Tell A Friend | Add to Favourites | Print this Page
14 November, 2010
Learn to deal with reality
reality will deal with you.
URL of This Issue:
Back to General Index of all issues of Last Days
Contents of this Issue ...
Watch is Dedicated to Watching and Reporting About the Enemy Who Intends to Enslave Us
- Prince Charles Releases a New Book, Called Harmony, on His 62nd Birthday.
- The Real Agenda Behind Prince Charles' Book Harmony.
- What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really All About? (Part 1)
- What is Prince Charles Doing With a Hammer?
- Report From Iron Mountain
- The Ninth Wave-Agenda 21
Watch Out: The World Bank Is Quietly
Funding a Massive Corporate Water Grab
"Why do you think the Media is so important to us? You have (as
a society), in your hypnotized comatose state, given your Free Will consent to the state your planet is in
today. You saturate your minds with the unhealthy dishes served up for you on your televisions that you are
addicted to, violence, pornography, greed, hatred, selfishness, incessant 'bad news', fear and 'terror'. When
was the last time you stopped, to think of something beautiful and pure? The planet is the way it is, because
of your collective thoughts about it. You are complicit
in your inaction, every time you 'look the other way' when you see an injustice. Your
'thought' at the sub-conscious level of creation to the Creator, is your allowance of these things to occur.
In so doing, you are serving our purpose."
(Source: Henry Makow, Illuminati Reveal Crazy Apocalyptic Agenda )
Important Note ...
Filtering software may prevent you from receiving some important NazareneRemnant.org communications. To ensure
that you never miss an e-mail from us, please follow these tips ...
SUBSCRIBE and UNSUBSCRIBE information, and HOW YOU GOT ON THIS LIST can be found at the end of this
1. Prince Charles Releases a New Book,
Called Harmony, on His 62nd
Harmony: A New
Way of Looking at Our World - a new film and book by The Prince of Wales.
comment: A New Way of Looking at Our World
is undoubtedly according to the system of the New World Order, which is actually the Nazi
Fourth Reich. The Book of Revelation goes into more detail, and tells us clearly that we are currently in
the time just prior to the opening of the fourth seal, which will usher in the Fourth Empire: “And the first beast
[was] like a lion, and the second beast like a calf, and the third beast had a face as a man, and the
fourth beast [was] like a flying eagle.” (Revelation 4: 7) The symbol of the Nazi Third Rech was
of course that of the flying eagle, or the Zodiacal Sign of Scorpio (which is Prince Charles' Zodiacal
Harmony is the new book from The Prince of Wales. Working for more than two years with
Tony Juniper and Ian Skelly, The Prince has set out his own personal view of how we can live sustainably to protect
the long-term future of our planet. The book is accompanied by a film.
Harmony challenges the reader to reconsider the assumptions that determine how we live, and how we might
change in seeking a more durable future for humankind.
For the better part of four decades The Prince has been at the forefront of a growing ecological movement. During
this time he has worked with an array of environmental activists, business leaders, academics, and charities in
developing more balanced and sustainable ways of living.
In Harmony The Prince brings together his unique wealth of experience to present a positive agenda for a
wide array of modern challenges. From farming and engineering to medicine, architecture and education,
Harmony suggests that by taking the best of modern science and technology and combining these with
traditional knowledge and methods, we can begin to restore the balance between Man and Nature.
Harmony goes further, however. For the first time it reveals the philosophical convictions that drives The
Prince of Wales’s diverse initiatives, highlighting the truly interconnected character of the world and
demonstrating how Nature herself can help us to mend the crisis of perception that lies at the heart of so many
Harmony presents an integrated view of how we might positively address the awesome challenges that
confront humankind. Harmony is a timely call to global action.
Read the first 27 pages
of Harmony as a PDF file - you will need Adobe Reader to view the file.
"Prince Charles’ Green Movie
Harmony, the 2011 Trust, and the 2012 Jubilee
In April 2009, HarperCollins announced
that a new “green” book and film project titled “Harmony” produced by
Prince Charles is to be released in 2010, and a children’s picture book version of it in 2011. The book will
feature Charles’ views as an organic farmer and will include his thoughts as a campaigner against genetically
modified crops, modern architecture, and global warming, similar to Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth.
by the way, is not just a ‘randomly’ chosen term selected by Charles. It is the modern form of Harmonia, the Greek immortal goddess of harmony and concord. Her Roman
equivalent was Concordia. In Greek mythology Harmonia was the wife of
Cadmus, a Phoenician prince, the son of king Agenor and the brother of Phoenix, Cilix and Europa. According to
myth, after Cadmus became king of the Illyrians, he and Harmonia were metamorphosed into dragons and
transferred to Elysium, or, according to others, they were carried away in a resplendent chariot drawn by
dragons. In Euripides’ The Bacchae, Cadmus is portrayed as being
turned into a dragon or a serpent, after Dionysus overthrows Thebes, the Greek city founded by him. There
is an urn dated to 560-550 BC in the Louvre (E707) in Paris with a painting of “Cadnus and the Dragon” on
it, very similar to those in later times of St. George and the Dragon. We remember, St. George is the
Ever Green Green One – the Green Man!
Following on from the release of Harmony in 2010, Prince Charles as royal patron of the 2011 Trust established by the Bible Society to celebrate the 400th
anniversary of the publication of the original King James Bible in 1611 by his forefather King James I of
England – will lead the Protestant world to celebrate its legacy and affect upon English history and literature
– while promoting special ecumenical gatherings, interdenominational and interfaith dialogue between all the
major religious leaders of the world. (Daniel 11:37 “Neither shall he regard the God [capital ‘G’] of his
fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above
Then, significantly, commencing in May
(remember? the goddess “Maia”) in 2012, just as the Olympic torch makes its way through Britain before the
opening of the Games on July 27 – the biggest party of the century will be thrown lasting three months when the
Queen’s 60 years reign and diamond jubilee coincides with Olympic Games." (Source:
Antichrist And The Green Prince )
2. The Real Agenda Behind Prince
Charles' Book Harmony.
(By Larry Abraham. Published 1993 by Double A Publications, Inc., 2320 W. Peoria #C122,
Phoenix, AZ85029. Tel. (800)
subtitle of Abraham's book is The Environmentalists' Drive For Global
Power, and describes how the war-substitute that appeared most
feasible to the Iron Mountain study group has been converted into an action program. First, however, let's review the
other major possibilities that were considered by that group, and briefly observe what has
social welfare system was proposed, to include health care, college education, modern housing, and poverty
elimination for all. We now have myriad programs dealing with these matters, including Medicare, Medicaid, college
tuition grants, subsidized housing, and income assistance programs of various kinds, on which we as a nation have
spent close to $5 trillion in the 30 or so years since LBJ declared his War on Poverty, without appreciably
changing the incidence of "poverty." All this can certainly be considered a world-class effort to produce serious
waste, but it has also produced a major backlash among those who are being taxed to pay for it, a backlash which
the elites can't control very well. As they predicted, it clearly can't serve their long-term
now have a space research program which the public is willing to support at a reasonable level, but "reasonable" is
nowhere near enough as a substitute for war.
environmental issue has clearly been selected as the major policy initiative to be developed. Recall that the Iron
Mountain report expressed doubt that this issue would prove to be viable if dealt with only on its inherent merits,
since the public would not likely view a sullied environment as a sufficiently severe threat to justify spending
massive amounts of money on it, much less give up one's life in such a cause. It might be possible, however, to
enhance the environmental threat, or even to invent a fake issue if an appropriate real one could not be found,
though the conferees thought it better not to further discuss such possibilities in their written report. That,
however, is what Abraham discusses at length in his excellent book.
first few pages of his book, Abraham plainly states his fundamental thesis. The real goal of the secret elites, he
says, "is nothing less than to control natural resources worldwide. The Insiders of Environmentalism realize – even
if many innocent bystanders do not – that the wealth of the world consists of the things that men take from the
earth, and they want to control it all…. For what is now being unleashed in the name of 'saving the earth' is
nothing less than the most historic grab for power in all of human history."
then commences to lay out his evidence. In April 1970, just four years after the completion of the
Iron Mountain study, President Nixon declared the first
Earth Day, and in the same year established the Environmental Protection Agency. Abraham quotes a news article
celebrating the 20th anniversary of that first Earth Day: "Government, business, and consumers have spent up to a
trillion dollars, by Department of Commerce count, to clean the environment…. The U.S. seems to find three new environmental hazards for
each one it conquers." Thus this "war-replacement" project, with its germ of a justifiable excuse for incurring
public expenditures, has obviously added mightily to the production of economic waste, but that's hardly its total
purpose, as we shall shortly see.
1970 there also appeared an article by insider George F. Kennan in the CFR's journal Foreign Affairs, entitled "To
Prevent a World Wasteland … A Proposal." The article, no doubt written for the edification of the worker bees in
the fields of the elites, was nothing less than the concrete plan for implementing the environmental project
suggested by the Iron Mountain Special Study Group. Abraham quotes from the paper extensively, from which one may
list the following principal elements of the plan:
Treat environmental issues as
transnational, since water and air contamination are no respecters of national boundaries.
Create facilities to collect, store, and
disseminate worldwide data on all aspects of environmental problems and activities.
Promote the coordination of present
international research and operational environmental activities.
Establish international environmental
standards, and advise and help governments and other organizations on how to meet those
Most important of all, establish and
enforce "suitable rules for all human activities" conducted within the great international media of the high seas,
the stratosphere, outer space, and perhaps the polar areas. Since individual governments and their selfish
parochial nationals cannot be trusted to make or enforce such regulations, the task must be given to an
An international body should be created
to perform the above functions, including that of enforcing the rules and standards to be created. The body,
perhaps called the Environmental Agency, should be empowered to act, not on the basis of agreements between
government representatives, but by "collaboration among scholars, scientists, experts, and perhaps also something
in the nature of envi¬ronmental statesmen and diplomats – but true inter¬national servants…. The agency would
require, of course, financial support from the sponsoring gov¬ernments … and one should not underestimate the
amount of money that would be required."
case the Establishment workers still don't get it, Kennan specifically spells out that the environmental issue is
to replace society's fixation on the then-current Cold War, of which Kennan was a major architect, as Abraham
clearly documents. Kennan emotes:
only the international scientific community but the world at large has great need, at this dark hour, of a new and
more promising focus of attention. The great communist and Western powers, particularly, have need to replace the
waning fixations for the cold war with interests which they can pursue in common and to everyone's benefit. For
young people the world over, some new opening of hope and creativity is becoming an urgent spiritual necessity.
Could there, one wonders, be any undertaking better designed to meet these needs, to relieve the great convulsions
of anxiety and ingrained hostility that now rack international society, than a major international effort to
restore the hope, the beauty, and the salubriousness of the international environment in which man has his being?"
(Abraham's emphasis added.)
defined for us the purposes of war as an instrument for controlling a servile citizenry, The Report From Iron
Mountain has defined the criteria and a suggested replacement for war, and Kennan's article provided a blueprint to
install that replacement. It was expected to take about a generation and a half for that replacement to mature,
however, and the remainder of The Greening describes the forced growth of environmental fervor during that
going into that, however, Abraham gives us a preview of the elites' most recent assessment of the status of their
plan, along with details on how it is to be completed. It appears in a 1991 book by Jim MacNeill called Beyond
Interdependence: The Meshing of the World's Economy and the Earth's Ecology, published by the Trilateral
Commission, and containing a foreword by David Rockefeller himself. The book lays out the major goal to be sought
at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit meeting then being planned: "The major purpose of this conference is to launch a
global transition to sustainable development." The mechanics laid out for the conference, says Abraham, were to be
such as to endow it with "the political capacity to produce the basic changes needed in our national and
international economic agendas and in our institutions of governance [our emphasis] to ensure a secure and
sustainable future for the world community." He quotes Beyond Interdependence: "By the year 2012, these changes
must be fully integrated into our economic and political life," and then notes that someone up there seems to be
setting deadlines for us.
"Sustainable growth" says Abraham is "Insider jargon for Green de-industrialization, global
carteliza¬tion of natural resources, and international control of the world's economy…. [It] is a new synonym
for Iron Mountain's 'stability,' i.e., perpetuating Insider control."
We have referred to the same term as "social stability," meaning "keeping the Low's in poverty and the High's in
recommends environmental taxes to pay for the real cost of using (replacing?) natural resources. Such costs may be
highly speculative, but don't worry, those "environmental statesmen and diplomats" mentioned above can probably
handle the job. "Politically," says
Abraham, "MacNeill teaches that environmental interdependence means the end of national sovereignty. It will
provide the 'external necessity' for a world government with new laws and regulations aplenty." And if some nations
don't rush to relinquish their sovereignty, remember that MacNeill says it's OK to accept its piecemeal erosion by
the "steady encroachment on their sovereignty by the forces of economic interdependence."
MacNeill's "credible threat," which The Iron Mountain Report required, consisted, said Abraham,
of "the same old worn-out menu of eco-hoaxes: over¬population, ozone hole, global warming, deforestation,
bio-diversity, acid rain, rising sea levels, soil degrada¬tion, ad nauseam." The "alternate enemies" are to consist
of those who resist the imposition of interna¬tional controls over these areas, such as us taxpayers, especially
those of us who can still read. To control all of this, MacNeill proposes that a new international environmental
super-agency be created.
Read the Full Story Here:
3. What Is The “Green” and Environmental Movement Really
All About? (Part 1)
This article begins with the serialisation of a book that gives vital background
understanding to the epidemic of the green environmental movement that is sweeping the Earth. It is called
Antichrist and the Green Prince, written
by New Zealander John D Christian, and first published in 2009. If you prefer to read a PDF version of the whole
book, there is a download link below.
By John D Christian
Copyright © John D.
Christian 2009. Used with permission.
Note:Make sure you
read Antichrist and the Green
and The Sinister Garden at
Highgrove,as they are deeply connected.
Links for downloading
From the Introduction
to Antichrist And The Green
For most people nowadays, the
study of the old pagan “nature” religions, myths, deities, gods and goddesses from ancient Babylon, Egypt, Greece
and Rome, seem complex and confusing because there are so many of
them. As the result of this, more often than not they are simply disregarded by the general
masses as ‘irrelevant’ or ‘harmless’ old myths coming from a bygone era having no relevance to the modern world
today. Of course, this is absolutely not the case at
all, and today they are still alive and well as ever they were, even more so, and now subtly form
the very basis for the “green” New World Order, Masonic, one world “environmental” religion and
At the time of Christ and the
apostles it was these “mythological” “nature” deities and beliefs that were the primary inspiration
responsible for crucifying Christ, persecuting and murdering Christians. The Bible mentions them under different
names, but the chief ones in the New Testament, are the Roman sun god, Jupiter, and his consort, the mother earth
While Paul and Barnabas were in
Lycaonia, Acts 14:11-19 records, that Paul was stoned for challenging these very beliefs:
“And when the
people saw what Paul had done, they lifted up their voices, saying in the speech of Lycaonia, The gods are come
down to us in the likeness of men. And they called Barnabas, Jupiter; and
because he was the chief speaker. Then the priest of
Jupiter, which was before their city, brought oxen and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice
with the people. Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in
among the people, crying out, And saying, Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with
you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God, which made heaven, and
earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein ...”
Jupiter, the Roman sun god, is
again mentioned in Acts 19:35.
While at Ephesus, the center of
mother earth goddess Diana (Greek name, Artemis) worship, Demetrius, a silversmith, who made silver shrines for
Diana, when threatened by Paul’s preaching, said:
“So that not only
this our craft is in danger to be set at nought; but also that the temple of the great goddess Diana should be
despised, and her magnificence should be destroyed, whom all Asia and the world worshippeth.” (Acts
At the time of Christ and the
apostles, the “whole world” worshipped this goddess apart from the small remnant of genuine
Even the Ephesian town-clerk
“… Ye men of
Ephesus, what man is there that knoweth not how that the city of the Ephesians is a worshipper of the great goddess
Diana, and of the image which fell down from Jupiter?” (Acts 19:35).
Diana is mentioned in Acts
19:24, 27, 28, 34, 35.
Diana’s great temple and shrine
at Ephesus was considered one of the wonders of the ancient world and was a place of devout pilgrimage. Worshippers
at Ephesus adored her so much, that even the Christian church there couldn’t totally give up the worship of her
completely, so she was gradually assimilated into their beliefs.
In 380AD, her shrine was
re-dedicated to the Virgin Mary, whose old age and death in subsequent Roman Catholic Church legend, was and still
is, erroneously claimed to be at Ephesus. Later, in 431AD, many of the former great goddess titles of Diana were
taken by the church declaring “Mary” to be the new “God Bearer,” “Queen of Heaven,” “Divine Virgin,” “Mother of
God,” and “Mother of All.” Of course, they conveniently omitted her more “darker side” as the “Queen of Witches”
and “Death-Bringing Goddess” who, with Apollo, used poisoned arrows to kill the Niobids, (which will be explained
in greater detail later). Most depictions of the death-bringing Diana show a bow, arrows and a “dead beast” of some
sort with her.
In the Old Testament, the
worship of the sun god and the mother earth goddess was Israel’s greatest sin. In Jeremiah 7:18, Israel made
“cakes to the queen of heaven” in much the same way as pagans and apostate Christians do today in
worshipping her at the pagan feast of Easter named after the Egyptian/Babylonian mother earth goddess Ishtar
(Egyptian name, Isis) – by baking and eating hot cross buns. The bun (and Easter eggs also) represents her as the
fertility goddess producing cereals and food, and the cross on top is one of the ancient symbols for the Babylonian
sun god impregnating her. During the time of Jeremiah, the Jews living in Egypt were all worshipping her as the
Egyptian “queen of heaven.” For this great sin in worshipping the mother earth goddess, God through Jeremiah
“…Behold, I have sworn
by my great name, saith the LORD, that my name shall no more be named in the mouth of any man of Judah in all
the land of Egypt, saying, The Lord GOD liveth.” (Jeremiah 44:26).
This curse and promise still
remains in force today. It is no coincidence that the spurious “Egyptian” Ben Asher Hebrew Text of the Old
Testament is still used by all Orthodox Jews today, and tragically many Messianic Jews and Christians as well. This
is also the same text from which all corrupt modern New Age bible Old Testaments are translated. It is also no
coincidence, that all of the corrupt modern bible New Testaments in the church today are translated from the
spurious “Egyptian” Alexandrian Greek Text of the New Testament. In contrast, the King James Bible is
translated from the genuine Ben Chayyim Hebrew Text (not from Egypt) and the Textus Receptus Greek
Text (also not from Egypt). This great curse (and now deception) on most Jews and apostate Christians has
occurred through one major reason only – the turning away from worshipping the true Creator and God of the Bible –
and commencing to worship the sun god and his consort, this “green” “mother earth goddess.”
In ancient times in Babylon,
Egypt, Greece and Rome, this supreme deified pagan sun god was deemed to be incarnated in the king or pharaoh. In
other words, the king or pharaoh was believed not to be just “a man.” He was believed to be a literal god himself.
It follows, then, that the soon-coming, deceptive, world leader most Christians now refer to as “Antichrist” will
be such “a man” masquerading as a similar god. This is what this book is all about.
Matthew 24, Jesus prophetically summarized details to his disciples about future cataclysmic events which
would wax worse and worse in the last days and lead up to and transpire during a period of “great
tribulation” (v.29) at the end of the world (v.13) heralding the rise of Antichrist, and Jesus’ second coming
(v.27). The main feature of this period would be “deception,” and Jesus started off by warning his
disciples by saying, “Take heed that no man deceive you” (v.4).
The beginning of this period
leading up to this time of “great tribulation” would be characterized first by wars and rumors of wars (i.e.,WW1,
WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Iraq etc.) then followed by famines, pestilences and earthquakes in many places (which are
dramatically increasing now). This period is called “the beginning of sorrows” (v.8).
It is then quickly followed by
the introduction of severe persecution of genuine Christians, which leads up to the start of the time of “great
tribulation.” (v.21). Man will become so wicked during this period that “except those days should be shortened,
there should no flesh be saved” (v.22). Immediately after the tribulation (v.29), Christ’s second coming
occurs (v.30) and all the elect are gathered together to be with him (v.31). Following this event, God then brings
his judgment on the wicked and those who would destroy the earth.
In Revelation chapters 6-13,
Jesus revealed to John in much greater detail what was going to happen during this debilitating period, which would
lead up to the enthronement of a man who would become a Satanic world “leader” (German: Fuehrer) who
Christians refer to as Antichrist. This wicked man would cause his satanic mark to be placed in the right hand or
forehead of every living person in the world for buying and selling who do not have Jesus Christ as Lord
In WW2, how an entire, great,
cultured nation like Germany could be deceived by such an obscure, “weasel” of a man like the Fuehrer,
Adolph Hitler, has always been a deep mystery for many people, almost beyond comprehension. If his almost
trance-like adoration by the masses and subsequent reign of terror was anything, it surely was a “final warning” to
the world never again to be deceived. But will most people ever heed the warning? Obviously the true Antichrist
character will be much more subtle and cleverer. Jesus warned in Matthew 24:24 that, “if it were
possible, they shall deceive the very elect.” Paul too, in 2 Corinthians 11:14 warned, “And no marvel; for
Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.”
The title, “Prince of
Wales,” in Welsh is Tywysog Cymr. The verb tywys means to lead.
The literal translation of Welsh Tywysog is
“Leader,” in German, Fuehrer
Revelation chapter 6
prophetically summarizes some of the key “opening events” which lead up to this diabolically deceptive and evil
period where this man/god/prince becomes universally worshipped. The prophecy in Revelation 6 is commonly referred
to as ‘The Four Horses of the Apocalypse.’(‘Apocalypse’ is simply Greek for
One cannot properly understand
this key prophecy in Revelation 6 without first understanding the Old Testament prophecy of the “Four Chariots
and Horses” in Zechariah 6, which “foreshadows” Revelation 6, and readers are encouraged to read this prophecy
as well. The “fourth chariot” in Zechariah 6:3 contained “grisled and bay horses,” and the Hebrew word translated
“grisled” (Strong’s Hebrew #1261 – ‘barod’ comes from Hebrew #1258 ‘’barad’ – ‘hail’). It’s a big
subject, and for the sake of brevity, this study will only concentrate on the “fourth horse” of the
Apocalypse and its relationship specifically to Prince Charles as the coming Antichrist. It primarily involves
about two or three key verses of scripture centered around Revelation 6:8, so let’s start the first chapter by
reading this verse.
The Pale Horse: Chloros and Chloris
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was
Death, and Hell followed with him. And power was given unto them over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with
the sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth.” (Revelation
In this verse the KJV translators
controversially translated the word ‘pale’ from the Greek word
‘chloros’ (Strong’s Greek #5515) which means either ‘green or
pale.’ The only other places in the New Testament where this Greek
word chloros is used is in Mark 6:39, Revelation 8:7, and Revelation
9:4. In all these verses the word chloros is translated as ‘green.’
Because of this apparent discrepancy or contradiction, some modern bible scholars now claim that the KJV translation of the word chloros to ‘pale’ is an error, and
the correct word should be ‘green.’ Their reasoning for this is that modern words derived from
the Greek word chloros
such as ‘chlorophyll’ (the green pigment involved in photosynthesis in plants), ‘chlorine’ (a common chemical
element that as a gas is greenish yellow), ‘chlorosis’ (in botany is a condition in which plant foliage produces
insufficient chlorophyll) and the Greek name ‘Chloe’ (literally ‘a green shoot’- another name for Demeter the
Greek goddess of agriculture) are all directly associated with the color green – not pale. As a result of this
reasoning some modern bible translators have changed the text in Revelation 6:8. The Phillips Translation has ‘sickly green in color.’ The Contemporary English Version (CEV) has ‘pale green’ etc. So who is correct? –
the King James Bible translators or the modern version editors? So let’s explain.
The normal translation of the Greek word
chloros into English definitely should be green. The modern bible version
editors are partly correct there is no doubt. But why did the KJV translators translate chloros as ‘green’ elsewhere in the New Testament, yet in Revelation 6:8 so
abruptly depart from the standard rendering and mysteriously change it to ‘pale?’
The etymology (history of the formation of
words) of the Greek word chloros is much deeper than most people
realize. For example, the word chlorosis derived from it, is not only
a botanical term for a condition in which plant foliage produces insufficient chlorophyll, it is also a medical
term for anemia that is
characterized by a green color to the skin, also known as ‘greensickness.’ The Greek word chloros – ‘green’ ‘pale,’ in turn, originally is derived directly from the
name of the Greek nymph/mother earth goddess Chloris (sometimes spelled Chloros,
Khloros or Khloris). Chloris in Greece was originally the goddess
associated with the new, green, spring growth.
In ancient Greek mythology, Chloris’s name
was originally Meliboea, who was one of Niobe and Amphion’s fourteen children, seven male and seven female,
called the Niabids. Meliboea was the only one, or one of two children, spared when Artemis (Roman name, Diana)
and Apollo killed the Niobids in retribution for Niobe’s insult to their mother Leto, bragging that she had many
children and Leto had only two. Meliboea was so frightened by the ordeal, she turned permanently pale, changing
her name to ‘Chloris’ which in Greek literally means ‘pale one.’ She
is referred to in Homer’s Odyssey, (Book11, lines 281-296). This is
why, in Greek, Chloros or Chloris can be translated either as ‘green’
or ‘pale.’ In the context of Revelation 6:8, this is why the KJV translators chose to call the fourth horse of
the apocalypse ‘pale’ rather than green, because the whole chapter is describing a “frightening ordeal” – not
like a pleasant one that would normally be associated with the color ‘green.’
It is important to remember that all of
the world’s pagan sun-gods and mother-earth goddesses, no matter what their manifestation, aspect, or
personification, have their primary beginnings in the Bible’s characterization of Adam and Eve. All pagan
mother-earth goddess myths can be traced right back to the original account of Adam and Eve in Genesis chapters
1-3, and involve primarily a woman, a serpent (Satan) and a tree. Thus, the ancient Greek name for the goddess
Athena (after which Athens today is named) was originally Athana. The
Greek name ‘Athana’ is a shortened form of ‘A-Thanatos’ which means ‘deathlessness,’ and is simply the pagan Greek representation of the serpent’s
lie to Eve that she would never die – but would become a god, knowing good and evil. All of the ancient
Egyptian, Babylonian, Greek and Roman mother-earth goddesses, no matter what their individual personification or
names, are all pagan masquerades of Satan in the original garden of
The opposite of A-Thanatos is ‘Thanatos’ (Strongs Greek
2288) from which the capitalized word in Revelation 6:8 ‘Death’
is directly translated. Thanatos capitalized is the literal
Greek god of Death. ‘Hell’
is also capitalized in Revelation 6:8 and is translated from Hades
the literal Greek god of the Underworld. In ancient Greece,
both these gods were represented as men.
bronze statue of a gladiator, with sword in hand, confronts the
westward-facing Thyme Walk, and the Cedar of Lebanon, on
Prince Charles’ property Highgrove. Of course this gladiator
is Thanatos, or Prince Charles himself!
In ancient Greek art and sculpture
the god Thanatos is usually shown as
a naked winged man or boy with a huge scabbard and sword hanging over his left hip. In Greek
mythology he was looked on less as a god, but more as the Angel of Death, who inherited from Zeus [Start Nazarene Remnant comment: Zeus is actually
the father of the demons, i.e. satan. Thus in Prince Charles’ garden at his home of Highgrove in Wales, he has a
statue depicting this very situation. The statue is facing East—the direction from which the returning Messiah
[Osiris] will return—ready to battle against Christ at His return. [
comment] his role as a judge of who shall
live and who shall die. He did this by weighing the living on a balance-scale. The Greeks got their pagan ideas
about Thanatos from the ancient Egyptians.
In the Egyptian Book of the Dead, Anubis engages in the ‘Weighing of the Heart,’ in which he
decides the fate of the dead by balancing on a giant scale his or her heart against a feather – the feather of
Justice, the feather of Maat.
[Start Nazarene Remnant comment: In all the scenes
of the Last Judgment from ancient Egyptian art, satan is always present to greedily accept those who have been
declared evil, and therefore cast into the Pit of eternal death. Prince Charles is playing out the role of satan
here, at the Last Judgment. End Nazarene Remnant comment]
Two of these feathers, bound around a central element woven from ‘green’ plant stems
represented the Egyptian trinity, and were shown on the triple Atef Crown
of Osiris, the great sun-god of Egypt, worn by Pharaoh, from which today the “three ostrich feathers” emblem of the Prince of Wales is originally derived.
Atef Crown of Osiris.
comment: Prince Charles, as the Antichrist,
is really following the dictums of Masonic sorcery here, which in this case is to imitate—invert—mock the truth of the Most High God. He is imitating Osiris (i.e. the
Messiah), then inverting good or righteousness into evil, and finally, in everything
the satanic Illuminati core-elite do, and follow in their ceremonies and rituals, they laugh at and mock the Most High God, and His
Son, Jesus Christ (better known as Yeshua ) by dressing in his regalia. This is what the Romans did with Christ’s
purple robe after the crucifixion on Calvary.
Thus Osiris, in ancient Egypt, when He is
wearing the Atef Crown, is heralding to us that He has overcome evil, and has become purified [via the keeping
of the monthly New Moon Festivals], since the Atef Crown is the specific feathered white crown of Osiris. That
is why he is called the ruler (i.e. over-comer) of the Underworld! This overcoming is telling us that He is
re-born again, and has “traveled,” spiritually speaking, the 36 degrees from the domain of the Underworld (i.e.
Hades, Hell or the Abyss, signified by the massive Southern star Canopus) to the domain of Saturn, on the
Ecliptic path, which in the Great Pyramid at Giza, was the Star Chamber of Isis, which today has been corruptly
renamed to the Queen’s Chamber. When Prince Charles, or the members of the Order of The Garter (e.g. Queen
Elizabeth II, Prince Phillip, and Prince William), wears the Atef Crown, they are mockingly proclaiming that
they are ruled by evil, and delight in the fact!
Charles version of the Atef Crown of Osiris,
as taken from his coat of arms.
is what Wikipedia says about the Atef Crown: “Atef is the specific feathered white crown of the Egyptian
Deity Osiris. It combines the Hedjet, the crown of Upper Egypt, with red Ostrich feathers for
the Osiris cult. The Atef crown identifies Osiris in ancient Egyptian painting. Osiris wears the Atef crown as a symbol of the ruler of the
underworld. The tall bulbous white piece in the center of the
crown is between two ostrich feathers. The feathers represent truth, justice, morality, and balance. The Atef crown is similar, save for
the feathers, to the plain white crown (Hedjet) used in the Predynastic Period and later as a symbol for
pharaonic Upper Egypt.”
all this symbolism from ancient Egypt it is important to understand that the White Crown of Upper Egypt stands
for the Birthright Holy Spirit [i.e. Isis], and the red Crown of Lower Egypt stands for the Sceptre Holy Spirit
[called Re or Ra by the ancient Egyptians. Also realize that the Southern Hemisphere of the Earth stands for the
White Crown, while the Northern Hemisphere stands for the Red Crown.]. End
The Roman Catholic Church
“Christianized” the god Thanatos and changed his name to St.
Michael, now the protector of the
Roman Catholic Church. This is why Roman Catholic artists often depict the Archangel St. Michael at the Last
Judgment wielding a sword in one hand and in the other a balance-scale weighing the souls of the dead! In truth,
the Roman Catholic Archangel St. Michael is the Angel of Death.
In Revelation, ‘Death’ and ‘Hell’ are
often linked together, as they are in Revelation 6:8 in relation to the pale horse. Revelation 9:11 explains;
“And they had a king over them,
which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue his name is
Apollyon.” Abaddon and
Apollyon both mean ‘destroyer.’ In Revelation 9, Abaddon/Apollyon is both the angel of the bottomless pit and
the king of the locusts (masters of green plant destruction). In Greek, Apollyon is just another name for the
Greek god Apollo.
In Strong’s Hebrew and Chaldee Dictionary of the Old Testament the first 24 words in
Hebrew are largely associated with terms like ‘father’ (‘ab’ #1), ‘green,’ or ‘a green plant’ (‘eb’ #3),
‘destroy’ or ‘perish’ (‘abad’ #7), ‘perishing’ or ‘destruction’ [Greek
:Abaddon] (‘abaddown’ #11), and the Hebrew month
‘Abib’ [Nisan] (‘abiyb’ #24), – meaning ‘to be tender green’ i.e.
‘a young ear of grain’ ‘ear,’ ‘green ears of corn.’ The Hebrew meaning is much deeper than just
“destruction” and is closely associated with the color ‘GREEN.’ The full name of this “king” or “angel of the bottomless pit”
is therefore not just “destruction.” It is more correctly: “Green plant
destroyer” or, “Father of Green Plant
In ancient Greece, the locust was the emblem of Apollo who brutally
poisoned his victims. His emblem, the locust, typified his power in destroying agriculture through bringing on pestilence and thus – starvation. He was also the god of
healing, but also the god of “sending of plague and pestilence.” His arrows, it was believed, could send plague, as
happened in the Iliad Book I. In the first book of the Iliad, Apollo is angry with the Greeks for refusing to return the daughter of his
priest Chryses. To punish them, Apollo showers the Greeks with arrows of plague, possibly bubonic, since the
plague-sending Apollo is a special aspect connected to mice.
The locust emblem of Apollo was probably
the Desert Locust, which is normally green. Interestingly, when these
locusts are crowded together they enter a gregarious phase of activity when their color changes from green to
black, yellow or orange. If a black hopper is separated from its swarm at a sufficient early stage it can be
induced to turn green again. When swarming, a medium size plague can contain a billion locusts and cover an
invasion area of 20 square kilometers, and consume 3,000 tonnes of green vegetation or crops per day. When
swarming they will eat every green thing in their path. Wind tunnel tests have shown that a locust can fly
continuously for 17 hours, and there is evidence of an actual recorded flight of locusts from the Canary Islands
to the British Isles in 1954, a distance of 1600 miles. In Africa, swarms can travel 2000 miles in a month. They
usually fly at about 10-12 miles per hour and move down-wind. Locust pheromones or hormones produced during
mating, in combination with scales that come off their wings and cuticle can act as allergens to humans causing
severe respiratory illnesses such as asthma, Lung Eczema or Laboratory Animal Allergy. These respiratory
diseases can occur one or two years after initial exposure. In insect rearing laboratories dealing with locusts,
there are therefore strict rules on wearing face masks, in much the same way as there are today for Avian and
Swine Flu outbreaks. John the Baptist ate locusts.
The apostle John wrote the Book of Revelation in AD96 during the reign of the Roman Caesar Domitian
(reign: AD81-96), who banished him to Patmos, severely persecuted Jews and Christians, and who believed he was
the literal incarnation of Apollo. Remember? It was Apollo in Greek mythology who killed the Niabids and saved
the mother-earth goddess Meliboea, who was originally the “green goddess” of spring who changed her name to
Chloris, who in fear turned pale – from which is derived the name of the “pale horse” of the apocalypse in the
book of Revelation! Well, in Rome, Satan changed her name again!
Click the Link to Download the Full PDF
Antichrist and the Green
4. What is Prince Charles Doing With a
Here Charles is play-acting Orcus, the Angel of Death. For
see Antichrist and the Green Prince, Chapter
Five, "St. George,
Jupiter, and the Nazi, Green Frog Prince."
Prince Charles with his
hammer, performing for his Jewish Ashkenazi groomers. The hammer is decidedly one of the most
anti-Christian symbols you can possibly think of. It is used by world Freemasonry, and the Order of the
Garter, and in every court and parliament on the planet:
“Let us erect the two pillars, one at the right and the other at the left. Let us bless them.
We bless these instrument and we also bless these various symbols of Jesus (12) that represent, ironically,
some episode of those that the Impostor spoke of during his preaching in his instructions and blasphemies, such
as the cock, the sword, the light, the darkness, the
hammer, because of its being the instrument that was used to nail his hands and his
feet, and with it we will open all the sessions, emphasizing this irony. Every
session will be opened by striking three times consecutively with this hammer; thus we will remember eternally,
through the centuries, that we have crucified him and that with this hammer we have fixed the nails in his
hands and feet, killing him. These three stars you see symbolize the three nails. We would be able to change
them for three points that VI have the same significance. Among our symbols will be the three steps, ridiculing
with them this blasphemy: God is Father, Son and Holy Ghost, with his claiming to be the Son.”
(FromDissipation of the Darkness: History of the Origin of Masonry, available here:
5. Report From Iron Mountain
This summary is from chapter 7 of Alan B Jones' How
the World Really Works.
"Report From Iron Mountain On The Possibility
And Desirability Of Peace"
(Foreword by Leonard Lewin. Pub. 1967, Dial Press, NY. Call American Opinion Books,
This remarkable book appeared eighteen years after Orwell's 1984, and suffers from many of
the same speculations as to its origins. It is not a novel, but rather a report written by the members of a 15-man
"Special Study Group" commissioned, they believe, by some governmental entity which wished to remain unknown. The
report is addressed to that unknown requestor, the work of the group having been completed after about two and a
half years of labor. The members of the group knew that they had been carefully screened and selected for the task, that they
represented the highest levels of scholarship, experience, and expertise in a wide range of the physical and social
sciences, that they possessed years of service in business, government, and academe, and that among them they had
access to a vast proportion of the country's resources in the social and physical science fields. The Special Study
Group was clearly possessed of outstanding establishmentarian credentials.
The book comes to us because one of the members of the group, identified only as John
Doe, approached Mr. Lewin several months after the completed report had been submitted, and
sought his help in getting the report commercially published, since he (Doe) felt that the public had a right to be
apprised of its existence, even though the group had previously agreed to keep it secret. Mr. Lewin, having agreed
to serve in that capacity, wrote a foreword spelling out these circumstances and passing on what little he learned
from Doe concerning the study's origin and its participants. He further revealed his personal reaction to the
conclusions of the report, conclusions which he said he does not share, but which appear to explain aspects of
recent American policies which have otherwise been incomprehensible from a "common sense" viewpoint.
As with 1984, we shall not indulge in speculation as to the possible motives of persons
involved in commissioning, performing, or publicizing the Study's activities, except to suggest the possibility
that both 1984 and The Report From Iron Mountain may have been created to serve as
guides for middle-level workers in the fields of the elites. This would require, of course, a certain skill in
reading between the lines,since calling a spade a spade would
obviously raise too much public reaction. But let's move right along, starting with a little
background on the nature of the Study Group and its operations.
The name Iron Mountain was derived from the name of the location, near Hudson, N.Y., where the
first and last meeting of the Study Group took place. The meeting place served to impress and convince the
participants of the authenticity of their endeavor. It was a well-equipped underground facility built to
survive a nuclear holocaust, and was being used by hundreds of American corporations for the
safekeeping of their critical documents. It also even housed substitute corporate headquarters for a number of
them, including such major establishment firms as Standard Oil of New Jersey, Shell, and Manufacturers Hanover
Meetings other than the first and last were held, approximately monthly, at universities, hotels,
summer camps, private estates, or business establishments in various parts of the country,
but never in the same place
twice. Participants were paid travel and per diem expenses by a member
identified as the "government contact" who also instructed them not to report those payments on their income
tax returns, and to otherwise do whatever was necessary to keep their deliberations secret.
The first meeting was held in August of 1963, though the idea for the study, according to Doe,
originated as far back as 1961 with the incoming staff of John Kennedy's administration, mostly, says Doe, "with
McNamara, Bundy, and Rusk." Doe further revealed that three of
the fifteen Study Group members had been in on the planning which produced the group, but the identities of none of
the members (except for Doe) were revealed to Lewin. The last meeting was held in March of
1966, and the report was completed and submitted shortly thereafter. Lewin was approached by
Doe during the following winter to arrange for commercial publication. (For reference, recall that John Kennedy was
assassinated on November 22, 1963.)
Lewin warned in his foreword that the Report contained presumptions and recommendations which were,
on the face of it, outrageous and offensive to ordinary common sense, including such
notions that poverty is both necessary and desirable, that the return of slavery as an institution may be
desirable, and that budgeting the optimum number of deaths to occur annually in warfare was a proper function
of government. With this warning in mind, one cannot help but be mentally probing, as he proceeds through the
Report, for the real purposes being served, including the foundation premises upon which the study was based.
Doe told Lewin that the purpose stated by the anonymous caller who recruited him was "to determine,
accurately and realistically, the nature of the problems that would confront the United States if and when a
condition of 'permanent peace' should arrive, and to draft a program for dealing with this contingency." The
Report's transmittal letter rephrased these
"1) to consider the problems involved in the contingency of a transition to a general condition
of peace, and
2) to recommend procedures for dealing with this contingency." As the Report's Introduction
again rephrased it, the following two questions were to be addressed: "What can be expected if peace comes?
What should we be prepared to do about it?" We are soon led to observe that there is something
askew in the logic of the first stated purpose. A society's "problems" are not nearly as uniquely determined by the
presence or absence of "peace" as they are by other societal characteristics, most particularly the presence or
absence of "individual liberty." The question to the Study Group should therefore spell out as a postulate the
status of this elemental characteristic, since the society's "problems" will be grossly different depending upon
whether its citizenry is or is not "free."
We, as Americans, would naturally assume that the Study Group would automatically acknowledge,
respect, and seek to preserve the philosophical foundation of our country (the existence of our individual
inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness) along with the mechanics which our forefathers
put in place (the U.S. Constitution) to try to preserve those rights for their posterity, rights which they had
just wrested from Old World monarchs representative of the entire prior world history of ongoing despotic rule by
whoever managed to acquire a preponderance of arms. It soon became clear, however, that
such an assumption was ill-founded, and that the implicit
presumption of the Study Group was that the condition of individual freedom was to be that which had
historically existed in the Old World, namely the subservience of the citizenry to an
The main question that was to absorb the group's labor was posed early in the Report's
Introduction. Presuming a world with no war, war preparations, or armaments, were there not certain societal
functions fulfilled in the past by warfare for which substitute activities would have to be found in a world of
peace? Thus, what functions did war fulfill? If no viable substitutes could be found to
fulfill them, was "peace" even desirable, in terms of "social stability?"
The study member who was the government contact was code-named Able by Doe, who revealed to Lewin
that it was Able who challenged the classical definition of war, and suggested that war served other purposes
beyond being an extension of diplomacy, or ultimate physical actions in support of a foreign policy, etc. All the
other members ultimately came around to his view. It was also Able who, with one other member, drafted the Report,
circulated it for review, and then produced the final version. It therefore seems likely that those who conceived
the study had pretty well in mind what the study would produce from the beginning.
Of course all of us ordinary folk have a pretty good idea of why peace is desirable. In a few
words, war involves lots of us getting
killed, usually for the benefit of kings or other elites with whom we have little truck,
and even if we physically survive, our savings, i.e., the fruits of our lifelong labors, are expropriated (by
inflation or otherwise) and spent on killing others, reducing our ability to lead the good life, and ruining life
in its entirety for those who are killed, displaced, enslaved, tortured, etc. All that being so, what is this
"social stability" that the Report refers to which may bring into question the desirability of peace?
It took a long time for the Report to get around to defining what it meant by "social stability."
But here are a few of the significant steps that we detected on the way. First, in describing the scope of the
study, the Report claims that one of the operative criteria was to avoid utilizing any preconceived value
assumptions (such as one's right to life or liberty, we assume). But then it proclaims one, since any serious
investigation "must be informed by some normative standard... The stability of society is the one bedrock value
that cannot be avoided." The words still remain undefined, however.
The Report next goes directly into the economic effects of disarmament, alleging that such effects
would be the same whether disarmament preceded or followed the attainment of peace. The study therefore entirely
bypasses the issue of how nations, centered about our own Constitutional Republic, might work to create the desired
peace with freedom, for example by jointly defining the conditions, including self-sufficiency and security, which
must be satisfied to make nations willing to disarm, and then working jointly to realize those conditions. With a
regime of "peace with freedom" established, the institutions then existing could be examined to seek out problems
then remaining and recommend programs for dealing with them. The Study, however, avoids looking at what
institutional structures might evolve in the production of peace with freedom, though such structures would
undoubtedly be very different from those presently existing.
The Report fleetingly describes and then dismisses prior studies leading to mechanistic disarmament
procedures. This brief discourse acknowledges that before such scheduled disarmament procedures could begin,
genuine agreement of intent would have to be reached among the major powers. We described that above as seeking to
define and then realize the conditions which would permit nations to feel secure about disarming.
The Report, however, does not mention the attainment of common
intent, but rather proclaims that disarmament efforts have been unsuccessful because nations
do not want peace to reign, and desire instead that the use of war as an institution continue, because
war serves certain essential purposes that peace cannot. In point of fact, says the
Report, war is not "subordinate to the social systems it is believed to serve." Rather, society's war readiness
"supersedes its political and economic structure. War is itself the basic social
system, within which other secondary modes of social organization conflict or conspire. It is the
system which has governed most human societies of record, as it is today."
We find fault with the above, not respecting its accurate description of how the Old World powers
behaved in order to expand their powers at the expense of others (that is, to indulge the fatal flaw of their
rulers of being corruptible by power), but most particularly with respect to the purposes and intent of the United
States of America, in whose name and for whose benefit the Special Study Group was presumably laboring. George
Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned Americans to stay out of Europe's intrigues and wars, which had no
legitimate place in our newly constructed country, a country which, for the first time in human history, was put
together to be run by the people for the benefit of the people, and not for the benefit of those momentarily
powerful persons in governmental office, who would in fact be frequently replaced. The power to make war was
carefully put in the hands of the Congress, representing the wide-ranging electorate. The carnage of the Civil War
renewed our abhorrence of war, and conspiratorial efforts were required (see Chapter 5 of How the World Really Works) to drag us against our will into World War
1. That produced further revulsion, and further conspiratorial efforts were required to get us into World War 2.
That ghastly war fed mass efforts to get us out of the Vietnam War, mass efforts that arose from our increasing
conviction that we, the public, were being
manipulated, a conviction made possible by our improved historical awareness and our much
improved access to current events due to the growth of modern communication media.
We the people do not want war, we know we do not want it, and we are more than willing to support
efforts to obtain and maintain peace in the world. To this end we supported the formation of the UN, but were again
conned into doing something against our real interests, because
the UN is clearly recognized now not as an institution seeking peace with
freedom, but rather as the institution charged with acquiring political and military control over the world's
peoples for the benefit of today's power elites.
Let's go on with the Report. It next sets about to define what it says are the real
functions served by war, and in so doing cannot avoid tipping its hand concerning its previously
implicit postulates. It first takes up the economic functions of war. Though war involves waste, it says, such
waste has social utility, in that the waste is outside the control of market forces, and is subject instead to
"arbitrary central control." That control can be used to "stabilize the advance" of the world's industrial
economies, which have "developed the capacity to produce more than is required for their economic survival..." It
can also be used as a sort of economic flywheel to balance the economy, and is better for this purpose than
wasteful social welfare programs, because the latter, once initiated, become imbedded in the general economy where
they are "no longer subject to arbitrary control." In fact, compared to war, "no combination of techniques for
controlling employment, production, and consumption has yet been tested that can remotely compare to it in
One perhaps begins to detect that a major goal, perhaps the major implicit postulate, is control,
and more particularly, arbitrary central control. But, we ask, why do we want to "stabilize the advance" of the
industrial economies? Isn't it proper to try to avoid war in order to permit the continuing increase in our own
standard of living, as well as the rest of the world's? And isn't war a ludicrous price to pay as a mechanism for
smoothing out the ripples in the economy? Aren't better and
much less costly mechanisms available? The answers are right around the corner.
The Report has now arrived at its core issue:
the hidden political functions of war. And here we run once
again into that undefined phrase that we started with: "social stability." War, we are told, is even more
critically needed for maintaining social stability than it is for providing economic stability. It is fully capable
of doing so because a state's war powers constitute "the basic authority of a modern state over its people." In our
modern industrial societies, war has served "as the last great safeguard against the elimination of necessary
social classes." Our productive economies make it more difficult to "maintain distribution patterns insuring the
existence of 'hewers of wood and drawers of water.'" But fortunately, the arbitrary nature of war expenditures and
related military activities "make them ideally suited to control these essential class
relationships." Unless a substitute can be found, the institution of war must be continued "to
preserve whatever quality and degree of poverty a society requires as an incentive as well as to maintain the
stability of its internal organization of power." (Our emphasis added.)
The prime political function of warfare, as understood by the Study Group, is thus seen to be
to preserve poverty in the society as an aid
to maintaining the elite class in control. The congruence of the
Report with Orwell's 1984 is now clear. What social stability really means is "keeping the Low's
in poverty and the High's in power, forever."
The last essential step to completing the Study Group's thesis is to understand why war
is so readily accepted by the public, whose members are always the prime losers in any war. The
reason, says the Report, is that individual citizens will willingly rise to the defense of their society when they
see it being threatened by an external enemy. The enemy, of course, must be formidable and the threat real, or at
least perceived to be real. Such a major threat to one's society justifies to the individual the loss of life
associated with meeting that threat, including even the loss of one's own life. It may be very difficult, says the Report, to find a substitute for war that produces
the desired waste of resources and is at the same time so readily acceptable to
the populace. The Report makes no mention of the ease or difficulty of producing wars on
demand, perhaps because the means were so obvious that no discussion was felt to be needed.
The final nonmilitary function of war, not necessarily incapable of adequate fulfillment by a
substitute, is the loss of life which it produces. This comes
under the euphemism of ecological control, aimed at
maintaining the world's population at that reduced level at which it may successfully sustain itself within the
constraints of the world's agricultural capacity. The Report briefly acknowledges that this
Malthusian notion of population control may be approaching obsolescence due to the increasing
efficiency with which food and other essentials are being produced, but then quickly dismisses the thought. The
chief difficulty with using war for population control, says the Report, is that war regressively kills off a
higher proportion of the fittest (our young warriors), instead of our old, weak, and infirm, thereby acting against
eugenic improvement. Modern warfare has the promise of improvement in this regard, however, since
nuclear warfare will enable millions to be rapidly killed off, and indiscriminately
with respect to the weak or the strong. (It really says that!)
The Report further notes, as an incidental matter, that medical science has also exacerbated the
problem by removing pestilence as a method of population control, but even worse, it has done so by perpetuating
the lives of those who would otherwise have been eliminated by their genetic susceptibilities, thereby eugenically
weakening the race. The coming "transition to peace" should probably take these matters into account as well.
The Report then seeks to define substitutes for the essential nonmilitary
functions of war which it has allegedly found in the economic, political, sociological, and ecological
arenas. In the economic field, there are two important
criteria for substitutes:
They must be wasteful (involving the
destruction of at least 10 percent of the gross national product) and they must
be outside the consumer supply and demand system.
The first candidates considered are massive
social welfare systems, such as cradle-to-grave health care, college education for all,
housing for all at the level of the current top 15 percent, environmental purity with respect to air, water, forests,
parks, etc., and the elimination of
poverty via a guaranteed annual income or other appropriate redistribution scheme. While
these schemes may prove useful during the transition to peace, says the Report, they all suffer from the
disadvantage that they are too cheap (not as wasteful as war), and would work themselves into
a permanent level of expenditure embedded within the general economy, and therefore not subject to arbitrary
A second possibility for an economic surrogate is a massive, open-ended space research program having
substantially unattainable goals, such as the colonization of Mars, etc. This one might produce sufficient economic
waste, and could be extended indefinitely, but lacks the urgency associated with an imminent, credible threat.
In fact, this lack of a credible threat turned out to be the main difficulty with
finding any viable substitute for the political and sociological functions of war. Any such
substitute requires the existence of an "alternate enemy" posing a massive and credible threat, sufficient for one
to be willing to give up his life to fight. Of the social welfare programs mentioned above,
environmental pollution is
perhaps the only one which might be blown up into a big enough threat to convince people that lots of money
urgently had to be thrown at the problem. But even this appears to have doubtful viability, even if efforts
were made to deliberately poison the environment in various ways in order to enhance the threat. The Report's
way around this apparent brick wall was to conclude that, if a viable natural
substitute could not be found, a fake one would have to be
invented. The Study Group didn't wish to pursue that matter any further, at least
in print, in order not "to compromise, by premature discussion, any possible option that may eventually lie
open to our government."
The Study Group did manage to find an alternate to war for proper population control (an
"ecological" function). The Report declares:
"A universal requirement that procreation be limited to the products of
artificial insemination would provide a fully adequate substitute for population levels. Such a reproductive
system would have the added advantage of being susceptible of direct eugenic management.. The indicated
intermediate step - total control of conception with a variant of the ubiquitous 'pill,'
via water supplies or certain essential foodstuffs - is already under development." (Emphasis
The only question the Report raised about this matter was whether the imposition of procreation control should or should
not await the arrival of peace. The participants seemed to reluctantly agree that it should, since significant
excess manpower would probably be needed in the warfare that was likely to ensue prior to the arrival of the "peace
system," and because procreation control would naturally also require the existence of a centrally enforced
The Report reprises the motivation for the study, now clearly stated, in its summary:
"The permanent possibility of war is the foundation for stable
government; it supplies the basis for general acceptance of political authority. It has enabled
societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has ensured the subordination of the citizen to the
state, by virtue of the residual war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood.. The war system has provided
the machinery through which the motivational forces governing human behavior have been translated into binding
social allegiance... The foregoing [political and sociological] functions of war are essential to the survival
of the social systems we know today."
Except, perhaps, the one created in the late 1700's by Jefferson, Adams, Madison, Hamilton, and
their revolutionary compatriots.
After all of this cerebral effort, the Report concludes, "No program or combination of programs yet
proposed for a transition to peace has remotely approached meeting the comprehensive functional requirements of a
world without war... The war system cannot responsibly be allowed to disappear until
1) we know exactly what it is we plan to put in its place, and
2) we are certain, beyond reasonable doubt, that these substitute institutions will serve their
purposes in terms of the survival and stability of society.. It is uncertain, at this time, whether peace will
ever be possible. It is far more questionable . that it would be desirable, even if it were demonstrably
But given the above, the Report goes on to complain how even the "war system" is getting difficult
and risky to manage. For example, it is becoming more possible "that one or more sovereign nations may arrive,
through ambiguous leadership, at a position in which a ruling administrative class may lose control of basic public
opinion or of its ability to rationalize a desired war." Horrors! What if significant leaks were to develop in the
media's paper and electronic curtains? The final recommendation of the study is that a War/Peace Research
Agency be created, with unlimited secret funding, and accountable only to the President, to continue
research on both how to get to the sought-for permanent peace, and how best to shore up the present war system so
that it can continue to be efficiently used until such time as a stable peace is secured. The war studies should
include, for example, the "determination of minimum and optimum
levels of destruction of life, property, and natural resources prerequisite to
the credibility of external threat essential to the political and motivational functions."
One wonders if such a War/Peace Research Agency presently exists. In our review (Chapter 5) of
Griffin's The Creature From Jekyll Island we noted that Griffin also had made
reference to The Report From Iron Mountain. We encourage you to read and absorb his interpretation, which
has an emphasis somewhat different from ours. Griffin supplies evidence of the authenticity of the Report by
quoting the written assertion to that effect by Harvard's establishmentarian professor John Kenneth Galbraith, who admitted to participating in the study in
at least a consultative capacity. We would also like to borrow from Griffin's conclusions concerning the study's
importance. He asks why this study differs from any other think tank effort, and then writes (p. 525):
"The answer is that this one was commissioned and executed, not by ivory tower dreamers and
theoreticians, but by people who are in charge. It is the brainchild of the CFR. Furthermore, it should be
obvious that the stratagems outlined in the report are already being implemented. All one has to do is hold the
report in one hand and the daily newspaper in the other to realize that every major trend in American life is
conforming to the recommendations of the report. So many
things that otherwise are incomprehensible suddenly become perfectly
clear: foreign aid, wasteful spending, the destruction of American industry, a
job corps, gun control, a national police force, the apparent demise of Soviet power, a UN army, disarmament, a
world bank, a world money, the surrender of national independence through treaties, and the ecology hysteria.
The Report From Iron Mountain has already created our present. It is now shaping our future."
We will have more to say about a major element of that shaping process in our next review."
Source of this
This summary is chapter 7 of Alan B Jones' excellent book, How the World Really
Works. You can get a free copy of the entire book at the following link:
How the World Really Works
The Protocols Of The Learned
Elders Of Zion
1984 by George Orwell
6. The Ninth Wave--Agenda 21
4 November, 2010
“In order to save the world we must first of all destroy
the world, in order to remake our world in a sustainable way.”
A partial transcript of
the 9 minute video
"Agenda 21 is the 1992 United Nations real declaration on the
environment and development. It is the agenda for the twenty-first century for a 'Brave New World' where everything that you've cherished and held true will no longer
Agenda 21 defines itself as 'the comprehensive plan of action'
to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations systems. It also elevates
nature above man and it contains something called the Precautionary Principle where basically you're guilty
until proven innocent. Sustainable Development is the philosophy designed to bring human beings across the globe
under the full control of a narrow human-elite. It's a forty chapter document to basically control the world.
It's based entirely on social control mechanisms." (This was what George H. W. Bush had in mind when he
introduced the need for a New World Order on September 11, 1990) (1)
"Sustainable Developers have designed a global movement
coordinated through a global action plan to create world government in accordance with certain objectives. These
objectives include an end to national sovereignty, the abolition of private property, the restructure of the
family unit, and increasing limitations and restrictions on mobility and individual opportunity.
Goal' includes the listings of 'what is not sustainable.' A couple examples include:
Private property! Seven twenty-eight lists fossil fuels. Golf courses and ski-lodges are not (sustainable).
Irrigation is not-sustainable. Paved roads; Consumerism agriculture, herbicides, pesticides; elsewhere it lists
farmland, pastures, grazing of livestock and the family unit. The focus of sustainable development is the
abolition of private property; societal undermining of the family and abandonment of the constitutional
protection of unalienable rights as established in the Declaration of Independence.
In the 1990's . . . mother-earth's surface wasn't to be
scratched. Human beings were to be concentrated into human settlement zones. Educational systems were to focus
on the environment as the central organizing principle all aspects of life were covered.
I went to these committees at the request of some people who
told me that I needed to understand what was going on and I came back and I said ' This is craziness, this is so
silly it has no chance of having any effect on our society.' Well I was wrong.
The United States' government support for the sustainable
development Agenda 21 is very clear: In 1992 while the real conference was going on, George Bush then president,
was there where he executed the Agenda and the 21 protocols on behalf of the United States, and brought it
back to Washington D.C. Within a year Bill Clinton, BY EXECUTIVE ORDER, no congressional review, established The
President's Counsel for 'Sustainable Development.'
In Santa Cruz we've got a two lane freeway system, we need four
but what we're getting is hundreds of millions of dollars in federal money to dig a dilapidated rail line that
Southern Pacific wants to put in the hands of somebody else; so that a commuter line can be built along the
railroad-track that will be followed by fourteen story buildings where people will live in 'stack-em and pack-em
units where developers sop called 'sustainable developers' will be these highrises with federal dollars. In
fact Santa Cruz has received a 300 million dollar federal grant to build the first three thousand of these stack
& pack units. The county Board of Supervisors said that 'If you're a sustainable developer then you're
immune from any construction 'defect liability.' It's a partnership (private) between selected developers
building this New World Order and using tax-payer dollars in order to do it.
This is a map of the Wildlands Project. To explain the map
the red dots are to be off-limits to human beings. No
resource development, no human activity. If you live there you won't! The yellow areas are the areas for major
control of all human activity. If you live there you won't.
The black dots are the 'smart-growth zones' where human beings are to be stacked and packed in small
living-units along rail tracks. The smart-growth program also has jobs-assigned and children-cared-for by the
The question has been asked many times 'How the people that plan
to perpetrate this will make it last, and the answer to that is that you steal a generation of children and you
indoctrinate them so that they accept these ideas and they become 'Global Citizens' in the coming 'Global
UNESCO came out and declared 2005 and 2015 - The Decade for
Education for 'Sustainable Development.' But they go on to say that it will encompass the forty-chapters of
Agenda Twenty-One: And that is your federal national curriculum. The entire purpose of second grade social
studies is to transfer loyalty form the family to the government; and to teach them about sustainable economic
consumption. Students construct their own understandings of 'reality' and realize
that objective reality is 'not knowable' so 'why bother.' The truth is the truth which keeps men
free is being suppressed in order to prop up our new attitude training Agenda.
And it moves on: This is our new math they call it connected
mathematics. Standard 3 tells us that mathematics is 'man-made' that it is arbitrary and good solutions are
arrived at by consensus! Most of us assume that 2+2 is always going to equal 4 You're wrong we might reach a
new consensus (2+2=5). How well does it work: Well they tell ya. In the teacher's guide in the back they tell ya
that because the curriculum doesn't emphasize arithmetic computations done by hand, some students may not do as
well on tests assessing computational skills. 'We believe such a trade-off in the favor of CMP is very much to
the student's advantage, in the world of work.'
Our children are mathematically illiterate on
purpose! How do I know on purpose? Why isn't this just a basic
bad-idea? Because the Sustainable Development plan tells us so! 'Generally more highly educated people who have
higher incomes can consume more resources, than poorly educated people who tend to have lower incomes. In this
case more education increases the threat to sustainability.'
I did not believe for the longest time it was a deliberate
policy the dumbing down: I thought the dumbing down was a natural consequence of a bad idea. Folks it's
deliberate, it's DELIBERATE!
The Sustainable Globalist-Goal is the orchestration
of a planned fall of American principles, values and lifestyles. The effect on the average American will be devastating. With modernizing technology the
ordinary person will live without independence, privacy, or substantive rights.
Another press-conference I attended was the ICLEI Group, the
International Committee for Local Environmental Initiatives that helps in the implementation of Agenda 21 in
all of our local communities. One of the speakers was a Harvey Rubin, the vice-chair of ICLEI, and I asked him
about the correlative rights of Americans that Americans derive from the United States Constitution and the Bill
of Rights, your individual liberties, your private property, your freedom of speech I asked about it clashing
with Agenda 21 and you know what his response was! 'Individual rights must
take a back-seat to THE COLLECTIVE." End of the transcription.
This garage has been part of a century's long war in which
various criminal elements have always struggled for thousands of years to steal from everyone else the fruits of
their own labor, and the right to determine what their own lives should be all about. Agenda 21 needs to be forcefully
“There are two great powers that have been fighting since time
began. Every advance in human life, every scrap of knowledge and wisdom and decency we have has been torn by one
side from the teeth of the other. Every little increase in human freedom has been fought over furiously between
those who want us to know and those who want us to obey and to be humble and to submit." Taken from The Golden Compass Pg. 283, by
Philip Pullman from the first book of his trilogy: ‘Dark Materials.’”
If the people of the world do not firmly reject Agenda 21 and
all of its blatantly criminal assertions, then we shall no longer have that "Universe" that supposedly we are
all a part of.
Watch the video and spread this far and wide please!
1. Toward a New World Order
2. Agenda 21 For Dummies
7. Watch Out: The World Bank Is Quietly Funding a Massive Corporate Water
By Scott Thill,
4 November, 2010
Even though water privatization has been a massive failure
around the world, the World Bank just quietly gave $139 million to its latest corporate
Billions have been spent allowing corporations to profit from public water sources even though water privatization has been an epic failure
in Latin America, Southeast Asia, North America, Africa and everywhere else it's been tried. But don't tell that to
controversial loan-sharks at the World Bank. Last month, its private-sector funding arm International Finance Corporation (IFC) quietly dropped a cool 100 million euros ($139
million US) on Veolia Voda, the Eastern European subsidiary of
Veolia, the world's largest private water corporation. Its latest target? Privatization of
Eastern Europe's water resources.
"Veolia has made it clear that their business model is based on
maximizing profits, not long-term investment," Joby Gelbspan, senior program coordinator for private-sector
watchdog Corporate Accountability International, told AlterNet. "Both the World Bank and the
transnational water companies like Veolia have clearly acknowledged they don't want to invest in the
infrastructure necessary to improve water access in Eastern Europe. That's why this 100 million euro investment
in Veolia Voda by the World Bank's private investment arm over the summer is so alarming. It's further evidence
that the World Bank remains committed to water privatization, despite all evidence that this approach will not
solve the world's water crisis."
All the evidence Veolia needs that water grabs are doomed
exercises can be found in its birthplace of France, more popularly known as the heartland of water privatization. In June, the municipal
administration of Paris reclaimed the City of Light's water services from both of its homegrown multinationals
Veolia and Suez, after a torrent of controversy. That's just one of 40 re-municipilazations in France
alone, which can be added to those in Africa, Asia, Latin America, North America and more in hopes of painting a
not-so-pretty picture: Water privatization is ultimately both a horrific concept and a failed
"It's outrageous that the World Bank's IFC would
continue to invest in corporate water privatizations when they are failing all over the
world," Maude Barlow, chairwoman of Food and Water Watch and the author of Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Fight for the Right to Water, told
AlterNet. "A similar IFC investment in the Philippines is an unmitigated disaster. Local communities and their
governments around the world are canceling their contracts with companies like Veolia because of cost overruns,
worker layoffs and substandard service."
The Philippines is an excellent
example of water privatization's broken model. After passing
the Water Crisis Act in 1995, the Philippines landed a $283 million privatization plan managed
partially by multinational giants like Suez and Bechtel. After some success, everything fell apart after 2000,
and it wasn't long before tariff prices repeatedly increased, water service and quality worsened, and public opposition skyrocketed. Today, some Filipinos still don't have water connections, tariffs have increased from 300 to 700 percent
in some regions, and outbreaks of cholera and gastroenteritis have cost lives and sickened hundreds.
"The World Bank has learned nothing from these disasters and
continues to be blinded by an outdated ideology that only the unregulated market will solve the world's
problems," added Barlow.
But asking the World Bank to learn from disaster would be akin
to annihilating its overall mission, which is to capitalize on
disaster in the developing world in pursuit of profit. Its nasty history of economic and
environmental shock therapy sessions have severely wounded more than one country, and has been sharply
criticized by brainiacs like Joseph Stiglitz, who was once the Bank's chief economist, and Naomi Klein, whose
indispensable history The Shock Doctrine is a horrorshow of privatization nightmares. From its cultural
imperialism and insensitivity to regional differences to its domination by a handful of economic elites drunk on
deregulation, whose utter failure needs no further example than our continuing global economic crisis, the World
Bank's good intentions have been compromised by an unending string of terrible press and crappier
"In the past, the World Bank pushed privatization as the way to
increase investment in basic infrastructure for water systems," said Gelbspan. "But since then bank officials
have admitted that the transnational corporations don't want to invest in infrastructure, and instead want only
to pare down operations and skim profits. The World Bank has lowered the bar, satisfied with so-called
'operational efficiency,' that cuts utility workforce, tightens up bill collections and shuts off people who
That's been a recipe for failure and protest, especially in the
very region that IFC and Veolia hope to pump for all its water worth. In 1998, World Bank loans were secured to
upgrade the crumbling post-Soviet water system in Yerevan, a city in the Eastern European nation of Armenia.
With a caveat: It had to be managed by a private contractor. The Italian transnational ACEA landed the job, but
quickly failed to extend water access, partially thanks to company corruption. It also failed to properly
maintain water pressure, allowing sewage to seep into the city's drinking water and sicken hundreds. Despite the
travesty, the World Bank issued another contract in 2006 to Veolia, which hired ACEA's top executive. Two years
later, only one in three Yerevan residents were lucky enough to score 24-hour water service, while contamination
problems continued. Veolia's contract with the city is up for renewal in 2015.
goes for the Turkish city of Alacati, which landed a $13 million loan in the late '90s, as
well as Veolia's incompetence. The city's water bills skyrocketed to 12 times the price of service in other
parts of the country. Multiply that times most every nation or city that has privatized its water service, and
you've got a good idea of why the World Bank's IFC is under fire for rapacious resource-snatching. And why the
developing world is right to be wary of its good graces, although the World Bank can do good when it so
"The World Bank does not at all speak with one voice on their
pro-privatization stance," Darcey O'Callaghan, Food and Water Watch's international policy director, explained
to AlterNet. "One staff member referred to it as a bad experiment that has been proven wrong, while higher
staffers try to take a more nuanced position, claiming that the Bank is neither for or against privatization but
simply promotes the most appropriate model for specific communities. Unfortunately, our own statistics have
shown that regardless of their statements, 52 percent of their projects between 2004 and 2008 promoted some form
But rather than repair privatization's failed project at its
source, the World Bank is simply spinning off its compromised philosophy to the IFC. So while the World Bank may
be torn in its endorsement of water privatization, the IFC has no such reservations, in hopes of dodging the
slings and arrows of public outcry, and perhaps legal liability.
"What's really scary," O'Callaghan added, "is that we are
increasingly seeing the International Finance Corporation pick up where the Bank has left off in water
privatization. The IFC is a Bank-sponsored institution whose goal is to promote the private sector, and because
their financing also comes from the private sector, they can be more difficult to hold accountable. Worse yet,
according to our 2000-2008 stats, 80 percent of IFC loans had gone to the four largest multinational water
companies, further concentrating the global water industry."
It's not just water that's at the center of Earth's mounting
resource wars. In late October, Britain's government announced it was looking to sell off its state-owned forests to counteract a yawning deficit. Today, natural gas
companies are preparing to drill in America's national parks. Indeed, America and Britain's bungled occupation of Iraq is a protracted resource war for
control of the embattled nation's oil reserves. Water is just one more natural resource,
albeit the most important one, worth a killing to those seeking to callously leverage limited funds for innocent
"Droughts and deserts are spreading in over 100 countries,"
Barlow said. "It is now clear that our world is running out of clean water, as the demand gallops ahead of
supply. These water corporations, backed still by the World Bank, seek to take advantage of this crisis by
taking more control over dwindling water supplies."
Which is another way of saying that, regardless of the
refreshing trend toward re-municipalization, no one should expect the World Bank or its IFC untouchables to give
up the privatization and deregulation ghost anytime soon. That means that every city, and citizen, is due for a
day of reckoning of some sort, and should fight back against the bankrupt privatization paradigm with everything
in its arsenal.
"Get involved at the local level," O'Callaghan said. "Know where your water comes from. Fight against privatization
schemes. Promote conservation. Don't drink bottled water."
And Barlow adds, "The only path to a water-secure future is
water conservation, source water protection, watershed restoration and the just and equitable sharing of the
water resources of the planet. Water is a
commons, a public trust and a human right and no one has the right to appropriate for profit when others are
dying from lack of access."
Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and
Stop Relying on Limited
News--Get Your Information From these Web sites:
"Every night the
same tawdry televised crap so thick and quick it makes you sick. Are you well informed or is
your News Limited?" (Quote from
satanist, Aloysius Fozdyke, The Fozdyke
Latest editions to this list of alternative new
Atlantic Free Press
Axis of Logic
Information Clearing House
My Catbird Seat
Redress Information & Analysis
Here's some good advice from Gilad
addition to Web sites that can be visited for their alternative views, a number of writers can be relied on to
report accurately and provide revealing commentary avoided by mainstream media. To view articles, simply type their
names into a search engine like Google, Yahoo or MSN.
the leading—always reliable–commentators include Robert Fisk, John Pilger, Gwynne Dyer, Mark Steele, Uri Avneri,
Arundhate Roy, Alexander Cockburn, Ted Rall, Greg Palast, Robert Jensen, Mike Whitney, Alan Hart, Jeff Blankfort,
Gilad Atzmon, Jonathan Cook, Mazin Qumsiyeh, Chris Hedges, Ramzy Baroud, Franklin Lamb, James Petras, Debbie
Mennon, Glenn Greenwald, Paul Craig Roberts, Stephen Zunes, Amy Goodman, Eric Margolis, Richard Falk, Jeff Gates,
Stuart Littlewood and Gordon Duff." (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/author/gilad
Additional Resources ...
The Warning of the Last
The Real Crisis Is About To
Unfold And Its Not Financial
The Usher of Desecration
The Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of
How to Download and Keep
YouTube Videos …
Go to the following link for
How to Download and Keep YouTube Videos
Ask a Question or Just Let Me Know What You Think ...
My aim is to make Last Days Watch newsletter as useful to you as possible. So
if you have any questions, suggestions, tips, or other comments, or ideas for upcoming issues, I would love to hear
Just e-mail me at the email address shown at the bottom of the page, or use the form on the Contact
Thanks for reading.
See you next issue.
John Mulligan http://www.NazareneRemnant.org
Subscriber's Notes Section ...
HOW DID YOU GET ON THIS LIST:
You or someone you know subscribed you, or you downloaded an eBook from our site, or you are a
subscriber to our "Last Days Watch" ezine, or you requested free information from us. If someone has
subscribed you against your will, please follow the UNSUBSCRIBE instructions that are found in the How to
Unsubscribe section below. Then you will no longer receive this newsletter.
PRIVACY STATEMENT: Our list of subscribers is strictly confidential. Your details have
never been and never will be passed on to any third party, whatsoever. Your privacy is paramount to us! Therefore
it gets the respect it deserves. Should you ever wish to unsubscribe, see the instructions on how to do this at the
bottom of every issue.
SPAM DISCLAIMER: Every subscriber to this newsletter has personally requested a
subscription, and have confirmed their subscription through a double-optin procedure.
To SUBSCRIBE go to this page:
How to UNSUBSCRIBE:
At the bottom of every e-Mail sent by NazareneRemnant.org you will find a special link that enables you to
UNSUBSCRIBE at any moment, or EDIT your subscription details. The link looks like the one below, and all you have
to do is click on it, or highlight the link, copy to the clipboard, and then paste into your browser, and hit
Example Link For Explanation Purposes Only ...
Click on the link below to CANCEL your subscription or EDIT your details: