NazareneRemnant header graphic

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page

Cover image for Last Days Watch

Issue #49
25 July, 2011

Learn to deal with reality or
reality will deal with you.



URL of This Issue:

Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days Watch.

Contents of this Issue ...

  1. Polish Parliament Votes To Ban Abortion
  2. Diet is Key to Spiritual Advancement
  3. A 32 Year Old Freemason, Christian, Conservative and Nationalist Arrested for Oslo Bombing and Shootings
  4. The Rot Downunder: The Globalists' Australian Nexus
  5. CIA Veteran: Israel To Attack Iran In Fall [of 2011]
  6. Sydney Opera House Next False Flag?
  7. Satanist Insider: A Woman will Herald the Antichrist
  8. Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal
  9. 'Murdoch behind 9/11, Iraq, Afghan wars and Financial Meltdown'
  10. Murdoch Is Not The Only Maggot In The Rotten Apple
  11. Tying Israel Irrevocably to 9/11: "We Know Who, We Even Know Why…"
  12. France Didn't Have a Revolution
  13. ACA Showcases Lady Gaga and the Grim Reality of the Depths of Australian Immorality
  14. Getting Used To Life Without Food
  15. Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 4 of 6
  16. Democracy Finally Being Exposed: The Left versus Right Political Charade
  17. The Government Has Its Eye On Your Money!
  18. Money Was The Key Ingredient In New York's Gay Marriage Bill
  19. The Jewish Financed Attack on Heterosexuality is Satanism
  20. Lucifer is the God of Judaism
  21. Julia Gillard Has No Carbon Sense
  22. Who Said “Australia’s Got Talent”?
  23. Will the Satanist Julia Gillard Put a Price on Oxygen As Well?
  24. Iceland's Message to the Money-Power Elite
  25. Pop Music as a Corrupting Force
  26. Clinton Outlines Road Ahead for Arab Democracy
  27. What Will Gas-Drilling Do To Your Food Supply?
  28. The Kabbalah: The NWO's Satanic Bible
  29. Secret War Between Tony Blair And Prince Charles
  30. Revealed: British Government's Plan to Play Down Fukushima  

  31. Fukushima--Japan's Faustian Bargain With the West
  32. How To Control People
  33. Central Bank, World Tyranny, Fixed Markets
  34. Exposed! Public Education is Indoctrination
  35. Death Sentence For Private And Home Education, Courtesy Of Supreme Court
  36. Centrelink, Welfare, and the Fall of the West
  37. Review of "Cruel Hoax"
  38. Moscow Museum Puts Lenin's Jewish Roots On Display
  39. News in Brief.

Last Days Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us ...

"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your 'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur. In so doing, you are serving our purpose."  (Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )

We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists who are not "TC" Proponents ...

"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home... In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)

Important Note ...

Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important communications. To ensure that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...

SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this newsletter.


1. Polish Parliament Votes To Ban Abortion

Historic Polish bill to ban all abortion clears first vote 254-151.


By Kathleen Gilbert

July 1, 2011

WARSAW, July 1, 2011 ( - A massive grassroots campaign in Poland to implement a total ban on abortion witnessed an important victory Friday as the lower house of the Polish parliament fought off a first round of voting intended to scrap the historic bill.

Sejm lawmakers voted 254-151 against a motion by the pro-abortion communist Democratic Left Alliance to reject the measure. In a second vote, the legislation was sent back to committee for further consideration, forcing a slower legislative path. learned earlier this week that the ban was thrust forward by strong pro-life sentiment in the former Communist country, where sponsors, requiring 100,000 signatures within three months to bring the bill forward, obtained 600,000 in two weeks.

Technically, abortions in Poland currently may only be obtained when the child is diagnosed with a serious condition, the mother diagnosed with a health problem, or where the pregnancy resulted from “illegal activity.” But local leaders say that the exceptions - whereby the procedure is still illegal but “not punishable” - are routinely abused by abortionists.

In a speech before Parliament on Thursday, Mariusz Dzierzawski of the Polish pro-life PRO Foundation described abortion as the country’s heritage from communist times, when “children were killed in their mothers’ wombs on a mass scale in public hospitals and private offices.”

“What differentiates good states from evil states? The way in which they treat the human person,” said Dzierzawski. “A good state is one where every person is respected, and institutions serve good ends.

“Totalitarian states ignore the dignity of the person. ... Every genocide begins with denying the humanity of the victims.”

The current effort would strike down all three exceptions to the legal penalty. It requires two more votes in the lower chamber before it moves to the Senate.

In an open letter to parliamentarians, the National Ob/Gyn Section of the Catholic Association of Polish Medical Doctors expressed their support for the measure.

The doctor is the ‘servitor Vitae’ - a servant of Life and should protect human life from its beginning to its natural death,” said president Maria Szczawinska. “We are not refusing the right to rescue human life, but we strongly oppose killing the unborn child. That is why we join the many voices in support of the project totally banning the killing of unborn children.”


2. Diet is Key to Spiritual Advancement

July 15, 2011  

The corruption of the body in terms of food consumption is a big part of spiritual corruption 

By Mike P

TAIWAN- Upon reviewing your pointed article, "How to Worship God", I felt there was a point of practical importance that you might want to append to that. Diet.

How can a man, or woman, or child (especially), who does not consume the necessary nutrition for the body be expected also to pay attention to  the soul?

I have lived in Taiwan for some time. Several years ago, I thought I was dying. I had severe pain in my lungs daily, and each afternoon and evening I was overwhelmed by drowsiness and lethargy. Lines had appeared on my forehead. I suffered gastrointestinal enteritis three times, in six months.

I once heard a speaker state, "People tend to stay where they are, until the pain of where they are is estimated to be greater than the pain of change." I expect that that is generally true. In any case, I finally took it to heart, and I took control of my diet.

This action, has transformed my life. Constant close attention to what I eat, how I eat, and when I eat, has revitalized a body and mind. The lines have disappeared from my face. The pain and lethargy are gone. I look great and feel good. My exercise capability has tripled. I research what is good for me to consume, and I incorporate that into my diet. I am what I eat. That's a fact.

When I recommend nutritional caution to anyone here, it's perceived as elitism. People can't stand that I eat right, while they eat shit.

I have a wife. Bet your ass we eat right. I care about her health, because digestion is everything. It affects the mind, it affects the mood, it affects mental state, it affects the ability to think logically and clearly, it affects our relationship, and a right diet is worth the pain of change.

I'm a teacher. I daily suffer the sight of lazy, ignorant parents who bring their children to my school, with a cluster of McDonald's bags in their hands. If you guessed that their children are the low performers in my classes....

We expend much energy over the corruption of the soul. Corruption of the body is perhaps not exactly as critical, but it is primary; in fact, often, it is the corruption of the body, not just sexually, but in bare terms of food consumption, which makes spiritual corruption far easier to perform in the longer term.

Diet Recommendation:

Stay away from these "food" items and components, because even if you can't feel it, they are killing you:

gluten; refined sugar; preservatives (of any kind); other chemical food additives (of any kind); nutritionally unnecessary oils; processed soy products; processed meat; pork (do some research - stay away from it);
beef (same thing); canned fish and vegetables (mercury); any juices produced in a factory; carbohydrate-heavy foods such as bread and pasta.

To build a reliably healthy diet, follow these rules (allergy-prone individuals may have to double-check with a physician and a professional nutritionist):

1. Take in as broad of protein sources as possible, without consuming damaging protein sources. Fish, nuts of all kinds, dark or black chocolate, occasional chicken and chicken liver, cod liver and cod liver oil, black beans (and other beans), real butter (yes), fruits, and vegetables. Kelp is a fantastic source of protein and non-heme iron.  Don't forget chicken eggs: you need that. If you include protein drinks, you're taking a risk on liver and kidney damage in the long run, so be careful.

2. Make your diet 75% completely fruit and vegetable. Get a blender. Wash everything thoroughly, and throw it all in there together. Figure out what you like, make blends, and sip from it all day. Focus on cooked broccoli and tomato (do some research), carrot, celery, apple, orange, lemon, blueberry, strawberry, cranberry, banana (but watch the potassium draw), and anything that has strong colors. Don't take off the fruit peels when you blend oranges and such, because you need the pectin in the peels. Don't like the taste? Grow up. Get used to it. You'll learn to like it. Include cabbage and cauliflower in your cooked meals.

Read the Full Article Here:
Diet is Key to Spiritual Advancement


3. A 32 Year Old Freemason, Christian, Conservative and Nationalist Arrested for Oslo Bombing and Shootings

By Henrik Palmgren
23 July, 2011


Anders Behring Breivik in full Freemason regalia.

Anders Behring Breivik in full Freemason regalia.

Anders Behring Breivik has been arrested for the shootings in Utøya. The suspected gunman is a 32-year-old Norwegian man who posed as a police officer. He is also being linked to the bombings in Oslo.

His wiki thread currently reads:  


Anders Behring Breivik (born 13 February 1979) is suspected of being the perpetrator of the 2011 Norway attacks. On 22 July 2011, he approached a Labour Party youth camp, posing as a police officer. He then proceeded to open fire on the 13 to 25 year old youth present, reportedly killing at least 10. He has also been linked with the bomb blast that took place approximately two hours earlier, and is now in police custody.

Behring studied at the Oslo Commerce School, and is a self-described Conservative, Christian and Nationalist. He is also described as a one-time freemason. He owns the company Breivik Geofarm. 


The reference to his ties to freemasonry can be found on TV 2, the largest commercial television station in Norway. See here.

His Twitter account, that only has one post from July 17th says: 

One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100 000 who have only interests.

Also, every profile picture on his Facebook account was uploaded on July 17, 2011, just five days before the attacks.


Who is this guy?

What happened to him?

What was his motives?

Sky news reports that an anonymous police official said the suspect was arrested in Utoya and appears to have acted alone in the attacks.

He was shot and wounded during the arrest.

The police official said he did not think the attacks were "linked to any international terrorist organisations" but seemed to be the work of a "madman".

Norway's TV2 claimed the suspect has links to right-wing extremism, without disclosing its sources.

An eyewitness reported seeing between 25 and 30 bodies on the island. 


As usual the lying mainstream media avoids reporting the real issues involved in this grisly crime, such as ...


Youth Camp Just Endorsed Palestinian State 

The Second Tragedy is the Lies  

Wayne Madsen - The Mossad Did Norway

Possible Israeli Connection To Oslo Attacks 

Norway Shooter Loves Israel - Report   

Atzmon - Norway And The Jewish Right Wing Connection  

Norway Suspect Wanted European Anti-Muslim Crusade

Norway Killer Called Brown, Prince Charles 'Traitors'

Hunt For Brits Linked To Norway Killer   

Brother Nathanael - Did Israel's Mossad Do 9/11? (Video) 

Norway - The Second Tragedy Is The Lies  

Tarpley - Norway Terror Attacks A False Flag Op

Norway To Support Palestinians Says Norwegian FM 

Norway Backs Palestinian Bid For Recognition     

Huge Blast Blows Out PM Office Windows


Also See:


The 33rd Degree Freemason

Oslo False Flag - Now Everyone Is A Suspect 

Norway Under Attack (for supporting Palestine?) 

Norway + Israel = Unfavourable Relations 

Unexploded Bombs in Oslo - 92 People Confirmed Dead 

Oslo Police Do Bomb Exercise Days Before Blasts 



4. The Rot Downunder: The Globalists' Australian Nexus


A globalist rat's nest amidst the rise of Asia.  


By Tony Cartalucci

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Addendum : A description of Lowy Institute's involvement regarding the formation of a planetary regime, as illustrated in selected articles (this list will be updated):

Regarding the climate change hoax: The [Australian] PM's Address to the Lowy Institute via The Australian newspaper.

Regarding US-Australian military integration: " Planners make the case for US bases" via The Australian.

Regarding the contrivance of an World Internet Organization to regulate the Internet globally: " The Shadow of Cyber Regulation" via ISN, by Lowy Institute's Jonas Rey.

Promoting Australia's commitment to endless war in Afghanistan: "More to do in Oruzgan " via The Sydney Morning Herald, by Lowy Institute Non-Resident Fellow, Dr Rodger Shanahan. 


Bangkok, Thailand July 5, 2011 - Meet the Lowy Institute. Filled with big business interests and perhaps the most degenerate, depraved minds humanity has yet produced, it poses as an "independent international policy think tank," whose objective is to "generate new ideas and dialogue on international developments and Australia’s role in the world." The word "independent" is somewhat confusing, but what is clear is that it is yet another Fortune 500 run policy and propaganda clearinghouse serving not Australia, but rather the global corporate-financier elite.


The Lowry Institute.


Notable corporate members include JP Morgan, Rothschild, Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, and Cheveron. While Australian brands like Qantas, BHP Billiton, and the National Australian Bank appear more "indigenous" in nature, the reality is that their boards, like everything in the globalist realm, are an ongoing game of musical chairs between all of the worlds globalist, multinational corporations. For example, BHP Billiton's board of directors alone features Jacques Nasser, formerly of Ford Motor Company and JP Morgan, John Buchanan formally of British Petroleum and Vodafone, Carlos Cordeiro formally of Goldman Sachs, David Crawford formally of Bank of America, and the list goes on and on.

The Lowy Institute's board of directors is something to behold. Sitting at the top, is 80 year-old, accused tax evader, Australian-Israeli Frank Lowy, after whom the institute is named. He currently oversees the Westfield Group, was a board member of the Reserve Bank of Australia, and sits upon the board of directors of the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) - not of Australia, but of Israel. Joining him is son Peter Lowy, who is also a Lowy Institute board member, a RAND Corporation trustee, and a board member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council - not of Australia, but of the United States. Also on the board amongst several others, is Professor Ross Garnaut of the University of Melbourne as well as Australian National University (ANU), Ian Macfarlane formally of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Goldman Sachs, and Temasek Holdings, Professor Robert O'Neill of the corporate-stacked International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), and a former head of ANU's Strategic and Defense Studies Centre.

Perhaps most disturbing however is the inclusion of Brookings Institution's Martin Indyk, the co-author of the, frankly speaking, insane "Which Path to Persia?" report where Indyk, fellow Lowy associate Michael O'Hanlon, and others conspired against the nation of Iran to fund known terrorist organizations, engineer fake street protests, buy off members of the Iranian military, and even attempt to provoke Iran into a war it was disinterested in fighting - not for national security, but for what Indyk, O'Hanlon, and others called, "American interests and influence throughout the Middle East."

It then appears that the Lowy Institute is nothing more than a collection of banksters, criminal conspirators, and multinational multi-corporate interests. It is a institute of big business, by big business, and for big business. What is alarming is the vast reach it has within Australia's universities and the alleged "free-press." The name Australian National University comes up more than once and various members of Lowy's staff are also contributors to both Australian and international papers and television networks. Also alarming is the "cross pollination" reflected in Lowy's staff between the institute and other notorious corporate-funded corporate-serving organizations like the Brookings Institution, the International Crisis Group, the fraudulent Harvard Belfer Center, and the warmongering Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Our People: Ties to globalist think-tanks and the media.

Dr. Khalid Koser: Non-Resident Fellow in Foreign Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution.

Dr. Michael Fullilove: Non-Resident Senior Fellow in Foreign Policy at the Brookings Institution, Rhodes Scholar, has published articles in The New York Times, the Financial Times, The Washington Post, the International Herald Tribune, Slate, The Daily Beast, the Los Angeles Times, The Christian Science Monitor, The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Australian, the Australian Financial Review, The Spectator, The Washington Quarterly, The National Interest and Foreign Affairs.

Whit Mason: International Crisis Group while in Kosovo, then speechwriter for the UN Kosovo mission, and USAID in Pakistan.

Paul Kelly: Editor-at-large of The Australian, previously Editor-in-Chief of The Australian. Is a regular commentator on ABC television (Australian Broadcasting Corporation).

Dr. Michael Wesley: Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Fiona Cunningham: Interned at the Belfer Center at Harvard University and the International Crisis Group.

Fergus Hanson: Fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Own Harries: Published over 200 articles in leading journals and magazines, including Foreign Affairs, Commentary, New Republic, Harper's, Orbis, The New York Times, The New York Times Magazine, The American Scholar, National Review, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, The Times (London), The Spectator, The Reader's Digest, as well as in his own journal, The National Interest, and in various Australian publications, including Quadrant , The Bulletin, Policy , The Australian Outlook, The Australian, The Australian Financial Review, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age. (It should be noted that the "National Interest," Harries' own publication, features such warmongering, illegal conspiratory articles as "Free Baluchistan," and "The Chinese Cozy Up to the Pakistanis" where it is suggested that the United States should fund and arm rebels inside Pakistan to carve up the nation to balk Chinese-Pakistani relations.)

Ties to the Australian National University

The Lowy Institute appears to maintain close ties with all of Australia's prominent universities. The Australian National University, however, is one that is stumbled across over and over again, with Lowy co-hosting events, tapping ANU's professors for research papers, and airing its propaganda under a pseudo-academic light. Additionally, many of Lowy's own members have been drawn from ANU's alumni as well as prominent heads of various ANU departments.

Martine Letts: Lowy Institute Deputy Directory, appointed to the ANU Council in 2004.

Professor Hugh White: Lowy Institute Visiting Fellow, professor of Strategic Studies at ANU. Also a regular columnist for The Age and the Sydney Morning Herald.

Professor Warwick McKibbin: Lowry Institute Professional Fellow, Director of ANU Research School of Economics, and also a Non-Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution.

Dr. Milton Osborne: Visiting Fellow in the Faculty of Asian Studies at the Australian National University.

Professor Alan Dupont: Senior Fellow at ANU's Strategic and Defence Studies Centre.

The first search result that comes up within Lowy Institute's publication archives is an interesting document titled, "Thai studies in Australia." Under "Specialists Consulted," no less than 9 "specialists" came from ANU, including the notoriously intellectually dishonest Andrew Walker of ANU's "New Mandala" blog. Walker is fond of taking regional corporate agendas and shoehorning them into something resembling that of academia to lend them legitimacy they'd otherwise lack. He is also adept at giving the corporatocracy talking points a decidedly liberal spin, drawing in well intentioned people to consider his "work" when otherwise they'd be revolted.

Walker spends his time berating Thailand's self-sufficiency economy, suggesting that encouraging people to be self-reliant agriculturally, the very principle that throughout history has produced the strongest, most resilient nations on earth, somehow excludes them from participating in the "national economy" as well as participating in "electoral democracy." He and his partner, Nicholas Farrelly, post up articles promoting the very worst aspects of the corporate-financiers' NGO creep into sovereign Asia, as progressive and justified.

Right on cue, as National Endowment for Democracy-funded "Bersih 2.0" was preparing for mass demonstrations in Malaysia, Walker's "New Mandala" blog posted the following, "The biggest threat – as perceived by the present administration – to Malaysia’s internal security is a demand for free and fair elections." What Walker failed to research and tell his readership, was the fact that Bersih is on record, with organizers themselves admitting to it, having received funds from the National Endowment for Democracy-funded National Democratic Institute, as well as from globalist bankster George Soros' "Open Society" foundation. The threat then, contrary to what was written on "New Mandala" is not "free and fair elections," but rather foreign-funded sedition led by globalist-stooge, Ibrahim Anwar.

Lowy's propaganda outfit

Walker's "New Mandala" blog also dutifully hits on all the key talking points being pushed by the global corporate-financiers. When an ex-Reuters journalist penned his disingenuous, conveniently timed Wikileaks-based hit piece titled, "Thai Story," Walker was right by his side providing an outlet and badly needed legitimacy for his hackery. But in addition to Walker, there was the Lowy Institute's propaganda mouthpiece, "The Interpreter." After the July 3, 2011 Thai elections, the Interpreter chimed in with "The danger of a Thai civil war" where the globalist, degenerate-filled, elitist think-tank skipped past their client-stooge Thaksin Shinawatra, and laid the blame for Thailand's current political turmoil on the nation's revered monarchy. Citing Marshall's 3,000 unverified, unsubstantiated Wikileaks cables, who Marshall himself claims, is only "believed to have been downloaded by US soldier Bradley Manning in Iraq," the Interpreter suggests it is "journalism of the highest order."

Adding insult to injury, for those who understand how this network operates, the Interpreter cites fellow degenerate, corporate-serving globalist think-tank, the Council on Foreign Relations to bolster their claim.

The Interpreter maintains a partnership of sorts with other globalist connected rags like "The Diplomat" who echo the globalist consensus on any given issue and itself boasts partnerships with corporate-funded global think-tanks like the Soros-funded Foreign Policy Centre. There is a reason why the Interpreter, the Diplomat, and Andrew Walker's "New Mandala" blog are all on the same page along with other corporate-serving propaganda outfits like CNN, the Economist, the Wall Street Journal, and many others. It is because beneath the veneer of objectivity and academia, lies what is an obviously self-serving agenda propagated by a self-evident, omnipresent global despotic corporatocracy.


Upon the Council on Foreign Relation's seal is the word VBIQVE, latin for "everywhere," and manifests itself in the common English word, ubiquitous. Indeed as we see, regarding just the Lowy Institute alone, it contaminates an entire region's news, media, universities, literature, research, studies, and of course, through the papers and propaganda it produces with the clout it puts behind them, the region's politics and laws as well. The global corporatocracy is everywhere, affecting everything, perhaps so profoundly it escapes one's notice.

However, upon seeing this network exposed, the people involved, their history of promoting an unaccountable, self-serving agenda at everyone's expense but their own, we can begin rendering moot the false legitimacy they foist upon society with their fancy logos, lofty titles, disingenuous liberal-esque spin, their insufferable arrogance, and entire institutions co-opted or even contrived to serve their own ends.

We can begin by exposing these charlatans, stooges, and crooks for what they really are. We can boycott the corporations that fund and perpetuate these unsavory, dubious, and often well-hidden agendas. We can also begin to replace this nefarious network they've constructed by becoming self-sufficient on a local level. There is good reason why ANU imposter-academic Andrew Walker, along with the Wall Street Journal and the Economist are so adamantly against Thailand's attempt at implementing nation-wide localism - it is because it will set a viable example for all nations to follow out from under the squatting parasites that make up the global elite.


5. CIA Veteran: Israel To Attack Iran In Fall [of 2011]




The Israeli security establishment is increasingly worried by Netanyahu's bellicose stance towards Iran. 


By MJ Rosenberg Last Modified: 17 Jul 2011  


A longtime CIA officer who spent 21 years in the Middle East is predicting that Israel will bomb Iran in the fall, dragging the United States into another major war and endangering US military and civilian personnel (and other interests) throughout the Middle East and beyond.

Earlier this week, Robert Baer appeared on the provocative KPFK Los Angeles show  Background Briefing, hosted by Ian Masters. It was there that he predicted that Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is likely to ignite a war with Iran in the very near future.

Robert Baer has had a storied career, including a stint in Iraq in the 1990s where he organised opposition to Saddam Hussein. (He was recalled after being accused of trying to organise Saddam's assassination.) Upon his retirement, he received a top decoration for meritorious service.

Baer is no ordinary CIA operative. George Clooney won an Oscar for playing a character based on Baer in the film Syriana (Baer also wrote the book).

He obviously won't name many of his sources in Israel, the United States, and elsewhere, but the few he has named are all Israeli security figures who have publically warned that Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak are hell-bent on war.

Most former Mossad chiefs wary of Netanyahu

Baer was especially impressed by the unprecedented warning about Netanyahu's plans by former Mossad chief Meir Dagan. Dagan left the Israeli intelligence agency in September 2010. Two months ago, he predicted that Israel would attack and said that doing so would be "the stupidest thing" he could imagine. According to  Haaretz:

When asked about what would happen in the aftermath of an Israeli attack Dagan said that: "It will be followed by a war with Iran. It is the kind of thing where we know how it starts, but not how it will end."

The Iranians have the capability to fire rockets at Israel for a period of months, and Hizbollah could fire tens of thousands of grad rockets and hundreds of long-range missiles, he said.

According to Ben Caspit of the Israeli daily Maariv, Dagan's blasts at Israel's political leadership are significant not only because Mossad chiefs, in office or retired, traditionally have kept their lips sealed, but also because Dagan is very conservative on security matters.

Caspit writes that Dagan is "one of the most rightwing militant people ever born here. ... When this man says that the leadership has no vision and is irresponsible, we should stop sleeping soundly at night".

Dagan describes the current Israeli government as "dangerous and irresponsible" and views speaking out against Netanyahu as his patriotic duty.

And his abhorrence of Netanyahu is not uncommon in the Israeli security establishment.  Accordingto Think Progress, citing the  Forward newspaper, 12 of the 18 living ex-chiefs of Israel's two security agencies (Mossad and Shin Bet), are "either actively opposing Netanyahu's stances or have spoken out against them". Of the remaining six, two are current ministers in Netanyahu government, leaving a grand total of four out of 18 who independently support the prime minister.

In short, while Congress dutifully gives Netanyahu 29 standing ovations, the Israelis who know the most about both Netanyahu and Israel's strategic situation think he is a dangerous disaster.

But according to Baer, we ain't seen nothing yet.

There is almost "near certainty" that Netanyahu is "planning an attack [on Iran] ... and it will probably be in September before the vote on a Palestinian state. And he's also hoping to draw the United States into the conflict", Baer explained.

The Israeli air force would attack "Natanz and other nuclear facilities to degrade their capabilities. The Iranians will strike back where they can: Basra, Baghdad", he said, and even Afghanistan. Then the United States would jump into the fight with attacks on Iranian targets. "Our special forces are already looking at Iranian targets in Iraq and across the border [in Iran] which we would strike. What we're facing here is an escalation, rather than a planned out-and-out war. It's a nightmare scenario. We don't have enough troops in the Middle East to fight a war like that." Baer added, "I think we are looking into the abyss".

Another US war?

Masters asked Baer why the US military is not mobilising to stop this war from happening. Baer responded that the military is opposed, as is former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who used his influence to thwart an Israeli attack during the Bush and Obama administrations. But he's gone now and "there is a warning order inside the Pentagon" to prepare for war.

It should be noted that the Iranian regime is quite capable of triggering a war with the United States through some combination of colossal stupidity and sheer hatred. In fact, as Baer explained, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard would welcome a war. They are "paranoid". They are "worried about ... what's happening to their country economically, in terms of the oil embargo and other sanctions". And they are worried about a population that increasingly despises the regime.

They need an external enemy. Because we are leaving Iraq, it's Israel. But in order to make this threat believable, they would love an attack on their nuclear facilities, love to go to war in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia and Iraq and hit us where they could. Their defense is asymmetrical. We can take out all of their armored units. It's of little difference to them, same with their surface-to-air missile sites. It would make little difference because they would use terrorism. They would do serious damage to our fleet in the Gulf.

Given all that, is it possible that the United States would allow Israel to attack when the president knows we would be forced to join the war on Israel's side?

"The president is up for re-election next year," Blair pointed out, and Israel is "truly out of control".

What happens when you see 100 F-16's approaching Iraq and there is a call to the White House [from Netanyahu] that says "We're going in, we're at war with Iran"? What does the President of the United States do? He has little influence over Bibi Netanyahu. ... We can't stop him. And he knows it.

It's a pretty frightening scenario, made infinitely more so by the fact that top Israelis (who have heard Netanyahu's thinking from Netanyahu himself) also see the future the same way. Those Israelis deserve a world of credit for sounding the warning bell loudly enough that we would hear it and do something about it - although it's impossible to know if the people who matter are paying attention.

Actually, only one person matters: the US president. If Israel bombed Iran tomorrow, Congress would forget all about their partisan differences and run, not walk, to the House and Senate floors to endorse the attack and call for unstinting support for Israel. That is what Congress always does, and will always do so long as the lobby (and the donors it directs) are the key players in making our Middle East policies.

And who knows what Obama would do? So far, he has not exactly distinguished himself when it comes to standing up to Netanyahu.

But an Israeli attack on Iran would be different. It would endanger countless Americans (in the region and here at home, too). It would kill off any economic recovery by causing oil prices to skyrocket. It would engulf us in another Middle East war. And it would threaten the existence of the state of Israel.

This is something the president needs to focus on instead of being forced to nickel and dime with the likes of Representative Eric Cantor and Senator Mitch McConnell. How incredible that these two, and their right-wing allies, have our government tied in knots in their incessant effort to elevate themselves by destroying the President of the United States. It is sickening.


MJ Rosenberg is a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at the Media Matters Action Network.

The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent Al Jazeera's editorial policy.

A version of this article was previously published on Foreign Policy Matters.


6. Sydney Opera House Next False Flag?

By Bonnie Malkin, Sydney
21 Jul 2011

Source: Sydney Opera House Next False Flag?

Sydney Opera House the next false flag?

The building was featured on the front of the latest edition of Inspire, an English-language magazine that has reportedly been linked to al-Qaeda and includes instructions on how to make bombs.

But Robert McClelland, the attorney general, said that the nation's terror threat level would not change as a result of the Opera House appearing in the magazine's regular bomb-making section, "Open Source Jihad."

In the magazine, the section is described as "a resource manual for those who loathe the tyrants; includes bomb-making techniques; security measures, guerrilla tactics, weapons training and all other jihad-related activities".

"I have been advised this publication does not represent any change to the extent of the terrorist threat within Australia," Mr McClelland said in a statement.

"And I am advised it has not been accompanied by any specific threat in Australia or to Australian citizens."

The country's National Terrorism Alert Level currently sits at medium, which means a terrorist attack could occur. It has been at the same level since 2001.

Peter Dein, New South Wales's counter-terrorism commander, said there was no text in the magazine relating to the Opera House.

He added that it was hard to interpret what message it might be sending.

"It could simply be the fact that it's an icon that is well known around the Western world and may not really have any relevance that it is in Sydney," he said.

"What we are concerned about is the influences this particular magazine can have on vulnerable people in our community who are likely to be influenced by this extremist rhetoric."

The Opera House is under 24-hour surveillance, but that did not stop an anti-war protester from scaling its famous white sails to paint "No War" in red on the side of the building in 2003.

Earlier this year, security at another Sydney landmark, the Harbour Bridge, was breached when a former soldier climbed to the top of the structure to protest about fathers' rights.


7. Satanist Insider: A Woman will Herald the Antichrist

July 13, 2011


" We are in the process of organizing a structured, hierarchical society - a modern day caste system, if you will. Everyone will be monitored, every transaction recorded and the ignorant, credulous, gutless and idiotic slaves will be safe and belittled."

[Disclaimer: Posting this material should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its accuracy or viewpoint. I assume readers will take what they wish from it. However I do endorse the central assumption, that most of our "leaders" are Illuminati satanists, their agents or their dupes. See this last testament from a leading Satanist first made public by Fozdyke in January 2010. HM ]

By Aloysius Fozdyke

Satanists, whether adepts of the Alpha Lodge or not, have only ever wanted one thing: Everything!

And we want what's best for the sheeple. Indeed, we are the only ones who give the sheeple what they want.

Essentially we have merged crime with policy; stealing with government. We will continue to take whatever wealth remains to be handed to us by the preposterous populace we serve.

We produce wars to help cull the useless eaters. We pass laws to destroy their economies. Whilst we grow wealthy, the filth grow poor. And we do this because that's what the sheeple want.

Do you think that we could be as successful as we are without the help we receive? Whilst we are at the forefront of humanity, they seek salvation in superstition and revelation in Internet mysticism.

Governments internationally, of all types of political persuasions, give the automated appearance of principle whilst singing from our songbook.

Sheeple want to be corralled because that's what makes them feel safe.

They love brutal police and heavily armed military security decorating their streets. They're paying for our programs and the bullets that will cull them.

They want media garbage, masturbatory nihilism, religious banalities and political paranoia whilst the system is run as a closed shop by an oligarchy of business interests and in-our-pocket bureaucrats whoring with us: their monied masters. All the important decisions are made behind closed doors.


Don't you love pre-packaged question-and-answer sessions and scripted, flag and slogan, lying politicians mouthing pundit-generated opinions; politicians who represent nothing except the system itself? Notice how centrists are now further to the right and votes are cast on social issues for the lesser of the two evils?

We are in the process of organizing a structured, hierarchical society - a modern day caste system, if you will. Everyone will be monitored, every transaction recorded and the ignorant, credulous, gutless and idiotic slaves will be safe and belittled.

Already their children eat from our hand. We are in the process of increasing our control. Our Father's name is hallowed upon His Earth just as it will be in heaven. His and His followers time has come.

(Left, Michele Bachmann has the right eyes for the job. But no Fozdyke didn't mention her.)

The Usher of Desecration was chosen by Our God. She is not one of us, yet Her name is now known. Her kingdom will come into being at the end of 2012. She is an avatar; an instrument. Her will is irrelevant. Her advisers are us.

She will be rewarded for the quality of Her effective and spectacular fictions, for Her uplifting and enjoyable lies - all of which will be defensible in theory.

Think W.J. Clinton or weapons of mass destruction. The sheeple will continue to live a conceited, narcissistic dream that they are dangerous, ungovernable and possess an exacting eye over their elected leaders rather than admit that they are stupid, irrelevant and powerless.

I told your readers who would win the last Australian federal election and I'm now giving them important information before it manifests. Can they read between my lines or will they continue to deny my truth?

We know that they don't care.

Even they know that much.


Comments for "Satanist Insider: A Woman will Herald the Antichrist"

 said (July 14, 2011): 

Henry, this is from the Bayside prophecies. The monetary collapse, the War in the Middle East, the comet Elenin, etc. were all predicted by this woman in New York. This quote is for Mr. Fozdyke as he still has time to repent from his evil ways before it is too late for him. 

"I warn you now: beware and watch, for one will come among you with the powers of satan. Know that he shall say to you, 'I am out in the field. Come to me.' But you shall not go. Others will say to you: 'Go! I have seen him. He is yonder, over beyond the building.' You will say: 'No. I have not seen him.' For I shall come to you in the like manner in which I ascended. I shall descend with a roar of triumph from the multitudes of Heaven. We shall come in great victory." - Jesus, January 31, 1976 

Repent, Mr. Fozdyke, you still have time to save your soul. What good is temporary wealth and power when your path as of right now leads you to eternal suffering in the lake of fire? 


Henrique  said (July 13, 2011): 

Fozdyke, you idiot. The ONLY, and I say ONLY power you and your "caste" still have is the cult and reverence towards De-humanized Science, which is something we Truthers are about to start attacking hard. Bertrand Russel wrote that every "specialist" would be a semi-god eventually and Jaques Ellul The Red Bishop wrote that every "medical" TV show or series is just plain empty in-your-face propaganda. We KNOW THAT and believe me, not everyone who wanders the Internet believes in Aliens, 2012, Reptilians or other nonsense coming from your MI-6 boy David Icke or any other infiltrated piece of crap.  

We don't trust money-science ( like Climate Change ) and the next Revolution will be in the direction of TAMING science and remodeling it to fit the real and true interests of humankind. We already know where to attack, and we're gonna win. On your side you have the naiveté of the older generations who still revere technology ( and science ) as something unreachable for the common man, the Individual ( from whom everything emanates ), and kneel before it. But we, I, specially, don't kneel before anything, and I don't care who your chosen whore will be; prepare yourselves for tough intellectual battles from now on. " Have no fear".! 


Thanks H, 


I don't share your view of David icke. I think he is doing marvelous work, and if he says reptiles or ET's are running the Illuminati, I'll reserve judgment. But for my own account, I just trace things to the Illuminati bankers. That is enough to explain world events. 



Derek  said (July 13, 2011): 

The Usher of Desecration (UoD) is the person who prepares the way for antichrist...he/she is not the antichrist himself. That would be the one who Fozdyke refers to as "Vindex." The UoD is sort of the evil twin or alter ego of a John the Baptist and plays the same role of "preparing the way". It is "Vindex" who is antichrist and who is having his way prepared even now, but which will be prepared in an even more intensified manner via this UoD. 

Satan (a Hebrew word meaning "adversary"), aka Lucifer, biblically also called Hillel Ben-Shachar (the shining one, son of the dawn), cannot create...he can only imitate and pervert. He can only come behind the true God after He has already set in motion some circumstance and play off that initial creation. Therefore his entire plan will be an alter/flip-side/perversion of the original plan you see outlined in the Bible. He sees Himself as worthy to sit in the place of God (who the "adepts" refer to as Enlil, a most ancient Assyrian designation for Yahweh), he will have for himself a son who is anointed with his power and who sits at his right hand and he will also have a prophet who points toward and lifts up his son to the masses. It's all just a sad copy for a sad little "god" who wants to be king of a sad little hill for a short time. He hates that he was created and can never be a creator. 

Since the major political development scheduled for the end of 2012 is the US presidential election I would assume Fozdyke is referring to either Michele Bachmann or Sarah Palin. It can't be Christine Lagarde as she's already in power and frankly she only influences monetary policy and doesn't have great political power. Angela Merkel will be out of power by then. I don't see any other female power brokers who could fit the bill. I didn't think it could get worse than Obama as far as preparing the way for antichrist but maybe we're in for a real treat soon from a personage we wouldn't have predicted. We'll see. [Nazarene Remnant comment: The fact that the Nazi Fourth Reich is what we’re really talking about here, and it is scheduled to begin in Australia, specifically in that part of Australia North of the Tropic of Capricorn, and that our red-haired PM, Julia Gillard, is a lesbian pro-abortionist, as well as a practicing Satanist, and an habitual liar (she’s often referred to here as Juliar), makes her a front runner for the woman Fozdyke is talking about. But then again, there is Queen Semiramis II herself … Queen Elizabeth II!]


Ralph  said (July 13, 2011):

You're right; the plan of your master is still here, it is still in operation, and people like yourself are still actively pursuing its completion. And great, a woman as the antichrist … [Nazarene Remnant comment: The identity of the Antichrist is crystal clear: the current Prince of Wales, Prince Charles. That is certain!] That must be something! But seriously, the only thing I "read between the lines" is your nervousness and fear. So what, if because of your master, you have deceived, hurt and killed the majority of the world?

Am I a great Satanist if I deceive, hurt and kill a thousand small and helpless puppies that depend on me for survival? Because what it comes down to is that we have basically all been helpless puppies in regard to the fallen ones in control, from the moment we were separated from our Father.

Yes, people may go through a rough period in the near future thanks to this plan and world structure, but in the end you know every knee will bow down to Jesus, the Son of the Creator. You already do so now, by not being able to use his name, referring to him by “that 2000 year old death Jewish Bastard” or whatever. I mean, common, that couldn’t possibly make you feel like the “almighty Satanist” you claim to be right?! The only true God, the Creator, shall wipe away all tears from our eyes; there shall be no more death, no more sorrow, no more crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away. This structure, this caste system, this need for death, pain and sorrow ARE the former things that will pass away.

I know, you laugh at people who say things like this, but it sounds like nervous laughter to me. You know you will absolutely NOT live forever if you keep following your master. He is a deceiver and you know you are being deceived. Not a thousand underground bases or caves can rescue you from that. I cannot judge you for your actions, but when the day comes when the true Messiah does, I wouldn’t want to be in your shoes for anything in this world.  


8. Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal

July 19, 2011  

Sir Paul Stephenson, former Commissioner of London Police.

Former Commissioner of London
Police, Sir Paul Stephenson. 

"My hunch is that, with police collaboration, Murdoch and his newspaper ran an intelligence gathering operation designed to blackmail England's Masonic elite and ensure they toe the line. "

By Henry Makow Ph.D


Clearly there is a lot more to the Murdoch scandal than we have been told.

You don't shutter a 167-year-old newspaper, the largest English-language weekly in the world, just because some reporters were overzealous in their quest for news.

If the newspaper had only hacked the phones of Milly Dowler and the 9-11 victims' families, I doubt we would be hearing about this.

The newspaper hacked the phones, computers, bank accounts, phone and medical records of leading members of the Illuminati establishment, Governors of the Bank of England,  the royal family, and politicians and their wives such as Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Jack Straw, Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell.

My hunch is that, with police collaboration, Murdoch and his newspaper ran an intelligence gathering operation designed to blackmail England's Masonic elite and ensure they toe the line.

The hacking has been common knowledge for more than a dozen years, when The Guardian exposed it in 1999. Remember when Prince Charles was recorded in 1989 saying he envied Camilla's tampon? Nothing was done because this was the way power was organized.

In 2003, News of the World Editor Rebekah Brooks admitted to a parliamentary committee that they had paid police for information and intended to continue. This has been public knowledge for some time!

But the times are changing. Something went wrong. [Nazarene Remnant comment: What we are seeing now has been part of “The Plan” all along. See section 14, “The Plan calls for the Illuminati money-power elite to be exposed and vilified,” in our free book, The Usher of Desecration for explanation.] Perhaps Murdoch and his cohorts overstepped their bounds. Perhaps they started to monitor the wrong people. Perhaps they got too big for their britches.

I don't know the reason but the time had come to take Murdoch down and reorganize the system of blackmail in England.

It was time to clean house, not just at the newspaper but also at Scotland Yard. It remains to be seen how deeply the Prime Minister David Cameron is involved.

These are dangerous times for Illuminati collaborators. No one is safe from swift demotion: Dominique Strauss-Khan, Muammar Gaddafi, Hosni Mubarak, and now even Rupert Murdoch.


Commentators who bemoan pervasive official corruption refuse to address the underlying cause. Our important institutions all have been infiltrated and subverted by a satanic cult, Freemasonry.

This ancient secret society is dedicated to undermining our institutions and values, and folding every country into a tyrannical world government controlled by its sponsors, the Rothschild central banking cartel.

Read the Full Story:
Masonic Blackmail Behind Murdoch Scandal


9. 'Murdoch behind 9/11, Iraq, Afghan wars and Financial Meltdown'

Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff, interviewed by Press TV


Media mogul Rupert Murdoch has played a significant role in the elections of three U.S. presidents, as well as some of the events that have happened during their administrations including the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the economic meltdown, says Gordon Duff, senior editor and writer for Veterans Today.

"Murdoch is a close associate of a significant criminal conspiracy of industrialists, bankers and others. He is the front man for them… the person who gives them control of governments through bribery and blackmail," Duff told Press TV's U.S. Desk on Thursday.

"We have three presidents of the United States who have essentially been appointed to office and controlled entirely by Rupert Murdoch and the things that happened during their administrations," he added.

Rupert Murdoch. 

A Word or Two on What Isn't Being Said
By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


Today the British papers not owned by Rupert Murdoch "rumored" that he might be jailed. Americans, even Brits, have little or no idea what is at risk here. There is simply no one who can report it when the individual who, not only controls the world's largest news organization turns out to be, well, what?

Who is Rupert Murdoch?

What he is not is an Australian "right wing" billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda.

What is his agenda? Ah, there's the rub.

Was it about selling newspapers using scandals or spying in the name of Israel to push Britain and the United States into wars for Israel? [Nazarene Remnant comment: And that includes Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and all the other nations who are in Iraq and Afghanistan.] There is a simple answer.

Murdoch's primary motivation isn't even that he is "for Israel." Murdoch is, perhaps, the most influential Israeli, more powerful than Netanyahu. The problem with that is that his beliefs are what we call "ultra-nationalist."

This makes him a threat. Ultra-nationalists are known to support wars, plan terrorist acts, manipulate populations into strife and racism, foster fear and panic, even financial ruin.

What are we describing here?

If you aren't totally brain dead, you realize I am describing Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.

Murdoch owns Fox News and so much else you may not have a time to look at the list. If he doesn't own it he doesn't want it.

Fox is a network and Murdoch, owning so many newspapers across America and being a foreigner shouldn't be able to control such a thing. How did he do it?

Reagan "appointed" Murdoch an American citizen. Murdoch promised to have Fox News support Republicans and say whatever was needed, no matter how false, how stupid or, as we have seen now for decades, how genuinely evil.

What he really did, however, was use Fox as a base to allow Israel to run spy operations.

These went two ways:

1. Israel got lots of military technology and secrets they could sell to America's enemies for money. This is good "Murdoch" business sense, as we all see now.

2. Murdoch helped Israel gain control of congress. They literally run the United States. The tools? As in Britain [Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc etc], bribery and blackmail, police, military and congress.

No surprises for anyone.

Murdoch has, in fact, engineered the last 20 plus years of American [Australia, New Zealand, Canada etc etc] history, picking politicians, throwing elections, establishing policies. Were the decisions his own?

I don't think so. I think Murdoch represents a group, mostly financial, making up the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve Banks and organized crime.

There is an Israeli or Jewish aspect to some of this but not in the sense of being "pro" or "anti" Semitic. The Murdoch empire, married to the "lily white" "no Jews allowed" Republican Party simply put their own very powerful spin on the good old "New World Order," pushing it into drug running, arms and human trafficking, manipulated international currencies and debt on a massive scale, ran America and the European Union into economic collapse, worked with oil companies to set up price fixing schemes…

This is what Murdoch and his friends have done, all the while pointing their fingers at Osama bin Laden [and Al-Qaida] and the evil "liberals."

They divided Britain, starting at first as "conservatives" and then changed to "liberals." What they did in Britain is undermine legal government, destroy the nation and the public's trust in the government, Blair, Cameron, it doesn't matter, Murdoch chose both and ran and runs both like hand puppets as he did with Bush and his friends.

The ideas are simple. Bilk the countries out of every last cent, use a portion to bribe or blackmail politicians, buy police and get even more money.

Then you lie to the people, give them enemies to hate, arrange wars for them to fight and stand back and watch them destroy themselves.

Are there people really this evil?

Yes there are, Murdoch, the gang at his companies, the gang at Fox News, the folks in the US called "neocons," the Israeli lobby in the US, the ADL, AIPAC and the Likudist faction in Israel run by Netanyahu.

These folks hate the United States.

A similar group hate Britain. Australia has their own, he runs that place entirely, right into the ground. He also runs Germany, Canada, he runs much of what was once the "free world."

Am I describing Satan?

Pretty much.

His strongest advocates, those who have stood with his thieves and liars against all that is decent, all that is good, all that is right is the Evangelical and "Zionist" communities in the United States. They were and are the "fertile ground" for his message of hate and deceit.

Who does Murdoch claim to hate?

Muslims for sure, they are all bad. Everything he touches in his hundreds of publications and TV shows or the phony news his gang of cutthroats create, hate of Muslims is always on top. This pleases his Israeli friends. If things keep going as they are, he may need to hide out there and Israel will always protect him, maybe plow down a few Palestinian homes to give him a grand estate. After all, Muslims are an easy target, living in petty dictatorships run by thieves who we have now learned have always run to Washington and Tel Aviv for orders.

Take out a second. Think the word "Palestinian." Do you also think "terrorist?" Do you see a child being killed by an Israeli helicopter or innocent people killed by a TV villain, almost invariably played by Jewish actors, perhaps a sick "inside joke" of Murdoch's.
The Islamic people of the world have been played, exploited and crushed since 1919. History will show it carefully planned and financed by a certain European banking family, one that 6 years earlier had established an illegal banking system in the US.

Learn about the real Balfour Declaration and how it was gotten through blackmail, learn who wrote it and to whom it was sent.

The story reads exactly like the things that are coming out in Britain day after day.

Murdoch tells his followers to hate "smart people." There has to be fear of the educated, the "elites." You can't have rampant racism and blind ignorance until you destroy public trust in the natural leaders, until you destroy real culture and replace it with mechanized music, scandal mongering, dirty sex and endless conspiracies.

Murdoch is the real king of conspiracy theories.

Look at the endless list of wild accusations that came from Fox alone. Then look at the others, the accusations, the wild and insane things that were written into history but likely planned by Murdoch.

9/11 probably had Murdoch's hand in it as did the London bombings on 7/7.

There could be no great conspiracy without control of the news.

Now we find the news itself controlled the governments and may well have written the scripts to the wars, the rigged elections, the acts of terror and the misdirection that sent America into a decade of cruel and useless bloodletting after terror groups that never existed in the first place.

Now, today, as our British cousins are reeling in the revelations that their government for decades has not been their own, a diseased hybrid of crazy old man, Israeli spies and the paid stooges that the people thought were serving them….

And it goes on in America, full blast, Murdoch and his creatures, planning the future of America.

One of his creatures is Boehner.

Another is Palin.

Then there is Gingrich.

There was the entire Bush administration.

But, to get to the dark heart of evil, first you look at Fox News.


Well ... Who is Rupert Murdoch?

Dems Calling For Murdoch Investigation Got $$$ From NewsCorp   

Phone Hacking Inquiry Judge Attended Murdoch Parties

Hacking Collectives Reshaping The Online World 


10. Murdoch Is Not The Only Maggot In The Rotten Apple

Public enemy Number One is the  pro-Israel lobby

 Stuart Littlewood 


 The maggot in the apple, David Cameron and Rupert Murdoch.


Having disposed of the Murdoch menace – for the moment anyway – it’s time for the British public to turn the spotlight on the other villainsour craven politicians pay homage to.

Public enemy Number One is the pro-Israel lobby. An organization called the Conservative Friends of Israel states it has “twin aims of supporting Israel and promoting Conservatism. With close to 2000 activists as members – alongside 80% of Conservative MPs – CFI is active at every level of the Party”. 

And the rot goes all the way to the top, with Conservative prime minister David Cameron endorsing it enthusiastically: “I am proud not just to be a Conservative, but a Conservative Friend of Israel; and I am proud of the key role CFI plays within our Party.” 

Back in 2006 The Jewish Chronicle ran a report on the backers bankrolling Cameron’s bid for the party leadership. It was sent to the Committee on Standards in Public Life as an example of how the pro-Israel lobby infiltrates government and undermines the very principles the standards watchdog was established to uphold. But Zionist tentacles reach further than you think. The Committee ignored it. 

At the time Cameron, a self-proclaimed Zionist, pledged: “If I become Prime Minister, Israel has a friend who will never turn his back on her…”

The Liberal Democratsallow a similar lobby group to flourish within their ranks. Its stated aim is to “maximise support for the State of Israel within the Liberal Democrats and Parliament”. Labour also has a virulent Israel supporters club that broadcasts Tel Aviv’s propaganda and, when in power, appoints Israel lobby stooges to key ministerial and other positions. 

Britain, as everyone knows, has carved an unfortunate niche for itself as America’s poodle.But not enough people ask the key question: whose poodle is America? American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has the private parts of US Congress in such a vice-like grip that the Zionist regime’s interests come first in Washington. For example, the US House of Representatives felt obliged to endorse, by 390 votes to 5, Israel’s assault on Gaza in the winter of 2008/9, a massacre that killed over 1,400 (mostly Palestinian civilians including a large number of women and children), wounded and maimed thousands more, left tens of thousands homeless and horrified the rest of the world. 

It is amazing how many people with dual passports stalk the corridors of power in Washington. And we all saw the orchestrated adulation with which the Israeli premier was received the other week. 

Israel ’s propaganda machine of course denies it.Nevertheless the US House of Representatives felt obliged to endorse, by 390 votes to 5, Israel’s murderous assault on Gaza in the winter of 2008/9, an atrocity that killed over 1,400 (mostly Palestinian civilians including a large number of women and children), wounded and maimed thousands more, left tens of thousands homeless and horrified the rest of the world. 

The knock-on effect in the UK is inevitable. We too are so embroiled in the Zionists’ perpetual strife with the Islamic world that we’ve been sucked into the same cesspit. Britain is now one of the most hated nations on earth thanks to our cosy association with US-Israeli ambitions in the Middle East.

Meet the ‘Israel-firsters’ 

Israel was founded on terror, land theft, ethnic cleansing and extreme brutality.Why would the British Establishment wish to snuggle up to it? Why did Liam Fox, now Defence Secretary, famously say: “We must remember that in the battle for the values that we stand for, for democracy against theocracy, for democratic liberal values against repression – Israel’s enemies are our enemies and this is a battle in which we all stand together or we will all fall divided.” 

As if that wasn’t absurd enough William Hague, now foreign secretary, came out with this in 2008: “The unbroken thread of Conservative Party support for Israel that has run for nearly a century from the Balfour Declaration to the present day will continue. Although it will no doubt often be tested in the years ahead, it will remain constant, unbroken, and undiminished by the passage of time.” 

Undimished by the passage of crime, too. Tzipi Livni was Israeli foreign minister at the time of Operation Cast Lead and largely responsible for the unimaginable terror and destruction unleashed on Gaza’s civilians. Livni’s office issued a statement saying she was proud of Operation Cast Lead and, lacking all remorse, she later declared: “I would today take the same decisions.” Obviously she is on several wanted lists. When a warrant for her arrest was issued in London she went whining to our then foreign secretary David Miliband, who apologized. When the Conservative coalition came in and Hague took over the Foreign Office who can forget how Hague rushed to prove his loyalty by promising that our universal jurisdiction laws would be changed to protect Israel’s suspected war criminals? It was “an appalling situation where a politician like Mrs Livni could be threatened with arrest on coming to the UK” he said. 

David Cameron, for his part, told Conservative Friends of Israel: “The ties between this party and Israel are unbreakable. And in me, you have a Prime Minister whose belief in Israel is indestructible.” 

And he recently told a Jewish audience: “I want to be clear, we will always support Israel… when Iran flouts its international obligations Britain is and will remain at the forefront of the international community in ratcheting up the pressure with tough sanctions. We will not stand by and allow Iran to cast a nuclear shadow over Israel or the wider region.”

Considering it is Israel which casts the nuclear shadow, menaces the region and flouts international laws and conventions, that remark was beyond ridiculous. Cameron, like Fox, seems determined to make Israel’s enemies Britain’s enemies when we have no quarrel with any of them. 

Who gave him permission to spout such dangerous drivel in our name? 

Hague too loves ratcheting up the violence. While still deeply embroiled in an unwinnable Afghan campaign he started bombing the hell out of Libya months ago – with no end in sight – and is now sending more British aircraft into “theatre” to intensify the carnage, seemingly oblivious to the fact that back home in Britain we are struggling to make ends meet with a monumental economic and financial deficit around our necks. 

Who’s he doing all this bloodshed for? Certainly not for us. 

Lacking military experience these Israel-firsters, liked Blair and others before them, show an unhealthy lust for death and destruction. They are what I believe our American cousins call ‘chicken-hawks’ – talking tough but taking care never to risk their own worthless skins. 

Lawlessness rules, OK? 

Another ardent admirer of the Zionist regime is James Arbuthnot, the Parliamentary chairman of the Conservative Friends of Israel. He told Parliament: “Everyone in this House should have an interest in Israel, because it is a country that embodies the values that we should stand for. Israel [has] become a bastion of the rule of law…”

Israel ’s prime minister Netanyahu heads their Likud party,  which is the embodiment of greed, racist ambition, lawlessness and callous disregard for other people’s rights. In any other country it would be banned and its leaders locked up. Yet Netanyahu is welcomed like a hero in the US and given 29 standing ovations by Congress. 

Likud intends to make the seizure of Jerusalem permanent and establish Israel’s capital there. It will “act with vigor” to ensure Jewish sovereignty in East Jerusalem (which still officially belongs to the Palestinians as does the Old City). The illegal settlements are “the realization of Zionist values and a clear expression of the unassailable right of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel”. They will be strengthened and expanded. As for the Palestinians, they can run their lives in a framework of self-rule “but not as an independent and sovereign state”. 

Are these the values Arbuthnot is suggesting we adopt? 

Kadima, the party of Livni, Olmert and Barak, is little better and has also pledged to preserve the larger settlement blocs and steal Jerusalem. 

As for Arbuthnot’s claim that Israel is a bastion of the rule of law, a UN fact-finding mission, dealing with the assault on the Mavi Marmara last year, declared that “no case can be made for the legality of the interception”. 

But here’s Arbuthnot again, arguing the case for Israel… “Given that the flotilla was designed to be provocative and to end in violence, we should not blame Israel for the violence against which it failed to guard itself; the blame lies with those who went on to the flotilla expressly seeking martyrdom.” 

The Mission considered that Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza amounted to collective punishment and thus was illegal and contrary to Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The interception of the Mavi Marmara on the high seas was “clearly unlawful” and could not be justified even under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations (the right of self-defence). 

The Centre for Constitutional Rights agrees that the blockade “cannot be reconciled with the principles of international law, including international humanitarian law”. Center for Constitutional Rights Legal Analysis September 2010.pdf 

If the blockade is illegal, why is it allowed to continue? Because subservient Israel-firsters in London, Washington and other capitals won’t act. Lawlessness rules, OK? 

Arbuthnot, by the way, is also chairman of Britain’s Defence Select Committee. Worrying, isn’t it? 

Conflict of interests 

The British government’s policy of shielding and cosseting Israel’s extremists makes all of us complicit in that regime’s crimes. How does this perverse devotion to a foreign power square with the Seven Principles of Public Life, especially the one about Integrity, which the government is supposed to uphold? The Principle of Integrity lays down that holders of public office should not place themselves under any financial or other obligation to outside individuals or organisations that might seek to influence them in the performance of their official duties. 

Do MPs and ministers not understand this simple imperative?If the Israel lobby has no influence, as some have claimed, how do our leaders explain away the 80 percent of Conservative MPs who are Friends of Israel? How do they explain the appointment of a Foreign Secretary who has been a Friend of Israel since boyhood and a minister in charge of Middle East affairs who is a former officer of the Conservative Friends of Israel? 

There are rules about conflict of interests.Why aren’t they followed? Do we ever hear an MP or minister, when taking part in a Middle East debate, say “Mr Speaker, I wish the House to know that I am a staunch member of Friends of Israel and Jewish money paid for my election campaign”? 

In his infatuation with Israel Mr Hague even stoops to provide cover for its mega-crimes. At the height of the murderous Gaza blitz, Hague announced to Parliament: “The immediate trigger for this crisis… was the barrage of hundreds of rocket attacks against Israel on the expiry of the ceasefire or truce.” 

The truce with Hamas didn’t “expire”. It was violated after five months by Israeli forces in order to provoke Hamas and provide an excuse for the long-planned assault. Israel had also failed to deliver its side of the ceasefire bargain, which was to lift the blockade. 

Our Middle East minister, Alistair Burt, is another comedian.He recently announced that Britain would not recognise a Palestinian state unless it emerged from a peace deal with Israel. London, he said, could “not recognise a state that does not have a capital, and doesn’t have borders”. 

Hadn’t he heard?Palestine’s borders are the pre-1967 armistice lines as defined in UN resolutions and recognised by the international community. Where does Burt suppose Israel’s borders are? Is Israel where Israel is supposed to be, within internationally defined borders? No, it isn’t. Israel keeps its borders fluid, all the time grabbing a bit more land here and confiscating a bit more there. Yet London recognises Israel. 

Burt, Hague, Cameron, Fox, Arbuthnot… there are many more like them. How can we be sure where their allegiance lies? Whom do they really work for? 

I’ll leave the last word on Israel’s evil machinations to Sir Gerald Kaufman, the straight-talking Jewish MP. He said in a Commons debate in January 2008: “Is it not a fact that only international action can bring to an end the humanitarian disaster caused by collective punishment imposed by the gang of amoral thugs who comprise the Israeli Government and violate not only international law but the historic Jewish conscience?” 

Sir Gerald’s family suffered horribly during the Holocaust and his sick grandmother was shot dead in her bed by a German soldier. “They’re not simply war criminals, they’re fools,” he said of the Israelis when Operation Cast Lead was launched. “My grandmother did not die to provide cover for Israeli soldiers murdering Palestinian grandmothers in Gaza.” 


Cameron’s judgment, already wobbly, has finally been shot to pieces by his coziness with Murdoch’s ‘mafia’, and he should be clearing his desk. Add to that his dangerous obsession with racist Israel which drags us into unnecessary wars against countries that pose no threat, and sacrifices our lads in uniform in an unjust cause, and it’s clear that he must go. 


Our elected MPs belong to us, the British voters.Not to some gang of foreign thugs. We must mobilise to make sure they clearly understand this. And we must work to take back our parliament.


11. Tying Israel Irrevocably to 9/11

"We Know Who, We Even Know Why ..."

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor


This week, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Managing Editor at Veterans Today, was interviewed on 9/11 and Israel’s involvement and their influence in American affairs.   Dr. Sabrosky is interviewed by Susan Modaress of Press TV.  Runtime is 20 minutes.

Alan, I call him that, a fellow editor, fellow Marine and good friend, does what few do when discussing issues of such extreme controversy.  Alan sticks to the facts, takes the facts to logical conclusions and stops there. Any American of any political leaning or ethnicity can and should, out of patriotism and out of sanity, watch this interview. 

The case made is a case that will stand up in a court of law, a case not contrived for entertainment, for propaganda or for an emotional “fix,” feeding hate, prejudice or the desire by some for conspiracies to fill the void of a life bereft of meaning. 

Alan Sabrosky is “serious as a heart attack.” 

There is an underlying message to this interview, intended or not.  Dr. Sabrosky establishes a defensible position and sets limits. 

A majority of Americans are aware that 9/11 had clear signs of government complicity, both operationally and in the subsequent investigation that even Judge Napolitano and Geraldo Rivera of Rupert Murdoch’s FOX NEWS called a “whitewash.”  A major Australian poll taken last fall showed 77% of people there believe the US government to be fully complicit in 9/11.  Similar polls in the US regularly score over 50%, some much higher. 

Sabrosky’s case, presented with much clarity, plants responsibility for 9/11 at the feet of Israel and Americans whose loyalties, if we can call them that, are certainly not to the United States.  That these “Americans” now believed to be complicit in the planning and execution of the 9/11 terror attacks are, for the most part, officials of the government, is telling. 

Their complicity couldn’t be more obvious if they were caught standing with the detonation switches in their hands. 

Israel is a different story, a public relationship characterized as “close friendship” and a private one that more closely resembles that between America and the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War. 

Most Americans are not aware of how the relationship between Israel and the United States has soured over the past 40 years.  Behind an endless barrage of stories of the holocaust and fear mongering about Antisemitism, political extremists in Israel and their allies in the US, many in positions of extreme power and influence, have contrived to seriously harm the United States, ostensibly under the guise of “support for Israel” and misrepresented security issues. 

Sabrosky calls it “high treason.” 

Below, the forgotten Geraldo Rivera report on 9/11, now “disappeared” from history, from the archives, forgotten and victim of its own “coverup.”

YouTube - Veterans Today -  


Beyond this, the past decade has bombarded the American public and the world with wildly conflicting conspiracy theories and phony science, the worst of it from the American government itself. 

What can I say as a postscript or commentary to the interview?  Liberal, conservative, Jew, Gentile, what Alan Sabrosky says is simply the truth.  He has the credentials and the character to know the truth. 

The message: 

Believing the government and mainstream media’s version of 9/11 and allowing Israeli “dual citizens” to serve in government or electing and appointing officials whose relationship with Israel is detrimental to the security of the United States is inconsistent with citizen responsibility for any American. 

Related Interview:

Declassified: Massive Israeli manipulation of US media exposed 


12. France Didn't Have a Revolution

July 14, 2011  

By Andrew Smith



The French Revolution was part of the long-term Illuminati banker plan to reshape mankind to serve them and their god Lucifer.

“The Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobinsforced the regime change historians call the French Revolution.” 


The value of history lies primarily in appreciating what's happening today. We have a sense that events are driven by the past and that history repeats itself.

But why? Perhaps, the hidden planners of historical events have a limited repertoire of dirty tricks. They suppress the history of the deceptions practiced on our great grandparents, so they can mislead, maim and mutilate us and later generations.

Only when we see that the French Revolution of 1789 was planned and financed from abroad (just like the Russian Revolution of 1917) can we suspect that the current "unrest" and "revolutions" in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Bahrain, Thailand, Yemen, Syria and now Malaysia are not truly popular revolts but irregular warfare coups. Of course, in the case of Libya where Qadaffi came close to eradicating the rebels, the foreign coup has become a regular military operation supported by NATO air strikes. But they still call it a revolution.

The dictionary defines "revolution" as a "sudden and violent change in government or in the political constitution of a country, mainly brought about by internal causes; as the French Revolution of 1789." But subversive elements in London working with French and European revolutionaries--NOT INTERNAL CAUSES--engineered the Paris bloodbaths historians call a revolution.

Before 1919 when Nesta B. Webster published her history of the French tragedy, there was nothing in English except Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution (1837). In her preface to The French Revolution: A Study in Democracy (1919) she expressed shock.  "So far, in England, the truth is not known; we have not even been told what really happened.

Histories still teach that before the French Revolution the French aristocracy kept the peasantry hungry and desperate without any real hope or direction for the future. In her work, Webster explodes these notions regarding peasant misery before 1789 with the letters of Dr. Rigby who traveled through the French countryside in 1789 and who described "its extraordinary fertility" and its "state of the highest cultivation."

"The crops are beyond any conception I could have had of them
… tens of thousands of acres of wheat superior to any that can be produced in England..." He described the French people as happy, prosperous and contented. (pp. 4-5)

Yet in the midst of this abundance there was famine. It triggered the French Revolution just like the unrest today in the Middle East. And we are still taught that upon hearing of the starving French peasantry, Louis XVI's wife, Queen Marie Antoinette remarked, "Let them eat cake." This bogus quotation is used to color the French aristocrats as out of touch. In fact Marie Antoinette blamed England. She knew what was happening.

And Americans today like Webster, have blinders on when it came to their own government's dishonorable foreign policy. Webster refused to hold her English Government responsible notwithstanding the overwhelmingly damning evidence.

 "What, then, is the explanation of the belief in English cooperation with the revolutionary movement? Of the English guineas found on the rioters? Of the Englishmen mingling in the mobs of Paris during popular agitations? Of the seditious pamphlets printed in London? Of the traffic in letters, messages, and money maintained between England and the revolutionary leaders? Many of these leaders were constantly in England both before and during the Revolution... These facts admit of no denial: to suppose, however, any complicity on the part of the English Government is illogical and absurd." pp.30-31

A Royalist historian and contemporary of the worst atrocities, Felix Louis Montjoie, copiously documented the role of French King Louis XVI's cousin, the Freemason Duc d'Orleans, who bought up large portions of the French grain in 1789. This role backfired on him as he was guillotined in Nov. 1793. 

Later historians document the role of  Pitt, the English Parliament and the King's Privy Counsel in hoarding French grain with the aid of the Illuminati British East India Company in warehouses on the English Channel Islands of Guernsey and Jersey. (Why the French Did Not Have an American Revolution, by Pierre Beaudry, p. 5.)

England was a mere pawn in the Illuminati game of pseudo-revolutions that overturn governments and give credit to democratic/communist freedom fighting homeboys and eventually even train the conquered population to celebrate the destruction of their history and culture. So today the French ironically celebrate their disgrace with Bastille Day, July 14

In the words of John Robison in his Proofs of a Conspiracy (1797)

"The earlier revolutionary leaders were, as we have seen, the disciples of the German Illuminati, and it was they who initiated them into the art of forming political committees " to carry through the great plan of a general overturning of religion and government . . . .These committees arose from the Illuminati in Bavaria . . . and these committees produced the Jacobin Club."

The chief lesson," Robison goes on to observe, that the revolutionary leaders took from Germany, " was the method of doing business, of managing their own correspondence, and of procuring and training pupils." pp. 190-191

The Illuminati operating in the guise of the Jacobins forced the regime change historians call the French Revolution.  During the Russian Revolution they masqueraded as the Bolsheviks. Today they brag they are behind the Middle East revolutions. So maybe we should believe them. 

[Nazarene Remnant comment: All these ‘isms have to be replaced with the most important one of all—Satanism, for that is what “revolutionary” socialism, communism, Fascism, and Bolshevikism have always been.]

Just Like the Russian Revolution of 1917:  


Just Like The Unrest Today in the Middle East  


"Let Them Eat Cake."  




What the Study of History Should Have Been




C omments for "France Didn't Have a Revolution"

 said (July 14, 2011):

Finally somebody made this point clear ( that "revolutions" are always organized and financed from outside and don't arise from the native people's desires ). Also, an interesting addendum, that Robison and other "non-official/revisionist" historians mentioned is that to aid and add numbers to the Jacobins (low-level deluded French Freemasons [Nazarene Remnant comment: i.e. “Porch Masons”]) thousands of MERCENARIES were hired, specially from Germany and Italy, to agitate and attack Bastille, killing sadistically the Royals.

A reason for this could be found in the Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion ( book shamefully "forbidden" and out of press here in Brazil due to pressure from the Israelite Federation ) where they explicitly point that the Gentile's only hope and protecting power, his "breastfeeding mother" is the Blood Monarchs, cause corrupted as they may be, they still hold a symbiotic ( and symbolic ) attachment to their original people.

Instead, the document goes on, "we" should replace that with demagogues and opportunists and establish "democracies" in which all parties eat from our hands ( they are begging for campaign money every 2 and 4 years ). One of the reasons why I stand for the restoration of the Empire here in Marx-stinking ( and bankster-occupied ) Brazil.

Another point nobody makes nor even dare to talk about is the interesting "American Revolution", in which 90% of the intellectually involved were Freemasons and during the Independence War that followed, while British troops and natives were beating the daylight out of each other, Washington, Franklin and others were partying and having eugenic-driven ritualized sexual orgies in the infamous "Hellfire clubs" in ENGLAND. Why nobody digs on that? 


13. ACA Showcases Lady Gaga and the Grim Reality of the Depths of Australian Immorality

"Today, most of the good people are afraid to be good. They strive to be broadminded and tolerant! It is fashionable to be tolerant - but mostly tolerant of evil - and this new code has reached the proportions of demanding intolerance of good. The wall of resistance to evil has thus been broken down and no longer affords protection to those who, persecuted by evil doers, stand in need of it." (Lady Edith Queenborough, Occult Theocrasy, published in 1933, p. 4)

Monday, 11 July, 2011: Fittingly on the eve of the establishment of the first nation into the Nazi Fourth Reich--which is Australia--that the lying media should host a television event which ash been billed as “one of the most talked-about in Australian television history.”

 Lady Gaga on A Current Affair.

From the ACA Web site:

"A Current Affair's anticipated special event is finally here — Lady Gaga and Tracy Grimshaw's A Gaga Affair will air tonight on the Nine Network.

Lady Gaga’s performance is set to be “one of the most talked-about in Australian television history”, and fans have been clamouring to get a glimpse of the Born This Way star since her arrival in Sydney on Friday night.

Her interview with ACA host Tracy Grimshaw will be followed by an exclusive performance, which can be viewed at 6:30pm AEST tonight on Nine and the ACA website.

Tracy said she was keeping an open mind ahead of the special presentation. "Lady Gaga is one of the most exciting performance artists in the world right now," she said.

"She is brave, provocative and passionate. And, I gather, can be a bit unpredictable in interviews if she chooses."

Lady Gaga's visit to Australia will also include her Your All-Time Exclusive GAGA LIVE performance at Sydney 'Monster' Hall to promote her latest release, Born This Way. 

The event will be broadcast nationally on Nine's digital channel GO!."

Lady Gaga's arrival in Australia was no coincidence. It was all part of the fanfare associated with the announcement, or the birth of, the Nazi Fourth Reich here on Australian soil--the new satanic mindset she is singing about. The charade behind the Carbon Tax announcemnst on July 10 was another such announcement (as well as a distraction from events soon to take place in Rockhampton, on the Tropic of Capricoen, on the 12th Jult, 2011--i.e. Operation Talisman Sabre).

Here are a couple of comments on this alchemal new birth, from Vigilant Citizien:

"... we are witnessing the birth of a new persona within the 'core personality' of humanity. The birth is happening within the minds of people and is visually represented by creepy facial horns."

"Despite the superficial eccentricity of the song, Born This Way is about conforming and adhering to a pre-defined mindset, a philosophy that is compatible with a New World Order. It is not Gaga’s vision, it is their vision. It is the mind state they want you to adopt in order for them to carry on with their Agenda unopposed. This is what they want you to think: There are no important values or moral codes; good and evil are a big blur and being a mindless zombie is cool. If you think this way, “you’re on the right track baby”. I’m not. Guess I wasn’t born that way."

With reference to Lady Gaga's recent Judas video, Vigilant Citizen makes the following observations:

"Going beyond simple shots at Christianity for pure shock value, Judas summarizes the underlying spiritual messages found in Lady Gaga’s works which are, in turn, a reflection of the elite’s philosophy that needs to be taught to the masses. Whether it is intentional or not, Judas symbolizes the spiritual shift of humanity as it enters what is “the Age of Horus”. Crowley considered the last two thousand years to be the Age of Osiris, ruled by Christianity’s “emphasis on death, suffering, sorrow and the denial of the body”. He however considered this era to be necessary to give birth to the Age of Horus, whose Aeon would lead humanity to a new kind of spirituality. Other esoteric schools describe this shift in different words. Some describe it as the Age of Aquarius taking the place of the Age of Pisces, which was dominated by Christianity (they say Jesus was associated with the symbol of the fish because he ruled the Age of Pisces). Is this the reason Gaga’s words refer to the “future of culture”?

  In the most Biblical sense,
  I am beyond repentance
  Fame, hooker, prostitute wench vomits her mind
  But in the cultural sense
   I just speak in future tense

Whether the general population subscribes to these esoteric predictions or not, it certainly is “following the script” that was laid out. The same way Lady Gaga was eyeing Judas while riding with Jesus, society as a whole has let go of the core tenets of Christianity to embrace a philosophy that is compatible with Crowley’s Thelema. Even if most people do not even know what is the Thelema, they live by it on a daily basis. That being said, organized religions and the elite are not necessarily opposite forces. Religions and religious sects have often been used as tools of the political elite to divide-and-conquer countries and to oppress and to manipulate the masses. Times have however changed and, today, the Illuminati is looking to unite the world under a single world government and a single world religion. This religion’s values are based on egoism, materialism and the sexualization of pretty much everything. Most music videos, movies and TV shows subtly celebrate these values. In other words, they want you to be in love with Judas."

Well Tracey Grimshaw, shame on you for presenting this creature from the Abyss to Australians. It sure is grim stuff, worthy of your namesake!

Find Out What Lady Gaga is Really All ABout:

Lady Gaga’s “Judas” and the Age of Horus

Lady Gaga’s “Born This Way” – The Illuminati Manifesto

Lady Gaga Collaborators Continue to Die


14. Getting Used To Life Without Food

Wall Street, BP, Bio-Ethanol And The Death Of Millions.

© Copyright by F. William Engdahl
Author of Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation *  

29 June 2011 


My late grandfather, a man of sturdy Norwegian-American farm stock, who later became a newspaper editor and political activist during the First World War, used to say, 'A man can get used to pretty much anything with time, except dying...and even that with some practice.' Well, as fate has it, it seems we, the vast majority of the human race, are about to test that adage in regard to the availability of our daily bread itself.  


Food is one of those funny things it's hard to live without. We all tend to take it for granted that our local supermarket will continue to offer whatever we wish, in abundance, at affordable prices or nearly so. Yet living without adequate food is the growing prospect facing hundreds of millions, if not billions, of us over the coming years.  


In a sense it's a genuine paradox. Our planet has everything we need to produce nutritious natural food to feed the entire world population many times over. This is the case, despite the ravages of industrialized agriculture over the past half century or more.  


Then, how can it be that our world faces, according to some predictions, the prospect of a decade or more of famine on a global scale? The answer lies in the forces and interest groups that have decided to artificially create a scarcity of nutritious food. The problem has several important dimensions.  


Eliminating emergency reserves


The ability to manipulate the price of essential foods worldwide at will -- almost irrespective of today's physical supply and demand for grains -- is quite recent. It is also scarcely understood.  


Up until the grain crisis of the mid-1970s there was no single "world price" for grain, the benchmark for the price of all foods and food products.  


From the time of the earliest traces left by Sumerian civilization some two thousand years before Christ, in the region between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in today's Iraq, almost every culture had the practice of storing a reserve stock of a grain harvest ­ right up to the most recent times. Wars, droughts and famines were the reason. When properly stored, grain can be safely stored over a period of about seven years, enabling reserve stocks in case of an emergency.  


After the Second World War, Washington created a General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) to serve as a wedge to push free trade among major industrial nations, especially the European Community. During initial negotiations, agriculture was deliberately kept off the table at the insistence of the Europeans, especially the French, who regarded political defense of Europe's Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) and European agriculture protections as non-negotiable.  


Beginning in the 1980s with the political crusades of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, the extremist free market views of Chicago's Milton Friedman became increasingly accepted by leading European power circles. Step-by-step the resistance to the Washington agriculture free trade agenda dissolved.  


After more than seven years of intense horse-trading, lobbying and pressure, the European Union finally agreed in 1993 to the GATT Uruguay Round, requiring a major reduction of national agriculture protection. Central to the Uruguay Round deal was agreement on one major change: national grain reserves as a government responsibility were to be ended.  


Under the new 1993 GATT agreement, formalized with the creation of a World Trade Organization to police the agreements with enforceable sanctions against violators, 'free trade' in agriculture products was for the first time an agreed priority of the world's major trading nations, a fateful decision to put it mildly.  


Henceforth, grain reserves were to be managed by the 'free market,' by private companies, greatest among them the US Grain Cartel giants, the behemoths of American agribusiness. The grain companies argued that they would be able to fill any emergency gaps more efficiently and save governments the cost. That ill-advised decision would open the floodgates to unprecedented grain market shenanigans and manipulations.  


ADM (Archer Daniels Midland), Continental Grain, Bunge and the primus inter pares, Cargill-the largest privately-held grain and agribusiness trading company in the world-emerged the great winners of the WTO process.  


The outcome of the GATT agriculture talks was very much to the liking of the people at Cargill. That was no surprise to insiders. Former Cargill executive Dan Amstutz played the key role in drafting the agriculture trade section of the GATT Uruguay Round. In 1985 D. Gale Johnson of the University of Chicago, a colleague of Milton Friedman, co-authored a seminal report for David Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission that was the blueprint for what they called "market-oriented" agricultural reform. It provided the framework for the US position in the coming GATT Uruguay Round negotiations. The Rockefeller group and its think tanks were the architects of 'agricultural reform,' as with so much in our post-1945 world.  


The process of eliminating government grain reserves in major producing countries took time, but with the passage of the 1996 Farm Bill, the US had virtually eliminated its grain reserves. The EU followed soon after. Today, among major agriculture producing countries, only China and India still hold to a strategic security policy of nationally held grain reserves.  

Read the Full Story Here:
Getting Used To Life Without Food


15. Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 4 of 6

This Report was given to the publisher of RMNews the year it was written, 1996. The Source who hand delivered it would not state who the author was. RMNews does not know if this has been published elsewhere.  


The Rumor Mill News Agency 


Source of this version:  


The USA Antarctic Base

Although not situated on the Australian continent, the American Antarctic Base situated at the South Pole is an integral part of America's network of secret bases in the Southern Hemisphere. It is linked via satellite to Pine Gap and other bases in Australia, Christchurch in New Zealand (it's main supply base), Punta Arenas in Southern Chile and the long standing CIA/NSA base in Cape Town, South Africa.

The base is built mainly under the ice. This was done by mining out large trenches in which buildings were placed in neat rows. The trenches were then covered with ice and snow. Due to the natural ice build up over the years the base is now deeply below the surface of the ice cap.

Due to the large airspaces in the trenches (now tunnels) the ambient temperature of the air was raised to above freezing level without effecting the surrounding ice. This combined with the individual heated buildings make it a comfortable place to live.

The main purpose of the base appears to be top secret experimentation in the area of electro magnetism and the earth's magnetic field. In fact so secret are these activities that personnel are openly hostile to any uninvited visitors even though such visits are few and far between. One such case involved the Australian millionaire adventurer Dick Smith in the late 1980's. Mr. Smith was on a trans polar flight in his private plane when he encountered bad weather and strong head winds. To play it safe he decided to land at the American Base and request additional fuel. He later described his arrival there as an unpleasant incident. Although the base administration knew who he was, he was greeted by an armed angry group of men who told him he had no right to be there and to leave immediately. He told them that he needed fuel and would pay for it. This was met with a refusal and an order to take off without delay. In fact the Base Commander put the order in the crudest of terms. So much so in fact that Mr Smith started to fear for his life. On leaving the base he decided to turn back to the Russian Base where he was warmly welcomed, accommodated for 24 hours in very comfortable conditions and given all the fuel he needed free of charge. On his return to Australia he made very bitter comments about his reception at the South Pole.

Another rather amusing incident occurred in December, 1995. This involved a lone Englishman who was walking and sledge sailing across Antarctica to create a record for the Guinness Book of Records. He sailed into the base on Christmas Day and wondered if it would be possible to telephone his mother in England to wish her a merry Christmas. Once again the reception was hostile and, believe it or not, was told to leave immediately. Being stubborn he insisted on using the telephone and after a lot of argument he was allowed into an above ice hut and told he could make a quick call. He did so and after hanging up was presented with a large bill for the cost of the call. It was inferred he may have trouble leaving if he did not pay. Fortunately he had spare English money on his sledge and decided to pay up. Finally to add insult to injury he was given a very poor exchange rate for his English bank notes.

An Australian scientist who had spent a year with the Aurora Borealis (Southern Lights) research team at the main Australian Antarctic Base situated at Mawson told the author an interesting story about American activities in the region. He said that when the Americans conducted their regular experiments big changes occurred in the Aurora and communications were effected. He did not know exactly what they were doing but believed they were driving electro magnetic energy into the earth's magnetic field which was causing the disruption in the Aurora. He agreed that it was probably related to the HAARP experiments in Alaska as he had heard the effects on the Northern Lights were similar.

Tidbinbilla Tracking Station - Australian Capital Territory

The Tidbinbilla tracking station situated close to Canberra in the ACT is the most important in Australia. Established under a joint agreement between the United Kingdom, Australia and the USA it is an essential part of the US space programme. It is also a vital control center for the Hubble orbital telescope. In fact the first images transmitted by the telescope were received by Tidbinbilla and they caused quite some concern.

A scientific advisor to the Australian Government told the author that he was present when the first photographs arrived. They clearly showed solar systems around the closer stars at which the telescope was aimed. According to this advisor it was possible to discern more than fifty new solar systems in the first few hundred pictures. It seemed apparent that virtually every star has a solar system of one type or another and the evidence arriving at Tidbinbilla was undeniable. The revelations caused consternation among the control room staff, particularly the Americans who were angered that Australians and British were parties to these revelations. A meeting was hastily arranged and although all present had security clearances they were told that it was of utmost importance that nothing leaked out and they must not talk about what they had seen. 

One American scientist said that the public must not know about any new planets as it would "start them thinking and who knows where that would end." It had to be kept secret. But how can the results of such a highly publicised event be kept secret? The answer was quite simple, tell the public that due to some miscalculations the telescope was faulty and was not able to produce clear pictures. It would have to be modified before it could be used properly and such modifications could only be carried out by a special space shuttle flight to be arranged in about two years time.

The story was accepted without question and NASA was only too happy to take the blame. They had made such a large investment in the Hubble telescope that it was not difficult to obtain extra government funds to conduct the so called repairs.

NASA was now in an ideal position. It could carry out extensive testing of the telescope in absolute secrecy as it was assumed it did not work. The door was open to make improvements to the system and get a closer look at those planets. A new camera costing US$100,000,000 was constructed and a modification to the secondary mirror system, which could be adjusted from the Earth, was designed and produced at similar cost. The power system was expanded in size to handle the increased electrical consumption of the new camera and integrated computer system. Rarely do scientists have the chance to test their equipment in such a way and, then make modifications at any cost. The Hubble telescope now operates around the clock and the results are most satisfactory. All photographs are carefully checked and even airbrushed prior to release to other scientists. The lid is on and will stay there for a long time to come.

The Parks Radio Telescopes - New South Wales

Situated in a beautiful area in New South Wales the Parks radio telescope complex is perhaps the most important of it's kind in the world. Larger facilities exist in the Northern hemisphere but none of them have the advantage of a clear and direct window to the Milky Way.

Parks has been involved in the US space programme and many major research projects over the past thirty years. According to a government source it detected intelligent signals from outer space more than twenty five years ago and has done so ever since. Perhaps the most publicised project in which Parks has been involved was the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) programme which was abruptly closed down in 1995. It was meant to be a cover or public relations operation to keep the public reminded that nothing was out there and if it was, it was so far away it could not be found. Unfortunately for the secret governments it did not turn out that way. Parks hit rate (a hit being a positive identification of intelligent signals) was alarmingly high. The plug had to be pulled before too much leaked out. The public was told that as nothing could be found the project would be terminated immediately to stop any further necessary depletion of funds.

The results of Parks intensive investigation produced some bizarre results. Intelligent radio and what proved to be television signals were identified in several parts of the galaxy and emanating from areas up to three thousand light years away from the earth. The contents of these emanations are classified above top secret as they indicate that technical civilisations equal or superior to our own were very active more than three thousand years ago. Without doubt the most interesting material of all would be the enhanced television pictures which apparently showed the daily life of a number of alien civilisations of ages past and still do.

The American NSA has close co-operation with Parks and has liaison staff posted there on a full time basis. Under these arrangements the Parks facilities are a defacto outpost of the NSA's vital intelligence gathering network.

Lifeboat Australia

The late Sir Phillip Baxter who was the head of the Australian Atomic Energy Commission during the 1950s and early 60s was convinced at that time that the world was careening head long into inevitable nuclear destruction. He strongly advocated the production of nuclear weapons in Australia, the strengthening of all it's defences and close military involvement with the USA. He said Australia could be turned into the world's lifeboat and in the event of the major destruction he envisaged, could harbour the most important parts of world civilisation, a sort of totally self sufficient Atlantis from which the world could be recreated.

As it turned out it was not necessary to expend huge amounts of capital to produce nuclear weapons as due to Australia's close relations with the United Kingdom, and America and the fact that Australia was already a major producer of uranium it was not difficult to strike a deal with both parties to secretly store suitable nuclear weapons in the country for the use of the three allies should it ever prove necessary. However it was important to have a suitable delivery system and the Australian Government chose the then new American F-111 fighter bomber.

The nuclear weapon stores have remained in Australia and over the years expanded to accommodate a wide variety of new weapon systems that have been developed since the 1960's. This information has been kept from the Australian public and for obvious reasons there is little likelihood the present policy of secrecy will change.

Sir Phillip's proposal was publicly brushed aside and the media in general tended to infer that it as nothing more than an eccentric dream of an aging scientist. However behind the scenes his ideas were considered with great seriousness and appear to form the basis of current thinking in relation to Australia's strategic planning. Nuclear war remains a threat and one which will increase as more and more nations either buy or develop their own weapons systems. Apart from that there appears to be several new dangers facing the earth ranging from world climatic disruption, possible cosmic cataclysm or even an invasion from outer space. Whatever the driving forces are, Sir Philips original plan of turning Australia into a lifeboat (perhaps now better described as a fortress) seems to be the first priority and the main driving force behind it is coming from the USA

At this point the author would like to clarify why this report was started in the first place. It's always important to know what motivates such things and why it is necessary to record such matters.

During March, 1994 the author heard from a European correspondent requesting his comments about a letter he had received from a friend in Western Australia. To clarify this for the reader an extract of the Australian's letter of 14th February, 1994 is quoted verbatim as follows

"(1) There is at the present time a massive upgrading of the Australian rescue and disaster services. This was started about three years ago (Circa 1991) according to one newly trained instructor of these updated rescue services, and all this has to be in place and ready by 1998 (!?).

The services involved are the Government controlled and operated rescue services, and also the so called "Volunteer Rescue Services", Police Rescue Services, plus Fire Brigade and Ambulance Services.

(2) The second thing to be noted, two licenced gun-dealers (the above mentioned newly trained rescue service man is one of them) tell me thattheir gun-dealer licences are terminated in 1997 (!?). I gather that all other gun dealers (at any rate in New South Wales) will also have their gun-dealer licences terminated in 1997.

I recently had a long talk with this man, whom I have known for a long time. He is of the opinion that around 1997/98 the Federal Government intends to withdraw all firearms from the general public, and that the only people who will then have firearms will be the military and police. (Of course the criminals no doubt will still have their illegal weapons, I suppose).

In view of the foregoing, one may legitimately ask, I think, why it is necessary for the Australian public to be disarmed at precisely the same time as a vastly upgraded rescue and disaster service will be in place?

Very Obviously Some Highly Disturbing Events Are Envisaged As Taking Place At That Time!"

After some thought the author made a brief reply as he was already aware of some rather odd changes being made to emergency services Australia wide. He believed that if urgency was involved then events would speed up between 1994 and 1998 and so many people would be involved that it would be impossible to keep the lid on such developments for an indefinite period of time. Some of those involved would have to talk. Little did the author know what he was getting into when he started to ask questions of old friends and contacts and probe in many dark corners.

From mid 1994 the pace of events was already showing signs of increased speed. By the end of 1995 it was almost impossible to keep up with the rapidly changing events and since the change of the Federal Government in March 1996 it seems, to use American phraseology, "all hell has broken loose". The previously expected urgency of Government action and their often inexpiable behaviours clearly indicates a timetable that is being followed at all cost and one which seems to be very limited in scale. There is a definite atmosphere of tension and apprehension which the Government is doing nothing to alleviate. In fact they appear to go on promoting their plans without regard to public feelings and in some instances as if they were hell bent on committing political suicide. The fact that all the parties in Government seem to be working together in some kind of national consensus increases the strangeness of the situation. Presently no opposition exists.

The author will now deal with events from March 1996 to June, 1996 which he believes definitely indicate the high level of urgency which now prevails and the crash through or crash attitude of the Australian authorities.


16. Democracy Finally Being Exposed: The Left versus Right Political Charade

July 3, 2011

[Left vs Right] "accurately reflects our careful, artificial polarization of the population on phony issues that prevents the issue of our [money] power from arising in their minds."


Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," a manual published in 1974 that purports to instruct an Illuminati heir.

Through systematic infiltration of all major intellectual, political, and ideological organizations, using the lure of financial support and instant publicity, we have been able to set the limits of public debate within the ideological requirements of our money power.

The so-called Left-Right political spectrum is our creation. In fact, it accurately reflects our careful, artificial polarization of the population on phony issues that prevents the issue of our power from arising in their minds.

The Left supports civil liberties and opposes economic or entrepreneurial liberty. The Right supports economic liberty and opposes civil liberty. Of course neither can exist fully (which is our goal) without the other. We control the Right-Left conflict such that both forms of liberty are suppressed to the degree we require.

Our own liberty rests not on legal or moral "rights," but on our control of the government bureaucracy and courts which apply the complex, subjective regulations we dupe the public into supporting for our benefit.

Innumerable meaningless conflicts to divert the attention of the public from our operations find fertile ground in the bitter hatreds of the Right/Left imbroglio. Right and Left are irreconcilable on racial policy, treatment of criminals, law enforcement, pornography, foreign policy, women's lib, and censorship to name just a few issues.

Although censorship in the name of "fairness" has been useful in broadcasting and may yet be required in journalism, we generally do not take sides in these issues. Instead we attempt to prolong the conflicts by supporting both sides as required.

War, of course, is the ultimate diversionary conflict and the health of our system. War provides the perfect cover of emergency and crisis behind which we consolidate our power. Since nuclear war presents dangers even to us, more and more we have resorted to economic crisis, energy shortages, ecological hysteria, and managed political drama to fill the gap. Meaningless, brush fire wars, though, remain useful.

We promote phony free enterprise on the Right and phony democratic socialism on the Left. Thus, we obtain a "free enterprise" whose "competition" is carefully regulated by the bureaucracy we control and whose nationalized enterprises are controlled directly through our government.

In this way we maintain a society in which the basis of our power, legal titles to property and money, remain secure, but in which the peril of free, unregulated competition is avoided and popular sovereignty is nullified.

The democratic process is a sitting duck for our money power. Invariably we determine the candidates of the major parties and then proceed to pick the winners. Any attempts at campaign reforms simply put the rules of the game more firmly under our government's control.

Totalitarianism of the fascist of communist varieties is no danger to us as long as bastions of private property remain to serve as our bases of operation. Totalitarian governments of both Right and Left, because of the vulnerability of their highly visible leaders to party rivals, can be manipulated easily from abroad.

Primarily, totalitarian dictatorships efficiently prevent new money lords that could challenge our power from arising in whole continents, civilizations, and races.

Perhaps a few words on ideology proper are in order before I conclude.

The only valid ideology, of course is rational egoism, that is, the maximization of the individual's gratification by whatever means prove practical. This requires power over nature, especially, when possible, power over other humans who are the most versatile and valuable tools of all.

Fortunately, we do not have a society of egoists. Money lords would be impossible in such a society as the mental spooks and rationalizations by which we characteristically manipulate and deceive would be a laughing stock

Under such circumstances a policy of live and let live or true "laissez-faire" anarchy might be the only alternative. Certainly a hierarchical order would be difficult to maintain by force alone. However, in the current era, while minds are yet in the thrall of altruistic collectivistic, and divine moralistic spooks, the egoist's rational course is to utilize such spooks to control others.

Related Articles:

The Zionist Billionaires Who Control Politics

Corporate Elite Funds far Left & Islam  


Koch Funds the Right 


17. The Government Has Its Eye On Your Money!

By Robyn E. Blumner

July 26, 2001

© St. Petersburg Times, published July 22, 2001

Our government hates money.

Now that might sound odd since Congress is so very good at spending it, but the truth is money is considered a drug-war enemy. The ease with which money moves without our government being able to track it has led to an elaborate set of rules designed to prevent narcotics smugglers from enjoying their illicit profits. But the consequence of these rules is that all of us who engage in financial transactions are now targets of government spying.

Today, every bank customer is a suspect. If a financial institution has reason to believe a transaction is out of the ordinary for that person, it must submit a "suspicious activity report" to the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This is done without the customer's knowledge, and it means banks are expected to know their customers' financial habits and revenue sources.

(For those who have been following these issues, this might sound like the "Know Your Customer" regulations that were defeated in 1999 when the government received more than 300,000 negative public comments. While the regulations were withdrawn, the suspicious-activity-report program continues under the Bank Secrecy Act.)

Since 1997 the U.S. Postal Service has also been sending "suspicious activity reports" to the federal government. When customers of money orders and wire transfers seem to have more money than they should or if they seem to be avoiding the reporting requirements that kick in for money orders of $3,000 or more, a report must be filed. In a training video on how to identify a suspicious transaction, the postal service tells its employees, "It's better to report 10 legal transactions than to let one illegal transaction get by." The program is called "Under the Eagle's Eye," a name that says it all.

But getting American banks and the postal service to rat out their mostly innocent customers was the easy part. It's getting the rest of the world to join in that's been the challenge.

If you want a reason to join the black-helicopter set, read the reports put out by the Financial Action Task Force on Money Laundering, the 29-nation task force that includes the United States, Germany, Japan and the rest of the world's richest industrial nations. The task force has developed a set of 40 "recommendations" to combat international money laundering that read like the postal services' training video.

Under the recommendations, all countries around the world are expected to force their banks to know their customers and their financial habits. Banks are also expected to submit "suspicious activity reports" on out-of-the-ordinary and large cash transactions, and keep the monitoring program secret from their customers.

Sound familiar?

According to Bradley Jansen of the Free Congress Foundation, the group that has been leading the battle against these incursions, "countries are also supposed to set up foreign intelligence units that are not under the control of the government's financial regulators but under law enforcement, with the aim of setting up a global network of unaccountable financial police."

In June, FATF issued its annual report of "blacklisted" countries -- those nations that have made insufficient progress in following FATF's recommendations. This year Russia and the Philippines made the list, as well as 13 other nations.

Those that make the blacklist are subject to full-blown economic sanctions, something our government is loath to do, or advisories issued to our own banks to require detailed documentation before doing business there, an approach that relies on voluntary cooperation to limited effect.

But for the past two Congresses, a bill has been introduced to give the secretary of the Treasury vast new unilateral powers to add teeth to FATF's blacklist. The International Counter-Money Laundering and Anti-Corruption Act would give the Treasury secretary the option of barring U.S. banks from doing business with nations that refuse to compromise the privacy of their bank customers. And now the legislation has renewed life, since the chairmanship of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee has shifted from Republican Phil Gramm of Texas, an opponent of the measure, to Paul Sarbanes, D-M.D., a supporter and co-sponsor.

The United States is saying to other nations: Spy on your people, know how they get and use their money or you can forget about doing business with us.

So much for our tradition of government restraint, where the actions of individuals are not subject to state scrutiny without probable cause.

We might pride ourselves as being a beacon of liberty, but in reality the light we're shining is not to advance freedom but to invade privacy. Our anti-money laundering efforts are just another way we have exported our drug war to the detriment of civil liberties around the world. 

Further Research:

It's Time to Circle The Wagons 

While the sheep are sleeping, the predators move in. 


Secrets Of The Federal Reserve 

The Federal Reserve Is A privately Owned Corporation 

The American Hallucination 

Ny Times: Saying Income Tax Is Illegal 

IRS ~ Tax Info 

Satellite Spying? "Echelon" 

The truth about the United Nations! 

The United Nations plans to CONFISCATE your profit and ---. 

Documents Show FBI Web Surveillance 


18. Money Was The Key Ingredient In New York's Gay Marriage Bill

By Sam Stein
27 June 2011


WASHINGTON -- The passage of historic legislation legalizing same sex marriage in the state of New York last Friday was owed in large part to a compelling political motivator: money.

Although New York's legislators were already disposed to approving gay marriage because of the more progressive disposition of the state and a major grassroots campaign in support of the bill, LGBT activists from both parties turned to a simple, poignant argument: Lawmakers not only stood to gain the support of well-funded gay-rights supporters if they backed the bill, they would suffer if they opposed it or shied away from the spotlight.

"I didn't come in there saying, 'Do this for me,'" recalled Ken Mehlman, the openly gay former RNC chairman who persuaded Republican lawmakers in Albany that there was not only political support but ideological consistency in backing the bill. "I said, 'Do this for you.' We didn't walk in there saying, 'Do this not only because it is the right thing from a policy perspective.' We were saying, 'It is the right thing to build the party from a political perspective.'"

The politics of gay rights have grown complex in a very short period of time. Once shunned by both parties, only to be picked up as a cause by more progressive-minded Democrats, LGBT issues no longer break down cleanly among the party lines.

Increasingly, a cadre of deep-pocketed Republican donors is joining in the charge. And the enticements they are using to sway lawmakers are not just conservative arguments for civil liberties or public opinion polls that show a generational divide on gay rights, but the promise of contributions or other forms of political support.

These are not quid-pro-quos, necessarily, though New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was fond of telling on-the-fence lawmakers that a yes vote would give them access to deep coffers. Rather, the LGBT community -- often splintered into disparate factions with contrasting strategic visions -- has turned itself into a political heavyweight, equipped with an impassioned grassroots movement to compliment a growing fundraising stream.

"There is no question that we have crossed the line, that now there is a tremendous political downside to either being on the wrong side of this civil rights issue, or even being passive or silent on this particular issue," said Chad Griffin, board president of American Foundation for Equal Rights. "You just look at the stories that were already written on how this will fuel Andrew Cuomo's presidency if he were to run in 2016. He has an instant base of donors."

Certainly, the White House recognizes this donor dynamic, as the President held a LGBT fundraiser in New York City just one day before the historic vote.

Increasingly, however, the defining feature of the gay rights activist community is its bipartisan nature. Some of the biggest donors in the Republican Party were bankrollers of the gay marriage push in New York and, presumably, would write checks for candidates elsewhere who back their worldview.

As The New York Times reported, several weeks before the crucial vote, Gov. Andrew Cuomo's most trusted advisers met with "a group of super-rich Republican donors," successfully convincing them to "win over the deciding Senate Republicans." Attendees included Paul Singer, whose son is gay, and hedge fund managers Cliff Asness and Dan Loeb. According to interviews with nearly a dozen activists and operatives involved in the New York same sex marriage push, that anecdote was -- as one source put it -- just one of many critical stepping stones on the path towards the bill's passage. Steven Cohen a hedge fund manager and the founder of SAC Capital, also was persuaded to lend his clout to the campaign.

Last year, the American Foundation for Equal Rights held a major event featuring Singer, Mehlman, and Peter Thiel, the gay billionaire who was an original investor in both PayPal and Facebook. It also included a host of famous politicos, like former Gov. William Weld, Environmental Protection Agency head Christie Todd Whitman and Republican operatives Nicole Wallace and Alex Castellanos. The event provided an early illustration of the type of donor base that was available for the right-minded candidate.

Shortly thereafter, observers got a sense of how that base could be mobilized. The Human Rights Campaign held a fundraiser for Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) in April to reward her vote to repeal the military's anti-gay Don't Ask Don't Tell policy. Tactically, they held the event in New York.

"We wanted to make sure that Republicans in the state senate saw that we were willing to be financial allies to those who step out," said a source involved in the planning of the fundraiser.

By the time Cuomo was ready to push forward with same sex marriage legislation, the landscape was decidedly different than when the legislature rejected a similar bill in 2009. Conservatives in the state were late to opposition, as was the Catholic Church. When they finally did pledge to campaign against Republicans who supported the measure, their opposition was neutralized.

Mehlman had already gone up to Albany to personal discuss the issue with skeptical lawmakers, emphasizing the philosophical soundness of supporting same sex marriage as well as the personal political benefits. "This is demographically right for the party" he would stress, underscoring that constituent opinion was moving in a very certain direction.

The big time Republican funders, likewise, would make calls of reassurance where need be as would Ted Olson, the Bush v. Gore lawyer who has since played a leading role in arguing the constitutionality of same sex marriage.

And then there was the governor's office.

"Cuomo was able to convince people -- both Democrats and Republicans -- that they were more likely to get reelected if they supported marriage equality than if they didn't," said Richard Socarides, of gay rights organization Equality Matters and the chief aide on LGBT issues in the Clinton White House. "The right-wing threatened these guys and the Catholic Church threatened them."

"Wall Street interests who supported marriage equality were an important counter to that," he said. "So yes, money played a role."

Money was also critical in building the type of grassroots campaign that played a big role in the legislation's passage. More than $2 million was spent on the campaign organized by progressive groups and labor organizations, the "most aggressive field campaign in state legislative history for a gay right issues across this country," according to the Human Rights Campaign's Fred Sainz. Republican donors gave $800,000 of that.

"It built this narrative that this was not only a vote they would take at their peril, but that not supporting it or bottling it up would be to their downside," said one top operative on the campaign.

In the end, all the money, pressure, behind the scenes lobbying and in front of the cameras advocacy was enough to convince four of 32 state senate Republicans to cast yes votes. That was enough.

But in the wake of its passage -- with all the euphoric talk of history's arch and a Cuomo run for the White House at 2016 -- strategy decisions once again revolved around cash.

The Log Cabin Republicans, a pro-gay rights conservative group, immediately launched a fundraising drive to protect those four members who backed its cause. Clarke Cooper, the group's executive director, said it wasn't meant to be a "quid pro quo." The goal -- as with the repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell -- was to demonstrate that "it was either extremely beneficial of them to have voted for [the bill] or that there was no negative effect."

The organization's state officials were a bit blunter. "Right now, agenda item number one is making sure that those four courageous Republicans who voted yes are protected," New York Log Cabin Republicans Chairman Gregory T. Angelo told HuffPost's Matt Sledge.


19. The Jewish Financed Attack on Heterosexuality is Satanism

June 29, 2011

The essence of  satanism is to substitute the perverted mindset of the Lucifer-loving central bankers for God-given reality.  This means that all that is natural and healthy must be deemed sick; all that is true is false; and all that is good is evil. And vice versa.

By Henry Makow Ph.D.


Recently a tiny state-funded daycare in Stockholm was in the news for adopting heterophobic policies including the promotion of gender confusion and homosexuality.

The action of a lesbian daycare director with 33 pre-schoolers is not significant. Significant is that the Illuminati mass media heralded it as a "progressive" experiment rather than child abuse. The same thing happened in May when  Marxist trendies in Toronto decided to mess with their newborn's mind by denying his/her gender.

The promotion of heterophobic acts without labeling them as such is a veiled assault on heterosexual society. It is an ongoing psy op designed to destabilize society and weaken its resistance to the NWO.

It also reveals the true Communist and satanic nature of the NWO. Yes, the NWO is designed to concentrate all wealth and power on the hands of the Illuminati central bankers.

But more than that, it is a state of mind, a satanic spell characterized by homosexuality, pornography, money-lust, violence, deception and death. We are all being inducted into this satanic cult which is based on the Kabbalah.


The essence of satanism is to substitute the perversions of Lucifer-loving bankers for God-given reality.  This means that all that is natural and healthy must be deemed sick; all that is true is false; and all that is good is evil. And vice versa.

Thus, we have a vicious mindless attack on gender, and male-female love, things that are healthy, natural, god-given and necessary.

Male and female gender spans all of nature. Gender differences are documented in science.

"There has seldom been a greater divide between what intelligent, enlightened opinion presumes - that men and women have the same brain - and what science knows: that they do not," writes Neuropsychologist Dr Anne Moir.

"Conclusive scientific research presents an irrefutable truth: The difference between men and women is not merely physical. It is neurological, too. Male and female human brains are wired differently, causing us to think, feel, react and respond in strikingly different ways."

Common sense tells us that women are different because they have babies. Children must be conceived in love and raised in a secure and wholesome environment. Men and women have complementary roles based on different skills and temperaments.

The satanist Illuminati attack on gender is an attack on heterosexuals and on love itself.  Obviously, the economic elite and media are complicit. They are controlled by the Illuminati banking cartel.


Under Communism, science and art were repressed if they did not conform to "revolutionary" truth. Revolutionary refers to the overthrow of God (reality, truth, morality) and the replacement with the rule of Illuminati bankers fronted by the State.

These perverts are instituting their Communist satanism in the form of the NWO. You can see this by the pervasiveness of "political correctness"  a term that is Communist in origin.

You can see it in their denial and suppression of God and Intelligent Design. 

You can see it in their promotion of promiscuity and deviance ("sexual liberation,") pornography, satanism, violence and obscenity in the mass media.

You can see it in their brutish "feminism" which pretends to champion women but, in fact, despises femininity and deprives women of natural fulfillment as wives and mothers.

You can see it when male and female genders are deemed "stereotypes" except when they are reversed, i.e. women acting like men or vice-versa. When gay men pretend to be female or transsexuals switch sexes, then somehow they are no longer "stereotypes."

You can see it in the bankers' financing of gay marriage, which implies homosexuals and heterosexuals are identical. 

Apparently heterosexuals do not have human rights. It's fine to deny a helpless child his gender identity, but don't interfere with a youth who is gay.

"Human rights" and "gay rights" clearly are ruses to deny human rights to the vast heterosexual majority.

But that's typically satanic, communist and kabbalist. Light ("The Enlightenment") is darkness. Lucifer, the Light-bringer, is God. "Human rights" are a mode of human re-engineering and enslavement.  

Yes, this reality shift extends to language. The term homophobic is widely recognized. The term heterophobic is not. Heterophobia garners 250,000 references on Google Search. Homophobia over 10 million - 40 times as many to denote opposition to practices of 1/50th of the population. 

We are being brainwashed by the mass media, inducted into a sinister satanic cult whose goal is to enslave mankind, spiritually, mentally and physically. This is the true nature of the New World Order.

Related Articles: 

Rejection of the Feminine is Rooted in the Occult

  Will Newman - Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?

Richard Evans - The Kabbalah is a Hoax

Makow - The God of the Kabbalah

Kabbalah Explains Current Events     


Comments for "Attack on Heterosexuality is Satanism"

Ken said (June 30, 2011): 

Well said! It is high time to call things by their appropriate names. This can be done without hating people, but still with courage and firmness.

I like the thought in your introductory statement. Satan truly hates our Creator. Our Creator is so big He has every good thing in His mind, hand, and creation. The only room Satan can possibly make for his "alternate lifestyle" issues must include perverting and upending what has already been made good. He starts with our hearts, then our minds, then everything else follows.

It is real spiritual warfare.  


Glenn said (June 29, 2011): 

As usual Henry, you've hit the mark. 

Yesterday, I had a spontaneous and lively debate with two local woman in their 50's. Both were heterosexual, however one woman praised Toronto Mayor Rob Ford for having backbone enough to fore go making an appearance in support of Toronto's recent Gay Pride Parade. I too praised Rob Ford's decision to go to the family cottage for the weekend. 

The other woman turned to me and hissed, " oooh you're a homophobe " ..." you hate gay people ". 

You're so right about ' heterophobia '. This woman who lashed out at me, wasn't even an angry Lesbian. If she was, I would have completely understood, and her frothing at the mouth and spitting venom all over me, would have garnered some empathy ( maybe ). 

This incident echo's the points your article illustrates, that due to social re-engineering, we have become brainwashed to embrace this utter lie. 

She like so many others, are literally blinded by their own ignorance and hypocrisy. 


20. Lucifer is the God of Judaism

Original Title: Is Lucifer the god of Judaism?  

April 7, 2010 

By Will Newman 



Rabbi's satanic horned salute.

WILL NEWMAN, who holds a B.A. in Religion, attended Jewish synagogue, and has relatives involved in Talmudism, Cabala, B'nai Brith and Masonry.

In 1976, Walter White, Jr., "a concerned patriot," conducted an interview with a young Jew named Harold Rosenthal who was the assistant to Sen. Javits of New York.

 the interview, later published as "The Hidden Tyranny", the arrogant Rosenthal belligerently boasts (on tape) that the Jewish people have fabricated certain "falsehoods which work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power."

debunks the commonly accepted lie that, "the Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people."

Rosenthal said in part: 'Most Jews do not like to admit it, but
our god is Lucifer -- so I wasn't lying -- and we are his chosen people. Lucifer is very much alive.'" ( Interview 1967.htm)

Lucifer's goal is to "be like the most High" (Isa 14:14) and to usurp the worship of God (Mat 4:9).

Lucifer's purpose is to deceive the whole world (Rev 12:9) by transforming himself into an angel of light (2Co 11:4). This is best exemplified by the Freemasons. Their motto of "making good men better" produces a far more favorable public image than the more accurate alternative: “how to become demon-possessed in 33-easy-steps.” The Jewish and Masonic religions both worship the same god.


In most Jewish synagogues, a bright burning flame represents their god. The Hebrew word for Lucifer is "Hillel" (Strong's Concordance #H1966) meaning "bright light." Curiously, this is the name chosen for the Jewish student organization. A central text in Cabalism is entitled "the Zohar," which translates to the book of brightness or splendor.

The Jewish six-pointed star is the highest symbol in the occult and goes by various names--the Star of Moloch/Saturn/Chiun/Remphan. It is a symbol of the union of male and female and is identical in meaning to the Masonic square and compass, which is also a six-pointed symbol around the letter "G" representing the generative sexual act. In place of the "G" we find יהוה amidst many Jewish stars.

The Hebrew symbol חי  worn around the necks of many Jews ostensibly symbolizes "life" (lachaim). The word literally translates to a "living thing" or "beast" (H2416); this symbol is an idol for The Beast.

The Jewish name for god is represented by the tetragrammaton
 יהוה (YHVH) can be pronounced Yahweh or Jehovah. The significance of God's name is repeatedly emphasized throughout the scriptures.

When dissected in the Hebrew, the true definition of Jehovah (Yah-Hovah) is revealed. "Yah" (#H3050) means "god". "Hovah" (#H1942) translates to "eagerly coveting, falling, desire, ruin, calamity, iniquity, mischief, naughtiness, noisome, perverse, very wickedness."

Jehovah is synonymous with Baal: 

Read the Full Article:
Lucifer is the God of Judaism


21. Julia Gillard Has No Carbon Sense

The dubious science of the climate crusaders.


By William Happer  


Original Title: "The Truth About Greenhouse Gases"

Thanks to for the idea of the title!

The object of the Author in the following pages has been to collect the most remarkable instances of those moral epidemics which have been excited, sometimes by one cause and sometimes by another, and to show how easily the masses have been led astray, and how imitative and gregarious men are, even in their infatuations and crimes,” wrote Charles Mackay in the preface to the first edition of his Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds. I want to discuss a contemporary moral epidemic: the notion that increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, notably carbon dioxide, will have disastrous consequences for mankind and for the planet. The “climate crusade” is one characterized by true believers, opportunists, cynics, money-hungry governments, manipulators of various types—even children’s crusades—all based on contested science and dubious claims.

I am a strong supporter of a clean environment. We need to be vigilant to keep our land, air, and waters free of real pollution, particulates, heavy metals, and pathogens,but carbon dioxide (CO2 ) is not one of these pollutants. Carbon is the stuff of life. Our bodies are made of carbon. A normal human exhales around 1 kg of CO2 (the simplest chemically stable molecule of carbon in the earth’s atmosphere) per day. Before the industrial period, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere was 270 ppm. At the present time, the concentration is about 390 ppm, 0.039 percent of all atmospheric molecules and less than 1 percent of that in our breath. About fifty million years ago, a brief moment in the long history of life on earth, geological evidence indicates, CO2 levels were several thousand ppm, much higher than now. And life flourished abundantly.

Now the Environmental Protection Agency wants to regulate atmospheric CO2 as a “pollutant.” According to my Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary, to pollute is “to make or render unclean, to defile, to desecrate, to profane.” By breathing are we rendering the air unclean, defiling or desecrating it? Efforts are underway to remedy the old-fashioned, restrictive definition of pollution. The current Wikipedia entry on air pollution, for example, now asserts that pollution includes: “carbon dioxide (CO2)—a colorless, odorless, non-toxic greenhouse gas associated with ocean acidification, emitted from sources such as combustion, cement production, and respiration.”

As far as green plants are concerned, CO2 is not a pollutant, but part of their daily bread—like water, sunlight, nitrogen, and other essential elements. Most green plants evolved at CO2 levels of several thousand ppm, many times higher than now. Plants grow better and have better flowers and fruit at higher levels. Commercial greenhouse operators recognize this when they artificially increase the concentrations inside their greenhouses to over 1000 ppm.

Wallis Simpson, the woman for whom King Edward VIII renounced the British throne, supposedly said, “A woman can’t be too rich or too thin.” But in reality, you can get too much or too little of a good thing. Whether we should be glad or worried about increasing levels of CO2 depends on quantitative numbers, not just qualitative considerations.

How close is the current atmosphere to the upper or lower limit for CO2? Did we have just the right concentration at the preindustrial level of 270 ppm? Reading breathless media reports about CO2 “pollution” and about minimizing our carbon footprints, one might think that the earth cannot have too little CO2, as Simpson thought one couldn’t be too thin—a view which was also overstated, as we have seen from the sad effects of anorexia in so many young women. Various geo-engineering schemes are being discussed for scrubbing CO2 from the air and cleansing the atmosphere of the “pollutant.” There is no lower limit for human beings, but there is for human life. We would be perfectly healthy in a world with little or no atmospheric CO2—except that we would have nothing to eat and a few other minor inconveniences, because most plants stop growing if the levels drop much below 150 ppm. If we want to continue to be fed and clothed by the products of green plants, we can have too little CO2.

The minimum acceptable value for plants is not that much below the 270 ppm preindustrial value. It is possible that this is not enough, that we are better off with our current level, and would be better off with more still. There is evidence that California orange groves are about 30 percent more productive today than they were 150 years ago because of the increase of atmospheric CO2.

Although human beings and many other animals would do well with no CO2 at all in the air, there is an upper limit that we can tolerate. Inhaling air with a concentration of a few percent, similar to the concentration of the air we exhale, hinders the diffusional exchange of CO2 between the blood and gas in the lung. Both the United States Navy (for submariners) and nasa (for astronauts) have performed extensive studies of human tolerance to CO2. As a result of these studies, the Navy recommends an upper limit of about 8000 ppm for cruises of ninety days, and nasa recommends an upper limit of 5000 ppm for missions of one thousand days, both assuming a total pressure of one atmosphere. Higher levels are acceptable for missions of only a few days.

We conclude that atmospheric CO2 levels should be above 150 ppm to avoid harming green plants and below about 5000 ppm to avoid harming people. That is a very wide range, and our atmosphere is much closer to the lower end than to the upper end. The current rate of burning fossil fuels adds about 2 ppm per year to the atmosphere, so that getting from the current level to 1000 ppm would take about 300 years—and 1000 ppm is still less than what most plants would prefer, and much less than either the nasa or the Navy limit for human beings.

Yet there are strident calls for immediately stopping further increases in CO2 levels and reducing the current level. As we have discussed, animals would not even notice a doubling of CO2 and plants would love it. The supposed reason for limiting it is to stop global warming—or, since the predicted warming has failed to be nearly as large as computer models forecast, to stop climate change. Climate change itself has been embarrassingly uneventful, so another rationale for reducing CO2 is now promoted: to stop the hypothetical increase of extreme climate events like hurricanes or tornados [Nazarene Remnant comment: No politician or military person will acknowledge that HAARP is being used as a weapon of weather modification, capable of inflicting great dame around the world. See the article on Clandestine Weather Modification]. But this does not necessarily follow. The frequency of extreme events has either not changed or has decreased in the 150 years that CO2 levels have increased from 270 to 390 ppm.

Let me turn to some of the problems the non-pollutant CO2 is supposed to cause. More CO2 is supposed to cause flooded cities, parched agriculture, tropical diseases in Alaska, etc., and even an epidemic of kidney stones. It does indeed cause some warming of our planet, and we should thank Providence for that, because without the greenhouse warming of CO2 and its more potent partners, water vapor and clouds, the earth would be too cold to sustain its current abundance of life.

Other things being equal, more CO2 will cause more warming. The question is how much warming, and whether the increased CO2 and the warming it causes will be good or bad for the planet.

The argument starts something like this. CO2 levels have increased from about 280 ppm to 390 ppm over the past 150 years or so, and the earth has warmed by about 0.8 degree Celsius during that time. Therefore the warming is due to CO2. But correlation is not causation. Roosters crow every morning at sunrise, but that does not mean the rooster caused the sun to rise. The sun will still rise on Monday if you decide to have the rooster for Sunday dinner.

There have been many warmings and coolings in the past when the CO2 levels did not change. A well-known example is the medieval warming, about the year 1000, when the Vikings settled Greenland (when it was green) and wine was exported from England. This warm period was followed by the “little ice age” when the Thames would frequently freeze over during the winter. There is no evidence for significant increase of CO2 in the medieval warm period, nor for a significant decrease at the time of the subsequent little ice age. Documented famines with millions of deaths occurred during the little ice age because the cold weather killed the crops. Since the end of the little ice age, the earth has been warming in fits and starts, and humanity’s quality of life has improved accordingly.

A rare case of good correlation between CO2 levels and temperature is provided by ice-core records of the cycles of glacial and interglacial periods of the last million years of so. But these records show that changes in temperature preceded changes in CO2 levels, so that the levels were an effect of temperature changes. This was probably due to outgassing of CO2 from the warming oceans and the reverse effect when they cooled.

The most recent continental ice sheets began to melt some twenty thousand years ago. During the “Younger Dryas” some 12,000 years ago, the earth very dramatically cooled and warmed by as much as 10 degrees Celsius in fifty years.

The earth’s climate has always been changing. Our present global warming is not at all unusual by the standards of geological history, and it is probably benefiting the biosphere. Indeed, there is very little correlation between the estimates of CO2 and of the earth’s temperature over the past 550 million years (the “Phanerozoic” period). The message is clear that several factors must influence the earth’s temperature, and that while CO2 is one of these factors, it is seldom the dominant one. The other factors are not well understood. Plausible candidates are spontaneous variations of the complicated fluid flow patterns in the oceans and atmosphere of the earth—perhaps influenced by continental drift, volcanoes, variations of the earth’s orbital parameters (ellipticity, spin-axis orientation, etc.), asteroid and comet impacts, variations in the sun’s output (not only the visible radiation but the amount of ultraviolet light, and the solar wind with its magnetic field), variations in cosmic rays leading to variations in cloud cover, and other causes.

The existence of the little ice age and the medieval warm period were an embarrassment to the global-warming establishment, because they showed that the current warming is almost indistinguishable from previous warmings and coolings that had nothing to do with burning fossil fuel. The organization charged with producing scientific support for the climate change crusade, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), finally found a solution. They rewrote the climate history of the past 1000 years with the celebrated “hockey stick” temperature record.

The first IPCC report, issued in 1990, showed both the medieval warm period and the little ice age very clearly. In the IPCC’s 2001 report was a graph that purported to show the earth’s mean temperature since the year 1000. A yet more extreme version of the hockey stick graph made the cover of the Fiftieth Anniversary Report of the United Nation’s World Meteorological Organization. To the surprise of everyone who knew about the strong evidence for the little ice age and the medieval climate optimum, the graph showed a nearly constant temperature from the year 1000 until about 150 years ago, when the temperature began to rise abruptly like the blade of a hockey stick. The inference was that this was due to the anthropogenic “pollutant” CO2.

This damnatia memoriae of inconvenient facts was simply expunged from the 2001 IPCC report, much as Trotsky and Yezhov were removed from Stalin’s photographs by dark-room specialists in the later years of the dictator’s reign. There was no explanation of why both the medieval warm period and the little ice age, very clearly shown in the 1990 report, had simply disappeared eleven years later.

The IPCC and its worshipful supporters did their best to promote the hockey-stick temperature curve. But as John Adams remarked, “Facts are stubborn things, and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” The hockey-stick curve caught the attention of two Canadians, Steve McIntyre, a mining consultant, and an academic statistician, Ross McKitrick. As they began to look more carefully at the original data—much of it from tree rings—and at the analysis that led to the hockey stick, they became more and more puzzled. By hard, remarkably detailed, and persistent work over many years, consistently frustrated in their efforts to obtain original data and data-analysis methods, they showed that the hockey stick was not supported by observational data. An excellent, recent history of this episode is A. W. Montford’s The Hockey Stick Illusion.

About the time of the Copenhagen Climate Conference in the fall of 2009, another nasty thing happened to the global-warming establishment. A Russian server released large numbers of e-mails and other files from computers of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia. Among the files released were e-mails between members of the power structure of the climate crusade, “the team.” These files were, or should have been, very embarrassing to their senders and recipients. A senior scientist from CRU wrote, for example: “PS, I’m getting hassled by a couple of people to release the CRU station temperature data. Don’t any of you three tell anybody that the UK has a freedom of information act.”

A traditional way to maintain integrity in science is through peer review, the anonymous examination of a scientific paper by qualified, competing scientists before publication. In a responsible peer review, the authors may be required to make substantial revisions to correct any flaws in the science or methodology before their paper is published. But peer review has largely failed in climate science. Global warming alarmists have something like Gadaffi’s initial air superiority over rag-tag opponents in Libya.

Consider this comment from one of the most respected IPCC leaders, as revealed in the CRU e-mails: “I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow—even if we have to define what the peer-review literature is.” And consider the CRU e-mail comment on a journal that committed the mortal sin of publishing one of the heretical papers: “I think we have to stop considering Climate Research as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.” Peer review in climate science means that the “team” recommends publication of each other’s work, and tries to keep any off-message paper from being accepted for publication.

James Madison reminds us in The Federalist Papers that “no man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity. With equal, nay with greater reason, a body of men are unfit to be both judges and parties at the same time.” Madison goes on to observe that the smaller the community, the more likely that parties and judges will be one and the same.

Let me summarize how the key issues appear to me, a working scientist with a better background than most in the physics of climate. CO2 really is a greenhouse gas and other things being equal, adding the gas to the atmosphere by burning coal, oil, and natural gas will modestly increase the surface temperature of the earth. Other things being equal, doubling the CO2 concentration, from our current 390 ppm to 780 ppm will directly cause about 1 degree Celsius in warming. At the current rate of CO2 increase in the atmosphere—about 2 ppm per year—it would take about 195 years to achieve this doubling. The combination of a slightly warmer earth and more CO2 will greatly increase the production of food, wood, fiber, and other products by green plants, so the increase will be good for the planet, and will easily outweigh any negative effects. Supposed calamities like the accelerated rise of sea level, ocean acidification, more extreme climate, tropical diseases near the poles, and so on are greatly exaggerated.

“Mitigation” and control efforts that have been proposed will enrich a favored few with good political ties—at the expense of the great majority of mankind, including especially the poor and the citizens of developing nations. These efforts will make almost no change in earth’s temperature. Spain’s recent experiment with green energy destroyed several pre-existing jobs for every green job it created, and it nearly brought the country to bankruptcy.

The frightening warnings that alarmists offer about the effects of doubling CO2 are based on computer models that assume that the direct warming effect of CO2 is multiplied by a large “feedback factor” from CO2-induced changes in water vapor and clouds, which supposedly contribute much more to the greenhouse warming of the earth than CO2. But there is observational evidence that the feedback factor is small and may even be negative. The models are not in good agreement with observations—even if they appear to fit the temperature rise over the last 150 years very well.

Indeed, the computer programs that produce climate change models have been “tuned” to get the desired answer. The values of various parameters like clouds and the concentrations of anthropogenic aerosols are adjusted to get the best fit to observations. And—perhaps partly because of that—they have been unsuccessful in predicting future climate, even over periods as short as fifteen years. In fact, the real values of most parameters, and the physics of how they affect the earth’s climate, are in most cases only roughly known, too roughly to supply accurate enough data for computer predictions. In my judgment, and in that of many other scientists familiar with the issues, the main problem with models has been their treatment of clouds, changes of which probably have a much bigger effect on the temperature of the earth than changing levels of CO2.

What, besides the bias toward a particular result, is wrong with the science? Scientific progress proceeds by the interplay of theory and observation. Theory explains observations and makes predictions about what will be observed in the future. Observations anchor our understanding and weed out the theories that don’t work. This has been the scientific method for more than three hundred years. Recently, the advent of the computer has made possible another branch of inquiry: computer simulation models. Properly used, computer models can enhance and speed up scientific progress. But they are not meant to replace theory and observation and to serve as an authority of their own. We know they fail in economics. All of the proposed controls that would have such a significant impact on the world’s economic future are based on computer models that are so complex and chaotic that many runs are needed before we can get an “average” answer. Yet the models have failed the simple scientific test of prediction. We don’t even have a theory for how accurate the models should be.

There are many honest, hardworking climate scientists who are trying to understand the effects of CO2 on climate, but their work has fallen under suspicion because of the hockey-stick scandal and many other exaggerations about the dangers of increasing CO2. What has transformed climate science from a normal intellectual discipline to a matter of so much controversy?

A major problem has been the co-opting of climate science by politics, ambition, greed, and what seems to be a hereditary human need for a righteous cause. What better cause than saving the planet? Especially if one can get ample, secure funding at the same time? Huge amounts of money are available from governments and wealthy foundations for climate institutes and for climate-related research.

Funding for climate studies is second only to funding for biological sciences. Large academic empires, prizes, elections to honorary societies, fellowships, and other perquisites go to those researchers whose results may help “save the planet.” Every day we read about some real or contrived environmental or ecological effect “proven” to arise from global warming. The total of such claimed effects now runs in the hundreds, all the alleged result of an unexceptional century-long warming of less than 1 degree Celsius. Government subsidies, loan guarantees, and captive customers go to green companies. Carbon-tax revenues flow to governments. As the great Russian poet Pushkin said in his novella Dubrovsky, “If there happens to be a trough, there will be pigs.” Any doubt about apocalyptic climate scenarios could remove many troughs.

What about those who doubt the scientific basis of these claims, or who simply don’t like what is being done to the scientific method they were taught to apply and uphold? Publications of contrary research results in mainstream journals are rare. The occasional heretical article is the result of an inevitable, protracted battle with those who support the dogma and who have their hands on the scales of peer review. As mentioned above, we know from the Climategate emails that the team conspired to prevent contrary publications from seeing the light of day and even discussed getting rid of an editor who seemed to be inclined to admit such contentious material.

Skeptics’ motives are publicly impugned; denigrating names are used routinely in media reports and the blogosphere; and we now see attempts to use the same tactics that Big Brother applied to the skeptical hero, Winston Smith, in Orwell’s 1984. In 2009 a conference of “ecopsychologists” was held at the University of West England to discuss the obvious psychological problems resident in those who do not adhere to the global warming dogma. The premise of these psychologists was that scientists and members of the general population who express objective doubt about the propagated view of global warming are suffering from a kind of mental illness. We know from the Soviet experience that a society can find it easy to consider dissidents to be mentally deranged and act accordingly.

The management of most scientific societies has enthusiastically signed on to the global warming bandwagon. This is not surprising, since governments, as well as many states and foundations, generously fund those who reinforce their desired outcomes under the cover of saving the planet. Certain private industries are also involved: those positioned to profit from enacted controls as well as financial institutions heavily invested in “green technologies” whose rationale disappears the moment global warming is widely understood to be a non-problem. There are known connections and movements of people involved in government policy, scientific societies, and private industry, all with the common thread of influencing the outcome of a set of programs and investments underpinned by the supposed threat of global warming.

My own trade union, the American Physical Society (APS), is a good example, but hardly the worst. An APS Council statement issued on November 18, 2007 states: “The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security, and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now.” This is pretty strong language for physicists, for whom skepticism about evidence was once considered a virtue, and nothing was incontrovertible.

In the fall of 2009 a petition, organized by Fellow of the American Physical Society, Roger Cohen, and containing the signatures of hundreds of distinguished APS members was presented to the APS management with a request that at least the truly embarrassing word “incontrovertible” be taken out of the statement. The APS management’s response was to threaten the petitioners, while grudgingly appointing a committee to consider the request. It was exactly what James Madison warned against. The committee included members whose careers depended on global warming alarmism, and the predictable result was that not one word was changed. Bad as the actions of the APS were, they were far better than those of most other scientific societies, which refused to even reconsider extreme statements on climate.

The situation is even more lamentable for the general public, which is fed a constant stream of propaganda by specialists in environmental issues from the mainstream media and well-funded alarmist blogs. Not unlike functionaries of Orwell’s Ministry of Truth in 1984, with its motto “Ignorance is Strength,” many members of the environmental news media dutifully and uncritically promote the party line of the climate crusade.

However, the situation is slowly getting better. Skeptics are more numerous and better organized than before. In a few cases, leading former adherents have publicly and courageously spoken out against the dogma and its core of establishment promoters. The IPCC itself has come under severe criticism by the international scientific establishment for its series of bizarre errors and organizational failings. Under pressure from a dissident group of Fellows, the Royal Society moved to meaningfully moderate its former radically alarmist position on global warming. And perhaps most important of all, public skepticism has increased significantly, and with it has come a major drop in support of the climate crusade’s attempt to seize control of the “pollutant,” CO2.

I began with a quotation from the preface of the first edition of Mackay’s Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, and it is worth recalling now a quotation from the preface of the second edition: “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.”

In our efforts to conserve the created world, we should not concentrate our efforts on CO2. We should instead focus on issues like damage to local landscapes and waterways by strip mining, inadequate cleanup, hazards to miners, and the release of real pollutants and poisons like mercury, other heavy metals, and organic carcinogens. Much of the potential harm from coal mining can be eliminated, for example, by requirements that land be restored to a condition that is at least as good as, and preferably better than, when the mining began.

Life is about making decisions, and decisions are about trade-offs. We can choose to promote investment in technology that addresses real problems and scientific research that will let us cope with real problems more efficiently. Or we can be caught up in a crusade that seeks to suppress energy use, economic growth, and the benefits that come from the creation of national wealth.

William Happer is the Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University.

Related Article:


The Politicised Science of Climate Change

Coal Man (Robert E Murray) not Buying Global Warming Hysteria 

The New Dark (Green) Age 

BRICS vs PIGS - the Myth that Green Energy will promote Prosperity

The Global Warming Delusion 

How to Create Carbon Credits - Kill a Camel 

Models and Climate Forecasts 


22. Who said “Australia’s Got Talent”?

By Len Clampett

Wondering why the confidence of Australians is at a record low? Then just pause to consider the body of work, over the last few years, of the Rudd and Gillard Labor governments:

  • The Home Insulation debacle. 
  • The Building the Education Revolution debacle. 
  • The Mining Tax (Mark I) fiasco. 
  • The Murray Darling Basin debacle. 
  • The National Broadband Network (NBN) profligacy debacle. 
  • The illegal immigrant and Malaysian Solution debacle. 
  • The Live-Cattle-to-Indonesia fiasco. 
  • The (still developing) Mining Tax Mark II shambles. 
  • The Carbon Tax debacle. 
  • Slumping investor confidence resulting in never before contemplated Sovereign Risk. 
  • Allowing a complete incompetent to remain in control of the Reserve Bank, leading to … 
  • Successive ill-considered, unnecessary and massively harmful increases in interest rates. 
  • Allowing the complete politicization of Treasury… 
  • Which now reports to arguably the World’s Worst Treasurer, outside continental Africa. 
  • Handing control of policy to a clutch of maniacal Greens and ego-driven Independents, and, 
  • Leaving us with a complete lack of leadership and total loss of any sense of national direction. 

Then add to that:

  • The near complete invisibility of the resources boom we are supposed to be so grateful for; 
  • Unimaginable and ever-increasing government waste; 
  • Mindless escalation in bureaucracy, crippling initiative and choking business; 
  • Ideological changes to IR legislation that are stifling job growth and productivity; 
  • A looming government-led, union-driven attack on independent contractors; 
  • Looming reductions in Medical and Child Care benefits; 
  • Unaffordable housing costs and spiraling rents; 
  • Out-of-control utility costs, local government charges and grocery price increases; 
  • Bank fee rip-offs; Insurance rip-offs; Petrol price rip-offs; 
  • A huge increase in personal financial stress and insolvencies; 
  • Retail and Construction sectors on the brink of disaster; 
  • A plethora of small and medium sized business on the brink; 
  • Terrified consumers who have stopped spending through fear and loss of confidence; 
  • A country governed from an isolated city-state populated by overpaid and overfed politicians, bureaucrats and assorted sycophants (who have not the slightest experience in, or comprehension of, the real world) cheered on by an overloaded gravy-train packed full of gluttonous consultants who toady to egos and incompetence, while voraciously gorging themselves at the national trough … 

Get the picture?

Okay, when it comes to the major political acts, arguably one’s often as bad as the other. But think about it… Over the last 20 years Labor have given us Keating, Beazley, Crean,  Latham, Beazley (… again), Rudd and now Gillard, with the likes of Wayne Swan, Peter Garrett, Stephen Conroy, Joe Ludwig – and let’s not forget Kevin, again – in her backing lineup.

Australia’s Got Talent? … You’re kidding me.

This lot are so hopeless they’d be jeered off stage at a Union picnic.

Thanks for nothing, except misery, Labor.

Leonard Clampett

Economist, and Middle of the Road Activist/Common Sense extremist.


23. Will the Satanist Julia Gillard Put a Price on Oxygen As Well?

Today in Australia the satanic lesbian, and pro-abortion, PM of Australia, Julia Gillard, forced on the sleepy and apathetic Australian population a new tax on the life-giving carbon dioxide gas, under the excuse of a horde of lies.

Some critical things she lied about included:

"We know that our climate is warming."

"The science is clear ... the planet is warming ... and that warming is caused by carbon ... by human activity."

Probably the only worthwhile thing she said was expose John Howard as being as menvber of the same party who wants this impost:

"John Howard, when he was PM, tried to put a price on carbon."


This is what Gillard said on National television on Sunday night, July 10, 2011:

"Our climate is changing," whereas the reality says that that is nothing new on the Earth.

"This is caused by carbon pollution," she unashamedly lied over and over.


24. Iceland's Message to the Money-Power Elite

Go suck eggs banksters!  … and I, and 30,000 other people on Facebook, agree!  


“Its rejection for the second time by Iceland is a testament to its people, who feel they should bear no responsibility for the losses of foreigners endured in the financial crisis Iceland is of particular interest because it did not bail out its banks like Ireland did, or foreign ones like the U.S. did. If that fervour catches on amongst taxpayers worldwide, as it has in Iceland and with the tea party movement in America, the banks would have something to fear; that is, the inability to draw from limitless amounts of funding from gullible government officials and central banksIt appears that the root cause is government guarantees, whether explicit or implicit, on risk-taking by the banks…” 


… So why is Australia not using the banking powers in the Commonwealth Constitution Sect. 51 (viii) Wayne Swan, Glen Stevens, Malcolm Turnbull, Andrew Fraser …?


Iceland Declares Independence from International Banks  
By Bill Wilson 


Iceland is free. And it will remain so, so long as her people wish to remain autonomous of the foreign domination of her would-be masters — in this case, international bankers. 

On April 9, the fiercely independent people of island-nation defeated a referendum that would have bailed out the UK and the Netherlands who had covered the deposits of British and Dutch investors who had lost funds in Icesave bank in 2008. 


At the time of the bank’s failure, Iceland refused to cover the losses.  But the UK and Netherlands nonetheless have demanded that Iceland repay them for the “loan” as a condition for admission into the European Union. 


In response, the Icelandic people have told Europe to go pound sand. The final vote was 103,207 to 69,462, or 58.9 percent to 39.7 percent. “Taxpayers should not be responsible for paying the debts of a private institution,” said Sigriur Andersen, a spokeswoman for the Advice group that opposed the bailout. 


A similar referendum in 2009 on the issue, although with harsher terms, found 93.2 percent of the Icelandic electorate rejecting a proposal to guarantee the deposits of foreign investors who had funds in the Icelandic bank. The referendum was invoked when President Olafur Ragnur Grimmson vetoed legislation the Althingi, Iceland’s parliament, had passed to pay back the British and Dutch.  


Under the terms of the agreement, Iceland would have had to pay £2.35 billion to the UK, and €1.32 billion to the Netherlands by 2046 at a 3 percent interest rate.  Its rejection for the second time by Iceland is a testament to its people, who feel they should bear no responsibility for the losses of foreigners endured in the financial crisis. 


That opposition to bailouts led to Iceland’s decision to allow the bank to fail in 2008.  Not that the taxpayers there could have afforded to.   As noted by Bloomberg News, at the time the crisis hit in 2008, “the banks had debts equal to 10 times Iceland’s $12 billion GDP.” 


“These were private banks and we didn’t pump money into them in order to keep them going; the state did not shoulder the responsibility of the failed private banks,” Iceland President Olafur Grimsson told Bloomberg Television. 


The voters’ rejection came despite threats to isolate Iceland from funding in international financial institutions.  Iceland’s national debt has already been downgraded by credit rating agencies, and now those same agencies have promised to do so once again as punishment for defying the will of international bankers. 


This is just the latest in the long drama since 2008 of global institutions refusing to take losses in the financial crisis.  Threats of a global economic depression and claims of being “too big to fail” have equated to a loaded gun to the heads of representative governments in the U.S. and Europe.  Iceland is of particular interest because it did not bail out its banks like Ireland did, or foreign ones like the U.S. did.  


If that fervour catches on amongst taxpayers worldwide, as it has in Iceland and with the tea party movement in America, the banks would have something to fear; that is, the inability to draw from limitless amounts of funding from gullible government officials and central banks.  It appears that the root cause is government guarantees, whether explicit or implicit, on risk-taking by the banks.  


Ultimately, such guarantees are not necessary to maintain full employment or even prop up an economy with growth, they are simply designed to allow these international institutions to over leverage and increase their profit margins in good times — and to avoid catastrophic losses in bad times. 


The lesson here is instructive across the pond, but it is a chilling one.  If the U.S. — or any sovereign for that matter — attempts to restructure their debts, or to force private investors to take a haircut on their own foolish gambles, these international institutions have promised the equivalent of economic war in response.  However, the alternative is for representative governments to sacrifice their independence to a cadre of faceless bankers who share no allegiance to any nation. 



It is the conflict that has already defined the beginning of the 21st Century.  The question is whether free peoples will choose to remain free, as Iceland has, or to submit. 


Bill Wilson is the President of Americans for Limited Government. You can follow Bill on Twitter at @BillWilsonALG. 


25. Pop Music as a Corrupting Force

July 1, 2011

Lady Gaga is honored by Illuminati Queen Elizabeth II. 

Lady Gaga is honored by the Queen. The Illuminati
uses the entertainment industry (TV, movies, music)
to induct society into satanism.

By Peter St. George

Everywhere we go we see tiny white buds resting perfectly inside ears blocking out all sounds but pop music. Is this music uplifting or degrading?

I believe it is the Devil's forked tongue. Just consider the lyrics: "Just dance, it'll be ok", "Smack ma bitch up" and "Kill that nigga".

Lady Gaga repeats the word "Judas" 37 times in her blasphemous "I'm in love with Judas". Even the Queen is a Gaga fan apparently. Gaga has 70% as many Google results for her name as Jesus.

So far I have managed to avoid listening to this satanism and if it should be played near me I would observe Matthew 5:29 "If your right eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell."

But how are satanic themes so widespread and prevalent in modern popular music? Simply put, those who create and manage the music are the high priests of Satan: the Illuminati. If you look at any musician who is selling big and trace their record label upwards you will find a division of Illuminati Inc.

Have you ever wondered why there is no crackdown on illegal music downloads now thought to be over 800 tracks per teenager? Well it is because the devil does not charge for his sermons as long as it is more effective!

The Satanists know that "It's not about the money...We don't need your money...We just wanna make the world dance. Forget about the Price Tag".

Have you ever wondered why "gangsta' rappers" are duet ing with young women who admit to "selling their soul to the devil"? It is because there is no longer a divide between most music of different genres and tastes. The musicians are all owned by the same satanic cult and serve the same wretched master. They do as they are told or else (Michael Jackson et al).


Plato recognized that music could change character and be used to corrupt people. Aristotle too stated that "Some [music] makes men sad and grave, like the so-called Mixolydian, others enfeeble the mind, like the relaxed modes, another, again, produces a moderate and settled temper, which appears to be the peculiar effect of the Dorian; the Phrygian inspires enthusiasm....The same principles apply to rhythms; some have a character of rest, others of motion, and of these latter again, some have a more vulgar, others a nobler has a power of forming the character, and should therefore be introduced into the education of the young...."

However, Aristotle would surely be devastated to hear young girls singing "Don't be a little bitch with your chit chat just show me where your dick's at." Or a more subliminal and repeated ad nauseum "Put your hands in the air, like you just don't care" which is perhaps an instruction to submission i.e. "Put your hands up".

The quality that is valued in popular music has shifted dramatically to being "catchy" rather than beautiful and stirring. This is all part of the satanic plan to ingrain their mind-set into people. In the current generation, simplicity not complexity is valued. Instead of listening to an orchestra play a note they would rather hear gunshots between verses.

Now this is not to say that all music is bad or music is inherently evil. My point is that it is highly efficient at promoting an agenda or manipulating people. In fact, music and dancing seem intrinsic to human nature as it is present in all societies. African tribes sing and dance through the night.

However, there is a difference - they do it together as a group! They are not self-absorbed, sucking in mindless and harmful lyrics, seeking to subvert them from their natural God-given tendencies with satanic scripture. Instead they rejoice in kinship and God.

Now, it may be said that these "pop stars" have concerts where thousands of people come and "sing-a-long". Yet this too is a lie and a disgrace to music. For the songs lack heart, emotion and righteous meaning. They are sung by mindless drones who will sing whatever sick and twisted words are put into their head, scream approval when told that their favorite artist sold their soul to the devil and throw up Illuminati symbolism on command.

Compare these numb, swaying and pathetic "hero" worshipers to that of a musical Christian gathering. If you go to any number of churches on a Sunday you will see the true meaning of music. People are regularly brought to tears (including myself) not due to some hollow phrase but at the meaning and love that the lyrics stir up within oneself. This is the true root and purpose of music before it was subverted and the very nature of it which is the nature of all things; God.

He can clearly be found and experienced when someone takes in the meaning of, "If you pass through raging waters in the sea, you shall not drown. If you walk amid the burning flames, you shall not be harmed. If you stand before the pow'r of hell and death is at your side, know that I am with you through it all."

Peter St.George is the pen name of a 22-year-old Canadian.


Comments for "Pop Music as a Corrupting Force"

David said (July 4, 2011):

A quick comment for the music industry piece. I don't think people should get too fatalistic about satanic control of the music industry. These days that control is mostly illusory, as the means of creating professional music are reasonably cheap and available to people. Instruments, recording devices are affordable and music is passed around on mp3's, which means you don't need to pay publishing costs.

Here is an article by David Byrne (of talking heads fame) talking about how musicians are more free from industry control than they once were. His talks of 6 models that musicians can now follow: Rather than moaning about satanic control of the music industry (or to compliment that criticism), people can create their own music and positively effect people. Individuals change the world. We have more power than we think.


Luke said (July 3, 2011):

Henry,great article on the Pop Music industry.I'm a huge extreme metal fan (the stuff that makes Metallica sound like the BeeGees) and people these days have no appreciation for thrash metal's complexity and technicality. It's also EXTREMELY MASCULINE which goes against the whole emasculazation of men program. I also listen to some really good Christian Metal such as Beliver,Living Sacrifice,Vengeance Rising,Seventh Angel, etc. I'm also friends with Scott Waters of Ultimatum, who I have no doubt he's a brother in Christ. Thanks for another great article. Jeremy


Rob said (July 3, 2011):

Hi Henry,

Response to Pop Culture as a corrupting force.

The fact that the Rock / Pop industry is a “Tool of the devil” is “A given” and is no longer even a debatable issue, the only question that can now be asked is, “Are you content with that fact ?”

The very term: “Rock and Roll” means “Fornication”……

In 1951 when this new music came onto the scene, it was called by different names, boogie woogie, rhythm and blues etc.

However, none of these terms seemed to “Hit the spot” a DJ. named Allan Freed, who worked on a Cleveland Ohio radio station, went down into the ghetto area of Cleveland Ohio and asked them what they called this kind of music.

“Rock and Roll” they replied, “Due to the fact that we commit fornication or adultery to the beat of the music, many times in the back seat of a car, so we rock and roll.”

Allan Freed returned to the radio station used the term and the rest as they say, “Is history.”


Rock and Roll is the primary tool of satanists.

Ordination of rock music leaders, musicians, promoters, producers, distributors and others involved in the dissemination of rock music are ordained.

Rock music is viewed at this time as the primary tool of satanists.

Source: Video - What`s wrong with Christian Rock ?

Taken from a satanist statement.


David Bowie.

Rock has always been the DEVIL`S music, you can’t convince me that it isn’t. I honestly believe everything I’ve said, I believe rock and roll is dangerous.

Source: Rolling Stone magazine. 12th February 1976. Page 83.



It was in the early 1970`s when my sisters arrived in Kalamantan, Barat, Indonesia, where our parents are serving as missionaires with R.E.M.U. International, with them they had brought a contempory Christian record which was the “In thing” in Canada they said.

They were playing the record one evening, when an older national Christian stopped by the door to my sister’s astonishment his immediate question was, “Why are you playing witch doctor’s music, by which they call on Satan ?”

To the national who had left the old heathen practices which included the witch doctor, it was hard to explain why Christian young people in the churches who had sent out the missionary to teach them the way of salvation and separation from the world, could even begin to listen to that kind of music.

I was there when this incident happened and am writing now to verify it.

Statement by: Jim Walkington.

Source: Video - What`s wrong with Christian Rock ?


26. Clinton Outlines Road Ahead for Arab Democracy

AP foreign, Friday July 1 2011

By Bradley Klapper


Associated Press= VILNIUS, Lithuania (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday that the rule of law, political parties and democratic institutions must emerge in the Arab world if it is to emulate Eastern Europe's remarkable transition two decades ago from authoritarianism to truly free societies.

In Lithuania for an international democracy conference, Clinton cited the real risk of Middle Eastern and North African nations slipping back into autocratic old ways. And she lamented the latest accounts of violence in Syria, with security forces and knife-wielding, government-organized thugs reportedly attacking protesters in the city of Aleppo.

"Today there are new democracies fighting for life, there are vicious autocrats clinging to power," Clinton said in a speech at the "Community of Democracies" meeting. "This is an hour or need. And every democracy should stand up and be counted."

Drawing on the experience of Lithuania and other countries that opened up when the Iron Curtain came down 22 years ago, Clinton outlined a series of fundamentals she said were necessary for nations to make the transition to democracy: institutions rooted in law; equality for all, including women; a free press; economic opportunity; legitimate leaders.

The implicit warning was that it is uncertain if the Arab reform movements will translate into stable democratic societies. While Tunisia and Egypt try to find their own formulas for a new system of governance, the would-be democrats of Syria may never get their chance.

Speaking at a news conference in Vilnius, the Lithuanian capital, Clinton said Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime wasn't sending a coherent message. She noted how it allowed an opposition meeting in Damascus this week, while pressing on militarily in the north.

"We know what they have to do," Clinton said. "They must begin a genuine transition to democracy, and allowing one meeting of the opposition in Damascus is not sufficient action toward achieving that goal."

Clinton said Assad's government is running out of time and it must advance a serious political process or face increased resistance.

The democracy conference was being held only a short distance from Belarus, Europe's last autocratic stronghold, where authorities are cracking down on demonstrators amid the country's worst financial crisis since the fall of the Soviet Union.

Clinton lamented the brutal repression in the country and how the government denies its citizens the most basic rights. President Alexander Lukashenko's iron fist has long been an asterisk to democratic change in eastern Europe, and the Obama administration is alarmed by the rapidly deteriorating situation.

Without mentioning either country by name, Clinton also expressed concerns about the political motivations behind Ukraine's legal proceedings against former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, and Russia's refusal to allow a new opposition party to participate in upcoming elections.


27. What Will Gas-Drilling Do To Your Food Supply? 

Posted by Steve in Green Living on May 27th, 2011 | no responses

Friday, May 27, 2011 9:50

The controversial gas-drilling practice of fracking is tainting water. Your food might be next.

Fracking pollution from gas-drilling. 

Fracking Pollution  

By Barry Estabrook

There’s a stunning moment in the Academy Award-nominated documentary Gasland, where a man touches a match to his running faucet—to have it explode in a ball of fire. This is what hydraulic fracturing, a process of drilling for natural gas known as “fracking,” is doing to many drinking water supplies across the country. But the other side of fracking—what it might do to the food eaten by people living hundreds of miles from the nearest gas well—has received little attention. 

Fracking well. Photo credit: RiverkeeperUnlike many in agriculture, cattle farmer Ken Jaffe has had a good decade. But lately he’s been nervous, worried fracking will destroy his business. Jaffe’s been good to his soil, and the land has been good to him. By rotating his herd of cattle to different pastures on his Catskills farm every day, he has restored the once-eroded land and built a successful business with his grass-fed and -finished beef. His Slope Farms sells meat to food coops, specialty meat markets, and high-end restaurants in New York City, about 160 miles to the southeast. “If you feed your micro-herd—the bacteria and fungi in the soil—then your big herd will do well, too,” he said when I visited him recently on a cool, sunny afternoon. 

But a seam of black rock lies nearly a mile beneath the topsoil he has so scrupulously nurtured, and the deposit contains enormous quantities of natural gas. Profit-hungry energy companies—and the politicians that their campaign donations support—are determined to exploit that resource, even though it could destroy the livelihoods of thousands of small farmers like Jaffe who have sprung up in New York City’s vibrant, alternative food shed. 

Energy companies liberate the gas, which is trapped in tiny bubble-like pockets in the rock, by forcefully injecting chemicals diluted with millions of gallons of water into the rock. This fracking ruptures the earth, creating fissures through which the gas passes—along with a witch’s brew of carcinogens, acutely poisonous heavy metals, and radioactive elements. 

“For sustainable agriculture, fracking is a disaster,” says Jaffe. The gas rush started in the South and West, but has spread to the East and now affects 34 states. Under much of West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York lies a 400-million-year-old geographic formation called the Marcellus Shale. Although estimates vary, the shale may hold 50 trillion cubic feet of recoverable natural gas, enough to meet New York State’s needs for 50 years. To see what fracking can do to food production, Jaffe has only to look at what has happened to some of his colleagues in nearby Pennsylvania, where the first fracked well came into production in 2005, and where there are now there are now more than 1,500. 

Last year, the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture quarantined 28 cattle belonging to Don and Carol Johnson, who farm about 175 miles southwest of Jaffe. The animals had come into wastewater that leaked from a nearby well that showed concentrations of chlorine, barium, magnesium, potassium, and radioactive strontium. In Louisiana, 16 cows that drank fluid from a fracked well began bellowing, foaming and bleeding at the mouth, then dropped dead. Homeowners near fracked sites complain about a host of frightening consequences, from poisoned wells to sickened pets to debilitating illnesses. 

The Marcellus Shale itself contains ethane, propane, and butane, arsenic, cobalt, lead, chromium—toxins all. Uranium, radium, and radon make the shale so radioactive that companies sometimes drop Geiger counters into wells to determine whether they have reached the gas-rich deposits. But those compounds are almost benign compared to the fracking fluids that drillers inject into the wells. At least 596 chemicals are used in fracking, but the companies are not required by law to divulge the ingredients, which are considered trade secrets. According to a report prepared for the Ground Water Protection Council, a national association of state agencies charged with protecting the water supply, a typical recipe might include hydrochloric acid (which can damage respiratory organs, eyes, skin, and intestines), glutaraldehyde (normally used to sterilize medical equipment and linked to asthma, breathing difficulties, respiratory irritation, and skin rashes), N,N-dimethyl formamide (a solvent that can cause birth defects and cancer), ethylene glycol (a lethal toxin), and benzene (a potent carcinogen). Some of these chemicals stay in the ground. Others are vented into the air. Many enter the water table or leach into ponds, streams, and rivers. 

For the most part, state and federal governments have turned a blind eye to the problems brought about by fracking. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that it has no jurisdiction to investigate matters related to food production, a contention disputed by Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), who wrote a report urging the EPA to study all issues associated with fracking. A concerned farmer who prefers not to be identified forwarded me an email written to him by Jim Riviere, the director of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank, a group of animal science professors that tracks incidents of chemical contamination in livestock. Riviere wrote that his group receives up to 10 requests per day from veterinarians dealing with exposures to contaminants, including the byproducts of fracking. Nonetheless, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has slashed funding to his group. “We are told by the newly reorganized USDA that chemical contamination is not their priority,” Riviere wrote. 

“The dangers of fracking to the food supply are not something that’s been investigated very much,” said Emily Wurgh of Food and Water Watch, an environmental group based in Washington, D.C. “We have been trying to get members of Congress to request studies into effects of fracking on agriculture, but we haven’t gotten much traction.” 

Fracking is not a new technology. It was first put into commercial use in 1949 by Halliburton, and that company has made billions from employing the extraction method. But it really wasn’t until 2004 that fracking really took off, the year that the EPA declared that fracking “posed little or no threat” to drinking water. Weston Wilson, a scientist and 30-year veteran of the agency, who sought whistleblower protection, emphatically disagreed, saying that the agency’s official conclusions were “unsupportable” and that five of seven members of the review panel that made the decision had conflicts of interest. (Wilson has continued to work at the EPA, and continues to be publicly critical of fracking.) 

A year later, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act with a “Halliburton loophole,” a clause inserted at the request of Dick Cheney, who had been Halliburton’s CEO before becoming vice president. The loophole specifically exempts fracking from the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, the CLEAR Act, and from regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency, and it unleashed the largest and most extensive drilling program in history, according to Josh Fox, the creator of the film Gasland. 

In 2010 New York State imposed a moratorium on gas drilling, but if that were to be lifted, fracking would deal a triple whammy to Ken Jaffe’s farm, and thousands more like it. (Compare a map of the Marcellus Shale with one of small organic farms.

Back on his pasture, Jaffe gestured to a pond in a bowl-like valley surrounded by sloping pastures and hillsides of maples, white pines, and blossoming wild cherries and apple trees, that, along with wells on the property, provides water for his animals. Given the geography of the land, any chemical contamination seeping from the rock would go directly into Jaffe’s water supply, poisoning his cattle.

And it’s not just his herd that’s vulnerable; all the plant life on his property would also be in danger. According to Jaffe, ozone is more lethal to crops than all other airborne pollutants combined, and of all crops, few are more susceptible to it than clover, a nutrient-rich feed that is critical to his method of sustainable cattle raising. While ozone is normally associated with automobile exhaust, fracking generates so much of it that Sublette Country, Wyo., has ozone levels as high as Los Angeles. This, despite the fact that it has fewer than 9,000 residents spread out over an area the size of Connecticut. What it does have is gas wells. 

Even if his cows and his land would somehow remain unaffected by nearby wells, Jaffe’s business would still likely suffer. Joe Holtz is manager of Brooklyn’s Park Slope Food Coop, which buys a cow a week from Jaffe (and upwards of $3 million products from other New York area farms). He says that his environmentally conscious organization would be forced to seek alternatives to New York meat and produce if fracking becomes commonplace. “If the air is fouled and the animals are drinking water that contains poisonous fracking chemicals, then products from those animals are going to have poisons,” he told me. Given the progress that small, local farms have made in the region, he says, the decision to stop dealing with long-term suppliers would be hard. But he adds, “We would have to stop buying from them. There is no doubt in my mind.” 


28. The Kabbalah: The NWO's Satanic Bible

David Livingstone.

David Livingstone

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
May 3, 2010


My interest was picqued when I noticed that the very first chapter of David Livingstone's new book, "Surrendering Islam" was dedicated to "The Kabbalah" and the Occult. This was a subject I wanted to learn more about.

Since the so-called "Enlightenment," mankind has gradually fallen under the spell of the Kabbalah. What we have been taught to believe is "progress" is actually the resurgence of an ancient satanic pagan fertility cult, epitomized by the Kabbalah.

David Livingstone has the stomach and genius to dive into this cesspool, and take its measure. More squeamish observers (like myself) know it only by its stench.

Thanks to David's explanation of its background, I had a eureka moment. The "god" of the Kabbalah is not god at all. It is Lucifer. Freemasonry is based on the Kabbalah. Illuminati Jews and their Freemasonic allies are stealthily erecting a New World Order dedicated to Lucifer. That's why the ubiquitous logo of the City of Ottawa, where I am currently visiting, is an O with three tails. 666.


According to Livingstone, the Kabbalah is based on ancient pagan mythologies which recount the story of an original god who created the universe, and a usurper god (Lucifer) who eventually defeats him and comes to rule the universe in his stead. 

Lucifer is the offspring of the father-god and his wife, the goddess. But the son-god also marries his mother. The son-god was identified with the sun while the goddess was identified with the planet Venus, the first star seen at sunrise.

"Essentially, the god and the goddess were seen as two aspects of a single god." Livingstone writes. "As such, other names for Satan have included "Prince of Dawn" or "Son of the Dawn."

Lucifer, who exemplified evil, was known as a "dying God" because every winter he died and descended to the underworld where he ruled over the spirits of the dead. Kabbalism is a sex cult tied to the cycle of the seasons. It is concerned with the incestuous mating of the god and goddess to ensure fertility. 

Lucifer demands sacrifices. He must be appeased to avert his evil and direct it against one's enemies. The most evil sacrifice is the slaughter of a child. Livingstone explains: 

"This [child sacrifice] became the basis of this cult as it was worshipped throughout the ancient world. Rituals of death and resurrection imitated that of the god [Lucifer.]

Participants would imbibe intoxicants and dance to music in order to achieve a state of ecstasy, or Jinn [demon] possession, by which they believed they could achieve supernatural abilities like shape-shifting, clairvoyance and other magical powers. In this state, they would slaughter a child and eat its flesh and drink its blood [Nazarene Remnant comment: Satanists delight in mocking God at every turn. Thus they always make it a practice to defy the command of the Most High God, to abstain from eating blood, as found here: “For [it is] the life of all flesh; the blood of it [is] for the life thereof: therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh: for the life of all flesh [is] the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut off.” (Leviticus 17: 14)] so that the god could be reborn in them."

Read the Full Story here:
The Kabbalah-The NWO's Satanic Bible


29. Secret War Between Tony Blair And Prince Charles

Original Title: Alastair Campbell: Blair Was Angry at Prince's Interference


Latest volume of former spin doctor's diary reveals Blair accused Prince Charles of 'screwing' the government


The Guardian, Saturday 2 July 2011




Alastair Campbell, left, with Tony Blair, says the former prime minster resented interference from the Prince of Wales. Photograph: Ben Curtis/Press Association 

Tony Blair believed that the Prince of Wales publicly interfered in sensitive areas of government policy in a manner that sometimes stepped over the constitutional boundaries historically respected by the royal family, according to Alastair Campbell.

In extracts from the latest volume of his diaries, published in the Guardian today and on Monday, the former No 10 communications director writes that Blair became so exasperated he once privately accused the prince of "screwing us".


Campbell, a teetotaller, also discloses in today's extracts that the pressure of working in Downing Street became so great that he started drinking again around the turn of the millennium. He never told Blair.


He also reveals that George Bush said in July 2001 that Vladimir Putin had "looked a bit scared" when he accused the then Russian president of selling more than conventional weapons to rogue states.


The main focus of today's extracts confirms what ministers across the spectrum have long complained of in private: the Prince of Wales regularly attempts to influence government policy, usually in long handwritten letters.


In the most detailed account of the prince's interventions, Campbell suggests that the heir to the throne even displayed signs of disapproving of the government. Campbell indicates that at one point Blair raised his concerns with the Queen.


"While publicly we stayed supportive, TB said Charles had to understand there were limits to the extent to which they could play politics with him," Campbell wrote on 31 October 1999 of a meeting between Blair and the prince after he took Prince William on a provocative day's foxhunting. "He said it was 90 minutes of pretty hard talk, not just about hunting."


Campbell  writes that Blair, who was not invited to the royal wedding, became angry when the prince:


§             Made "deeply unhelpful" interventions during the foot and mouth crisis in 2001. Campbell wrote on 16 March 2001: "TB said he knew exactly what he was doing. He also asked whether Charles had ever considered help when 6,000 jobs were lost at Corus [the steel manufacturer]. He said this was all about screwing us and trying to get up the message that we weren't generous enough to the farmers." 

§             Boycotted a banquet in 1999 for Jiang Zemin, then president of China, a decision criticised by Blair as "silly". In a long paper to Blair the prince wrote: "I feel very strongly about it." 

§             Challenged Blair on plans to outlaw foxhunting. In what Campbell described as a "long note on hunting" in late 1999, the prince said it was good for the environment. 

§             Declared in the same note that hereditary peers, the majority of whom were abolished by Labour in 1999, had much to offer. Campbell wrote that the prince had said "menacingly": "We don't really want to be like the continentals, now do we?" 

§             Insisted that he had to speak out about GM foods after Downing Street had made clear its unhappiness with what Campbell describes as a "dreadful" Mail on Sunday article. In the same note to Blair the prince wrote: "I cannot stay silent." 


Campbell  said Blair was furious with the prince's Mail on Sunday article in May 1999. "He was pretty wound up about it, said it was a straightforward anti-science position, the same argument that says if God intended us to fly, he would have given us wings. It certainly had a feel of grandstanding."


Campbell  writes that Blair thought the prince had a political agenda because he was upset by the former prime minister's speech to the Labour conference in October 1999 in which he attacked the "forces of conservatism". He wrote on 1 November 1999: "TB said he bought the line that because we were modernising, that meant we were determined to do away with all traditions but he had to understand that some traditions that did not change and evolve would die. It all had the feel of a deliberate strategy, to win and strengthen media support by putting himself at arm's length from TB and a lot of the changes we were making."


Campbell  added: "TB felt he had been really stung by the forces of conservatism speech. He said they felt much more vulnerable than in reality they are. We know they still have the power to 'keep us in our place' but they don't always see it like that."


Blair even appeared to have raised his concerns with the Queen. On 1 June 1999, shortly after publication of the prince's article, Campbell wrote: "TB saw the Queen and seemingly didn't push too hard re Charles, but he was very pissed off."


Campbell  said last night that the anger in the Blair team was mainly caused by the prince's media operation under Mark Bolland, his deputy private secretary between 1997 and 2002. Matters improved when Paddy Harverson, the prince's head of communications, joined his team in 2004.


Campbell  told the Guardian: "Tony Blair valued their regular private conversations and respects Prince Charles's right to speak up on important issues. But this was a period when it seemed Charles's media team was proactively and publicly setting them at odds on some of the government's most difficult issues – not just hunting, where the differences were well known, but GM food, China, and agriculture.


"When Paddy Harverson [Bolland's successor] came in, things improved greatly. It might seem ironic me complaining about the media operation but just as I felt Charlie Whelan gave Gordon Brown problems so I thought the same of Mark Bolland at times for the Prince of Wales."


[As usual] Clarence House declined to comment.


Power and Responsibility: The Alastair Campbell Diaries, Volume Three, covers the years 1999-2001. 


Nazarene Remnant comment:This is high drama designed to deceive the public, as well as to follow the dictates of the Grand Plan. Now “the Plan” calls for a very much free and roaming Prince Charles, not one tucked away in some smelly British jail. My belief is that Prince Charles will steadily appear to distance himself from the Illuminati Establishment—including His own mother and Windsor family—by becoming increasingly critical of them in many areas. We always have to remember that Charles has been groomed as the “Saviour,” the returning Prince Arthur, who is going to re-establish the Golden Age of Camelot. He is also staged to negotiate and sign the Peace Plan between the “Earthlings” and the invading “Aliens,” which is something that will loom very large on the horizon in coming months. So he cannot be arrested and jailed, as the above writer says is the fate of the British Royal Family. My estimation, for what it’s worth, is that the Royal Family won’t be arrested and jailed at all, because they will have disappeared into their secret hideouts they have prepared around the world for this very event. Charles himself has been showing signs that this is the name of the game he’s currently engaged in, and there have been signs of this happening for quite some time now. See more details in our free book The Usher of Desecration, available here:


30. Revealed: British Government's Plan to Play Down Fukushima

Internal emails seen by show PR campaign was launched to protect UK nuclear plans after tsunami in Japan. 


Government officials launched a PR campaign to ensure the accident at the Fukushima nuclear facility in Japan did not derail plans for new nuclear power stations in the UK. Photograph: AP


British government officials approached nuclear companies to draw up a co-ordinated public relations strategy to play down the Fukushima nuclear accident just two days after the earthquake and tsunami in Japan and before the extent of the radiation leak was known.


Internal emails seen by the Guardian show how the business and energy departments worked closely behind the scenes with the multinational companies EDF Energy, Areva and Westinghouse to try to ensure the accident did not derail their plans for a new generation of nuclear stations in the UK.


"This has the potential to set the nuclear industry back globally," wrote one official at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), whose name has been redacted. "We need to ensure the anti-nuclear chaps and chapesses do not gain ground on this. We need to occupy the territory and hold it. We really need to show the safety of nuclear."


Officials stressed the importance of preventing the incident from undermining public support for nuclear power.


The Conservative MP Zac Goldsmith, who sits on the Commons environmental audit committee, condemned the extent of co-ordination between the government and nuclear companies that the emails appear to reveal.


"The government has no business doing PR for the industry and it would be appalling if its departments have played down the impact of Fukushima," he said.


Louise Hutchins, a spokeswoman for Greenpeace, said the emails looked like "scandalous collusion". "This highlights the government's blind obsession with nuclear power and shows neither they, nor the industry, can be trusted when it comes to nuclear," she said. 

The Fukushima accident, triggered by the Japan earthquake and tsunami on 11 March, has forced 80,000 people from their homes. Opinion polls suggest it has dented public support for nuclear power in Britain and around the world, with the governments of Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Thailand and Malaysia cancelling planned nuclear power stations in the wake of the accident.


The business department emailed the nuclear firms and their representative body, the Nuclear Industry Association (NIA), on 13 March, two days after the disaster knocked out nuclear plants and their backup safety systems at Fukushima. The department argued it was not as bad as the "dramatic" TV pictures made it look, even though the consequences of the accident were still unfolding and two major explosions at reactors on the site were yet to happen.


"Radiation released has been controlled – the reactor has been protected," said the BIS official, whose name has been blacked out. "It is all part of the safety systems to control and manage a situation like this."


The official suggested that if companies sent in their comments, they could be incorporated into briefs to ministers and government statements. "We need to all be working from the same material to get the message through to the media and the public. 

"Anti-nuclear people across Europe have wasted no time blurring this all into Chernobyl and the works," the official told Areva. "We need to quash any stories trying to compare this to Chernobyl."


Japanese officials initially rated the Fukushima accident as level four on the international nuclear event scale, meaning it had "local consequences". But it was raised to level seven on 11 April, officially making it a major accident" and putting it on a par with Chernobyl in 1986.


The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has released more than 80 emails sent in the weeks after Fukushima in response to requests under freedom of information legislation. They also show:


§             Westinghouse said reported remarks on the cost of new nuclear power stations by the deputy prime minister, Nick Clegg, were "unhelpful and a little premature".


§             The company admitted its new reactor, AP1000, "was not designed for earthquakes [of] the magnitude of the earthquake in Japan", and would need to be modified for seismic areas such as Japan and California.


§             The head of the DECC's office for nuclear development, Mark Higson, asked EDF to welcome the expected announcement of a safety review by the energy secretary, Chris Huhne, and added: "Not sure if EDF unilaterally asking for a review is wise. Might set off a bidding war."


§             EDF promised to be "sensitive" to how remediation work at a UK nuclear site "might be seen in the light of events in Japan."


§             It also requested that ministers did not delay approval for a new radioactive waste store at the Sizewell nuclear site in Suffolk, but accepting there was a "potential risk of judicial review".


§             The BIS warned it needed "a good industry response showing the safety of nuclear – otherwise it could have adverse consequences on the market". 


On 7 April, the office for nuclear development invited companies to attend a meeting at the NIA's headquarters in London. The aim was "to discuss a joint communications and engagement strategy aimed at ensuring we maintain confidence among the British public on the safety of nuclear power stations and nuclear new-build policy in light of recent events at the Fukushima nuclear power plant".


Other documents released by the government's safety watchdog, the office for nuclear regulation, reveal that the text of an announcement on 5 April about the impact of Fukushima on the new nuclear programme was privately cleared with nuclear industry representatives at a meeting the previous week. According to one former regulator, who preferred not to be named, the degree of collusion was "truly shocking".


A spokesman for the DECC and BIS said: "Given the unprecedented events unfolding in Japan, it was appropriate to share information with key stakeholders, particularly those involved in operating nuclear sites. The government was very clear from the outset that it was important not to rush to judgment and that a response should be based on hard evidence. This is why we called on the chief nuclear inspector, Dr Mike Weightman, to provide a robust and evidence-based report."


A DECC source played down the significance of the emails from the unnamed BIS official, saying: "The junior BIS official was not responsible for nuclear policy and his views were irrelevant to ministers' decisions in the aftermath of the Japanese earthquake."


Tom Burke, a former government environmental adviser and visiting professor at Imperial College London, warned that the British government was repeating mistakes made in Japan. "They are too close to industry, concealing problems, rather than revealing and dealing with them," he said.


"I would be much more reassured if DECC had been worrying about how the government would cope with the $200m-$300m of liabilities from a catastrophic nuclear accident in Britain."


The government last week confirmed plans for eight new nuclear stations in England and Wales. "If acceptable proposals come forward in appropriate places, they will not face unnecessary holdups," said the energy minister, Charles Hendry.


The NIA did not comment directly on the emails. "We are funded by our member companies to represent their commercial interests and further the compelling case for new nuclear build in the UK," said the association's spokesman.


"We welcome the interim findings of the independent regulator, Dr Mike Weightman, who has reported back to government that UK nuclear reactors are safe." 


31. Fukushima--Japan's Faustian Bargain With the West

June 6, 2011

Our Tokyo correspondent describes a general feeling of betrayal by the West. But the satanist-led (Illuminati) "West" literally may have sabotaged Fukushima in order to coerce the Japanese into world government.

By Grace-Eki

It is finally dawning on the Japanese that the 'West' was not/is not what it was purported to be and that the contact with the West and its technology has been a Faustian bargain.

Indeed the whole of 'West' can almost be summarized, post Renaissance and Enlightenment as an re-enactment of the myth of Dr. Faustus. And with similar tragic ending to it. [In this myth, Faustus sells his soul to the devil for power and knowledge.]

The desire of the common people is the same all over the world. It is to live in peace, in relative comfort and well-being and to wish the best for their children and thus the future generation. It is so very similar all over the world; this clash of civilization/culture only occurs because of outside imposition.

People of Fukushima and the rest of Japan are highly aware that they have robbed their children, their future -- having been conned (admitted, their own fault and ignorance) about the safety, and all the positive (lucrative) possibility that nuclear energy could bring into their area....The very irony of the town's slogan, "Brighter Future through Nuclear Power/Energy" that still hangs above the -involuntarily abandoned-ghost town, sums up the situation.

And of course, Fukushina rhymes very much with Hiroshima!

Unlike the WWII consequence, this time all four islands of Japan will be contaminated.

Japanese people are not exactly dumb; they may be naïve and ingenious (as with many native inhabitants) and are exceedingly misinformed about the West and by extension-the whole global, geo-strategical situation.

Thanks to the control of the Media, and especially the post WWII, built up of NIHON TV(channel 4), the CIA has managed to turn Japanese opinion in a pro-USA direction!

Nota Bene: that Showa Emperor (the real WWII war criminal), gave the Chrysanthemum Medal to General Le May in 1964...actually he did not quite give it to him personally as is the custom but the Japanese government did: the message is "Thank you so much for 'holocausting' the inhabitants of Japan'- we are just so honoured!"

Some of the Japanese are no better than Pavlovian dogs. This is due to the strategy by the feudal Tokugawas who imposed Isolationism for the inhabitants- while allowing the West, one-way access via the Dutch East India Company and accepting their yearly summary regarding the Western (read:Global) situation at face value and never sending an observer/messenger/spy to even check if it was accurate.

This document was treated almost like some 'secret documents' and only shared among the very few elite and never disclosed to the Japanese people....The consequence is that for the relative peaceful period of 270 years or so, the Japanese were raised in total oblivion as to what occurred beyond the sea.

It is one thing to read about the Inquisition, War of Religion, French Revolution, Conquest and colonialism etc. via a history text book; another to directly participate, witness or have one's life and families be destroyed through these factors... Zbigniew Brzezinski is not completely off, when he called Japan 'a fragile flower'. Yes, from a Social Darwinism imbued global monopolist controller (the geo-strategist with his Chessboard); he is absolutely right.

That Tokugawa feudal period was like being raised in a green-house, isolated from the rest of the world. We are suffering the consequences now.

The tragedy is not only due to radiation.....there is the abandonment and massacre of 'live'-stock which also came with post-Perry and the West. There was no domestication of four legged animals (for food consumption) and it was the Westerners, when once Japan abandoned Isolationism that insisted that White people can not survive without beef and dairy!

It was the so-called MEIJI Emperor (some of us believe him to be a changeling...) who ate beef for the very first time (cooked French style as to make it non-noticeable)! This occurred in 1873, which is only about one hundred and thirty-forty years ago, meaning -not such a long time ago.

Yet long enough, that the majority of the younger generation Japanese don't even have much idea about anymore. (They have been busy drinking mild, eating steak and becoming big and tall like the White Westerners....seriously, that was the slogan in getting them to change their dietary habits; and yes, ice-cream do taste often wonderful!....)

So the tragedy, of course is first and foremost to the human residents...but many people have been ANGST by the massacre of these creatures and wonder, why they could not simply be freed and left there so see if they could survive......

This too is the consequence of copying the West as the idealized model.

A country prone to such natural disasters cannot take that responsibility for another life. It is a double Angst, in a culture that believes by instinct in reincarnation, Karma and the presence of a all creatures, including bugs.

A lot of people who attend these anti-nuclear demonstrations make it very clear that they would like to see Fukushima closed and the whole of Japan become nuclear-free.

That every single nuclear power plant be closed, because to err is part of being human. They are highly concerned that out of sixty-something new nuclear power plants, over forty are in Asia.

And if Fukushima can become a deterrent, like Chernobyl-for Europe; it is a well worthwhile lesson.

And if there really is a lack of energy, well let us just use less is our attitude.

(It is only corporate greed that never understands the concept of Enough and even less on Less...).

Food crisis; eat less. People survived the Edo period just fine without oil...-without animal husbandry-without jet travel, -without many items deemed indispensable when they are not, and in reality -often just junk and garbage. We are all under the spell of scientific progress!

All the so-called modern day conveniences are just not worth the current road of technological 'progress'.....

People here are both concerned and apologetic about polluting the ocean. The ocean belongs to the whole world and all creatures and knows no boundaries...

It is such a well known and accepted concept that life sprang from the sea.
In fact in French, the word mother is inside the sea (la mer and mère) and in Japanese, the word mother is inside the Kanji for the sea....

And right now, like HIROSHIMA, it is an experimentation time and nobody can really foresee the future. Suffice to say, it is very grim.

I would like to add that despite everything, people are being positive, and accept that a certain % will perish and a certain % would hopefully survive and plan to stay put, where they are even if it means eating radioactive food, and living with radiation. People survived HIROSHIMA, so why not. Plus the world is circular, there really is only one planet and the world across the sea appears rather vicious, competitive and sinister!!!





Comments for "Fukushima -- Japan's Faustian Bargain With the West"


Ed said (June 8, 2011):


I'm something of a student of history, and one of the questions that have come up to me is "what would have happened if Japan had not gone into the isolation of the Tokugawa period?"


My take on that is conditioned by what happened not too long before then, when Toyotomi Hideyoshi was shogun. Hideyoshi had the megalomaniac idea that he was going to make himself emperor of Asia, and to that end commenced by invading Korea. The Japanese had better guns than the Koreans (James Clavell's nonsense notwithstanding), and would have overwhelmed Korea in short order if it hadn't been for the superior Korean navy, which saved Korea (and, indirectly, Ming China) from the Japanese by threatening the Japanese supply lines.


There's a very interesting book on this, titled _Samurai Invasion_, by Stephen Turnbull. The 1592-97 war in Korea was a bloodbath. After the Japanese withdrew, their attention again became centered on the situation at home; there was more fighting between the factions in Japan after Hideyoshi passed away in 1597, and this eventuated after a time in the establishment of the Tokugawa shogunate. The Tokugawa, as we know, were severely isolationist, and essentially prevented Japan from having any part in what was going on in the rest of the world from about 1620 or so until the 1860s.


Had there been a Toyotomi shogunate instead of the Tokugawa, I think that east Asia and the Pacific would have been treated to a display of Japanese militarism and psychotic violence in the 17th century that would have been as bad or worse than what they did in the early 20th. The Japanese are no more or less innocent than any other nationality in the world; to blame everything bad on "Western culture" while pretending that non-Westerners are some sort of primeval innocents is simply preposterous. We have lots of reactors in North America and in Europe, after all, which tells me that we in the West are just as naive and innocent as the Japanese---or not.




JB said (June 7, 2011):


shima is the Japanese word for island


So Fukushima means "F*CK YOU ISLAND!"




No more so than the fact that a dollar is a green span, or that Bernie Made Off with everyone's money, or that Kashkari carried off all your cash, and then there is Rep Weiner's ghastly weiner, but lets not go there.




MS said (June 7, 2011):


In response to Fukushima, I would like to remind you all... of the dream I had the night it happened, I was taken into a vortex a hands length above my head, and the next thing you know I was standing beside an angel with thousands of other people sitting on a mountain top, looking down at the HAARP facility .. I saw a blue discharge of what seemed to be millions of volts. I got a horribly sick feeling in my stomach,, and awoke. The reason I mention this, is a) because it's the God's honest truth and b) because I honestly feel that japan, a nation of honor , has been a people deceived by the luciferian illuminati, It was divided up after WW2. japan got the technology, after all, SONY is an acronym for Standard.Oil.New.York. ... My guess is that Japan wasn't "towing the line" for the N.W.O|O.W.N .. and my suspicions, are that they would have used NANOTECHNOLOGY , for the GOOD OF MAN KIND,, which is a no,no in the luciferian doctrine...




Dan said (June 7, 2011):


Japan has suffered more fatalities from nuclear irradiation than any other country in the world.


Does anyone remember the tragic irradiation of the Japanese fishing ship the Daigo Fukuryu Maru (Lucky Dragon 5) due to the Bikini Atoll 15 megaton hydrogen bomb test in 1954? The crew of 23 were exposed to lethal radiation fallout, many died excruciating deaths. The U.S, government tried to keep the incident a secret, and paid the families of crew members $2500 bucks to forget about it. (That's right, twenty five one hundred dollar bills).


"The tragedy of the Daigo Fukuryu Maru gave rise to a fierce anti-nuclear movement in Japan, rising especially from the fear that the contaminated fish had entered the market. "


What were all those 1950's Japanese 'Godzilla' movies really about? Godzilla was an allegory of radiation disaster. These fear memes are deeply programmed into the Japanese mainland psyche after all these years.


That's why I'm certain that the tsunami was triggered - a man caused disaster. The Satanists could rely upon the Japanese public to freak out against nuclear energy with one horror show like this. It opens up psychic wounds.


32. How To Control People

Monday, 8 January 2001

Source: writes:

How To Control People by Charley Reese

The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred. Here are a few tips on how smart people can control other people. If any of this rings a bell - Well, then wake up!

The first principle of people control is not to let them know you are controlling them. If people knew, this knowledge will breed resentment and possibly rebellion, which would then require brute force and terror, and old fashioned, expensive and not 100 % certain method of control.

It is easier than you think to control people indirectly,to manipulate them into thinking what you want them to think and doing what you want them to do.

One basic technique is to keep them ignorant. Educated people are not as easy to manipulate. Abolishing public education or restricting access to education would be the direct approach. That would spill the beans. The indirect approach is to control the education they receive.

It's possible to be a Ph.D., doctor, lawyer, businessman, journalist, or an accountant, just to name a few examples, and at the same time be an uneducated person. The difference between true education and vocational training has been cleverly blurred in our time so that we have people successfully practicing their vocations while at the same time being totally ignorant of the larger issues of the world in which they live.

The most obvious symptom is their absence of original thought. Ask them a question and they will end up reciting what someone else thinks or thought the answer was. What do they think? Well, they never thought about it. Their education consisted of learning how to use the library and cite sources.

That greatly simplifies things for the controller because with lots of money, university endowments, foundations, grants, and ownership of media, it is relatively easy to control who they will think of as authorities to cite in lieu of doing their own thinking.

Another technique is to keep them entertained. Roman emperors did not stage circuses and gladiator contests because they didn't have television. We have television because we don't have circuses and gladiator events. Either way, the purpose is to keep the people's minds focused on entertainment, sports, and peripheral political issues. This way you won't have to worry that they will ever figure out the real issues that allow you to control them.

Just as a truly educated person is difficult to control, so too is an economically independent person. Therefore, you want to create conditions that will produce people who work for wages, since wage earners have little control over their economic destiny. You'll also want to control the monetary, credit, and banking systems. This will allow you to inflate the currency and make it next to impossible for wage earners to accumulate capital. You can also cause periodic deflation to collapse the family businesses, family farms, and entrepreneurs, including independent community banks.

To keep trade unions under control, you just promote a scheme that allows you to shift production jobs out of the country and bring back the products as imports (it is called free trade). This way you will end up with no unions or docile unions.

Another technique is to buy both political parties so that after a while people will feel that no matter whether they vote for Candidate A or Candidate B, they will get the same policies. This will create great apathy and a belief that the political process is useless for effecting real change.

Pretty soon you will have a population that feels completely helpless, and thinks the bad things happening to them are nobody in particular's fault, just a result of global forces or evolution or some other disembodied abstract concept. If necessary, you can offer scapegoats.

Then you can bleed them dry without having to worry overly much that one of them will sneak into your house one night and cut your throat. If you do it right, they won't even know whose throat they are cutting.

Charley Reese E-mail:

What you do with this article now that you have read it ... Is up to you.

Sales Tax School Tax Liquor Tax Luxury Tax Excise Taxes Property Tax Cigarette Tax Medicare Tax Inventory Tax Real Estate Tax Well Permit Tax Fuel Permit Tax Inheritance Tax Road Usage Tax CDL license Tax Dog License Tax State Income Tax Food License Tax Vehicle Sales Tax Gross Receipts Tax Social Security Tax Service Charge Tax Fishing License Tax Federal Income Tax Building Permit Tax IRS Interest Charges Hunting License Tax Marriage License Tax Corporate Income Tax Personal Property Tax Accounts Receivable Tax Recreational Vehicle Tax Workers Compensation Tax Watercraft Registration Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone State and Local Tax IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) State Unemployment Tax (SUTA) Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon) Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax

Don’t forget Income Tax Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the hell happened? Can you spell 'politicians? ' I hope this goes around THE WORLD at least 1000 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!! GO AHEAD - - - BE FREE!!!


33. Central Banks, World Tyranny, Fixed Markets

"The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends. The occult power of the Central Bank to create money out of nothing is the fountainhead that fuels our far-flung financial and political empire."

Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," a manual used to instruct an Illuminati heir published in 1974.

In its pristine form a Central Bank is a private monopoly of a nation's money and credit issuance supported by the coercive power of the state.

That the Central Bank be directly in our hands is vital until our new order is firmly established throughout the governmental, business, intellectual and political spheres of society.

After our order is consolidated, formal nationalization of the Central Bank with great fanfare is usually advisable in order to dispel any lingering suspicion that it is operated for private gain.

Of course only loyal agents of the dynasty are allowed to obtain high offices in the Bank and our power remains intact. Obvious private monopolies are always the targets of sharp reformist agitators. Only the most paranoid, however, can see through the public facade to the private monopoly of the nationalized or quasi-nationalized Central Bank.

The Central Bank is the primary monopoly on which all our monopoly power depends. The occult power of the Central Bank to create money out of nothing is the fountainhead that fuels our far-flung financial and political empire. I will make a quick survey of a few of the ways this secret money power is brought to bear.

Basically, the power of our Central Bank flows from its control over the points of entry into the economy of new, inflationary money which it creates out of thin air.

Ordinarily, bills of exchange, acceptances, private bonds, government bonds and other credit instruments are purchased by the Central Bank through specially privileged dealers in order to put the new money, often only checking accounting entries, into circulation.

The dealers are allowed a large profit since they are fronts operated by our agents. Our purchase of government securities pleases the government, as our purchase of private debt pleases private debtors. As a quid pro quo to assure "good management" our agents are given directorships, managerial posts, and offices in the corporations and government's so benefited.

As the addiction to the narcotic of inflationary easy credit grows and grows we demand more and more control of our dependent entourage of governments and corporations. When we finally end the easy credit to "combat inflation," the enterprises and governments either fall directly into our hands, bankrupt, or are rescued at the price of total control.

Also, we ruling bankers control the flow of money in the economy through the wide authority of the Central Bank to license, audit, and regulate private banks.

Banks that loan to interests outside the loyal entourage are "audited" by the Central Bank and found to be dangerously overextended. Just a hint of insolvency from the respected Central Bank authorities isenough to cause a run on the disobedient bank or at least dry up its vital lines of credit. Soon the banking establishment learns to follow the hints and nods of your father's agents at the Central Bank automatically.

Further, the periodic cycles of easy money and tight money that we initiate through our control of the Central Bank cause corresponding fluctuations in all markets. Our inner circle knows in advance the timing of these cycles and, therefore reaps windfall profits by speculating in commodity, stock, currency, gold, and bond markets.

Monopolistic stock and commodity Exchanges are a vital adjunct to our power made possible by our Central Bank power. We do not allow a fair auction market to exist, but make a great show of "tough" government regulation to create a false sense of confidence among small investors.

With the aid of our regulatory charade and financial power we are able to maintain Exchanges tailored to our entourage's need to manipulate stock prices at the expense of independent investors. Our privileged specialists on the floors of our Exchanges, aided by the propaganda of our financial press and brokerage houses, continually play on naivete and greed to drain the savings of the unwary into our coffers.

The stock, commodities, and securities held in trading accounts by the Exchange and brokerage houses provides us with a clout far beyond our own actual holdings with which we can manipulate prices and win proxy fights for corporate takeovers.

Little danger to our lucrative racket exists from public-spirited regulation. Our manipulations are so complex that only the most brilliant experts could comprehend them.

To most economists our Exchange operations appear to be helpful efforts to "stabilize" the market. We ruling bankers, if able to keep peace among ourselves, become richer and richer as time passes without the annoyance of exerting productive effort of benefit to others.

Makow Comment: This document is authentic in my opinion, and very gratifying since it blames central bankers for most of humanity's problems, a view I have held since 2002.  




Iceland Declares Independence from International Banks 


34. Exposed! Public Education is Indoctrination

"Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal."

Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power," a manual published in 1974 used to instruct an Illuminati heir.


Village of the Damned.

Above, scene from "Village of the Damned."



In order to maintain our system of power, the institution of universal public education is indispensable...
The primary purpose of public education is to inculcate the idea that our crucial institutions of coercion and monopoly were created for the public good by popular national heroes to blunt the past power of the malefactors of great wealth. Crucial is to create the impression that, although the people have been exploited in the past, today the wealthy are at the mercy of an all-powerful government which is firmly in the hands of the people or do-good liberals... 
Centralization of control [of education] at the state, or preferably national level, assists in building the climate of opinion we require in public education. Failing to obliterate local control, other methods nearly as effective are available.

Our overwhelming financial clout in the publishing industry can induce relatively uniform textbook selection. Further leverage can be created by promoting teacher colleges and teaching machines. National teacher's associations and unions are also an excellent power base from which to foster our programs of indoctrination.

With our great influence in publishing and publicity we are able to, selectively popularize educational theorists whose views are incidentally beneficial, compatible, or at least not in conflict with our own goals.

This way we obtain sincere, energetic activists to propagate our desires without having to reveal our motives or even existence. We do not want an educational system that produces hard-driving individuals bent on amassing great wealth and power.

Therefore, we discourage education that would develop the potential powers of students to their fullest. "Liberal" education that stresses knowledge for its own sake or even sophistry and sterile mental gymnastics is of no danger to us.

"Relevant," vocational, or career-oriented education also poses no danger to our power. 

Education that prepares students to accept a cog-like existence in our military-industrial-social-welfare-regulation complex is ideal. Progressive education with its stress on "social adjustment" also produces the conformity we require of our subjects.

Emphasis on competitive sports may produce a certain amount of disruptive competitiveness among the participants, but primarily has the effect of creating life-long voyeuristic spectators who will enthusiastically sublimate their competitiveness into endless hours of following college and professional sports on the boob tube. Space spectaculars and dramatic political infighting are also marvelous diversions with which to occupy the masses.

Anyone seeking social change will gravitate to the field of education. Our strategy is simple: Let only those succeed whose influence would be compatible with our power. Encourage all who would develop the passive or receptive mode of existence. Discourage all who promote the aggressive or active capacities. 

Build a great cult of salvation through endless education, touting it as the "democratic" path to success. Deride the frontal approach to success of the "outmoded' rugged individualist.

Before yielding the floor ... I would like to comment on the demise of religious education as a vehicle for social control. Religion, in its time, was a remarkable weapon for inculcating subservience, altruism, and self-abnegation among our subjects. We did not give up this weapon voluntarily.

Your grandfather, for one, supported the Baptist faith well after most finance capitalists had turned wholly to secular ideologies. However, a trend toward rationality in human affairs plods along inexorably quite outside the reach of our power.

Only in our totalitarian dictatorships can this trend be quashed entirely. In the semi-open societies in which our money power is based, the forces of reason can only be impeded and diverted. Some have theorized that, eventually, widespread rational egoism will overturn our order. I am confident that secular faiths and just plain confusion will suffice to sustain our power for many centuries to come.



Comments for "Exposed! Public Education is Indoctrination"

Gary said (July 5, 2011): 

Your article reminded me of a book exposing the deliberate downfall of the public education system. 

Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt wrote a book called The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America that would seem to relate to this article in showing that what happened to the public education system was deliberately planned. 

The author has made her book available for free on her web site as a PDF file you can download: 

I have not had a chance to finish reading the book yet, but given her prior position as a former Senior Policy Advisor in the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), (U.S. Department of Education) I would think that she would know what she is talking about. 

Public education teachers give high marks to this whistleblower's account:

"Iserbyt's book is a psychological lifeboat for teachers who feel trapped on the 'education Titanic.'" (Polly Ball, B.S., 30 yr. teacher, elementary education)

"I applaud Iserbyt for her shocking, completely documented expose. A dynamite book which presents a clear chronology of educational restructuring. Compelling evidence shows school reform, supported by all political stripes, to be a totalitarian plan using Skinnerian behavior modification and other equally manipulative psychological techniques to subjugate future generations in a state of ignorant bliss." (O. Jerome (Jed) Brown, M.A., 25 yr. teacher, former candidate WA State Supt. of Public Instruction)

"the deliberate dumbing down of america provides knowledge critical to combatting the education crisis we are facing. This all-in-one reference book should be added to everyone's personal library." (Betting Dobbs, R.N., B.S., M.S., retired teacher, President of Guardians of Education for ME)

"Iserbyt has directed her flashlight into the darkest, secret, elitist corners of academe, flushing out and exposing to the light of day the termites who have been eating away at the foundations of traditional academic education." (Gene Malone, B.A., M.E., 30 yr. teacher, founder of Freedom 2000/USA)

"This country, if it is to remain a sovereign, free and independent America, depends upon the greatest number of Americans reading and acting upon the information in this timely book." (Ann Herzer, M.A., Reading Specialist, 20 yr. teacher, former candidate AZ Supt. of Pub. Inst., member Dau. Am. Rev.)

"Teachers: Don't miss reading this book! It's what you've been waiting for!" (Barbara McFarline-Kosiec, Ph.D. in Leadership in Education, 35 yr. teacher.)

"Unbelievable book! Iserbyt's straight shooting tells the whole truth and nothing but the truth. This is a `must read' for elected officials, who should give serious consideration to her proposals to turn the situation around. Home schoolers and traditional teachers will not be able to put this book down." (Steve Schran, B.S., 15 yr. teacher, professional musician)

You can download a free PDF of The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America by Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt here:

[Nazarene Remnant comment:Also see John Taylor Gatto’s great work on exposing the deliberate manipulation of the education system:  


The Underground History of American Education,The Odysseus Group, Suite 3W 295 East 8th Street NY, NY, 2000-2004. Available here:


There is also a suppressed book by Australian author Jean Marion Wallis:  


The Subversion of Australian Education: What is Wrong With Our Schools? Published by The Australian League of Rights. Available on


If you cannot get a copy from Scribd, try our site here:


Also see the following in our freely available book, What The Study Of History Should Have Been, available here: 


Appendix B      What’s Behind the “Education” Agenda? 

Appendix D     Weaponized Education: Controlling Tomorrow With The Youth of Today 

Appendix G     Ramping Up and Dumbing Down Maths Teaching 

Appendix H     Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Are Going the Same Way! 

Appendix M     The Makers of Modern Schooling 

Appendix N     Honest Bill Cosby Tells U.S. Blacks The Truth


Paul said (July 5, 2011):

I went to public schools till Grade 11 and had the highest marks in my class. In Grade 12 in the private Christian school I nearly failed because those private school students were light years ahead of me and all the other boarding students. Public schools know this to be true but will never imitate the private schools.  

Instead they lambaste them at every turn, especially home schooled students. Yet around a quarter of public school teachers hypocritically send their children to private schools.  


Ibrahim said (July 5, 2011): 

Last night, I had a dream in which I was in a college classroom with my fellow-students, and we were each given a slip of paper containing a summary of the American Psychiatric Association's 1973 decision to remove homosexuality from the APA's official list of mental disorders.

The principal of the college sat on a high chair to the side of our table, and he called us each in turn to give him our own individual explanations about how we understood the APA's 1973 decision.

As someone who is deeply involved in reorientation therapy, I wasn't quite sure what I would say to the college principal about my beliefs. Should I lie and say that I agreed wholeheartedly with the APA, or should I tell the truth and thus get myself kicked off the course?

I didn't understand the meaning of this dream until I read your article this morning. Everything makes so much more sense to me now. Thank you so much for helping me to see the education system for what is really is. 


35. Death Sentence For Private And Home Education, Courtesy Of Supreme Court

By Charlotte Iserbyt
July 8, 2002


The Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decision allowing the constitutionality of financial aid to parents which they may use at religious or private schools, including virtual academy (computer-assisted-instruction) charter schools available to home schoolers, will result in the deliberate dumbing down of all education.

In this latter regard, the writer of this article was told in 1981 by the Director of the Office of Libraries and Learning Technology, U.S. Department of Education, that " in the future all education will take place in the home, using computer-assisted-instruction, but that we will always have the school buildings for 'socialization' purposes." This is the United Nations lifelong learning/brainwashing concept (International community education) which places all community services under the umbrella of the community school. (The National Alliance of Business refers to this agenda as Kindergarten-Age 80).

The public sector succumbed years ago to federal control through funding. Now, private schools, willing to go the "voucher" route in order to get the money to stay in business, will have the opportunity to be equally dumbed down, denied a liberal arts curriculum, and stripped of all sound moral education. I can already hear the howling from voucher-supporting conservatives the first time the heavy hand of the federal government lands on a private school denying it the right to determine "what is right and what is wrong" in its curriculum, hiring practices, recital of the Pledge of Allegiance, The Lord's Prayer, etc. Those private schools which courageously, for reasons of conscience, resist vouchers will eventually be forced out of business due to their inability to remain competitive.

Interestingly enough, the blame for this incredibly dangerous Trojan Horse decision can be laid at the feet of the conservative majority on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Is school choice a plot to implement the socialist, corporate fascist, workforce training agenda for the global planned economy?

You 'betcha.

This decision will succeed in carrying out the long-standing leftist/internationalist goal of total control of all education (public and private) through the dollar. It provides a classic example of what the late Senator Edmund Muskie, D. ME. referred to when he described how the Democrats, when they couldn't get something controversial approved, would go to the Republicans for action. Muskie, known as "Mr. Metro", used as an example President Nixon's implementation of metropolitan/regional government (the unconstitutional carving of the nation into ten regions), something the Democrats had been unwilling or unable to tackle or accomplish.

The late Robert Hutchins, left-wing educator, former President of the University of Chicago, and supporter of World Government, would be ecstatic over the voucher decision. In fact, he could have written it. In an article by Virgil C. Blum in The Commonweal, January 31, 1964 entitled "Freedom and Equality", p. 513, Blum says:

"Dr. Robert M. Hutchins sees no constitutional difficulty in federal aid for the education of church-related school children in secular subjects. The fact that such education 'is permitted by religion' or that federal aid for such education is an 'aid to religion' he says 'is immaterial.' The benefit that accrues to religion, Hutchins argues, is 'incidental to an overriding public benefit.' Consequently, 'such incidental benefits,' he reasons 'do not invalidate the legislation'."

It is not difficult to understand why Hutchins would be supporting aid to church schools. He knew it was not a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow but government control and therefore, he could argue that "aid to religion" as a byproduct of government support for church schools would be 'incidental to an overriding public benefit.'

Why don't more people understand that government control of private and home school education is exactly what is going to happen? And why have religious organizations, especially those affiliated with the Catholic Church, supported school choice proposals when they have so much to loose once the government controls are implemented?

If the question of school choice is considered in a vacuum, without the benefit of an in-depth understanding of the history and highly controversial goals of American public education, if it is considered simply in the context of providing a better education for low income children, if it is considered only as an issue of equal funding for all children, one escapes the very dangerous crux of the matter: ACCOUNTABILITY... accountability to the government which is granting the voucher or tax credit.

While working in the Department of Education and involved in supervising grants and contracts to local schools, government labs and centers, United States and foreign universities, etc., I had to make sure that the recipients of the federal grants complied with federal regulations, guidelines, and criteria for that particular project. I never questioned the wisdom of such a requirement. Although the U.S. Department of Education is in itself an unconstitutional entity and should not exist, it would still have been illegal to allow recipients of federal money (extracted from the taxpayers) to spend that money as they wished. There must be accountability as long as we Americans want government to perform in an orderly, fair manner.

Elected officials and others in supervisory positions, including public school superintendents who complain about government regulations, should, when the government honey pot is passed around the board table, just say "NO". That is the only way to avoid the regulations imposed rightfully in the name of "accountability," and to remain a truly free agent. During my three-year tenure as an elected school board member I voted "NO" on every single motion to accept federal curriculum or federal funding.

So, why is it that those promoting tuition tax credits and vouchers have missed this point of accountability? Is it because it is too simple to understand? Is it because they feel that the need to level the field for low income children should take precedence over accountability requirements and that accountability requirements are not to be feared? Read on...

In 1982, while working on a U.S. Department of Education technology grant to the Association for Educational Computing and Technology, a spin-off the National Education Association, I was shocked by some internal comments in an early draft of the grant. Although I was not working in an "Eyes Only" position for the CIA or Defense Department, but for an agency which supposedly exists to provide a beneficial service to parents, children, and teachers, this paper was stamped CONFIDENTIAL! On one page there appeared the following information:

"PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES: What We (the U.S. Department of Education) Can Control or Manipulate? Under that incredible question the following items and activities were listed: State participation/selection process, role of advisors, content of program, training of state leaders, resource people utilized, basic skills content areas emphasized, perception of need to use technology." The main reason I gave that document to the press, for which I was subsequently relieved of my duties, was that I was appalled at the blatant attitude of the federal government regarding the national public school system. Do the five justices who ruled favoring school choice proposals live in such a dream world that they believe the government will require less regulation of the private and home schools than it requires of the public schools?

There is a certain naivety, Alice in Wonderland attitude, amongst those who should know better regarding what will happen to private schools and home school entities which accept vouchers. Did the Supreme Court majority not study the catastrophic history of school choice in France which resulted, in 1983, with the socialist French Government under Mitterand assuming control of all private and religious education which received government funding?

The conservative Mayor of Paris, Jacques Chirac, said the takeover threatens "the free choice of schools by parents, the basic character of private education, the freedom of management of these establishments."

The conservative Paris newspaper, LeFigaro said it was worse than that: "Private schools are no longer threatened. The propositions of Education Minister Alain Savery on the future of private education are equivalent to a sentence of death."

It is understandable that parents are desperate to find a solution to the devastating problems facing their children in the public schools. However, they should realize that the despicable situation has been planned for over 150 years (the dumbing down was deliberate...the Hegelian dialectic at work), in order to get the parents to call for and accept what is being sold to them as a solution providing freedom of choice, which in fact is what the internationalists, especially the Carnegie Corporation, has had planned for at least 75 years. The Carnegie Corporation's plan to change our economic system from free market to collectivist was published in 1934 in its little book "Conclusions and Recommendations for the Social Studies". Not only did President Reagan in 1985 sign agreements with President Gorbachev to merge the United States and Soviet education systems; the Carnegie Corporation signed even more extensive agreements with the Soviet Academy of Science to carry out the same agenda.

Let me warn parents and private school administrators: "Freedom to choose" is exactly the opposite of what they and the private sector will receive if they take one penny of federal, state or local tax money to educate children. Believe it or not, slavery is right around the corner, since once the private sector is controlled through vouchers, thereby creating a partnership with government (corporate fascism), students , having been psychologically profiled, will be tracked into specific training at an early age and later into job slots to suit the needs of the corporate sector and the global economy. That is the failed international socialist quota system that in essence provides NO CHOICE! Our children will have no freedom to choose what they want for their futures. This is going on right now in the public school sector due to Goals 2000, the School to Work Opportunities Act, and the reauthorization of the ESEA (S.1, the Bush-Kennedy "No child Left Behind Act.") Some bright 9th graders are spending 3 out of 5 days a week at the job site, rather than studying math, science, literature, history, foreign languages, art, music, etc. which would give them a liberal arts education, indispensable for upward mobility, freedom, and an understanding of the world in which they live.

Ah.....would that Aristotle, 384-322 B.C., could return to express his displeasure with this latest development. He said "Educated men are as much superior to uneducated men as the living are to the dead."

What school choice is all about is not giving parents a real choice without strings attached; it is about controlling all children (referred to as "human resources"), everywhere on this planet, in order to implement the corporate fascist global economy, with 100% participation in the global computer!

Why, otherwise, does one find most of the major players and promoters of school choice coming from the corporate sector, with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as the largest and loudest supporter of all? TIME magazine, 6/8/92, owned by Time-Warner came close to the truth when it said "...the Bush Administration strongly supports the concepts that underlie the Edison Project...Many observers believe Whittle's long-term plan anticipates the use of these (voucher) funds. If adopted, the reform (vouchers) could funnel billions of public dollars into private schools..." And NEWSWEEK, 6/8/92, not to be outdone by TIME, said "There's no question that Whittle schools could be extremely rewarding ...If Congress approves a voucher system..." Are we so naive that we believe big business really cares about our children's futures? It cares, and rightfully so, about big profits. That's perfectly fine, but not at the expense of our children's freedom to choose their futures.

Conservatives have a problem understanding the overt and heavily-funded position of the teachers' unions in opposition to school choice, and refuse to understand or accept the NEA and AFT leadership's covert position of support. The unions would be pretty stupid not to support vouchers when they know that the international education agenda calls for such "choice" in order to implement the global workforce training agenda and that their membership will be called upon to staff the training sites. It is the average traditional classroom teacher who opposes school choice for obvious reasons, some of which are cited in this article. The following quotes substantiate the above conclusion:

The late Albert Shanker, President, American Federation of Teachers--"It may be that we can't get the big changes we need without choice."

President George Bush, Sr.--"Choice is the one reform that drives all others."

Former U.S. Secretary of Education Lauro Cavazos--"President Bush and I are determined to use the power of choice to help restructure American education."

To illustrate how the promoters of this totalitarian agenda know full well what they are doing, one need go no further than to the writings of major education change agent Chester Finn, who was once opposed to school choice but is presently a supporter of the concept. (Finn assisted in the development of the National Institute of Education in 1970, served under Secretary William Bennett as Assistant Secretary, Office of Educational Research and Improvement in the mid-eighties, and was the author of America 2000, renamed Goals 2000 during the Clinton Administration.

Finn also serves on the National Governing Board for the National Assessment for Educational Progress. The NAEP is the tool for measuring accountability to politically-correct government viewpoints (60 percent of the test items measure political correctness and school-to-work readiness). The NAEP, which President Bush mandated be administered in all schools, will determine not only curriculum, but compliance with accountability standards and therefore will be essential in the determination of which private schools and home schoolers will receive vouchers. That is the reason this decision will do away with private and home schooling education as they are presently constituted.

In an article he wrote entitled "Public Service, Public Support, Public Accountability", March, 1982, National Association of Secondary School Principals' Bulletin, p. 69, Finn said:

"Some to be sure, like to think they can have it both ways; i.e. can obtain aid without saddling themselves with unacceptable forms of regulation. But most acknowledge the general applicability of the old adage that he who pays the piper calls the tune, and are more or less resigned to amalgamating or choosing between assistance and autonomy."

And, in American Education, May, 1982, "Public Support for Private Education." Part 1, p. 5, Finn said:

  "Short of scattering money in the streets or handing it out to everyone who wants some, the funding agency must define eligible recipients...This means, in a word, 'regulation,' the inevitable concomitant of public financial support."

The other side of the coin, Finn says, is "the obligation of private schools to recognize certain limits to their differentness and certain ways they must conform to the norms and expectations of a society that values and supports them..."

In returning to this most bizarre Supreme Court Decision, something comes to mind. Why did Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor recently attend a conference in Europe to familiarize herself with World Court decisions and how they might play out in the United States, under our present Constitution? Could this school choice decision, in the future, have anything to do with world court decisions, universal/global education, public private partnerships, global work force training, etc.?

Remember, it was Karl Marx who called for a "combination of education with industrial production." And the global government being implemented today is nothing more nor less than what Lenin called for: international socialism.

Why did the majority of our elected officials in Congress and appointees on the Supreme Court allow these radical changes to take place, changes which will forever affect the futures of our children and the special nature of the greatest, freedom-loving country in the history of the world?

Because they no longer represent the best interests of their constituents. Their allegiance is to the global elite at the United Nations and elsewhere, from whom theyreceive their marching orders. Or, especially in the case of our elected officials, they have been so dumbed down in the public schools that they didn't even know what form of government and economy they swore to uphold when they assumed office.

 Our government, through this latest decision, has placed the last nail in the coffin of "freedom". This decision finalizes the exchange of our highly successful free market system and republican form of government for a failed 'ism' form of government. Whether our new form of government will be corporate fascism, socialism, or communism (all of which differ only in minor ways), remains to be seen.

Note: Credit for some of the research in this article goes to Barbara M. Morris who wrote the indispensable book on the dangers of school choice: "Tuition Tax Credits...A Responsible Appraisal", 1983, and to Billy Lyon who wrote a fascinating treatise "Connections and Conflicts of Interest (Or, There Ought to Be an Investigation!) 1992, which documents the role of conservatives, liberals, corporations. foundations, etc. in the promotion of school choice and the school-to-work agenda.

Other Books and Articles by Charlotte Iserbyt:

Death Of Free Will - Iserbyt / Niwa - PDF format - 11/10/10

United States-People's republic of China Education Agreement - 5/1/10

Obama's Health Care Plan - 8/8/09

Iraq Veteran Victim of Government Abuse - 11/23/07

Operation Save U.S. - 3/7/07

The North American Soviet Union - 2/27/07

The Devil's Seven Prong Fork - 1/13/07

Restoring The Draft - 6/5/06

Maine's Never Ending Assault On Traditional Education - 4/9/06

Happy New Year Gift - 1/3/06

Reject Political Correctness! 'Shout Merry Christmas' - 12/7/05

Preparing Children For Virtual/World Classrooms - Part 2 - 8/29/05

Revolution In Education - Soviet Style - Part 1 - 8/29/05

The Robotic CAFTA Vote - 7/28/05

Help Defeat CAFTA - 7/25/2005

Hooray For France! - 5/31/05

Base Closures : Disarming America - 5/27/05

Unanimous Treason - 5/12/05

Miracles Still Happen! - 4/9/05

Refuse The National I.D. Card - 2/12/05

Bush Admin Hiring of Ex-KGB Chiefs to Develop Internal Passport - 1/9/05
(Letter to Nancy Pelosi)

Intelligence Reform's Internal Passport - 12/31/04 (Published in The Times Record, Brunswick Me.)

Shame On Buchanan - 10/21/04

"Achtung! Your Passport, Bitte" - 10/14/04

Background Paper on President Reagan and the U.S. Department of Education - 6/16/04

Many Ways To Skin A Cat - 6/6/04

American Culture Takes a Hit - 5/7/04

You'll Know It's True When It Happens To You - 3/7/04

Warning : The Impending Draft - 2/25/04

Regionalism is Communism - 2/4/04

Walks Like a Duck, Talks Like a Duck... - 1/16/04

Happy New Year : Keep Your Eye On The Ball - 1/1/04

"Uncle Sam Wants You, Your Sister, and Your Girlfriend or Wife" - 11/11/03

United States-Russian Merger: a Done Deal? - 10/16/03

Bush Must Go! - 8/4/03

Former KGB Heads To Help Spy On Americans - 4/24/03

Former USSR Premier/ex KGB Head To Work for Homeland Security! - 4/23/03

Community/ Communist Oriented Policing - 2/13/03

New Spectator Sport for Americans...Watch it Play Out! - 2/1/03

Kissinger out of the Closet - 11/27/02

Cold War Myth: An Exercise in the Use of the Dialectic - 11/23/02

Death Sentence for Private and Home Education, Courtesy of Supreme Court -7/8/02

No American Left Alone - 4/12/02

The Pizza Choice Game

The Choice Charade


36. Centrelink, Welfare, and the Fall of the West

Original Title: Illuminati Use Socialism to Buy Complicity



All bound up in red tape.


"Social security, free health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, [at the expense of the middle class] create a dependent class whose support for our critical measures can easily be made part of a package deal." (see #5 below)  


“There is no proletarian, not even a Communist, movement, that has not operated in the interests of money, in the direction indicated by money, and for the time being permitted by money--and that without the idealists among its leaders having the slightest suspicion of the fact. (Oswald Spengler, Decline of the West


Excerpt from "The Occult Technology of Power,"  which purports to be a manual used to instruct an Illuminati heir, published in 1974. Internal references suggest that it was a work of imagination based on intensive study and observation. Mostly consistent with my conclusions, I regard it as an inspired account of reality.

The danger to our system
 clearly is not that the "people" will spontaneously rise up and dispossess us. The "people" never initiate anything. All successful movements are led from the top, usually without the knowledge of the movement, by men like your father with vast resources and brilliant plans.

The real danger arises in the upper-middle classes. Occasionally, these people make vast fortunes through some brilliant technological innovation in their business or through the favor of local politicians that escape our influence.

Because of their ignorance of the reality of our power, however, the new rich usually fall easily into our hands. For instance, they seldom realize until too late that the dozens of loans they may owe to apparently independent banks can be called simultaneously with a mere nod from your father...

The following measures, however, are found necessary by nearly all money lords:

1. Steeply Graduated Income Tax ~ Income tax does not affect us because our money was accumulated before the tax was imposed and most of it is now safely protected in our network of tax exempt foundations. Foundation income and capital can legally be used to finance the bulk of our social, economic, literary, and even political propaganda. In a pinch it is easily diverted to illegal uses. Expensive "studies" required by our profitable economic operations can be legitimately financed through foundations.

To the middle classes, however, income tax makes life into an endless treadmill. Even the most productive find themselves unable to accumulate significant capital. They are forced into the clutches of our Central Bank entourage for injections of the inflationary credit which we are privileged to create out of nothing....

2. Business Regulation ~ When upstarts slip through our financial tentacles and tax shields, perhaps with the aid of outsiders, a second line of defense becomes vital. Licensing in the crucial area of broadcasting has proven particularly necessary. This makes serious upstart-led mass political challenge impossible. Harassment by bureaucrats armed with arbitrary and voluminous industrial safety regulations is a new and increasingly effective technique. Security registration requirements, "to protect the small investor," can cause fatal delays in an upstart's ability to raise capital on the stock market. Ecological considerations are easily perverted to stymie the plans of those who would upset the stability of our carefully planned system.

Anti-trust law, however, is our ultimate weapon. The handy doctrine of "pure and perfect" competition which we have fostered in our universities is ideally suited to convict any successful competitor, at our discretion....

3. Subsidies, Tariffs, and Foreign Aid ~ ... Foreign aid maintains our empire of foreign dictators abroad while providing guaranteed, highly profitable sales to our corporations at home base. Foreign aid should always be contingent on the purchase of goods, usually military hardware, that only our entourage of firms can provide. Few have the courage to oppose such altruistic aid to the "starving masses" of the "third world."

4. Centralization of Power ~ Real division of power between national, state, and local government is dangerous to our system. When local politicians have real autonomy, even in limited spheres, they can do much to enable upstarts to challenge our power. Our program is to bring all levels of government under our sway through such innovations as federal aid, revenue sharing, high federal taxation, and regional government.

5. Alliance with the Lower Classes ~ In order to keep our valuable regulatory machinery in place and under our control, we must have the mass support of the numerous lower classes against our vigorous, but scarce middle-class rivals. The best method is to provide the lower classes with subsidies at the expense of the middle class. This creates a mutual hatred that prevents the middle class from appealing effectively to the lower classes for support.

Social security, free health care, unemployment benefits, and direct welfare payments, while doing nothing for us directly, create a dependent class whose support for our critical measures can easily be made part of a package deal.

Please note also that the major labor unions began with our financing and are led to this day by leaders of our choosing. No one can rise to or remain at the top of a rough and tumble union without our financial backing.

In spite of their rebellious rhetoric, bought union leaders are the source of our power over the management of firms with widely held stock. Unions are the ultimate weapon for destroying otherwise invulnerable, self-financing rivals.

Further, downward flexibility of wages and prices which obtains without widespread unionization would increase the ability of the economy to survive without our aid during the economic crises we create.

Bread and circuses are as useful today as in Roman times for mobilizing the mob against our staid adversaries.



Comments for "Illuminati Use Socialism to Buy Complicity "

Henrique said (July 7, 2011): 

From my point of view, as the revolutionary movement in the West, following advice from the Frankfurt School gurus, uses "minorities" instead of "proletariat", a law or jurisdiction of "Total legal Neutrality", which for example wouldn't treat you as a special person depending on whatever you like to do with the orifices in your body or the amount of pigmentation you have in your skin (which reduces politics to zoology, for example) would be quite effective in breaking all the revolutionary spearheads and give us time to reconstruct our societies based on the common natural values we share. By the way, glad you're aware of Oswald Spengler, he's the best writer in Western history, in my opinion. Also take a look at this: 


Paul said (July 7, 2011): 

Most men would not give their wives to another man to have her sexual needs met.Yet I meet  man after man, and especially Christians, who give their wives (and the rest of their family members) over to governmentto have their health care needs met, their educational and retirement needs met, and to a certain extent their social needs. There is no possession anymore of our family. Our families' problems are open to the hold world. We are no longer jealous of taking care of our own kin.

Socialism is the worst threat to our society and because of socialism we have feminism and homosexuality. Without socialism the gay community would most likely just disappear and so would feminism which can only survive on government debt because it is so unprofitable otherwise. 

Also see:


Why Are Christian men Such Wimps?



Brian said (July 7, 2011): 

I remember when I was younger I couldn't get enough material to read on the Nazis, starting with Shirer's Rise and fall of the Third Reich. Then there were all those TV productions like "World at War", etc. which continue on, ad nauseum, to this day. I find myself in that same boat of morbid fascination when reading this series of the "Occult Technology of Power". The difference of course being that this series serves as an expose to what in effect constitutes the nuts n' bolts of the "Protocols".

I'm trying to figure out who this Illuminati heir may be, and I have a guess. This came out in 1974, and say the heir being spoken to was 58 years old at the time, meaning he would have been born in 1916. David Rockefeller is 95 years old. Do you think it's him? The time-line would be about right with John D. being the grandfather. 



I believe the document is based on the Rockefellers but the workshop-for-an-heir device is purely literary. 



37. Review of Cruel Hoax

Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order by Henry Makow

Book Review by Ingri Cassel

Cruel Hoax book cover.

Since the long awaited for arrival of Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order in our mailbox last December 2007, I find nearly every conversation creates an opportunity to begin sharing Makow's brilliant insights into a core issue of why everything seems to be going wrong in America. Makow is a brilliant and eloquent writer who has succinctly explained what I have been feeling inside most of my life: That "feminism" has been intentionally sewn into our culture to facilitate the systematic destruction of heterosexual relationships and the nuclear family. Makow also describes why the destruction of families is central to the "New World Order" scheme.

The truth is that I was a typical product of the baby boom years after World War II and grew up believing that girls and boys are basically the same except for their body parts.

However, I was curious enough by the society I grew up in to want to know more about human behavior so I pursued a degree in humanistic psychology. During the course of obtaining a bachelor's degree, I took many classes intended to program students into believing feminist-backed philosophies.

As the 70s became the 80s, gender differences were increasingly minimized and the professional world was suddenly open to men and women equally. Although most young women dream about finding a man whom they love, trust and respect enough to marry and have children with, the culture urges them to attend college and begin a career first and wait until later to start a family. Psychologically, women are tricked into prioritizing school, work and money over motherhood and child rearing, their central biological function and primary social obligation.

Makow is a brilliant thinker and writer, connecting the dots of the conspiracy to destroy the family, the foundation of a healthy society.This is done by neutering males psychologically and making them irrelevant and redundant.

In today's world, women do not have to choose between careers and family because their formerly vital role as family nurturers has been obsoleted by state-licensed daycares; fathers are disposable. What better way to control the masses then by having the state raise our children in the absence of a functional nuclear family. Makow's choice of a 1976 quote from Harry Rosenthal succinctly encapsulates the impact of this arrangement on individuals and culture:

"We have castrated society through fear and intimidation. Its manhood exists only in combination with a feminine outward appearance. Being so neutered, the populace has become docile and easily ruled. As all geldings...their thoughts are not involved with concerns of the future and their posterity, but only with the present and with the next meal."

Cruel Hoax is a series of poignant essays divided into four sections: Book One-Feminism, Communism and the New World Order; Book Two-Homosexuality and Hetero-homosexuality; Book Three-How Heterosexuality Works; Book Four-Freemasonry, Brainwashing and the Illuminati.

What many readers will appreciate most are the insights Makow elucidates in Book Three-How Heterosexuality Works. I found myself reflecting for weeks on my own familial relationships and how our ignorance of gender differences in the context of a healthy heterosexual relationshipis at the root of dysfunctional families and hence society today.

Once you read this book you will begin to look at everything differently and you will see that lesbianism and homosexuality in men aren't lifestyle choices individuals make of their own free will. These sexual aberrations are the result of patiently laid traps intended to create weak, malleable, self-absorbed citizen/subjects through the statutory and social advancement of feminist ideals.

Why? Because a nation of virtuous, self-governing individuals who are products of healthy heterosexual unions represent the greatest threat to a totalitarian state.

The review above was originally published in the January, 2009 edition of The Idaho Observer

The book is available here:


38. Moscow Museum Puts Lenin's Jewish Roots On Display

From Dick Eastman
25 May 2011

Because Lenin was supposedly a gentile, it was always denied that the Russian October Revolution was an all-Jewish affair...

Jews loyal to Zionist ideal -- which involved crushing and enslaving the gentiles -- was the object of the October Russian Revolution just as it is goal of Lloyd Blankfein and ten thousand other Jews among the American and Britsh ruling elite.
60 million ethnic Russians were killed by the Bolshiveks and the Karl Marxian communists in a span of less than 50 years. Bolsheviks joined from as far away as New York City--where the press worked to brainwash Americans against the Russian people at least as early as 1905. If you don't like a people, you're not going to reach out and help them. I have an antique book printed that year that talks about it. The NY press lied about the Russian people.
These Jews are the greatest mass murderers of all history and communism is their vehicle for world conquest.  It's time that their true history was made known to the entire world.
For full story and photos:


39. News in Brief.

Weekly South African Report

Was the Sinking of the Titanic an Insurance Scam?

The Suppressed Free Electricity Generation System of Nikola Tesla.
Princess Diana Death Documentary Banned In UK 

US Women Turn To Prostitution To Support Family 

Zionist Greece Stops Gaza Bound Flotilla Boats 

Gaddafi Threatens To Attack Europe - Zionists Jump For Joy

Pack Journalism Anti-Gaddafi Propaganda  

Cell Phones, Texting, Social Media Destroying Children  

What Is Agenda 21? - You'd Better Wake Up

Weather Modification - Covert Weapon Of Mass Destruction

Kirwan - World War 3 Written On The Wind

Call This A RECOVERY? - The Big Lie 

How Greed Is Destroying America  

Top Japan Nuke Expert - Much Worse Radiation To Come

Secret War Between Tony Blair And Prince Charles
Polish Parliament Votes To Ban Abortion 
Two Suns? Twin Stars Could Be Visible From Earth By 2012

Princess Diana Police Hid Crucial Information 

Radiation Spreads All Over Japan...Via Cows 

Another Premier Japanese Beef Hit By Cesium Scare

Melt-Through Simulation Done Before Fukushima (Video)

New Saudi Arabia Law - Political Dissent A Crime 

Free Speech Can Get More Prison Time Than Murder (Video)

Man Who Wrote The Coming Gold Confiscation Act? 

HR Bill 1505 - DHS Takeover Of Sea Shores 

HuffPost Covers Filer Stating Gen Ramey Lied About Roswell 

The 'Belle 8-3-11' Mystery Grows

Phone Hacking Used By Sunday Mirror, Claims BBC

US Authorities Preparing To Subpoena News Corp 

UN Lying Over Somalia Famine - Islamists 

The Great Games - Review By Gilad Atzmon

Walnuts Are Drugs Says FDA

Human And Animal Genes Being Mixed In Embryos

Banned Commercial About US National Debt (Video)

Devvy - Obama Could Be Removed By His Own Signature

Interview With Beelzebub T. McGlobalist

China's ElectroMagnetic Pulse Weapons

Eat 2 lbs Japan Radioactive Beef, Get 80 Microsieverts


Stop Relying on Limited News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:

"Every night the same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is your News Limited?"(Quote from satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke Letters.)

The 10 Most Influential People in the Alternative Media: 2011 Version

Latest editions to this list of alternative new sites:



Atlantic Free Press

Axis of Logic

Common Dreams


Information Clearing House

My Catbird Seat

Online Journal

Redress Information & Analysis

Sabbah Report 
Veterans Today


Here's some good advice from Gilad Atzmon:

"In addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.

Some of the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri, Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort, Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges,  Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates, Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." ( )


Additional Resources ...

The Warning of the Last Days

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold And Its Not Financial

The Usher of Desecration

The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion


How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …


Go to the following link for instructions ...

How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos


Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...

My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear from you.

Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact page:

Thanks for reading.

See you next issue.

John Mulligan


Subscriber's Notes Section ...


You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.

PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the bottom of every issue.

SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.

To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:


At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by you will find a special link that enables you to UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit GO.

Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...

Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:


URL of This Issue:


• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map

The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture

The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days

The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial

The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)


So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]


Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”


[1] Dr. Greg Evenson


Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.

Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.

UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...

"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?


As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.


Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 

How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download

Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)

We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)

False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations

John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto

Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Democracy Is An Illusion

Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?

Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.

What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)

We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.


So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.


Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.


This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”


Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.

Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.

The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes

"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King,

Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.

The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.

The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book

How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)

"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."

“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)