Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
25 July, 2011
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
- Polish Parliament Votes To Ban Abortion
- Diet is Key to Spiritual Advancement
- A 32 Year Old Freemason, Christian, Conservative and Nationalist Arrested for Oslo Bombing and
- The Rot Downunder: The Globalists' Australian Nexus
- CIA Veteran: Israel To Attack Iran In Fall [of 2011]
- Sydney Opera House Next False Flag?
- Satanist Insider: A Woman will Herald the Antichrist
- Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal
- 'Murdoch behind 9/11, Iraq, Afghan wars and Financial Meltdown'
- Murdoch Is Not The Only Maggot In The Rotten Apple
- Tying Israel Irrevocably to 9/11: "We Know Who, We Even Know Why…"
- France Didn't Have a Revolution
- ACA Showcases Lady Gaga and the Grim Reality of the Depths of Australian Immorality
- Getting Used To Life Without Food
- Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 4 of 6
- Democracy Finally Being Exposed: The Left versus Right Political Charade
- The Government Has Its Eye On Your Money!
- Money Was The Key Ingredient In New York's Gay Marriage Bill
- The Jewish Financed Attack on Heterosexuality is Satanism
- Lucifer is the God of Judaism
- Julia Gillard Has No Carbon Sense
- Who Said “Australia’s Got Talent”?
- Will the Satanist Julia Gillard Put a Price on Oxygen As Well?
- Iceland's Message to the Money-Power Elite
- Pop Music as a Corrupting Force
- Clinton Outlines Road Ahead for Arab Democracy
- What Will Gas-Drilling Do To Your Food Supply?
- The Kabbalah: The NWO's Satanic Bible
- Secret War Between Tony Blair And Prince Charles
Revealed: British Government's Plan to Play
- Fukushima--Japan's Faustian Bargain With the West
- How To Control People
- Central Bank, World Tyranny, Fixed Markets
- Exposed! Public Education is Indoctrination
- Death Sentence For Private And Home Education, Courtesy Of Supreme Court
- Centrelink, Welfare, and the Fall of the West
- Review of "Cruel Hoax"
- Moscow Museum Puts Lenin's Jewish Roots On Display
- News in Brief.
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as a society), in your hypnotized comatose state,
given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy
dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred,
selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When was the last time you stopped, to think of something
beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because of your collective thoughts about it.
You are complicit in your inaction, every time you 'look the
other way' when you see an injustice. Your 'thought' at the sub-conscious level of
creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur. In so doing, you are serving our purpose." (Source:
Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal
Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists
who are not "TC"
"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in
selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the
official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For
propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home...
In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of
countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on
us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the
voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. Polish Parliament Votes To
Historic Polish bill to ban all abortion clears first
By Kathleen Gilbert
July 1, 2011
WARSAW, July 1, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A massive grassroots campaign in Poland to implement a
total ban on abortion witnessed an important victory Friday as the lower house of the Polish parliament fought off
a first round of voting intended to scrap the historic bill.
Sejm lawmakers voted 254-151 against a motion by the pro-abortion communist Democratic Left
Alliance to reject the measure. In a second vote, the legislation was sent back to committee for further
consideration, forcing a slower legislative path.
LifeSiteNews.com learned earlier this week that the ban was thrust forward by strong pro-life
sentiment in the former Communist country, where sponsors, requiring 100,000 signatures within three months to
bring the bill forward, obtained 600,000 in two weeks.
Technically, abortions in Poland currently may only be obtained when the child is diagnosed with a
serious condition, the mother diagnosed with a health problem, or where the pregnancy resulted from “illegal
activity.” But local leaders say that the exceptions - whereby the procedure is still illegal but “not punishable”
- are routinely abused by abortionists.
In a speech before Parliament on Thursday, Mariusz Dzierzawski of the Polish pro-life PRO
Foundation described abortion as the country’s heritage from communist times, when “children were killed in their
mothers’ wombs on a mass scale in public hospitals and private offices.”
“What differentiates good states from evil states? The way in which they treat the human person,”
said Dzierzawski. “A good state is one where every person is respected, and institutions serve good ends.
“Totalitarian states ignore the dignity of the person. ... Every genocide begins with denying the
humanity of the victims.”
The current effort would strike down all three exceptions to the legal penalty. It requires two
more votes in the lower chamber before it moves to the Senate.
In an open letter to parliamentarians, the National Ob/Gyn Section of the Catholic Association of
Polish Medical Doctors expressed their support for the measure.
The doctor is the ‘servitor Vitae’ - a servant of Life and should protect human life from its
beginning to its natural death,” said president Maria Szczawinska. “We are not refusing the right to rescue human
life, but we strongly oppose killing the unborn child. That is why we join the many voices in support of the
project totally banning the killing of unborn children.”
2. Diet is
Key to Spiritual Advancement
July 15, 2011
The corruption of the body in terms of
food consumption is a big part of spiritual corruption
By Mike P
TAIWAN- Upon reviewing your pointed article, "How to Worship God", I felt there was a point of practical
importance that you might want to append to that. Diet.
How can a man, or woman, or child (especially), who does not consume the necessary nutrition for the body be
expected also to pay attention to the soul?
I have lived in Taiwan for some time. Several years ago, I thought I was dying. I had severe pain in my lungs
daily, and each afternoon and evening I was overwhelmed by drowsiness and lethargy. Lines had appeared on my
forehead. I suffered gastrointestinal enteritis three times, in six months.
I once heard a speaker state, "People tend to stay where they are, until the pain of where they are is estimated to
be greater than the pain of change." I expect that that is generally true. In any case, I finally took it to heart,
and I took control of my diet.
This action, has transformed my life. Constant close attention to what I eat, how I eat, and when I eat, has
revitalized a body and mind. The lines have disappeared from my face. The pain and lethargy are gone. I look great
and feel good. My exercise capability has tripled. I research what is good for me to consume, and I incorporate
that into my diet. I am what I eat. That's a fact.
When I recommend nutritional caution to anyone here, it's perceived as elitism. People can't stand that I eat
right, while they eat shit.
I have a wife. Bet your ass we eat right. I care about her health, because digestion is everything. It affects the
mind, it affects the mood, it affects mental state, it affects the ability to think logically and clearly, it
affects our relationship, and a right diet is worth the pain of change.
I'm a teacher. I daily suffer the sight of lazy, ignorant parents who bring their children to my school, with a
cluster of McDonald's bags in their hands. If you guessed that their children are the low performers in my
We expend much energy over the corruption of the soul. Corruption of the body is perhaps not exactly as critical,
but it is primary; in fact, often, it is the corruption of the body, not just sexually, but in bare terms of food
consumption, which makes spiritual corruption far easier to perform in the longer term.
Stay away from these "food" items and components, because even if you can't feel it, they are killing you:
gluten; refined sugar; preservatives (of any kind); other chemical food additives (of any kind); nutritionally
unnecessary oils; processed soy products; processed meat; pork (do some research - stay away from it);
beef (same thing); canned fish and vegetables (mercury); any juices produced in a factory; carbohydrate-heavy foods
such as bread and pasta.
To build a reliably healthy diet, follow these rules (allergy-prone individuals may have to double-check with a
physician and a professional nutritionist):
1. Take in as broad of protein sources as possible, without consuming damaging protein sources. Fish, nuts of all
kinds, dark or black chocolate, occasional chicken and chicken liver, cod liver and cod liver oil, black beans (and
other beans), real butter (yes), fruits, and vegetables. Kelp is a fantastic source of protein and non-heme
iron. Don't forget chicken eggs: you need that. If you include protein drinks, you're taking a risk on liver
and kidney damage in the long run, so be careful.
2. Make your diet 75% completely fruit and vegetable. Get a blender. Wash everything thoroughly, and throw it all
in there together. Figure out what you like, make blends, and sip from it all day. Focus on cooked broccoli and
tomato (do some research), carrot, celery, apple, orange, lemon, blueberry, strawberry, cranberry, banana (but
watch the potassium draw), and anything that has strong colors. Don't take off the fruit peels when you blend
oranges and such, because you need the pectin in the peels. Don't like the taste? Grow up. Get used to it. You'll
learn to like it. Include cabbage and cauliflower in your cooked meals.
Read the Full Article Here:
is Key to Spiritual Advancement
3. A 32 Year Old Freemason, Christian, Conservative and
Nationalist Arrested for Oslo Bombing and Shootings
By Henrik Palmgren
23 July, 2011
Anders Behring Breivik in full Freemason regalia.
Anders Behring Breivik has been arrested for the shootings in Utøya.
The suspected gunman is a 32-year-old Norwegian man who posed as a police officer. He is also being linked to
the bombings in Oslo.
His wiki thread currently reads:
Anders Behring Breivik (born 13 February 1979) is suspected of being the perpetrator of the 2011
Norway attacks. On 22 July 2011, he approached a Labour Party youth camp, posing as a police officer. He then
proceeded to open fire on the 13 to 25 year old youth present, reportedly killing at least 10. He has also
been linked with the bomb blast that took place approximately two hours earlier, and is now in police
Behring studied at the Oslo Commerce School, and is a self-described Conservative, Christian
and Nationalist. He is also described as a one-time freemason. He owns the company Breivik
The reference to his ties to freemasonry can be found on TV 2, the largest commercial television
station in Norway.
His Twitter account, that only has one post from July 17th says:
One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only
Also, every profile picture on his Facebook account was uploaded on July 17, 2011, just five
days before the attacks.
Who is this guy?
What happened to him?
What was his motives?
Sky news reports that an anonymous police official said the suspect was arrested in Utoya
and appears to have acted alone in the attacks.
He was shot and wounded during the arrest.
The police official said he did not think the attacks were "linked to any international
terrorist organisations" but seemed to be the work of a "madman".
Norway's TV2 claimed the suspect has links to right-wing extremism,
without disclosing its sources.
An eyewitness reported seeing between 25 and 30 bodies on the island.
As usual the lying mainstream media avoids
reporting the real issues involved in this grisly crime, such as
Youth Camp Just Endorsed Palestinian State
The Second Tragedy is the
Wayne Madsen -
The Mossad Did Norway
Possible Israeli Connection To Oslo
Norway Shooter Loves
Israel - Report
Norway And The Jewish Right Wing Connection
Norway Suspect Wanted European
Norway Killer Called Brown, Prince Charles 'Traitors'
Hunt For Brits Linked To Norway Killer
Brother Nathanael - Did Israel's Mossad Do
Norway - The Second Tragedy Is
Tarpley - Norway
Terror Attacks A False Flag Op
Norway To Support Palestinians Says
Backs Palestinian Bid For Recognition
Blast Blows Out PM Office Windows
The 33rd Degree
Flag - Now Everyone Is A Suspect
Norway Under Attack (for supporting Palestine?)
Norway + Israel =
Bombs in Oslo - 92 People Confirmed Dead
Oslo Police Do Bomb Exercise Days
The Rot Downunder: The Globalists' Australian
A globalist rat's nest amidst the rise of Asia.
Tuesday, July 5, 2011
: A description
of Lowy Institute's involvement regarding the formation of a planetary regime, as illustrated in selected
articles (this list will be updated):
Regarding the climate change hoax: The
[Australian] PM's Address to the Lowy Institute via The Australian newspaper.
Regarding US-Australian military integration: "
Planners make the case for US bases" via The Australian.
Regarding the contrivance of an World Internet Organization to regulate the Internet globally: "
The Shadow of Cyber Regulation" via ISN, by Lowy Institute's Jonas Rey.
Australia's commitment to endless war in Afghanistan: "More to do in Oruzgan " via
The Sydney Morning Herald,
by Lowy Institute Non-Resident Fellow, Dr Rodger Shanahan.
Bangkok, Thailand July 5, 2011 - Meet the Lowy Institute. Filled with big
business interests and perhaps the most degenerate,
depraved minds humanity has yet produced, it poses as an "independent international policy
think tank," whose objective is to "generate new ideas and dialogue on international developments and Australia’s
role in the world." The word "independent" is somewhat confusing, but what is clear is that it is yet another
Fortune 500 run policy and propaganda clearinghouse serving not Australia, but rather the global corporate-financier
Notable corporate members include JP Morgan,
Rothschild, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, and Cheveron. While Australian brands like Qantas, BHP
Billiton, and the National Australian Bank appear more "indigenous" in nature, the reality is that their boards,
like everything in the globalist realm, are an ongoing game of musical chairs between all of the worlds
globalist, multinational corporations. For example, BHP Billiton's board of directors alone
features Jacques Nasser, formerly of Ford Motor Company and JP Morgan, John Buchanan formally of British
Petroleum and Vodafone, Carlos Cordeiro formally of Goldman Sachs, David Crawford formally of Bank of America,
and the list goes on and on.
The Lowy Institute's board of directors is something to
behold. Sitting at the top, is 80 year-old, accused
tax evader, Australian-Israeli Frank Lowy, after whom the institute is
named. He currently oversees the Westfield
Group, was a board member of the Reserve Bank of
Australia, and sits upon the board of
directors of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) - not of Australia, but of Israel. Joining him
is son Peter Lowy, who is also a Lowy Institute board
member, a RAND Corporation trustee, and a
board member of the Homeland Security Advisory
Council - not of Australia, but of the United States. Also on the board amongst several others, is Professor Ross Garnaut of the University of Melbourne as
well as Australian National University (ANU), Ian
Macfarlane formally of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Goldman Sachs, and Temasek Holdings, Professor Robert O'Neill of the corporate-stacked
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), and a former head of ANU's Strategic and Defense Studies
Perhaps most disturbing however is the inclusion of Brookings Institution's Martin Indyk, the co-author of the, frankly speaking,
insane "Which Path to
Persia?" report where Indyk, fellow Lowy associate Michael O'Hanlon, and
others conspired against the nation of Iran to fund known terrorist organizations, engineer fake street protests,
buy off members of the Iranian military, and even attempt to provoke Iran into a war it was disinterested in
fighting - not for national security, but for what Indyk, O'Hanlon, and others called, "American interests and influence throughout the Middle
It then appears that the Lowy Institute is nothing more than a
collection of banksters, criminal conspirators, and multinational multi-corporate interests. It
is a institute of big business, by big business, and for big business. What is alarming is
the vast reach it has within Australia's universities and the alleged "free-press." The name
Australian National University comes up more than once and various members of Lowy's staff are also
contributors to both Australian and international papers and television networks. Also alarming is the "cross
pollination" reflected in Lowy's staff between the institute
and other notorious corporate-funded corporate-serving organizations like the Brookings Institution,
the International Crisis Group, the
fraudulent Harvard Belfer
Center, and the warmongering Center for Strategic and
Ties to globalist think-tanks and the media.
Dr. Khalid Koser: Non-Resident Fellow in Foreign
Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution.
Dr. Michael Fullilove: Non-Resident Senior Fellow
in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Rhodes Scholar, has published articles in The New York Times, the
Financial Times, The Washington Post, the International Herald Tribune, Slate, The Daily Beast, the Los Angeles
Times, The Christian Science Monitor, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Australian, the Australian Financial
Review, The Spectator, The Washington Quarterly, The National Interest and Foreign Affairs.
Whit Mason: International Crisis Group while in
Kosovo, then speechwriter for the UN Kosovo mission, and USAID in Pakistan.
Paul Kelly: Editor-at-large of The Australian, previously Editor-in-Chief of The Australian. Is a regular commentator on ABC television (Australian
Dr. Michael Wesley: Non-Resident Senior Fellow at
the Brookings Institution.
Fiona Cunningham: Interned at the Belfer Center at
Harvard University and the International Crisis Group.
Fergus Hanson: Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Own Harries: Published over 200 articles in leading
journals and magazines, including Foreign Affairs, Commentary, New Republic, Harper's, Orbis, The New York Times,
The New York Times Magazine, The American Scholar, National Review, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, The Times
(London), The Spectator, The Reader's Digest, as well as in his own journal, The National Interest, and in various
Australian publications, including Quadrant , The Bulletin, Policy , The Australian Outlook, The Australian, The
Australian Financial Review, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. (It should be noted that the "National
Interest," Harries' own publication, features such warmongering, illegal conspiratory articles as "Free Baluchistan," and
"The Chinese Cozy Up to
the Pakistanis" where it is suggested that the United States should fund and arm rebels inside
Pakistan to carve up the nation to balk Chinese-Pakistani relations.)
Ties to the Australian National University
Lowy Institute appears to maintain close ties with all of Australia's prominent universities. The
Australian National University, however, is one that is stumbled across over and over again, with Lowy
co-hosting events, tapping ANU's professors for research papers, and airing its propaganda under a pseudo-academic
light. Additionally, many of Lowy's own members have been drawn from ANU's alumni as well as prominent heads of
various ANU departments.
Martine Letts: Lowy Institute Deputy Directory,
appointed to the ANU Council in 2004.
Professor Hugh White: Lowy Institute Visiting
Fellow, professor of Strategic Studies at ANU. Also a regular columnist for The Age and the Sydney Morning
Professor Warwick McKibbin: Lowry Institute
Professional Fellow, Director of ANU Research School of Economics, and also a Non-Senior Fellow at the Brookings
Dr. Milton Osborne: Visiting Fellow in the Faculty
of Asian Studies at the Australian National University.
Professor Alan Dupont: Senior Fellow at ANU's
Strategic and Defence Studies Centre.
The first search result that comes up within Lowy Institute's publication archives is an interesting document
titled, "Thai studies in Australia." Under
"Specialists Consulted," no less than 9 "specialists" came from ANU, including the notoriously intellectually
dishonest Andrew Walker of ANU's "New Mandala" blog. Walker is fond of taking regional corporate agendas and
shoehorning them into something resembling that of academia to lend them legitimacy they'd otherwise lack. He is
also adept at giving the corporatocracy talking points a decidedly liberal spin, drawing in well intentioned people
to consider his "work" when otherwise they'd be revolted.
Walker spends his time
berating Thailand's self-sufficiency economy, suggesting that encouraging people to be self-reliant
agriculturally, the very principle that throughout history has produced the strongest, most resilient nations on
earth, somehow excludes them from participating in the "national economy" as well as participating in "electoral
democracy." He and his partner, Nicholas Farrelly, post up articles promoting the very worst aspects of the
corporate-financiers' NGO creep into sovereign Asia, as progressive and justified.
Right on cue, as National Endowment for Democracy-funded "Bersih 2.0" was preparing for mass demonstrations in
Malaysia, Walker's "New Mandala" blog posted the following, "The
biggest threat – as perceived by the present administration – to Malaysia’s internal security is a demand for free
and fair elections." What Walker failed to research and tell his readership, was the fact that Bersih is on record,
organizers themselves admitting to it, having received funds from the National Endowment for Democracy-funded
National Democratic Institute, as well as from globalist bankster George Soros' "Open Society" foundation. The
threat then, contrary to what was written on "New Mandala" is not "free and fair elections," but rather foreign-funded sedition
led by globalist-stooge, Ibrahim Anwar.
Walker's "New Mandala" blog also dutifully hits on all the key talking points being pushed by the global
corporate-financiers. When an ex-Reuters journalist penned his disingenuous, conveniently timed Wikileaks-based hit piece
titled, "Thai Story," Walker was right by his side
providing an outlet and badly needed legitimacy for his hackery. But in addition to Walker, there was the Lowy
Institute's propaganda mouthpiece, "The
Interpreter." After the July 3, 2011 Thai elections, the Interpreter chimed in with "The danger of a Thai civil
war" where the globalist, degenerate-filled, elitist think-tank skipped past their client-stooge Thaksin
Shinawatra, and laid the blame for Thailand's current political turmoil on the nation's revered monarchy. Citing
Marshall's 3,000 unverified, unsubstantiated Wikileaks cables, who Marshall himself claims, is only "believed to
have been downloaded by US soldier Bradley Manning in Iraq," the Interpreter suggests it is "journalism of the
Adding insult to injury, for those who understand how this network operates, the Interpreter cites fellow
degenerate, corporate-serving globalist think-tank, the Council on Foreign Relations
to bolster their claim.
The Interpreter maintains a partnership of sorts with other globalist connected rags like "The Diplomat" who echo
the globalist consensus on any given issue and itself boasts
partnerships with corporate-funded global think-tanks like the Soros-funded Foreign Policy Centre. There is a reason why the Interpreter, the
Diplomat, and Andrew Walker's "New Mandala" blog are all on the same page along with other corporate-serving
propaganda outfits like CNN, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, and many others. It is because beneath the
veneer of objectivity and academia, lies what is an obviously self-serving agenda propagated by a self-evident,
omnipresent global despotic corporatocracy.
Upon the Council on Foreign Relation's seal is the word VBIQVE, latin for "everywhere," and manifests itself in the
common English word, ubiquitous. Indeed as we see,
regarding just the Lowy Institute alone, it contaminates an entire region's news, media, universities, literature,
research, studies, and of course, through the papers and propaganda it produces with the clout it puts behind them,
the region's politics and laws as well. The global corporatocracy is everywhere, affecting
everything, perhaps so profoundly it escapes one's notice.
However, upon seeing this network exposed, the people involved, their history of promoting an unaccountable,
self-serving agenda at everyone's expense but their own, we can begin rendering moot the false legitimacy they
foist upon society with their fancy logos, lofty titles, disingenuous liberal-esque spin, their insufferable
arrogance, and entire institutions co-opted or even contrived to serve their own ends.
We can begin by exposing these charlatans, stooges, and
crooks for what they really are. We can boycott the corporations that fund and
perpetuate these unsavory, dubious, and often well-hidden agendas. We can also begin to replace this nefarious
network they've constructed by becoming self-sufficient on a local
level. There is good reason why ANU imposter-academic Andrew Walker, along with the Wall Street
Journal and the Economist are so adamantly
against Thailand's attempt at implementing nation-wide localism - it
is because it will set a viable example for all nations to
follow out from under the squatting parasites that make up the global
5. CIA Veteran: Israel To Attack Iran In
Fall [of 2011]
The Israeli security establishment is increasingly worried by Netanyahu's bellicose stance
Rosenberg Last Modified: 17 Jul 2011
A longtime CIA officer who spent 21 years in the Middle East is predicting that Israel will bomb
Iran in the fall, dragging the United States into another major war and endangering US military and
civilian personnel (and other interests) throughout the Middle East and beyond.
Earlier this week, Robert Baer appeared on the provocative KPFK Los Angeles
Background Briefing, hosted by Ian Masters. It was there that he predicted that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin
Netanyahu is likely to ignite a war with Iran in the very near future.
Robert Baer has had a storied career, including a stint in Iraq in the 1990s where he organised
opposition to Saddam Hussein. (He was recalled after being accused of trying to organise Saddam's
assassination.) Upon his retirement, he received a top decoration for meritorious service.
Baer is no ordinary CIA operative. George Clooney won an Oscar for playing a character based on
Baer in the film Syriana (Baer also wrote the book).
He obviously won't name many of his sources in Israel, the United States, and elsewhere, but the
few he has named are all Israeli security figures who have publically warned that Netanyahu and Defense
Minister Ehud Barak are hell-bent on war.
Most former Mossad chiefs wary of Netanyahu
Baer was especially impressed by the unprecedented warning about Netanyahu's plans by former
Mossad chief Meir Dagan. Dagan left the Israeli intelligence agency in September 2010. Two months ago, he
predicted that Israel would attack and said that doing so would be "the stupidest thing" he could imagine.
When asked about what would happen in the aftermath of an Israeli attack Dagan said
that: "It will be followed by a war
with Iran. It is the kind of thing where we know how it starts, but not how it will end."
The Iranians have the capability to fire rockets at
Israel for a period of months, and Hizbollah could fire tens of thousands of grad
rockets and hundreds of long-range missiles, he said.
According to Ben Caspit of the Israeli daily Maariv, Dagan's blasts at Israel's
political leadership are significant not only because Mossad chiefs, in office or retired, traditionally have
kept their lips sealed, but also because Dagan is very conservative on security matters.
Caspit writes that Dagan is "one of the most rightwing militant people ever born here. ... When
this man says that the leadership has no vision and is irresponsible, we should stop sleeping soundly at
Dagan describes the current Israeli government as "dangerous and irresponsible" and views
speaking out against Netanyahu as his patriotic duty.
And his abhorrence of Netanyahu is not uncommon in the Israeli security
Accordingto Think Progress, citing the
Forward newspaper, 12 of the 18 living ex-chiefs of Israel's two security agencies (Mossad and Shin
Bet), are "either actively opposing Netanyahu's stances or have spoken out against them". Of the remaining
six, two are current ministers in Netanyahu government, leaving a grand total of four out of 18 who
independently support the prime minister.
In short, while Congress dutifully gives Netanyahu 29 standing ovations, the Israelis who know
the most about both Netanyahu and Israel's strategic situation think he is a dangerous disaster.
But according to Baer, we ain't seen nothing yet.
There is almost "near certainty" that Netanyahu is "planning an attack [on Iran] ... and it will
probably be in September before the vote on a Palestinian state. And he's also hoping to draw the United
States into the conflict", Baer explained.
The Israeli air force would attack "Natanz and other nuclear facilities to degrade their
capabilities. The Iranians will strike back where they can: Basra, Baghdad", he said, and even Afghanistan.
Then the United States would jump into the fight with attacks on Iranian targets. "Our special forces are
already looking at Iranian targets in Iraq and across the border [in Iran] which we would strike. What we're
facing here is an escalation, rather than a planned out-and-out war. It's a nightmare scenario. We don't have
enough troops in the Middle East to fight a war like that." Baer added, "I think we are looking into the
Another US war?
Masters asked Baer why the US military is not mobilising to stop this war from happening. Baer
responded that the military is opposed, as is former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who used his
influence to thwart an Israeli attack during the Bush and Obama administrations. But he's gone now and "there
is a warning order inside the Pentagon" to prepare for war.
It should be noted that the Iranian regime is quite capable of triggering a war with the United
States through some combination of colossal stupidity and sheer hatred. In fact, as Baer explained, the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard would welcome a war. They are "paranoid". They are "worried about ... what's
happening to their country economically, in terms of the oil embargo and other sanctions". And they are
worried about a population that increasingly despises the regime.
They need an external
enemy. Because we are leaving Iraq, it's Israel. But in order
to make this threat believable, they would love an attack on their nuclear facilities,
love to go to war in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Iraq and hit us where they could.
Their defense is asymmetrical. We can take out all of their armored units. It's of
little difference to them, same with their surface-to-air missile sites. It would make
little difference because they would use terrorism. They would do serious damage to our
fleet in the Gulf.
Given all that, is it possible that the United States would allow Israel to attack when the
president knows we would be forced to join the war on Israel's side?
"The president is up for re-election next year," Blair pointed out, and Israel is "truly out of
What happens when you see 100 F-16's
approaching Iraq and there is a call to the White House [from Netanyahu] that says
"We're going in, we're at war with Iran"? What does the
President of the United States do? He has
little influence over Bibi Netanyahu. ... We can't stop him. And he knows
It's a pretty frightening scenario, made infinitely more so by the fact that top Israelis (who have heard
Netanyahu's thinking from Netanyahu himself) also see the future the same way. Those Israelis deserve a world of
credit for sounding the warning bell loudly enough that we would hear it and do something about it - although it's
impossible to know if the people who matter are paying attention.
Actually, only one person matters: the US president. If Israel bombed Iran tomorrow, Congress would forget all
about their partisan differences and run, not walk, to the House and Senate floors to endorse the attack and call
for unstinting support for Israel. That is what Congress always does, and will always do so long as the lobby (and
the donors it directs) are the key players in making our Middle East policies.
And who knows what Obama would do? So far, he has not exactly distinguished himself when it comes to standing up
But an Israeli attack on Iran would be different. It would endanger countless Americans (in the region and here
at home, too). It would kill off any economic recovery by causing oil prices to skyrocket. It would engulf us in
another Middle East war. And it would threaten the existence of the state of Israel.
This is something the president needs to focus on instead of being forced to nickel and dime with the likes of
Representative Eric Cantor and Senator Mitch McConnell. How incredible that these two, and their right-wing allies,
have our government tied in knots in their incessant effort to elevate themselves by destroying the President of
the United States. It is sickening.
MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at the Media Matters Action Network.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent Al Jazeera's editorial
A version of this article was previously published on Foreign Policy
6. Sydney Opera
House Next False Flag?
By Bonnie Malkin, Sydney
21 Jul 2011
Sydney Opera House Next False Flag?
The building was featured on the front of the latest edition of Inspire,
an English-language magazine that has reportedly been linked to al-Qaeda and includes instructions on how to make
But Robert McClelland, the attorney general, said that the nation's terror threat level would not
change as a result of the Opera House appearing in the magazine's regular bomb-making section, "Open Source
In the magazine, the section is described as "a resource manual for those who loathe the tyrants;
includes bomb-making techniques; security measures, guerrilla tactics, weapons training and all other jihad-related
"I have been advised this publication does not represent any change to the extent of the terrorist
threat within Australia," Mr McClelland said in a statement.
"And I am advised it has not been accompanied by any specific threat in Australia or to Australian
The country's National Terrorism Alert Level currently sits at medium, which means a terrorist
attack could occur. It has been at the same level since 2001.
Peter Dein, New South Wales's counter-terrorism commander, said there was no text in the magazine
relating to the Opera House.
He added that it was hard to interpret what message it might be sending.
"It could simply be the fact that it's an icon that is well known around the Western world and may
not really have any relevance that it is in Sydney," he said.
"What we are concerned about is the influences this particular magazine can have on vulnerable
people in our community who are likely to be influenced by this extremist rhetoric."
The Opera House is under 24-hour surveillance, but that did not stop an anti-war protester from
scaling its famous white sails to paint "No War" in red on the side of the building in 2003.
Earlier this year, security at another Sydney landmark, the Harbour Bridge, was breached when a
former soldier climbed to the top of the structure to protest about fathers' rights.
7. Satanist Insider: A Woman
will Herald the Antichrist
July 13, 2011
We are in the process of organizing a structured, hierarchical society - a modern day caste system, if you will.
Everyone will be monitored, every transaction recorded and the ignorant, credulous, gutless and idiotic slaves will be safe
[Disclaimer: Posting this material should not be
interpreted as an endorsement of its accuracy or viewpoint. I assume readers will take what they wish from it.
However I do endorse the central assumption, that most of our "leaders" are Illuminati satanists, their agents or
their dupes. See this last
testament from a leading Satanist first made public by Fozdyke in January 2010. HM ]
By Aloysius Fozdyke
Satanists, whether adepts of the Alpha Lodge or not, have only ever wanted one thing: Everything!
And we want what's best for the sheeple. Indeed, we are the only ones who give the sheeple what they want.
Essentially we have merged crime with policy; stealing with government. We will continue to take whatever wealth remains to be handed to us by
the preposterous populace we serve.
We produce wars to help cull the useless eaters. We pass laws to destroy their economies. Whilst we grow wealthy,
the filth grow poor. And we do this because that's what the sheeple want.
Do you think that we could be as successful as we are without the help we receive? Whilst we are at the forefront
of humanity, they seek salvation in superstition and revelation in Internet mysticism.
Governments internationally, of all types of political persuasions,
give the automated appearance of principle whilst singing from our
Sheeple want to be corralled because that's what makes them feel safe.
They love brutal police and heavily armed military security decorating their streets. They're paying for our
programs and the bullets that will cull them.
media garbage, masturbatory nihilism, religious banalities and political paranoia whilst the system is run as a
closed shop by an oligarchy of business interests and in-our-pocket bureaucrats whoring with us: their monied
masters. All the important decisions are made behind closed
THE REST IS JUST THEATER
Don't you love pre-packaged question-and-answer sessions and scripted, flag and slogan, lying politicians mouthing
pundit-generated opinions; politicians who represent nothing except the system itself? Notice how centrists are now
further to the right and votes are cast on social issues for the lesser of the two evils?
We are in the process of organizing a structured, hierarchical society - a modern day caste system, if you will.
Everyone will be monitored, every transaction recorded and the ignorant, credulous, gutless and idiotic slaves will
be safe and belittled.
their children eat from our hand. We are in the process of increasing our control. Our Father's name
is hallowed upon His Earth just as it will be in heaven. His and His followers time has come.
(Left, Michele Bachmann has the right eyes
for the job. But no Fozdyke didn't mention her.)
The Usher of Desecration was chosen by Our God. She is not one of us, yet Her name is now known. Her kingdom will
come into being at the end of 2012. She is an avatar; an instrument. Her will is irrelevant. Her advisers are us.
She will be rewarded for the quality of Her effective and spectacular fictions, for Her uplifting and enjoyable
lies - all of which will be defensible in theory.
Think W.J. Clinton or weapons of mass destruction. The sheeple will continue to live a conceited, narcissistic
dream that they are dangerous, ungovernable and possess an exacting eye over their elected leaders rather than admit that they are stupid, irrelevant and
I told your readers who would win the last Australian federal election and I'm now giving them important
information before it manifests. Can they read between my lines or will they continue to deny my truth?
We know that they don't care.
Even they know that much.
for "Satanist Insider: A Woman will Herald the Antichrist"
Andrew said (July 14,
Henry, this is from the
Bayside prophecies. The monetary collapse, the War in the Middle East, the comet Elenin, etc. were all predicted
by this woman in New York. This quote is for Mr. Fozdyke as he still has time to repent from his evil ways
before it is too late for him.
"I warn you now: beware and
watch, for one will come among you with the powers of satan. Know that he shall say to you, 'I am out in the
field. Come to me.' But you shall not go. Others will say to you: 'Go! I have seen him. He is yonder, over
beyond the building.' You will say: 'No. I have not seen him.' For I shall come to you in the like manner in
which I ascended. I shall descend with a roar of triumph from the multitudes of Heaven. We shall come in great
victory." - Jesus, January 31, 1976
Repent, Mr. Fozdyke, you
still have time to save your soul. What good is temporary wealth and power when your path as of right now leads
you to eternal suffering in the lake of fire?
said (July 13,
Fozdyke, you idiot. The
ONLY, and I say ONLY power you and your "caste" still have is the cult and reverence towards De-humanized
Science, which is something we Truthers are about to start attacking hard. Bertrand Russel wrote that every
"specialist" would be a semi-god eventually and Jaques Ellul The Red Bishop wrote that every "medical" TV show
or series is just plain empty in-your-face propaganda. We KNOW THAT and believe me, not everyone who wanders the
Internet believes in Aliens, 2012, Reptilians or other nonsense coming from your MI-6 boy David Icke or any
other infiltrated piece of crap.
We don't trust
money-science ( like Climate Change ) and the next Revolution will be in the direction of TAMING science and
remodeling it to fit the real and true interests of humankind. We already know where to attack, and we're gonna
win. On your side you have the naiveté of the older generations who still revere technology ( and science ) as
something unreachable for the common man, the Individual ( from whom everything emanates ), and kneel before it.
But we, I, specially, don't kneel before anything, and I don't care who your chosen whore will be; prepare
yourselves for tough intellectual battles from now on. " Have no fear".!
I don't share your view of David icke. I think he is doing marvelous
work, and if he says reptiles or ET's are running the Illuminati, I'll reserve judgment. But for my own account, I
just trace things to the Illuminati bankers. That is enough to explain world events.
said (July 13,
The Usher of Desecration
(UoD) is the person who prepares the way for antichrist...he/she is not the antichrist himself. That would be
the one who Fozdyke refers to as "Vindex." The UoD is sort of the evil twin or alter ego of a John the Baptist
and plays the same role of "preparing the way". It is "Vindex" who is antichrist and who is having his way
prepared even now, but which will be prepared in an even more intensified manner via this UoD.
Satan (a Hebrew word
meaning "adversary"), aka Lucifer, biblically also called Hillel Ben-Shachar (the shining one, son of the dawn),
cannot create...he can only imitate and pervert. He
can only come behind the true God after He has already set in motion some circumstance and play off that initial
creation. Therefore his entire plan will be an alter/flip-side/perversion of the original plan you see outlined
in the Bible. He sees Himself as worthy to sit in the place of God (who the "adepts" refer to as Enlil, a most ancient Assyrian designation for Yahweh), he will have for himself a
son who is anointed with his power and who sits at his right hand and he will also have a prophet who points
toward and lifts up his son to the masses. It's all just a sad copy for a sad little "god" who wants to be king
of a sad little hill for a short time. He hates that he was created and can never be a creator.
Since the major political
development scheduled for the end of 2012 is the US presidential election I would assume Fozdyke is referring to
either Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin. It can't be Christine Lagarde as she's already in power and frankly she
only influences monetary policy and doesn't have great political power. Angela Merkel will be out of power by
then. I don't see any other female power brokers who could fit the bill. I didn't think it could get worse than
Obama as far as preparing the way for antichrist but maybe we're in for a real treat soon from a personage we
wouldn't have predicted. We'll see. [Nazarene Remnant comment: The
fact that the Nazi Fourth Reich is what we’re really talking about here, and it is scheduled to begin in
Australia, specifically in that part of Australia North of the Tropic of Capricorn, and that our red-haired PM,
Julia Gillard, is a lesbian pro-abortionist, as well as a practicing Satanist, and an habitual liar (she’s often
referred to here as Juliar), makes her
a front runner for the woman Fozdyke is talking about. But then again, there is Queen Semiramis II herself …
Queen Elizabeth II!]
said (July 13,
You're right; the plan of
your master is still here, it is still in operation, and people like yourself are still actively pursuing its
completion. And great, a woman as the antichrist … [Nazarene Remnant comment: The
identity of the Antichrist is crystal clear: the current Prince of Wales, Prince Charles. That is
certain!] That must be something! But seriously, the only thing I "read between the lines" is your
nervousness and fear. So what, if because of your master, you have deceived, hurt and killed the majority of the
Am I a great Satanist if I
deceive, hurt and kill a thousand small and helpless puppies that depend on me for survival? Because what it
comes down to is that we have basically all been helpless puppies in regard to the fallen ones in control, from
the moment we were separated from our Father.
Yes, people may go through a rough period in the near future thanks to this plan and world structure, but in the
end you know every knee will bow down to Jesus, the Son of the Creator. You already do so now, by not being able to
use his name, referring to him by “that 2000 year old death Jewish Bastard” or whatever. I mean, common, that
couldn’t possibly make you feel like the “almighty Satanist” you claim to be right?! The only true God, the
Creator, shall wipe away all tears from our eyes; there shall be no more death, no more sorrow, no more crying,
neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. This structure, this caste system,
this need for death, pain and sorrow ARE the former things that will pass away.
I know, you laugh at people
who say things like this, but it sounds like nervous laughter to me. You know you will absolutely NOT live
forever if you keep following your master. He is a deceiver and you know you are being deceived. Not a thousand underground bases or caves can rescue you
from that. I cannot judge you for your actions, but when the day comes when the true Messiah
does, I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes for anything in this world.
Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal
July 19, 2011
Former Commissioner of London
Police, Sir Paul Stephenson.
"My hunch is that, with police collaboration, Murdoch and his newspaper ran an intelligence
gathering operation designed to blackmail England's Masonic elite and ensure they toe the line. "
By Henry Makow
Clearly there is a lot more to the Murdoch scandal than we have been told.
You don't shutter a 167-year-old newspaper, the largest English-language weekly in the world, just because some
reporters were overzealous in their quest for news.
If the newspaper had only hacked the phones of Milly Dowler and the 9-11 victims' families, I doubt we would be
hearing about this.
The newspaper hacked the phones, computers, bank accounts, phone and medical records of leading members of the
Illuminati establishment, Governors of the Bank of England, the royal family, and politicians and their
wives such as Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Jack Straw, Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell.
My hunch is that, with police collaboration, Murdoch and his newspaper ran an intelligence gathering operation
designed to blackmail England's Masonic elite and ensure they toe the line.
The hacking has been common knowledge for more than a dozen years, when The Guardian exposed it in 1999.
Remember when Prince Charles was recorded in 1989 saying he envied
Camilla's tampon? Nothing was done because this was the way power
In 2003, News of the World Editor Rebekah Brooks admitted to a parliamentary committee that they had paid police
for information and intended to continue. This has been public knowledge for some time!
But the times are changing. Something went wrong.
comment: What we are seeing now has been part of “The Plan” all along. See
section 14, “The Plan calls for the Illuminati money-power elite to be exposed and vilified,” in our free
book, The Usher of
Desecration for explanation.] Perhaps Murdoch and his cohorts
overstepped their bounds. Perhaps they started to monitor the wrong people. Perhaps they got too big for their
I don't know the reason but the time had come to take Murdoch down and reorganize the system of blackmail in
It was time to clean house, not just at the newspaper but also at Scotland Yard. It remains to be seen how deeply
the Prime Minister David Cameron is involved.
These are dangerous times for Illuminati collaborators. No one is safe from swift demotion: Dominique
Strauss-Khan, Muammar Gaddafi, Hosni Mubarak, and now even Rupert Murdoch.
bemoan pervasive official corruption refuse to address the underlying cause. Our important institutions all
have been infiltrated and subverted by a satanic cult, Freemasonry.
This ancient secret society is dedicated to undermining our institutions and values, and folding every country into
a tyrannical world government controlled by its sponsors, the Rothschild central banking cartel.
Read the Full Story:
Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal
9. 'Murdoch behind 9/11, Iraq, Afghan wars and Financial Meltdown'
Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff, interviewed by Press TV
Media mogul Rupert Murdoch has played a significant role in the elections of three U.S. presidents,
as well as some of the events that have happened during their administrations including the 9/11 terrorist attacks,
the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the economic meltdown, says Gordon Duff, senior editor and writer for
"Murdoch is a close associate of a significant criminal conspiracy of industrialists, bankers and
others. He is the front man for them… the person who gives them control of governments through bribery and
blackmail," Duff told Press TV's U.S. Desk on Thursday.
"We have three presidents of the United States who have essentially been appointed to office and
controlled entirely by Rupert Murdoch and the things that
happened during their administrations," he added.
A Word or Two on
What Isn't Being Said
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor
Today the British papers not owned by Rupert Murdoch "rumored" that he might be jailed. Americans, even Brits, have
little or no idea what is at risk here. There is simply no one who can report it when the individual who, not only
controls the world's largest news organization turns out to be, well, what?
Who is Rupert Murdoch?
What he is not is an Australian "right wing" billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an
Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?
Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for
two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass
laws at will. Where did the power come from?
We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda.
What is his agenda? Ah, there's the rub.
Was it about selling newspapers using scandals or spying in the name of Israel to push
Britain and the United States into wars for Israel? [Nazarene Remnant comment: And that includes
Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and all the other nations who are in Iraq and
Afghanistan.] There is a simple answer.
Murdoch's primary motivation isn't even that he is "for Israel." Murdoch is, perhaps, the most influential Israeli, more powerful than
Netanyahu. The problem with that is that his beliefs are what we call
This makes him a threat. Ultra-nationalists are known to support wars, plan terrorist acts,
manipulate populations into strife and racism, foster fear and panic, even financial ruin.
What are we describing here?
If you aren't totally brain dead, you realize I am describing Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn
Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.
Murdoch owns Fox News and so much else you may not have a time to look at the list. If he doesn't
own it he doesn't want it.
Fox is a network and Murdoch, owning so many newspapers across America and being a foreigner
shouldn't be able to control such a thing. How did he do
Reagan "appointed" Murdoch an American citizen. Murdoch promised to have Fox News support
Republicans and say whatever was needed, no matter how false, how stupid or, as we have seen now for decades, how
What he really did, however, was use Fox as a base to allow Israel to run spy
These went two ways:
1. Israel got lots of military technology and secrets they could sell to America's enemies
for money. This is good "Murdoch" business sense, as we all see now.
2. Murdoch helped Israel gain control of congress. They literally run the United States. The
tools? As in Britain [Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc etc], bribery and blackmail, police, military and
No surprises for anyone.
Murdoch has, in fact, engineered the last 20 plus years of American [Australia, New Zealand, Canada
etc etc] history, picking politicians, throwing elections, establishing policies. Were the decisions his own?
I don't think so. I think Murdoch represents a group, mostly financial, making up
the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve Banks and organized
There is an Israeli or Jewish aspect to some of this but not in the sense of being "pro" or "anti"
Semitic. The Murdoch empire, married to the "lily white" "no Jews allowed" Republican Party simply put their own
very powerful spin on the good old "New World Order," pushing it into drug running, arms and human trafficking,
manipulated international currencies and debt on a massive scale, ran America and the European Union into economic
collapse, worked with oil companies to set up price fixing schemes…
This is what Murdoch and his friends have done, all the while
pointing their fingers at Osama bin Laden [and Al-Qaida] and the evil "liberals."
They divided Britain, starting at first as "conservatives" and then changed to "liberals." What
they did in Britain is undermine legal government, destroy the nation and the public's trust in the government,
Blair, Cameron, it doesn't matter, Murdoch chose both and ran and runs both like
hand puppets as he did with Bush and his friends.
The ideas are
simple. Bilk the countries out of
every last cent, use a portion to bribe or blackmail politicians, buy police and get even more
Then you lie to the people, give them enemies
to hate, arrange wars for them to fight and stand back and watch them destroy themselves.
Are there people really this evil?
Yes there are, Murdoch, the gang at his companies, the gang at Fox News, the folks in the US called
"neocons," the Israeli lobby in the US, the ADL, AIPAC and the Likudist faction in Israel run by Netanyahu.
These folks hate the United States.
A similar group hate Britain. Australia has their own, he runs that place
entirely, right into the ground. He also runs Germany, Canada, he runs
much of what was once the "free world."
Am I describing Satan?
His strongest advocates, those who have stood with his thieves and liars against all that is
decent, all that is good, all that is right is the Evangelical and "Zionist" communities in the United States. They
were and are the "fertile ground" for his message of hate and deceit.
Who does Murdoch claim to hate?
Muslims for sure, they are all bad. Everything he touches in his hundreds of publications and TV
shows or the phony news his gang of cutthroats create, hate of Muslims is always
on top. This pleases his Israeli friends. If things keep going as they are, he may need
to hide out there and Israel will always protect him, maybe plow down a few Palestinian homes to give him a grand
estate. After all, Muslims are an easy target, living in petty dictatorships run by thieves who we have now learned
have always run to Washington and Tel Aviv for orders.
Take out a second. Think the word "Palestinian." Do you also think "terrorist?" Do you see a child
being killed by an Israeli helicopter or innocent people killed by a TV villain, almost invariably played by Jewish
actors, perhaps a sick "inside joke" of Murdoch's.
The Islamic people of the world have been played, exploited and crushed since
1919. History will show it carefully planned and financed by a certain European
banking family, one that 6 years earlier had established an illegal banking system in the US.
Learn about the real Balfour Declaration and how it
was gotten through blackmail, learn who wrote it and to whom it was sent.
The story reads exactly like the things that are coming out in Britain day after day.
Murdoch tells his followers to hate "smart people." There has to be
fear of the educated, the "elites." You can't have rampant racism and blind ignorance until you destroy public
trust in the natural leaders, until you destroy real culture and replace it with mechanized music, scandal
mongering, dirty sex and endless conspiracies.
Murdoch is the real king of conspiracy theories.
Look at the endless list of wild accusations that came from Fox alone. Then look at the others, the
accusations, the wild and insane things that were written into history but likely planned by Murdoch.
9/11 probably had Murdoch's hand in it as did the London bombings on 7/7.
There could be no great conspiracy without control of the news.
Now we find the news itself controlled the governments and may well have written the scripts to the
wars, the rigged elections, the acts of terror and the misdirection that sent America into a decade of cruel and
useless bloodletting after terror groups that never existed in the first place.
Now, today, as our British cousins are reeling in the revelations that
their government for decades has not been their
own, a diseased hybrid of crazy old man, Israeli spies and the paid stooges that
the people thought were serving them….
And it goes on in America, full blast, Murdoch and his creatures, planning the future of
One of his creatures is Boehner.
Another is Palin.
Then there is Gingrich.
There was the entire Bush administration.
But, to get to the dark heart of evil, first you look at Fox News.
Well ... Who is Rupert Murdoch?
Dems Calling For Murdoch Investigation Got $$$ From NewsCorp
Phone Hacking Inquiry Judge Attended Murdoch Parties
Hacking Collectives Reshaping The Online World
10. Murdoch Is Not The Only
Maggot In The Rotten Apple
Public enemy Number One is the
of the Murdoch menace – for the moment anyway – it’s time for the
British public to turn the spotlight on the other villainsour craven politicians
pay homage to.
Public enemy Number One is the pro-Israel lobby.
An organization called the Conservative Friends of Israel states it has “twin aims of supporting Israel and
promoting Conservatism. With close to 2000 activists as members – alongside 80% of Conservative MPs – CFI is active
at every level of the Party”.
And the rot goes all the
way to the top, with Conservative prime minister David Cameron endorsing it
enthusiastically: “I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative Friend of Israel; and I am proud
of the key role CFI plays within our Party.”
Back in 2006 The Jewish
Chronicle ran a report on the backers bankrolling Cameron’s bid for the party leadership. It was sent to the
Committee on Standards in Public Life as an example of how the pro-Israel lobby infiltrates government and
undermines the very principles the standards watchdog was established to uphold. But Zionist tentacles reach
further than you think. The Committee ignored it.
At the time Cameron, a self-proclaimed Zionist, pledged:
“If I become Prime Minister,
Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on her…”
Democratsallow a similar lobby group
to flourish within their ranks. Its stated aim is to “maximise support for the State of Israel within the
Liberal Democrats and Parliament”. Labour also has a virulent Israel
supporters club that broadcasts Tel Aviv’s propaganda and, when in power, appoints Israel lobby stooges to key
ministerial and other positions.
Britain, as everyone knows,
has carved an unfortunate niche for itself as America’s poodle.But not enough people ask
the key question: whose poodle is America? American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has the private parts of US Congress in such a vice-like grip that the
Zionist regime’s interests come first in Washington. For example, the US House of Representatives felt obliged
to endorse, by 390 votes to 5, Israel’s assault on Gaza in the winter of 2008/9, a massacre that killed over
1,400 (mostly Palestinian civilians including a large number of women and children), wounded and maimed
thousands more, left tens of thousands homeless and horrified the rest of the world.
It is amazing how many
people with dual passports stalk the corridors of power in Washington. And we all saw the
orchestrated adulation with which the Israeli premier was received the other week.
machine of course denies it.Nevertheless the US House
of Representatives felt obliged to endorse, by 390 votes to 5, Israel’s murderous assault on Gaza in the winter
of 2008/9, an atrocity that killed over 1,400 (mostly Palestinian civilians including a large number of women
and children), wounded and maimed thousands more, left tens of thousands homeless and horrified the rest of the
The knock-on effect in the
UK is inevitable. We too are so embroiled in the Zionists’ perpetual strife with the Islamic world that we’ve
been sucked into the same cesspit. Britain is now one of the most hated nations on earth thanks to our cosy association
with US-Israeli ambitions in the Middle East.
Israel was founded on terror, land theft, ethnic cleansing and extreme
brutality.Why would the British
Establishment wish to snuggle up to it? Why did Liam Fox, now Defence Secretary, famously say: “We must
remember that in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic
liberal values against repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all
stand together or we will all fall divided.”
As if that wasn’t absurd
enough William Hague, now foreign secretary, came out with this in 2008: “The unbroken thread of Conservative
Party support for Israel that has run for nearly a century from the Balfour Declaration to the present day will
continue. Although it will no doubt often be tested in the years ahead, it will remain constant, unbroken, and
undiminished by the passage of time.”
Undimished by the passage
of crime, too. Tzipi Livni was Israeli foreign minister at the time of Operation Cast Lead and largely
responsible for the unimaginable terror and destruction unleashed on Gaza’s civilians. Livni’s office issued a
statement saying she was proud of Operation Cast Lead and, lacking all remorse, she later declared: “I would
today take the same decisions.” Obviously she is on several wanted lists. When a warrant for her arrest was
issued in London she went whining to our then foreign secretary David Miliband, who apologized. When the
Conservative coalition came in and Hague took over the Foreign Office who can forget how Hague rushed to prove
his loyalty by promising that our universal jurisdiction laws would be changed to protect Israel’s suspected war
criminals? It was “an appalling situation where a politician like Mrs Livni could be threatened with arrest on
coming to the UK” he said.
David Cameron, for his
part, told Conservative Friends of Israel: “The ties between this party and Israel are unbreakable. And in me,
you have a Prime Minister whose belief in Israel is indestructible.”
And he recently told a
Jewish audience: “I want to be
clear, we will always support Israel… when Iran flouts its international obligations Britain is and will remain
at the forefront of the international community in ratcheting up the pressure with tough sanctions. We will not
stand by and allow Iran to cast a nuclear shadow over Israel or the wider region.”
Considering it is Israel
which casts the nuclear shadow, menaces the region and flouts international laws and conventions,
that remark was beyond ridiculous.
Cameron, like Fox, seems determined to make Israel’s enemies Britain’s enemies when we have no quarrel with
any of them.
Who gave him
permission to spout such dangerous drivel in our name?
Hague too loves ratcheting
up the violence. While still deeply embroiled in an unwinnable Afghan campaign he started bombing the hell out
of Libya months ago – with no end in sight – and is now sending more British aircraft into “theatre” to
intensify the carnage, seemingly oblivious to the fact that back home in Britain we are struggling to make ends
meet with a monumental economic and financial deficit around our necks.
Who’s he doing all this bloodshed for?
Certainly not for us.
Lacking military experience
these Israel-firsters, liked Blair and others before them, show an unhealthy lust for death and destruction.
They are what I believe our American cousins call ‘chicken-hawks’ – talking tough
but taking care never to risk their own worthless skins.
Another ardent admirer of
the Zionist regime is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary chairman of the Conservative Friends of Israel. He told
Parliament: “Everyone in this
House should have an interest in Israel, because it is a country that embodies the values that we should stand
for. Israel [has] become a bastion of the rule of law…”
minister Netanyahu heads their Likud
which is the embodiment
of greed, racist ambition, lawlessness and callous disregard for other people’s rights. In any other country it would be banned and its leaders locked
up. Yet Netanyahu is welcomed like a hero in the US and given 29 standing ovations by
Likud intends to make the
seizure of Jerusalem permanent and establish Israel’s capital there. It will “act with vigor” to ensure Jewish
sovereignty in East Jerusalem (which still officially belongs to the Palestinians as does the Old City).
The illegal settlements are “the realization of Zionist values and a clear expression of the unassailable right
of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel”. They will be strengthened and expanded. As for the
Palestinians, they can run their lives in a framework of self-rule “but not as an independent and sovereign
Are these the values
Arbuthnot is suggesting we adopt?
Kadima, the party of Livni,
Olmert and Barak, is little better and has also pledged to preserve the larger settlement blocs and steal
As for Arbuthnot’s claim
that Israel is a bastion of the rule of law, a UN fact-finding mission, dealing with the assault on the Mavi
Marmara last year, declared that “no case can be made for the legality of the
But here’s Arbuthnot again,
arguing the case for Israel… “Given that the flotilla was designed to be provocative and to end in violence, we
should not blame Israel for the violence against which it failed to guard itself; the blame lies with those who
went on to the flotilla expressly seeking martyrdom.”
The Mission considered that
Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza amounted to collective punishment and thus was illegal and contrary to Article
33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The interception of the Mavi Marmara on the high seas was “clearly
unlawful” and could not be justified even under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations (the right of
The Centre for
Constitutional Rights agrees that the blockade “cannot be reconciled with the principles of international law,
including international humanitarian law”. Center for Constitutional
Rights Legal Analysis September 2010.pdf
If the blockade is illegal,
why is it allowed to continue? Because
subservient Israel-firsters in London, Washington and other capitals won’t act. Lawlessness rules,
Arbuthnot, by the way, is
also chairman of Britain’s Defence Select Committee. Worrying, isn’t it?
The British government’s
policy of shielding and cosseting Israel’s extremists makes all of us complicit
in that regime’s crimes. How does this perverse devotion to a foreign power square with the
Seven Principles of Public Life, especially the one about Integrity, which the government is supposed to uphold?
The Principle of Integrity lays down that holders of public office should not place themselves under any
financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the
performance of their official duties.
Do MPs and ministers not
understand this simple imperative?If the Israel lobby has no
influence, as some have claimed, how do our leaders explain away the 80 percent of Conservative MPs who are
Friends of Israel? How do they explain the appointment of a Foreign Secretary who has been a Friend of Israel
since boyhood and a minister in charge of Middle East affairs who is a former officer of the Conservative
Friends of Israel?
There are rules
about conflict of interests.Why aren’t they followed?
Do we ever hear an MP or minister, when taking part in a Middle East debate, say “Mr Speaker, I wish the House
to know that I am a staunch member of Friends of Israel and Jewish money paid for my election
In his infatuation with
Israel Mr Hague even stoops to provide cover for its mega-crimes. At the height of the murderous Gaza blitz,
Hague announced to Parliament: “The immediate trigger for this crisis… was the barrage of hundreds of rocket
attacks against Israel on the expiry of the ceasefire or truce.”
The truce with Hamas didn’t
“expire”. It was violated after five months by Israeli forces in order to provoke Hamas and provide an excuse
for the long-planned assault. Israel had also failed to deliver its side of the ceasefire bargain, which was to
lift the blockade.
Our Middle East minister,
Alistair Burt, is another comedian.He recently announced that
Britain would not recognise a Palestinian state unless it emerged from a peace deal with Israel. London, he
said, could “not recognise a state that does not have a capital, and doesn’t have
Hadn’t he heard?Palestine’s borders are the
pre-1967 armistice lines as defined in UN resolutions and recognised by the international community. Where does Burt
suppose Israel’s borders are? Is Israel where Israel is supposed to be, within internationally defined borders? No,
it isn’t. Israel keeps its borders fluid, all the time grabbing a bit more land here and confiscating a bit more
there. Yet London recognises
Burt, Hague, Cameron, Fox,
Arbuthnot… there are many more like them. How can we be sure where their allegiance lies? Whom do they really work for?
I’ll leave the last word on
Israel’s evil machinations to Sir Gerald Kaufman, the straight-talking Jewish MP. He said in a Commons debate in
January 2008: “Is it not a fact
that only international action can bring to an end the humanitarian disaster caused by collective punishment
imposed by the gang of amoral
thugs who comprise the Israeli Government and violate not only international law but the historic Jewish
Sir Gerald’s family
suffered horribly during the Holocaust and his sick grandmother was shot dead in her bed by a German soldier.
“They’re not simply war criminals, they’re fools,” he said of the Israelis when Operation Cast Lead was
launched. “My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers
Cameron’s judgment, already
wobbly, has finally been shot to pieces by his coziness with Murdoch’s ‘mafia’, and he should be clearing his
desk. Add to that his dangerous obsession with racist Israel which
drags us into unnecessary wars against countries that pose no threat, and sacrifices our lads in uniform in an
unjust cause, and it’s clear that he must go.
Our elected MPs belong to us, the British voters.Not to some gang of foreign
thugs. We must mobilise to make sure they clearly understand this. And we must work to take back our
11. Tying Israel Irrevocably to 9/11
"We Know Who, We Even Know Why
This week, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Managing Editor at
Veterans Today, was interviewed on 9/11 and Israel’s involvement and their influence in American
affairs. Dr. Sabrosky is interviewed by Susan Modaress of Press TV. Runtime is 20
Alan, I call him that, a fellow editor, fellow Marine and good friend, does what few do when
discussing issues of such extreme controversy. Alan sticks to the facts, takes the facts to logical
conclusions and stops there. Any American of any political leaning or ethnicity can and
should, out of patriotism and out of sanity, watch this interview.
The case made is a case that will stand up in a court of law, a case not contrived for
entertainment, for propaganda or for an emotional “fix,” feeding hate, prejudice or the desire by some for
conspiracies to fill the void of a life bereft of meaning.
Alan Sabrosky is “serious as a heart attack.”
There is an underlying message to this interview, intended or not. Dr. Sabrosky
establishes a defensible position and sets limits.
A majority of Americans are aware that 9/11 had clear signs of government complicity, both
operationally and in the subsequent investigation that even Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera of Rupert
Murdoch’s FOX NEWS called a “whitewash.” A major Australian poll
taken last fall showed 77% of people there believe the US government to be fully complicit in
9/11. Similar polls in the US regularly score over 50%, some much
Sabrosky’s case, presented with much clarity, plants responsibility for 9/11 at the feet of
Israel and Americans whose loyalties, if we can call them that, are certainly not to the United States.
That these “Americans” now believed to be complicit in the planning and execution of the 9/11 terror attacks
are, for the most part, officials of the government, is telling.
Their complicity couldn’t be more obvious if they were caught standing with the detonation switches in their hands.
Israel is a different story, a public relationship characterized as “close friendship” and a private
one that more closely resembles that between America and the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold
Most Americans are not aware of how the relationship between Israel and the United States has
soured over the past 40 years. Behind an endless barrage of stories of the holocaust and fear mongering
about Antisemitism, political extremists in Israel and their allies in the US, many in positions of extreme
power and influence, have contrived to seriously harm the United States, ostensibly under the guise of
“support for Israel” and misrepresented security issues.
Sabrosky calls it “high treason.”
Below, the forgotten Geraldo Rivera report on 9/11, now “disappeared” from history, from the
archives, forgotten and victim of its own “coverup.”
YouTube - Veterans Today -
Beyond this, the past decade has bombarded the American public and the world with wildly
conflicting conspiracy theories and phony science, the worst of it from the American government
What can I say as a postscript or commentary to the interview? Liberal, conservative, Jew,
Gentile, what Alan Sabrosky says is simply the truth. He has the credentials and the character to know
Believing the government and mainstream media’s version of 9/11 and allowing Israeli “dual
citizens” to serve in government or electing and appointing officials whose relationship with Israel is
detrimental to the security of the United States is inconsistent with citizen responsibility for any
12. France Didn't Have a Revolution
July 14, 2011
By Andrew Smith
The French Revolution was part
of the long-term Illuminati banker plan to reshape mankind to serve them and their god Lucifer.
Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobinsforced the regime change historians call the French
The value of
history lies primarily in appreciating what's happening today. We
have a sense that events are driven by the past and that history repeats itself.
But why? Perhaps, the hidden planners of historical events have a limited repertoire of
dirty tricks. They suppress the history of the deceptions practiced on our
great grandparents, so they can mislead, maim and mutilate us and later generations.
Only when we see that the French Revolution of 1789 was planned and financed from abroad (just like the Russian
Revolution of 1917) can we suspect that the current "unrest" and "revolutions" in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Bahrain, Thailand, Yemen, Syria
and now Malaysia are not truly popular revolts but irregular warfare coups. Of course, in the
case of Libya where Qadaffi came close to eradicating the rebels, the foreign coup has become a regular military
operation supported by NATO air strikes. But they still
call it a revolution.
The dictionary defines "revolution" as a "sudden and violent change in government or in the political constitution
of a country, mainly brought about by internal causes; as the French Revolution of 1789." But subversive elements in London working with French and European
revolutionaries--NOT INTERNAL CAUSES--engineered the Paris bloodbaths historians call a
Before 1919 when Nesta B. Webster published her history of the French tragedy, there was nothing in English except
Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution (1837). In her preface to
The French Revolution: A Study in Democracy (1919) she expressed
shock. "So far, in England, the truth is not known; we have not even been told
what really happened.
Histories still teach that before the French Revolution the French aristocracy kept the peasantry hungry and
desperate without any real hope or direction for the future. In her work, Webster explodes these notions regarding
peasant misery before 1789 with the letters of Dr. Rigby who traveled through the French countryside in 1789 and
who described "its extraordinary fertility" and its "state of the highest cultivation."
"The crops are beyond any conception I could have had of
them … tens of thousands of acres of wheat superior to any that can be produced in England..." He
described the French people as happy, prosperous and contented. (pp. 4-5)
Yet in the midst of this abundance there was famine. It triggered the French Revolution just like the unrest today
in the Middle East. And we are still taught that upon hearing of the starving French peasantry, Louis XVI's wife,
Queen Marie Antoinette remarked, "Let them eat cake." This bogus quotation is used to color the French aristocrats as
out of touch. In fact Marie Antoinette blamed England. She knew what was happening.
And Americans today like Webster, have blinders on when it came to their own government's dishonorable foreign
policy. Webster refused to hold her English Government responsible notwithstanding the overwhelmingly damning
"What, then, is the explanation of the belief in English cooperation with the revolutionary movement? Of the
English guineas found on the rioters? Of the Englishmen mingling in the mobs of Paris during popular agitations? Of
the seditious pamphlets printed in London? Of the traffic in letters, messages, and money maintained between
England and the revolutionary leaders? Many of these leaders were constantly in England both before and during the
Revolution... These facts admit of no denial: to suppose, however, any complicity on the part of the English
Government is illogical and absurd." pp.30-31
A Royalist historian and contemporary of the worst atrocities, Felix Louis Montjoie, copiously documented the role
of French King Louis XVI's cousin, the Freemason Duc d'Orleans, who bought up
large portions of the French grain in 1789. This role backfired on him as he was guillotined in Nov.
Later historians document the role of Pitt, the English Parliament and the King's Privy Counsel in hoarding
French grain with the aid of the Illuminati British East India Company in warehouses on the English Channel Islands
of Guernsey and Jersey. (Why the
French Did Not Have an American Revolution, by Pierre Beaudry, p. 5.)
a mere pawn in the Illuminati game of
pseudo-revolutions that overturn governments and give credit to democratic/communist freedom fighting
homeboys and eventually even train the conquered population to celebrate the destruction of their history and
culture. So today the French ironically celebrate their disgrace with Bastille Day, July 14
In the words of John Robison in his Proofs of a Conspiracy (1797)
"The earlier revolutionary leaders were, as we have seen, the disciples of the German Illuminati, and it was they
who initiated them into the art of forming political committees " to carry through the great plan of a general
overturning of religion and government . . . .These committees arose from the Illuminati in Bavaria . . .
and these committees produced the Jacobin
The chief lesson," Robison goes on to observe, that the revolutionary leaders took from Germany, " was the method
of doing business, of managing their own correspondence, and of procuring and training pupils." pp. 190-191
The Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobins forced the regime change historians call the French Revolution.
Russian Revolution they masqueraded as the Bolsheviks. Today they brag they are behind the Middle East revolutions.
So maybe we should believe them.
comment: All these ‘isms have to be replaced with the most important one of
all—Satanism, for that is what “revolutionary” socialism,
communism, Fascism, and Bolshevikism have always been.]
Just Like the
Russian Revolution of 1917:
Just Like The
Unrest Today in the Middle East
"Let Them Eat
What the Study of
History Should Have Been
omments for "France Didn't Have a Revolution"
Henrique said (July 14, 2011):
Finally somebody made this point clear ( that "revolutions"
are always organized and financed from outside and don't arise from the native people's desires ). Also, an
interesting addendum, that Robison and other "non-official/revisionist" historians mentioned is that to aid and
add numbers to the Jacobins (low-level deluded French Freemasons [Nazarene Remnant
comment: i.e. “Porch Masons”]) thousands of MERCENARIES
were hired, specially from Germany and Italy, to agitate and attack Bastille, killing
sadistically the Royals.
A reason for this could be found in the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion ( book shamefully "forbidden" and out
of press here in Brazil due to pressure from the Israelite Federation ) where they explicitly point that the
Gentile's only hope and protecting power, his "breastfeeding mother" is the Blood Monarchs, cause corrupted as
they may be, they still hold a symbiotic ( and symbolic ) attachment to their original people.
Instead, the document goes on, "we" should replace that with
demagogues and opportunists and
establish "democracies" in which all parties eat from
our hands ( they are begging for campaign money every 2 and 4 years ). One of the reasons why I
stand for the restoration of the Empire here in Marx-stinking ( and bankster-occupied ) Brazil.
Another point nobody makes nor even dare to talk about is the
interesting "American Revolution", in which 90% of the intellectually involved were Freemasons and during the
Independence War that followed, while British troops and natives were beating the daylight out of each other,
Washington, Franklin and others were partying and having eugenic-driven ritualized sexual orgies in the infamous
"Hellfire clubs" in ENGLAND. Why nobody digs on that?
13. ACA Showcases Lady Gaga and the Grim
Reality of the Depths of Australian Immorality
of the good people are afraid to be good. They strive to be
broadminded and tolerant! It is fashionable to be tolerant - but mostly tolerant of evil - and
this new code has reached the proportions of demanding intolerance of good. The wall of
resistance to evil has thus been broken down and no longer affords protection to those who, persecuted by
evil doers, stand in need of it." (Lady Edith Queenborough, Occult Theocrasy, published in 1933, p. 4)
Monday, 11 July, 2011: Fittingly on the eve of the establishment of the first
nation into the Nazi Fourth Reich--which is Australia--that the lying media should host a television event which
ash been billed as “one of the most talked-about in Australian television history.”
From the ACA Web site:
"A Current Affair's anticipated special event is finally here — Lady Gaga and Tracy Grimshaw's
A Gaga Affair will air tonight on the Nine Network.
Lady Gaga’s performance is set to be “one of the most talked-about in Australian television
history”, and fans have been clamouring to get a glimpse of the Born This
Way star since her arrival in Sydney on Friday night.
Her interview with ACA host Tracy
Grimshaw will be followed by an exclusive performance, which can be viewed at 6:30pm
AEST tonight on Nine and the ACA website.
Tracy said she was keeping an open mind ahead of the special presentation. "Lady Gaga is one of
the most exciting performance artists in the world right now," she said.
"She is brave, provocative and passionate. And, I gather, can be a bit unpredictable in
interviews if she chooses."
Lady Gaga's visit to Australia will also include her Your All-Time Exclusive GAGA LIVE
performance at Sydney 'Monster' Hall to promote her latest release, Born This
The event will be broadcast nationally on Nine's digital channel GO!."
Lady Gaga's arrival in Australia was no coincidence. It was all part of the fanfare associated with
the announcement, or the birth of, the Nazi Fourth Reich here on Australian soil--the new satanic mindset she is
singing about. The charade behind the Carbon Tax announcemnst on July 10 was another such announcement (as well as
a distraction from events soon to take place in Rockhampton, on the Tropic of Capricoen, on the 12th Jult,
2011--i.e. Operation Talisman Sabre).
Here are a couple of comments on this alchemal new birth, from Vigilant Citizien:
"... we are witnessing the birth of a new persona within the 'core personality' of humanity.
The birth is happening within the minds of people and is visually represented by creepy facial horns."
"Despite the superficial eccentricity of the song, Born This Way is about conforming and
adhering to a pre-defined mindset, a philosophy that is compatible with a New World Order. It is not Gaga’s
vision, it is their vision. It is the mind state they want you to adopt in order for them to carry on with
their Agenda unopposed. This is what they want you to think: There are no important values or moral codes; good
and evil are a big blur and being a mindless zombie is cool. If you think this way, “you’re on the right track
baby”. I’m not. Guess I wasn’t born that way."
With reference to Lady Gaga's recent Judas video, Vigilant Citizen makes the following
"Going beyond simple shots at Christianity for pure shock value, Judas summarizes the underlying
spiritual messages found in Lady Gaga’s works which are, in turn, a reflection of the elite’s philosophy that needs
to be taught to the masses. Whether it is intentional or not, Judas symbolizes the spiritual shift of humanity as
it enters what is “the Age of Horus”. Crowley considered the last two thousand years to be the Age of Osiris, ruled
by Christianity’s “emphasis on death, suffering, sorrow and the denial of the body”. He however considered this era
to be necessary to give birth to the Age of Horus, whose Aeon would lead humanity to a new kind of spirituality.
Other esoteric schools describe this shift in different words. Some describe it as the Age of Aquarius taking the
place of the Age of Pisces, which was dominated by Christianity (they say Jesus was associated with the symbol of
the fish because he ruled the Age of Pisces). Is this the reason Gaga’s words refer to the “future of culture”?
In the most Biblical sense,
I am beyond repentance
Fame, hooker, prostitute wench vomits her mind
But in the cultural sense
I just speak in future tense
Whether the general population subscribes to these esoteric predictions or not, it certainly is
“following the script” that was laid out. The same way Lady Gaga was eyeing Judas while riding with Jesus,
society as a whole has let go of the core tenets of Christianity to embrace a philosophy that is
compatible with Crowley’s Thelema. Even if most
people do not even know what is the Thelema, they live by it on a daily
basis. That being said, organized religions and the elite are not necessarily opposite
forces. Religions and religious sects have often been used as tools of the political elite to divide-and-conquer
countries and to oppress and to manipulate the masses. Times have however changed and, today, the Illuminati is
looking to unite the world under a single world government and a single world religion.
This religion’s values are based on egoism, materialism
and the sexualization of pretty much everything. Most music videos, movies and TV shows subtly celebrate
these values. In other words, they want you to be in love with
Well Tracey Grimshaw, shame on you for presenting this creature from the Abyss to
Australians. It sure is grim stuff, worthy of your
Find Out What Lady Gaga is Really All
Lady Gaga’s “Judas” and the Age of Horus
Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” – The Illuminati Manifesto
Lady Gaga Collaborators Continue to Die
14. Getting Used To Life Without
Wall Street, BP,
Bio-Ethanol And The Death Of Millions.
© Copyright by F. William Engdahl
Author of Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic
29 June 2011
My late grandfather, a man
of sturdy Norwegian-American farm stock, who later became a newspaper editor and political activist during the
First World War, used to say, 'A man can get used to pretty much anything with time, except dying...and even
that with some practice.' Well, as fate has it, it seems we, the vast majority of the human race, are about to
test that adage in regard to the availability of our daily bread itself.
Food is one of those funny
things it's hard to live without. We all tend to take it for granted that our local supermarket will continue to
offer whatever we wish, in abundance, at affordable prices or nearly so. Yet living without adequate food is the
growing prospect facing hundreds of millions, if not billions, of us over the coming years.
In a sense it's a genuine
paradox. Our planet has everything we need to produce nutritious natural food to feed the entire world
population many times over. This is the case, despite the ravages of industrialized agriculture over the past
half century or more.
Then, how can it be that
our world faces, according to some predictions, the prospect of a decade or more of famine on a global scale?
The answer lies in the forces and interest groups that have decided to artificially create a scarcity of
nutritious food. The problem has several important dimensions.
Eliminating emergency reserves
The ability to manipulate
the price of essential foods worldwide at will -- almost irrespective of today's physical supply and demand for
grains -- is quite recent. It is also scarcely understood.
Up until the grain crisis
of the mid-1970s there was no single "world price" for grain, the benchmark for the price of all foods and food
From the time of the
earliest traces left by Sumerian civilization some two thousand years before Christ, in the region between the
Tigris and Euphrates rivers in today's Iraq, almost every culture had the practice of storing a reserve stock of
a grain harvest right up to the most recent times. Wars, droughts and famines were the reason. When properly
stored, grain can be safely stored over a period of about seven years, enabling reserve stocks in case of an
After the Second World War,
Washington created a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to serve as a wedge to push free trade among
major industrial nations, especially the European Community. During initial negotiations, agriculture was
deliberately kept off the table at the insistence of the Europeans, especially the French, who regarded
political defense of Europe's Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) and European agriculture protections as
Beginning in the 1980s with
the political crusades of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, the extremist free market views of Chicago's
Milton Friedman became increasingly accepted by leading European power circles. Step-by-step the resistance to
the Washington agriculture free trade agenda dissolved.
After more than seven years
of intense horse-trading, lobbying and pressure, the European Union finally agreed in 1993 to the GATT Uruguay
Round, requiring a major reduction of national agriculture protection. Central to the Uruguay Round deal was
agreement on one major change: national grain reserves as a government responsibility were to be ended.
Under the new 1993 GATT
agreement, formalized with the creation of a World Trade Organization to police the agreements with enforceable
sanctions against violators, 'free trade' in agriculture products was for the first time an agreed priority of
the world's major trading nations, a fateful decision to put it mildly.
Henceforth, grain reserves
were to be managed by the 'free market,' by private companies, greatest among them the US Grain Cartel giants,
the behemoths of American agribusiness. The grain companies argued that they would be able to fill any emergency
gaps more efficiently and save governments the cost. That ill-advised decision would open the floodgates to
unprecedented grain market shenanigans and manipulations.
ADM (Archer Daniels
Midland), Continental Grain, Bunge and the primus inter pares, Cargill-the largest privately-held grain and
agribusiness trading company in the world-emerged the great winners of the WTO process.
The outcome of the GATT
agriculture talks was very much to the liking of the people at Cargill. That was no surprise to insiders. Former
Cargill executive Dan Amstutz played the key role in drafting the agriculture trade section of the GATT Uruguay
Round. In 1985 D. Gale Johnson of the University of Chicago, a colleague of Milton Friedman, co-authored a
seminal report for David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission that was the blueprint for what they called
"market-oriented" agricultural reform. It provided the framework for the US position in the coming GATT Uruguay
Round negotiations. The Rockefeller group and its think tanks were the architects of 'agricultural reform,' as
with so much in our post-1945 world.
The process of eliminating
government grain reserves in major producing countries took time, but with the passage of the 1996 Farm Bill,
the US had virtually eliminated its grain reserves. The EU followed soon after. Today, among major agriculture
producing countries, only China and India still hold to a strategic security policy of nationally held grain
Read the Full Story Here:
Getting Used To Life Without Food
15. Fortress Australia; Hidden
Agenda, Part 4 of 6
This Report was given to the publisher of RMNews the year it was written, 1996. The Source who
hand delivered it would not state who the author was. RMNews does not know if this has been published
The Rumor Mill News Agency
Source of this version:
The USA Antarctic Base
Although not situated on the Australian continent, the American Antarctic Base situated at the
South Pole is an integral part of America's network of secret bases in the Southern Hemisphere. It is linked
via satellite to Pine Gap and other bases in Australia, Christchurch in New Zealand (it's main supply base),
Punta Arenas in Southern Chile and the long standing CIA/NSA base in Cape Town, South Africa.
The base is built mainly under the ice. This was done by mining out large trenches in which
buildings were placed in neat rows. The trenches were then covered with ice and snow. Due to the natural ice build up over
the years the base is now deeply below the surface of
the ice cap.
Due to the large airspaces in the trenches (now tunnels) the ambient temperature of the air was
raised to above freezing level without effecting the surrounding ice. This combined with the individual
heated buildings make it a comfortable place to live.
The main purpose of the base appears to be top secret experimentation in the area of electro
magnetism and the earth's magnetic field. In fact so secret are these activities that personnel are openly
hostile to any uninvited visitors even though such visits are few and far between. One such case involved the
Australian millionaire adventurer Dick Smith in the late 1980's. Mr. Smith was on a trans polar flight in his private plane when he
encountered bad weather and strong head winds. To play it safe he decided to land at the American Base and
request additional fuel. He later described his arrival there as an unpleasant incident. Although the base
administration knew who he was, he was greeted by an armed angry group of men who told him he had no right to
be there and to leave immediately. He told them that he needed fuel and would pay for it. This was met with a
refusal and an order to take off without delay. In fact the Base Commander put the order in the crudest of
terms. So much so in fact that Mr Smith started to fear for his life. On leaving the base he decided to turn
back to the Russian Base where he was warmly welcomed, accommodated for 24 hours in very comfortable
conditions and given all the fuel he needed free of charge. On his return to Australia he made very bitter
comments about his reception at the South Pole.
Another rather amusing incident occurred in December, 1995. This involved a lone Englishman who
was walking and sledge sailing across Antarctica to create a record for the Guinness Book of Records. He sailed into the base on Christmas Day and
wondered if it would be possible to telephone his mother in England to wish her a merry Christmas. Once again
the reception was hostile and, believe it or not, was told to leave immediately. Being stubborn he insisted
on using the telephone and after a lot of argument he was allowed into an above ice hut and told he could
make a quick call. He did so and after hanging up was presented with a large bill for the cost of the call.
It was inferred he may have trouble leaving if he did not pay. Fortunately he had spare English money on his
sledge and decided to pay up. Finally to add insult to injury he was given a very poor exchange rate for his
English bank notes.
An Australian scientist who had spent a year with the Aurora
Borealis (Southern Lights) research team at the main Australian Antarctic Base situated at Mawson told
the author an interesting story about American activities in the region. He said that when the Americans conducted their regular
experiments big changes occurred in the Aurora and communications were
effected. He did not know exactly what they were doing but believed they were driving electro magnetic
energy into the earth's magnetic field which was causing the disruption in the Aurora. He agreed that it was probably related
to the HAARP experiments in Alaska as he had heard the effects on the Northern Lights were similar.
Tidbinbilla Tracking Station - Australian Capital Territory
The Tidbinbilla tracking station situated close to Canberra in the ACT is the most important in
Australia. Established under a joint agreement between the United Kingdom, Australia and the USA it is an
essential part of the US space programme. It is also a vital control center for the Hubble orbital telescope.
In fact the first images transmitted by the telescope were received by Tidbinbilla and they caused quite some
A scientific advisor to the Australian Government told the author that he was present when the
first photographs arrived. They clearly showed solar systems around the closer stars at which the telescope
was aimed. According to this advisor it was possible to discern more than fifty new solar systems in the
first few hundred pictures. It seemed apparent that virtually every star has a solar system of one type or
another and the evidence arriving at Tidbinbilla was undeniable. The revelations caused consternation among
the control room staff, particularly the Americans who were angered that Australians and British were parties
to these revelations. A meeting was hastily arranged and although all present had security clearances they
were told that it was of utmost importance that nothing leaked out and they must not talk about what they had
One American scientist said that the public must not know about any new planets as it would
"start them thinking and who knows where that would end." It had to be kept secret. But how can the results
of such a highly publicised event be kept secret? The answer was quite simple, tell the public that due to
some miscalculations the telescope was faulty and was not able to produce clear pictures. It would have to be
modified before it could be used properly and such modifications could only be carried out by a special space
shuttle flight to be arranged in about two years time.
The story was accepted without question and NASA was only too happy to take the blame. They had
made such a large investment in the Hubble telescope that it was not difficult to obtain extra government
funds to conduct the so called repairs.
NASA was now in an ideal position. It could carry out extensive testing of the telescope in
absolute secrecy as it was assumed it did not work. The door was open to make improvements to the system and
get a closer look at those planets. A new camera costing US$100,000,000 was constructed and a modification to
the secondary mirror system, which could be adjusted from the Earth, was designed and produced at similar
cost. The power system was expanded in size to handle the increased electrical consumption of the new camera
and integrated computer system. Rarely do scientists have the chance to test their equipment in such a way
and, then make modifications at any cost. The Hubble telescope now operates around the clock and the results
are most satisfactory. All photographs are carefully checked and even airbrushed prior to release to other
scientists. The lid is on and will stay there for a long time to come.
The Parks Radio Telescopes - New South Wales
Situated in a beautiful area in New South Wales the Parks radio telescope complex is perhaps the
most important of it's kind in the world. Larger facilities exist in the Northern hemisphere but none of them
have the advantage of a clear and direct window to the Milky Way.
Parks has been involved in the US space programme and many major research projects over the past
thirty years. According to a government source it detected intelligent signals from outer space more than
twenty five years ago and has done so ever since. Perhaps the most publicised project in which Parks has been
involved was the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) programme which was abruptly closed down in
1995. It was meant to be a cover or public relations operation to keep the public reminded that nothing was
out there and if it was, it was so far away it could not be found. Unfortunately for the secret governments
it did not turn out that way. Parks hit rate (a hit being a positive identification of intelligent signals)
was alarmingly high. The plug had to be pulled before too much leaked out. The public was told that as
nothing could be found the project would be terminated immediately to stop any further necessary depletion of
The results of Parks intensive investigation produced some bizarre results. Intelligent radio
and what proved to be television signals were identified in several parts of the galaxy and emanating from
areas up to three thousand light years away from the earth. The contents of these emanations are classified
above top secret as they indicate that technical civilisations equal or superior to our own were very active
more than three thousand years ago. Without doubt the most interesting material of all would be the enhanced
television pictures which apparently showed the daily life of a number of alien civilisations of ages past
and still do.
The American NSA has close co-operation with Parks and has liaison staff posted there on a full
time basis. Under these arrangements the Parks facilities are a defacto outpost of the NSA's vital
intelligence gathering network.
The late Sir Phillip Baxter who was the head of the Australian Atomic Energy Commission during
the 1950s and early 60s was convinced at that time that the world was careening head long into inevitable
nuclear destruction. He strongly advocated the production of nuclear weapons in Australia, the strengthening
of all it's defences and close military involvement with the USA. He said Australia could be turned into the
world's lifeboat and in the event of the major destruction he envisaged, could harbour the most important
parts of world civilisation, a sort of totally self sufficient Atlantis from which the world could be
As it turned out it was not necessary to expend huge amounts of capital to produce nuclear
weapons as due to Australia's close relations with the United Kingdom, and America and the fact that
Australia was already a major producer of uranium it was not difficult to strike a deal with both parties to
secretly store suitable nuclear weapons in the country for the use of the three allies should it ever prove
necessary. However it was important to have a suitable delivery system and the Australian Government chose
the then new American F-111 fighter bomber.
The nuclear weapon stores have remained in Australia and over the years expanded to accommodate
a wide variety of new weapon systems that have been developed since the 1960's. This information has been
kept from the Australian public and for obvious reasons there is little likelihood the present policy of
secrecy will change.
Sir Phillip's proposal was publicly brushed aside and the media in general tended to infer that
it as nothing more than an eccentric dream of an aging scientist. However behind the scenes his ideas were
considered with great seriousness and appear to form the basis of current thinking in relation to Australia's
strategic planning. Nuclear war remains a threat and one which will increase as more and more nations either
buy or develop their own weapons systems. Apart from that there appears to be several new dangers facing the
earth ranging from world climatic disruption, possible cosmic cataclysm or even an invasion from outer space.
Whatever the driving forces are, Sir Philips original plan of turning Australia into a lifeboat (perhaps now
better described as a fortress) seems to be the first priority and the main driving force behind it is coming
from the USA
At this point the author would like to clarify why this report was started in the first place.
It's always important to know what motivates such things and why it is necessary to record such
During March, 1994 the author heard from a European correspondent requesting his comments about
a letter he had received from a friend in Western Australia. To clarify this for the reader an extract of the
Australian's letter of 14th February, 1994 is quoted verbatim as follows
"(1) There is at the present
time a massive upgrading of the Australian rescue and disaster services. This was started about three years ago (Circa 1991) according to one newly trained instructor of
these updated rescue services, and all this has to be in place and ready by 1998 (!?).
The services involved are the Government controlled and operated rescue services, and also the
so called "Volunteer Rescue Services", Police Rescue Services, plus Fire Brigade and Ambulance
(2) The second thing to be noted, two licenced gun-dealers (the above mentioned newly trained
rescue service man is one of them) tell me thattheir gun-dealer licences are terminated in 1997 (!?). I gather that all other gun dealers (at any rate in New South Wales) will also have their
gun-dealer licences terminated in 1997.
I recently had a long talk with this man, whom I have known for a long time. He is of the
opinion that around 1997/98 the Federal Government intends to withdraw all firearms from the general public,
and that the only people who will then have firearms will be the military and police. (Of course the
criminals no doubt will still have their illegal weapons, I suppose).
In view of the foregoing, one may legitimately ask, I think, why it is necessary for the
Australian public to be disarmed at precisely the same time as a vastly upgraded rescue and disaster service
will be in place?
Very Obviously Some Highly Disturbing Events Are Envisaged As Taking Place At
After some thought the author made a brief reply as he was already aware of some rather odd
changes being made to emergency services Australia wide. He believed that if urgency was involved then events
would speed up between 1994 and 1998 and so many people would be involved that it would be impossible to keep
the lid on such developments for an indefinite period of time. Some of those involved would have to talk.
Little did the author know what he was getting into when he started to ask questions of old friends and
contacts and probe in many dark corners.
From mid 1994 the pace of events was already showing signs of increased speed. By the end of
1995 it was almost impossible to keep up with the rapidly changing events and since the change of the Federal
Government in March 1996 it seems, to use American phraseology, "all hell has broken loose". The previously
expected urgency of Government action and their often inexpiable behaviours clearly indicates a timetable that is being followed at all cost and one which seems to be very limited in scale. There is a definite atmosphere of tension
and apprehension which the Government is doing nothing to alleviate. In fact they appear to go on promoting
their plans without regard to public feelings and in some instances as if they were hell bent on committing
political suicide. The fact that all the parties in Government seem to be working together in some kind of
national consensus increases the strangeness of the situation. Presently no opposition exists.
The author will now deal with events from March 1996 to June, 1996 which he believes definitely
indicate the high level of urgency which now prevails and the crash through or crash attitude of the
16. Democracy Finally Being
Exposed: The Left versus Right Political Charade
July 3, 2011
[Left vs Right] "accurately reflects our careful, artificial polarization of the population on phony issues that
prevents the issue of our [money] power from arising in their minds."
Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," a
manual published in 1974 that purports to instruct an Illuminati heir.
Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations,
using the lure of financial support and instant
publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements
of our money power.
The so-called Left-Right political
spectrum is our creation. In fact, it accurately reflects our careful, artificial polarization of the
population on phony issues that prevents the issue of our power from arising in their minds.
The Left supports civil liberties and opposes economic or entrepreneurial liberty. The Right supports economic
liberty and opposes civil liberty. Of course neither can exist fully (which is our goal) without the other.
We control the Right-Left conflict
such that both forms of liberty are suppressed to the degree we require.
Our own liberty rests not on legal
or moral "rights," but on our control of the government
bureaucracy and courts which apply the complex, subjective regulations we dupe the public into
supporting for our benefit.
conflicts to divert the attention of the public from our operations find fertile ground in the bitter
hatreds of the Right/Left imbroglio. Right and Left are irreconcilable on racial policy, treatment of criminals,
law enforcement, pornography, foreign policy, women's lib, and censorship to name just a few issues.
Although censorship in the name of "fairness" has been useful in broadcasting and may yet be required in
journalism, we generally do not take sides in these issues. Instead we attempt to prolong the conflicts by supporting
both sides as required.
War, of course, is the ultimate diversionary
conflict and the health of our system. War provides the perfect cover of emergency and crisis
behind which we consolidate our power. Since nuclear war presents dangers even to us, more and more we have
resorted to economic crisis, energy shortages, ecological hysteria, and managed political drama to fill the gap.
Meaningless, brush fire wars, though, remain useful.
We promote phony free enterprise on the Right and phony democratic socialism on the Left. Thus, we obtain
a "free enterprise" whose "competition" is carefully regulated by the bureaucracy we control and whose nationalized
enterprises are controlled directly through our government.
In this way we maintain a society in which the basis of our power, legal titles to property and money, remain
secure, but in which the peril of free, unregulated competition is avoided and popular sovereignty is
democratic process is a sitting duck for our money power. Invariably we determine the candidates of the major parties and then
proceed to pick the winners. Any attempts at campaign reforms simply put the rules of the game more
firmly under our government's control.
Totalitarianism of the fascist of communist varieties is no danger to us as long as bastions of private property
remain to serve as our bases of operation. Totalitarian governments of both Right and Left, because of the
vulnerability of their highly visible leaders to party rivals, can be manipulated easily from abroad.
Primarily, totalitarian dictatorships efficiently prevent new money lords that could challenge our power from
arising in whole continents, civilizations, and races.
Perhaps a few words on ideology proper are in order before I conclude.
The only valid ideology, of course is rational egoism, that is, the maximization of the individual's gratification
by whatever means prove practical. This requires power over nature, especially, when possible, power over other
humans who are the most versatile and valuable tools of all.
Fortunately, we do not have a society of egoists. Money lords would be impossible in such a society as the mental
spooks and rationalizations by which we characteristically manipulate and deceive would be a laughing stock
Under such circumstances a policy of live and let live or true "laissez-faire" anarchy might be the only
alternative. Certainly a hierarchical order would be difficult to maintain by force
alone. However, in the current era, while minds are yet in the thrall of altruistic collectivistic,
and divine moralistic spooks, the egoist's rational course is to utilize such spooks to control others.
The Zionist Billionaires Who Control Politics
Corporate Elite Funds far
Left & Islam
Koch Funds the
17. The Government Has Its Eye On Your
By Robyn E. Blumner
July 26, 2001
© St. Petersburg Times, published July 22, 2001
Our government hates money.
Now that might sound odd since Congress is so very good at spending it, but the truth is money is
considered a drug-war enemy. The ease with which money moves without our government being able to track it has led
to an elaborate set of rules designed to prevent narcotics smugglers from enjoying their illicit profits. But the
consequence of these rules is that all of us who engage in financial transactions are now targets of government
Today, every bank customer is a suspect. If a financial institution has reason to believe a
transaction is out of the ordinary for that person, it must submit a "suspicious activity report" to the Treasury
Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This is done without the customer's knowledge, and it means
banks are expected to know their customers' financial habits and revenue sources.
(For those who have been following these issues, this might sound like the "Know Your Customer"
regulations that were defeated in 1999 when the government received more than 300,000 negative public comments.
While the regulations were withdrawn, the suspicious-activity-report program continues under the Bank Secrecy
Since 1997 the U.S. Postal Service has also been sending "suspicious activity reports" to the
federal government. When customers of money orders and wire transfers seem to have more money than they should or
if they seem to be avoiding the reporting requirements that kick in for money orders of $3,000 or more, a report
must be filed. In a training video on how to identify a suspicious transaction, the postal service tells its
employees, "It's better to report 10 legal transactions than to let one illegal transaction get by." The program is
called "Under the Eagle's
Eye," a name that says it all.
But getting American banks and the postal service to rat out their mostly innocent customers was
the easy part. It's getting the rest of the world to join in that's been the challenge.
If you want a reason to join the black-helicopter set, read the reports put out by the Financial
Action Task Force on Money Laundering, the 29-nation task force that includes the United States, Germany, Japan and
the rest of the world's richest industrial nations. The task force has developed a set of 40 "recommendations" to
combat international money laundering that read like the postal services' training video.
Under the recommendations, all countries around the world are expected to force their banks to know
their customers and their financial habits. Banks are also expected to submit "suspicious activity reports" on
out-of-the-ordinary and large cash transactions, and keep the monitoring program secret from their customers.
According to Bradley Jansen of the Free Congress Foundation, the group that has been leading the
battle against these incursions, "countries are also supposed to set up foreign intelligence units that are not
under the control of the government's financial regulators but under law enforcement, with the aim of setting up a
global network of unaccountable financial police."
In June, FATF issued its annual report of "blacklisted" countries -- those nations that have made
insufficient progress in following FATF's recommendations. This year Russia and the Philippines made the list, as
well as 13 other nations.
Those that make the blacklist are subject to full-blown economic sanctions, something our
government is loath to do, or advisories issued to our own banks to require detailed documentation before doing
business there, an approach that relies on voluntary cooperation to limited effect.
But for the past two Congresses, a bill has been introduced to give the secretary of the Treasury
vast new unilateral powers to add teeth to FATF's blacklist. The International Counter-Money Laundering and
Anti-Corruption Act would give the Treasury secretary the option of barring U.S. banks from doing business with
nations that refuse to compromise the privacy of their bank customers. And now the legislation has renewed life,
since the chairmanship of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee has shifted from Republican Phil
Gramm of Texas, an opponent of the measure, to Paul Sarbanes, D-M.D., a supporter and co-sponsor.
The United States is saying to other nations: Spy on your people, know how they get and use their
money or you can forget about doing business with us.
So much for our tradition of government restraint, where the actions of individuals are not subject
to state scrutiny without probable cause.
We might pride ourselves as being a beacon of liberty, but in reality the light we're shining is
not to advance freedom but to invade privacy. Our anti-money laundering efforts are just another way we have
exported our drug war to the detriment of civil liberties around the world. http://www.sptimes.com/News/072201/Columns/Government_has_its_ey.shtml
It's Time to Circle The Wagons
While the sheep are sleeping, the predators move in.
Secrets Of The Federal Reserve
The Federal Reserve Is A privately Owned Corporation
The American Hallucination
Ny Times: Saying Income Tax Is Illegal
IRS ~ Tax Info
Satellite Spying? "Echelon"
The truth about the United Nations!
The United Nations plans to CONFISCATE your profit and ---.
Documents Show FBI Web Surveillance
18. Money Was The Key
Ingredient In New York's Gay Marriage Bill
By Sam Stein
27 June 2011
WASHINGTON -- The passage of historic legislation legalizing same sex
marriage in the state of New York last Friday was owed in large part to a compelling political motivator:
Although New York's legislators were already disposed to approving gay marriage because of the more
progressive disposition of the state and a major grassroots campaign in support of the bill, LGBT activists from
both parties turned to a simple, poignant argument: Lawmakers not only stood to gain the support of well-funded
gay-rights supporters if they backed the bill, they would suffer if they opposed it or shied away from the
"I didn't come in there saying, 'Do this for me,'" recalled Ken Mehlman, the openly gay former RNC
chairman who persuaded Republican lawmakers in Albany that there was not only political support but ideological
consistency in backing the bill. "I said, 'Do this for you.' We didn't walk in there saying, 'Do this not only
because it is the right thing from a policy perspective.' We were saying, 'It is the right thing to build the party
from a political perspective.'"
The politics of gay rights have grown complex in a very short period of time. Once shunned by both
parties, only to be picked up as a cause by more progressive-minded Democrats, LGBT issues no longer break down
cleanly among the party lines.
Increasingly, a cadre of deep-pocketed Republican donors is joining in the charge. And the
enticements they are using to sway lawmakers are not just conservative arguments for civil liberties or public
opinion polls that show a generational divide on gay rights, but the promise of contributions or other forms of
These are not quid-pro-quos, necessarily, though New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was fond of
telling on-the-fence lawmakers that a yes vote would give them access to deep coffers. Rather, the LGBT community
-- often splintered into disparate factions with contrasting strategic visions -- has turned itself into a
political heavyweight, equipped with an impassioned grassroots movement to compliment a growing fundraising
"There is no question that we have crossed the line, that now there is a tremendous political
downside to either being on the wrong side of this civil rights issue, or even being passive or silent on this
particular issue," said Chad Griffin, board president of American Foundation for Equal Rights. "You just look at
the stories that were already written on how this will fuel Andrew Cuomo's presidency if he were to run in 2016. He
has an instant base of donors."
Certainly, the White House recognizes this donor dynamic, as the President held a LGBT fundraiser
in New York City just one day before the historic vote.
Increasingly, however, the defining feature of the gay rights activist community is its bipartisan
nature. Some of the biggest donors in the Republican Party were bankrollers of the gay marriage push in New York
and, presumably, would write checks for candidates elsewhere who back their worldview.
As The New York Times reported, several weeks before the crucial vote, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's most
trusted advisers met with "a group of super-rich Republican donors," successfully convincing them to "win over the
deciding Senate Republicans." Attendees included Paul Singer, whose son is gay, and hedge fund managers Cliff
Asness and Dan Loeb. According to interviews with nearly a dozen activists and operatives involved in the New York
same sex marriage push, that anecdote was -- as one source put it -- just one of many critical stepping stones on
the path towards the bill's passage. Steven Cohen a hedge fund manager and the founder of SAC Capital, also was
persuaded to lend his clout to the campaign.
Last year, the American Foundation for Equal Rights held a major event featuring Singer, Mehlman,
and Peter Thiel, the gay billionaire who was an original investor in both PayPal and Facebook. It also included a
host of famous politicos, like former Gov. William Weld, Environmental Protection Agency head Christie Todd Whitman
and Republican operatives Nicole Wallace and Alex Castellanos. The event provided an early illustration of the type
of donor base that was available for the right-minded candidate.
Shortly thereafter, observers got a sense of how that base could be mobilized. The Human Rights
Campaign held a fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) in April to reward her vote to repeal the military's
anti-gay Don't Ask Don't Tell policy. Tactically, they held the event in New York.
"We wanted to make sure that Republicans in the state senate saw that we were willing to be
financial allies to those who step out," said a source involved in the planning of the fundraiser.
By the time Cuomo was ready to push forward with same sex marriage legislation, the landscape was
decidedly different than when the legislature rejected a similar bill in 2009. Conservatives in the state were late
to opposition, as was the Catholic Church. When they finally did pledge to campaign against Republicans who
supported the measure, their opposition was neutralized.
Mehlman had already gone up to Albany to personal discuss the issue with skeptical lawmakers,
emphasizing the philosophical soundness of supporting same sex marriage as well as the personal political benefits.
"This is demographically right for the party" he would stress, underscoring that constituent opinion was moving in
a very certain direction.
The big time Republican funders, likewise, would make calls of reassurance where need be as would
Ted Olson, the Bush v. Gore lawyer who has since played a leading role in arguing the constitutionality of same sex
And then there was the governor's office.
"Cuomo was able to convince people -- both Democrats and Republicans -- that they were more likely
to get reelected if they supported marriage equality than if they didn't," said Richard Socarides, of gay rights
organization Equality Matters and the chief aide on LGBT issues in the Clinton White House. "The right-wing
threatened these guys and the Catholic Church threatened them."
"Wall Street interests who supported marriage equality were an important counter to that," he said.
"So yes, money played a role."
Money was also critical in building the type of grassroots campaign that played a big role in the
legislation's passage. More than $2 million was spent on the campaign organized by progressive groups and labor
organizations, the "most aggressive field campaign in state legislative history for a gay right issues across this
country," according to the Human Rights Campaign's Fred Sainz. Republican donors gave $800,000 of that.
"It built this narrative that this was not only a vote they would take at their peril, but that not
supporting it or bottling it up would be to their downside," said one top operative on the campaign.
In the end, all the money, pressure, behind the scenes lobbying and in front of the cameras
advocacy was enough to convince four of 32 state senate Republicans to cast yes votes. That was enough.
But in the wake of its passage -- with all the euphoric talk of history's arch and a Cuomo run for
the White House at 2016 -- strategy decisions once again revolved around cash.
The Log Cabin Republicans, a pro-gay rights conservative group, immediately launched a fundraising
drive to protect those four members who backed its cause. Clarke Cooper, the group's executive director, said it
wasn't meant to be a "quid pro quo." The goal -- as with the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell -- was to demonstrate
that "it was either extremely beneficial of them to have voted for [the bill] or that there was no negative
The organization's state officials were a bit blunter. "Right now, agenda item number one is making
sure that those four courageous Republicans who voted yes are protected," New York Log Cabin Republicans Chairman
Gregory T. Angelo told HuffPost's Matt Sledge.
19. The Jewish Financed Attack on Heterosexuality is
June 29, 2011
The essence of satanism is to substitute the perverted mindset of the Lucifer-loving central bankers for
God-given reality. This means that all that is natural and healthy must be deemed sick; all that is true is
false; and all that is good is evil. And vice versa.
By Henry Makow Ph.D.
Recently a tiny state-funded daycare in Stockholm was in the news for
adopting heterophobic policies including the promotion of gender confusion and homosexuality.
The action of a lesbian daycare director with 33 pre-schoolers is not significant. Significant is that the
Illuminati mass media heralded it as a "progressive" experiment rather than child abuse. The same thing happened in
May when Marxist trendies in Toronto
decided to mess with their newborn's mind by denying his/her gender.
The promotion of heterophobic acts without labeling them as such is a veiled assault on heterosexual society. It
is an ongoing psy op designed to destabilize society and weaken its resistance to the NWO.
It also reveals the true Communist and satanic nature of the NWO. Yes, the NWO is designed to concentrate all
wealth and power on the hands of the Illuminati central bankers.
But more than that, it is a state of mind, a satanic spell characterized by homosexuality, pornography, money-lust,
violence, deception and death. We are all being inducted into this satanic cult which is based on the Kabbalah.
The essence of satanism is to substitute the perversions of Lucifer-loving bankers for God-given reality.
This means that all that is natural and healthy must be deemed sick; all that is true is false; and all that is
good is evil. And vice versa.
Thus, we have a vicious mindless attack on gender, and male-female love, things that are healthy, natural,
god-given and necessary.
Male and female gender spans all of nature. Gender differences are documented in science.
"There has seldom been a greater divide between what intelligent, enlightened opinion presumes - that men and women
have the same brain - and what science knows: that they do not," writes Neuropsychologist Dr Anne Moir.
"Conclusive scientific research presents an irrefutable truth: The difference between men and women is not merely
physical. It is neurological, too. Male and female human brains are wired differently, causing us to think, feel,
react and respond in strikingly different ways."
Common sense tells us that women are different because they have babies. Children must be conceived in love and
raised in a secure and wholesome environment. Men and women have complementary roles based on different skills and
The satanist Illuminati attack on gender is an attack on heterosexuals and on love itself. Obviously, the
economic elite and media are complicit. They are controlled by the Illuminati banking cartel.
COMMUNISM = SATANISM =
Under Communism, science and art were repressed if they did not conform to "revolutionary" truth. Revolutionary
refers to the overthrow of God (reality, truth, morality) and the replacement with the rule of Illuminati bankers
fronted by the State.
These perverts are instituting their Communist satanism in the form of the NWO. You can see this by the
pervasiveness of "political correctness" a term that is Communist in origin.
You can see it in their denial and suppression of God and Intelligent Design.
You can see it in their promotion of promiscuity and deviance ("sexual liberation,") pornography, satanism,
violence and obscenity in the mass media.
You can see it in their brutish "feminism" which pretends to champion women but, in fact, despises femininity and
deprives women of natural fulfillment as wives and mothers.
You can see it when male and female genders are deemed "stereotypes" except when they are reversed,
i.e. women acting like men or vice-versa. When gay men pretend to be female or transsexuals switch sexes, then
somehow they are no longer "stereotypes."
You can see it in the bankers'
financing of gay marriage, which implies homosexuals and heterosexuals are identical.
Apparently heterosexuals do not have human rights. It's fine to deny a helpless child his gender identity, but
don't interfere with a youth who is gay.
"Human rights" and "gay rights" clearly are ruses to deny human rights to the vast heterosexual majority.
But that's typically satanic, communist and kabbalist. Light ("The Enlightenment") is darkness. Lucifer, the
Light-bringer, is God. "Human rights" are a mode of human re-engineering and enslavement.
Yes, this reality shift extends to language. The term homophobic is widely recognized. The term heterophobic is
not. Heterophobia garners 250,000 references on Google Search. Homophobia over 10 million - 40 times as many to
denote opposition to practices of 1/50th of the population.
We are being brainwashed by the mass media, inducted into a sinister satanic cult whose goal is to enslave mankind,
spiritually, mentally and physically. This is the true nature of the New World Order.
Rejection of the Feminine is Rooted in the
Will Newman - Is Lucifer the God of
Richard Evans - The Kabbalah is a
Makow - The God of the Kabbalah
Kabbalah Explains Current Events
for "Attack on Heterosexuality is Satanism"
Ken said (June 30, 2011):
Well said! It is high time to call things by their
appropriate names. This can be done without hating people, but still with courage and firmness.
I like the thought in your introductory statement. Satan truly hates our Creator. Our Creator is so big He has
every good thing in His mind, hand, and creation. The only room Satan can possibly make for his "alternate
lifestyle" issues must include perverting and upending what has already been made good. He starts with our hearts,
then our minds, then everything else follows.
It is real spiritual warfare.
Glenn said (June 29, 2011):
As usual Henry, you've hit the mark.
Yesterday, I had a spontaneous and lively debate with two
local woman in their 50's. Both were heterosexual, however one woman praised Toronto Mayor Rob Ford for having
backbone enough to fore go making an appearance in support of Toronto's recent Gay Pride Parade. I too praised Rob
Ford's decision to go to the family cottage for the weekend.
The other woman turned to me and hissed, " oooh you're a
homophobe " ..." you hate gay people ".
You're so right about ' heterophobia '. This woman who
lashed out at me, wasn't even an angry Lesbian. If she was, I would have completely understood, and her frothing at
the mouth and spitting venom all over me, would have garnered some empathy ( maybe ).
This incident echo's the points your article illustrates,
that due to social re-engineering, we have become brainwashed to embrace this utter lie.
She like so many others, are literally blinded by their own
ignorance and hypocrisy.
20. Lucifer is the
God of Judaism
Original Title: Is Lucifer the god of Judaism?
April 7, 2010
By Will Newman
Rabbi's satanic horned salute.
WILL NEWMAN, who holds a B.A. in Religion, attended Jewish synagogue, and has relatives
involved in Talmudism, Cabala, B'nai Brith and Masonry.
In 1976, Walter
White, Jr., "a concerned
patriot," conducted an interview with a young Jew named Harold Rosenthal who was the assistant to Sen. Javits of
In the interview, later published as "The Hidden Tyranny", the
arrogant Rosenthal belligerently boasts (on tape) that the Jewish people have fabricated certain "falsehoods
which work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power."
Rosenthal debunks the commonly accepted
lie that, "the Jews are
Israelites, and thus God's chosen people."
Rosenthal said in part: 'Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn't lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.'" (www.macquirelatory.com/Wallace Interview 1967.htm)
Lucifer's goal is to "be like the most High" (Isa 14:14) and
to usurp the worship of God (Mat 4:9).
Lucifer's purpose is to deceive the whole world (Rev 12:9) by transforming himself into an angel of light (2Co
11:4). This is best exemplified by the Freemasons. Their motto of "making good men better" produces a far more favorable public image
than the more accurate alternative: “how to become
demon-possessed in 33-easy-steps.” The Jewish and Masonic religions both worship the same god.
In most Jewish synagogues, a bright burning flame represents their god. The Hebrew word for Lucifer is "Hillel"
(Strong's Concordance #H1966) meaning "bright light." Curiously, this is the name chosen for the Jewish
student organization. A central text in Cabalism is entitled "the Zohar,"
which translates to the book of brightness or splendor.
six-pointed star is the highest symbol in the occult and goes by various names--the Star of
Moloch/Saturn/Chiun/Remphan. It is a symbol of the union of male and female and is identical in meaning to the Masonic square and compass,
which is also a six-pointed symbol around the letter "G" representing the generative sexual act. In place of the
"G" we find יהוה amidst many Jewish
worn around the necks of many Jews
ostensibly symbolizes "life" (lachaim). The word literally translates to a "living thing" or "beast"
(H2416); this symbol is
an idol for The Beast.
The Jewish name for god is represented by the tetragrammaton יהוה (YHVH) can be pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. The significance
of God's name is repeatedly emphasized throughout the scriptures.
When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah (Yah-Hovah) is revealed. "Yah" (#H3050) means "god".
"Hovah" (#H1942) translates to "eagerly coveting, falling, desire, ruin, calamity, iniquity, mischief, naughtiness,
noisome, perverse, very wickedness."
Jehovah is synonymous
Read the Full Article:
the God of Judaism
21. Julia Gillard Has No Carbon
The dubious science of the climate crusaders.
By William Happer
Title: "The Truth About Greenhouse Gases"
Carbon-Sense.com for the idea of the title!
The object of the Author in
the following pages has been to collect the most remarkable instances of those moral epidemics which have been
excited, sometimes by one cause and sometimes by another, and to show how easily the
masses have been led astray, and how imitative and gregarious men are, even in their infatuations
and crimes,” wrote Charles Mackay in the preface to the first edition of his Extraordinary Popular Delusions
and the Madness of Crowds. I
want to discuss a contemporary moral epidemic: the notion that increasing atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide, will have disastrous consequences for mankind and for the
planet. The “climate crusade” is one characterized by true believers, opportunists, cynics, money-hungry
governments, manipulators of various types—even children’s crusades—all based on contested science and dubious
I am a
strong supporter of a clean environment. We need to be vigilant to keep our land, air, and waters
free of real pollution, particulates, heavy metals, and pathogens,but carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is not one of these
pollutants. Carbon is the stuff of life. Our bodies are made of carbon. A normal human exhales
around 1 kg of CO2 (the simplest chemically stable molecule of carbon in the earth’s atmosphere) per day. Before
the industrial period, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere was 270 ppm. At the present time, the
concentration is about 390 ppm, 0.039 percent of all atmospheric molecules and less than 1 percent of that in
our breath. About fifty million years ago, a brief moment in the long history of life on earth, geological
evidence indicates, CO2 levels were several thousand ppm, much higher than now. And life flourished
Now the Environmental Protection Agency wants to regulate atmospheric CO2 as a “pollutant.” According to my
Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, to pollute is “to make or render unclean, to defile, to desecrate, to
profane.” By breathing are we rendering the air unclean, defiling or desecrating it? Efforts are underway to remedy
the old-fashioned, restrictive definition of pollution. The current Wikipedia entry on air pollution, for example,
now asserts that pollution includes: “carbon dioxide (CO2)—a colorless, odorless, non-toxic greenhouse gas
associated with ocean acidification, emitted from sources such as combustion, cement production, and
As far as green plants are concerned, CO2 is not a pollutant, but part of their daily
bread—like water, sunlight, nitrogen, and other essential elements. Most green plants evolved at CO2 levels of
several thousand ppm, many times higher than now. Plants grow better and have better flowers and fruit at higher
levels. Commercial greenhouse
operators recognize this when they artificially increase the concentrations inside their greenhouses to over 1000
Wallis Simpson, the woman for whom King Edward VIII renounced the British throne, supposedly said, “A woman can’t
be too rich or too thin.” But in reality, you can get too much or too little of a good thing. Whether we should be
glad or worried about increasing levels of CO2 depends on quantitative numbers, not just qualitative
How close is the current atmosphere to the upper or lower limit for CO2? Did we have just the right concentration
at the preindustrial level of 270 ppm? Reading breathless media reports about CO2 “pollution” and about minimizing
our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth cannot have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn’t
be too thin—a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young
women. Various geo-engineering
schemes are being discussed for scrubbing CO2 from the air and cleansing the atmosphere of the “pollutant.”
There is no lower limit for human beings, but there is for human life.
We would be perfectly healthy in a world with little or no atmospheric
CO2—except that we would have nothing to eat and a few other minor inconveniences,
because most plants stop growing if the levels drop much below 150 ppm. If we want to continue to be fed and
clothed by the products of green plants, we can have too little CO2.
The minimum acceptable value for plants is not that much below the 270 ppm preindustrial value. It is possible that
this is not enough, that we are better off with our current level, and would be
better off with more still. There is evidence that California orange groves are about 30
percent more productive today than they were 150 years ago because of the increase of atmospheric CO2.
Although human beings and many other animals would do well with no CO2 at all in the air, there is an upper limit
that we can tolerate. Inhaling air with a concentration of a few percent, similar to the concentration of the air
we exhale, hinders the diffusional exchange of CO2 between the blood and gas in the lung. Both the United States
Navy (for submariners) and nasa (for astronauts) have performed
extensive studies of human tolerance to CO2. As a result of these studies, the Navy recommends an upper limit of
about 8000 ppm for cruises of ninety days, and nasa recommends an
upper limit of 5000 ppm for missions of one thousand days, both assuming a total pressure of one atmosphere. Higher
levels are acceptable for missions of only a few days.
We conclude that atmospheric CO2 levels should
be above 150 ppm to avoid harming
green plants and below about 5000 ppm to avoid harming
people. That is a very
wide range, and our atmosphere is much closer to the lower end than to the upper end. The current rate of burning
fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would
take about 300 years—and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the
nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.
Yet there are strident calls for immediately stopping further increases in CO2 levels and reducing the current
level. As we have discussed, animals
would not even notice a doubling of CO2 and plants would love it. The supposed reason for limiting it is to
stop global warming—or, since the predicted warming has failed to be nearly as large as computer models forecast,
to stop climate change. Climate change itself has been embarrassingly uneventful, so another rationale for reducing
CO2 is now promoted: to stop the hypothetical increase of extreme climate events like hurricanes or tornados
comment: No politician or military person will acknowledge that HAARP is being
used as a weapon of weather modification, capable of inflicting great dame around the
world. See the article on Clandestine Weather Modification].
But this does not necessarily follow. The frequency of extreme events has either not changed or has decreased in
the 150 years that CO2 levels have increased from 270 to 390 ppm.
Let me turn to some of the problems the non-pollutant CO2 is supposed to cause. More CO2 is supposed to cause
flooded cities, parched agriculture, tropical diseases in Alaska, etc., and even an epidemic of kidney stones. It
does indeed cause some warming of our planet, and we should thank Providence for that, because without the greenhouse warming of CO2 and its
more potent partners, water vapor and clouds, the earth would be too cold to sustain its current abundance of
Other things being equal, more CO2 will cause more warming. The question is how much warming, and whether the
increased CO2 and the warming it causes will be good or bad for the planet.
The argument starts something like this. CO2 levels have
increased from about 280 ppm to 390 ppm over the past 150 years or so, and the earth has warmed by about 0.8 degree
Celsius during that time. Therefore the warming
is due to CO2. But correlation is not causation. Roosters crow every morning at sunrise, but that
does not mean the rooster caused the sun to rise. The sun will still rise on Monday if you decide to have the
rooster for Sunday dinner.
There have been many warmings and coolings in the past when the CO2
levels did not change. A well-known example is the medieval warming, about the year 1000, when the
Vikings settled Greenland (when it was green) and wine was exported from England. This warm period was
followed by the “little ice age” when the Thames would frequently freeze over during the winter. There is no
evidence for significant increase of CO2 in the medieval warm period, nor for a significant decrease at the time of
the subsequent little ice age. Documented famines with millions of deaths occurred during the little ice age
because the cold weather killed the crops. Since the end of the little ice age, the earth has been warming in fits
and starts, and humanity’s quality of life has improved accordingly.
A rare case of good correlation between CO2 levels and temperature is provided by ice-core records of the cycles of
glacial and interglacial periods of the last million years of so. But these records show that changes in
temperature preceded changes in CO2 levels, so that the levels were an effect of temperature changes. This was
probably due to outgassing of CO2 from the warming oceans and the reverse effect when they cooled.
The most recent continental ice sheets began to melt some twenty thousand years ago. During the “Younger Dryas”
some 12,000 years ago, the earth very dramatically cooled and warmed by as much as 10 degrees Celsius in fifty
The earth’s climate has always been
changing. Our present global warming is not at all unusual by the standards of geological history,
and it is probably benefiting the biosphere. Indeed, there is very little correlation between the estimates of CO2
and of the earth’s temperature over the past 550 million years (the “Phanerozoic” period). The message is clear that several factors
must influence the earth’s temperature, and that while CO2 is one of these factors, it is seldom the dominant
one. The other factors are not well understood. Plausible candidates are spontaneous variations of the
complicated fluid flow patterns in the oceans and atmosphere of the earth—perhaps influenced by continental drift,
volcanoes, variations of the earth’s orbital parameters (ellipticity, spin-axis orientation, etc.), asteroid and
comet impacts, variations in the sun’s output (not only the visible radiation but the amount of ultraviolet light,
and the solar wind with its magnetic field), variations in cosmic rays leading to variations in cloud cover, and
The existence of the little ice age and the medieval warm period
were an embarrassment to the global-warming establishment, because they
showed that the current warming is almost indistinguishable from previous warmings and coolings that had nothing to
do with burning fossil fuel. The organization charged with producing scientific support for the climate
change crusade, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), finally found a solution. They rewrote the
climate history of the past 1000 years with the celebrated “hockey stick” temperature record.
The first IPCC report, issued in 1990, showed both the medieval warm period and the little ice age very clearly. In
the IPCC’s 2001 report was a graph that purported to show the earth’s mean temperature since the year 1000. A yet
more extreme version of the hockey stick graph made the cover of the Fiftieth Anniversary Report of the United
Nation’s World Meteorological Organization. To the surprise of everyone who knew about the strong evidence for the
little ice age and the medieval climate optimum, the graph showed a nearly constant temperature from the year 1000
until about 150 years ago, when the temperature began to rise abruptly like the blade of a hockey stick.
The inference was that this was due to the anthropogenic “pollutant”
This damnatia memoriae of inconvenient facts was simply
expunged from the 2001 IPCC report, much as Trotsky and Yezhov were removed from Stalin’s photographs by dark-room
specialists in the later years of the dictator’s reign. There was no explanation of why both the medieval warm
period and the little ice age, very clearly shown in the 1990 report, had simply disappeared eleven years
The IPCC and its worshipful supporters did their best to promote the hockey-stick temperature curve. But as John
Adams remarked, “Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of
our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” The hockey-stick curve caught the attention of two
Canadians, Steve McIntyre, a mining consultant, and an academic statistician, Ross McKitrick. As they began to look
more carefully at the original data—much of it from tree rings—and at the analysis that led to the hockey stick,
they became more and more puzzled. By hard, remarkably detailed, and persistent work over many years, consistently
frustrated in their efforts to obtain original data and data-analysis methods, they showed that the hockey stick was not supported by
observational data. An excellent, recent history of this episode is A. W. Montford’s The Hockey
About the time of the Copenhagen
Climate Conference in the fall of 2009, another nasty thing happened to the global-warming establishment. A
Russian server released large numbers of e-mails and other files from computers of the Climate Research Unit (CRU)
of the University of East Anglia. Among the files released were e-mails between members of the
power structure of the climate crusade, “the team.” These files were, or should have been, very
embarrassing to their senders and recipients. A senior scientist from CRU wrote, for example: “PS, I’m getting
hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that
the UK has a freedom of information act.”
A traditional way to maintain integrity in science is through peer review, the anonymous examination of a
scientific paper by qualified, competing scientists before publication. In a responsible peer review, the authors
may be required to make substantial revisions to correct any flaws in the science or methodology before their paper
is published. But peer review has largely failed in climate science.
Global warming alarmists have something like Gadaffi’s initial air superiority over rag-tag opponents in Libya.
Consider this comment from one of the most respected IPCC leaders, as revealed in the CRU e-mails: “I can’t see
either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow—even if we have to
define what the peer-review literature is.” And consider the CRU e-mail comment on a journal that committed the
mortal sin of publishing one of the heretical papers: “I think we have to stop considering Climate Research
as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community
to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.” Peer review in climate science means that the “team”
recommends publication of each other’s work, and tries to keep any off-message paper from being accepted for
James Madison reminds us in The Federalist Papers that “no man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause,
because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay
with greater reason, a body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same time.” Madison goes on to
observe that the smaller the community, the more likely that parties and judges will be one and the same.
Let me summarize how the key issues appear to me, a working scientist with a better background than most in the
physics of climate. CO2 really is a greenhouse gas
and other things being equal, adding the gas to the atmosphere by burning coal, oil, and natural gas will modestly
increase the surface temperature of the earth. Other things being equal, doubling the CO2 concentration,
from our current 390 ppm to 780 ppm will directly cause about 1 degree Celsius in warming. At the current rate of
CO2 increase in the atmosphere—about 2 ppm per year—it would take about 195 years to achieve this doubling.
combination of a slightly warmer earth and more CO2 will greatly increase the production of food, wood, fiber, and
other products by green plants, so the increase will be good for the planet, and will easily outweigh any negative
effects. Supposed calamities like the accelerated rise of sea level, ocean acidification, more
extreme climate, tropical diseases near the poles, and so on are greatly
“Mitigation” and control efforts that have been proposed will enrich a favored few with good political ties—at the
expense of the great majority of mankind, including especially the poor and the citizens of developing nations.
These efforts will make almost no change in earth’s temperature. Spain’s recent experiment with green energy destroyed several
pre-existing jobs for every green job it created, and it nearly brought the country to bankruptcy.
The frightening warnings that alarmists offer about the effects of doubling CO2 are based on computer models that
assume that the direct warming effect of CO2 is multiplied by a large “feedback factor” from CO2-induced changes in
water vapor and clouds, which supposedly contribute much more to the greenhouse warming of the earth than CO2. But
there is observational evidence that the feedback factor is small and may even be negative. The models are not in
good agreement with observations—even if they appear to fit the temperature rise over the last 150 years very
computer programs that produce climate change models have
been “tuned” to get the desired answer. The values of various parameters like clouds and the
concentrations of anthropogenic aerosols are adjusted to get the best fit to observations. And—perhaps partly
because of that—they have been unsuccessful in predicting future climate, even over periods as short as fifteen
years. In fact, the real values of most parameters, and the physics of how they affect the earth’s climate, are in
most cases only roughly known, too roughly to supply accurate enough data for computer predictions. In my judgment,
and in that of many other scientists familiar with the issues, the main problem with models has been their
treatment of clouds, changes of which probably have a much bigger effect on the temperature of the earth than
changing levels of CO2.
What, besides the bias toward a particular result, is wrong with the science? Scientific progress proceeds by the
interplay of theory and observation. Theory explains observations and makes predictions about what will be observed
in the future. Observations anchor our understanding and weed out the theories that don’t work. This has been the
scientific method for more than three hundred years. Recently, the advent of the computer has made possible another
branch of inquiry: computer simulation models. Properly used, computer models can enhance and
speed up scientific progress. But they are not meant to replace theory and observation and to serve as an
authority of their own. We know they fail in economics. All of the proposed controls that would have such a
significant impact on the world’s economic future are based on computer models that are so complex and chaotic that
many runs are needed before we can get an “average” answer. Yet the models have failed the simple scientific test
of prediction. We don’t even have a theory for how accurate the models should be.
There are many honest, hardworking climate scientists who are trying to understand the effects of CO2 on climate,
but their work has fallen under suspicion because of the hockey-stick scandal and many other exaggerations about
the dangers of increasing CO2. What has transformed climate science from a normal intellectual discipline to a
matter of so much controversy?
A major problem has been the co-opting of climate science by politics, ambition, greed, and what seems to be a
hereditary human need for a righteous cause. What better cause than saving the planet? Especially if one can get
ample, secure funding at the same time? Huge amounts of money are available from governments and wealthy
foundations for climate institutes and for climate-related research.
Funding for climate studies is second only to funding for biological sciences. Large academic empires, prizes, elections to
honorary societies, fellowships, and other perquisites go to those researchers whose results may help
“save the planet.” Every day we read about some real or contrived
environmental or ecological effect “proven” to arise from global warming. The total of such claimed effects
now runs in the hundreds, all the alleged result of an unexceptional century-long warming of less than 1
degree Celsius. Government subsidies, loan guarantees, and captive customers go to green companies.
Carbon-tax revenues flow to governments. As the great Russian poet Pushkin said in his novella
Dubrovsky, “If there happens to be a trough, there will be
pigs.” Any doubt about apocalyptic climate scenarios could remove many troughs.
What about those who doubt the scientific basis of these claims, or who simply don’t like what is being done to the
scientific method they were taught to apply and uphold? Publications of contrary research results in mainstream
journals are rare. The occasional heretical article is the result of an inevitable, protracted battle with those
who support the dogma and who have their hands on the scales of peer review. As mentioned above, we know from the Climategate emails that the
team conspired to prevent contrary publications from seeing
the light of day and even discussed getting rid of an editor who seemed to be inclined to admit such
Skeptics’ motives are publicly impugned; denigrating names are used routinely in media reports and the blogosphere;
and we now see attempts to use the same tactics that Big Brother applied to the skeptical hero, Winston Smith, in
Orwell’s 1984. In 2009 a
conference of “ecopsychologists” was held at the University of West England to discuss the
obvious psychological problems resident in those who do not adhere to the global warming dogma. The
premise of these psychologists was that scientists and members of the general population who express objective
doubt about the propagated view of global warming are suffering from a kind of mental illness. We know from the
Soviet experience that a society can find it easy to consider dissidents to be mentally deranged and act
The management of most scientific societies has enthusiastically signed on to the global warming bandwagon. This is
not surprising, since governments, as well as many states and foundations, generously fund those who reinforce
their desired outcomes under the cover of saving the planet. Certain private industries are also involved: those
positioned to profit from enacted controls as well as financial institutions heavily invested in “green
technologies” whose rationale
disappears the moment global warming is widely understood to be a non-problem. There are known connections
and movements of people involved in government policy, scientific societies, and private industry, all with the
common thread of influencing the outcome of a set of programs and investments underpinned by the supposed threat of
My own trade union, the American Physical Society (APS), is a good example, but hardly the worst. An APS Council
statement issued on November 18, 2007 states: “The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no
mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social
systems, security, and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning
now.” This is pretty strong language for physicists, for whom skepticism about evidence was once considered a
virtue, and nothing was incontrovertible.
In the fall of 2009 a petition, organized by Fellow of the American Physical Society, Roger Cohen, and containing
the signatures of hundreds of distinguished APS members was presented to the APS management with a request that at
truly embarrassing word “incontrovertible” be taken out of the statement. The APS management’s
response was to threaten the petitioners, while grudgingly appointing a committee to consider the request. It was
exactly what James Madison warned against. The committee included members whose careers depended on global warming
alarmism, and the predictable result was that not one word was changed. Bad as the actions of the APS were, they
were far better than those of most other scientific societies, which refused to even reconsider extreme statements
situation is even more lamentable for the general public, which is fed a constant stream of
propaganda by specialists in environmental issues from the mainstream media and well-funded alarmist blogs. Not
unlike functionaries of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth in 1984, with its motto “Ignorance is Strength,” many
members of the environmental news media dutifully and uncritically promote the party line of the climate
However, the situation is slowly getting better. Skeptics are more numerous and better organized than before. In a
few cases, leading former adherents have publicly and courageously spoken out against the dogma and its core of
establishment promoters. The IPCC itself has come under severe criticism by the international scientific
establishment for its series of bizarre errors and organizational failings. Under pressure from a dissident group
of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically alarmist position on global
warming. And perhaps most important of all, public skepticism has increased significantly, and with it has come
a major drop in support of the climate crusade’s attempt to seize
control of the “pollutant,” CO2.
I began with a quotation from the preface of the first edition of Mackay’s Extraordinary Popular Delusions and
the Madness of Crowds, and it is worth recalling now a quotation from the preface of the second edition: “Men,
it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their
senses slowly, one by one.”
In our efforts to conserve the created world, we should not concentrate our efforts on CO2. We should instead focus on issues
like damage to local landscapes and waterways by strip mining, inadequate cleanup, hazards to miners, and the
release of real pollutants and poisons like mercury, other heavy metals, and organic carcinogens. Much of the
potential harm from coal mining can be eliminated, for example, by requirements that land be restored to a
condition that is at least as good as, and preferably better than, when the mining began.
Life is about making decisions, and decisions are about trade-offs. We can choose to promote investment in
technology that addresses real problems and scientific research that will let us cope with real problems more
efficiently. Or we can be caught up in a crusade that seeks to suppress energy use, economic growth, and the
benefits that come from the creation of national wealth.
William Happer is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University.
Science of Climate Change
Coal Man (Robert E
Murray) not Buying Global Warming Hysteria
22. Who said “Australia’s Got
why the confidence of Australians is at a record low? Then just pause to consider the body of
work, over the last few years, of the Rudd and Gillard Labor governments:
Home Insulation debacle.
Building the Education Revolution debacle.
Mining Tax (Mark I) fiasco.
Murray Darling Basin debacle.
National Broadband Network (NBN) profligacy debacle.
illegal immigrant and Malaysian Solution debacle.
(still developing) Mining Tax Mark II shambles.
Carbon Tax debacle.
- Slumping investor confidence resulting in never before contemplated Sovereign
- Allowing a complete incompetent to remain in control of the Reserve Bank, leading to
- Successive ill-considered, unnecessary and massively harmful increases in interest
- Allowing the complete politicization of Treasury…
- Which now reports to arguably the World’s Worst Treasurer, outside continental
- Handing control of policy to a clutch of maniacal Greens and ego-driven Independents,
- Leaving us with a complete lack of leadership and total loss of any sense of national
Then add to
near complete invisibility of the resources boom we are supposed to be so grateful
- Unimaginable and ever-increasing government waste;
- Mindless escalation in bureaucracy, crippling initiative and choking
- Ideological changes to IR legislation that are stifling job growth and
looming government-led, union-driven attack on independent contractors;
- Looming reductions in Medical and Child Care
- Unaffordable housing costs and spiraling rents;
- Out-of-control utility costs, local government charges and grocery price
- Bank fee rip-offs; Insurance rip-offs; Petrol price
huge increase in personal financial stress and insolvencies;
- Retail and Construction sectors on the brink of
plethora of small and medium sized business on the brink;
- Terrified consumers who have stopped spending through fear and loss of
- A country governed from an
isolated city-state populated by overpaid and overfed politicians, bureaucrats and assorted sycophants (who
have not the slightest experience in, or comprehension of, the real world) cheered on by an overloaded
gravy-train packed full of gluttonous consultants who toady to egos and incompetence, while voraciously gorging
themselves at the national trough …
Okay, when it comes
to the major political acts, arguably one’s often as bad as the other. But think about it… Over the last 20 years
Labor have given us Keating, Beazley, Crean, Latham, Beazley (… again), Rudd and now Gillard, with the likes
of Wayne Swan, Peter Garrett, Stephen Conroy, Joe Ludwig – and let’s not forget Kevin, again – in her backing
Got Talent? … You’re kidding me.
This lot are so hopeless they’d be jeered off stage at a Union
Thanks for nothing, except misery, Labor.
Economist, and Middle of the Road Activist/Common Sense
23. Will the Satanist Julia
Gillard Put a Price on Oxygen As Well?
Today in Australia the satanic lesbian, and pro-abortion, PM of Australia, Julia Gillard, forced on
the sleepy and apathetic Australian population a new tax on the life-giving carbon dioxide gas, under the excuse of a
horde of lies.
Some critical things she lied about included:
"We know that our climate is warming."
"The science is clear ... the planet is warming ... and that warming is caused by carbon ... by
Probably the only worthwhile thing she said was expose John Howard as being as menvber of the same
party who wants this impost:
"John Howard, when he was PM, tried to put a price on carbon."
This is what Gillard said on National television on Sunday night, July 10, 2011:
"Our climate is changing," whereas the reality says that that is nothing new on the Earth.
"This is caused by carbon pollution," she unashamedly lied over and over.
24. Iceland's Message to the Money-Power
Go suck eggs banksters! … and I, and 30,000 other people on Facebook, agree!
“Its rejection for the second time by Iceland is a testament to its people, who feel they should
bear no responsibility for the losses of foreigners endured in the financial
crisis … Iceland is of particular interest because it did not bail out its banks like Ireland did, or foreign
ones like the U.S. did. If that fervour catches on amongst taxpayers worldwide, as it has in Iceland and with
the tea party movement in America, the banks would have something to fear; that is, the inability to draw
from limitless amounts of funding from gullible government officials and central banks. It appears that the root cause
is government guarantees, whether explicit or implicit, on risk-taking by the
… So why is Australia not using the banking powers in the Commonwealth Constitution Sect. 51 (viii) Wayne Swan, Glen
Stevens, Malcolm Turnbull, Andrew Fraser …?
Iceland Declares Independence from International
By Bill Wilson
Iceland is free. And it will remain so, so long as her people wish to remain autonomous of the
foreign domination of her would-be masters — in this case, international bankers.
On April 9, the fiercely independent people of island-nation defeated a referendum that would
have bailed out the UK and the Netherlands who had covered the deposits of British and Dutch investors who
had lost funds in Icesave bank in 2008.
At the time of the bank’s failure, Iceland refused to cover the losses. But the UK and Netherlands nonetheless have demanded that Iceland repay them for the
“loan” as a condition for admission into the European Union.
In response, the Icelandic people have told Europe to go pound sand. The final
vote was 103,207 to 69,462, or 58.9 percent to 39.7 percent. “Taxpayers should not be responsible for paying the debts of a
private institution,” said Sigriur Andersen, a spokeswoman for the Advice group that
opposed the bailout.
A similar referendum in 2009 on the issue, although with harsher terms, found 93.2 percent of
the Icelandic electorate rejecting a proposal to guarantee the deposits of foreign investors who had funds in
the Icelandic bank. The referendum was invoked when President Olafur Ragnur Grimmson vetoed legislation the
Althingi, Iceland’s parliament, had passed to pay back the British and Dutch.
Under the terms of the agreement, Iceland
would have had to pay £2.35 billion to the UK, and €1.32 billion to the Netherlands by 2046 at a 3 percent
interest rate. Its rejection for the second time by Iceland is a testament to its people, who feel
they should bear no responsibility for the losses of foreigners endured in the financial
That opposition to bailouts led to Iceland’s decision to allow the bank to fail in 2008.
Not that the taxpayers there could have afforded to.
As noted by Bloomberg News, at the time the crisis hit in 2008, “the banks had debts equal to 10 times
Iceland’s $12 billion GDP.”
“These were private banks and we didn’t pump money into them in order to keep them going; the
state did not shoulder the responsibility of the failed private banks,” Iceland President Olafur Grimsson
told Bloomberg Television.
The voters’ rejection came despite threats to isolate Iceland from funding in international
financial institutions. Iceland’s national debt has already been downgraded by credit rating agencies,
and now those same agencies have promised to do so once again as punishment for defying the will of
This is just the latest in the long drama since 2008 of global institutions refusing to take
losses in the financial crisis. Threats of a global economic depression and claims of being “too big to
fail” have equated to a loaded gun to the heads of representative governments in the U.S. and Europe.
Iceland is of particular interest because it did not bail out its banks like Ireland did, or foreign ones
like the U.S. did.
If that fervour catches on amongst taxpayers worldwide, as it has in Iceland and with the tea
party movement in America, the banks
would have something to fear; that is, the inability to draw from limitless amounts of funding
from gullible government officials and central banks. It appears that the root cause is government
guarantees, whether explicit or implicit, on risk-taking by the banks.
Ultimately, such guarantees are not necessary to maintain full employment or even prop up an
economy with growth, they are simply designed to allow these international institutions to over leverage and
increase their profit margins in good times — and to avoid catastrophic losses in bad times.
The lesson here is instructive across the pond, but it is a chilling one. If the U.S. — or
any sovereign for that matter — attempts to restructure their debts, or to force private investors to take a
haircut on their own foolish gambles, these international institutions have promised the equivalent of
economic war in response. However, the alternative is for
representative governments to sacrifice their independence to a cadre of faceless bankers who share no
allegiance to any nation.
It is the conflict that has already defined the beginning of the 21st Century.
The question is whether free peoples will choose to remain free,
as Iceland has, or to submit.
Bill Wilson is the President of Americans for Limited Government. You can follow Bill on Twitter
25. Pop Music as a Corrupting
July 1, 2011
Lady Gaga is honored by the Queen. The Illuminati
uses the entertainment industry (TV, movies, music)
to induct society into satanism.
By Peter St. George
Everywhere we go we see tiny white buds resting perfectly inside ears blocking out all sounds but
pop music. Is this music uplifting or degrading?
I believe it is the Devil's forked tongue. Just consider the lyrics: "Just dance, it'll be ok",
"Smack ma bitch up" and "Kill that nigga".
Lady Gaga repeats the word "Judas" 37 times in her blasphemous "I'm in love with Judas". Even the
Queen is a Gaga fan apparently. Gaga has 70% as many Google results for her name as Jesus.
So far I have managed to avoid listening to this satanism and if it should be played near me I
would observe Matthew 5:29 "If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for
you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell."
But how are satanic themes so widespread and prevalent in modern popular music? Simply put, those
who create and manage the music are the high priests of Satan: the Illuminati. If you look at any musician who is
selling big and trace their record label upwards you will find a division of Illuminati Inc.
Have you ever wondered why there is no crackdown on illegal music downloads now thought to be over
800 tracks per teenager? Well it is because the devil does not charge for his sermons as long as it is more
The Satanists know that "It's not about the money...We don't need your money...We just wanna make
the world dance. Forget about the Price Tag".
Have you ever wondered why "gangsta' rappers" are duet ing with young women who admit to "selling
their soul to the devil"? It is because there is no longer a divide between most music of different genres and
tastes. The musicians are all owned by the same satanic cult and serve the same wretched master. They do as they
are told or else (Michael Jackson et al).
Plato recognized that music could change character and be used to corrupt people. Aristotle too
stated that "Some [music] makes men sad and grave, like the so-called Mixolydian, others enfeeble the mind, like
the relaxed modes, another, again, produces a moderate and settled temper, which appears to be the peculiar effect
of the Dorian; the Phrygian inspires enthusiasm....The same principles apply to rhythms; some have a character of
rest, others of motion, and of these latter again, some have a more vulgar, others a nobler movement....music has a
power of forming the character, and should therefore be introduced into the education of the young...."
However, Aristotle would surely be devastated to hear young girls singing "Don't be a little bitch
with your chit chat just show me where your dick's at." Or a more subliminal and repeated ad nauseum "Put your
hands in the air, like you just don't care" which is perhaps an instruction to submission i.e. "Put your hands
The quality that is valued in popular music has shifted dramatically to being "catchy" rather than
beautiful and stirring. This is all part of the satanic plan to ingrain their mind-set into people. In the current
generation, simplicity not complexity is valued. Instead of listening to an orchestra play a note they would rather
hear gunshots between verses.
Now this is not to say that all music is bad or music is inherently evil. My point is that it is
highly efficient at promoting an agenda or manipulating people. In fact, music and dancing seem intrinsic to human
nature as it is present in all societies. African tribes sing and dance through the night.
However, there is a difference - they do it together as a group! They are not self-absorbed,
sucking in mindless and harmful lyrics, seeking to subvert them from their natural God-given tendencies with
satanic scripture. Instead they rejoice in kinship and God.
Now, it may be said that these "pop stars" have concerts where thousands of people come and
"sing-a-long". Yet this too is a lie and a disgrace to music. For the songs lack heart, emotion and righteous
meaning. They are sung by mindless drones who will sing whatever sick and twisted words are put into their head,
scream approval when told that their favorite artist sold their soul to the devil and throw up Illuminati symbolism
Compare these numb, swaying and pathetic "hero" worshipers to that of a musical Christian
gathering. If you go to any number of churches on a Sunday you will see the true meaning of music. People are
regularly brought to tears (including myself) not due to some hollow phrase but at the meaning and love that the
lyrics stir up within oneself. This is the true root and purpose of music before it was subverted and the very
nature of it which is the nature of all things; God.
He can clearly be found and experienced when someone takes in the meaning of, "If you pass through
raging waters in the sea, you shall not drown. If you walk amid the burning flames, you shall not be harmed. If you
stand before the pow'r of hell and death is at your side, know that I am with you through it all."
Peter St.George is the pen name of a 22-year-old Canadian.
Comments for "Pop Music as a Corrupting Force"
David said (July 4, 2011):
A quick comment for the music industry piece. I don't think people should get too fatalistic about
satanic control of the music industry. These days that control is mostly illusory, as the means of creating
professional music are reasonably cheap and available to people. Instruments, recording devices are affordable and
music is passed around on mp3's, which means you don't need to pay publishing costs.
Here is an article by David Byrne (of talking heads fame) talking about how musicians are more free
from industry control than they once were. His talks of 6 models that musicians can now follow: http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/magazine/16-01/ff_byrne?currentPage=all Rather
than moaning about satanic control of the music industry (or to compliment that criticism), people can create their
own music and positively effect people. Individuals change the world. We have more power than we think.
Luke said (July 3, 2011):
Henry,great article on the Pop Music industry.I'm a huge extreme metal fan (the stuff that makes
Metallica sound like the BeeGees) and people these days have no appreciation for thrash metal's complexity and
technicality. It's also EXTREMELY MASCULINE which goes against the whole emasculazation of men program. I also
listen to some really good Christian Metal such as Beliver,Living Sacrifice,Vengeance Rising,Seventh Angel, etc.
I'm also friends with Scott Waters of Ultimatum, who I have no doubt he's a brother in Christ. Thanks for another
great article. Jeremy http://www.ultimatum.net/mainframe.html
Rob said (July 3, 2011):
Response to Pop Culture as a corrupting force.
The fact that the Rock / Pop industry is a “Tool of the devil” is “A given” and is no longer even a
debatable issue, the only question that can now be asked is, “Are you content with that fact ?”
The very term: “Rock and Roll” means “Fornication”……
In 1951 when this new music came onto the scene, it was called by different names, boogie woogie,
rhythm and blues etc.
However, none of these terms seemed to “Hit the spot” a DJ. named Allan Freed, who worked on a
Cleveland Ohio radio station, went down into the ghetto area of Cleveland Ohio and asked them what they called this
kind of music.
“Rock and Roll” they replied, “Due to the fact that we commit fornication or adultery to the beat
of the music, many times in the back seat of a car, so we rock and roll.”
Allan Freed returned to the radio station used the term and the rest as they say, “Is history.”
Rock and Roll is the primary tool of satanists.
Ordination of rock music leaders, musicians, promoters, producers, distributors and others involved
in the dissemination of rock music are ordained.
Rock music is viewed at this time as the primary tool of satanists.
Source: Video - What`s wrong with Christian Rock ?
Taken from a satanist statement.
Rock has always been the DEVIL`S music, you can’t convince me that it isn’t. I honestly believe
everything I’ve said, I believe rock and roll is dangerous.
Source: Rolling Stone magazine. 12th February 1976. Page 83.
WHY ARE YOU PLAYING WITCH DOCTOR`S MUSIC
It was in the early 1970`s when my sisters arrived in Kalamantan, Barat, Indonesia, where our
parents are serving as missionaires with R.E.M.U. International, with them they had brought a contempory Christian
record which was the “In thing” in Canada they said.
They were playing the record one evening, when an older national Christian stopped by the door to
my sister’s astonishment his immediate question was, “Why are you playing witch doctor’s music, by which they call
on Satan ?”
To the national who had left the old heathen practices which included the witch doctor, it was hard
to explain why Christian young people in the churches who had sent out the missionary to teach them the way of
salvation and separation from the world, could even begin to listen to that kind of music.
I was there when this incident happened and am writing now to verify it.
Statement by: Jim Walkington.
Source: Video - What`s wrong with Christian Rock ?
26. Clinton Outlines Road
Ahead for Arab Democracy
AP foreign, Friday July 1 2011
By Bradley Klapper
Associated Press= VILNIUS, Lithuania (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that the
rule of law, political parties and democratic institutions must emerge in the Arab world if it is to emulate
Eastern Europe's remarkable transition two decades ago from authoritarianism to truly free societies.
In Lithuania for an international democracy conference, Clinton cited the real risk of Middle Eastern and North
African nations slipping back into autocratic old ways. And she lamented the latest accounts of violence in Syria,
with security forces and knife-wielding, government-organized thugs reportedly attacking protesters in the city of
"Today there are new democracies fighting for life, there are vicious autocrats clinging to power," Clinton said
in a speech at the "Community of Democracies" meeting. "This is an hour or need. And every democracy should stand
up and be counted."
Drawing on the experience of Lithuania and other countries that opened up when the Iron Curtain came down 22
years ago, Clinton outlined a series of fundamentals she said were necessary for nations to make the transition to
democracy: institutions rooted in law; equality for all, including women; a free press; economic opportunity;
The implicit warning was that it is uncertain if the Arab reform movements will translate into stable democratic
societies. While Tunisia and Egypt try to find their own formulas for a new system of governance, the would-be
democrats of Syria may never get their chance.
Speaking at a news conference in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital, Clinton said Syrian President Bashar Assad's
regime wasn't sending a coherent message. She noted how it allowed an opposition meeting in Damascus this week,
while pressing on militarily in the north.
"We know what they have to do," Clinton said. "They must begin a genuine transition to democracy, and allowing
one meeting of the opposition in Damascus is not sufficient action toward achieving that goal."
Clinton said Assad's government is running out of time and it must advance a serious political process or face
The democracy conference was being held only a short distance from Belarus, Europe's last autocratic stronghold,
where authorities are cracking down on demonstrators amid the country's worst financial crisis since the fall of
the Soviet Union.
Clinton lamented the brutal repression in the country and how the government denies its citizens the most basic
rights. President Alexander Lukashenko's iron fist has long been an asterisk to democratic change in eastern
Europe, and the Obama administration is alarmed by the rapidly deteriorating situation.
Without mentioning either country by name, Clinton also expressed concerns about the political motivations
behind Ukraine's legal proceedings against former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, and Russia's refusal to allow a
new opposition party to participate in upcoming elections.
27. What Will Gas-Drilling Do To Your Food
Posted by Steve in Green Living on May 27th, 2011 | no responses
Friday, May 27, 2011 9:50
The controversial gas-drilling practice of fracking is tainting water. Your food might be next.
By Barry Estabrook
There’s a stunning moment in the Academy Award-nominated
documentary Gasland, where a man touches a match to his running faucet—to have it explode in a ball of
fire. This is what hydraulic fracturing, a process of drilling for natural gas known as “fracking,” is doing to
many drinking water supplies across the country. But the other side of fracking—what it might do to the food
eaten by people living hundreds of miles from the nearest gas well—has received little
Fracking well. Photo credit: RiverkeeperUnlike many in
agriculture, cattle farmer Ken Jaffe has had a good decade. But lately he’s been nervous, worried fracking will
destroy his business. Jaffe’s been good to his soil, and the land has been good to him. By rotating his herd of
cattle to different pastures on his Catskills farm every day, he has restored the once-eroded land and built a
successful business with his grass-fed and -finished beef. His Slope Farms sells meat to food coops, specialty meat
markets, and high-end restaurants in New York City, about 160 miles to the southeast. “If you feed your
micro-herd—the bacteria and fungi in the soil—then your big herd will do well, too,” he said when I visited him
recently on a cool, sunny afternoon.
But a seam of black rock lies nearly a mile beneath the
topsoil he has so scrupulously nurtured, and the deposit contains enormous quantities of natural gas. Profit-hungry
energy companies—and the politicians that their campaign donations support—are determined to exploit that resource,
even though it could destroy the livelihoods of thousands of small farmers like Jaffe who have sprung up in New
York City’s vibrant, alternative food shed.
Energy companies liberate the gas, which is trapped in tiny
bubble-like pockets in the rock, by forcefully injecting chemicals diluted with millions of gallons of water into
the rock. This fracking ruptures the earth, creating fissures through which the gas passes—along with a witch’s
brew of carcinogens, acutely poisonous heavy metals, and radioactive elements.
“For sustainable agriculture, fracking is a disaster,” says
Jaffe. The gas rush started in the South and West, but has spread to the East and now affects 34 states. Under much
of West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York lies a 400-million-year-old geographic formation called the
Marcellus Shale. Although estimates vary, the shale may hold 50 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas,
enough to meet New York State’s needs for 50 years. To see what fracking can do to food production, Jaffe has only
to look at what has happened to some of his colleagues in nearby Pennsylvania, where the first fracked well came
into production in 2005, and where there are now there are now more than 1,500.
Last year, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture quarantined 28 cattle belonging to Don and Carol
Johnson, who farm about 175 miles southwest of Jaffe. The animals had come into wastewater that leaked from a
nearby well that showed concentrations of chlorine, barium, magnesium, potassium, and radioactive strontium. In
Louisiana, 16 cows that drank fluid from a fracked well began bellowing, foaming and bleeding at the mouth, then
dropped dead. Homeowners near fracked sites complain about a host of frightening consequences, from poisoned
wells to sickened pets to debilitating illnesses.
The Marcellus Shale itself contains ethane, propane, and
butane, arsenic, cobalt, lead, chromium—toxins all. Uranium, radium, and radon make the shale so radioactive that
companies sometimes drop Geiger counters into wells to determine whether they have reached the gas-rich deposits.
But those compounds are almost benign compared to the fracking fluids that drillers inject into the wells. At least
596 chemicals are used in fracking, but the companies are not required by law to divulge the ingredients, which are
considered trade secrets. According to a report prepared for the Ground Water Protection Council, a national
association of state agencies charged with protecting the water supply, a typical recipe might include hydrochloric acid (which can damage respiratory organs, eyes,
skin, and intestines), glutaraldehyde (normally used to sterilize medical equipment and linked to asthma,
breathing difficulties, respiratory irritation, and skin rashes), N,N-dimethyl formamide (a solvent that can
cause birth defects and cancer), ethylene glycol (a lethal toxin), and benzene (a potent carcinogen). Some of
these chemicals stay in the ground. Others are vented into the air. Many enter the water table or leach into
ponds, streams, and rivers.
For the most part, state and federal governments have turned
a blind eye to the problems brought about by fracking. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that it has
no jurisdiction to investigate matters related to food production, a contention disputed by Congressman Maurice
Hinchey (D-NY), who wrote a report urging the EPA to study all issues associated with fracking. A concerned farmer
who prefers not to be identified forwarded me an email written to him by Jim Riviere, the director of the Food
Animal Residue Avoidance Databank, a group of animal science professors that tracks incidents of chemical
contamination in livestock. Riviere wrote that his group receives up to 10 requests per day from veterinarians
dealing with exposures to contaminants, including the byproducts of fracking. Nonetheless, the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) has slashed funding to his group. “We are told by the newly reorganized USDA that
chemical contamination is not their priority,” Riviere wrote.
“The dangers of fracking to the food supply are not
something that’s been investigated very much,” said Emily Wurgh of Food and Water Watch, an environmental group
based in Washington, D.C. “We have been trying to get members of Congress to request studies into effects of
fracking on agriculture, but we haven’t gotten much traction.”
Fracking is not a new technology. It was first put into
commercial use in 1949 by Halliburton, and that company has made billions from employing the extraction method. But
it really wasn’t until 2004 that fracking really took off, the year that the EPA declared that fracking “posed
little or no threat” to drinking water. Weston Wilson, a scientist and 30-year veteran of the agency, who sought
whistleblower protection, emphatically disagreed, saying that the agency’s official conclusions were
“unsupportable” and that five of seven members of the review panel that made the decision had conflicts of
interest. (Wilson has continued to work at the EPA, and continues to be publicly critical of
A year later, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act with a
“Halliburton loophole,” a clause inserted at the request of Dick Cheney, who had been
Halliburton’s CEO before becoming vice president. The loophole specifically exempts fracking from the Safe
Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, the CLEAR Act, and from regulation by the Environmental Protection
Agency, and it unleashed the largest and most extensive drilling program in history, according to Josh Fox, the
creator of the film Gasland.
In 2010 New York State imposed a moratorium on gas drilling,
but if that were to be lifted, fracking would deal a triple whammy to Ken Jaffe’s farm, and thousands more like it.
(Compare a map of the Marcellus Shale with one of small organic farms.)
Back on his pasture, Jaffe gestured to a pond in a bowl-like
valley surrounded by sloping pastures and hillsides of maples, white pines, and blossoming wild cherries and apple
trees, that, along with wells on the property, provides water for his animals. Given the geography of the land, any
chemical contamination seeping from the rock would go directly into Jaffe’s water supply, poisoning his cattle.
And it’s not just his herd that’s vulnerable; all the plant life on his property would also be in danger. According
to Jaffe, ozone is more lethal to crops than all other airborne pollutants combined, and of all crops, few are more
susceptible to it than clover, a nutrient-rich feed that is critical to his method of sustainable cattle raising.
While ozone is normally associated with automobile exhaust, fracking generates so much of it that Sublette Country,
Wyo., has ozone levels as high as Los Angeles. This, despite the fact that it has fewer than 9,000 residents spread
out over an area the size of Connecticut. What it does have is gas wells.
Even if his cows and his land would somehow remain
unaffected by nearby wells, Jaffe’s business would still likely suffer. Joe Holtz is manager of Brooklyn’s Park
Slope Food Coop, which buys a cow a week from Jaffe (and upwards of $3 million products from other New York area
farms). He says that his environmentally conscious organization would be forced to seek alternatives to New York
meat and produce if fracking becomes commonplace. “If the air is fouled and the animals are drinking water that
contains poisonous fracking chemicals, then products from those animals are going to have poisons,” he told me.
Given the progress that small, local farms have made in the region, he says, the decision to stop dealing with
long-term suppliers would be hard. But he adds, “We would have to stop buying from them. There is no doubt in my
28. The Kabbalah: The NWO's Satanic
By Henry Makow
May 3, 2010
My interest was
picqued when I noticed that the
very first chapter of David Livingstone's new book, "Surrendering Islam" was dedicated to "The Kabbalah"
and the Occult. This was a subject I wanted to learn more about.
Since the so-called
"Enlightenment," mankind has gradually fallen under the spell of the Kabbalah. What we have been taught to believe is "progress" is actually the
resurgence of an ancient satanic pagan fertility cult, epitomized by the Kabbalah.
David Livingstone has the
stomach and genius to dive into this cesspool, and take its measure. More squeamish observers (like myself) know
it only by its stench.
Thanks to David's
explanation of its background, I had a eureka moment. The "god" of the Kabbalah
is not god at all. It is Lucifer. Freemasonry is based on the
Kabbalah. Illuminati Jews and their Freemasonic allies are stealthily erecting a New World Order
dedicated to Lucifer. That's why the ubiquitous logo of the City of Ottawa, where I am currently visiting, is
an O with three tails. 666.
According to Livingstone, the Kabbalah is based on ancient pagan mythologies which recount the story of an original
god who created the universe, and a usurper god (Lucifer) who eventually
defeats him and comes to rule the universe in his stead.
Lucifer is the offspring of
the father-god and his wife, the goddess. But the son-god also marries his mother. The son-god was identified
with the sun while the goddess was identified with the planet Venus, the first star seen at sunrise.
"Essentially, the god and
the goddess were seen as two aspects of a single god." Livingstone writes. "As such, other names for Satan have
included "Prince of Dawn" or "Son of the Dawn."
Lucifer, who exemplified
evil, was known as a "dying God" because every winter he died and descended to the underworld where he ruled
over the spirits of the dead. Kabbalism is a sex cult tied to the cycle of the seasons. It is concerned with the
incestuous mating of the god and goddess to ensure fertility.
Lucifer demands sacrifices. He must be appeased to avert
his evil and direct it against one's enemies. The most evil sacrifice is the slaughter of a child. Livingstone
"This [child sacrifice]
became the basis of this cult as it was worshipped throughout the ancient world. Rituals of death and
resurrection imitated that of the god [Lucifer.]
Participants would imbibe
intoxicants and dance to music in order to achieve a state of ecstasy, or Jinn [demon] possession, by which they
believed they could achieve supernatural abilities like shape-shifting, clairvoyance and other magical powers.
In this state, they would slaughter a child and eat its flesh and drink its blood [Nazarene Remnant
comment: Satanists delight in mocking God at every turn. Thus they always
make it a practice to defy the command of the Most High God, to abstain from eating blood, as found here:
“For [it is] the life of all flesh; the blood of it [is] for the life
thereof: therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the
life of all flesh [is] the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.” (Leviticus 17:
14)] so that the god could be reborn in them."
Read the Full Story here:
The Kabbalah-The NWO's Satanic Bible
29. Secret War Between Tony Blair And
Title: Alastair Campbell: Blair Was Angry at Prince's Interference
Latest volume of former
spin doctor's diary reveals Blair accused Prince Charles of 'screwing' the government
The Guardian, Saturday 2 July 2011
Alastair Campbell, left,
with Tony Blair, says the former prime minster resented interference from the Prince of Wales. Photograph: Ben
Tony Blair believed that the Prince of Wales publicly
interfered in sensitive areas of government policy in a manner that sometimes stepped over the constitutional
boundaries historically respected by the royal family, according to Alastair Campbell.
In extracts from the latest
volume of his diaries, published in the Guardian today and on Monday, the former No 10 communications director
writes that Blair became so exasperated he once privately accused the prince of "screwing us".
Campbell, a teetotaller,
also discloses in today's extracts that the pressure of working in Downing Street became so great that he
started drinking again around the turn of the millennium. He never told Blair.
He also reveals that George
Bush said in July 2001 that Vladimir Putin had "looked a bit scared" when he accused the then Russian president
of selling more than conventional weapons to rogue states.
The main focus of today's
extracts confirms what ministers across the spectrum have long complained of in private: the Prince of Wales
regularly attempts to influence government policy, usually in long handwritten letters.
In the most detailed
account of the prince's interventions, Campbell suggests that the heir to the throne even displayed signs of
disapproving of the government. Campbell indicates that at one point Blair raised his concerns with the
"While publicly we stayed
supportive, TB said Charles had to understand there were limits to the extent to which they could play politics
with him," Campbell wrote on 31 October 1999 of a meeting between Blair and the prince after he took Prince
William on a provocative day's foxhunting. "He said it was 90 minutes of pretty hard talk, not just about
Blair, who was not invited to the royal wedding, became angry when the prince:
unhelpful" interventions during the foot and mouth crisis in 2001. Campbell wrote on 16 March 2001: "TB said he
knew exactly what he was doing. He also asked whether Charles had ever considered help when 6,000 jobs were lost at
Corus [the steel manufacturer]. He said this was all about screwing us and trying to get up the message that we
weren't generous enough to the farmers."
banquet in 1999 for Jiang Zemin, then president of China, a decision criticised by Blair as "silly". In a long
paper to Blair the prince wrote: "I feel very strongly about it."
on plans to outlaw foxhunting. In what Campbell described as a "long note on hunting" in late 1999, the prince said
it was good for the environment.
Declared in the
same note that hereditary peers, the majority of whom were abolished by Labour in 1999, had much to offer. Campbell wrote that the
prince had said "menacingly": "We don't really want to be like the continentals, now do we?"
Insisted that he
had to speak out about GM foods after Downing Street had made clear its unhappiness with what Campbell describes as
a "dreadful" Mail on Sunday article. In the same note to Blair the prince wrote: "I cannot stay
said Blair was
furious with the prince's Mail on Sunday article in May 1999. "He was
pretty wound up about it, said it was a straightforward anti-science position, the same argument that says if
God intended us to fly, he would have given us wings. It certainly had a feel of grandstanding."
Blair thought the prince had a political agenda because he was upset by the former prime minister's speech to
the Labour conference in October 1999 in which he attacked the "forces of conservatism". He wrote on 1 November
1999: "TB said he bought the line that because we were modernising, that meant we were determined to do away
with all traditions but he had to understand that some traditions that did not change and evolve would die. It
all had the feel of a deliberate strategy, to win and strengthen media support by putting himself at arm's
length from TB and a lot of the changes we were making."
added: "TB felt
he had been really stung by the forces of conservatism speech. He said they felt much more vulnerable than in
reality they are. We know they still have the power to 'keep us in our place' but they don't always see it like
Blair even appeared to have
raised his concerns with the Queen. On 1 June 1999, shortly after publication of the prince's article, Campbell
wrote: "TB saw the Queen and seemingly didn't push too hard re Charles, but he was very pissed off."
said last night
that the anger in the Blair team was mainly caused by the prince's media operation under Mark Bolland, his
deputy private secretary between 1997 and 2002. Matters improved when Paddy Harverson, the prince's head of
communications, joined his team in 2004.
Guardian: "Tony Blair valued their regular private conversations and respects Prince Charles's right to speak up on important issues.
But this was a period when it seemed Charles's media team was proactively and publicly setting them at odds on
some of the government's most difficult issues – not just hunting, where the differences were well known, but GM
food, China, and agriculture.
"When Paddy Harverson
[Bolland's successor] came in, things improved greatly. It might seem ironic me complaining about the media
operation but just as I felt Charlie Whelan gave Gordon Brown problems so I thought the same of Mark Bolland at
times for the Prince of Wales."
[As usual] Clarence House
declined to comment.
Power and Responsibility:
The Alastair Campbell Diaries, Volume Three, covers the years 1999-2001.
Nazarene Remnant comment:This is
high drama designed to deceive the public, as well as to follow the dictates of the Grand Plan. Now “the
Plan” calls for a very much free and roaming Prince Charles, not one tucked away in some smelly British jail.
My belief is that Prince Charles will steadily appear to distance himself from the Illuminati
Establishment—including His own mother and Windsor family—by becoming increasingly critical of them in many
areas. We always have to remember that Charles has been groomed as the “Saviour,” the returning Prince
Arthur, who is going to re-establish the Golden Age of Camelot. He is also staged to negotiate and sign the
Peace Plan between the “Earthlings” and the invading “Aliens,” which is something that will loom very large
on the horizon in coming months. So he cannot be arrested and jailed, as the above writer says is the fate of
the British Royal Family. My estimation, for what it’s worth, is that the Royal Family won’t be arrested and
jailed at all, because they will have disappeared into their secret hideouts they have prepared around the
world for this very event. Charles himself has been showing signs that this is the name of the game he’s
currently engaged in, and there have been signs of this happening for quite some time now. See more details
in our free book The Usher of Desecration, available here:
30. Revealed: British Government's Plan to Play Down
Internal emails seen by
Guardian.co.uk show PR campaign was launched to protect UK nuclear plans after tsunami in
launched a PR campaign to ensure the accident at the Fukushima nuclear facility in Japan did not derail plans
for new nuclear power stations in the UK. Photograph: AP
officials approached nuclear companies to draw up a co-ordinated public relations strategy to play down the
Fukushima nuclear accident just two days after the earthquake and tsunami in
Japan and before the extent of the radiation leak was
emails seen by the Guardian show how the business and energy departments worked closely behind the scenes with
the multinational companies EDF Energy, Areva and Westinghouse to try to ensure the accident did not derail their
plans for a new generation of nuclear stations in the UK.
"This has the potential to set the nuclear industry back globally," wrote one official at the
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), whose name has been
redacted. "We need to ensure the anti-nuclear chaps and chapesses do not gain ground on this. We need to occupy
the territory and hold it. We really need to show the safety of nuclear."
Officials stressed the
importance of preventing the incident from undermining public support for nuclear power.
The Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith, who sits on the Commons environmental
audit committee, condemned the extent of co-ordination between the government and nuclear companies that the
emails appear to reveal.
"The government has no
business doing PR for the industry and it would be appalling if its departments have played down the impact of
Fukushima," he said.
Louise Hutchins, a
spokeswoman for Greenpeace, said the emails looked like "scandalous collusion". "This highlights the
government's blind obsession with nuclear power and shows neither they, nor the industry, can be trusted when it
comes to nuclear," she said.
The Fukushima accident,
triggered by the Japan earthquake and tsunami on 11
March, has forced 80,000 people from their homes. Opinion polls suggest it has dented
public support for nuclear power in Britain and around the
world, with the governments of Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Thailand and
Malaysia cancelling planned nuclear power stations in the wake of the accident.
The business department
emailed the nuclear firms and their representative body, the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA), on 13 March, two days after the disaster
knocked out nuclear plants and their backup safety systems at Fukushima. The department argued it was not as bad
as the "dramatic" TV pictures made it look, even though the consequences of the accident were still unfolding and two
major explosions at
reactors on the site were yet to happen.
"Radiation released has
been controlled – the reactor has been
protected," said the BIS official,
whose name has been blacked out. "It is all part of the safety systems to control and manage a situation like
The official suggested that
if companies sent in their comments, they could be incorporated into briefs to ministers and government
statements. "We need to all be working from the same material to get the message through to the media and the
"Anti-nuclear people across
Europe have wasted no time blurring this all into Chernobyl and the works," the official told Areva. "We need to
quash any stories trying to compare this to Chernobyl."
initially rated the Fukushima accident as level four on the international nuclear event scale, meaning it had
"local consequences". But it was raised
to level seven on 11 April, officially making it a major accident" and putting it on a par with Chernobyl in
The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has released more than 80
emails sent in the weeks after Fukushima in response to requests under freedom of information legislation. They
reported remarks on the cost of new nuclear power stations by the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, were
"unhelpful and a little premature".
admitted its new reactor, AP1000, "was not designed for earthquakes [of] the magnitude of
the earthquake in Japan", and would need to be modified for seismic areas such as Japan and
The head of the
DECC's office for nuclear
development, Mark Higson, asked EDF to welcome the expected announcement of a safety review by the energy
secretary, Chris Huhne, and added: "Not sure if EDF unilaterally
asking for a review is wise. Might set off a bidding war."
EDF promised to be
"sensitive" to how remediation work at a UK nuclear site "might be seen in the light of events in
It also requested
that ministers did not delay approval for a new radioactive waste store at the Sizewell nuclear site in Suffolk, but accepting
there was a "potential risk of judicial review".
The BIS warned it
needed "a good industry response showing the safety of nuclear – otherwise it could have adverse consequences on
On 7 April, the office for
nuclear development invited companies to attend a meeting at the NIA's headquarters in London. The aim was "to
discuss a joint communications and engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain confidence among the
British public on the safety of nuclear power stations and nuclear new-build policy in light of recent events at
the Fukushima nuclear power plant".
Other documents released by
the government's safety watchdog, the office for nuclear regulation, reveal that
the text of an announcement on 5 April about the impact of Fukushima on the new nuclear programme was privately
cleared with nuclear industry representatives at a meeting the previous week. According to one former regulator,
who preferred not to be named, the degree of collusion was "truly shocking".
A spokesman for the DECC
and BIS said: "Given the unprecedented events unfolding in Japan, it was appropriate to share information with
key stakeholders, particularly those involved in operating nuclear sites. The government was very clear from the
outset that it was important not to rush to judgment and that a response should be based on hard evidence. This
is why we called on the chief nuclear inspector, Dr Mike Weightman, to provide a robust and evidence-based
A DECC source played down
the significance of the emails from the unnamed BIS official, saying: "The junior BIS official was not
responsible for nuclear policy and his views were irrelevant to ministers' decisions in the aftermath of the
Tom Burke, a former government environmental adviser and visiting
professor at Imperial College London, warned that the British government was repeating mistakes made in Japan.
"They are too close to industry, concealing problems, rather than revealing and dealing with them," he
"I would be much more
reassured if DECC had been worrying about how the government would cope with the $200m-$300m of liabilities from
a catastrophic nuclear accident in Britain."
The government last
week confirmed plans for eight new nuclear stations in England and Wales. "If acceptable proposals come
forward in appropriate places, they will not face unnecessary holdups," said the energy minister, Charles
The NIA did not comment
directly on the emails. "We are funded by our member companies to represent their commercial interests and
further the compelling case for new nuclear build in the UK," said the association's spokesman.
"We welcome the interim
findings of the independent regulator, Dr Mike Weightman, who has reported back to government that UK nuclear
reactors are safe."
31. Fukushima--Japan's Faustian Bargain
With the West
Our Tokyo correspondent describes a general feeling of betrayal by the West. But the satanist-led (Illuminati)
"West" literally may have
sabotaged Fukushima in order to coerce the Japanese into world government.
It is finally dawning on the Japanese that the 'West' was not/is not what it was purported to be and
that the contact with the West and its technology has been a Faustian bargain.
Indeed the whole of 'West' can almost be summarized, post Renaissance and Enlightenment as an re-enactment of
the myth of Dr. Faustus. And with similar
tragic ending to it. [In this myth, Faustus sells his soul to the devil for power and knowledge.]
The desire of the common people is the same all over the world. It is to live in peace, in relative comfort and
well-being and to wish the best for their children and thus the future generation. It is so very similar all over
the world; this clash of civilization/culture only occurs because of outside imposition.
People of Fukushima and the rest of Japan are highly aware that they have robbed their children, their future --
having been conned (admitted, their own fault and ignorance) about the safety, and all the positive (lucrative)
possibility that nuclear energy could bring into their area....The very irony of the town's slogan, "Brighter
Future through Nuclear Power/Energy" that still hangs above the -involuntarily abandoned-ghost town, sums up the
And of course, Fukushina rhymes very much with Hiroshima!
Unlike the WWII consequence, this time all four islands of Japan will be contaminated.
Japanese people are not exactly dumb; they may be naïve and ingenious (as with many native inhabitants) and are
exceedingly misinformed about the West and by extension-the whole global, geo-strategical situation.
Thanks to the control of the Media, and especially the post WWII, built up of NIHON TV(channel 4), the CIA has
managed to turn Japanese opinion in a pro-USA direction!
Nota Bene: that Showa Emperor (the real WWII war criminal), gave the Chrysanthemum Medal to General Le May
in 1964...actually he did not quite give it to him personally as is the custom but the Japanese government did: the
message is "Thank you so much for 'holocausting' the inhabitants of Japan'- we are just so
Some of the Japanese are no better than Pavlovian dogs. This is due to the strategy by the feudal Tokugawas who
imposed Isolationism for the inhabitants- while allowing the West, one-way access via the Dutch East India Company
and accepting their yearly summary regarding the Western (read:Global) situation at face value and never sending an
observer/messenger/spy to even check if it was accurate.
This document was treated almost like some 'secret documents' and only shared among the very few elite and never
disclosed to the Japanese people....The consequence is that for the relative peaceful period of 270 years or so,
the Japanese were raised in total oblivion as to what occurred beyond the sea.
It is one thing to read about the Inquisition, War of Religion, French Revolution, Conquest and colonialism etc.
via a history text book; another to directly participate, witness or have one's life and families be destroyed
through these factors... Zbigniew Brzezinski is not completely off, when he called Japan 'a fragile flower'. Yes,
from a Social Darwinism imbued global monopolist controller (the geo-strategist with his Chessboard); he is
That Tokugawa feudal period was like being raised in a green-house, isolated from the rest of the world. We are
suffering the consequences now.
The tragedy is not only due to radiation.....there is the abandonment and massacre of 'live'-stock which also came
with post-Perry and the West. There was no domestication of four legged animals (for food consumption) and it was
the Westerners, when once Japan abandoned Isolationism that insisted that White people can not survive without
beef and dairy!
It was the so-called MEIJI Emperor (some of us believe him to be a changeling...) who ate beef for the very first
time (cooked French style as to make it non-noticeable)! This occurred in 1873, which is only about one hundred and
thirty-forty years ago, meaning -not such a long time ago.
Yet long enough, that the majority of the younger generation Japanese don't even have much idea about anymore.
(They have been busy drinking mild, eating steak and becoming big and tall like the White Westerners....seriously,
that was the slogan in getting them to change their dietary habits; and yes, ice-cream do taste often
So the tragedy, of course is first and foremost to the human residents...but many people have been ANGST by the
massacre of these creatures and wonder, why they could not simply be freed and left there so see if they could
This too is the consequence of copying the West as the idealized model.
A country prone to such natural disasters cannot take that responsibility for another life. It is a double Angst,
in a culture that believes by instinct in reincarnation, Karma and the presence of a soul.....in all creatures,
A lot of people who attend these anti-nuclear demonstrations make it very clear that they would like to see
Fukushima closed and the whole of Japan become nuclear-free.
That every single nuclear power plant be closed, because to err is part of being human. They are highly concerned
that out of sixty-something new nuclear power plants, over forty are in Asia.
And if Fukushima can become a deterrent, like Chernobyl-for Europe; it is a well worthwhile lesson.
And if there really is a lack of energy, well let us just use less is our attitude.
(It is only corporate greed that never understands the concept of Enough and even less on Less...).
Food crisis; eat less. People survived the Edo period just fine without oil...-without animal
husbandry-without jet travel, -without many items deemed indispensable when they are not, and in reality -often
just junk and garbage. We are all under the spell of scientific progress!
All the so-called modern day conveniences are just not worth the current road of technological 'progress'.....
People here are both concerned and apologetic about polluting the ocean. The ocean belongs to the whole world and
all creatures and knows no boundaries...
It is such a well known and accepted concept that life sprang from the sea.
In fact in French, the word mother is inside the sea (la mer and mère) and in Japanese, the word mother is inside
the Kanji for the sea....
And right now, like HIROSHIMA, it is an experimentation time and nobody can really foresee the future. Suffice to
say, it is very grim.
I would like to add that despite everything, people are being positive, and accept that a certain % will perish and
a certain % would hopefully survive and plan to stay put, where they are even if it means eating radioactive food,
and living with radiation. People survived HIROSHIMA, so why not. Plus the world is circular, there really is only
one planet and the world across the sea appears rather vicious, competitive and sinister!!!
Comments for "Fukushima -- Japan's Faustian Bargain With
Ed said (June 8, 2011):
I'm something of a student of history, and one of the questions that have come up to me is
"what would have happened if Japan had not gone into the isolation of the Tokugawa period?"
My take on that is conditioned by what happened not too long before then, when Toyotomi
Hideyoshi was shogun. Hideyoshi had the megalomaniac idea that he was going to make himself emperor of Asia, and
to that end commenced by invading Korea. The Japanese had better guns than the Koreans (James Clavell's nonsense
notwithstanding), and would have overwhelmed Korea in short order if it hadn't been for the superior Korean
navy, which saved Korea (and, indirectly, Ming China) from the Japanese by threatening the Japanese supply
There's a very interesting book on this, titled _Samurai Invasion_, by Stephen Turnbull. The
1592-97 war in Korea was a bloodbath. After the Japanese withdrew, their attention again became centered on the
situation at home; there was more fighting between the factions in Japan after Hideyoshi passed away in 1597,
and this eventuated after a time in the establishment of the Tokugawa shogunate. The Tokugawa, as we know, were
severely isolationist, and essentially prevented Japan from having any part in what was going on in the rest of
the world from about 1620 or so until the 1860s.
Had there been a Toyotomi shogunate instead of the Tokugawa, I think that east Asia and the
Pacific would have been treated to a display of Japanese militarism and psychotic violence in the 17th century
that would have been as bad or worse than what they did in the early 20th. The Japanese are no more or less
innocent than any other nationality in the world; to blame everything bad on "Western culture" while pretending
that non-Westerners are some sort of primeval innocents is simply preposterous. We have lots of reactors in
North America and in Europe, after all, which tells me that we in the West are just as naive and innocent as the
JB said (June 7, 2011):
shima is the Japanese word for island
So Fukushima means "F*CK
No more so than the fact that a dollar is a green span, or that Bernie Made Off with
everyone's money, or that Kashkari carried off all your cash, and then there is Rep Weiner's ghastly weiner, but
lets not go there.
MS said (June 7, 2011):
In response to Fukushima, I would like to remind you all... of the dream I had the night it
happened, I was taken into a vortex a hands length above my head, and the next thing you know I was standing
beside an angel with thousands of other people sitting on a mountain top, looking down at the HAARP facility ..
I saw a blue discharge of what seemed to be millions of volts. I got a horribly sick feeling in my stomach,, and
awoke. The reason I mention this, is a) because it's the God's honest truth and b) because I honestly feel that
japan, a nation of honor , has been a people deceived by the luciferian illuminati, It was divided up after WW2.
japan got the technology, after all, SONY is an acronym for Standard.Oil.New.York. ... My guess is that Japan wasn't "towing
the line" for the N.W.O|O.W.N .. and my suspicions, are that they would have used NANOTECHNOLOGY , for the GOOD
OF MAN KIND,, which is a no,no in the luciferian doctrine...
Dan said (June 7, 2011):
Japan has suffered more fatalities from nuclear irradiation than any other country in the
Does anyone remember the tragic irradiation of the Japanese fishing ship the Daigo Fukuryu
Maru (Lucky Dragon 5) due to the Bikini Atoll 15 megaton hydrogen bomb test in 1954? The crew of 23
were exposed to lethal radiation fallout, many died excruciating deaths. The U.S, government tried to keep the
incident a secret, and paid the families of crew members $2500 bucks to forget about it. (That's right, twenty
five one hundred dollar bills).
"The tragedy of the Daigo Fukuryu Maru gave rise to a fierce anti-nuclear movement in Japan,
rising especially from the fear that the contaminated fish had entered the market. "
What were all those 1950's Japanese 'Godzilla' movies really about?
Godzilla was an allegory of radiation
disaster. These fear memes are deeply programmed into the Japanese mainland psyche
after all these years.
That's why I'm certain that the tsunami was triggered - a man caused disaster. The Satanists
could rely upon the Japanese public to freak out against nuclear energy with one horror show like this. It opens
up psychic wounds.
32. How To Control People
Monday, 8 January 2001
How To Control People by Charley Reese http://disc.yourwebapps.com/Indices/149495.html
The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred.
Here are a few tips on how smart people can control other
people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!
The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling
them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would
then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.
It is easier than you think to control people indirectly,to manipulate them into
thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.
One basic technique is to keep them
ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or
restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans. The indirect approach is
to control the education they receive.
It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer,
businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time
be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational
training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while
at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.
The most obvious symptom is their absence of original
thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or
thought the answer was. What do they think? Well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite
That greatly simplifies things for the controller because with lots of money, university
endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as
authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.
Another technique is to keep them
entertained. Roman emperors did not stage circuses and gladiator contests because they
didn't have television. We have television because we don't have circuses and gladiator events. Either way, the
purpose is to keep the people's minds focused on entertainment, sports, and peripheral political issues. This way
you won't have to worry that they will ever figure out the real issues that allow you to control them.
Just as a truly educated person is difficult to
control, so too is an economically independent person. Therefore, you want to create
conditions that will produce people who work for wages, since wage earners have little control over their economic
destiny. You'll also want to control the monetary, credit, and banking systems. This will allow you to inflate the
currency and make it next to impossible for wage earners to accumulate capital. You can also cause periodic
deflation to collapse the family businesses, family farms, and entrepreneurs, including independent community
To keep trade unions under control, you just promote a scheme that allows you to
shift production jobs out of the country and bring back the
products as imports (it is called free trade). This way you will end up with no unions or docile
Another technique is to buy both political
parties so that after a while people will feel that no matter whether they vote for
Candidate A or Candidate B, they will get the same policies. This will create
great apathy and a belief that the political process is useless for effecting real change.
Pretty soon you will have a population that feels completely helpless, and thinks the bad things happening to them are
nobody in particular's fault, just a result of global forces or evolution or some other
disembodied abstract concept. If necessary, you can offer scapegoats.
Then you can bleed them dry without having to worry overly much that one of them will sneak into
your house one night and cut your throat. If you do it right, they won't even know whose throat they are
Charley Reese E-mail: OSOreese@aol.com
What you do with this article now that you have read it ... Is up to you.
Sales Tax School Tax Liquor Tax Luxury Tax Excise Taxes Property Tax Cigarette Tax Medicare Tax
Inventory Tax Real Estate Tax Well Permit Tax Fuel Permit Tax Inheritance Tax Road Usage Tax CDL license Tax
Dog License Tax State Income Tax Food License Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Gross Receipts Tax Social Security Tax
Service Charge Tax Fishing License Tax Federal Income Tax Building Permit Tax IRS Interest Charges Hunting
License Tax Marriage License Tax Corporate Income Tax Personal Property Tax Accounts Receivable Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax Workers Compensation Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone State and Local Tax IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) State Unemployment
Tax (SUTA) Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Federal Universal
Service Fee Tax Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon) Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Don’t forget Income Tax Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most
prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom
stayed home to raise the kids.
What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians? ' I hope this goes around THE WORLD at least
1000 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!! GO AHEAD - - - BE FREE!!!
33. Central Banks, World Tyranny, Fixed Markets
"The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends. The occult
power of the Central Bank to create money out of nothing is the fountainhead that fuels our far-flung
financial and political empire."
Excerpt from "The Occult
Technology of Power," a manual used to instruct an Illuminati heir published in 1974.
In its pristine
form a Central
Bank is a private monopoly of a nation's
money and credit issuance supported by the coercive power of the state.
That the Central Bank be directly in
our hands is vital until our new order is firmly established throughout the governmental, business,
intellectual and political spheres of society.
After our order is consolidated,
formal nationalization of the Central Bank with
great fanfare is usually advisable in order to dispel any lingering suspicion that it is operated for
Of course only loyal agents of the dynasty are allowed to obtain high offices in the Bank and our power remains
intact. Obvious private monopolies are always the targets of sharp reformist agitators. Only the most paranoid,
however, can see through the public facade to the private monopoly of the nationalized or quasi-nationalized
The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our
monopoly power depends. The occult power of the Central Bank to create money out of nothing is the
fountainhead that fuels our far-flung financial and political empire. I will make a quick survey of a few of the
ways this secret money power is brought to bear.
Basically, the power of our Central Bank flows from its control over the points of entry into the economy of new,
inflationary money which it creates out of thin air.
Ordinarily, bills of exchange, acceptances, private bonds, government bonds and other credit instruments are
purchased by the Central Bank through specially privileged dealers in order to put the new money, often only
checking accounting entries, into circulation.
The dealers are allowed a large profit since
they are fronts operated by our agents. Our purchase of government securities pleases the
government, as our purchase of private debt pleases private debtors. As a quid pro quo to assure "good
management" our agents are given directorships, managerial posts, and offices in the corporations and government's
As the addiction to the narcotic of inflationary easy credit grows and grows we demand more and more control of our
dependent entourage of governments and corporations. When we finally end the easy credit to "combat inflation,"
the enterprises and governments either fall directly into our hands, bankrupt, or are rescued at the price of total control.
Also, we ruling bankers control the flow of money in the economy through the wide authority of the Central Bank to
license, audit, and regulate private banks.
Banks that loan to interests outside the loyal entourage are "audited" by the Central Bank and found to be
dangerously overextended. Just a hint of insolvency from the respected Central Bank authorities isenough to cause a
run on the disobedient bank or at least dry up its vital lines of credit. Soon the banking
establishment learns to follow the hints and nods of your father's agents at the Central Bank automatically.
Further, the periodic cycles of easy
money and tight money that we initiate through our control of the Central Bank cause corresponding fluctuations in
all markets. Our inner circle knows in advance the timing of these
cycles and, therefore reaps windfall profits by speculating in commodity, stock, currency,
gold, and bond markets.
Monopolistic stock and commodity Exchanges are a vital adjunct to our power made possible by our Central Bank
power. We do not allow a fair
auction market to exist, but make a great show of "tough" government regulation to create a false sense of
confidence among small investors.
With the aid of our regulatory charade and financial power we are able to maintain Exchanges tailored to our
entourage's need to manipulate stock prices at the expense of independent investors. Our privileged specialists on
the floors of our Exchanges, aided by the propaganda of our financial press and brokerage houses, continually play
on naivete and greed to drain the savings of the unwary into our coffers.
The stock, commodities, and securities held in trading accounts by the Exchange and brokerage houses provides us
with a clout far beyond our own actual holdings with which we can manipulate prices and win proxy fights for
Little danger to our lucrative
racket exists from public-spirited regulation. Our manipulations are so complex that only
the most brilliant experts could comprehend them.
To most economists our Exchange operations appear to be helpful efforts to "stabilize" the market. We ruling
bankers, if able to keep peace among ourselves, become richer and richer as time passes without the annoyance of
exerting productive effort of benefit to others.
Makow Comment: This document is authentic in my opinion, and very gratifying since it blames central bankers
for most of humanity's problems, a view I
have held since 2002.
Iceland Declares Independence from International Banks
34. Exposed! Public Education is
"Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence
in our military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal."
Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," a manual published in 1974 used to
instruct an Illuminati heir.
Above, scene from "Village of the Damned."
In order to maintain our system of power, the institution of universal public education is
The primary purpose of public education is to inculcate the idea that our crucial institutions of coercion and
monopoly were created for the public good by popular national heroes to blunt the past power of the malefactors of
great wealth. Crucial is to create the impression
that, although the people have been exploited in the past,
today the wealthy are at the mercy of an all-powerful government
which is firmly in the hands of the people or do-good
Centralization of control [of education] at the state, or preferably national level, assists in building the
climate of opinion we require in public education. Failing to obliterate local control, other methods nearly as
effective are available.
Our overwhelming financial clout in the publishing industry can induce relatively uniform textbook
selection. Further leverage can be created by promoting teacher
colleges and teaching machines. National teacher's associations and unions are also an excellent power
base from which to foster our programs of indoctrination.
With our great influence in publishing and publicity we are able to, selectively popularize educational theorists
whose views are incidentally beneficial, compatible, or at least not in conflict with our own goals.
This way we
obtain sincere, energetic activists to propagate our desires without having to reveal our motives or even
existence. We do not want an educational system that produces hard-driving individuals bent on
amassing great wealth and power.
Therefore, we discourage education that would develop the potential powers of students to their fullest. "Liberal"
education that stresses knowledge for its own sake or even sophistry and sterile mental gymnastics is of no danger
"Relevant," vocational, or
career-oriented education also poses no danger to our power.
Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our
military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal. Progressive education with its stress on "social
adjustment" also produces the conformity we require of our subjects.
Emphasis on competitive sports may
produce a certain amount of disruptive competitiveness among the participants, but primarily has the effect of
creating life-long voyeuristic spectators who will enthusiastically sublimate their competitiveness into endless hours of
following college and professional sports on the boob tube. Space spectaculars and dramatic political
infighting are also marvelous diversions with which to occupy the masses.
seeking social change will gravitate to the field of education. Our strategy is simple: Let only those
succeed whose influence would be compatible with our power. Encourage all who would develop the passive or
receptive mode of existence. Discourage all who promote the
aggressive or active capacities.
Build a great cult of salvation through endless education, touting it
as the "democratic" path to success. Deride the frontal approach to success of the "outmoded' rugged
Before yielding the floor ... I would like to comment on the demise of religious education as a vehicle for social
control. Religion, in its time, was a remarkable weapon for inculcating subservience,
altruism, and self-abnegation among our subjects. We did not give up this weapon
Your grandfather, for one, supported the Baptist faith well after most finance capitalists had turned wholly to
secular ideologies. However, a trend toward rationality in human affairs plods along inexorably quite outside the
reach of our power.
Only in our totalitarian dictatorships can this trend be quashed entirely. In the semi-open societies in which our
money power is based, the forces of reason can only be impeded and diverted. Some have theorized that, eventually,
widespread rational egoism will overturn our order. I am confident that secular faiths and just plain confusion
will suffice to sustain our power for many centuries to come.
Comments for "Exposed! Public Education is
Gary said (July 5, 2011):
Your article reminded me of a book exposing the deliberate
downfall of the public education system.
Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt wrote a book called The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America that would seem
to relate to this article in showing that what happened to the public education system was deliberately
The author has made her book available for free on her web
site as a PDF file you can download:
I have not had a chance to finish reading the book yet, but
given her prior position as a former Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement
(OERI), (U.S. Department of Education) I would think that she would know what she is talking
Public education teachers give
high marks to this whistleblower's account:
"Iserbyt's book is a psychological lifeboat for teachers who
feel trapped on the 'education Titanic.'" (Polly Ball, B.S., 30 yr. teacher, elementary education)
"I applaud Iserbyt for her shocking, completely documented
expose. A dynamite book which presents a clear chronology of educational restructuring. Compelling evidence shows
school reform, supported by all political stripes, to be a totalitarian plan using Skinnerian behavior modification
and other equally manipulative psychological techniques to subjugate future generations in a state of ignorant
bliss." (O. Jerome (Jed) Brown, M.A., 25 yr. teacher, former candidate WA State Supt. of Public
"the deliberate dumbing down of america provides knowledge
critical to combatting the education crisis we are facing. This all-in-one reference book should be added to
everyone's personal library." (Betting Dobbs, R.N., B.S., M.S., retired teacher, President of Guardians of
Education for ME)
"Iserbyt has directed her flashlight into the darkest,
secret, elitist corners of academe, flushing out and exposing to the light of day the termites who have been eating
away at the foundations of traditional academic education." (Gene Malone, B.A., M.E., 30 yr. teacher, founder of
"This country, if it is to remain a sovereign, free and
independent America, depends upon the greatest number of Americans reading and acting upon the information in this
timely book." (Ann Herzer, M.A., Reading Specialist, 20 yr. teacher, former candidate AZ Supt. of Pub. Inst.,
member Dau. Am. Rev.)
"Teachers: Don't miss reading this book! It's what you've
been waiting for!" (Barbara McFarline-Kosiec, Ph.D. in Leadership in Education, 35 yr. teacher.)
"Unbelievable book! Iserbyt's straight shooting tells the
whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is a `must read' for elected officials, who should give serious
consideration to her proposals to turn the situation around. Home schoolers and traditional teachers will not be
able to put this book down." (Steve Schran, B.S., 15 yr. teacher, professional musician)
You can download a free PDF of The Deliberate
Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt here:
see John Taylor Gatto’s great work on exposing the deliberate manipulation of the education system:
History of American Education,The Odysseus Group, Suite
3W 295 East 8th Street NY, NY, 2000-2004. Available here: http://www.johntaylorgatto.com
There is also a suppressed book by Australian author Jean Marion Wallis:
The Subversion of
Australian Education: What is Wrong With Our Schools?
Published by The Australian League of Rights. Available on http://www.Scribd.com
If you cannot get a copy from Scribd, try our site here:
Also see the following in our freely available book, What The Study Of History Should Have Been,
Appendix B What’s Behind the “Education” Agenda?
Weaponized Education: Controlling Tomorrow With The Youth of Today
Ramping Up and Dumbing Down Maths Teaching
Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Are Going the Same Way!
The Makers of Modern Schooling
Honest Bill Cosby Tells U.S. Blacks The Truth
Paul said (July 5, 2011):
I went to public schools till Grade 11 and had the highest marks in my class. In Grade 12 in the private Christian
school I nearly failed because those private school students were light years ahead of me and all the other
boarding students. Public schools know this to be true but will never imitate the private schools.
Instead they lambaste them at every turn, especially home
schooled students. Yet around a quarter of public school teachers
hypocritically send their children to private schools.
Ibrahim said (July 5, 2011):
Last night, I had a dream in which I was in a college
classroom with my fellow-students, and we were each given a slip of paper containing a summary of the American
Psychiatric Association's 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from the APA's official list of mental
The principal of the college sat on a high chair to the side of our table, and he called us each in turn to give
him our own individual explanations about how we understood the APA's 1973 decision.
As someone who is deeply involved in reorientation therapy, I wasn't quite sure what I would say to the college
principal about my beliefs. Should I lie and say that I agreed wholeheartedly with the APA, or should I tell the
truth and thus get myself kicked off the course?
I didn't understand the meaning of this dream until I read your article this morning. Everything makes so much more
sense to me now. Thank you so much for helping me to see the education system for what is really
35. Death Sentence For Private
And Home Education, Courtesy Of Supreme Court
By Charlotte Iserbyt
July 8, 2002
The Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decision allowing the constitutionality of financial aid to parents
which they may use at religious or private schools, including virtual academy (computer-assisted-instruction)
charter schools available to home schoolers, will result in the deliberate dumbing down of all education.
In this latter regard, the writer of this article was told in 1981 by the Director of the Office of
Libraries and Learning Technology, U.S. Department of Education, that " in the future all education will take place
in the home, using computer-assisted-instruction, but that we will always have the school buildings for
'socialization' purposes." This is the United Nations lifelong learning/brainwashing concept (International
community education) which places all community services under the umbrella of the community school. (The National
Alliance of Business refers to this agenda as Kindergarten-Age 80).
The public sector succumbed years ago to federal control through funding. Now, private schools,
willing to go the "voucher" route in order to get the money to stay in business, will have the opportunity to be
equally dumbed down, denied a liberal arts curriculum, and stripped of all sound moral education. I can already
hear the howling from voucher-supporting conservatives the first time the heavy hand of the federal government
lands on a private school denying it the right to determine "what is right and what is wrong" in its curriculum,
hiring practices, recital of the Pledge of Allegiance, The Lord's Prayer, etc. Those private schools which
courageously, for reasons of conscience, resist vouchers will eventually be forced out of business due to their
inability to remain competitive.
Interestingly enough, the blame for this incredibly dangerous Trojan Horse decision can be laid at
the feet of the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.
Is school choice a plot to implement the socialist, corporate fascist, workforce training agenda
for the global planned economy?
This decision will succeed in carrying out the long-standing leftist/internationalist goal of total
control of all education (public and private) through the dollar. It provides a classic example of what the late
Senator Edmund Muskie, D. ME. referred to when he described how the Democrats, when they couldn't get something
controversial approved, would go to the Republicans for action. Muskie, known as "Mr. Metro", used as an example
President Nixon's implementation of metropolitan/regional government (the unconstitutional carving of the nation
into ten regions), something the Democrats had been unwilling or unable to tackle or accomplish.
The late Robert Hutchins, left-wing educator, former President of the University of Chicago, and
supporter of World Government, would be ecstatic over the voucher decision. In fact, he could have written it. In
an article by Virgil C. Blum in The Commonweal, January 31, 1964 entitled "Freedom and Equality", p. 513, Blum
"Dr. Robert M. Hutchins sees no constitutional difficulty in federal aid for the education of
church-related school children in secular subjects. The fact that such education 'is permitted by religion' or that
federal aid for such education is an 'aid to religion' he says 'is immaterial.' The benefit that accrues to
religion, Hutchins argues, is 'incidental to an overriding public benefit.' Consequently, 'such incidental
benefits,' he reasons 'do not invalidate the legislation'."
It is not difficult to understand why Hutchins would be supporting aid to church schools. He knew
it was not a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow but government control and therefore, he could argue that "aid
to religion" as a byproduct of government support for church schools would be 'incidental to an overriding public
Why don't more people understand that government control of private and home school education is
exactly what is going to happen? And why have religious organizations, especially those affiliated with the
Catholic Church, supported school choice proposals when they have so much to loose once the government controls are
If the question of school choice is considered in a vacuum, without the benefit of an in-depth
understanding of the history and highly controversial goals of American public education, if it is considered
simply in the context of providing a better education for low income children, if it is considered only as an issue
of equal funding for all children, one escapes the very dangerous crux of the matter: ACCOUNTABILITY...
accountability to the government which is granting the voucher or tax credit.
While working in the Department of Education and involved in supervising grants and contracts to
local schools, government labs and centers, United States and foreign universities, etc., I had to make sure that
the recipients of the federal grants complied with federal regulations, guidelines, and criteria for that
particular project. I never questioned the wisdom of such a requirement. Although the U.S. Department of Education
is in itself an unconstitutional entity and should not exist, it would still have been illegal to allow recipients
of federal money (extracted from the taxpayers) to spend that money as they wished. There must be accountability as
long as we Americans want government to perform in an orderly, fair manner.
Elected officials and others in supervisory positions, including public school superintendents who
complain about government regulations, should, when the government honey pot is passed around the board table, just
say "NO". That is the only way to avoid the regulations imposed rightfully in the name of "accountability," and to
remain a truly free agent. During my three-year tenure as an elected school board member I voted "NO" on every
single motion to accept federal curriculum or federal funding.
So, why is it that those promoting tuition tax credits and vouchers have missed this point of
accountability? Is it because it is too simple to understand? Is it because they feel that the need to level the
field for low income children should take precedence over accountability requirements and that accountability
requirements are not to be feared? Read on...
In 1982, while working on a U.S. Department of Education technology grant to the Association for
Educational Computing and Technology, a spin-off the National Education Association, I was shocked by some internal
comments in an early draft of the grant. Although I was not working in an "Eyes Only" position for the CIA or
Defense Department, but for an agency which supposedly exists to provide a beneficial service to parents, children,
and teachers, this paper was stamped CONFIDENTIAL! On one page there appeared the following information:
"PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES: What We (the U.S. Department of Education) Can Control or Manipulate?
Under that incredible question the following items and activities were listed: State participation/selection
process, role of advisors, content of program, training of state leaders, resource people utilized, basic skills
content areas emphasized, perception of need to use technology." The main reason I gave that document to the press,
for which I was subsequently relieved of my duties, was that I was appalled at the blatant attitude of the federal
government regarding the national public school system. Do the five justices who ruled favoring school choice
proposals live in such a dream world that they believe the government will require less regulation of the private
and home schools than it requires of the public schools?
There is a certain naivety, Alice in Wonderland attitude, amongst those who should know better
regarding what will happen to private schools and home school entities which accept vouchers. Did the Supreme Court
majority not study the catastrophic history of school choice in France which resulted, in 1983, with the socialist
French Government under Mitterand assuming control of all private and religious education which received government
The conservative Mayor of Paris, Jacques Chirac, said the takeover threatens "the free choice of
schools by parents, the basic character of private education, the freedom of management of these
The conservative Paris newspaper, LeFigaro said it was worse than that: "Private schools are no
longer threatened. The propositions of Education Minister Alain Savery on the future of private education are
equivalent to a sentence of death."
It is understandable that parents are desperate to find a solution to the devastating problems
facing their children in the public schools. However, they should realize that the despicable situation has been
planned for over 150 years (the dumbing down was deliberate...the Hegelian dialectic at work), in order to get the
parents to call for and accept what is being sold to them as a solution providing freedom of choice, which in fact
is what the internationalists, especially the Carnegie Corporation, has had planned for at least 75 years. The
Carnegie Corporation's plan to change our economic system from free market to collectivist was published in 1934 in
its little book "Conclusions and Recommendations for the Social Studies". Not only did President Reagan in 1985
sign agreements with President Gorbachev to merge the United States and Soviet education systems; the Carnegie
Corporation signed even more extensive agreements with the Soviet Academy of Science to carry out the same
Let me warn parents and private school administrators: "Freedom to choose" is exactly the opposite
of what they and the private sector will receive if they take one penny of federal, state or local tax money to
educate children. Believe it or not, slavery is right around the corner, since once the private sector is
controlled through vouchers, thereby creating a partnership with government (corporate fascism), students , having
been psychologically profiled, will be tracked into specific training at an early age and later into job slots to
suit the needs of the corporate sector and the global economy. That is the failed international socialist quota
system that in essence provides NO CHOICE! Our children will have no freedom to choose what they want for their
futures. This is going on right now in the public school sector due to Goals 2000, the School to Work Opportunities
Act, and the reauthorization of the ESEA (S.1, the Bush-Kennedy "No child Left Behind Act.") Some bright 9th
graders are spending 3 out of 5 days a week at the job site, rather than studying math, science, literature,
history, foreign languages, art, music, etc. which would give them a liberal arts education, indispensable for
upward mobility, freedom, and an understanding of the world in which they live.
Ah.....would that Aristotle, 384-322 B.C., could return to express his displeasure with this latest
development. He said "Educated men are as much superior to uneducated men as the living are to the dead."
What school choice is all about is not giving parents a real choice without strings attached; it is
about controlling all children (referred to as "human resources"), everywhere on this planet, in order to implement
the corporate fascist global economy, with 100% participation in the global computer!
Why, otherwise, does one find most of the major players and promoters of school choice coming from
the corporate sector, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as the largest and loudest supporter of all? TIME magazine,
6/8/92, owned by Time-Warner came close to the truth when it said "...the Bush Administration strongly supports the
concepts that underlie the Edison Project...Many observers believe Whittle's long-term plan anticipates the use of
these (voucher) funds. If adopted, the reform (vouchers) could funnel billions of public dollars into private
schools..." And NEWSWEEK, 6/8/92, not to be outdone by TIME, said "There's no question that Whittle schools could
be extremely rewarding ...If Congress approves a voucher system..." Are we so naive that we believe big business
really cares about our children's futures? It cares, and rightfully so, about big profits. That's perfectly fine,
but not at the expense of our children's freedom to choose their futures.
Conservatives have a problem understanding the overt and heavily-funded position of the teachers'
unions in opposition to school choice, and refuse to understand or accept the NEA and AFT leadership's covert
position of support. The unions would be pretty stupid not to support vouchers when they know that the
international education agenda calls for such "choice" in order to implement the global workforce training agenda
and that their membership will be called upon to staff the training sites. It is the average traditional classroom
teacher who opposes school choice for obvious reasons, some of which are cited in this article. The following
quotes substantiate the above conclusion:
The late Albert Shanker, President, American Federation of Teachers--"It may be that we can't get
the big changes we need without choice."
President George Bush, Sr.--"Choice is the one reform that drives all others."
Former U.S. Secretary of Education Lauro Cavazos--"President Bush and I are determined to use the
power of choice to help restructure American education."
To illustrate how the promoters of this totalitarian agenda know full well what they are doing, one
need go no further than to the writings of major education change agent Chester Finn, who was once opposed to
school choice but is presently a supporter of the concept. (Finn assisted in the development of the National
Institute of Education in 1970, served under Secretary William Bennett as Assistant Secretary, Office of
Educational Research and Improvement in the mid-eighties, and was the author of America 2000, renamed Goals 2000
during the Clinton Administration.
Finn also serves on the National Governing Board for the National Assessment for Educational
Progress. The NAEP is the tool for measuring accountability to politically-correct government viewpoints (60
percent of the test items measure political correctness and school-to-work readiness). The NAEP, which President
Bush mandated be administered in all schools, will determine not only curriculum, but compliance with
accountability standards and therefore will be essential in the determination of which private schools and home
schoolers will receive vouchers. That is the reason this decision will do away with private and home schooling
education as they are presently constituted.
In an article he wrote entitled "Public Service, Public Support, Public Accountability", March,
1982, National Association of Secondary School Principals' Bulletin, p. 69, Finn said:
"Some to be sure, like to think they can have it both ways; i.e. can obtain aid without saddling
themselves with unacceptable forms of regulation. But most acknowledge the general applicability of the old adage
that he who pays the piper calls the tune, and are more or less resigned to amalgamating or choosing between
assistance and autonomy."
And, in American Education, May, 1982, "Public Support for Private Education." Part 1, p. 5, Finn
"Short of scattering money in the streets or handing it out to everyone who wants some, the
funding agency must define eligible recipients...This means, in a word, 'regulation,' the inevitable concomitant of
public financial support."
The other side of the coin, Finn says, is "the obligation of private schools to recognize certain
limits to their differentness and certain ways they must conform to the norms and expectations of a society that
values and supports them..."
In returning to this most bizarre Supreme Court Decision, something comes to mind. Why did Supreme
Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently attend a conference in Europe to familiarize herself with World Court
decisions and how they might play out in the United States, under our present Constitution? Could this school
choice decision, in the future, have anything to do with world court decisions, universal/global education, public
private partnerships, global work force training, etc.?
Remember, it was Karl Marx who called for a "combination of education with industrial production."
And the global government being implemented today is nothing more nor less than what Lenin called for:
Why did the majority of our elected officials in Congress and appointees on the Supreme Court allow
these radical changes to take place, changes which will forever affect the futures of our children and the special
nature of the greatest, freedom-loving country in the history of the world?
Because they no longer represent the best interests of their constituents. Their allegiance is to
the global elite at the United Nations and elsewhere, from whom theyreceive their marching orders. Or, especially
in the case of our elected officials, they have been so dumbed down in the public schools that they didn't even
know what form of government and economy they swore to uphold when they assumed office.
Our government, through this latest decision, has placed the last nail in the coffin of
"freedom". This decision finalizes the exchange of our highly successful free market system and republican form of
government for a failed 'ism' form of government. Whether our new form of government will be corporate fascism,
socialism, or communism (all of which differ only in minor ways), remains to be seen.
Note: Credit for some of the research in this article goes to Barbara M. Morris who wrote the
indispensable book on the dangers of school choice: "Tuition Tax Credits...A Responsible Appraisal", 1983, and to
Billy Lyon who wrote a fascinating treatise "Connections and Conflicts of Interest (Or, There Ought to Be an
Investigation!) 1992, which documents the role of conservatives, liberals, corporations. foundations, etc. in the
promotion of school choice and the school-to-work agenda.
Other Books and
Articles by Charlotte Iserbyt:
Death Of Free Will - Iserbyt / Niwa - PDF format - 11/10/10
United States-People's republic of China Education Agreement - 5/1/10
Obama's Health Care Plan -
Iraq Veteran Victim of Government
Abuse - 11/23/07
Operation Save U.S. -
The North American
Soviet Union - 2/27/07
The Devil's Seven Prong Fork -
Restoring The Draft -
Maine's Never Ending Assault
On Traditional Education - 4/9/06
Happy New Year Gift - 1/3/06
Reject Political Correctness! 'Shout
Merry Christmas' - 12/7/05
Preparing Children For
Virtual/World Classrooms - Part 2 - 8/29/05
Revolution In Education - Soviet
Style - Part 1 - 8/29/05
The Robotic CAFTA Vote - 7/28/05
Help Defeat CAFTA -
Hooray For France! -
Base Closures : Disarming America - 5/27/05
Unanimous Treason -
Miracles Still Happen! -
Refuse The National I.D. Card -
Bush Admin Hiring of Ex-KGB Chiefs to
Develop Internal Passport - 1/9/05
(Letter to Nancy Pelosi)
Intelligence Reform's Internal
Passport - 12/31/04 (Published in The Times Record,
Shame On Buchanan -
"Achtung! Your Passport, Bitte" -
Background Paper on President Reagan and
the U.S. Department of Education - 6/16/04
Many Ways To Skin A Cat -
American Culture Takes a Hit -
You'll Know It's True When It Happens To
You - 3/7/04
Warning : The Impending Draft -
Regionalism is Communism -
Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a
Duck... - 1/16/04
New Year : Keep Your Eye On The Ball - 1/1/04
"Uncle Sam Wants You, Your Sister, and
Your Girlfriend or Wife" - 11/11/03
United States-Russian Merger: a Done
Deal? - 10/16/03
Bush Must Go! - 8/4/03
Former KGB Heads To Help Spy On Americans -
Former USSR Premier/ex KGB
Head To Work for Homeland Security! - 4/23/03
Communist Oriented Policing - 2/13/03
New Spectator Sport for
Americans...Watch it Play Out! - 2/1/03
Kissinger out of the Closet -
Cold War Myth: An Exercise in the Use of
the Dialectic - 11/23/02
Death Sentence for
Private and Home Education, Courtesy of Supreme Court -7/8/02
No American Left Alone - 4/12/02
The Pizza Choice Game
The Choice Charade
Welfare, and the Fall of the West
Title: Illuminati Use Socialism to Buy Complicity
"Social security, free
health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, [at the expense of the middle class] create a
dependent class whose support for our critical measures can easily be made part of a package
deal." (see #5 below)
“There is no proletarian,
not even a Communist, movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in the direction indicated by
money, and for the time being permitted by money--and that without the idealists among its leaders having the
slightest suspicion of the fact.” (Oswald Spengler, Decline of the West)
Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," which purports
to be a manual used to instruct an Illuminati heir, published in 1974. Internal references suggest that it was a
work of imagination based on intensive study and observation. Mostly consistent with my conclusions, I regard it
as an inspired account of reality.
The danger to our system clearly is not that the
"people" will spontaneously rise up and dispossess us. The "people" never initiate anything. All successful movements are led from the top,
usually without the knowledge of the movement, by men like your father with vast resources and brilliant plans.
The real danger arises in the upper-middle classes.
Occasionally, these people make vast fortunes through some brilliant technological innovation in their business or
through the favor of local politicians that escape our influence.
Because of their ignorance of the reality of our power, however, the new rich
usually fall easily into our hands. For instance, they seldom realize until too late that the
dozens of loans they may owe to apparently independent banks can be called simultaneously with a mere nod from
The following measures, however, are found necessary by nearly all money lords:
1. Steeply Graduated Income Tax ~ Income tax does not affect us
because our money was accumulated before the tax was imposed and most of it is now safely protected in our network
of tax exempt foundations. Foundation income and capital can legally be used to finance the bulk of our social,
economic, literary, and even political propaganda. In a pinch it is easily diverted to illegal uses. Expensive
"studies" required by our profitable economic operations can be legitimately financed through foundations.
To the middle classes, however, income tax makes life into
an endless treadmill. Even the most productive find themselves
unable to accumulate significant capital. They are forced into the clutches of our Central Bank entourage for
injections of the inflationary credit which we are privileged to create out of nothing....
2. Business Regulation ~ When upstarts slip through our
financial tentacles and tax shields, perhaps with the aid of outsiders, a second line of defense becomes vital.
Licensing in the crucial area of broadcasting has proven particularly necessary. This makes serious upstart-led
mass political challenge impossible. Harassment by bureaucrats armed with arbitrary and voluminous industrial
safety regulations is a new and increasingly effective technique. Security registration requirements, "to protect
the small investor," can cause fatal delays in an upstart's ability to raise capital on the stock market.
Ecological considerations are easily perverted to stymie the plans of those who would upset the stability of our
carefully planned system.
Anti-trust law, however, is our
ultimate weapon. The handy doctrine of "pure and perfect" competition which we have fostered in our
universities is ideally suited to convict any successful competitor, at our discretion....
3. Subsidies, Tariffs, and Foreign Aid ~ ... Foreign aid
maintains our empire of foreign dictators abroad while providing guaranteed, highly profitable sales to our
corporations at home base. Foreign aid should always be contingent on the purchase of goods, usually military
hardware, that only our entourage of firms can provide. Few have the courage to oppose such altruistic aid to the
"starving masses" of the "third world."
4. Centralization of Power ~ Real division of power between
national, state, and local government is dangerous to our system. When local
politicians have real autonomy, even in limited spheres, they can do much to enable upstarts to challenge our
power. Our program is to bring all levels of government under our sway through such innovations
as federal aid, revenue sharing, high federal taxation, and regional government.
5. Alliance with the Lower
Classes ~ In order to keep our valuable regulatory machinery in place and under our control, we
must have the mass support of the numerous lower classes against our vigorous, but scarce middle-class rivals. The
best method is to provide the lower classes with subsidies at the expense of the middle class. This creates a
mutual hatred that prevents the middle class from appealing effectively to the lower classes for support.
security, free health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, while doing nothing for us directly, create a dependent class whose support for our critical measures
can easily be made part of a package deal.
Please note also that the major labor unions began with our financing and are led to this day by leaders of our
choosing. No one can rise to or remain at the top of a rough and tumble union without our financial backing.
In spite of their rebellious rhetoric, bought union leaders are the source of our power over the management of
firms with widely held stock. Unions are the ultimate weapon for destroying otherwise invulnerable, self-financing
Further, downward flexibility of wages and prices which obtains without widespread unionization would increase the
ability of the economy to survive without our aid during the economic crises we create.
Bread and circuses
are as useful today as in Roman times for mobilizing the mob against our staid
Comments for "Illuminati Use Socialism to Buy Complicity "
Henrique said (July 7, 2011):
From my point of view, as the revolutionary movement in the
West, following advice from the Frankfurt School gurus, uses "minorities" instead of "proletariat", a law or
jurisdiction of "Total legal Neutrality", which for example wouldn't treat you as a special person depending on
whatever you like to do with the orifices in your body or the amount of pigmentation you have in your skin (which
reduces politics to zoology, for example) would be quite effective in breaking all the revolutionary spearheads and
give us time to reconstruct our societies based on the common natural values we share. By the way, glad you're
aware of Oswald Spengler, he's the best writer in Western history, in my opinion. Also take a look at this:
Paul said (July 7, 2011):
Most men would not
give their wives to another man to have her sexual needs met.Yet I
man after man, and especially Christians, who give their wives (and the rest of their family members) over to
governmentto have their health care needs met, their educational and
retirement needs met, and to a certain extent their social needs. There is no possession anymore of our family. Our
families' problems are open to the hold world. We are no longer jealous of taking care of our own kin.
Socialism is the worst threat to our society and because of socialism we have feminism and homosexuality. Without
socialism the gay community would most likely just disappear and so would feminism which can only survive on
government debt because it is so unprofitable otherwise.
Why Are Christian men Such Wimps?
Brian said (July 7, 2011):
I remember when I was younger I couldn't get enough material
to read on the Nazis, starting with Shirer's Rise and fall of the Third
Reich. Then there were all those TV productions like "World at War", etc. which continue on, ad nauseum, to
this day. I find myself in that same boat of morbid fascination when reading this series of the "Occult Technology
of Power". The difference of course being that this series serves as an expose to what in effect constitutes the
nuts n' bolts of the "Protocols".
I'm trying to figure out who this Illuminati heir may be, and I have a guess. This came out in 1974, and say the
heir being spoken to was 58 years old at the time, meaning he would have been born in 1916. David Rockefeller is 95
years old. Do you think it's him? The time-line would be about right with John D. being the
I believe the document is based on the Rockefellers but the
workshop-for-an-heir device is purely literary.
37. Review of Cruel
Cruel Hoax: Feminism
and the New World Order by Henry Makow
Book Review by Ingri Cassel
Since the long awaited for arrival of Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New
World Order in our mailbox last December 2007, I find nearly every conversation creates an opportunity to
begin sharing Makow's brilliant insights into a core issue of why everything seems to be going wrong in America.
Makow is a brilliant and eloquent writer who has succinctly explained what I have been feeling inside most of my
life: That "feminism" has been intentionally sewn into our culture to facilitate the systematic destruction of
heterosexual relationships and the nuclear family. Makow also describes why the destruction of families is central
to the "New World Order" scheme.
The truth is that I was a typical product of the baby boom years after
World War II and grew up believing that girls and boys are basically the same except for their body
However, I was curious enough by the society I grew up in to want to know
more about human behavior so I pursued a degree in humanistic psychology. During the course of obtaining a
bachelor's degree, I took many classes intended to program students into believing feminist-backed
As the 70s became the 80s, gender differences were increasingly minimized
and the professional world was suddenly open to men and women equally. Although most young women dream about
finding a man whom they love, trust and respect enough to marry and have children with, the culture urges them to
attend college and begin a career first and wait until later to start a family. Psychologically, women are tricked into prioritizing
school, work and money over motherhood and child rearing, their central biological function and primary social
Makow is a brilliant thinker and writer, connecting the dots of the
conspiracy to destroy the family, the foundation of a healthy society.This is done by neutering males psychologically and
making them irrelevant and redundant.
In today's world, women do not have to choose between careers and family
because their formerly vital role as family nurturers has been obsoleted by state-licensed daycares; fathers are
disposable. What better way to control the masses then by having the state raise our children in the
absence of a functional nuclear family. Makow's choice of a 1976 quote from Harry
Rosenthal succinctly encapsulates the impact of this arrangement on individuals and
"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its
manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has
become docile and easily ruled. As all geldings...their thoughts are not involved with concerns of the future
and their posterity, but only with the present and with the next meal."
Cruel Hoax is a series of poignant essays divided into four
sections: Book One-Feminism, Communism and the New World Order; Book Two-Homosexuality and Hetero-homosexuality;
Book Three-How Heterosexuality Works; Book Four-Freemasonry, Brainwashing and the
What many readers will appreciate most are the insights Makow elucidates in
Book Three-How Heterosexuality Works. I found myself reflecting for weeks on my own familial relationships and how
our ignorance of gender differences in the context of a healthy heterosexual
relationshipis at the root of dysfunctional families
and hence society today.
Once you read this book you will begin to look at everything differently
and you will see that lesbianism and homosexuality in men aren't lifestyle choices individuals make of their own
free will. These sexual aberrations are the result of patiently laid traps intended to create weak, malleable,
self-absorbed citizen/subjects through the statutory and social advancement of feminist
Why? Because a nation of virtuous, self-governing individuals who are
products of healthy heterosexual unions represent the greatest threat to a totalitarian
The review above was originally published in the January, 2009 edition of
The Idaho Observer
The book is available here: http://www.cruelhoax.ca/?cruelhoaxbook
38. Moscow Museum Puts Lenin's
Jewish Roots On Display
From Dick Eastman
Because Lenin was supposedly a gentile,
it was always denied that the Russian October Revolution was an all-Jewish
Jews loyal to Zionist ideal -- which involved crushing and enslaving
the gentiles -- was the object of the October Russian Revolution just as it is goal of Lloyd Blankfein and ten
thousand other Jews among the American and Britsh ruling elite.
60 million ethnic Russians were killed by the Bolshiveks and the Karl Marxian communists in a span of
less than 50 years. Bolsheviks joined from as far away as New York City--where the press worked to brainwash
Americans against the Russian people at least as early as 1905. If you don't like a people, you're not going to
reach out and help them. I have an antique book printed that year that talks about it. The NY press lied about the
These Jews are the greatest mass murderers of all
history and communism is their vehicle for world conquest. It's time that their true history
was made known to the entire world.
For full story and photos:
39. News in Brief.
Weekly South African
Was the Sinking of the
Titanic an Insurance Scam?
The Suppressed Free Electricity Generation System of
Princess Diana Death Documentary Banned In
US Women Turn To
Prostitution To Support Family
Zionist Greece Stops Gaza Bound Flotilla Boats
Gaddafi Threatens To Attack Europe - Zionists Jump For Joy
Pack Journalism Anti-Gaddafi Propaganda
Phones, Texting, Social Media Destroying Children
What Is Agenda 21? - You'd Better Wake
Weather Modification - Covert Weapon
Of Mass Destruction
Kirwan - World War 3 Written On The Wind
Call This A RECOVERY? -
The Big Lie
How Greed Is
Japan Nuke Expert - Much Worse Radiation To Come
Secret War Between
Tony Blair And Prince Charles
Votes To Ban Abortion
Two Suns? Twin Stars Could Be Visible From Earth By
Diana Police Hid Crucial Information
Spreads All Over Japan...Via Cows
Premier Japanese Beef Hit By Cesium Scare
Melt-Through Simulation Done
Before Fukushima (Video)
New Saudi Arabia Law - Political Dissent A Crime
Free Speech Can Get
More Prison Time Than Murder (Video)
Man Who Wrote The Coming Gold
HR Bill 1505 - DHS Takeover Of Sea Shores
Covers Filer Stating Gen Ramey Lied About Roswell
'Belle 8-3-11' Mystery Grows
Phone Hacking Used By
Sunday Mirror, Claims BBC
Preparing To Subpoena News Corp
Lying Over Somalia Famine - Islamists
Great Games - Review By Gilad Atzmon
Walnuts Are Drugs Says
Human And Animal Genes Being Mixed In Embryos
Banned Commercial About
US National Debt (Video)
Devvy - Obama Could Be Removed By His Own
Beelzebub T. McGlobalist
Eat 2 lbs Japan Radioactive
Beef, Get 80 Microsieverts
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?"(Quote from satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke,
The Fozdyke Letters.)
The 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media: 2011 Version
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:
URL of This Issue: