Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
10 May, 2011
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
- Where Do We Stand on Solidarity?
- The Global Criminal Masterminds Behind Al-Qaida Finally Exposed
- What is this Carnage [in the Middle East] Really All About?
- Obama-Osama: Your Daily Psy Op
- Lies, Damn Lies And Bin Laden's Death
- Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth
- Prove It! by Jim Kirwin
- The Insanity of Christian Zionism!
- Draw Your Own Conclusions From These Facts and Figures About Global Warming
- What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 8)
- Global Governance (Part 8 of 9)
- News in Brief
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as
a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in
today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are
addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When
was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because
of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit
in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your
'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur.
In so doing, you are serving our purpose."
(Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
We applaud John Pilger and all honest journalists
who are not "TC"
"We journalists ... have to be brave enough to defy those who seek our collusion in
selling their latest bloody adventure in someone else's country... That means always challenging the
official story, however patriotic that story may appear, however seductive and insidious it is. For
propaganda relies on us in the media to aim its deceptions not at a far away country but at you at home...
In this age of endless imperial war, the lives of
countless men, women and children depend on the truth or their blood is on
us ... Those whose job it is to keep the record straight ought to be the
voice of people, not power." (John Pilger, in his new film The War You Don't See)
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. Where Do We Stand on
By Adrian Salbuchi
There is no true
without fairness, truth, justice and
Pope John Paul II
Perhaps, all that is
to open roads for solidarity in the world
is the cooperation of just one more
I am convinced that today’s consumer
blinded by the market, will be replaced by another
which shall be characterized by the transcendental fact
that social justice and solidarity cannot be
Rene Geronimo Favaloro
One of the cruel facets of nature is that it does not like
the weak. In general, nature’s logic is that the strong survive
and the weak perish. Whatever romantic advocates of universal pacifism might say, the truth is
that the panther will still prey on gazelles and we ourselves will continue slaughtering calves and lambs for our
barbecues. It may not be a very kind aspect of Mother Nature, but she has an indisputable predilection for
excellence: she gets quite expediently rid of the useless, the deformed, the degenerate and she promotes quite
powerfully the strong, the healthy, and the well-built. Probably, we should not exaggerate this in Darwinian terms,
but the fact can be observed directly. Only those who have deliberately decided to shut their eyes do not see it,
and only those who have deliberately decided to shut down their minds try to explain it away.
In spite of this, as everybody knows, good old Mother Nature
has her paradoxes. For example, many times she rewards cowards with survival. Bravery can become anti-selective in
biological terms. Brave people are exposed to shorter lives, therefore, statistically they may mate fewer times
than the cowardly. Darwin could never explain why we did not become a species of frightened
On the other hand, nature has also had the whim of allowing
the existence of beings whose role in the general context I have never been able to fully understand. Can anyone
tell me what role in nature do flies, mosquitoes and snakes have? Alright, I know: flies and mosquitoes are what
frogs feed on. But then: what is the point of frogs? OK, frogs are eaten by snakes. But then and again: what is the
purpose of snakes? This is a small and eternal debate I have with my environmentalist friends, but as far as I am
concerned a swamp doesn’t get more beautiful or more useful due to frogs that eat mosquitoes and snakes that eat
frogs. I accept it as the fickleness of Mother Nature and I trust she knows what she is doing. But, quite honestly,
it really does not move my heart at all.
However it may be, there is one thing that holds true: in
biological terms, human beings are among the most extraordinary and complex creatures on Earth.
And they are also among the most dangerous
Oceans of ink and mountains of paper have been used to
debate on whether man is “good” or “evil”. The controversy between the anthropological optimism of Rousseau and the
anthropological pessimism of Hobbes is by no means over; even though today the politically correct standpoint – at
least officially – is optimism. Honestly, I think that man’s inherent goodness or evil is not – or at least should
not be – an anthropological discussion, nor even a “philosophical” one in its usually understood terms. Because,
essentially, it is a metaphysical question, and ultimately, a theological issue.
I could not really say if man is good or evil by nature.
What I do know is that man is a dangerous animal.
We are dangerous. More than ten thousand years of History
prove that we are capable of killing, slitting throats and exterminating our own species; and that is something no
other creature has done nor does. We are the only ones capable of killing just for the sake of it and without this
constituting an exceptional and occasional behaviour observed only in some statistically irrelevant cases of other
species. Murdering, burning, plundering, raping are inherent to our historical behaviour. We devastate our
environment and build artificial environments that alter the planet’s ecological balance. In a few years, we have
been capable of annihilating what nature took millions to build. We empty lakes to irrigate our crops and we create
other lakes where there were none to power our hydroelectric dams. We love God but we are capable of executing
others who love Him differently, or under another name. The West has even seen the massacre between people who
loved the same God with the same name.
Read the Full Article:
Global Criminal Masterminds Behind Al-Qaida Finally
By Nazarene Remnant
10 May, 2011
The most important part of this article exposes the fact that the supposed terrorist organisation
known as Al-Qaida does not in fact exist, and has never existed. It was
always a creation of the criminal cabal that now is in power in all nations on Earth. Now I know you will
find this very hard to believe, since every daily news item we see or hear on TV, in the newspapers,
magazines, and on radio, to do with some kind of violent and murderous terrorist act on this planet,
it is Al-Qaida invariably that did it!
To refresh your memory, here's a partial list of the evils that Osama Bin
Laden and Al-Qaida has supposedly perpetrated over the years, according to the lies and propaganda
our governments drip-feed to us on the hour every hour:
1992: Blamed for a bombing in Aden, Yemen,
which is his supposed first terrorist strike.
1993: Supposed to have inspired the bomb
attack on New York's World Trade Centre.
1995: Reckoned to be involved in
assassination attempt on Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak.
1998: Linked to the US embassy bombings in
Kenya and Tanzania.
2000: Responsible for the bombing of USS
2001: Totally blamed for 911, the deadly
attack on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre in New York City, which kills 3,000 people.
2002: Escapes US bombings at Tora Bora in
Afghanistan and supposedly goes into hiding. He then is blamed for the Bali bombings in Indonesia, which kills
202 people, mostly Australian, but I reckon you had better read this before
believing these lies.
2004: Supposedly kills more than 200 people
in the Madrid bombings.
2005: Blamed for the London bombings, but
read this before being conned on this
Al-Qaida is in fact is
a creation of the CIA in conjunction with the criminal cabal that now is
in power in all of the major nations on Earth. It is most important that you view the
following BBC video, titled BBC Now Admits Al Qaeda Never
Existed, which is available here:
This video discloses the following
||That the many videos of Osama Bin
Laden threatening the West were all fake. The fighters gathering around him in the videos were all
hired for the day and told to bring their own weapons.
||Osama Bin Laden never had any
formal organisation behind him, until the English/Americans invented one for him.
||Bin Laden never used the term "Al
Qaida" until after 911, when he realized that this was the term the English/Americans expected him to
||Al Qaida in fact
actually never existed.
The Five Founding Nations of
the AshkeNazi Fourth
Reich (aka New World
There are five nations who are going to be the founding nations of the
AshkeNAZI Fourth Reich, as the following image clearly shows.
The five founding nations of the New World Order.
For more information on the Nazi (NWO) Takeover of the World by these five countries, see:
Reading 77: "The Nazi Fourth Reich To Begin in Australia," of The Real Crisis is About to Unfold, and It's Not
Financial, which contains the following articles:
Article #1: "Australia is One of the Five Founding Nations of the New World Order."
Article #2: "The NWO Plan for the Takeover of Australia."
Article #3: "The UN to Establish an Interim Military Government in Australia."
Article #4: "Fortress Australia: Hidden Agenda."
Article #5: "NATO's Afghan War Model Is Prototype for the Takeover of the World."
Article #6: "Fortress Australia and the Nazi Takeover of the World."
The Australian Roots of
the New World Order
The Evil Incarnate Julia Gillard, Prime Minister of Australia
“In a dramatic coup on June 24 2010, Julia Gillard who was Deputy Prime Minister took over as
Prime Minister from Kevin Rudd and became Australia's first female PM. It occurred at a time Rudd was taking
a battering in the polls and was not well liked within his own party.
Gillard is the first PM to be unmarried and a lesbian. She is in a relationship to Tim Mathieson
- who is a ‘beard.’ [A "beard" is a person of the opposite sex who
marries or dates a closeted lesbian or gay person to cover up their
homosexuality. In the past, often lesbians married gay men so that both could "pass" as
straight, either for work or for their families. Source: http://lesbianlife.about.com/od/herstory/g/Beard.htm]
She is the first PM to be sworn in without making reference to God and did not swear on the Bible. (Like her
'hero', Bob Hawke, Gillard is an admitted atheist.) She was sworn in by Australia's first female Governor
General (Quentin Bryce.) Bryce has held numerous high offices with the aim of advancing women's and
"minority" rights at the expense of the Australia's European majority. Bryce's daughter is married to Bill
Shorten who was pivotal in bringing Gillard into the office of PM.
When she was at high school, Gillard was mentored by the Jewish liberal (i.e. Communist) Marlene
Pilowski. When she moved to Melbourne to attend university, she became the Education Vice President of the
left wing (i.e. Communist) AUS (Australian Union of Students), and later was its President.
Gillard was in the Socialist Forum from her
university days. The forum's objectives were to create a socialist / feminist society through Labor
governments. It originally consisted of ex-members of the Victorian branch of the Communist Party and some
ALP members. Gillard was one of the two original paid organizers of the Forum. She wrote numerous documents
for the Socialist Forum including 'Being a Socialist Teacher' and 'Future Directions of the Left'.
It was also through the Forum that she met Labor heavy-weight Joan Kirner and worked closely
with her on Labor's Affirmative Action Plan. Gillard wrote the constitution for the pro-abortion feminist
organization EMILY's List (in Australia), which supports "progressive" Labor women.
In 2006, when in opposition, Gillard voted for legalizing the abortion pill RU486 and for stem
cell research, which both became law.
In March 2010, when she was Education Minister, Senator Ron Boswell said that “Julia Gillard's
new [education] curriculum reads like a learners manual for international socialism.” [Nazarene Remnant
comment: Better is …“Julia Gillard's new [education] curriculum reads like a learners manual
for international satanism.” ]
As PM, Gillard has tried to assuage Australians by painting herself as a moderate. She has also
distanced herself from Rudd, who had become the fall-guy for a bad government. Gillard however should take
more blame as she was one of the "gang of 4" that made the decisions.
She was directly responsible for the Building Education Revolution (BER) scandal over building
unneeded overpriced schools. In less than three years, the Federal Labor Government has gone from a 20
billion dollar surplus (left by Howard) to 180 billion debt, and is borrowing an extra BILLION dollars every
The repeating theme in Australian Federal and state politics is that Labor governments create
massive debt, and the Conservatives (Liberal / National party governments) then spend years repaying that
debt. The main point is often unrealised - governments shouldn't be borrowing or repaying money from
off-shore lenders in the first place.
Before holding the next general election (probably this year - 2010), Gillard will have to
straighten out 3 key policy areas:
1. She compromised on the mining tax, which was originally introduced by Rudd to pay off debt. With
her dodgy projection figures, she claimed it would bring the budget back into the black, but this is
2. The second issue, that of the "boat people." Boat arrivals have increased at over 50 times the
rate under Howard because of Rudd's loose regulations. Boat people are considered queue jumpers. Gillard said
that they will be processed in East Timor although there is no centre there. She is ignoring the centre
already built at Nauru. Gusmao, the PM of East Timor claims he wasn't consulted and didn't want a centre in
3. The third issue is the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS.) Rudd initially pushed it hard, but it was
defeated in the Senate. The average Australian didn't really understand what it was, but many have since
woken up that it is essentially a big expense which will effect ordinary people. The ETS is not about saving
the environment so much as social change and the redistribution of wealth. [Nazarene Remnant
comment: To understand what the “Green” environment movement is really all about, see this
important article: “What is the
‘Green’ and Environmental Movement Really All About?” In Last Days
Watch newsletter, Issue 37a, 14 November, 2010, available here: http://www.NazareneRemnant.org/issue-37a-ldw.html ]
Gillard who has painted herself to be a bit of a non-scary moderate, is red at the centre.
The media distracts and woos the dumb masses with news about her latest haircuts, etc (her boyfriend Mathieson is a hairdresser of unknown
sexual orientation.) [Nazarene Remnant comment: That’s a very naïve comment
However, it is clearly her aim to re-engineer society, but years of the Left's influence in
Labor governments, education and the media has already done much of that.
As PM, Gillard just looks like another version of Rudd. Pretending to listen to the people, she
instead pushes the NWO agenda [Nazarene Remnant comment: Unless we stop playing
these habitual doublespeak word games that these Nazis have
instilled in us, we will never be able to call a spade a spade. These fiends—and that’s exactly who they
are—are not “socialists,” “communists,” “red,”“labourites,” and so on. They are child-murdering criminal
satanists who are out to kill us and transform the world into the most diabolical evil empire ever to appear
on the face of the Earth, and that’s the AshkeNazi Fourth Reich. We have to be very clear
about this, because our lives, and the lives of our children, depend upon our clear insight and great
vigilance. To gain a smidgen of insight into what these people really get up to in their private and very
secretive lives, see our free book The Black Mass You Don't Want To
Know About, freely available here: http://NazareneRemnant.org/the-black-mass-you-don't-want-to-know-about.html
. The movie Eyes Wide Shut, directed by Stanley Kubrick (1928—1999), only skimmed the surface of the private lives of these
Being a non-religious 50 year old woman in a de-facto relationship is nothing unusual in
Australia anymore. Gillard simply mirrors what Australia already is, while helping to push it ever closer to
extinction in the name of 'tolerance'.
[Nazarene Remnant comment: I would prefer to say
that we are being led by a child-murdering, lesbian, atheistic, satanic psychopath whose real agenda is now
very well known. This writer did well to say that “Gillard simply mirrors what Australia already is.” Indeed
being led by a pure satanist put there, and financed by the Australian people, says it all about our foolish
and naïve nation.
also ought to become aware of the connection between child sacrifice in satanic
coverns(this is a very
regular occurrence in Australia), and the murder of the unborn child, which is abortion. Gillard is deeply
connected to both. Here is the connection between abortion and satanism:
Book Demonic Abortion, Euteneuer explains that an abortion is a
ritualistic sacrifice of a baby to Satan and it has been practiced from a long time ago.
He wrote that “…
programs of sex education in the schools change how the youth of a country behave in matters of human sexuality.
Sex education is the systematic values and behavior modification program of the culture of death, and it is very
effective when it is implemented in the public school systems, far from the watchful eyes of
He also advocated
that exorcisms be performed outside abortion clinics, which he described as
“temples of a demonic religion.”
C said (January 25,
Anton LaVey, high priest and founder of the
Church of Satan admitted that abortion was an actual sacrifice to
Satan.He said it with all the
glibness of one who knew he wouldn't even be reprimanded. This is true, it really
For a full expose of the evil that lies deep within Julia Gillard, see our free
Julia Gillard, Red Slippers, “TC” Proponents, and the AshkeNAZI Fourth
Prime Minister Julia Gillard (c), Queensland Premier Anna Bligh (L) and
Opposition leader Tony Abbott look on at the funeral service for Lance Corporal Jared MacKinney at the Ashgrove
Baptist Church on September 10, 2010 in Brisbane, Australia. The 28-year old soldier was killed in battle in
Afghanistan's Oruzgan province in late August. (September 9, 2010 - Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images AsiaPac)
(L-R) U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Australian Foreign
Minister Kevin Rudd pose at the start of the AUSMIN talks at Government House on November 8, 2010 in Melbourne,
Australia. Secretary Clinton travelled to Melbourne with U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to participate in
the annual Australia-U.S. ministerial meetings. The meetings were originally scheduled for January 2010 but were
postponed so Secretary Clinton could help organise U.S. relief efforts following the Haiti earthquake. (November 7,
2010 - Photo by Pool/Getty Images AsiaPac) Source: http://www.zimbio.com
Read more here:
The Global Criminal Masterminds Behind
Al-Qaida Finally Exposed
3. What is this Carnage [in the Middle East] Really All
Source: David Icke Newsletter, July 23rd 2006
This copy: http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=68
The Story That So Very Few People Have The Research Or
The Guts To Tell
Hello all …
I want to continue where I left off last week because after
seven more days of constant propaganda over what is now a full blown war in the Middle East some balance and
background is desperately required here.
We keep being told that the conflict was started by
Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Gaza Strip when a total of three Israeli
soldiers were kidnapped. Bullshit. What is happening is the latest outbreak of hostilities that began when the
Rothschild dynasty targeted what was then Arab Palestine to be what it called a ‘Homeland for the Jews’.
The Rothschild cabal could not care less about Jews. To them
they are a means to an end of global control. The first leader of Israel,David
Ben-Gurion, summed up this mind set when he said:
‘If I knew that it was possible to
save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of
Israel, I would choose the latter, for before us lies not only the numbers of these children but the historical
reckoning of the people of Israel.’ (Quoted on pp 855-56 in Shabtai Teveth’s Ben-Gurion)
The ‘Jewish homeland’ was from
the start a Rothschild fiefdomorchestrated
through a global secret society network of interbreeding families known as the Illuminati. The goal of these
families is domination of the planet through a world government dictatorship, a world army and a micro-chipped
population, as I have been detailing in my books all these years.
This week the Israeli writer, Barry Chamish, told of a
meeting with Evelyn Rothschild’s grandson, who abandoned the family to be a Mormon. Chamish said he learned that
just seven families are enjoying the ‘fruits of the war’. The grandson had said of the Rothschilds: ‘They created Israel as their personal toy.
It makes them richer and gives them more control. It’s not going to be destroyed.’
The Rothschilds funded the early European settlers in
Israel, manipulated events in Germany that led to the horrific treatment of Jewish people and others, and then used
that as the excuse to reach their long-term goal - a Rothschild-Illuminati stronghold in Palestine using the Jewish
population as fodder to be used and abused as necessary. They called their
plan ‘Zionism’. This
term is often used as a synonym for Jewish people when it is actually a political movement devised and promoted
through the House of Rothschild and opposed by many Jews.
The most visible Zionist front in the United States today
are the so-called‘neo-conservatives’ or ‘neo-cons’, that I highlighted last week in the first
part of this expose.
The Rothschilds exploited as their ‘justification’ to seize
Palestine the claim in the Old Testament that the Jews were God’s Chosen People and that ‘He’ had gifted them the
land of what was once called Israel. That’s it, no more debate required.‘God’ has spoken,
it’s in the Old Testament, and so we’re moving in.
As Golda Meir,
another Israeli Prime Minister, said in Le Monde in 1971: ‘This
country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by God Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for
The invasion and subversion of an entire nation was based on
texts in the Bible written by who knows who thousands of years ago after the Jewish captivity in the ancient
Illuminati centre of Babylon in what is now Iraq. Pinch me, it can’t be true. ‘Ouch’, yes it is.
In fact, this nonsense is an historical fraud because the
vast majority of Jewish people, those who call themselves ‘Ashkenazi’ Jews, have no connection to the
land of Palestine/Israel at all, as courageous Jewish writers like Arthur Koestler have detailed. See his book
Tribe. The Ashkenazi come from a country once known
as Khazaria in southern Russia and the Caucasus, not the land they have used the Biblical texts to lay claim
Those later called Ashkenazi Jews moved north over the
centuries into Russia and then Western Europe and these were the people targeted by Hitler and the Nazis and
exploited by the Rothschilds to populate Palestine. Koestler wrote that the official story of Jewish origins
‘begins to look like the most cruel hoax history has ever perpetrated’.
Jewish writer Arthur Koestler detailed the Khazar origins of
most Jewish people in his book, The Thirteeenth Tribe. Here is a
brief summary of what he revealed …The Story of the non-Semitic Jews - http://www.missionislam.com/nwo/khazars1.htm
Jews fall into two main groups,
the Ashkenazi and the Sephardic,who were once
located in Spain and Portugal. Daniel Elazar at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs wrote that at the end of
the 11th Century, 97% of Jews were Sephardic, but the ratio changed dramatically over the centuries and by 1931
Ashkenazi Jews accounted for nearly 92 per cent of world Jewry.
Today the Ashkenazim utterly
dominate Israel society both in numbers and control. Jewish organizations like the Anti Defamation League (ADL) constantly
target others for ‘racism’ when Israel is a strictly and fiercely hierarchical society based on race, even among
the Jews. The Ashkenazi are at the top, of course, followed by the Sephardic, and, irony of irony, then come the
Mizrahi Jews, who descend from the Jewish communities of the Middle East. At the bottom of the pile are the black
Ethiopian Jews who have long complained of blatant racism. Underneath all of them come the Palestinian Arabs.
(See Racism Inside Israel - http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BEN108A.html;
Racism By Any Other Name - http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2006/666/666p21.htm;
and The Life of an American Jew in Racist Marxist Israel -
This Internet article described one expression of this
racist Israeli structure - income distribution:
‘Israeli society is further fragmented by ethnic class and
religious inequality. In general terms, Arab citizens are the lowest paid, and have seen a decline in their
position over the period 1990 to 2001. Mizrahi Jews (Jews of African or Asian descent) have seen a small
improvement, whilst Ashkenazi Jews (Jews of European or North American descent) are the highest paid, and have seen
a 10 percent rise in their pay. In 2001, Ashkenazi Jews received on average one and a half times the income of
Mizrahi Jews and twice that of Arabs.’
It is time that Zionist racism and apartheid was exposed to
balance the endless claims of racism and ‘anti-Semitism’ that come the other way through Illuminati fronts like the
ADL and many others that have been set up to brand as racist anyone who challenges the Zionist
In truth, Ashkenazi Jews are not
even a Semitic people - it is the Arabs and
minority Jewish people who are the Semites. Not that it should matter what they are, the human body is just a
potential vehicle for the Infinite Consciousness that we all are. But such labels are used by these people to
suppress debate so we need to balance the propaganda.
The lands of the Semitic peoples. Why aren’t we told that
being ‘anti-Semitic’ overwhelmingly means ‘anti-Arab’??
So imagine if all this happened in your country. There you
are peacefully getting on with your life and getting along well enough with the small numbers of Jewish people who
live in your communities - just as the Palestinian people were. Then, American and European governments
decree that your land, where your ancestors have lived for thousands of years, belongs to someone else and
millions of Jewish people from all over the world descend upon your country.
Even worse, they don’t want to
just live among you - they want to take
complete control of everything and turn you into serfs and slaves. How would you react? How would anyone react in the face of
The Palestinians were supposed to just lie down and accept
this staggering injustice and if they didn’t they were ‘terrorists’. What the world seems to have forgotten, and
they will certainly not be reminded by the mainstream media or even most of the ‘alternative’ media, is that
it was through terrorism that Israel was imposed upon the
incumbent Arab population.
This is the story.
The idea that a Jewish homeland in Israel was the result of
what happened in Nazi Germany is ridiculous. That was the justification used at the time by the Rothschilds amid
the wave of - understandable - public sympathy. But the planning and manipulation began long before in the 19th and
early 20th centuries through the Rothschilds and their gofers like Chaim Weizmann. British Prime Minister and
Foreign Secretary, Viscount
Palmerston, was a close Rothschild family associate and patriarch of European Freemasonry. He
mixed with all the major Illuminati names of his era. As early as 1840, he wrote:
‘There exists at the present time
among the Jews dispersed over Europe a strong notion that the time is approaching when their nation is to return to
Palestine. It would be of manifest importance to the Sultan to encourage the Jews to return and settle in Palestine
because the wealth that they would bring with them would increase the resources of the Sultan’s dominions, and the
Jewish people if returning under the sanction and protection at the invitation of the Sultan would be a check upon
any future evil designs of Egypt or its neighbours. I wish to instruct your Excellency strongly to recommend to the
Turkish government to hold out every just encouragement to the Jews of Europe to return to Palestine.’
More bullshit. Palmerston was
pushing the Rothschild-Illuminati agenda and he knew it.
The Rothschild/Illuminati-manipulated First World War led to
the ‘Balfour Declaration’ in 1917 when the
British Foreign Secretary, Lord Balfour, declared his government’s support for a Jewish homeland in Israel. This
announcement was connected to a deal to bring the United States into the war, a scam orchestrated through President
Woodrow Wilson’s minders, Edward Mandel
House and Bernard
Baruch. Both were Rothschild agents in America.
It was Lionel Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild, who
formulated with others this British government ‘declaration’ in support of a Jewish homeland. What became known as
the ‘Balfour Declaration’ was actually a letter from Balfour to Lord Rothschild. What official history does not
tell you is that a major Illuminati grouping is called the Round Table and this spawned organisations like the
Royal Institute of International Affairs in London and both the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral
Commission in the United States. Lord Balfour was an inner-circle member of the Round Table, Lord Rothschild was its
funder, and the ‘Balfour Declaration’ was a letter between the two!
The Balfour Declaration promised Palestine to both the Jews and
Arabs, in fact. They wanted to keep the Arabs on
their side for a while because they needed them to revolt against the Turks as part of their First World War
strategy. They used the man known as ‘Lawrence of
Arabia’ to lead this campaign. However, they, and Lawrence, knew it was all a lie.
The Balfour Declaration said that ‘nothing shall be done
which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of the existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine’. But
Rothchild sidekick Chaim Weizmann would say: ‘With regard to the Arab question - the British told us that there are
several hundred thousand Negroes there but this is a matter of no consequence’. Nor have they been ever since.
After Europe had been devastated by the
Rothschild-Illuminati First World War there came the Versailles ‘Peace’
Conference near Paris in 1919 in which reparations were imposed on the post war German government,
the Weimar Republic, that
were so crippling and unsustainable that they prepared the ground for Hitler and the Nazis to come to power on a
platform of restoring German pride and the nation’s economy.
Every one of the major ‘advisors’ at Versailles from
Britain, France and the United States was either a Rothschild bloodline or controlled by them. These included
Bernard Baruch. And guess what? They announced their official support for a Jewish homeland in
The Hitler regime was funded by Illuminati-Rothschild agents
like the Rockefellers, Harrimans and Prescott Bush, grandfather of the idiot president. This allowed the German war
machine to emerge in just a few years from the ashes of economic collapse. What followed was the Second World War,
the concentration camps, and the Illuminati-Rothschild use of these horrors to secure their long-held goal - a
foothold in the Middle East to advance their plans far into the future.
The lands that the Rothschilds and their agents wished to
occupy were populated at the time by the Arabs or Palestinians, but there was always going to be but one
fate for them. Former Israel Prime Minster, Yitzhak
Rabin, said in an uncensored version of his memoirs, published in the New York Times on 23 October 23rd, 1979:
‘We walked outside, Ben-Gurion
accompanying us. Allon repeated his question - What is to be done with the Palestinian population?’ Ben-Gurion
waved his hand in a gesture which said “Drive them out!”
And that’s what they did.
The Arabs were driven out of power or consequence in their
own land by Zionist terrorist groups like Hagana, Irgun and the Stern Gang (also known as Lehi) who bombed and
assassinated Arabs, fellow Jews and the British administrators who had control over Palestine under a mandate from
the League of Nations and the Versailles Peace Conference. ‘Palestine’ was then the region we now call Israel, Jordan, the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, formerly belonging to the Ottoman Empire.
This Zionist terrorism led to the imposition of the
Jewish state in 1948 when 750,000 or more Arabic people were expelled from their own land.
Among the major players in these and other terrorist operations
were Menachem Begin, Yitzhak Shamir and Ariel Sharon, butchers who became Israeli Prime
Ministers and had the nerve to condemn Arab terrorism.
The Stern Gang was named by the British after its first
commander, Avraham Stern, who later formed his own group, Irgun Zvai Leumi be-Yisrael (National Military
Organization in Israel). An Internet article describes the motivation:
‘… Stern believed that the Jewish
population should focus its efforts on fighting the British rather than supporting them in World War II; and that
forceful methods were an effective means to achieve those goals. He differentiated between “enemies of the Jewish
people” (e.g., the British) and “Jew haters”, (e.g., the Nazis), believing that the former needed to be defeated,
and the latter neutralized. To this end, he initiated contact with Nazi authorities offering an alliance with
Germany in return for transferring Europe’s Jews to Palestine and the establishment of a Jewish state
This has always been the true motivation of these manipulators and they
have treated Jewish people as a whole as cattle to be exploited at will to this end.
Irgun, led by later Prime Minister, Menachem Begin, was
responsible for the bombing of the British headquarters at the King David Hotel in Jerusalem. It killed 91 Britons,
Arabs and Jews, injuring many more, and this was only one of a stream of terrorist outrages and assassinations that
ended in the creation of Israel. An article on the World Socialist Website, points out:
‘It is not simply that Ariel
Sharon and company are a bunch of hypocrites or political amnesiacs about the past. More importantly, the Irgun,
led by Menachem Begin, the Stern Group and Lehi, its successor, went on to form the Herut party, forerunner of the
Likud party, and the ultra right-wing Moledet party, which form the main coalition partners of Sharon’s government.
The gang of former generals,
ultra-nationalists and religious bigots that run Israel today are the political heirs of terrorists who furthermore
had close connections with the fascists. In this, they mirrored some of the Arab nationalists in Palestine, Egypt
and Iraq who allied themselves with Germany in order to rid themselves of British imperialism. These alliances led
to a virtual civil war between the various wings of the Zionist movement during World War II.’
This is what people
need urgently to realise. To challenge Israel is
not to condemn Jewish people as a whole. It is to expose the fact that they are fodder in a game most do not begin
to understand - a game controlled from the start by a leadership made up of terrorists. When we understand this,
past and present events start to make far more sense.
a war criminal of astonishing proportions, was United States
National Security Advisor and Secretary of State from 1969 to1977 and responsible for the death and suffering of
extraordinary numbers of people around the world. But his prime
role was to represent the interests of Israel and
the Illuminati plan for the Middle East that I will describe shortly. Especially after the emergence
of Kissinger, the Illuminati-Israel grip on American foreign and domestic policy began to tighten ever more
The Illuminati/Israel nexus has spent decades taking over
the government structure of the United States to ensure that (a) Israel has become the recipient of ONE THIRD of
all US aid; (b) that it is funded to the tune of billions a year by the US to finance its military spending and
build up; and (c) that the United States government pursues a foreign policy of unbelievable bias towards Israel
and against the surrounding Arab states.
The pathetic statements about Lebanon by Bush that blamed
Hezbollah for everything, supported the mass murder of civilians, sorry ‘Israel’s right to defend itself’, and
showing no desire to secure a ceasefire, are typical of how Israel controls the US government through the
Illuminati network. So is the mantra of
‘Iran and Syria are to blame’. These are both on the Illuminati hit list and they need an excuse to target
As I pointed out in detail last week, the Bush
administration is dominated by supporters of Israel through the Project for the New American Century, the American
Enterprise Institute, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee (AIPAC), one of the top lobby groups in Washington. Joel Beinin, a contributing editor of Middle
East Report and a professor of Middle East history at Stanford University, says that the AIPAC …:
‘… became a significant force in
shaping public opinion and US Middle East policy after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war. Its power was simultaneously
enabled and enhanced by Israel’s emergence as a regional surrogate for US military power in the Middle East in the
terms outlined by the 1969 Nixon Doctrine’. (In other words, the Kissinger Doctrine).
An AIPAC foreign policy associate in Jerusalem told
CNSNews.com that in one month alone some 10% of the members of
the U.S. House of Representatives had visited Israel on tours it had arranged. CBS News also
reported in 2004 that an FBI investigation had found evidence that a senior Pentagon analyst with close ties to
neo-con Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz and neo-con Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith had provided a
draft presidential directive on Iran to the AIPAC that was then passed to the Israeli government.
Add to all this the Zionist control through ownership and
personnel of much of the mainstream media and you have a network that gives the Arabic peoples no chance whatsoever
of justice and understanding and the public no chance of being told the truth.
So to current events and their true significance.
It is claimed that everything started with the kidnapping of
the Israeli soldiers, but we need to go back at least to June 9th when Israel shelled a beach in Gaza killing eight
Palestinians and injuring 32 civilians, including 13 children. The dead included seven members of one family. The
Israeli government offered its ‘deep regret’, but this outrage was no accident. It was part of the process of
instigating a reaction so that what has happened since could unfold.
On June 13th ,an Israeli plane fired at a vehicle on a busy
Gaza road and when civilians hurried to help the injured another missile was fired into the crowd. Eleven
Palestinians died, including two medical staff and two children.
Come on, the Israeli
government was saying - retaliate. We have the
gun cocked, we’re ready to go, and we just need you to give us the excuse to pull the trigger.
If Arab people had done the same they would have been called
terrorists, the pimps of the ‘world community’ would have been red-faced in their condemnation, and Israel’s
American-funded military would have done what have these past ten days.
The outrageous double-standards are just sickening. I saw
some former Israel military commander this week saying how terrible it was that Israeli children had to be sitting
in bomb shelters in Haifa when, as she spoke those words, children were being killed by Israeli bombs in
But then Israeli Prime Minister and terrorist, Menachem Begin, told the Israeli parliament that Palestinians ‘are beasts walking on two legs’ and another Prime Minister and
terrorist, Yitzhak Shamir, said in a speech to Jewish settlers that the Palestinians ‘would would be crushed like
grasshoppers … heads smashed against the boulders and walls’. (’Begin and the ‘Beasts’, New Statesman, June 25, 1982, and Yitzhak Shamir quoted in the New York Times
April 1st, 1988). That is what they really think.
Have no illusions here, Arabs and the rest of the world’s
peoples, are seen as inferior beings - little more than vermin - to the extremist fanatics who buy the nonsensical
baloney of a ‘God’s Chosen People’. It was the neo-con Israel fanatic John Bolton, the ‘US’ (Illuminati/Israel)
Ambassador to the UN, who said this week that there was a ‘moral’ difference between the deaths of Israeli
civilians and those of Lebanese people in the conflict.
‘I think it would be a mistake to ascribe moral equivalence
to civilians who die as the direct result of malicious terrorist acts,’ he said, and those caused by Israel’s
’self-defense’. Behind that statement is the racism that has long been at the heart of American and Israeli policy.
But then why shouldn’t Israel and its supporters be racist to others when their very state is based on apartheid
and racism on a mega scale?
Bolton, like Bush and Secretary of State Rice, sing for their supper at the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee.
‘What should we do
next, oh masters?’
‘We must say Syria and Iran are to blame, and it is too
early to have a ceasefire so Israel can go on killing the innocent for as long as it wants?’
‘Alright, anything you
The creation of Israel was never an end in itself. It has
always been a means to an end. All
along, the plan has been to target the Islamic world to trigger a global war that
would set the world ablaze and lead to the ’solution’ of centralised control of the planet and all its
peoples. To do that they needed to create a point of conflict, a power keg, among the Arab countries that
could be exploded to start another global conflict. This is the real reason for the creation of Israel and the real
reason why the United States has spent its billions building up Israel’s might and military.
a Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry
and Illuminati to the core, is alleged to have written a letter in 1871 to an infamous Illuminati operative,
Guissepe Mazzini, in which he outlined the three world
wars that would lead to global domination.
The first war, he is supposed to have written, would overthrow the Czars in Russia through
a conflict between the British and Germanic Empires; and the second would lead to political Zionism
being strong enough to install a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. Now there are many who say the letter
never existed, but what is interesting, in the light of current events, is what he is supposed to have said about
World War Three:
‘The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the
“agentur” of the “Illuminati” between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic World. The war must be
conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political
Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile, the other nations, once more divided on this issue, will be constrained to fight to the point of
complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion …We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and
we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect
of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves
against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the
multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or
direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light
through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of
Lucifer, brought finally out in the public
view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the
destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.’
Source: Cmdr.William Guy Carr, former Intelligence Officer
in the Royal Canadian Navy, quoted in Satan: Prince of This
If Pike did not write that, then the faker was some prophet.
Illuminati agenda all along has been to create so much war, conflict and upheaval of every kind that the people
agree to be ruled by a centralised global dictatorship to ’solve the problems’ these perceived ’saviours’ have
actually created. It is the technique I have dubbed Problem-Reaction-Solution. You covertly create the problem and then overtly
offer the solution … the change you want to impose on the world.
The plan has always been to use Israel as the spark to
explode the Middle East into war, which would then drag in more and more countries and lead to a conflict with
China. North Korea is part of this, also. One of the reasons the rest of the Arab world has been so restrained over
events in Lebanon is that they know the game plan and are terrified of the consequences for them.
It seems that the terrorist-turn-Prime Minister-terrorist,
Ariel Sharon, was pursuing policies that did not suit the needs of the agenda. So he took his leave - stage far
right -after his massive induced stroke to be replaced by his ‘friend’ Ehud Olmert and the truly appalling Shimon Peres who now front up the devastation and mass
murder in Lebanon and Gaza.
Sharon: You were just a sad pawn, mate. Peres: no words would suffice.
This is the historical background, the falling dominoes,
that have led to what is happening today with hundreds of Lebanese killed, more than half a million made refugees,
and missiles killing and maiming Israelis who are manipulated and programmed by their own sick government to
believe the Big Lie.
Of course, Arab terrorism is equally wrong.
Violence just begets violence, only peace begets peace. Every
kidnapping, death and injury is a personal and family tragedy and none is more or less important than any other.
The sight of the Hezbollah leader, Hassan Nasrallah, calling two Arab children in Israel killed by Hezbollah
rockets ‘martyrs for Palestine’ was gut-wrenching. There are idiots and terrorist fanatics on both sides and I have
no illusions about the suppression of freedom in Syria or Iran either. It is a case of seeing the big picture in
which the monstrous game is being played out and putting the Arab response into its historical
It is time for all of us to come together, Arab, Jew,
Gentile, whatever name you give yourself. The labels don’t matter; they are but diversions, illusions. We are ALL
one infinite consciousness caught in a crazy computer game believing it to be real.
What do most Israelis, Arabs, Jews, Gentiles, Chinese,
whoever, really want? They want
peace and love and harmony in their lives. So let us grasp that together. It is what unites
us, this desire for peace, love and freedom. It crosses the delusions of the religious and racial divide. Why
should we go on allowing the crazies to deny it to us?
How do we change the world from hatred and war to peace and
We must be peaceful and loving and cease to cooperate with
the forces of hatred and war.
They can only control us and dictate to us with our
cooperation because they are the few and we are the many. We are the power on this planet if only we realised that
and expressed it with a passion. The dark eyes and dark suits can only have power through divide and rule. They
want us to fight among ourselves, only then can these pathetic people have their wicked way.
As Gandhi said: ‘We must be the
change we want to see in the world.’
Truer words never spoken.
‘I’m ready, what about you?
3. Obama-Osama: Your Daily Psy Op
Both work for the CIA in
the theater department.
By K.R. Nilsen
On May 1. 2011, to the day exactly 235 years after the founding of Illuminate, US president Obama proudly
announced that the US military had killed the "most wanted terrorist" in the world, Osama Bin Laden. And after this
crime, where a man was apparently sentenced and murdered without any trial whatsoever, people all over the world
are rejoicing and dancing in the streets!
Amazing - a tasteless and morbid celebration of murder on Illuminati day [May 1], exactly according the spirit of
[Nazarene Remnant comment: May 1 is May Day, a most high
day in the satanic calendar. May 1 every year is Beltaine, Walpurgis or May
Day, and on it a blood ritual and/or Druid Fire Festival are always held. Coven Initiations also
take place on this day. May 1 is also the same date the Illuminati was founded in 1776! In my country, Australia,
May Day is also celebrated as Labor Day, which we should have recognised for wehat it really meant.]
There are, however, a couple more points that make all of this smell even more:
1. Funny that this happens right at the time where the birth certificate controversy is at its highest. What
greater diversion could have been cooked up, than this? President Obama is apparently a very "lucky" guy, and the
timing is just perfect.
2. Bin Laden was hastily buried, on the grounds that the US military had such a great respect for Islamic burial
traditions. However, this did not apply when Saddam's sons were killed: they were kept for 11 days before burial,
and displayed for all the world to see. And we all know about the tendency of great warlords, to put their captives
and causalities in public display, for gathering whatever "honor" the masses can give them. You tell me that the US
military/government has no such tendency anymore?
3. Now if the US military was so keen to observe Islamic burial traditions, why then did they allegedly bury Bin Laden at sea,
when this is strictly prohibited in Islamic tradition? You tell me they respected one part of
the tradition so much that they had to break another part of the same tradition? How stupid can these people
possibly think that we are?
4. In no culture in this world is it preferred to bury people at sea. Everybody intuitively knows that having
someone buried in the ground, is the preferred option. Why, because we then know where they are, of course. And
more important: we know they are dead, leaving no room for uncertainty whatsoever. And with uncertainty gone, the
eventual process of grief can then start with its healing effects. Bottom line is that the US military command
perfectly knew and understood that burying the guy at sea was not in accord with any tradition whatsoever, and
would provoke reactions and tough questions. There absolutely has to be some other reason for doing this. What
could that possibly be...?
5. Of course the US military and the White House is now being challenged on whether they really killed Bin Laden on
May 1. John Brennan, Barack Obama's counter-terrorism adviser said: "We are going to do everything we can to make
sure that nobody has any basis to try to deny that we got Osama bin Laden."
Sorry guys, too late. If you really meant what you said here, why dump the guy at sea, effectively abandoning the
only real evidence that could convince the skeptics: a dead body.
6. We then have the congressional statements of various CIA people that
Bin Laden was killed in late 2001 or early 2002. This also coincides
with the fact that the US hunt for Bin Laden was dramatically reduced after 2002. From regarding him as the "number
one priority", president Bush Jr. later claimed that he "did not care" at all where Bin Laden was. What an
incredible 180 degree turnaround regarding the so-called "world's most wanted man"! There can be only one reason
for this change of attitude.
7. The US military command well knows that doing their thing this way, is going to provoke a lot of contention.
Some will come from the Islamic parts of the world, but the heaviest allegations are going to be domestic,
splitting the US population even more. The timing is perfect too, as the critique of president Obama is mounting.
Just another example of the Illuminati strategy of divide-and-conquer, further dividing the US of A. All of this is
probably done to make the "conspiracy theorists", meaning anyone not buying what the powers-that-be declare in
their ex-cathedra statements as pure and unadulterated truth, look really stupid. Yet another attack on anyone
trying to think for themselves.
Without a body, this issue will obviously never go to rest, but rather separate the population further into
"trusters" and "skeptics" regarding the US government. Further, Bin Laden was allegedly executed on May 1, the same
date as Illuminate was founded on, in 1776. Hey, what an interesting coincidence - how strange indeed! All of this
is going to feed endless speculation and contention, and in reality we have yet another 9/11 to think about now,
instead of a resolve of the original one as allegedly intended.
The crazy thing about all of this, is that the guy has probably
been dead for almost 10 years already. Seems like some people are kind of hard to kill, especially
the ones created by the CIA and the US military to be scapegoats in their own evil schemes.
With Bin Laden officially gone, who is now going to be the new scapegoat? Take your pick, but I'll put my 5 cents
on a US domestic group: big-government skeptics in general, and "conspiracy theorists" in particular. Chances
are, there has now been a sea change - better get ready for some action.
Kaj Nilsen is a 42 y.o. computer programmer and information analyst, from Norway. He is working on a book
dedicated to cracking the number 7 code of the Bible and its prophecies.
"Obama-Osama: Your Daily Psy Op "
said (May 4,
President Obama, Vice
President Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and others watched the
raid to kill Bid Laden live. Well they killed someone, even if it was not OBL. What better way is there for the
Illuminati elite to celebrate the Satanic holiday Walpurgis Eve, than to watch a live snuff film?
said (May 4,
Once again an "on target"
article. Well written and so very to the point. I saw on the news this evening the White House , was revamping
it's "fire-fight" story. . allegedly someone "misspoke". . a lie is still a lie no matter what you call
We have become the laughing
stock of the world with this escapade, it's not even an attempt to cover their tracks. . It's a textbook example
of what my grandfather used to tell me. . "If you can't dazzle them with your brilliance, then baffle them with
your BS!" There's far too much of that coming from Washington, they can no longer hide the inevitable, I fear
our country is on a high speed track to destruction from within. .
Thank you for providing
another incredibly, "spot on" piece of journalism.
said (May 3,
The reason the pictures of
the dead body have not been released yet is the guy that worked on the birth certificate has not even seen the
pictures yet becuase he's out taking another "Photo Shop" class.
Help May Day, May Day
Another O-BS-AMA-erica story from the White House!
said (May 3,
Kaj is right. The 'burial
at sea' is as ludicrous as it is unnecessary. Obviously our government could have fabricated more credible
excuses for avoiding demands for a third party examination of a body. They have the capacity to create virtual
doubles, programmed to believe they really are the original. The man who stood trial and was hung as Saddam
Hussein was likely a double.
I'm glad Kaj brought this
question up, as to how or why would the government be so 'stupid' as to pull an excuse so lame it's worthy of a
The 'ludicrous' factor is
in fact a 'tell' of a psychological operation. All these events have something ludicrous in their official
explanations. Once you see a few, you learn to wait for it. They always throw one or more into it.
Remember 911, when they
told us the kerosene (aka jet fuel) explosions melted steel girders, and vaporized the 'black box' flight
recorders of both planes? Plus vaporized the passengers?
Then they told us with a
straight face that PASSPORT of the alleged ring leader of the hijackers and pilot of Flight 11 was found by NYPD
lying in the street, as if it has wafted down to the ground from the fireball, completely intact.
They do this because there are two kinds of people.
The majority or
about 80% have minds naturally inclined to believe the easy explanation, and it turns out that sometimes 'easy'
doesn't mean 'true'. It's like somebody telling a child that their daddy is a serial murder who's been killing
other kids in the neighborhood. The 'easier' thing in that case is to believe your Dad wouldn't do such a thing -
even if they'd seen him washing blood off his hands a lot lately.
Why make the Big Lie
unbelievable, unacceptable to common sense? They do it because they want everybody to KNOW at the subconscious level that
they're lying, because THEY CAN. It's a subliminal message
that's saying "hello, we just committed another huge crime and want you to know there
isn't a thing you can do about it".
In fact they added the
'buried at sea' touch knowing that people like us will say it out loud - on internet forums like this.. I just
heard a radio call in show here this morning with a few people calling in pointing out the same thing.
And then other callers saying "we need to give Obama credit for being a great leader for bringing Osama to
Justice". I'm quoting the caller verbatim.
So rather than being a bold
face lie, now it's a 'debate'. See how they work? The people pointing out the obvious will be labeled "Truthers"
and media will lump us in with Charlie Sheen.
4. Lies, Damn Lies And Bin Laden's Death
3 May, 2011
Winston Churchill rightly
explained that "(a) lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." He
said it perhaps before television. For sure before 24-hour cable TV and modern technology instantly
It applies to Obama's
latest lie, announced at 11:35PM EDT on bin Laden, saying:
"Tonight, I can report to
the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin
Laden, the leader of al Qaeda, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men,
women, and children."
Highlighting 9/11, he
painstakingly discussed everything but the truth. America's media repeated it. Celebratory crowds in front of
the White House, in Times Square, and at "ground zero" cheered it past midnight, mindlessly believing a lie.
More on that below.
On May 1, New York Times
writers Peter Baker, Helene Cooper and Mark Mazzetti headlined, "Bin Laden Is Dead, Obama says: continuing:
Calling him "the mastermind
of the most devastating attack on American soil in modern times and the most hunted man in the world," Obama
announced his death Sunday night, declaring "justice has been done."
reporting, Baker, Cooper and Mazzetti called his "demise....a defining moment in the American-led fight against
terrorism, a symbolic stroke affirming the relentlessness of the pursuit of those who attacked New York and
Washington on Sept. 11, 2001."
New Year's eve arrived
early in America, celebrating a lie, the "bewildered herd" again seduced by presidential deception.
A USA Today editorial
headlined, "At last, bin Laden is dead," saying:
"Could there be any more
satisfying words to hear?"
The Boston Globe
highlighted "a moment of unity" after nearly a decade of war, calling Obama's announcement a "vindication of a
manhunt spanning presidential administrations, and involving numerous agencies and countless intelligence
AP quoted Bill Clinton
"I congratulate the
president, the national security team and the members of our armed forces on bringing Osama bin Laden to justice
after more than a decade of murderous al Qaeda attacks."
House speaker John Boehner
(R. OH) said it was "great news..."
House Democrat leader Nancy
Pelosi called it "historic."
Senate Democrat leader
Harry Reid "reaffirm(ed) our resolve to defeat the terrorist forces that killed (9/11 victims) and thousands of
others across the globe."
Expect lots more
cheerleading ahead, led by major media reports doing what they do best, providing sanitized, managed news, not
Separating Fact from
Post-9/11, bin Laden became
"Enemy Number One," the nation's top "security threat." In fact, if he hadn't existed, he'd have been invented
for political advantage.
In March 1985, after Ronald
Reagan signed National Security Decision Directive (NSDD) 166 to arm Afghan Mujahideen fighters, Pakistan's
Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) recruited bin Laden to fight Soviet Afghan forces as a CIA asset. He likely
remained one until his death, while simultaneously called "Enemy Number One," using him advantageously both
David Ray Griffin wrote
seminal books on 9/11, including "The New Pearl Harbor," "The 9/11 Commission Report," "9/11 and American
Empire," "9/11 Contradictions," "Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7," and "Osama Bin Laden: Dead of
It was also the title of
his October 9, 2009 Global Research article, covering two types of evidence:
(1) Objective evidence that
After December 13, 2001,
his regularly intercepted messages stopped.
On December 26, 2001,
according to "a leading Pakistani newspaper" story, a prominent Taliban official said he attended his funeral.
Bin Laden, in fact, was
very ill with kidney disease. In September 2001, CBS News anchor Dan Rather reported that he was admitted to a
Rawalpindi, Pakistan hospital on September 10, 2001, and France's Le Figaro said:
"Dubai....was the backdrop
of a secret meeting between Osama bin Laden and the local CIA agent in July (2001). A partner of the
administration of the American Hospital....claims that (bin Laden) stayed (there) between the 4th and 14th
of July (and) received visits from many members of his family as well as prominent Saudis and Emiratis. (During
the same period), the local CIA agent, known to many in Dubai, was seen taking (the hospital's) main elevator
(to) bin Laden's room."
Why not if he was a valued
In July 2002, "CNN reported
that (his) bodyguards had been captured in February of that year, adding: 'Sources believe that if the
bodyguards were captured away from bin Laden, it is likely the most wanted man in the world is dead."
Finally, despite Washington
offering a $25 million reward for information leading to his capture or killing, no one came forward.
(2) Testimonial evidence of
In 2002, influential
"people in a position to know" that he died included:
-- Pakistan President
-- FBI counterterrorism
head Dale Watson;
-- Oliver North saying,
"I'm certain that Osama is dead....and so are all the other guys I stay in touch with;"
-- Afghanistan President
-- Israeli intelligence
saying supposed bin Laden messages were fake; and
-- Pakistan's ISI
"confirm(ing) the death of....Osama bin Laden (and) attribut(ing) the reasons behind Washington's hiding (the
truth) to the desire of (America's hawks) to use the issue of al Qaeda and international terrorism to invade
Other evidence includes
former CIA case officer Robert Baer telling National Public Radio (NPR): "Of course he's dead."
Then in March 2009, "former
Foreign Service officer Angelo Codevilla published an essay in the American Spectator entitled 'Osama bin
Elvis,' " saying:
"Seven years after (bin
Laden's) last verifiable appearance among the living, there is more evidence of Elvis's presence among us than
fake messages and videos, saying today's advanced technology can fool experts, but not all of them.
For years, bin Laden tapes
surfaced at strategically-timed moments. Consider one on Friday, September 7, 2007 ahead the sixth 9/11
anniversary. Hector Factor's Neal Krawetz, a digital image forensics expert, said it was full of low quality
visual and audio splices, a likely fake.
Striking also was bin
Laden's beard that was gray in recent images. In this one, it was black. In addition, he was dressed in a white
hat and shirt, as well as a yellow sweater, the same attire as on an October 29, 2004 video. Moreover, the
background, lighting, desk and camera angle were identical.
Krawetz noted that "if you
overlay the 2007 and 2004 videos, bin Laden's face is the same (unaged)." Only his beard was darker, and the
picture contrast was adjusted. Most important are the edits showing obvious splices, at least six video ones in
all. Even more audio ones were used that appeared to be words and phrases spliced together, making Krawetz
suspect a vocal imitator was used.
A Final Comment
Clear evidence showed bin
Laden died years ago, likely in December 2001. However, reporting it was concealed to pursue America's "war on
As a result, "Enemy Number
One" was used to stoke fear as pretext for imperial wars on Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, perhaps others
now planned, and numerous proxy ones in Somalia, Yemen, Bahrain, Palestine, Central Africa, Colombia, and
wrote his bin
Laden book, hoping to shorten America's wars. He also wished to expose "fake bin Laden tapes (used as) one part
of an extensive propaganda operation....furthering the militarization of America and its foreign policy" while
popular needs go begging.
Obama's latest lie left
America's imperial agenda unchanged. In fact, his announcement likely bolsters public support for what's clearly
become unpopular, saying:
"(T)hink back to the sense
of unity that prevailed on 9/11," urging people to show it again despite how militarism harms their security,
well-being and futures by draining funds badly needed for domestic needs.
Instead, expect increasing
amounts used for corporate handouts and wars, Obama as uncaring about human needs as extremist Republicans. He's
also an inveterate liar.
Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at email@example.com. Also visit his blog site
at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive
Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at
noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
5. Prove It!
By Jim Kirwan
2 May 2011
Sunday Night Obama went on
nationwide Television to announce that "Osama bin Laden is Dead." His speech is below, with my comments and
other articles interspersed which challenge everything that Obama said. Obama has lied about everything he's
done since he took office. He's broken every campaign promise he made prior to getting elected: But since he
repeats this series of lies every time he speaks about 911 - it just seemed like a requirement to answer this
fool with some of the facts concerning this topic.
O: "Good evening. Tonight,
I can report to the American people and to the world that the United States has conducted an operation that
killed Osama bin Laden, the leader of al-Qaida, and a terrorist who's responsible for the murder of thousands of
innocent men, women, and children."
k: That is a Lie! There was
an attack on 911 but it was not planned or directed from caves in Afghanistan; It was planned and carried out by
agents of CIA, Mossad and M I-5, with cover from the FBI, the Pentagon, the White House and the Shadow
Government of Dick Cheney who all assisted in the planning and execution of the attacks on 911.
O: "It was nearly 10 years
ago that a bright September day was darkened by the worst attack on the American people in our history. The
images of 9/11 are seared into our national memory -- hijacked planes cutting through a cloudless September sky;
the Twin Towers collapsing to the ground; black smoke billowing up from the Pentagon; the wreckage of Flight 93
in Shanksville, Pennsylvania, where the actions of heroic citizens saved even more heartbreak and destruction."
k: There was no evidence of
human-remains in Shanksville, no remains of an aircraft, no engines, nor aircraft parts of any kind were ever
found, there was only a scratch in the earth, no evidence of any fire or explosion: The ditch was filled with
junk metal that had been dumped in it-there was no evidence of any aircraft or even of a real crash, and of
course there was no black-box ever found.
O: "And yet we know that
the worst images are those that were unseen to the world. The empty seat at the dinner table. Children who were
forced to grow up without their mother or their father. Parents who would never know the feeling of their
child's embrace. Nearly 3,000 citizens
k: A nearly identical
number of empty chairs and grieving hearts were also present in the aftermath of Pearl Harborthat killed almost
the same number of Americans; for yet another LIE. That was on December 7, 1941 to forceAmerica's entry into
WWII. 911 was the trigger needed, by the White House; in the words of Project for the New American Century:
"America needs another Pearl Harbor."
O: "On September 11, 2001,
in our time of grief, the American people came together. We offered our neighbors a hand, and we offered the
wounded our blood. We reaffirmed our ties to each other, and our love of community and country. On that day, no
matter where we came from, what God we prayed to, or what race or ethnicity we were, we were united as one
k: What the public was
unaware of on 911, and for the most part are still unaware of today; is that on 911 the people of the United
States were illegally being SPIED UPON by their own government and that had been going on at that time for seven
months-by order of The Decider, George W. Bush.
O: "We were also united in
our resolve to protect our nation and to bring those who committed this vicious attack to justice. We quickly
learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by al-Qaida -- an organization headed by Osama bin Laden, which
had openly declared war on the United States and was committed to killing innocents in our country and around
the globe. And so we went to war against al Qaida to protect our citizens, our friends, and our allies."
k: That is a series of lies
that has no foundation whatsoever in fact-and never has, since day one! Al Qaida is a drawer in the CIA that on
9-10-2001 was an agency of the CIA in good standing; there was no "organization" just a list of names. Osama was
involved in a number of Black-Ops Operations:
'Al-Qaeda embarked on a
trail of attacks, beginning with the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that killed six and first raised the
specter of Islamist extremism spreading to the United States. Bin Laden was the prime suspect in bombings of US
servicemen in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996 as well as attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998
that killed 224.
In October 2000, suicide
bombers rammed into the USS Cole warship in Yemen, killing 17 sailors, and al-Qaeda was blamed. Disowned by his
family and stripped of Saudi citizenship, bin Laden had moved first to Sudan in 1992 and later resurfaced in
Afghanistan before the Taliban seized Kabul in 1996.' From Al Jazeera
k: Everything that was
blamed on Osama bin Laden, prior to 911 was committed by Mossad and CIA, with the full approval of the
government and the Pentagon.
O: "Over the last 10 years,
thanks to the tireless and heroic work of our military and our counterterrorism professionals, we've made great
strides in that effort. We've disrupted terrorist attacks and strengthened our homeland defense. In Afghanistan,
we removed the Taliban government, which had given bin Laden and al-Qaida safe haven and support. And around the
globe, we worked with our friends and allies to capture or kill scores of al-Qaida terrorists, including several
who were a part of the 9/11 plot."
k: Pure unadulterated BS.
Bush said 'He can run but he can't hide!' and then he was killed in Bora-Bora on December 13, 2001; but the
government chose to keep his death SECRET, so that they could issue the requisite HOAX tapes whenever the public
became nervous. It was much the same as now when Obama's popularity is beginning to fall heavily in the
polls-like magic 'It's Osama bin Laden to the rescue once again!' The brain-dead public that has no idea of what
happened in and to the world, eleven years ago is now enthralled with joy, over something that is just another
Obama Lie atop that mountain of such lies that he continues to espouse whenever he is near a microphone.
O: "Yet Osama bin Laden
avoided capture and escaped across the Afghan border into Pakistan. Meanwhile, al-Qaida continued to operate
from along that border and operate through its affiliates across the world."
k: The Pentagon, the CIA
and Mossad are the real-world figures that do the deeds blamed on Osama and while they are assisted by a few
local rebels in the countries in which these "attacks" supposedly take place-there is NO INTERNATIONAL "AL
Qaida." This entire farce was part of the report from the 911 Commission when Richard Clark testified that he,
as the CIA Counter-terrorism Officer created Al Qaida, to use throughout the Middle-East as one of the CIA
assets in the field.
O: "And so shortly after
taking office, I directed Leon Panetta, the director of the CIA, to make the killing or capture of bin Laden the
top priority of our war against al-Qaida, even as we continued our broader efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and
defeat his network."
k: Leon Panetta is not
smart enough to tie his own shoelaces, much less to be responsible for anything of consequence. He just got
promoted for his lackey-services to the administration, by being moved up to head the Pentagon: "Panetta said
that his mission was 'to make certain that the United States remained the world's most powerful military in the
world; to "PROTECT the SECURITY that is so important to this country." Excuse me; what is supposed to be
protected is not "SECURITY" but "FREEDOM" because without Freedom the only point of having "excessive-and
totally protected-security" is to maintain the Police-State that we are all now living in!" (1)
O: "Then, last August,
after years of painstaking work by our intelligence community, I was briefed on a possible lead to bin Laden. It
was far from certain, and it took many months to run this thread to ground. I met repeatedly with my national
security team as we
developed more information
about the possibility that we had located bin Laden hiding within a compound deep inside of Pakistan. And
finally, last week, I determined that we had enough intelligence to take action, and authorized an operation to
get Osama bin Laden and bring him to justice."
k: "The embarrassment of
having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December
13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn't nuts is finally saying what
they have known for years.
However, since we lost a
couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is
someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops"
looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually
talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for
that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004
election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.
In 66 pages, General
Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is "Mullah Omar" now. In his talk at West Point,
President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it "out
of the bag" long ago.
Bin Laden was killed by
American troops many, many years ago.
knew Osama bin
Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam
and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistaninstead of
the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves." (2)
O: "Today, at my direction,
the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound inAbbottabad, Pakistan. A small team of
Americans carried out the operation with extraordinary courage and capability. No Americans were harmed. They
took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his
k: As they had to know that
this was a matter of supposedly massive importance (assuming that they did NOT know that Osama has been dead
since December 13, 2001) why did these super-killers not take photographs of the corpse, or get a DNA sample
from the body? If they were "hunting Osama with such ferocity for over ten years," then why were they not
interested in having any PROOF whatsoever of what they say they did? That doesn't make sense, given that
according to Obama these people ought to be acclaimed national heroes for their service to their country or
something like that. WHERE'S THE PROOF THAT WHO THEY KILLED WAS INDEED OSAMA BIN LADEN!
O: "For over two decades,
bin Laden has been al-Qaida's leader and symbol, and has continued to plot attacks against our country and our
friends and allies. The death of bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation's effort
to defeat al-Qaeda."
k: All you have to do
Obama, to "Defeat Al Qaeda, is just open the file drawer and tear up the file. We could sure use the
multiple-Trillions that you and Bush have managed to totally waste, chasing the shadows you and the Pentagon
along with Mossad & the FBI created.
O: "Yet his death does not
mark the end of our effort. There's no doubt that al-Qaida will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must
-- and we will -- remain vigilant at home and abroad."
k: Of course, how else
would anyone expect a completely cowardly nation to react, especially now that we have all but SURRENDERED
OUTRIGHT to Homeland Security-wherever they choose to raise their serpentine heads.
O: "As we do, we must also
reaffirm that the United States is not -- and never will be -- at war with Islam. I've made clear, just as
President Bush did shortly after 9/11, that our war is not against Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he
was a mass murderer of Muslims. Indeed, al-Qaida has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including
our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity."
k: Maybe Obama might want
to ask himself about the millions upon millions that we've already maimed, tortured and killed in Afghanistan
and Iraq, as well as Pakistan and now Libya? And if you add in what we've done to the Palestinians under
Reichfurer Netanyahu; but that's another story. What should he say "Oops sorry about that?" Anyone that
understands what they are looking at today in the Middle-East would have to conclude that if we are not "at war"
with Muslims then we are certainly giving a very good imitation of that apparent fact.
O: "Over the years, I've
repeatedly made clear that we would take action within Pakistan if we knew where bin Laden was. That is what
we've done. But it's important to note that our counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to bin
Laden and the compound where he was hiding. Indeed, bin Laden had declared war against Pakistan as well, and
ordered attacks against the Pakistani people. Tonight, I called President Zardari, and my team has also spoken
with their Pakistani counterparts. They agree that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations. And
going forward, it is essential that Pakistan continue to join us in the fight against al-Qaida and its
k: More propaganda, more
disinformation and lots more lies to add to the already overflowing barrels of lies that both Obama and Bush
have been spreading everywhere now for the last eleven years.
O: "The American people did
not choose this fight. It came to our shores, and started with the senseless slaughter of our citizens. After
nearly 10 years of service, struggle, and sacrifice, we know well the costs of war. These efforts weigh on me
every time I, as Commander-in-Chief, have to sign a letter to a family that has lost a loved one, or look into
the eyes of a service member who's been gravely wounded.
k: Yeah we are beginning to
understand the costs of this war, that we are paying for while the rich have both their get-out-of-jail-free
cards and their massive bonuses, and we continue to get the shaft. Stuff the speech Obama that might have worked
in World War Two, but now it's just another huge portion of swill for the fools and suckers to swallow whole.
O: "So Americans understand
the costs of war. Yet as a country, we will never tolerate our security being threatened, nor stand idly by when
our people have been killed. We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We
will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families
who have lost loved ones to al-Qaida's terror: Justice has been done."
k: You can say nothing of
the kind Barrack. There is no Al Qaida; there is no justice in any of these twisted wars for corporate greed and
global terror: there is only you and all your lies, acting as the MC for New World Order, and the elites
whenever your presence is required. Understand this Mr. Imposter: You need to be impeached forthwith, and after
you are found guilty you will be found swinging from a rope on national television for TREASON. You've lied
about your Birth Certificate and now you're lying about bin Laden's Death Certificate. You are no longer of any
use at all.
O: "Tonight, we give thanks
to the countless intelligence and counterterrorism professionals who've worked tirelessly to achieve this
outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their names. But tonight, they feel the
satisfaction of their work and the result of their pursuit of justice.
We give thanks for the men
who carried out this operation, for they exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of
those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has borne the heaviest share of the burden
since that September day. Finally, let me say to the families who lost loved ones on 9/11 that we have never
forgotten your loss, nor wavered in our commitment to see that we do whatever it takes to prevent another attack
on our shores."
k: If you were serious
about that you would insist upon imprisoning all those in this country that were complicit in the attacks of
911-because they are still here and wearing multi-thousand dollar suits, they don't live in caves and they
aren't Saudi-Citizens: Most of them are Zionists but all of them are traitors to this country.
O: "And tonight, let us
think back to the sense of unity that prevailed on 9/11. I know that it has, at times, frayed. Yet today's
achievement is a testament to the greatness of our country and the determination of the American people.
The cause of securing our
country is not complete. But tonight, we are once again reminded that America can do whatever we set our mind
to. That is the story of our history, whether it's the pursuit of prosperity for our people, or the struggle for
equality for all our citizens; our commitment to stand up for our values abroad, and our sacrifices to make the
world a safer place."
k: "The sheer arrogance of
that statement given the differences between the truth and your lying-version of everything that has happened
since 911: That statement is filled not just with hypocrisy, but it is virtually trolling for a system of values
that if they were in effect today would have killed you outright long before now. "Prosperity and Equality"! And
what about "Freedom, Responsibility, or Justice"? Guess they don't count any more- right Obama?
O: "Let us remember that we
can do these things not just because of wealth or power, but because of who we are: one nation, under God,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Thank you. May God bless you. And may God bless the United States
k: Maybe it was once true
that Americans could do whatever they set their minds to: But it appears that with so much "help" from censors,
monitors and spies, that's become a lot more difficult to do these days-but you wouldn't know much about that
either, which is YET another reason to IMPEACH YOU NOW!
1) Playing the HAARP Card
2) Gordon Duff: Years of
Deceit US Openly Accepts bin Laden Long Dead
6. Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress
Twenty-Five WaysTo Suppress Truth
WaysTo Suppress Truth: The
Rules of Disinformation (Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist)
By H. Michael
Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved
(Revised April 2000)
Permission to reprint/distribute hereby granted for any non commercial use provided information
reproduced in its entirety and with author information in tact. For more Intel/Shadow
government related info, visit the Author's Web site:
Twenty-Five Rules of
Built upon Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression by David Martin, the following may be useful
to the initiate in the world of dealing with veiled and half-truth, lies, and suppression of
truth when serious crimes are studied in public forums. This, sadly, includes every day news media,
one of the worst offenders with respect to being a source of disinformation. Where the crime
involves a conspiracy, or a conspiracy to cover up the crime, there will invariably be
a disinformation campaign launched against those seeking to uncover and expose the truth and/or the
conspiracy. There are specific tactics which disinfo artists tend to apply, as revealed here. Also
included with this material are seven common traits of the disinfo artist which may also
prove useful in identifying players and motives.
The more a particular party fits the traits and
is guilty of following the rules, the more likely they are a professional disinfo artist with a vested
motive. People can be bought, threatened, or blackmailed into providing disinformation, so even
"good guys" can be suspect in many cases.
A rational person participating as one interested in the truth will evaluate that chain of evidence
and conclude either that the links are solid and conclusive, that one or more links are weak and need
further development before conclusion can be arrived at, or that one or more links can be broken,
usually invalidating (but not necessarily so, if parallel links already exist or can be found, or if a
particular link was merely supportive, but not in itself key to) the argument. The game is played by
raising issues which either strengthen or weaken (preferably to the point of breaking) these links. It
is the job of a disinfo artist to interfere with these evaluations... to at least make people
think the links are weak or broken when, in truth, they are not... or to propose alternative
solutions leading away from the truth. Often, by simply impeding and slowing down the process
through disinformation tactics, a level of victory is assured because apathy increases with time
It would seem true in almost every instance, that if one cannot break the chain of evidence for a
given solution, revelation of truth has won out. If the chain is broken either a new link must
be forged, or a whole new chain developed, or the solution is invalid and a new one must be found...
but truth still wins out. There is no shame in being the creator or supporter of a failed solution,
chain, or link, if done with honesty in search of the truth. This is the rational approach. While it
is understandable that a person can become emotionally involved with a particular side of a given issue,
it is really unimportant who wins, as long as truth wins. But the disinfo artist will seek
to emotionalize and chastise any failure (real or false claims thereof), and will seek by means of
intimidation to prevent discussion in general.
It is the disinfo artist and those who may pull their
strings (those who stand to suffer should the crime be solved) MUST seek to prevent rational and complete
examination of any chain ofevidence which would hang them. Since fact and truth seldom fall on their own, they must
be overcome with lies and deceit. Those who are professional in the art of lies and deceit, such as the
intelligence community and the professional criminal (often the same people or at least working together), tend to
apply fairly well defined and observable tools in this process.However, the public at large is not well armed
against such weapons, and is often easily ledastray by these time-proven tactics. Remarkably, not even media and
law enforcement have
NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of
For such disinformationalists, the overall aim is to avoid
discussing links in the chain of evidence which cannot be broken by truth, but at all times, to use clever
deceptions or lies to make select links seem weaker than they are, create the illusion of a break, or better still,
cause any who are considering the chain to be distracted in any number of ways, including the method of questioning
the credentials of the presenter. Please understand that fact is fact, regardless of the source. Likewise, truth is
truth, regardless of the source. This is why criminals are allowed to testify against other criminals. Where a
motive to lie may truly exist, only actual evidence that the testimony itself IS a lie renders it completely
invalid. Were a known 'liar's' testimony to stand on its own without supporting fact, it might certainly be of
questionable value, but if the testimony (argument) is based on verifiable or otherwise demonstrable facts, it
matters not who does the presenting or what their motives are, or if they have lied in the past or even if
motivated to lie in this instance -- the facts or links would and should stand or fall on their own merit and their
part in the matter will merely be supportive.
Moreover, particularly with respects to public forums such as newspaper letters to the editor, and Internet chat
and news groups, the disinfo type has a very important role. In these forums, the principle topics of discussion
are generally attempts by individuals to cause other persons to become interested in their own particular position,
idea, or solution -- very much in development at the time. People often use such mediums as a sounding board and in
hopes of pollination to better form their ideas. Where such ideas are critical of government or powerful, vested
groups (especially if their criminality is the topic), the disinfo artist has yet another role -- the role of
nipping it in the bud. They also seek to stage the concept, the presenter, and any supporters as less than credible
should any possible future confrontation in more public forums result due to their early successes. You can often
spot the disinfo types at work here by the unique application of "higher standards" of discussion than necessarily
warranted. They will demand that those presenting arguments or concepts back everything up with the same level of
expertise as a professor, researcher, or investigative writer. Anything less renders anydiscussion meaningless and
unworthy in their opinion, and anyone who disagrees is obviously stupid -- and they generally put it in exactly
So, as you read any such discussions, particularly so in Internet news groups (NG), decide for yourself when a
rational argument is being applied and when disinformation, psyops (psychological warfare operations) or trickery
is the tool. Accuse those guilty of the latter freely. They (both those deliberately seeking to lead you astray,
and those who are simply foolish or misguided thinkers) generally run for cover when thus illuminated, or --
put in other terms, they put up or shut up (a perfectly acceptable outcome either way, since truth is the goal.)
Here are the twenty-five methods and seven traits, some of which don't apply directly to NG application. Each
contains a simple example in the form of actual (some paraphrased for simplicity) from NG comments on commonly
known historical events, and a proper response.[examples & response- http://www.proparanoid.com/truth.html]
Accusations should not be overused -- reserve for repeat
offenders and those who use multiple tactics. Responses should avoid falling into emotional traps or informational
sidetracks, unless it is feared that some observers will be easily dissuaded by the trickery. Consider quoting the
complete rule rather than simply citing it, as others will not have reference. Offer to provide a complete copy of
the rule set upon request (see permissions statement at end):
Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation
Note: The first rule and last five (or six, depending on situation) rules are generally not directly within the
ability of the traditional disinfo artist to apply. These rules are generally used more directly by those at the
leadership, key players, or planning level of the criminal conspiracy or conspiracy to cover up.
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.
Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If
it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid
discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being
critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues
by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory
terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press,
because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can
associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the
Internet' which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of
your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent
to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the
opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their
significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while
actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and
ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other
methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks',
'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists',
'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of
fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack
of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore
any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady
stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism, reasoning -- simply make an
accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that
would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which
could be taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids
discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate
yourself with authority and present your argument with enough 'jargon' and 'minutia' to illustrate you are 'one who
knows', and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical
argument is offered, avoid discussing issues except with denials they have any credibility, make any sense, provide
any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A
derivative of the straw man -- usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges
early on which can be or were already easily dealt with - a kind of investment for the future should the matter not
be so easily contained.) Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt
with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground
uncovered, can usually then be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without
need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions.
Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the 'high road' and 'confess' with candor that some innocent
mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of
proportion and imply greater criminalities which, 'just isn't so.' Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later,
and even publicly 'call for an end to the nonsense' because you have already 'done the right thing.' Done properly,
this can garner sympathy and respect for 'coming clean' and 'owning up' to your mistakes without addressing more
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the
overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair
as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly
without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the
issues by reasoning backwards or with an apparent deductive logic which forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by
requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best with issues qualifying for rule
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This
requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanish evidence and witnesses. If it does not
exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one
of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial
comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions
who can 'argue' with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing
more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you
can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to
make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only
will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the
issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how 'sensitive they are to criticism.'
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs.
This is perhaps a variant of the 'play dumb' rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an
opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent
to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed
or withheld, such as a murder weapon.) In order to completely avoid discussing issues, it may be required that you
to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or
even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new
facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations -- as useful tools to neutralize
sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the
purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or
other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all
sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when
properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful
evidence and that the evidence is sealed and unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict is
achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed. Usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty
innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s),
group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific,
investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address
issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger
distractions. If the above does not seem
to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events
such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not
prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address
issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of
theircharacter by release of blackmail information, or merely by destroying them financially, emotionally, or
severely damaging their health.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is
getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen. .
Note: There are other ways to attack truth, but these listed are the most common, and others are likely derivatives
of these. In the end, you can usually spot the professional disinfo players by one or more of seven (now 8) distinct traits:
Eight Traits of the
By H. Michael Sweeney
copyright (c) 1997, 2000 All rights reserved
(Revised April 2000 - formerly SEVEN Traits)
1) Avoidance. They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive
input,generally avoiding citation of references or
credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything
about their presentation implies their authority
andexpert knowledge in the matter
without any further justification for credibility.
2) Selectivity. They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying
thehit-and-run approach against mere commentators
supportive of opponents, or focusing heavierattacks on
key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentatorbecome argumentative with any success,
the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.
3) Coincidental. They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new
controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in
theparticular public arena involved. They likewise
tend to vanish once the topic is no longer ofgeneral concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for
a reason, and vanish with the reason.
4) Teamwork. They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs
orteams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any
public forum, but there will likely be anongoing pattern
of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved.Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a
source for strawman or other tactics designed to dilute
opponent presentation strength.
5) Anti-conspiratorial. They almost always have disdain for 'conspiracy
theorists'and, usually, for those who in any way believe
JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why,if they hold
such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a NG focusing on
conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying tomake fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold
in such disdain.Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an
ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems
from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become
emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most
people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal.
Butdisinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the
'image' and are hot and cold with respect topretended
emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's justa job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well
in a communicationsmedium as they might be able in a
real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You
might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo.
With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will
generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they
play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their
communications style,substance, and so forth, or simply
7) Inconsistent. There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their
trueself/motives. This may stem from not really knowing
their topic, or it may be somewhat'freudian', so to
speak, in that perhaps they really root for the
side of truth deep within.
I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory
information which neutralizes itself and the
author. For instance, one such player claimed
to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a
grade-school education. I'm not aware of too many Navy pilots who don't have a college degree. Another claimed no
knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.
8) BONUS TRAIT: Time Constant. Recently
discovered, with respect to News Groups, is the response time factor. There are three ways this can be seen to
work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:
1) ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for
truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The
government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do
some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT - FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed
2) When dealing in more direct ways with a
disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR - there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay.
This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to 'get
permission' or instruction from a formal chain of command.
3) In the NG example 1) above, it will often ALSO be seen
that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay - the team approach in play. This is
especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to
potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.
I close with the first paragraph of the introduction to my unpublished book, Fatal Rebirth:
Truth cannot live on a diet of secrets, withering within entangled lies. Freedom cannot live
on a diet of lies, surrendering to the veil of
oppression. The human spirit cannot live on a diet of oppression, becoming subservient in the end to the will of
evil. God, as truth incarnate, will not long let stand a world devoted to such evil. Therefore, let us have the
truth and freedom our spirits require... or let us die seeking these things, for without them, we shall surely and
justly perish in an evil world.
7. The Insanity of Christian Zionism!
Next time someone asks you to send your money to Israel, go and have a good look at David Duke’s
Youtube movie clip, The Insanity of Christian
Zionism!, and you will find out many home truths you won’t be comfortable with. The
first fact that you had better understand is that Israel is totally anti-Christian. For example, did you know
that Christians in Israel are regularly spat upon, and no action is ever taken against the
The Insanity of Christian Zionism!
David Duke correctly points out that he, along with the rest of the planet, has been lied to
about Israel, about Judaism, and about Zionism. When you support Christian Zionism with financial donations,
you are actually ignorantly and naively supporting satan’s evil agenda here
The apostle Paul tells us clearly that even in his day, it was the Jews who were the real rogue
people on the Earth:
“For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus:
for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they [have] of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have
persecuted us; and they
please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the
Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the
uttermost.” (1 Thessalonians 2: 14-16)
However, while David Duke is spot on when he points out the insanity of Christian Zionism, he’s
patently wrong when he says he’s a Christian. The following article by Ted Pike puts the whole matter in
David Duke's Must-See Video
By Ted Pike
5 May 11
David Duke is a staunch evolutionist whose deterministic premises undergird a racialist view of
civilization and many of its problems. He posits a largely racial solution to the real and conspiratorial
Jewish supremacist efforts to undermine white culture through race mixing, unfettered immigration, and
cultural assault. Duke believes that racial differences exist because of different selection pressures on
evolving man: harsh northern climes created more intelligent, creative races (whites) while milder, tropical
ones produced less intelligent and resourceful ones (blacks).
Duke's evolutionary premises could encourage eugenics policies if someday enthroned in power.
Certainly, the Third Reich was founded on similar convictions of evolution-engendered racial superiority.
Duke scorns the Old Testament as largely the twisted, even homicidal tribalism of a mis-evolved
race. He says he is a Christian but he does not accept the Genesis record of creation, divine inspiration of
the Old Testament, or the providentially orchestrated role the Hebrews played in preparing the way for Jesus,
the Messiah. Thus he has no confidence in the wealth of specific Old Testament predictions that Christ will
one day redeem a repentant remnant out of Israel at His second coming.
In his latest video, "The Insanity of Christian Zionism," Duke attempts to reason evangelical Christians away from
their love affair with Zionism. One would think his rejection of main Christian tenets would render Duke ill
equipped to credibly instruct evangelicals. Yet in this video Duke powerfully exposes the anti-Christianity and
atrocities of Israel, not just against Arab Muslims but also against very large numbers of Arab Christians.
Much as I disagree with Duke's evolutionary and racialist premises, I completely agree with his
expose of the madness that is Christian Zionism. His video should be required viewing not only for
enlightened anti-Zionists but all, left or right, who grope beneath a dark cloud of Zionist-induced darkness.
Duke teaches that we should respond to other races with love and appreciation of their unique
qualities, even though they may be inferior to whites. Unfortunately, as Duke has spent a lifetime promoting
the hard line southern racism which virtually dehumanizes blacks, it is difficult to accept his claim to love and appreciate blacks
and their culture.
How could Duke convince me that he is now as reformed and generous as he claims to be? If Duke
is really a Christian believer, then we must hear from him convincing declarations of the unity in Jesus
which should exist between whites and blacks. If he is a Christian,
he should begin preaching the most fundamental truth of Christianity:
being is absolutely equal in God's sight, equally loved, equally full of potential for eternal life with
them. This is not frosting on a theory of mindless human origins which makes some
winners, others losers. Such genuine love that is beyond reproach is the first principle of the Old Testament
that Duke scorns.
Jesus summarized the Mosaic law: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with
all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and foremost commandment. The second is like it,
'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'" (Matt. 22:37-39)
* For my own perspectives on issues of race, integration and civil rights, black intelligence,
etc., read my article Is Obama Fulfilling Bible
Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative
8. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part
the Green Prince
By John D Christian, Copyright © John D. Christian 2009. Used with permission.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Antichrist and the Green
Oregon Petition: 31,000 Scientists Say “No Global
The Oregon Petition
is the name commonly given to a petition opposed to the Kyoto protocol, organized by the Oregon Institute of
Science and Medicine (OISM) between 1999 and 2001, and re-circulated again in 2007. During the 1999-2001 period the
United States was negotiating with other countries on implementation of the protocol before the Bush administration
withdrew from the process in 2001.
National Academy of Sciences President Frederick Seitz wrote a cover letter endorsing the petition. The Oregon
Petition was the fourth, and by far the largest, of five prominent efforts to show that a scientific consensus does
not exist on the subject of anthropogenic global warming, following the 1992 Statement by Atmospheric Scientists on
Greenhouse Warming, the Heidelberg Declaration and the Leipzig Declaration.
The petition site
currently lists in excess of 31,000 scientists, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, who are signatories to the
petition. The following is the wording of the Petition:
We urge the United States government
to reject the global warming agreement that was written in Kyoto, Japan in
December, 1997, and any other similar proposals. The proposed limits on greenhouse
gases would harm the
environment, hinder the advance of science and technology, and
damage the health and welfare of mankind.
There is no convincing scientific evidence that human
release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will,
in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the earth’s atmosphere and
disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that
increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the
The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of
“settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and
consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the
petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis. The
petition’s list of signers and web-site is: www.petitionproject.org/
The British-controlled global mainstream
press and media propaganda machine continuously try and infer that the Oregon Petition is a hoax. It is
The National Center For Public Policy
Research in March 22, 2004, www.nationalcenter.org/TSR032204.html ran an article entitled, Global
Warming: Why Can’t the Mainstream Press Get Even Basic Facts Right? They wrote;
“BACKGROUND: The Associated Press
ran a global story this past weekend that makes the following statements:
“Carbon dioxide, the gas largely blamed
for global warming, has reached record-high levels in the atmosphere after growing at an accelerated pace last
“Carbon dioxide, mostly from burning coal,
gasoline and other fossil fuels, traps heat that otherwise would radiate into space.”
“Global temperatures increased by about 1
degree Fahrenheit (0.6 degrees Celsius) during the 20th century, and international panels of
scientists sponsored by world governments have concluded that most of the warming probably was due to greenhouse
SECOND RESPONSE: How many scandals
does the mainstream press need before it starts routinely running stories through fact
THIRTY SECOND RESPONSE: Faulty
“news” stories like this one, which mislead people all over the world, are one of many alarmist global warming
reports by the media that do not reflect a consensus of scientists. What is more alarming than what scientists
genuinely know about global warming is that a media outlet as influential as the AP would run a wire story this
faulty, and that so many news editors would be gullible enough to run it.
DISCUSSION: a brief
Quote 1: The AP said: “Carbon
dioxide, the gas largely blamed for global warming, has reached record-high levels in the atmosphere after
growing at an accelerated pace in the past year…”
Facts:Carbon dioxide is not the major
greenhouse gas (water vapor is). Carbon dioxide accounts for less than ten percent of the greenhouse effect, as
carbon dioxide’s ability to absorb heat is quite limited. Only about 0.03 percent of the Earth’s atmosphere
consists of carbon dioxide (nitrogen, oxygen, and argon constitute about 78 percent, 20 percent, and 0.93
percent of the atmosphere, respectively). The sun, not a gas, is primarily to “blame” for global warming – and
plays a very key role in global temperature variations as well.
Quote 2:The AP said: “Carbon dioxide,
mostly from burning of coal, gasoline and other fossil fuels, traps heat that otherwise would radiate into
Fact:Most of the carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere does not come from the burning of fossil fuels. Only about 14 percent of it does.
Quote 3:The AP said: “Global
temperatures increased by about 1 degree Fahrenheit (0.6 degrees Celsius) during the 20th century,
and international panels of scientists sponsored by world governments have concluded that most of the warming
probably was due to greenhouse gases.”
Facts:Most of the 20th
century global warming occurred in the first few decades of that century, before the widespread burning of
fossil fuels (and before 82 percent of the increase in atmospheric CO2 observed in the 20th century).
The Earth does not have “world governments.” It doesn’t even have one, as the United Nations is not a
government, but an association of nations. If the AP is referring to the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change, the AP should become aware that the IPCC report itself (the part written by scientists)
reached no consensus on climate change. What did reach a conclusion was an IPCC “summary for policymakers”
prepared by political appointees. Most reporters quote only the summary, being either too lazy or too
undereducated to understand the actual report. This does not explain, however, why reporters don’t more
frequently interview scientists who helped prepare it – scientists such as IPCC participant Dr. Richard Lindzen
of MIT, who says the IPCC report is typically “presented as a consensus that involves hundreds, perhaps
thousands, of scientists … and none of them was asked if they agreed with anything in the report except for the
one or two pages they worked on.” Lindzen also draws a sharp distinction between the scientists’ document and
its politicized summary: “the document itself is informative; the summary is not.””
In the photosynthesis growing process in
plants, they breathe in carbon dioxide CO2 molecules out of the air and emit oxygen back into the atmosphere.
Reduce carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and you are destroying green plant life. You then are destroying animal
life. You are destroying human life.
Chlorophyll, which gives green plants
their green color, is very similar to hemoglobin, the substance in red blood cells that gives them their red
color and helps them transport oxygen. Aside from the center atom, the chlorophyll molecule (magnesium) is
identical to the hemoglobin molecule (iron). Through Nuclear Transformation, the magnesium in chlorophyll gains
protons until it becomes iron. The result is the hemoglobin molecule. Because of this process, nothing is better
for building healthy blood than chlorophyll, the “blood” of plants in green vegetables.
One of the basic nutrients rich in green
leafy vegetables is folic acid. It helps make red blood cells and other new cells. It is also found in rich
concentrations in liver. Deficiencies of folic acid in the diet can cause birth defects, anemia, spina bifida,
miscarriage, neonatal death or lifelong disability, depression, and numerous diseases of the central nervous
Rather than encourage people to eat a proper “balanced” diet, over the past few
years governments in collusion with big corporations have been passing laws (incidentally, often pushed by
“green” parties) to compulsorily add folic acid to cereals, other grain products and bread. But this is the
synthetic version of folate, not the natural form. A recent 10-year study has found that men who took this type
of folic acid in supplements faced more than twice the risk of prostate cancer when compared to those who didn’t
take the supplements. One wonders what the long-term negative effects of this policy might be, especially for
pregnant women. There simply is no effective substitute for eating a proper ‘balanced’ diet including green
leafy vegetables and meat.
In Prince Charles’ urgent rush to reduce
CO2 global warming emissions, on his behalf, Al Gore is promoting a new “Global Alliance” (World Government)
funded by a global CO2 carbon tax. In some greenhouses, they pump CO2 into the air so that the plants can grow
more easily and more quickly. If you take all of the CO2 out of the air, or a large proportion of it as Charles
and Gore recommend, abolish the application of fertilizer, convert the farmland and pastures back to their
organic, natural, wilderness state, global agricultural production will rapidly collapse, plant life will die,
and eventually, there will be no food for anyone.
In Matthew 24, Jesus prophesied, (after
warning his disciples to “take heed that no man deceive you”), in the
latter days on earth there would increasingly be “wars and rumours of
wars,” “famines, pestilences and earthquakes” in many places before a time of “great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time,
no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved.” He did
say in Luke 21:25-26, “And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the
moon, and in the stars; and upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring;
Men’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those things which are coming on the earth: for the
powers of heaven shall be shaken.”
Based on Matthew 24 and Luke 21, it is
true the world is soon going to experience a formidable series of dire cataclysmic events affecting the weather
and how we all live on earth – but they are not going to be
caused by any supposed rise in greenhouse gases or global warming.
Rather, these tumultuous events may soon
be caused by secret nuclear tsunami depth bombs (NDBs), the many top secret HAARP bases now strategically
located around the world, including those in Russia, that now have the almost ‘miraculous’
power to transmit radio waves up into the ionosphere at enormous power to destabilize the magnetic field of the
earth, causing earthquakes, floods and extreme changes to the weather and create manmade ‘natural’ disasters.
They may be caused by the Alpha
International Space Station’s giant, secret, MIRACL deuterium-fluorine
chemical laser and ancillary satellite “Star Wars-type” space-based laser weapons, or other similar hi-tech
weaponry. Millions of people may be murdered by the government or the UN World Health Organization’s deliberate
release of chemical agents or biological viruses through vaccines, war, nuclear conflict, or the deliberate
reduction in farm production and food supply causing famines. But they definitely will not be caused by any deceptive ‘green’ reductions in energy use,
carbon footprints, cow “farts” or CO2 emissions.
“Global warming” and
“sustainable development” is a hoax and a fraud – madness. But it is more than just that – it is purely Satanic!
The copyright of this book is only for the purposes of protecting the original text. It may be
freely quoted, reproduced in full or in part, for profit or not, without the author’s or publisher’s permission.
All Scriptures in this book are quoted from the Authorized King James Bible Version. All underlining or emphasis in
quotations (whether from the Bible or elsewhere) are the author’s unless otherwise stated. Special thanks to
brother Martin for assisting with the research, and for helping motivate the author to write this book.
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Antichrist and the Green
9. Global Governance (Part 8 of 9)
By Henry Lamb
New York To Beijing (1995)
All the pomp that was missing in New York was present in Beijing for the fourth World Women's
Congress in September 1995, preceded by a week-long NGO Forum. The event was expected to produce a Platform for
Action to guide national and international policy on women's issues into the 21st century. The event was the
culmination of a "180-Day Local-to-Global-to-Local Women's Empowerment Campaign" organized by the NGO WEDO (Women
for Environment and Development Organization).
WEDO's parent organization, Women U.S.A. Fund, Inc, is headed by Bella Abzug, Congresswomen Patsy
Mink and Maxine Waters, and Gloria Steinem. Funding for the NGO comes from the Ford Foundation, the MacArthur
Foundation, the Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation and the Turner Foundation. The campaign featured the coordinated
release of press kits to the media, boycotts, "take over the legislature for a day" rallies, forums, lunchtime
workshops with fellow workers, and a "myriad of actions" all over the world. The purpose of the campaign was to
focus public attention on the Beijing Conference, and more particularly, on WEDO's conference agenda.
WEDO called for the tracking of all national and international economic and development programs by
social and gender impact studies; restrictions on economic growth in industrialized countries; the transfer of
common property (water, forests, grazing lands and fishing waters) to international control; prohibiting ownership
of such common property to national or international corporations; national and international strategies to
alleviate women's poverty; remuneration for women's unpaid work (housekeeping, child rearing, etc.); taxes shifted
from income to consumption; universal guaranteed income and payment for childcare and other socially productive
activities; and a universal 50/50 program that would require all business and government entities to have a 50/50
men/women work force.96
The conference produced more hype, hoopla, and hyperbole than anything else. First there was a flap
about having a World Conference on Women's issues in a nation which so severely oppressed women. Then there was a
flap about the facilities. Then there was a flap about the extreme security measures. Then there was Hillary
Clinton, who put in a personal appearance. Of significance is the reappearance of the "Tobin Tax" as a recommended
way to fund the extravagant programs demanded by the delegates. There reappeared new calls to elevate the status
and authority of NGO's in decision-making and in program administration. And there was a new idea advanced -- the
FDR (not Franklin D. Roosevelt).
The FDR means "Family Dependency Ratio." The idea calls for extensive monitoring of the activities,
consumption, and production of every member of every family to determine whether a family is a net "consumer" or
"producer." This idea grew out of WEDO's demand to "value and remunerate" women for their unpaid work.97
Throughout the Conference, debate on the serious issues as well as the frivolous issues proceeded
with virtually no challenge to the appropriateness of UN jurisdiction over a range of issues that should be at
least national, if not extremely personal. Taxation, employment policies, and land use policies were all offered up
to the UN. Delegates and the NGO lobbyists passed the stage of questioning the appropriateness of global
governance; it is now a question of how much and how soon. There is no longer any discussion of freedom, property
rights, or national sovereignty. The discussion centers around how best to get the wealth from developed countries
into the UN for redistribution to the undeveloped countries. The documents coming from each of the successive World
Conferences continue to reflect the assumption that government -- the United Nations Government -- should be
sovereign, and that nation states are secondary, and individuals are cannon-fodder. From Beijing To San Francisco
The Beijing Conference had hardly adjourned when Gorbachev's State of the World Forum convened in
San Francisco, September 27, 1995. Though not an official UN function, the Forum was designed to advance global
governance. Forum President and founder of the Christic Institute, Jim Garrison, told the San Francisco Weekly, "We
are going to end up with world government . . . we have to govern and regulate human interaction.98 Gorbachev told
the hand-picked audience of celebrities and dignitaries that "we are giving birth to the first Global
Civilization." Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Carter's National Security Advisor, told the audience that
"regionalism" must precede world government. New-age guru, Sam Keen received enthusiastic applause for his
"If we cut the world's population by 90%, there won't be enough people left to do ecological
The Forum's agenda called for the transfer of all armaments to the UN, the initiation of global
taxation, stricter population control programs, and the elimination of nationalism and national borders. The
highlight of the event was a joint presentation by Gorbachev, former President George Bush, and former Prime
Minister Margaret Thatcher. Gorbachev is the founding President of Green Cross and the Gorbachev Foundation. He
along with Maurice Strong were regarded as candidates to replace Butrous Butrous-Ghali as Secretary-General of the
United Nations at the expiration of Ghali's term December 31, 1996.99 However since UN rules have required that an
African hold the position of Secretary-General for another term, Kofi Annan has assumed this position. Maurice
Strong has been designated his "Senior Advisor" for restructuring the United Nations. On 16 July 1997, Kofi Annan
released a report on UN "reform" plans. They coincide with the blueprint drawn in Our Global Neighborhood: Report
of the Commission on Global Governance. It is noteworthy that its lead author is Maurice Strong.
Antichrist and the Green Prince
10. News in Brief.
EU To Replace Britain On UN Security Council?
Arrests In Syria As Tanks Roll In
Everything You Do Is Monitored
Best US Places To Be For The Coming Collapse
Br. Nathanael - Trump Has Been
US To Use Pakistan Region For
The Suppressed Free Electricity Generation System of
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?" (Quote from
satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details:
URL of This Issue: