NazareneRemnant header graphic

Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page

Cover image for Last Days Watch

Issue #46
25 May, 2011

Learn to deal with reality or
reality will deal with you.



URL of This Issue:

Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days Watch.

Contents of this Issue ...

  1. Scientist Flips, Blows Global Warming to Bits
  2. Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System
  3. Fortress Australia: Hidden Agenda, Part 1 of 6
  4. Where Do We Stand on Perseverance?
  5. Is Temptation an Outmoded Concept?
  6. In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes Centre Stage
  7. Qadhafi’s Libya Knows How the Global System Really Works
  8. Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World
  9. Libya All About Oil, or Central Banking?
  10. Organized Jewry Opposes Free Speech
  11. Galileo Movement Brings Sanity to The Carbon Dioxide Debate in Australia
  12. America's Death Squads
  13. Lessons From Argentina: Go Get Your Dollars Out Now! FAST !!! 
  14. Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11
  15. Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors
  16. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 9)
  17. Where Have all the Real Men Gone?
  18. A Native American's View of Manhood
  19. Australian Demands Freemason Judges Outed
  20. The Pacific Ocean: A Radioactive Garbage Dump
  21. How the Illuminati Got Above the Mormons
  22. Unlawful Killing: Film About the Death of Diana Likens Prince Philip to Fred West
  23. Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in Brazil
  24. The Great Cholesterol Deception
  25. Who is Andrea Rossi?
  26. Global Governance (Part 9 of 9)
  27. News in Brief

Last Days Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us ...

"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your 'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur. In so doing, you are serving our purpose."  (Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )

We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists who are not "TC" Proponents ...

"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home... In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)

Important Note ...

Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important communications. To ensure that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...

SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this newsletter.


1. Scientist Flips, Blows Global Warming to Bits

Former Australian “alarmist” scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) based in false science.


“… those “in-the-know” on the climate science were aware as far back as the mid-1990s that CO2 levels are not directly connected with global warming.  But, there was just    SO much money to be made on AGW that the data needed to be manipulated, and we’ve known for a while now that it was.  One more climate scientist blowing the whistle on this issue is like adding a snowflake to an avalanche, but the AGW believers are getting less and less able to hide behind the increasingly debunked, alarmist science.” (“Is Global Warming Up in Smoke?”  )




By Bruce McQuain


May 15, 2011




David Evans is a scientist. He has also worked in the heart of the AGW machine.  He consulted full-time for the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to 2010, modeling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural products. He has six university degrees, including a PhD in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. The other day he said:


“The debate about global warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a skeptic.”


And with that he begins a demolition of the theories, premises and methods by which the AGW scare has been foisted on the public.


The Politics:


“The whole idea that carbon dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s. Butthe gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome. So rather than admit they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now outrageously maintain the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.”


He makes clear he understands that CO2 is indeed a “greenhouse gas”, and makes the point that if all else was equal then yes, more CO2 in the air should and would mean a warmer planet. But that’s where the current “science” goes off the tracks. It is built on an assumption that is false.


The Science:


But the issue is not whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much. 

Most scientists, on both sides, also agree on how much a given increase in the level of carbon dioxide raises the planet’s temperature, if just the extra carbon dioxide is considered. These calculations come from laboratory experiments; the basic physics have been well known for a century.


The disagreement comes about what happens next.


The planet reacts to that extra carbon dioxide, which changes everything. Most critically, the extra warmth causes more water to evaporate from the oceans. But does the water hang around and increase the height of moist air in the atmosphere, or does it simply create more clouds and rain? Back in 1980, when the carbon dioxide theory started, no one knew. The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas. [emphasis mine]


But it didn’t increase the height of the moist air around the planet as subsequent studies have shown since that time. However, that theory or premise became the heart of the modeling that was done by the alarmist crowd.


The Modeling:


This is the core idea of every official climate model: For each bit of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three bits of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of three — so two-thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (and other factors); only one-third is due to extra carbon dioxide.


That’s the core of the issue. All the disagreements and misunderstandings spring from this. The alarmist case is based on this guess about moisture in the atmosphere, and there is simply no evidence for the amplification that is at the core of their alarmism. 

What did they find when they tried to prove this theory?


Weather balloons had been measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that as the planet warms, a hot spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10 kilometres up, as the layer of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above. During the warming of the late 1970s, ’80s and ’90s, the weather balloons found no hot spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves that the climate models are fundamentally flawed, that they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to carbon dioxide.


This evidence first became clear around the mid-1990s.



Evans is not the first to come to these conclusions. Earlier this year, in a post I highlighted, Richard Lindzen said the very same thing.


For warming since 1979, there is a further problem. The dominant role of cumulus convection in the tropics requires that temperature approximately follow what is called a moist adiabatic profile. This requires that warming in the tropical upper troposphere be 2-3 times greater than at the surface. Indeed, all models do show this, but the data doesn’t and this means that something is wrong with the data. It is well known that above about 2 km altitude, the tropical temperatures are pretty homogeneous in the horizontal so that sampling is not a problem. Below two km (roughly the height of what is referred to as the trade wind inversion), there is much more horizontal variability, and, therefore, there is a profound sampling problem. Under the circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that the problem resides in the surface data, and that the actual trend at the surface is about 60% too large. Even the claimed trend is larger than what models would have projected but for the inclusion of an arbitrary fudge factor due to aerosol cooling. The discrepancy was reported by Lindzen (2007) and by Douglass et al (2007). Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data. 


Evans reaches the natural conclusion – the same conclusion Lindzen reached:


At this point, official “climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up, and instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters. 


And why will it continue? Again, follow the money:


We are now at an extraordinary juncture. Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully accept their advice, because the only ways to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead to world government — how exciting for the political class! 


Indeed. How extraordinarily unexciting for the proletariat who will be the ones stuck with the bill if these governments ever succeed in finding a way to pass the taxes they hope to impose and extend even more government’s control over energy.


While you’re listening to the CEOs of American oil companies being grilled by Congress today, remember all of this. They’re going to try to punish an industry that is vital to our economy and national security, and much of the desire to do that is based on this false “science” that has been ginned up by government itself as an excuse to control more of our energy sector, raise untold revenues for its use and to pick winners and losers. All based on something which is, according to Evans and other scientists, now demonstrably false.


Bruce McQuain blogs at Questions and Observations (QandO), Blackfive, the Washington Examiner and the Green Room.  Follow him on Twitter: @McQandO 


2. Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System

15 May 2011


"If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days."

By Debra Siddons

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH) Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the 12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of you less familiar with this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the following links:- 

There are two very important precedents that were established with this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/ Mountbatten (left) which was based on two distinct points.

The first point being she was knowingly, and with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years. In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature.

Which brings us to the second point.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited.

The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece of man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect. To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times, which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her other numerous crimes.

 Queen Elizabeth II's Coronation Oath.

All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "her majesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority from her. All cases brought by the state are "Regina vs. Xxxxxxx", which means they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn't really the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or the jurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do any of "her majesty's" courts or judges.

Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth could lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are obviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is by a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury trial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth.

No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority.

That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the Laws of God. These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at the start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.

To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two pieces of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined.

Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God. 

Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked awareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, but didn't know. We know now.

For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, we aren't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all you really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the BAR.

So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to this insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread the word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion can begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your freedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World Order".

For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit: 

By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this simple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a second precedent set during this landmark case.

While the official reason for this trial was to address this trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice", the real reason for this trial was so the authorities could punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect" which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream media reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy theory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a way that it "changes the minds of people who see it." That's how powerful the truth really is.

This was the first time this information was shown at an official proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the jurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London on July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For those unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of correcting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the outset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers" (who were also found not guilty).

John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United States and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind Jane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the event.

As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on record.

And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of that official record.

This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice sounding words, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of the hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up around us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and the courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of the personal cost.

"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke

If you haven't seen "7/7 Ripple Effect" yet, please go to and download it now. As James Fetzer points out, "It's a free tutorial on how these false flag operations are pulled off."

Related Articles:

Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschild's Crown's-crown.html

The Crown Temple by Rule of Mystery Babylon  

Queen Elizabeth II's Achille's Heel's-achille's-heel.html   

Elizabeth II and Ripple Effect (video)

See the article “Gangsters in Tiaras,” in Reading 45: “Zeroing In On The Antichrist: ‘Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing,’” in our free book, The Warning of the Last Days, available here:   

See the articles “The British Monarch is Not the Crown,” “The Occult Roots of The Wizard of Oz,” and “The Wizard of Oz = the Crown Temple,” in Reading #42: “The Wizard of Oz,” in our free book, The Warning of the Last Days, available here:


Comments for "Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System"


Rino  said (May 21, 2011):


In reference to Landmark Case, isn't it interesting? I have noticed on most websites that when someone speaks the truth, there is always an attorney keeping a watching eye on what is being written to the point that when the truth comes out to awaken people about facts, these attorneys jump in (as they do in any court scenario) and they either attack what has been presented or attack the one who is presenting the information, as delusional or frivolous.


However we know as fact that every lawyer speaks in a 'foreign tongue' (code) usually with marbles in their mouth and will most certainly attempt to profit from people's misery, a legal mercenary for hire. Everything an attorney or lawyer in court scenario presents is always hearsay, they never have first hand personal knowledge of any fact and for the most part present 'joint the dots' evidence. I would never want to take on this profession of being a lawyer, why?  

Because it is one of only two professions that Christ condemns. When an attorney speaks out as something being rubbish or delusional then it is time to pay attention to what he doesn't what you to pay attention to. The other critical point to make is that in order to 'apply the substantive Law' you need lawful money, i.e. silver or gold coin to pay any debt. While we use 'legal tender', currency, as money we deal in fictions only and trumped up charges, this, is the reality.


The Law cannot be applied when we use legal tender so now the attorneys deal in procedures only and make attempts to contract with any 'victim' by agreement of his or her default responses or conduct using construed/implied conduct that is taken under 'judicial notice' that a victim must have agreed with the prosecution because they either 'argued' or failed to respond to a 'charge' and therefore must be 'agreeing' to be guilty by their conduct.


Christ tells us how we can win these legal/fictional cases, 'agree with your adversary quickly while you are on the way with him', in other words, they key is to come to an agreement in the private and then bring that into the court for ratification and not for re-deterimation. Information that you present here Henry in relation to this case is very important so that people can protect themselves from these vultures in the legal system who operate as Satan do, they accuse the angels night and day with trumped up charges! Thank you for this very revealing piece of writing.




Rod  said (May 21, 2011):


Boys, J.D., a tad touchy on the subject aren't we? Obviously you are on the attack here as your livelihood could/would or may be, jeopardized.


Your over-the-top discrediting, ridiculing, and bashing is all too common-place when truth is presented and the curtain gets drawn back just a little. 

Maybe, just maybe, even you have been kept in the dark as you proceeded up the "legal" pyramid to get you to your lofty perch. Why don't you seek to remove the pole from your own eye before attacking someone who is looking for freedom for all. You may represent what we have been brainwashed to accept as "legal" but that doesn't make it "lawful".


To answer your question as to "where" the Bible says about law(s) it is in (KJV) Deuteronomy 4: 2 "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you." So now you have heard it. God's "command" to His people Israel (12 tribes, of which 2 are Jews, and the other 10, that include the British commonwealth nations and the USA).


Your sidetracking about taxes confirms to me that your issue is about money. Isn't that just what your "legal" is all about. Certainly not justice for all. And that is what exposing this imposter queen is all about.


[Nazarene Remnant comment: It is an old error, even a ploy, to include the Jews as being part of the children of Israel. This is not so! The Jews were never a part of national Israel. They first appeared in history as the children of Cain, then Canaan, and finally became fused in the multi-racial Edom-Mongol, Amelekite, Canaanite stock that occupied various lands in the Middle East. The Jews have never been identified with Our Heavenly Father’s people, the Kingdom, nor the Messiah. The word Jew was never applied to any people in the Bible until we come to II Kings 16: 6 in the year 739 BC. For more details see the article "The Distinction Between Jew and Judah," here: ]




WW said (May 22, 2011):

This brings to head another hairy issue, in that with this accreditation comes a grant of royal title, that of Esquire. All members of the BAR are entitled to the use of Esquire after their name, whether they chose to disclose this or not.

This brings every said lawyer in conflict with the US Constitution as far as eligibility for public office in the United States.

Royal title is in conflict with eligibility for holding office in the federal government:

Article I, Section 9:

"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."

The War of 1812 was actually fought ove the original 13th Amendment which put teeth into Secrion 9 above--a whole other story...




Mike  said (May 21, 2011):


I feel that the article is badly in need of clarifying because Debra kind of butchered her explanation of the situation and has offered a poor reflection of a very important topic. Perhaps its even worth putting some of the following directly at the end of the article, instead of as a comment, so people actually understand the situation. The comment is: 

"I've been following the trial of Muad'Dib/JAH for some time and know the situation clearly. Whilst I do agree that this is potentially a landmark case, which could be used to seriously disrupt the UK/Commonwealth courts (and thus much more), the jurisdictional argument used by JAH was NEVER designed to be used in America. He explained that many times, so Debra is stretching things.


To clarify the situation for everyone, as it shows/proves on JAH's website, Elizabeth made with the British people where she promised to "maintain the Laws of God" to the utmost of her power ( ). If you watch the BBC footage of the coronation, it is made extremely clear during her coronation that the "Laws of God" are written in the Bible, not parliament (watch the first 1minute 20seconds of the video--note well 1:10 into it).


Elizabeth  is handed a Bible and told that in it is the Royal Laws of God, which is what she swore to uphold. This is done so that there is no doubt what the "Laws of God" are. At this point, it doesn't matter whatsoever if someone is christian, atheist, or satanist. No one's personal beliefs change the FACT that Elizabeth swore to uphold the Biblical Law. The evidence JAH collected shows video, audio, and paperworkproof of her making this contract, and what the terms of that contract were. Other people's personal beliefs have NOTHING to do with this.


In the Biblical Law which Elizabeth swore to uphold, Deuteronomy 4:2 says: "Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish [ought] from it" 

So, Elizabeth made a legally binding contract which says she promises not to make new laws. This means that the very first time she gave "royal assent" to pass new legislation in the UK, she was in breech of contract, as that would add more laws, when she swore NOT to do that.


Since the contract Elizabeth made is what entitles her to the "crown", and the authority of that position, when she broke that contract, she lost her crown and therefore her power to legally and lawfully bring criminal cases against people.


This is extremely simple contract Law and JAH kept it very simple so as not to confuse people. You have a contract with very clearly identified terms, and Elizabeth broke it. Since that contract is what gave her authority over the courts, she's broken the contract, she has no authority, and thus she had no jurisdiction over JAH.


THAT was the case, pure and simple, and because its so bullet-proof obvious, the court couldn't argue against it.


What "Paul" said makes sense in the US although it will never take down the awful system, which is what needs to be done. "JD"'s ego-based rant and talking about the Bible like he knows what it says when he doesn't, isn't helping anything. Debra has confused the matters and wrongly extended its scope. I hope the explanation above clears things up."




Paul  said (May 21, 2011):


Speaking as someone based in the United States, I don't know whether challenging the jurisdiction of a court based on QEII's coronation oath, or lack thereof, or on whether the B.A.R. is really the "British Accreditation Registry", etc, is going to meet w/ much success. Most courts and magistrates here would look upon claims of this nature as being more akin to "kooky" conspiracy theories and litigants must always bear in mind that the #1 purpose of going to court is simply TO PUT ON A GOOD SHOW. 

Litigation, and the administrative maneuvering that invariably precedes litigation, is nothing if not show business.


However, speaking from personal experience, I can attest that a rationally argued counterclaim, challenging the jurisdiction of a tribunal, will almost always end in success. Again, I don't know what people in British Commonwealth countries, or in Roman civil law jurisdictions (i.e., the rest of the planet) do, but in the United States it's quite clear and obvious: the sovereignty is vested in the People, and the People -- owing to the fact that in America we have no "King" -- are therefore the holders and rules of court.


When you file legal paperwork with a court in America, don't go in there claiming that you're a "U.S.citizen" or a "Sovereign State Citizen" or a "resident of such-and-such state or county".. All these "statuses" are simply corporate, legal fictions and all this does is give the administrative tribunal jurisdiction over your person. Instead, simply make the claim that you're one of the People of the "jurisdiction" in which you're appearing and reason rationally therefore.


I was recently in traffic court on a quasi-serious misdemeanor charge. I raised about four or five distinct, cogently-reasoned out challenges to the jurisdiction of the administrative tribunal in which I was appearing, and I filed my paperwork before appearing. Paraphrasing my experience at the arraignment hearing (which, for traffic court, is a room full of hundreds of people in major city I live in), the magistrate was basically yelling and screaming at everyone who was there in line before me, then when I appeared before the magistrate, she simply smiled and ask: "Mr. XXXX, what is it that you would like me to do for you today?" and I replied, "Well your Honor, I would very appreciate it if the court would dismiss these charges".. to which she answered (paraphrasing): "Your wish is granted.. these charges are dismissed".. As I was leaving the room, I heard her (again) yelling and screaming at the next person in line behind me.  

The key is HONOR: You must HONOR their process before you can expect them to honor yours.  You must (in the language of the New Testament) "give to receive".. Nor is it necessarily "easy".. You do have to have your wits about you. I didn't just cut-and-paste random patriot mythology I slopped off the Internet: rather, I spent several weekends in a row, all weekend, in the law library doing real legal research putting together real legal briefs to submit to a real court. But it is effective, it did work. Challenges to jurisdiction, if cogently and rationally argued, almost always do.  

The late Bill Cooper has a series of lectures out on YouTube where he talks about the importance of challenging jurisdiction. To paraphrase Cooper: if you don't challenge jurisdiction, you're almost guaranteed to lose ... if you do challenge jurisdiction, it's almost impossible not to win. The present-day Master of this subject is Bill Thornton down in Orange County, Calif. I invite your readers to explore his Web site and audio lectures at: His Web site is a bit rough around the edges (in terms of presentation and navigation), but it's packed w/ some of the best legal information you'll find anywhere.




J.D.  said (May 21, 2011):


I've never read such delusional, unabashed lunacy in fifty-six years of life.


This woman is simply loony. She imagines that lawyers aren't really admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court of a given US state, but they are registered with the B.A.R., the British Accredation Registry. I guess that thirty-two years ago, they just forgot to give me my UK registry card at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. And that each time that I've been admitted to the bar of another court, my British papers must have gotten mixed up. When I passed the Illinois Bar Exam, they must have erased my memories of questions concerning English law by mind control. I should wear an aluminum foil cap if I take another bar exam. When I got admitted to the bar of the US Supreme Court, they must have just forgotten to collect my British Registry dues. She's a danger to herself to any fool, desperate for some way out of a pickle, who'd take this seriously.


She doesn't know a damn thing about the law. Conflict or not, it was the US Supreme Court which decided the issue of whether the initial imposition of the income tax, including upon federal judges, impermissibly and unconstitutionally reduced the salary of federal judges during their tenure in office as textually prohibited in the Constitution. The justices admitted the inherent conflict but expressed the doctrine that when it was necessary that someone decide the issue and no one without such a conflict existed, that jurisdiction would vest notwithstanding a conflict of interest because of necessity, and held that the tax was not unconstitutional. Federal judges pay income taxes as a result of that decision by interested federal judges on the Supreme Court. Yes, every judge has jurisdiction to determine his or her own jurisdiction. In fact, in our federal courts, which are all courts of limited jurisdiction, the question is present in every case, must be proven, and is determined in every case. That's a pretty basic principle familiar to any first year law student. I'm telling you that this lady is nuts.


She asserts that the Law of God is what is announced in the first five books of the Bible. But she never proves that, or even tries to prove it. It's a pretty controversial statement to a believer, let alone what an atheist or deist (like Washington or Jefferson or Lincoln) or agnostic would make of it. Maybe some sect of Judaism believes that, but I've never met a person who'd agree. God's law, to a Christian, means more than that. This lady is an arrogant, errant fool.


She claims that God's law says that all human law is without legitimacy. Where is it that the first five books of the Bible say that??? Not a passage I've ever heard. St. Paul says quite the opposite, and Christ had no problems suggesting that taxes be paid. The lady is bonkers.


Shame on you for giving her a platform.



J. D. Obenberger and Associates
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
3700 Three First National Plaza
70 West Madison Street
Chicago, IL 60602 




Debra Replies said (May 22, 2011):


To Mike -


You are incorrect when you say JAH's Lawful Defence does not apply, at all, to America.

This is explained further with clarity and specificity in my comment posted to lawyer, J.D..


To J.D. -


Not uncommon for insane lawyers to think they are normal and others are crazy.


U.S. Lawyers have sworn allegiance to the Supreme Court of a given State, and subsequently to the British Accreditation Registry which oversees the whole judicial circus.


Each time you've been admitted to the B.A.R. you swore an oath of allegiance to the Crown Court, never questioning what the B.A.R. stood for, even after thirty-two years. The B.A.R. has been right in front of your face all along.




You've said I'm a danger. I am a danger to lawyers, judges, the Crown, anyone else supporting a criminal "legal" system.


No-one is, or ever was, permitted to make-up any rules/laws to rule people. IT IS Wrong. Period.


"Issues" are to be decided by a jury (community ), never / ever by a judge using made-up rules.


American judges having sworn the Judicial Oath before God, which is, to serve only God; thus an oath not Lawful and null and void if not serving God. Associations with the B.A.R. effectively allows for both Exhibits 1 and 2, ordering God's Laws in the Courts. It's quite simple; either you maintain the oath you took, or you must step down and allow the people to practice their God-given rights.


I don't have to prove The Law. It is there and as a lawyer, B.A.R. member, you swore on a Bible.


Which is exactly the point. You are ordered to keep that oath "you" took, then swore to maintain.


The Bible does not command one must know God to follow The Law. Yet it is The Law.

Odd you are not aware of the oath you took, and apparently in numerous States, on Biblical Law.


Clearly you are threatened. God's Law is for humans. The Lawful Defence explains in detail, needing to be read over and over till it sinks in, because the extent of a Rothschild brainwashing is obviously very extensive.


I understand you are threatened. Criminals usually are when caught red-handed.

To those claiming "too religious", nothing is more religious than the Coronation Ceremony itself.



Also see:

The London 7/7 Bombers Were Inncoent Patsies: or google "7/7 bombers 'were innocent patsies'"

The Trial of Muad'Dib (9-12 May 2011)

"9/11 Ripple Effect" about the September 11th, 2001 false flag attack in the U.S.

"7/7 Ripple Effect" about the July 7th, 2005 false flag attack in the U.K.

The Truth About the British Monarchy

The Truth About the Stone of Destiny (aka the Coronation Stone)

British Royalty Dined on Human Flesh


3. Fortress Australia; Hidden Agenda, Part 1 of 6

This Report was given to the publisher of RMNews the year it was written, 1996. The Source who hand delivered it would not state who the author was. RMNews does not know if this has been published elsewhere.  


The Rumor Mill News Agency 


Source of this version:  


Report No. I 


Author's Note 

This report results from two years of part time investigation of recent developments in Australia which appear to indicate that some unusual and urgent preparations are being made to turn Australia into a self sufficient "safe haven." The details mentioned in the report have been kept as concise as possible to enable readers to make up their own minds about the wide-ranging evidence which suggests a well organised and developing plan of action aimed at reaching culmination by the end of the present decade. This report can be considered as interim only as the process is ongoing and apparently gaining in momentum. The author intends to continue his investigations and publish additional reports in the future.

June 30, 1996 

Fortress Australia Hidden Agenda Emergency Services 

During 1989/90 closed door discussions began between the Federal government in Canberra and all the State governments in view of upgrading all Australian emergency services. It was agreed that prompt action would be taken to facilitate better co-ordination between all existing services and funds would be provided to assist with training programmes, the provision of new equipment and the recruitment of additional full time professional staff. Communications were considered of primary importance and it was decided to establish an Australian wide standard system encompassing all existing services which are Federal and State police forces, metropolitan fire brigades, country fire authorities, ambulance services, rescue services and other volunteer emergency services. 

Basically the reorganisation seems to follow along the lines of the old Civil Defence Organisation and it is interesting to note the same old names are being used again. The states have been divided up into regions and each placed under the command of a controller. A sub regional controller is responsible to a central regional controller. From there it goes to state level and then on to Federal level centred in Canberra. As was the case with the original organisations each region is capable of operating on it's own if the chain of command should break down due to warfare, civil unrest or natural disaster. Close liaison has been arranged with all branches of the armed services and in some instances joint training programmes have been arranged on a regular basis. Military reservists are encouraged to become voluntary emergency workers in their local areas as not only. their knowledge is of use but it helps develop mutual trust between the community and service personnel in general. 

During the past year the Federal Government has encouraged voluntary involvement of as many private citizens as possible. In this way a regional controller with a small staff can develop a substantial organisation at very low cost. Further so called cost savings have been made by centralising emergency communications in each state and 'privatising' them by selling them off to an outside contractor. State Government has moved the communication systems covering Police, Fire and Ambulance services under one roof at great expense to the tax payer and then sold them off to a company called 'Intergraph Inc' which is a specialised American communications company said to be closely connected to the United States National Security Agency (NSA). 

Of further interest is the origins of some of the professional staff members who have been employed to develop and consolidate the new look organisation particularly in the State of Victoria. 

The National Safety Council - Victorian Division 

In 1927 Mr. Ernest W. Cox, then President of the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria formed the National Safety Council (NSCA). The objectives-of this new organisation were: safety at work, safety on the roads and safety at home. From the outset it was run by a committee made up of representatives from major government organisations such as the Police Department, Education Department, Railways Department and Tramways Board. Community and business organisations were also included such as the Automobile Club, Commercial Travellers Association, Trades Hall Council and Accident Underwriters Association. By 1928 it had a full time staff who were promoting its aims throughout Victoria. When the depression hit Australia in 1929 the Victorian government withdrew its financial support forcing the staff to work on reduced wages and for the NSCA to. depend on private contribution made by big business and some wealthy individuals. The organisation survived and in 1934 the government renewed it's contribution allowing the NSCA to further expand it's role in the community. 

The second World War produced rapid growth in the organisation and for the first time it became involved in military matters, a role it maintained throughout it's remaining history. By 1948 the NSCA had led to the development of an entire safety and security industry employing more than 300,000 people. 

In 1976 a mysterious person named John Freidrich joined the NSCA as a safety officer at the State Electricity Commission power station in Yallourn, Victoria. Freidrich was not his real name and to this day his real identity has remained unknown. Due to his high intelligence, diligence and a good measure of assistance from several powerful backers, principally the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), he quickly rose through the ranks and, despite the fact his background was a myth, and he did not even possess an Australian passport or valid birth certificate, he became the executive director in 1982. His meteoric rise to power could only be described as astonishing, however as there was plenty of money in it for everyone there were few complaints. When an opposition member of parliament raised a question about the appointment in the House he was howled down by the government. 

Freidrich (CIA Code Name 'IAGO') took to his new job like a duck to water. Money started to flow and the NSCA plunged into an unprecedented period of expansion. 

The NSCA headquarters were moved from plush offices in St. Kilda Road, Melbourne (close to the US Consul General's office in Albert Road which was then the principal CIA Station in Australia) to Sale, a country town in Gippsland, Victoria. A complete airport was built in West Sale opposite the RAAF base situated in East Sale. No cost was spared and an elaborate base which included the largest hyperbaric (decompression) facilities in Australia and an indoor horse riding arena was built in record time. Any amount of money was made instantly available by the government and banks. All that was required was Freidrich's signature. 

Together with the development of the base came what can only be described as a private airforce involving dozens of fixed wing aircraft, both propeller and pure jet, and dozens of helicopters. In fact Freidrich's private helicopter, a Bell 212, had previously been owned by Idi Amin! Apart from that there was a marine section which purchased a number of the latest deep sea recovery vehicles at enormous cost. It seemed that everything that was required by the new look organisation was provided immediately with no regard at all to the costs involved. 

The NSCA obtained--contracts from all the military services to take care of their search and rescue requirements and from the Bass Strait off shore oil rigs to attend to any emergency that may arise. Facilities were set up at Sale to provide specialised training to many public authorities and to train special service personnel employed by the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and their backers, the CIA. 

Perhaps the most important services NSCA provided was firstly security back up to all the American secret bases in Australia including the new Omega bases in Victoria and Tasmania, and secondly provide deep sea submarine rescue facilities for the American nuclear submarine force constantly patrolling the Southern Ocean. There were several occasions when they were called in to use helicopter crowd control methods at Pine Gap and the Gippsland Omega station. It is not known if their submarine rescue facilities were ever used. 

The association with the East Sale RAAF base was a close one. In fact two senior RAAF officers sat on the board of the NSCA. East Sale is a secure RAAF base and is often used by NASA (U2 flights) and other unexplained US aircraft. It is also the repository of secret UFO information and was the base that Frederick Valentich attended for a special course relating to UFO's before he disappeared over Bass Strait on 21st October, 1978 while reporting a close encounter with a large UFO. So concerned was Valentich about what he had seen and been told at Sale that he emotionally told his parents shortly afterwards that "should they take me I should be O.K. so don't worry, they will probably put me back." (This was told to the writer by Guido Valentich, Frederick's father, in late October, 1978). 

It has been inferred that the NSCA was closely involved with the UFO problem and had all the equipment necessary to effect retrievals on land and from the great ocean depths. They also ran their own international airline which did not account to anyone and moved people, drugs and money in and out of Australia. Freidrich's ex personal pilot told the author that he often flew him to airports in various parts of Australia where he would transfer to another aircraft and disappear. On one occasion he flew to Essendon Airport in Melbourne where Freidrich told him to wait. An executive jet in US colours and the CIA insignia on the tail landed shortly afterwards and Freidrich climbed aboard. Four hours later the plane returned and Freidrich walked back to his own plane and ordered the pilot to fly back to West Sale. Apart from mentioning the weather he said nothing about the strange flight. The pilot also claimed that he often received orders to fly together with a back up pilot to deserted airstrips in the Australian outback. 

Most of these strips were built during the second World Waryet, oddly enough, are still maintainedby persons unknown. Another plane would be parked there and the keys and instructions as to what to do next would be in one of the wheel wells. The instructions usually involved flying to a second air strip where Freidrich would be waiting with his canvas overnight bag. He would then fly Freidrich either to Richmond RAAF base in New South Wales or back to West Sale. On three occasions he had to pick up Freidrich from Pine Gap. Each time he flew alone in a NSCA Lear Jet and made the pick ups around 3 A.M. Even at Pine Gap Freidrich was always waiting alone on the vacant airstrip. 

It was also well known that the US Airforce conducted joint training exercises with the NSCA and there were several reports of the US Green Beret officers entering Australia on tourist visas and going directly to West Sale. 

The operation had some similarities to other past CIA activities in Australia. The best known example was the case of the Nugan-Hand merchant bank which prior to it's collapse in 1980 was said to have been involved in arms and drug trafficking, the laundering of drug money, and the funding of CIA operations in Australia and Asia. Nugan-Hand was run by Australian Frank Nugan and American Michael Hand, a past Green Beret officer and employee of Air America. In the late 1960's and early 1970's the officer in charge of the overall operations of Nugan-Hand plus a major US currency counterfeiting operation in Sydney was the already infamous General Richard V. Secord. 

When the operation was closed down, Michael Hand was given a new passport and immediately returned to the USA where he now lives under another name.Frank Nugan lost a great deal of money and threatened to expose the operation if he was not reimbursed. This was a serious error as he was shot dead a few days later with a .300 magnum hunting rifle. 

As the Cold War came to a close it was decided to dump the NSCA. Suddenly it was revealed that hundreds of millions of dollars had been misappropriated and Freidrich was blamed. The West Sale base was closed and hundreds of trained and highly experienced personnel were dismissed. Freidrich initially went into hiding as he knew full well that when such secret operations are closed down the cleaners come in and any potential embarrassments are quickly eliminated. Freidrich played his cards correctly and surfaced to face charges of bank fraud and other commercial crimes. While on bail he supposedly committed suicide which, of course, was most convenient to everyone involved. However, there were strong indications that he was not dead but had been quickly withdrawn to the USA just like Michael Hand and a unidentified corpse from the city morgue had been put in his place. Several police officers who talked about this were told that they would be dismissed without pension rights if they mentioned it again. Everyone shut up. 

But what of all that trained staff? Within weeks of the NSCA close down many of them were absorbed into other government services and the organisations they had helped to train. Many others are now involved in the new rapidly developing State emergency services. No doubt, like the old Civil Defence Organisation personnel, most of them will have kept their American contacts and are firmly part of the security old boys network. Nevertheless NSCA trained officers are considered the best in their field and are fully capable of putting organisations together quickly and effectively. This seems to be what they are doing at the present time. 

There are indications that a fully operational, co-ordinated nation wide rescue and emergency service must be ready for any eventuality by 1998/99 at the latest. The reason for such haste is not clear but it appears that something is expected to happen by the end of the decade and as far as humanly possible the government wants to be ready for it. This seems to fit in with other preparations being made by the Federal and State police force and the armed services. 

Things Military 

The Australian Submarine Corporation has just launched it's second Collins Class submarine and a further six are due for delivery by 1999. Their cost is estimated at around one billion dollars each. There are plans to produce many more for friendly nations in South East Asia and if possible keep the enormously expensive factory in continuous production well into the next century. 

The naval dock yards in Melbourne has launched their second $500 million frigate, with a further eight planned for delivery by 1999. Like the submarines, the government expects to receive further orders from New Zealand, Indonesia, Singapore and possibly Malaysia. 

On the 16th January, 1996 the government announced that a new $200 million armaments depot and munitions loading facility will be built for the Navy at Point Wilson near Geelong (49 miles from Melbourne). Building will begin this year and the facility will be fully operational by the end of 1998. 

The airforce has just ordered at the cost of $900 million, 12 new C130 transport planes from the USA to expand their air transport capability. Also their entire fleet of F111 fighter bombers are being rebuilt to bring them up to the latest standards. The cost per aircraft is about $30 million. More than 40 aircraft are involved in this refurbishment programme. 

In late 1995 the army moved it's southern armoured division from Victoria to the Northern Territory. The government stated at the time that as they did not expect an invasion from the Antarctic there was no point in keeping them in the Southern part of Australia. Does that mean they expect an attack from the North? 

In January, 1996 a source in the USA advised that the army had placed a large order for Jeeps specially prepared to resist chemical and biological warfare agents. The exact number is not known but it is understood to be in the hundreds. Similar vehicles were used by the American forces in the Gulf War. Why should they be considered a vital addition to the army's inventory of equipment in Australia? Delivery will take place over the next two years, meaning it will be completed by mid 1998. No mention of this order has been made by any of the Australian media or any government authority. 

United States B52 bombers, F15 and F18 fighters as well as early warning aircraft are now stationed in northern Australia and a so called practice bombing range in the Northern Territory is being used by American, Australian, Indonesian and Singapore airforces. Singapore has been allowed to station a fighter squadron in Queensland and Indonesia is conducting regular military exercises with the Australian armed forces. The last one involved 7000 Indonesians for two weeks in Northern Queensland. 

A whole new era in the relationship between Australia and Indonesia opened in December, 1995 with the signing of a joint defence treaty by the Australian and Indonesian governments. This treaty contains some very unusual and ambiguous language. One point has already caused some debate as it indicates that one party will go to the aid of the other "due to any adverse challenge". This could mean anything. Most critics immediately assumed Australia would have to help Indonesia even in the event of an internal problem developing in their country. They did not seem to think about the possibility of Australia asking the Indonesians to help them in one of their internal problems. 

This situation is disquieting as the people that write such treaties know what they are saying so it is unlikely the loose wording was just a slip of the pen. Also the results of the survey which was given to US Marines at Twenty-Nine Palms in Southern California, wanting to know if they would shoot on their own people,were similar to the results of secretly conducted surveys in Australia. They won't do it! However there are many foreign troops that would, and this has produced the fear of United Nation's troops being used in the USA for that purpose. As for Australia they now have access to some of the most unscrupulous professional killers in the world in the form of the Indonesian military. Portugese Timor is a perfect example of their capabilities. [Nazarene Remnant comment: I have been living on the road now for several years, and have spent time in many parts of Northern Australia. As you would expect, in camps at night, often before a blazing fire, many stories and experiences would be told. One interesting story that I came across in North Queensland was that of two amateur fishermen who had gone to the Cape for “some good fishing,” durng their annual holidays. As they were trekking through a really isolated part of the Cape they saw down a track Indonesian soldiers, fully kitted up in military uniform, standing guard on the road. The fishermen said much about this, and “hightailed” it out of tere as quick as they could.] 

Apart from the rather negative aspects of the treaty there are some positives. Indeed following the signing of the treaty Australian Foreign Minister, Gareth Evans, said "Of course neither of us will involve ourselves in each other's internal affairs but we may have to act together to stop terrorists, drug smugglers or a huge influx of boat people moving to the south." It seems fairly certain that the issue of forced migration is the most important one. Morally Australia could not be involved in killing off thousands or even millions of people trying to get to it's shores. It would have to think of some other way. On the other hand Indonesia would hardly think twice about it particularly in view of the fact they would be first to be overrun. If one looks at a map of Australia and South East Asia, the only way boats small or large can quickly get through to the south is via the waterways that divide the islands of Indonesia. Any other route is long and dangerous and most small boats would not survive such a voyage. 

The speed with which this new treaty was entered into indicates things need to be arranged quickly and this fits in with other recent developments. 

On 4th January, 1996 news leaked out that Singaporewas going to terminate it's military training arrangements in Taiwan and with the agreement of the Australian government move it's programme to Australia.Almost certainly a defence treaty will follow the move which would further help seal off the waterways to seafaring migrants. Further the Singaporians are in a very insecure area of the world, surrounded by millions of Muslims and facing the prospect of Malaysia becoming a fundamentalist country by the end of the century. Most readers would be aware of Singapore's neo fascist system and extreme methods of dealing with almost everything e.g. an American boy was incarcerated for three months and flogged for spraying some paint on a car. A local citizen was imprisoned for two years for littering etc. etc. Outside threats of any kind make their militant regime very nervous. As Singaporians are basically Chinese, the Malaysians would be only too happy to see-them disappear. Could it be that there are plans to move a large part of Singapore's 3,000,000 population to Australia and save them from a fate worse than death? Their military is alreadyhere so why not bring their brains, banks and hotels as well? 

Command Integration Of Australian Armed Services 

On the 15th January, 1996 it was announced that the Australian army, airforce and navy will be placed under single command. A new post of 'Commander Australian Theatre' (an odd choice of name) is being created to coordinate the country’s air land and sea defences under a single Commanding Officer. 

A new site is being selected for the establishment of a headquarters and this is expected to be in a secure area (possibly underground) in New South Wales. As the new headquarters must be reasonably close to Canberra it will probably be situated in the extensive underground facilities in the Snowy Mountains. These secret facilities were built at the time of construction of the Snowy Mountains hydro electric scheme and totally concealed from the public. It is a vast system capable of supporting thousands of people and connected to Canberra by a secret underground railway. The. Defence Department said this was the biggest change to the Australian defence force in 20 years and only stops short of total integration of the army, airforce and navy into a single body. 

General Baker, the defence force Chief of Staff, said the restructuring would help eliminate the need for any major changes between peace and war. Further he said Australia was leading the world with this new approach. 

It is obvious that an integrated military force closely coordinated with all Federal and State emergency services and police organisations would be a very effective and efficient organisation. Such coordination could, in times of emergency, be used rapidly and decisively to deal with any problem situation on an Australia wide basis. Total military control could be established in a few hours. 

The target date for having the $500 million reorganisation fully operational is by 1998/99.By that time the machinery of a police state will be firmly in place and it will then be possible to introduce dictatorial powers at a moment’s notice. 

Coast Watch Service 

Since the second World War the Australian Government has operated a coast watch system along the northern coast line of the continent. The responsibility for this was initially placed in the hands of the Australian Navy and Airforce. In recent years it became necessary to greatly increase the capacity of the service to control illegal fishing, drug smuggling and the flow of illegal immigrants. To achieve a much higher level of surveillance the system has been partially 'privatised.' Like the NSCA, a private South Australian company which operates a large number of aircraft has been contracted to undertake continuous surveillance from the North West to the North East and patrol the ocean dividing Australia from Indonesia and New Guinea. Over the past two years the government has been very generous to this contractor by donating a substantial number of fixed wing aircraft and providing interest free finance for the purchase of new aircraft from the USA and Europe. As the trickle of boat people has been increasing over the past few years the government appears to be acting with some urgency. 

The Navy and the Airforce are still involved in the coast watch, the private contractor being used as their extra set of eyes. Normally when an arrest takes place it's the Navy that does the job. Modern patrol boats similar to those being used by the US coast guard are in constant production in Western Australia and added to the Navy at the rate of around six per year. 

Police Services And The Prisons 

Over the past five years the State and Federal police forces have been undergoing a great deal of reorganisation. New training methods have been adopted and 'state of the art' equipment purchased at very high cost. Advisory groups, mainly from the American FBI, have been helping with the reorganisation and it seems their advice has been taken very seriously. 

The Federal Police are changing their entire structure. In future only the senior administrative staff in Canberra will have ranks such as 'Inspector' or 'Director'. All others will be described as ‘Federal Agents', no matter what their previous status was. This is in line with the American system. New legislation is envisaged to give the new Australian FBI far greater powers than were enjoyed by the old Federal Police Force and allow them to operate on an Australia wide basis. As far as the State Police Forces are concerned, they are rapidly adopting the methods used by major overseas police forces. Special operation groups (Swat Teams) are being established in ever increasing numbers on the excuse that they have to combat terrorism! 

These groups are now training on a regular basis with the Army SAS. The government said this was necessary to provide the best possible training in view of the threat of international terrorism occurring at the Sydney Olympic Games in the year 2000. This seems rather odd as it would hardly be necessary to initiate such a wide ranging and long term training programme in every state to combat a possible fourteen day threat in the year 2000. Who are they kidding? The public as usual. 

As part of the upgrading of the State police forces a larger number of officers are being sent overseas for specialised training. As in the past, the majority of them are sent to the USA for specialised courses with the FBI and the International Police Academy. This training seems to involve everything including such subjects as 'Advanced Interrogation Methods.' 

Other Airwing officers are being sent to a special helicopter training school together with military personnel and selected civilians, to learn helicopter crowd control and other techniques. It is planned to 'privatise' the police airwings by selling them to outside contractors. Two large American companies have already made it clear that they want to buy this part of the business. 

All police forces are coordinated with the State Emergency Services (SES) and have direct contacts with Australia's intelligence organisations. It's one big happy family.[1] 

Australian prisons are being 'privatised'as quickly as possible. This is very disquieting as private prisons are wide open to abuse particularly if they fall into the hands of unscrupulous people. This seems to be what is happening in Australia. 

The American Wackenhut Inc. seems to have no difficulty in obtaining the rights to run the prison system in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria and it's expected they will do the same in all other states. The fact that Wackenhut Inc. is subject to criminal proceedings in the USA does not seem to concern any of our state administrators. 

The founder of the company, Mr. Wackenhut himself is described as a shadowy figure who previously was a senior officer in the FBI and still has regular contact with both the FBI and CIA. It is claimed that his main expertise was in the area of clandestine operations. 

Privatisation of the prison system will save little or nothing. It's main purpose seems to be to place control of these establishments in the hand of a foreign power. At the same time government authorities lose their vital, independent right to oversee the conduct of the prisons and the selection and control of those that operate them. 

In the USA it has been proved that Wackenhut has employed convicted criminals as prison guards and there are rumours that they have been doing the same thing in Australia. Further they have diverted millions of dollars of US government funds to their own use thus depriving prison inmates of drug rehabilitation and educational programmes. In November, 1995 it was reported to the New South Wales government that the same scam had occurred at one of Wackenhut's new state prisons at Junee. The New South Wales government said they would "investigate the matter", but were not worried about the integrity of Wackenhut! 

These developments can only produce justifiable concern. Anyone that thinks about it has to ask the question, "What the hell is going on?" 

[1] Recently (2009) in NSW, the Police, Ambulance, Fire Brigade, and SES have been reorganized under one umbrelaa oragnisation, called Department of Police and Emergency Services, acronym DOPES! 


4. Where Do We Stand on Perseverance?

By Adrian Salbuchi  


Most of the time, luck is nothing but
a generic concept to describe capacity,
intelligence, effort and perseverance.
Charles Kettering 

If you fall seven times, get up eight. 

Chinese Proverb 

If you add a little to a little,
and then do it again,
soon that little shall be much.


If you try to hit the moon with a stone
you will not succeed; but you will end up
knowing how to use a sling.
Arab Proverb 

While discipline implies method and order in the pursuit of objectives, perseverance implies steadiness and continuity in the pursuit of those same objectives. In other words: behaving without order and method is being undisciplined; changing objectives arbitrarily all the time is being inconstant. 

The difference does matter, since many times discipline is understood as perseverance and vice-versa. However, to a certain extent the confusion may be justified since often both virtues go together; as well as their respective vices. Generally speaking, a disciplined person is also persevering and an unstable person will hardly be disciplined. Nevertheless, in this case as in many others, similarity does not necessarily mean sameness. 

It is important to be committed to a method and a procedural order in order to pursue an objective. But achieving and fulfilling that objective is not less vital. Let’s not forget that discipline is just a method, a way, a path that with more or less obstacles will lead to an objective. Staying firmly on the path means “to be on the right track”: Granted: this is a lot already. But unfortunately, it is far from being enough. Because to achieve success you have to walk that “right track” right to its very end. Here is where you need perseverance, steadiness and persistence. Here is where you have to be like a bulldog biting a bone and not letting it go until it is crushed. Being on the right track is no big deal if we never reach the goal because we are changing goals and tracks all the time. 

Theoretically there are many of these “right tracks” to choose from and every single one of them may lead to an objective we may consider worthy or desirable. The problem arises when we have to admit that it is impossible to tread all paths in a lifetime so there, at some point along the way, we will be forced to make a decision. And, as we all surely know, decisions almost always imply exclusions. 

For example, when we choose a profession, we are unavoidably discarding all other professions which we could have also chosen. If we decided to be carpenters we will have discarded being mechanics, marble workers or electricians. If we choose medicine we will have excluded agronomy, science, law, and all those other careers beyond medicine. Truly serious – and sometimes even critical – is that, while we make decisions and choose options as we live, our possibilities narrow and decrease. For that reason, first choices are almost always the most crucial in life, and it is really sad to see how poorly our current culture prepares us to make them. 

One of the most tremendous and unfortunate mistakes introduced by egalitarianism is to make us believe that all options are available for everyone; that, theoretically, anyone can (or should be able to) be – or do – anything. There is a gross misunderstanding here which, as a rule, comes from a demagoguery that is as foul as it is perverse. One thing is to have certain professions, activities or jobs monopolized by a social sector and thus banned from the rest, be it by law or as a matter of fact. Another and a very different thing is to claim that in a truly free society absolutely all options should be available and any person should be able to choose and become whatever that given person fancies to desire. 

Read the Full Article:


5. Is Temptation an Outmoded Concept?

Temptation: how far is too far?

People will resist eating fats and sugars because they are unhealthy. But they think nothing of indulging toxic and self-destructive desires.


By Henry Makow Ph.D.


May 17, 2011




"Rule your mind or it will rule you."  -- Horace


"It's all good"  -- popular expression c. 2011  


Most people act like the concept of "temptation" is a relic of a bygone era.


Yet in their hearts, I think they know the concept has never been more timely and urgent than it is today.


A woman asked a newspaper  advice column recently:


"I've been in a relationship for many years with the same guy. I love him, but I've recently discovered I might be more attracted to members of the same sex. Should I tell him?


Should I end it? Is there something psychologically wrong with me?"


The psychologist Dr. Joti Samra replied:


"First and foremost, there is absolutely nothing that is psychologically wrong with you for having questions about your sexual orientation.... One's true sense of sexual orientation is not a choice ... If you feel that your partner is someone you could talk to openly, and without judgment, you could certainly gently raise the issue with him."


This lady has a passing fancy for other ladies. No wonder, the media is full of it. It's the latest thing. So she raises it with her boyfriend. If he isn't also brain-dead, he will not be happy to learn that his future wife, and the mother of his children, his rock and solace, is a closet lesbian.


Wouldn't it be smarter to shut up and let it pass?


Do we have to indulge every attraction we feel, even if it is destructive to us and the people we supposedly love?


Say she were attracted to other men. Should she act on that too? Discuss it with him?  Most heterosexuals are sexually attracted to many members of the opposite sex. But if they are already committed to someone they care about, they repress it. They recognize it as temptation.


Suppose this woman was sexually attracted to children? Would the psychologist OK that as well? "One's true sense of sexual orientation is not a choice.."  Believe me, this kind of logic leads to pedophilia. After that, bestiality.


People will resist eating fats and sugars because they are unhealthy. But they think nothing of indulging toxic and self-destructive desires.


True religions see man as the interface between spirit (God) and matter (animal.)  Man is like a little boy (spirit) riding an elephant (body.) He must restrain his animal instincts.  He must be able to recognize temptation and resist it.


Our "secular" society is a stepping stone to the Illuminati's satanism. The satanist does not recognize this dichotomy between spirit and matter. He denies the existence of spriit and sees humans as animals. He finds salvation in self-indulgence, not self-restraint. "Do what thou wilt," is the satanist motto.


We are like Eve in the garden, subjected to temptation 24/7. Money. Sex. Food. Material things. Power. Fame. TV is full of gorgeous bodies.

Read the Full Story:
Is Temptation an Outmoded Concept


6. In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes Centre Stage

May 1, 2011 By davidjones  




© By Gerald A. Perreira


Muammar Qadhafi


Muammar Qadhafi


We are fighting nothing other than al-Qaeda in what they call the Islamic Maghreb. It’s an armed group that is fighting from Libya to Mauritania and through Algeria and Mali.… If you had found them taking over American cities by the force of arms, tell me what you would do? (From a letter sent by the Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi to the US president Barack Obama.)


In the Theatre of the Absurd, anything is possible. However, this latest scenario in Libya has taken absurdity to a whole new dimension. A rag-tag bunch of armed, al-Qaeda affiliated tribesmen, being referred to as a ‘pro-democracy movement’ by British State TV (BBC) and other mainstream media outlets, are now being openly armed and trained by the French, British and American governments. This same Coalition of Crusaders, with the support of the Arab League, is fighting alongside the rebels, launching continual bombing raids on targets in Tripoli and beyond, including Muammar Qadhafi’s compound, in a brazen attempt to assassinate the man and re-colonise Libya.


And what is the support inside Libya for this so-called ‘Libyan pro-democracy movement’? The answer is less than 2% of the entire Libyan population. One might have expected that the Western and Arab worlds would have offered Qadhafi and the Libyan armed forces assistance to deal with this al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) inspired insurgency. But no. Surprisingly, or maybe not so surprisingly, instead, Britain and the US, led by the clown Sarkozy, in what can only be described as a war mongering frenzy, launched an all out attack on Muammar Qadhafi, his family, and the Libyan people.


As this article goes to press, the Coalition forces continue to savagely bomb targets in Tripoli and beyond, killing civilians and destroying vital infrastructure. They are pounding Libya with a force that was last seen when they invaded Iraq, doing their utmost to leave Qadhafi and his people defenceless against this insurgency. In fact, so brazen is the imperialist Obama, that he has announced an ‘overt operation’, sending in CIA operatives to train and equip the rebels. Rebels who the State Department admits are disorganised and untrained and unable to articulate a vision for Libya, beyond killing Qadhafi.


These rebels however do have an agenda. Their leaders and ideologues, inside and out of Libya, are well known for misinterpreting verses from the Quran, quoting out of context, in an attempt to justify their so-called jihad and practices which are fundamentally alien to the Islamic spirit. The best the Libyan rebels, read counter-revolutionaries, can do, is to chant ‘From Tunisia, Egypt to Libya and on, we will spread Jihad!’


Western Powers and al-Qaeda – On the Same Side


As far back as the mid 90s, a former MI5 agent, David Shayler, testified that British intelligence employed the services of an al-Qaeda cell inside Libya, paying them a large fee to assassinate Muammar Qadhafi. The assassination attempt was carried out. A grenade was lobbed at Qadhafi as he walked among a crowd in his hometown, Sirte. He was saved by one of his bodyguards, who threw herself on the grenade.


Shayler revealed that while he was working on the Libya desk in the mid 90s, British secret service personnel were collaborating with the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was connected to one of Osama bin Laden’s trusted lieutenants. The LIFG officially joined al-Qaeda in 2007. On an Islamist website in 2009, Ayman al-Zawahiri welcomed them to the fold.


Over the past two years, the Libyan authorities have released scores of imprisoned Islamists from the LIFG into the custody of their families and communities in a humanitarian attempt to integrate them back into Libyan society. With a pledge that they would use the forums set up in the country, under the auspices of the General People’s Congress, to express their views. Many of the released prisoners had fought in Afghanistan and Iraq and been returned to the Libyan authorities as part of an agreement with the US. If Qadhafi was truly the ruthless man the West would have us believe, then surely these rebels, classified as terrorists by the US, would have remained in prison and their fate very different.


One of those released in 2008 was the LIFG commander, Abdel Hakim al-Hasidi, now one of the leaders of this uprising. Over the last decade, al-Hasidi fought in Afghanistan, was captured in Pakistan in 2002, handed over to the US, and subsequently handed back to the Libyan authorities. In a recent interview with the Italian newspaper, Il Sole 24 Ore, al-Hasidi admitted that, “jihadists who fought in Iraq against the US are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Qadhafi.”


Libya  was the first country to issue an arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden. The Libyan authorities have for years tried to warn the world about the very serious threat posed by these Islamic deviants. According to David Shayler, Western intelligence turned a deaf ear to Libya’s warnings as far back as the mid 90s because they were actually working with the al-Qaeda group inside Libya, to kill Qadhafi, and roll back the Libyan revolution.


True Religion versus False Religion


The battle being fought in the Libyan desert today dates way back beyond the mid 90s. Today’s battle is essentially a battle between, on the one hand, the revolutionary Islam of Prophet Muhammad, manifest in the writings of Muammar Qadhafi and in the practice of


the Libyan revolution. And on the other hand, the reactionary Islam of the Ikhwan al-Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood) and their off shoots such as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and its affiliate, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.


The Muslim revolutionary scholar, Ali Shariati, notes that, “the battle of history is the battle of religion against religion… true religion versus false religion.”


The Islam of the Wahhabist/Salafi sect, adhered to by the LIFQ, is a reactionary interpretation and practice of Islam that seeks to replicate the political and social structures of 7th century Arabian society. Although for the BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera cameras, the rebels are careful to present themselves to the world as a force fighting for ‘liberal democracy’ and to show their love and admiration for the West. Off camera, they are calling for what AQIM has named the ‘Islamic Emirate in the Maghreb’.


Qadhafi, along with other progressive Islamic scholars, argues the message of the Quran and Islamic theology is incompatible with the idea of an emirate. They point out dynastic rule was imported into the body politic of Islam by the likes of Abu Sufyan Muawiyah, the governor of Damascus, in the period 642 to 661, who borrowed these anti-Islamic practices from the Byzantium Empire and the Persians. Qadhafi points out this particular system of governance has nothing at all to do with Islam.


The central ideological concern of Muammar Qadhafi and the Libyan revolution was to redefine Islam in the context of modern knowledge and contemporary political systems and thought. This is a task that requires us to revisit and rethink previous political systems set up by Muslims, without losing any of the Perennial Truth that is Islam.


The Third Universal Theory, outlined in Qadhafi’s Green Book, is a comprehensive worldview – a body of philosophical, political, economic, sociological and scientific principles, all inter-related. Together they form an alternative and largely self-sufficient intellectual structure. It is a guide for authentic Islamic revolution, and can be applied to non-Islamic, popular revolutions. It ushers in a whole new social and political practice, outlining an alternative model of democracy.


Progressive academics worldwide have acclaimed The Green Book as a serious body of political thought, offering an incisive critique of Western parliamentary democracy, capitalism and Marxist socialism. In addition, there is no denying the system of direct democracy, posited by Qadhafi’s Third Universal Theory, offers an alternative model and solution for Africa and many other parts of the ‘Third World’, where multi-party ‘democracy’ has been a dismal failure, resulting in ethnic/tribal conflict, social fragmentation and political chaos.


In his book Islam and the Third Universal Theory: The Religious Thought of Muammar al Qadhafi, the respected Muslim scholar Mahmoud Ayoub points out that, “the first part of the Green Book is an interpretation of one single verse of the Quran: ‘and their affairs are decided through consultation (shura) among themselves’… To others it means an assembly of jurists ruling over a traditional Islamic society strictly governed by Shariah. Only Qadhafi has taken the important Quranic precept seriously, understanding it literally, and applying it equally to every member of society.”


Ayoub further states that, “Qadhafi sees Islam as a perpetual revolution against unnecessary and illegitimate wealth, exploitation and oppression. Qadhafi asserted that the Islam which both the East and the West knew was that observed by kings and princes, as well as mendicants (darawish) who live off Islam. Thus, people thought of Islam as a reactionary movement, a message which could never keep up with life. They considered Islam simply as a religious heritage which could be venerated but which had to be kept from the fields of action and human struggle.”


This Islam, whose theology is primarily one of liberation, has been marginalised, distorted and co-opted to serve the interests of ruling elites throughout the Muslim world. Theirs is the Islam observed by kings and princes, the ‘feudal Islam’ of the Ikhwan al-Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood) and its Wahhabi spiritual leaders, such as Egyptian cleric, Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who recently issued a fatwa stating that any Libyan soldier who can shoot dead embattled leader Muammar Qadhafi should do so “to rid Libya of him.”


Qaradawi is a neo-feudalist, who has defended the practice of female genital mutilation, called for the death penalty to be applied to those who leave Islam and advocates separate systems of law for different classes of citizens. Qadhafi views Qaradawi and those like him as the spiritual heirs of the corrupt Umayyad dynasty (661-750) that transformed the revolutionary Islam of the Holy Prophet into a feudal dispensation.


How does Qadhafi’s revolutionary Islam play out in practice? Why is this man and the revolution he has led such a threat? And why, over recent weeks, have people from every corner of the globe spoken out in support of Qadhafi and the Libyan revolution? Why have thousands of African freedom fighters (not mercenaries as the BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera would have us believe) poured into Libya from the Congo, Guinea, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Niger, Chad, Mauritania, Southern Sudan, Kenya, Ethiopia and Burkina Faso to fight to the death for this leader and Libya?


Who is this man and this revolution that has the moral authority and power to draw an army of Africans from every corner of the continent and solidarity from liberation movements, political parties and progressive governments worldwide?

Read the Full Article:
In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes Centre Stage 


7. Qadhafi’s Libya Knows How the Global System Really Works

© By Adrian Salbuchi

… the system of elected parliaments is based on propaganda to win votes. It is a demagogic system in the real sense of the word. Votes can be bought and falsified. Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns, and the result is that only the rich get elected. (The Green Book by Col. Muammar Qadhafi)

At a news conference in Tripoli on 7 March, former Libyan Foreign Minister Moussa Koussa accused the Western powers of trying to split his country by supporting separatist rebel forces: “It’s clear they are getting in touch with the defected people of eastern Libya. It’s clear there is a conspiracy to divide Libya. The English are yearning for the colonial era of the past as the first nations who started getting in touch with the secessionists were the English, as well as the French and the Americans.”


This statement shows just how aware part of the Libyan leadership is of the bigger agenda that the Global Power Elite have regarding their country and the region as a whole. People like Mr Koussa know only too well that what drives the sudden civil strife in his country that served as an excuse for an all-out attack by France, the UK and the US against Libya, is not any concern over “human rights,” or “democracy,” or “protecting the civilian population.” Rather, what is really on the globalist agenda is their need to subdue, weaken and control Libya, mainly because under Col. Muammar Qadhafi’s leadership the Libyans never bowed to the Global Power Elite.


Libya may have shown pragmatic willingness to negotiate suspension of its weapons technology in 2004, agreed to sell its massive “sweet crude” oil wealth to the West, and defined a political solution to the Lockerbie incident, yet under Qadhafi they never succumbed to Western arm-twisting, as the leaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen, Bahrain, Dubai and Qatar have. Other non-aligned countries in the region such as Iran and Syria hold similar views.


A Libya (or several splinter-Libyas) under friendly caretaker regimes1 as they achieved in so many countries throughout the world, would be a heaven-sent for American and British oil companies, for US-UK interests in the region, and for Israel…


Double Standards:
UN Resolution No. 1973


Libya is not yours. Libya is for all Libyans. The resolutions of the Security Council are invalid because the Security Council is not authorized according to the U.N. Charter to intervene in internal affairs of any country… You have no right ever to intervene in our internal affairs. Who gave you the right to intervene in our internal affairs? You will regret it if you take the step toward intervening in our internal affairs, the affairs of our country. It is indeed our country; it is not your country.


– From a letter sent by the Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi to the French president, British prime minister and UN Secretary General.


          In country after country, the Globalist agenda seemed to be faring well, except in Libya where their interventionist plans were not on schedule. Forces loyal to Col. Qadhafi were putting secessionists forces centred on Benghazi up against a wall. So, “emergency action” had to be taken. All of a sudden the mainstream media began noisily echoing French, British and US hysteria regarding the need to immediately “protect” East Libya’s “civilian population” against Qadhafi’s attacks. A “concern” most surprising, when you consider that the UK, France and the US had no qualms when Hosni Mubarak was killing Egyptians earlier this year, or when authoritarian Saudis invaded (or were sent in by the US?) Bahrain a few weeks ago2 whilst Yemeni leader Ali Abdullah Saleh gave his police shoot-to-kill orders against anti-government demonstrators.


          Clearly, the “good guy/bad guy” rationale depends on whether the ongoing “guy” is willing to subordinate to the Global Power Elite or not. This brings to mind an anecdote from the nineteen-forties when one of US president Franklin D Roosevelt’s aides pointed out to him his moral concerns over US support of Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza whom he considered to be an “SOB”; to which Roosevelt candidly replied by saying, “Yes, you’re right; he is an SOB; but he’s our SOB!”


          Over seventy years later, the US has systematically backed – and still backs – a veritable army of SOB caretaker presidents, prime ministers, sheiks and military strongmen. Trouble only starts for ruling SOB’s if and when they cease honouring explicit or implicit political agreements with the US-UK-Israel, as happened to Panama’s Manuel Noriega in 1989, and to Saddam Hussein first in 1991 and then in 2003.


          The fact is Qadhafi never cozied up to the US, the UK and Israel, however global oil cartel interests in Libya won him a lease of life. The time has come, however, when the Global Power Elite objectives now go far beyond oil: they need to redraw the geopolitical map of the Middle East and North Africa, which entails eroding all Nation-States in the region in preparation for the coming World Government. And Qadhafi’s Libya is clearly not ready to go along with that.


          Ergo, Resolution No. 1973, giving the Global Power Elite’s hand-picked “leaders” in France, the UK, the US and puppets in Italy, Spain and elsewhere their much needed “cloak of legality” to unilaterally attack Libya with their military forces. As expected, Resolution No. 1973 was quickly passed on 17 March, ordering a “no fly zone” over Libya and authorising “air strikes.” The mainstream media obediently lent PsyWar coverage to Western incursions to the limit of irrationality, as their war-mongering is centred on a “Qadhafi must go” cry, and yet Qadhafi does not even hold any formal government post in the Libyan State. He does not need to; his prestige amongst his followers is sufficient, and that is what is making it especially difficult for the West to oust him…


          The UN vote was not unanimous, however: of the five permanent Security Council members, France, the UK and the US voted against Libya, whilst Russia and China abstained. The two other BRIC countries – Brazil and India – also abstained, as did Germany.


          It is indicative of the perils all countries run today when we see Russia and China reluctant to veto such UK-France-US manoeuvring over the UN. Either one could have blocked unilateral military action, just as the US systematically blocks dozens of UN Resolutions condemning Israeli attacks against Palestine and its outrageous behaviour in the Middle East.3 China, most likely, abstained in order not to irritate their pro-US-UK Saudi Arabian trade partners who now sell more oil to China than any other country. Russia, in turn, has complex ethnic issues of its own.


          Here, in a nutshell, we have a brief snapshot of how Global Power works, the speed with which they were able to align the support of “the international community” to their goals and interests, naturally having the entire global mainstream media superstructure willing to oblige “justifying” their attack on Libya and silencing all other damning questions and evidence.


Our Kind of “Democracy…”


          The extensive carve up and revamping of all of North Africa and the Islamic Middle East is very much in the forefront of the Global Power Elite’s plans, of which the attacks on Qadhafi’s Libya are but a chapter. In their march towards “democratisation” of the region, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it abundantly clear what this means when, prior to her visit to Tunisia and Egypt at the end of March, she declared that the US has “an enormous stake in ensuring that Egypt and Tunisia provide models for the kind of democracy that we want to see.” Elsewhere, she added that the US wishes “to be a partner in the important work that lies ahead as (the region) embarks on a transition to a genuine democracy.4 (Emphasis mine)


            And what is that “genuine” democracy the US, the UK, France, Spain, Italy “want to see”? Simple: a mechanical vote-counting system fully dependent on the Money Power that feeds and controls political parties, politicians, journalists, anchor newsmen, universities, NGO’s and other public and private players. The practical effects of the brand of “democracy” that Hillary and her friends “want to see” are the “erosion piece by piece of Sovereign Nation-States” as planned by the Council on Foreign Relations.


Increasingly, the remnants of “democratic states” are given the role of lending lip service to the Global Private Power System by spraying a thin, shiny layer of “legality” on it. Again in Hillary’s own words, she stressed “the difficulties of nurturing the institutions that support democracy, including robust political parties, a free media and the rule of law.”5


Déjà vu: Their Fingerprints
are all Over the Place


          Writing from Argentina, I would point out some poignant parallels in this story with my country, on the diplomatic, military and PsyWar stages.


          On the diplomatic and military side, three decades ago – during the heyday of Thatcher and Reagan – Argentina’s US-backed ruling Military Junta led by General Leopoldo Galtieri suddenly somersaulted and wrenched the Falkland-Malvinas Islands in the South Atlantic from British hands. That was on 2 April 1982 and, again the US and Britain manoeuvred with unheard of speed, rallying the support of “the international community.” Within 72 hours, UN Resolution No. 502 had been passed allowing the UK and US to “legally” take the islands back by force. Argentina’s sole option: unconditional surrender.


          After a British nuclear submarine sank the Argentine destroyer “General Belgrano” outside the UK war exclusion zone, Argentina’s air force quickly reacted and sank or damaged over two dozen British ships, shot down scores of RAF jets, and heavily damaged both Britain’s aircraft carriers forcing them to withdraw from the war theatre, notably using French-made “Exocet”6 air-to-sea missiles, some of which were generously provided on very short notice by Col. Qadhafi’s Libya Arab Jamahiriya. For the UK, overwhelming defeat of Argentina was the sole option, and here lie the roots of our country’s present-day weakness and decadence.


          On the PsyWar and political stages, the Global Power Elite threat to split Libya up into two or three new “democratic” countries would tie in with their agenda bent on eroding national sovereignty everywhere. We can also see their “fingerprint” if we compare Libya today with Argentina nine years ago, when at the height of our country’s almost total financial, banking and monetary collapse triggered by the Wall Street banksters which forced Argentina to default on its massive Foreign Debt, the New York Times published a high-profile article whose title said it all: “Some in Argentina see Secession as the Answer to Economic Peril.”7 In it they recommended that the immensely large and rich Patagonia Region in the south of the country, should secede from the rest of Argentina and then be traded with the Global Power Elite’s banking cartels to cancel the country’s foreign debt.


          Clearly, territorial break-up is very much on the globalist agenda, whether in Argentina or Libya.8


          A split up Libya would facilitate control of its massive oil wealth and strategic North African and Mediterranean geopolitical position. The logic is always the same: on the “hard road to world order” it is always easier to control a myriad of smaller, weaker and bickering countries than it is a few large, more powerful and coherent political entities.


How Do They Do It?


          If asked to identify the Global Power Elite’s most powerful weapon, one might be tempted to respond saying it is their military fire power, or their money power, or their political prowess. But on a grander scale, their overriding main advantage – their “secret weapon” so to speak – is of a much more subtle nature: it is their uncanny talent and ability for very Long-Term Planning; and by “long-term” I mean not just decades but centuries. This entails a powerful capability of ensuring that their global plans are promoted generation after generation, and this requires, amongst other things, a very powerful, consistent and loyalty-based succession and communication system.


          Long-Term Planning is probably their “best kept secret” not because they hide it from the public (which they don’t), but because the better part of mankind just cannot see it, for the simple reason that mass education in all countries in the world has increasingly shifted towards and focused on short-term thinking, modelling and planning. Whether in elementary school, high school or college, our basic training is centred on “learning to do things in our lives”: i.e., learning a trade or profession, in order to “earn a living and get ahead in life.” “Life,” in today’s world, is being constrained to having a work career, marriage & child-rearing, “fun & entertainment,” and then as the decades go by, retirement and, finally, “game over”...


             Short term thinking people are much easier to control, because they are intrinsically egotists in that, as I say, they have been reared just to “do things with their lives” (in a manner that is useful to the ongoing social system). Except under truly exception conditions where their personal lives and livelihood are threatened, people for the most part are reluctant to become involved in the greater picture of Man’s predicament on Earth. Mankind’s evolution (some might say involution) into what it has become today is the product of a very extensive chain of highly complex long-term processes, which 99% of the population cannot see simply because the subtleties of Long-Term thought and planning elude them. They have just plain not been educated for that. 

          The Global Power Elite – Deciders, Planners and Do-ers – however, are all “Long-Termers.” This is a key result of their inheriting vast power and wealth from their family, social and financial/industrial environments and networks, which quickly make a point of selecting their “best and brightest” and ensuring that they get a “proper education,” which basically means that Elites are trained in Long-Term thought, vision, and scenario modelling.


          All nations today should understand that the only guarantee for national sovereignty lies not so much in maintaining powerful armed forces – which for countries in the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and elsewhere is clearly impossible when confronting the US, UK, and EU firepower – but rather in understanding the Global Power Elite’s key strengths and weaknesses. Then counter-PsyWar and PsyOps can be designed to mitigate and neutralise their hold over people’s minds everywhere. This requires understanding why they want us all to think and act in certain ways, and why they do not want us to think and act in certain other ways…


          And one of those “other ways” they despise is when countries are truly Non-Aligned. When they retain the power to think and act independently, even if within cultural frameworks that may appear different from our own and even difficult for many of us to understand.


          Clearly, Non-Alignment – whether in Nasser’s Egypt, Peron’s Argentina, Chavez’s Venezuela, Tito’s Yugoslavia, Assad’s Syria, the Ayatollah’s Iran, or Qadhafi’s Libya – is very much hated by the globalists, for the simple reason that beyond all local differences, Non-Alignment to the Global Power Elite inevitably leads to people valuing their own national sovereignty and independence above all other considerations, which in turn leads to the strengthening of Sovereign Nation-States.


          And, the Sovereign Nation-State is the Global Power Elite’s Public Enemy Number One.




1. See my previous article “Global Elites Behind Chaos in Arab World” published in this issue of New Dawn magazine.


2. George Friedman, publisher of Stratfor Global Intelligence expressed these double standards most eloquently when he stated: “We’re not going to mess with Bahrain because we’re not going to get into a fight with the Saudis who support the current structure, and because it is where the United States keeps its (Indian Ocean) fleet.” See “US, UN won’t step in Bahrain mess say experts”, The Boston Herald, 21 March.


3. From 1982 to 2006, the US vetoed 32 UN Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli policies and behaviour and systematically blocked Arab efforts to put the subject of Israel’s nuclear weapons arsenal on the International Atomic Energy Agency’s agenda, the State of Israel being the sole country in the Middle East that has atomic Weapons of Mass Destruction and a proven track record of its willingness to use them.


4. “Clinton to stress democracy in Egypt, Tunisia trip” by Andrew Quinn, The New York Times, 10 March.


5. “Clinton to tell Egyptians democracy takes time” by Arshad Mohammed, The New York Times, 14 March.


6. So concerned were the British over their losses at the height of the Falklands-Malvinas War in 1982, that then French President Francoise Mitterand confessed to his psychoanalyst that “The Iron Lady” Margaret Thatcher had threatened to drop a nuclear bomb over Argentina’s second largest city of Córdoba if Mitterand did not hand over to her the secret air defense codes of the French “Exocet” missiles in the hands of the Argentine military. See Rendez-vous: The Psychoanalysis of Francois Mitterrand by Ali Magoudi, the French president’s psychoanalyst from 1982 to 1993.


7. Article by Larry Rohter,  The New York Times, 27 August 2002.  


8. The Coming World Government: Tragedy & Hope?, chapter 7 – “Territory in Jeopardy: The Patagonia”, by Adrian Salbuchi, available at 


Related Articles:


Don't Believe What Media Says About Gaddafi  

Obama's 9 Orwellian Lies About Libya 

Tony Blair and CFR Lies On Libya (Video) 

What The Zionists Won't Let You Know About Gadaffi (Video) 



8. Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World

Revolt in North Africa and the Middle East: The Real Agenda Exposed.

© By Adrian Salbuchi


Source: New Dawn magazine, May-June 2011, pp. 9-14, available here:  

PDF download button.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF eBook
 Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World

“Solve et Coagula” 

(“Dissolve and Recompose”) 

Traditional method used by Medievla alchemists to wrench from matter its secrets. 


It all began rather suddenly in January 2011 in Tunisia when President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali was ousted following major uprisings and food riots. Then, in rapid succession came seemingly similar social upheavals and uprisings in Algeria, Iraq, Oman; notably in Egypt which ended Hosni Mubarak’s rigid thirty-year regime; and even more turmoil followed in Yemen, Bahrain, Syria and, worst of all, civil war has erupted in Libya. 


So, yes, some dominoes are falling as authoritarian regimes are weakened and overthrown one after another; however, no, not in all cases is it simply ‘the will of the People’ that has triggered these civil commotions. We must look closer at unfolding patterns … because there certainly appears to be far more powerful forces acting behind the scenes; forces that have other objectives and interests on a vaster scale. 


Will the events in the Middle East and North Africa spread further afield as many are nervously asking? Who’s next? Saudi Arabia? Greece? Spain? Ireland? South East Asia? Latin America …? The US and the UK maybe …? 


The big question is: has the Global Power Elite decided that the time has come for global ‘regime change?’ Are they promoting, triggering and allowing widespread revolution on purpose? Do they believe that they can control it? Is short-term economic and political turmoil the price they are willing to pay to achieve far more ambitious long-term objectives? 


Global Regime Change


The answer these and other questions, we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture from loftier historical and geographical viewpoints. This entails a dramatic paradigm shift that many—most—people have difficulty coping with. Its main feature is that we need to realise that over the past four decades a massive global power shift has occurred resulting in political, economic, military, diplomatic, and social decision-making power drifting away from the public Sovereign Nation-State (where it has dwelt for centuries), towards a totally new, more elusive Private Power Structure. We can, in fact, describe this as the Privatisation of Power. 


Through the years, this has been variously and ambiguously described as the ‘New World Order,’ ‘One World,’ the ‘Establishment,’ ‘Globalisation,’ ‘Over-World,’ even ‘democracy,’ depending upon whether you choose to stress its conceptual, social, economic, political, administrative or cultural aspects. I prefer to call it the Global Power Elite because it spans all of these ideas and points to specific people and organisations. 


For many who realise that something is rotten and not just in the state of Denmark, increasingly the key question is: who calls the shots in the world today? I hardly believe that we need to resort to any elusive, conspiratorial, secret group of mischief-makers who sit in some Wizard of Oz-like eyrie, operating master levers and switches that run the planet. No. In fact it’s really much more visible than that … you just need to know where and how to look. 


Today’s world is controlled and managed by a Global Power Elite consisting of key individuals and families using vastly powerful organisations whose leverage mechanisms are embedded into all of the world’s economic, financial, media, educational, government, academic, political and legal infrastructure organisations. [The broad scheme of these structures is shown in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below. Note that the figures and pictures are only available in the PDF downloadable version.] 


Through a small but highly efficient network of strategic planners—often referred to as “think tanks”—medium and long-tern national, regional, and global plans are conceived, researched, developed, scenario-tested and designed. These are then converted into highly complex action plans and executed in a complex and coordinated manner by powerful Elites in multinational corporations, transnational banks, mainstream mediam, key government posts, universities, and other entities. All focused on growing their vast power and ensuring that on key matters in every field and everywhere they are always the ‘deciders of last resort.’ 


These are not even secret organisations: they have names, membership rosters, addresses, web sites, they publish papers and reports, give conferences … i.e. they pretty much act out in the “open,” even though they can keep a low profile thanks to the fact that they also control the mainstream media as one of their key power factors. We can definitely say they are not really secret, but rather discrete


A few names: the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) founded in 1919; its London sister organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as “Chatham House”), the Trilateral Commission (founded in 1973 at the behest of David Rockefeller and based on the ideological premises set forth by Zbigniew Brezezinski in his seminal 11971 book Between Two Ages: The Role of America in the Technetronic Age), the Bilderberg Conference (a significantly higher echelon on the global power pyramid convoked by European nobility and wealth in 1954), and other similar organisations that tie into the very intricate, complex, and integrated global network of power structures.


The Global Power Elite Agenda


Three fundamental global processes that tie in with their long-term interests and objectives are being macro-managed: 

Read the Full Story:
Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World

PDF download button.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF eBook
 Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World


9. Libya All About Oil, or Central Banking?

By Ellen Brown  

April 14, 2011 



Several writers have noted the odd fact that the Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March to create their own central bank - this before they even had a government. Robert Wenzel wrote in the Economic Policy Journal:  


I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks out of a popular uprising. This suggests we have a bit more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated influences. 


Alex Newman wrote in the New American:  


In a statement released last week, the rebels reported on the results of a meeting held on March 19. Among other things, the supposed rag-tag revolutionaries announced the "[d]esignation of the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority competent in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a temporary headquarters in Benghazi." 


Newman quoted CNBC senior editor John Carney, who asked, "Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power? It certainly seems to indicate how extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era."

Another anomaly involves the official justification for taking up arms against Libya. Supposedly it's about human rights violations, but the evidence is contradictory. According to an article on the Fox News website on February 28:  

As the United Nations works feverishly to condemn Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi for cracking down on protesters, the body's Human Rights Council is poised to adopt a report chock-full of praise for Libya's human rights record.

The review commends Libya for improving educational opportunities, for making human rights a "priority" and for bettering its "constitutional" framework. Several countries, including Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, and Saudi Arabia but also Canada, give Libya positive marks for the legal protections afforded to its citizens - who are now revolting against the regime and facing bloody reprisal.  


Whatever might be said of Gaddafi's personal crimes, the Libyan people seem to be thriving. A delegation of medical professionals from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus wrote in an appeal to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin that after becoming acquainted with Libyan life, it was their view that in few nations did people live in such comfort:  


[Libyans] are entitled to free treatment, and their hospitals provide the best in the world of medical equipment. Education in Libya is free, capable young people have the opportunity to study abroad at government expense. When marrying, young couples receive 60,000 Libyan dinars (about 50,000 US dollars) of financial assistance. Non-interest state loans, and as practice shows, undated. Due to government subsidies the price of cars is much lower than in Europe, and they are affordable for every family. Gasoline and bread cost a penny, no taxes for those who are engaged in agriculture. The Libyan people are quiet and peaceful, are not inclined to drink, and are very religious. 


They maintained that the international community had been misinformed about the struggle against the regime. "Tell us," they said, "who would not like such a regime?"

Even if that is just propaganda, there is no denying at least one very popular achievement of the Libyan government: it brought water to the desert by building the largest and most expensive irrigation project in history, the US$33 billion GMMR (Great Man-Made River) project. Even more than oil, water is crucial to life in Libya.

The GMMR provides 70% of the population with water for drinking and irrigation, pumping it from Libya's vast underground Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System in the south to populated coastal areas 4,000 kilometers to the north. The Libyan government has done at least some things right.

Another explanation for the assault on Libya is that it is "all about oil", but that theory too is problematic. As noted in the National Journal, the country produces only about 2% of the world's oil. Saudi Arabia alone has enough spare capacity to make up for any lost production if Libyan oil were to disappear from the market. And if it's all about oil, why the rush to set up a new central bank? 

Another provocative bit of data circulating on the Net is a 2007 "Democracy Now" interview of US General Wesley Clark (Ret). In it he says that about 10 days after September 11, 2001, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Clark was surprised and asked why. "I don't know!" was the response. "I guess they don't know what else to do!" Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran. 

What do these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers' central bank in Switzerland.

The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen Jr, writing on, noted that "[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein, the oil nation had made the move to accept euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar."

According to a Russian article titled "Bombing of Libya - Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US Dollar", Gaddafi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gaddafi suggested establishing a united African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency.

During the past year, the idea was approved by many Arab countries and most African countries. The only opponents were the Republic of South Africa and the head of the League of Arab States. The initiative was viewed negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi was not swayed and continued his push for the creation of a united Africa. 

And that brings us back to the puzzle of the Libyan central bank. In an article posted on the Market Oracle, Eric Encina observed:  


One seldom mentioned fact by western politicians and media pundits: the Central Bank of Libya is 100% State Owned ... Currently, the Libyan government creates its own money, the Libyan Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that Libya is a sovereign nation with its own great resources, able to sustain its own economic destiny. One major problem for globalist banking cartels is that in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central Bank and its national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central Bank of Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy but this is certainly at the top of the globalist agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.


Libya  not only has oil. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), its central bank has nearly 144 tonnes of gold in its vaults. With that sort of asset base, who needs the BIS, the IMF and their rules?

All of which prompts a closer look at the BIS rules and their effect on local economies. An article on the BIS website states that central banks in the Central Bank Governance Network are supposed to have as their single or primary objective "to preserve price stability".

They are to be kept independent from government to make sure that political considerations don't interfere with this mandate. "Price stability" means maintaining a stable money supply, even if that means burdening the people with heavy foreign debts. Central banks are discouraged from increasing the money supply by printing money and using it for the benefit of the state, either directly or as loans.

In a 2002 article in Asia Times Online titled "The BIS vs national banks" Henry Liu maintained:  


BIS regulations serve only the single purpose of strengthening the international private banking system, even at the peril of national economies. The BIS does to national banking systems what the IMF has done to national monetary regimes. National economies under financial globalization no longer serve national interests.

... FDI [foreign direct investment] denominated in foreign currencies, mostly dollars, has condemned many national economies into unbalanced development toward export, merely to make dollar-denominated interest payments to FDI, with little net benefit to the domestic economies.  


He added, "Applying the State Theory of Money, any government can fund with its own currency all its domestic developmental needs to maintain full employment without inflation." The "state theory of money" refers to money created by governments rather than private banks.

The presumption of the rule against borrowing from the government's own central bank is that this will be inflationary, while borrowing existing money from foreign banks or the IMF will not. But all banks actually create the money they lend on their books, whether publicly owned or privately owned. Most new money today comes from bank loans. Borrowing it from the government's own central bank has the advantage that the loan is effectively interest-free. Eliminating interest has been shown to reduce the cost of public projects by an average of 50%.

And that appears to be how the Libyan system works. According to Wikipedia, the functions of the Central Bank of Libya include "issuing and regulating banknotes and coins in Libya" and "managing and issuing all state loans". Libya's wholly state-owned bank can and does issue the national currency and lend it for state purposes.

That would explain where Libya gets the money to provide free education and medical care, and to issue each young couple $50,000 in interest-free state loans. It would also explain where the country found the $33 billion to build the Great Man-Made River project. Libyans are worried that North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led air strikes are coming perilously close to this pipeline, threatening another humanitarian disaster.

So is this new war all about oil or all about banking? Maybe both - and water as well. With energy, water, and ample credit to develop the infrastructure to access them, a nation can be free of the grip of foreign creditors. And that may be the real threat of Libya: it could show the world what is possible.

Most countries don't have oil, but new technologies are being developed that could make non-oil-producing nations energy-independent, particularly if infrastructure costs are halved by borrowing from the nation's own publicly owned bank. Energy independence would free governments from the web of the international bankers, and of the need to shift production from domestic to foreign markets to service the loans.

If the Gaddafi government goes down, it will be interesting to watch whether the new central bank joins the BIS, whether the nationalized oil industry gets sold off to investors, and whether education and healthcare continue to be free.

Ellen Brown is an attorney and president of the Public Banking Institute, In Web of Debt, her latest of eleven books, she shows how a private cartel has usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her websites are and

(Copyright Ellen Brown 2011)


10. Organized Jewry Opposes Free Speech


“People demand freedom of speech to make up for the

freedom of thought which they” avoid. (Kierkegaard) 



By Prof Kevin MacDonald
29 January 2009 




It is something of an axiom of Jewish life that "Is it good for the Jews?" remains the litmus test of Jewish communal activity - in other words, interest over principles. A good example is free speech. There can be little doubt that the organized Jewish community sees free speech as a problem because it may be used to criticize the behavior of Jewish organizations and especially Israel. 


In Canada the response of the organized Jewish community to recent demonstrations against Israel was to attempt to invoke Canada's restrictions on free speech in order to silence their critics. The Canadian Jewish Congress complained that protests against Israel's incursion into Gaza contained images that were "uncivil, un-Canadian, that demonize Jews and Israelis." They are asking the police to investigate the matter, for referral to the Canadian Human Rights Commission which is in charge of enforcing laws that infringe on free speech. Although the organized Jewish community in Canada has strongly supported the thought crime legislation (see below), Bernie Farber, the head of the CJC, stated "we are firm supporters and believers in the need to be able to demonstrate passionately in free and democratic societies."  


Because of the First Amendment, we are still a ways from situation in Canada here in the US. Nevertheless, the ADL has been in the forefront of promoting hate-crime legislation in America, and there can be little doubt that they see the First Amendment as a barrier to their interests in suppressing thoughts and speech critical of Israel and other Jewish interests.  


An example of the efforts of the organized Jewish community in the direction of thought control is the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of 2004. This law created an office of "Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism" within the State Department, headed by Gregg J. Rickman. The act not only requires the State Department to document acts of anti-Semitism, but also to "combat acts of anti-Semitism globally."  


The act does not say what the U.S. must do to combat anti-Semitism around the world. I assume combating anti-Semitism wouldn't require any more in the way of lives and money than, say, the war in Iraq - another project spearheaded by Jewish activism on behalf of Israel. But that may be wishful thinking as the same activists are avidly promoting a war with Iran which would likely be even more disastrous.  


In any case, the office issued its most recent Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism Report (GASR) in March of last year. The document is an excellent example of Jewish activism that would be unremarkable except that it is now officially ensconced at the highest reaches of the U.S. government. As we shall see, it goes beyond criticism anti-Jewish actions to anti-Jewish attitudes, such as statements about Jewish influence.  


The report performs the by now familiar casuistry on Israel as a cause of anti-Semitism. The reader is led to believe that the allegations of Israeli atrocities are overblown propaganda - when the real question is just how Palestinians manage to survive at all in the occupied territories. The recent horrifying incursion into Gaza is only the most recent example. Not only did Israel carry out a starvation-inducing blockade during a ceasefire and an assault that finally provoked Palestinian retaliation, there seems little doubt that Israel committed war crimes - particularly the use of white phosphorus bombs in densely populated civilian areas.  


The report complains that Israel's bad behavior is singled out while nobody cares when other governments behave inhumanely. The problem here is that because Israel's bad behavior is in important ingredient in enflaming the entire region, it should interest everyone. And because of the role of the Israel Lobby in shaping American policy, Israel's bad behavior is even more properly the concern of all Americans. American taxpayers are not being asked to massively subsidize other badly behaved governments, nor are they asked to fight and die in wars designed to advance the interests of those governments.  


The report graciously states that "responsible criticism" of Israel's policies is acceptable. (Thanks!) But there's a catch: "Those criticizing Israel have a responsibility to consider the effect their actions may have in prompting hatred of Jews."  


This, of course, has the effect of proscribing criticism of Israel for fear of being called an anti-Semite. Presumably responsible criticism of Israel does not include books like John Mearsheimer and Steven Walt's The Israel Lobby, despite its academic tone and masterful marshalling of evidence. Jewish activists have routinely accused the authors of resurrecting the Protocols and other vicious acts of anti-Semitism.  


As the report notes, Israel is without doubt the source of most anti-Jewish words and deeds in the contemporary world. But the report also points to traditional Jewish stereotypes as a continuing concern: Jews as more loyal to Israel and Jewish interests than the interests of their country of residence; and Jews as having inordinate influence and control over media, the economy or government. For example, according to ADL surveys, substantial percentages of Europeans believe that Jews have too much power in business and in international financial markets. (The percentages range from around 20% in Germany to 60% in Hungary.)  


Similarly, ADL surveys indicate that beliefs that Jews are disloyal are common among Europeans, ranging from 39% in France to 60% in Spain. The report notes that "those who believe that Jews are more loyal to Israel than to their own country tend to believe that Jew-ish lobbying groups and individual Jews in influential positions in national governments seek to bend policy toward Israel's interests."  


In other words, these anti-Semites are living under the illusion that organizations like AIPAC actually have some influence. And they may even believe that highly placed Jews like Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams and Richard Perle may have steered U.S. policy in a way that benefited Israel to the detriment of the United States.  


As I noted in my review of Mearsheimer and Walt, Pro-Israel activists such as Perle typically phrase their policy recommendations as aimed at benefiting the United States. Perle does this despite evidence that he has a strong Jewish identity and despite the fact that he has typical Jewish concerns, such as anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and the welfare of Israel. Perle poses as an American patriot despite credible charges of spying for Israel, writing reports for Israeli think tanks and op-eds for the Jerusalem Post, and maintaining close personal relation-ships with Israeli leaders.  


Needless to say, the GASR is not a good place to find nuanced or fair treatments of these issues.  


The GASR also has a section deploring ethnic nationalist movements of non-Jews, mainly in Eastern Europe, complaining that these movements are commonly anti-Jewish. Typically the anti-Jewish sentiments of such movements stem from the perception that Jews are an elite with considerable power and that this elite opposes the ethno-nationalism of non-Jews-a view that certainly has some basis in reality. (Jewish opposition to ethno-nationalism is restricted to non-Jews in areas where Jews form a Diaspora; it does not, of course, apply to Israel.)  


For example, the GASR singles out Roman Catholic institutions as "encouraging anti-Semitism and ethnic and religious chauvinism." Chief among the offenders is a conservative Catholic radio station in Poland, Radio Maryja, cited for claiming that "Jews were pushing the Polish government to pay exorbitant private property restitution claims [for Holocaust reparations], and that Poland's President was `in the pocket of the Jewish lobby.'"  


This seems odd, since it would hardly be surprising if indeed Jews and Jewish organizations were pressuring the Polish government on this issue. Indeed, Norman Finkelstein points out:  


In negotiations with Eastern Europe, Jewish organizations and Israel have demanded the full restitution of or monetary compensation for the pre-war communal and private assets of the Jewish community. Consider Poland. The pre-war Jewish population of Poland stood at 3.5 million; the current population is several thousand. Yet, the World Jewish Restitution Organization demands title over the 6,000 pre-war communal Jewish properties, including those currently being used as hospitals and schools. It is also laying claim to hundreds of thousands of parcels of Polish land valued in the many tens of billions of dollars. Once again the entire US political and legal establishment has been mobilized to achieve these ends. Indeed, New York City Council members unanimously supported a resolution calling on Poland 'to pass comprehensive legislation providing for the complete restitution of Holocaust assets', while 57 members of Congress (led by Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York) dispatched a letter to the Polish parliament demanding 'comprehensive legislation that would return 100% of all property and assets seized during the Holocaust'.  


No sign of Jewish involvement there. Clearly, Radio Marija is way out of line.  


Incidentally, Finkelstein has paid dearly for offending the Israel Lobby: blacklisted from employment in the academic world, deported and barred from Israel, and living in a rent-stabilized apartment near his boyhood home in Brooklyn. The Lobby clearly believes in free speech so long as it's in done in one's closet and assuming the neighbors can't hear it. (More on this below.)  


Also related to Poland, the GASR notes that Maciej Giertych, European Parlia-ment Deputy and former head of the Political Party League of Polish Families, wrote a booklet "suggesting that Jews were unethical and a `tragic community' because they did not accept Jesus as the Messiah." The report also deplored the ADL's finding that 39% of Polish respondents agreed that "Jews are responsible for the death of Christ."  


This is truly amazing. Here we have an official U.S. government report condemning a Polish politician and a large percentage of the Polish people for expressing religious ideas that date from the origins of the Church in antiquity. It's very reminiscent of the situation in Canada where the Christian Heritage Party has been charged with promoting hatred because they published material opposing homosexuality for religious reasons stemming from their reading of the Bible.  


Incidentally, the GASR complains that Giertych also claimed that "Jews `create their own ghettos' because they like to separate themselves from others." Residential segregation, of course, was standard Jewish behavior in the Diaspora beginning in the ancient world, and it certainly occurred in Poland well into modern times. Indeed, it continues in many areas of the Diaspora today. But, as with thought crimes generally, truth is no defense.  


The GASR coyly states that "While the report describes many measures that foreign governments have adopted to combat anti-Sem-itism, it does not endorse any such measures that prohibit conduct that would be protected under the U.S. Constitution."  


Nevertheless, the act requires the compilation of material that would presumably be protected by the US Constitution, in particular "instances of propaganda in government and nongovernment media that attempt to justify or promote racial hatred against Jewish people." When one considers that a great many of the attitudes mentioned in the GASR are either substantially factual or reflect common religious beliefs, they would certainly seem to fall within the protections of the First Amendment.  


And it's pretty clear where its heart lies. Indeed, as Ezra Levant has recently described, Jewish organizations and activists have been a major source of support for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, intervening in dozens of cases in favor of plaintiffs.  


Levant describes the Simon Weisenthal Center as "one of the most vicious interveners in Canadian Human Rights Commission censorship trials." And Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress stated recently that "our anti-hate laws are probably the most underused." Levant comments: "That sounds like Ian Fine, senior counsel for the CHRC, who declared that `there can't be enough laws against hate.' So while the rest of the country is realizing that our government censorship has gone too far, Farber says it goes nowhere far enough; it's underused. He wants more censorship, more government intervention into thoughts and ideas - and the emotion called `hate'."  


Clearly, the office of Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism is nothing if not a Jewish activist organization. And it doubtless would love to institute the same kinds of thought control in the U.S. that have made Canada into a police state. Indeed, it would be entirely within the letter of the law that created this monster if the United States were to declare war on Poland as a means of combating anti-Semitism. At least it won't be necessary to invade Canada.  


Kevin MacDonald is a professor of psychology at California State University­Long Beach. 



11. The Galileo Movement Brings Sanity and Honesty to the Carbon Dioxide Debate in Australia

On 17 May 2011, in Sydney Australia, radio personality Alan Jones, launched the Galileo Movement during his morning breakfast show on radio 2GB. The Galileo Movement aims to expose the lies and "... misrepresentations pushing a 'price on carbon dioxide,' and seeks to protect Australians and our future in five areas:

Protect freedom - personal choice and national sovereignty;
Protect the environment;
Protect science and restore scientific integrity;
Protect our economic security;
Protect people's emotional health by ending Government and activists' constant destructive bombardment of fear and guilt on our kids and communities.

Here's a brief introduction to the Galileo Movement, from founders Case Smit and John Smeed:

"We care about freedom, security, the environment, humanity and our future.

The Galileo Movement's co-founders are retirees Case Smit and John Smeed. Their business backgrounds are in science and engineering - science's real-world application. Their experience is in environmental protection and ensuring air quality.

At first they simply accepted politicians' claims of global warming blamed on human production of carbon dioxide (CO2). When things didn't add up, they each separately investigated. Stunned, they discovered what many people are now discovering: climate claims by some scientists and politicians contradict observed facts."

The Galileo Movement's patron is Australia's own Alan Jones, radio 2GB's popular talkback presenter. Alan has a long history of speaking out for the downtrodden and for protecting freedom. His innate expertise straddles the fields of politics, sport and the media. His wealth of experience complements the basic science that is the Galileo Movement's core.

Results of voting on the site, so far:

92.19% are against the introduction of a Carbon Tax and/or Emissions Trading Scheme in Australia.
6.76% are for the introduction of a Carbon Tax and/or Emissions Trading Scheme in Australia.
86.49% say that the Government should be prepared to hold a Royal Commission to test the veracity of the Anthropogenic (Man made) Global Warming claims, before introducing associated legislation.
7.04% are against such a Royal Commission.

Have your say by voting here now ...

For more information on this much needed public forum, in these days of lying and deception, click the Galileo Movement link.


12. America's Death Squads

By Jim Kirwan
16 May 2011  




[Nazarene Remnant comment: Don’t think this can happen at your family home? You had better think again, especially if you’re on one the three lists mentioned in this book. We also point out that the events pictured in the following story will happen in all countries of the world!] 


How have we come down to this? It did not happen overnight, and this has been the result of decades of extreme-right-wing views of the role of "law-enforcement" polices throughout this country. The very first problem with the entire concept stems from the definition of "law·en·force·ment." The term infers that there are laws that need to be enforced; but the fact is there are no longer any "laws" that govern the behavior of those in uniform.  


This is how we have apparently become unwilling participants in this massive crime against the rights and responsibilities of everyone in this country; from the citizens that are the victims to the thugs that are illegally making these arrests; Tasering and sometimes torturing people-as well as those who are murdered by those same people that are armed, supposedly, to protect the same people that the uniformed law-enforcers are now making undeclared-war-upon.  


When I was as consultant to the California Department of Justice in the late nineteen-seventies the mood among a great many "officers" was that police in California were being restricted far-too-much by having to Mirandize suspects: Because this limited what police could do to "catch-the-bad-guys."  


In fact these same lazy, bull-headed cops were adamant that there should be no restrictions upon whatever they might want to do to get "confessions" from those they had decided were criminals. In this process the first, fourth and fifth amendments were considered to be counter-productive to "good-police-work (i.e. cops needed a blank check, including beating confessions out of suspects). After Death-Squad-Reagan became president these efforts began to be seen as much more desirable than they ever-had been before. Of course after 911 these criminally-open-ended policing polices became defacto law. And the result of these miscarriages of actual justice are now the law of the land: All of which are heavily buried under many layers of false-flag national-security and STATE Security requirements which is how America has come to find itself in the crosshairs of police weapons for the slightest infractions on so very many different occasions.  


This brings us to the latest version of lawless-behavior by a SWAT TEAM in Tucson, Arizona. This nameless and faceless "TEAM" murdered an ex-marine in his own home, with 71 shots which were fired at him without reason: and basically without warning. All the members of this TEAM should be profiled in the local papers, with their pictures and home addresses published, along with the records of their entire-service to the despicable Tucson Police Department that routinely utilizes their illegal-services (murder-for-hire). If Tucson cops were any-good at their so-called jobs then the number of home-invasions would not be the problem that they definitely are today!  


May 12, 2011 "LR" -- Jose Guerena survived two combat tours of Iraq, only to become a casualty of the Regime's longest war - the one waged against its domestic subjects in the name of drug prohibition. The former Marine was slaughtered by a SWAT team during a May 5 assault on his home in Arizona.  


Guerena's wife, Vanessa, heard a noise outside the couple's home near Tucson at about 9 a.m. Jose, who had just gone to bed after pulling a 12-hour shift at the Asarco Mine, suspected - correctly, as it turned out - that his family was threatened by an armed criminal gang. Grabbing his AR-15, Guerena instructed his wife and four-year-old son to hide in the closet while he confronted the intruders. According to Mrs. Guerena, the stormtroopers from the Pima County Regional SWAT team never identified themselves as police; they simply stormed into the home and started shooting.  


"I saw this guy pointing me at the window, Vanessa recalled in a television interview. "So, I got scared. And, I got like, 'Please don't shoot, I have a baby.' I put my baby [down]. [And I] put bag in window. And, I yell 'Jose! Jose! Wake up!'"  


"A deputy's bullet struck the side of the doorway, causing chips of wood to fall on his shield," recounts the Arizona Daily Star, paraphrasing an account provided by Pima County Sheriff's Office (PCSO) functionary Michael O'Connor. "That prompted some members of the team to think the deputy had been shot." Guerena never fired a shot; the marauders who invaded his home fired no fewer than seventy-one. As is standard procedure in such events, the invaders claimed that Guerena had fired on the officers, as he had every moral and legal right to.  


Neither Jose nor his wife had a criminal history of any kind. The attack on their home was described as a narcotics enforcement operation, but there are no reports that narcotics were found at the residence ­ - even though the invaders reportedly "seized" (that is, stole) something that belonged to the victim." (1)  


Whatever garbage was 'gleaned' from this attack that involved victims from four different homes that morning; must become public knowledge; so that the public can determine if this death sentence was warranted. As the "officers" were invading this man's home; the burden of PROOF that apparently justified this callous MURDER needs to be proven, beyond the shadow of any doubt! The "officers-involved" need to be immediately suspended and their pay frozen pending a full and open public-investigation of everyone from the Commander of that unit all the way down to and including whatever supposed "intelligence" there might have been that justified this irreversible action that resulted in the DEATH of the "SUSPECT." The judges that issued the warrants, the departments of the government that were behind the orders issued to the SWAT TEAM; in sum everyone and everything involved here ought to become part of this public-investigation. If there were any "justice" these so-called "officers" would be FIRED immediately and then investigated: IF that is, they were being judged the same way that their VICTIM was treated in this instance!  


"The Pima County Regional SWAT team fired 71 shots in seven seconds at a Tucson man they say pointed a gun at officers serving a search warrant at his home.  


Jose Guerena, 26, a former Marine who served in Iraq twice, was holding an AR-15 rifle when he was killed, but he never fired a shot, the Sheriff's Department said Monday after initially saying he had fired on officers during last week's raid. Six days after Guerena was shot, few details about the investigation that brought the SWAT team to the southwest-side home Guerena shared with his wife and their two young sons are known. Guerena's role in the narcotics investigation is unclear and deputies would not comment on what was seized from his home. Three other homes within a quarter of a mile from Guerena's house, were served search warrants related to the investigation that morning. The addresses and the names of people who live in the other homes have not been made public." (2)  


Is the USA now nothing but a holding-pen for unnamed suspects that can be murdered at random; if so, then we need to know that! That is what 'we have all been' since George W. Bush began spying on US citizens seven months before 911 happened. We have no rights, and we have now way to question, to challenge or to confront these animals in uniform: And everyday our ability to deal legally with these out-of-control-uniformed-outlaws is diminished. It is amazing that most of these creatures probably need to use their own fingers to be able to count to ten; and anything over that presents a problem. The US is drafting troops from our wars overseas, straight into police-departments here, without any police-training and putting them in the field as if the people they confront here are no different than those they were murdering routinely overseas. Maybe that's why this RAID looked more like a night-raid in Baghdad than a SWAT-TEAM 'action' in Tucson? This is producing time-bombs that cannot continue in a holding pattern for much longer. . .  


If this situation is not directly and publicly addressed then things like Vigilantism could well begin to make a comeback among the population. Because no people can be targeted as we have been TARGETED, for very long without producing an equal and opposite REACTION to these illegal and outrageous behaviors by those that are supposed to protect the public and not simply brutalize and murder us. Apparently no response to these POLICE-STATE tactics was ever contemplated by those dark-forces that have instituted these illegal polices: However there will be a spontaneous public BACKLASH, and the only questions will be When and Where: NOT IF.  


Seventy-one shots and although 'The TARGET" was armed, and combat-trained, his weapon while fully loaded was still on SAFETY, and he did not fire a single shot! He had just gone to sleep after working a twelve-hour shift overnight, and he was suddenly awakened to this nightmare. The house was darkened (that helps if you're trying to sleep) but to the invaders this was suspicious, and just seemed to confirm that something illegal was going on). No one in this criminal murder has even asked things like:  


"What happened to 'the presumption of INNOCENCE?"  


So Jose Guerena was murdered at home, in front of his wife and one of their children. (His wife was never referred to as his wife officially ­ she was just the unidentified woman). So, unless you like living in Baghdad or Kabul, you need to begin to DEMAND ANSWERS to the questions that at this moment, WE, as American-Victims of POLICE-STATE-INSECURITY are not allowed to ever-ask!  


Whatever else happened in Tucson, Arizona these uniformed thugs MURDERED Jose Guerena; and his murders MUST be TRIED in Open Court!  


1. He Served the Empire Abroad: The Regime Killed Him in His Home   


2. SWAT Team Fired 71 shots in Raid   


13. Lessons From Argentina: Go Get Your Dollars Out Now! FAST !!!

By Adrian Salbuchi  




November 10, 2008  

The events of the last two weeks have clearly revealed that the global financial, monetary and banking system imposed on the world by the power structures promoting “globalization” is fundamentally flawed, unviable and immoral in its effects upon the most all of Mankind.  After allowing a small cabal of shady characters to illegitimately accumulate vast amounts of wealth and power over markets, corporations, industries, media, armed forces and entire nations, like the World Trade Center towers on 9/11, this entire System is now in free-fall, collapsing into itself in one massive implosion.  


This loathsome and unjust Global Power System was designed and implemented over the past seven decades by the geopolitical and geoeconomic strategic planners serving the New World Order power structures, most notably its network of discrete, low-profile but highly powerful private think tanks, such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR, founded in New York in 1919), The Trilateral Commission (founded in 1973), The Bilderberg Conference (formed in Holland in 1954), and others like the Cato Institute, American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the notorious Neo-con Project for a New American Century (PNAC)  (1).   

Considering the enormous complexity of the process that is taking place right now; the vast amounts of information we are bombarded with every minute of the day, and the apparent difficulty in foreseeing just how this global crisis will finally be resolved, we would summarize certain important aspects and key data which we believe will help us put together this veritable jig-saw puzzle, so that we may begin to fathom what the true face of this horrendous creature euphemistically called “globalization”, is really like.     

As Argentine citizens, we have a huge advantage over other peoples including US citizens when it comes to understanding and coping with this kind of crisis.  I say this because in our own lifetimes we have suffered in Argentina all of what is now happening globally – albeit on a much smaller scale in our case.  We’ve seen this movie…  We’ve been there, and done that…   We’ve been pushed and dragged through the entire hysterical hocus-pocus of inflation, hyperinflation, systemic banking collapses, currency changes, Debt Bond Swaps, Mega-Debt Bond Swaps, financial “armouring”, banking holidays, freezing of bank accounts, etc., etc...  And we have also suffered the end-results: bank bail-outs paid for by taxpayers (or through inflation, or through the confiscation of savings), disappearance of pension funds, destruction of job posts and overall impoverishment of the population. 

So, take a clue from our thirty years’ experience in “financial meltdowns”:  Go Get Your Dollars Out From Your Bank Now, And Do It Fast!!!!   

A Flawed Model 


·          Finance versus Economics  The financial system (i.e., the basically virtual, unreal and parasitic wonderworld of banking), was designed to function in a way increasingly contrary to the interests of the Economy (i.e., the real world of concrete work, labour and production/services).  In recent decades, Finance and the Economy have increasingly parted paths, ceasing to maintain the essential balance and equilibrium that is necessary for ensuring healthy economic activity centered on the Common Good of the People.  In fact, Finance and Economy have today become all but total enemies.  This can be seen, for example, by the fact that the present Global Economic and Financial System rests almost completely on the concept of DEBT, which is another way of saying that the Real Economy is always controlled by, and subservient to, the interests, whims and crises of Virtual Finance.


·          The Debt System  The Doctrine (or, should I say, Dogma) of Extreme Capitalism has imposed the concept of DEBT as the preferred way to move the economy.  In most countries (Argentina, for example) this means that there is no proper use of the local National Currency by the State to generate credit in a controlled and non-Interest bearing manner.  This is the best way of fueling economic expansion for specific social, defense, infrastructure, and technological developments, always focusing on the Common Good and prioritizing the National Interest.  One of Extreme Capitalism’s key dogmas says that central banks controlling the national currency must be totally “independent” of Government.  However, since all such institutions must finally respond to somebody somewhere, we thus discover that nowadays central banks are subordinated and subservient not to the State (i.e., the People), but rather to the private banking superstructure, both local and global, which naturally leaves the whole concept of the Common Good and National Interest almost totally aside.  This is so in Argentina as in other countries, however in the case of the United States this is particularly extreme because its central bank – the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) - is a private institution, with almost 97% of its unique shareholding structure in the hands of the private banking infrastructure itself, both domestic (in a first instance) as well as global (if we look further afield).  Once the private banking superstructure achieves control of the local central bank, it is then in a position to impose chronic and often drastic under-monetization of the Economy. This means that there is never enough money to satisfy the true needs of the Real Economy.  That’s when the private banks come on stage offering to close that artificially generated ”gap”, becoming the prime credit generators of the economy, for which they charge interest – often at usury rates  – for  loans made to individuals, companies and even the State itself.  We should also understand that the key source of inflation in all economies lies not so much in monetary expansion by the State (if this is kept in sync with true economic growth), but rather most inflation in any economy is fueled by interest bearing loans made by the private banking sector.  At a Geoeconomic level (2), this has also served to generate massive public debt in Third World countries like Argentina,. fueled by rampant corruption amongst the individuals involved in the lending and borrowing process, and supported by Governments that never seem to understand how to use the sovereign functions inherent in their power to issue money to fund and promote balanced economic growth.  Instead, these countries adopt IMF-designed neoliberal policies on key matters spanning from central banking functions, fiscal policies, debt, rates of interest and exchange, to banking regulations and other key factors, that have all been twisted out of shape so that they run counter to the country’s National Interest. 


·          Fractional Reserve Banking System - This is a universaly applicable banking concept in today’s global marketplace, that allows the private banking infrastructure to generate “Virtual Money” literally out of thin air (i.e., electronic credit lines, loans and the like) in a proportion of 6, 10, 30 or 50 times more than the actual Real Money they hold in their bank vaults.  To add insult to injury, the banks then charge you hefty interest rates for the “money” they created out of nothing and ”lent” to you, whilst they require collateral consisting of real stuff like your home, your car, or your company.    The proportion between the number of Dollars or pesos in their vaults and the amount of credit they can generate, is determined by the local central bank (remember: controlled by the private banks themselves), is called minimum monetary reserves under the Fractional Reserve Banking System and reflects a statistical estimate of what portion of deposit holders will normally visit the bank to withdraw their money in cash.   The problem is that the concept of “normal” is basically a group or collective psychological factor, intimately linked to the perception that deposit-holders have regarding the financial system in general, and individual banks in particular.  When “abnormal” times come – and boy have they come today!! – then people panic and run to their banks all at the same time, demanding to withdraw their money, not as electronic blips on the ATM machine, but as hard cash.   That was when we all discovered that the amount of Real Money in each bank’s vaults was not suffient to pay all depositors, except for a handful (normally privileged insiders who “saw it all coming”).  For the rest: of us, there was nothing left and the banking system collapsed.  That’s when in the US for example, and barring any taxpayer funded bail-outs, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) indemnifies up to 100.000 dollars in the US or, in Argentina, that’s when we all realized that we had all been totally robbed, and took to the streets to uselessly bang our pots and pans on the banks’ monumental iron-clad gates, conveniently shuttered the night before… All thanks to the inherently fraudulent Fractional Reserve Banking System.  This is what happened in Argentina in 2001 and this is what is unfolding right now in the US. 


·          Investment Banking – In the US, Commercial or Main Street banks like Bank of America, JPMorganChase or CitiGroup are allowed to generate 8 to 10 “Virtual” – i.e., fake – Dollars for every Real Buck they have in their vaults.  This scheme is controlled by the authorities, i.e., the FED and the Comptroller of the Currency.  However, so called “investment banks” in the US and elsewhere, do not need to comply with any such requirements; they are the ones making Mega-Loans to Corporations, the US Government and foreign Governments like Argentina’s, which is why they are far less controlled and regulated  This means that for every Real Dollar they hold, these investment bankers can create 26 ”virtual” Dollars (Goldman Sachs), 30 “virtual” Dollars (Morgan Stanley), more than 60 (Merrill Lynch, just before they went bust), or more than 100 in the cases of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. (3) 


·          Channeling and Transference System - Another key factor lies in the way that the global financial system has structured automatic channels to bring in profits and transfer away all losses throughout the entire system.  This has the effect that in times of great growth and gigantic profits (i.e., when the whole system grows), it is stable and allows creating many trillions of dollars out of thin air).  That’s when profits are conveniently privatized, i.e., they naturally flow into the pockets of shareholders, speculators, directors, CEO’s, top management, “investors” and other key stakeholders in financial institutions and Corporate infrastructure.  But when the system suddenly contracts, and tail-spins out of control as is happening now, then mechanisms are conveniently activated to socialize all losses through State-funded bailouts, special loans, FED-funded acquisitions via specific “vehicles” like JPMorgan, Citicorp and Bank of America, so that it is the domestic and foreign populations as a whole who end up paying the bill, through such phenomenae as inflation, hyperinflation (oh, we know a lot about that in Argentina!!), banking collapses, tax hikes, debt defaults, nationalizations, etc). 


·          The 4 Pillars of the Extreme Capitalist Model – In short the key factors described above, in the long-term all function together in a coordinated, consistent and synchronized manner, which means that, even if in the short- and medium-terms there are spates of high profits where money is sloshed around big time, in the long-term the whole system just doesn’t add up.  That’s when you have periodic meltdowns like today’s.  Usually, they are explained away by well-paid economic gurus writing brainy explanations in The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times or New York Times, who tell us that this is all just part of “the economic cycle”.  For the most part, they can isolate sections of those downturns and localize them, so that they only affect a couple of emerging markets…  Like Argentina in 2001, or Brazil in 1999, or Mexico in 1997. In short, these four pillars are:


1.       Programmed Monetary Insufficiency - Artificially generated by an “independent” central bank, controlled by the local and global private banking institutions superstructure; 


2.       Private banking based on Fractional Reserves - As a system, this allows banks to create money out of thin air, charging interest for it – often at usury rates -, and generating huge profits for “investors” and creditors;


3.       Debt  - This is the key concept that “fuels” private and public economies replacing the far more economically sound concept of reinvesting company profits and promoting a savings culture.  Those who benefit from the unnecessary creation of debt need to promote and instigate among the public at large in all countries, fericiously undisciplined consumerism and greed, which goes hand in hand with  total rejection of the very concept of saving and preparing for a rainy day. (4)


4.       Privatize Profits /Socialize Losses – As a channelling and transference scheme for the various stages of the recurrent “cycles”, so that when they reach the inexorable stage where collapse is nunavoidable, there is always a way of making the population at large pay the bill. 

Read the Full Article:
Lessons From Argentina Go Get Your Dollars Out Now


14. Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11

A Review of the book that has been called "the most important book of the twenty-first century."

Book Review by Eric Larsen Ph.D.

Sunday, 17 April 2011 06:32

What a complete, unmitigated disaster 9/11 and the ten awful years following it have been—ten years of murder, crime, lawlessness, deceit, stupidity, and blindness that are only now meliorated, at long last, by the publication of Dr. Judy Wood’s unique, revelatory, and unequivocally welcome book, Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.


Allow me to make full disclosure now, so that those (and, believe me, there are many) who will choose not to read further can quit right away and save time.


I, me, Eric Larsen, wrote the Foreword to Dr. Wood’s book. I wrote it partly because I have known for many years about Dr. Wood’s research; partly because I have followed the website that Dr. Wood has maintained (; and partly because I was lucky enough to be given the opportunity to write that Foreword.


It wasn’t just an opportunity but a high honor. To give an idea of how great an honor it was, here is the first line of what I wrote:

The book you now hold in your hands is the most important book of the twenty-first century.

Let me go further and quote the two sentences also , since the same obligation pertains now as did when I wrote themthe obligation for me to explain why I said so unqualified a thing and what I meant by it. Here’s what I meant, and still do:

Where Did the Towers Go? is a work, assuming that its content and message are properly and fairly heeded, that offers a starting point from which those who genuinely want to do it can begin, first, to rein in and then, perhaps, even end the wanton criminality and destructiveness of a set of American policies that took as their justification and starting point the horrific events of September 11, 2001.

As everyone knows, 9/11 has been “the justification and starting point” for all manner of destruction, loss, crime, and horror. Without 9/11, there would have been no “Patriot Act,” no abuse of FISA and stripping away of privacy rights, no Military Commissions Act of 2006 with its setting aside of Habeas Corpus, no implementation of Northcom and deployment of our own military forces on domestic American soil (for use against who, you might ask?), and no trashing of Bill of Rights and Constitutional guarantees, no programmatic and precedent-setting weakening and eliminating of right and guarantees so that the very concepts of “citizenship” and “freedom” have been emptied out to the point where setting up concentration camps inside the U.S. is now legal and not a one of us would have any recourse whatsoever if it were decided that we should be thrown into a cell in one of them and forgotten forever.[1]


Without 9/11, there would never have been any fake and opportunistic “Global War on Terror,” would never have been Guantanamo as we know it now, never have been official programs of torture or fake demonizing of Islam in order to justify wars in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Somalia, or to justify overt plans for the murder of U.S. citizens living in places like, say, Yemen.


There’s more, much more. The complete list of atrocities, crimes, and inhumanities triggered by or justified by 9/11 could fill whole chapters, even books. By using 9/11 as propaganda—by using it as trigger, excuse, justification, or catalyst—the U.S. has betrayed itself, its principles, and its people, and has made itself the world’s most dangerous enemy of all mankind and also of Earth herself.


How can it conceivably be, given these facts, that we, a nation of people who presumably have minds of our own—how can it be that we have done nothing to stop this hideous parade of monstrosities and horrors? In the Foreword to Dr. Wood’s book, I wrote: 

It is now almost a decade since 9/11 took place, and in all that time no unassailable, permanent, or, in pragmatic terms, politically influential progress has been made in determining exactly and irrefutably what took place on that day—or what did not take place.


We—that is, we the potential resistance or opposition to U.S. criminal policy—have been spinning our wheels for a complete decade. There are a lot of reasons for this wheel-spinning, including various programs of very skillful and extraordinarily devious cover-up after cover-up after cover-up of the central question of what did happen on 9/11. For, as long as that central question remains unanswered, or for as long as that question can be caused to remain obfuscated, blurred, muddled-up, in doubt—as long as that situation continues, the wheels will continue to spin and people won’t quite know what to do. Dr. Wood is very well aware of this fact. Her own way of putting it is that before accusing someone of a crime, you’ve got to know what crime they committed. In her Author’s Preface, she writes:


You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it.


That kind of clear, cool, commonsense logic is rare among the many who for ten years have talked a very great deal about 9/11, although it’s obvious that in Dr. Wood such good sense resides in abundance. Here’s the opening of her Author’s Preface:


For the record, I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01—nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01. This is not a case of belief [Dr. Wood’s emphasis]. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence.


Yes. To say that George did not do X hardly means that Al did do X. Even worse is to imagine that someone’s belief that George did or didn’t do X has any necessary relationship to the truth or the fact of the matter at all. Dr. Wood will have none of this substitution of “belief” for “thinking.” She is a scientist, and a very highly educated one, with “a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), and a Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science” (again from my Foreword). Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for them to conclude.  

Read the Full Review Here:


15. Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors

May 13, 2011

Source: Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors

Gehlen casts Hitler as the most brilliant secret agent in history. Like the Pied Piper, he led a targeted people to disaster.  

By Henry Makow Ph.D.

In the past, I have presented evidence 
that Martin Bormann, the man who signed Hitler's paycheck, was a Soviet i.e. Illuminati agent but I was not sure if Hitler was Bormann's dupe or also a conscious traitor. 


The testimony of General Reinhard Gehlen, chief of German intelligence gathering for  Russia, suggests the latter is true. 


In his memoirs, "The Service" (World Pub. 1972) Gehlen says that he and Admiral Canaris, head of the Abwehr, suspected there was a traitor in the German Supreme Command. Both had noticed that the Soviets were receiving "rapid and detailed information … on top level decision-making."  


They both suspected Martin Bormann, the Deputy Fuehrer and Head of the Nazi Party. 

"Our suspicions were largely confirmed when, independently of one another, we found out that Bormann and his group were operating an unsupervised radio transmitter network and using it to send coded messages to Moscow. 


When OKW monitors reported this, Canaris demanded an investigation; but word came back that Hitler himself had emphatically forbidden any intervention: he had been informed in advance of these Funkspile, or "fake radio messages," and he had approved them" (p.71). 


Despite the fact that vital information continued to leak, Gehlen and Canaris left it at that. "Neither of us was in any position to denounce the Reichsleiter [Bormann] with any prospect of success." 


In his book "Hitler's Traitor" Louis Kilzer estimated that Bormann was worth fifty divisions to the Soviets. 


After the war, Gehlen, who headed the BND (West German Intelligence Agency) was able to confirm Bormann's treason. "During the 1950's, I was passed two separate reports from behind the Iron Curtain to the effect that Bormann had been a Soviet agent...' 


The fact that Hitler shielded Bormann confirms that he also was an active traitor. Both served the Illuminati (Masonic) bankers, i.e. the Rothschild syndicate, based in London. The Illuminati were also behind Stalin and Communism, not to mention Churchill, and FDR.  


By fabricating war, the Illuminati wage war on humanity with the ultimate goal of a veiled world government dictatorship. 


Think 9-11, "The Patriot Act," the TSA.  Behind the veil of democracy and fighting terror, they are constructing a police state. 

Read the Full Article Here:
Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors


16. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 9)

Antichrist and the Green Prince

By John D Christian, Copyright © John D. Christian 2009. Used with permission.

PDF download button.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF eBook
 Antichrist and the Green Prince

Chapter Eleven

World Environment Day: St. George, Asclepius And Apollyon 

World Environment Day (WED) was established by the socialist/fascist United Nations General Assembly on 5th June, 1972. Since then, the day is commemorated each year on the same date, 5th June. Every year, a different city is nominated, allowing various countries to supposedly showcase the positive things being done nationally, regionally and internationally to promote sustainable practices and reduce the dire impacts of climate change and global warming. The aim is to stimulate awareness of the environment and enhance political attention and public action in “reclaiming paradise” as some of the UN’s leading imbeciles put it. The United Nations Environment Program World Environment Day celebration is now widely observed in more than 100 countries, and is the most widely popular and heavily supported day on the United Nations calendar.  


Every year, on June 5, the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP), heads of state, prime ministers, ministers, VIPs and leading business organizations from around the world join forces to mark the event. City councils, businesses, local communities, interest groups, schools and kindergartens are now being mobilized to observe the celebration. Soon every child in the world will be celebrating World Environment Day. 

On 5 June, 2009, World Environment Day was hosted by Mexico with the lie and ecumenical theme, “Your Planet Needs You – Unite to Combat Climate Change.” One of the most prestigious awards of the UNEP is called The Champions of the Earth Award, and in 2009 this was presented to Yann Arthus-Bertrand. On November 10, 2008, he had a private dinner at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, with none other than Prince Charles, Nicolas Sarkozy and the French Minister for Ecology Jean Louis Borloo. 

On July 1, 2005, Yann Arthus-Bertrand founded the international environmental organization GoodPlanet, and set up the program Action Carbone to offset his own greenhouse gas emissions generated by his helicopter transports utilized for his photography. On April 22, 2009, Yann Arthus-Bertrand was officially designated as the United Nations Environmental Program Goodwill Ambassador. 


He founded the Altitude Agency in 1991, which was the world’s first press agency and images bank specializing in aerial photography. In 1994 he started a thorough study on the state of the earth funded by UNESCO. Since then he has been involved in several environmental projects associated with his photography, and he has been highly honored by France being made a Knight of the Legion d’ Honneur and Knight of the Ordre du Merite Agricole (national order of agricultural merit).  


In April 2007 he started directing a movie firstly called Boomerang. He later changed the title into Home. A 2-hour film documentary, it was released on World Environment Day, June 5, 2009, and is to be shown all around the world to generate mass awareness of the “home truths” and “urgency” the world now faces as the result of global warming and climate change. The man who principally funded this major propaganda documentary is Francois-Henri Pinault, billionaire chief of the luxury goods firm PPR, whose brands include Gucci, Yves Saint Laurent, Balenciaga, Stella McCartney and Puma. 


Francois-Henri Pinault is the son of Francois Pinault, a French billionaire who founded the company. According to Forbes List of Billionaires (2008) Francois Pinault is ranked the 39th richest person in the world with an estimated fortune of US$16.9 billion. His holding company is called none other than Artemis S.A., which in turn owns a host of other giant companies. Remember? – the Greek name Artemis for the mother earth goddess is just another name for the Roman goddess Diana, who is just another aspect of Maia and Chloris. Well, according to Artemis S. A. is in turn controlled by Pinault-Printemps-Redoute S.A. The following list of some of the most prominent characters on the Supervisory Board of Pinault-Printemps-Redoute S.A. is revealing: 


ReneBarbier De La Serre, c/o Compagnie Financiere Edmund de Rothschild; Anthony Hamilton, c/o Fox Pitt Kelton Group Ltd, London; Francois Henrot, c/o Rothschild & Cie Banque, Paris; Philippe Lagayette, c/o J.P. Morgan & Cie S.A., Paris; Baudoin Prot, c/o BNP Paribas, Paris; Roger Bruno, c/o Lazard Freres, Paris; and lest we forget the man himself who is supposed to own the company but doesn’t – Francois Pinault, c/o Artemis.


Julien Sereys de Rothschild, born in 1971, youngest son of Baroness Philppine de Rothschild and co-owner of Chateau Mouton Rothschild and a member of the Supervisory Board of Baron Philippe de Rothschild S.A. works closely with Francois Pinault. Both Julien and UNEP World Environment Day climate hero, David de Rothschild (heir to the Rothschild European fortune) and Loren Rothschild work closely with Prince Charles, Al Gore and the UN. 


At the beginning of this book, much was written about how, in Greek mythology, the sun god Apollo, and earth goddess Artemis, killed the Niobids with their “poisoned arrows,” causing Meliboea the “green” mother earth goddess to be so frightened and terrified by the ordeal that she turned permanently “pale” – and changed her name to the goddess Chloris – the root word from which the Greek word Chloros is translated into English in the KJV in Revelation 6:8 referring to the fourth “pale” horse of the Apocalypse, accompanied by the Greek gods, Death and Hell.  


Also, remember how the prophecy in Revelation 9:11 was explained, “And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.” – how the author has interpreted this by combining the Hebrew and Greek names together to mean the Father of Green Plant Destruction.” Who, in Revelation 12:9, is referred to simply as, “that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world.” 


Well, there is still something rather more important to know about Apollo’s chief celebrations in Greece and Rome related to John’s prophecy. In Greek mythology, Apollo’s first great achievement was to rid Pytho (Delphi) of the dragon-like serpent Python. This venomous demon protected the sanctuary of Pytho from its lair beside the Castalian Spring, where it stood guard while Sibyl proclaimed her prophecies as she inhaled the trance inducing vapors from an open chasm. Apollo killed Python with his bow and poisoned arrows (according to Homer, “he killed the fearsome dragon Python, piercing it with his darts”). Apollo then took charge of the oracle, and ridded the neighboring countryside of widespread destruction, since Python had previously destroyed all the crops and farmland, sacked the villages, polluted the lakes, rivers and springs. However, to make restitution for killing Python, as the fearsome dragon was the son of the mother earth goddess Gaia, Apollo had to serve Admetus for nine years as a cowherd. This he did, and after his service was completed he returned to Pytho coming in the guise of a dolphin bringing with him priests from the Island of Crete (Apollo’s cult name ‘Delphinos’ means ‘dolphin’ or ‘porpoise’ and this is how Delphi was named). 

After killing the dragon, Python, and taking possession of the oracle, the sun god, or god of light, Phobus, then was transformed and became known as ‘Pythian Apollo.’ He then bestowed divine powers on one of the priestesses in the sanctuary, and she became known as Pythia. It was she who inhaled the trance-inducing vapors from a crack in the temple floor, while she sat on a tripod chewing laurel leaves. (The laurel tree, leaves, and wreath being sacred to Apollo – hence the reason why “laurel wreaths” are still used today as a sacred prize awarded in sports and musical competitions. The term ‘laureate’ today is derived from the Latin word ‘laurea’ – ‘laurel.’ In Protestant Britain, the “poet laureate” is named by the sovereign as a member of the royal household and charged with the composing of suitable verses for the royal court and state – on behalf of Apollo!). From this time forth Delphi became the most important oracle center of Apollo. 


This pagan Greek myth of “Apollo slaying the dragon” is originally derived from the earliest Babylonian myth of the sun god, Marduk (represented by a red dragon) called “Marduk slaying the dragon Tiamat.” Gradually this myth of “Apollo slaying the dragon” in Greece was adopted in Rome, and then “Christianized” by the Roman Catholic Church, and later the Church of England, to become the myth called “St. George and the Dragon.” Today St. George is really the Protestant church’s “Christianized” Jupiter.  


St. George’s Feast Day in the Church of England is held every year on April 23, which was the most important pagan feast day in ancient Rome consecrated to Jupiter called the Vinalia. Not only is St. George (Jupiter) the pagan patron saint of England. He is also the patron of the highest degree of World Freemasonry, The Most Noble Order of the Garter and St. George, whose head, the British Sovereign, is his literal incarnation. The badge of the Order of the Garter actually has a picture of the mythical “St. George Slaying the Dragon” on it.  


The Roman Jupiter, is just another personification the Greek sun god Zeus, and his son, Pythian Apollo, represented as a red dragon. It is not just a coincidence that one of the Prince of Wales emblems is a red dragon, and Prince Charles wears on his left hand little finger images of two dragons surrounding an amethyst on his Prince of Wales Gold Ring.  


In ancient Greece, on the Athenian calendar, the first month was called Hekatombaion, originally named Kronion, named after an old festival honoring Apollo. Today this month is roughly equivalent to May/June. It begins at sunset with the first visible crescent moon following the summer solstice. During this month, the 6th day was sacred to Demeter as her birthday, and the 7th day of the month was Apollo’s birthday.  


In Rome, the month of June was dedicated to the goddess Juno, after which today the month is named. June 1st was sacred to her as Juno Moneta, goddess of money. June was also dedicated to Apollo and Diana (Greek Artemis) on June 3, where 27 sacrificial cakes were offered during the Secular Games.  


Apollo was introduced to Rome from Greece first as a “healing god” in the fifth century B.C. as the result of a desperate attempt to cure a serious epidemic. The circumstances surrounding the building of his first temple in the Prata Flaminia to the southwest of the Capitol explain exactly why he was brought in. A serious epidemic inspired the dedication of the shrine pro valetudine populi in honor of the god who bore the official name of Apollo Medicus (Livy 4.25.3;40.51.6). The temple to him was dedicated in 433 BC and consecrated in 431 BC.  


As time passed, he gradually was no longer only confined solely to the domain of medicine, as he took on the Greek “darker side” of Apollyon as a “destroyer” and “murderer” in his full Greek personification with Artemis killing the Niabids. 


Today the Euro-American Women’s Council now worships the Greek goddess Artemis.  



UN World Health Organization (WHO): Apollo, Aesculapius, Hygeia, Panacea, and Swine Flu 


One of the sons of Apollo, who was transformed into the serpent-dragon, was Asclepius (Latin: Aesculapius) who carried on his father Apollo’s Satanic serpent-like association with medicine. As the Greek god of medicine, Asclepius carried the Serpent-entwined Staff, now the dominant symbol of the UN World Health Organization and also the world medical profession. There are “two sides” of medicine, one good, and one bad. 


In 1992, a survey of all American health organizations found that 62% of professional associations used the rod of Asclepius as their emblem, whereas in commercial medical organizations, 76% used the Caduceus, the short herald’s staff entwined by two serpents, sometimes called the Wand of Hermes or Wand of Mercury. (Appropriately, Mercury was the Roman god of liars and thieves). Both the Serpent-entwined Staff of Asclepius and the Caduceus of Hermes/Mercury have their origins in Egypt and Babylon, where they were used as emblems of Tammuz, the sun god, and the earth goddess Ishtar, as an awakener of life in the spring. 


Asclepius had six daughters. One of them was called Hygeia, the Greek goddess of Health (from which the modern name ‘health’ is derived) who also became his wife. She helped her father Asclepius carry out his father Apollo’s Satanic deeds! As a mother earth goddess in Athens she was called Athena Hygieia. Her cult did not begin to spread until the Delphic oracle under Apollo recognized her after the debilitating Plague of Athens in 430-427BC.  


She was often depicted as a young woman with the serpent of Apollo entwined around her body feeding from a cup, or standing with her father/husband Asclepius or grandfather Apollo. She was so respected at times in Greece that the Pythagoreans (vegetarians and “Greenies”) used her name as a special greeting. In 1968 a stamp was issued in Greece to commemorate the 20th anniversary (1948-1968) of the UN World Health Organization (WHO). What did it have on it? It had the UN World Health Organization’s emblem and an image of the goddess Hygeia on it. 


Up until recent times at least, virtually all medical doctors and physicians throughout the world have taken the pagan Hippocratic Oath of Hippocrates, who worshipped Apollyon, on graduation. The oath is one of the oldest binding documents in history. Hippocrates (460-370 BC) renown as the famous Greek physician and “father of medicine” was a pagan, Greek mystic and philosopher who later became known as a physician. There is absolutely no documentary proof that he was ever a real, bona fide physician as we imagine a doctor to be today.  


The first words in the Classic Oath remarkably read: “I swear by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and Hygeia, and Panakeia, …” The noun “physician” refers to a person skilled in the art of healing, but in Hippocrates’s oath it is capitalized as Apollo’s SURNAME. It means the complete opposite of healing, and as the surname of Apollo (Apollyon in Revelation – ‘destroyer’) it means death. According to the Bible, Jesus Christ is the “Great Physician.” (Matthew 9:12, Mark 2:17). “Apollo Physician” is therefore one of the names of Antichrist. 


The English word ‘health’ today comes from old English ‘haelth,’ from ‘hal.’ Similarly, the verb ‘to heal’ comes from middle English ‘helen’ from old English ‘haelen,’ related to old high German ‘heilen.’ During the Nazi Third Reich, when the German people saluted Hitler, as their supreme “Fuehrer,” they greeted him with the term, “Heil! Hitler!” which most Germans mistakenly believed meant “health to you Hitler” because “heil” in German means ‘health.’ But “Heil” capitalized and used as a proper noun does not necessarily mean ‘health’ in general terms at all. It was the German medical profession’s pagan swearing of the Hippocratic Oath to the god Apollyon, and the blind worship of Hygeia (Health) that inspired them to worship the “Fuehrer” as the commander-in-chief in a political sense, but as their “great physician” Apollyon in a medical and spiritual sense. Pausanias noted the statues of Hygeia, one of the six daughters of Asclepius and granddaughter of Apollo, and of Athena Hygeia were sited close to the entrance of the Acropolis in Athens.  


Although the Classic Oath was largely pagan, consecrated to Apollyon (Satan) it did at least require all doctors to give an assurance they would keep their patient’s medical records confidential and private, and they would not harm any of their patients, perform abortions and so on. However, the Modern Version, written in 1964 by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School of Medicine at Tufts University used by most medical schools in USA today says no such thing other than using nebulous terms like “I will respect the privacy of my patients.” Today the graduation ritual in medical schools is called the White Coat Ceremony. As has always been the case, it is a religious service and “rite of passage”, similar to a priest’s ordination to priesthood, symbolizing the “conversion” of the “lay candidate” into the membership of the medical profession. The White Coat Ceremony and modern practice of the medical profession wearing “white coats” is directly derived from the ancient rituals of Apollo, Asclepius, and Hygeia in their sanctuaries. Pausanias, Description of Greece2.4.5 describes: “By this gymnasium [in Korinthos] are temples of Zeus and Asklepios. The images of Asklepios and Hygeia are of white marble.” And Pausanias, Description of Greece 2.11. 6 describes: “”[In the sanctuary of Asklepios at Titane, Sikyonia:] Of the image [of Alexanor, grandson of Asklepios] can be seen only the face, hands and feet, for it has about it a tunic of white wool and a cloak. There is a similar image of Hygeia (Health); this, too, one cannot see easily because it is so surrounded with the locks of women, who cut them off and offer them to the goddess, and with strips of Babylonian raiment.” Also, the Roman Catholic Pope still wears his “white” robe vestments today to symbolize himself as the “holy father” Apollo.  


The fourth deity in the Hippocratic Oath is Panacea (Panakeia), the Greek goddess of healing, another granddaughter of Apollo and daughter of Asclepius. She was the “cure-all” goddess or “universal remedy” goddess. The modern word “pandemic’ is directly derived from her via the Greek word pandemos ‘pertaining to all people,’ from pan ‘all’ demos ‘people.’ A disease is said to be an ‘epidemic’ when it becomes widespread within a specific community or population at a specific time but later subsides. It is said to be ‘endemic’ when it exists all the time or is native to a resident community or population. It is said to be ‘pandemic’ when it spreads throughout the whole country or world. It is when a disease or virus becomes pandemic that it is named after the worship of this particular goddess.


Since all doctors and health authorities around the world are now being rapidly “socialized” under the fascist/communist power of the UN World Health Organization (WHO) (whose occult logo is the Serpent-entwined Staff of Asclepius) through national medical associations, companies, and government health (goddess Hygeia) agencies (whose logos contain the Devil’s Caduceus short herald’s staff entwined by two serpents of Hermes/Mercury) the gods of theft, commerce, deception and death – it shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise to see, in the near future, under the echoing screams of the pagan media propaganda and the UN World Health Organization health professionals – reverberating cries of warnings about flu “Pandemics” and such like to the goddess Panacea!  


In ancient Greece, the goddess Panacea at times mobilized almost every single medical doctor in the Greek world – away from continuing to genuinely “help” their patients, (like the “good side” of Apollo) – to become like Apollyon, her grandfather of old in classic antiquity, with his “darker side” and destroying spirit, split personality, in which he abruptly turned and, with his twin sister Artemis, the “green” mother goddess, hypocritically brutally poisoned (vaccinated) in a “pandemic” many of his “plague-ridden” patient/enemies/children (the Niabids, children of Amphion and Niobe) with his poisoned arrows of death!  


Today, the equivalent sort of events which would likely bring on the “darker side” of the medical profession to worship “Apollyon” as a “Savior” to come and save “Mother Earth,” the “Empire” or “Republic” would be something like a deliberately caused, serious, bird-flu or swine-flu epidemic leading in turn to a global pandemic outbreak! In Rome, Caesar was given the supreme power of a dictator under the protection of Apollo, with the approval of the senate, only as a result of such perilous states of emergency that threatened to paralyze the state. 


Swine Flu Pandemic and Tamiflu 


The UN World Health Organization’s deceptive global ‘Swine-flu Pandemic’ declaration in mid-June 2009 recommending mass global vaccination with the Tamiflu antiviral drug is a good case in point. Tamiflu is manufactured by the giant Swiss pharmaceutical Basel-based Roche Holding AG. (As at 2008 it had 80,080 employees). Founded in 1896 by Fritz Hoffman-La Roche, the company was singled out (with a number of other Basel chemical companies) in August 2001 by an Independent Commission of Experts (ICE) to probe Switzerland’s wartime past – as one of the companies that put its own interests ahead of humanitarian concerns in dealing with the Nazis. Roche owned factories in Germany between 1933 and 1945 and was an important supplier of pharmaceuticals for the Third Reich. The company had direct dealings with the Wehrmacht (armed forces) and used forced slave labor at its plants. The company is presently making billions out of the sale of Tamiflu. While Tamiflu is manufactured by Roche, it was developed by Gilead Sciences Inc., headquartered in Foster City, California (as at 2008 it had 2,979 employees) which owns the intellectual property rights to the drug and receives a percentage of the profits. 


Donald H. Rumsfeld joined the Board of Directors of the company in 1988 not long after it was founded in 1987. In 1997, he assumed the position of Chairman of Gilead Sciences Inc., a position which he held in the years prior to becoming US Secretary of Defense under the Bush administration. In 1985 Monsanto purchased G. D. Searle, the chemical company that held the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet. When Donald Rumsfeld was Chairman of G. D. Searle 1977-1985, he was instrumental in getting the FDA to approve the unconscionable use of aspartame as a food sweetener, against overwhelming scientific evidence that it is so deadly it can be used as ant killer, rat poison, and causes deadly brain tumors in those who consume it. For Rumsfeld’s personal responsibility to business, in 1977, he was awarded the highest US civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Since the approval of aspartame, he has personally been responsible for giving literally millions of people around the world brain tumors and other serious health effects from consuming aspartame in food and drink products. 


Tamiflu (Tami ‘Tammuz’ – flu ‘influenza’) is named after the demonic Babylonian sun god Tammuz. It is not a vaccine, but a drug (Oseltamivir). Roche is so arrogant, it even has the audacity to put a “yellow emblem of the rising sun god” on its Tamiflu logo. In Ezekiel 8:14-16, there were “women weeping for Tammuz,” and men “with their faces toward the east” worshipping the sun – and they were severely punished for their ignorance.  


According to Gilead Sciences, Inc., the biopharmaceutical company that developed Tamiflu, the founders named their company after “Gilead” a place mentioned in the Bible. Gilead was famed for its small trees that produced a resin, similar to frankincense and myrrh used in medicine, considered to be the first genuine pharmaceutical product. The leaf in the company’s red logo, they say, symbolizes healing, life and growth, while the shield represents safety, strength and honor. Together they signify Gilead’s efforts to use the healing power of science to create medicines that treat life-threatening diseases. 

In the Bible Old Testament the English word “Gilead” in Hebrew is ‘Gilad’ (Strong’s Hebrew #1568) from ‘Galed’ – ‘heap of testimony’ (Strongs Hebrew #1567) from ‘Gal’ (Strong’s Hebrew #1530) – meaning ‘heap of dung.’  


One would have to be, quite seriously, as mad as a “March hare” to vaccinate oneself or one’s family with Tamiflu or believe a word these individuals and companies now have to say. Do you really think these wealthy individuals and companies, who in the past have shown they do not even possess the morals of alley cats, have everyone’s best interests and health at heart?  


In fascist Rome, there was nothing like the plausible excuse of a good old “plague” or “pandemic” sweeping the empire to accentuate the threat against the State, to justify the rapid introduction of extraordinary measures and powers, under martial law, to round up disobedient itinerant groups, suppress rebellious provinces, isolate defiant citizens, or compulsorily quarantine infectious protestors or enemies of the state. 


Could a socialist man-made threat of global “Swine Flu Pandemic” impetuously moving unchecked from country to country be used by the UN WHO and fascist media monopoly to bring “the world’s countries closer together in global solidarity” – to help bring in or accelerate the introduction of a tyrannical New World Order global government? 

Events like these are now regularly occurring at such a lightning pace, the chances that they are just a “coincidence” are near impossible. As the old Roman Senate saying goes about politics, “nothing happens by chance.” All that Asclepius, Hygeia, and Panacea have to do now is to have Mars, god of war, swoop into the theater of doom with Chaos, and Rome’s great masses will be literally crying out for Apollo or Jupiter to come and save them.  


Author's Note:

The copyright of this book is only for the purposes of protecting the original text. It may be freely quoted, reproduced in full or in part, for profit or not, without the author’s or publisher’s permission. All Scriptures in this book are quoted from the Authorized King James Bible Version. All underlining or emphasis in quotations (whether from the Bible or elsewhere) are the author’s unless otherwise stated. Special thanks to brother Martin for assisting with the research, and for helping motivate the author to write this book.

PDF download button.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF eBook
 Antichrist and the Green Prince


17. Where Have all the Real Men Gone?

May 12, 2011

By Maureen,


"I've been a mother for 16 a single one....struggling like everyone to keep from going completely under. Have been a massage therapist since 92.......My son is 16 and my daughter is 11. I 'm quite upset about the change that's been brought from feminism. We women CANNOT be everything.......I am instinctively a nurturer, trying to play two roles as a mother is impossible to do."

By Maureen Smith

I for one would like to know
just where the real men went?

Now, you might look around and say they haven't gone anywhere! Bull,
I'm talking about real men. Men with integrity. Nobody wants to stand for anything! Not for their God! Not for their God-given rights! Not for their Families! Not for Love!

What happened to the instinct to protect families and loved ones? I see energy going into trivial pursuits...sports....drugs....sexual conquests......competition over the superficial. I see the world crumbling around us and ask why no one cares enough to consider where all of this is taking us....

Now, before you start getting upset I won't leave out the women's role.
It makes me sick to see women today who are so consumed with worldly things that in order for a man to even rate, he needs to have money and be able to supply them with petty things they deem important.

Can I say.... demand people! Demand drives production of even attitude. Perhaps we would see a change in what men put as their priority's if women had a value system that consisted of more than trying to impress other people with how they look or what they own and needing to fit in.

If women were attracted to men that stood for something other than the love of money, like, say our children ....our rights ......we would certainly see a well needed change. We must as women support men in the endeavors of such.

.. ..

Something is missing ......and yes you guessed it, it is God! 

If you were to look at the Bible and then at the rack of magazines and compare. One promotes love and security about one's self ...the other promotes self-hatred, jealousy and trivial and unrealistic ideals.

And if you don't possess the money to do as they do.....well you're on your own. Do we truly believe that someone is worthless as a human being because they may be overweight or do not look like people in the magazines?

Can you honestly say that you are not quicker to smile at a pretty lady or a man that pulls up in an expensive car? But why do we do this? Media influences have completely stripped away both men and women's sense of identity and replaced them with a web of self loathing and despair.

So we are in continual pursuit of what they tell us we need, or need to be. You are not the sum of all that you possess but you are the sum of all that you think and do.

True self worth can only come from sacrificing ourselves to God and for others. Through Agape love only. 

Think.....when you buy all of those things trying to fulfill yourselves, who is benefiting? You end up being no better off and loving the slave master, not the Master.

.. ..

Yes, there are some good men out there, I am glad to know.
I'm sure it's not easy in the face of all that they are up against.

Today it is not manly to love God, to be loyal, to fight evil or to even just do what is right! Today all of these things are considered just plain CRAZY.

But there are some of us women who actually thinks it's SEXY to see men who are not blind to the evil that surrounds us. I, on behalf of those few women say, Thank you! Thank you for not giving up on what's right and just.


Comments for "Where Have all the Real Men Gone? "

Stephen said (May 14, 2011): 

"Society" and women do not WANT "real men", hence there are none. Also, men have come to realize that being "real men" holds no advantages in this era of 80% divorce where 2/3's are initiated by the wife.

The gentleman who is heading overseas understands the true situation


Michael said (May 14, 2011): 

We do not know enough about Maureens’ circumstances but Peter and Marco together with myself have an endless well to draw from in our immediate surroundings concerning complaining women and their fates. How do you convey what you see as a truthful message, yet knowing you most certainly will hurt a number of emotions in the person you direct your words towards, while still not losing the constructiveness you’re trying your best to put forth?

Maureen, I bid you the best of luck in finding someone to share your life provided it is under mutual volition and benefit, but what about your children? Have you like most women of your situation I’m familiar with, lent your childrens’ ears for some of your confessions regarding your feelings for men in general and some in particular. How much would you gauge have rubbed off on your son and daughter? Do you know that boys and girls react differently to such influence in their formative years, but neither reaction is a healthy one.

Fine, you missed the boat! Hey, you might get lucky! Life goes on with or without you, but don’t you dare sabotage lives not yet lived or you’ll experience an old-age no one will envy.


Peter said (May 13, 2011): 

Your recent article quotes a mother asking where have all the real men gone? Her article describes where they have gone and the cause for it. Toxic feminism has not "empowered" women--it has debased them. The logical fallacy that she is embracing is that "real men" have "gone" somewhere. In today's feminized culture, men are not supposed to be men.

If you're wondering where I get that idea.......With whom did she have children?

Did she wait for a real man to come around or did she procreate with someone of lesser quality? Now that she has children, she wants a "real man." She didn't pick a "real man" to marry (assuming that she did marry the father) How long before, statistically, all these women who now claim that they want real men have none left to find? They aren't creating them or fostering them into existence. Women today certainly aren't demanding chivalry from men. It's simple supply and demand. The "real men" are not at all in demand, in reality. Women are getting what they are asking for. Period.

Throughout history, women have been a civilizing influence on men. We, in our natural state, are brutish, crass and, in just about every way, uncivilized. That is our fallen nature. Get a group of guys together and you will see a different person than one who is in the office or in "polite" society, regardless of how refined they are. A hilarious and entertaining example of this is Seven Brides for Seven Brothers. This musical/play shows men in their natural state who are civilized by a very strong woman.

I became a Christian at age 30. Prior to that I did not suffer from lack of attention from females. I treated women poorly, used them and discarded them. If I came across a decent woman, I kept walking. I'm not proud of this, quite the opposite.

When I became a Christian, God turned my life around and I became the man I had always wanted to be--honest, decent, loving (in the true sense of the word), compassionate. I couldn't find a date to save my life. Numerous female friends would comment on how I should be married, what a shame it was that I hadn't "found someone," etc. I repeatedly got the "death knell" of any hope of a relationship--"you're such a nice/great guy!" As soon as someone said that to me, I knew that I'd never date them or any of their friends. Believe me, the irony was not lost on me!

My story does have a happy ending! I have found a most remarkable woman who does value my character and attributes. We're getting married on 4 JUN 11. God had to wait a long time for me to grow up enough to appreciate the value of a "real woman!" Her story is similar to mine, but from the opposite direction.

In short (yeah, I know.....too late!), if she wants to find a real man, she will have to become a real woman. A real woman doesn't tolerate nonsense from "unreal" men.


Marco said (May 13, 2011): 

I wanted to respond to this article because of my own experience with dating Christian women. I've started off dates feeling so enthusiastic that I might have found a religious woman, only to be let down. I can usually tell how versed a woman is when I begin quoting bible scripture, and asking basic trivia questions like "who was the first man to see Jesus after he rose from the cave?" I can tell you that every woman I have dated falls flat-face-down at these tests. Most have also never heard the term "agape", or know its meaning. Most have to spend a full minute just trying to remember the names of the four gospels. Most have not fully read The Book of Revelations because "it makes no sense". I've also found that some are really just golddiggers hiding behind a religious front. They use God as a means to an end to secure marriage and the one-sided money exchange that comes out of the marital contract. They have little interest in discussing dogma, but they get piqued talking about what kind of upward mobility you have in your career.

One of my Christian male friends is moving away to Brazil this year, and another is moving to Argentina; It is my hope to join them in South America once they have established a beachhead. I am lucky enough to have a career path that will let me work away from my native land. If I can't find a virtuous Christian woman on this continent, I am already making preparations to leave and go to one that has them. If you want to know where all the real men have gone - they are busy fleeing the burning Anti-Christian house.

I also find it remarkable how preachy religious women get after they have children and age. Where was that verbosity when they were nubile and marriageable?


Brian said (May 13, 2011): 

Home late and tired to the bone, but couldn’t pass up the chance to say “Bravo Maureen”. Like Ted, I’m a thirty-year man who is happy to have stayed the course, and the deciding factor was always my responsibility to my family, and to God!

I’ve never considered myself to be an especially brave man, but am proud to say that I’ve always had a big problem with the truth – I KEEP TELLING IT, though I’m not popular for it.

You go girl!


Ted said (May 13, 2011): 

Thank you for your thoughtful article. I've been a husband and a father for almost 30 years, and it hasn't been easy. I have been tempted to leave more times than I can count, but my responsibility to my children and the commitment to my marriage prevented me from going through with it. I don't claim that my loyalty was self generated, since it was my ego which wanted to flee. It was only the grace of God that kept our family intact. If I wasn't convinced that there was a right and a wrong, and gave into relativism, I would be foolishly separated from my family right now.

Alone, I'm a weak and stupid man. It's only when I allow the divinity within to emerge that I become a "real man". We all share the same divinity, we just let the ego drown it out.


18. A Native American's View of Manhood

May 18, 2011


"Lose the idea that you must learn to think like a woman ... you do not."


By Robert Pierre 



(Sitting Bull, left)


I was compelled to reply to the recent article entitled "Where have all the good men gone?" because for the past few months, I have been asking myself the same question.  

I am a man of the tribes of First Peoples (Native American) living on the border between Canada and the US. I work with broken families and focus on guidance and healing for the children. I have been married for 21-years and have a son and daughter.


In all my travels, I have realized one thing: Men are no longer 'real men' in the sense that they "no longer walk 'Upright'. 


Most men I meet are weak, spineless 'pussy whipped' girlie men or 'men' who walk around being 'loud and thrusting their chests.  


Upright men do not 'whine his feelings' when being corrected for distortions in his thinking or actions.  He says; "Yes maybe you are right, I will be more aware in the future". 

A man understands that the measure of a good lover is not how many women he makes love to, but how well he makes love with 'The One Woman'.


A man does not always need to thrust his chest and posture, in order to maintain his ego. A real man is content in his self knowing.


A man knows that the Creator gave us two ears and one mouth for a reason.  That being, so men and women will listen to each other, twice as much as we speak. 

A man will always walk 'upright', in the eyes of his woman and children if he is taught to respect their right to a happy life, as much as his own.


A man does not rely on other men, and their propaganda, to define who he is.


A man is self sufficient, and does not need to rely on the handouts of his 'masters', in order for his family to survive; and he contributes to his community.


A man will take an afternoon off work to be with his kids, and teach them to be as 'upright men', even if they are girls. Period.


Upright men must be agile and fast of foot; to defend his family in times of trouble, and to do his daily dance.


These are just a few examples, but i think you get the thrust of it.

Read the Full Story:
A Native American's View of Manhood


19. Australian Demands Freemason Judges Outed

May 11, 2011   



John Wilson writes to his MP demanding Judges reveal their affiliations to Freemasonry.

David Elliott, MP,
State Member for Baulkham Hills,
Old Northern Road,
Baulkham Hills,
NSW 2153.
Dear David,
I dropped a copy of that DVD, "Christian or Freemason" ( into your Electoral Office yesterday. It's a real eye-opener, isn't it.
Some People have suggested that you are a Freemason.
The exposure, by Brian Shaw, of this insane cult must really have members of this cult thinking "What have I gotten myself into?"
It truly is insanity.
It's such a pathetic facade of "respectability" to pose as an "Honourable" Judge or "distinguished" Member of Parliament while what these persons are doing is purely and simply evil.
That episode with John Bauskis getting stuck into "Justice" John David Hislop in the NSW Supreme Court on Monday was a classic. All through the session, John David Hislop continually had his head down and silent for long pauses. Obviously, he was going through extreme mental distress, thinking "What have I gotten myself into?" John Bauskis was hammering him and saying, "You have no jurisdiction. You cannot judge in your own cause. Jurisdiction is decided by a Special Jury. All you can do is make a date for a Special Jury to determine the Jurisdiction of the Court."
Christ Jesus said to "love our enemies" .... but what fools they are!
Here was one Judge, John David Hislop, committing Perjury to protect another Judge, George Alfred Palmer, from facing Trial by Jury for the Indictment John Bauskis had filed against the latter.
John Bauskis kept repeating, "What you are doing is Treason." .... and John David Hislop did not deny that, at any stage, because he knew it was true.
What fools they are.
"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?"
Attached is a List of the Judges of the NSW Supreme Court, incidentally ABN 77 057 165 500, to be used to put on record which ones are Freemasons. A similar List ought to drawn up for Members of the NSW Parliament, ABN 89 288 775 026.
Your secretary said you would be back at Baulkham Hills on Friday. We must talk again and soon.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.




Comments for "Australian Demands Freemason Judges Outed"


Austin said (May 12, 2011):


John Wilson is indeed a very brave. I would be very surprised if he didn't come home one evening to find his house had been torched, his car up on bricks with the wheels and engine missing and his bank accounts frozen, pending some lame duck 'enquiry'.

Of course, that's assuming that these things (and more) haven't happened to him just yet...


Two years ago, a contact of mine in the neighbourhood told me of a dinner that he was invited to one evening. This event was held at a prestigious venue, and several hundred people were present. I asked him about the makeup of the crowd, and he told me the following: "They were essentially business people, senior members of the police and politicians, but the most prominent people of all were well known crime figures: from the 'dodgy brothers' right up to organised crime - all mixing and mingling at the one event."

I have no doubt that members of the lodge were there too - representing all three groups!

--Austin in Brisbane




Dan said (May 11, 2011):


Neutralizing occasional public demand for transparency of government official's memberships in secret societies is old hat for international Masonry. Every generation or so enough of the public become aware of the racket that the Masonic governments make a show of requiring disclosure. Then the requirement is revoked later when the heat's off. See below, England just completed that cycle. Considering the facts that Britain was plunged into wars and became the most intrusive Big Brother society in West despite ten years of required disclosure of public 'servant' Masonic membership, the issue is actually a hoodwink.


The 'blue lodge' organizations memberships aren't where the 'action is' anymore. The real secret societies moved into government 'security' agencies over a century ago.


Association with those agencies is "protected under national security".


1998 - UK: Politics New judges must declare masonic membership - March 5, 1998


"Freemasons who join the police or judiciary in England have to declare their membership of the ancient fraternal society.


The move, which was introduced last month by Home Secretary Jack Straw, means serving judges will also be asked to make a voluntary declaration but will not be compelled to do so."


2009 -Jack Straw's decision to no longer force applicants for the judiciary to declare if they are Freemasons was today branded a "disgrace" by a Labour MP. - November 2009


[Gordon Prentice (Pendle) said there would again be a "cloak of secrecy" following the move by the Justice Secretary.


Mr Straw said last week that a review had shown no evidence of "impropriety or malpractice" as a result of a judge being a Freemason and it would be "disproportionate" to continue with the practice, introduced in 1998.


The United Grand Lodge of England made representations to ministers in May and indicated it might seek judicial review of the policy.

At Commons question time today Mr Prentice asked: "Is it not a disgrace that you have decided to allow judges no longer to have to declare if they are Freemasons?"We know that one in 20 of our judges are Freemasons. Why on earth the cloak of secrecy?"


Mr Straw replied: "There was no secrecy about my announcement, I made the announcement by way of written ministerial statement last week in the light of a European Court of Human Rights judgment against the state of Italy, which was made in 2006, and to which our attention was drawn by the Grand Lodge of Freemasons.


"It suggested that a continuation of a compulsory register...was likely to be unlawful.

After legal advice I accepted that. It is open to any judge to declare that they are Freemasons."

He added that there had been "no evidence" of any "unacceptable behavior by Freemason judges.

Ministry of Justice figures indicate there are 3,808 judges in England and Wales and 205 or 5.4 per cent are Freemasons. There are also 29,702 magistrates, of whom 1,900 or 6.4 per cent are Freemasons.]


[Nazarene Remnant comment: It’s also about time that the Australian people wake up to the fact that our country has already been hijacked (thus the ABN numbers of every government system, whether it be at the Federal, State or local level). Our state Premiers are now State CEOs, and the Prime Minister is now the Australian CEO, nothing more and nothing less, serving the secret Government of the world and not the Australian people.] 


20. The Pacific Ocean: A Radioactive Garbage Dump

By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
14 May, 2011


“The ocean is now a plastic wasteland.” Capt. Charles Moore, 2010

Ocean Contamination

For the past two months, it has not been possible to separate the on-going radioactive poisons heading east on the Pacific Ocean currents from Japan to North America (and thence around the globe) with other serious oceanic environmental troubles. This is not simply just a one-issue crisis, even though Fukushima’s radioactive nightmare continues to poison the rest of our planet.

Firstly, of primary importance for our health and well being: it is not a safe choice to eat any fish or crustaceans caught there. This is due, of course, to the widespread radioactivity of the Pacific Ocean.

The tragedy of the now contaminated entire Pacific Ocean is as epic as the Gulf of Mexico’s mass dispersants poisoning. More than a year since the BP oil-rig catastrophe, the impact on both the human and wildlife populations continues to soar to disastrous heights. The death toll for all wildlife will never be accurately known, as unconscionably sea turtles (and unknown other kinds of sea life) were burned alive. For months, no tally was taken of dead mammals and birds washing ashore. It was more than ineptitude and poor management of this enormous crisis. It was, and continues to be, a criminal cover-up of vast proportions.

The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) released a new report estimating “that around 26,000 dolphins and whales, 82,000 birds, and 6,000 sea turtles were likely harmed [or killed] by the spill.”(1) There was far more than harm. There was much unaccounted wildlife death; and the now one-year-later continuing toll may be far higher. However, as with Fukushima’s nuclear reactors tragedy, nothing has been done to safeguard human lives, nor protect all of the ocean’s animals and birds (really, the entire vast and precious ecosystem!). All of this is under constant siege from human negligence, deliberate harm, and corporate greed.

It is quite clear, from both these enormous on-going disasters, that corporate-driven secret plans and responses do not include any real solutions. Harm is their watchword, as our planet’s web-of-life continues to unravel at an accelerated pace. This is due to human malfeasance. A new report published shows how all the hundreds of Fukushima workers, now putting their lives on the line for a devastating situation that cannot be fixed, are all expendable. See:

Dead fish and sharks are already arriving along the California coast. Although the cause is supposedly unknown, it is doubtful if we will ever be told that any dead sea life washing ashore is most likely radioactive. See:


The EPA has refused to test the Gulf of Alaska for radioactivity. In their latest negligence, EPA posted on May 3, their refusal to monitor daily radiation from Fukushima, “due to the consistent decrease in radiation levels related to the Japanese nuclear incident.”(2) This was no “incident.”

This is why I have repeatedly urged everyone to join together and get radiation monitoring in your area. Low levels of ionizing radiation, as Dr. Helen Caldicott has frequently said are extremely dangerous. Further, she has consistently noted that it is deliberately misleading to connect exterior radiation levels with internal ones. We will never get the truth from any government agency or official. In fact, their planned deceit and intentional extreme harm put us all in continued danger. It is vital that we get accurate information ourselves, and know how much we can really protect ourselves.

As I have learned personally from the cover-up during and after 2003, 1-million-acre California FIRESTORM, any government agency has already long been compromised and corrupted. As Jeff Rense wrote on April 21, it is the “latest example of blatant Federal negligence. …This is another egregious abandonment of their obligation to watch over the public health and welfare. …[and] the public’s right to know and be kept safe and informed be damned.” His article also has an excellent map, showing the ocean currents coming to the West Coast and up to Alaska. This continued refusal to test the waters also protects the now-toxic catches of Alaska’s fishing industry, while poisoning anyone who eats contaminated fish:

This is not the fishing industry’s fault, per se. [That is another separate article.] Rather, it is the result of this enormous radioactive contamination that puts everything in grave jeopardy. Does any of this really compute to a rational person who still can think critically and sees the bigger picture?

This article covers another oceanic nightmare that must be included in our awareness of what is happening throughout the entire Pacific Ocean. It does impact all of us. Our oceans have been in long-term and devastating decline for decades. The seas are no longer what we may think of: miles and miles of pristine and beautiful glistening waters, gentle sea breezes, with an occasional whale or dolphin leaping out of the water.

The Pacific Ocean has also been poisoned with colossal amounts of garbage floating in a vortex area called NORTH PACIFIC SUBTROPICAL GYRE. This is the Pacific Ocean’s floating toxic, petroleum-based plastics dump that has contaminated and killed countless millions of fish and mammals, including dolphins and seals. In 1997, these huge areas were discovered by Captain Charles Moore while he was returning to California from Hawaii on his vessel, the 50-foot “Algalita” (now the name of the foundation he set up). He took a detour through a region with little wind, due to the ocean currents. Normally, this area is usually avoided by sailors, because of these very calm seas.

Day after day, as Captain Moore sailed, he saw endless piles of plastic trash floating for miles and miles. Originally, this area was called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Far from some small “patch,” it is thought that this massive amount is actually twice the size of the continental US. This swirling soup of floating garbage is about 500-nautical miles off California’s coast, and stretches across the northern part of the Pacific Ocean, past Hawaii, and comes close to Japan. Unseen by satellite photos, this massive “sea of rubbish is translucent and [is on, and also] lies just below the water’s surface” and continues under water through the water column.(3)

Since Moore started doing this research, the size of this trash has grown enormously. Now the Great Garbage Patch is divided into the Western and Eastern Garbage Patch, on either side of the Hawaiian archipelago. According to Marcus Eriksen, Algalita’s research director, there is about 100-million tons of flotsam floating in this region.

In 1994, Captain Moore had originally founded Algalita Marine Research Foundation, to focus on the “restoration of disappearing giant kelp forests and the improvement of water quality through the preservation and re-construction of wetlands along California’s coast.”(4) He was so shocked by what he saw in the Pacific Ocean, that he became a dedicated environmental activist, and decided to raise global awareness and find much-needed answers. With his foundation, he now focuses on collaborative ocean research to find out the extent of this massive amount of floating garbage and the damage it continues to cause. The non-profit foundation, now in its sixteenth year, has brought worldwide attention to the fate of millions of tons of discarded plastics and how it has impacted all sea life and damaged human health.

Firstly, even the smallest particles of plastic, are broken down “by wave action or sunlight” (called photodegradation), and then they are eaten by fish. Once eaten, these plastics then travel up the ocean food chain (from small fish to larger ones), and they eventually wind up on your seafood dinner plate. “Every little piece of plastic manufactured in the past 50 years that made it into the ocean is still out there somewhere,” said chemist Tony Andrady, with the US-based Research Triangle Institute.(5) This goes for EVERY bit of plastic made: from shredded plastic to any large item. See:

According to the UN Environment Program, “plastic debris causes the deaths of more than a million sea birds every year, as well as more than 100,000 marine mammals. Syringes, cigarette lighters, and toothbrushes have been found inside the stomachs of dead seabirds,” mistaking them for food.(6) “A Dutch study in the North Sea of fulmar seabirds concluded [that] 95 percent of the birds had plastics in their stomachs. More than 1600 pieces were found in the stomach of one bird in Belgium.”(7)

The ocean is now “an endless trail of trash floating in the middle of the Pacific: water bottles, plastic crates, disposable(sic) diapers, bath toys, cigarette lighters, tampon applicators [styrofoam, too]; a veritable buffet of convenience culture.”(8) This refuse is what is dumped in the ocean from landfills. Unbelievably, other trash includes: kayaks, carrier, refrigerators, furniture, Lego blocks, footballs, and fishing nets. All these items were thrown overboard either from oil-rig platforms or ships. As on land around the globe, our seas have become a vast stench of sewage.

Possibly millions (no one is counting) of the plastic 6-pak holders for soda and beer have been found strangling sea and other wildlife [e.g., fish, otters, and small seals]. The plastic diameter to hold these cans is just wide enough for some small animal’s head to get stuck in it. Once their head is caught, they cannot get out. In the oceans, plastics also break down into smaller and smaller pieces. These are mistaken for fish eggs or other kinds of food and ingested by fish. Last month, the Los Angeles Times reported that researchers have found “about 35 percent of fish they collected in the northern Pacific Ocean in 2008 had plastic in their stomachs. …Some lantern fish [had] as many as 83 plastic fragments in a single fish.”(9) Often tiny pieces of plastics are part of the plankton that whales eat. Plastic does kill. This is yet another reason not to use plastic. See:



Captain Charles Moore, who has been documenting this “waste slick more insidious than an oil spill, due to the impossibility of cleanup,” has produced a documentary about this called “Synthetic Sea.”

Captain Moore calls the ocean “the world’s largest toilet bowl that never flushes.” In 1999, as part of his research to carefully document this garbage, he discovered that “for every pound of naturally occurring plankton…[there was [a] yielded [of] 6 pounds of plastic.”(10) By 2008, in the same original region, they recorded a staggering increase of 45 to 1 times more plastic than plankton! There were less tan-colored pieces of plastic. Moore believes they have been eaten by birds and other plankton feeders, because they resemble krill. Color is an important factor as is shape, as it mimics food. “Over 70 species of birds have been found to ingest these pieces of plastic that resemble their natural food supply. Studies have shown that they then have higher PCBs content, and it is a way to transport pollutions.”(11) Plastic does not “break down” anywhere in our environment. It just get smaller and smaller to cause more harm throughout the entire web-of-life as it travels up the food chain. Thus, the “quality of life” for the entire marine ecosystem has been undermined and ruined.

As noted in the above-cited excellent “Synthetic Sea” 2010 documentary: “There’s no such a thing as biodegradation of petroleum-based plastic.”

The author of another article, Anna Cummins who traveled on the “Algalita” (Moore’s oceanic research vessel), wrote that: “though we’ve all come on this trip (in 2004) fully prepared to find constant evidence of plastic thousands of miles from land, it’s still shocking to see it in person. It simply does not belong here. …The highest level of pollution [is] in highly productive zones.”(12)

This essential research is done in “international waters,” so it has been barely touched by any agency in charge of environmental issues in any country. The garbage just continues to grow. As usual, much of the scientific research stays in journals. However, there are staggering pollution and reproductive issues that will not go away, and will contribute to the continued dramatic dwindling numbers of ocean creatures. The repercussions of this toxicity go far beyond the oceans. There are two main crises that are already impacting all of us.


(1) Plastic is a well-known chemical hormone disruptor. It changes and toxifies the body’s natural hormonal balance. It is one of the major reasons for hermaphroditic indications in frogs and other amphibians. This research goes back to the late 1970s. Plastics have been part of our daily life for almost a century. They have replaced many natural and safer products. Hard and soft plastics are chemical and petroleum-based. Ubiquitous in our environment, they have not been proven safe to use. Thousands of new chemicals and plastics are put on the market each year without the benefit of human safety testing. Chemical corporations continue to spend billions to advertise and market plastics as “necessary” to our daily lives. Yet, most people still do not realize the invisible and toxic risks to using plastics.

One category of industrial chemicals that are used as softeners and emulsifiers is called phthalates [pronounced “tha-lates”]. These plastics are found in products from baby bottles, thin fruit and vegetable produce bags, food wraps, children’s toys, food storage items, lubricants, medicals devices and IV bags, wood finishes, perfumes, and thousands of beauty products. They emit cumulative but invisible highly dangerous toxins. Since the 1970s, phthalates have been known to be global pollutants. Even so, more than 1-billion pounds of toxic phthalates are produced annually. No extensive long-term tests were done before they were marketed. Sometimes, phthalates may be listed as: Dibutyl phthalate (DBP); Diethyl phthalate (DEP); or Butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP). When you purchase most products containing phthalates, most often there is no warning label to advise you, as a consumer, of the dangers. Phthalates now show up frequently in human urine as a biomarker from daily exposure.

Phthalates are a class of extremely dangerous chemicals known as hormone or endocrine disruptors, popularly called “gender-benders.” This means that these chemicals are absorbed into the body (by breathing the off-gassing and by ingesting) and then cause damage by disrupting hormonal balances (both in humans and all animals). These poisons bio-accumulate in us and all other living creatures. They cause serious developmental harm from the very beginnings of life: in utero, in sperm DNA, in organ damage, early puberty, cancer (testicular, prostate, and breast –all of which have increased dramatically over the past four decades). Phthalates suppress the proper functioning of the immune system.

With the Fukushima reactors catastrophe, now out of control, there is no research on the synergistic relationship between these chemical hormone disruptors and radioactive Uranium (spewing from Fukushima’s reactors), also a hormone disruptor.

(2) Hormone disruption is a major factor in the increase of obesity in the US. The media portrays this as a dietary issue. Yes, it is. But far past this is the use of toxic plastics that surround our every move: from nuking it in microwave ovens and boiling food in pre-packaged “pouches” [loaded with chemical poisons] to drinking many different (already chemically poisoned) drinks bottled in it. There is no nutritional value in these kinds of packaged and prepared foods. These toxins are stored in body fat, and wreck the body’s ability to repair itself.

As it works its way up the food chain, where bigger fish eat the already contaminated fish (who’ve already eaten even smaller ones), these toxins bio-accumulate synergistically, until it reaches the human population –billions of whom have been eating/drinking food packaged in plastic. This goes for other proteins sources as well. Cows also eat a contaminated food supply: either grass loaded with other chemical hormone-disrupting pesticides, or water sources filled with chemicals and antibiotics. Some of the best research on hormone disruption and its long-term generational impact can be found in Dr. Theo Colburn’s et al. “Our Stolen Future.” This is essential reading.

Hormone-disrupting chemicals and radiation not only affect the genders of animals, they can also be linked to DNA damage and birth defects in humans. This is rarely reported, again because the gravity of these findings would shut down the chemical and nuclear companies, if people knew the extent of the genetic contamination with which we are already dealing (actually, since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). In her article on the impact of radiation and nuclear power, geoscientist Leuren Moret notes:

“The daily ‘permitted’ radioactive emissions and discharges into the Irish Sea since the 1950’s, have turned the contaminated sediments, seawater, and biosphere into a radioactive sink or permanent point source of radiation, with serious local and global effects. Daily ‘permitted’ radioactive emissions and discharges from global sources have accumulated to higher radiation levels in the biosphere than any Chernobyls would release, and are the main cause of the large increase in ocean dead zones since the 1970’s. People are missing or overlooking the serious impact of chronic releases…a strategy guaranteed to continue to fail.”(13)

How much further will this daily contamination of the Irish Sea, and the vast additional nuclear and chemical synergistic contamination of the Pacific Ocean affect us all? Everything is inter-connected. Our planet’s entire web-of-life continues to be in an overwhelming state of siege. Most of this is invisible (unless it affects you or your family directly!). Nonetheless, it continues to impact all of us. This has been the elite’s decades-long, behind-the-scenes plan for utter destruction.

Almost 16 years ago, National Geographic’s cover story, “Diminishing Returns: Exploiting the Ocean’s Bounty,” highlighted in graphic detail the rapaciousness of huge trawling vessels that haul in massive amounts of sea life. In 1995, more than 37,000 ships with 1-million crew worldwide, created “a 50-year boom in fishing technology [that] created a powerful industrial fleet.”(14) Along with oceanic plastic garbage, globalization of the oceans has destroyed them. Small boat fishermen who rely on their catch to feed their local families are often left without resources to fish far from home. Poor fishermen, eeking out a minimal existence, cannot compete with fishing supertankers. A photo from this NG story shows a Senegalese fisherman cleaning small sardines he caught with toxic wastewater. “Fish stock are dwindling, and once independent fisherman now cater to the whims of European buyers. ‘This,’ says a Senegalese community worker, ‘is just the latest battleground between rich north and poor south.’”(15)

These poor fishermen cannot compete with mega-corporation globalized hauls. In addition, many fish and mammals caught in these huge nets are supposedly “unprofitable.” Their lives mean nothing. Euphemistically called “by-catch,” it is not known how many possibly billions of dead creatures have been tossed overboard as unprofitable. The dramatic cost to all sea life has been devastating. Between thousands of pollutants, dead by-catch, enormous over-fishing, sonar, and nuclear bombs exploded underwater by military, the entire web of sea life has suffered dramatically.

Our Oceans Are in a RED ALERT Crisis

Thus, this human rapaciousness creates built-in diminution and death. Each year, the size of mature fish and mammals become smaller, and there are less and less species. Japan, with the world’s largest appetite for fish (for sushi, etc.) and whales, will now have a totally radioactive ocean soon to be devoid of life. Tuna is loaded with mercury [long-term eating of it is a major contributing factor to dementia]. Over the past three decades, whales and dolphins, numbering in the thousands, have beached themselves. Oregon salmon are radioactive from decades of nuclear releases from the Hanford Nuclear Superfund site. Many species are in dramatic decline. Corporate-scientists have few “public” explanations. The few independent scientists left are silenced.

Radioactivity and Nuclear Consequences

Not under any public discussion or commentary by any scientists: what is/will be the impact of on-going radiation traveling across the Pacific Ocean as it encounters miles and miles of toxic degrading plastic? How will hormone disrupting plastic and radioactivity impact this vast area’s ecology? What kind of real future will sea birds and all other sea life have with this gigantic contamination? Hormone disrupting chemicals are known to bio-accumulate up the food chain in a synergistic manner that could equal far more than 1,600 times the original dose of poisons. No creature is safe from this horrendous nightmare! Nor are we.

Caretaking of our planet, Mother Earth our only home, is not a corporate concern. Last month, Michael Parenti wrote of “Profit Pathology and the Disposable Planet.”(16) In short order, with this ecological disaster right in front of us, nothing will be left; and we are already in grave and deliberately orchestrated financial ruin. Nor, are environmental organizations really doing their jobs to protect. The one thing rarely discussed in this degraded death-equation is the human poisoning of our oceans! It is eradicating our planet’s species. This is part of the current Sixth Extinction. The last one was the dinosaurs, 65-million years ago. What have humans wrought?

Rachel Carson (1907-1964) wrote a beautiful work, a best-seller, called “The Sea Around Us.” It was an ode to the magnificence of our great waters. When she received the National Book Award for it, she said: “the winds, the sea, and the moving tides are what they are. If there is wonder and beauty and majesty in them, science will discover these qualities. If they are not there, science cannot create them. If there is poetry in my book about the sea, it is not because I deliberately put it there, but because no one could write truthfully about the sea and leave out the poetry.”

This book is a hymn to the sea. It was the closing of a time before science unleashed nano-replicating particles into the Gulf of Mexico or the illegal aerosol crimes of Chemtrails loaded with a myriad of invisible but deadly chemicals to poison all of us and our planet’s lands and sea.(17)

By weight, we are 61-percent water. Salt-water oceans make up 71 percent of the earth. We cannot live without it, nor can all the wondrous assortment of sea life. They cannot survive in toxic seas, any more than we can survive breathing the toxic spew that no longer passes for “air.”

Almost forty years ago, Jacques Yves Cousteau brought these amazing sights to our home televisions. We sat enthralled by what he shared with us traveling on the Calypso. There was a sense of magic that filled his programs. They educated us, but there was more. They enchanted us. We listened to the songs of the whales, and these new underwater sounds enthralled us. The music from the ocean’s depths gave many of us a deep empathy for these far-away creatures. Truly, we cannot live without them. See:


Who could then have imagined the corporate rapaciousness that ensued and has been globalized at any and all costs? Who could think that whales would be hunted almost to extinction, while insane military plans to detonate bombs, take thousands of sea animals’ lives, and emitted sonar to harm these magnificent giants of our seas? The US Navy has a five-year plan to kill 11.7 million marine mammals in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and the Gulf of Mexico! There has hardly been any public discussion of this rapacious warfare “testing.”(18) For what sane reason?

The whales and dolphins, the turtles and tuna have lives, too. Not to be hunted or burned to death. Not to be poisoned with deadly chemicals, or phthalates, or radioactivity. Our ocean’s living planetary gifts are under siege. They are all part of the wonders of our world. We must care for them as a sacred trust!

Our countries are under criminal siege, as well. If humans destroy all of it, we destroy ourselves. We live in a topsy-turvy brutal and violent world without ethical or moral values. In our wrecked economies, where all social services are gutted, only the military and killing has a giant budget. Orwellian humans, with a complete lack of what used to make us truly human, have created a devastating scenario that is unraveling our very web of life. This threatens all of us right now. What have we permitted in our names?

We do have other choices. We can cut down drastically (or totally) on our use of plastic. As consumers, we do have choices of not buying or using dangerous items. We can make these choices before we go to the check-out counter. We can make safer consumer decisions and we must speak out. Go though your own house or apartment: see how many un-necessary plastic items can be recycled. Use safer items: glass or stainless steel. It is not difficult to do some Spring Cleaning, and safely get rid of these dangerous items: There are thousands of plastic recycle centers around. We have the potential of demanding and using safer alternatives. Just think what we could collectively do by not buying or boycotting all these dangerous and toxic items! We no longer can shop on automatic pilot and take things off the shelves without understanding the dangers of thousands of products we use. There are consequences to using products daily that are manufactured without any safety concerns. And they bio-accumulate up the food chain to us.


1. Lynn Hermann. “New report calls for end to all new offshore drilling.” Digital Journal. April 26, 2011:

2. Updated on May 3, 2011: EPA. Japanese Emergency: Radiation Monitoring.

3. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden. “The world’s rubbish dump: a tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan.” London. The Independent. Feb. 5, 2008:

4. See:

5. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden, op. cit.

6. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden, ibid.

7. The Plastic Killing Fields –Pacific Ocean Gyre Garbage Patch Grows to the Size of Texas.” Jan. 14, 2008:

8. Anna Cummins. “Sailing the Synthetic Sea.” WEND magazine. Vol. 3, Issue 4, November 2008: p. 20. Special thanks to CAP for sharing this reference with me.

9. Tony Barboza. “Ingestion of plastic found among small ocean fish.” Los Angeles Times. March 11, 2011:,0,6588047.story

10. Cummins, op. cit., p. 22.

11. See: Y. Mato et al. “Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine Environment.” Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 35 (2001): 318-324; and Christian M. Boerger et al. “Plastic ingestion by plankivorous fishes in the North Pacific Central Gyre.” Marine Pollution Bulletin. Vol. 60 (2010): 2275-2278.

12. Cummins, op. cit., p. 24-25.

13. Leuren Moret. BE FOREWARNED: The accompanying photos with this article are shocking and gravely upsetting, but we NEED to see what nuclear radiation does! “Global Implications of Sellafield. ‘Irish Seas Coast Effect’ and Beyond.” April 15, 2009:

14. Michael Parfit. “Diminishing Returns: Exploiting the Ocean’s Bounty.” National Geographic. Vol.188. No. 5, November 1995: p. 9.

15. Parfit., ibid., p. 22.

16. Michale Parenti. “Profit Pathology and the Disposable Planet.” Global Research. April 8, 2011:

17. May 11, 2011 update on the Gulf of Mexico “Blue Plague:; and

18. Rosalind Peterson.


Educator and environmental writer Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the highly acclaimed book, “The Uterine Crisis.” London’s “The Ecologist” calls this book “an inspiration.”

Related Articles:

Fukushima and Chernobyl – the Diabolical Nuclear Duo and the Alternative  


RED ALERT! There is no protection for Fukushima’s “Expendable” Citizens or Us  


21. How the Illuminati Got Above the Mormons

By Paul Drockton




What happened to the Mormons is instructional for any organization that has been infiltrated and manipulated by the Satanic Psychopaths. It is also why I look to God and Conscience for my salvation instead of any organization, even one that I believe has true Doctrine, Priesthood keys, and corrrect ordinances. 


Modern Mormonism has become a "Cult of Personality" for the vast majority of its members.  


1. The doctrine of "infallibility" (God's Prophets are perfect men that don't make mistakes) has taken hold within the membership. Further, it has been expanded to anyone that has a position in the Church. Of course this has been proven to be a false doctrine through the case of Mark Hoffman and his forgeries, which were gobbled up and presented as legitimate historical documents by the Mormon Church. 


2. The Doctrine of Infallibility allows men like Jon Huntsman Senior to sit on both the Council on Foreign Relations and the 5th quorum of the seventy in the LDS Leadership, without most so-called Patriotic members so much as blinking an eye. 


3. It also allows those that practice Satanic Ritual Abuse to avoid prosection and detection as long as one of their Cult Leaders is  in a position of Leadership. 

The Book of Mormon is written as a warning to our generation and it clearly depicts Satanic Psychopaths holding high office in the Church: 


8 Now the brother of Shared, whose name was Gilead, also received great strength to his army, because of secret combinations. 


9 And it came to pass that his high priest murdered him as he sat upon his throne. (Source




22  Now there was no lawyer nor judge nor high priest that could have power to condemn any one to death save their condemnation was signed by the governor of the land. 


23 Now there were many of those who testified of the things pertaining to Christ who testified boldly, who were taken and put to death secretly by the judges, that the knowledge of their death came not unto the governor of the land until after their death.... 


  27 Now it came to pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds; and the remainder, yea, even almost all the lawyers and the high priests, did gather themselves together, and unite with the kindreds of those judges who were to be tried according to the law. 


28 And they did enter into a covenant one with another, yea, even into that covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was given and administered by the devil, to combine against all righteousness. 


29 Therefore they did combine against the people of the Lord, and enter into a covenant to destroy them, and to deliver those who were guilty of murder from the grasp of justice, which was about to be administered according to the law. (Source


There is something that the Book of Mormon demonstrates repeatedly: 


1. The First Generation is righteous because of severe trials and humility.   


2. The Second Generation is mostly righteous and prospers in the land. 


3. The 3rd generation gets fat and lazy because of the work of their forebears. 


4. The 4th generation is just downright evil and embraces Satanic Secret Combinations. 


God will bring in "new blood" to replace the old poisoned blood. This "New Blood" will often build a new society on the bones of the old. Righteous men teach that only God is infallible, not man. Consider the words of Jesus Christ: 


18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God. 


Jesus Christ explained the principle of fallen man and the falsehood of the Doctrine of infallibility in that one simple quote. In other words, He stated, "You can only call Me good if you know Me to be God." 


Any man that claims that he is infallible, is also claiming that he is God. There is only one God, and He is not here on this earth at the present time. Those that accept the doctrine of infallibility for mortal men with high positions will ultimately be decieved and then destroyed for worshipping idols (which has the same root as idleness/lazyness). 


The Secret Combinations (Satanic Psychopaths) have taken a firm hold in the Mormon Church. Jesus stated they would in the Book of Mormon when He visited the Americas: 


"10 And thus commandeth the Father that I should say unto you: At that day when the Gentiles shall sin against my gospel, and shall reject the fulness of my gospel, and shall be lifted  up in the pride of their hearts above all nations, and above all the people of the whole earth, and shall be filled with all manner of lyings, and of deceits, and of mischiefs, and all manner of hypocrisy, and murders, and priestcrafts, and whoredoms, and of secret abominations; and if they shall do all those things, and shall reject the fulness of my gospel, behold, saith the Father, I will bring the fulness of my gospel from among them." 


Mormon Doctrine is full of references of the destruction of many Mormons of European descent (Gentiles) and the restoration of the American Indians in this land. The majority of Mormons have rejected the Bill of Rights, United States Constitution, the Book of Mormon, and the Spirit of Revelation and replaced them with the false doctrines of men. Like the other wicked Gentiles mentioned in the Book of Mormon, they will be swept from the land by the judgments of God. 


The American Indian, who has been humbled through severe trials that have lasted centuries, will retake his rightful position alongside the righteous that remain in the land after it has been purged.


22. Unlawful Killing: Film About the Death of Diana Likens Prince Philip to Fred West

Cannes Film Festival

Given that its entire £2.5 million budget was paid for by Mohamed Fayed, the conclusions of a new documentary about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales were not entirely unexpected.

See the video here:

The film, called Unlawful Killing, asserts that the Duke of Edinburgh is a “psychopath” in the mould of Fred West, that the Princess was murdered by the Establishment and that the Queen and other members of the Royal family are “gangsters in tiaras”.

As the film was premiered at Cannes, its director, Keith Allen, tried to defend the “ludicrous” slurs on the monarchy as he was accused by the Princess’s closest friend of cashing in on her death.

Allen, best known for playing the Sheriff of Nottingham in the BBC’s Robin Hood TV series, had already upset those closest to the Princess by including a photograph of her lying fatally injured in the back of a car moments after it had crashed in Paris in 1997.

And the astonishing comments about the Royal family which are made in the film have provoked fresh contempt.

Rosa Monckton, the Princess’s best friend, said: “Why is he doing this?

“The only reason he could be doing it is to make money by appealing to the conspiracy theorists.

“I also think he’s an attention seeker.”

The film, which took almost four years to produce, is so defamatory towards members of the Royal family that Allen will not even attempt to distribute it in Britain, having been told by lawyers he would have to make 87 cuts to it.

But he believes it will make money in America, where conspiracy theories about the Princess’s death remain popular, despite the conclusion of a six-month inquest in 2008 that there was “not a shred of evidence” to support Mr Fayed’s claims.

The film takes its title from the verdict of the inquest jury, which found that Henri Paul, the drink-driver who crashed the Mercedes in which the Princess died, and a number of paparazzi photographers pursuing the vehicle, had been guilty of “gross negligence”.

Mr Fayed is interviewed in the film, and repeats his long-held belief that the Princess, 36, and his son Dodi, 41, were murdered on the orders of the Duke of Edinburgh because he did not want the Princess to marry a Muslim.

Surprisingly, the film neglects to mention the fact that it was entirely bankrolled by Mr Fayed.

One scene features a photograph of the Queen and Princess Margaret, with Allen claiming in a voiceover that "many people regard them as gangsters in tiaras". He goes on to say that "the Royal family are notorious for their racism".

One of the contributors to the documentary is Oliver James, a clinical psychologist and broadcaster. He tells Allen: "I think Prince Philip is someone who is devoid of an internal sense of right and wrong, he doesn't care for anyone else... that is very like Fred West or any other psychopathic individual."

The film also makes repeated references to the Duke of Edinburgh's "Nazi background" whilst ignoring his distinguished Naval career in the Second World War.

Asked if he supported Mr Fayed's view that the Duke was involved in the Princess's death, Allen replied: "I do believe that Diana was in a position to rock a number of boats and I do believe that a warning may have silenced her. You could argue [the crash] was a warning-only situation and I think it may have gone too far."

Martyn Gregory, author of the definitive account of the fatal crash in the Alma underpass, called Diana: The Last Days, branded the film "ludicrous" and said: "It simply regurgitates everything Mohamed Fayed has been saying since the year 2000. It is rehearsing the Planet Fayed view."

A spokesman for Mr Fayed said he had seen the film and “he is absolutely delighted with it”.

Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the film.

Related Articles:

Diana 'killing' movie at Cannes 

Inquest jury traces Princess Diana's final journey in Paris  

Prince Philip sent 'nasty, cruel' letters to Diana  

Diana coroner: No evidence of Royal plot  



23. Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in Brazil

By Julio Severo  

Julio Severo is the author of the book O Movimento Homossexual (The Homosexual Movement), published by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House Publishers. In November 2004, he gave, in the Chamber of Deputies in Brasília, the introductory speech in the First Evangelical Parliamentary Front Meeting. The first magazine of the Front also published an article by Mr. Severo on homosexuality. His book has been the first writing in Portuguese to expose the homosexual movement and it has been a reference for Christian parliamentarians in Brazil. 


Until 1994, gay rights and parades were virtually unheard of and non-existent in Brazil. Yet, from 1995 on, after the first ILGA conference in Rio de Janeiro, homosexual activism became increasingly powerful in visibility, until the arrival of the Lula government, when their highest intentions and values became a threat and reality predominant in the Brazilian society. 

The social and moral structure of Brazil in the decades of 1950 and 1960 was basically strong, largely because of the predominant Catholicism in more than 90 percent of the population. In many places, evangelicals were threatened with lynching if they tried to evangelize, especially in small towns. Homosexual activity was a shameful and secret behavior, despised by the society.  A girl pregnant out of wedlock ran the risk of being expelled from her house. The Brazilian people were socially conservative, although the Carnival and public prostitution were tolerated. 

The largest threat to the society came from radical leftist movements. Communists almost took control in Brazil in 1964, but the military took over the government and was able to stop a communist coup. 

The Catholic Church was a driving force against the communist threat, but after Vatican II many Catholic leaders began surrendering to the Theology of Liberation. In the decades of 1970 and 1980, traditional Protestant churches embraced Protestant versions of Liberation Theology. In the late 1990s and early 2000, some Pentecostal and charismatic churches also subscribed. These leftist Christians are today known as progressistas. The Brazilian term progressista (progressive), according to the noted Aurélio Dictionary of Portuguese Language, means “someone who, though not being a member of a socialist or communist party, accepts and/or supports socialist or Marxist principles.”  So evangélicos progressistas are evangelicals committed to supporting and promoting the socialist agenda. 

Liberation Theology can boast an important victory in Brazil, for having a 73.6 percent Catholic population; Brazil is the largest Catholic country in the world. Protestants are 15.4 percent.  “Progressive” Christians are a growing presence and influence among both of these Christian religions. 

After the military left the government in 1985, leftist politicians, supported by the Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (Base Ecclesiastical Communities [BECs], where progressive Catholic leadership encouraged poor Catholic communities to get involved in political action according to Liberation Theology  tenets), began to heavily affect the political and social system, leading Brazil gradually leftward. BECs were the most important support behind the main popular leftist party in Brazil, Partido dos Trabalhadores (Workers’ Party), better known by its acronym PT.  

With such leftism, abortion and homosexuality began to be promoted as rights in the decade of 1990. (In the decade of 1980, there were leftists advocating abortion and homosexuality, but while abortion advocates had limited visibility and no legal influence, the rare gay advocates had none at all — except in a very few isolated examples, especially in universities.) Even though there are no anti-sodomy laws in Brazilian society, its religious heritage had always been an important social factor discouraging such behavior. 

Less conservative in the heart and more in the image: the current political ethics in Brazil    

Read the Full Story:
Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in Brazil


24. The Great Cholesterol Deception

November 17, 2010
By davidjones


© By Dr. Peter Dingle




Millions of Australians are prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs – statins like Pravachol®, Zocor® and Lipitor® – each year at a cost of more than $1 billion dollars with very little, if any, benefit. In the US, some 40 million people currently take statins at a cost of more than $3.00 per pill, more than $1,000 per year, totalling more than $40 billion a year.


While there are many exaggerated claims and a lot of hype about the benefits of statins, there are also many studies showing no benefits at all. The pro-statin hype is based on the misuse and abuse of statistics.


Various independent studies in prestigious, peer-reviewed journals have shown that statin use in primary prevention – that is, to save lives – has minimal or no value in reducing mortality and certainly nothing that is considered anywhere near clinically significant to warrant their widespread use. It does not matter how one manipulates the statistics, the results just aren’t there.


In data gathered in 2009 from six trials, a review of the efficacy in lowering the risk of death with statins found virtually no difference between the treatment group and the control group.1 There are many more of these studies.


In an independent meta-analysis (when a number of studies are put together to achieve more statistical power) of randomised controlled trials in patients without CVD, statin therapy decreased the incidence of major coronary and cerebrovascular events and revascularisations but not coronary heart disease or overall mortality.2


Taking statins for a number of years will not reduce mortality: “Primary prevention with statins provides only small and clinically hardly relevant improvement of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality.”3 “Hardly relevant” means there is virtually no clinical benefit; as the authors of these particular studies are independent, they gain nothing by stating this.


Another review found that “current clinical evidence does not demonstrate that titrating lipid therapy (trying to lower cholesterol with statins) to achieve proposed low LDL cholesterol levels is beneficial or safe.”4 In other words, lowering lipids has no real benefit and has the potential for adverse effects.


Following up on this, in a major independent review of studies funded by the Ministry of Health of British Columbia (Canada) on statins and primary prevention, researchers reported that “statins have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit in primary prevention trials.”5 This is a government report carried out by an independent university yet its findings are still ignored.


The problem really comes down to vested interests and the abuse of statistics. To overcome the limitations of small studies, vested parties combine many studies into a meta-analysis. The researchers themselves select the studies used in the meta-analysis. A fundamental problem is that researchers with direct links to drug companies have the authority to select the most positive studies and ignore the rest – including independent studies not funded by pharmaceutical companies. Despite this, they have still not been able to show any clinically significant findings.


As readers of the scientific journals, we should not be confused between statistical significance and clinical significance. For an outcome to be “statistically significant” means that the outcome was likely a result of the treatment – whether the result was 100% effective or less than 0.1% effective. That is, if you treat 1,000 people to save one life (0.1%) it may be statistically significant but it is not clinically significant. “Clinical significance” means 20% to 30% or more. The drug companies’ most positive studies on statins for prevention of CVD report statistical significance, mostly 1% or less, and none have found any clinical significance.


Busy medical professionals don’t have time to review the statistics; few of them may be aware of the different ways the statistics are manipulated. So if the experienced professionals don’t understand the results of these studies, how do we expect the media or public to understand?


More Deception


The studies on statins also report “relative risk,” not “absolute risk” or “real risk.” The relative risk reduction is highly misleading6,7,8,9,10 if not deceptive. An example of relative risk is: if you have four people in a study who die in the placebo group (no drug) compared to three people who die in the drug treatment group – that is, four were expected to die but with the drug only three did – then there is a 25% relative risk reduction. However, to get this effect of saving one life you would have to treat 1,000 people and the real risk reduction is 0.1%. Relative risk is like adding 1+1 to get 11 or 2+5 to get 25 or more. How can the pharmaceutical companies and the researchers working for them get away with this? This is probably because (at least in my experience) most people are afraid of statistics.


In studies by the Medical Research Council dating back to the late 1980s, researchers found that of 1,000 men ranging in age from 35 to 64 who received treatment for mild hypertension over five years, there were six fewer strokes and two fewer cardiovascular events than would be expected.11,12 The real risk reduction over five years was 0.9%. 

Ten years later, a study of Pravachol® was released in the media, with much fanfare, as having a 22% drop (relative risk, not real risk) in mortality. However, when one looks at the numbers and statistics behind the calculations, treating 1,000 middle-aged men who had hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol) and no evidence of a previous myocardial infarction with pravastatin for five years resulted in seven fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes, and two fewer deaths from other causes than would be expected in the absence of treatment.13 The real risk reduction, however, was a mere 0.9%, less than 1% or nine lives out of 1,000 when treated for five years. The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study).


Conservatively, put another way, researchers treated 1,000 people for five years at a total cost of over $5 million to save seven people from CVD. One might wish to compare this to the cost and efficacy of adopting healthy lifestyle choices.


In the Heart Protection Study in the United Kingdom, more than 20,000 participants aged 40 to 80 years with high risk of cardiovascular disease but average-to-low levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were treated with 40mg daily of simvastatin (marketed under several trade names including Zocor). Of 20,500+ study participants, 577 on statins died from a heart attack, 701 not treated died from a heart attack. That is a 25% relative risk reduction over five years.14 Sounds good, doesn’t it? The real percentage improvement is actually 1.7%. Over the five-year study, they saved 25 people per year in a high-risk population with previous cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, renal impairment or diabetes. These are seriously ill people and the researchers still achieved a benefit of only 1.7%. Researchers neglected to mention that around 30,000 people were not allowed in or dropped from the study and not counted in the percentage of people with side effects. There were 10,269 people on statins and 10,267 people on a placebo.15


A study of 90,056 participants combining 14 randomised trials looked at the best outcome for people who had pre-existing conditions: 47% had pre-existing chronic heart disease, 21% had a history of diabetes and 55% a history of hypertension. The death rate was 8.5% among the statin group compared to 9.7% in the control group. This difference represents 1.2%.16


The well-known JUPITER study compared a placebo group to a statin-taking group. The study found that there were 68 heart attacks in the placebo group and 31 heart attacks in the drug treatment group – a 58% relative risk reduction. There were 64 strokes in the placebo group, compared to 33 strokes in the treatment group, a relative risk reduction of 48%.17 Sounds good, doesn’t it? However, the drug treatment group had 8,901 participants in it. In real terms, the heart attack risk went from a very low 0.76% to 0.35% and the risk of stroke went from 0.72% to 0.37%.


Effectively, if you treat 300 people with expensive and dangerous drugs you might save one life. Under the best possible scenario, the real risk reduction was well under one half of one percent. The real risk reduction of consuming a handful of raw mixed nuts is much higher. It is interesting to note that one of the risk factors used to select the participants in the study was C-Reactive Protein (CRP) an indicator of inflammation, the real cause of CVD.


In an independent assessment of the same statistics in 2010 titled “Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy. A Critical Reappraisal” by Michel de Lorgeril and her 8 colleagues found that “the JUPITER Study” was severely flawed.18 This recent analysis did a careful and independent review of both results and methods used in the JUPITER Study and reported that the “trial was flawed.” 

In an unprecedented attack on the study they (scientists other than myself usually don’t say boo even when it is serious) stated that, “The possibility that bias entered the trial is particularly concerning because of the strong commercial interest in the study.” In other words, the big pharmaceutical money influenced the study. And concluded, “The results of the trial do not support the use of statin treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and raise troubling questions concerning the role of commercial sponsors.”


This is a scathing attack in scientific terms of the earlier drug company sponsored study. Scientist do not go out of their way to create waves but these ones have not just found different results but also criticised the earlier studies link with pharmaceutical industry. It highlights not only that the studies don’t show any significant results but these studies and the education of our doctors is strongly influenced by the drug companies.19 

More recently, a study reported in the BMJ was a meta-analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials of about 70,000 people followed for an average of four years.20 In these trials, people with risk factors for cardiovascular disease but no history of existing disease were randomised to receive statins or no treatment. The relative risk reduction was 12% for total mortality, 30% for coronary event and 19% for a cerebrovascular event (stroke). However, the real risk reduction was 0.6%, 1.3% and 0.4% respectively. The actual number needed to treat to save one life was 167. Despite this outcome the authors of the study concluded, “In patients without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, statin use was associated with significantly (statistical not clinical) improved survival and large (statistical) reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events.” (emphasis added.).


In fact, the authors had significant associations with the drug companies and failed to mention it was statistically significant but not clinically significant. Again, busy medical professionals tend to read only the abstracts; claims like this are pretty convincing, though very misleading.


More telling however, is the latest findings in June 2010 where two major independent studies, one the re-analysis of the Jupiter Study reported above and the other “A Meta-analysis of 11 Randomised Controlled Trials Involving 65,229 Participants” (don’t worry about the title) by Ray Kausik and 6 other independent researchers. The study, wait for it, found the use of statins in high-risk individuals was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in mortality. That is, they don’t save lives. Their data combined from 11 studies with 65,229 participants followed for approximately 244,000 person-years, a very big study, reported that this “meta-analysis did not find evidence for the benefit of statin therapy on all-cause mortality in a high-risk primary prevention set-up.” In other words they don’t save lives even in a high risk group. Even if you have all the elevated risk factors these drugs don’t work.


How many more studies to we need to do to show these drugs don’t work?


Professor Peter Dingle’s new book on the truth about cholesterol and cholesterol lowering medication, The Great Cholesterol Deception, is available. To order, visit




1 Bartolucci, A.A., S. Bae, et al. (2009). A Bayesian meta-analysis approach to address the effectiveness of statins in preventing death after an initial myocardial infarction. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress. Cairns, Australia. 2009. Cairns, Australia.


2 Thavendiranathan, P., A. Bagai, et al. (2006). “Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Archives of Internal Medicine 166: 2307-2313.


3 Vrecer, M., S. Turk, et al. (2003). “Use of statins in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke. Meta-analysis of randomized trials.” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 41(12): 567-577. M.Turk, S.Drinovec, J.Mrhar, A.International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 567-57741122003


4 Hayward, R.A., T.P. Hofer, et al. (2006). “Narrative review: Lack of evidence for recommended low-density lipoprotein treatment targets: A solvable problem.” Annals of Internal Medicine 145(7): 520-530.


5 University of British Columbia (2003). “Do statins have a role in primary prevention? A review by the Therapeutics Initiative of the Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics of the University of British Columbia.” Therapeutics Letter (48).


6 Fidan, D., B. Unal, et al. (2007). “Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales, 2000–2010.” QJM 100: 277-289.


7 Franco, O.H., A. Peeters, et al. (2005). “Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 59: 927-933. O.H.


8 Franco, O.H., E.W. Steyerberg, et al. (2006). “Effectiveness calculation in economic analysis: the case of statins for cardiovascular disease prevention.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60: 839-845.


9 Capewell, S. (2008). “Will screening individuals at high risk of cardiovascular events deliver large benefits? No.” British Medical Journal 337: a1395. S. British Medical Journal Capewell200816161617


10 Nuovo, J., J. Melnikow, et al. (2002). “Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in randomized controlled trials.” Journal of American Medical Association 287: 2813-2814.


11 Medical Research Council Working Party (1985). “MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results.” British Medical Journal 291: 97-104.


12 Miall, W.E. and G. Greenberg (1987). Mild Hypertension: Is There Pressure to Treat? An account of the MRC trial. New York, Cambridge University Press.


13 Shepherd, J., S.M. Cobbe, et al. (1996). “Prevention of coronary heart disease with Pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia.” New England Journal of Medicine 333: 1301-1307. P.W.McKillop, J.H.Packard, C.J.New England Journal of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 1301-13073331996


14 Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002). “MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.” Lancet 360: 7-22.


15 Ibid.


16 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators, C. Baigent, et al. (2005). “Efficacy and safety of cholesterol lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins.” Lancet 366: 1267-1278. L.Buck, G.Pollicino, C.Kirby, A.Sourjina, T.Peto, R.Collins, R.Simes, R.Lancet, Lancet 1267-12783662005


17 Ridker, P.M., E. Danielson, et al. (2008). “Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein.” New England Journal of Medicine 359(21): 2195-2207. J.G.Nordestgaard, B.G.Shepherd, J.Willerson, J.T.Glynn, R.J.JUPITER Study Group, New England Journal of Medicine 2195-2207359212008


18 Ray, K.K., S.R.K. Seshasai, et al. (2010). “Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 65 229 participants.” Archives of Internal Medicine 170(12): 1024-1031.


19 de Lorgeril, M., P. Salen, et al. (2010). “Cholesterol lowering, cardiovascular diseases, and the Rosuvastatin-JUPITER controversy: A critical reappraisal.” Archives of Internal Medicine 170(12): 1032-1036.


20 Brugts, J.J., T. Yetgin, et al. (2009). “The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.” British Medical Journal 338: b2376.


DR. PETER DINGLE Ph.D has a Bachelor of Education in Science, Bachelor of Environmental Science with first class honours, and a Ph.D. Dr. Dingle is an Associate Professor in Health and the Environment at Murdoch University and one of Australia’s best motivational health speakers. He has spent the past twenty years as a researcher, educator, communicator and author. He has more than 100 scientific papers. Dr. Dingle currently has 6 books in print with the latest ones My Dog Eats Better Than Your Kids and Is Your Home Making You Sick. He is a regular in state and national print media and may be heard weekly on radio and TV, reporting on health and the environment. He was the presenter on the award winning SBS program “Is Your House Killing You”, he is seen regularly on “Can we help” on ABC and is currently filming his second TV series. His website is

The above article appeared in New Dawn No. 123 (Nov-Dec 2010).



25. Who is Andrea Rossi?

Source: Who is Andrea Rossi?

He is an Italian engineer and inventor who has been working on energy related projects for decades. Currently, he is the President and Founder of Leonardo Technologies Incorporated of Bedford , NH .  

What is the Energy Catalyzer?

It is a "Cold Fusion" device developed by Italian engineer and inventor Andrea Rossi. It produces heat by placing nickel powder of very small particle size (nano-meters to micro-meters) in a pressurized hydrogen environment along with currently undisclosed (for proprietary reasons) catalysts that enhance the reaction. When this environment is heated to approximately 450 - 500 C, a nuclear reaction starts taking place. This reaction releases a large amount of energy while consuming very little hydrogen and nickel powder.  

What is Cold Fusion?

It is a term that describes a broad range of nuclear reactions – including nuclear fusion – at relatively low temperatures. For example, hundreds of degrees instead of millions of degrees like inside of a star such as our sun.  

How much energy does this system produce?

There is currently only one model of reactor that has been disclosed. It is designed to produce 10 kW of continuous thermal energy in the form of heated water or steam. However, this is not the upper limit of the energy the system can produce. It can be throttled up to 130 kW or higher, but that is avoided except during experimentation for safety reasons.  

How large is the system?

The reactor vessel itself is very small with a volume of only one liter. The auxiliary equipment such as control mechanisms, lead shielding, hydrogen canister, and other components can easily fit on a medium sized table top.  

How much fuel does the Energy Catalyzer consume?

Very little. One hundred grams of nickel powder will power the device for six months. However, since only a small amount of that nickel will have reacted with the hydrogen 90% of the nickel will remain. It can be extracted, re-processed, and re-used as fuel.  

What isotopes of nickel are consumed?

The nickel powder put into the device is not of any specific isotope. It is just common ordinary nickel of a very small particle size. However, is thought that only two isotopes of nickel (62Ni and 64Ni) are being consumed.  

What type of hydrogen is consumed?

Only light hydrogen is used. Heavy hydrogen (deuterium) does not work.  

Are by-products being created?

The two isotopes 62Ni and 64Ni are apparently being transmuted into non-radioactive isotopes of copper and trace amounts of other stable and non radioactive elements such as zinc.  

What is the catalyst and why has it not been disclosed?

Only Andrea Rossi and a few close business partners know the identity of the proprietary catalyst. The catalyst is critical intellectual property, as it is the key to producing significant quantites of energy. A patent application has been submitted covering the catalyst(s) involved. It has been stated that when the patent application is granted and a full patent is issued, the information about the catalyst or catalysts will be revealed.  

When will the patent be granted?

It is hoped the patent will be granted by the time the one megawatt plant opens this October. However, there is a standing policy at the US Patent Office not to grant patents to "cold fusion" devices. If the patent office does not approve it by then, the information about the catalyst will have to remain secret. Please do not hound or contact the patent office about this issue. The best way to proceed is to get as many people as possible interested in this technology. Millions of people openly discussing why the patent office is not granting a patent to a valid technology being put to industrial use may make it difficult for them to justify their actions.

Read the Full Story:
Who is Andrea Rossi?  

More on Andrea Rossi:

Ampenergo Amps Up Rossi's Energy Catalyzer In America 

Patent Granted For Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer  

Andrea Rossi's Cold Fusion Energy Catalyzer 

Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator 

The Magic Of Andrea Rossi (Video) 

E-Cat Energy Catalyzer Invented By Andrea Rossi 

97 Rossi E-Cats Operating In Four Countries 

E-Cat Energy Catalyzer Andrea Rossi: E-Cat To Be Official Launch Name 

Andrea Rossi - Alternative Energy Genius 

Specifics Of Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer Test 

Focardi-Rossi Energy Catalyzer 

Rossi Catalyzer - Google Search 

US 2011005506(A1) - Google Search
Rossi Catalyzer - Google Search


26. Global Governance (Part 9 of 9)

By Henry Lamb


From San Francisco To Istanbul (1996)

Habitat II, the UN Conference on Human Settlements, convened in Istanbul in June 1996. Despite the fact that Habitat I called for the elimination of private property in 1976, the U.S. has contributed more than $32 million100 to its operations and sent an enthusiastic delegation to Istanbul to assure the Conference that America is supporting its objectives. The entire agenda was bathed in the ambiguous language of sustainable development. Two of the major issues to emerge through the noise of 4000 delegates and 25,000 NGO representatives, were: (1) the right to housing, and (2) good governance.

Although at least three previous UN documents declare the right to housing, two of them have not been ratified by the U.S. Consequently, the universal right to housing is in question. Article 5 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination declares a right to housing. The U.S. has ratified that Convention. The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Human Rights, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which declare the right to housing, have not been ratified by the U.S. As the leader of one NGO, called the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, says: "The right to housing is a powerful, mobilizing tool for women's groups, street children and so on. Denying this right would be a great step backwards." 101 If housing is declared to be a universal right, then the UN would have the responsibility of guaranteeing and enforcing that right. And to have meaning, the UN would have to have the authority to collect the money necessary to provide universal housing.

Of more direct importance is the issue of "good governance." Throughout all the conferences of the 1990s, emphasis has been placed on expanding the role and functions of NGOs in the decision-making process and the management and administration of government programs at every level. Habitat II Director-General, Wally N'Dow, said:

"The road to Istanbul has been marked by many innovations. One of seminal importance has been a pioneering change in the rules of procedure -- a change that was initiated during the preparatory process and subsequently endorsed by the General Assembly [Rule 61] in recognition of the important role of local authorities and NGOs. As a result, all the organizations and institutions of civil society will receive unparalleled recognition at a UN conference, nominating their representatives to participate in a formal session . . . . They speak for countless millions of men and women in the cities and towns across the planet, the true constituents of Habitat II."102

This rule change officially elevates NGOs to participatory status in the policy-making process of the United Nations. Policy making by individuals who have no direct or indirect accountability to the electorate is a foreign concept in America. It is common -- in fact expected -- in socialist countries. In America, if voters do not like the way America is being represented in the UN, voters can remove the President who appoints UN delegates and elect someone else who more accurately reflects American values. American voters cannot unelect representatives from the Sierra Club, or the president of a gay feminist NGO, or any other NGO who may be selected by their peers to make global policies which affect Americans.

Moreover, Rule 61 invites participation by local officials. Heretofore, the UN has served its member nations as represented by official delegates. This rule is the first step toward bypassing the official national government to extend UN influence, programs, and eventually money, regulations, and enforcement -- directly to the people within the nation. This is the essence of governance by civil society, orchestrated by the United Nations. This is the first wave of the reality of global governance. From Istanbul To Geneva (1996)

The second meeting of The Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COPII-FCCC), convened in Geneva, Switzerland July 8-19, 1996. The treaty was presented in 1992 at the Rio "Earth Summit," and has now been ratified by 159 nations, including the U.S. The treaty requires participating Annex I (developed) nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000.

At COPI, however, meeting in Berlin in 1995, the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) proposed that developed nations reduce emissions to a level 20%, less than 1990 levels. The COP did not adopt the proposal, but did adopt the "Berlin Mandate" which was an agreement to develop a legally binding Protocol by 1997. COPII was designed to negotiate The terms of the Protocol for adoption at COPlII in Kyoto, Japan in 1997.

To influence the proceedings, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released its Second Assessment Report (SAR). For the first time, the official UN body claimed that ". . . the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate." Although 100 scientists -- some of whom were participants in the IPCC process -- publicly objected to the report's findings in a statement called the "Leipzig Declaration," the Conference pushed forward toward a legally binding Protocol. The conference document, called the "Ministerial Declaration," endorses The SAR; declares that emissions will eventually have to be reduced by 50%; and calls on developed nations to initiate policies to reduce emissions within specific industries: energy, transportation, agriculture, forestry, waste management, and economic instruments. From Geneva To Global Governance (1998)

When Shirdath Ramphal handed over the IUCN gavel to Jay Hair in 1993, he turned his attention to the Commission on Global Governance which he co-chaired along with Ingvar Carlsson, former Prime Minister of Sweden and then-Leader of the Social Democratic Party in Sweden. Like the Commissions of the 1980s (Brandt, Palme, MacBride, and Brundtland) it was an independent commission, meaning that it was not created by a resolution of the UN General Assembly. It operated officially as an NGO but, as a practical matter, it was an instrument of the United Nations. The Commission on Global Governance received the formal endorsement of Butrous-Butrous Ghali, UN Secretary-General, and funding from the United Nations Development Program. Nine nations and several private foundations also supplied funding. Oscar Arias, former President of Costa Rica was a member of the Commission. Arias won the Nobel Peace Prize for his "peace plan" which called on nations to direct disarmament savings to the UN's development programs.

Adele Simmons, President of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, was a member. Maurice Strong also served on the 28-member Commission.

Several of the Commission's ideas were advanced experimentally at the various world conferences during the early 1990s. They tested the waters particularly for the several global taxation ideas, and for their ideas about global governance through civil society. Their final report was released in conjunction with the 50th anniversary of the United Nations in the fall of 1995, entitled Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance.

The Commission recommended that:

"the General Assembly should agree to hold a World Conference on Governance in 1998, with its decisions to be ratified and put into effect by 2000."103

Hereafter, numbers in parentheses indicate the reference page number in Our Global Neighborhood. The Commission bases its recommendations on the belief that human activities have irreversible environmental impacts and that human activities need to be "managed" to keep the "adverse outcomes within prudent bounds" (p. 11). "Effective and equitable management calls for a systemic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance" (p. 30).

The Commission is convinced that the world is ready to accept "a set of core values that can unite people of all cultural, political, religious, or philosophical backgrounds.... It is fundamentally important that governance should be underpinned by democracy at all levels and ultimately by the rule of enforceable law" (p.48). "Underpinned by democracy" has a totally different meaning to people who live in a socialist democratic nation, than to people who live in a "free" country such as America. Americans think of "democracy" as the process by which they elect the individuals to represent them in their exercise of the limited power that Americans have chosen to give to their government. In socialist nations, "democracy" means participating in the process by which the sovereign government decides how to manage its subjects.

The "core values" upon which global governance is to be based include liberty. But again, in America, liberty has a totally different meaning from what the Commission describes. "Liberty is threatened by deprivation, economic dislocation, oppression based on gender or sexual orientation, abuse of children, debt bondage, and other social and economic patterns." (p. 50) Americans realize that these conditions are only some of the inherent risks of being free. Liberty is the freedom to exercise individual ingenuity and apply individual energy to avoid the risks and rise above all other dangers.

The very fact that Americans, and others who live in free societies, have risen above these risks, creates an injustice in the world according to the Commission. "Although people are born into widely unequal economic and social circumstances, great disparities in their conditions or life chances are an affront to the human sense of justice. . . . A concern for equity is not tantamount to an insistence on equality, but it does call for deliberate efforts to reduce gross inequalities . . . and to promote a fairer sharing of resources" (p. 51). Mutual respect which is defined to be "tolerance," caring -- with a global reach -- and integrity, which is defined as supporting the program, round out the Commission's core values.

Voluntary acceptance of global governance is the preferred means of achieving it. Education programs to teach the "global ethic" have been underway by UNESCO and by UNEP for more than 20 years. That the U.S. government, through its representatives to the various UN agencies, has not already crushed this global governance agenda is a testament to the effectiveness of the UN's education program. But the Commission is not content to rely upon voluntary acceptance. An intricate maze of international, enforceable law is encircling the planet in the form of Conventions, Treaties, and Executive Agreements.

To implement, administer, and enforce global governance, the Commission has recommended a major restructuring of the UN system. The Commission recommends an "Assembly of the People" which "should consist of representatives of organizations accredited to the General Assembly as Civil Society Organizations . . . . A Forum of 300-600 organs of global civil society would be desirable and practicable" (p. 258-259). A new "Petitions Council" is recommended, to consist of five to seven representatives of "civil society," for the purpose of reviewing petitions from NGOs in the field to direct to the appropriate UN agency for enforcement action (p. 260).

A new Economic Security Council (ESC) would replace the existing Economic and Social Council. The new ESC would consist of no more than 23 members who would have responsibility for all international financial and development activities. The IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO -- virtually all finance and development activities -- would be under the authority of this body. There would be no veto power by any nation, nor would there be permanent member status for any nation (p. 266f).

The existing Security Council would be restructured. Veto power of the five permanent members would be eliminated, as would permanent member status over time. With the Secretary-General's office expanded to include the function of Commander-in-Chief, the Security Council would oversee a new UN standing army, complete with support and transport car capabilities. (p. 100f) The Commission calls for an international convention on curtailment of the arms trade (p. 129), a demilitarization of international society, and disarming of civilians. (p. 131)

A new International Criminal Court would be created, complete with its own "independent prosecutor or a panel of prosecutors of the highest moral character." (p. 324) The International Court of Justice would become "compulsory" and it would issue binding verdicts in order to ''strengthen international law." (p.308f)

To protect the environment:

"We propose that the Trusteeship Council . . . be given the mandate of exercising trusteeship over the global commons. The global commons include the atmosphere, outer space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction, and the related environment and life-support systems that contribute to the support of human life. Its functions would include the administration of environmental treaties in such fields as climate change, biodiversity, outer space and the Law of the Sea. It would refer, as appropriate, any economic or security issues arising from these matters to the Economic Security Council or the Security Council." (p. 251f)

The Commission suggests that "the new Council "would benefit from contributions from civil society organizations. Of major significance is the expansion of the concept of security:

"All people, no less than all states, have a right to a secure existence, and all states have an obligation to protect those rights. (p. 84) Where people are subjected to massive suffering and distress, however, there is a need to weigh a state's right to autonomy against its people's right to security. (p. 71) We believe a global consensus exists today for a UN response on humanitarian grounds in cases of gross abuse of the security of people." (p. 89) The security of the people is challenged "from threats to the earth's life-support systems, extreme economic deprivation, the proliferation of conventional small arms, the terrorizing of civilian populations by domestic factions, and gross violations of human rights." (p. 79)

The Commission believes that the UN should protect the "security of the people" inside the borders of sovereign nations, with or without the invitation of the national government. It proposes the expansion of an NGO "early warning" network to function through the Petitions Council to alert the UN to possible action. It has recommended implementation of the Tobin Tax, and several other taxing schemes. (p. 217f) It has called for a world conference in 1998 to present the treaties and other documents necessary to bring about complete global governance by the year 2000.


The views expressed in this article are not necessarily the opinions of the list owner.

This material is distributed free to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for non-profit educational purposes.

-- John Henry



Antichrist and the Green Prince 


27. News in Brief.

Irish Bombshell: Government Raids Private Pensions To Pay For Spending 

The proof that Campbell and Blair DID lie about the Iraq War: Devastating secret evidence declassified [which also proves that Australia's John Howard is a national traitor of the same ugly dimensions as Blair and Co.]

MI6 Plotted with No. 10 to Oust Saddam in Bid to Win 'Prize' of Secure Oil Supplies 

Facebook Paid PR Firm To Smear Google 

Illuminati Run The Royals 

Geithner Eliminates Hi-Tech Transfer Restrictions To China 

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Speaks The Truth 

Step In Or Starve 

Fukushima Plutonium Meets Chemtrail Barium - The Perfect Crime?

YOUR FREE WILL: The Global Power Elite’s Achilles Heel  

Forecast 2011: An End Run Towards World Government 

New book! The Coming World Government: Tragedy and Hope? 

Argentina: Targeted by World Government – Danger over ‘Patagonia’! 

The Global Power Elite is Not That Strong! 

A Message From Argentina … Our Sympathies To The People Of Greece! 

Secret WikiLeaks Document Confirms North American Union Plan 

Weather Warfare: 'West plots to cause drought in Iran'  

Osama's Funeral Reported in December 2001 

List of countries the USA has bombed since the end of World War II  

The Never-Ending War Machine 

Spy Drones Becoming Pervasive INSIDE America  

Tarpley - China Ultimatum Warns US Not To Attack Pakistan  

Massive Spying On Ameircans Revealed (Video)  

More Madness - Scientists Now Claim Heart Attack Vax   

Tehran Has Obama And US Nailed  

Japan Admits More Radiation Leak From MOX 3 Into Pacific 

Tokyo Radiation 500% Higher Than Govt Announced  

The World According To Henry Kissinger 

BBC Film Foretold Fukushima Meltdown Disaster 

Satanic Rothschilds, Non-Semitic, Gangster State Of Israel  

Iran Culpable Of 9/11? Zioloons Getting Desperate? 

Ahmadinejad Accuses Europe Of Weather Warfare   

Netanyahu Publicly Crushes Obama Over 1967 Border Remarks 

Netanyahu Dumps On Barky's 'Peace Plan' At The WH  

Once Again, Barky Shows Who's In Charge (Not Him)  

Is Netanyahu Next? 

The Next Israeli President 

British Royalty Dined On Human Flesh  

Feds Predict Up To 10 Hurricanes In 2011  

Bollyn - 9-11...The Zionist Coverup 

Iran Accused Of Designing 9/11 (sure) 

NATO Sinks 8 Libya Warships, Slaughters Crews 

Is Jesus Coming Soon? Is The End Near? 

Netanyahu Says Obama Endangering Israel  

Obama Demands Jewish Pullback, Warns Arab Dictators   

Obama's Middle East Hypocrisy - Every Major Promise Broken 

E-book Sales Overtake Print Titles For First Time  

Face Recognition Too Creepy Even For Google   

Blake's Jerusalem 'Reserved For Homosexuals' 

Cooked Tomatoes As Good As Statins For Cholesterol  

Egyptian Uprising Reporter - '2 Egypts Have Emerged'  

The Satanic Cult Behind the Music Industry, Part 1 (Video) 


Stop Relying on Limited News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:

"Every night the same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is your News Limited?" (Quote from satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke Letters.)

Latest editions to this list of alternative new sites:



Atlantic Free Press 

Axis of Logic  

Common Dreams 


Information Clearing House  

My Catbird Seat 

Online Journal 

Redress Information & Analysis 

Sabbah Report 
Veterans Today

Here's some good advice from Gilad Atzmon:

"In addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.

Some of the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri, Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort, Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges,  Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates, Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." ( )


Additional Resources ...

The Warning of the Last Days

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold And Its Not Financial

The Usher of Desecration

The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion


How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …


Go to the following link for instructions ...

How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos


Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...

My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear from you.

Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact page:

Thanks for reading.

See you next issue.

John Mulligan


Subscriber's Notes Section ...


You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.

PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the bottom of every issue.

SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.

To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:


At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by you will find a special link that enables you to UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit GO.

Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...

Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:


URL of This Issue:


Bookmark This Page
Delicious Digg Facebook Furl Google Bookmarks Netvouz Reddit Spurl Stumbleupon Wists Yahoo My Web


• Home
• How to Translate this Page
• Sacred Calendar 2004 to 2017
• The New Moon Festivals
• Beliefs and Structure
• Invitation
• Core eBooks
• Articles and Reports
• Healing and Health
• Things I Would Like My Grandchildren To Know
• Stages of the Restoration of All Things
• Last Days Watch ezine
• Expose the Synagogue of Satan Locally
• Download Brochures
• Download Full Web Site
• About Nazarene Remnant
• Help Us
• Resources
• Quotations of Interest
• Contact
• Link to Us
• Code of Conduct
• Mirror This Site
• Site Map

The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture ...

We are entering an age that Satanists call the Age of Fire, when they will use every murderous, demonic, vicious, and most cunning tactics and lies to usher in their Nazi Fourth Reich (aka the New World Order). They have made the following point very clear:

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.” (David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations Organization) ...

Read the Full Article:
The Most Stern Warning in all Scripture

The Warning of the Last Days 

The Warning of the Last Day eBook cover image

"Therefore, behold, I will make them know, this once I will make them know my power and my might, and they shall know that my name is the Lord. The clamour will resound to the ends of the earth, for the Lord has an indictment against the nations; he is entering into judgment with all flesh, and the wicked he will put to the sword." (Jeremiah 16: 21; 25: 31)

Free Download:The Warning of the Last Days

The Usher of Desecration 

Usher:Noun: “Somebody who shows people to their seats, e.g. in a theatre or at a wedding.” Verb: “To inaugurate or introduce (something): usher in a new era.”

Desecration: Verb: “1. To violate the sanctity (of something sacred); to profane (it). 2. To treat (a sacred place) irreverently or contemptuously.” The Penguin English Dictionary, 2nd Edition, 2003.

“If someone was planning to murder you, you would like to know months in advance, wouldn’t you?”

Read the Book:
The Usher of Desecration

The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial. 

 Read the Book:
The Real Crisis Is About To Unfold and It's Not Financial

The Time for Talk is Over

“The trip is over folks, we are out of road. I wish I could tell you where you are going. If you don't know or don't have a map, it wouldn't do me much good to try to tell you anyway. One thing is for certain; from here you will walkthe rest of the way. For many it will be to destination unknown. Most are on the way to the City of Despair, in the State of Confusion, located within the Nation of Disgrace. For others, the destination will not be pleasant nor a matter of choice. You get the picture. Those who, ‘take all of your belongings and climb into the truck,’ will weep in utter misery for the personal negligence that they brought upon themselves and their families. You will have paid the ultimate price.

 A prudent [man] foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.” (Proverbs 22: 3, KJV)


So,...will you take the final moments God is giving you to step away from your ‘stupid zone’ and do what you should have so long ago? Will you finally make some plans? Will you really sell off your unnecessary toys and purchase the absolutely necessary survival tools that will give you just a chance to make it through? Will you search out the ultimate truth of our predicament and the One who can give you peace, serenity and eternal life? Can you admit that putting a dictator in office was one of your very worst mistakes, and you will try to make amends by resisting him and his communist platform? Will you do all you can to convert your family and friends who also voted for him and others supporting him to work against him in every way possible? That may sting and burn to be told that, but it is far better than the amputation of your limbs that is coming if he continues to dismantle this nation and its last freedoms.

“Procrastination in implementing your family's self preservation plans will be terminal.” [1]


Editorials like these are expected to consume about 1500 words. This is half that. Like I said, the time for talk is over.”


[1] Dr. Greg Evenson


Read the Article:
The Time for Talk is Over

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight 

Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight cover image

Read the article Defining the Spiritual War You Failed To Fight.

Worldwide Church of God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International 

Worldwide Church oof God Returns to the Vomit as Grace International book cover.

“But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog [is] turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.” (2 Peter 2: 22)

“As a dog returneth to his vomit, [so] a fool returneth to his folly.” (Proverbs 26: 11) 

Discover the part played by the Illuminati Jew, Rupert Murdoch (pictured above), and his Zondervan publishing company, in the destruction of Herbert W Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.

What Murdoch "... is not is an Australian 'right wing' billionaire. Murdoch, though born in Australia is an Israeli citizen and Jewish. Why is this important?

Murdoch is now admitted to have controlled the political systems in Britain and America for two decades. He has had the power to choose national leaders, make policy, pass laws at will. Where did the power come from?

We now know it came from spying, blackmail, bribery and propaganda." (Veterans Today Senior Editor, Gordon Duff.)

Get the book here.

UFO's Originate in Nazi Antarctic Bases 

Nazi flying saucers thumbnail.

"Perhaps in order to engineer and prepare the global collective psyche to the "great earth-shattering announcement" that may be coming any day now, ... that the US, UK and allies are in contact with "technologically superior beings from other worlds, which do exist after all and we are in contact with them."

Read more here ...

"The only correct term for the mis-called 'anti-Semitic' is 'Jew-wise.' It is indeed the only fair and honest term. The phrase 'anti-Semite' is merely a propaganda word used to stampede the unthinking public into dismissing the whole subject from their minds without examination: so long as that is tolerated these evils will not only continue, but grow worse." (The Nameless War, by Captain Archibald Maule Ramsay, p. 63)

Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?

“Is it ok if I vent a little today? I’ve built up a little frustration over the past couple of months and I just need a pressure release. Will you let me do it?


As you may be aware I have started a varsity football program at a local Christian High School. Although I vowed to myself that I would never return to prowling the sidelines when I walked away from public education in 2000,the opportunity to train young males to be men was something I could not, in good conscience, run from.


Not all males are men. I hope you understand that. Especially convincing is the evidence I have garnered recently that Christian males in particular are the least manly.



Why Are Christian Men Such Wimps?


How Shall We Tell The Children? 

 "And they shall go into the holes of the rocks, and into the caves of the earth, for fear of the Lord, and for the glory of his majesty, when he ariseth to shake terribly the earth." Isaiah 2:19 (KJV)

How Shall We Tell The Children eBook cover image

"But how shall we tell the children? We probably won't tell them; the knowledge would be too dangerous to the "system" we have developed to ensure our own preservation. As long as they will continue to work in order to support, and in order to die in, for, and because of our system, we will allow as many of them who can do so, to survive until we have lived out our lives in the manner to which we have become accustomed. It has always worked before, so maybe it will continue to work long enough to keep me comfortable until I die. It is a gamble in which the odds are becoming increasingly negative."

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How Shall We Tell The Children eBook 

How The World Really Works, by Alan Jones 

How The World Really Works cover image

Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

The picture which Alan Jones paints in this book is one which you must understand if your efforts in truly understanding how the world REALLY works are ever to amount to anything. We paint that picture by presenting an ordered set of book reviews which identify our enemies and describe the primary strategies and actions which they have taken against us over the last 100 years or so. Our goal in writing the book was to provide an accurate portrayal of that picture within the covers of a single moderate- length book. The 12 chapter titles of How The World Really Works are ... the names of the books being reviewed.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> How The World Really Works eBook

Secrecy or Freedom, by Alan Jones 

Secrecy or Freedom ebook cover

Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

This is Alan Jones' most recent book, published in April, 2001. While countless books have been written revealing yet one more outrage which the New World Order folks have perpetrated on us, Jones has resolved on an entirely different purpose: to define a way of mounting a counterattack on those elites, and not just delay their next victory, but destroy their viability, and take back our country and the world for middle class citizens everywhere. In the same way that an army or a football team will surely lose in the long run if it has only a defense and no offense, we too shall lose our world to the elites if we fail to marshal our resources, mount a viable offense against them, and reduce their present dominance of public affairs to a nullity. To that end, this book goes right back into history to discover their origin, their modus operandi, their strengths, and most importantly, their weaknesses. The exercise has been successful, and reveals a crucial weakness which may readily be exploited. We will, in this web page, outline our search, our major findings, and finally a plan of action to save our country for the benefit, we hope, of a great number of future generations of free citizens. Our historical look will go back 2000 years and beyond. Our sources are not generally well known, are not Nobel prize- winning historians, but nevertheless are historical truth seekers whose researches are uniquely valuable. Each of the chapters of Secrecy or Freedom? carries the title of the historical work which is reviewed in that chapter. In this web page, we will give you an inkling of what is covered in each of these chapters, with the hope that these few words will lead you to order our book, carefully absorb its contents, and then join in our proposed action plan to take back our country.

How To Get A FREE Copy>>> Secrecy or Freedom eBook

How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Known To Man, by Mary Croft 

You're an asset of the state. You're duped into entering the world of commerce and finance and trapped in imaginary debt bya brilliant but simple con. When you see your name written in UPPERCASE LETTERS it has a very different meaning to the one your parents gave you. This is an amazing ebook. We highly recommend it.

Click here to download

Classy Beauty, 25, Seeks Man Making $500K 

 Classy Beauty, 25, seeks man making $500M.

Reply to "Classy" Beauty,25, who advertised on Craig's List for a Man Making $500K.

The Answer ...

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year.

Read the Answer the "Classy" Beauty Got

"If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." - George Orwell (1903-1950)

We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning.

“Regarding the Jesuits, quoting Rabbi Finkelstein: “We [the Jews] infiltrated  the Roman Catholic Church right from the very beginning. Why do you think the Pope, the Cardinals and all the Bishops wear yarlmulkahs? (skullcaps) The white race never figures this out. A thousand years later the white race began to wake up ... we had to come up with a plan B ... so we formed the Jesuits. There was a nice boy, Ignatius Loyola. He started the Jesuits.” (Loyola was Jewish. Research/read the Jesuit Extreme Oath.)”

(From The Real History of the Earth. Why in Hell is All This Happening Again? by David Thatcher.)

False Flag Operations or "False flag terrorism" occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people. The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy.

False Flag Operations

John Taylor Gatto's "The Underground History of American Education"

"If we ever needed a battering ram to pull down the evil structure of compulsory public schooling, this book should be able to do the job. The book calls for a revolution. But not a violent one. It can be won easily and peaceably by merely taking the kids out of the public schools. It's still legal to do so. That would change America radically. But the pessimists will say that most parents are too brain-dead to care what goes on in the public schools. Those parents who do care have already gotten their kids out and are homeschooling them. But we know that every day more and more parents are beginning to see the light. That's encouraging." (Samuel L. Blumenfeld)

Read more: 
John Taylor Gatto

Democracy Is An Illusion 

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one perhaps of the Right, and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can 'throw the rascals out' at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy... But either party in office becomes in time corrupt, tired, unenterprising, and vigorless. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor,approximately the same policies". (Carroll Quigley, Tragedy and Hope, 1966, p. 1247-48)

Democracy Is An Illusion

Why Men are So Attracted to Foreign Women 

Have you ever wondered why men are so attracted to foreign (non-Western) women? Have you heard from a friend lately that her ex fiancee is now looking for a Russian bride or that a male relative is engaged to a Filipina? And, do you scoff at that and put it down to these men being 'desperate' and those women as just wanting a ticket into the country?

Why You Shouldn't Get Involved With a Married Man [or Woman]
Here's a question that's been sent to me recently about a woman wondering if she should get involved with a married man. Here's my reply telling her why you shouldn't get involved with a married man! This woman's name has been changed to remain anonymous.

What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

What You Should Know About Swine Flu eBook cover image

"These are challenging times and we need to stay calm and think things through - not just panic and react. Fear, panic and emotional reaction got us into this mess and it is certainly not going to get us out of it.

We also need to realise - here, now - that  we have long crossed the line into a fully-fledged  fascist dictatorship. It has hidden itself to most people this far, but it is about to lift the veil.

It is no longer an option to do nothing or passively acquiesce to authority out of fear or apathy. Or, at least, it's not if we care about our freedoms and, most importantly, those of our children and grandchildren who will have to live almost their entire lives under a global jackboot of sheer, undiluted evil.

The word 'evil' is much overused and I don't say it lightly; but we are dealing with evil in the sense that the word is the reverse of 'live'. Those behind the conspiracy to cull the human population and turn the rest into little more than computer terminals are anti-life. They have no respect for it and no empathy with those who suffer the consequences of their actions, no matter how appalling.

I have been warning of what was coming for nearly 20 years and it is not 'coming' any more - it's here. No more excuses from anyone, please. We have to deal with it. We have to draw a line in the sand and say no more.

Never was this more important than with  the conspiracy to force swine flu vaccination upon the global population. The swine flu virus was created in a laboratory to generate  mass panic with the specific intention of forcing everyone to have the vaccine. Problem-Reaction-Solution. This 'natural' swine flu virus apparently contains genes from humans, birds and pigs from several continents.

If you concoct and release a virus and then implement a clearly long-planned mass vaccin-ation programme, there can be only one sensible conclusion: swine flu is not the biggest danger here - it's the vaccine." (David Icke)

Free Download: What You Should Know About Swine Flu 

This Has to be the Definitive Report on the Vaccination Hoax.  

“The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon. National Institutes of Health.

Are you scared when you’re told you have to vaccinate your child with 49 doses in 14 vaccines before age 6? Or are you scared at the idea of not vaccinating and so “exposing” your child to serious illnesses?

Are you scared about the school threatening you that if you don’t vaccinate you can’t enrol your child?

FEAR. That’s what all these pro-vaccine campaigns are based on. As a parent, what’s the biggest scare of all? When your child gets sick with a serious disease and you feel responsible for that. As you see, vaccine supporters couldn’t go wrong with this and developed a dogma that’s been bought over and over again over the years by people. The magic insurance policy to solve it all.

So, even if your child gets sick, at least you know you did everything you could for his/her health and vaccinated, right? But what if the very vaccination is able to cause the illness in the first place??

Could The Vaccine Hoax Be Over?

An extraordinary paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

The 45 page paper with detailed evidence can be downloaded here.

Also see the short article about this report in Issue #65a of our newsletter Last Days Watch, which is here.

Wolves in Sheep's Clothing 

"Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves"  (Matthew 7: 15)

Vicious wolf

"For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works." (2 Corinthians 11: 13-15)

We are Facing Orwellian, Totalitarian Slavery 

That's what they want to impose on us. That's the reason behind all the national identity cards, DNA data bases, surveillance cameras, GPS tracking devices in cars and trucks and cell phones, digital micro-chipping of everything from A to Z, Internet surveillance and censorship, telephone taps, body and luggage searches and scans at airports, finger printing of air travelers and bank customers, interrogations at airline boarding gates, intrusive banking regulations, and much more. The Powers That Be are branding and penning up the global "human herd" in just the same way that cattle ranchers tag their cattle herds with ear tags and fence them into feed lots to fatten them up for slaughter. The Powers That Be regard us as their livestock, as their personal property, and they are in the process of branding us, tagging us, and penning us up, so that they can manage us like cattle or swine. Our plight is that stark and simple.


So do you want to be a slave or free? That's the question. Because if you want to be free you're absolutely going to have to do something about it. Millions of people are going to have to go outside of their comfort zone, that's the hard truth of the matter, because the status quo is simply not remotely acceptable for people who want to live as free human beings on this planet.


Don't imagine that you can just vote in the next criminally rigged election and a new set of corrupt politicians will somehow magically make things better. THEY WON'T. The galling thing is that the Powers That Be have set up a global system to which they insist we assiduously adhere and obey every corrupt dictate they issue, while they themselves flagrantly flout the Constitution with impunity, and never cease massively enriching themselves and their plutocrat cronies, and rolling in corrupt luxury, at our ruinous expense.


This pathetic charade will continue only as long as the people permit it, because when the people declare a de facto Jubilee Year, the jig will be up. As a matter of fact, that process is already underway. It is a simple truth that unemployed people cannot service a loan, cannot pay a tax bill, and cannot pay a fine that is imposed on them for failure to do any of the foregoing. So as the unemployed rolls continue to swell, more and more people will simply refuse or fail to make credit card payments, to pay back home, automobile and student loans, and will default on furniture, appliance and pay day loans, and much more. This is already happening and the trend will increase.”


Read the Full Story:
Hidden in Plain Sight 


The Manipulated Man

The Manipulated Man book cover.

Are You Laughing Yet, or Would You Forward this Email on to a Friend or Relative? 

The Email "Are You Laughing Yet?"

Pass this very insightful email on if you think it has merit. If not then just discard it ... no one will know you did. But, if you discard this thought process, don't sit back and complain about what bad shape the world is in.

The Plain Truth About Glorious Carbon Dioxide 

"Nature is a self-regulating mechanism that dwarfs any mindless effort to 'control' the amount of CO2 produced by coal-fired utilities, steel manufacturers, autos and trucks, and gasoline fueled lawn mowers. Okay, children, let's all sit up straight at our desks. We are going to begin 2009 with a lesson about carbon dioxide (CO2)." (Alan Caruba)

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes  

Lindsey Williams' book cover,

Lindsey Williams, a Baptist minister and author of the 1980's book The Energy Non-Crisis (on line) has been reporting inside information about oil price-manipulation for many years now, and generally the information has been accurate.

According to Pastor Williams, the Globalists are fomenting rebellion as an excuse to raise the oil prices to $150-200 a barrel.

Pastor Williams revealed in his book that the US has huge untapped oil reserves that the elites have known about for decades. After manipulating the oil prices  to around $200 a barrel, we will finally see these US oil reserves opened for production.

The Oil, Gas and Energy Crises are Massive Hoaxes

"Anyone not preaching coming out of the state church and the government system is a false prophet."(Neal King,

Christ's Flag is The Union Jack 

The Union Jack.

The Union Jack

The Australian and New Zealand flags go back much further than the 200 years you probably are aware of. Notice the most prominent symbol on all these flags is the eight-pointed cross. This 8 pointed cross consists of two different four pointed crosses (the x and the + crosses) that are superimposed!

The Australian National Flag.

Australian Flag

The New Zealand National Flag.

New Zealand Flag

Their heraldic  symbolism goes back 3,500 years; to the time of Moses and Joshua, the great Israelite (not Jewish) Military-Commanders.

The vertical cross on the flag is for the Great Cross that is formed at critical times in the Galaxy, and this is called the Galactic Cross. T  he diagonal cross stands for the Earth Cross. The Earth cross is the cross of the Zodiac, while the Galactic Cross is the intersection of the Galactic Equator with the Ecliptic and its perpendicular axis.

Four times during the Great Year (which is 25,920 years long)--i.e. every 6,480 years--the Earth Cross aligns with the Galactic Cross to form a single four-pointed cross in the sky. This is what will occur on December 21, 2012, which will herald the end of the "Dark Cycle."

For more information download Part I and Part II of Jan Wicherink's "Great Celestial Conjunction Crosses" reports.  These reports are also in our free book The Prophet Daniel and December 21, 2012.

The red on the flag stands for human blood, and the white stands for the Birthright Holy Spirit, which does the work of redemption (i.e. the born-again process), thus changing a sinful human being into a true blue-blood (i.e. the Elect). Blue is the colour of Sirius, and the Creator God of ancient Khemit (Egypt) known as Ptah (who we call God the Father). In this process it is important to know that there are 216 bones in the human body, and the blood is actually made in the bones!

Furthermore, the science of Khemitology reveals that Ptah was referred to as “He Who Comes from the Blue,” and was always depicted with a blue head covering or with blue skin.

What race was Ptah depicted as?

In the depictions of Ptah from ancient Khemit (the proper name for ancient Egypt) “Ptah is usually depicted with Asian eyes, a Caucasian nose, and Negroid lips. He apparently represents many races as the ‘Father’ or progenitor race from Sirius. Ptah became known as Dyas or Zeus to the Greeks, and later ‘pater’ (father) to the Romans: Ptah, Pater, ‘Father Race.’” (Source: Stephen S Mehler’s The Land of Osiris: An Introduction to Khemitology, Adventures Unlimited Press, 2001, p. 180)

It is also noteworthy that Egyptologist’s word for the bright star Sirius is Sopdet (Sp.dt). According to the science of Khemitology, the Egyptologists have it wrong (and I would heartily agree), and the word should be S.pth, which is Sa-Ptah, “The Birthplace of Ptah.” Thus we see the clear connection between God the Father and the eighth planet of the Solar System, the bright star Sirius.

For more information on the names of the Messiah and God the Father, and these flags, see our free book The God Messiah Worships.

The Heraldic Symbolism of the Unicorn on the British Coat-of-Arms

British coat of arms.

The British Coat-of-Arms is the Coat-of-Arms of the 12 tribed Kingdom of Israel and Christ their Rightful KING.

The TRUE Israel People have, on their "Coat-of-Arms", a Lion and a Unicorn which is shown as a white horse "rampant" with one horn. The amber Lion "rampant" on the left-side is the emblem of the two-tribed "House of Judah" and the Unicorn or white Wild-Ox "rampant" on the right-side is the emblem of the ten-tribed "House of Israel", collectively making the 12-tribed "Kingdom of Israel".

The word British is Hebrew. It means "the People of the Covenant" or in other words "the People Israel", whose written Constitution; under that Covenant, that they have rejected to their own loss; is written in the Bible (Israel's Book) that they still swear on to tell the Truth, but whose Constitution, under which there are no poor people, is then foolishly rejected by almost everyone, in favour of inferior and unjust, man-made laws and economics which cause poverty and therefore also crime brought about by deprivation and desperation.

Read More.

Compare the imposter Antichrist's Coat-of-arms (below) ...

The Antichrist's coat-of-arms.

The lion facing the East stands for the Zodiacal Sign of Leo, the 12th Sign in the Birthright Zodiac. The unicorn stands for the Constellation of Pegasus in the Zodiacal Sign of Aquarius. Both animals are holding the Shield of Salvation, or the Shield of Damnation, depending upon your attitude to God and your way of life, whether you are in rebellion or submission.

Consequently the Lion stands for the White Crown of Upper Egypt, while the Unicorn stands for the Red Crown of Lower Egypt. While the symbols may have changed, the meaning has remained the same over the Millenia.

The Bible is Not a Jewish Book 

The statement is commonly made, even by those who should know better, that “we Christians owe a debt to the Jews, for we got our Bible, and our religion, from them.” While many people have been deceived into believing this, it is completely false.  Part of the mistake comes from the complete confusion in the minds of nearly all people as to just what they mean by “Jew.” Are they referring to people of a certain race? Or people of a certain religion? For the two are not the same.  There are in Africa today some pure-blooded Negroes who are Jews by religion and there are in China today some pure-blooded Mongolians who are Jews by religion. Likewise, there are some people today who are racially of the stock we know as Jews, but who have been converted to other religions.

Read the Full Article:
The Bible is Not a Jewish Book

How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? 

“In another pamphlet, entitled How Many Men are Necessary to Change a Crime into a Virtue? Adin Ballou [another champion of non-resistance] says: ‘One man may not kill. lf he kills a fellow-creature, he is a murderer. lf two, ten, a hundred men do so, they, too, are murderers. But a government or a nation may kill as many men as it chooses, and that will not be murder, but a great and noble action. Only gather the people together on a large scale, and a battle of ten thousand men becomes an innocent action. But precisely how many people must there be to make it so?- that is the question. One man cannot plunder and pillage, but a whole nation can. But precisely how many are needed to make it permissible? Why is it that one man, ten, a hundred, may not break the law of God, but a great number may?” (Quoted in Leo Tolstoy’s book, The Kingdom of Heaven Is Within You, p. 6.)

"Don't think for a moment you are going to vote the Illuminati out of office. They control the major and minor political parties. They control the process of government, they control the process of information flow, they control the process of creating money and finally they control Christendom. (However, God controls the hearts of His people.)" (From The Top 13 illuminati Bloodlines, by Fritz Springmeier)
Woe Unto You Lawyers! (and Policemen) 

"Of all the specialized skills abroad in the world today, the average man knows least about the one that affects him most – about the thing that lawyers call The Law. A man who will discourse at length about the latest cure for streptococci infection or describe in detail his allergic symptoms cannot begin to tell you what happened to him legally – and plenty did – when he got married. A man who would not dream of buying a car without an intricate and illustrated description of its mechanical workings will sign a lease without knowing what more than four of its forty-four clauses mean or why they are there. A man who will not hesitate to criticize or disagree with a trained economist or an expert in any one of a dozen fields of learning will follow, unquestioning and meek, whatever advice his lawyer gives him. Normal human skepticism and curiosity seem to vanish entirely whenever the layman encounters The Law.

There are several reasons for this mass submission, One is the average man’s fear of the unknown – and of policemen."

“Telling the story of the rise of Communism [Nazarene Remnant comment: This term Communism needs to be replaced by the word Satanism, because we now know that this term was chosen to hide the underlying devotion to Satan that drives these people. End NR comment] means revealing the histories of the worst of the criminals involved at the time. But this is necessary, for without knowledge of the secrets of evil, we cannot properly develop the good, either. As the Swedish philosopher Henry T. Laurency wrote: ‘Only he who knows evil knows good.’ 
Then we shall appreciate goodness above everything else on earth.Then we may really be able to welcome the truth, even if it is frightening and dismiss lies, even if they are pleasant.” (Juri Lina, Under the Sign of the Scorpion, p. 63)