to insert any open messages into film projects. This is due to two very simple rules: too much openness exposes the process; and, gradual influence is far more powerful and effective in the long run. In the event that no open messages are going to be inserted, two other options remain which still allow for gradual influence to build.
 
The first is Signature Symbology. The Illuminati have, over time, generated a huge set of symbols and visual icons which, in partnership with the more blatant messages, exert an impressive (some would say frightening) measure of influence on public thought.

These are the Signatures of Illuminati interference in a project. When viewers see a symbol inserted into a film, this event draws up memories of past encounters with that symbol, and of any messages or themes attached to that symbol.

This is often what some people call an "unconscious" or "subliminal" process. I call it "unreflective", for the simple reason that most people are just not paying any attention to the influences that affect them deeply.

Of course everyone wants to leap on the "Illuminati eye" as a blatantly repetitive symbol these days. That's a misguided judgment, and I'll get to that part soon. An example of a less obvious Signature Symbol is the gargoyle. Any film or other production featuring even brief glimpses of gargoyles is announcing that it has the Illuminati stamp of approval.
 
The second option is influence over the music attached to a project. Film music - well, music in general - holds a powerful influence over viewers and listeners. Similar musical themes across various projects excite unreflective (or subliminal) memories even more deeply than do visual symbols.
 
One of the tactics of the Illuminati is to present a large set of what we could call Distraction Symbols. The very name "Illuminati" is itself a Distraction Symbol. Distraction Symbols are meant to occupy the attention of both the mildly curious thinkers and the overly excitable conspiracy theorists.

Oftentimes, Distraction Symbols are in fact genuine signature symbols, but the publicly presented meanings of these symbols are well-planned and tightly controlled propaganda. The meanings of Distraction Symbols have been either completely falsified or else skewed just enough to push amateur analysts in the wrong directions.
 
Let's ask some questions. What do the Illuminati wish to accomplish? What do the subordinate participants in Illuminati projects wish to accomplish? What are the major themes the Illuminati focus on presenting? Why have they selected these particular themes?

Read the Full Story:
Illuminati Inspect Every Hollywood Script

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
6. Hollywood Peddles Specific Occult Themes 
 
August 22, 2011 

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/aspen2.html

George Lucas developed the spiritual format of Star Wars culture to be precisely Kabbalistic.

The lower levels of human society will be completely sexualized. Sexuality will saturate society. Sexual exploration will be encouraged from youth: hence the current seeding of child sexualization. Sexual practice will be a mandate, not an option. At higher levels, true sexual mastery will be taught.

By Aspen
(a former professional movie critic)

(For HenryMakow.com)

The Illuminati are seeding the public with notions that gradually grow larger and more influential over time. They did it with Feminism; they did it with flexi-sexuality; they are doing it with anti-religion and with child sexualization now. They do this because the future society they have planned must be structured differently from what we all know now. A different structure requires citizens with different thinking who will accept that structure.
 
Themes:

Satanism, Witchcraft, and Anti-Religion
 
Are the Illuminati Satanists, in the strict sense of "Satanist"? Are they witches? Do they worship a tall, horned guy with red skin? In all likelihood, no, but they heavily sponsor and support Satanic cultural influences and themes. Obvious film vehicles for apparent Satanic ideology have included the works of Roman Polanski (Rosemary's Baby ; The Ninth Gate), several films starring Nicolas Cage (um, basically, everything over the past several years), and Natalie Portman (same thing), and even the somewhat recent animated Western-style film Rango. I could provide a longer list, and I may do that later.
 
The Illuminati sponsor such projects in order to break the public credibility of organized religions. The so-called "New World Order" (really, it's The Other New World Order You Didn't Hear About) won't include any of the currently popular religions, or their members. If you're a Christian, a Muslim, a Jew, a Buddhist, a Daoist, a Satanist, or a member of any subset of those, or of any other offhand cult, you're on "the list".
 
Kabbalistic Ideology
 
The essence of Kabbalah is that there exists no real opposition between what traditional religions have chosen to label as "opposites", like Good and Evil. If you want a very straightforward representation of this, you can try to find and view an early Yiddish film called The Dybbuk, and you'll see the Kabbalah in action. A more recent film would be The Dark Crystal, directed by Jim Henson (the creator of the Muppets). This film culminates in a scene where Good and Evil coalesce into perfect, ethereal beings of pure light. It is the insertion of a small, perfect shard of crystal, into a very large and evil crystal, which makes this transformation possible.
 
The most popular representation of Kabbalah philosophy has been the Star Wars series of films, comics, and books. It's no accident that George Lucas was tapped to build these projects, and you can be sure that he did not do it alone. The root derivative of the very name "Lucas" means "wolf". The wolf is one of the Illuminatis' more subtle symbols, yet it is by now a constant infiltrator of film media, and that is to the point: in the Protocols of Zion, the Illuminati name themselves as wolves. More on this later.
 
Most viewers of the Star Wars films are not aware that George Lucas developed the spiritual format of Star Wars culture to be precisely Kabbalistic. Within the space of the books and illustrated novels (comic books) following the conclusion of "Episode 6" (Return of the Jedi), Luke Skywalker (Luke = Lucas) travels a new path of exploration of "the Force", during which he attempts, successfully, to fuse the powers of the Good Side with the powers of the Dark Side. He nearly loses out to the temptations of the sheer power of the Dark Side, but he is narrowly saved by the love projected by his sister, Leia. He does not have to give up the Dark Side, once he has been saved.
 
As has already been noted on Dr. Makow's site, recent films like Black Swan contain similar messages.
 
Are the Illuminati Kabbalists? No. These Kabbalistic messages are only a rough transcription of the Illuminatis' more finessed version of "Kabbalah". It is a fine-tuned Utilitarian Ethics, elitist in essence because it is based on measured Intelligence. That means, that future human society is to have a hierarchy arranged according to the intelligence levels of its members.
 
The Illuminati present Kabbalistic ideas to the public because according to Utilitarian Ethics, "good" and "evil" are simplistic labels that destroy the human ability to make honest decisions.

Sexuality
 
(Left, Natalie Portman, nee Hershlag, in Closer, 2004)

Feminism, homosexuality, bi-sexuality, "the inner slut", sex without commitment, no-strings flings... There's no point in providing a film list for this material, but I would recommend looking up Natalie Portman again. What is this stuff all about? It just keeps getting more and more in-your-face. Why are the Illuminati so interested in "destroying traditional family values"? Is it because they hate God? Is it because they hate all religious and traditional people?
 
No, that's not the point of it. The ultimate aim of the Illuminati is not to create a planet of confused and violent degenerates, but to centralize reproductive control.

[Nazarene Remnant comment: This otherwise good article degenerates into trivial rubbish at this point. The Illuminati hate God and everything He stands for, period! Of course the Illuminati want to destroy the family, and they have done just that! The point is that the Illuminati aim to make the West "stink," so that God, who will not tolerate evil once it becomes totally entrenched, will be the destroyer. This is satan's big "fix," and he works on it always.]
 
In tandem with increasingly strict rules concerning what parents can and cannot do, the expansion of sexual freedoms and the amplification of potential sexual proclivities is the pre-cursor to a society that knows no central family unit. This was - PARTLY - Plato's idea. Where the Illuminati differ from Plato is that, whereas Plato intended only to scatter people's sentiments to include the body politic entirely (because if there's no family, then everyone is family), the Illuminati are more intent on controlling human evolution via the laboratory.

[Nazarene Remnant comment:  Notice how the young today have been bonded to each other, and their family bonding is minimal and in many cases non-existant. When I was a school teacher, even in the early years, the creation of Year Masters and Year Advisors, was always aimed at making the young people bond with each other and their year group. This Illuminati goal has been easily achieved. Today satanists proclaim that the "youth" are theirs, and its not hard to see why.]
 
The plan is that gradually home parenting will be proven, scientifically, and beyond all reasonable doubt, to be less effective in producing stable individuals. Survival crises will mandate that random sexual intercourse - with an aim to REPRODUCTION -- must cease, in favor of test tube creations of superior physical condition and stamina.
 
In the meantime, what to do with all that sexual desire that suddenly has no "purpose"? If people are not trying to have babies, by fucking, then what are they going to be trying to do?
 
This is why the sexual fields of possibility are being seeded. Once the aim of reproduction has been wholly distanced from sexual activity, then human sexuality will have to have an alternative destination. [Nazarene Remnant comment:  What we are actually reading about is planned genocide, whereby the young are encouraged and hoaxed not to reproduce themselves, but to go on enjoying the benefits of sexual lust, without its long-term commitments and wholesomeness, which has always been a family with many children. Unfortunately the majority of our youth have bought this lie without blinking and without thinking through the long-term consequences for themselves and for society. But the really long-term agenda is to suppress the knowledge of our destiny, which is to live forever, something that has been denied to the members of the Illuminati. To find out the facts of the matter, see The Two Seeds of Genesis 3:15 ]

Read the Full Story:
Hollywood Peddles Specific Occult Themes 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

7. Therapist Calls Homosexuality Mental Illness

August 1, 2011  

 

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/homosexuality.html  

 

"Most homosexuals don't want to be homosexual, anymore than a schizophrenic wants to hear voices. A highly respected colleague quietly told me that he cures 80% of the homosexuals that come to him." 

[Editor's Note: Rather than mental disease, I see homosexuality as a developmental disorder usually caused by identifying with the wrong parent. I believe in live-and-let live. My concern is with the Illuminati (satanist) campaign by corporations, schools and media to spread this disorder to healthy heterosexuals, under the disguise of "tolerance," in order to destabilize society.]

By Anthony Carpenter
(henrymakow.com)
 

 

In 1973, the weight of empirical data, coupled with changing social norms and the development of a politically active gay community, led the Board of Directors of the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM).  

 

Some psychiatrists who fiercely opposed this action subsequently circulated a petition calling for a vote on the issue by the Association's membership. That vote was held in 1974, and the Board's decision was ratified. (http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html) 

 

1973 is the date that Satanists have gained control over the field of psychology. Today there is little protest over taking the diagnosis of homosexuality out of the DSM. I believe from speaking with colleagues that many professionals do not openly express their dismay with the removal of homosexuality from the DSM out of fear of ridicule or even reprisal.  

 

My personal experience standing up for the truth likewise has brought  ridicule from both Satanists and Christian fundamentalists.  

 

I believe homosexuality is a mental illness and a difficult illness to bear. Growing up homosexual is traumatizing even to the strongest. They suffer through constant harassment from schoolmates, families and even strangers. Depression is often a major issue with homosexuals. Most homosexuals in addition suffer from a broad spectrum of psychosis and serious emotional disturbances.  

 

Police and prison guards tell me that homosexuals cause more trouble than 20 normal inmates combined. They place the homosexuals in the same cell blocks for their own safety and to concentrate the dramas they instigate in an area isolated from the general prison population.  

 

The Satanic line is that homosexuality is normal, not a disease. Therefore they give the homosexuals no hope of a cure because you don't need to cure the normal. They give the green light to activities that threaten public health and safety. Humanity is threatened with extinction in sub-Saharan Africa because of promiscuous hetero- and homosexual behavior. Sadly we see this green light given daily for these amoral activities in our Satanic-controlled media.  

 

CURE 

 

There is a cure for homosexuality, but well meaning but ignorant therapists (especially Christian fundamentalists) have had dismal results treating it successfully. Most homosexuals don't want to be homosexual, anymore than a schizophrenic wants to hear voices. A highly respected colleague quietly told me that he cures 80% of the homosexuals that come to him. He says that the other 20% don't want a cure. 

 

Be assured however, the Satanists do not want a cure to be known. Its part of their plan to destroy humanity. Therapists that insinuate that it can be cured are persecuted, humiliated and could find themselves embroiled with legal problems. Therefore therapists skilled in this field don't advertise and try to remain under the radar. 

 

There is another aspect that I have never seen addressed. Homosexuality and promiscuous heterosexual sex has a spiritual price. Participants will take on the spiritual negativity of their illicit partner's family tree or epigenetics into their own lives and that of their descendants (as if the promiscuous don't already have enough problems). 

 

Promiscuous sex is a heavy burden upon society. Aside from the socially transmitted diseases, the cost of abortions and fatherless children is much higher than most realize. Fatherless children are much more likely to become drug users, drop out of school and end up in prison. This increases the tax burden on all of us. I always think it odd that there is so much antagonism against illegal immigrants, but there is virtually nothing said of the burden caused by promiscuous sex. 

 

Promiscuous sex, whether homo- or heterosexual is destroying the very fabric of our civilization. It is destroying the integrity of the family and turning the world into a patch work of broken families and broken nations.  

 

Read the Full Article:
Therapist Calls Homosexuality Mental Illness

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

8. Zionists Admit Breivik is Fjordman! Breivik, Rightist Mass Murderer, 'Atlas Shrugged' Contributor

http://www.richardsilverstein.com/tikun_olam/2011/07/22/rightist-wreak...  

Source: http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/blog/joeblow/zionists-admit-breivik-fjordman-breivik-rightist-mass-murderer-atlas-shrugged-contribut  

A far-right Norwegian nationalist with ardent anti-Muslim views levelled savage blows at the mainstream political culture of his country with massive attacks on the government building housing the prime minister’s office and a summer camp at which young followers of the ruling Labor Party played.  He killed 80 people.  There are many questions raised by the savagery of this attack.  How could Norwegian security allow such a thing to happen in the heart of Oslo, in a government facility housing the nation’s leader and political heart?  How do we apprehend the enormity of the devastation and the fact that it was wrought by a far-right terrorist targeting the country’s liberal political leadership?  But for me, another important question which no one, so far is asking is why did most of the world first think the terrorist/s responsible were Muslim, when the actual killer hates Muslims? 

The hand of the Mossad.

The hand of the Mossad: "Mossad is a master at false-flag terrorist attacks designed to alter perceptions and punish opponents of Israeli policy. The fingerprints of Israeli intelligence are all over the 9/11 attacks on the United States, the 3/22 train bombings in Madrid, the 7/7 transit bombings in London, and, now, the 7/22 attacks in Norway… While the Israeli-influenced corporate media has droned on and on about the dangers of Islamist terrorism, it is now obvious that the major threat to public safety comes from the State of Israel, a rogue nation that does not hesitate to murder the innocent to achieve its sordid political aims," Wayne Madsen, July 25, 2011.

 
In fact, this is what the New York Times wrote in its story which did report the political affiliation of the killer: 

Initial reports focused on the possibility of Islamic militants, in particular Ansar al-Jihad al-Alami, or Helpers of the Global Jihad, cited by some analysts as claiming responsibility for the attacks. American officials said the group was previously unknown and might not even exist. 

There was ample reason for concern that terrorists might be responsible. 

How’s that again?  Are the only terrorists in the world Muslim?    If so, what do we call a right-wing nationalist capable of planting major bombs and mowing down scores of people for the sake of the greater glory of his cause?  If even a liberal newspaper like the Times can’t call this guy a terrorist, what does that say about the mindset of the western world? 

It’s absolutely imperative for the world to face the fact that for every Islamist willing to resort to violence there is a right-wing nationalist willing to do the same.  We can see that in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  Equally important to note that while there may be some on the left who have resorted to violence (in this country in the 1960s for example), the overwhelming share of mayhem comes from the political right.  We can see that in Israel, where the extreme settler movement assassinated a prime minister and murdered fellow Israeli Jews.  The same holds true here in the U.S., where a white supremacist, Jared Loughner, recently murdered a federal judge and several others in addition to nearly assassinating Gabrielle Giffords, a Jewish member of Congress. 

Norwegian bloggers are reporting that Breivik is the author of a blog called Fjordman and that he’s guest blogged for Atlas Shrugs, Jihad Watch and Gates of Vienna “for years.”  As Breivik, he publicly praised one of her posts.  Elise Hendrick has translated a passage from Realisten which confirms that Fjordman and Breivik are one and the same: 

According to his own statements, Anders Behring Breivik previously operated the blog ‘Fjordman’, and later wrote for many years under the pseudonym Fjordman for the anti-Muslim and Zionist blogs Gates of Vienna and Jihad Watch. 

In fact, an intrepid friend of Elise’s has created a web page with the “collected works” of the miraculous Fjordman.  Pretty soon there’ll be a Festschrift in his honor.  And did you know he’s written a book (of course he has, he’s an articulate mass-murderer), Defeating Eurabia.  It’ll only set you back 50 bucks to get a glimpse into the mind of an anti-jihadi terrorist.  Here’s a favorable review of Geert Wilders magnum opus, Fitna penned by Fjordman.  And don’t ya know that feminism leads to the oppression of women, natch.  And Caucasophobia is racism, of course. 

I was curious about the views of such an individual would be regarding Israel.  And lo and behold, the educated terrorist doesn’t disappoint.  Here is his Why Europeans Should Support Israel.  With friends like this does Israel need enemies? 

There may be people out there more knowledgeable about the minds of assassins, but I’ve rarely heard of articulate mass murderers.  The most recent one that comes to mind is the Unabomber who wrote long treatises which were published unwillingly by several major newspapers.  Perhaps readers can think of others.  But generally, it appears that our man Breivik is a paragon of the pathological literary mindset. 

I don’t think we can blame Robert Spencer or Pam Geller specifically for not being able to predict that one of their political allies would be a homicidal killer and terrorist.  But still, if you lie down with dogs you’ll wake up with fleas.  The brand of hate peddled by Geller and Spencer naturally attracts such a following.  H/t Loonwatch

Breivik’s Twitter account contains a single tweet

"One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only interests." 

To which I’ve replied in a tweet of my own: 

"One person with homicidal right wing beliefs is equal to the force of 100,000 who think only Muslims can be terrorists." 

My strong hunch is that there must be a substantial group which participated in this conspiracy.  One man doesn’t make and plant two bombs and then travel to an island and kill 70 people alone. 

Whether it is Israel, the U.S., or Norway, if we wear blinders which prevent us from seeing that Muslims are NOT the only people capable of mass political violence, then we have left ourselves vulnerable to the ascendancy of a violent far-right political culture.  If you examine what happened in 1995, when Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated, the Israeli political liberal-centrist mainstream basically imploded after a series of Palestinian bombings and the onset of the second Intifada.  All of which enabled the ascendancy of settler extremists and their Likud fellow travellers who have now taken control of Israel’s political discourse.  People now forget that one of the most savage acts of political incitement was a speech delivered by Bibi Netanyahu from a Jerusalem balcony while members of the crowd brayed for blood vengeance against Rabin.  The assassination followed shortly thereafter.  Bibi, the Likud and the settlers have been the ones who gained the most politically from the murder. 

I would never hold that the political left is wholly pure and virtuous, but when it comes to an impulse to violence those on the far-right largely have the market cornered. 

Related:

The Norway Manifesto - New Bin Laden Is Born   

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

9. The Damning of Tony Blair: Former PM to Be Held to Account on Iraq in Chilcot Report on Iraq War.

Iraq war deal 'signed in blood' by former Prime Minister
Cabinet members kept in the dark in build-up to the war
'Obvious failings' in post-war planning

By Simon Walters
31st July 2011

Tony Blair is to face scathing criticism from the official inquiry into the Iraq War for the role he played in leading Britain into one of its biggest foreign policy fiascos in modern history. The Mail on Sunday has been told that the former Prime Minister will be held to account on four main failings:

1. Bogus claims that were made about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
2. Not telling the British public about his secret pledge with George Bush to go to war.
3. Keeping the Cabinet in the dark by his 'sofa government' style.
4. Failing to plan to avoid the post-war chaos in Iraq.

Well-placed sources say the reputations of Mr Blair and key allies (undobtedly a reference to Australia's 33rd degree Freemason PM John Howard) will suffer major damage when the report by Sir John Chilcot’s (left) Iraq War inquiry is published this autumn.

Mr Blair, former Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and ex-Downing Street spin doctor Alastair Campbell are all expected to be criticised.

All those taken to task by Chilcot’s five-strong panel of experts will receive notice in the next few weeks of the inquiry’s conclusions.

They will be given a final chance to respond to their alleged failings before the report is finalised. Although it has not yet been written, clear indications have been given as to which areas it will focus on.

George W Bush and Tony Blair.

The damning verdict of the Chilcot Inquiry comes eight years after Tony Blair
went to war against Saddam Hussein with George Bush. Australian Prime
Miniuste John Winston Howard should also fall under damnation for his part
in this great national tragedy (and he will).

The damning verdict of the Chilcot Inquiry comes eight years after Mr Blair went to war against Saddam Hussein with George Bush.

A total of 179 British soldiers died in Iraq while estimates for the number of Iraqi dead vary from 100,000 to 650,000.

Although Saddam was toppled within weeks, the invasion led to a bloody aftermath and there were claims that it contributed to increased terrorism in the UK and elsewhere.

In evidence, a defiant Tony Blair said he had no regrets about the war.

In evidence, a defiant Tony Blair said he had no regrets about the war and maintained Britain would ultimately be able to look back on it with 'immense pride'

The Chilcot Inquiry, set up by then Prime Minister Gordon Brown two years ago, is the third inquiry into the conflict. It followed the Butler Inquiry into the intelligence failings and the Hutton Inquiry into the death of Ministry of Defence weapons expert Dr David Kelly.

Inquiry chairman, former civil servant Sir John Chilcot, 72, was asked to conduct a more searching investigation spanning the period from 2001, two years before the war, right through to 2009.

The Mail on Sunday understands that the inquiry rounds on Mr Blair for telling Parliament that intelligence suggesting Saddam had WMDs was ‘beyond doubt’.

In evidence, a defiant Mr Blair said he had no regrets about the war and maintained Britain would ultimately be able to look back on it with ‘immense pride’. [Nazarene Remnant comment: This is the same stance John Howard (below left) takes when confronted with his part in this bloodbath.]

But he admitted he had misunderstood the claim in a Downing Street dossier that Saddam could launch WMDs in 45 minutes.

He also conceded there was not a ‘growing’ threat from Saddam in the autumn of 2002 – despite stating precisely that in the Commons before the war.

The inquiry report is also expected to criticise spin doctor Mr Campbell, whose denial that the dossier on Saddam’s weapons was designed to ‘make the case for war’ was challenged by former spy chief Major-General Michael Laurie, who was head of intelligence collection for the Defence Intelligence Agency.

Major-General Laurie told the inquiry two months ago: ‘Alastair Campbell said the purpose of the dossier was not “to make a case for war”. I had no doubt at that time this was exactly its purpose and these very words were used.

Although Saddam Hussein was toppled within weeks, the invasion led to a bloody aftermath in Iraq

Although Saddam Hussein (right) was toppled within weeks, the invasion led to a bloody aftermath in Iraq

‘We knew at the time that its purpose was precisely to make a case for war, rather than setting out the available intelligence. I and those involved in its production saw it exactly as that, and that was the direction we were given.’

And earlier this month an unnamed MI6 officer said Mr Campbell acted like ‘an unguided missile’ in work on the intelligence dossier.

The spin doctor had ‘a propensity to have rushes of blood to the head and pass various stories and information to journalists without appropriate prior consultation’.

The inquiry is also understood to focus on the way that Mr Blair privately told Mr Bush more than a year before the conflict that he would back the war, while claiming in public he had not made up his mind.

Mr Blair denied that a deal to go to war had been ‘signed in blood’ at President Bush’s Texas ranch in 2002. He said they merely agreed to ‘deal’ with Saddam.

However, a rift between Mr Blair and Mr Straw over whether the UK supported ‘regime change’ will also feature prominently in Chilcot’s conclusions.

Furthermore, Mr Straw is in the line of fire after saying he only ‘very reluctantly’ endorsed the war, but ignored warnings from Foreign Office legal advisers that it was illegal.

Sir Michael Wood, former senior legal adviser at the Foreign Office, said he considered resigning in protest at the war and was sidelined after he objected.

Mr Blair’s ‘sofa government’ style, whereby key decisions on the war were made in his study by a small circle of confidants – with most Cabinet Ministers and officials excluded – is also expected to be condemned.
Sir John Chilcot's Iraq War inquiry is published this autumn

Sir John Chilcot's Iraq War inquiry is published this autumn

Former Cabinet Secretaries Lord Wilson and Lord Turnbull, who both served under Mr Blair, told of their failed pleas to Mr Blair to rely on traditional Cabinet committees.

Lord Turnbull said the Cabinet was not asked to approve the war until the eve of the invasion in March 2003, by which time they were ‘imprisoned’ and had little choice but to agree – or see Mr Blair ousted.

The failure to anticipate the post-war turmoil that followed Saddam’s defeat is believed to be another major part of Chilcot’s conclusions.

The inquiry heard how Major-General Tim Cross, a senior British officer, asked Mr Blair to delay the invasion of Iraq two days before the conflict, partly because planning for afterwards was ‘woefully thin’.

Major-General Cross said: ‘I remember saying, in so many words, I have no doubt at all that we will win this military campaign. I do not believe that we are ready for post-war Iraq.’

When he arrived in Baghdad after the war, things were worse than he expected. ‘Baghdad was held together by chicken wire and chewing gum,’ he said.

Last night sources close to Mr Blair said that they were aware of the kind of criticism he was likely to face.

A spokesman for the Chilcot Inquiry said: ‘We will not provide a running commentary on the inquiry.’ A source close to the inquiry said reports that Mr Blair would be heavily criticised were ‘speculation’.

A spokesman for Tony Blair said: ‘This is a deliberate attempt to pre-judge a report that hasn't even been written yet.

'We're not going comment until it has been published.’

How Chilcot put Blair on the Rack:

Iraq War Deal ‘Signed In Blood’ By Blair

The inquiry pursued a claim that a deal was ‘signed in blood’ by Mr Blair at Mr Bush’s ranch in Crawford, Texas, in 2002, a year before the war – while Mr Straw denied regime change was considered.

Panel member Sir Roderic Lyne asked Mr Straw: ‘What Mr Blair said about Crawford was very simple – Saddam either had a change of heart or regime change was on the agenda. He says it is on the agenda, you say it was off. Weren’t you and the Prime Minister aiming for different objectives?’

Sofa Government

Inquiry member Sir Lawrence Freedman challenged the way Cabinet Ministers were kept in the dark in the build-up to the war.
His colleague Sir Roderic said: ‘Would the board of any company ever be asked to take collective responsibility for a major strategic decision without a single paper or discussion in a board committee?’

Dodgy Intelligence Dossiers

Sir John Chilcot said Mr Blair’s claim that the secret services had established ‘beyond doubt’ that Saddam had WMD ‘was not possible to make on the basis of intelligence’.

When Mr Blair insisted: ‘I did believe it, frankly, beyond doubt,’ Sir Lawrence said: ‘Beyond your doubt, but beyond anybody’s doubt?’ Sir Roderic suggested Mr Blair had ‘misled Parliament’.

Post-War Blunders

Inquiry member Baroness Prashar questioned Mr Blair on ‘obvious failings’ in post-war planning. There was ‘so much concentration on the (military) campaign planning that attention wasn’t paid to the aftermath.’

She told Mr Straw: ‘The U.S. was dysfunctional . . . yet we continued to assume they would sort it out. It wasn’t for want of people drawing it to the attention of the Prime Minister. Why did we not pay enough attention to that?’

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

10. Satanist Insider Unveils Famous Personalities

July 30, 2011
Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/primer.html 

Edward Heath (left) was the highest initiated Satanist in Britain to become Prime Minister (1970-74.)

Both [Prime Ministers Harold Wilson] and [Ted] Heath used to sacrifice children and the British royal family still does.
 Ted Heath (1916-2005) took a real delight in it... Likewise, the British royals have public and very private lives... Prince William is being groomed for big things. He is a man to watch! ....Prince William definitely isn't Charles' son. Neither is Prince Harry, although his conception was out of spite as much as misplaced infatuation.

"There is a Secret God, a Hidden God, who dwells in a spiraling tower fortress and who has guided and overseen our development from time immemorial - and who has remained concealed but very close to us awaiting the "future" time of re-awakening. The time of the re-awakening is near. Already we have heard the distant claps of thunder which signal the coming storm." (S. E. Flowers, Ph.D.)


By Aloysius Fozdyke
(HenryMakow.com)

Despite what some believe; based on book reading, conjecture and lies, Satanism is a label applied to a variety of spirituality and practice, from disgruntled teens slaughtering small animals in cemeteries to the rigorous methodology and practice of the Alpha Lodge.

That Lodge traces its history to Sumerian and Egypt and the cities of Babylon and Ur. Its methods actively embrace this life, this world, this physical realm, this body as a means to illumination and awakening. The left-hand path is not a route of escapism from reality, but a confrontation with the full totality of physical and psychic existence, encompassing pleasure and joy as well as horror, pain and mortality. You become a deliberate outcast!

Each grade is achieved, never simply conferred. Sometimes it takes many years for advancement - but you can never really leave the Lodge. There is a point of no return. Indeed, each ritual binds the participants tighter; closer to one another and the dream and nightmare Mysteries of Our Deities. We co-ordinate the actions of the left-hand path and its adherents.

The left-hand path in its purist form is always characterized by radical opposition. Its method of initiation is based on cultivating estrangement and deliberate alienation from divine, natural and human rule. Through an active and positive sacred glorification of the radical Other (Drugoy), the walker of the left-hand path steps outside previously secure borders, a self-exiled, self-determined creation of his or her own autonomous will! This sacralized separation from the established law and custom, particularly sexual convention, is not to be confused merely with the empty acts of the social rebel - it is instead a God-like disdain for the restrictions that bind the uninitiated, a taking of supreme responsibility for one's own actions.

We don't worship Satan - We emulate Him! We seek to become Gods and Goddesses in our own right. As such, our path is inherently lonely. One's first cull - whether ceremonial or mundane - is always significant. There's a realization that cannot be expressed. And after a cull we try to engage in sex as quickly as is possible, for Our Mysteries are founded upon death and sex. Anal sex is one of our supreme sacraments. Properly performed it both releases and constrains. "The Wand must be bedaubed..."

SOME HISTORY

According to its Knowledge Lectures, the Alpha Lodge existed mainly in England until the nineteenth century when its operational base became the Australian colony of New South Wales. There some of the highest echelons of the landed gentry establishment embraced it. Individuals such as Alfred Deakin and later, King O'Malley caused some problems, but by the time William Morris Hughes was Prime Minister, these obstacles had largely been overcome by focusing on the bureaucracy. We work behind the scenes.

Those with limited purpose or self-respect use what little power they are given in predictable ways. One only need observe what has happened since the Twin Towers in New York were destroyed to see how police, customs officers, security guards and other petty bureaucrats have created the sort of nameless, faceless and soulless justice that is foundational for the hierarchical future. By concentrating on the system everybody and everything falls into place. As was often said by my mentor, Petor Narsagonan, 'Satan is a wonderful systems man!' This was learned early by the Alpha Lodge. [Nazarene Remnant comment: Peter Narsagonan is the ex-Lord Mayor of Sydney, Sir David Griffin, aka Frater 616. For more information on this traitor see The Fozdyke Letters [1] on our site.]

At that time and well into the twentieth century, there was a libertarian strain within the Lodge. As Satan had left the tyranny of heaven to pursue freedom; freedom was what the lodge supported. However it became increasingly apparent that the masses did not want liberty. As the Western world - including Australia - moved comfortably to the implementation of mass incarceration, right-hand path-ers had every reason to celebrate. With surveillance cameras now in streets, in stores, at public transport stations and above the motorways; with telephone conversations that may be recorded for 'training' purposes; with the proliferation of government regulations, directives, policy initiatives; scanning devices and detection machines; proof of identity requirements and triplicate forms the conformist herd is comfortable!

As the future is worked out Satanists will be gold capstone of the societal pyramid.

[Aussie Prime Minister] Billy Hughes caused a major problem after his attendance at the Versailles Peace Conference. There was a distinct possibility in the 1920s that the federated colonies of the Commonwealth of Australia would in fact become a sovereign nation. The same possibility was open to New Zealand and Canada. After a lot of effort on the part of Alpha Lodge initiates all over the globe, only the British colony of South Africa became a sovereign nation.The income and influence of the left-hand path and its adherents remains intact to this day.

MEANS OF CONTROL

The right-hand path takes responsibility away from the individual by having a formal dogma, a code of ethics and behavior and by having the individual participate in an organized grouping. In that way and to varying extents the identity of the individual is taken away by belief systems which the individual has to accept, and by them accepting some higher authority, be such authority an individual, a group or an ideology. The Alpha Lodge took over these authorities - political parties, the military, the public service, financial institutions, the legal profession, churches, charities and others - by a variety of means and in this way achieved its aims.

The Church of Satan and its child, the Temple of Set are the public faces of the left-hand path. They remain magnets for those with promise who will be invited to join or who will find more serious and clandestine branches of a very old tradition. In that regard the Order of Nine Angles in Britain is a sister 'lodge' to the various Alpha Lodges worldwide and increasingly so in America.

In the pedestrian world the universities of Oxford and Cambridge in the Britain and the Universityof Texas in America remain the Alpha Lodge's fertile recruiting grounds. Like all modern universities, these centers of learning prepare their students for a life of work in some dismal institution, trapping them in the retirement system and creating prisoners of the State. But unlike modern universities, these three and the University of Osaka remain at the forefront of Luciferianism. Osaka University in Japan became important in the mid-1980s owing to its relationship with of all groups, the I.R.A. Not many realize that Irish republicans have a deep and long association with Osaka University, as that university also now has with the left-hand path in Asia.

Northern Ireland has many Satanists of high caliber. Irish Satanists are particularly into child abductions and sacrifice. Theirs is an old, dark paganism replete with seasonal celebrations. Akin to the Order of Nine Angles, the Irish nonetheless retain their own mysteries. Some of their highest people are also members of the Alpha Lodge. Clonegal Castle and its surrounds are well know to Irish initiates.

ANTON LAVEY AND NORMAN LINDSAY

Howard Stanton Levey (left) was originally associated with the American branch O.T.O. and it was from them that he was first taught serious Magick. Carl Kellner, Dr. Gérard Encausse, Theodor Reuss, John Yarker, Major General K.E. Haushofer and Dietrich Eckart were some heavyweights in the foundation of what is today known as the Alpha Lodge. Their work was based in Europe but also found fertile soil in America, particularly owing to the later efforts of Edward Alexander Crowley and his connections with the British intelligence services. It was this teaching - via Crowley through Marvel Whiteside Parsons - which was the foundation of H.S. Levey's later developments.

Whilst the Church of Satan is officially atheistic, its founder definitely wasn't. Prior to becoming Anton LaVey, Howard Levey engaged in a number of activities which are yet to see the light of day - if these ever do. For example, he was at one time an associate of [Zodiac Killer] Dick Gaikowski.

It was around 1964-5, that the Alpha Lodge first made contact with him and a fruitful arrangement it turned out to be. His endearing achievements remain the Ordo Cave Lupam (just a few short years after the Profumo Affair) and its influence upon the (originally Australia- based) Black Order (of Typhon). It is a shame that he never met [foremost Australian artist] Norman Lindsay who contributed much to the Black Order's success.

Crowley constantly stressed attracting significant and successful people into the occult world and Satanism certainly did. Prior to the 1960s many Freemasons were recruited internationally. These well placed, professional connections are still paying dividends today, particularly in Ireland, but Australia was no different.Aristocrats (particularly those with strong Norman ancestry), politicians, bureaucrats, media glitterati, social workers and even Christian clerics now worship at the altars of Satan.

Norman Lindsay (left) was never homosexual but, that said, he at times enjoyed the favors of very young girls. He engaged in work surrounding the mysteries of the vagina, particularly the Kaula rites of Tantric Magick. I'm told that there are a number of bodies which were buried outside (but around) his Faulconbridge property. Nearby there are chambers beneath the ruins of a now derelict mansion that was burnt out some decades ago. I understand that these subterranean chambers have not been accessed since the 1930s, when that mansion was sold.

Norman Lindsay discovered that the use of ritual and sex created a separate world where normal morality was forgotten. Young children initiated through such rites displayed cognitive distortions, often becoming disciples of their original abusers. Norman maintained that cruelty and violence were natural and that society's denial of these was simply Christian hypocrisy. Through him the Alpha Lodge in Australia began organized sexual exploitation, harnessing their rites towards power and the control of the individuals involved.

The child victims were disoriented by the robes, incense, incantations and locations. Who is going to believe a little child haunted by shame and terror talking about sexual abuse and torture at the same time they mention the bizarre aspects of ritual? Norman maintained that secrecy and silence were the first and best lines of defense; followed of course, by the lack of credibility of the victims themselves. Decades after his death, initiates of the Alpha Lodge proposed "subconsciously fabricated memories" as the actual cause of some of the distressing stories which have more recently seen the light of day, but it should be remembered that the earlier insights of Lindsay were foundational in the acceptance of the 'panic', 'witch hunt' and 'hysteria' claims of today's denying professionals.

If a child speaks of what occurred, they become victims of a dismissive, incredulous society and the sensationalist media circus which generates itself around the ambiguities of their stories. They are pushed to the margins of society's conscience and consciousness, then forgotten. It was discovered that a few evocative words was usually enough to cripple a victim with visceral flashbacks of the shame and agony being relived again and again - for their memories are a prison without walls.

Lindsay rediscovered that in a threatening ritual situation - with its heightened sense of alertness, with reaction and responses at fever pitch - if the chance to respond in a constructive way is denied then everyday responses to danger become dysfunctional. In such individuals fear, anger and sadness can be manipulated to quickly escalate. Emotionally numbed and fatigued child initiates can develop a separate sense of complete difference to others together with a belief in the total power of their perpetrators. I'm told that some of the children went on to live extraordinary lives - both within and outside of the Alpha Lodge - whilst most descended into prostitution for the Alpha Lodge, followed by early death.

In America today Norman Lindsay is worshiped by initiates as the God He is. He has become greater than the mortal He knew would die that a God may be born. His feast is twenty-one days after the Eve of All Hallows. A young (virgin) girl is presented to the Temple, prepared by female members and initiated by the most advanced male in attendance who wishes to do so. Others may then take their turn. Her bodily juices are collected and used in later rituals, principally to consecrate or in ointments.

BRITISH SATANISM

Meanwhile in Britain, Bob Boothby and Tom Driberg, apart from being homosexuals, were also active Satanists. Tom's cover of Anglo-Catholicism kept him out of a lot of bother. Both were involved behind the scenes in organizing for Harold Wilson and Edward Heath to become Prime Ministers of Britain, as Wilson was a high initiate of the left-hand path and together with Nat Rothschild, Britain is still influenced by their seminal work. Heath, on the other hand, was the highest initiated Satanist in Britain to become Prime Minister.

Even occultists know little, if anything, about Bob or Ted's visits to the ancient sacrificial Wood in Clapham, Sussex and their association with certain people in the surrounding areas. The Wood holds some serious secrets stretching back in time to before Roman Britain and indeed it still does. From what I've been told, one day some of these hidden horrors will be found, but by then those involved will be long dead.

Just as in Australia, there are tunnels and caverns beneath Chequers and I'm aware that Heath used these. Balmoral Castle also sits atop a vast expanse of underground workings. There are secret tunnels beneath London that lead into the Earth. If you know where to look, a few of London's subterranean ghost railway stations and the odd pub cellar are good places to start. Some of these may be natural whilst others have been constructed. Prior to London becoming a Roman city there were mines in the area, mines that were later discovered and used. Indeed, it would be true to state that thousands of people could live in the tunnels and caverns beneath the City as there are abundant water sources. The crowning, in-your-face audacity of the British Establishment was to name the bunker beneath the Ministry of Defence 'Pindar' - after the Greek poet, of course!

Both Wilson and Heath used to sacrifice children and the British royal family still does. Ted Heath took a real delight in it, or so I'm told. Apparently he used to engage in ritual outside of London on a Common associated with Francis Dashwood. Likewise, the British royals have public and very private lives. Their obsession with hidden, esoteric traditions stretching back millennia is nothing short of amazing. Prince William is being groomed for big things. He is a man to watch!

The Dark Lord, Peter Mandelson, (left) apart from being openly gay, is one of the highest initiates in the United Kingdom. He was trained in the hebdomadry system of Magick, the same system used by both the Alpha Lodge and the Order of Nine Angles. His close association with international business figures and the Bildberg group have been of great, indeed inestimable use to the left-hand path. Following well thought out and well honed traditions, his dream is a prison-grid global community.He loves to control. And 'Mandy' as he's known to those who know him best, is as sharp and dangerous as a stiletto.

It is Mandelson who has helped turn Europeans into serfs for Europe's banks. Europe is now reverting to a neo-feudalism structure with bankers as the overlords of their indentured citizenry. Britain, America and the rest of the world will go the same way. Kleptocratic politicians are merely vassals. If current debts were simply wiped off of the books the only tragedy would be the destruction of the 'too big to fail' banks. While politicians call that a catastrophe it would actually be freedom for millions of disenfranchised debt-serfs. That's why it must not happen - and won't!

Wages will continue to be cut even as taxes are increased to service the debt owed to the Banker Lords. Politicians everywhere are bowing and scraping before their Lords, promising deeper cuts and higher taxes. This is as it should be and will effectively cripple economies around the world. Protectionism under the guise of 'Fair Trade' will be shortly implemented after the American crash. This is what the filth want and we will give them what they want - taxation, poverty and war.

The next war will start in Iran but will bring the entire Islamic world into conflict with the [Christ]tian west. Right-hand pathers like nothing better than wars and killing. For long before I was born the Alpha Lodge has been orchestrating to give them what they want. After the next big war we will be in a position to take over everything that is left. "For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones...Therefore the kings of the earth shall be Kings for ever: the slaves shall serve."

Living most of his life as a repressed homosexual urolagnist and having been taught to be cautious; Mandy's viciousness, cunning and polished, diplomatic persona are his enduring trademarks. Just don't get in his way. He lives by the left-hand path code of honour, loyalty and revenge. It was Mandelson who was instrumental in the death of James Rusbridger, particularly in the sordid way his 'suicide' was made to look.

PRINCESS DIANA

Hekate and Diana are both Goddesses of the night and the Alma bridge tunnel sits beneath crossroads. Indeed, when looking at the memorial on the ground floor of Harrods - complete with the more obvious fish bladder and chalice - little is left to the imagination. And the flaming torch - it's everywhere, even on her grave. Indeed, one of the things the flaming torch represents - apart from a Wand - is the golden semen of the thirteen royal families of Europe. Diana was largely kept out of the inner workings of the British royal family owing to her inability to toe the line. After William, she was expendable and rightly so. She'd served her purpose. Her death was merely icing on the cake.

Princess Diana was a sheep among wolves. She was chosen owing to her Stuart blood. [Her stepfather] Peter Shand Kydd did more in the colonies than raise sheep. He was initiated into the Alpha Lodge some years before Norman Lindsay died, or so I'm told. I've no idea if they ever met, but it wouldn't surprise me. Both loved the fairer sex and monogamy was impossible.

His mission was to break up the already troubled marriage of Diana's parents with a view to causing emotional problems for her. He succeeded! Poor, beautiful, doe-eyed and stupid Diana never achieved much intellectually and was therefore perfect for her purpose. Prince William definitely isn't Charles' son. Neither is Prince Harry, although his conception was out of spite as much as misplaced infatuation. William's father is a citizen of the world but is based in France. I've never met him, but those who have are impressed and fearful. If Satan has a vice-regent on Earth it is Him.

Michael Wynn's Occult Reference Library  

FOOTNOTE:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

11. Why Narcissists Rise To The Top

 By Anna Edwards

11th August 2011

Narcissists rise to the top because people mistake their confidence and authority for leadership qualities.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2024577/Narcissists-rise-people-mistake-confidence-authority-leadership-qualities.html 

They may be charming, confident and climb the job ladder with ease, but when they reach the top, narcissists are actually not very good at their roles.

Such people are often too self-obsessed to do their jobs properly, according to a study.

Those who love themselves and have vast self-confidence often impress others with their self-belief, dominance and authority, leading them to climb the career ladder effortlessly.

However, scientists have discovered that while narcissists are convincing leaders, they are so consumed by their own brilliance that it actually cripples their creativity and often causes them to make bad decisions.

They like to squirrel away information from their colleagues and are too focused on themselves to allow others to shine in the workplace, researchers said.

It also prevents proper interaction with colleagues who often vastly overestimate the ability of their overconfident bosses.

Scientists at the University of Amsterdam proved their theory by conducting an experiment involving 150 people, split into groups of three.

One of the three was randomly assigned as group leader as part of a task intended to choose a job candidate.

Information about the candidate was handed out, some to a single member, some to the entire group.

The group was told that all three members could contribute advice, but that their leader was ultimately responsible for any decisions.

The study was designed to see how narcissistic leaders could hold back information about candidates, a tactic that could result in a less skilled person given the job, thereby damaging the company.

Questionnaires given to 'employees' and 'leaders' revealed that employees hailed narcissistic leaders as the most effective.

But they were wrong.

Leaders with the largest egos had the most negative effect on their group's overall performance.

They were too self-centred and authoritarian to communicate properly or listen to their colleagues.

Study author Barbora Nevicka, of at the University of Amsterdam, said: 'As expected, the group members rated the most narcissistic leaders as most effective.

'In fact, the groups led by the greatest egotists chose the worse candidate for the job. The narcissistic leaders had a very negative effect on their performance.

'They inhibited the communication because of self-centeredness and authoritarianism.'

She added: 'Narcissism can sometimes be useful in a leader.

'In a crisis, for instance, people feel that a strong, dominant person will take control and do the right thing,and that may reduce uncertainty and diminish stress.

'However, in the everyday life of an organization, communication, sharing of information, perspectives, and knowledge is essential to making good decisions.

'In brainstorming groups, project teams, government committees, each person brings something new. That's the benefit of teams. That's what creates a good outcome.

'Good leaders facilitate communication by asking questions and summarizing the conversation-something narcissists are too self-involved to do.'

Discussing how narcissists can flourish in politics and even lead governments, Ms Nevicka added: 'Narcissists are very convincing.

'They do tend to be picked as leaders. There's the danger - that people can be so wrong based on how others project themselves.

'You have to ask: "Are the competencies they project valid, or are they merely in the eyes of the beholder?"

The results are published in the Journal Psychological Science.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

12. The Beware The Risen People: Global Banking-A Criminal Syndicate Of Tyrants And Thieves!

By Gabriel Donohoe
July 21, 2011

Source: Beware The Risen People, Part 1  

[On the evening before his execution by a British firing squad for his part in the Easter Rebellion in Dublin in 1916, Padraic Pearse etched a few lines from his own poem, "The Rebel", on the wall of his cell ...  

And I say to my people's masters: Beware
Beware of the thing that is coming,
Beware of the risen people
Who shall take what ye would not give...
Ye that have harried and held,
Ye that have bullied and bribed.
Tyrants… hypocrites… liars!

Pearse's words were directed at the rulers of the British Empire, but today they can be addressed to a cadre of criminal bankers and their political puppets who would impose financial slavery on us all.]

The World Awakens!

In a time of unprecedented global awakening, the peoples of the nations are rapidly becoming aware of how they’ve been kept in financial bondage for centuries. The veils of deception and fraud carefully woven by a malevolent Money Power[1] are being torn apart like spider web in a gale. The outrageous criminality imposed upon mankind for generations is finally exposed for all to see. 

People are fast discovering how a cunning cabal of banksters[2] conned them into giving up their labour, their property, and their freedom. They now see how years of their precious energy and toil have been stolen from them by financial terrorists who have long kept humanity in a wretched state of debt, misery, and fear. 

But now the tide of wakefulness is rising fast. A tsunami of anger and indignation is beginning to roll towards the banksters and their political camp followers. A worldwide revolution against villainy and corruption grows by the day. The masses are demanding truth and justice, and the cry of their fury is fearsome and foreboding. 

Fraudsters beware! Beware of the hordes who are rising from their slumber. Beware of the people who have caught you pillaging. Beware of the wrath of the betrayed. Beware of the thing that is coming… tyrants… hypocrites… liars!

Fearful of the risen people, the criminal syndicates who run the world from behind the facade of governments and suborned global institutions are terrified of losing their ill-gotten wealth and privileges, and perhaps their lives. 

Zbigniew Brzezinski, a Bilderberger and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, recently addressed the Council on Foreign Relations in Montreal and warned his fellow elitist villains about this new “global political awakening”[3]

Brzezinski said: “For the first time in all of human history mankind is politically awakened – that’s a total new reality – it has not been so for most of human history.” 

Brzezinski bewailed the fact that the whole world had awakened politically and was now “consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.” He lamented that an enlightened people would no longer tolerate financial slavery and serfdom nor would they allow the stealthy move towards a single world currency which would mean complete domination of the world by the international banksters. 

The People Versus The Banks

More than a century ago Lord Acton said, “The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.” 

That fight has now been joined. 

In recent years, a growing number of people throughout the world are stumbling upon a massive deception that the banksters and their vassals have been fiercely trying to keep secret for years. It’s a secret so incredible that the mind will not accept the truth of it on a first hearing. 

The secret?…

…It is the borrower and not the bank who truly funds the loan!

That may seem an incredible hypothesis. 

But it’s true. In most loan transactions, banks do not lend out their money; first, they receive the full amount from the unwitting borrower himself, then they deceitfully loan it back to the borrower as if it had originally come from their own assets, and they charge punitive rates of interest to boot. 

The idea is so preposterous that one’s first inclination is to dismiss it as hokum. But let’s have a quick look at the origins of modern banking before we explain how the borrower is, in all actuality, the lender. And at the end of this article we’ll show how you can lawfully get out of debt and have your loans written off; it involves challenging the banksters from a position of truth, knowledge, and personal empowerment. 

There has been much dishonesty and trickery in the field of banking since the set-up of the Bank of England in 1694. Although misleadingly called the “Bank of England” it did not belong to the English Government or to the English people. It was a private bank that dealt in deceptive practices for private profit. 

The Bank of England practised ‘fractional reserve lending’, a counterfeiting process which permitted the bank to lend out more money than it actually possessed. At the inception of the Bank of England, the fractional reserve ratio was set at 2 to 1. That meant it could lend out and collect interest on twice as much money as it really owned. 

Fractional reserve ratios soon ran out to 3, 5, and 9 times the amount of bank reserves, and in some cases to many multiples of these amounts. Although modern capital reserves are generally set at a minimum of 8% (a lending ratio of 12½ to 1) some banks, such as those in Canada, Australia, and elsewhere have no requirements at all (see Wikipedia – Reserve requirement). 

Fractional reserve lending is a gigantic confidence trick that allows banks across the globe to create money out of thin air and charge interest on it. Charging interest on money created out of nothing is a crime known as usury. Incredibly, governments permit it without question and a compliant judiciary accommodates banking fraud in the courts every day of the week. In bygone days, usurers were put to death; but today they live in opulence like emperors and consider themselves above the law. 

The criminality of modern banking owes its origins to the double-dealing goldsmiths of the Middle Ages. The goldsmiths owned secure vaults where they would store gold and silver coin and bullion for their clients for a fee. When a merchant stored gold with the goldsmith he was given a receipt, or chit, for the amount of his deposit. Soon these chits were traded in the marketplace at face value; they were more convenient and safer than carrying gold around. 

The goldsmith, also a money lender, began to lend out chits instead of his gold. At first, these chits were fully backed by an equivalent amount of gold in his vault. Then it wasn’t long before he cunningly progressed to lending out chits backed by his depositors’ gold – without the depositors’ knowledge or consent. Soon, the devious goldsmith found that he could get away with even more blatant skulduggery. 

He noticed that only 10% of his depositors ever turned up to reclaim their gold from his vault. This observation led the audacious goldsmith to lend out 10 times more chits than he actually possessed in gold. That meant that nine tenths of his loans were backed by nothing of value, merely conjured up out of thin air. And if 10% of his depositors ever returned for their gold he would have enough on hand to satisfy their requirements. 

Life was suddenly becoming very rosy for the wily goldsmith. By charging interest on non-existing gold he extorted a vast fortune from his clients. Just like modern banking today. 

But greed begets greed and it wasn’t long before the avaricious goldsmith began to ponder on a method to loan out chits backed by no gold at all. If he could pull this off he would surely become master of the world. Regrettably, events show that he has indeed pulled it off, and he is indeed master of the world. 

It might have begun this way… 

The goldsmith purchased some bread and savouries in his local bakery and the bill came to five shillings. He didn’t have cash on him but the baker, knowing he was good for the money, agreed to accept his IOU for 5s. When the miller came to the baker for payment for flour he also agreed to accept the goldsmith’s five shilling IOU in place of cash. And the miller in turn paid the farmer for his wheat with the IOU, and the farmer paid his labourer, and the labourer paid the innkeeper for beer, and so on and on… 

The shrewd goldsmith noticed that his IOU never came back to him to be redeemed for five shillings in coin but was accepted and perpetually transmitted as cash by everyone in the community. What had cost the goldsmith nothing but a scrap of paper and ink was exchanged for valuable goods and services by all who accepted it. 

In fact, the goldsmith had effectively stolen the labour and the goods of the baker, the miller, the farmer, and the others. He had contributed nothing to the production of wealth in the community but had undeservedly shared in its benefits. In the animal kingdom, such a freeloader would be known as a parasite or bloodsucker. In human terms he would be called a thief. 

The goldsmith became excited about his experiment with his IOU. If only he could compel the government to make his IOUs legal tender and force the people to trade exclusively with them he would be wealthy beyond comprehension. 

As time went by, the mega-rich goldsmith became even richer and his decadent offspring eventually evolved into the international banksters we know and detest today. Through their immense wealth this criminal banking cabal has come to wield unwarranted control over heavily indebted governments, businesses, and individuals throughout the world. 

Read the Full Article Here:
Beware The Risen People: Global Banking-A Criminal Syndicate Of Tyrants And Thieves 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

13. List of National Debt by Country

February 7th, 2011

Source: http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/economics/list-of-national-debt-by-country/

Some selected levels of Public Sector debt in different countries:

US Gross Debt 2010 - $14,867.5bn 97% of GDP (US Debt) (US have two figures, gross debt (97% of GDP) includes funds held by government e.g. social security. Net debt (60% of GDP) excludes this.
Japan National Debt 228% of GDP 2011 (Japan national debt)
Italy National Debt 115% of GDP (FT)
UK National Debt 58% of GDP (UK) (note UK is now publishing two figures - one which includes bank bailouts and one which excludes. The figure in this graph is based on old calculation which includes financial sector intervention. The ONS now publish a figure without financial sector intervention. See (UK national debt for more details.


 Other selected Levels of Public Debt as a % of GDP from 2010

1 Japan 225.80
2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 185.00
3 Lebanon 150.70
4 Zimbabwe 149.00
5 Greece 144.00
6 Iceland 123.80
7 Jamaica 123.20
8 Italy 118.10
9 Singapore 102.40
10 Belgium 98.60
11 Ireland 94.20
12 Sudan 94.20
13 Sri Lanka 86.70
14 France 83.50
15 Portugal 83.20
16 Egypt 80.50
17 Belize 80.00
18 Hungary 79.60
19 Germany 78.80
20 Dominica 78.00
21 Nicaragua 78.00
22 Israel 77.30 
23 United Kingdom 76.50
24 Malta 72.60
25 Austria 70.40
26 Netherlands 64.60
27 Spain 63.40
28 Cote d'Ivoire 63.30
29 Jordan 61.40
30 Cyprus 61.10
31 Brazil 60.80
32 Mauritius 60.50
33 Ghana 59.90
34 World 59.30
35 Albania 59.30
36 Bahrain 59.20
37 United States 58.90
38 Seychelles 58.80
39 Morocco 58.20
40 Bhutan 57.80
41 Guyana 57.00
42 Vietnam 56.70
43 Philippines 56.50
44 Uruguay 56.00
45 India 55.90
46 Croatia 55.00
47 El Salvador 55.00
48 Poland 53.60
49 Malaysia 53.10
50 Kenya 50.90
51 Argentina 50.30
52 Pakistan 49.90
53 Tunisia 49.50
54 Turkey 48.10
55 Norway 47.70
56 Denmark 46.60
57 Aruba 46.30
58 Latvia 46.20
59 Finland 45.40
60 Colombia 44.80
61 United Arab Emirates 44.60
62 Costa Rica 42.40
63 Thailand 42.30
64 Dominican Republic 41.70
65 Mexico 41.50
66 Serbia 41.50
67 Slovakia 41.00
68 Mozambique 40.80
69 Sweden 40.80
70 Malawi 40.40
71 Czech Republic 40.00
72 Panama 40.00
73 Bolivia 39.70
74 Bangladesh 39.30
75 Ethiopia 39.30
76 Yemen 39.10
77 Bosnia and Herzegovina 39.00
78 Ukraine 38.40
79 Switzerland 38.20
80 Montenegro 38.00
81 Lithuania 36.70
82 Slovenia 35.50
83 Romania 34.80
84 Cuba 34.40
85 Macedonia 34.20
86 Canada 34.00
87 Taiwan 33.90
88 South Africa 33.20 
89 Senegal 32.10
90 Syria 29.80
91 Guatemala 29.60
92 Papua New Guinea 27.80
93 Indonesia 26.40
94 Trinidad and Tobago 26.40
95 Honduras 26.10
96 Gabon 25.80
97 Algeria 25.70
98 New Zealand 25.50
99 Venezuela 25.50
100 Moldova 25.00
101 Zambia 24.10
102 Korea, South 23.70
103 Peru 23.60
104 Tanzania 23.30
105 Ecuador 23.20
106 Paraguay 22.80
107 Botswana 22.60
108 Australia 22.40
109 Uganda 20.40
110 Angola 20.30
111 Namibia 20.00
112 Hong Kong 18.20
113 China 17.50
114 Saudi Arabia 16.70
115 Bulgaria 16.20
116 Iran 16.20
117 Luxembourg 16.20
118 Kazakhstan 16.20
119 Nigeria 13.40
120 Kuwait 12.60
121 Qatar 10.30
122 Cameroon 9.60
123 Russia 9.50
124 Uzbekistan 9.00
125 Estonia 7.70
126 Gibraltar 7.50
127 Chile 6.20
128 Wallis and Futuna 5.60 .
129 Azerbaijan 4.60
130 Oman 4.40
131 Equatorial Guinea 4.10
132 Libya 3.30

Source: CIA factbook - National Debt by Country

 Notes: Japan's Public sector debt is very high. However, Japan has a high savings rate which makes it easier for the government to finance the debt. 90% of Japanese debt is owned by Japanese individuals. US has a low savings ratio and 25% of US debt is owned by foreigners. Nevertheless the National Debt of Japan is a real burden for the economy.

An important factor is not just cumulative national debt, but, the annual budget deficit. This annual deficit determines the rate of deterioration in the public sector debt.

In the above list, the United States debt is given at just below 60% of national debt. But, a more commonly used statistics is gross government debt which stands at close to 97% of GDP.

External Debt

A different statistics is external debt, this the amount of debt a country owes to other countries. It includes both the private and public sector debt. See: list of external debt by country

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14. New NASA Data Blows Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism

By James Taylor
Forbes
July 27, 2011

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than alarmist computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.  

Study co-author Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville and U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer flying on NASA's Aqua satellite, reports that real-world data from NASA's Terra satellite contradict multiple assumptions fed into alarmist computer models. 

"The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show," Spencer said in a July 26 University of Alabama press release. "There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans." 

In addition to finding that far less heat is being trapped than alarmist computer models have predicted, the NASA satellite data show the atmosphere begins shedding heat into space long before United Nations computer models predicted. 

The new findings are extremely important and should dramatically alter the global warming debate. 

Scientists on all sides of the global warming debate are in general agreement about how much heat is being directly trapped by human emissions of carbon dioxide (the answer is "not much"). However, the single most important issue in the global warming debate is whether carbon dioxide emissions will indirectly trap far more heat by causing large increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds. Alarmist computer models assume human carbon dioxide emissions indirectly cause substantial increases in atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds (each of which are very effective at trapping heat), but real-world data have long shown that carbon dioxide emissions are not causing as much atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds as the alarmist computer models have predicted. 

The new NASA Terra satellite data are consistent with long-term NOAA and NASA data indicating atmospheric humidity and cirrus clouds are not increasing in the manner predicted by alarmist computer models. The Terra satellite data also support data collected by NASA's ERBS satellite showing far more longwave radiation (and thus, heat) escaped into space between 1985 and 1999 than alarmist computer models had predicted. Together, the NASA ERBS and Terra satellite data show that for 25 years and counting, carbon dioxide emissions have directly and indirectly trapped far less heat than alarmist computer models have predicted. 

In short, the central premise of alarmist global warming theory is that carbon dioxide emissions should be directly and indirectly trapping a certain amount of heat in the earth's atmosphere and preventing it from escaping into space. Real-world measurements, however, show far less heat is being trapped in the earth's atmosphere than the alarmist computer models predict, and far more heat is escaping into space than the alarmist computer models predict. 

When objective NASA satellite data, reported in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, show a "huge discrepancy" between alarmist climate models and real-world facts, climate scientists, the media and our elected officials would be wise to take notice. Whether or not they do so will tell us a great deal abouthow honest the purveyors of global warming alarmism truly are. 

James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News.

Image of Al Gore from http://www.DavidIcke.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

15. Lies, Damn Lies And 'Safe' Nuclear Power 

By Stephen Lendman
1 July, 2011

Source: http://www.rense.com/general94/liesdamn.htm

In any form, nuclear power is inherently unsafe. For decades, nuclear expert Helen Caldicott warned it must be abandoned, saying:
 
"As a physician, I contend that nuclear technology threatens life on our planet with extinction. If present trends continue, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink will soon be contaminated with enough radioactive pollutants to pose a potential health hazard far greater than any plague humanity has ever experienced."
 
Anti-nuclear activist/expert Professor Karl Grossman agrees, calling "Atomic Energy: Unsafe in the Real World" in his June 29 article, saying:
 
"Nuclear power requires perfection and no acts of God" to avoid accidents that may become catastrophes. Humans and technology aren't perfect. Natural and other type disasters happen. "(W)e can't eliminate them. But we can - and must eliminate atomic energy" or it will eliminate us.
 
On March 18, Bloomberg said Japan's Fukushima disaster "follows decades of falsified safety reports, fatal accidents and underestimated earthquake risks in Japan's atomic power industry."
 
The same is true in America and elsewhere - governments, regulators, and power companies suppressing vital truths, instead of shutting down inherently unsafe plants, making all of them ticking bombs.
 
Fukushima, Chernobyl and Three Mile Island exploded. Others as bad or worse are assured, irradiating vast parts of the earth disastrously. On June 22, kinetictruth.com headlined, "US heading toward nuclear disaster," saying:
 
"After a yearlong investigation, AP concluded that many of the nation's facilities are still (operating) because the safety standards that they are held to have been repeatedly weakened as regulations (for the world's most hazardous industry became) more and more lax."
 
After reviewing tens of thousands of government and industry studies and documents since the 1970s, it concluded that the industry-run Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) falsified arguments, saying "safety margins could be eased without peril." As a result, not only are Americans endangered, so is one-fifth of the nation's electricity supply.
 
Many problems AP found could trigger a nuclear disaster, including broken seals and nozzles, rusted pipes, aging facilities past their useful life, and numerous examples of shoddy maintenance and management laxity. Nonetheless, NRC officials rubber stamp license extensions, including 66 facilities over 25 years old re-licensed for another two decades, instead of responsibly shutting them down.
 
Vermont Yankee is perhaps the most notorious. Licensed to begin operating in 1972, Vermont's Senate voted 26 - 4 against re-licensing in February 2010, citing radioactive tritium leaks, falsified management statements, a 2007 cooling tower collapse, among other problems, proving the facility is a disaster waiting to happen.
 
Nonetheless, on March 21, 2011, the NRC extended its life for another 20 years until 2032. Moreover, Entergy, Vermont Yankee's owner and America's second largest nuclear generator after Exelon, sued to revoke a state law, giving it legislative authority to suspend operations when its current license expires next March.
 
The plant, in fact, has the same GE Mark 1 Boiling Water Reactor design as Fukushima's Units 1 and 2. According to Citizens's Action Network's Bob Stannard:
 
"It's unimaginable to think that the NRC would declare this plant safe when (it) houses 640 tons of spent fuel in an unprotected fuel pool with no containment vessel. In Japan, the plant that's in the worst shape has only 80 tons."
 
If Vermont Yankee blows, perhaps all Vermont and New England go with it, and given its deplorable state, it may if it's 20 year extension isn't stopped.
 
Mid-America Threatened
 
In Missouri, record floods threaten two nuclear plants - the Cooper Nuclear Station and Fort Calhoun Station, yet little about either is reported, especially on television where most people get news. In early June moreover, the FAA issued an indefinite "no-fly hazards" restriction over the facilities to conceal the worst of what's happening.
 
Both plants issued low level "unusual event" alerts that may rise to catastrophic ones. On June 30, the Omaha World-Herald reported that both plants store spent fuel rods in open casks. As a result, if Missouri River flood levels rise enough, they'll "overflow them and carry contaminated water downstream."
 
Both plants "use outdoor, above-ground entombment (called dry cask storage) for its oldest fuel," kept in welded shut steel canisters placed "inside concrete bunkers that rely on outside air flowing" to dissipate residual heat. Allegedly, bunkers and canisters can withstand flooding. They may soon get a chance to prove it.
 
On June 15, Rense.com contributor Tom Burnett headlined, "Ft. Calhoun Spent Fuel In Ground Pools, Flooded Already?" saying:
 
"Ft. Calhoun is the designated spent fuel storage facility for the entire state of Nebraska....and maybe for more than one state." It's stored in ground-level pools underwater but open on top. "When the Missouri River pours in there, it's going to make Fukushima look like an x-ray. But that's not all. There are a LOT of nuclear plants on both the Missouri and Mississippi and they can all go to hell fast" if flood waters or other natural disasters threaten them.
 
Ft. Calhoun's spent and recently removed fuel are stored "OUTSIDE the reactor waiting to wash away or explode - which will destroy about 15,000 square miles of what used to be the corn belt," besides the potential human toll.
 
In fact, "Calhoun may already be spewing radiation into the flooding Missouri." However, an information blackout keeps the public uninformed, including about an NRC report effectively saying it's unprepared "to protect the intake structure and auxiliary building against external flooding."
 
Nonetheless, Omaha Public Power District CEO Gary Gates told AP:
 
"There is no possibility of a meltdown. The floodwaters are outside of Ft. Calhoun, not inside," AP adding:
 
"Fort Calhoun is the subject of more public concern because the floodwaters have surrounded that plant and forced workers to use raised catwalks to access the facility." Cooper Nuclear Station "is more elevated, so the floodwaters aren't as close to the facility." But the facility is by no means out of danger.
 
NRC chairman Gregory Jaczko also claims flooding endangers neither plant, words he may later eat if levels keep rising. In fact, Public Citizen's Tyson Slocum believes conditions are dangerous, saying:
 
"We're inches away from (Calhoun) nuclear plant being flooded. It's already an island. And we still have a very real possibility of flood levels rising....There's always the possibility of the situation escalating, especially when we don't control all the variables. That's what happened in Japan."
 
"There's no question that there's significant concern about the threat that rising flood waters pose to flooding certain operations of the plant that could disable certain critical safety features, including cooling systems."
 
Cooper may also be endangered, he added, saying:
 
"We wouldn't be having this conversation if this were a wind farm or if this were a solar power installation. Nuclear power inherently poses enormous risks to our communities. We really have to start questioning whether (it) should be a viable part of our 21st century energy mix."
 
Any sane person would call that a no-brainer.
 
In addition, conditions appear worse, not better, after a protective Calhoun facility water-filled berm collapsed on June 26 after being struck by some heavy equipment. As a result, "(m)ore than 2 feet (60 cm) of water rushed in around containment buildings and electrical transformers," according to Reuters.
 
Most disturbing is that very likely the worst of what's happening is suppressed. Moreover, it's standard practice for all major industries to protect their bottom line priorities, aided by complicit regulators, government officials, and media bosses, dismissive of public safety concerns.
 
As a result, the official IAEA Chernobyl death count was 4,000 when, in fact, a New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS) study concluded numbers approaching one million and counting. Moreover, little information explained how BP destroyed America's Gulf and gravely harmed the health and livelihoods of millions of area residents.
 
In early June, the Nuclear Energy Institute, a US industry lobbying group, claimed:
 
"No health effects are expected among the Japanese people as a result of the events at Fukushima." In fact, weeks after the March 11 disaster, two distinguished nuclear experts, Christopher Busby and Marion Fulk, publicly said northern Japan (one-third of the country) is uninhabitable and should be evacuated. By now perhaps most or all Japan is affected, as well as many other parts of the world, including American air, water, soil and food contaminated by hazardous radiation levels.
 
America's Southwest On the Edge
 
In late June, the Las Conchas fire began in New Mexico's Sante Fe National Forest, 12 miles southwest of the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). It's America's largest nuclear weapons research center, storing huge amounts of nuclear waste, including a reported 30,000 55-gallon drums of plutonium, the most toxic substance known.
 
According to the Los Alamos Study Group (LASG), a LANL site called "Area G" houses a nuclear dump, 19 miles from Sante Fe Plaza. "It's Growing. And It's Ours Forever:"
 
-- larger than the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, NM;
 
-- permanent waste is kept "in shallow unlined pits and shafts covered with dirt;"
 
-- enough's there to "fill 1.4 million 55 gallon drums - plus (another 60,000 drums) of temporarily-stored waste;"
 
-- weapons testing and production adds another 54,000 drums annually;
 
-- "two other mesas (will also be used) for dump sites;"
 
-- regulatory oversight is entirely absent; and
 
-- most waste "is entirely unnecessary."
 
In fact, weapons development, testing and production way exceeds Cold War levels, even after America's 2010 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) with Russia. It was an agreement more in name than substance, given Washington's determination to pursue nuclear superiority by replacing old weapons with new, improved, more destructive ones.
 
As a result, LASG said LANL weapons design and testing continue. "Production of plutonium bomb cores has begun. A second plutonium plant is planned. Many more tons of plutonium are needed for the bomb factories. Huge new facilities for weapons testing and or novel kinds of nuclear processing - which will produce even more waste - are planned."
 
Everything is dangerous and secret. LASG worries most about:
 
-- increasing US Southwest drought, creating conditions for raging fires; and
 
-- natural or engineered "unexpected events," causing "unthinkable" nuclear catastrophes, including one affecting LANL, surrounding areas, and potentially much of America's Southwest because bad enough nuclear accidents are unforgiving.
 
Whether current Los Alamos fires qualify isn't known. On June 28, AP said midday flames were "as close as 50 feet from the grounds." LANL safety assurances aren't reliable, nor is information about potential widespread contamination if containment doesn't work.
 
In Los Alamos, Senator Tom Udall (D. NM) said, "We are throwing absolutely everything at this that we've got." As a precautionary measure, the city's entire 11,000 population was evacuated.
 
According to Concerned Citizens for Nuclear Safety executive director Joni Arends:
 
"The concern is that (drums of plutonium) will get so hot that they'll burst. That would put this toxic material into the plume. It's a concern for everybody."
 
She also worries that fire may affect LANL nuclear-contaminated soil. With a staff of about 15,000, the facility is huge, including 2,000 buildings, covering over 36 square miles on nearly four dozen sites.
 
It's been around since WW II as part of the Manhattan Project. Thereafter, it evolved into a major scientific and nuclear research facility, developing, testing and producing state-of-the art weapons, as well as multidisciplinary work in various fields, including national security, space, renewable energy, medicine, nanotechnology, and supercomputing.
 
About one-third of its technical staff are physicists, one-fourth engineers, one-sixth chemists and materials scientists, and the others involved in mathematics, computational science, biology, geoscience, and other disciplines. Along with Alameda County, CA's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, it's one of two Department of Energy facilities designing nuclear weapons and related activities.
 
Because of fire, lab facilities were shut for days. Moreover, 30 or more of its structures were destroyed, yet LANL claims its buildings were constructed to meet strict nuclear safety standards. In Japan, Tokyo Electric (TEPCO), regulators and government officials gave similar nuclear safety assurances, even after disaster struck, and still suppress vital information millions of Japanese citizens need to know. America's NRC does it notoriously.
 
Why expect LANL to operate otherwise, especially given its sensitive work and large amounts of stored nuclear waste, including plutonium, perhaps vulnerable to ignite and spread over a wide area disastrously, despite officials calling the exposure risk small. Maybe they're right, maybe not but won't say. On June 30, Los Alamos County Fire Chief Douglas Tucker said the fire could double or triple in size before it's checked, adding:
 
"We have fire all around the lab. It's a road away."
 
On June 29, the Sante Fe Reporter said nearly 93,000 acres were consumed. Its feature story headlined, "Flash Point: The West is burning. Is global 'weirding' to blame? saying:
 
Another 60,748 acres are ablaze, threatening LANL. It's not one big fire. Since last July, nearly 1,000 ignited around the state, most in the past few months because of tinderbox dry conditions. They're also across the West from Texas to California, as well as north to Colorado and Utah. In nearly a year, over 711,000 New Mexico aces were lost.
 
In a separate report, writer Chip Ward said Arizona and Texas are burning besides New Mexico and other states. However, residents close to Los Alamos live in fear, worried that smoke plumes might contain deadly radiation, especially plutonium if it ignites. Unless prevented, "the West is ours to lose," and perhaps a whole lot more.
 
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
 
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
 
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

16. The CIA In Australia:  America'S Foreign Watergate

By www.wakeupmag.co.uk 

Source: http://www.american-buddha.com/cia.australia.htm 

"The CIA's aim in Australia was to get rid of a government they did not like and that was not co-operative… it's a Chile, but in a much more sophisticated and subtle form." (VICTOR MARCHETTI, ex-CIA officer, 1980)

"There is profoundly increasing evidence that foreign espionage and intelligence activities are being practised in Australia on a wide scale… I believe the evidence is so grave and so alarming in its implications that it demands the fullest explanation. The deception over the CIA and the activities of foreign installations on our soil… are an onslaught on Australia's sovereignty." (GOUGH WHITLAM to the Australian Parliament, 1977)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On December 2nd 1972, Australia's first Labor Government for twenty-three years was elected. The new Prime Minister, Edward Gough Whitlam, quickly set about a series of historic legislations: wages, pensions and unemployment benefits were increased; equal pay for women was introduced; a free national health service was established; spending on education was doubled; university and college fees were abolished; and legal aid became a universal right.  

The Federal Government assumed responsibility for Aboriginal health, education and welfare, and the first land rights legislation for Aborigines was drafted. Cultural initiatives for women, Aborigines and immigrants were set up. Imperial honours such as knighthoods and MBEs were scrapped. The "Commonwealth Government" was renamed the Australian Government and an Australian anthem replaced "God Save the Queen."  

Conscription was ended. Australian troops were withdrawn from the Vietnam War and men imprisoned for draft evasion were released. Australian ministers publicly condemned the American conduct of the Vietnam War. The U.S. bombing of Hanoi during Christmas 1972 was denounced as the work of "maniacs" and "mass murderers". Deputy Prime Minister, Dr Jim Cairns, called for public rallies to condemn the bombing and for boycotts on American goods. In response, Australian dockers refused to unload American ships. Whitlam himself warned the Nixon administration that he might draw Indonesia and Japan into protests against the bombing. 

The Australian Government also pressed for support for the Indian Ocean Zone of Peace, which was opposed by the US, and spoke up in the United Nations for Palestinian rights. The French were condemned for testing nuclear weapons in the South Pacific, and refugees fleeing the CIA-backed coup in Chile were welcomed into Australia (an irony in the light of Washington's retaliation against Whitlam). 

"We were told that the Australians might as well be
regarded as North Vietnamese collaborators."
(FRANK SNEPP, CIA officer stationed in Saigon at
the time of the Agency's covert activities against
the Whitlam government.)

The CIA's alarm over the Australian Government rose to a fury when, in the early hours of March 16th 1973, the Attorney General, Lionel Murphy, led a raid on the Melbourne offices of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO). Murphy and Whitlam were concerned about ASIO's involvement with local fascist Croatian groups that had carried out terrorist acts in Australia and against Yugoslav diplomats abroad.  

Set up under the auspices of the UKUSA Treaty in 1949, ASIO had distinguished itself by not uncovering a single spy or traitor (this is still the case), yet it had become almost as powerful in Australia as the CIA itself. ASIO had a secret pact of loyalty to the CIA and helped to set up and maintain secret police organisations that kept files on all Australian Labor Party members, prominent politicians, government officials, union leaders, members of the Council of Civil Liberties and anyone considered the slightest left-of centre. Even prayer meetings for peace were watched and recorded.  

According to a top-secret report to a Royal Commission into Australia's secret services led by Mr Justice Hope, for decades members of ASIO handed over to the CIA slanderous information against Australian politicians and senior officials who they regarded unfavourably. This material ranged from accusations of subversive tendencies to concern about their personal lives, and allowed the CIA to work against these people in ways that ranged from blackmail to efforts to block their careers.  

ASIO is run as an internal organisation in Australia. The Australian Secret Intelligence Service, ASIS, operates abroad and is less well known. Code-named MO9, its existence was only acknowledged after the Labor Government came to power in 1972. ASIS played an important role in the CIA's covert activities against foreign governments in Southeast Asia. For example, after Cambodia's Prince Sihanouk broke off diplomatic relations with the United States in 1965, the CIA used ASIS to secretly carry out its work in the country for the next four years, despite official Australian policy being one of strict neutrality. After Sihanouk was overthrown in a CIA-inspired coup, American forces invaded Cambodia and the US carpet-bombing of the country - a bombing so intense that during one six-month period in 1973, American B52s dropped the equivalent (in tons of bombs) of five Hiroshimas on the civilian population - served as a catalyst for the rise to power of Pol Pot and the genocidal Khmer Rouge).  

 Extract from a top-secret ASIS document, describing the organisation's activities.

Extract from a top-secret ASIS document,
describing the organisation's activities.

Whitlam also discovered that ASIS agents were working for the CIA in Chile, de-stabilising the government of Salvador Allende, who was supported by the Australian Labor Government. Whitlam promptly ordered the ASIS officers home. However, some remained in Chile under Australian Embassy cover and without Whitlam's knowledge; Allende was subsequently murdered during the CIA-orchestrated military coup led by the dictator General Augusto Pinochet. 

The CIA's concern over the activities of the Whitlam government was due to the fact that Australia played a pivotal role in the United States' desire for covert influence over Indo-China. Some of the most strategically important and top-secret American bases outside the United States are located in Australia. These include the U.S. Naval Communication Station, North West Cape, on the northern coast of Western Australia, which transmits battle orders for the nuclear missile-carrying Polaris submarines. The most secretive Australian intelligence organisation is the Melbourne-based Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) which is modelled on the American National Security Agency, NSA. The DSD spies for the U.S. in the Indian Ocean, the South Pacific and Southeast Asia. There is also the Joint Intelligence Organisation (JIO), established in 1970 under the supervision of the CIA's analyst division, and the Office of National Assessments (ONA), whose job is to co-ordinate and analyse Australia's extensive spying networks in the region.  

Most important of all is Pine Gap, near Alice Springs, officially described as an American- Australian "Joint Defence Space Research Facility", but in actuality it is an entirely American spy-satellite base, run by the CIA and the NSA. Pine Gap can pick up communications from almost anywhere in the world; its primary function is the collection of data from CIA sources and transmitters, and the preparation for nuclear warfare. So secretive were Pine Gap and the other major U.S. base at Nurrungar in South Australia that no details of their plans were revealed to successive Australian Prime Ministers and their cabinets.  

Leaked Australian Defence Department documents disclosed that in 1972, high-frequency transmitters at North West Cape had helped the United States to mine Haiphong and other North Vietnamese harbours; and that satellites controlled from Pine Gap and Nurrungar were being used to pinpoint targets for the American bombing of Cambodia. These actions were taken entirely without the consent or knowledge of the Australian government. 

William Corson, a former senior U.S. intelligence officer, also revealed that the CIA ran between ten and fifteen "black airfields" at their secret Australian bases during the Vietnam War, flying "hot" CIA agents from Vietnam for debriefing. In 1975, as the North Vietnamese captured control of South Vietnam, massive supplies of drugs that had been stashed by the CIA in Vietnam were flown into the secret U.S. airfields in Australia. The drugs were redistributed to "regional drug banks", thus providing a "reserve currency" for the Agency's global criminal activities.  

The top-secret American base at Nurrungar, South Australia.

The top-secret American base at Nurrungar, South Australia.

In October 1973, during the Middle East War, President Nixon put U.S. forces on nuclear "Level Three" alert, through the base at North West Cape. Australia had become involved, without the knowledge of its government, in a war on the other side of the world. When Whitlam found out about this, he was furious and told Parliament that although the Australian government would honour agreements with America covering existing spy stations, "there will not be extensions or proliferations." 

Whitlam's words were to have serious consequences for the fate of his government. A new American Ambassador was appointed to Australia - Marshall Green, widely known as "the coup-master". Green was a senior U.S. policy planner for Southeast Asia and had the distinction of being involved in several countries where the CIA had masterminded coups, such as Indonesia and Chile. 

Green visited the office of Clyde Cameron, a senior minister in the Whitlam government, and made the threat that if the Labor Government honoured one of its key election pledges to reclaim national ownership of oil refineries and other industries which had been mostly sold to American transnational interests, "we would move in." In early 1974, Green addressed the Australian Institute of Directors with a speech that amounted almost to an incitement to rise against the Australian Government. Green went on to say that Australian business leaders "could expect help from the United States, which would be similar to the help given to South America." (The CIA-sponsored coup in Chile had happened only a few months earlier).  

The CIA set about a programme of discrediting Jim Cairns, leader of the anti-Vietnam War movement. ASIO timed the leak of a defamatory "Cairns file" to the Bulletin magazine to coincide with Cairns' election to Deputy Prime Minister in 1974. This file claimed that Cairns "echoed Communist views... and his activities could lead to the fascist cult of the personality... and to the destruction of the democratic system of government." A few weeks later, ASIO leaked a second file to journalist Peter Samuels, a regular publisher of CIA propaganda. Under the headline The Pathway to Terrorism, Samuels wrote that ASIO's prime concern about Cairns was the "terrorist" potential of his part in the anti-war movement. 

By the end of 1974, inflation and the money supply were rising at an alarming rate due to the dramatic rise in the cost of oil. Despite this, the Whitlam Government was determined to honour its election promise to hand control of U.S. multinational subsidiaries to the Australian people. In order to achieve this, Whitlam sent two of his ministers to scour the Middle East for a loan of $A4 billion. 

In November 1974 Rex Connor, the Minister for Minerals and Energy, met with Tirath Khemlani, a Pakistani "commodities merchant" who was working for the London brokers Dalamal & Sons. Unknown to Connor, Khemlani was a con-man who had been sent to sabotage the Australian Government by a Hong Kong arms firm closely associated with Commerce International, a Brussels-based armaments company with widespread links to the CIA. (Commerce International was set up as a front for Task Force 157, the highly secretive CIA "dirty tricks" organisation). 

In March 1975 Jim Cairns was introduced to Melbourne businessman George Harris, who told Cairns that a $A4 billion loan was available from Commerce International with a once-only brokerage fee of 2.5%. Cairns considered the offer a fairy tale and rejected the deal. Harris then contacted Phillip Lynch, Deputy Leader of the opposition Liberal Party. When Lynch raised the question of the brokerage fee in Parliament, Cairns denied that any such agreement existed. Within days, a letter with Cairns' signature was published on the front pages of the national newspapers and Cairns was forced to resign for "misleading Parliament." Cairns steadfastly maintained that he never agreed to or put his name to such an outrageous and incriminating letter. A top-secret CIA briefing document for the U.S. President dated July 3rd 1975 later revealed that Cairns had been sacked "even though the evidence had been fabricated."  

The CIA was involved in further activities designed to undermine the Whitlam Government. In July 1975 the Australian media reported that the Mercantile Bank and Trust Company, based in the Bahamas, had issued a letter seeking $4,267,365,000 "for and on behalf of the Government of Australia." The bank did not claim to be acting with the approval of the Australian Government and cabinet ministers had never heard of it. But the implication was enough to fill the newspapers with another "scandal". Much later, an ASIO officer was to publicly state: "some of the documents which helped discredit the Labor Government in its last year in office were forgeries planted by the CIA." 

Mercantile Bank and Trust was set up and owned by the CIA's Colonel Paul Helliwell, who built up a network of banks, including the infamous Castle Bank, which collapsed after U.S. tax investigators found it was laundering drugs money for the CIA and the Mafia (see the Wake Up article Dealing in Death: The CIA and the Drugs Trade). As the loans affair reached its climax in the spring of 1975, a welter of supposedly incriminating documents forged by the CIA were given widespread coverage in the Australian media. Tirath Khemlani himself arrived in Australia with two bags bulging with more "incriminating" documents. Bodyguards provided by the opposition parties accompanied Khemlani and the CIA paid his expenses. Khemlani made outrageous claims in the media that Labor ministers had received commissions and "kickbacks" from the loans, that documents proving corruption were soon to be made public, and so on.  

In fact not one of these "documents" proved a thing; not one penny was paid by anyone to the government, nor did any minister profit from the affair. In 1981 a CIA contract employee, Joseph Flynn, revealed that he had forged some of the loans affair documents and had bugged a hotel room where Gough Whitlam was staying. He had been paid by Michael Hand, co-founder of the CIA's Nugan Hand Bank.  

Former Nugan Hand principal Karl Schuller provided evidence to Australian Corporate Affairs investigating officers that the CIA transferred a "slush fund" of $A2,400,000 to the main opposition parties in March 1973, four months after Whitlam's election. An investigation by a special New South Wales police task force concluded that "many links were found between individuals connected with Nugan Hand and individuals connected in very significant ways with U.S. intelligence organisations, specifically the Central Intelligence Agency and the Office of Naval Intelligence [Task Force 157]... at times those links have the appearance of the direct involvement of the U.S. intelligence community itself." The Commission called for criminal charges for "drug, conspiracy, perjury and passport offences." (A year after Frank Nugan's death, the Deputy Director of the CIA, Admiral Bobby Inman, expressed deep concern that the investigations into Nugan Hand Bank would lead to disclosure of a range of CIA dirty tricks calculated to undermine the Whitlam Government). 

It was revealed in the press that the CIA had offered the Australian opposition Liberal Party (the Liberals were actually conservative) "unlimited funds" in their unsuccessful attempt to defeat the Labor party in the May 1974 parliamentary elections. Former CIA officer Victor Marchetti confirmed that the CIA had funded both of the major opposition parties and that the Liberals had been receiving CIA funds since the late 1960s.  

According to the former Deputy Director of Intelligence for the CIA, Dr Ray Cline, the CIA passed information to opposition politicians not only to discredit the Whitlam Government but also to put pressure on Australian civil servants who in turn would pressure the Governor-General, Sir John Kerr. 

When the Pine Gap Treaty, which would determine the future of the CIA's most valuable overseas base, was due for renewal on December 9th 1975, Whitlam's comments that he might not renew the treaty raised major alarms in the Agency. CIA Director William Colby later wrote that the "threat" posed by the Whitlam Government was one of the three "world crises" of his career, comparable with the Middle East war two years previously, when the United States considered using nuclear weapons.  

The CIA Station Chief in London, Dr John Proctor, contacted MI6 and asked for British help with "the Whitlam problem." William Colby directly approached his opposite number, head of MI6, Sir Maurice Oldfield, to emphasise to British intelligence that Australia was "traditionally Britain's domain" and that if Pine Gap was closed down, "the Alliance would be blinded strategically." The CIA also sought assistance from MI6 and MI5 liaison officers based in Washington.  

British intelligence has long had a vested interest in Australian politics. MI6 operates its own base at Kowandi, south of Darwin, where its highly secret activities are concealed from the Australian government and people. They include widespread interception of communications and covert operations in Asia. The Australian Secret Intelligence Service, ASIS, also operates from this base and is highly integrated with British intelligence. 

At the same time as U.S. intelligence was targeting the Australian Labor Government, Peter Wright (of Spycatcher infamy) and his colleagues in British intelligence were busy destabilising the British Labour Government of Harold Wilson. Wright conspired with his close friend, James Jesus Angleton, the extreme right-wing head of CIA counter-intelligence, to "target" the three Western leaders they regarded as "Communist agents": Harold Wilson, Willy Brandt in Germany and Gough Whitlam.  

After discovering that the British and American intelligence services based in Australia were secretly involved in Indonesia's invasion of East Timor, Whitlam ordered the dismissal of the heads of ASIO and ASIS in the autumn of 1975, and then began to make moves against the CIA. Then, at the beginning of November, it was revealed in the press that a former CIA officer, Richard Stallings, had been channelling funds to J. Douglas Anthony, leader of the opposition National Country Party, and was a close friend and former tenant of Anthony's Canberra home. Whitlam accused the opposition of being "subsidised by the CIA."  

In Parliament, Doug Anthony admitted that Stallings was a friend but challenged Whitlam to provide evidence that Stallings worked for the CIA. (Stallings' name was not on the official list of "declared" CIA officers working in Australia, but on a "confidential" list held by the Permanent Head of the Australian Defence Department, Sir Arthur Tange). Whitlam prepared a reply, which he intended to give when Parliament resumed the following week, on Tuesday November 11th. 

The CIA was frantic. The Australian Prime Minister was about to blow the cover of the agent who had set up Pine Gap and to reveal that the supposedly "joint" facility was a CIA charade. Furthermore, the future of the base itself was to be subject to parliamentary debate. The day before his speech was due, Whitlam was informed of a telex from the ASIO station in Washington, which stated that the Prime Minister of Australia was a security risk in his own country. The message had been virtually dictated by Theodore Shackley, head of the CIA's East Asia Division (and whose plethora of illegal covert activities have been outlined in other articles on this site).  

On Sunday November 9th, the Australian Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, was briefed on the "security crisis", while the head of the Defence Department declared publicly: "This is the greatest risk to the nation's security there has ever been." The CIA was certain that Whitlam would announce the cancellation of the Pine Gap agreement on December 9th, and set into motion a plan to install in power a political party to "protect the sanctity of U.S. bases."  

Six weeks earlier, during a visit to Indonesia, opposition politician Andrew Peacock had briefed government officials there on the current state of the Australian political crisis. He described in detail a sequence of events that were about to take Australia by surprise. A record of his briefing was later read into Australian Hansard:  

"Whitlam will not agree to hold an election.... The Governor-General would be forced to ask Malcolm Fraser to form a Cabinet. But this Cabinet would not be able to get a mandate to govern, because Parliament is controlled by the Labor Party.... Fraser is appointed PM, a minute later he asks the Governor-General to dissolve Parliament, following which a general election is to be held." 

And that was exactly what happened. On November 11th, the day Whitlam was to inform Parliament fully about the CIA and American bases in Australia, he was summoned by Kerr from Parliament House. Without warning, Kerr dismissed Whitlam as Prime Minister, dissolved both houses of Parliament and appointed Malcolm Fraser, leader of the Liberal Party, to head an interim government until new elections could be held in December. An unelected official (whose position was traditionally only that of a figurehead representative of the Queen of England) had, in one arbitrary and unconstitutional act, overthrown a legitimate and democratically elected government.  

Back in the House of Representatives, Whitlam called for a vote of confidence in himself and his government. An overwhelming majority supported Whitlam. Indeed, six motions proposed that day, including a motion of no-confidence in Malcolm Fraser, were passed by absolute majorities. The Speaker of the House delivered Parliament's clear message of confidence in the Whitlam government personally to the Governor-General. Kerr refused to accept it. The no-confidence motion against Fraser legally obliged the Governor-General to dismiss Fraser, but Kerr chose to ignore this. 

Former CIA officers who were among the Agency's "top seven" in 1975, revealed ten years later that "Whitlam was set up. The action that Kerr took was so extreme that it would take far more than a constitutional crisis to cause him to do what he did...." A Deputy Director of the CIA said, "Kerr did what he was told to do."  

During the first week of the coup, the Australian army was recalled to barracks and there were reports that units were issued with live ammunition. There were demonstrations against the sacking of the Labor Government throughout Australia; the unions began to mobilise and prepare for a general strike. However, Bob Hawke, the President of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), summoned the press and delivered a stirring speech in which he said that "working people must not be provoked... we have to show we are not going to allow this to snowball." Hawke's intervention was critical: Australia's organised labour was strangely quiet in response to the affair. In fact Marshall Green later said that he found Bob Hawke so amenable to the CIA's cause that "Bob gave me his private telephone number and said if anything ever comes up that desperately needs some action, this is the number to ring."  

An election was called for December 13th 1975. During the campaign, three letter bombs were posted to Kerr, Fraser and the ultra-right-wing Queensland Premier, Johannes Bjelke-Petersen. Most of the press, led by Rupert Murdoch's papers, concluded that the bombs were sent by left-wing extremists within the Labor Party. There was not a shred of evidence to support this and no culprits were ever found, but the charge of "terrorism" was used to great effect against Labor. 

Four days before the election, Bjelke-Petersen called a special session of the Queensland Parliament to hear "dramatic revelations". He claimed to be "in possession of material which made clear that two Ministers of the Whitlam Government were due to receive staggering sums of money as a consequence of secret commissions and kickbacks." Bjelke-Petersen then moved quickly to gag any debate and to prevent the Labor leader from arranging for parliamentary investigation of the "revelations". The undisclosed "revelations" made large headlines in the press. No material or evidence of any kind was ever produced, but the publicity achieved its goal. Whitlam lost the election. 

The new Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser renewed the Pine Gap treaty for another decade. He also offered Washington a naval base at Cockburn Sound, even though the Americans had not requested it. In his first budget, Fraser increased the size of ASIO and gave it more money, proportionately, than any other government body. Kerr was given an unequalled pay rise of 170% and was promoted to "Knight Grand Cross of the Order of St. Michael and St. George."  

The Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr.

The Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr. Despite denying that he ever had any connections with the CIA or any other intelligence organisations, Kerr in fact had a long association with covert intelligence operations, firstly as a member of the top-secret Directorate of Research and Civil Affairs during the Second World War. He was then seconded to the Office of Strategic Services, OSS, the fore-runner of the CIA. Although he joined the Australian Labor Party early in his career, Kerr was always well to the right politically. He was chief legal adviser to the Industrial Groups, a body which sought to dominate trade unionism and was linked to the Democratic Labor Party (DLP), an extreme "anti-Communist" organisation whose split from the Labor Party and subsequent spoiler tactics kept Labor in opposition until the election of Gough Whitlam in 1977. Kerr was an active member of the Australian Association for Cultural Freedom, which was exposed in Congress in 1967 as being "founded, funded and generally run by the CIA." In the 1960s Kerr travelled to the United States to arrange funding from the Asia Foundation; that too, was exposed in Congress as a CIA conduit for money and influence.

The trade union movement of Australia had long been infiltrated by U.S. intelligence. As John Grenville, assistant secretary of the Victorian Trades Hall, revealed, "it was generally accepted that the U.S. labour attaché was the station agent for the CIA." Robert Walkinshaw was the labour attaché from 1962 to 1964. During his time in Melbourne, a trade-union publication, Spotlight, was set up, funded and run by the CIA. Walkinshaw's subsequent CIA posting was Indonesia, during the military coup in which over half a million alleged Communists were murdered. Walkinshaw was later posted as CIA adviser in Phuoc Tuy, Vietnam, where the Australian army and Australian CIA advisers were based.  

The CIA later admitted giving money to the General Secretary of the powerful Australian Worker's Union, Tom Dougherty, to "fight Communism in the AWU." Four years later the National Secretary of the Federation Ironworkers' Association, Laurie Short, began many visits to the United States, which were sponsored by the CIA. Short returned to Australia "determined to get rid of the Commies and their friends" from the Labor Party and the unions. He also delivered the clear message that "in America, the trade-union movement looked to Australian unionists to help counteract the spread of Communism in the Far East." 

The three Americans involved in supporting Bob Hawke's campaign for the Presidency of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) - Emil Lindahl, Gerry O'Keefe and Ed McHale - all worked for the CIA. Gerry O'Keefe was exposed as a major CIA operator in right-wing Chilean unions that helped to overthrow the Allende Government. Ed McHale was U.S. labour attaché in the early 1970s and maintained a "close personal relationship" with Hawke when the ACTU President was one of the most powerful union bosses Australia had ever known. McHale was internationally known as a senior CIA officer, having long been Assistant Director of Radio Free Europe, which had been set up, financed and run by the CIA. 

In 1977 the American Christopher Boyce disclosed details of CIA activities in Australia, specifically the manipulation of unions. Boyce was employed by a Californian aerospace company, TRW Systems Inc., in a cryptographic communications centre which linked CIA headquarters in Virginia with the Agency's satellite surveillance system in Australia. Boyce revealed that the CIA had infiltrated Australian labour unions, had manipulated their leadership and suppressed strikes, particularly those involving railroads and airports. Boyce described one instance when TRW had material and personnel to ship out to the CIA spy base at Pine Gap. The Agency was concerned that strikes at Australian airports could wreck their schedule. However, a telex from CIA headquarters said, "CIA will continue to suppress the strikes. Continue shipment on schedule." In other words, the CIA had infiltrated the hierarchy of Australian trade unions.  

Boyce and his associate Andrew Daulton Lee were put on trial in 1977 for selling U.S. secrets to the Russians. Lee had flown to the Soviet Embassy in Mexico and sold details of the CIA's covert activities in Australia to the Soviets. Boyce maintained that he had never intended the information to go the Russians, that Lee had agreed to make it public through one of his father's influential friends, but that he had been blackmailed by Lee, a heroin addict and pusher.  

Evidence emerged during the trial that most of TRW's communications came from Pine Gap and that although the United States had signed an Executive Agreement with Australia to share information from Pine Gap, the agreement was not being honoured and "certain information" was regularly concealed from the Australian government. Boyce described the CIA's campaigns to subvert Australian trade unions "particularly in the transport industry", and revealed that the Agency was using Pine Gap to eavesdrop on telephone and telex messages to and from Australia of a political character, and that the CIA had funded the Australian opposition political parties. Boyce also revealed that the Australian Governor-General, Sir John Kerr, was referred to by Joe Harrison, the CIA chief at TWR, as "our man Kerr." 

Boyce's disclosures caused a sensation in the United States. The prosecuting lawyers made no attempt to refute his allegations but successfully objected to any further evidence about the CIA's activities in Australia. The judge complied with a direct CIA request and agreed that Boyce would not mention the "Australia information" at his trial if, in return, the government did not use it against him - such was the sensitivity of the matter. Boyce and Lee were both found guilty; Lee was given a life sentence, while Boyce was sent for "psychiatric observation" - an indication that he might be treated leniently in return for his silence. However, Boyce made it consistently clear that he was so outraged at the betrayal of an ally - Australia - that he intended to talk. He was subsequently given forty years in Marion Federal Penitentiary in Illinois, where he is kept in solitary confinement. Whenever he leaves his cell, he is manacled, handcuffed and accompanied by two guards. It is said that his only hope of release rests on his continued silence about what happened in Australia.  

The American Christopher Boyce described CIA covert operations in Australia .

The American Christopher Boyce described CIA covert operations in Australia aimed at bringing down the Labor Government of Gough Whitlam. Boyce was sentenced to 40 years solitary confinement for his refusal to stay silent on the matter.

Five years after the overthrow of Whitlam, in April 1981, senior executives of nineteen Australian corporations met at Melbourne's Noah's Hotel for a "forecasting round table" organised by Business International. Business International is a worldwide American organisation of "consultants" which represents the top multi-national companies in Australia. In December 1977, the New York Times exposed Business International's clandestine links with the CIA. 

The nineteen had come to hear Business International's Alan Carroll express his concern about the resurgence of the Labor Party under Bill Hayden, who had held senior posts in the Whitlam Government and described himself as a republican and a democratic socialist. At that time, Bob Hawke had completed his term as ACTU President and was a newly elected Labor Party Member of Parliament. Carroll told the meeting that he knew Hawke "pretty well" and "basically, Hawke will be Labor Party leader by the middle of next year; and that's my business, and we won't go into that in any great depth. But he will be there. It's all under way. The game plan is totally under way and I forecast 3 to 5 on a Hawke Government in '83! We had a meeting with him about one month ago and we're meeting with him every six months from now. It's terribly important." A top-secret CIA briefing document for the U.S. President described Hawke as "the best qualified" to succeed Whitlam as Labor leader.  

The forecasts of the Agency and Alan Carroll came true in almost every detail. In February 1983, three weeks before an election was due, Hawke and others on the party's right wing mounted a successful putsch against Bill Hayden. With the slogan, "Bob Hawke, Bringing Australia Together", the CIA's chosen candidate became Australian Prime Minister. Hawke went on to cultivate many ties with anti-Communist groups and developed what U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz described as "a fine relationship" with Presidents Nixon and Reagan.  

Hawke's Government repeatedly refused to release some 1,200 documents on the Nugan Hand Bank, the front for international crime and illegal CIA operations in Australia. Hawke also refused to find out why the CIA barred the release, under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, of fourteen intelligence reports on Commerce International, the CIA-front company that played a central role in the destruction of the Whitlam Government. In 1989 a committee headed by a former Chief Justice of the High Court recommended rigorous Government secrecy in order to prevent disclosures about the activities of the CIA, MI5 and MI6 in the internal affairs of Australia.  

The CIA's illicit actions against the Australian Labor Party clearly indicate that the Agency will not hesitate to move against even supposed allies if it considers that they threaten U.S. interests; the full range of CIA dirty tricks can be expected to be applied against any Western nation with the same lack of impunity and regard for the law that the Agency has shown in its wars with its enemies in the East.  

Good mates: U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz and Bob Hawke, 1987.

Good mates: U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz and Bob Hawke, 1987.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

17. The Business Of America Is War

By Stephen Lendman
27 June 2011
 
Noted trends analyst Gerald Celente said it, and it's true. In fact, America's business is war, more war, multiple wars, permanent wars, pillaging one nation after another for wealth, power, and dominance, while homeland needs go begging.
 
America never was and isn't now the "land of the free and home of the brave." In fact, it's become a "Let 'em eat cake" society.
 
Whether or not Marie Antoinette actually said it, France's 1789-99 revolution was very real, delivering guillotine justice, not promised "Liberte, Egalite, and Fraternite," a status now destroying what's left of American freedom, heading for the trash bin of history if not already there.
 
Earlier articles discussed Washington's wars against Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya and Yemen, as well as numerous proxy ones in Africa, Asia, Central and South America, and at home against Muslims, Latino immigrants, and working households.
 
Combined, they represent a shocking contempt for rule of law justice, democratic values and humanity, notions now mere artifacts long ago abandoned to advance America's imperium.
 
As previous articles explained, out-of-control imperialism is heading America for tyranny and ruin. In her 1951 book, "The Origins of Totalitarianism," Hannah Arendt said it's "never content to rule by external means, namely, through the state and a machinery of violence; thanks to its peculiar ideology and the role assigned to it in this apparatus of coercion, totalitarianism has discovered a means of dominating and terrorizing human beings from within."
 
She called it dictatorship based on:
 
"(1) an elaborate ideology;
 
(2) a single mass party;
 
(3) terror;
 
(4) a technologically conditioned monopoly of communication;
 
(5) a monopoly of weapons; (and)
 
(6) a centrally controlled economy."
 
Duplicitously called a democracy, today's America nearly qualifies:
 
(1) Its ideology is concentrated wealth and power.
 
(2) It's governed by a two-party duopoly - the money or property party, excluding alternative choices.
 
(3) It's the world's leading purveyor of state terrorism, waging global wars against nations, groups or individuals, including targeted assassinations of its own citizens.
 
(4) Major media managed news gives it dominant (not monopoly) communication control, but efforts to subvert Internet discourse and debate may undermine its free and open content.
 
(5) Corporate-run society makes it centrally controlled for bottom line priorities, excluding other choices.
 
In her book, "Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil," Arendt said crimes of state aren't committed by fanatics or sociopaths, just "terrifyingly normal" (people)....neither perverted or sadistic....who accepted the premises of their superiors and their state" to continue current and/or longstanding policies.
 
In his book, "On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," Ward Churchill agreed, explaining what he called the "technocrats of empire," functioning as "little Eichmanns," banally serving imperial interests, no matter how lawless or evil. They could say "no," of course, but go along to get along, including at the highest levels. For them, it's to share spoils, no matter the harm or human misery globally.
 
Churchill's many books and writings discussed 500 genocidal years against America's indigenous peoples, as well as its global imperial apparatus. Touching the right nerves persuasively, the University of Colorado disgracefully fired him in summer 2007, a pattern repeated elsewhere against other activist professors, notably targeting Israeli critics like Norman Finkelstein, Joel Kovel, Denis Rancourt, and Sami Al-Arian among others.
 
Al-Arian was also lawlessly arrested, tried, acquitted, imprisoned, brutalized, then freed, but remains under house arrest awaiting dismissal of spurious charges against him.
 
Imperial America's War Machine
 
The empire never sleeps or tolerates anti-war activism, threatening its quest for unchallengeable "full spectrum dominance" over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space, electromagnetic spectrum and information systems with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary, including with nuclear weapons preemptively.
 
September 11, 2001 served as pretext to consolidate power, destroy civil liberties and human rights, and wage permanent wars against invented enemies for global dominance over world markets, resources, and cheap labor - notably at home and throughout
Eurasia, Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and Asia at the expense of democratic freedoms and social justice.
 
In its 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), the Pentagon called it the "long war." Dick Cheney said wars won't end in our lifetime, and former CIA Director James Woolsey said America "is engaged in World War IV, and it could continue for years....This fourth world war, I think, will last considerably longer than either World Wars I or II did for us."
 
In his 1990 address to a joint session of Congress, GHW Bush called it a "New World Order," preparing the public for Operation Desert Storm and years of war and occupation of Iraq, perhaps knowing Serbia/Kosovo, Afghanistan, and other targeted states would follow.
 
Obama is America's latest warrior president, succeeding numerous past ones, including Washington, Madison, Jackson, Lincoln, T. Roosevelt, Wilson, F. Roosevelt, Truman, Johnson, Nixon, Reagan, GHW Bush, Clinton, and GW Bush preceding him.
 
Today's stakes, however are far greater and riskier because of Pentagon grand plans, including militarizing space as a platform for future wars. A previous article explained, accessed through the following link:
 
http://sjlendman.blogspot.com/2010/09/americas-grand-strategy-militarizing.html
 
It discussed plans to position nuclear, other state-of-the-art weapons, and delivery systems to wage multiple wars from space anywhere on short notice. Under Obama, the policy remains in place. His May 2010 National Security Strategy:
 
"reserve(s) the right to act unilaterally if necessary to defend our nation and our interests." In other words, to wage preemptive wars, using first-strike nuclear and other destructive weapons "to keep the American people safe (and advance the nation's) values and ideals," pursuing unchallengeable global/space dominance, ruling by intimidation and war, making the world safe for capital.
 
During the Cold War, MAD (mutually assured destruction) held both sides at bay. Today's strategy includes "more flexible options (for) a wider range of contingencies (with weapons) to optimize performance." It means destroy an adversary's capabilities preemptively, then target others to eliminate all challenges to US dominance.
 
With America on a nuclear hair-trigger, it reinvented MAD in new form, threatening potential global nuclear winter, defined as "a long period of darkness and extreme cold that scientists predict would follow a full-scale nuclear war, a layer of dust and smoke in the atmosphere cover(ing) the earth and block(ing) the rays of the sun, (causing) most living organisms (to) perish."
 
Anti-nuclear expert Helen Caldicott says "one single failure of nuclear deterrence could end human history (quickly). Once initiated, it would take one hour to trigger a swift, sudden end to life on this planet." Only nuclear disarmament and abolition of nuclear weapons can stop it, what's never discussed or considered.
 
On January 17, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower coined the phrase "military industrial complex" in his farewell address, saying:
 
"....we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist."
 
As he prepared to leave office, he could hardly imagine the difference 50 years would make, transforming fortress America into a colossus, waging permanent global wars, spending unconscionable amounts on militarism and threatening planetary survival in the process.
 
On April 17, 2010, Independent Institute analyst Robert Higgs said annual "defense-related spending greatly exceeds the amounts budgeted by the Department of Defense," presenting FY 2009 data, the most recent figures available.
 
The official $636.5 billion spent way understated a growing annual total even Higgs can't fully identify, given enormous black budgets and hidden add-ons, likely totaling hundreds of billions of dollars. What's known for FY 2009, however, in billions of dollars includes the following:
 
-- Department of Defense: $636.5
 
-- Department of Energy (nuclear weapons and environmental cleanup): $16.7
 
-- Department of State: $36.3
 
-- Department of Veterans Affairs: $95.5
 
-- Department of Homeland Security: $51.7
 
-- Department of the Treasury (for Military Retirement Fund): $54.9
 
-- Half of NASA's budget: $9.6
 
-- Net interest attributable to past-debt-financed defense outlays: $126.3
 
Total: $1,027.5 trillion
 
Moreover, the National Priorities Project's analysis of FY 2010 discretionary spending showed 62% spent for military-related purposes, including 4% for veterans' benefits.
 
For FY 2012, the House approved $690.1 billion, an 8.4% increase (though below the $725 FY 2011 budget, a temporary drop, likely compensated for with add-ons). The Senate will approve a similar amount. If the entire $1,027.5 trillion increases by the same amount, it raises known FY 2012 defense-related spending to $1,113.8 trillion.
 
In fact, with supplemental and hidden add-ons, as well as Pentagon, intelligence, and other unknown amounts, the grand total likely exceeds $1.5 trillion, a figure rising most years while popular needs go begging.
 
Higgs also cites the unreliability of official numbers. He believes it's more accurate to take the Pentagon's basic budget and double it because as much as 40% of it is black or hidden. Moreover, as Pentagon power grows, more spending accrues to congressional districts. As a result, Congress willingly goes along as jobs are allegedly created. In addition, generous campaign contributions follow - bribes to keep funding the war machine.
 
Congressional Affirmation of Permanent War
 
The current House bill, HR 1540 includes a worrisome/duplicitous Sec. 1034: Affirmation of Armed Conflict with Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and Associated Forces, affirming:
 
"(1) the United States is engaged in an armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces and that those entities continue to pose a threat to the United States and its citizens, both domestically and abroad;
 
(2) the President has the authority to use all necessary and appropriate force during the current armed conflict with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and associated forces pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40);
 
(3) the current armed conflict includes nations, organization(s), and persons, who --
 
(A) are part of, or are substantially supporting al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners; or
 
(B) have engaged in hostilities or have engaged in hostilities or have directly supported hostilities in aid of a nation, organization, or person described in subparagraph (A); and
 
(4) the President's authority pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force....includes the authority to detain belligerents, including persons described in paragraph (3), until the termination of hostilities."
 
In September 2001, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) for "the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States." Still in force today, it began the "war on terror," giving George Bush carte blanche authority to wage global wars in violation of international and constitutional laws. A 2002 AUMF against Iraq followed.
 
The House (and likely the Senate) FY 2012 Defense Authorization bill affirms that authority, letting Obama as commander and chief, wage wars anywhere at his discretion. He's taking full advantage, duplicitous congressional posturing notwithstanding.
 
On June 24, in fact, House Republicans and 70 Democrats rejected support for Obama's Libya war, but defeated a measure to defund it. In other words, they authorized war at the same time symbolically rejecting it, exposing their gross hypocrisy.
 
America's Permanent War Agenda
 
In inflation adjusted dollars, annual defense spending more than doubled under George Bush and keeps rising under Obama despite growing budget cutting pressures, given a much greater national debt burden than reported.
 
Officially it's nearly $14.3 trillion (headed for an estimated $15.5 trillion by September 30), exceeding 100% of GDP at that time. Omitted, however, is another $7.6 trillion owed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and other government agencies, besides future trillion dollar or more amounts added annually.
 
It hardly matters, given the military/industrial complex's power to demand what it wants and get it. Today, in fact, it comprises:
 
-- defense, technology, energy, financial, private military contractor (PMCs), and other corporate interests;
 
-- Congress;
 
-- America's media;
 
-- prominent think tanks and other pressure groups;
 
-- various others benefitting from militarism; and
 
-- the Pentagon colossus, a frightening power unto itself, threatening humanity's survival.
 
The Defense Department's FY 2010 Base Structure Report shows how large it's become, even with important information omitted:
 
DOD is the world's largest landlord with over 539,000 facilities (buildings, structures, and linear structures) located on nearly 5,000 sites, covering more than 28 million acres and over two billion square feet of space in America, its territories and overseas. In fact, these numbers way understate much higher totals as many Pentagon facilities are secret and/or unreported.
 
They include over 1,000 overseas bases in 150 or more countries, as well as additional secret ones shared with or leased from host countries. As of April 2009, Congressional Research Service data includes 1,402,000 total active duty US military personnel worldwide, 73,000 National Guard, and 208,000 Selected Reserves, for a 1,683,000 total.
 
Add to them America's private military contractor (PMC) army, corporate mercenaries profiting from US imperialism. They perform a wide range of functions from combat to consulting to logistics, virtually anything once done by the Pentagon. Moreover, America's intelligence agencies, State Department, Homeland Security, and other branches also use PMCs.
 
Overall, they're unregulated, unaccountable, and often out-of-control, involved in some of the most controversial aspects of war from over-billing to ritual slaughter of unarmed civilians. Yet they're not prosecuted, convicted or imprisoned, just rewarded with fat contracts costing far more for services military personnel once performed. Moreover, the more they're used, the greater they influence war making, sustaining their bottom line priorities at the expense of a free society and vital homeland needs.
 
America's New Military Industrial Complex
 
On March 1, 2003 Business 2.0 magazine writers Ian Mount, Matthew Maier and David Freedman headlined, "The New Military Industrial Complex" for digital age war, describing the Pentagon's "revolution in military affairs (RMA)," comprised of "faster, lighter, smarter" cutting-edge technology warfare. Readying for it, they're building an unchallengeable high-tech arsenal, more advanced now than then.
 
The old one remains and gets huge contracts for new and more traditional weapons. The result is an influential "iron triangle" of Congress, the Pentagon and defense industry. Besides major media support, conservative think tanks also like:
 
-- the Project for a New American Century (PNAC); its "Rebuilding America's Defenses" scheme promotes US global hegemony;
 
-- the Center for Security Policy (CSP) headed by super-hawk Frank Gaffney endorses a policy of "Peace through Strength" and perpetual wars for perpetual peace;
 
-- the Committee on the Present Danger (CPD) composed of hard right leaders and members, "fighting terrorism and the ideologies that drive it;"
 
-- the National Institute for Public Policy (NIPP), focusing on defense issues, tied to the nuclear weapons industry; and
 
-- the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), emphasizing national security and "advancing (US) global interests;" specializing in crisis management, it's connected to the highest levels in government and the Pentagon.
 
The nation's 16 intelligence agencies, including CIA, NSA, DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency), FBI, Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence, DHS (Department of Homeland Security), and Department of State comprise another component destroying a free society. They comprise a multi-billion dollar funded, largely off-the-books, clandestine anti-democratic network. Interconnected with thousands of private contractors, they're tied to world governments and their intelligence services.
 
Moreover, they comprise a government/military/industrial/intelligence service/media/think tank colossus, waging global wars, bankrupting the nation, wrecking the remnants of a free society. Plagued by the same dynamic that doomed past empires unwilling to change, they also pursue the misguided notion that militarism sustains growth.
 
In fact, it erodes it by sacrificing industrial America, shifting production and other high-paying service operations abroad to focus on war making. As a result, essential homeland needs go begging, including healthcare, education, job creation, and the nation's infrastructure, crumbling from years of neglect.
 
In his farewell address, Eisenhower said:
 
"Every gun that is made, every war ship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, from those who are cold and not clothed."
 
In his November 2003 Harper's article titled, "The War Business," Chalmers Johnson said:
 
"(M)unitions and war profiteering have (become) the most efficient means for well-connected capitalists to engorge themselves at the public trough." Even Wall Street profits hugely. "To call these companies 'private,' though, is mere ideology. (Weapons and) munitions making in the United States today (and related industries profiting from them are) not really private enterprise. It is state socialism."
 
They also destroy constitutional freedoms, what George Washington in 1796 warned about, saying "overgrown military establishments (are) inauspicious to liberty." Johnson called it America's future, now more the present, saying, "When war becomes the most profitable course of action, we can certainly expect more of it," sacrificing a free society for private interests reaping short-term gains.
 
In his book titled, "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War," Andrew Bacevich discussed America's "trinity," its global military presence, power projection, and intervention, creating a "permanent national security crisis....propell(ing) the United States into a condition approximating perpetual war." However, "(no) evidence exists - none - to suggest that US efforts advance the cause of global peace," just the opposite. As a result, "(o)ver the horizon, a shipwreck of epic proportions awaits."
 
It's coming perhaps when least expected. Nations that live by the sword, die by it. America is no exception, nor any other.
 
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
 
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
 
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

18. 10 Questions The MPs Will Not Ask Murdoch

By Robin Beste  

Source: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article28624.htm

July 18, 2011 "Stop the War Coalition" --
 What was it about the relationship with Murdoch that made Tony Blair feel it was appropriate to take a phone call from a newspaper proprietor just hours prior to the most momentous decision a prime minister can make: ordering the country's armed forces to war? [Nazarene Remnant comment: And why did the 33rd degree Freemason PM of Australia, John Winston Howard, frog-march Australia into Iraq right behind Blair?

 

When Rupert Murdoch appears before the parliamentary committee on 19 July 2011, here are ten questions the MPs certainly will not ask about the relationship he had with Tony Blair during the run up to the Iraq war, when Murdoch was, in the words of Blair's former press officer Lance Price, "the third most powerful figure in the Labour government," after Blair himself and Gordon Brown. 

 

  1. In 2002-3 all of your 127 newspapers around the world, with a combined circulation of 40 million a week, supported the Iraq war. We now know you were often in direct contact with the then prime minister Tony Blair, who you said at the time was "extraordinarily courageous and strong" and who had "shown great guts" in planning the war on Iraq. How much coordination was there between Downing Street  and News International on the media presentation of what was widely regarded as an illegal war? 
     
  2. You said when interviewed in the run up to the war that Iraq's oil was central to the rationale for overthrowing Saddam Hussein: "The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy...would be $20 a barrel for oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country." Tony Blair always insisted in public that Iraq's oil played no part in the decision to attack Iraq. To what extent did he agree with you in private that getting control of the world's second biggest oil reserves was at the heart of the war aims?
  3. All of your newspapers  used Tony Blair's "dodgy dossier" of September 2002 to try and generate a war fever with the bogus claim that -- in the words of The Sun headline -- "BRITS 45 MINUTES FROM DOOM". The hand of Alistair Campbell, Blair's press officer, is widely regarded as having been responsible for the dossier's fabrications. There was no coverage in the Sun or the rest of News International's outlets, when it was revealed that some of this dossier, which was supposed to present a cast iron case for attacking Iraq, was drawn from a 12-year old thesis, published on the internet by a PhD student. Was this because you and Blair made a pact that News International would be relentless in promoting the war, even if this meant using lies and distortion?
  4. You spoke to Tony Blair by telephone on 11 March 2003, after the announcement by the then French prime minister Jacques Chirac that France would veto a second United Nations resolution sanctioning war against Iraq. Blair was banking on this resolution to help sell a war that was opposed by an overwhelming majority of the British public. The next day, the Sun wrote, "Like a cheap tart who puts price before principle, money before honour, Jacques Chirac struts the streets of shame. The French President's vow to veto the second resolution at the United Nations - whatever it says - puts him right in the gutter." To what extent did your conversation with Blair influence the co-ordinated attack on Chirac across all of your newspapers?
  5. You spoke again with Blair on 13 March 2003. The next day, the Sun intensified its vitriolic abuse of Chirac: "Charlatan Jacques Chirac is basking in cheap applause for his 'Save Saddam' campaign - but his treachery will cost his people dear. This grandstanding egomaniac has inflicted irreparable damage on some of the most important yet fragile structures of international order." Did your conversation with Tony Blair reveal that the "grandstanding egomaniac" and "damage to the structures of international order" may have been more appropriately applied to him rather than to Chirac?
  6. Your third phone call with Tony Blair within nine days took place on 19 March 2003, the day before the Iraq war started. What was it about the relationship you had with Tony Blair that made him feel it was appropriate to take a phone call from a newspaper proprietor just hours prior to the most momentous decision a prime minister can make: ordering the country's armed forces to war?
  7. When the United Nations inspectors under Hans Blix could find no evidence of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, the coverage in your newspapers bordered on hysteria -- "HE'S GOT 'EM. LET'S GET HIM" screamed the Sun headline. When it was later shown beyond dispute that the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq never existed, did you not feel that News International should have issued an apology for promoting a lie to justify an illegal war?
  8. You spoke to Tony Blair on January 29, 2004. This was the day after the Sun leaked extracts from the Hutton Report into the death of government scientist David Kelly, who had been hounded to suicide by Alistair Campbell and the Blair spin machine. Kelly had been revealed -- almost certainly by a leak from Blair's office -- as the source of the BBC report that said the case for war had been "sexed up" in the "dodgy dossier". The Hutton Report, since thoroughly discredited as a whitewash, said Blair and Campbell were -- in the Sun's words -- "completely cleared of criticism". No such fate for the chairman of the BBC Greg Dyke and chairman of the BBC governors Gavyn Davies, both of whom resigned, as Blair, Campbell and your newspapers took the opportunity to savage the BBC for broadcasting the "sexed up" claim. When you spoke to Tony Blair on 29 January, were you both gloating over a spin job well done through the leaking of the Hutton report to the Sun, arranged we must assume between Alistair Campbell and Rebekah Wade (now Brooks), who was then editor of the paper?
  9. You are renowned for putting the interests and the profits of your media empire above all other considerations. What payoff did News International get from Tony Blair for the unqualified support it gave for his illegal war in Iraq?
  10. Over one million people were killed in Iraq. Another four million were made refugees by the war. The country's infrastructure was so devastated that even today, electricity is rationed for many Iraqis, many still do not have access to clean drinking water or a functioning sewage system, and the health service, which was once the most advanced in the region, now struggles to provide a decent level of care. I79 British soldiers were killed and hundreds more suffered life changing injuries. As a direct result of the war, Britain suffered terrorist atrocities on 7 July 2005, in which 52 people were killed. Does your conscience ever regret the key part that you and your newspapers played in promoting an illegal war which has brought such death and destruction to the Iraqi people, unbearable bereavement to the families of British soldiers sent to kill and be killed for a lie, and increased insecurity from the threat of terrorist attack to the people of Britain?  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

19. Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 5 of 6

This Report was given to the publisher of RMNews the year it was written, 1996. The Source who hand delivered it would not state who the author was. RMNews does not know if this has been published elsewhere.  

 

The Rumor Mill News Agency
http://rumormillnews.com/FORTRESS_AUSTRALIA.htm 

 

Source of this version: 

http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/fortress_australia.htm  

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Emergency Services - March 1996

The Victorian State Government headed by Mr Jeff Kennett promised prior to his re-election that every state secondary school will establish emergency service cadet corps to help develop leadership and social skills. Many-private, fee paying schools have maintained army orientated cadet corps but these have been eliminated from the public state education system for many years.

It is interesting to note that instead of basing the new cadet corps solely on the Army, the State Government proposes to involve 213,000 students in all other military and emergency services. Students will have a choice of training with the Army, Air Force, Navy, Police, Fire Brigade, Country Fire Authority, Conservation Department and the Metropolitan Ambulance Services. It is expected that in two to three years time a large pool of basically trained young personnel will be available to support these services if required. This programme is already in existence in Western Australia and it is expected to be adopted by most other states over the next two years. The cost of operating the scheme in Victoria is expected to be around $50,000,000 per year.

Considering the effort being put into the reorganisation and development of all Australian emergency services the Cadet system (like the Scout movement) is an excellent way of training young and enthusiastic personnel for future use without having to enlighten them as to their true purpose. If all Australian states join in there could be as many as 1,000,000 students under part time training by the end of 1997.

After his re-election in March Mr. Kennett immediately authorised a pilot study programme to commence in several schools in view of developing a state wide Cadet system by 1997. 

Military Matters

(1) During late March the Federal Government announced that the Australian Army would start training Singapore Air Force helicopter pilots at the Army Aviation Centre at Oakey, 150KM west of Brisbane where a squadron of twelve super puma helicopters and about two hundred and fifty service personnel and their families would be based. Singapore forces already had flight training at several RAAF bases and armoured training at Shoalwater Bay, Queensland.

(2) The Federal Government announced that it was purchasing one hundred special multi wheeled armoured all terrain vehicles, for the Army. These will be supplied by Canada and stationed in the northern part of Australia. The government has also decided to set up a part manufacturing programme for these vehicles in the near future. It is expected that more than five hundred will be produced within three years.

(3) The Labor Government lost the federal election in March and were replaced by the Howard Conservative government. One of the new governments first action was to instruct the Australian Submarine Corporation to speed up the production of the Collins class submarines. The production is presently running to the original schedule but the government wants them as soon as possible. The factory will be expanded and staff numbers increased to achieve this.

(4) The frigate building programme in Melbourne is also to be speeded up. So far the second frigate is operational and the third is due to be launched this year. The government wants all 10 within three years.

(5) It appears that Australia has continued to purchase large numbers of used but refurbished F111 fighter bombers from the USA. There are indications that the airforce now has around 280 F-111 aircraft at their disposal! This is an enormous number in anyone's estimation and it is difficult to understand why Australia would need such a large number of them.

(6) The ever increasing amount of sophisticated military equipment is causing a serious shortage of skilled man power to operate it, particularly in the airforce. To get around part of the problem the armed services are offering positions to outside contractors such experienced airline pilots and flight engineers. Of course no one will go into such services for lower wages so the services have agreed to pay such outsiders at commercial rates and add a variety of benefits and perks to make the new positions more attractive. This means that an experienced pilot contracted from outside the airforce could be paid three or four times more than a regular careers airforce pilot of the same rank. Obviously the urgency of obtaining the services of the new staff outweighs the conflicts it will no doubt cause. It has been rumoured that, should the need arise, the US government will provide a large number of skilled personnel on a lease basis to operate all the equipment should this prove necessary during a time of emergency.

(7) Shortly after the new federal government came to power in March, new discussions began with the US Government about the establishment of a greater American military presence in Australia. These discussions are still underway and are expected to continue for most of 1996. The US government has asked Australia to agree to the establishment of a major network of military supply bases in Australia which will be stocked with large quantities of munitions, spare parts and complete equipment to fully support any American military operations in the Asia/Pacific area. The US government has promised substantial investment in this project involving the joint co-operation of Australian companies.

(8) The US government has proposed that a major naval base be built for their use at Darwin in the Northern Territory. It is expected that the Australian government will agree to this during 1996.

(9) The US government has further requested the setting up of training facilities in Australia at which American military personnel can be field trained in all forms of warfare. This would be in addition to the present air force training facilities already in operation.

(10) Apart from the new naval base at Darwin, the US government has suggested they establish a substantial military presence in the northern part of Australia. This will be discussed in Washington in June, 1996. [Nazarene Remnant comment: This presence will be in many parts of Northern Australia, with Townsville and Bowen being prime areas. As well RAAF Base Sherger, 30 km North of Weipa is still awaiting aircraft and personnel, besides the 300 Afghans it currenly—January 2011—houses.]

(11) The new Australian Prime Minister, Mr. Howard, made it clear in May 1996 that Australia must have wider and closer co-operation with the USA "at every level."

(12) On the 11th June, 1996 the Australian government announced that there would a major shake up of all military services with a much greater emphasis placed on combat capability and readiness than top heavy administration.

Pine Cap

In March it was announced by the US and Australian governments that the top secret base at Pine Gap, Central Australia was being expanded. A second above ground power station is now under construction as well as a large number of houses for additional staff. Normally Pine Gap has a staff of 400 to 500 at any one time. This is being increased to around 1,200 this year. The reason given for the expansion was the need to keep a close watch on the Asian area with particular attention being paid to the development of economic espionage. The fact that such a dubious reason was given in the first place is extremely unusual. Perhaps odd would be a better description. One wonders if the E.T.'s are also having redecoration done.

New Space Launch Facility To Be Built Near Darwin

On the 19th June it was announced that a new rocket launch facility would be built near Darwin, Northern Territory. This will be financed by Australian, Russian, US and South East Asian money (particularly from Thailand). Being close to the equator, larger than normal payloads can be launched. Large Russian made rockets will be used for this purpose. Initially these will be fully imported and then part manufactured by the Australian Submarine Corporation in South Australia together with the smaller Russian designed rocket delivery systems they are planning to produce by 1997. It is envisaged that the facility will launch hundreds of satellites for both civilian and military purposes by the end of the decade.

Initially it was proposed that such a facility be built in the northern part of Queensland but due to aboriginal land claims this proposal was shelved. It is also important to note that the Darwin space facilities would be close to the proposed new American naval base and air station which would compliment the military operations centred there.

Police And Prisons

As of early 1996 the various State and Federal police forces continue to expand their special operations groups and to train with the military SAS. The excuse is still the same, to counter terrorist activities that may occur during the Sydney Olympic Games in the year 2000. Apart from these activities selected groups in these police forces are being trained to search for weapons in readiness for the impending anti-gun legislation which will be introduced during the second half of 1996.

Since 1994 the police and the military have been conducting joint counter-terrorist exercises of a new and rather sinister nature. The make believe enemies are Australian citizens who start agitating on the subjects of "foreign ownership of Australian resources and business and foreign involvement in the Australian governmental system." It appears that the Anti-Terrorist Plan has been modified to give emphasis to such possible civil activities. These modifications also include insistence that the government takes action to remove as many firearms as possible from civilian hands. It is interesting to note that foreign ownership in Australian business and resources is now above 90% and a large proportion of that is in the hands of American investors.

The development of the private prison system has continued with some speed since the beginning of 1996. In April the Victorian government announced that a new women's prison would be built in 1996/97 and operated by the "Correction Corporation of Australia" which is an American owned company in competition with Wackenhut Inc. It seems that the criticism of Wackenhut Inc. has caused the government to share this profitable business with others hungry for such opportunities. An additional men's prison will be built at the same time and managed by the British based company "Guard Force Ltd." which, in the main, is controlled by American shareholders.

The Attack On Gun Ownership

Unfortunately since 1987 Australia has been subjected to a series of mass shootings perpetrated by supposed lone crazed individuals wanting to get back at society. Each time such an atrocity has occurred there has been a clamour to ban all guns held by the civilian community. The most recent shooting was perpetrated at the tourist site of Port Arthur in Tasmania during April 1996 when thirty five tourists were killed by a wealthy 27 year old local man using two stolen guns for no apparent reason. Within hours a co-ordinated propaganda campaign of unprecedented proportions was launched in the media, aimed at the elimination of private gun ownership starting with the Australia wide banning of all. self loading rifles and shotguns and the restriction of ammunition sales.

The Federal Government was quick to seize the opportunity and obtained prompt agreement from the states to ban various types of weapons and demonise gun ownership in general. The result has been a public uproar and the possibility of the federal coalition government being seriously damaged by the eventual loss of seats in it's grass root electorates.

This has not stopped the government who strangely suggest that they do not care if they lose power as a result of their new extremist policy. At this point the reader should refer to the extract of the letter from Western Australia on Page 28 of this report. The Australian government does not seem to be in control of the situation.

Despite the noise and the government threats to ban all privately owned firearms together with the incongruous sight of the new Prime Minister, John Howard, addressing a large group of pro gun demonstrators wearing a bulging bullet proof vest, the government has a major problem. To understand this problem it is important to take a short look at some of Australia's past history in relation to the, ownership and use of firearms.

Since Captain Cook (the official British discoverer of Australia) arrived at Botany Bay more than two hundred years ago, firearms have been an important part of Australian society. They were used to subdue hostile native, hunt for food, guard convicts and train new settlers to defend the colony against the possible invasions from France and Russia.

Also, to support all British Colonial objectives wherever such support was deemed necessary. Remaining a Crown Colony until 1901 the founders of Australia were regularly involved in British. military affairs throughout the Empire. After federation and the creation of quasi self rule in Australia the obligation remained and it was not until the end of the second World War that Australian allegiance to the British Empire began to fade in favour of the USA

Guns had played a vital role in the forging of a nation and the support of a great empire, often at enormous individual cost. There is an unquestionable tradition of gun ownership in Australia and an ingrained sense that the right of such legitimate ownership involving the defence of the home and nation should not be challenged by anyone. Thus it is difficult to understand why the Australian government, which must have an appreciation of these facts, has acted in such a high handed way and is telling a large section of the Australian population to lay down it's arms. The Port Arthur massacre is being used as the excuse to attempt the civilian disarmament of the country, causing immediate and strong resistance from several million Australians. Even more puzzling is the assumption by the government that, following rushed legislation, citizens will simply hand in their guns for a small compensation payment. As only three states in Australia have had any form of gun registration in operation over the past 20 years there is no record of where all the guns are.

Further in those states (Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia) where registration was introduced in the 1980's it was an accepted fact that only about 15% to 20% of the guns privately owned at that time were registered in the first place. As for Queensland, New South Wales, Tasmania and the Northern Territory no method of registration was ever introduced so there is no way of locating the many millions of guns in those areas.

To give the reader an idea of the magnitude of gun ownership in Australia the Victoria Police Force estimated in 1995 that there was approximately three guns for every man, woman and child in Australia. With a population of just over 18 million this means there are around 54 million guns in private hands and only a small percentage of this number are recorded in only three states. It is safe to say that it would be totally impossible to confiscate even a small number of these weapons without the full co-operation of the Australian public. It is very unlikely that such co-operation will be given and the government knows it. So why are they intent on turning this matter into a major political issue which is already starting to threaten the very foundations of democratic government in Australia? Could it be that the pressure to embark on such an impossible task is coming from outside the country? Due to their lack of understanding, could the future intended occupiers of Australia, the representatives of the new world order, have made a gross miscalculation of the Australian reaction to their demands? The author feels that this is a decided possibility and events could easily get out of control and produce a major political backlash against these policies.

Another point of interest is that the Australian armed forces own little more than 250,000 small arms. When this is compared with the estimated 54 million in the Australian community it pales into insignificance. It also represents a very real threat against any official organisations, either foreign or local which may decide to use force to get it's way. Like the United States an armed population is a very big deterrent to totalitarian forces and more a preserver of freedom than a destroyer of it. The Australian government knows this yet relentlessly pursues it's ill advised policies. Perhaps they have no choice. When they are told to jump they say 'how high.'

It is also rumoured that all present political parties in government are agreeing with one another on the issue because their leadership is aware of the danger facing the country and when something happens they will be forced into a government of national unity anyway. It certainly would explain the bizarre newspaper and T.V. images of all the opposing party leaders, standing together, with their arms around each others shoulders, like long lost brothers.

It seems apparent that Australia is being prepared to survive some form of major disaster in the not too distant future. There is some sort of timetable in existence pointing towards the end of the present decade. The big question is what are they expecting that can not be revealed to the public? Could it be a cosmic cataclysm involving a comet or asteroid striking the earth? Are preparations being made with the help of friendly extraterrestrials to resist an invasion of inimical forces from outer space? Is a climatic or seismic crisis developing which would cause social disruption and war throughout the world? Nothing is sure, only that obvious and massive preparations are being made to protect and secure the Australian continent from a cataclysmic event. No doubt time will tell.

The author would like to mention that as far as possible the information contained in this report was checked and where possible attempts were made to verify it. However it has to be borne in mind that some information may contain some inaccuracies due to the impossibility of verifying source material. Never-the-less the author considers the majority of the information well founded and truthful.

It should also be pointed out that many of the providers of this information required their identities to be covered in such a way that they could not be identified. This involved some minor alterations to the narrative to produce such cover and has not compromised the information described in any way.
JUNE 1996

Addendum To Report No 1

Immigration (Refer To Pages 9 And 10)

On the 4th July, 1996 the Federal Government announced that new restrictions would be placed on the number of immigrants allowed to enter Australia., Family reunion will be eliminated as a reason for automatic entry to Australia and emphasis will now be placed on English language capabilities and personal skills. Also immigrants will have to pay a bond of A$30,000 to the government to ensure that they do not settle in major cities but take up residence in rural areas and towns. Should they move to a major city such as Sydney or Melbourne they would forfeit the bond. By introducing such complex regulations the government is expected to cut the rate of immigration by at least 50%.

The New 'Sherger' Air Base

On the 7th July, 1996 the Federal Government announced the establishment of a new air base situated at the north west tip of Cape York Peninsula (the most northern point of Australia) near the small mining town of Wiepa. The base will have a three kilometre runway and facilities for the accommodation of six hundred staff. The completion date for this new A$150 million project is November, 1998. It is interesting to note that due to the lack of man power the base will only have a caretaker staff. All other personnel will be flown in during times of need (see page 30 paragraph 6). 

Japanese Space Shuttle (See Page 21 Paragraph 6)

During the first week of July, 1996 Japan successfully tested their first 1/3 scale model of their space shuttle by launching it from a helicopter. It landed by remote control on the main Woomera airport runway. A full scale prototype will now be constructed.

NOTE FROM RMNEWS: There were a few typos and things we felt were mistakes, such as Aurora Borealis rather than Aurora Australis -- After long thought, it was decided to leave the mistakes as the unknown author wrote them.

RMNews P.O. Box 1784 Aptos, CA 95001 info@rumormillnews.com

The Uncensored National Rumor

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

20. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 13)

Chapter Fifteen

The Green Prince: Apollyon And The Green Bible

 

During the old Roman Empire, the fasces were a bundle of rods bound by the helve (head) of an axe, and borne by the victors before the Roman magistrates in symbol of their authority at once to scourge and decapitate. The fasces symbolized the power of individuals all brought together in union and harmony under the emperor and empire state. 

 

The Roman fasces only contained an axe head whenever an official state of war existed. Since Rome was in a state of war most of the time, rarely were fasces without the axe head ever seen. During a state of emergency, the emperor or leader was given supreme power to do as he wished without consulting the senate. In this case he was given the title ‘dictator,’ and on this occasion the fasces were considered to be invested totally in him. 

 

Emperors treated the fasces with the same respect as a modern ruler would respect his national flag or coat of arms. Usually the fasces preceded the emperor before his address to the Roman senate. The axe head on the fasces was removed while conducting business in Roman government buildings, which served as a reminder that the bearers had no life or death powers within their jurisdiction – unlike the emperor. 

 

A dominant feature of Roman fascism is that it “merged” the rich merchants and bankers together in “union” with the socialist Roman state headed by the emperor who was the supreme leader. It was he alone who ultimately, had supreme dictatorial power to “scourge and decapitate” in his position as dictator. Mussolini and Hitler did exactly that during the Second World War. 

 

Today the two chief fascist state governments in the world are those of Britain and the United States. To symbolize the British Sovereign’s fascist control of the world, four tritons (Tritones were the sons of Neptune/Poseidon) carry the Sovereign in the Gold State Coach, with the front two carrying conch shells as trumpets, and the rear two carrying the Roman fasces. Dolphins, sacred to Apollo (Apollyon), hold in place the splinter bar by which the coach (and Sovereign) is driven. To symbolize the British Sovereign’s fascist power over the US government, these two fasces are also mounted on the wall at the back of the Speaker’s Podium in the US House of Representatives.

 

While it is true that all socialism be it Fascism, Marxism, Communism, Christian Socialism or Fabian Socialism are all the same in that they are all based around the worship of the pagan sun god and mother earth goddess, Prince Charles’ particular version of socialism is more a “merger” of neo-Nazi fascism (with the fascist state leader working with big business and corporations) and Fabian Socialism (where the state leader introduces his socialist policies “gradually,” rather than by direct revolution or confrontation like Marxism). 

 

Fascism is the ‘merger’ of state socialism with corporatism. Just as Hitler and Mussolini colluded hand in hand with unprincipled big business interests to carry out their despotic reigns of terror, so is Prince Charles now doing “subtly” through his many influential charities and IBLF on a global basis. 

 

The Prince’s Charities is a powerful group of not-for-profit organizations of which the Prince of Wales is president. Currently there are about 17 of which 15 have personally been founded by the Prince himself. Five of these organizations actively work to control his global corporate environmental program through all of the world’s largest banks and corporations; Business and the Environment Program (BEP), Business in the Community (BITC), Scottish Business in the Community (SBC), Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum (IBLF) and In Kind Direct. 

 

The Prince of Wales Business and the Environment Program (BEP) has the stated objective of getting all global corporations and companiesto integrate his concepts of sustainability into their thinking and practices. Each year he hosts a meeting for the alumni of BEP, and one of its major creations is the Corporate Leaders Group on Climate Change, which now is the most significant influence in the world on corporate and government policies on energy and global warming policy. 

 

The Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum (IBLF) was formed in 1990 by Charles to bring his ideas on business and development to global banks and corporations. Through the IBLF, Charles now directly controls the policies of just about every major bank and corporation in the world. Today the IBLF leads numerous global corporate environmental projects, such as the International Hotels Environment Initiative, which now sets the environmental standards and policies of all the major hotel chains throughout the world.

 

His charity, In Kind Direct, was founded in 1996 to distribute companies’ surplus goods to charities. Not only is he leading the global corporate environmental and sustainable development program, he is Royal Patron of the Soil Association, Patron of the Wildfowl and Wetland Trust, The Royal Society for Nature Conservation, Marine Conservation Society, International Tree Foundation, Garden Organic, Climate Group, and on and on. 

 

Apollo (Apollyon)in Greek mythology, was the most “subtle” and “cunning” benevolent incarnation of the dragon and Satan of all. In ancient Rome he almost deceived everyone! – In Revelation 13:4, John said a future day was coming when the whole world was going to worship this dragon! 

 

One could quite easily call him the great “deceiver” and “paradox” god. On the one hand, he was characterized in statues and sculptures as an innocent, naked, pure, handsome young man, clean shaven and carrying either a lyre, or his bow and arrows. He was the sacred god of light, peace and harmony, a Christ-like figure, god of prophecy, philosophy, colonization, medicine, healing, archery (but not for war or hunting), poetry, dance, music, agriculture, trees, protector of cattle and fruit trees, herds and flocks, shepherds, protector of pastures, the elimination of plagues, the giver of divine guidance and the “savior” of the earth, for the Greek and Roman people.  

 

But on the other hand, deceptively lurking beneath his innocent looking posture, he had a deceptively wicked split personality and was a sexual deviant. He was a ruthless tyrant when he got angry. With Artemis, his wife and sister, he murdered the Niabids with his poisoned arrows. He sent the deadly plague on his enemies. He was transformed into a serpent and a dragon. In short – he was the Devil in disguise – Apollyon – the destroyer – who, incarnated in Augustus, became the tyrannical chief enemy of liberty and freedom, of Jesus Christ and his disciples. 

 

Like Apollo and Augustus, paradoxically, on the one hand, Prince Charles equally wants to become the “savior” of the environment and mother earth through his sustainable development policies introduced by the UN, governments and corporate sector. He wisely wants to encourage his people to produce and eat more vegetarian and organic food, support natural health products and remedies in medicine, help farmers and agriculturalists eliminate the negative aspects of intensive production, save the world’s forests and fisheries, and through his many charities and his Prince’s Trust wants to help disadvantaged young people, the unemployed, the destitute, and everybody and everything else in general. Like Apollo, he supports the arts, music, theatre, and many Hollywood stars and musicians are among his chief ambassadors and admirers.  

 

He outwardly opposes wars, plagues, world starvation, opposes vaccination, chemical pesticides and herbicides in agriculture and so on. But on the other hand, there is a much “darker side” to his outwardly, unassuming, innocent-looking character: 

 

Paradoxically, the very companies, corporations, banks and leading business CEO’s and “knights of the Realm” that support his many charities and are members of his IBLF, are also the very same fascist organizations that have relentlessly destroyed the rain forests in Brazil, raped the world’s fisheries, manufactured and sprayed much of the world’s farms with chemical pesticides and herbicides, monopolized the world’s health, pharmaceutical, energy, water, seed and food resources (Monsanto is a good example).  

 

In two world wars they have unabatedly made trillions of dollars of profits out of manufacturing and selling military weapons, thrown millions of people into concentration camps, starvation and death, dropped millions of lethal bombs and chemicals on innocent people, murdered countless millions in Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam and Iraq. Even today, they are making trillions of dollars more from secretly building up the world’s massive global stockpile of military armaments and other even more deadly space-based hi-tech weaponry. 

 

Paradoxically, at the Earth Summit in Rio, through Agenda 21 (300 pages) and other radical UN documents such as the Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages) promoted by the UN Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II, Prince Charles was indirectly responsible for introducing an old pagan concept which “inverted” all of the existing, constitutional, democratic, personal and property rights and values espoused by Christianity – and transferred them to the environment and the religion of mother earth Gaia worship. In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable than a human being. A rare bird becomes more valuable than a high producing farm or a large hospital.  

 

The first Habitat conference was held in 1974 and it specifically identified “private property” ownership as a threat to the peace and equality of the environment. The UN’s secret agenda through “environmentalism” and “sustainable development” is very cunning and has deceived a lot of well-meaning people.  

 

Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure that the earth’s resources are “sustainable” for future generations there is no doubt. But the socialist goal of “sustainable development” and “environmentalism” has absolutely nothing to do with protecting the environment or sustainability at all. It is all about world dictatorship, a one world government and pagan religion, the abolition of private property and property rights, and ultimately, collectivization of housing and farms under fascist corporate State control under a one world leader.

 

Under this system, all of the small farmer’s and private property owner’s rights would be effectively extinguished and overridden by strict environmental and sustainable development resource consents and laws. The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate government consent would become worse than murder. Not only would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have to be licensed too. Farmers would need to be licensed to operate or work on their collectivized farms, spray weeds, care for cattle or drive their tractors under new Soviet-styled health and safety laws. All tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited and licensed, as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any other persons or institutions that could be likely to criticize their socialist bosses. 

 

All potential young parents would need to have a license to have children, and if there was any family genetic weakness of some sort in their state-controlled doctor’s medical records, no license would be given. In the end you would need a license or permit to take your boat on a lake, take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel between towns or cities.  

 

Everything including man and beast would be micro-chipped, tattooed, or marked for identification and all buying and selling. Most essential commodities like fuel and food would be rationed. In short, a new, full-blown fascist “Fourth Reich” global Nazi state!

 

At a speech by HRH The Prince of Wales, introducing H. Lee Scott Jr., CEO and President of Wal-Mart Stores, (one of the biggest companies in the world) at the 2007 lecture of The Prince of Wales’ Business and Environment Program, Banqueting House, London, Prince Charles said; 

 

“Today we are celebrating the first anniversary of Wal-Mart’s announcement that within five years it will source all its fish from stocks certified by the Marine Stewardship Council … I think it is right to acknowledge publicly that this initiative began with Unilever, just as the equally successful Forest Stewardship Council started with B & Q. In each case, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) found a brave and innovative company as a partner … Of course, I don’t need to tell any of you that true sustainable development is about far more than the environment alone. It is about building a society both now and for future generations in which the natural and social capital are in harmony. My point is that to achieve this we urgently need leaders who are willing to make the first move.” 

 

On October 9, 2007, Thomas Nelson Inc. and paper manufacturer Domtar, published the first bible in history on Prince Charles’ Forest Stewardship Council certified paper. What was it called? – The Green Bible!  

 

Based on the spurious NRSV text, and published in conjunction with the Sierra Club, The Humane Society and the Eco-Justice Program of the National Council of Churches USA, it has contributions from Desmond Tutu, Pope John Paul II and many others. (Charles has even got the present pope calling himself a “Green Pope” now as well). 

 

The blasphemous slogan on the front cover of the bible says: “Understand the Bible’s powerful message for the earth.” – (i.e., “mother earth” – not mankind!). Lauren F. Winner, of Duke Divinity School, says in the advertizing for the new bible; “We need to get serious about getting green. The Green Bible is challenging, inspiring, and hopeful. It will change the way you think, and the way you live.” 

 

Conclusion

 

Understandably, the apostle Paul eloquently summarized this sad practice of “green” sun god and mother earth goddess worship of his day, when he wisely wrote to the Romans: 

 

“For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:  

 

Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.  

 

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.  

 

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:  

 

Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.Amen.” (Romans 1:20-25) 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

21. Good Summaries of Climate Change Issues.

American Thinker: Global Warming ‘Science’  

 

Joanne Nova – The “Ten Second” Guide To The World Of Skeptics

 

David Evans, Carbon Accounting Modeler, Says It’s a Scam 

 

Eight Myths of a Carbon Tax: Tony Shepherd, The Australian, April 1, 2011 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

22. Cold War Myth: An Exercise In The Use Of The Dialectic

By Charlotte Iserbyt
November 23, 2002

Source: http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/pages/articles/article_page.html

Just because the commies (peaceniks) are opposed to Bush's agenda, for their dangerous reasons, does not mean we true constitutionalists have to side with Skull and Bones Bush's march to war. (Read America's Secret Establishment... An Introduction to the Order of Skull & Bones...can be ordered from me for only $30. Make check payable to: 3D Research Co., 1062 Washington St., Bath, ME 04530). I know you guys know that but thought I'd put my views on paper so that you can forward them wherever you wish. This is what I try to say on my radio interviews. It's late, very late.

We've made that mistake (supporting the Republican Party) through the years, feeling that the Republicans are constitutionalists and care about our sovereignty, etc. Nixon gave us regional government; Reagan signed the education agreements with the Soviet Union (Gorbachev). (I used to be a Republican but am now an Independent)

Carroll Quigley, Clinton's mentor at Georgetown Univ. explained the internationalists'/financiers' control of both parties in his book Tragedy and Hope. The more I read and the more I "think" and "ponder" the events of the past century the more I believe there was never really a Cold War. I also worked in Soviet Affairs in the State Department and had many questions then...in 1958/59...I typed the press release lying to the world about Gary Powers when his U-2 was shot down over Soviet Union.

Why would there be a Cold War when the powers that be on Wall Street created the Soviet Union (also supported Hitler) and the United Nations was formed by communists. The UN Charter written by Alger Hiss Soviet agent and top Carnegie official, and Russian-born Leo Pasvolsky. Very interesting entry in my book on page 112, Don Bell's article re "White House conference on the Industrial World", 1972. This article contains proof of USA and other nation's knowledge, 20 years beforehand, of Wall coming down and phoney collapse of communism in order to implement international economic system (world govt., communism).

All wars since WWII have been UN-sponsored in order to debilitate our country, get our youth on drugs, and move us toward Lenin's goal of international socialism (world govt.) Education was also used for same purpose. Don't have to go into that, except mention U.S.-Soviet Ed agreements which speak for themselves.

Opposition from the left to Bush's planned invasion of Iraq is no more diabolical than Bush's plans for war and world government. Left's opposition represents use of dialectic. Most of those opposing it don't even understand the dialectic, but the elite implementing World Government understand its use beautifully. They need Saddam Hussein (enemy) and the left's opposition to Bush's war vs. Bush's agenda in order to arrive at the synthesis, another move towards world government. The left opposed the UN's war in Vietnam as well in order to come to the synthesis, defeat and another step forward for the communists. Try telling a leftist friend from sixties the war in Vietnam was a UN war! Good luck! Try that on a conservative who should know better and he/she is probably equally uninformed. That fact went down the memory hole long ago!

When will we learn? Don't forget Gorbachev's comment in London 2 years ago that the European Union is the New Soviet Union. Don't forget that the Republican Party several years back invited Gorbachev as keynote speaker at luncheon to raise money for Republican candidates.

No question that Bush is implementing communism (a softer, gentler kind? just wait):

(1) planned economy (failed socialism) through STW initiatives (quotas for jobs), like in Cuba, N. Korea, China, old Soviet Union, recommended by Carnegie Corp. in 1934 when AHA published its Conclusions and Recommendations for the Social Studies...change America from individualist economy to planned, socialist economy in "World Order." Communism calls for combination of industry and government and education and work. Don't forget Carnegie Corp . piloted OBE (Eight Year Study) in 1930s. this study paved way for implementation Skinnerian/Pavlovian performance-based, results-based, outcome-based education in 80s and 90s and ultimately what we see going on now: school to work (STW). Lynn Cheney, Vice President's wife, testified eloquently in opposition to STW three years ago. Where is she now? Muffled due to her husband's position working for the big supporter of STW and the New World Order.

(2) school vouchers for federal control (dumbing down) of all schools, including home schools (Bennett taking care of that with his Virtual Academy charter school: fed funded)

(3) Faith-based initiatives. Don't forget Washington Post article re: George Bush's faith-based initiatives which WP called "communitarianism" which most dictionaries define as a communistic form of government. This communitarian agenda (old community ed) includes UN's lifelong learning under unelected school district and all services run through schools. National Alliance of Business refers to this glowingly as K-80. Faith-based initiative will result in takeover over of churches just as in Soviet Union. Russian Orthodox Church funded by Moscow was and probably still is arm of KGB. (Not much left to do to American Christian churches; they did it to themselves...read Time mag. article in my book re Federal Council of Churches plans for world government back in 1942.)

(4) Bush supports most of what Chairman of Communist Party in 1932, William Foster buried with honors in The Kremlin, called for in his book "Toward a Soviet America". Bush supports unconstitutional Department of Education and has mandated national curriculum and national testing. supports scientific research-based reading method (Skinner) called for in Reading Excellence Act, and S1 mandates Use of Skinnerian/Pavlovian method first for phonics-based instruction, later for school to work and all subjects. This is mastery learning/ direct instruction. Skinner said "I could make a pigeon a high achiever by reinforcing it on a proper schedule."

Department of Education suported by Bush is involved in implementing communist agenda: School to work agenda, Humanistic (atheistic) curriculum including evolution, internationalism, etc. No right/no wrong curriculum: Alger Hiss's good friend, Gen. Brock Chisholm, Canadian psychiatrist, called for getting rid of the conscience in speech he gave in 1945 to World Health Organization (UN). We see results of his recommendation carried out in no right/no wrong curriculum implemented from 1965 on in our schools: Columbine, etc., etc. ENRON?

(5) Patriot Act and Homeland Security which, aside from trampling on our constitutional rights, initially called for TIPS program. Mistake on Bush's part...moving too fast in implementing police state. He had to back off TIPS. Use of COPS program whereby police become social workers and come into our homes and are used in schools.

(6) Public/Private partnership (corporate fascism/socialism). Reagan started them. I was liaison from Dept. of Ed with White House when that happened. Communist Manifesto calls for partnership of government and industry.

(7) U.S.-Soviet education agreements signed first by Eisenhower in 1958, and through the years by other presidents and then by Carnegie and Reagan in 1985 (most extensive ones). Merger of U.S. and Soviet Union: Refer to Congresional Hearings 1953 during which Norman Dodd told by Gaither, President, Ford Foundation that tax-exempt foundations received their orders from The White House (Eisenhower at that time) to use their money to change America so it could be comfortabley merged with Soviet Union.

(8) Regional government at local, state, national and international levels which is Lenin's international socialism. Bush involved in setting up "New Soviet Union" in this hemisphere modelled on European Union referred to by Gorbachev as "New Soviet Union". Lenin called for regionalization of world. Regionalism is communism. See Daily World entry in my book, comments by Morris Zeitlin.

Put all of the above together and what do we have?

Since Republicans are now in control of Congress why not demand that they sumbit legislation calling for abolishing unconstitutional U.S. Department of Education. Be sure to tell them that means "assessment" as well since Chester Finn said even with Department gone, "assessment" was all government needed in order to be in control... words to that effect. That would solve almost all of our problems since the international school to work program which is changing our free form of government (freedom depends on economic freedom, not just political) would be collapsed if USA, no 1. economic partner in global economy, no longer participating, but educating its students in academics for upward mobility. I believe all good school teachers would support this legislation.

I guess I could go on and on, but I don't want to ruin my day or yours. Am taking my dog for a walk.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

23. The Imperialism of Jewish Capital

September 25, 2007  

By Henry Makow Ph.D. 

 

Source: http://henrymakow.com/the_imperialism_of_jewish_capi.html

The Great red Dragon.

 

A book published in 1889 "The Red Dragon" by L.B. Woolfolk suggests to me that British (and American) imperialism originated in the need of  Jewish bankers and their Gentile confederates to translate money they could create out of nothing (thanks to their control of credit), into real wealth (i.e. world ownership.)

The book confirms my assertion that "the Jewish Conspiracy is British Imperialism." (May 2004) 

 

When these bankers finagled a credit monopoly in England in 1694, they turned into a monster that now has highjacked humanity. The London-based banking cartel literally has gobbled up the planet, and will not be content until it owns everything, and enslaves mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically. This, in a nutshell, is the New World Order. [Nazarene Remnant comment: It is high time we stop referring to the Nazi Fourth Reich as the New World Order.]

 

The last push came from a secret society Cecil Rhodes started in 1891 to "absorb the wealth of the world" and "to take the government of the whole world."   

 

A recent UN study says 2% of the world's population own 50% of the wealth, while half own barely 1% of the wealth. Needless to say, the richest 2% are mainly the London-based bankers and people associated with them.  

 

Today British, American and Zionist imperialism manifest the banker agenda for "world government" through the destruction of religion, nation, race and family. This imperialism does not express the interests or wishes of ordinary English, American or Jewish people who are being colonized themselves.

THE RED DRAGON

L.B. Woolfolk was an American Baptist preacher who traced the machinations of the banking cartel in the decades after the Civil War. He confirmed his assertions by contacts with members of this cartel during visits to London . He says "the Great Red Dragon" is the symbol of the "Jew London Money Power."

In his book, which is on line, he describes how this cartel bought up the US economy through intermediaries, and controlled it long before the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.  

 

By 1864, almost 150 years ago, Woolfolk claims the wealth of the world already was concentrated in their hands.  

 

"The Imperialism of Capital to which I allude is a knot of capitalists—Jews almost to a man—who make their headquarters in the Money Quarter of London, in Threadneedle street, Lombard, and other streets in that vicinity, where bankers have their habitat. These Jew capitalists have succeeded in centralizing in their own hands the industry and commerce of the earth. —They own almost all the debts of the world, —the debts of nations, states, counties, municipalities, corporations and individuals, —amounting in the aggregate, it is estimated, to seventy-five billion dollars, on which they are annually receiving about four billion dollars of interest. —They own the manufactories, the shipping, and the commerce of Great Britain, and most of the manufactures, shipping and commerce of the whole world. —They have attained control of the industry and trade of the whole earth;and are rapidly centralizing all business in their own hands. They hold possession of all the great lines of trade and business of all kinds, and they regulate all prices by their own arbitrary methods. This Money Power of the Money Quarter of London is the only grand pre-eminent Imperialism existing on the earth." 

 

Woolfolk traces the beginnings of this cartel to the British East India Company in the early part of the Eighteenth Century. 

 

"In 1764, the British East India Company was the grandest and richest corporation in the world. It was the only corporation, which ruled a territorial empire. It was enriched by traffic, by the extension of its trade through the conquest of the trading stations of its Continental rivals and by the wholesale plunder of India....it came to pass that the greater part of the stock of the East India Company, and of the other companies afterwards organized out of the dividends of that great company, fell into the hands of the Jews. The Jews became the great Money Kings of the world.... History presents no career of conquest, in which fraud, deceit and rapine were so blended as in the conquest of India by the East India Company. It was the first example in the history of the world of a trading corporation becoming an imperial power; and its imperial rule was marked by the rapacity, chicane and fraud that characterize a great corporation in the soulless and conscienceless pursuit of gain."  

 

With the invention of the steam engine in 1775, only the capitalists of the British East India Company had the means to profit from the industrial revolution. They set up hundreds of joint stock companies—manufacturing companies of all kinds, coal and iron mining, railways and ships, real estate-- which concealed their ownership.  

Read the Full Article Here:
The Imperialism of Jewish Capital

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

24. Is the Devil in the New World Order?

Is the Devil in the New World Order?

Most people are not aware of the Luciferic connection.


By Ken Raggio  

Source: http://www.kenraggio.com 

“...and the dragon gave him his power, and his
seat, and great authority,”
 (Revelation 13:2. ) 

The devil is in the details - literally. Satan himself drives this new world government. (Note: Although a dragon is the modern symbol of China, the Bible clearly says that the dragon mentioned here is the Devil - "He laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan," Revelation 20:2, also 12:9).

Most peopleeither refuse to believe or don't WANT to believe that God or Satan are real forces in the world today. This article will show you, in hard facts, that they ARE. I am not suggesting that people are atheists. People definitely believe in spirits, but they do not accept truly Biblical concepts or teachings about God and devils. Spiritualism has never had more practitioners. But in that reality lies a great and universal error.

Neo-paganism is a more accurate term to apply to popular religion today. Modern society demonstrates that it is possible to have a keen sensitivity to the spirit world and yet know NOTHING about the true and living God.

It is up to Bible believers to emphatically assert the TRUTH that is revealed in the Bible - which, in its original language, is the infallible Word of God.

Let's take a few moments to review some basic but extremely critical assertions of Bible prophecy.

Lucifer and Jesus Christ are the two major forces in world events.

Lucifer is the principal spiritual force for evil in the world today. He is the driving force in the New World Order. This is verifiable. There are any number of key personalities in the New World Order that are dramatically and explicitly linked to Luciferian doctrines and practices.

(For an in-depth study of the Biblical character of Lucifer, and his ambitions, please study my online article, "Satan’s Doom" at www.kenraggio.com.)

Rooted in ancient beliefs tracing back as far as Nimrod at the Tower of Babel, a vast procession of empire builders have marched across the centuries in defiance of the Kingdom of God, and in deference to the earthly kingdoms of men and devils.

NONE of these empires have worked independently of Satan's evil princes. EVERY society is influenced by a demon prince. The scriptures prove this. For further explanation, see my articles, The Nature of the Battle, SPIRITS!, Spiritualism, and Spiritual Warfare

In these last prophetic days, some of these principalities are fulfilling major prophetic roles. Most of them have been at work for centuries to bring about the destruction of civilization as we know it, in order that they may have complete possession of the world.

The reason I make that statement, is because the Bible is perfectly clear to tell us that before Jesus Christ returns to the earth at Armageddon, several international events must take place, and several political alliances and coalitions must be created. NOTHING can prevent these eventualities. They WILL occur! 

If we follow the scripture closely, then follow the daily news, we can plainly observe these fulfillments.

I have traced back hundreds of years to identify the major spirits of the past two thousand years, and attempt to show how they have brought us to our present dilemma. If you will be patient, these explanations will astonish you.

Read the Full Article Here:
Is the Devil in the New World Order

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

25. Somalia: the Real Causes of Famine

By Michel Chossudovsky
Global Research, July 21, 2011

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25725 

The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order, by Michel Chossudovsky  

For the last twenty years, Somalia has been entangled in a "civil war" amidst the destruction of both its rural and urban economies.  

 

The country is now facing widespread famine.  According to reports, tens of thousands of people have died from malnutrition in the last few months. The lives of  several million people are threatened. 

 

The mainstream media casually attributes the famine to a severe drought without examining the broader causes. 

An atmosphere of  "lawlessness, gang warfare and anarchy" is also upheld as one of the major causes behind the famine. 

 

But who is behind the lawlessness and armed gangs?  

 

Somalia is categorized as a "failed state", a country without a government. 

But how did it become a "failed state"? There is ample evidence of foreign intervention as well as covert support of armed militia groups. Triggering "failed states" is an integral part of US foreign policy. It is part of a military-intelligence agenda.

According to the UN, a situation of famine prevails in southern Bakool and Lower Shabelle, areas in part controlled by Al Shahab, a jihadist militia group affiliated to Al Qaeda. 

 

Both the UN and the Obama administration had accused Al Shahab of imposing "a ban on foreign aid agencies in its territories in 2009". What the reports do not mention, however, is that Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM) ("Movement of Striving Youth") is funded by Saudi Arabia and supported covertly by Western intelligence agencies. 

The backing of Islamic militia by Western intelligence agencies is part of a broader historical pattern of covert support to Al Qaeda affiliated and jihadist organizations in a number of countries, including, more recently, Libya and Syria. 

 

The broader question is: What outside forces triggered the destruction of the Somali State in the early 1990s? 

Somalia remained self-sufficient in food until the late 1970s despite recurrent droughts. As of the early 1980s, its national economy was destabilized and food agriculture was destroyed. 

 

The process of economic dislocation preceded the onset of the civil war in 1991. Economic and social chaos resulting from IMF "economic medicine" had set the stage for the launching of a US sponsored "civil war".   

 

An entire country with a rich history of commerce and economic development, was transformed into a territory. 

In a bitter irony, this open territory encompasses significant oil wealth. Four US oil giants had already positioned themselves prior to the onset of the Somali civil war in 1991:

 

Far beneath the surface of the tragic drama of Somalia, four major U.S. oil companies are quietly sitting on a prospective fortune in exclusive concessions to explore and exploit tens of millions of acres of the Somali countryside. 

 

According to documents obtained by The Times, nearly two-thirds of Somalia was allocated to the American oil giants Conoco, Amoco, Chevron and Phillips in the final years before Somalia's pro-U.S. President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown and the nation plunged into chaos in January, 1991. ... 

 

Officially, the Administration and the State Department insist that the U.S. military mission in Somalia is strictly humanitarian. Oil industry spokesmen dismissed as "absurd" and "nonsense" allegations by aid experts, veteran East Africa analysts and several prominent Somalis that President Bush [Senior], a former Texas oilman, was moved to act in Somalia, at least in part, by the U.S. corporate oil stake. 

 

But corporate and scientific documents disclosed that the American companies are well positioned to pursue Somalia's most promising potential oil reserves the moment the nation is pacified. And the State Department and U.S. military officials acknowledge that one of those oil companies has done more than simply sit back and hope for peace. 

 

Conoco Inc., the only major multinational corporation to maintain a functioning office in Mogadishu throughout the past two years of nationwide anarchy, has been directly involved in the U.S. government's role in the U.N.-sponsored humanitarian military effort.( The Oil Factor in Somalia : Four American petroleum giants had agreements with the African nation before its civil war began. They could reap big rewards if peace is restored. - Los Angeles Times 1993)

Somalia had been a colony of Italy and Britain. In 1969, a post-colonial government was formed under president Mohamed Siad Barre; major social programs in health and education were implemented, rural and urban infrastructure was developed in the course of the 1970s, significant social progress including a mass literacy program was achieved.   

 

The early 1980s marks a major turning point.

The IMF-World Bank structural adjustment program (SAP) was imposed on sub-Saharan Africa. The recurrent famines of the 1980s and 1990s are in large part the consequence of IMF-World Bank "economic medicine".

In Somalia, ten years of IMF economic medicine laid the foundations for the country's transition towards economic dislocation and social chaos.

By the late 1980s, following recurrent "austerity measures" imposed by the Washington consensus, wages in the public sector had collapsed to three dollars a month. 

 

The following article first published in 1994 in Le Monde diplomatique and Third World Resurgence centers on the historical causes of famine in Somalia. 

 

This article was subsequently included as a Chapter in my book The Globalization of Poverty and the New World Order,  first edition 1997, second edition, Global Research. Montreal, 2003.  

Read the Full Story Here:
Somalia the Real Causes of Famine

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

26. Hard Facts on China

Some Hard Facts on China Today.

 

China has 19% of the world's population, but consumes …

 

53% of the world's cement

48% of the world's iron ore

47% of the world's coal

... and the majority of just about every major commodity.

In 2010, China produced 11 times more steel than the United States.

In 2010, China produced 11 times
more steel than the United States.

 New World Record: China made and sold 18 million vehicles in 2010.

New World Record: China made and sold 18 million vehicles in 2010.

 

There are more pigs in China than in the next 43 pork producing nations combined.

 China currently has the world's fastest train and the world's largest high-speed rail network.

China currently has the world's fastest train and the
world's largest high-speed rail network.

 

Read the Full Story:
Hard Facts About China

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

27. ECHELON: The Global Eavesdropping Scheme

Dwarfs Murdoch's "News of the World"

By Sherwood Ross

Source: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25708

As eavesdroppers go, next to Uncle Sam and John Bull, Rupert Murdoch, the moral force behind Fox News, is an amateur.

That's because a global eavesdropping scheme being run today by the United States and Great Britain dwarfs anything that Rupert Murdoch's editors at The News of The World (TNTW) ever dared attempt.

British Prime Minister David Cameron may well deny he knew TNTW was tapping the phones of members of UK's Royal household or those of American 9/11 victims. But he can't claim he doesn't know his country is a partner in ECHELON, which, according to Washington journalist Bill Blum, is a "network of massive, highly automated interception stations" that is eavesdropping on the entire world.

"Like a mammoth vacuum cleaner in the sky, the National Security Agency (NSA) sucks it all up: home phone, office phone, cellular phone, email, fax, telex...satellite transmissions, fiber-optic communications traffic, microwave links, voice, text images (that are) captured by satellites continuously orbiting the earth and then processed by high-powered computers," Blum writes in his book "Rogue State" (Common Courage Press).

Calling it the greatest invasion of privacy ever, Blum says the ceaseless, illegal spy system sucks up perhaps billions of messages daily, including those of prime ministers, the Secretary-General of the UN, the pope, embassies, Amnesty International, Christian Aid, and transnational corporations and that "if God has a phone, it's being monitored."

Blum also said that during the countdown to its invasion of Iraq in 2003, the U.S. listened in on the conversations of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the UN weapons inspectors in Iraq, "and all the members of the UN Security Council...when they were deliberating about what action to take in Iraq."

Launched in the 1970s to spy on Soviet satellite communications, the NSA and its junior partners in Canada, Britain, Australia, and New Zealand operate ECHELON, which is a network of massive, highly automated interception stations covering the globe at the expense of American taxpayers.

Today, Ed Miliband, leader of the Labour opposition, is blasting PM Cameron on grounds that, according to The New York Times of July 19, "the recent scandals in British life were caused by a lack of accountability among those in high places." Across Britain, Miliband said, "there is a yearning for a more decent, responsible, principled country."

What makes the British public recoil is the sort of conduct by former TNTW reporter Clive Goodman, who pleaded guilty in Jan., 2007, to hacking the voice mails of aides to the royal family.

Pardon me, but how does that crime begin to compare with ECHELON, an organ of the U.S. Government, spying on the Secretary-General of the United Nations or the Pope? Or stealing, as it has, confidential business information and passing it along to favored firms?

I'll say this for Mr. Murdoch: he's closed down his biggest newspaper; he's fired top editors and reporters for their part in the scandals. He's gone before the public and begged forgiveness. By contrast, what have high U.S. officials done about the crimes committed via ECHELON? Zip, and they have no announced plans to do so. They continue to operate ECHELON unashamedly.

Rupert Murdoch's TNTW was only attempting to do in a small way what the governments of the U.S., U.K., Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are doing big time every day. ECHELON is a criminal operation in violation of international law and terminating it might make America, too, "a more decent, responsible, principled country." #

Sherwood Rossis a Miami-based public relations consultant who operates the Anti-War News Service. To contribute to his service or comment reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com

Sherwood Ross is a frequent contributor to Global Research.  Global Research Articles by Sherwood Ross

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

28. Libya in Pictures: What the Mainstream Media Does Not Tell You

By Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

Global Research, July 16, 2011

Global Research reports from Tripoli

Mirage fighters, F16 fighters, B-2 Stealth bombers, 15,000 NATO air sorties. the bombing of thousands of civilian targets...

NATO is said to be coming to the rescue of the Libyan people. That is what we are being told.

Western journalists have quite deliberately distorted what is happening inside Libya. They have upheld NATO as an instrument of peace and democratization.

They have endorsed an illegal and criminal war.

They are instruments of US-NATO propaganda.

Global Research's Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya reporting from Tripoli refutes the media consensus which uphold's NATO's humanitarian mandate. He provides us with a review of the mass rallies directed against NATO including extensive photographic evidence.

Forward this article. Post it on Facebook. Spread the word.

Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, July 15, 2011

See the pictures for yourself ... here:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25630

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

29. NATO will be Defeated in Libya

The Libyan Resistance Movement. A Defining Moment for Africa

By Gerald A. Perreira

July 14, 2011

The argument in Libya has been won by the Al Fateh revolution. There is now a glaring truth confronting the North Atlantic Terrorist Organization (NATO) – Muammar Qaddafi has handed out over one million kalashnikovs to the Libyan people. If he was the brutal dictator that NATO would have us believe him to be, then the armed population could have turned their guns on him and the revolutionary armed forces by now, especially as they would have NATO’s full backing if they did so.

Instead, on July 1st, more than a million Libyans, were in Green Square and the surrounding streets, to hear Muammar Qaddafi speak and to rally against NATO.

Chinese media put the number at 1.7 million and Intifada – Voice of Palestine website called it ‘the largest demonstration ever in world history’. The crowd chanted over and over again ‘We want Qaddafi’ while unveiling a green flag 6 kilometers long.

The Al Fateh revolution has given the Libyan people a taste of the dignity that comes with true independence and real sovereignty.

Unlike so many ‘Third World’ nation-states, Libya, under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi, has been a surrogate of neither the East nor the West. The first thing that hits you when you step off the plane at Tripoli International Airport is that Libyans are firmly in control of their country. Libya is a power unto herself and Libyans are not taking kindly to NATO’s attempts at re-colonization.

What has developed in Libya is a conundrum for NATO. They may have imagined that with such vicious ongoing bombing raids, Qaddafi’s forces would have crumbled.

Instead, they have witnessed the opposite. In the face of this all out aggression, over 10,000 bombing raids and into its fifth month, the Libyan patriotic and revolutionary armed forces and the vast majority of Libyans have remained steadfast and loyal, defending their revolution and its leader.

There are even pro-Qaddafi rallies in Benghazi, and constant gun battles between pro-Qaddafi forces and the rebels in Benghazi and Misurata. In villages and towns, reportedly under rebel control, the green flag of the Al Fateh revolution can be seen flying from homes and public buildings. One thing is clear, if Qaddafi did not have mass support he could not be resisting this barbaric onslaught so effectively.

Every day the rebels reveal themselves to be mere surrogates of an imperialist plot to overthrow the Libyan revolution. They cannot call for health-care, housing, free education, subsidized food and a share in the oil wealth because they have all of that.

Residents in areas where the NATO backed rebels are in control, have reported that the rebels are looting stores and removing goods and food at gunpoint. There are also numerous reports of torture, rape and execution of captured pro-Qaddafi soldiers, Black Libyans and migrant workers from neighboring African countries.

The nature of the Benghazi rebels is best illustrated by events that occurred after rebels took control of the mountain village of Qawalish in Western Libya. Many of the villagers were forced to evacuate the area since, according to a report carried on July 10th, in the New York Times:

  “All of the shops in the town had been ransacked, several homes were burned, and the town’s gas station, in fine condition when Qawalish fell, had been vandalized to the point of being dismantled. In building after building furniture was flipped over, dishes and mirrors shattered, and everything torn apart. Except for a few rebels roaming the streets in cars and trucks, the town was deserted – a shattered, emptied ghost town decorated with broken glass.”

There is no doubt that ‘the Coalition of Demons’, as Minister Louis Farrakhan has called them, has realized their grave mistake – if not out in the open, certainly behind closed doors. Having finally understood that the Benghazi rebels are not now, nor would they ever be in a position to take power in Libya, the ‘Coalition of Demons’ is crumbling, with major differences surfacing amongst members on how to proceed with this ill-fated mission impossible.

After spending billions of dollars at a time when their economies are in deep crisis and reeling from the cost of years of war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Europe and the US are now scrambling for a solution which will allow them to save face.

The French, who were the driving force behind the invasion of Libya, are now pressing for dialogue with Tripoli. On July 11th, in a report carried in Flash News Today, French Defense Minister, Gerard Longuet stated: “We’ll stop the bombing when the Libyans talk to each other and the military forces on all sides return to their barracks. They can talk to each other because we provide the proof that there is no solution by force”.

I wonder sometimes if these people actually hear themselves. No matter what disdainful spin Gerard Longuet tries to put on the situation, he can never convince us that the purpose of this mission was an exercise to prove that this conflict could not be resolved by force.

The truth is that the French, British and Americans, in their arrogance and ignorance, believed that toppling Qaddafi and rolling back the Libyan revolution would be a push over and now they are trying everything to avoid admitting an all out defeat.

In addition to the death and destruction caused by this French, British and US barbaric adventurism, an estimated 150,000 people have been forced to flee Libya, many of them African migrant workers. These refugees, who were working in Libya and supporting their families in other parts of Africa, now find themselves sleeping in parks in Italy and France.

With an estimated 23 million men and women unemployed in Europe, a figure that is expected to increase in the coming months as the capitalist crisis deepens, the situation for these refugees is disastrous.

NATO picked on a country that has experienced a profound political and social revolution for the past 40 plus years. The majority of Libyans only know life in the Jamahiriya and have lived in its dignity, comfort and calm all their lives, causing many of them to perhaps become complacent, taking much of what they had for granted.

However, there is no doubt that their revolutionary spirit has been reignited by NATO’s bombs and they are standing behind the Al Fateh revolution. As one female student from Al Fateh University put it, “Libya is our mother and Qaddafi is our father.”

NATO – North Atlantic Terrorist Organization

NATO is a terrorist organization. Originally created to check the spread of Soviet Communism into Western Europe, this European organization has now reinvented itself as an enforcer and defender of White supremacy. On a global crusade, NATO brutally enforces neo-colonialism worldwide under the guise of ‘spreading democracy’ and ‘humanitarian intervention’.

Since the onset of colonialism, hundreds of years ago, West Europeans have carried out a policy of genocide and plunder throughout the world. NATO comprises these same old tribes of Europe organized under a modern day umbrella.

The number of Iraqis slaughtered in the ongoing US war and occupation of Iraq – now in its ninth year, is estimated at 1,455,590, let alone the numbers murdered in Afghanistan, Somalia, Cote d’Ivoire and conflicts all over the world – set in motion either covertly or overtly by these terrorists. No people in the entire history of humanity have made war on all peoples and murdered more people than these North Atlantic Tribes. This is an historical fact.

Qaddafi – African Hero

Only leaders who are determined to live for their people are prepared to die for their people. Young Libyans from the Student Revolutionary Committees in the streets of Tripoli chant ‘Allah, Qaddafi, Libya’. The overwhelming majority of Libyans – young and old – love him. And then there is the massive outpouring of love and support that has come from every corner of the globe, where people, organizations and liberation movements, all of whom have received assistance from him at one time or other, have raised their voices against NATO’s unprovoked aggression.

But nowhere is Qaddafi loved more than in Africa. His genuine commitment to our liberation is known to all Africans. African youth support his vision. Rappers have called him ‘African Hero’.

Tuaregs and freedom fighters from all over the continent have joined with the Libyan people to defend Tripoli. The Pan-African movement has been re-energized. It is no accident that it took an attack on the man who said ‘The Black race shall prevail throughout the world’, to galvanize the movement which is capable of bringing about the dream of Garvey and Nkrumah, a dream which Muammar Qaddafi has pursued at his own peril.

Tingba Muhammad, in an excellent article in The Final Call, made the following indisputable points:

  “Since he came to leadership in that oil-rich nation in 1969, Col. Qaddafi has amassed a record of accomplishment for Black Africa unmatched in modern history. Using his nation’s oil revenues, he has set the exploited former Italian colony firmly on the road to true independence… those who take the time to look past the litany of white lies about Qaddafi will be introduced to a man whose progressive record of accomplishments very well may be unmatched by ANYONE who has ever led a nation in modern times. And this is not hyperbole! We will take it further: If this man—Muammar Qaddafi—ever ran for president of America with a résumé like his, we dare say EVERY American would not only vote for him, but would angrily trash the 22nd amendment to the Constitution to allow him to serve forever!”

‘Wathint Abafazi Wathint Imbokotho’ – ‘You Strike a Woman, You Strike a Rock’

The women of Libya are taking a leading role in defending the gains of the revolution. Under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi they have been able to realize their own emancipation, which is uniquely Libyan and not based on the Eurocentric notions of Western feminism.

They are amongst the most highly educated female population in Africa and the Arab world. They are free to dress with or without the headscarf, because Qaddafi understands that Islam cannot be enforced by a ‘moral police force’, harassing and beating people in the streets for not dressing in hijab and not praying on time.

Adhering to the edict articulated by Prophet Muhammad, stating that ‘there can be no compulsion in religion’, Qaddafi knows that the only way forward is to raise the consciousness of the people.

What protects the Islamic tradition and way of life in Libya is that their very liberation is derived from the true emancipatory spirit of Islam. They have been able to hold onto their traditions, while shedding the reactionary pre-Islamic residue that permeates so much of the Muslim world. No one is clearer than the women of Libya about what to expect from the backward, al-Qaeda inspired Benghazi counter-revolutionaries, and they are having none of it.

Sarkozy – the Wicked Pied Piper

NATO is arming and fighting alongside al Qaeda in Libya after telling the world for years that al Qaeda is the single largest threat to their national security.

At the same time, they continue to claim that they are fighting al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan and Somalia. This might seem like a contradictory and confused foreign policy however, it is classical Machiavellian policy at play and nobody plays Machiavellian politics better than Europeans.

War criminal, Henry Kissinger, summed it up many years ago when he said: “We do not have permanent friends or permanent enemies – we only have permanent interests.”

Obama, Cameron, Berlusconi and other European leaders were led on a merry dance by French president and white supremacist, Sarkozy.

His real reason for France’s frantic move against Libya was his government’s embarrassing failure to save their minion, Zinedine Ben Ali in Tunisia, in an election year. We know this man Sarkozy by his actions and his words. He is on record as saying, in true Hegelian spirit, that:

“The tragedy of Africa is that the African man has never really entered history. The African peasant has known only the eternal renewal of time via the endless repetition of the same actions and the same words. In this mentality, where everything always starts over again, there is no place for human adventure or for any idea of progress.” He added: “Africa’s problem is that its present is permeated with nostalgia for the paradise of its lost childhood….”

They call it Democracy – we know it as Hypocrisy

Muammar Qaddafi has handed out kalashnikovs to an entire people. Libya is one of maybe only two countries in the world – the other being Cuba – that could arm their people under these circumstances. Why?

Could Sarkozy, Cameron, Obama, or for that matter the Sheikdoms in the Arab world who have lined up against Qaddafi, hand out kalashnikovs like pancakes to their populace under the same circumstances? I think not.

In fact, in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia was called on to invade and brutally suppress the rebellion. The Bahraini ruling family is certainly not arming the people.

When the Saudis brutally suppressed the uprising in Bahrain, not a word was uttered from the ‘international community’ – international community being a euphemism for the US and Western Europe. And if a few words were uttered by Hillary Clinton, it was done for the sake of protocol and meant nothing.

Kwame Ture Speaks

The great Pan-African revolutionary, Kwame Ture, was a frequent visitor to Libya. He was a member of the World Mathaba based in Tripoli and a vocal supporter of the Al Fateh revolution. He led a worldwide campaign to break the unjust sanctions placed on Libya in the 90s and worked tirelessly to promote Nkrumah and Qaddafi’s vision of a united and truly independent Africa.

He made an interesting point about the double standards that the West applied when dealing with Africa, which is particularly relevant to what is happening in Libya today.

He observed that when sections of society in Europe or the United States disagree, even violently disagree, it is called pluralism and this is said to be a vital ingredient of their democracy.

It is never said that the US is undemocratic because they disagree–on the contrary it is, according to them, what makes it democratic. Our people on the other hand are not allowed to have differences or disagreements. When we do, it is called disunity and dissent, never pluralism.

When revolutionary leaders defend their revolutions against counter-revolutionary uprisings they are called brutal dictators. The contradiction is that throughout the history of the United States, any uprising against America’s injustice has always been suppressed violently, and Kwame would remind us that he was one that knew this from personal experience.

The Libyan rebels make up an estimated 2 percent of the entire Libyan population. What is the percentage of people who disagreed with George W. Bush or who now disagree with Barak Obama? In fact, Bush only received 50.7 percent of the US citizens’ vote and Obama only 52.9 percent. There is a great deal of dissent there.

In the Green Book, Muammar Qaddafi has this to say:

“Political struggle which culminates in the victory of a candidate obtaining 51 percent of the total votes of the electorate, establishes a dictatorship in the seat of power garbed in the guise of democracy. It is in fact, a dictatorship because 49 percent of the electorate would then be governed by an instrument of government they did not vote for, and which has been imposed upon them. This is the essence of dictatorship…under such systems the people are the victims whose votes are vied for by exploitative competing factions, who dupe the people into political circuses that are outwardly noisy and frantic, but inwardly powerless and irrelevant.”

Western Fallacies

Let us put one fallacy to rest forever – Europeans do not have a monopoly on the theory and practice of democracy. It is not my intention here to enter into what is a huge discussion of what constitutes democracy. Suffice to say, that Western Europe and the US, which continue to this day to brutally enforce their undemocratic systems of colonialism, neo-colonialism and capitalism worldwide, are not in either a moral or historical position to lecture the world on what is or is not democratic.

Those who promote democracy, European and US style, must be aware that the Fathers of the American revolution excluded the indigenous peoples and the captured Africans from their ‘democratic’ project. Same with the French revolutionaries, who in 1789 were proclaiming ‘liberty, equality and fraternity’, but were not prepared to extend these principles to the captured Africans working their plantations in the Caribbean.

However fallacious the Western notion of democracy may be, the only thing that matters from an African perspective is that the West is prevented from continuing to impose this fallacious notion on us. They can, as far as we are concerned, have whatever political system they choose. The point is, so can we as Africans. This is what we are fighting for – our inalienable right to self-determination – to freely decide our own destiny.

That is what it means to finally throw off the yoke of colonialism and imperialism, and that is what Libya dared to do under the leadership of Muammar Qaddafi. And Qaddafi dared to extend this vision to the entire African continent.

In the words of the Afrocentric intellectual warrior, Dr Molefi Kete Asante:

“The work of the Brother Leader, as he is sometimes called, has been to raise African consciousness to the point that some of the nations on the continent of Africa begin to reject the loyalty they hold for their colonial masters…Qaddafi has proposed that Africa do away with travel restrictions, create a common currency and ease trade tariffs and barriers. This African solidarity is not only a threat to the West – some who identify as Arabs have a difficult time accepting the Africanity promoted by Qaddafi.”

The battle for African self-determination did not start in Libya or with Qaddafi – it is a very long battle stretching back to the earliest incursions into Africa. And it is not the first time that Africans have faced such a sophisticated and deadly European attack – we can look way back at the battle of Isandlwana in 1879, where the arrogant British army, one of the most technologically advanced in the world at that time, was humbled by the Zulu fighters under the leadership of the great African king, Cetshwayo.

What this ‘Coalition of Demons’ currently attacking Libya, armed with the most sophisticated weaponry known to humankind, is slowly coming to realize, is that they could well be defeated by the will of the Libyan people armed with their faith, revolutionary consciousness and kalashnikovs.

Fear of a Black Planet

‘Up you mighty race, you can accomplish what you will’ – Marcus Garvey

‘The Black race shall prevail throughout the world’ – Muammar Qaddafi

This is a defining moment for Africa and Africans all over the world. It is a moment in history that we must seize.

Africans on the continent and throughout the Diaspora were recently given a tiny glimpse of the kind of power that Africa can possess, when Jean Ping, speaking on behalf of the African Union, directed all member states to ignore the ICC’s (International Colonial Court) call for Qaddafi’s arrest. Jean Ping stated that “the ICC is discriminatory because it only pursues Africans. The Hague-based court ignores crimes committed by Western powers in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan”. Thank you, Jean Ping.

However, it is the African youth on the continent and in the Diaspora that are leading and inspiring us towards true independence. Tendai Wenyika, Deputy General Secretary of the Pan-African Youth Union, addressing the recent AU Heads of State summit in Malabo, Equatorial Guinea called on African leaders to:

“demand the arrest of the likes of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy, who through their unprovoked war have violated the supreme tenets of the Nuremburg Principles and committed the crime of all crimes…We call for the suspension of all engagements with NATO, and Africa must begin to strengthen its internal ties, security and trade mechanisms in order for us to prosper.”

As I have stated in previous articles, there is nothing that White Power fears more than a united Africa. They know that a united Africa would completely alter the balance of power globally. The well-documented fact is that if Africa stopped the flow of all resources and raw materials to the Western nations for just one week, the United States and Europe would grind to a halt.

In 2007, in Conakry Guinea, Qaddafi made a simple observation to a cheering crowd of thousands:

“Whenever I ask people about Pepsi-Cola and Coca-Cola people immediately say it’s an American or European drink. This is not true. The kola is African. They have taken the cheap raw material from us, they’ve made it into a drink, and they sell it back to us for a high price. We should be producing it ourselves and selling it to them.”

If only Africa could realize its immense power. Realizing this power is primarily a psychological transition, since the material facts are overwhelmingly clear. Almost every known natural resource needed to run the contemporary industrial economies—such as uranium, gold, copper, cobalt, coltan (for cell phones, video games, laptops), platinum, diamonds, bauxite, and especially large reserves of oil are located in Africa. Azania (South Africa) alone contains half the world’s gold reserves. Democratic Republic of Congo contains half of the world’s cobalt and 80 percent of the world’s known coltan reserves. One quarter of the world’s aluminum ore is found in the coastal belt of West Africa and the continent is awash in petroleum reserves.

Time for ‘us’ to put sanctions on ‘them’

It is time to stop the flow of these strategic resources to the Western capitals until they meet our demands. Yes, it is time for us to sanction the Western capitals. The Global Pan-African Movement and the African masses are crying out for it – the time is now. Africans everywhere must exert maximum pressure on their leaders to realize this power, as Muammar Qaddafi dared to, or move aside.

But how would we survive if we were to sanction these Western capitals? I can hear the detractors cry. Answer: there are huge emerging economies such as China, India and Brazil who will be only too happy to pick up the slack.

Already this is the West’s greatest fear: In an article titled, ‘Wen calls for more Access for Africa’, which appeared in 2007 in the Financial Times, W. Wallis and G. Dyer, wrote:

“Western powers real concern is that African States will opt for Chinese deals to free themselves from the punitive conditions of IMF/ World Bank loans and other forms of financial dependence on Europe and the Unites States. As the second largest source of oil in Africa, Angola is now in such a strong position that it is rejecting IMF loans completely. As one consultant put it, with all their oil revenue, they don’t need the IMF or the World Bank. They can play the Chinese off the Americans.”

In another article, ‘China and the USA in a new cold war over Africa’s oil riches: Darfur? It’s the oil, stupid…’ William Engdahl points out:

“Today China draws an estimated 30% of its crude oil from Africa. That explains an extraordinary series of diplomatic initiatives which have left Washington furious. China is using no-strings-attached dollar credits to gain access to Africa’s vast raw material wealth, leaving Washington’s typical control game via the World Bank and IMF out in the cold. Who needs the painful medicine of the IMF when China gives easy terms and builds roads and schools to boot?”

What does all this mean for Africa? Quite simply it means that we now have a choice in trading partners, and although all trading partners drive a hard bargain – some are giving better deals than others.

Black Power – African Power!

This is the moment to put all our efforts into the realization of Nkrumah and Qaddafi’s grand plan for a United States of Africa. A strong and truly independent Africa, with one government, one defense force and one currency based on our African gold standard as Qaddafi has proposed. Only when we can achieve this level of unity and power, will we be able to take our rightful place in the world. Only then can we say that the time is finally over when Africa must run from one power broker to another to do our bidding. At last we will be able to do our own bidding on our own terms. Backed by a population of 1 billion people, Africa will then be able to make demands that cannot be ignored.

In 2009, at a meeting of the AU in Addis Ababa, Qaddafi, commenting on European and US attitudes to Africa, had this to say: ‘If they do not want to live with us fairly, then they should know it is our planet and they can go to another planet.’

Fair and just is all we are seeking – only the unfair and unjust have anything to fear from a Black planet.

Gerald A. Perreira is a founding member of the Guyanese organizations, Joint Initiative for Human Advancement and Dignity and Black Consciousness Movement Guyana (BCMG). He lived in Libya for many years, served in the Green March, an international battalion for the defense of the Libyan revolution and was an executive member of the World Mathaba based in Tripoli.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

30. 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media-2011 Version

Many readers will expect to see Matt Drudge or Arianna Huffington on this list. Although they both indeed have leading Internet news websites that cover some fringe stories and report on systematic injustices more so than the mainstream media, they primarily aggregate mainline news. Therefore, they are excluded from our "alternative media" label.

The criteria we've chosen to base these rankings of the most influential alternative media figures are the following:

people that have the courage to seek the truth no matter where the information leads them;
those with the courage to question 9/11;
those who don't buy into the false left-right political paradigm;
those who are grounded in peace and liberty;
those with the communication skills and platform to affect real change.

Significantly, each of the people who made our list is clearly driven by unyielding passion. Despite some natural disagreements, they each provide a unique bridge to forbidden knowledge and they all deserve high praise for their efforts and commitment to inform the public. Sincerely, it is very encouraging to have so many talented voices leading the stampede for truth, liberty, justice, and peace.

With so many people doing great work in the real alternative media, we are sure that some deserving reporters will be left off the list. Although Activist Post has forged relationships with some of the people on this list, we've tried to remain as non-biased as possible in our observations. At the end, we've also included a list of those who deserve honorable mention for their tireless work and talent providing the truth.

10. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts:  Paul Craig Roberts is one of the most respected columnists in the alternative media. His syndicated articles can be seen on many leading alternative news websites including Lew Rockwell, Infowars, Counterpunch, InformationClearingHouse and countless others. Roberts scores huge points in the credibility department having been the former head of policy at the Department of Treasury under Reagan, and the editor of the Wall Street Journal -- among a long list of other accolades. His research is impeccable and his vision of how the world really operates is second to none. He knows why and when the global chess pieces are moving, and has the incredible talent to communicate difficult concepts to the general public. He has written several books including The Tyranny of Good Intentions , and How the Economy was Lost . His many interviews can be seen on Russia Today and Prison Planet TV. Roberts is also a recent contributor to Gerald Celente's esteemed Trends Journal. There is no one better at reporting the reality of geo-political events and the workings of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve.

Many of Paul Craig Roberts' articles are here:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts-arch.html 

9. Gary Franchi: Franchi is a longtime researcher and liberty activist. His essays and reports have been published all over the Internet and in the book Songs of Freedom: Tales From the Revolution . He's also the producer of several documentaries like Camp FEMA and Don't Tread on Me . Because of his tenacious work, he now has one of the best alternative media platforms on the Internet. His liberty social network, RTR.org (Restore the Republic) has over 32,000 members and is growing quickly. The quality of his Reality Report newscasts rival the multi-million dollar productions at any cable news outfit -- except he reports TRUTH news. Franchi does an excellent job aggregating the most important stories in the alternative news and presenting them in a concise and visually appealing newscast. We've found each of Franchi's recent Reality Reports to be must-see TV, and only expect this up-and-comer's influence to continue to grow.

Gary Franchi's Web site is here:
http://rtr.org/

8. Adam Kokesh: Kokesh is a former Iraq war veteran turned peace activist, a former Libertarian congressional candidate, and the current host of Russia Today's Adam Vs. The Man nightly cable TV show. He recently gained recognition when he was brutally arrested for silently dancing at the Thomas Jefferson Memorial with other activists. The video of the alarming arrest went absolutely viral and surely brought many new viewers to his TV show and to the truth movement. Kokesh is well-informed, well-spoken, committed to individual liberty and peace, and has the legitimacy of having served his country in combat. Kokesh recently received high praise from a fellow journalist who details his appeal here. Watch for Kokesh's influence to grow as more people become aware that a genuine truther has an entertaining and informative TV show. The establishment is in big trouble with the likes of Kokesh on the airwaves.

Adam Kokesh's Web site is here:
http://www.adamvstheman.com/

Read the Full List Here:
10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media-2011 Version

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

31. The Federal Reserve ADMITS that Its 12 Banks Are PRIVATE - Not Government - Entities

Source: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/07/federal-reserve-admits-that-its-12.html
 

Much of the tens of trillions in bailout money and "easy" money from quantitative easing went to foreign banks (and see this, this and this).
 

Indeed, Ron Paul noted recently that one-third of all fed bailout loans - and essentially 100% of loans from the New York Fed - went to foreign banks.
 

The New York Fed is the most important Fed bank. As Bloomberg pointed out in 2009:
 

“The New York Fed is one of 12 regional Federal Reserve banks and the one charged with monitoring capital markets. It is also managing $1.7 trillion [now up to at least $1.9 trillion] of emergency lending programs [and accepting collateral from the banks in return].”
 

However, the country's most powerful "agency" - the Federal Reserve - is actually no more federal than Federal Express. The Fed itself admitted (via Bloomberg):
 

“While the Fed’s Washington-based Board of Governors is a federal agency subject to the Freedom of Information Act and other government rules, the New York Fed and other regional banks maintain they are separate institutions, owned by their member banks, and not subject to federal restrictions.”
 

For that reason, the New York Fed alleged in the lawsuit brought by Bloomberg to force the Fed to reveal some information about its loans - Bloomberg LP v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 08-CV-9595, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan) - that it was not subject to Federal Freedom of Information Act. As Bloomberg reported in a separate article:
 

“The Federal Reserve Bank of New York ... runs most of the lending programs. Most documents relevant to [a freedom of information lawsuit filed by Bloomberg news] are at the New York Fed, which isn’t subject to FOIA law, according to the central bank. The Board of Governors has 231 pages of documents, to which it is denying access under an exemption for trade secrets.” 


As the long-time Chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee (Charles McFadden) said on June 10, 1932: 

 

“Some people think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies ....”

 

Similarly, the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) - often called the "central banks' central bank", as it coordinates transactions between central banks, and which is the entity determining the level of reserves banks are required to keep worldwide - is itself owned by the central banks of the world.
 

As Spiegel reported in 2009:
 

“The BIS is a closed organization owned by the 55 central banks. The heads of these central banks travel to the Basel headquarters once every two months, and the General Meeting, the BIS's supreme executive body, takes place once a year.”

 

In, other words, the private banks own the Fed (and most other central banks), and the central banks - in turn - own BIS, the global bank regulator.

Interestingly, Spiegel points out that BIS is largely immune from regulation, oversight or taxes: 

 

“Formally registered as a stock corporation, it is recognized as an international organization and, therefore, is not subject to any jurisdiction other than international law.
 

It does not need to pay tax, and its members and employees enjoy extensive immunity. No other institution regulates the BIS, despite the fact that it manages about 4 percent of the world's total currency reserves, or €217 trillion ($304 trillion), as well as 120 tons of gold...
 

Central bankers are not elected by the people but are appointed by their governments. Nevertheless, they wield power that exceeds that of many political leaders. Their decisions affect entire economies, and a single word from their lips is capable of moving financial markets. They set interest rates, thereby determining the cost of borrowing and the speed of global financial currents.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

32. Modern Christianity is Designed to Create Extremely Dissociated People ...

Original Title: Dissociated State of Mind is Social Necessity

July 26, 2011

Institutionalized Insanity

"The machine must function without thinking, or individual will, for it to fulfill its purpose of managing the crowd predictably."

By Kevin D. Annett
(For HenryMakow.com)
 

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/in_the_sleep_room.html

I was wondering today why it is that we are all insane.

I paid my way through college by working as an orderly in the campus hospital's nuthouse; and of course later, I dealt for years with church congregations. So I know a lot about crazy people, and the societies they create.

Life was oddly familiar on the psych ward, whose inhabitants - whether  patients or staff - spun about themselves a self-sustaining, insular and utterly dissociated little world that, like society at large, resisted change or even study.

Cleaning up feces-covered patients, helping drug them, and listening to their elaborate mental concoctions, helped me to understand institutionalized insanity, and how convincing it can be.

The day I started working on the chronic ward of the University of British Columbia's psychiatric hospital, the head nurse was knocked out cold by an enormous guy they'd just carted in from Riverview hospital: high as a kite and not the kind of gentleman to be told off, like Big Nurse tried doing.

Violence is unusual in a nuthouse, not simply because everyone is drugged to the nines.

Like in any workplace, everything is so completely and mind-numbingly routinized that the assembly line of meds, meals, television and outings leaves no room, or energy, for a completely spontaneous and willful act like striking out.

So, the reaction of my co-workers to the sight of Big Nurse lying unconscious and bloody on the floor of her station, as her drooling assailant smiled down at us, was interesting. Nobody moved. The unpredictable had happened.

As I smiled nervously back at the assaulter, I thought at first that our collective numbness arose from fear, and a natural desire to stay clear of the guy's sizable fists. But then I saw the genuine confusion on everyone's faces. Nobody had expected this, even though we had all been trained to expect it.

The procedure had broken down, and without it, we were helpless.

Fortunately, our numbness was dispelled by the arrival of other orderlies from the adjoining ward, who immediately tackled the guy and shook us back to our senses.

Later that night, scribbling my report of the incident in the duty log, I wrote in the margins,

"The machine must function without thinking, or individual will, for it to fulfill its purpose of managing the crowd predictably."

Sigmund Freud observed that the natural instincts of any person must be suppressed for society to function as a mass of managed individuals: a suppression that breeds "civilized" mankind's basic neurotic condition. Society, in short, makes us all crazy: or more exactly, massively dissociated.

Hardly accidental, or even merely consequential, our insanity is a necessity. For without being dissociated, we couldn't dwell for a day in what we call civilization.

DISSOCIATION

Since it's our basic operating principle, let's examine this thing called dissociation.

Don't look to psychology for a definition, since like all sciences, it tends to examine and classify the tiny scales of a dragon while ignoring the Beast in its totality. We need to know what dissociation means not just for one person but for an entire culture.

A dissociated person cannot relate and integrate a normal feeling, observation or occurrence with the rest of her being. In effect, that person's thinking is like a component on an assembly line.

As an example, I recently showed a family member hard and incontrovertible proof that her church was responsible for the death of many thousands of children in their Indian boarding schools. That person acted confused at first, and eventually acknowledged the truth and expressed her horror. And yet the next Sunday, she attended that same church and gave her usual offering to sustain it.

Her mind, in effect, was not capable of integrating a new and unsettling truth. What she knew could not be related to her daily pattern of life.

Psychology likes to treat such dissociation as some kind of individual mental illness resulting from a trauma. But any large organization, let alone a compartmentalized, consumptionist society like ours, structurally requires such a mentality in its workers for the system to function efficiently.

Cohesion rests on the suppression of unpredictable human responses which might threaten the functioning of what is in effect an enormous machine.

A rational, feeling person who integrates thought and action is potentially unpredictable, and may refuse, for example, to obey. The machine's operations would then come to a halt. But a person whose senses and thoughts can never possibly affect his behavior will not threaten the automatic life of the machine. Hierarchy therefore abhors an integrated personality because of its essential unpredictability.

AN EXAMPLE

In my first year as an ordained clergyman in the United Church of Canada, I attempted to withdraw from its clergy pension plan as a matter of personal choice and faith, following the advice of Jesus not to accumulate security or wealth in this world.

I was informed by the head officer of the church that I did not have the right to do so. My attempt to integrate my beliefs with my life-practice, in short, was an unacceptable disruption in the eyes of the church. If I was to remain a "competent" employee, I would have to segregate my conscience from my behavior, in a classic dissociated manner.

I eventually saw the Machine Wisdom behind the church's response to my attempt at integration: for only a dissociated clergyman who did not link all of his faith with all of his life would be capable of operating competently in a religious culture that preaches one set of values on Sunday, and then lives exactly the opposite values throughout the week: and expects its followers to do the same.

As statistics show, clergy are particularly neurotic individuals who are especially prone to fixations, behavioral disorders, alcohol abuse, divorce and violent obsessions causing the routine abuse of children.

This erratic condition is caused by the extreme dissociation imposed on clerics by the severity with which they must daily sacrifice their personal values and faith to the quite opposite standards of a religious corporation.

At the risk of seeming trite, let me say that, if society in general requires its members to go crazy, the church demands that its clergy become Satanic: literally, "the Adversary" of all in themselves that they once held sacred and inviolable.

Again, there is nothing surprising or unusual in such a terrible requirement, from the perspective of the structural necessities of a hierarchical institution.

Looking back, my entry into the insanity of a modern psychiatric ward was just the proper training for the church ministry, since the management rather than the curing of brutalized people by maintaining them in a permanently dissociated state is the core aim of both psychiatry and religion.

It's small wonder, accordingly, that the power of the secular priesthood of psychiatrists as well as the religious priesthood is traditionally unchallengeable in our culture. For both of these cults claim to have the answer to social and personal happiness, as defined by the neurotic requirements of modern civilization and its organized repression of natural human impulses.

To answer my first question, we are all insane because the God of Commerce needs it that way.

How do we get better? Stay tuned. 


---

Read the truth of genocide in Canada and globally at:

www.itccs.org
www.hiddennolonger.com
www.hiddenfromhistory.org

Kevin can be reached at hiddenfromhistory1@gmail.com or kevin_annett@hotmail.com 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 

Comments for "Dissociated State of Mind is Social Necessity"

Irish Dan said (July 26, 2011): 

Ireland  can provide abundant examples of the writers theory carried into practice. The Famine episode is perhaps the finest historical example. 


Ireland suffered an appalling loss of live in the famines of ' Black
47' when hundreds of thousands starved to death and in all during the 'Famine Years' millions of Irish people were lost through starvation, arising disease and illness. 

Ireland  however during this period produced enough food to feed her population twice over and then some. The food was exported for substantial profits. In fact the years of 'The Famine' food exports rose as did profits year on year. 

The English are blamed for the famine and as they had governance of the country at that period, Britain can be held to account for overall responsibility. However on the ground another picture quickly emerges : comfortable Roman Catholic farmers grew crops to feed animals for export, crops that could have fed the local surrounding populace. These other root crops were guarded by armed men hired by the farmers who daily drove by starving Roman Catholic men, women and children's corpses much as the German Concentration Camp Guards did. 

The same pattern was to repeat under Irish Freedom and self governance : everybody knew what was happening in the Industrial schools where children were abused and the Magdelne Laundries where legally kidnapped women were used for Slave Labor by religious orders of nuns. 

The topic of 'dissociate state needs a far deeper and more extensive exploration. There is only one stand for a Christian in all of this and no hiding places “He that had done this to the least one of my children had also done it unto me.” 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

33. Naming Names: Your Real Government

When dark deeds unfold, point the finger in this direction. 
 

By Tony Cartalucci

Source: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/naming-names-your-real-government.html  

 

This is your real government; they transcend elected administrations, they permeate every political party, and they are responsible for nearly every aspect of the average American and European's way of life. When the "left" is carrying the torch for two "Neo-Con" wars, starting yet another based on the same lies, peddled by the same media outlets that told of Iraqi WMD's, the world has no choice, beyond profound cognitive dissonance, but to realize something is wrong.

What's wrong is a system completely controlled by a corporate-financier oligarchy with financial, media, and industrial empires that span the globe. If we do not change the fact that we are helplessly dependent on these corporations that regulate every aspect of our nation politically, and every aspect of our lives personally, nothing else will ever change.

The following list, however extensive, is by far not all-inclusive. However after these examples, a pattern should become self-evident with the same names and corporations being listed again and again. It should be self-evident to readers of how dangerously pervasive these corporations have become in our daily lives. Finally, it should be self-evident as to how necessary it is to excise these corporations from our lives, our communities, and ultimately our nations, with the utmost expediency.

International Crisis Group
www.crisisgroup.org

Background: While the International Crisis Group (ICG) claims to be "committed to preventing and resolving deadly conflict," the reality is that they are committed to offering solutions crafted well in advance to problems they themselves have created in order to perpetuate their own corporate agenda.

Nowhere can this be better illustrated than in Thailand and more recently in Egypt. ICG member Kenneth Adelman had been backing Thailand's Prime Minster Thaksin Shinwatra, a former Carlyle Group adviser who was was literally standing in front of the CFR in NYC on the eve of his ousting from power in a 2006 military coup. Since 2006, Thaksin's meddling in Thailand has been propped up by fellow Carlyle man James Baker and his Baker Botts law firm, Belfer Center adviser Robert Blackwill of Barbour Griffith & Rogers, and now Robert Amsterdam's Amsterdam & Peroff, a major corporate member of the globalist Chatham House.

With Thailand now mired in political turmoil led by Thaksin Shinwatra and his "red shirt" color revolution, the ICG is ready with "solutions" in hand. These solutions generally involve tying the Thai government's hands with arguments that stopping Thaksin's subversive activities amounts to human rights abuses, in hopes of allowing the globalist-backed revolution to swell beyond control.

The unrest in Egypt, of course, was led entirely by ICG member Mohamed ElBaradei and his US State Department recruited, funded, and supported April 6 Youth Movement coordinated by Google's Wael Ghonim. While the unrest was portrayed as being spontaneous, fueled by the earlier Tunisian uprising, ICG's ElBaradei, Ghonim, and their youth movement had been in Egypt since 2010 assembling their "National Front for Change" and laying the groundwork for the January 25th 2011 uprising.

ICG's George Soros would then go on to fund Egyptian NGOs working to rewrite the Egyptian constitution after front-man ElBaradei succeeded in removing Hosni Mubarak. This Soros-funded constitution and the resulting servile stooge government it would create represents the ICG "resolving" the crisis their own ElBaradei helped create.

Notable ICG Board Members:

George Soros
Kenneth Adelman
Samuel Berger
Wesley Clark
Mohamed ElBaradei
Carla Hills

Notable ICG Advisers  :

Richard Armitage
Zbigniew Brzezinski
Stanley Fischer
Shimon Peres
Surin Pitsuwan
Fidel V. Ramos

Notable ICG Foundation & Corporate Supporters:

Carnegie Corporation of New York
Hunt Alternatives Fund
Open Society Institute
Rockefeller Brothers Fund
Morgan Stanley
Deutsche Bank Group
Soros Fund Management LLC
McKinsey & Company
Chevron
Shell

Brookings Institute
www.brookings.edu

Background: Within the library of the Brookings Institute you will find the blueprints for nearly every conflict the West has been involved with in recent memory. What's more is that while the public seems to think these crises spring up like wildfires, those following the Brookings' corporate funded studies and publications see these crises coming years in advance. These are premeditated, meticulously planned conflicts that are triggered to usher in premeditated, meticulously planned solutions to advance Brookings' corporate supporters, who are numerous.

The ongoing operations against Iran, including US-backed color revolutions, US-trained and backed terrorists inside Iran, and crippling sanctions were all spelled out in excruciating detail in the Brookings Institute report, "Which Path to Persia?" The more recent UN Security Council resolution 1973 regarding Libya uncannily resembles Kenneth Pollack's March 9, 2011 Brookings report titled "The Real Military Options in Libya."

Notable Brookings Board Members:

Dominic Barton: McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Alan R. Batkin: Eton Park Capital Management
Richard C. Blum: Blum Capital Partners, LP
Abby Joseph Cohen: Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Suzanne Nora Johnson: Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Richard A. Kimball Jr.: Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Tracy R. Wolstencroft: Goldman, Sachs & Co.
Paul Desmarais Jr.: Power Corporation of Canada
Kenneth M. Duberstein: The Duberstein Group, Inc.
Benjamin R. Jacobs: The JBG Companies
Nemir Kirdar: Investcorp
Klaus Kleinfeld: Alcoa, Inc.
Philip H. Knight: Nike, Inc.
David M. Rubenstein: Co-Founder of The Carlyle Group
Sheryl K. Sandberg: Facebook
Larry D. Thompson: PepsiCo, Inc.
Michael L. Tipsord: State Farm Insurance Companies
Andrew H. Tisch: Loews Corporation

Some Brookings Experts:
(click on names to see a list of recent writings.)

Kenneth Pollack
Daniel L. Byman
Martin Indyk
Suzanne Maloney
Michael E. O'Hanlon
Bruce Riedel
Shadi Hamid

Notable Brookings Foundation & Corporate Support:

Foundations & Governments

Ford Foundation
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
The Rockefeller Foundation
Government of the United Arab Emirates
Carnegie Corporation of New York
Rockefeller Brothers Fund

Banking & Finance

Bank of America
Citi
Goldman Sachs
H&R Block
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
Jacob Rothschild
Nathaniel Rothschild
Standard Chartered Bank
Temasek Holdings Limited
Visa Inc.

Big Oil

Exxon Mobil Corporation
Chevron
Shell Oil Company

Military Industrial Complex & Industry

Daimler
General Dynamics Corporation
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Siemens Corporation
The Boeing Company
General Electric Company
Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Raytheon Co.
Hitachi, Ltd.
Toyota

Telecommunications & Technology

AT&T
Google Corporation
Hewlett-Packard
Microsoft Corporation
Panasonic Corporation
Verizon Communications
Xerox Corporation
Skype

Media & Perception Management

McKinsey & Company, Inc.
News Corporation (Fox News)

Consumer Goods & Pharmaceutical

GlaxoSmithKline
Target
PepsiCo, Inc.
The Coca-Cola Company

Council on Foreign Relations
www.cfr.org

Background & Notable Membership: A better question would be, who isn't in the Council on Foreign Relations? Nearly every self-serving career politician, their advisers, and those populating the boards of the Fortune 500 are CFR members. Many of the books, magazine articles, and newspaper columns we read are written by CFR members, along with reports, similar to Brookings Institute that dictate, verbatim, the legislation that ends up before the West's lawmakers.

A good sampling of the most active wings of the CFR can be illustrated best in last year's "Ground Zero Mosque" hoax, where CFR members from both America's political right and left feigned a heated debate over New York City's so-called Cordoba House near the 3 felled World Trade Center buildings. In reality, the Cordoba House was established by fellow CFR member Feisal Abdul Rauf, who in turn was funded by CFR financing arms including the Carnegie Corporation of New York, chaired by 9/11 Commission head Thomas Kean, and various Rockefeller foundations.

Notable CFR Corporate Support:

Banking & Finance

Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
JPMorgan Chase & Co
American Express
Barclays Capital
Citi
Morgan Stanley
Blackstone Group L.P.
Deutsche Bank AG
New York Life International, Inc.
Prudential Financial
Standard & Poor's
Rothschild North America, Inc.
Visa Inc.
Soros Fund Management
Standard Chartered Bank
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Veritas Capital LLC
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
Moody's Investors Service

Big Oil

Chevron Corporation
Exxon Mobil Corporation
BP p.l.c.
Shell Oil Company
Hess Corporation
ConocoPhillips Company
TOTAL S.A.
Marathon Oil Company
Aramco Services Company

Military Industrial Complex & Industry

Lockheed Martin Corporation
Airbus Americas, Inc.
Boeing Company,
DynCorp International
General Electric Company
Northrop Grumman
Raytheon Company
Hitachi, Ltd.
Caterpillar
BASF Corporation
Alcoa, Inc.

Public Relations, Lobbyists & Legal Firms

McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Omnicom Group Inc.
BGR Group

Corporate Media & Publishing

Bloomberg
Economist Intelligence Unit
News Corporation (Fox News)
Thomson Reuters
Time Warner Inc.
McGraw-Hill Companies

Consumer Goods

Walmart
Nike, Inc.
Coca-Cola Company
PepsiCo, Inc.
HP
Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
De Beers

Telecommunications & Technology

AT
Google, Inc.
IBM Corporation
Microsoft Corporation
Sony Corporation of America
Xerox Corporation
Verizon Communications

Pharmaceutical Industry

GlaxoSmithKline
Merck & Co., Inc.
Pfizer Inc.

The Chatham House 
www.chathamhouse.org.uk

Background & Membership: The UK's Chatham House, like the CFR and the Brookings Institute in America, has an extensive membership and is involved in coordinated planning, perception management, and the execution of its corporate membership's collective agenda.

Individual members populating its "senior panel of advisers" consist of the founders, CEOs, and chairmen of the Chatham House's corporate membership. Chatham's "experts" are generally plucked from the world of academia and their "recent publications" are generally used internally as well as published throughout Chatham's extensive list of member media corporations, as well as industry journals and medical journals. That Chatham House "experts" are submitting entries to medical journals is particularly alarming considering GlaxoSmithKline and Merck are both Chatham House corporate members.

No better example of this incredible conflict of interest can be given than the current Thai "red" color revolution being led by Chatham House's Amsterdam & Peroff with consistent support lent by other corporate members including the Economist, the Telegraph and the BBC.

In one case, the Telegraph printed, " Thai protests - analysis by Dr Gareth Price and Rosheen Kabraji," within which Price and Kabraji make a shameless attempt at defending the Western-backed, Maoist themed, violent protests. While the Telegraph mentioned that Price and Kabraji were both analysts for the Chatham House, they failed to tell readers that the Telegraph itself retains a corporate membership within the Chatham House as does the Thai protest leader's lobbyist, Robert Amsterdam and his Amsterdam & Peroff lobbying firm.

Notable Chatham House Major Corporate Members:

Amsterdam & Peroff
BBC
Bloomberg
Coca-Cola Great Britain
Economist
GlaxoSmithKline
Goldman Sachs International
HSBC Holdings plc
Lockheed Martin UK
Merck & Co Inc
Mitsubishi Corporation
Morgan Stanley
Royal Bank of Scotland
Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd
Standard Bank London Limited
Standard Chartered Bank
Tesco
Thomson Reuter
United States of America Embassy
Vodafone Group

Notable Chatham House Standard Corporate Members:

Amnesty International
BASF
Boeing UK
CBS News
Daily Mail and General Trust plc
De Beers Group Services UK Ltd
G3 Good Governance Group
Google
Guardian
Hess Ltd
Lloyd's of London
McGraw-Hill Companies
Prudential plc
Telegraph Media Group
Times Newspapers Ltd
World Bank Group

Notable Chatham House Corporate Partners:

British Petroleum
Chevron Ltd
Deutsche Bank
Exxon Mobil Corporation
Royal Dutch Shell
Statoil
Toshiba Corporation
Total Holdings UK Ltd
Unilever plc

Conclusion

These organizations represent the collective interests of the largest corporations on earth. They not only retain armies of policy wonks and researchers to articulate their agenda and form a consensus internally, but also use their massive accumulation of unwarranted influence in media, industry, and finance to manufacture a self-serving consensus internationally.

To believe that this corporate-financier oligarchy would subject their agenda and fate to the whims of the voting masses is naive at best. They have painstakingly ensured that no matter who gets into office, in whatever country, the guns, the oil, the wealth and the power keep flowing perpetually into their own hands. Nothing vindicates this poorly hidden reality better than a "liberal" Nobel Peace Prize wearing president, dutifully towing forward a myriad of "Neo-Con" wars, while starting yet another war in Libya.

Likewise, no matter how bloody your revolution is, if the above equation remains unchanged, and the corporate bottom lines left unscathed, nothing but the most superficial changes will have been made, and as is the case in Egypt with International Crisis Group stooge Mohamed ElBaradei worming his way into power, things may become substantially worse.

The real revolution will commence when we identify the above equation as the true brokers of power and when we begin systematically removing our dependence on them, and their influence on us from our daily lives. The global corporate-financier oligarchy needs us, we do not need them, independence from them is the key to our freedom.

For more information on alternative economics, getting self-sufficient and moving on without the parasitic, incompetent, globalist oligarchs:

The Lost Key to Real Revolution
Boycott the Globalists
Alternative Economics
Self-Sufficiency

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

34. The Real Revolution

 

 The real revolution: growing your own food.


By Tony Cartalucci 

 

February 26, 2011 

Source: http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com/2011/03/real-revolution.html

 

Believe it or not, growing your own food or visiting your local
farmers market
  is more revolutionary and constructive
than burning down your own city and killing security forces. 


As Washington plunges the Middle East and North Africa into chaos, and city by city collapses into the hands of globalist stooges, many have mistakenly interpreted this "change" as a positive transformation.

On the contrary, the regimes that will replace the embattled nationalistic dictators in each nation the globalists despoil will interface not with the national governments in the service of their people, but will interface with the "civil society" underlay the Western backed NGOs have meticulously built up over decades. This "civil society" will in turn answer to corporate serving globalist institutions, like the IMF, WTO, World Bank and the UN, instituting crushing economic "liberalization."

We have been given a prepackaged ideal of what "revolution" is supposed to look like. So when we see people in the streets battling security forces, waving flags, all within the backdrop of their burning society, we are satisfied that "revolution" is taking place. But the reality is, this is not a revolution by any stretch of the imagination. It is a high-tech, high-speed invasion and subjugation, a corruption of the sovereign state similar to what Tacitus described in Roman conquered Britannia.

From HistoryWorld.net:  

 

'His object was to accustom them to a life of peace and quiet by the provision of amenities. He therefore gave official assistance to the building of temples, public squares and good houses. He educated the sons of the chiefs in the liberal arts, and expressed a preference for British ability as compared to the trained skills of the Gauls. The result was that instead of loathing the Latin language they became eager to speak it effectively. In the same way, our national dress came into favour and the toga was everywhere to be seen. And so the population was gradually led into the demoralizing temptation of arcades, baths and sumptuous banquets.  The unsuspecting Britons spoke of such novelties as 'civilization', when in fact they were only a feature of their enslavement.'  (Tacitus Annals of Imperial Rome, translated Michael Grant, Penguin 1956, 1975, page 72.) 


As we can see, "civil society" is not a new idea, nor is the concept of lulling a population into decadence and complacency while rolling them into a corrupt, exploitative domineering empire.

Real Revolution 

Real revolution will take place when people realize what indeed is really happening, who is behind it, and then no longer paying into their corrupt system. This translates into boycotting the corporate combines behind the very policies we deplore, and replacing "their" system that benefits only them, with our own system that solely benefits ourselves.

The following lists contain the corporations and institutions that constantly turn up behind the most heinous atrocities unfolding today. From the millions murdered in the misadventure in Vietnam, to the millions dying or maimed in the global "War on Terror," and of course the chaos unfolding during the premeditated reordering of the Middle East and North Africa that will indefinitely affect millions of lives and their future, these are the people responsible:

CFR Corporate Membership
Chatham House Major Corporate Membership
Chatham House Standard Corporate Membership
International Crisis Group Supporters
Movements.org Supporters

Some may be skeptical of whether or not boycotting and replacing the elitist system that currently domineers mankind is even possible, however it is already taking place. The alternative media is one such example, where people fed up with being lied to by obnoxious propagandists have decided to turn off the TV and report the news themselves. It has become a self-sustaining industry with exponential growth, where reputation and accuracy is replacing the slick graphics and 500 dollar suits that used to represent "legitimacy."

The alternative media offers people accurate information. Accurate information is essential when making life decisions. Hearing the truth allows us to make decisions that benefit ourselves and our community. This stands contra to the current corporate owned media who would have us living our lives to benefit their shareholders, even to our own detriment.

We can and we must translate the success of the alternate media to all aspects of our life. The globalists have this unwarranted power because we have continuously paid into the corrupt system they have created and monopolize.
 

If young men became local deputies instead of joining the army, if we stopped shopping at Walmart (CFR), drinking Pepsi (CFR), eating at all the corporate owned junk-food restaurants, canceled our credit cards, canceled all but our internet connections, and basically boycotted all globalist corporations in general – along with replacing them with our own local system, where would the globalists get their manpower? Their money? Their legitimacy?  

They need us, we don’t need them. That’s the big secret. We get our freedom back as soon as we take back our responsibilities for food, water, security, the monetary system, power, and manufacturing; that is independence. Independence is freedom, freedom is independence. We’ll never be free as long as we depend on the Fortune 500 for our survival.  

Fixing these problems unfolding overseas starts with fixing the problems in our own backyards. Boycott the globalists, cut off their support, undermine their system, and they lose their ability to commit these atrocities. That will be a real revolution and it can start today. Not burning cities and masked rebels waving flags, but communities no longer dependent and fueling a corrupt system we all know must come to an end. 

Please also see: "The Founding Fathers Didn't Drink British Tea."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

35. Tea Party is Controlled Opposition

The Tea Party was created to be a  mouse trap for millions of people that were waking up and beginning to ask the right questions and stand up for themselves.

[Now] Tea Party constituents are used as useful idiots, 'demanding' the very policies that are impoverishing them.

By Richard Evans
(HenryMakow.com)


The Debt Ceiling / Default threat is a standard Punch and Judy script debate.  The ceiling's raised every year - sometimes twice a year.  It's been raised 10 times since the year 2000, and 74 times since 1962.  Usually they don't want the public to know so it's back page news.  When they make it a big deal like this year, it means they want to drastically cut social services.

So they play this old  'good cop, bad cop' routine.  The Republicans are the bad cop that pretend to gridlock raising tax on the rich.   The argument is reversing the Bush tax cuts will prevent new job creation.

The Democrats play "good cop" by offering to cut social security or other benefits in return for 'compromise' on raising taxes.  When it's all over, the imaginary "ceiling" is "raised", and consumers are seeing less of take home out of their paychecks.

Obama,  Capitol Hill, and Bernanke all serve the same master. Governments don't plan and dictate economic policy anymore.  The financial sector does. Who is the financial sector? It's Wall Street in America; the city of London in England, the Bourse in France and Frankfurt in Germany.  This combine has taken over the authority of de facto centralized economic planning bureaucracies. They now control governments through international bypassing of local laws, and they've got all the politicians in their pocket. Central banks are controlled by financial interests - board members and controlling share holders aren't elected by consumer votes. . So they are not beholding to the public.

It started in the 80's with massive 'de-regulation' that kept the financial sector under control since they'd tried the last attempt at global coup d'tat between 1929 and 1933.

When you know all this, it becomes obvious how the Tea Party constituents are used as useful idiots, 'demanding' the very policies that are impoverishing them.

TEA PARTY

What is the Tea Party?   For those who can remember 2006-2008 before the election, there was a year where a lot of people seemed to be waking up to the news that both parties were screwing them.   In the election of 2006 the Democrats regained seats through voters who wanted the military adventures and deficit spending stopped and the troops recalled, and peace. 

No sooner than the election was done Democrat House speaker Nancy Pelosi went on national TV with Bush and Cheney to let voters know there would be no change in foreign policy.  Alienation of voters by both parties reached an all time high by March 2007. 

That's when Ron Paul appeared to lure them back into the 'magic of believing' in the election circus.  Supposedly Libertarian, Ron Paul actually led millions of voters back to the Republican ticket.

Then was the economic shock, crash, and 'Bailout' - TARP.   It was a done deal as Bush's last act of treachery before handing off to Obama, Wall Street and the 'mysterious offshore speculators'.

So by the summer of 2009, the growing pool of alienated voters and half awake, half asleep people were herded into this 'grass roots phenomenon' called the Tea Party.

I learned about the local Tea Party group here in town and very quickly recognized what I'd seen years before when I was involved with the Left local organizations in the past.   I assure you that anywhere more than a few people attempt to become organized to influence voting or political issues on any level, they will be infiltrated by at least two professional organizers skilled in hijacking action groups and turning them into controlled oppositions.

That is what the Tea Party was from the beginning.  The Tea Party was created to be a controlled opposition mouse trap for millions of people that were waking up and were beginning to ask the right questions and stand up for themselves.

In July 30's article, Fozdyke wrote, "If current debts were simply wiped off of the books the only tragedy would be the destruction of the 'too big to fail' banks. While politicians call that a catastrophe it would actually be freedom for millions of disenfranchised debt-serfs. That's why it must not happen - and won't!"

"Wages will continue to be cut even as taxes are increased to service the debt owed to the Banker Lords. Politicians everywhere are bowing and scraping before their Lords, promising deeper cuts and higher taxes. This is as it should be and will effectively cripple economies around the world."


Unbeknownst to American consumers (ie, labor, tax payers), The exponential debt system crashed years ago and has been running on artificial life support since 2008.  "Jobless recovery" is a euphemism for depression. The financial interests that own the politicians and the Fed - well aware the jig is up - ordered their lackeys in government and media to make sure all losses are borne by the consumer without them knowing it for as long as possible. In fact  Obama and Bernanke have been dutifully carrying out the order  to lower US wages by 30%.  How do we know the percentage?  That's how much it takes to bring US wages on par with the rest of the hemisphere. In America, that's why your grocery, fuel, and utility bills have been steadily rising at an alarming rate since last year.

Once you know that Bernanke's job has been to lower the US standard of living (wage value) 30% between 2006 and 2013 he no longer looks like a fumbler.  Media encourages the public to think politicians and bureaucrats 'foul up' because they're 'stupid'.  It only looks that way if you believe their job is serve and protect the consumer.  On the contrary.  We are just 'human resources', i.e. livestock.

DEFAULT

So what do consumers have to lose if Capitol Hill defaults?  What would happen?

Default means the dollar would not be acceptable tender again until the United States paid.  How have they been paying?  They have been promising the labor of Americans that have to pay taxes. That means 18-40% of the labor of those just starting careers will go to the Federal Reserve combine for the next four decades of their lives - just to pay the interest on debt incurred this year.

When they "raise the ceiling," that means they've taken it out of the future pockets of American taxpayers. US money isn't backed by gold or natural resources.  it's backed by HUMAN resources.

Remember it's the Globalist financial sector calling the shots through their vassal politicians.  The only reason they would tell the politicians to actually default is this:  it will mean they want to collect the "debt" in privatization of public sectors.  A serious example of hostile privatization of public assets was after the Soviet Union fell down, and the Russian government handed over natural resources like OIL to private 'investors'.  The buyers were called "the Oligarchs" and they were nothing but proxies for House Rothschild.

Will they default this time?   I don't think they will so long as the US Military occupation of the Middle East is necessary in their unfolding plans.  So I expect default will come after the next big war.  

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

36. The International Monetary Fund's "Kiss of Death"

By Paul Drockton 

 

Source: http://www.moneyteachers.org/International+Monetary+Fund.html  

 

"They’ll say the IMF is arrogant. They’ll say the IMF doesn’t really listen to the developing countries it is supposed to help. They’ll say the IMF is secretive and insulated from democratic accountability. They’ll say the IMF’s economic ‘remedies’ often make things worse – turning slowdowns into recessions and recessions into depressions. And they’ll have a point. I was chief economist at the World Bank from 1996 until last November, during the gravest global economic crisis in a half-century. I saw how the IMF, in tandem with the U.S. Treasury Department, responded. And I was appalled." (Joseph Stigletz- Former IMF Chief Economist) 

 

8/3/11 (Special Thanks to S. Davis)   

 

The following is from the International Monetary Fund Website: 

 

"the IMF remains one of the largest official holders of gold in the world. Consistent with the new income model for the Fund agreed in April 2008, on September 18, 2009, the IMF Executive Board approved gold sales strictly limited to 403.3 metric tons, representing one eighth of the Fund's total holdings of gold at that time. Resources linked to these gold sales will also help boost the Fund's concessional lending capacity. The approved sales program was completed in late December 2010." (Source

 

The question remains, how did the IMF acquire so much gold bullion? Again, the answer is right on their website: 

 

The IMF acquired its current gold holdings prior to the Second Amendment through four main types of transactions. 

 

§            “First, when the IMF was founded in 1944 it was decided that 25 percent of initial quota subscriptions and subsequent quota increases were to be paid in gold. This represents the largest source of the IMF's gold. 

 

§            Second, all payments of charges (interest on member countries' use of IMF credit) were normally made in gold. 

 

§            Third, a member wishing to acquire the currency of another member could do so by selling gold to the IMF. The major use of this provision was sales of gold to the IMF by South Africa in 1970–71. 

 

§            And finally, member countries could use gold to repay the IMF for credit previously extended.” (Ibid) 

 

In other words, when a country borrows money from the International Monetary Fund, they repay the interest in gold bullion.  The Knights Templar used the same techniques to bankrupt the Monarchies of Europe and the Catholic Church: 

 

  1. The Templars would agitate for war between the monarchies of Europe, and Crusades for the Catholic Church.
  2. They would also lobby for increased "social spending"
  3. Cash strapped kings and Pope's would borrow "chits", the Templar version of "money" from them.
  4. All loans and interest were repaid in gold and silver. 

Gold and silver are the only real wealth in this world. Exchanging worthless pieces of paper for real bullion hardly seems like a fair exchange, but, these men are, after all, plundering pirates.  The IMF is the gold collector, and apparently resells the gold it collects at a deep discount to "member nations" central banks (Rockefellers and Rothschilds). (Ibid.) 

 

It also resells the gold to other private (Rothschild/Rockefeller) banking concerns at supposed "market prices": 

 

"The first phase in the Fund’s gold sales was set aside exclusively for off-market sales to interested central banks and other official holders, which were conducted at market prices at the time of the transactions. In October and November 2009, the Fund sold 212 metric tons of gold in separate off-market transactions to three central banks: 200 metric tons were sold to the Reserve Bank of India during October 19-30; 2 metric tons to the Bank of Mauritius on November 11; and 10 metric tons to the Central Bank of Sri Lanka on November 23." (Ibid)

The New World Order is made possible by the private ownership of the world's currencies and the multitude of privately owned National Banks. Whether those concerns exist in Great Britain, India, or the United States means very little, as they are all controlled by the same small cabal of Satanic Psychopaths that reside in the "City of London". The City of London is a one square mile parcel of property that enjoys the same autonomy as the Papal State in Rome.

 

The International Monetary Fund exists as just another tool to plunder those countries that get sucked into the Banksters' perpetual wars and endless creation of "social programs". They are Parasites that suck off the life blood of everything that is good in this world. 

 

We end up with trillions of dollars in debt. They end up with trillions of dollars in gold and silver. We bury our dead by the hundreds of millions, they profit from the funerals.  

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

37. Illuminati Use Cancer to Hold Us Hostage

August 12, 2011  

Source: http://henrymakow.com/illuminatiusecancer.html

Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer.

Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, above, discovered that not only cancer but all diseases are triggered by unexpected shocks and traumas. Thugs showed up and threatened that if he didn't disown his findings, things would become unpleasant.

By Stephen Coleman
(For HenryMakow.com)

In 1978, Dr. Hamer's son Dirk was mortally wounded in a shooting accident, shot by the crown prince of Italy. Dirk died 4 months later.

Six months later Dr. Hamer was diagnosed with testicular cancer. He had the cancer surgically removed.

Since Dr. Hamer never had been seriously ill, he wondered if the sudden shock of his son's accident may have triggered his cancer. While working in a large cancer clinic, he visited the ward with testicular cancer patients and began asking them questions. He noted that, prior to the diagnosis, every patient has had a serious conflict, or loss of a loved one.

He visited the ovarian cancer ward and the patients also had lost a dear loved one prior to diagnosis. He learned in the university that the testicles and ovaries were of the same embryonic origins.

Dr. Hamer then noted on brain CT scans that every testicular and ovarian cancer patient had a dark spot in the same location.  He concluded that not only cancers but all disease is triggered by unexpected shocks and traumas. Later he came to the conclusion that various related smaller emotional triggers can accumulate over years or even decades to manifest as disease.

In 1981, he submitted his findings in a post doctoral thesis at the University at Tubingen, Germany.  Within days, a couple of thugs showed up at his home. They threatened that if he didn't disown his findings things would become unpleasant.  Dr. Hamer refused. He had made a momentous discovery and had rigorously proved it.

Meanwhile Dr. Hamer and his wife were the target of constant harassment from the the powerful Italian Savoy family who were responsible for their son's death. Dr Hamer believes that this constant persecution eventually caused the death of his wife in 1985.

A few months later the University of Tubingen rejected his thesis without any testing or serious review.

They refused to accept the link between the psyche and disease.  Years later, the court ordered the university to test Hamer's findings. Despite this the university has never complied.

In 1986, court action was sought against Dr. Hamer for refusing to deny his discoveries. The court took away his license to practice medicine, told him to get another line of work and warned him not to speak to any cancer patients.

Nevertheless, he operated an underfunded cancer clinic and was having phenomenal success with a 92% cure rate in well over 20,000 cases.  Dr. Hamer maintains that modern cancer treatments are cruel, barbarous and unnecessary. He says that if he knew the truth back when he had his testicular cancer, he would never have asked for its surgical removal.

The persecutions became so intense that he fled to Spain, where he practiced.  Eventually he was arrested and falsely imprisoned. France extradited him for further persecution and imprisoned him for a further three years on ridiculous falsified charges.

Read the Full Story:
Illuminati Use Cancer to Hold Us Hostage

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

38. 16 Quotes On Drugs

30 January 2003
Source: http://www.Rense.com

1. "The cause of most disease is in the poisonous drugs physicians superstitiously give in order to effect a cure."  Charles E. Page, M.D.
 
2. "Medicines are of subordinate importance because of their very nature they can only work symptomatically."  Hans Kusche, M.D.
 
3. "If all the medicine in the world were thrown into the sea, it would be bad for the fish and good for humanity"  O.W. Holmes, (Prof. of Med. Harvard University)
 
4. "Drug medications consists in employing, as remedies for disease, those things which produce disease in well persons. Its materia medica is simply a lot of drugs or chemicals or dye-stuffs in a word poisons. All are incompatible with vital matter; all produce disease when brought in contact in any manner with the living; all are poisons." R.T. TraIl, M.D., in a two and one half hour lecture to members of congress and the medical profession, delivered at the Smithsonian Institute in Washington D.C.
 
5. "Every drug increases and complicates the patients condition."  Robert Henderson, M.D.
 
6. "Drugs never cure disease. They merely hush the voice of nature's protest, and pull down the danger signals she erects along the pathway of transgression. Any poison taken into the system has to be reckoned with later on even though it palliates present symptoms. Pain may disappear, but the patient is left in a worse condition, though unconscious of it at the time." Daniel. H. Kress, M.D.
 
7. "The greatest part of all chronic disease is created by the suppression of acute disease by drug poisoning." Henry Lindlahr, M.D.
 
8. "Every educated physician knows that most diseases are not appreciably helped by medicine." Richard C. Cabot, M.D. (Mass. Gen. Hospital)
 
9. "Medicine is only palliative, for back of disease lies the cause, and this cause no drug can reach." Wier Mitchel, M.D.
 
10. "The person who takes medicine must recover twice, once from the disease and once from the medicine." William Osler, M.D.
 
11. "Medical practice has neither philosophy nor common sense to recommend it. In sickness the body is already loaded with impurities. By taking drug - medicines more impurities are added, thereby the case is further embarrassed and harder to cure." Elmer Lee, M.D., Past Vice President, Academy of Medicine.
 
12. "Our figures show approximately four and one half million hospital admissions annually due to the adverse reactions to drugs. Further, the average hospital patient has as much as thirty percent chance, depending how long he is in, of doubling his stay due to adverse drug reactions."  Milton Silverman, M.D. (Professor of Pharmacology, University of California)
 
13. "Why would a patient swallow a poison because he is ill, or take that which would make a well man sick." L.F. Kebler, M.D.
 
14. "What hope is there for medical science to ever become a true science when the entire structure of medical knowledge is built around the idea that there is an entity called disease which can be expelled when the right drug is found?"  John H. Tilden, M.D.
 
15. "The necessity of teaching mankind not to take drugs and medicines, is a duty incumbent upon all who know their uncertainty and injurious effects; and the time is not far distant when the drug system will be abandoned."  Charles Armbruster, M. D.
 
16. "We are prone to thinking of drug abuse in terms of the male population and illicit drugs such as heroin, cocaine, and marijuana. It may surprise you to learn that a greater problem exists with millions of women dependent on legal prescription drugs."  Robert Mendelsohn, M.D

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

39. Why did Japan Surrender?

Sixty-six years ago, we dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima. Now, some historians say that’s not what ended the war.

 

By Gareth Cook  

August 7, 2011

 

Source: http://boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2011/08/07/why_did_japan_surrender/?page=full

 

What ended World War II?

 

For nearly seven decades, the American public has accepted one version of the events that led to Japan’s surrender. By the middle of 1945, the war in Europe was over, and it was clear that the Japanese could hold no reasonable hope of victory. After years of grueling battle, fighting island to island across the Pacific, Japan’s Navy and Air Force were all but destroyed. The production of materiel was faltering, completely overmatched by American industry, and the Japanese people were starving. A full-scale invasion of Japan itself would mean hundreds of thousands of dead GIs, and, still, the Japanese leadership refused to surrender.

 

But in early August 66 years ago, America unveiled a terrifying new weapon, dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. In a matter of days, the Japanese submitted, bringing the fighting, finally, to a close.

 

On Aug. 6, the United States marks the anniversary of the Hiroshima bombing’s mixed legacy. The leader of our democracy purposefully executed civilians on a mass scale. Yet the bombing also ended the deadliest conflict in human history.

 

In recent years, however, a new interpretation of events has emerged. Tsuyoshi Hasegawa - a highly respected historian at the University of California, Santa Barbara - has marshaled compelling evidence that it was the Soviet entry into the Pacific conflict, not Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that forced Japan’s surrender. His interpretation could force a new accounting of the moral meaning of the atomic attack. It also raises provocative questions about nuclear deterrence, a foundation stone of military strategy in the postwar period. And it suggests that we could be headed towards an utterly different understanding of how, and why, the Second World War came to its conclusion. 

“Hasegawa has changed my mind,” says Richard Rhodes, the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “The Making of the Atomic Bomb.” “The Japanese decision to surrender was not driven by the two bombings.”

 

President Truman’s decision to go nuclear has long been a source of controversy. Many, of course, have argued that attacking civilians can never be justified. Then, in the 1960s, a “revisionist school” of historians suggested that Japan was in fact close to surrendering before Hiroshima - that the bombing was not necessary, and that Truman gave the go-ahead primarily to intimidate the Soviet Union with our new power.

 

Hasegawa - who was born in Japan and has taught in the United States since 1990, and who reads English, Japanese, and Russian - rejects both the traditional and revisionist positions. According to his close examination of the evidence, Japan was not poised to surrender before Hiroshima, as the revisionists argued, nor was it ready to give in immediately after the atomic bomb, as traditionalists have always seen it. Instead, it took the Soviet declaration of war on Japan, several days after Hiroshima, to bring the capitulation.

 

Both the American and Japanese public have clung to the idea that the mushroom clouds ended the war. For the Japanese, Hiroshima is a potent symbol of their nation as victim, helping obscure their role as the aggressors and in atrocities that include mass rapes and beheading prisoners of war. For the Americans, Hiroshima has always been a means justified by the end.

 

“This seems to touch a nerve,” observes Hasegawa.

 

That may help explain why Hasegawa’s thesis, which he first detailed in an award-winning 2005 book and has continued to bolster with new material, is still little known outside of academic circles, says Ward Wilson, a nuclear weapons scholar who has drawn on Hasegawa’s insights in his own recent work. Measured against the decades of serious and settled thinking about World War II, Hasegawa’s scholarship feels radical. But another reason, Wilson argues, is that to look at history in this new light is to entertain what seem like shocking ideas. That the destruction of cities does not sway leaders. That what happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not overly remarkable. And, strangest of all: That nuclear explosives may not be particularly effective weapons of war.

 

The Pacific War began in 1941 with the violent humiliation at Pearl Harbor. Japan already held parts of China, and quickly invaded New Guinea, the Dutch East Indies, Burma, and Singapore. Manila fell. The country enjoyed air supremacy across most of Southeast Asia; in February 1942, it even attacked Australia. Japan’s control was tightening, and it appeared unstoppable.

 

After the epic Battle of Midway in the summer of 1942, however, the United States and its allies gained the momentum. Still, progress was slow as Marines hopped from atoll to island to atoll: wading through bloody coral shallows under a rain of shelling, engaging an enemy that was dug in, highly trained, and willing to fight to the death. The names of these tropical hells - Gaudalcanal, Iwo Jima, Okinawa - have become Marine Corps legend. The casualties were heavy.

 

By the summer of 1945, the Americans had cornered Japan and assembled a final invasion plan, codenamed Operation Downfall. The first stage was scheduled for the fall, and would have opened with the landing of more than 700,000 troops on Kyushu, the southernmost of the big four islands. It would have been a larger operation than D-Day, certain to result in a bloody slaughter.

 

Americans, then and today, have tended to assume that Japan’s leaders were simply blinded by their own fanaticism, forcing a catastrophic showdown for no reason other than their refusal to acknowledge defeat. This was, after all, a nation that trained its young men to fly their planes, freighted with explosives, into the side of American naval vessels.

 

But Hasegawa and other historians have shown that Japan’s leaders were in fact quite savvy, well aware of their difficult position, and holding out for strategic reasons. Their concern was not so much whether to end the conflict, but how to end it while holding onto territory, avoiding war crimes trials, and preserving the imperial system. The Japanese could still inflict heavy casualties on any invader, and they hoped to convince the Soviet Union, still neutral in the Asian theater, to mediate a settlement with the Americans. Stalin, they calculated, might negotiate more favorable terms in exchange for territory in Asia. It was a long shot, but it made strategic sense.

 

On Aug. 6, the American bomber Enola Gay dropped its payload on Hiroshima, leaving the signature mushroom cloud and devastation on the ground, including something on the order of 100,000 killed. (The figures remain disputed, and depend on how the fatalities are counted.)

 

As Hasegawa writes in his book “Racing the Enemy,” the Japanese leadership reacted with concern, but not panic. On Aug. 7, Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo sent an urgent coded telegram to his ambassador in Moscow, asking him to press for a response to the Japanese request for mediation, which the Soviets had yet to provide. The bombing added a “sense of urgency,” Hasegawa says, but the plan remained the same.

 

Very late the next night, however, something happened that did change the plan. The Soviet Union declared war and launched a broad surprise attack on Japanese forces in Manchuria. In that instant, Japan’s strategy was ruined. Stalin would not be extracting concessions from the Americans. And the approaching Red Army brought new concerns: The military position was more dire, and it was hard to imagine occupying communists allowing Japan’s traditional imperial system to continue. Better to surrender to Washington than to Moscow.

 

By the morning of Aug. 9, the Japanese Supreme War Council was meeting to discuss the terms of surrender. (During the meeting, the second atomic bomb killed tens of thousands at Nagasaki.) On Aug. 15, the Japanese surrendered unconditionally. 

How is it possible that the Japanese leadership did not react more strongly to many tens of thousands of its citizens being obliterated?

 

One answer is that the Japanese leaders were not greatly troubled by civilian causalities. As the Allies loomed, the Japanese people were instructed to sharpen bamboo sticks and prepare to meet the Marines at the beach.

 

Yet it was more than callousness. The bomb - horrific as it was - was not as special as Americans have always imagined. In early March, several hundred B-29 Super Fortress bombers dropped incendiary bombs on downtown Tokyo. Some argue that more died in the resulting firestorm than at Hiroshima. People were boiled in the canals. The photos of charred Tokyo and charred Hiroshima are indistinguishable.

 

In fact, more than 60 of Japan’s cities had been substantially destroyed by the time of the Hiroshima attack, according to a 2007 International Security article by Wilson, who is a senior fellow at the Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies. In the three weeks before Hiroshima, Wilson writes, 25 cities were heavily bombed. 

To us, then, Hiroshima was unique, and the move to atomic weaponry was a great leap, military and moral. But Hasegawa argues the change was incremental. “Once we had accepted strategic bombing as an acceptable weapon of war, the atomic bomb was a very small step,” he says. To Japan’s leaders, Hiroshima was yet another population center leveled, albeit in a novel way. If they did*n’t surrender after Tokyo, they weren’t going to after Hiroshima.

 

Hasegawa’s work is an important new entry into the scholarly conversation, reconstructing the conflicting perspectives of Russians, Americans, and Japanese, and concluding that the bomb played a secondary role. Barton Bernstein, a professor of history emeritus at Stanford University, is the unofficial dean of American atomic bomb scholarship and counts himself as both a fan and a critic of Hasegawa. Hasegawa’s ability to read three languages, Bernstein says, gives him a unique advantage over other scholars. Hasegawa spent years working through primary documents, with a deep understanding of linguistic and cultural nuance. His knowledge was especially valuable because historians of the period face such fragmentary and contradictory evidence, in part because the Japanese destroyed many documents.

 

But therein lies the weakness of the Hasegawa interpretation as well, Bernstein says. After a long war and in the space of a few days, the Japanese leadership was hit with two extraordinary events - Hiroshima and the Soviet invasion - and sorting out cause and effect, based on incomplete documentation, may prove impossible.

 

“When you look through all the evidence, I think it is hard to weigh one or the other more heavily,” Bernstein said. “The analysis is well intentioned, but more fine-grained than the evidence comfortably allows.”

 

Yet Bernstein, Hasegawa, and many historians agree on one startling point. The public view that the atomic bomb was the decisive event that ended World War II is not supported by the facts.

 

What happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki has framed the world’s thinking about nuclear weapons. Those days in August remain the only instance of nuclear war. The sheer horrors of the destruction, and the lingering poison of radioactivity, inform what has come to be called nuclear deterrence: No sane nation would bring a nuclear attack on itself, and so having nuclear weapons deters your enemies from attacking. When two rival nations have nuclear weapons, as during the Cold War, the result is stalemate. 

Hasegawa’s scholarship disturbs this simple logic. If the atomic bomb alone could not compel the Japanese to submit, then perhaps the nuclear deterrent is not as strong as it seems. In fact, Wilson argues, history suggests that leveling population centers, by whatever method, does not force surrender. The Allied firebombing of Dresden in February of 1945 killed many people, but the Germans did not capitulate. The long-range German bombing of London did not push Churchill towards acquiescence. And it is nearly impossible to imagine that a bomb detonated on American soil, even one that immolated a large city, would prompt the nation to bow in surrender.

 

If killing large numbers of civilians does not have a military impact, then what, Wilson asks, is the purpose of keeping nuclear weapons? We know they are dangerous. If they turn out not to be strategically effective, then nuclear weapons are not trump cards, but time bombs beneath our feet.

 

Whatever the merits of this position, it suffers the great handicap of trying to change, fundamentally, how several generations have thought about the atomic age, says Linton Brooks, who has served in arms control and nuclear policy positions in several administrations. “Fifty years of telling ourselves that these things are different has sort of made them different,” says Linton. “That is the mystique of nuclear weapons.”

 

Hasegawa’s own relationship to the events of August of 1945 testifies to the degree to which, all these years later, they resist clear appraisal. As a child, Hasegawa watched the Tokyo firebombing from his roof, and he can still recall the eerie orange glow on the horizon. Growing up, he felt anger at the Japanese government for bringing the conflict onto its people. Later, working as a scholar in America, he accepted the position that the atomic bombing was necessary to end the war. Today he views America’s bombings of Japan’s cities - Hiroshima and Tokyo included - as war crimes. Yet, he adds, they are crimes America should not apologize for until Japan comes to terms with war crimes of its own. These are the evolving views of a man who has mustered the courage to look at an ugly period of history without flinching - something that most people, Americans and Japanese alike, have found themselves unable to do.

 

Gareth Cook is a Globe columnist and former editor of Ideas. 

 

[Nazarene Remnant comment: This analysis fits happily into the inherited, but false, notion of history that most of us believe. Check out The Secret Road to Mount Olympus, and where the atomic bomb was actually developed, and how it got into American hands, for some sobering reality!

 

http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-secret-road-to-mount-olympus.html  ]

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

40. The Rise of the Archons

"Whatever ideas are the most suppressed are most likely to be the closest to the truth." (Weidner's First Law of the Universe)

"If a picture is worth a thousand words then a symbol is worth a thousand pictures." (Weidner's Second Law of the Universe)

"The only people who call conspiracies ' theories' are the conspirators." (Weidner's Third Law of the Universe)

~~~~~~~~~~~

An interview with Jay Weidner on Rense Radio  

Rense: Many people have heard the term “Archon” but would be hard-pressed to define it. What is an Archon?

Weidner: To begin with, I would draw attention to two articles on your site: The Global Coup d'Etat and the one about ownership of the world. The Queen of England owns one sixth of the non-ocean surface of the world; and keep that in mind as we go into the Archon subject. The Archons were whispered about in texts after the burning of the library at Alexandra with some mention of mysterious beings called Archons. But the powers that be spent 1,300 years cleaning up the records andhad written out the Archons from our history. In 1947, texts were found in clay jars in Nag Hammadi in Egypt and, on these texts was a story of what the Nag Hammadi people, 2,000 years ago, thought the world was about.

The reason the Nag Hammadi texts, which date back 2,100 years (100 BC), are so important is that no-one has been able to put a spin on it [the texts have not been altered, destroyed or omitted as in the Bible], no-one has been able to distort or destroy them which is what they’d really like to do [to keep the information and knowledge from the masses]. Luckily, they survived, were successfully translated and when many people read them, they found a clear and defined discussion of what these Archons are. The texts had been buried in a deep cave in Egypt, in order to protect the most important information that they had.  

Rense: There are 13 codices containing over 50 texts, which is quite a substantial amount of writing.

Weidner: A highly descriptive document of an entirely different world [from the one we know]. People don’t realise that, 2,000 years ago, there was a religion on this planet called Gnosticism, which was the biggest religion on earth at the time, was vying with Hinduism. You could go take a university course on the history of religions now and wouldn’t even find a mention of Gnosticism. The Nag Hammadi texts provide a description for what the Gnostics believed. Gnostic is a Greek word meaning knowledge – gnosis. The Gnostics believe that liberation can only be achieved by knowledge, by the consumption and evaluation of reality through knowledge. The library at Alexandria was run by Gnostics and they were the first people to collect scrolls and books and assemble this information. Their culture spread throughout Europe and the Middle East. This was long before the advent of the Western religions outside of Judaism which was mostly concentrated in Israel. Gnostics preached that there was an invasion that occurred about 3,600 BC and, about 1,600 years before the Nag Hammadi texts were buried, they wrote that this invasion was like a virus and, in fact, they were hard pressed to describe it. The beings that were invading were called Archons. These Archons had the ability to duplicate reality, to fool us. They were jealous of us because we have an essence of some kind, a soul, that they don’t possess, and the Nag Hammadi texts describe the Archons. One looks like a reptile and the other looks like an unformed baby or a foetus. It is partially living and partially non-living and has grey skin and dark, unmoving eyes. The Archons are duplicating reality so that when we buy into it, when we come to believe that the duplicated, false state reality is the real reality - then they become the victors.

Rense: How are they duplicating reality? Is it by using consciousness?

Weidner: Yes, according to the texts, they can get into people and can manipulate people to do things very suddenly that are very odd. But also they are actually responsible for the deterioration of culture, so unlike the culture of the ancient Greeks or Chinesebut a cheap façade of a culture. As the Archonic presence has spread across the earth and has escalated in the 20th century, you can see that they are responsible for sprawl and the mass ugliness that is everywhere.

Television is an example of Archonic imitation.

Humans are imitated on television but the imitation is altered and is nearly always obscene and profane because the Archons not only do not understand the sacred but they hate it. They are jealous of the natural world and of human beings with the natural world. Also of sexual relationships: loving couples make them angry and they love violence and are sexually titillated by anger and war and death. They create war to consume energy from the dying.

Rense: The Archons seem to be making their big move now, at this time. You can find out about the Nag Hammadi Library on the Internet, which is the living record of the great Gnostic movement. Gnostics and Templars seem to have been all but cleansed from history. How, in the texts, have the Archons been described as coming here? Is there any reference to their mode of transit, travel?

Weidner: Supposedly, they live or lurk outside the inner planets near Saturn i.e. in our solar system. The Gnostics thought that Jehovah was an alien, off planet, demon and that he was a fake god – a masquerading Archon again - duplicating reality. They did believe in God, they believed in what they called the one true God and that’s how they always defined it. Interestingly, Jesus defined his belief as being of the one true God, always delineating it. I believe many of the stories of Jesus are actually Gnostic myths about a possible rebellion against the Archons who came down very severely on the rebel.

So the Archons were released somehow from a prison – and this is probably what The Book of Enoch is about – where he said he took the demons and locked them in a box but that they would come back at the end of time. Jesus was very interested in relating this idea that something was going to happen at the end of time. So you see this illusion going on and then we see also that when Sitchin translated the texts, the cuneiform tablets, that the Annunaki are probably also the Archons. So we can learn more about the Archons by reading about the Annunaki who came here and altered us genetically [using our DNA] so that they could make slaves of us. So we can work out a picture of what these Archonic forces are. They were somehow successfully quelled and then began their re-emergence and they are as close to immortal as we could understand and that’s why their plan is so precise but they needed time to gain power because, the people of the earth were essentially Gnostics who were resistant to, and didn’t believe in the “religion” that was being foisted on them where they must be fearful of an angry, war god called Jehovah. But eventually, the forces of Jehovah conquered the last of them and now they are pretty much in control of the system and are getting ready for the final, gleeful [sarcastic] orgy of despair and horror [imposed upon humans] which is what they like. So, following Tim Rifat and his horrific description of what is about to happen. This is very appropriate, very accurate because this is exactly what they want to occur.

When I did a show for the History Channel last year, I shot it so that it would not end up making people fearful. I shot it so that it didn’t have any fearful footage and they went behind my back and they shot more footage without my knowing and they filled this special, for which I was one of the producers, resulting in two hours of terrorising fear. This is the head of a major network. I think the Archons are involved in some bizarre pornography where they are here and they are perverting us and enjoying every last second of it and we’re letting it happen and I don’t know if there’s any escape from it because now they’ve made it almost desirable to be violent and perverted and sick.

Read the Full Article Here:
The Rise of the Archons 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

41. The Invasion Of Australia - Official At Last

By John Pilger
1 July 2011

Source: http://www.johnpilger.com/articles/the-invasion-of-australia-official-at-last

The City of Sydney has voted to replace the words “European arrival” in the official record with “invasion”.  The deputy lord mayor, Marcelle Hoff, says it is intellectually dishonest to use any other word in describing how Aboriginal Australia was dispossessed by the British. “We were invaded,” said Paul Morris, an Aboriginal adviser to the council. “It is the truth and it shouldn’t be watered down. We wouldn’t expect Jewish people to accept a watered-down version of the Holocaust, so why should we?”

In 2008, the then prime minister Kevin Rudd formally apologised to Aborigines wrenched from their families as children under a policy inspired by the crypto-fascist theories of eugenics. White Australia was said to be coming to terms with its rapacious past, and present. Was it? The Rudd government, noted a Sydney Morning Herald editorial, “has moved quickly to clear away this piece of political wreckage in a way that responds to some of its supporters’ emotional needs, yet it changes nothing. It is a shrewd manoeuvre.”

The City of Sydney ruling is a very different gesture, and admirable; for it reflects not a liberal and limited “sorry campaign”, seeking feel-good “reconciliation” rather than justice, but counters a cowardly movement of historical revision in which a collection of far-right politicians, journalists and minor academics claimed there was no invasion, no genocide, no Stolen Generation, no racism. 

The platform for these holocaust deniers is the Murdoch press, which has long run its own insidious campaign against the indigenous population, presenting them as victims of each other or as noble savages requiring firm direction: the eugenicists’ view.  Favoured black “leaders” who tell the white elite what it wants to hear while blaming their own people for their poverty, provide a PC cover for a racism that often shocks foreign visitors. Today, the first Australians have one of the shortest life expectancies in the world and are incarcerated at five times the rate of blacks in apartheid South Africa. Go to the outback and see the children blinded by trachoma, a biblical disease, entirely preventable, eradicated in third world countries but not in rich Australia. The Aboriginal people are both Australia’s secret and this otherwise derivative society’s most amazing distinction: the world’s oldest society.

In its landmark rejection of historical propaganda, Sydney, the country oldest and largest city, recognises black Australia’s “cultural endurance” and, without saying so directly, a growing resistance to an outrage known as “the intervention”. In 2007, John Howard sent the army into Aboriginal Australia to “protect the children” who, said his minister for indigenous affairs, were being abused in “unthinkable numbers”. It is striking how Australia’s incestuous political and media elite so often rounds on the tiny black minority with all the fervour of the guilty, unaware perhaps that the national mythology and psyche remain culpably damaged while a nationhood, once stolen, is not returned to the original inhabitants.

Journalists accepted the Howard government’s reason for “intervening” and went hunting for the lurid. One national TV programme used an “anonymous youth worker” to allege “sex slavery” rings among the Mutitjulu people. He was later exposed as a federal government official and his “evidence” discredited. Of 7433 Aboriginal children examined by doctors, just four were identified as possible cases of abuse. There were no “unthinkable numbers”. The rate was around that of white child abuse. The difference was that no soldiers invaded the beachside suburbs, no white parents were swept aside, their wages diminished and welfare “quarantined”. It was all a mighty charade, but with serious purpose.

The Labor governments that followed Howard have reinforced the new controlling powers over black homelands: the strict Julia Gillard especially: a prime minister who lectures her compatriots on the virtues of colonial wars that “make us who we are today” and imprisons refugees from those wars indefinitely, including children, on an offshore island not deemed to be Australia, which it is.

In the Northern Territory, the Gillard government are effectively driving Aboriginal communities into apartheid areas where they will be “economically viable”. The undeclared reason is that the Northern Territory is the only part of Australia where Aborigines have comprehensive land rights, and that here lies some of the world’s biggest deposits of uranium, and other minerals. The most powerful political force in Australia is the multi-billion dollar mining industry. Canberra wants to mine and sell and those bloody blackfellas are in the way again. But this time they are organised, articulate, militant, a resistance of conscience and culture. They know it is a second invasion. Having finally uttered the forbidden word, white Australians should stand with them.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

42. News in Brief

New Japan Law 'Cleanses' Bad Nuclear News

Apple Now Has More Cash Than US Government   

51 Solid Reasons Obama Is Unfit For The Presidency  

Is US Biggest Threat To World Peace? (is grass green?) 

Bush 'Was Projecting Calm' With 9/11 Blank Goat Face 

Mossad Attack On Norway  
Israel Shamir's Analysis Of Breivik's Ideas
 
Norway Killer Parked Car Bomb At PM Office Door   
Daily NATO Obscene War Crimes In Libya  
Libyan Rebel Chief Shot Dead 'By Own Side'   
US Claims Iranian General 'Secretly Running' Iraq  

Gilad Atzmon - De-Zionification Now  

Economic Armageddon And You  

720 Quakes In Canary Islands In One Week  

Extreme Weather & Natural Disasters - How Do We Prepare? 

Elder Abuse - The (Almost) Invisible Crime 

School Puts Bright Children In Colored Uniforms  

'Earth Clock' Measures Hrs, Mos, Solstices, Equinoxes (Video) 

Grandmother Is Strip Searched & Held For 12 Days At Border 

The Talmud - "An Ocean Of Nonsense" 

More Homosexuals Alone In Old Age   

Video From Inside Reactor 3 Building  

How DUMB Has US Become? WalMart Express Sign  

Facebook Boss Calls For End To Internet Anonymity 

Morris - The Norway Bombing And Israel - Vid (excellent) 
Tea Party Holds US, World To Ransom 

Cyprus On Verge Of Economic Collapse 

Spanish PM Calls Gen Elections Four Months Early 
Every Hour Of TV Watching Shortens Life By 22 Minutes
Shocking Truth - Stock Market Is Owned By The Govt 

Why The Afghan Nightmare Won't End Soon 
US 'Loses' $360m In Afghanistan 
TX Grid Officials - Idiots Or Enron Style Manipulators? 
Orthodox Jews 'Protecting Pedophiles'

Gaddafi's Libyan Army Retakes Key Towns

"Whores to the Right of Me, Whores to the Left of Me." 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Stop Relying on Limited News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:

"Every night the same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is your News Limited?"(Quote from satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke Letters.)

The 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media: 2011 Version

*** Be wary! Probably "Controlled Oppostion."

Latest editions to this list of alternative new sites:

AlterNet

Antiwar

Atlantic Free Press

Axis of Logic

Common Dreams

Counterpunch

Information Clearing House

My Catbird Seat

Online Journal

Redress Information & Analysis

Sabbah Report 
Veterans Today

Here's some good advice from Gilad Atzmon:

"In addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.

Some of the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri, Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort, Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges,  Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates, Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad )

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Additional Resources ...

The Warning of the Last Days

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold And Its Not Financial

The Usher of Desecration

http://NazareneRemnant.org/resources.html

The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …

 

Go to the following link for instructions ...

How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...

My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear from you.

Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact page:

http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/contact.html

Thanks for reading.

See you next issue.

John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subscriber's Notes Section ...

 HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:

You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.

PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the bottom of every issue.

SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.

To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:

http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/subscribe.html

How to UNSUBSCRIBE:

At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit GO.

Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...

Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:
http://NazareneRemnant.org/cgi-bin/ar/r.cgi?s=3&a=1&k=dL4ah4dk923j

 

URL of This Issue:
http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/issue-50-ldw.html

 

• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• FAQ
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map
 


The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture


The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days


The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration


The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial


The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)

 

So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]

 

Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”

 

Footnote:
[1] Dr. Greg Evenson

 

Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over


Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.


Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.


UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...


"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?

 

As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.

 

Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.

 

ReadMore:

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

 


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 


How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook


Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook


How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download


Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got



"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)



We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)


False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations


John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto


Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Read more >>
Democracy Is An Illusion


Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?


Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
 
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.


What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 



This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.


Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)


We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 
 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.

 

So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.

 

Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.

 

This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”

 

Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 

 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.


Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.


The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)


The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes


"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King, Iron-Clay.com)


Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.


The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.


The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book


How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)


"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."



“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)