Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
25 May, 2011
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
- Scientist Flips, Blows Global Warming to Bits
- Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System
- Fortress Australia: Hidden Agenda, Part 1 of 6
- Where Do We Stand on Perseverance?
- Is Temptation an Outmoded Concept?
- In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes Centre Stage
- Qadhafi’s Libya Knows How the Global System Really Works
- Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World
- Libya All About Oil, or Central Banking?
- Organized Jewry Opposes Free Speech
- Galileo Movement Brings Sanity to The Carbon Dioxide Debate in Australia
- America's Death Squads
- Lessons From Argentina: Go Get Your Dollars Out Now! FAST !!!
- Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11
- Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors
- What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 9)
- Where Have all the Real Men Gone?
- A Native American's View of Manhood
- Australian Demands Freemason Judges Outed
- The Pacific Ocean: A Radioactive Garbage Dump
- How the Illuminati Got Above the Mormons
- Unlawful Killing: Film About the Death of Diana Likens Prince Philip to Fred West
- Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in Brazil
- The Great Cholesterol Deception
- Who is Andrea Rossi?
- Global Governance (Part 9 of 9)
- News in Brief
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as
a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in
today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are
addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When
was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because
of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit
in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your
'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur.
In so doing, you are serving our purpose."
(Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists
who are not "TC"
"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in
selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the
official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For
propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home...
In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of
countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on
us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the
voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. Scientist Flips, Blows Global Warming to
Former Australian “alarmist” scientist says Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) based in false
“… those “in-the-know” on the climate science were
aware as far back as the mid-1990s that CO2 levels are not directly connected with global warming.
But, there was just
SO much money to
be made on AGW that the data needed to be
manipulated, and we’ve known for a while now
that it was.
One more climate scientist blowing the
whistle on this issue is like adding a
snowflake to an avalanche, but the AGW believers are getting less and less able to hide behind the increasingly
debunked, alarmist science.” (“Is Global Warming Up in Smoke?” http://axisofright.com/2011/05/15/is-global-warming-up-in-smoke/
May 15, 2011
David Evans is a scientist.
He has also worked in the heart of the AGW machine. He consulted full-time for
the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change) from 1999 to 2005, and part-time 2008 to
2010, modeling Australia’s carbon in plants, debris, mulch, soils, and forestry and agricultural
products. He has six university degrees, including a PhD in Electrical Engineering from
Stanford University. The other day he said:
“The debate about global
warming has reached ridiculous proportions and is full of micro-thin half-truths and misunderstandings. I am a
scientist who was on the carbon gravy train, understands the evidence, was once an alarmist, but am now a
And with that he begins a
demolition of the theories, premises and methods by which the AGW scare has been foisted on the
“The whole idea that carbon
dioxide is the main cause of the recent global warming is based on a guess that was proved false by empirical
evidence during the 1990s. Butthe gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries,
trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the
outcome. So rather than admit
they were wrong, the governments, and their tame climate scientists, now outrageously maintain the fiction that
carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant.”
He makes clear he
understands that CO2 is indeed a “greenhouse gas”, and makes the point that if all else was equal then yes, more
CO2 in the air should and would mean a warmer planet. But that’s where the current “science” goes off the
tracks. It is built on an assumption that is false.
But the issue is not
whether carbon dioxide warms the planet, but how much.
Most scientists, on both
sides, also agree on how much a given increase in the level of carbon dioxide raises the planet’s temperature,
if just the extra carbon dioxide is considered. These calculations come from laboratory experiments; the basic
physics have been well known for a century.
The disagreement comes
about what happens next.
The planet reacts to that
extra carbon dioxide, which changes everything. Most critically, the extra warmth causes more water to
evaporate from the oceans. But does the water hang around and increase the height of moist air in the
atmosphere, or does it simply create more clouds and rain? Back in 1980, when the carbon dioxide theory started,
no one knew. The alarmists guessed that it would increase the height of moist air around the planet, which would
warm the planet even further, because the moist air is also a greenhouse gas. [emphasis mine]
But it didn’t increase the
height of the moist air around the planet as subsequent studies have shown since that time. However, that theory
or premise became the heart of the modeling that was done by the alarmist crowd.
This is the core idea of
every official climate model: For each bit of warming due to carbon dioxide, they claim it ends up causing three
bits of warming due to the extra moist air. The climate models amplify the carbon dioxide warming by a factor of
three — so two-thirds of their projected warming is due to extra moist air (and other factors); only one-third
is due to extra carbon dioxide.
That’s the core
of the issue. All the disagreements and
misunderstandings spring from this. The alarmist case is based on this guess about moisture in the atmosphere,
and there is simply no evidence for the amplification that is at the core of their alarmism.
What did they find when
they tried to prove this theory?
Weather balloons had been
measuring the atmosphere since the 1960s, many thousands of them every year. The climate models all predict that
as the planet warms, a hot spot of moist air will develop over the tropics about 10 kilometres up, as the layer
of moist air expands upwards into the cool dry air above. During the warming of the late 1970s, ’80s and ’90s,
weather balloons found no hot spot. None at all. Not even a small one. This evidence proves that
the climate models are fundamentally flawed, that they greatly overestimate the temperature increases due to
This evidence first became
clear around the mid-1990s.
Evans is not the first to
come to these conclusions. Earlier this year, in a post I highlighted, Richard Lindzen said the very same thing.
For warming since 1979,
there is a further problem. The dominant role of cumulus convection in the tropics requires that temperature
approximately follow what is called a moist adiabatic profile. This requires that warming in the tropical
upper troposphere be 2-3 times greater than at the surface. Indeed, all models do show this, but the data
doesn’t and this means that something is wrong with the data. It is well known that above about 2 km
altitude, the tropical temperatures are pretty homogeneous in the horizontal so that sampling is not a problem.
Below two km (roughly the height of what is referred to as the trade wind inversion), there is much more
horizontal variability, and, therefore, there is a profound sampling problem. Under the circumstances, it is
reasonable to conclude that the problem resides in the surface data, and that the actual trend at the surface is
about 60% too large. Even the claimed trend is larger than what models would have projected but for the
inclusion of an arbitrary fudge factor due to aerosol cooling. The discrepancy was reported by Lindzen (2007)
and by Douglass et al (2007). Inevitably in climate science, when data conflicts with models, a small coterie
of scientists can be counted upon to modify the data.
Evans reaches the natural
conclusion – the same conclusion Lindzen reached:
At this point, official
“climate science” stopped being a science. In science, empirical evidence always trumps theory, no matter how
much you are in love with the theory. If theory and evidence disagree, real scientists scrap the theory. But official
climate science ignored the crucial weather balloon evidence, and other subsequent evidence that backs it up,
instead clung to their carbon dioxide theory — that just happens to keep them in well-paying jobs
with lavish research grants, and gives great political power to their government masters.
And why will it continue? Again, follow the money:
We are now at an
extraordinary juncture. Official climate science, which is funded and directed entirely by government, promotes a theory
that is based on a guess about moist air that is now a known falsehood. Governments gleefully
accept their advice, because the only ways to curb emissions are to impose taxes and extend government control
over all energy use. And to curb emissions on a world scale might even lead
to world government — how exciting for the political
Indeed. How extraordinarily
unexciting for the proletariat who will be the ones stuck with the bill if these governments ever succeed in
finding a way to pass the taxes they hope to impose and extend even more government’s control over
While you’re listening to
the CEOs of American oil companies being grilled by Congress today, remember all of this. They’re going to try
to punish an industry that is vital to our economy and national security, and much of the desire to do that is
based on this false “science” that has been ginned up by government itself as an excuse to control more of our
energy sector, raise untold revenues for its use and to pick winners and losers. All based on something which is, according to Evans and other
scientists, now demonstrably false.
McQuain blogs at Questions and Observations (QandO), Blackfive, the Washington Examiner and the Green Room. Follow
him on Twitter: @McQandO
2. Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal
15 May 2011
"If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of
the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not
By Debra Siddons
For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH)
Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the 12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and
politically-motivated charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice". For those of you less familiar with
this landmark case, John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film "7/7 Ripple Effect". For more details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the
There are two very important precedents that were established with
this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the
court to challenge
both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/
Mountbatten (left) which was based on two distinct
point being she was knowingly, and with malice
aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned. There are those who may
wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the
Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years. In actual fact
the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract, requiring the monarch's signature.
Which brings us to the second
At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract,
before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of
God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her
hand placed on the Sovereign's Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract. Please note well
that in The Law of God, found in
the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly
The very first time that she gave "royal assent" to any piece of
man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the British people and she ceased to be the
monarch with immediate effect. To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of
times, which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable
FACT. She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her
other numerous crimes.
All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or "her
majesty's" courts, which means every judge draws their authority from her. All cases brought by the state
are "Regina vs.
Xxxxxxx", which means they are all brought in the name of
the queen. So if she isn't really the monarch, then she doesn't have the authority or the jurisdiction to bring a
case against anyone else. And neither do any of "her majesty's" courts or judges.
Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own
cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth could lawfully rule on a challenge to the
jurisdiction and sovereignty of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are obviously not
impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be
decided is by a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury trial to decide his challenge to
the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth.
No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury
trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own
cause. That doesn't mean they won't try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act
(just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill's trial) and
that their decision is immediate
grounds for an appeal and for a citizen's arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point
is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority.
That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark
case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all
of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a
matter of weeks if not days.
The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore
on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the Laws of
God. These two factual pieces of evidence
ought to be presented at the start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where
you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.
To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two
pieces of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God's
Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed
forth maintaining only God's Laws with judges roles clearly defined.
Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the
Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of
Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to
Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked awareness of that which was in place,
and there for people to use, but didn't know. We know now.
For those of you in the United States who may be thinking "hey, we
aren't a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?" all you really need to know is that these three little
letters:- B.A.R., stand
for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn't matter
whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR
association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the
So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all
know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we
can put an end to this insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread the word to as many as
possible so that this peaceful rebellion can begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your freedoms
swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their "New World
For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please
By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of
this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this simple plan into motion that you may have
forgotten there was a second precedent set during this landmark case.
While the official reason for this trial was to address this
trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to "pervert the course of justice", the real reason for this trial
was so the authorities could punish John Anthony Hill for making the "7/7 Ripple Effect" which, in less than an
hour and using strictly mainstream media reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy
theory. The film is so credible that even the
prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a
way that it "changes the minds of people who see it." That's how powerful the truth really
This was the first time this information was shown at an official
proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the jurors felt the film accurately depicted what
happened in London on July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For those unfamiliar with the
case, JAH forwarded copies of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of correcting
misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the outset of the first trial of the supposed "7/7 helpers"
(who were also found not guilty).
John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his
testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United States and
that both 9/11 and
7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on to show the
jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on
9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible
and still standing in the window behind Jane Standley's left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the
As a result of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" being shown to the jurors by
the prosecution and John Anthony Hill's testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag
attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on
And the "Not Guilty" verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of
that official record.
This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new
beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren't just nice sounding words, but a reality. This could be heaven
on earth instead of the hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up around us. Just as John
Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and
the courage to take
action to do the right thing, regardless of the
"All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do
nothing." - Edmund Burke
If you haven't seen "7/7 Ripple Effect" yet, please go to http://jforjustice.co.uk/77 and download it now. As James Fetzer points out, "It's a free tutorial on how these false flag operations are pulled
Queen Elizabeth Fronts for Rothschild's
The Crown Temple by Rule of Mystery
Queen Elizabeth II's Achille's
Elizabeth II and Ripple Effect (video)
See the article “Gangsters in Tiaras,” in Reading
45: “Zeroing In On The Antichrist: ‘Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing,’” in our free book, The Warning of the Last
Days, available here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-warning-of-the-last-days.html
See the articles “The British Monarch is Not the
Crown,” “The Occult Roots of The Wizard of Oz,” and “The Wizard of Oz = the Crown
Temple,” in Reading #42: “The Wizard of Oz,” in our free book, The Warning of the
Last Days, available here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-warning-of-the-last-days.html
for "Landmark Case Could Stymie Legal System"
said (May 21,
In reference to Landmark
Case, isn't it interesting? I have noticed on most websites that when someone speaks the truth, there is always
an attorney keeping a watching eye on what is being written to the point that when the truth comes out to awaken
people about facts, these attorneys jump in (as they do in any court scenario) and they either attack what has
been presented or attack the one who is presenting the information, as delusional or frivolous.
However we know as fact
that every lawyer speaks in a 'foreign tongue' (code) usually with
marbles in their mouth and will most certainly attempt to profit from people's
misery, a legal mercenary for hire. Everything an attorney or lawyer in court scenario
presents is always hearsay, they never have first hand personal knowledge of any fact and for the most part
present 'joint the dots' evidence. I would never want to take on this profession of being a
Because it is one of only two professions that Christ condemns. When an attorney speaks out as
something being rubbish or delusional then it is time to pay attention to what he doesn't what you to pay attention
to. The other critical point to make is that in order to 'apply the substantive Law' you need lawful money, i.e. silver or gold coin
to pay any debt. While we use 'legal tender', currency, as money we deal in fictions only and trumped up charges,
this, is the reality.
The Law cannot be applied
when we use legal tender so now the attorneys deal in procedures only and make attempts to contract with any
'victim' by agreement of his or her default responses or conduct using construed/implied conduct that is taken
under 'judicial notice' that a victim must have agreed with the prosecution because they either 'argued' or
failed to respond to a 'charge' and therefore must be
'agreeing' to be guilty by their conduct.
Christ tells us how we can
win these legal/fictional cases, 'agree with your adversary quickly while you are on the way with him', in other
words, they key is to come to an agreement in the private and then bring that into the court for ratification
and not for re-deterimation. Information that you present here Henry in relation to this case is very important
so that people can protect themselves from these vultures in the legal system who operate as Satan do, they
accuse the angels night and day with trumped up charges! Thank you for this very revealing piece of
said (May 21,
Boys, J.D., a
tad touchy on the subject aren't we? Obviously you are on the
attack here as your livelihood could/would or may be, jeopardized.
Your over-the-top discrediting, ridiculing, and bashing is all too common-place when truth is presented and the
curtain gets drawn back just a little.
Maybe, just maybe, even you
have been kept in the dark as you proceeded up the "legal" pyramid to get you to your lofty perch. Why don't you
seek to remove the pole from your own eye before attacking someone who is looking for freedom for all. You may
represent what we have been brainwashed to accept as "legal" but that doesn't make it "lawful".
To answer your question as
to "where" the Bible says about law(s) it is in (KJV) Deuteronomy 4: 2 "Ye shall
not add unto the word which I command
you, neither shall you diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the Lord your
God which I command you." So now you have heard it. God's "command" to His people Israel (12 tribes, of
which 2 are Jews, and the other 10, that include the British commonwealth nations and the USA).
Your sidetracking about
taxes confirms to me that your issue is about money. Isn't that just what your "legal" is all about. Certainly not justice for all. And that is what exposing
this imposter queen is all about.
[Nazarene Remnant comment: It is an old error, even a
ploy, to include the Jews as being part of the children of Israel. This is not so! The Jews were never a part of
national Israel. They first appeared in history as the children of Cain, then Canaan, and finally became fused in
the multi-racial Edom-Mongol, Amelekite, Canaanite stock that occupied various lands in the Middle East. The Jews
have never been identified with Our Heavenly Father’s people, the Kingdom, nor the Messiah. The word Jew was never
applied to any people in the Bible until we come to II Kings 16: 6 in the year 739 BC. For more details see the
article "The Distinction Between Jew and Judah," here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-distinction-between-jew-and-judah.html
(May 22, 2011):
This brings to head another
hairy issue, in that with this accreditation comes a grant of royal title, that of Esquire. All members of the
BAR are entitled to the use of Esquire after their name, whether they chose to disclose this or
This brings every said
lawyer in conflict with the US Constitution as far as eligibility for public office in the United
Royal title is in conflict
with eligibility for holding office in the federal government:
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of
Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument,
Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State."
The War of 1812 was
actually fought ove the original 13th Amendment which put teeth into Secrion 9 above--a whole other
said (May 21,
I feel that the article is
badly in need of clarifying because Debra kind of butchered her explanation of the situation and has offered a
poor reflection of a very important topic. Perhaps its even worth putting some of the following directly at the
end of the article, instead of as a comment, so people actually understand the situation. The comment
"I've been following the
trial of Muad'Dib/JAH for some time and know the situation clearly. Whilst I do agree that this is potentially a
landmark case, which could be used to seriously disrupt the UK/Commonwealth courts (and thus much more), the
jurisdictional argument used by JAH was NEVER designed to be used in America. He explained that many times, so
Debra is stretching things.
To clarify the situation
for everyone, as it shows/proves on JAH's website, Elizabeth made with the British people where she promised to
"maintain the Laws of God" to the utmost of her power (http://jahtruth.net/signed-o.jpg ). If you watch the BBC footage of the
coronation, it is made extremely clear during her coronation that the "Laws of
God" are written in the Bible, not parliament …
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwzOHVx8LV8 (watch the first
1minute 20seconds of the video--note well 1:10 into it).
is handed a
Bible and told that in it is the Royal Laws of God, which is what she swore to uphold. This is done so that
there is no doubt what the "Laws of God" are. At this point, it doesn't matter whatsoever if someone is
christian, atheist, or satanist. No one's personal beliefs change the FACT that Elizabeth
swore to uphold the Biblical Law. The evidence JAH collected shows video, audio, and
paperworkproof of her making this contract, and what the terms of that
contract were. Other people's personal beliefs have NOTHING to do with this.
In the Biblical Law which
Elizabeth swore to uphold, Deuteronomy 4:2 says: "Ye shall not ADD unto the word which I command you, neither
shall ye diminish [ought] from it"
So, Elizabeth made a
legally binding contract which says she
promises not to make new laws. This means that the very first time she gave "royal assent" to
pass new legislation in the UK, she was in breech of contract, as that would add more laws, when she swore NOT
to do that.
Since the contract
Elizabeth made is what entitles her to the "crown", and the authority of that position, when she broke that
contract, she lost her crown and therefore her power to legally and lawfully bring criminal cases against
This is extremely simple
contract Law and JAH kept it very simple so as not to confuse people. You have a contract with very clearly
identified terms, and Elizabeth broke it. Since that contract is what gave her authority over the courts, she's broken the
contract, she has no authority, and thus she had no jurisdiction over
THAT was the case, pure and simple, and because its so
bullet-proof obvious, the court couldn't argue against it.
What "Paul" said makes
sense in the US although it will never take down the awful system, which is what needs to be done. "JD"'s
ego-based rant and talking about the Bible like he knows what it says when he doesn't, isn't helping anything.
Debra has confused the matters and wrongly extended its scope. I hope the explanation above clears things
said (May 21,
Speaking as someone based
in the United States, I don't know whether challenging the jurisdiction of a court based on QEII's coronation
oath, or lack thereof, or on whether the B.A.R. is really the "British Accreditation Registry", etc, is going to
meet w/ much success. Most courts and magistrates here would look upon claims of this nature as being more akin
to "kooky" conspiracy theories and litigants must always bear in mind that the #1 purpose of going to court is simply TO PUT ON A GOOD
Litigation, and the
administrative maneuvering that invariably precedes litigation, is nothing if not show business.
However, speaking from
personal experience, I can attest that a rationally argued counterclaim, challenging the jurisdiction of a
tribunal, will almost always end in success. Again, I don't know what people in British Commonwealth countries,
or in Roman civil law jurisdictions (i.e., the rest of the planet) do, but in the United States it's quite clear
and obvious: the sovereignty is vested in the People, and the People -- owing to the fact that in
America we have no "King" -- are therefore the holders and rules of court.
When you file legal
paperwork with a court in America, don't go in there claiming that you're a "U.S.citizen" or a "Sovereign State
Citizen" or a "resident of such-and-such state or county".. All these "statuses" are simply corporate, legal
fictions and all this does is give the administrative tribunal jurisdiction over your person. Instead, simply
make the claim that you're one of the People of the "jurisdiction" in which you're appearing and reason
I was recently in traffic
court on a quasi-serious misdemeanor charge. I raised about four or five distinct, cogently-reasoned out
challenges to the jurisdiction of the administrative tribunal in which I was appearing, and I filed my paperwork
before appearing. Paraphrasing my experience at the arraignment hearing (which, for traffic court, is a room
full of hundreds of people in major city I live in), the magistrate was basically yelling and screaming at
everyone who was there in line before me, then when I appeared before the magistrate, she simply smiled and ask:
"Mr. XXXX, what is it that you would like me to do for you today?" and I replied, "Well your Honor, I would very
appreciate it if the court would dismiss these charges".. to which she answered (paraphrasing): "Your wish is
granted.. these charges are dismissed".. As I was leaving the room, I heard her (again) yelling and screaming at
the next person in line behind me.
The key is
HONOR: You must HONOR their process before you can expect them to honor yours.
You must (in
the language of the New Testament) "give to receive".. Nor is it necessarily "easy".. You do have to have
your wits about you. I didn't just cut-and-paste random patriot mythology I slopped off the Internet: rather,
I spent several weekends in a row, all weekend, in the law library doing real legal research putting together
real legal briefs to submit to a real court. But it is effective, it did work. Challenges to jurisdiction, if
cogently and rationally argued, almost always do.
The late Bill Cooper has a
series of lectures out on YouTube where he talks about the importance of
challenging jurisdiction. To paraphrase Cooper: if you don't challenge jurisdiction, you're
almost guaranteed to lose ... if you do challenge jurisdiction, it's almost impossible not to win. The
present-day Master of this subject is Bill Thornton down in Orange County, Calif. I invite your readers to
explore his Web site and audio lectures at: http://1215.org/. His Web site is a
bit rough around the edges (in terms of presentation and navigation), but it's packed w/ some of the best legal
information you'll find anywhere.
said (May 21,
I've never read such
delusional, unabashed lunacy in fifty-six years of life.
This woman is simply loony.
She imagines that lawyers aren't really admitted to the bar of the Supreme Court of a given US state, but they
are registered with the B.A.R., the British Accredation Registry. I guess that thirty-two years ago, they just
forgot to give me my UK registry card at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. And that each time that I've been admitted
to the bar of another court, my British papers must have gotten mixed up. When I passed the Illinois Bar Exam,
they must have erased my memories of questions concerning English law by mind control. I should wear an aluminum
foil cap if I take another bar exam. When I got admitted to the bar of the US Supreme Court, they must have just
forgotten to collect my British Registry dues. She's a danger to herself to any fool, desperate for some way out
of a pickle, who'd take this seriously.
She doesn't know a damn
thing about the law. Conflict or not, it was the US Supreme Court which decided the issue of whether the initial
imposition of the income tax, including upon federal judges, impermissibly and unconstitutionally reduced the
salary of federal judges during their tenure in office as textually prohibited in the Constitution. The justices
admitted the inherent conflict but expressed the doctrine that when it was necessary that someone decide the
issue and no one without such a conflict existed, that jurisdiction would vest notwithstanding a conflict of
interest because of necessity, and held that the tax was not unconstitutional. Federal judges pay income taxes
as a result of that decision by interested federal judges on the Supreme Court. Yes, every judge has
jurisdiction to determine his or her own jurisdiction. In fact, in our federal courts, which are all courts of
limited jurisdiction, the question is present in every case, must be proven, and is determined in every case.
That's a pretty basic principle familiar to any first year law student. I'm telling you that this lady is
She asserts that the Law of
God is what is announced in the first five books of the Bible. But she never proves that, or even tries to prove
it. It's a pretty controversial statement to a believer, let alone what an atheist or deist (like Washington or
Jefferson or Lincoln) or agnostic would make of it. Maybe some sect of Judaism believes that, but I've never met
a person who'd agree. God's law, to a Christian, means more than that. This lady is an arrogant, errant
She claims that God's law
says that all human law is without legitimacy. Where is it that the first five books of the Bible say that???
Not a passage I've ever heard. St. Paul says quite the opposite, and Christ had no problems suggesting that
taxes be paid. The lady is bonkers.
Shame on you for giving her
J. D. Obenberger and Associates
Attorneys and Counselors at Law
3700 Three First National Plaza
70 West Madison Street
Chicago, IL 60602
Replies said (May 22, 2011):
To Mike -
You are incorrect when you
say JAH's Lawful Defence does not apply, at all, to America.
This is explained further
with clarity and specificity in my comment posted to lawyer, J.D..
To J.D. -
Not uncommon for insane lawyers to think they are normal and others are
U.S. Lawyers have sworn
allegiance to the Supreme Court of a given State, and subsequently to the British Accreditation Registry which
oversees the whole judicial circus.
Each time you've been
admitted to the B.A.R. you swore an oath of allegiance to the Crown Court, never questioning what the B.A.R. stood for, even
after thirty-two years. The B.A.R. has been right in front of your face all
You've said I'm a danger. I
am a danger to lawyers, judges, the Crown, anyone else supporting a criminal "legal" system.
No-one is, or ever was,
permitted to make-up any rules/laws to rule people. IT IS Wrong.
"Issues" are to be decided by a jury (community ), never / ever by a judge using
American judges having sworn the Judicial Oath before God, which is, to serve only God; thus an oath not Lawful and null and void if not serving
God. Associations with the B.A.R. effectively allows for both Exhibits 1 and 2, ordering God's Laws in the
Courts. It's quite simple; either you maintain the oath you took, or you must step down and allow the people to
practice their God-given rights.
I don't have to prove The
Law. It is there and as a lawyer, B.A.R. member, you swore on a Bible.
Which is exactly the point.
You are ordered to keep that oath "you" took, then swore to
The Bible does not command
one must know God to follow The Law. Yet it is The Law.
Odd you are not aware of
the oath you took, and apparently in numerous States, on Biblical Law.
Clearly you are threatened.
God's Law is for humans. The Lawful Defence explains in detail, needing to be read over and over till it sinks
in, because the extent of a Rothschild brainwashing is
obviously very extensive.
I understand you are
threatened. Criminals usually are when caught red-handed.
To those claiming "too
religious", nothing is more religious than the Coronation Ceremony itself.
The London 7/7 Bombers Were Inncoent
http://mtrial.org/node/131 or google "7/7 bombers
'were innocent patsies'"
The Trial of Muad'Dib (9-12 May 2011)
"9/11 Ripple Effect" about the September 11th, 2001 false
flag attack in the U.S.
"7/7 Ripple Effect" about the July 7th, 2005 false flag
attack in the U.K.
The Truth About the British
The Truth About the Stone of Destiny (aka the Coronation
British Royalty Dined on Human
3. Fortress Australia; Hidden
Agenda, Part 1 of 6
This Report was given to the publisher of RMNews the year it was written, 1996. The Source who
hand delivered it would not state who the author was. RMNews does not know if this has been published
The Rumor Mill News Agency
Source of this version:
Report No. I
This report results from two years of part time investigation of recent developments in
Australia which appear to indicate that
some unusual and urgent preparations are being made to turn Australia into a self
sufficient "safe haven." The details mentioned in the report have been
kept as concise as possible to enable readers to make up their own minds about the wide-ranging evidence
which suggests a well organised and developing plan of action aimed at reaching culmination by the end of the
present decade. This report can be considered as interim only as the process is ongoing and apparently
gaining in momentum. The author intends to continue his investigations and publish additional reports in the
June 30, 1996
Fortress Australia Hidden Agenda Emergency Services
During 1989/90 closed door discussions began between the Federal government in Canberra and all the State governments in view of
upgrading all Australian emergency services. It was agreed that prompt action would be taken to facilitate
better co-ordination between all existing services and funds would be provided to assist with training
programmes, the provision of new equipment and the recruitment of additional full time professional staff.
Communications were considered of primary importance and it was decided to establish an Australian wide
standard system encompassing all existing services which are Federal and State police forces, metropolitan
fire brigades, country fire authorities, ambulance services, rescue services and other volunteer emergency
Basically the reorganisation seems to follow along the lines of the old Civil Defence
Organisation and it is interesting to note the same old names are being used again. The states have been
divided up into regions and each placed under the command of a controller. A sub regional controller is
responsible to a central regional controller. From there it goes to state level and then on to Federal level
centred in Canberra. As was the case with the original organisations each region is capable of operating on
it's own if the chain of command should break down due to warfare, civil unrest or natural disaster. Close
liaison has been arranged with all branches of the armed services and in some instances joint training
programmes have been arranged on a regular basis. Military reservists are encouraged to become voluntary
emergency workers in their local areas as not only. their knowledge is of use but it helps develop mutual
trust between the community and service personnel in general.
During the past year the Federal Government has encouraged voluntary involvement of as many
private citizens as possible. In this way a regional controller with a small staff can develop a substantial
organisation at very low cost. Further so called cost savings have been made by centralising emergency
communications in each state and 'privatising' them by selling them off to an outside contractor. State
Government has moved the communication systems covering Police, Fire and Ambulance services under one roof at
great expense to the tax payer and then sold them off to a company called 'Intergraph Inc' which is a
specialised American communications company said to be closely connected to the United States National
Security Agency (NSA).
Of further interest is the origins of some of the professional staff members who have been
employed to develop and consolidate the new look organisation particularly in the State of
The National Safety Council - Victorian Division
In 1927 Mr. Ernest W. Cox, then President of the Royal Automobile Club of Victoria formed the
National Safety Council (NSCA). The objectives-of this new organisation were: safety at work, safety on the
roads and safety at home. From the outset it was run by a committee made up of representatives from major
government organisations such as the Police Department, Education Department, Railways Department and
Tramways Board. Community and business organisations were also included such as the Automobile Club,
Commercial Travellers Association, Trades Hall Council and Accident Underwriters Association. By 1928 it had
a full time staff who were promoting its aims throughout Victoria. When the depression hit Australia in 1929
the Victorian government withdrew its financial support forcing the staff to work on reduced wages and for
the NSCA to. depend on private contribution made by big business and some wealthy individuals. The
organisation survived and in 1934 the government renewed it's contribution allowing the NSCA to further
expand it's role in the community.
The second World War produced rapid growth in the organisation and for the first time it became
involved in military matters, a role it maintained throughout it's remaining history. By 1948 the NSCA had
led to the development of an entire safety and security industry employing more than 300,000
In 1976 a mysterious person named John Freidrich joined the NSCA as a safety officer at the
State Electricity Commission power station in Yallourn, Victoria. Freidrich was not his real name and to this
day his real identity has remained unknown. Due to his high intelligence, diligence and
a good measure of assistance from several powerful backers, principally the US Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA), he quickly rose through the ranks and, despite the fact his background was a myth, and he did not even
possess an Australian passport or valid birth certificate, he became
the executive director in 1982. His meteoric rise to power could only be described as astonishing,
however as there was plenty of money in it for everyone there were few complaints. When an opposition member
of parliament raised a question about the appointment in the House he was howled down by the
Freidrich (CIA Code Name 'IAGO') took to his new job like a duck to water. Money started to flow
and the NSCA plunged into an unprecedented period of expansion.
The NSCA headquarters were moved from plush offices in St. Kilda Road, Melbourne (close to the
US Consul General's office in Albert Road which was then the principal CIA Station in Australia) to Sale, a
country town in Gippsland, Victoria. A complete airport was built in West Sale opposite the RAAF base
situated in East Sale. No cost was spared and an elaborate base which included the largest hyperbaric
(decompression) facilities in Australia and an indoor horse riding arena was built in record time. Any amount
of money was made instantly available by the government and banks. All that was required was Freidrich's
Together with the development of the base came what can only be described as a private airforce
involving dozens of fixed wing aircraft, both propeller and pure jet, and dozens of helicopters. In fact
Freidrich's private helicopter, a Bell 212, had previously been owned by Idi Amin! Apart from that there was
a marine section which purchased a number of the latest deep sea recovery vehicles at enormous cost. It
seemed that everything that was required by the new look organisation was provided immediately with no regard
at all to the costs involved.
The NSCA obtained--contracts from all the military services to take care of their search and
rescue requirements and from the Bass Strait off shore oil rigs to attend to any emergency that may arise.
Facilities were set up at Sale to provide specialised training to many public authorities and to train
special service personnel employed by the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) Australian Security
Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and their backers, the CIA.
Perhaps the most important services NSCA provided was firstly security back up to all the
American secret bases in Australia including the new Omega bases in Victoria and Tasmania, and secondly
provide deep sea submarine rescue facilities for the American nuclear submarine force constantly patrolling
the Southern Ocean. There were several occasions when they were called in to use helicopter crowd control
methods at Pine Gap and the Gippsland Omega station. It is not known if their submarine rescue facilities
were ever used.
The association with the East Sale RAAF base was a close one. In fact two senior RAAF officers
sat on the board of the NSCA. East Sale is a secure RAAF base and is often used by NASA (U2 flights) and
other unexplained US aircraft. It is also the repository of secret UFO information and was the base that
Frederick Valentich attended for a special course relating to UFO's before he disappeared over Bass Strait on
21st October, 1978 while reporting a close encounter with a large UFO. So concerned was Valentich about what
he had seen and been told at Sale that he emotionally told his parents shortly afterwards that "should they
take me I should be O.K. so don't worry, they will probably put me back." (This was told to the writer by
Guido Valentich, Frederick's father, in late October, 1978).
It has been inferred that the NSCA was closely involved with the UFO problem and had all the
equipment necessary to effect retrievals on land and from the great ocean depths. They also ran their own
international airline which did not account to anyone and moved people, drugs and money in and out of
Australia. Freidrich's ex personal pilot told the author that he often flew him to airports in various parts
of Australia where he would transfer to another aircraft and disappear. On one occasion he flew to Essendon
Airport in Melbourne where Freidrich told him to wait. An executive jet in US colours and the CIA insignia on
the tail landed shortly afterwards and Freidrich climbed aboard. Four hours later the plane returned and
Freidrich walked back to his own plane and ordered the pilot to fly back to West Sale. Apart from mentioning
the weather he said nothing about the strange flight. The pilot also claimed that he often received orders to
fly together with a back up pilot to deserted airstrips in
the Australian outback.
Most of these strips were built during the second World Waryet, oddly enough, are still maintainedby persons unknown. Another plane would be parked there and the keys and instructions as to what to do next would be
in one of the wheel wells. The instructions usually involved flying to a second air strip where Freidrich
would be waiting with his canvas overnight bag. He would then fly Freidrich either to Richmond RAAF base in
New South Wales or back to West Sale. On three occasions he had to pick up Freidrich from Pine Gap. Each time
he flew alone in a NSCA Lear Jet and made the pick ups around 3 A.M. Even at Pine Gap Freidrich was always
waiting alone on the vacant airstrip.
It was also well known that the US Airforce conducted joint training exercises with the NSCA and
there were several reports of the US Green Beret officers entering Australia on tourist visas and going
directly to West Sale.
The operation had some similarities to other past CIA activities in Australia. The best known
example was the case of the Nugan-Hand merchant
bank which prior to it's collapse in 1980 was said to have been involved in arms and drug
trafficking, the laundering of drug money, and the funding of CIA operations in Australia and Asia.
Nugan-Hand was run by Australian Frank Nugan and American Michael Hand, a past Green Beret officer and
employee of Air America. In the late 1960's and early 1970's the officer in charge of the overall operations
of Nugan-Hand plus a major US currency counterfeiting operation in Sydney was the already infamous General
Richard V. Secord.
When the operation was closed down, Michael Hand was given a new passport and immediately
returned to the USA where he now lives under another name.Frank Nugan lost a great deal of money and threatened to expose the operation if he was not
reimbursed. This was a serious error as he was shot dead a few days later with a .300 magnum hunting
As the Cold War came to a close it was decided to dump the NSCA. Suddenly it was revealed that
hundreds of millions of dollars had been misappropriated and Freidrich was blamed. The West Sale base was
closed and hundreds of trained and highly experienced personnel were dismissed. Freidrich initially went into
hiding as he knew full well that when such secret operations are closed down the cleaners come in and any
potential embarrassments are quickly eliminated. Freidrich played his cards correctly and surfaced to face
charges of bank fraud and other commercial crimes. While on bail he supposedly committed suicide which, of
course, was most convenient to everyone involved. However, there were strong indications that he was not dead
but had been quickly withdrawn to the USA just like Michael Hand and a unidentified corpse from the city
morgue had been put in his place. Several police officers who talked about this were told that they would be
dismissed without pension rights if they mentioned it again. Everyone shut up.
But what of all that trained staff? Within weeks of the NSCA close down many of them were
absorbed into other government services and the organisations they had helped to train. Many others are now
involved in the new rapidly developing State emergency services. No doubt, like the old Civil Defence
Organisation personnel, most of them will have kept their American contacts and are firmly part of the
security old boys network. Nevertheless NSCA trained officers are considered the best in their field and are
fully capable of putting organisations together quickly and effectively. This seems to be what they are doing
at the present time.
There are indications that a fully operational, co-ordinated nation wide rescue and emergency
service must be ready for any eventuality by 1998/99 at the latest. The reason for such haste is not clear
but it appears that something is expected to happen by the end of the decade and as far as humanly possible
the government wants to be ready for it. This seems to fit in with other preparations being made by the
Federal and State police force and the armed services.
The Australian Submarine Corporation has just launched it's second Collins Class submarine and a
further six are due for delivery by 1999. Their cost is estimated at around one billion dollars each. There
are plans to produce many more for friendly nations in South East Asia and if possible keep the enormously
expensive factory in continuous production well into the next century.
The naval dock yards in Melbourne has launched their second $500 million frigate, with a further
eight planned for delivery by 1999. Like the submarines, the government expects to receive further orders
from New Zealand, Indonesia, Singapore and possibly Malaysia.
On the 16th January, 1996 the government announced that a new $200 million armaments depot and
munitions loading facility will be built for the Navy at Point Wilson near Geelong (49 miles from Melbourne).
Building will begin this year and the facility will be fully operational by the end of
The airforce has just ordered at the cost of $900 million, 12 new C130 transport planes from the
USA to expand their air transport capability. Also their entire fleet of F111 fighter bombers are being
rebuilt to bring them up to the latest standards. The cost per aircraft is about $30 million. More than 40
aircraft are involved in this refurbishment programme.
In late 1995 the army moved it's southern armoured division from Victoria to the Northern
Territory. The government stated at the time that as they did not expect an invasion from the Antarctic there
was no point in keeping them in the Southern part of Australia. Does that mean they expect an attack from the
In January, 1996 a source in the USA advised that the army had placed a large order for Jeeps
specially prepared to resist chemical and biological warfare agents. The exact number is not known but it is
understood to be in the hundreds. Similar vehicles were used by the American forces in the Gulf War. Why
should they be considered a vital addition to the army's inventory of equipment in Australia? Delivery will
take place over the next two years, meaning it will be completed by mid 1998. No mention of this order has
been made by any of the Australian media or any government authority.
United States B52 bombers, F15 and F18 fighters as well as early warning aircraft are now
stationed in northern Australia and a so called practice bombing range in the Northern Territory is being
used by American, Australian, Indonesian and Singapore airforces. Singapore has been allowed to station a
fighter squadron in Queensland and Indonesia is conducting regular military exercises with the Australian
armed forces. The last one involved 7000 Indonesians for two weeks in Northern Queensland.
A whole new era in the relationship between Australia and Indonesia opened in December, 1995
with the signing of a joint defence treaty by the Australian and Indonesian governments. This treaty contains
some very unusual and ambiguous language. One point has already caused some debate as it indicates that one
party will go to the aid of the other "due to any adverse challenge". This could mean anything. Most critics
immediately assumed Australia would have to help Indonesia even in the event of an internal problem
developing in their country. They did not seem to think about the possibility of Australia asking the
Indonesians to help them in one of their internal problems.
This situation is disquieting as the people that write such treaties know what they are saying
so it is unlikely the loose wording was just a slip of the pen. Also the results of the survey which was
given to US Marines at Twenty-Nine Palms in Southern California, wanting to know if they would shoot on their own people,were similar to the results of secretly conducted surveys in Australia. They won't do it! However there are many foreign troops that would, and this has produced the
fear of United Nation's troops being used in the USA for that purpose. As for Australia they
now have access to some of the most unscrupulous professional
killers in the world in the form of the Indonesian military. Portugese Timor is a perfect example of their capabilities. [Nazarene Remnant comment: I have been living on
the road now for several years, and have spent time in many parts of Northern Australia. As you would expect,
in camps at night, often before a blazing fire, many stories and experiences would be told. One interesting
story that I came across in North Queensland was that of two amateur fishermen who had gone to the Cape for
“some good fishing,” durng their annual holidays. As they were trekking through a really isolated part of the
Cape they saw down a track Indonesian soldiers, fully kitted up in military uniform, standing guard on the
road. The fishermen said much about this, and “hightailed” it out of tere as quick as they
Apart from the rather negative aspects of the treaty there are some positives. Indeed following
the signing of the treaty Australian Foreign Minister, Gareth
Evans, said "Of course neither of us will involve ourselves in each other's internal affairs
but we may have to act together to stop terrorists, drug smugglers or a huge influx of boat people moving to
the south." It seems fairly certain that the issue of forced migration is the most important one. Morally
Australia could not be involved in killing off thousands or even millions of people trying to get to it's
shores. It would have to think of some other way. On the other hand Indonesia would hardly think twice about
it particularly in view of the fact they would be first to be overrun. If one looks at a map of Australia and
South East Asia, the only way boats small or large can quickly get through to the south is via the waterways
that divide the islands of Indonesia. Any other route is long and dangerous and most small boats would not
survive such a voyage.
The speed with which this new treaty was entered into indicates things need to be arranged
quickly and this fits in with other recent developments.
On 4th January, 1996 news leaked out that Singaporewas going to terminate it's military training arrangements in Taiwan and with the agreement of
the Australian government move it's programme to
Australia.Almost certainly a defence treaty will follow the move which would further help seal off the
waterways to seafaring migrants. Further the Singaporians are in a very insecure area of the world,
surrounded by millions of Muslims and facing the prospect of Malaysia becoming a fundamentalist country by
the end of the century. Most readers would be aware of Singapore's neo fascist system and extreme methods of
dealing with almost everything e.g. an American boy was incarcerated for three months and flogged for
spraying some paint on a car. A local citizen was imprisoned for two years for littering etc. etc. Outside
threats of any kind make their militant regime very nervous. As Singaporians are basically Chinese, the
Malaysians would be only too happy to see-them disappear. Could it be that there are plans to move a large part of
Singapore's 3,000,000 population to Australia and save them from a fate worse than death?
Their military is alreadyhere so why not bring their brains, banks and hotels as well?
Command Integration Of Australian Armed Services
On the 15th January, 1996 it was announced that the Australian army, airforce and navy will be
placed under single command. A new post of 'Commander Australian Theatre' (an odd choice of name) is being
created to coordinate the country’s air land and sea defences under a single Commanding
A new site is being selected for the establishment of a headquarters and this is expected to be
in a secure area (possibly underground) in New South Wales. As the new
headquarters must be reasonably close to Canberra it will probably be situated in the extensive underground
facilities in the Snowy Mountains. These secret facilities were built at the
time of construction of the Snowy Mountains hydro electric scheme and totally concealed from the public. It is a vast system capable of supporting thousands of people and connected to Canberra by a
secret underground railway. The. Defence Department said this was the biggest change to the Australian
defence force in 20 years and only stops short of total integration of the army, airforce and navy into a
General Baker, the defence force Chief of Staff, said the restructuring would help eliminate the
need for any major changes between peace and war. Further he said Australia was leading the world with this
It is obvious that an integrated military force closely coordinated with all Federal and State
emergency services and police organisations would be a very effective and efficient organisation. Such
coordination could, in times of emergency, be used rapidly and decisively to deal with any problem situation
on an Australia wide basis. Total military control could be established in a few hours.
The target date for having the $500 million reorganisation fully operational is by 1998/99.By
that time the machinery of a police state will be firmly in place and it will then be possible to introduce
dictatorial powers at a moment’s notice.
Coast Watch Service
Since the second World War the Australian Government has operated a coast watch system along the
northern coast line of the continent. The responsibility for this was initially placed in the hands of the
Australian Navy and Airforce. In recent years it became necessary to greatly increase the capacity of the
service to control illegal fishing, drug smuggling and the flow of illegal immigrants. To achieve a much
higher level of surveillance the system has been partially 'privatised.' Like the NSCA, a private South
Australian company which operates a large number of aircraft has been contracted to undertake continuous
surveillance from the North West to the North East and patrol the ocean dividing Australia from Indonesia and
New Guinea. Over the past two years the government has been very generous to this contractor by donating a
substantial number of fixed wing aircraft and providing interest free finance for the purchase of new
aircraft from the USA and Europe. As the trickle of boat people has been increasing over the past few years
the government appears to be acting with some urgency.
The Navy and the Airforce are still involved in the coast watch, the private contractor being
used as their extra set of eyes. Normally when an arrest takes place it's the Navy that does the job. Modern
patrol boats similar to those being used by the US coast guard are in constant production in Western
Australia and added to the Navy at the rate of around six per year.
Police Services And The Prisons
Over the past five years the State and Federal police forces have been undergoing a great deal
of reorganisation. New training methods have been adopted and 'state of the art' equipment purchased at very
high cost. Advisory groups, mainly from the American FBI, have been helping with the reorganisation and it
seems their advice has been taken very seriously.
The Federal Police are changing their entire structure. In future only the senior administrative
staff in Canberra will have ranks such as 'Inspector' or 'Director'. All others will be described as ‘Federal
Agents', no matter what their previous status was. This is in line with the American system. New legislation
is envisaged to give the new Australian FBI far greater powers than were enjoyed by the old Federal Police
Force and allow them to operate on an Australia wide basis. As far as the State Police Forces are concerned,
they are rapidly adopting the methods used by major overseas police forces. Special operation groups (Swat Teams) are
being established in ever increasing numbers on the excuse that they have to combat terrorism!
These groups are now training on a regular basis with the Army SAS. The government said this was
necessary to provide the best possible training in view of the threat of international terrorism occurring at
the Sydney Olympic Games in the year 2000. This seems rather odd as it would hardly be
necessary to initiate such a wide ranging and long term training programme in every state to combat a
possible fourteen day threat in the year 2000. Who are they kidding? The public as
As part of the upgrading of the State police forces a larger number of officers are being sent
overseas for specialised training. As in the past, the majority of them are sent to the USA for specialised
courses with the FBI and the International Police Academy. This training seems to involve everything
including such subjects as 'Advanced Interrogation Methods.'
Other Airwing officers are being sent to a special helicopter training school together with
military personnel and selected civilians, to learn helicopter crowd control and other techniques. It is
planned to 'privatise' the police airwings by selling them to outside contractors. Two large American
companies have already made it clear that they want to buy this part of the business.
All police forces are coordinated with the State Emergency Services (SES) and have direct contacts with Australia's intelligence organisations. It's one big happy
Australian prisons are being 'privatised'as quickly as possible. This is very disquieting as private prisons are wide open to abuse particularly if they fall
into the hands of unscrupulous people. This seems to be what is happening in Australia.
The American Wackenhut Inc. seems to have no difficulty in obtaining the rights to run the
prison system in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria and it's expected they will do the same in all
other states. The fact that Wackenhut Inc. is subject to criminal proceedings in the USA does not seem to
concern any of our state administrators.
The founder of the company, Mr. Wackenhut himself is described as a shadowy figure who
previously was a senior officer in the FBI and still has regular contact with both the FBI and CIA. It is
claimed that his main expertise was in the area of clandestine operations.
Privatisation of the prison system will save little or nothing. It's main purpose seems to be to
place control of these establishments in the hand of a foreign power. At the same time government authorities
lose their vital, independent right to oversee the conduct of the prisons and the selection and control of
those that operate them.
In the USA it has been proved that Wackenhut has employed convicted criminals as prison guards
and there are rumours that they have been doing the same thing in Australia. Further they have diverted
millions of dollars of US government funds to their own use thus depriving prison inmates of drug
rehabilitation and educational programmes. In November, 1995 it was reported to the New South Wales
government that the same scam had occurred at one of Wackenhut's new state prisons at Junee. The New South
Wales government said they would "investigate the matter", but were not worried about the integrity of
These developments can only produce justifiable concern. Anyone that thinks about it has to ask
the question, "What the hell is going on?"
4. Where Do We Stand on
By Adrian Salbuchi
Most of the time, luck is nothing
a generic concept to describe capacity,
intelligence, effort and
If you fall seven times, get up
If you add a little to a
and then do it again,
soon that little shall be much.
If you try to hit the moon with a
you will not succeed; but you will end up
knowing how to use a sling.
While discipline implies method and order in the pursuit of
objectives, perseverance implies steadiness and continuity in the pursuit of those same objectives. In other words:
behaving without order and method is being undisciplined; changing objectives arbitrarily all the time is being
The difference does matter, since many times discipline is
understood as perseverance and vice-versa. However, to a certain extent the confusion may be justified since often
both virtues go together; as well as their respective vices. Generally speaking, a disciplined person is also
persevering and an unstable person will hardly be disciplined. Nevertheless, in this case as in many others,
similarity does not necessarily mean sameness.
It is important to be committed to a method and a procedural
order in order to pursue an objective. But achieving and fulfilling that objective is not less vital. Let’s not
forget that discipline is just a method, a way, a path that with more or less obstacles will lead to an objective.
Staying firmly on the path means “to be on the right track”: Granted: this is a lot already. But unfortunately, it
is far from being enough. Because to achieve success you have to walk that “right track” right to its very end.
Here is where you need perseverance, steadiness and persistence. Here is where you have to be like a bulldog biting
a bone and not letting it go until it is crushed. Being on the right track is no big deal if we never reach the
goal because we are changing goals and tracks all the time.
Theoretically there are many of these “right tracks” to
choose from and every single one of them may lead to an objective we may consider worthy or desirable. The problem
arises when we have to admit that it is impossible to tread all paths in a lifetime so there, at some point along
the way, we will be forced to make a decision. And, as we all surely know, decisions almost always imply
For example, when we choose a profession, we are unavoidably
discarding all other professions which we could have also chosen. If we decided to be carpenters we will have
discarded being mechanics, marble workers or electricians. If we choose medicine we will have excluded agronomy,
science, law, and all those other careers beyond medicine. Truly serious – and sometimes even critical – is that,
while we make decisions and choose options as we live, our possibilities narrow and decrease. For that reason,
first choices are almost always the most crucial in life, and it is really sad to see how poorly our current
culture prepares us to make them.
One of the most tremendous and unfortunate mistakes
introduced by egalitarianism is to make us believe that all options are available for everyone; that,
theoretically, anyone can (or should be able to) be – or do – anything. There is a gross misunderstanding here
which, as a rule, comes from a demagoguery that is as foul as it is perverse. One thing is to have certain
professions, activities or jobs monopolized by a social
sector and thus banned from the rest, be it by law or as
a matter of fact. Another and a very different thing is to claim that in a truly free society absolutely all
options should be available and any person should be able to choose and become whatever that given person fancies
Read the Full Article:
5. Is Temptation an Outmoded Concept?
People will resist eating fats and sugars because they are unhealthy. But they think nothing of indulging
toxic and self-destructive desires.
By Henry Makow
May 17, 2011
"Rule your mind or it will
rule you." -- Horace
"It's all good" --
popular expression c. 2011
people act like the concept of
"temptation" is a relic of a bygone era.
Yet in their hearts, I
think they know the concept has never been more timely and urgent than it is today.
A woman asked a
advice column recently:
"I've been in a
relationship for many years with the same guy. I love him, but I've recently discovered I might be more
attracted to members of the same sex. Should I tell him?
Should I end it? Is there
something psychologically wrong with me?"
The psychologist Dr. Joti
"First and foremost, there
is absolutely nothing that is psychologically wrong with you for having questions about your sexual
orientation.... One's true sense of sexual orientation is not a choice ... If you feel that your partner is
someone you could talk to openly, and without judgment, you could certainly gently raise the issue with
This lady has a passing
fancy for other ladies. No wonder, the media is full of it. It's the latest thing. So she raises it
with her boyfriend. If he isn't also brain-dead, he will not be happy to learn that his
future wife, and the mother of his children, his rock and solace, is a closet lesbian.
Wouldn't it be smarter
to shut up and let it pass?
Do we have to indulge every attraction we feel, even if it is destructive to us and the
people we supposedly love?
Say she were attracted
to other men. Should she act on that too? Discuss it with him? Most heterosexuals are sexually attracted
to many members of the opposite sex. But if they are already committed to someone they care about,
they repress it. They recognize it as
Suppose this woman was
sexually attracted to children? Would the psychologist OK that as well? "One's true sense of sexual
orientation is not a choice.." Believe me, this kind of logic leads to pedophilia. After that,
People will resist
eating fats and sugars because they are unhealthy. But they think
nothing of indulging toxic and self-destructive desires.
True religions see man
as the interface between spirit (God) and matter (animal.) Man is like a little boy (spirit) riding
an elephant (body.) He must restrain his
animal instincts. He must be able to recognize temptation and resist it.
Our "secular" society
is a stepping stone to the Illuminati's satanism. The satanist does not recognize this
dichotomy between spirit and matter. He denies the existence of spriit and sees humans as
animals. He finds salvation in self-indulgence, not self-restraint. "Do what thou wilt," is the satanist motto.
We are like Eve in the
garden, subjected to temptation 24/7. Money. Sex. Food. Material things. Power. Fame. TV is full of
Read the Full Story:
Temptation an Outmoded Concept
6. In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes Centre
May 1, 2011 By davidjones
© By Gerald A.
We are fighting nothing
other than al-Qaeda in what they call the Islamic Maghreb. It’s an armed group that is fighting from Libya to
Mauritania and through Algeria and Mali.… If you had found them taking over American cities by the force of
arms, tell me what you would do? (From a letter sent by the
Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi to the US president Barack Obama.)
In the Theatre of the
Absurd, anything is possible. However, this latest scenario in Libya has taken absurdity to a whole new
dimension. A rag-tag bunch of armed, al-Qaeda affiliated tribesmen, being referred to as a ‘pro-democracy
movement’ by British State TV (BBC) and other mainstream media outlets, are now being openly armed and trained
by the French, British and American governments. This same Coalition of Crusaders, with the support of the Arab
League, is fighting alongside the rebels, launching continual bombing raids on targets in Tripoli and beyond,
including Muammar Qadhafi’s compound, in a brazen attempt to assassinate the man and re-colonise
And what is the support
inside Libya for this so-called ‘Libyan pro-democracy movement’? The answer is less than 2% of the entire Libyan
population. One might have expected that the Western and Arab worlds would have offered Qadhafi and the Libyan
armed forces assistance to deal with this al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) inspired insurgency. But no.
Surprisingly, or maybe not so surprisingly, instead, Britain and the US, led by the clown Sarkozy, in what can
only be described as a war mongering frenzy, launched an all out attack on Muammar Qadhafi, his family, and the
As this article goes to
press, the Coalition forces continue to savagely bomb targets in Tripoli and beyond, killing civilians and
destroying vital infrastructure. They are pounding Libya with a force that was last seen when they invaded Iraq,
doing their utmost to leave Qadhafi and his people defenceless against this insurgency. In fact, so brazen is
the imperialist Obama, that he has announced an ‘overt operation’, sending in CIA operatives to train and equip
the rebels. Rebels who the State Department admits are disorganised and untrained and unable to articulate a
vision for Libya, beyond killing Qadhafi.
These rebels however do
have an agenda. Their leaders and ideologues, inside and out of Libya, are well known for misinterpreting verses
from the Quran, quoting out of context, in an attempt to justify their so-called jihad and practices which are
fundamentally alien to the Islamic spirit. The best the Libyan rebels, read counter-revolutionaries, can do, is
to chant ‘From Tunisia, Egypt to Libya and on, we will spread Jihad!’
Powers and al-Qaeda – On the Same Side
As far back as the mid 90s,
a former MI5 agent, David Shayler, testified that British intelligence employed the services of an al-Qaeda cell
inside Libya, paying them a large fee to assassinate Muammar Qadhafi. The assassination attempt was carried out.
A grenade was lobbed at Qadhafi as he walked among a crowd in his hometown, Sirte. He was saved by one of his
bodyguards, who threw herself on the grenade.
Shayler revealed that while
he was working on the Libya desk in the mid 90s, British secret service personnel were collaborating with the
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was connected to one of Osama bin Laden’s trusted lieutenants. The
LIFG officially joined al-Qaeda in 2007. On an Islamist website in 2009, Ayman al-Zawahiri welcomed them to the
Over the past two years,
the Libyan authorities have released scores of imprisoned Islamists from the LIFG into the custody of their
families and communities in a humanitarian attempt to integrate them back into Libyan society. With a pledge
that they would use the forums set up in the country, under the auspices of the General People’s Congress, to
express their views. Many of the released prisoners had fought in Afghanistan and Iraq and been returned to the
Libyan authorities as part of an agreement with the US. If Qadhafi was truly the ruthless man the West would
have us believe, then surely these rebels, classified as terrorists by the US, would have remained in prison and
their fate very different.
One of those released in
2008 was the LIFG commander, Abdel Hakim al-Hasidi, now one of the leaders of this uprising. Over the last
decade, al-Hasidi fought in Afghanistan, was captured in Pakistan in 2002, handed over to the US, and
subsequently handed back to the Libyan authorities. In a recent interview with the Italian newspaper, Il Sole
24 Ore, al-Hasidi admitted that, “jihadists who fought in Iraq against the US are on the front lines of the
battle against Muammar Qadhafi.”
was the first
country to issue an arrest warrant for Osama bin Laden. The Libyan authorities have for years tried to warn the
world about the very serious threat posed by these Islamic deviants. According to David Shayler, Western
intelligence turned a deaf ear to Libya’s warnings as far back as the mid 90s because they were actually working
with the al-Qaeda group inside Libya, to kill Qadhafi, and roll back the Libyan revolution.
True Religion versus False Religion
The battle being fought in
the Libyan desert today dates way back beyond the mid 90s. Today’s battle is essentially a battle between, on
the one hand, the revolutionary Islam of Prophet Muhammad, manifest in the writings of Muammar Qadhafi and in
the practice of
the Libyan revolution. And
on the other hand, the reactionary Islam of the Ikhwan al-Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood) and their off
shoots such as al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb and its affiliate, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.
The Muslim revolutionary
scholar, Ali Shariati, notes that, “the battle of history is the battle of religion against religion… true
religion versus false religion.”
The Islam of the
Wahhabist/Salafi sect, adhered to by the LIFQ, is a reactionary interpretation and practice of Islam that seeks
to replicate the political and social structures of 7th century Arabian society. Although for the BBC, CNN and
Al Jazeera cameras, the rebels are careful to present themselves to the world as a force fighting for ‘liberal
democracy’ and to show their love and admiration for the West. Off camera, they are calling for what AQIM has
named the ‘Islamic Emirate in the Maghreb’.
Qadhafi, along with other
progressive Islamic scholars, argues the message of the Quran and Islamic theology is incompatible with the idea
of an emirate. They point out dynastic rule was imported into the body politic of Islam by the likes of Abu
Sufyan Muawiyah, the governor of Damascus, in the period 642 to 661, who borrowed these anti-Islamic practices
from the Byzantium Empire and the Persians. Qadhafi points out this particular system of governance has nothing
at all to do with Islam.
The central ideological
concern of Muammar Qadhafi and the Libyan revolution was to redefine Islam in the context of modern knowledge
and contemporary political systems and thought. This is a task that requires us to revisit and rethink previous
political systems set up by Muslims, without losing any of the Perennial Truth that is Islam.
The Third Universal Theory,
outlined in Qadhafi’s Green Book, is a comprehensive worldview – a body of philosophical, political,
economic, sociological and scientific principles, all inter-related. Together they form an alternative and
largely self-sufficient intellectual structure. It is a guide for authentic Islamic revolution, and can be
applied to non-Islamic, popular revolutions. It ushers in a whole new social and political practice, outlining
an alternative model of democracy.
worldwide have acclaimed The Green Book as a serious body of political thought, offering an incisive
critique of Western parliamentary democracy, capitalism and Marxist socialism. In addition, there is no denying
the system of direct democracy, posited by Qadhafi’s Third Universal Theory, offers an alternative model and
solution for Africa and many other parts of the ‘Third World’, where multi-party ‘democracy’ has been a dismal
failure, resulting in ethnic/tribal conflict, social fragmentation and political chaos.
In his book Islam and
the Third Universal Theory: The Religious Thought of Muammar al Qadhafi, the respected Muslim scholar
Mahmoud Ayoub points out that, “the first part of the Green Book is an interpretation of one single verse
of the Quran: ‘and their affairs are decided through consultation (shura) among themselves’… To others it
means an assembly of jurists ruling over a traditional Islamic society strictly governed by Shariah. Only
Qadhafi has taken the important Quranic precept seriously, understanding it literally, and applying it equally
to every member of society.”
Ayoub further states that,
“Qadhafi sees Islam as a perpetual revolution against unnecessary and illegitimate wealth, exploitation and
oppression. Qadhafi asserted that the Islam which both the East and the West knew was that observed by kings and
princes, as well as mendicants (darawish) who live off Islam. Thus, people thought of Islam as a
reactionary movement, a message which could never keep up with life. They considered Islam simply as a religious
heritage which could be venerated but which had to be kept from the fields of action and human
This Islam, whose theology
is primarily one of liberation, has been marginalised, distorted and co-opted to serve the interests of ruling
elites throughout the Muslim world. Theirs is the Islam observed by kings and princes, the ‘feudal Islam’ of the
Ikhwan al-Muslimeen (Muslim Brotherhood) and its Wahhabi spiritual leaders, such as Egyptian cleric, Yusuf
al-Qaradawi, who recently issued a fatwa stating that any Libyan soldier who can shoot dead embattled leader
Muammar Qadhafi should do so “to rid Libya of him.”
Qaradawi is a
neo-feudalist, who has defended the practice of female genital mutilation, called for the death penalty to be
applied to those who leave Islam and advocates separate systems of law for different classes of citizens.
Qadhafi views Qaradawi and those like him as the spiritual heirs of the corrupt Umayyad dynasty (661-750) that
transformed the revolutionary Islam of the Holy Prophet into a feudal dispensation.
How does Qadhafi’s
revolutionary Islam play out in practice? Why is this man and the revolution he has led such a threat? And why,
over recent weeks, have people from every corner of the globe spoken out in support of Qadhafi and the Libyan
revolution? Why have thousands of African freedom fighters (not mercenaries as the BBC, CNN and Al Jazeera would
have us believe) poured into Libya from the Congo, Guinea, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Niger, Chad,
Mauritania, Southern Sudan, Kenya, Ethiopia and Burkina Faso to fight to the death for this leader and
Who is this man and this
revolution that has the moral authority and power to draw an army of Africans from every corner of the continent
and solidarity from liberation movements, political parties and progressive governments worldwide?
Read the Full Article:
In the Theatre of the Absurd, Libya Now Takes
7. Qadhafi’s Libya Knows How the Global System Really
© By Adrian
… the system of elected
parliaments is based on propaganda to win votes. It is a demagogic system in the real sense of the word.
Votes can be bought and falsified. Poor people are unable to compete in the election campaigns, and the
result is that only the rich get elected. (The Green Book
by Col. Muammar Qadhafi)
At a news conference in
Tripoli on 7 March, former Libyan Foreign Minister Moussa Koussa accused the Western powers of trying to split
his country by supporting separatist rebel forces: “It’s clear they are getting in touch with the defected
people of eastern Libya. It’s clear there is a conspiracy to divide Libya. The English are yearning for the
colonial era of the past as the first nations who started getting in touch with the secessionists were the
English, as well as the French and the Americans.”
This statement shows just
how aware part of the Libyan leadership is of the bigger agenda that the Global Power Elite have regarding their
country and the region as a whole. People like Mr Koussa know only too well that what drives the sudden civil
strife in his country that served as an excuse for an all-out attack by France, the UK and the US against Libya,
is not any concern over “human rights,” or “democracy,” or “protecting the civilian population.” Rather, what is
really on the globalist agenda is their need to subdue, weaken and control Libya, mainly because under Col.
Muammar Qadhafi’s leadership the Libyans never bowed to the Global Power Elite.
Libya may have shown
pragmatic willingness to negotiate suspension of its weapons technology in 2004, agreed to sell its massive
“sweet crude” oil wealth to the West, and defined a political solution to the Lockerbie incident, yet under
Qadhafi they never succumbed to Western arm-twisting, as the leaders of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen,
Bahrain, Dubai and Qatar have. Other non-aligned countries in the region such as Iran and Syria hold similar
A Libya (or several
splinter-Libyas) under friendly caretaker regimes1 as they achieved in so many countries throughout the
world, would be a heaven-sent for American and British oil companies, for US-UK interests in the region, and for
UN Resolution No. 1973
is not yours. Libya is for all Libyans. The resolutions of the Security Council are invalid because the Security
Council is not authorized according to the U.N. Charter to intervene in internal affairs of any country… You have
no right ever to intervene in our internal affairs. Who gave you the right to intervene in our internal affairs?
You will regret it if you take the step toward intervening in our internal affairs, the affairs of our country. It
is indeed our country; it is not your country.
– From a letter sent by the
Libyan leader Muammar Qadhafi to the French president, British prime minister and UN Secretary
In country after country, the Globalist agenda seemed to be faring well, except in Libya where their
interventionist plans were not on schedule. Forces loyal to Col. Qadhafi were putting secessionists forces
centred on Benghazi up against a wall. So, “emergency action” had to be taken. All of a sudden the mainstream
media began noisily echoing French, British and US hysteria regarding the need to immediately “protect” East
Libya’s “civilian population” against Qadhafi’s attacks. A “concern” most surprising, when you consider that the
UK, France and the US had no qualms when Hosni Mubarak was killing Egyptians earlier this year, or when
authoritarian Saudis invaded (or were sent in by the US?) Bahrain a few weeks ago2 whilst Yemeni leader
Ali Abdullah Saleh gave his police shoot-to-kill orders against anti-government demonstrators.
Clearly, the “good guy/bad guy” rationale depends on whether the ongoing “guy” is willing to subordinate to the
Global Power Elite or not. This brings to mind an anecdote from the nineteen-forties when one of US president
Franklin D Roosevelt’s aides pointed out to him his moral concerns over US support of Nicaraguan dictator
Anastasio Somoza whom he considered to be an “SOB”; to which Roosevelt candidly replied by saying, “Yes, you’re
right; he is an SOB; but he’s our SOB!”
Over seventy years later, the US has systematically backed – and still backs – a veritable army of SOB caretaker
presidents, prime ministers, sheiks and military strongmen. Trouble only starts for ruling SOB’s if and when
they cease honouring explicit or implicit political agreements with the US-UK-Israel, as happened to Panama’s
Manuel Noriega in 1989, and to Saddam Hussein first in 1991 and then in 2003.
The fact is Qadhafi never cozied up to the US, the UK and Israel, however global oil cartel interests in Libya
won him a lease of life. The time has come, however, when the Global Power Elite objectives now go far beyond
oil: they need to redraw the geopolitical map of the Middle East and North Africa, which entails eroding all
Nation-States in the region in preparation for the coming World Government. And Qadhafi’s Libya is clearly not
ready to go along with that.
Ergo, Resolution No. 1973, giving the Global Power Elite’s hand-picked “leaders” in France, the UK, the US and
puppets in Italy, Spain and elsewhere their much needed “cloak of legality” to unilaterally attack Libya with
their military forces. As expected, Resolution No. 1973 was quickly passed on 17 March, ordering a “no fly zone”
over Libya and authorising “air strikes.” The mainstream media obediently lent PsyWar coverage to Western
incursions to the limit of irrationality, as their war-mongering is centred on a “Qadhafi must go” cry, and yet
Qadhafi does not even hold any formal government post in the Libyan State. He does not need to; his prestige
amongst his followers is sufficient, and that is what is making it especially difficult for the West to oust
The UN vote was not unanimous, however: of the five permanent Security Council members, France, the UK and the
US voted against Libya, whilst Russia and China abstained. The two other BRIC countries – Brazil and India –
also abstained, as did Germany.
It is indicative of the perils all countries run today when we see Russia and China reluctant to veto such
UK-France-US manoeuvring over the UN. Either one could have blocked unilateral military action, just as the US
systematically blocks dozens of UN Resolutions condemning Israeli attacks against Palestine and its outrageous
behaviour in the Middle East.3 China, most likely, abstained in order not to irritate their pro-US-UK
Saudi Arabian trade partners who now sell more oil to China than any other country. Russia, in turn, has complex
ethnic issues of its own.
Here, in a nutshell, we have a brief snapshot of how Global Power works, the speed with which they were able to
align the support of “the international community” to their goals and interests, naturally having the entire
global mainstream media superstructure willing to oblige “justifying” their attack on Libya and silencing all
other damning questions and evidence.
The extensive carve up and revamping of all of North Africa and the Islamic Middle East is very much in the
forefront of the Global Power Elite’s plans, of which the attacks on Qadhafi’s Libya are but a chapter. In their
march towards “democratisation” of the region, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton made it abundantly clear
what this means when, prior to her visit to Tunisia and Egypt at the end of March, she declared that the US has
“an enormous stake in ensuring that Egypt and Tunisia provide models for the kind of democracy that we want
to see.” Elsewhere, she added that the US wishes “to be a partner in the important work that lies ahead as
(the region) embarks on a transition to a genuine democracy.”4 (Emphasis mine)
And what is that “genuine” democracy the US, the UK, France, Spain, Italy “want to see”? Simple: a
mechanical vote-counting system fully dependent on the Money Power that feeds and controls political parties,
politicians, journalists, anchor newsmen, universities, NGO’s and other public and private players. The
practical effects of the brand of “democracy” that Hillary and her friends “want to see” are the “erosion piece
by piece of Sovereign Nation-States” as planned by the Council on Foreign Relations.
Increasingly, the remnants
of “democratic states” are given the role of lending lip service to the Global Private Power System by spraying
a thin, shiny layer of “legality” on it. Again in Hillary’s own words, she stressed “the difficulties of
nurturing the institutions that support democracy, including robust political parties, a free media and the rule
are all Over the Place
Writing from Argentina, I would point out some poignant parallels in this story with my country, on the
diplomatic, military and PsyWar stages.
On the diplomatic and military side, three decades ago – during the heyday of Thatcher and Reagan – Argentina’s
US-backed ruling Military Junta led by General Leopoldo Galtieri suddenly somersaulted and wrenched the
Falkland-Malvinas Islands in the South Atlantic from British hands. That was on 2 April 1982 and, again the US
and Britain manoeuvred with unheard of speed, rallying the support of “the international community.” Within 72
hours, UN Resolution No. 502 had been passed allowing the UK and US to “legally” take the islands back by force.
Argentina’s sole option: unconditional surrender.
After a British nuclear submarine sank the Argentine destroyer “General Belgrano” outside the UK war exclusion
zone, Argentina’s air force quickly reacted and sank or damaged over two dozen British ships, shot down scores
of RAF jets, and heavily damaged both Britain’s aircraft carriers forcing them to withdraw from the war theatre,
notably using French-made “Exocet”6 air-to-sea missiles, some of which were generously provided on very
short notice by Col. Qadhafi’s Libya Arab Jamahiriya. For the UK, overwhelming defeat of Argentina was the sole
option, and here lie the roots of our country’s present-day weakness and decadence.
On the PsyWar and political stages, the Global Power Elite threat to split Libya up into two or three new
“democratic” countries would tie in with their agenda bent on eroding national sovereignty everywhere. We can
also see their “fingerprint” if we compare Libya today with Argentina nine years ago, when at the height of our
country’s almost total financial, banking and monetary collapse triggered by the Wall Street banksters which
forced Argentina to default on its massive Foreign Debt, the New York Times published a high-profile
article whose title said it all: “Some in Argentina see Secession as the Answer to Economic Peril.”7 In
it they recommended that the immensely large and rich Patagonia Region in the south of the country, should
secede from the rest of Argentina and then be traded with the Global Power Elite’s banking cartels to cancel the
country’s foreign debt.
Clearly, territorial break-up is very much on the globalist agenda, whether in Argentina or
A split up Libya would facilitate control of its massive oil wealth and strategic North African and
Mediterranean geopolitical position. The logic is always the same: on the “hard road to world order” it is
always easier to control a myriad of smaller, weaker and bickering countries than it is a few large, more
powerful and coherent political entities.
They Do It?
If asked to identify the Global Power Elite’s most powerful weapon, one might be tempted to respond saying it is
their military fire power, or their money power, or their political prowess. But on a grander scale, their
overriding main advantage – their “secret weapon” so to speak – is of a much more subtle nature: it is their
uncanny talent and ability for very Long-Term Planning; and by “long-term” I mean not just decades but
centuries. This entails a powerful capability of ensuring that their global plans are promoted generation
after generation, and this requires, amongst other things, a very powerful, consistent and loyalty-based
succession and communication system.
Long-Term Planning is probably their “best kept secret” not because they hide it from the public (which they
don’t), but because the better part of mankind just cannot see it, for the simple reason that mass education in
all countries in the world has increasingly shifted towards and focused on short-term thinking, modelling and
planning. Whether in elementary school, high school or college, our basic training is centred on “learning to do
things in our lives”: i.e., learning a trade or profession, in order to “earn a living and get ahead in life.”
“Life,” in today’s world, is being constrained to having a work career, marriage & child-rearing, “fun &
entertainment,” and then as the decades go by, retirement and, finally, “game over”...
Short term thinking people are much easier to control, because they are intrinsically egotists in
that, as I say, they have been reared just to “do things with their lives” (in a manner that is useful to
the ongoing social system). Except under truly exception conditions where their personal lives and livelihood
are threatened, people for the most part are reluctant to become involved in the greater picture of Man’s
predicament on Earth. Mankind’s evolution (some might say involution) into what it has become today is
the product of a very extensive chain of highly complex long-term processes, which 99% of the population cannot
see simply because the subtleties of Long-Term thought and planning elude them. They have just plain not been
educated for that.
The Global Power Elite – Deciders, Planners and Do-ers – however, are all “Long-Termers.” This is a key result
of their inheriting vast power and wealth from their family, social and financial/industrial environments and
networks, which quickly make a point of selecting their “best and brightest” and ensuring that they get a
“proper education,” which basically means that Elites are trained in Long-Term thought, vision, and scenario
All nations today should understand that the only guarantee for national sovereignty lies not so much in
maintaining powerful armed forces – which for countries in the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and
elsewhere is clearly impossible when confronting the US, UK, and EU firepower – but rather in understanding the
Global Power Elite’s key strengths and weaknesses. Then counter-PsyWar and PsyOps can be designed to mitigate
and neutralise their hold over people’s minds everywhere. This requires understanding why they want us all to
think and act in certain ways, and why they do not want us to think and act in certain other
And one of those “other ways” they despise is when countries are truly Non-Aligned. When they retain the power
to think and act independently, even if within cultural frameworks that may appear different from our own and
even difficult for many of us to understand.
Clearly, Non-Alignment – whether in Nasser’s Egypt, Peron’s Argentina, Chavez’s Venezuela, Tito’s Yugoslavia,
Assad’s Syria, the Ayatollah’s Iran, or Qadhafi’s Libya – is very much hated by the globalists, for the simple
reason that beyond all local differences, Non-Alignment to the Global Power Elite inevitably leads to people
valuing their own national sovereignty and independence above all other considerations, which in turn leads to
the strengthening of Sovereign Nation-States.
And, the Sovereign Nation-State is the Global Power Elite’s Public Enemy Number One.
1. See my previous article
“Global Elites Behind Chaos in Arab World” published in this issue of New Dawn
2. George Friedman,
publisher of Stratfor Global Intelligence expressed these double standards most eloquently when he
stated: “We’re not going to mess with Bahrain because we’re not going to get into a fight with the Saudis who
support the current structure, and because it is where the United States keeps its (Indian Ocean) fleet.” See
“US, UN won’t step in Bahrain mess say experts”, The Boston Herald, 21 March.
3. From 1982 to 2006, the
US vetoed 32 UN Security Council Resolutions condemning Israeli policies and behaviour and systematically
blocked Arab efforts to put the subject of Israel’s nuclear weapons arsenal on the International Atomic Energy
Agency’s agenda, the State of Israel being the sole country in the Middle East that has atomic Weapons of Mass
Destruction and a proven track record of its willingness to use them.
4. “Clinton to stress
democracy in Egypt, Tunisia trip” by Andrew Quinn, The New York Times, 10 March.
5. “Clinton to tell
Egyptians democracy takes time” by Arshad Mohammed, The New York Times, 14 March.
6. So concerned were the
British over their losses at the height of the Falklands-Malvinas War in 1982, that then French President
Francoise Mitterand confessed to his psychoanalyst that “The Iron Lady” Margaret Thatcher had threatened to drop
a nuclear bomb over Argentina’s second largest city of Córdoba if Mitterand did not hand over to her the secret
air defense codes of the French “Exocet” missiles in the hands of the Argentine military. See Rendez-vous:
The Psychoanalysis of Francois Mitterrand by Ali Magoudi, the French president’s psychoanalyst from 1982 to
7. Article by Larry
Rohter, The New York Times, 27 August 2002.
8. The Coming World
Government: Tragedy & Hope?, chapter 7 – “Territory in Jeopardy: The Patagonia”, by Adrian Salbuchi,
available at www.asalbuchi.com.ar.
Don't Believe What Media Says About Gaddafi
Orwellian Lies About Libya
Tony Blair and CFR Lies
On Libya (Video)
Zionists Won't Let You Know About Gadaffi (Video)
8. Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab
Revolt in North Africa and the Middle East:
The Real Agenda Exposed.
© By Adrian Salbuchi
Source: New Dawn magazine, May-June 2011, pp. 9-14,
available here: http://www.NewDawnMagazine.com
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World
“Solve et Coagula”
(“Dissolve and Recompose”)
Traditional method used by Medievla alchemists to wrench from matter its
It all began rather suddenly in January 2011 in Tunisia when President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali
was ousted following major uprisings and food riots. Then, in rapid succession came seemingly similar social
upheavals and uprisings in Algeria, Iraq, Oman; notably in Egypt which ended Hosni Mubarak’s rigid
thirty-year regime; and even more turmoil followed in Yemen, Bahrain, Syria and, worst of all, civil war has
erupted in Libya.
So, yes, some dominoes are falling as authoritarian regimes are weakened and overthrown one
after another; however, no, not in all cases is it simply ‘the will of the People’ that has triggered these
civil commotions. We must look closer at unfolding patterns … because there certainly appears to be far more
powerful forces acting behind the scenes; forces that have other
objectives and interests on a vaster scale.
Will the events in the Middle East and North Africa spread further afield as many are nervously
asking? Who’s next? Saudi Arabia? Greece? Spain? Ireland? South East Asia? Latin America …? The US and the UK
The big question is: has the Global Power Elite decided that the time has come for global ‘regime
change?’ Are they promoting, triggering and allowing widespread revolution on purpose? Do they
believe that they can control it? Is short-term economic and political turmoil the price they are willing to
pay to achieve far more ambitious long-term objectives?
Global Regime Change
The answer these and other questions, we need to take a step back and look at the bigger picture
from loftier historical and geographical viewpoints. This entails a dramatic paradigm shift that
many—most—people have difficulty coping with. Its main feature is that we need to realise that over the past
four decades a massive global power shift has occurred resulting in political, economic, military,
diplomatic, and social decision-making power drifting away from the public Sovereign Nation-State (where it has dwelt for centuries), towards a
totally new, more elusive Private Power Structure. We can, in
fact, describe this as the Privatisation of Power.
Through the years, this has been variously and ambiguously described as the ‘New World Order,’
‘One World,’ the ‘Establishment,’ ‘Globalisation,’ ‘Over-World,’ even ‘democracy,’ depending upon whether you
choose to stress its conceptual, social, economic, political, administrative or cultural aspects. I prefer to
call it the Global Power Elite because it spans
all of these ideas and points to specific people and organisations.
For many who realise that something is rotten and not just in the state of Denmark, increasingly
the key question is: who calls the shots in the world today? I hardly believe that we need to resort to any
elusive, conspiratorial, secret group of mischief-makers who sit in some Wizard of Oz-like eyrie, operating
master levers and switches that run the planet. No. In fact it’s really much more visible than that … you
just need to know where and how to look.
Today’s world is controlled and managed by a Global Power Elite consisting of key individuals
and families using vastly powerful organisations whose leverage mechanisms are embedded into all of the
world’s economic, financial, media, educational, government, academic, political and legal infrastructure
organisations. [The broad scheme of these structures is shown in Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 below. Note that
the figures and pictures are only available in the PDF downloadable version.]
Through a small but highly efficient network of strategic planners—often referred to as “think tanks”—medium and
long-tern national, regional, and global plans are conceived, researched, developed, scenario-tested and
designed. These are then converted into highly complex action plans and executed in a complex and coordinated
manner by powerful Elites in multinational corporations, transnational banks, mainstream mediam, key
government posts, universities, and other entities. All focused on growing their vast power and ensuring that
on key matters in every field and everywhere they are always the ‘deciders of last resort.’
These are not even secret organisations: they have names, membership rosters, addresses, web sites, they publish papers and reports, give
conferences … i.e. they pretty much act out in the “open,” even though they can keep a low profile thanks to
the fact that they also control the mainstream media as one of their key power factors. We can definitely say
they are not really secret, but rather discrete.
A few names: the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) founded in 1919; its London
sister organisation, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as “Chatham House”), the
Trilateral Commission (founded in 1973 at the behest of David Rockefeller and based on the ideological
premises set forth by Zbigniew Brezezinski in his seminal 11971 book Between Two Ages: The Role of America in the Technetronic Age), the
Bilderberg Conference (a significantly higher echelon on the global power pyramid convoked by European
nobility and wealth in 1954), and other similar organisations that tie into the very intricate, complex, and integrated global network of
The Global Power Elite Agenda
Three fundamental global processes that tie in with their long-term interests and objectives are
Read the Full Story:
Global Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Elites Behind the Chaos in the Arab World
9. Libya All About Oil, or Central
By Ellen Brown
Several writers have noted the odd fact that the Libyan rebels took time out from their rebellion in March
to create their own central bank - this before they even had a
government. Robert Wenzel wrote in the Economic Policy Journal:
I have never before heard of a central bank being created in just a matter of weeks
out of a popular uprising. This suggests we have a bit
more than a rag tag bunch of rebels running around and that there are some pretty sophisticated
Alex Newman wrote in the
In a statement released
last week, the rebels reported on the results of a meeting held on March 19. Among other things, the supposed
rag-tag revolutionaries announced the "[d]esignation of the Central Bank of Benghazi as a monetary authority
competent in monetary policies in Libya and appointment of a Governor to the Central Bank of Libya, with a
temporary headquarters in Benghazi."
Newman quoted CNBC senior
editor John Carney, who asked, "Is this the first time a revolutionary group has created a central bank while it
is still in the midst of fighting the entrenched political power? It certainly seems to indicate how
extraordinarily powerful central bankers have become in our era."
Another anomaly involves the official justification for taking up arms against Libya. Supposedly it's about human
rights violations, but the evidence is contradictory. According to an article on the Fox News website on February
As the United Nations works
feverishly to condemn Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi for cracking down on protesters, the body's Human Rights
Council is poised to adopt a report chock-full of praise for Libya's human rights record.
The review commends Libya for improving educational opportunities, for making human rights a "priority" and for
bettering its "constitutional" framework. Several countries, including Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, and Saudi
Arabia but also Canada, give Libya positive marks for the legal protections afforded to its citizens - who are now
revolting against the regime and facing bloody reprisal.
Whatever might be said of
Gaddafi's personal crimes, the Libyan people seem to
be thriving. A delegation of medical professionals from Russia, Ukraine and Belarus wrote in
an appeal to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Prime Minister Vladimir Putin that after becoming acquainted
with Libyan life, it was their view that in few nations did people live in such comfort:
[Libyans] are entitled to
free treatment, and their hospitals provide the best in the world of medical equipment. Education in Libya is
free, capable young people have the opportunity to study abroad at government expense. When marrying, young
couples receive 60,000 Libyan dinars (about 50,000 US dollars) of financial assistance. Non-interest state
loans, and as practice shows, undated. Due to government subsidies the price of cars is much lower than in
Europe, and they are affordable for every family. Gasoline and bread cost a penny, no taxes for those who are
engaged in agriculture. The Libyan people are
quiet and peaceful, are not inclined to drink, and are very religious.
They maintained that
international community had been misinformed about the struggle against the regime. "Tell us,"
they said, "who would not like such a regime?"
Even if that is just propaganda, there is no denying at least one very popular achievement of the Libyan
government: it brought water to the desert by building the largest and most expensive irrigation project in
history, the US$33 billion GMMR (Great Man-Made River) project. Even more than oil, water is
crucial to life in Libya.
The GMMR provides 70% of the population with water for drinking and irrigation, pumping it from Libya's vast
underground Nubian Sandstone Aquifer System in the south to populated coastal areas 4,000 kilometers to the north.
The Libyan government has done at least some things right.
Another explanation for the assault on Libya is that it is "all about oil", but that theory too is problematic. As
noted in the National Journal, the country produces only about 2% of the world's oil. Saudi Arabia alone has enough
spare capacity to make up for any lost production if Libyan oil were to disappear from the market. And if it's all about oil, why the rush to set up a new central
Another provocative bit of data circulating on the Net is a 2007 "Democracy Now" interview of US General Wesley
Clark (Ret). In it he says that about 10 days after September 11, 2001, he was told by a general that the decision
had been made to go to war with Iraq. Clark was surprised and asked why. "I don't know!" was the response. "I guess
they don't know what else to do!" Later, the same general said
they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
these seven countries have in common? In the context of banking, one that sticks out is that none of
them is listed among the 56 member banks of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). That evidently puts them outside the long
regulatory arm of the central bankers' central bank in Switzerland.
The most renegade of the lot could be Libya and Iraq, the two that have actually been attacked. Kenneth Schortgen
Jr, writing on Examiner.com, noted that "[s]ix months before the US moved into Iraq to take down Saddam Hussein,
the oil nation had made the move to accept euros instead of dollars for oil, and this became a threat to the global
dominance of the dollar as the reserve currency, and its dominion as the petrodollar."
According to a Russian article titled "Bombing of Libya - Punishment for Ghaddafi for His Attempt to Refuse US
Dollar", Gaddafi made a similarly bold move: he initiated a movement to refuse the dollar and the euro, and called
on Arab and African nations to use a new currency instead, the gold dinar. Gaddafi suggested establishing a united
African continent, with its 200 million people using this single currency.
During the past year, the idea was approved by many Arab countries and most African countries. The only opponents
were the Republic of South Africa and the head of the League of Arab States. The initiative was viewed
negatively by the USA and the European Union, with French President Nicolas Sarkozy calling Libya a threat to the
financial security of mankind; but Gaddafi was not swayed
and continued his push for the creation of a united Africa.
And that brings us back to the puzzle of the Libyan central bank. In an article posted on the Market Oracle, Eric
One seldom mentioned fact
by western politicians and media pundits: the Central
Bank of Libya is 100% State Owned ... Currently, the Libyan government creates its own money, the
Libyan Dinar, through the facilities of its own central bank. Few can argue that Libya is a sovereign nation
with its own great resources, able to sustain its own economic destiny. One major problem for globalist banking
cartels is that in order to do business with Libya, they must go through the Libyan Central Bank and its
national currency, a place where they have absolutely zero dominion or power-broking ability. Hence, taking down the Central Bank of
Libya (CBL) may not appear in the speeches of Obama, Cameron and Sarkozy but this is certainly at the top of the
globalist agenda for absorbing Libya into its hive of compliant nations.
not only has
oil. According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), its central bank has nearly 144 tonnes of gold in its
vaults. With that sort of asset base, who needs the BIS, the IMF and their rules?
All of which prompts a closer look at the BIS rules and their effect on local economies. An article on the BIS
website states that central banks in the Central Bank Governance Network are supposed to have as their single or
primary objective "to preserve price stability".
They are to be kept independent from government to make sure that political considerations don't interfere with
this mandate. "Price stability" means maintaining a stable money supply, even if that means burdening the people
with heavy foreign debts. Central banks are discouraged from increasing the money supply by printing money and
using it for the benefit of the state, either directly or as loans.
In a 2002 article in Asia Times Online titled "The BIS vs
national banks" Henry Liu maintained:
BIS regulations serve only
the single purpose of strengthening the international private banking system, even at the peril of national
economies. The BIS does to national banking systems what the IMF has done to national monetary regimes. National
economies under financial globalization no longer serve national interests.
... FDI [foreign direct investment] denominated in foreign currencies, mostly dollars, has condemned many national
economies into unbalanced development toward export, merely to make dollar-denominated interest payments to FDI,
with little net benefit to the domestic economies.
He added, "Applying the
State Theory of Money, any government can fund with its own currency all its domestic developmental needs to
maintain full employment without inflation." The "state theory of money" refers to money created by governments
rather than private banks.
The presumption of the rule against borrowing from the government's own central bank is that this will be
inflationary, while borrowing existing money from foreign banks or the IMF will not. But all banks actually create
the money they lend on their books, whether publicly owned or privately owned. Most new money today comes from bank
loans. Borrowing it from the government's own central bank has the advantage that the loan is effectively
interest-free. Eliminating interest has been shown to reduce the cost of public projects by an average of 50%.
And that appears to be how the Libyan system works. According to Wikipedia, the functions of the Central Bank of
Libya include "issuing and regulating banknotes and coins in Libya" and "managing and issuing all state loans".
Libya's wholly state-owned bank can and does issue the national currency and lend it for state purposes.
That would explain where Libya gets the money to provide free education and medical care, and to issue each young
couple $50,000 in interest-free state loans. It would also explain where the country found the $33 billion to build
the Great Man-Made River project. Libyans are worried that North Atlantic Treaty
Organization-led air strikes are coming perilously close to this
pipeline, threatening another humanitarian disaster.
So is this new war all about oil or all about banking? Maybe both - and water as well. With energy, water, and
ample credit to develop the infrastructure to access them, a nation can be free of the grip of foreign creditors.
And that may be the real threat of Libya: it could show the world what is possible.
Most countries don't have oil, but new technologies are being developed that could make non-oil-producing nations
energy-independent, particularly if infrastructure costs are halved by borrowing from the nation's own publicly
owned bank. Energy independence would free governments from the web of the international bankers, and of the need
to shift production from domestic to foreign markets to service the loans.
If the Gaddafi government goes down, it will be interesting to watch whether the new central bank joins the BIS,
whether the nationalized oil industry gets sold off to investors, and whether education and healthcare continue to
Ellen Brown is an attorney and president of the Public Banking Institute,
http://PublicBankingInstitute.org. In Web of Debt, her latest of eleven books, she shows how a private cartel has
usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we the people can get it back. Her websites
are http://webofdebt.com and http://ellenbrown.com.
(Copyright Ellen Brown 2011)
10. Organized Jewry Opposes Free
demand freedom of speech to make up for the
of thought which they” avoid. (Kierkegaard)
By Prof Kevin MacDonald
29 January 2009
It is something of an axiom
of Jewish life that "Is it good for the Jews?" remains the litmus test of Jewish communal activity - in other
words, interest over principles. A good example is free speech. There can be little doubt that the organized
Jewish community sees free speech as a problem because it may be used to
criticize the behavior of Jewish organizations and especially Israel.
In Canada the response of
the organized Jewish community to recent demonstrations against Israel was to attempt to invoke Canada's
restrictions on free speech in order to silence their critics. The Canadian Jewish Congress complained that
protests against Israel's incursion into Gaza contained images that were "uncivil, un-Canadian, that demonize
Jews and Israelis." They are asking the police to investigate the matter, for referral to the Canadian Human
Rights Commission which is in charge of enforcing laws that infringe on free speech. Although the organized
Jewish community in Canada has strongly supported the thought crime legislation (see below), Bernie Farber, the
head of the CJC, stated "we are firm supporters and believers in the need to be able to demonstrate passionately
in free and democratic societies."
Because of the First
Amendment, we are still a ways from situation in Canada here in the US. Nevertheless, the ADL has been in the forefront of promoting hate-crime
legislation in America, and there can be little doubt that they see the First Amendment as a
barrier to their interests in suppressing thoughts and speech critical of Israel and other Jewish interests.
An example of the efforts
of the organized Jewish community in the direction of thought control is the Global Anti-Semitism Review Act of
2004. This law created an office of "Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism" within the State
Department, headed by Gregg J. Rickman. The act not only requires the State Department to document acts of
anti-Semitism, but also to "combat acts of anti-Semitism globally."
The act does not say what
the U.S. must do to combat anti-Semitism around the world. I assume combating anti-Semitism wouldn't require any
more in the way of lives and money than, say, the war in Iraq - another project spearheaded by Jewish activism
on behalf of Israel. But that may be wishful thinking as the same activists are avidly promoting a war with Iran
which would likely be even more disastrous.
In any case, the office
issued its most recent Contemporary Global Anti-Semitism Report (GASR) in March of last year. The document is an
excellent example of Jewish activism that would be unremarkable except that it is now officially ensconced at
the highest reaches of the U.S. government. As we shall see, it goes beyond criticism anti-Jewish actions to
anti-Jewish attitudes, such as statements about Jewish influence.
The report performs the by
now familiar casuistry on Israel as a cause of anti-Semitism. The reader is led to believe that the allegations
of Israeli atrocities are overblown propaganda - when the real question is just how Palestinians manage to
survive at all in the occupied territories. The recent horrifying incursion into Gaza is only the most recent
example. Not only did Israel carry out a starvation-inducing blockade during a ceasefire and an assault that
finally provoked Palestinian retaliation, there seems little doubt that Israel committed war crimes -
particularly the use of white phosphorus bombs in densely populated civilian areas.
The report complains that Israel's bad behavior is singled out while nobody cares when other governments behave
inhumanely. The problem here is that
because Israel's bad behavior is in important ingredient in enflaming the entire region, it should interest
everyone. And because of the role of the Israel Lobby in shaping American policy, Israel's bad behavior is even
more properly the concern of all Americans. American taxpayers are not being asked to massively subsidize other
badly behaved governments, nor are they asked to fight and die in wars designed to advance the interests of those
The report graciously
states that "responsible criticism" of Israel's policies is acceptable. (Thanks!) But there's a catch: "Those
criticizing Israel have a responsibility to consider the effect their actions may have in prompting hatred of
This, of course, has the
effect of proscribing criticism of Israel for fear of being called an anti-Semite. Presumably responsible
criticism of Israel does not include books like John Mearsheimer and Steven Walt's The Israel Lobby, despite its
academic tone and masterful marshalling of evidence. Jewish activists have routinely accused the authors of
resurrecting the Protocols and other vicious acts of anti-Semitism.
As the report notes, Israel
is without doubt the source of most anti-Jewish words and deeds in the contemporary world. But the report also
points to traditional Jewish stereotypes as a continuing concern: Jews as more loyal to Israel and Jewish
interests than the interests of their country of residence; and Jews as having inordinate influence and control
over media, the economy or government. For example, according to ADL surveys, substantial percentages of
Europeans believe that Jews have too much power in business and in international financial markets. (The
percentages range from around 20% in Germany to 60% in Hungary.)
Similarly, ADL surveys
indicate that beliefs that Jews are disloyal are common among Europeans, ranging from 39% in France to 60% in
Spain. The report notes that "those who believe that Jews are more loyal to Israel than to their own country
tend to believe that Jew-ish lobbying groups and individual Jews in influential positions in national
governments seek to bend policy toward Israel's interests."
In other words, these
anti-Semites are living under the illusion that organizations like AIPAC actually have some influence. And they
may even believe that highly placed Jews like Paul Wolfowitz, Elliott Abrams and Richard Perle may have steered
U.S. policy in a way that benefited Israel to the detriment of the United States.
As I noted in my review of
Mearsheimer and Walt, Pro-Israel activists such as Perle typically phrase their policy recommendations as aimed
at benefiting the United States. Perle does this despite evidence that he has a strong Jewish identity and
despite the fact that he has typical Jewish concerns, such as anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and the welfare of
Israel. Perle poses as an American patriot despite credible charges of spying for Israel, writing reports for
Israeli think tanks and op-eds for the Jerusalem Post, and maintaining close personal relation-ships with
Needless to say, the GASR
is not a good place to find nuanced or fair treatments of these issues.
The GASR also has a section
deploring ethnic nationalist movements of non-Jews, mainly in Eastern Europe, complaining that these movements
are commonly anti-Jewish. Typically the anti-Jewish sentiments of such movements stem from the perception that
Jews are an elite with considerable power and that this elite opposes the ethno-nationalism of non-Jews-a view
that certainly has some basis in reality. (Jewish opposition to ethno-nationalism is restricted to non-Jews in
areas where Jews form a Diaspora; it does not, of course, apply to Israel.)
For example, the GASR
singles out Roman Catholic institutions as "encouraging anti-Semitism and ethnic and religious chauvinism."
Chief among the offenders is a conservative Catholic radio station in Poland, Radio Maryja, cited for claiming
that "Jews were pushing the Polish government to pay exorbitant private property restitution claims [for
Holocaust reparations], and that Poland's President was `in the pocket of the Jewish lobby.'"
This seems odd, since it
would hardly be surprising if indeed Jews and Jewish organizations were pressuring the Polish government on this
issue. Indeed, Norman Finkelstein points out:
In negotiations with
Eastern Europe, Jewish organizations and Israel have demanded the full restitution of or monetary compensation
for the pre-war communal and private assets of the Jewish community. Consider Poland. The pre-war Jewish
population of Poland stood at 3.5 million; the current population is several thousand. Yet, the World Jewish
Restitution Organization demands title over the 6,000 pre-war communal Jewish properties, including those
currently being used as hospitals and schools. It is also laying claim to hundreds of thousands of parcels of
Polish land valued in the many tens of billions of dollars. Once again the entire US political and legal
establishment has been mobilized to achieve these ends. Indeed, New York City Council members unanimously
supported a resolution calling on Poland 'to pass comprehensive legislation providing for the complete
restitution of Holocaust assets', while 57 members of Congress (led by Congressman Anthony Weiner of New York)
dispatched a letter to the Polish parliament demanding 'comprehensive legislation that would return 100% of all
property and assets seized during the Holocaust'.
No sign of Jewish
involvement there. Clearly, Radio Marija is way out of line.
has paid dearly for offending the Israel Lobby: blacklisted from employment in the academic world, deported and
barred from Israel, and living in a rent-stabilized apartment near his boyhood home in Brooklyn. The Lobby
clearly believes in free speech so long as it's in done in one's closet and assuming the neighbors can't hear
it. (More on this below.)
Also related to Poland, the
GASR notes that Maciej Giertych, European Parlia-ment Deputy and former head of the Political Party League of
Polish Families, wrote a booklet "suggesting that Jews were unethical and a `tragic community' because they did
not accept Jesus as the Messiah." The report also deplored the ADL's finding that 39% of Polish respondents
agreed that "Jews are responsible for the death of Christ."
This is truly amazing. Here
we have an official U.S. government report condemning a Polish politician and a large percentage of the Polish
people for expressing religious ideas that date from the origins of the Church in antiquity. It's very
reminiscent of the situation in Canada where the Christian Heritage Party has been charged with promoting hatred
because they published material opposing homosexuality for religious reasons stemming from their reading of the
Incidentally, the GASR
complains that Giertych also claimed that "Jews `create their own ghettos' because they like to separate
themselves from others." Residential segregation, of course, was standard Jewish behavior in the Diaspora
beginning in the ancient world, and it certainly occurred in Poland well into modern times. Indeed, it continues
in many areas of the Diaspora today. But, as with thought crimes generally, truth is no defense.
The GASR coyly states that
"While the report describes many measures that foreign governments have adopted to combat anti-Sem-itism, it
does not endorse any such measures that prohibit conduct that would be protected under the U.S. Constitution."
Nevertheless, the act
requires the compilation of material that would presumably be protected by the US Constitution, in particular
"instances of propaganda in government and nongovernment media that attempt to justify or promote racial hatred
against Jewish people." When one considers that a great many of the attitudes mentioned in the GASR are either
substantially factual or reflect common religious beliefs, they would certainly seem to fall within the
protections of the First Amendment.
And it's pretty clear where
its heart lies. Indeed, as Ezra Levant has recently described, Jewish organizations and activists have been a
major source of support for the Canadian Human Rights Commission, intervening in dozens of cases in favor of
Levant describes the Simon
Weisenthal Center as "one of the most vicious interveners in Canadian Human Rights Commission censorship
trials." And Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress stated recently that "our anti-hate laws are probably
the most underused." Levant comments: "That sounds like Ian Fine, senior counsel for the CHRC, who declared that
`there can't be enough laws against hate.' So while the rest of the country is realizing that our government
censorship has gone too far, Farber says it goes nowhere far enough; it's underused. He wants more censorship,
more government intervention into thoughts and ideas - and the emotion called `hate'."
Clearly, the office of
Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism is nothing if not a Jewish activist organization. And it
doubtless would love to institute the same kinds of thought control in the U.S. that have made Canada into a
police state. Indeed, it would be entirely within the letter of the law that created this monster if the United
States were to declare war on Poland as a means of combating anti-Semitism. At least it won't be necessary to
MacDonald is a professor of
psychology at California State UniversityLong Beach.
11. The Galileo Movement
Brings Sanity and Honesty to the Carbon Dioxide Debate in Australia
On 17 May 2011, in Sydney Australia, radio personality Alan
Jones, launched the Galileo Movement during his morning breakfast show on radio 2GB. The Galileo
Movement aims to expose the lies and "... misrepresentations pushing a 'price on carbon dioxide,' and seeks to
protect Australians and our future in five areas:
||Protect freedom - personal choice
and national sovereignty;
||Protect the environment;
||Protect science and restore
||Protect our economic security;
||Protect people's emotional health
by ending Government and activists' constant destructive bombardment of fear and guilt on our kids and
Here's a brief introduction to the Galileo Movement, from founders Case Smit and John Smeed:
"We care about freedom, security, the environment, humanity and our future.
The Galileo Movement's co-founders are retirees Case Smit and John Smeed. Their business
backgrounds are in science and engineering - science's real-world application. Their experience is in
environmental protection and ensuring air quality.
At first they simply accepted politicians' claims of global warming blamed on human
production of carbon dioxide (CO2). When things didn't add up, they each separately investigated. Stunned, they
discovered what many people are now discovering: climate claims by some scientists and politicians contradict
The Galileo Movement's patron is Australia's own Alan Jones, radio 2GB's popular talkback
presenter. Alan has a long history of speaking out for the downtrodden and for protecting freedom. His innate
expertise straddles the fields of politics, sport and the media. His wealth of experience complements the basic
science that is the Galileo Movement's core.
Results of voting on the site, so
||92.19% are against the
introduction of a Carbon Tax and/or Emissions Trading Scheme in Australia.
||6.76% are for the introduction of a
Carbon Tax and/or Emissions Trading Scheme in Australia.
||86.49% say that the
Government should be prepared to hold a Royal Commission to test the veracity of the Anthropogenic (Man
made) Global Warming claims, before introducing associated legislation.
||7.04% are against such
a Royal Commission.
Have your say by voting here now ...
For more information on this much needed public forum, in these days of lying and deception, click
the Galileo Movement link.
12. America's Death Squads
16 May 2011
[Nazarene Remnant comment: Don’t think this can happen at your family home? You had
better think again, especially if you’re on one the three lists mentioned in this book. We also point out that the events pictured
in the following story will happen in all
countries of the world!]
How have we come down to
this? It did not happen overnight, and this has been the result of decades of extreme-right-wing views of the
role of "law-enforcement" polices throughout this country. The very first problem with the entire concept stems
from the definition of "law·en·force·ment." The term infers that there are laws that need to be enforced; but
the fact is there are no longer any "laws" that govern the behavior of those in uniform.
This is how we have
apparently become unwilling participants in this massive crime against the rights and responsibilities of
everyone in this country; from the citizens that are the victims to the thugs that are illegally making these
arrests; Tasering and sometimes torturing people-as well as those who are murdered by those same people that are
armed, supposedly, to protect the same people that the uniformed law-enforcers are now making
When I was as consultant to
the California Department of Justice in the late nineteen-seventies the mood among a great many "officers" was
that police in California were being restricted far-too-much by having to Mirandize suspects: Because this
limited what police could do to "catch-the-bad-guys."
In fact these same lazy,
bull-headed cops were adamant that there should be no restrictions upon whatever they might want to do to get
"confessions" from those they had decided were criminals. In this process the first, fourth and fifth amendments
were considered to be counter-productive to "good-police-work (i.e. cops needed a blank check, including beating
confessions out of suspects). After Death-Squad-Reagan became president these efforts began to be seen as much
more desirable than they ever-had been before. Of course after 911 these criminally-open-ended policing polices
became defacto law. And the result of these miscarriages of actual justice are now the law of the land: All of
which are heavily buried under many layers of false-flag national-security and STATE Security requirements which
is how America has come to find itself in the crosshairs of police weapons for the slightest infractions on so
very many different occasions.
This brings us to the
latest version of lawless-behavior by a SWAT TEAM in Tucson, Arizona. This nameless and faceless "TEAM" murdered
an ex-marine in his own home, with 71 shots which were fired at him without reason: and basically without
warning. All the members of this TEAM should be profiled in the local papers, with their pictures and home
addresses published, along with the records of their entire-service to the despicable Tucson Police Department
that routinely utilizes their illegal-services (murder-for-hire). If Tucson cops were any-good at their
so-called jobs then the number of home-invasions would not be the problem that they definitely are today!
May 12, 2011 "LR" -- Jose
Guerena survived two combat tours of Iraq, only to become a casualty of the Regime's longest war - the one waged
against its domestic subjects in the name of drug prohibition. The former Marine was slaughtered by a SWAT team
during a May 5 assault on his home in Arizona.
Guerena's wife, Vanessa,
heard a noise outside the couple's home near Tucson at about 9 a.m. Jose, who had just gone to bed after pulling
a 12-hour shift at the Asarco Mine, suspected - correctly, as it turned out - that his family was threatened by
an armed criminal gang. Grabbing his AR-15, Guerena instructed his wife and four-year-old son to hide in the
closet while he confronted the intruders. According to Mrs. Guerena, the stormtroopers from the Pima County
Regional SWAT team never identified themselves as police; they simply stormed into the home and started
"I saw this guy pointing me
at the window, Vanessa recalled in a television interview. "So, I got scared. And, I got like, 'Please don't
shoot, I have a baby.' I put my baby [down]. [And I] put bag in window. And, I yell 'Jose! Jose! Wake up!'"
"A deputy's bullet struck
the side of the doorway, causing chips of wood to fall on his shield," recounts the Arizona Daily Star,
paraphrasing an account provided by Pima County Sheriff's Office (PCSO) functionary Michael O'Connor. "That
prompted some members of the team to think the deputy had been shot." Guerena never fired a shot; the marauders
who invaded his home fired no fewer than seventy-one. As is standard procedure in such events, the invaders
claimed that Guerena had fired on the officers, as he had every moral and legal right to.
Neither Jose nor his wife
had a criminal history of any kind. The attack on their home was described as a narcotics enforcement operation,
but there are no reports that narcotics were found at the residence - even though the invaders reportedly
"seized" (that is, stole) something that belonged to the victim." (1)
Whatever garbage was
'gleaned' from this attack that involved victims from four different homes that morning; must become public
knowledge; so that the public can determine if this death sentence was warranted. As the "officers" were
invading this man's home; the burden of PROOF that apparently justified this callous MURDER needs to be proven,
beyond the shadow of any doubt! The "officers-involved" need to be immediately suspended and their pay frozen
pending a full and open public-investigation of everyone from the Commander of that unit all the way down to and
including whatever supposed "intelligence" there might have been that justified this irreversible action that
resulted in the DEATH of the "SUSPECT." The judges that issued the warrants, the departments of the government
that were behind the orders issued to the SWAT TEAM; in sum everyone and everything involved here ought to
become part of this public-investigation. If there were any "justice" these so-called "officers" would be FIRED
immediately and then investigated: IF that is, they were being judged the same way that their VICTIM was treated
in this instance!
"The Pima County Regional
SWAT team fired 71 shots in seven seconds at a Tucson man they say pointed a gun at officers serving a search
warrant at his home.
Jose Guerena, 26, a former
Marine who served in Iraq twice, was holding an AR-15 rifle when he was killed, but he never fired a shot, the
Sheriff's Department said Monday after initially saying he had fired on officers during last week's raid. Six
days after Guerena was shot, few details about the investigation that brought the SWAT team to the
southwest-side home Guerena shared with his wife and their two young sons are known. Guerena's role in the
narcotics investigation is unclear and deputies would not comment on what was seized from his home. Three other
homes within a quarter of a mile from Guerena's house, were served search warrants related to the investigation
that morning. The addresses and the names of people who live in the other homes have not been made public." (2)
Is the USA now nothing but
a holding-pen for unnamed suspects that can be murdered at random; if so, then we need to know that! That is
what 'we have all been' since George W. Bush began spying on US citizens seven months before 911 happened. We
have no rights, and we have now way to question, to challenge or to confront these animals in uniform: And
everyday our ability to deal legally with these out-of-control-uniformed-outlaws is diminished. It is amazing
that most of these creatures probably need to use their own fingers to be able to count to ten; and anything
over that presents a problem. The US is drafting troops from our wars overseas, straight into police-departments
here, without any police-training and putting them in the field as if the people they confront here are no
different than those they were murdering routinely overseas. Maybe that's why this RAID looked more like a
night-raid in Baghdad than a SWAT-TEAM 'action' in Tucson? This is producing time-bombs that cannot continue in
a holding pattern for much longer. . .
If this situation is not
directly and publicly addressed then things like Vigilantism could well begin to make a comeback among the
population. Because no people can be targeted as we have been TARGETED, for very long without producing an equal
and opposite REACTION to these illegal and outrageous behaviors by those that are supposed to protect the public
and not simply brutalize and murder us. Apparently no response to these POLICE-STATE tactics was ever
contemplated by those dark-forces that have instituted these illegal polices: However there will be a
spontaneous public BACKLASH, and the only questions will be When and Where: NOT IF.
Seventy-one shots and
although 'The TARGET" was armed, and combat-trained, his weapon while fully loaded was still on SAFETY, and he
did not fire a single shot! He had just gone to sleep after working a twelve-hour shift overnight, and he was
suddenly awakened to this nightmare. The house was darkened (that helps if you're trying to sleep) but to the
invaders this was suspicious, and just seemed to confirm that something illegal was going on). No one in this
criminal murder has even asked things like:
"What happened to 'the
presumption of INNOCENCE?"
So Jose Guerena was
murdered at home, in front of his wife and one of their children. (His wife was never referred to as his wife
officially she was just the unidentified woman). So, unless you like living in Baghdad or Kabul, you need to
begin to DEMAND ANSWERS to the questions that at this moment, WE, as American-Victims of POLICE-STATE-INSECURITY
are not allowed to ever-ask!
Whatever else happened in
Tucson, Arizona these uniformed thugs MURDERED Jose Guerena; and his murders MUST be TRIED in Open Court!
1. He Served the Empire Abroad: The Regime
Killed Him in His Home
2. SWAT Team Fired 71 shots in Raid
13. Lessons From
Argentina: Go Get Your Dollars Out Now! FAST
By Adrian Salbuchi
November 10, 2008
The events of the last two weeks have clearly revealed that the global financial, monetary and banking system
imposed on the world by the power structures promoting “globalization” is fundamentally flawed, unviable and
immoral in its effects upon the most all of Mankind. After allowing a small cabal of shady characters to
illegitimately accumulate vast amounts of wealth and power over markets, corporations, industries, media, armed
forces and entire nations, like the World Trade Center towers on 9/11, this entire System is
now in free-fall, collapsing into itself in one massive implosion.
This loathsome and
unjust Global Power System was designed and implemented over the past seven decades by the geopolitical and
geoeconomic strategic planners serving the New World Order power structures, most notably its network of
discrete, low-profile but highly powerful private think tanks, such as the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR, founded in New York in 1919), The Trilateral
Commission (founded in 1973), The Bilderberg
Conference (formed in Holland in 1954), and others like the Cato Institute, American
Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the notorious Neo-con Project for a New American
Century (PNAC) (1).
Considering the enormous
complexity of the process that is taking place right now; the vast amounts of information we are bombarded with
every minute of the day, and the apparent difficulty in foreseeing just how this global crisis will finally be
resolved, we would summarize certain important aspects and key data which we believe will help us put together
this veritable jig-saw puzzle, so that we may begin to fathom what the true face of this horrendous creature
euphemistically called “globalization”, is really like.
citizens, we have a huge advantage over other peoples including US citizens when it comes to understanding
and coping with this kind of crisis. I say this because in our own lifetimes
we have suffered in Argentina all of what is now happening globally – albeit on a much
smaller scale in our case. We’ve seen this movie… We’ve been there, and done
that… We’ve been pushed and dragged through the entire hysterical hocus-pocus of inflation,
hyperinflation, systemic banking collapses, currency changes, Debt Bond Swaps, Mega-Debt Bond Swaps,
financial “armouring”, banking holidays, freezing of bank accounts, etc., etc... And we
have also suffered the end-results: bank bail-outs paid for by taxpayers (or through inflation, or
through the confiscation of savings), disappearance of pension funds, destruction of job posts and overall
impoverishment of the population.
So, take a clue
from our thirty years’ experience in “financial
meltdowns”: Go Get
Your Dollars Out From Your Bank Now, And Do It Fast!!!!
A Flawed Model
Finance versus Economics–
financial system (i.e., the basically virtual, unreal and parasitic wonderworld of
banking), was designed to function in a way increasingly contrary to the interests of the Economy
(i.e., the real world of concrete work, labour and production/services). In
recent decades, Finance and the Economy have increasingly parted paths, ceasing to maintain the essential
balance and equilibrium that is necessary for ensuring healthy economic activity centered on the Common
Good of the People. In fact, Finance and Economy have today become all but total enemies. This
can be seen, for example, by the fact that the present Global Economic and Financial System rests almost
completely on the concept of DEBT, which is another way of saying that the Real Economy is
always controlled by, and subservient to, the interests, whims and crises of Virtual
The Debt System–
(or, should I say, Dogma) of Extreme Capitalism has imposed the concept of DEBT as the preferred
way to move the economy. In most countries (Argentina, for example) this means that there is no
proper use of the local National Currency by the State to generate credit in a controlled
and non-Interest bearing manner. This is the best way of fueling economic expansion
for specific social, defense, infrastructure, and technological developments, always focusing on the
Common Good and prioritizing the National Interest. One of Extreme Capitalism’s
key dogmas says that central banks controlling the national currency must be totally “independent” of
Government. However, since all such institutions must finally respond to somebody somewhere, we thus
discover that nowadays central banks are subordinated and subservient not to the State (i.e., the People),
but rather to the private banking superstructure, both local and global, which naturally leaves the whole
concept of the Common Good and National Interest almost totally aside. This is so in Argentina as
in other countries, however in the case of the United States this is particularly extreme because its
central bank – the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) - is a private institution, with almost 97% of
its unique shareholding structure in the hands of the private banking infrastructure itself, both domestic
(in a first instance) as well as global (if we look further afield). Once the private banking
superstructure achieves control of the local central bank, it is then in a position to impose chronic and
often drastic under-monetization of the Economy. This means that there is never
enough money to satisfy the true needs of the Real Economy. That’s when the private banks come on stage
offering to close that artificially generated ”gap”, becoming the prime credit generators of the
economy, for which they charge interest – often at usury rates – for loans made to
individuals, companies and even the State itself. We should also understand that the key source of
inflation in all economies lies not so much in monetary expansion by the State (if this is kept in sync
with true economic growth), but rather most inflation in any economy is fueled by interest bearing
loans made by the private banking sector. At a Geoeconomic level (2),
this has also served to generate massive public debt in Third World countries like Argentina,. fueled by
rampant corruption amongst the individuals involved in the lending and borrowing process, and supported by
Governments that never seem to understand how to use the sovereign functions inherent in their power to
issue money to fund and promote balanced economic growth. Instead, these countries adopt
IMF-designed neoliberal policies on key matters spanning from central banking functions, fiscal policies,
debt, rates of interest and exchange, to banking regulations and other key factors, that have all
been twisted out of shape so that they run counter to the country’s National
Fractional Reserve Banking System - This is a universaly
applicable banking concept in today’s global marketplace, that allows the private banking infrastructure to
generate “Virtual Money” literally out of thin air (i.e., electronic credit lines, loans and the
like) in a proportion of 6, 10, 30 or 50 times more than the actual Real Money they hold in their bank
vaults. To add insult to injury, the banks then charge you hefty interest rates for the “money”
they created out of nothing and ”lent” to you, whilst they require collateral consisting of real
stuff like your home, your car, or your company. The proportion between the number of
Dollars or pesos in their vaults and the amount of credit they can generate, is determined by the local central
bank (remember: controlled by the private banks themselves), is called minimum monetary reserves under the
Fractional Reserve Banking System and reflects a statistical estimate of what portion of deposit holders
will normally visit the bank to withdraw their money in cash. The problem is
that the concept of “normal” is basically a group or collective psychological
factor, intimately linked to the perception that deposit-holders have regarding the financial system in
general, and individual banks in particular. When “abnormal” times come – and boy have they come
today!! – then people panic and run to their banks all at the same time, demanding to withdraw their money,
not as electronic blips on the ATM machine, but as hard cash. That was when we all discovered that the
amount of Real Money in each bank’s vaults was not suffient to pay all depositors, except for a handful
(normally privileged insiders who “saw it all coming”). For the rest: of us, there was nothing left and
the banking system collapsed. That’s when in the US for example, and barring any taxpayer funded
bail-outs, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) indemnifies up to 100.000 dollars in the US or,
in Argentina, that’s when we all realized that we had all been totally robbed, and took to the
streets to uselessly bang our pots and pans on the banks’ monumental iron-clad gates, conveniently shuttered
the night before… All thanks to the inherently fraudulent Fractional Reserve Banking System. This is
what happened in Argentina in 2001 and this is what is unfolding right now in the US.
Investment Banking – In the US, Commercial or Main
Street banks like Bank of America, JPMorganChase or CitiGroup are allowed to generate 8 to 10 “Virtual” – i.e.,
fake – Dollars for every Real Buck they have in their vaults. This scheme is controlled by the
authorities, i.e., the FED and the Comptroller of the Currency. However, so called “investment
banks” in the US and elsewhere, do not need to comply with any such requirements; they are the ones making
Mega-Loans to Corporations, the US Government and foreign Governments like Argentina’s, which is why they are far
less controlled and regulated This means that for every Real Dollar they hold, these investment bankers
can create 26 ”virtual” Dollars (Goldman Sachs), 30 “virtual” Dollars (Morgan Stanley), more
than 60 (Merrill Lynch, just before they went bust), or more than 100 in the cases of Bear
Stearns and Lehman Brothers. (3)
Channeling and Transference System - Another key factor lies in the
way that the global financial system has structured automatic channels to bring in profits and transfer
away all losses throughout the entire system. This has the effect that in times of great growth
and gigantic profits (i.e., when the whole system grows), it is stable and allows creating many trillions of
dollars out of thin air). That’s when profits are conveniently privatized, i.e.,
they naturally flow into the pockets of shareholders, speculators, directors, CEO’s, top management,
“investors” and other key stakeholders in financial institutions and Corporate infrastructure. But when
the system suddenly contracts, and tail-spins out of control as is happening now, then mechanisms are
conveniently activated to socialize all losses through State-funded bailouts, special loans,
FED-funded acquisitions via specific “vehicles” like JPMorgan, Citicorp and Bank of America, so that it is the
domestic and foreign populations as a whole who end up paying the bill, through such phenomenae as
inflation, hyperinflation (oh, we know a lot about that in Argentina!!), banking collapses, tax
hikes, debt defaults, nationalizations, etc).
The 4 Pillars of the Extreme Capitalist Model – In short the key factors
described above, in the long-term all function together in a coordinated, consistent and synchronized
manner, which means that, even if in the short- and medium-terms there are spates of high profits where money is
sloshed around big time, in the long-term the whole system just doesn’t add up. That’s when you have periodic
meltdowns like today’s. Usually, they are explained away by well-paid economic gurus writing brainy
explanations in The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times or New York Times, who
tell us that this is all just part of “the economic cycle”. For the most part, they can isolate sections
of those downturns and localize them, so that they only affect a couple of emerging markets… Like Argentina
in 2001, or Brazil in 1999, or Mexico in 1997. In short, these four pillars
Monetary Insufficiency - Artificially generated by an
“independent” central bank, controlled by the local and global private banking institutions
2. Private banking based on
Fractional Reserves - As a system, this allows banks
to create money out of thin air, charging interest for it – often at usury rates -, and generating huge
profits for “investors” and creditors;
- This is the
key concept that “fuels” private and public economies replacing the far more economically sound concept of
reinvesting company profits and promoting a savings culture. Those who benefit from the unnecessary creation
of debt need to promote and instigate among the public at large in all countries, fericiously
undisciplined consumerism and greed, which goes hand in hand with total rejection of the very concept of
saving and preparing for a rainy day. (4)
4. Privatize Profits /Socialize
Losses – As a channelling and
transference scheme for the various stages of the recurrent “cycles”, so that when they reach the inexorable
stage where collapse is nunavoidable, there is always a way of making the population at large pay the
Read the Full Article:
Lessons From Argentina Go Get Your Dollars Out
14. Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed
Free-Energy Technology On 9/11
A Review of the book that has been called "the
most important book of the twenty-first century."
Book Review by Eric Larsen Ph.D.
Sunday, 17 April 2011 06:32
What a complete,
unmitigated disaster 9/11 and the ten awful years following it have been—ten years of murder, crime,
lawlessness, deceit, stupidity, and blindness that are only now meliorated, at long last, by the publication of
Dr. Judy Wood’s unique, revelatory, and unequivocally welcome book, Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on
Allow me to make full
disclosure now, so that those (and, believe me, there are many) who will choose not to read further can quit
right away and save time.
I, me, Eric Larsen, wrote
the Foreword to Dr. Wood’s book. I wrote it partly because I have known for many years about Dr. Wood’s
research; partly because I have followed the website that Dr. Wood has maintained (http://www.drjudywood.com/); and partly because I was lucky enough to be given
the opportunity to write that Foreword.
It wasn’t just an
opportunity but a high honor. To give an idea of how great an honor it was, here is the first line of what I
you now hold in your hands is the most important book of the twenty-first century.
Let me go further and quote
the two sentences also , since the same obligation pertains now as did when I wrote them—the obligation
for me to explain why I said so unqualified a thing and what I meant by it. Here’s what I meant, and still
Where Did the Towers
Go? is a work, assuming
that its content and message are properly and fairly heeded, that offers a starting point from which those
who genuinely want to do it can begin, first, to rein in and then, perhaps, even end the wanton criminality
and destructiveness of a set of American policies that took as their justification and starting point the
horrific events of September 11, 2001.
As everyone knows, 9/11 has
been “the justification and starting point” for all manner of destruction, loss, crime, and horror. Without
9/11, there would have been no “Patriot Act,” no abuse of FISA and stripping away of privacy rights, no Military Commissions Act of 2006 with
its setting aside of Habeas Corpus, no implementation of Northcom and
deployment of our own military forces on domestic American soil (for use against who, you might ask?),
and no trashing of Bill of Rights and Constitutional guarantees, no programmatic and precedent-setting weakening
and eliminating of right and guarantees so that the very concepts of “citizenship” and “freedom” have been
emptied out to the point where setting up concentration camps inside the U.S. is now legal and not a one
of us would have any recourse whatsoever if it were decided that we should be thrown into a cell in one of them
and forgotten forever.
Without 9/11, there would
never have been any fake and opportunistic “Global War on Terror,” would never have been Guantanamo as we know
it now, never have been official programs of torture or fake demonizing of Islam in order to justify wars in
Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Somalia, or to justify overt plans for the murder of U.S. citizens living in places
like, say, Yemen.
There’s more, much more.
The complete list of atrocities, crimes, and inhumanities triggered by or justified by 9/11 could fill whole
chapters, even books. By using 9/11 as propaganda—by using it as trigger, excuse, justification, or catalyst—the
U.S. has betrayed itself, its principles, and its people, and has made itself the world’s most dangerous enemy
of all mankind and also of Earth herself.
How can it conceivably be,
given these facts, that we, a nation of people who presumably have minds of our own—how can it be that we have
done nothing to stop this hideous parade of monstrosities and horrors? In the Foreword to Dr. Wood’s book, I
It is now almost a decade
since 9/11 took place, and in all that time no unassailable, permanent, or, in pragmatic terms,
politically influential progress has been made in determining exactly and irrefutably what took
place on that day—or what did not take place.
We—that is, we the
potential resistance or opposition to U.S. criminal policy—have been spinning our wheels for a complete decade.
There are a lot of reasons for this wheel-spinning, including various programs of very skillful and
extraordinarily devious cover-up after cover-up after cover-up of the central question of what did happen
on 9/11. For, as long as that central question remains unanswered, or for as long as that question can be
caused to remain obfuscated, blurred, muddled-up, in doubt—as long as that situation continues,
the wheels will continue to spin and people won’t quite know what to do. Dr. Wood is very well aware of this
fact. Her own way of putting it is that before accusing someone of a crime, you’ve got to know what crime
they committed. In her Author’s Preface, she writes:
You cannot convict someone
of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with. If you accuse someone of murder using a gun,
you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it.
That kind of clear, cool,
commonsense logic is rare among the many who for ten years have talked a very great deal about 9/11, although
it’s obvious that in Dr. Wood such good sense resides in abundance. Here’s the opening of her Author’s
For the record, I do not
believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01—nor do I believe that our
government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01. This is not a case of belief [Dr.
Wood’s emphasis]. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence.
Yes. To say that George did
not do X hardly means that Al did do X. Even worse is to imagine that someone’s belief that
George did or didn’t do X has any necessary relationship to the truth or the fact of the matter at all. Dr. Wood
will have none of this substitution of “belief” for “thinking.” She is a scientist, and a very highly educated
one, with “a B.S. in Civil Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), and a Ph.D. in
Materials Engineering Science” (again from my Foreword). Scientists, as all know or should know, proceed in
their thinking not according to belief or desired outcome but according solely and only to what the empirical
evidence they have gathered, studied, and observed allows them to conclude or makes it inevitable for
them to conclude.
Read the Full Review Here:
15. Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors
Source: Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors
Hitler as the most brilliant secret agent
in history. Like the Pied Piper, he led a targeted people to
By Henry Makow
In the past, I have presented
evidence that Martin
Bormann, the man who signed Hitler's paycheck, was a Soviet
i.e. Illuminati agent but I was not sure if Hitler was Bormann's dupe or also a conscious
The testimony of General Reinhard Gehlen, chief of German
intelligence gathering for Russia, suggests the latter is true.
In his memoirs,
"The Service" (World Pub. 1972) Gehlen says that he and
Admiral Canaris, head of the Abwehr, suspected there was a traitor in the German
Supreme Command. Both had noticed that the Soviets were receiving "rapid and detailed
information … on top level decision-making."
They both suspected Martin
Bormann, the Deputy Fuehrer and Head of the Nazi Party.
"Our suspicions were
largely confirmed when, independently of one another, we found out that Bormann and his group were operating an
unsupervised radio transmitter network and using it to send coded messages to Moscow.
When OKW monitors
reported this, Canaris demanded an investigation; but word came back that Hitler himself had
emphatically forbidden any intervention: he had been informed in advance of
these Funkspile, or "fake radio messages," and he had approved them"
Despite the fact that vital
information continued to leak, Gehlen and Canaris left it at that. "Neither of us was in any position to denounce
the Reichsleiter [Bormann] with any prospect of success."
In his book "Hitler's
Traitor" Louis Kilzer estimated that Bormann was worth fifty divisions to the
After the war, Gehlen, who
headed the BND (West German Intelligence Agency) was able to confirm Bormann's treason. "During the 1950's, I
was passed two separate reports from behind the Iron Curtain to the effect that Bormann had been a Soviet
The fact that
Hitler shielded Bormann confirms that he also was an active traitor. Both served the Illuminati (Masonic) bankers, i.e. the Rothschild
syndicate, based in London. The Illuminati were also behind Stalin and Communism,
not to mention Churchill, and FDR.
By fabricating war, the
Illuminati wage war on humanity with the ultimate goal of a veiled world government
Think 9-11, "The Patriot
Act," the TSA. Behind the veil of
democracy and fighting terror, they are constructing a police
Read the Full Article Here:
Hitler and Bormann Were Traitors
16. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part
the Green Prince
By John D Christian, Copyright © John D. Christian 2009. Used with permission.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Antichrist and the Green
World Environment Day: St. George, Asclepius And
World Environment Day (WED) was established by the socialist/fascist
United Nations General Assembly on 5th June, 1972. Since then, the day is commemorated each year on
the same date, 5th June. Every year, a different city is nominated, allowing various countries to
supposedly showcase the positive things being done nationally, regionally and internationally to promote
sustainable practices and reduce the dire impacts of climate change and global warming. The aim is to stimulate
awareness of the environment and enhance political attention and public action in “reclaiming paradise” as some
of the UN’s leading imbeciles put it. The United Nations Environment Program World Environment Day celebration is now widely observed in more than 100
countries, and is the most widely popular and heavily supported day on the United Nations
Every year, on June 5, the United Nations
Environmental Program (UNEP), heads of state, prime ministers, ministers, VIPs and leading business
organizations from around the world join forces to mark the event. City councils, businesses, local communities,
interest groups, schools and kindergartens are now being mobilized to observe the celebration. Soon every child
in the world will be celebrating World Environment Day.
On 5 June, 2009, World Environment Day was
hosted by Mexico with the lie and ecumenical theme, “Your Planet Needs
You – Unite to Combat Climate Change.” One of the most prestigious awards of the UNEP is called The Champions of the Earth Award, and in 2009 this was presented to Yann
Arthus-Bertrand. On November 10, 2008, he had a private dinner at the Elysee Palace in Paris, France, with none
other than Prince Charles, Nicolas Sarkozy and the French Minister for Ecology Jean Louis
On July 1, 2005, Yann Arthus-Bertrand
founded the international environmental organization GoodPlanet, and
set up the program Action Carbone to offset his own greenhouse gas
emissions generated by his helicopter transports utilized for his photography. On April 22, 2009, Yann
Arthus-Bertrand was officially designated as the United Nations Environmental Program Goodwill
He founded the Altitude Agency in 1991, which was the world’s first press agency and images
bank specializing in aerial photography. In 1994 he started a thorough study on the state of the earth funded by
UNESCO. Since then he has been involved in several environmental projects associated with his photography, and
he has been highly honored by France being made a Knight of the Legion d’ Honneur and Knight of the Ordre du
Merite Agricole (national order of agricultural merit).
In April 2007 he started directing a movie
firstly called Boomerang. He later changed the title into Home. A 2-hour film documentary,
it was released on World Environment Day, June 5, 2009, and is to be shown all around the world to generate mass
awareness of the “home truths” and “urgency” the world now faces as the result of global warming and climate
change. The man who principally funded this major propaganda documentary is Francois-Henri Pinault, billionaire
chief of the luxury goods firm PPR, whose brands include Gucci, Yves Saint Laurent, Balenciaga, Stella McCartney
Francois-Henri Pinault is the son of
Francois Pinault, a French billionaire who founded the company. According to Forbes List of Billionaires (2008) Francois Pinault is ranked the
39th richest person in the world with an estimated fortune of US$16.9 billion. His holding company is
called none other than Artemis
S.A., which in turn owns a host of other giant companies. Remember? – the Greek name
Artemis for the mother earth goddess is just another name for the
Roman goddess Diana, who is just another aspect of Maia and Chloris. Well, according
to www.secinfo.com/drDX9.2sf.d.htm Artemis S. A. is in turn
controlled by Pinault-Printemps-Redoute S.A. The following list of some of the most prominent characters on the
Supervisory Board of Pinault-Printemps-Redoute S.A. is revealing:
ReneBarbier De La Serre, c/o Compagnie
Financiere Edmund de Rothschild; Anthony Hamilton, c/o Fox Pitt Kelton Group Ltd, London; Francois Henrot, c/o
Rothschild & Cie Banque, Paris; Philippe Lagayette, c/o J.P. Morgan & Cie S.A., Paris; Baudoin Prot, c/o
BNP Paribas, Paris; Roger Bruno, c/o Lazard Freres, Paris; and lest we forget the man himself who is supposed to
own the company but doesn’t – Francois Pinault, c/o Artemis.
Julien Sereys de Rothschild, born in 1971,
youngest son of Baroness Philppine de Rothschild and co-owner of Chateau Mouton Rothschild and a member of the
Supervisory Board of Baron Philippe de Rothschild S.A. works closely with Francois Pinault. Both Julien and UNEP
World Environment Day climate hero, David de Rothschild (heir to the Rothschild European fortune) and Loren
Rothschild work closely with Prince Charles, Al Gore and the UN.
At the beginning of this book, much was
written about how, in Greek mythology, the sun god Apollo, and earth goddess Artemis, killed the Niobids with
their “poisoned arrows,” causing Meliboea the “green” mother earth goddess to be so frightened and terrified by
the ordeal that she turned permanently “pale” – and changed her name to the goddess Chloris – the root word from which the Greek word Chloros is translated into English in the KJV in Revelation 6:8 referring to
the fourth “pale” horse of the Apocalypse, accompanied by the Greek gods, Death and Hell.
Also, remember how the prophecy in
Revelation 9:11 was explained, “And they had a king over them, which is
the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his
name Apollyon.” – how the author has interpreted this by combining the Hebrew and Greek names together to
mean the “Father of Green Plant
Destruction.” Who, in Revelation 12:9, is referred to simply as, “that old serpent, called the
Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world.”
Well, there is still something rather more
important to know about Apollo’s chief celebrations in Greece and Rome related to John’s prophecy. In Greek
mythology, Apollo’s first great achievement was to rid Pytho (Delphi) of the dragon-like serpent Python. This
venomous demon protected the sanctuary of Pytho from its lair beside the Castalian Spring, where it stood guard
while Sibyl proclaimed her prophecies as she inhaled the trance inducing vapors from an open chasm. Apollo
killed Python with his bow and poisoned arrows (according to Homer, “he killed the fearsome dragon Python,
piercing it with his darts”). Apollo then took charge of the oracle, and ridded the neighboring countryside of
widespread destruction, since Python had previously destroyed all the crops and farmland, sacked the villages,
polluted the lakes, rivers and springs. However, to make restitution for killing Python, as the fearsome dragon
was the son of the mother earth goddess Gaia, Apollo had to serve Admetus for nine years as a cowherd. This he
did, and after his service was completed he returned to Pytho coming in the guise of a dolphin bringing with him
priests from the Island of Crete (Apollo’s cult name ‘Delphinos’
means ‘dolphin’ or ‘porpoise’ and this is how Delphi was named).
After killing the dragon, Python, and
taking possession of the oracle, the sun god, or god of light, Phobus, then was transformed and became known as
‘Pythian Apollo.’ He then bestowed divine powers on one of the priestesses in the sanctuary, and she
became known as Pythia. It was she who inhaled the trance-inducing vapors from a crack in the temple floor,
while she sat on a tripod chewing laurel leaves. (The laurel tree, leaves, and wreath being sacred to Apollo –
hence the reason why “laurel wreaths” are still used today as a sacred prize awarded in sports and musical
competitions. The term ‘laureate’ today is derived from the Latin word ‘laurea’ – ‘laurel.’ In Protestant Britain, the “poet laureate” is named by the
sovereign as a member of the royal household and charged with the composing of suitable verses for the royal
court and state – on behalf of Apollo!). From this time forth Delphi became the most important oracle
center of Apollo.
This pagan Greek myth of “Apollo slaying
the dragon” is originally derived from the earliest Babylonian myth of the sun god, Marduk (represented by a red
dragon) called “Marduk slaying the dragon Tiamat.” Gradually this myth of “Apollo slaying the dragon” in Greece
was adopted in Rome, and then “Christianized” by the Roman Catholic Church, and later the Church of England, to
become the myth called “St. George and the Dragon.” Today St. George is really the Protestant church’s
St. George’s Feast Day in the Church of England is held every year on April 23, which
was the most important pagan feast day in ancient Rome consecrated to Jupiter called the Vinalia. Not only is St. George (Jupiter) the pagan patron saint of England.
He is also the patron of the highest degree of World Freemasonry, The
Most Noble Order of the Garter and St. George, whose head, the British Sovereign, is his literal
incarnation. The badge of the Order of the Garter actually has a picture of the mythical “St. George Slaying
the Dragon” on it.
The Roman Jupiter, is just another
personification the Greek sun god Zeus, and his son, Pythian Apollo, represented as a red dragon. It is not just a
coincidence that one of the Prince of Wales emblems is a red dragon, and Prince Charles wears on his left hand
little finger images of two dragons surrounding an amethyst on his Prince of Wales Gold Ring.
In ancient Greece, on the Athenian
calendar, the first month was called Hekatombaion, originally named
Kronion, named after an old festival honoring Apollo. Today this
month is roughly equivalent to May/June. It begins at sunset with the first visible crescent moon following the
summer solstice. During this month, the 6th day was sacred to Demeter as her birthday, and the
7th day of the month was Apollo’s birthday.
In Rome, the month of June was dedicated
to the goddess Juno, after which today the month is named. June 1st was sacred to her as Juno Moneta,
goddess of money. June was also dedicated to Apollo and Diana (Greek Artemis) on June 3, where 27 sacrificial
cakes were offered during the Secular Games.
Apollo was introduced to Rome from Greece
first as a “healing god” in the fifth century B.C. as the result of a desperate attempt to cure a serious
epidemic. The circumstances surrounding the building of his first temple in the Prata Flaminia to the southwest
of the Capitol explain exactly why he was brought in. A serious epidemic inspired the dedication of the shrine
pro valetudine populi in honor of the god who bore the official name
of Apollo Medicus (Livy 4.25.3;40.51.6). The temple to him was
dedicated in 433 BC and consecrated in 431 BC.
As time passed, he gradually was no longer only confined solely to the domain of medicine, as he took on
the Greek “darker side” of Apollyon as a “destroyer” and “murderer” in his full Greek personification with
Artemis killing the Niabids.
Today the Euro-American Women’s Council now worships the Greek goddess Artemis.
World Health Organization (WHO): Apollo, Aesculapius, Hygeia, Panacea, and Swine
One of the sons of Apollo, who was
transformed into the serpent-dragon, was Asclepius (Latin: Aesculapius) who carried on his father Apollo’s
Satanic serpent-like association with medicine. As the Greek god of medicine, Asclepius carried the Serpent-entwined Staff, now the dominant symbol of the UN World Health
Organization and also the world medical profession. There are “two sides” of medicine, one good, and one
In 1992, a survey of all American health
organizations found that 62% of professional associations used the rod of
Asclepius as their emblem, whereas in commercial medical organizations, 76% used the Caduceus, the short herald’s staff entwined by two serpents, sometimes called
the Wand of Hermes or Wand of Mercury. (Appropriately, Mercury was the Roman god of liars and thieves). Both the
Serpent-entwined Staff of Asclepius and the Caduceus of Hermes/Mercury have their origins in Egypt and Babylon, where they
were used as emblems of Tammuz, the sun god, and the earth goddess Ishtar, as an awakener of life in the
Asclepius had six daughters. One of them
was called Hygeia, the Greek goddess of Health (from which the modern name ‘health’ is derived) who also became
his wife. She helped her father Asclepius carry out his father Apollo’s Satanic deeds! As a mother earth goddess
in Athens she was called Athena Hygieia. Her cult did not begin to
spread until the Delphic oracle under Apollo recognized her after the debilitating Plague of Athens in 430-427BC.
She was often depicted as a young woman
with the serpent of Apollo entwined around her body feeding from a cup, or standing with her father/husband
Asclepius or grandfather Apollo. She was so respected at times in Greece that the Pythagoreans (vegetarians and
“Greenies”) used her name as a special greeting. In 1968 a stamp was issued in Greece to commemorate the
20th anniversary (1948-1968) of the UN World Health Organization (WHO). What did it have on it? It
had the UN World Health Organization’s emblem and an image of the goddess Hygeia on it.
Up until recent times at least, virtually
all medical doctors and physicians throughout the world have taken the pagan Hippocratic Oath of Hippocrates, who worshipped Apollyon, on graduation. The
oath is one of the oldest binding documents in history. Hippocrates (460-370 BC) renown as the famous Greek
physician and “father of medicine” was a pagan, Greek mystic and philosopher who later became known as a
physician. There is absolutely no documentary proof that he was ever a real, bona fide physician as we imagine a
doctor to be today.
The first words in the Classic Oath remarkably read: “I swear by Apollo Physician and Asclepius and
Hygeia, and Panakeia, …” The noun “physician” refers to a person skilled in the art of healing, but in
Hippocrates’s oath it is capitalized as Apollo’s SURNAME. It means the complete opposite of healing, and
as the surname of Apollo (Apollyon in Revelation – ‘destroyer’) it
means death. According to the Bible, Jesus Christ is the “Great Physician.” (Matthew 9:12, Mark 2:17). “Apollo
Physician” is therefore one of the names of Antichrist.
The English word ‘health’ today comes from
old English ‘haelth,’ from ‘hal.’ Similarly, the verb ‘to heal’ comes from middle English ‘helen’ from old
English ‘haelen,’ related to old high German ‘heilen.’ During the Nazi Third Reich, when the German people
saluted Hitler, as their supreme “Fuehrer,” they greeted him with the term, “Heil! Hitler!” which most Germans mistakenly believed meant “health to you Hitler” because “heil” in German means ‘health.’ But “Heil” capitalized and used as a proper noun does not necessarily mean ‘health’
in general terms at all. It was the German medical profession’s pagan swearing of the Hippocratic Oath to the
god Apollyon, and the blind worship of Hygeia (Health) that inspired them to worship the “Fuehrer” as the
commander-in-chief in a political sense, but as their “great physician” Apollyon in a medical and
spiritual sense. Pausanias noted the statues of Hygeia, one of the six daughters of Asclepius and granddaughter
of Apollo, and of Athena Hygeia were sited close to the entrance of the Acropolis in
Although the Classic Oath was largely pagan, consecrated to Apollyon (Satan) it did at
least require all doctors to give an assurance they would keep their patient’s medical records confidential and
private, and they would not harm any of their patients, perform abortions and so on. However, the Modern Version, written in 1964 by Louis Lasagna, Academic Dean of the School
of Medicine at Tufts University used by most medical schools in USA today says no such thing other than using
nebulous terms like “I will respect the privacy of my patients.” Today the graduation ritual in medical schools
is called the White Coat Ceremony. As has always been the case, it is
a religious service and “rite of passage”, similar to a priest’s ordination to priesthood, symbolizing the
“conversion” of the “lay candidate” into the membership of the medical profession. The White Coat Ceremony and modern practice of the medical profession wearing
“white coats” is directly derived from the ancient rituals of Apollo, Asclepius, and Hygeia in their
sanctuaries. Pausanias, Description of Greece2.4.5 describes: “By
this gymnasium [in Korinthos] are temples of Zeus and Asklepios. The images of Asklepios and Hygeia are of white
marble.” And Pausanias, Description of Greece 2.11. 6 describes:
“”[In the sanctuary of Asklepios at Titane, Sikyonia:] Of the image [of Alexanor, grandson of Asklepios] can be
seen only the face, hands and feet, for it has about it a tunic of white wool and a cloak. There is a similar
image of Hygeia (Health); this, too, one cannot see easily because it is so surrounded with the locks of women,
who cut them off and offer them to the goddess, and with strips of Babylonian raiment.” Also, the Roman Catholic
Pope still wears his “white” robe vestments today to symbolize himself as the “holy father”
The fourth deity in the Hippocratic Oath
is Panacea (Panakeia), the Greek goddess of healing, another granddaughter of Apollo and daughter of Asclepius.
She was the “cure-all” goddess or “universal remedy” goddess. The modern word “pandemic’ is directly derived from her via the Greek word pandemos ‘pertaining to all people,’ from pan ‘all’ demos ‘people.’ A disease
is said to be an ‘epidemic’ when it becomes widespread within a
specific community or population at a specific time but later subsides. It is said to be ‘endemic’ when it exists all the time or is native to a resident community or
population. It is said to be ‘pandemic’ when it spreads throughout
the whole country or world. It is when a disease or virus becomes
‘pandemic’ that it is named after the worship of this
Since all doctors and health authorities
around the world are now being rapidly “socialized” under the fascist/communist power of the UN World Health
Organization (WHO) (whose occult logo is the Serpent-entwined Staff
of Asclepius) through national medical associations, companies, and government health (goddess Hygeia) agencies
(whose logos contain the Devil’s Caduceus short herald’s staff
entwined by two serpents of Hermes/Mercury) the gods of theft, commerce, deception and death – it shouldn’t come
as too much of a surprise to see, in the near future, under the echoing screams of the pagan media propaganda
and the UN World Health Organization health professionals – reverberating cries of warnings about flu “Pandemics” and such like to the goddess Panacea!
In ancient Greece, the goddess Panacea at times mobilized almost every single medical doctor in the Greek
world – away from continuing to genuinely “help” their patients, (like the “good side” of Apollo) – to become
like Apollyon, her grandfather of old in classic antiquity, with his “darker side” and destroying spirit, split
personality, in which he abruptly turned and, with his twin sister Artemis, the “green” mother goddess,
hypocritically brutally poisoned (vaccinated) in a “pandemic” many
of his “plague-ridden” patient/enemies/children (the Niabids, children of Amphion and Niobe) with his poisoned
arrows of death!
Today, the equivalent sort of events which
would likely bring on the “darker side” of the medical profession to worship “Apollyon” as a “Savior” to come
and save “Mother Earth,” the “Empire” or “Republic” would be something like a deliberately caused, serious,
bird-flu or swine-flu
epidemic leading in turn to a global pandemic outbreak! In Rome, Caesar was given the supreme power of a
dictator under the protection of Apollo, with the approval of the senate, only as a result of such perilous
states of emergency that threatened to paralyze the state.
Swine Flu Pandemic and Tamiflu
The UN World Health Organization’s
deceptive global ‘Swine-flu Pandemic’ declaration in mid-June 2009 recommending mass global vaccination with the
Tamiflu antiviral drug is
a good case in point. Tamiflu is manufactured by the giant Swiss pharmaceutical Basel-based Roche Holding AG. (As at 2008 it had 80,080 employees). Founded in 1896 by
Fritz Hoffman-La Roche, the company was singled out (with a number of other Basel chemical companies) in August
2001 by an Independent Commission of Experts (ICE) to probe Switzerland’s wartime past – as one of the companies
that put its own interests ahead of humanitarian concerns in dealing with the Nazis. Roche owned factories in
Germany between 1933 and 1945 and was an important supplier of pharmaceuticals for the Third Reich. The company
had direct dealings with the Wehrmacht (armed forces) and used forced slave labor at its plants. The company is
presently making billions out of the sale of Tamiflu. While Tamiflu is manufactured by Roche, it was developed
by Gilead Sciences Inc., headquartered in Foster City, California (as at 2008 it had 2,979 employees) which owns
the intellectual property rights to the drug and receives a percentage of the profits.
Donald H. Rumsfeld joined the Board of
Directors of the company in 1988 not long after it was founded in 1987. In 1997, he assumed the position of
Chairman of Gilead Sciences Inc., a position which he held in the years prior to becoming US Secretary of
Defense under the Bush administration. In 1985 Monsanto purchased G. D. Searle, the chemical company that held
the patent to aspartame, the active ingredient in NutraSweet. When Donald Rumsfeld was Chairman of G. D. Searle
1977-1985, he was instrumental in getting the FDA to approve the unconscionable use of aspartame as a food
sweetener, against overwhelming scientific evidence that it is so deadly it can be used as ant killer, rat
poison, and causes deadly brain tumors in those who consume it. For Rumsfeld’s personal responsibility to
business, in 1977, he was awarded the highest US civilian award, the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Since the
approval of aspartame, he has personally been responsible for giving literally millions of people around the
world brain tumors and other serious health effects from consuming aspartame in food and drink
Tamiflu (Tami ‘Tammuz’ – flu ‘influenza’) is named after the demonic Babylonian sun god Tammuz. It is
not a vaccine, but a drug (Oseltamivir). Roche is so arrogant, it even has the audacity to put a “yellow emblem
of the rising sun god” on its Tamiflu logo. In Ezekiel 8:14-16, there
were “women weeping for Tammuz,” and men “with their faces toward the east” worshipping the sun – and they were
severely punished for their ignorance.
According to Gilead Sciences, Inc., the
biopharmaceutical company that developed Tamiflu, the founders named their company after “Gilead” a place
mentioned in the Bible. Gilead was famed for its small trees that produced a resin, similar to frankincense and
myrrh used in medicine, considered to be the first genuine pharmaceutical product. The leaf in the company’s red
logo, they say, symbolizes healing, life and growth, while the shield represents safety, strength and honor.
Together they signify Gilead’s efforts to use the healing power of science to create medicines that treat
In the Bible Old Testament the English
word “Gilead” in Hebrew is ‘Gilad’ (Strong’s Hebrew #1568) from
‘Galed’ – ‘heap of testimony’ (Strongs Hebrew #1567) from ‘Gal’ (Strong’s Hebrew #1530) – meaning ‘heap of dung.’
One would have to be, quite seriously, as
mad as a “March hare” to vaccinate oneself or one’s family with Tamiflu or believe a word these individuals and companies now have to say. Do
you really think these wealthy individuals and companies, who in the past have shown they do not even possess
the morals of alley cats, have everyone’s best interests and health at heart?
In fascist Rome, there was nothing like
the plausible excuse of a good old “plague” or “pandemic” sweeping the empire to accentuate the threat against
the State, to justify the rapid introduction of extraordinary measures and powers, under martial law, to round
up disobedient itinerant groups, suppress rebellious provinces, isolate defiant citizens, or compulsorily
quarantine infectious protestors or enemies of the state.
Could a socialist man-made threat of
global “Swine Flu Pandemic” impetuously moving unchecked from country to country be used by the UN WHO and
fascist media monopoly to bring “the world’s countries closer together in global solidarity” – to help bring in
or accelerate the introduction of a tyrannical New World Order global government?
Events like these are now regularly
occurring at such a lightning pace, the chances that they are just a “coincidence” are near impossible. As the
old Roman Senate saying goes about politics, “nothing happens by chance.” All that Asclepius, Hygeia, and
Panacea have to do now is to have Mars, god of war, swoop into the theater of doom with Chaos, and Rome’s great
masses will be literally crying out for Apollo or Jupiter to come and save them.
The copyright of this book is only for the purposes of protecting the original text. It may be
freely quoted, reproduced in full or in part, for profit or not, without the author’s or publisher’s permission.
All Scriptures in this book are quoted from the Authorized King James Bible Version. All underlining or emphasis in
quotations (whether from the Bible or elsewhere) are the author’s unless otherwise stated. Special thanks to
brother Martin for assisting with the research, and for helping motivate the author to write this book.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Antichrist and the Green
17. Where Have all the Real Men Gone?
May 12, 2011
"I've been a mother for 16 years......now a single one....struggling like everyone to keep from going completely
under. Have been a massage therapist since 92.......My son is 16 and my daughter is 11. I 'm quite upset about the
change that's been brought from feminism. We women CANNOT be everything.......I am instinctively a nurturer, trying
to play two roles as a mother is impossible to do."
By Maureen Smith
I for one would like to knowjust where
the real men went?
Now, you might look around and say they haven't gone anywhere! Bull, I'm talking about real men.
Men with integrity. Nobody wants to stand for anything! Not for their God! Not for their God-given rights! Not for their Families! Not for
What happened to the instinct to protect families and loved ones? I see energy going into trivial
pursuits...sports....drugs....sexual conquests......competition over the superficial. I see the world crumbling
around us and ask why no one cares enough to consider where all of this is taking us....
Now, before you start getting upset I won't leave out the women's role.
It makes me sick to see women today who are so consumed with worldly things that in order for a man to even rate,
he needs to have money and be able to supply them with petty things
they deem important.
Can I say.... demand people! Demand drives production of even attitude. Perhaps we would see a change in what men
put as their priority's if women had a value system that consisted of more than trying to impress other people with
how they look or what they own and needing to fit in.
If women were attracted to men that stood for something other than the love of money, like, say GOD....family......
our children ....our rights ......we would certainly see a well needed change. We must as women support men in the
endeavors of such.
Something is missing ......and yes you guessed
it, it is God!
If you were to look at the Bible and then at the rack of magazines and compare. One promotes
love and security about one's self ...the other promotes self-hatred, jealousy and trivial and unrealistic
And if you don't possess the money to do as they do.....well you're on your own. Do we truly believe that someone
is worthless as a human being because they may be overweight or do not look like people in the magazines?
Can you honestly say that you are not quicker to smile at a pretty lady or a man that pulls up in an expensive car?
But why do we do this? Media influences have completely stripped away both men and women's sense of identity and
replaced them with a web of self loathing and despair.
So we are in continual pursuit of what they tell us we need, or need to be. You are not the sum of all that you
possess but you are the sum of all that you think and do.
True self worth can only come from sacrificing ourselves to God and for
others. Through Agape love only.
Think.....when you buy all of those things trying to fulfill yourselves, who is benefiting? You end up being no
better off and loving the slave master, not the Master.
Yes, there are some good men out there, I am glad to know. I'm sure it's not easy in the face of all
that they are up against.
Today it is not manly to love God, to be loyal, to fight evil or to
even just do what is right! Today all of these things are considered just plain CRAZY.
But there are some of us women who actually thinks it's SEXY to see men who are not blind to the evil that
surrounds us. I, on behalf of those few women say, Thank you! Thank you for not giving up on what's right and
Comments for "Where Have all the Real Men Gone? "
Stephen said (May 14, 2011):
"Society" and women do not WANT "real
men", hence there are none. Also, men have come to realize that being "real men" holds no advantages in this era of
80% divorce where 2/3's are initiated by the wife.
The gentleman who is heading overseas understands the true situation
Michael said (May 14, 2011):
We do not know enough about Maureens’
circumstances but Peter and Marco together with myself have an endless well to draw from in our immediate
surroundings concerning complaining women and their fates. How do you convey what you see as a truthful message,
yet knowing you most certainly will hurt a number of emotions in the person you direct your words towards, while
still not losing the constructiveness you’re trying your best to put forth?
Maureen, I bid you the best of luck in
finding someone to share your life provided it is under mutual volition and benefit, but what about your children?
Have you like most women of your situation I’m familiar with, lent your childrens’ ears for some of your
confessions regarding your feelings for men in general and some in particular. How much would you gauge have rubbed
off on your son and daughter? Do you know that boys and girls react differently to such influence in their
formative years, but neither reaction is a healthy one.
Fine, you missed the boat! Hey, you
might get lucky! Life goes on with or without you, but don’t you dare sabotage lives not yet lived or you’ll
experience an old-age no one will envy.
Peter said (May 13, 2011):
Your recent article quotes a mother
asking where have all the real men gone? Her article describes where they have gone and the cause for it. Toxic
feminism has not "empowered" women--it has debased them. The logical fallacy that she is embracing is that "real
men" have "gone" somewhere. In today's feminized culture, men are not supposed to be men.
If you're wondering where I get that
idea.......With whom did she have children?
Did she wait for a real man to come
around or did she procreate with someone of lesser quality? Now that she has children, she wants a "real man." She
didn't pick a "real man" to marry (assuming that she did marry the father) How long before, statistically, all
these women who now claim that they want real men have none left to find? They aren't creating them or fostering
them into existence. Women today certainly aren't demanding chivalry from men. It's simple supply and demand. The
"real men" are not at all in demand, in reality. Women are getting what they are asking for. Period.
Throughout history, women have been a civilizing influence on men. We, in our natural state, are brutish, crass
and, in just about every way, uncivilized. That is our fallen nature. Get a group of guys together and you will see
a different person than one who is in the office or in "polite" society, regardless of how refined they are. A
hilarious and entertaining example of this is Seven Brides for Seven Brothers. This musical/play shows men in their
natural state who are civilized by a very strong woman.
I became a Christian at age 30. Prior to that I did not suffer from lack of attention from females. I treated women
poorly, used them and discarded them. If I came across a decent woman, I kept walking. I'm not proud of this, quite
When I became a Christian, God turned my life around and I became the man I had always wanted to be--honest,
decent, loving (in the true sense of the word), compassionate. I couldn't find a date to save my life. Numerous
female friends would comment on how I should be married, what a shame it was that I hadn't "found someone," etc. I
repeatedly got the "death knell" of any hope of a relationship--"you're such a nice/great guy!" As soon as someone
said that to me, I knew that I'd never date them or any of their friends. Believe me, the irony was not lost on
My story does have a happy ending! I have found a most remarkable woman who does value my character and attributes.
We're getting married on 4 JUN 11. God had to wait a long time for me to grow up enough to appreciate the value of
a "real woman!" Her story is similar to mine, but from the opposite direction.
In short (yeah, I know.....too late!), if she wants to find a real man, she will have to become a real woman. A
real woman doesn't tolerate nonsense from "unreal" men.
Marco said (May 13, 2011):
I wanted to respond to this article
because of my own experience with dating Christian women. I've started off dates feeling so enthusiastic that I
might have found a religious woman, only to be let down. I can usually tell how versed a woman is when I begin
quoting bible scripture, and asking basic trivia questions like "who was the first man to see Jesus after he rose
from the cave?" I can tell you that every woman I have dated falls flat-face-down at these tests. Most have also
never heard the term "agape", or know its meaning. Most have to spend a full minute just trying to remember the
names of the four gospels. Most have not fully read The Book of Revelations because "it makes no sense". I've also
found that some are really just golddiggers hiding behind a religious front. They use God as a means to an end to
secure marriage and the one-sided money exchange that comes out of the marital contract. They have little interest
in discussing dogma, but they get piqued talking about what kind of upward mobility you have in your career.
One of my Christian male friends is moving away to Brazil this year, and another is moving to Argentina; It is my
hope to join them in South America once they have established a beachhead. I am lucky enough to have a career path
that will let me work away from my native land. If I can't find a virtuous Christian woman on this continent, I am
already making preparations to leave and go to one that has them. If you want to know where all the real men have
gone - they are busy fleeing the burning Anti-Christian house.
I also find it remarkable how preachy religious women get after they have children and age. Where was that
verbosity when they were nubile and marriageable?
Brian said (May 13, 2011):
Home late and tired to the bone, but
couldn’t pass up the chance to say “Bravo Maureen”. Like Ted, I’m a thirty-year man who is happy to have stayed the
course, and the deciding factor was always my responsibility to my family, and to God!
I’ve never considered myself to be an
especially brave man, but am proud to say that I’ve always had a big problem with the truth – I KEEP TELLING IT,
though I’m not popular for it.
You go girl!
Ted said (May 13, 2011):
Thank you for your thoughtful article.
I've been a husband and a father for almost 30 years, and it hasn't been easy. I have been tempted to leave more
times than I can count, but my responsibility to my children and the commitment to my marriage prevented me from
going through with it. I don't claim that my loyalty was self generated, since it was my ego which wanted to flee.
It was only the grace of God that kept our family intact. If I wasn't convinced that there was a right and a wrong,
and gave into relativism, I would be foolishly separated from my family right now.
Alone, I'm a weak and stupid man. It's
only when I allow the divinity within to emerge that I become a "real man". We all share the same divinity, we just
let the ego drown it out.
18. A Native American's View of Manhood
May 18, 2011
"Lose the idea that you must learn to think like a woman ... you do not."
compelled to reply to the recent article entitled "Where have all the
good men gone?" because for the past few months, I have been asking myself the same question.
I am a man of the tribes of
First Peoples (Native American) living on the border between Canada and the US. I work with broken families and
focus on guidance and healing for the children. I have been married for 21-years and have a son and
In all my travels, I have
realized one thing: Men are no longer 'real
men' in the sense that they "no longer walk
Most men I meet are weak, spineless 'pussy whipped' girlie men or 'men' who walk around being 'loud and thrusting
Upright men do not 'whine
his feelings' when being corrected for distortions in his thinking or actions. He says; "Yes maybe you are
right, I will be more aware in the future".
A man understands that the
measure of a good lover is not how many women he makes love to, but how well he makes love with 'The One
A man does not always need
to thrust his chest and posture, in order to maintain his ego. A real man is content in his self
A man knows that the
Creator gave us two ears and one mouth for a reason. That being, so men and women will listen to each other, twice as much
as we speak.
A man will always walk
'upright', in the eyes of his woman and children if he is taught to respect their right to a happy life, as much
as his own.
A man does not
rely on other men, and their propaganda, to define who he is.
A man is self sufficient,
and does not need to rely on the handouts of his 'masters', in order for his family to survive; and he
contributes to his community.
A man will take
an afternoon off work to be with his kids, and teach them to be as 'upright men', even if they are
Upright men must be agile
and fast of foot; to defend his family in times of trouble, and to do his daily dance.
These are just a few
examples, but i think you get the thrust of it.
Read the Full Story:
Native American's View of Manhood
19. Australian Demands Freemason Judges Outed
John Wilson writes to his MP demanding Judges reveal their affiliations to
David Elliott, MP,
State Member for Baulkham Hills,
Old Northern Road,
I dropped a copy of that DVD, "Christian or
Freemason" (www.elijahschallenge.net) into your Electoral Office yesterday. It's a real eye-opener,
Some People have suggested that you are a Freemason.
The exposure, by Brian Shaw, of this insane cult must really have members of this cult thinking "What have I gotten
It truly is insanity.
It's such a pathetic facade of "respectability" to pose as an "Honourable" Judge or "distinguished" Member of
Parliament while what these persons are doing is purely and simply evil.
That episode with John Bauskis getting stuck into "Justice" John David Hislop in the NSW Supreme Court on Monday
was a classic. All through the session, John David Hislop continually had his head down and silent for long pauses.
Obviously, he was going through extreme mental distress, thinking "What have I gotten myself into?" John Bauskis
was hammering him and saying, "You have no jurisdiction. You cannot judge in your own cause. Jurisdiction is
decided by a Special Jury. All you can do is make a date for a Special Jury to determine the Jurisdiction of the
Christ Jesus said to "love our enemies" .... but what fools they are!
Here was one Judge, John David Hislop, committing Perjury to protect another Judge, George Alfred Palmer, from
facing Trial by Jury for the Indictment John Bauskis had filed against the latter.
John Bauskis kept repeating, "What you are doing is Treason." .... and John David Hislop did not deny that, at any
stage, because he knew it was true.
What fools they are.
"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his own soul?"
Attached is a List of the Judges of the NSW Supreme Court, incidentally ABN 77 057 165 500, to be used to put on
record which ones are Freemasons. A similar List ought to drawn up for Members of the NSW Parliament, ABN 89 288
Your secretary said you would be back at Baulkham Hills on Friday. We must talk again and soon.
Comments for "Australian Demands Freemason Judges
said (May 12, 2011):
John Wilson is indeed a
very brave. I would be very surprised if he didn't come home one evening to find his house had been torched, his
car up on bricks with the wheels and engine missing and his bank accounts frozen, pending some lame duck
Of course, that's assuming
that these things (and more) haven't happened to him just yet...
Two years ago, a contact of
mine in the neighbourhood told me of a dinner that he was invited to one evening. This event was held at a
prestigious venue, and several hundred people were present. I asked him about the makeup of the crowd, and he
told me the following: "They were essentially business people, senior members of the police and politicians, but
the most prominent people of all were well known crime figures: from the 'dodgy brothers' right up to organised
crime - all mixing and mingling at the one event."
I have no doubt that
members of the lodge were there too - representing all three groups!
said (May 11, 2011):
public demand for transparency of government official's memberships in secret societies is old hat for
international Masonry. Every generation or so enough of the public become aware of the racket that the Masonic
governments make a show of requiring disclosure. Then the requirement is revoked later when the heat's off. See
below, England just completed that cycle. Considering the facts that Britain was plunged into wars and became
the most intrusive Big Brother society in West despite ten years of required disclosure of public 'servant'
Masonic membership, the issue is actually a hoodwink.
The 'blue lodge' organizations memberships aren't where the 'action is' anymore. The
real secret societies moved into government 'security' agencies over a century
Association with those
agencies is "protected under national security".
1998 - UK: Politics New
judges must declare masonic membership - March 5, 1998
"Freemasons who join the
police or judiciary in England have to declare their membership of the ancient fraternal society.
The move, which was
introduced last month by Home Secretary Jack Straw, means serving judges will also be asked to make a voluntary
declaration but will not be compelled to do so."
2009 -Jack Straw's decision
to no longer force applicants for the judiciary to declare if they are Freemasons was today branded a "disgrace"
by a Labour MP. - November 2009
[Gordon Prentice (Pendle)
said there would again be a "cloak of secrecy" following the move by the Justice Secretary.
Mr Straw said last week
that a review had shown no evidence of "impropriety or malpractice" as a result of a judge being a Freemason and
it would be "disproportionate" to continue with the practice, introduced in 1998.
The United Grand Lodge of
England made representations to ministers in May and indicated it might seek judicial review of the
question time today Mr Prentice asked: "Is it not a disgrace that you have decided to allow judges no longer to
have to declare if they are Freemasons?"We know that one in 20 of our judges are Freemasons. Why on earth the
cloak of secrecy?"
Mr Straw replied: "There
was no secrecy about my announcement, I made the announcement by way of written ministerial statement last week
in the light of a European Court of Human Rights judgment against the state of Italy, which was made in 2006,
and to which our attention was drawn by the Grand Lodge of Freemasons.
"It suggested that a
continuation of a compulsory register...was likely to be unlawful.
After legal advice I
accepted that. It is open to any judge to declare that they are Freemasons."
He added that
there had been "no evidence" of any "unacceptable behavior by Freemason judges.
Ministry of Justice figures indicate there are 3,808 judges in England and Wales and 205 or 5.4 per cent are
Freemasons. There are also 29,702 magistrates, of whom 1,900 or 6.4 per cent are Freemasons.]
[Nazarene Remnant comment: It’s also about time that the Australian people wake up to
the fact that our country has already been hijacked (thus the ABN numbers of every government system, whether it be
at the Federal, State or local level). Our state Premiers are now State CEOs, and the Prime Minister is now the
Australian CEO, nothing more and nothing less, serving the secret Government of the world and not the Australian
20. The Pacific Ocean: A Radioactive Garbage
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
14 May, 2011
“The ocean is now a plastic
wasteland.” Capt. Charles Moore, 2010
For the past two months, it has not been possible to separate the on-going radioactive poisons heading east on
the Pacific Ocean currents from Japan to North America (and thence around the globe) with other serious oceanic
environmental troubles. This is not simply just a one-issue crisis, even though Fukushima’s radioactive nightmare
continues to poison the rest of our planet.
Firstly, of primary importance for our health and well being: it is not a safe choice to eat any fish or
crustaceans caught there. This is due, of course, to the widespread radioactivity of the Pacific Ocean.
The tragedy of the now contaminated entire Pacific Ocean is as epic as the Gulf of Mexico’s mass dispersants
poisoning. More than a year since the BP oil-rig catastrophe, the impact on both the human and wildlife populations
continues to soar to disastrous heights. The death toll for all wildlife will never be accurately known, as
unconscionably sea turtles (and unknown other kinds of sea life) were burned alive. For months, no tally was taken
of dead mammals and birds washing ashore. It was more than ineptitude and poor management of this enormous crisis.
It was, and continues to be, a criminal cover-up of vast proportions.
The Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) released a new report estimating “that around 26,000 dolphins and
whales, 82,000 birds, and 6,000 sea turtles were likely harmed [or killed] by the spill.”(1) There was far more
than harm. There was much unaccounted wildlife death; and the now one-year-later continuing toll may be far higher.
However, as with Fukushima’s nuclear reactors tragedy, nothing has been done to safeguard human lives, nor protect
all of the ocean’s animals and birds (really, the entire vast and precious ecosystem!). All of this is under
constant siege from human negligence, deliberate harm, and corporate greed.
It is quite clear, from both these enormous on-going disasters, that corporate-driven secret plans and responses
do not include any real solutions. Harm is their watchword, as our planet’s web-of-life continues to unravel at an
accelerated pace. This is due to human malfeasance. A new report published shows how all the hundreds of Fukushima
workers, now putting their lives on the line for a devastating situation that cannot be fixed, are all expendable.
Dead fish and sharks are already arriving along the California coast. Although the cause is supposedly unknown,
it is doubtful if we will ever be told that any dead sea life washing ashore is most likely radioactive. See:
The EPA has refused to test the Gulf of Alaska for radioactivity. In their latest negligence, EPA posted on May
3, their refusal to monitor daily radiation from Fukushima, “due to the consistent decrease in radiation levels
related to the Japanese nuclear incident.”(2) This was no “incident.”
This is why I have repeatedly urged everyone to join together and get radiation monitoring in your area. Low
levels of ionizing radiation, as Dr. Helen Caldicott has frequently said are extremely dangerous. Further, she has
consistently noted that it is deliberately misleading to connect exterior radiation levels with internal ones. We
will never get the truth from any government agency or official. In fact, their planned deceit and intentional
extreme harm put us all in continued danger. It is vital that we get accurate information ourselves, and know how
much we can really protect ourselves.
As I have learned personally from the cover-up during and after 2003, 1-million-acre California FIRESTORM, any
government agency has already long been compromised and corrupted. As Jeff Rense wrote on April 21, it is the
“latest example of blatant Federal negligence. …This is another egregious abandonment of their obligation to watch
over the public health and welfare. …[and] the public’s right to know and be kept safe and informed be damned.” His
article also has an excellent map, showing the ocean currents coming to the West Coast and up to Alaska. This
continued refusal to test the waters also protects the now-toxic catches of Alaska’s fishing industry, while
poisoning anyone who eats contaminated fish:
This is not the fishing industry’s fault, per se. [That is another separate article.] Rather, it is the result
of this enormous radioactive contamination that puts everything in grave jeopardy. Does any of this really compute
to a rational person who still can think critically and sees the bigger picture?
This article covers another oceanic nightmare that must be included in our awareness of what is happening
throughout the entire Pacific Ocean. It does impact all of us. Our oceans have been in long-term and devastating
decline for decades. The seas are no longer what we may think of: miles and miles of pristine and beautiful
glistening waters, gentle sea breezes, with an occasional whale or dolphin leaping out of the water.
The Pacific Ocean has also been poisoned with colossal amounts of garbage floating in a vortex area called NORTH
PACIFIC SUBTROPICAL GYRE. This is the Pacific Ocean’s floating toxic, petroleum-based plastics dump that has
contaminated and killed countless millions of fish and mammals, including dolphins and seals. In 1997, these huge
areas were discovered by Captain Charles Moore while he was returning to California from Hawaii on his vessel, the
50-foot “Algalita” (now the name of the foundation he set up). He took a detour through a region with little wind,
due to the ocean currents. Normally, this area is usually avoided by sailors, because of these very calm seas.
Day after day, as Captain Moore sailed, he saw endless piles of plastic trash floating for miles and miles.
Originally, this area was called the Great Pacific Garbage Patch. Far from some small “patch,” it is thought that
this massive amount is actually twice the size of the continental US. This swirling soup of floating garbage is
about 500-nautical miles off California’s coast, and stretches across the northern part of the Pacific Ocean, past
Hawaii, and comes close to Japan. Unseen by satellite photos, this massive “sea of rubbish is translucent and [is
on, and also] lies just below the water’s surface” and continues under water through the water column.(3)
Since Moore started doing this research, the size of this trash has grown enormously. Now the Great Garbage
Patch is divided into the Western and Eastern Garbage Patch, on either side of the Hawaiian archipelago. According
to Marcus Eriksen, Algalita’s research director, there is about 100-million tons of flotsam floating in this
In 1994, Captain Moore had originally founded Algalita Marine Research Foundation, to focus on the “restoration
of disappearing giant kelp forests and the improvement of water quality through the preservation and
re-construction of wetlands along California’s coast.”(4) He was so shocked by what he saw in the Pacific Ocean,
that he became a dedicated environmental activist, and decided to raise global awareness and find much-needed
answers. With his foundation, he now focuses on collaborative ocean research to find out the extent of this massive
amount of floating garbage and the damage it continues to cause. The non-profit foundation, now in its sixteenth
year, has brought worldwide attention to the fate of millions of tons of discarded plastics and how it has impacted
all sea life and damaged human health.
Firstly, even the smallest particles of plastic, are broken down “by wave action or sunlight” (called
photodegradation), and then they are eaten by fish. Once eaten, these plastics then travel up the ocean food chain
(from small fish to larger ones), and they eventually wind up on your seafood dinner plate. “Every little piece of
plastic manufactured in the past 50 years that made it into the ocean is still out there somewhere,” said chemist
Tony Andrady, with the US-based Research Triangle Institute.(5) This goes for EVERY bit of plastic made: from
shredded plastic to any large item. See:
According to the UN Environment Program, “plastic debris causes the deaths of more than a million sea birds
every year, as well as more than 100,000 marine mammals. Syringes, cigarette lighters, and toothbrushes have been
found inside the stomachs of dead seabirds,” mistaking them for food.(6) “A Dutch study in the North Sea of fulmar
seabirds concluded [that] 95 percent of the birds had plastics in their stomachs. More than 1600 pieces were found
in the stomach of one bird in Belgium.”(7)
The ocean is now “an endless trail of trash floating in the middle of the Pacific: water bottles, plastic
crates, disposable(sic) diapers, bath toys, cigarette lighters, tampon applicators [styrofoam, too]; a veritable
buffet of convenience culture.”(8) This refuse is what is dumped in the ocean from landfills. Unbelievably, other
trash includes: kayaks, carrier, refrigerators, furniture, Lego blocks, footballs, and fishing nets. All these
items were thrown overboard either from oil-rig platforms or ships. As on land around the globe, our seas have
become a vast stench of sewage.
Possibly millions (no one is counting) of the plastic 6-pak holders for soda and beer have been found strangling
sea and other wildlife [e.g., fish, otters, and small seals]. The plastic diameter to hold these cans is just wide
enough for some small animal’s head to get stuck in it. Once their head is caught, they cannot get out. In the
oceans, plastics also break down into smaller and smaller pieces. These are mistaken for fish eggs or other kinds
of food and ingested by fish. Last month, the Los Angeles Times reported that researchers have found “about 35
percent of fish they collected in the northern Pacific Ocean in 2008 had plastic in their stomachs. …Some lantern
fish [had] as many as 83 plastic fragments in a single fish.”(9) Often tiny pieces of plastics are part of the
plankton that whales eat. Plastic does kill. This is yet another reason not to use plastic. See:
Captain Charles Moore, who has been documenting this “waste slick more insidious than an oil spill, due to the
impossibility of cleanup,” has produced a documentary about this called “Synthetic Sea.”
Captain Moore calls the ocean “the world’s largest toilet bowl that never flushes.” In 1999, as part of his
research to carefully document this garbage, he discovered that “for every pound of naturally occurring
plankton…[there was [a] yielded [of] 6 pounds of plastic.”(10) By 2008, in the same original region, they recorded
a staggering increase of 45 to 1 times more plastic than plankton! There were less tan-colored pieces of plastic.
Moore believes they have been eaten by birds and other plankton feeders, because they resemble krill. Color is an
important factor as is shape, as it mimics food. “Over 70 species of birds have been found to ingest these pieces
of plastic that resemble their natural food supply. Studies have shown that they then have higher PCBs content, and
it is a way to transport pollutions.”(11) Plastic does not “break down” anywhere in our environment. It just get
smaller and smaller to cause more harm throughout the entire web-of-life as it travels up the food chain. Thus, the
“quality of life” for the entire marine ecosystem has been undermined and ruined.
As noted in the above-cited excellent “Synthetic Sea” 2010 documentary: “There’s no such a thing as
biodegradation of petroleum-based plastic.”
The author of another article, Anna Cummins who traveled on the “Algalita” (Moore’s oceanic research vessel),
wrote that: “though we’ve all come on this trip (in 2004) fully prepared to find constant evidence of plastic
thousands of miles from land, it’s still shocking to see it in person. It simply does not belong here. …The highest
level of pollution [is] in highly productive zones.”(12)
This essential research is done in “international waters,” so it has been barely touched by any agency in charge
of environmental issues in any country. The garbage just continues to grow. As usual, much of the scientific
research stays in journals. However, there are staggering pollution and reproductive issues that will not go away,
and will contribute to the continued dramatic dwindling numbers of ocean creatures. The repercussions of this
toxicity go far beyond the oceans. There are two main crises that are already impacting all of us.
(1) Plastic is a well-known chemical hormone disruptor. It changes and toxifies the body’s natural hormonal
balance. It is one of the major reasons for hermaphroditic indications in frogs and other amphibians. This research
goes back to the late 1970s. Plastics have been part of our daily life for almost a century. They have replaced
many natural and safer products. Hard and soft plastics are chemical and petroleum-based. Ubiquitous in our
environment, they have not been proven safe to use. Thousands of new chemicals and plastics are put on the market
each year without the benefit of human safety testing. Chemical corporations continue to spend billions to
advertise and market plastics as “necessary” to our daily lives. Yet, most people still do not realize the
invisible and toxic risks to using plastics.
One category of industrial chemicals that are used as softeners and emulsifiers is called phthalates [pronounced
“tha-lates”]. These plastics are found in products from baby bottles, thin fruit and vegetable produce bags, food
wraps, children’s toys, food storage items, lubricants, medicals devices and IV bags, wood finishes, perfumes, and
thousands of beauty products. They emit cumulative but invisible highly dangerous toxins. Since the 1970s,
phthalates have been known to be global pollutants. Even so, more than 1-billion pounds of toxic phthalates are
produced annually. No extensive long-term tests were done before they were marketed. Sometimes, phthalates may be
listed as: Dibutyl phthalate (DBP); Diethyl phthalate (DEP); or Butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP). When you purchase most
products containing phthalates, most often there is no warning label to advise you, as a consumer, of the dangers.
Phthalates now show up frequently in human urine as a biomarker from daily exposure.
Phthalates are a class of extremely dangerous chemicals known as hormone or endocrine disruptors, popularly
called “gender-benders.” This means that these chemicals are absorbed into the body (by breathing the off-gassing
and by ingesting) and then cause damage by disrupting hormonal balances (both in humans and all animals). These
poisons bio-accumulate in us and all other living creatures. They cause serious developmental harm from the very
beginnings of life: in utero, in sperm DNA, in organ damage, early puberty, cancer (testicular, prostate, and
breast –all of which have increased dramatically over the past four decades). Phthalates suppress the proper
functioning of the immune system.
With the Fukushima reactors catastrophe, now out of control, there is no research on the synergistic
relationship between these chemical hormone disruptors and radioactive Uranium (spewing from Fukushima’s reactors),
also a hormone disruptor.
(2) Hormone disruption is a major factor in the increase of obesity in the US. The media portrays this as a
dietary issue. Yes, it is. But far past this is the use of toxic plastics that surround our every move: from nuking
it in microwave ovens and boiling food in pre-packaged “pouches” [loaded with chemical poisons] to drinking many
different (already chemically poisoned) drinks bottled in it. There is no nutritional value in these kinds of
packaged and prepared foods. These toxins are stored in body fat, and wreck the body’s ability to repair
As it works its way up the food chain, where bigger fish eat the already contaminated fish (who’ve already eaten
even smaller ones), these toxins bio-accumulate synergistically, until it reaches the human population –billions of
whom have been eating/drinking food packaged in plastic. This goes for other proteins sources as well. Cows also
eat a contaminated food supply: either grass loaded with other chemical hormone-disrupting pesticides, or water
sources filled with chemicals and antibiotics. Some of the best research on hormone disruption and its long-term
generational impact can be found in Dr. Theo Colburn’s et al. “Our Stolen Future.” This is essential reading.
Hormone-disrupting chemicals and radiation not only affect the genders of animals, they can also be linked to
DNA damage and birth defects in humans. This is rarely reported, again because the gravity of these findings would
shut down the chemical and nuclear companies, if people knew the extent of the genetic contamination with which we
are already dealing (actually, since the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki). In her article on the impact of
radiation and nuclear power, geoscientist Leuren Moret notes:
“The daily ‘permitted’ radioactive emissions and discharges into the Irish Sea since the 1950’s, have turned the
contaminated sediments, seawater, and biosphere into a radioactive sink or permanent point source of radiation,
with serious local and global effects. Daily ‘permitted’ radioactive emissions and discharges from global sources
have accumulated to higher radiation levels in the biosphere than any Chernobyls would release, and are the main
cause of the large increase in ocean dead zones since the 1970’s. People are missing or overlooking the serious
impact of chronic releases…a strategy guaranteed to continue to fail.”(13)
How much further will this daily contamination of the Irish Sea, and the vast additional nuclear and chemical
synergistic contamination of the Pacific Ocean affect us all? Everything is inter-connected. Our planet’s entire
web-of-life continues to be in an overwhelming state of siege. Most of this is invisible (unless it affects you or
your family directly!). Nonetheless, it continues to impact all of us. This has been the elite’s decades-long,
behind-the-scenes plan for utter destruction.
Almost 16 years ago, National Geographic’s cover story, “Diminishing Returns: Exploiting the Ocean’s Bounty,”
highlighted in graphic detail the rapaciousness of huge trawling vessels that haul in massive amounts of sea life.
In 1995, more than 37,000 ships with 1-million crew worldwide, created “a 50-year boom in fishing technology [that]
created a powerful industrial fleet.”(14) Along with oceanic plastic garbage, globalization of the oceans has
destroyed them. Small boat fishermen who rely on their catch to feed their local families are often left without
resources to fish far from home. Poor fishermen, eeking out a minimal existence, cannot compete with fishing
supertankers. A photo from this NG story shows a Senegalese fisherman cleaning small sardines he caught with toxic
wastewater. “Fish stock are dwindling, and once independent fisherman now cater to the whims of European buyers.
‘This,’ says a Senegalese community worker, ‘is just the latest battleground between rich north and poor
These poor fishermen cannot compete with mega-corporation globalized hauls. In addition, many fish and mammals
caught in these huge nets are supposedly “unprofitable.” Their lives mean nothing. Euphemistically called
“by-catch,” it is not known how many possibly billions of dead creatures have been tossed overboard as
unprofitable. The dramatic cost to all sea life has been devastating. Between thousands of pollutants, dead
by-catch, enormous over-fishing, sonar, and nuclear bombs exploded underwater by military, the entire web of sea
life has suffered dramatically.
Our Oceans Are in a RED ALERT Crisis
Thus, this human rapaciousness creates built-in diminution and death. Each year, the size of mature fish and
mammals become smaller, and there are less and less species. Japan, with the world’s largest appetite for fish (for
sushi, etc.) and whales, will now have a totally radioactive ocean soon to be devoid of life. Tuna is loaded with
mercury [long-term eating of it is a major contributing factor to dementia]. Over the past three decades, whales
and dolphins, numbering in the thousands, have beached themselves. Oregon salmon are radioactive from decades of
nuclear releases from the Hanford Nuclear Superfund site. Many species are in dramatic decline.
Corporate-scientists have few “public” explanations. The few independent scientists left are silenced.
Radioactivity and Nuclear Consequences
Not under any public discussion or commentary by any scientists: what is/will be the impact of on-going
radiation traveling across the Pacific Ocean as it encounters miles and miles of toxic degrading plastic? How will
hormone disrupting plastic and radioactivity impact this vast area’s ecology? What kind of real future will sea
birds and all other sea life have with this gigantic contamination? Hormone disrupting chemicals are known to
bio-accumulate up the food chain in a synergistic manner that could equal far more than 1,600 times the original
dose of poisons. No creature is safe from this horrendous nightmare! Nor are we.
Caretaking of our planet, Mother Earth our only home, is not a corporate concern. Last month, Michael Parenti
wrote of “Profit Pathology and the Disposable Planet.”(16) In short order, with this ecological disaster right in
front of us, nothing will be left; and we are already in grave and deliberately orchestrated financial ruin. Nor,
are environmental organizations really doing their jobs to protect. The one thing rarely discussed in this degraded
death-equation is the human poisoning of our oceans! It is eradicating our planet’s species. This is part of the
current Sixth Extinction. The last one was the dinosaurs, 65-million years ago. What have humans wrought?
Rachel Carson (1907-1964) wrote a beautiful work, a best-seller, called “The Sea Around Us.” It was an ode to
the magnificence of our great waters. When she received the National Book Award for it, she said: “the winds, the
sea, and the moving tides are what they are. If there is wonder and beauty and majesty in them, science will
discover these qualities. If they are not there, science cannot create them. If there is poetry in my book about
the sea, it is not because I deliberately put it there, but because no one could write truthfully about the sea and
leave out the poetry.”
This book is a hymn to the sea. It was the closing of a time before science unleashed nano-replicating particles
into the Gulf of Mexico or the illegal aerosol crimes of Chemtrails loaded with a myriad of invisible but deadly
chemicals to poison all of us and our planet’s lands and sea.(17)
By weight, we are 61-percent water. Salt-water oceans make up 71 percent of the earth. We cannot live without
it, nor can all the wondrous assortment of sea life. They cannot survive in toxic seas, any more than we can
survive breathing the toxic spew that no longer passes for “air.”
Almost forty years ago, Jacques Yves Cousteau brought these amazing sights to our home televisions. We sat
enthralled by what he shared with us traveling on the Calypso. There was a sense of magic that filled his programs.
They educated us, but there was more. They enchanted us. We listened to the songs of the whales, and these new
underwater sounds enthralled us. The music from the ocean’s depths gave many of us a deep empathy for these
far-away creatures. Truly, we cannot live without them. See:
Who could then have imagined the corporate rapaciousness that ensued and has been globalized at any and all
costs? Who could think that whales would be hunted almost to extinction, while insane military plans to detonate
bombs, take thousands of sea animals’ lives, and emitted sonar to harm these magnificent giants of our seas? The US
Navy has a five-year plan to kill 11.7 million marine mammals in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and the Gulf of
Mexico! There has hardly been any public discussion of this rapacious warfare “testing.”(18) For what sane
The whales and dolphins, the turtles and tuna have lives, too. Not to be hunted or burned to death. Not to be
poisoned with deadly chemicals, or phthalates, or radioactivity. Our ocean’s living planetary gifts are under
siege. They are all part of the wonders of our world. We must care for them as a sacred trust!
Our countries are under criminal siege, as well. If humans destroy all of it, we destroy ourselves. We live in a
topsy-turvy brutal and violent world without ethical or moral values. In our wrecked economies, where all social
services are gutted, only the military and killing has a giant budget. Orwellian humans, with a complete lack of
what used to make us truly human, have created a devastating scenario that is unraveling our very web of life. This
threatens all of us right now. What have we permitted in our names?
We do have other choices. We can cut down drastically (or totally) on our use of plastic. As consumers, we do
have choices of not buying or using dangerous items. We can make these choices before we go to the check-out
counter. We can make safer consumer decisions and we must speak out. Go though your own house or apartment: see how
many un-necessary plastic items can be recycled. Use safer items: glass or stainless steel. It is not difficult to
do some Spring Cleaning, and safely get rid of these dangerous items: There are thousands of plastic recycle
centers around. We have the potential of demanding and using safer alternatives. Just think what we could
collectively do by not buying or boycotting all these dangerous and toxic items! We no longer can shop on automatic
pilot and take things off the shelves without understanding the dangers of thousands of products we use. There are
consequences to using products daily that are manufactured without any safety concerns. And they bio-accumulate up
the food chain to us.
1. Lynn Hermann. “New report calls for end to all new offshore drilling.” Digital Journal. April 26, 2011:
2. Updated on May 3, 2011: EPA. Japanese Emergency: Radiation Monitoring. www.epa.gov/japan2011/data-updates.html
3. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden. “The world’s rubbish dump: a tip that stretches from Hawaii to Japan.” London.
The Independent. Feb. 5, 2008:
4. See: www.algalita.org/about-us/index.html
5. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden, op. cit.
6. Kathy Marks and Daniel Howden, ibid.
7. The Plastic Killing Fields –Pacific Ocean Gyre Garbage Patch Grows to the Size of Texas.” Jan. 14, 2008:
8. Anna Cummins. “Sailing the Synthetic Sea.” WEND magazine. Vol. 3, Issue 4, November 2008: p. 20. Special
thanks to CAP for sharing this reference with me.
9. Tony Barboza. “Ingestion of plastic found among small ocean fish.” Los Angeles Times. March 11, 2011:
10. Cummins, op. cit., p. 22.
11. See: Y. Mato et al. “Plastic Resin Pellets as a Transport Medium for Toxic Chemicals in the Marine
Environment.” Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 35 (2001): 318-324; and Christian M. Boerger et al. “Plastic ingestion by
plankivorous fishes in the North Pacific Central Gyre.” Marine Pollution Bulletin. Vol. 60 (2010): 2275-2278.
12. Cummins, op. cit., p. 24-25.
13. Leuren Moret. BE FOREWARNED: The accompanying photos with this article are shocking and gravely upsetting,
but we NEED to see what nuclear radiation does! “Global Implications of Sellafield. ‘Irish Seas Coast Effect’ and
Beyond.” April 15, 2009:
14. Michael Parfit. “Diminishing Returns: Exploiting the Ocean’s Bounty.” National Geographic. Vol.188. No. 5,
November 1995: p. 9.
15. Parfit., ibid., p. 22.
16. Michale Parenti. “Profit Pathology and the Disposable Planet.” Global Research. April 8, 2011:
17. May 11, 2011 update on the Gulf of Mexico “Blue Plague: http://worldvisionportal.org/wordpress; and
18. Rosalind Peterson. www.agriculturedefensecoalition.org/?q=us-navy
Educator and environmental writer Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the highly acclaimed book, “The
Uterine Crisis.” London’s “The Ecologist” calls this book “an inspiration.”
RED ALERT! There is no protection for
Fukushima’s “Expendable” Citizens or Us
21. How the Illuminati Got Above the Mormons
What happened to the
Mormons is instructional for any organization that has been infiltrated and manipulated by the Satanic
Psychopaths. It is also why I look to God and Conscience for my salvation instead of any organization, even one
that I believe has true Doctrine, Priesthood keys, and corrrect ordinances.
Modern Mormonism has become
a "Cult of Personality" for the vast majority of its members.
1. The doctrine of
"infallibility" (God's Prophets are perfect men that don't make mistakes) has taken hold within the membership.
Further, it has been expanded to anyone that has a position in the Church. Of course this has been proven to be
a false doctrine through the case of Mark Hoffman and his forgeries, which were gobbled up and presented as
legitimate historical documents by the Mormon Church.
2. The Doctrine of
Infallibility allows men like Jon Huntsman Senior to sit on both the Council on Foreign Relations and the 5th
quorum of the seventy in the LDS Leadership, without most so-called Patriotic members so much as blinking an
3. It also allows those
that practice Satanic Ritual Abuse to avoid prosection and detection as long as one of their Cult Leaders
is in a position of Leadership.
The Book of Mormon is written as a warning to our generation and it clearly depicts Satanic Psychopaths holding
high office in the Church:
8 Now the brother of
Shared, whose name was Gilead, also received great strength to his army, because of secret
9 And it came to pass that
his high priest murdered him as he sat upon his throne. (Source)
22 Now there was no
lawyer nor judge nor high priest that could have power to condemn any one to death save their
condemnation was signed by the governor of the land.
23 Now there were many of
those who testified of the things pertaining to Christ who testified boldly, who were taken and put to death
secretly by the judges, that the knowledge of their death came not unto the governor of the land until after
27 Now it came to
pass that those judges had many friends and kindreds; and the remainder, yea, even almost all the
lawyers and the high priests, did gather themselves together, and unite with the kindreds of those
judges who were to be tried according to the law.
28 And they did enter into
a covenant one with another, yea, even into that covenant which was given by them of old, which covenant was
given and administered by the devil, to combine against all righteousness.
29 Therefore they did
combine against the people of the Lord, and enter into a covenant to destroy them, and to deliver those who were
guilty of murder from the grasp of justice, which was about to be administered according to the law. (Source)
There is something that the
Book of Mormon demonstrates repeatedly:
1. The First Generation is
righteous because of severe trials and humility.
2. The Second Generation is
mostly righteous and prospers in the land.
3. The 3rd generation gets
fat and lazy because of the work of their forebears.
4. The 4th generation is
just downright evil and embraces Satanic Secret Combinations.
God will bring in "new
blood" to replace the old poisoned blood. This "New Blood" will often build a new society on the bones of the
old. Righteous men teach that only God is infallible, not man. Consider the words of Jesus
18 And Jesus said unto him,
Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.
Jesus Christ explained the
principle of fallen man and the falsehood of the Doctrine of infallibility in that one simple quote. In other
words, He stated, "You can only call Me good if you know Me to be God."
Any man that claims that he
is infallible, is also claiming that he is God. There is only one God, and He is not here on this earth at the
present time. Those that accept the doctrine of infallibility for mortal men with high positions will ultimately
be decieved and then destroyed for worshipping idols (which has the same root as
The Secret Combinations
(Satanic Psychopaths) have taken a firm hold in the Mormon Church. Jesus stated they would in the Book of Mormon
when He visited the Americas:
"10 And thus commandeth the
Father that I should say unto you: At that day when the Gentiles shall sin against my gospel, and shall reject
the fulness of my gospel, and shall be lifted up in the pride of their hearts above all nations, and above
all the people of the whole earth, and shall be filled with all manner of lyings, and of deceits, and of
mischiefs, and all manner of hypocrisy, and murders, and priestcrafts, and whoredoms, and of secret
abominations; and if they shall do all those things, and shall reject the fulness of my gospel, behold, saith
the Father, I will bring the fulness of my gospel from among them."
Mormon Doctrine is full of
references of the destruction of many Mormons of European descent (Gentiles) and the restoration of the American
Indians in this land. The majority of Mormons have rejected the Bill of Rights, United States Constitution, the
Book of Mormon, and the Spirit of Revelation and replaced them with the false doctrines of men. Like the other
wicked Gentiles mentioned in the Book of Mormon, they will be swept from the land by the judgments of
The American Indian, who
has been humbled through severe trials that have lasted centuries, will retake his rightful position alongside
the righteous that remain in the land after it has been purged.
22. Unlawful Killing: Film
About the Death of Diana Likens Prince Philip to Fred West
Cannes Film Festival
Given that its entire £2.5 million budget was paid for by Mohamed Fayed, the
conclusions of a new documentary about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales were not entirely
See the video
The film, called Unlawful Killing, asserts that the Duke of Edinburgh is a “psychopath” in the mould of Fred
West, that the Princess was murdered by the Establishment and that the Queen and other members of the Royal
family are “gangsters in tiaras”.
As the film was premiered at Cannes, its director, Keith Allen,
tried to defend the “ludicrous” slurs on the monarchy as he was accused by the Princess’s closest friend of
cashing in on her death.
Allen, best known for playing the Sheriff of Nottingham in the BBC’s Robin Hood TV series, had already upset
those closest to the Princess by including a photograph of her lying fatally injured in the back of a car
moments after it had crashed in Paris in 1997.
And the astonishing comments about the Royal family which are made in the film have provoked fresh
Rosa Monckton, the Princess’s best friend, said: “Why is he doing this?
“The only reason he could be doing it is to make money by appealing to the conspiracy theorists.
“I also think he’s an attention seeker.”
The film, which took almost four years to produce, is so defamatory towards members of the Royal family that
Allen will not even attempt to distribute it in Britain, having been told by lawyers he would have to make 87
cuts to it.
But he believes it will make money in America, where conspiracy theories about the Princess’s death remain
popular, despite the conclusion of a six-month inquest in 2008 that there was “not a shred of evidence” to
support Mr Fayed’s claims.
The film takes its title from the verdict of the inquest jury, which found that Henri Paul, the drink-driver
who crashed the Mercedes in which the Princess died, and a number of paparazzi photographers pursuing the
vehicle, had been guilty of “gross negligence”.
Mr Fayed is interviewed in the film, and repeats his long-held belief that the Princess, 36, and his son
Dodi, 41, were murdered on the orders of the Duke of Edinburgh because he did not want the Princess to marry a
Surprisingly, the film neglects to mention the fact that it was entirely bankrolled by Mr Fayed.
One scene features a photograph of the Queen and Princess Margaret, with Allen claiming in a voiceover that
"many people regard them as gangsters in tiaras". He goes on to say that "the Royal family are notorious for
One of the contributors to the documentary is Oliver James, a clinical psychologist and broadcaster. He
tells Allen: "I think Prince Philip is someone who is devoid of an internal sense of right and wrong, he
doesn't care for anyone else... that is very like Fred West or any other psychopathic individual."
The film also makes repeated references to the Duke of Edinburgh's "Nazi background" whilst ignoring his
distinguished Naval career in the Second World War.
Asked if he supported Mr Fayed's view that the Duke was involved in the Princess's death, Allen replied: "I
do believe that Diana was in a position to rock a number of boats and I do believe that a warning may have
silenced her. You could argue [the crash] was a warning-only situation and I think it may have gone too
Martyn Gregory, author of the definitive account of the fatal crash in the Alma underpass, called Diana: The
Last Days, branded the film "ludicrous" and said: "It simply regurgitates everything Mohamed Fayed has been
saying since the year 2000. It is rehearsing the Planet Fayed view."
A spokesman for Mr Fayed said he had seen the film and “he is absolutely delighted with it”.
Buckingham Palace declined to comment on the film.
Diana 'killing' movie at Cannes
traces Princess Diana's final journey in Paris
Philip sent 'nasty, cruel' letters to Diana
Diana coroner: No
evidence of Royal plot
23. Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in
Julio Severo is the author of the book O
Movimento Homossexual (The Homosexual Movement), published by the Brazilian branch of Bethany House
Publishers. In November 2004, he gave, in the Chamber of Deputies in Brasília, the introductory speech in
the First Evangelical Parliamentary Front Meeting. The first magazine of the Front also published an article
by Mr. Severo on homosexuality. His book has been the first writing in Portuguese to expose the homosexual
movement and it has been a reference for Christian parliamentarians in Brazil.
Until 1994, gay rights and
parades were virtually unheard of and non-existent in Brazil. Yet, from 1995 on, after the first ILGA conference
in Rio de Janeiro, homosexual activism became increasingly powerful in visibility, until the arrival of the Lula
government, when their highest intentions and values became a threat and reality predominant in the Brazilian
The social and moral
structure of Brazil in the decades of 1950 and 1960 was basically strong, largely because of the predominant
Catholicism in more than 90 percent of the population. In many places, evangelicals were threatened with
lynching if they tried to evangelize, especially in small towns. Homosexual activity was a shameful and secret
behavior, despised by the society. A girl pregnant out of wedlock ran the risk of being expelled from her
house. The Brazilian people were socially conservative, although the Carnival and public prostitution were
The largest threat to the
society came from radical leftist movements. Communists almost took control in Brazil in 1964, but the military
took over the government and was able to stop a communist coup.
The Catholic Church was a
driving force against the communist threat, but after Vatican II many Catholic leaders began surrendering to the
Theology of Liberation. In the decades of 1970 and 1980, traditional Protestant churches embraced Protestant
versions of Liberation Theology. In the late 1990s and early 2000, some Pentecostal and charismatic churches
also subscribed. These leftist Christians are today known as progressistas. The Brazilian term
progressista (progressive), according to the noted Aurélio Dictionary of Portuguese Language,
means “someone who, though not being a member of a socialist or communist party, accepts and/or supports
socialist or Marxist principles.” So evangélicos progressistas are evangelicals committed to
supporting and promoting the socialist agenda.
Liberation Theology can
boast an important victory in Brazil, for having a 73.6 percent Catholic population; Brazil is the largest
Catholic country in the world. Protestants are 15.4 percent. “Progressive” Christians are a growing
presence and influence among both of these Christian religions.
After the military left the
government in 1985, leftist politicians, supported by the Comunidades Eclesiais de Base (Base
Ecclesiastical Communities [BECs], where progressive Catholic leadership encouraged poor Catholic communities to
get involved in political action according to Liberation Theology tenets), began to heavily affect the
political and social system, leading Brazil gradually leftward. BECs were the most important support behind the
main popular leftist party in Brazil, Partido dos Trabalhadores (Workers’ Party), better known by its
With such leftism, abortion
and homosexuality began to be promoted as rights in the decade of 1990. (In the decade of 1980, there were
leftists advocating abortion and homosexuality, but while abortion advocates had limited visibility and no legal
influence, the rare gay advocates had none at all — except in a very few isolated examples, especially in
universities.) Even though there are no anti-sodomy laws in Brazilian society, its religious heritage had always
been an important social factor discouraging such behavior.
Less conservative in the
heart and more in the image: the current political ethics in Brazil
Read the Full Story:
Behind The Homosexual Tsunami in Brazil
24. The Great Cholesterol
November 17, 2010
© By Dr. Peter
Millions of Australians are
prescribed cholesterol-lowering drugs – statins like Pravachol®, Zocor® and
Lipitor® – each year at a cost of more than $1 billion dollars with very little, if any, benefit. In
the US, some 40 million people currently take statins at a cost of more than $3.00 per pill, more than $1,000
per year, totalling more than $40 billion a year.
While there are many
exaggerated claims and a lot of hype about the benefits of statins, there are also many studies showing no
benefits at all. The pro-statin hype is based on the misuse and abuse of statistics.
Various independent studies
in prestigious, peer-reviewed journals have shown that statin use in primary prevention – that is, to save lives
– has minimal or no value in reducing mortality and certainly nothing that is considered anywhere near
clinically significant to warrant their widespread use. It does not matter how one manipulates the statistics,
the results just aren’t there.
In data gathered in 2009
from six trials, a review of the efficacy in lowering the risk of death with statins found virtually no
difference between the treatment group and the control group.1 There are many more of these
In an independent
meta-analysis (when a number of studies are put together to achieve more statistical power) of randomised
controlled trials in patients without CVD, statin therapy decreased the incidence of major coronary and
cerebrovascular events and revascularisations but not coronary heart disease or overall
Taking statins for a number
of years will not reduce mortality: “Primary prevention with statins provides only small and clinically hardly
relevant improvement of cardiovascular morbidity/mortality.”3 “Hardly relevant” means there is
virtually no clinical benefit; as the authors of these particular studies are independent, they gain nothing by
Another review found that
“current clinical evidence does not demonstrate that titrating lipid therapy (trying to lower cholesterol with
statins) to achieve proposed low LDL cholesterol levels is beneficial or safe.”4 In other
words, lowering lipids has no real benefit and has the potential for adverse effects.
Following up on this, in a
major independent review of studies funded by the Ministry of Health of British Columbia (Canada) on statins and
primary prevention, researchers reported that “statins have not been shown to provide an overall health benefit
in primary prevention trials.”5 This is a government report carried out by an
independent university yet its findings are still ignored.
The problem really comes
down to vested interests and the abuse of statistics. To overcome the limitations of small studies, vested
parties combine many studies into a meta-analysis. The researchers themselves select the studies used in the
meta-analysis. A fundamental problem is that researchers with direct links to drug companies have the authority
to select the most positive studies and ignore the rest – including independent studies not funded by
pharmaceutical companies. Despite this, they have still not been able to show any clinically significant
As readers of the
scientific journals, we should not be confused between statistical significance and clinical significance. For
an outcome to be “statistically significant” means that the outcome was likely a result of the treatment –
whether the result was 100% effective or less than 0.1% effective. That is, if you treat 1,000 people to save
one life (0.1%) it may be statistically significant but it is not clinically significant. “Clinical
significance” means 20% to 30% or more. The drug companies’ most positive studies on statins for prevention of
CVD report statistical significance, mostly 1% or less, and none have found any clinical
Busy medical professionals
don’t have time to review the statistics; few of them may be aware of the different ways the statistics are
manipulated. So if the experienced professionals don’t understand the results of these studies, how do we expect
the media or public to understand?
The studies on statins also
report “relative risk,” not “absolute risk” or “real risk.” The relative risk reduction is highly
misleading6,7,8,9,10 if not deceptive. An example of relative risk is: if you
have four people in a study who die in the placebo group (no drug) compared to three people who die in the drug
treatment group – that is, four were expected to die but with the drug only three did – then there is a 25%
relative risk reduction. However, to get this effect of saving one life you would have to treat 1,000 people and
the real risk reduction is 0.1%. Relative risk is like adding 1+1 to get 11 or 2+5 to get 25 or more. How can
the pharmaceutical companies and the researchers working for them get away with this? This is probably because
(at least in my experience) most people are afraid of statistics.
In studies by the Medical
Research Council dating back to the late 1980s, researchers found that of 1,000 men ranging in age from 35 to 64
who received treatment for mild hypertension over five years, there were six fewer strokes and two fewer
cardiovascular events than would be expected.11,12 The real risk reduction over five years was
Ten years later, a study of
Pravachol® was released in the media, with much fanfare, as having a 22% drop (relative risk, not
real risk) in mortality. However, when one looks at the numbers and statistics behind the calculations, treating
1,000 middle-aged men who had hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol) and no evidence of a previous myocardial
infarction with pravastatin for five years resulted in seven fewer deaths from cardiovascular causes, and two
fewer deaths from other causes than would be expected in the absence of treatment.13 The real
risk reduction, however, was a mere 0.9%, less than 1% or nine lives out of 1,000 when treated for five years.
The research was sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical (West of Scotland Coronary Prevention
Conservatively, put another
way, researchers treated 1,000 people for five years at a total cost of over $5 million to save seven people
from CVD. One might wish to compare this to the cost and efficacy of adopting healthy lifestyle
In the Heart Protection
Study in the United Kingdom, more than 20,000 participants aged 40 to 80 years with high risk of cardiovascular
disease but average-to-low levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were treated with 40mg daily of
simvastatin (marketed under several trade names including Zocor). Of 20,500+ study participants, 577 on statins
died from a heart attack, 701 not treated died from a heart attack. That is a 25% relative risk reduction over
five years.14 Sounds good, doesn’t it? The real percentage improvement is actually 1.7%. Over
the five-year study, they saved 25 people per year in a high-risk population with previous cerebrovascular
disease, peripheral artery disease, renal impairment or diabetes. These are seriously ill people and the
researchers still achieved a benefit of only 1.7%. Researchers neglected to mention that around 30,000 people
were not allowed in or dropped from the study and not counted in the percentage of people with side
effects. There were 10,269 people on statins and 10,267 people on a placebo.15
A study of 90,056
participants combining 14 randomised trials looked at the best outcome for people who had pre-existing
conditions: 47% had pre-existing chronic heart disease, 21% had a history of diabetes and 55% a history of
hypertension. The death rate was 8.5% among the statin group compared to 9.7% in the control group. This
difference represents 1.2%.16
The well-known JUPITER
study compared a placebo group to a statin-taking group. The study found that there were 68 heart attacks in the
placebo group and 31 heart attacks in the drug treatment group – a 58% relative risk reduction. There were 64
strokes in the placebo group, compared to 33 strokes in the treatment group, a relative risk reduction of
48%.17 Sounds good, doesn’t it? However, the drug treatment group had 8,901
participants in it. In real terms, the heart attack risk went from a very low 0.76% to 0.35% and the risk of
stroke went from 0.72% to 0.37%.
Effectively, if you treat
300 people with expensive and dangerous drugs you might save one life. Under the best possible scenario,
the real risk reduction was well under one half of one percent. The real risk reduction of consuming a handful
of raw mixed nuts is much higher. It is interesting to note that one of the risk factors used to select the
participants in the study was C-Reactive Protein (CRP) an indicator of inflammation, the real cause of
In an independent
assessment of the same statistics in 2010 titled “Cholesterol Lowering, Cardiovascular Diseases, and the
Rosuvastatin-JUPITER Controversy. A Critical Reappraisal” by Michel de Lorgeril and her 8 colleagues found that
“the JUPITER Study” was severely flawed.18 This recent analysis did a careful and independent
review of both results and methods used in the JUPITER Study and reported that the “trial was
In an unprecedented attack
on the study they (scientists other than myself usually don’t say boo even when it is serious) stated that, “The
possibility that bias entered the trial is particularly concerning because of the strong commercial interest in
the study.” In other words, the big pharmaceutical money influenced the study. And concluded, “The results of
the trial do not support the use of statin treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases and raise
troubling questions concerning the role of commercial sponsors.”
This is a scathing attack
in scientific terms of the earlier drug company sponsored study. Scientist do not go out of their way to create
waves but these ones have not just found different results but also criticised the earlier studies link with
pharmaceutical industry. It highlights not only that the studies don’t show any significant results but these
studies and the education of our doctors is strongly influenced by the drug
More recently, a study
reported in the BMJ was a meta-analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials of about 70,000 people followed
for an average of four years.20 In these trials, people with risk factors for
cardiovascular disease but no history of existing disease were randomised to receive statins or no treatment.
The relative risk reduction was 12% for total mortality, 30% for coronary event and 19% for a cerebrovascular
event (stroke). However, the real risk reduction was 0.6%, 1.3% and 0.4% respectively. The actual number needed
to treat to save one life was 167. Despite this outcome the authors of the study concluded, “In patients without
established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, statin use was associated with
significantly (statistical not clinical) improved survival and large (statistical) reductions in
the risk of major cardiovascular events.” (emphasis added.).
In fact, the authors had
significant associations with the drug companies and failed to mention it was statistically significant but not
clinically significant. Again, busy medical professionals tend to read only the abstracts; claims like this are
pretty convincing, though very misleading.
More telling however, is
the latest findings in June 2010 where two major independent studies, one the re-analysis of the Jupiter Study
reported above and the other “A Meta-analysis of 11 Randomised Controlled Trials Involving 65,229 Participants”
(don’t worry about the title) by Ray Kausik and 6 other independent researchers. The study, wait for it, found
the use of statins in high-risk individuals was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in
mortality. That is, they don’t save lives. Their data combined from 11 studies with 65,229 participants followed
for approximately 244,000 person-years, a very big study, reported that this “meta-analysis did not find
evidence for the benefit of statin therapy on all-cause mortality in a high-risk primary prevention set-up.” In
other words they don’t save lives even in a high risk group. Even if you have all the elevated risk factors
these drugs don’t work.
How many more studies to we
need to do to show these drugs don’t work?
Professor Peter Dingle’s
new book on the truth about cholesterol and cholesterol lowering medication, The Great Cholesterol Deception, is
available. To order, visit
Bartolucci, A.A., S. Bae, et al. (2009). A Bayesian meta-analysis approach to address the effectiveness of
statins in preventing death after an initial myocardial infarction. 18th World IMACS/MODSIM Congress. Cairns,
Australia. 2009. Cairns, Australia. http://mssanz.org.au/modsim09
Thavendiranathan, P., A. Bagai, et al. (2006). “Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases with statin
therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.” Archives of Internal Medicine 166:
Vrecer, M., S. Turk, et al. (2003). “Use of statins in primary and secondary prevention of coronary heart
disease and ischemic stroke. Meta-analysis of randomized trials.” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
and Therapeutics 41(12): 567-577. M.Turk, S.Drinovec, J.Mrhar, A.International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
and Therapeutics. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 567-57741122003
Hayward, R.A., T.P. Hofer, et al. (2006). “Narrative review: Lack of evidence for recommended low-density
lipoprotein treatment targets: A solvable problem.” Annals of Internal Medicine 145(7): 520-530.
University of British Columbia (2003). “Do statins have a role in primary prevention? A review by the
Therapeutics Initiative of the Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics of the University of British
Columbia.” Therapeutics Letter (48).
Fidan, D., B. Unal, et al. (2007). “Economic analysis of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in
England and Wales, 2000–2010.” QJM 100: 277-289.
Franco, O.H., A. Peeters, et al. (2005). “Cost effectiveness of statins in coronary heart disease.” Journal of
Epidemiology and Community Health 59: 927-933. O.H.
Franco, O.H., E.W. Steyerberg, et al. (2006). “Effectiveness calculation in economic analysis: the case of
statins for cardiovascular disease prevention.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60:
Capewell, S. (2008). “Will screening individuals at high risk of cardiovascular events deliver large benefits?
No.” British Medical Journal 337: a1395. S. British Medical Journal Capewell200816161617
Nuovo, J., J. Melnikow, et al. (2002). “Reporting number needed to treat and absolute risk reduction in
randomized controlled trials.” Journal of American Medical Association 287: 2813-2814.
Medical Research Council Working Party (1985). “MRC trial of treatment of mild hypertension: principal results.”
British Medical Journal 291: 97-104.
Miall, W.E. and G. Greenberg (1987). Mild Hypertension: Is There Pressure to Treat? An account of the MRC trial.
New York, Cambridge University Press.
Shepherd, J., S.M. Cobbe, et al. (1996). “Prevention of coronary heart disease with Pravastatin in men with
hypercholesterolemia.” New England Journal of Medicine 333: 1301-1307. P.W.McKillop, J.H.Packard, C.J.New
England Journal of Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 1301-13073331996
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2002). “MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with
simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.” Lancet 360:
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaborators, C. Baigent, et al. (2005). “Efficacy and safety of cholesterol
lowering treatment: Prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of
statins.” Lancet 366: 1267-1278. L.Buck, G.Pollicino, C.Kirby, A.Sourjina, T.Peto, R.Collins, R.Simes, R.Lancet,
Ridker, P.M., E. Danielson, et al. (2008). “Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with
elevated C-reactive protein.” New England Journal of Medicine 359(21): 2195-2207. J.G.Nordestgaard,
B.G.Shepherd, J.Willerson, J.T.Glynn, R.J.JUPITER Study Group, New England Journal of Medicine
Ray, K.K., S.R.K. Seshasai, et al. (2010). “Statins and all-cause mortality in high-risk primary prevention: A
meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 65 229 participants.” Archives of Internal Medicine
de Lorgeril, M., P. Salen, et al. (2010). “Cholesterol lowering, cardiovascular diseases, and the
Rosuvastatin-JUPITER controversy: A critical reappraisal.” Archives of Internal Medicine 170(12):
Brugts, J.J., T. Yetgin, et al. (2009). “The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular
disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.” British Medical
Journal 338: b2376.
DR. PETER DINGLE
Ph.D has a Bachelor of Education
in Science, Bachelor of Environmental Science with first class honours, and a Ph.D. Dr. Dingle is an Associate
Professor in Health and the Environment at Murdoch University and one of Australia’s best motivational health
speakers. He has spent the past twenty years as a researcher, educator, communicator and author. He has more
than 100 scientific papers. Dr. Dingle currently has 6 books in print with the latest ones My Dog Eats Better
Than Your Kids and Is Your Home Making You Sick. He is a regular in state and national print media
and may be heard weekly on radio and TV, reporting on health and the environment. He was the presenter on the
award winning SBS program “Is Your House Killing You”, he is seen regularly on “Can we help” on ABC and is
currently filming his second TV series. His website is www.drdingle.com.
above article appeared in New Dawn No. 123 (Nov-Dec
25. Who is Andrea
Source: Who is Andrea Rossi?
He is an Italian engineer and inventor who has been
working on energy related projects for decades. Currently, he is the President and Founder of Leonardo Technologies
Incorporated of Bedford , NH .
What is the Energy Catalyzer?
It is a "Cold Fusion" device developed by Italian engineer
and inventor Andrea Rossi. It produces heat by placing nickel powder of very small particle size (nano-meters to
micro-meters) in a pressurized hydrogen environment along with currently undisclosed (for proprietary reasons)
catalysts that enhance the reaction. When this environment is heated to approximately 450 - 500 C, a nuclear
reaction starts taking place. This reaction releases a large amount of energy while consuming very little hydrogen
and nickel powder.
What is Cold Fusion?
It is a term that describes a broad range of nuclear
reactions – including nuclear fusion – at relatively low temperatures. For example, hundreds of degrees instead of
millions of degrees like inside of a star such as our sun.
How much energy does this system produce?
There is currently only one model of reactor that has been
disclosed. It is designed to produce 10 kW of continuous thermal energy in the form of heated water or steam.
However, this is not the upper limit of the energy the system can produce. It can be throttled up to 130 kW or
higher, but that is avoided except during experimentation for safety reasons.
How large is the system?
The reactor vessel itself is very small with a volume of
only one liter. The auxiliary equipment such as control mechanisms, lead shielding, hydrogen canister, and other
components can easily fit on a medium sized table top.
How much fuel does the Energy Catalyzer consume?
Very little. One hundred grams of nickel powder will power
the device for six months. However, since only a small amount of that nickel will have reacted with the hydrogen
90% of the nickel will remain. It can be extracted, re-processed, and re-used as fuel.
What isotopes of nickel are consumed?
The nickel powder put into the device is not of any specific
isotope. It is just common ordinary nickel of a very small particle size. However, is thought that only two
isotopes of nickel (62Ni and 64Ni) are being consumed.
What type of hydrogen is consumed?
Only light hydrogen is used. Heavy hydrogen (deuterium) does
Are by-products being created?
The two isotopes 62Ni and 64Ni are apparently being
transmuted into non-radioactive isotopes of copper and trace amounts of other stable and non radioactive elements
such as zinc.
What is the catalyst and why has it not been
Only Andrea Rossi and a few close business partners know the
identity of the proprietary catalyst. The catalyst is critical intellectual property, as it is the key to producing
significant quantites of energy. A patent application has been submitted covering the catalyst(s) involved. It has
been stated that when the patent application is granted and a full patent is issued, the information about the
catalyst or catalysts will be revealed.
When will the patent be granted?
It is hoped the patent will be granted by the time the one
megawatt plant opens this October. However, there is a standing policy at the US Patent Office not to grant patents
to "cold fusion" devices. If the patent office does not approve it by then, the information about the catalyst will
have to remain secret. Please do not hound or contact the patent office about this issue. The best way to proceed
is to get as many people as possible interested in this technology. Millions of people openly discussing why the
patent office is not granting a patent to a valid technology being put to industrial use may make it difficult for
them to justify their actions.
Read the Full Story:
Who is Andrea Rossi?
More on Andrea
Ampenergo Amps Up
Rossi's Energy Catalyzer In America
Patent Granted For Andrea Rossi Energy
Andrea Rossi's Cold Fusion Energy Catalyzer
Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion
The Magic Of Andrea Rossi (Video)
E-Cat Energy Catalyzer Invented By
97 Rossi E-Cats Operating In
E-Cat Energy Catalyzer Andrea
Rossi: E-Cat To Be Official Launch Name
Andrea Rossi - Alternative Energy Genius
Specifics Of Andrea
Rossi Energy Catalyzer Test
Rossi Catalyzer -
2011005506(A1) - Google Search
Catalyzer - Google Search
26. Global Governance (Part 9 of
From San Francisco To Istanbul
Habitat II, the UN Conference on Human Settlements,
convened in Istanbul in June 1996. Despite the fact that Habitat I called for the elimination of private
property in 1976, the U.S. has contributed more than $32 million100 to its operations and sent an enthusiastic
delegation to Istanbul to assure the Conference that America is supporting its objectives. The entire agenda was
bathed in the ambiguous language of sustainable development. Two of the major issues to emerge through the noise
of 4000 delegates and 25,000 NGO representatives, were: (1) the right to housing, and (2) good
Although at least three previous UN documents declare the
right to housing, two of them have not been ratified by the U.S. Consequently, the universal right to housing is
in question. Article 5 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination declares a
right to housing. The U.S. has ratified that Convention. The International Covenant on Economic, Social, and
Human Rights, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which declare the right to housing, have
not been ratified by the U.S. As the leader of one NGO, called the Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions, says:
"The right to housing is a powerful, mobilizing tool for women's groups, street children and so on. Denying this
right would be a great step backwards." 101 If housing is declared to be a universal right, then the UN would
have the responsibility of guaranteeing and enforcing that right. And to have meaning, the UN would have to have
the authority to collect the money necessary to provide universal
Of more direct importance is the issue of "good
governance." Throughout all the conferences of the 1990s, emphasis has been placed on expanding the role and
functions of NGOs in the decision-making process and the management and administration of government programs at
every level. Habitat II Director-General, Wally N'Dow,
"The road to Istanbul has been marked by many
innovations. One of seminal importance has been a pioneering change in the rules of procedure -- a change that
was initiated during the preparatory process and subsequently endorsed by the General Assembly [Rule 61] in
recognition of the important role of local authorities and NGOs. As a result, all the organizations and
institutions of civil society will receive unparalleled recognition at a UN conference, nominating their
representatives to participate in a formal session . . . . They speak for countless millions of men and women in
the cities and towns across the planet, the true constituents of Habitat
This rule change officially elevates NGOs to
participatory status in the policy-making process of the United Nations. Policy making by individuals who have
no direct or indirect accountability to the electorate is a foreign concept in America. It is common -- in fact
expected -- in socialist countries. In America, if voters do not like the way America is being represented in
the UN, voters can remove the President who appoints UN delegates and elect someone else who more accurately
reflects American values. American voters cannot unelect representatives from the Sierra Club, or the president
of a gay feminist NGO, or any other NGO who may be selected by their peers to make global policies which affect
Moreover, Rule 61 invites participation by local
officials. Heretofore, the UN has served its member nations as represented by official delegates. This rule is
the first step toward bypassing the official national government to extend UN influence, programs, and
eventually money, regulations, and enforcement -- directly to the people within the nation. This is the essence
of governance by civil society, orchestrated by the United Nations. This is the first wave of the reality of
global governance. From Istanbul To Geneva (1996)
The second meeting of The Conference of the Parties to
the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COPII-FCCC), convened in Geneva, Switzerland July 8-19, 1996. The
treaty was presented in 1992 at the Rio "Earth Summit," and has now been ratified by 159 nations, including the
U.S. The treaty requires participating Annex I (developed) nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990
levels by the year 2000.
At COPI, however, meeting in Berlin in 1995, the Alliance
of Small Island States (AOSIS) proposed that developed nations reduce emissions to a level 20%, less than 1990
levels. The COP did not adopt the proposal, but did adopt the "Berlin Mandate" which was an agreement to develop
a legally binding Protocol by 1997. COPII was designed to negotiate The terms of the Protocol for adoption at
COPlII in Kyoto, Japan in 1997.
To influence the proceedings, the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change (IPCC) released its Second Assessment Report (SAR). For the first time, the official UN body
claimed that ". . . the balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate." Although
100 scientists -- some of whom were participants in the IPCC process -- publicly objected to the report's
findings in a statement called the "Leipzig Declaration," the Conference pushed forward toward a legally binding
Protocol. The conference document, called the "Ministerial Declaration," endorses The SAR; declares that
emissions will eventually have to be reduced by 50%; and calls on developed nations to initiate policies to
reduce emissions within specific industries: energy, transportation, agriculture, forestry, waste management,
and economic instruments. From Geneva To Global Governance
When Shirdath Ramphal handed over the IUCN gavel to Jay
Hair in 1993, he turned his attention to the Commission on Global Governance which he co-chaired along with
Ingvar Carlsson, former Prime Minister of Sweden and then-Leader of the Social Democratic Party in Sweden. Like
the Commissions of the 1980s (Brandt, Palme, MacBride, and Brundtland) it was an independent commission, meaning
that it was not created by a resolution of the UN General Assembly. It operated officially as an NGO but, as a
practical matter, it was an instrument of the United Nations. The Commission on Global Governance received the
formal endorsement of Butrous-Butrous Ghali, UN Secretary-General, and funding from the United Nations
Development Program. Nine nations and several private foundations also supplied funding. Oscar Arias, former
President of Costa Rica was a member of the Commission. Arias won the Nobel Peace Prize for his "peace plan"
which called on nations to direct disarmament savings to the UN's development
Adele Simmons, President of the John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, was a member. Maurice Strong also served
on the 28-member Commission.
Several of the Commission's ideas were advanced
experimentally at the various world conferences during the early 1990s. They tested the waters particularly for
the several global taxation ideas, and for their ideas about global governance through civil society. Their
final report was released in conjunction with the 50th anniversary of the United Nations in the fall of 1995,
entitled Our Global Neighborhood: The Report of the Commission on Global
The Commission recommended
"the General Assembly should agree to hold a World
Conference on Governance in 1998, with its decisions to be ratified and put into effect by
Hereafter, numbers in parentheses indicate the reference
page number in Our Global Neighborhood. The Commission bases its recommendations on the belief that human
activities have irreversible environmental impacts and that human activities need to be "managed" to keep the
"adverse outcomes within prudent bounds" (p. 11). "Effective and equitable management calls for a systemic,
long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development. Its universal application is a
priority among the tasks of global governance" (p. 30).
The Commission is convinced that the world is ready to
accept "a set of core values that can unite people of all cultural, political, religious, or philosophical
backgrounds.... It is fundamentally important that governance should be underpinned by democracy at all levels
and ultimately by the rule of enforceable law" (p.48). "Underpinned by democracy" has a totally different
meaning to people who live in a socialist democratic nation, than to people who live in a "free" country such as
America. Americans think of "democracy" as the process by which they elect the individuals to represent them in
their exercise of the limited power that Americans have chosen to give to their government. In socialist
nations, "democracy" means participating in the process by which the sovereign government decides how to manage
The "core values" upon which global governance is to be
based include liberty. But again, in America, liberty has a totally different meaning from what the Commission
describes. "Liberty is threatened by deprivation, economic dislocation, oppression based on gender or sexual
orientation, abuse of children, debt bondage, and other social and economic patterns." (p. 50) Americans realize
that these conditions are only some of the inherent risks of being free. Liberty is the freedom to exercise
individual ingenuity and apply individual energy to avoid the risks and rise above all other
The very fact that Americans, and others who live in free
societies, have risen above these risks, creates an injustice in the world according to the Commission.
"Although people are born into widely unequal economic and social circumstances, great disparities in their
conditions or life chances are an affront to the human sense of justice. . . . A concern for equity is not
tantamount to an insistence on equality, but it does call for deliberate efforts to reduce gross inequalities .
. . and to promote a fairer sharing of resources" (p. 51). Mutual respect which is defined to be "tolerance,"
caring -- with a global reach -- and integrity, which is defined as supporting the program, round out the
Commission's core values.
Voluntary acceptance of global governance is the
preferred means of achieving it. Education programs to teach the "global ethic" have been underway by UNESCO and
by UNEP for more than 20 years. That the U.S. government, through its representatives to the various UN
agencies, has not already crushed this global governance agenda is a testament to the effectiveness of the UN's
education program. But the Commission is not content to rely upon voluntary acceptance. An intricate maze of
international, enforceable law is encircling the planet in the form of Conventions, Treaties, and Executive
To implement, administer, and enforce global governance,
the Commission has recommended a major restructuring of the UN system. The Commission recommends an "Assembly of
the People" which "should consist of representatives of organizations accredited to the General Assembly as
Civil Society Organizations . . . . A Forum of 300-600 organs of global civil society would be desirable and
practicable" (p. 258-259). A new "Petitions Council" is recommended, to consist of five to seven representatives
of "civil society," for the purpose of reviewing petitions from NGOs in the field to direct to the appropriate
UN agency for enforcement action (p. 260).
A new Economic Security Council (ESC) would replace the
existing Economic and Social Council. The new ESC would consist of no more than 23 members who would have
responsibility for all international financial and development activities. The IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO
-- virtually all finance and development activities -- would be under the authority of this body. There would be
no veto power by any nation, nor would there be permanent member status for any nation (p.
The existing Security Council would be restructured. Veto
power of the five permanent members would be eliminated, as would permanent member status over time. With the
Secretary-General's office expanded to include the function of Commander-in-Chief, the Security Council would
oversee a new UN standing army, complete with support and transport car capabilities. (p. 100f) The Commission
calls for an international convention on curtailment of the arms trade (p. 129), a demilitarization of
international society, and disarming of civilians. (p. 131)
A new International Criminal Court would be created,
complete with its own "independent prosecutor or a panel of prosecutors of the highest moral character." (p.
324) The International Court of Justice would become "compulsory" and it would issue binding verdicts in order
to ''strengthen international law." (p.308f)
To protect the
"We propose that the Trusteeship Council . . . be given
the mandate of exercising trusteeship over the global commons. The global commons include the atmosphere, outer
space, the oceans beyond national jurisdiction, and the related environment and life-support systems that
contribute to the support of human life. Its functions would include the administration of environmental
treaties in such fields as climate change, biodiversity, outer space and the Law of the Sea. It would refer, as
appropriate, any economic or security issues arising from these matters to the Economic Security Council or the
Security Council." (p. 251f)
The Commission suggests that "the new Council "would
benefit from contributions from civil society organizations. Of major significance is the expansion of the
concept of security:
"All people, no less than all states, have a right to a
secure existence, and all states have an obligation to protect those rights. (p. 84) Where people are subjected
to massive suffering and distress, however, there is a need to weigh a state's right to autonomy against its
people's right to security. (p. 71) We believe a global consensus exists today for a UN response on humanitarian
grounds in cases of gross abuse of the security of people." (p. 89) The security of the people is challenged
"from threats to the earth's life-support systems, extreme economic deprivation, the proliferation of
conventional small arms, the terrorizing of civilian populations by domestic factions, and gross violations of
human rights." (p. 79)
The Commission believes that the UN should protect the
"security of the people" inside the borders of sovereign nations, with or without the invitation of the national
government. It proposes the expansion of an NGO "early warning" network to function through the Petitions
Council to alert the UN to possible action. It has recommended implementation of the Tobin Tax, and several
other taxing schemes. (p. 217f) It has called for a world conference in 1998 to present the treaties and other
documents necessary to bring about complete global governance by the year
The views expressed in this article are not necessarily
the opinions of the list owner.
This material is distributed free to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving it for non-profit educational
Antichrist and the Green Prince
27. News in Brief.
proof that Campbell and Blair DID lie about the Iraq War: Devastating secret evidence
declassified [which also proves that Australia's John Howard is a national traitor of the same ugly
dimensions as Blair and Co.]
Plotted with No. 10 to Oust Saddam in Bid to Win 'Prize' of Secure Oil Supplies
PR Firm To Smear Google
Run The Royals
Geithner Eliminates Hi-Tech Transfer Restrictions To
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Speaks The Truth
Step In Or Starve
Fukushima Plutonium Meets Chemtrail Barium -
The Perfect Crime?
WikiLeaks Document Confirms North American Union Plan
Weather Warfare: 'West
plots to cause drought in Iran'
Reported in December 2001
List of countries the
USA has bombed since the end of World War II
The Never-Ending War
Spy Drones Becoming
Pervasive INSIDE America
- China Ultimatum Warns US Not To Attack Pakistan
Massive Spying On Ameircans Revealed
More Madness - Scientists Now Claim Heart Attack Vax
Has Obama And US Nailed
Admits More Radiation Leak From MOX 3 Into Pacific
Tokyo Radiation 500% Higher Than Govt Announced
World According To Henry Kissinger
Film Foretold Fukushima Meltdown Disaster
Rothschilds, Non-Semitic, Gangster State Of Israel
Culpable Of 9/11? Zioloons Getting Desperate?
Ahmadinejad Accuses Europe Of Weather Warfare
Netanyahu Publicly Crushes Obama Over 1967 Border Remarks
Netanyahu Dumps On Barky's 'Peace Plan' At The WH
Once Again, Barky Shows Who's In Charge (Not
Is Netanyahu Next?
Royalty Dined On Human Flesh
Predict Up To 10 Hurricanes In 2011
Bollyn - 9-11...The Zionist
Accused Of Designing 9/11 (sure)
NATO Sinks 8 Libya Warships, Slaughters Crews
Jesus Coming Soon? Is The End Near?
Netanyahu Says Obama Endangering Israel
Obama Demands Jewish Pullback, Warns Arab Dictators
Obama's Middle East Hypocrisy - Every Major
E-book Sales Overtake Print Titles For First Time
Face Recognition Too Creepy Even For Google
Jerusalem 'Reserved For Homosexuals'
Tomatoes As Good As Statins For Cholesterol
Reporter - '2 Egypts Have Emerged'
The Satanic Cult Behind the Music Industry,
Part 1 (Video)
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?" (Quote from
satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:
URL of This Issue: